AP CONSERVATIVES CRUZ A USA MD

Cruz Says ‘If Obama Can Do It, So Can I’

WOW! This 2016 Presidential Campaign is beginning to look like a mystery novel and the person the people want to call their American “Hero” is beginning to look like a “master deceiver”.

If you aren’t willing to know the truth then don’t bother to read any further, but this country is in serious trouble. To find out one of the “darlings” of the 2016 election is a master deceiver leaving a trail behind him even before the primary is really scary stuff.

I have followed Cruz for some time and originally thought he was actually one of the good guys – that he could be a savior for America. He would ask the right questions and kind of talk like Trump is calling “a spade a spade”.

The first thing that caught my attention was Cruz’s wife Heidi when I was doing my research on the North American Union (NAU). Common sense tells me you do not spend 5 years working on a Council on Foreign Relations “Task Force” and not support what they are doing.

Ted Cruz would have you believe his wife’s only 5 year involvement with the Task Force resulted in a “Dissenting Comment”. I do have to challenge Mr. Cruz on that because first of all you do not spend 5 years working on a project for a one paragraph comment and even if that was all the space she was given in the report her words are damning. Although we don’t want government controlling all the financial happenings in this country – private sector is no better. On pages 33-34 her words contend economic investment must be led by the private sector rather than government:

I support the Task Force report and its recommendations aimed at building a safer and more prosperous North America. Economic prosperity and a world safe from terrorism and other security threats are no doubt inextricably linked. While governments play an invaluable role in both regards, we must emphasize the imperative that economic investment be led and perpetuated by the private sector. There is no force proven like the market for aligning incentives, sourcing capital, and producing results like financial markets and profit-making businesses. This is simply necessary to sustain a higher living standard for the poorest among us – truly the measure of our success. As such, investment funds and financing mechanisms should be deemed attractive instruments by those committing the capital and should only be developed in conjunction with market participants.

May I ask Ms. Cruz if this is the thoughts of Goldman Sachs or Lehman Bros? Now you can understand why Cruz made this statement that he:  “remains open to a path to legal status for undocumented workers.”

Mr. Cruz needs to explain to the American people where he stands on the North American Union issue. Remember Mr. Cruz is a George W. Bush boy having obtained each of his Washington D.C. positions on the recommendations of Bush and it was on Bush’s recommendation the Texas Republican Party supported Cruz for his run to the U.S. Senate.

Being mentored by a Bush can have its consequences as it has with Jeb Bush being Marco Rubio’s mentor. Rubio in so many ways is a clone of Bush. Both Rubio and Cruz have learned well from the Bush’s on how to avoid answering questions and then of course you aren’t lying.

Second in a growing list of concerns is Cruz’s eligibility. There are many American Cruz supporters who are willing to overlook this fact or make large excuses for him, but facts and truth are facts and truth. Outside of the fact Ted Cruz currently is not a citizen of any country, what are his qualifications to be President of the United States?

Rafael Cruz moved his family to Texas in 1974. When he was a child, Ted Cruz’s mother told him that she would have to make an affirmative act to claim Canadian citizenship for him, so his family assumed that he did not hold Canadian citizenship. In August 2013, after the Dallas Morning News pointed out that Cruz had dual Canadian-American citizenship, he applied to formally renounce his Canadian citizenship and ceased being a citizen of Canada on May 14, 2014.

Cruz’s Harvard friends issued a strong legal consensus is that with even one American parent—a circumstance shared by Obama and Cruz—a child born anywhere qualifies as a “natural born American,” entitled to citizenship at birth and therefore eligible to serve as president.

There’s that he said, she said, come to the middle word “consensus” again. I wonder if Cruz and his lawyers learned that from Carly Fiorina.

Originally, when the calls were beginning for Cruz to consider running in 2016, that’s when he became very concerned about a fact that he knew, but had never disclosed to the public, including during his Senate campaign a year earlier. Ted Cruz was born a Canadian citizen at birth, and remained a legal citizen of Canada, all the way up until May 14, 2014.

In short, Sen. Ted Cruz was a legal citizen of Canada when he ran for and became a U.S. Senator, without ever having disclosed his Canadian citizenship to Texas voters, which under both Texas and U.S. Election law, is an act of fraud. Ted Cruz had committed election fraud by failing to disclose to Texas voters that he was a Canadian citizen in 2012.

No one can say for certain, but I think it is a very fair guess, that had Ted Cruz disclosed to Texas voters in 2012, that he had always been and remained at that time a legal citizen of Canada, his Republican opponent, Lieutenant Governor David Dewhurst, would have won that race and become the next U.S. Senator from Texas.

Many in Florida know Rubio is a liar and a deceiver which is why he isn’t getting the support of Floridians. Cruz is proving to fall into the same basket. He should be treated no differently than we have treated Obama when it came to his eligibility. Cruz can put this whole thing to rest by showing America his Birth Certificate.

By having retained his Canadian citizenship until 2014 means that he “could” have voted in Canada and ran for the Canadian Parliament at the same time he was in the U.S. Senate. This eligibility issue is showing a lack of integrity on the part of Cruz.

It was during this time that Cruz stated “that both he and Barack Obama were ineligible for the Oval Office”.  After the revelation of his Canadian birth certificate, Cruz and his friends moved into “damage control” mode alleging he was a “dual-citizen” which puts us back to the previous paragraph.

It was his friends and Fox News that tried to clear Cruz’s path to the WH claiming now he was a “natural born citizen” based on his renouncing his Canadian birth.

So, here we go again – a freshman Senator who is a Harvard Lawyer, with Harvard law friends and no U.S. documentation to prove that he is a U.S. citizen of any type. A man with known foreign origins, and the son of a Father, Rafael Cruz Sr. who was at no time in his life a legal citizen of the United States until 35 years after Ted’s birth in Canada, when he renounced his Canadian citizenship and naturalized to the United States in 2005.

The problem is obvious for Cruz; he cannot or will not provide or even discuss his eligibility.

Now we have another large issue coming to the surface and that is where Cruz’s money is coming from and more importantly what he is using it for. It should be of great concerns to Americans what secret “BIG” money is behind these PAC’s supporting the candidates. A candidate must owe them something as they do with their dealings with the lobbyists.

As of this past July, 2015, Robert Mercer had provided the major source of funding ($37 million raised) by a quartet of unlimited-money super PACs supporting Cruz’s campaign for the GOP presidential nomination. Cruz’s presidential campaign contracted with Cambridge Analytica to provide data services, and the company has had talks with at least one of those super PACs, according to sources.

Robert Mercer is the owner of Cambridge Analytica and the lead donor of the Cruz Campaign. Cambridge Analytica is connected to a British firm called the SCL Group which provides governments, political groups and companies around the world with services ranging from military disinformation campaigns to social media branding and voter targeting.

The campaign “claims” most of these funds are coming from the “grassroots” energy, but it would appear that this is not the case. It’s not uncommon for political campaigns, parties and PACs to pay huge contracts for data and other services to companies affiliated with their consultants. But it’s less common for such contracts to go to firms affiliated with the donors funding the whole enterprise.

Cruz spokesman Rick Tyler said Chris Wilson, the campaign’s director of research and analytics, is using Cambridge Analytica to build models that identify and sort persuadable voters in early primary states by six key personality types, which will be used to target the campaign’s outreach.

This is beginning to sound more like a Political operation rather than a political campaign. This has been made possible partly by the Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United decision, which opened new avenues for unlimited political spending. This ruling opened unprecedented “cash cow” doors to secret funding of political campaigns. Americans knew this was going to end up being a dangerous decision, now it is beginning to become clear just who is operating campaigns and it’s not the people.

In case you are not aware the decision allows unions, corporations, and associations to spend unlimited amounts in elections provided that they don’t coordinate their efforts with a candidate themselves. This was one time Obama was right when he said this decision would “open the floodgates to special interests”, but you can rest assured he has made use of this decision himself. You see PAC – you are seeing big money!

Mercer is also a computer scientist and the co-CEO of Renaissance Technologies, a hedge fund. Mercer and Cruz share a distrust of the IRS and Climate Change. They also share a view that leads to the White House in 2016. Mercer began his career at I.B.M. and made his fortune by using computer patterns to outsmart the stock markets. He has become the main donor in the Cruz campaigns 4 super PAC’s.

What is a hedge fund? It is a limited partnership of investors that uses high risk methods, such as investing with borrowed money, in hopes of realizing large capital gains. Those capital gains can come in many forms. Financial control of who is sitting in the White House is a very dangerous one for the American people.

The problem is with what Cruz is doing with his campaign money and using it to build data bases regarding American voters without their knowledge is no different than what the Federal government is doing.

Cruz’s campaigns investment in Cambridge Analytica — and their campaign’s embrace of their product — the Mercers also have become competitors in an increasingly cutthroat conservative political data race. Some of the right’s most influential and well-funded players — including the Koch brothers’ operation and the Republican National Committee — are jockeying for a market share and 2016 prospects in a political sub-industry expected to consume a huge portion of the billions spent in the campaign. The result of the competition could go a long way toward determining the winner of the White House and the Republican Party’s direction after the election.

It has been revealed the Cruz campaign has also linked with the Breitbart Group and Mark Zuckerberg Facebook Surveillance program to track, monitor and target YOU!

Ted Cruz’s presidential campaign is using psychological data based on research spanning tens of millions of Facebook users also, harvesting largely without their permission, to boost his surging White House run and gain an edge over Donald Trump and other Republican rivals.

What does this show you about these individuals integrity, especially Cruz? Are you going to make more excuses for Cruz America?

In November it was revealed that Breitbart.com was data-mining for the Ted Cruz campaign. America, don’t you feel invaded? I mean their attitude is “what are they going to do about it?” Or Hillary’s “what difference does it make?”

Ted Cruz using the firm that harvested data on millions of unwitting Facebook users Exclusive: Documents reveal donor-funded US startup embedded in Republican’s campaign paid a little known UK university academics to collect psychological profiles on potential voters. That little known company is Cambridge Analytica.

Another thing that stands out in front is the $500,000 Ted Cruz’s PAC Keep the Promise I made to Carly Fiorina’s PAC Carly for America back when she was still in the 2nd strong debates. Now why would one presidential candidate give another presidential candidate “half a million dollars”?

Having received $10M from Toby Neugebauer, and energy investor; $11M from Robert Mercer; and $15M from the Texas Wilkes family to his various PAC’s, this isn’t a large amount of campaign funds to have when running for president.

Mercer has also donated $750,000K to Club for Growth in support of their $1M advertisement campaign against Donald Trump. Club for Growth spokesman Doug Sachtleben stated, “Trump is the worst kind of politician. He’ll say anything to get elected, and then he’ll do just the opposite when he’s in office.

But Mr. Sachtleben – all politicians do that, even the ones you are supporting that is why they are referred to as politicians.

This is why you are afraid of Trump because he really isn’t a politician and he doesn’t need the party support, or their money and he is “telling it like it is”.

It is certainly unheard of for one candidate to donate to another who when they are running against each other and Cruz has refused to answer the question which leave a great deal to the imagination.

Cruz has even had a sit down with Henry Kissinger (he was also part of the NAU Task Force). Now why would Cruz want guidance from someone America has come to know as a traitor as he is a New World Order man?

Oh, on the TPA/TPP deal – Cruz maybe supposedly only one of few that went into that locked room to read the TPA (maybe he took a nap) but first he was for it and then against it but in this video Cruz states “he is for “fast tracking” trade agreements and supports Obama doing same. Apparently Cruz doesn’t care about Americans having jobs or the country’s sovereignty.

Cruz has also stated he does not support the Common Core Standards, but I have to ask the question “why does he support government intervention in the education of our children at all”.  He recently presented along with Mike Lee legislation that would have targeted Home Schoolers and linked them under “Private Schools” to be attached to the recently passed Communist ESEA. Once again, “non-educator” politicians trying to federally control another aspect of education.

The surest way to see another Democrat seize the Oval Office in 2016 is to run a blatantly unconstitutional candidate for the GOP.

Even Mr. Cruz has made the statement, “people run as who they are” and I would guess in the back of his mind he is referring to himself as well.

You would be wise to also read this article on Cruz “Ted Cruz, Henry Kissinger and the Globalists” by Kelleigh Nelson

And http://www.newswithviews.com/JBWilliams/williams317.htm

42 replies
  1. Carol
    Carol says:

    Thank ;you for this excellent article! I continue to be viciously attacked for trying to expose much of what is in your article. And there is more that you don’t even go into!

    Reply
  2. Carol
    Carol says:

    You hit the nail right on the head! He IS like Barry Hussein in so many ways it’s frightening! Really scary. His fraud and deceit in everything. I’ve done dozens and dozens of hours of research on him and he should never ever get anywhere near the WH. There is so much more you don’t cover in the article, and if people really knew what he was, they would not be Cruzbots. JB Williams brings up an excellent point and I believe it from what I know. That SHOULD be the biggest scandal of this century. Well, Obama’s coronation is actually #1, and Cruz is working very hard to emulate him.

    Reply
      • Sibyl S
        Sibyl S says:

        It is incumbent to Ted Cruz to provide proof of both his parents’ citizenship status at the time of his birth. Until that time, he has no proven eligibility.

        Reply
        • Stewart Mobley
          Stewart Mobley says:

          Why has he not been compelled to show proof?
          I just don’t get this, you have to show proof to get a valid state I’D or drivers license so you mean to say you don’t to run for office?

          Reply
    • Elizabeth /Angus
      Elizabeth /Angus says:

      I wish someone would post links to some of the allegations that are alluded to. then those of us sitting the fence would get the whole picture…..It does amaze me that our current president is in the same position or worse and nobody has been able to take him down…..
      This stuff makes Cruz sound like the anti-Christ. And, Fox News has not pushed for Cruz.

      Reply
      • Diane Kepus
        Diane Kepus says:

        Most researcher/bloggers these days do not link to every bit of information posted but choose rather that the reader do a little research themselves. By you going online and asking the question regarding a statement it helps you better understand once the reader has also done some “research”. Also, in that process the readers may find even more information to be shared – there are hours upon hours put into this – a lot more than any news agancy puts out.

        Reply
        • Stewart Mobley
          Stewart Mobley says:

          I have in fact done much self research AND encourage all to do the same and what I can tell you is Ted Cruz IS NOT the person we want. I’m a 52 year old THAT has been a Democrat UNTIL NOW.
          Trump 2016

          Reply
    • Joyce Clemons
      Joyce Clemons says:

      At one point I thought, Ted Cruz is “the real thing”. Then the facts began rolling in. While watching him in the debates, I had to admit he was playing it smart in his dealings with the other candidates, at least at first. Then I started to notice how oily and hypnotic his presentation manner was. I started to get the feeling I was watching a real world Uriah Heep. I was really bothered once I heard about him renouncing a Canadian citizenship, just before announcing his Presidential bid. Then, I read the Paul Clement paper defending his so-called eligibility. It was awful, just nauseating. It shouldn’t have appealed to any kind of Originalist, and as I combed through it I didn’t just find mistakes, I found deceit, deliberate omissions, and the same kind of naked political rhetoric, much of it cynical, you might expect if you accidently overheard Gruber. Terrible. Cruz is a mess. He’s the kind of vain and aspiring person that Samuel Adams warned you about. Run, don’t walk, the other way.

      Reply
    • LuvleeWA
      LuvleeWA says:

      Well after quite a bit of digging I found that Cruz has 4 ex CIA AGENTS working on his Campaign for him. One is a Propagandist. Then in another article I found that Cruz is a CIA plant just like Obama was. The more u research this guy the more dirt comes up. He is really bad news for this Country. Oh and check out his stand on GMO’S AND WHY WE DON’T NEED TO KNOW WHAT WE’RE FEEDING OUR KIDS.

      Reply
    • Diane Kepus
      Diane Kepus says:

      You are absolutely right Dr. Laity. I try not to refer to him as President but president and I sometimes out of habit capitalize, but I don’t like to give him the status. He is a deceiver and about time lazy Americans woke up and started vetting these candidates instead of leaving it to others including the press and their own staff and then trying tell those of us who have done the research we are wrong!

      Funny how they have spent the last 8 years screaming Obummer was ineligible but because it is the candidate they want they choose to look the other way. They deserve what they get but unfortunately they will bring the rest of us down too!

      Thanks Rich!

      Reply
      • Leithel1
        Leithel1 says:

        I refuse to acknowledge obama as president. I can’t bring myself to spell obama with a capitol O. obama doesn’t exist. His name is Barry Soetoro. He is an Indonesian Citizen. He was a foreign student, He still hasn’t been to Connecticut. Even Hawaii refuses to lie about him being born there the Hospital on his birth certificate doesn’t exist. There is nothing named after him in Hawaii. I can’t believe a word he has uttered. I can’t wait until our government exposes him and all that helped him burgle his way into the White House.

        Reply
    • sparkleplenty27s
      sparkleplenty27s says:

      You are wrong about McCain – not that I’d want him in any position above dog catcher, but he was born of TWO US citizens/parents and as a military brat, he along with hundreds of thousands of others, who are born outside the US when their parents are serving the nation elsewhere – are citizens! It requires being born of TWO citizen parents – to be a NATURAL born citizen – and for the rest, to be born in the US makes one a naturalized citizen by birth. It seems pretty clear that rubio, cruz, jindal are not eligible. We made this mistake twice (both obama elections) and the results have been horrendous. WE MUST NOT MAKE THE SAME MISTAKE AGAIN – AND WE MUST ABIDE BY THE CONSTITUTION AND OUR FOUNDER’S INTENTIONS.

      Reply
      • Diane Kepus
        Diane Kepus says:

        I do stand corrected regarding McCain, but once I finished the article I had gone looking for something else regarding the CIA and found further information regarding McCain. He is a dangerous individual as are the Bush Dynasty. Too bad Americans felt so comfortable all these years and were “asleep” to the treachery being done to the American people and we were paying them to do it. Thank God for the computers and internet as everything is there today – you just have to word the question properly.

        Reply
      • Frank_O'Pinion
        Frank_O'Pinion says:

        McCain is ineligible for the same reason that Cruz and Rubio are ineligible. All three are naturalized U.S. citizens. McCain’s citizenship falls under authority of Congress by the U.S. Constitution to enact uniform rules (statutes) of Naturalization. See 8 Code 1403.

        https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1403

        McCain’s ‘citizenship’ (not Natural Born Citizenship) can also be found in the Naturalization (operative word) Act of 1795.

        http://www.indiana.edu/%7Ekdhist/H105-documents-web/week08/naturalization1790.html

        To wit:
        SEC. 3. And be it further enacted, that the children of persons duly naturalized, dwelling within the United States, and being under the age of twenty-one years, at the time of such naturalization, and the children of citizens of the United States, born out of the limits and jurisdiction of the United States, shall be considered as citizens of the United States:

        No U.S. Statute claims that ANYONE is a natural born U.S. citizen. Congress only has authority to make CITIZENS. They do not have authority to make NATURAL BORN CITIZENS. Natural born U.S, citizens are made through the law of nature – born on U.S. soil to citizen parentS.

        So you see what we are up against? The very people (Congress) that are suppose to know what they are doing – are doing us wrong. Senate Resolution (SR) 511 was a scam, a red herring if you will, to divert attention away from Obama’s ineligibility. All of Congress is in on the scam to void Article II, Section 1, Clause 5.

        Reply
  3. sparkleplenty27s
    sparkleplenty27s says:

    I wonder, repeatedly, just how many times we Americans must get it WRONG before we learn a lesson. Talk about slow learners! The results from ignoring our laws and Constitution in the last 2 elections have proven monumentally bad for America and her citizens, and for our allies. One can’t claim awards for empowering our enemies and enabling them to do their dastardly deeds – and that in the final analysis is about the only claim to fame obama has as his legacy. That, and running us into damnation of debt, destroying our role in the world – well, you get the picture! WE MUST NOT DO THIS AGAIN! PERIOD

    Reply
  4. sparkleplenty27s
    sparkleplenty27s says:

    To the author of this article and to those others who IMPLY and suggest information of damning nature, I would offer this comment: IF YOU WISH TO BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY, IF YOU WISH TO DO REAL WORK, IF YOU SEEK TO INFORM AND EDUCATE RATHER THAN DESTROY – THEN HAVE THE COURAGE, DECENCY AND SMARTS TO OFFER LINKS TO SUPPORT YOUR ALLEGATIONS.

    This information is of course important and should be taken as such, but lacking validation, it is more rumor, conjecture and hearsay than fact-reporting. I have little doubt that there is fire where there is smoke – but you do a disservice to readers, to those involved such as cruz, and to our nation by making allegations without validation and presentation of facts.

    Reply
    • Diane Kepus
      Diane Kepus says:

      This is why there are links to the website for you to read and learn rather than me doing all the work or Dr. Swier or anyone else. There are links provided on my articles when appropriate but the website has enough information to keep you bury for a month reading original documents. If you dispute anything written please provide your research and I will gladly look it up. I am not here to deceive anyone, but to provide information to protect the American people from making the same mistakes over and over again. http://www.americaismyname.org

      Reply
    • Diane Kepus
      Diane Kepus says:

      Also it is very easy for you or anyone else to find the same information I did by doing a little “leg” work. That is what is wrong with this country – they will believe a news source but not go and do any research to prove them wrong. Make no mistake the American people need to be putting a little effort into this process too.

      Reply
    • Dianne Marshall
      Dianne Marshall says:

      To those who are using political correct swords to slice the messenger – your PC jedi weapons don’t work anymore. The only thing you can do is shout liar, disgrace, and all forms of Alinsky garbage back at the true facts. Pitiful that at this time in the 21st century Saul Alinsky is the best you have at looking at the facts. Well, it isn’t working anymore….who the heck cares what liars and enablers think! IT IS TIME FOR SOME COLD HARD TRUTH BASED ON REAL FACTS!

      Reply
    • sunshine
      sunshine says:

      Okay so article says Cruz could clear up eligibility if just showed his birth certificate? He did that back in Aug of 2013. If TX wanted to recall him for being a dual citizen they knew then. The reason Cruz resonates is because when he ran for senator he promised to keep his word and fight for Texans and he’s done just that. When I’ve asked people I know in Texas who supported him if they regret it they tell me look how much he’s hated and that’s from keeping his word to his constituents and many have told me best thing they did was vote for a constitutionalist conservative. If you don’t think Cruz put a huge target on his back exposing the Washington Cartel you’re mistaken. Look at how his own party had no problem blaming him for the gov shut down lmao are you serious?? These sellouts let their own colleague be called a terrorist and hostage taker knowing full well it was the Dems who were responsible for the shut down because they refused to budge on the funding they wanted. Please understand that while I appreciate people wanting to inform each other especially at a time when America is so far gone its important to flush out bogus twisted accusations. Cruz does have a huge grassroots following because people know he’s not a rino and did sellout once he got to Washington. Let me tell you something the Tea Partiers will never support someone who’s betrayed us once there for e.g. Sen Scott Brown even though ACA was dobe behind his back he waivered on too many other issues to ever win again. If Cruz did this he’d never have more hard cash than any other candidate. The only thing missing from this article is the lie that the Koch bros own him when the fact is they hate him too as he refused to support legislation they wanted. Will the Koch’s donate to a super pac for him in the future I honestly don’t know. They are conservatives and it’s going to be interesting to see what happens. Now while I have my concerns about some things I also saw Cruz listen to the voters when it came to TPA he did originally support because he’s for free trade but he said he needed to read the entire bill because he didn’t trust Obama and ultimately voted against it. As for TPP he never voted in favor. People need to realize these bills nowadays are so full of different things in 1 bill that it’s easy to say someone voted for/against something when they had said something different. For me it seems if someone changes position I want to know why and Cruz has been undeniably consistent on his positions. Let me end by saying that obviously I’m for Cruz but that doesn’t mean I wouldn’t vote for Trump defeating Hillary or any Dem is a MUST and I worry about us on the right constantly arguing now who’s candidate is better. I honestly wish they were on same ticket we’d be unstoppable. If we’re not careful and smart we could be in serious trouble. I’m 44 so while I grew up with Reagan I’ve never had an opportunity to vote for anyone close to him until now. God Bless America.

      Reply
  5. Kanbun
    Kanbun says:

    When did Cruz say that neither he or Obama are eligible? Nobody has produced any evidence that he ever said that. Where is your source for this? The guy is a complete bum, but if you have a reference ti would be valuable.

    Reply
    • C.L.Saunders
      C.L.Saunders says:

      I would imagine that clerking under Justice Scalia, and personal friend for 20+ years and being named one of the smartest constitutional lawyers in this country and the smartest student period that his professor has EVER taught and him (professor) being a democrate…says ALOT!!!

      Reply
  6. Kelleigh Nelson
    Kelleigh Nelson says:

    Dr.Swier, thank you for the excellent article on Ted Cruz. I noticed you mentioned my article at the end of your’s, and linked to it, but unfortunately, it goes to JB Williams article, which is a totally different topic on Cruz. At any rate, enjoyed the article.

    Reply

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. […] To make matters worse, Mercer, the hedge fund magnate and owner of Cambridge Analytica, is also Cruz’s main benefactor that bankrolled his Make The Promise I Super PAC. But there is a little quirk in that slippery slope. Last June, Keep the Promise I Super PAC (the same PAC bankrolled by Robert Mercer of Cambridge Analytica) gave Republican presidential candidate Carly Fiorina a half million bucks. So the big question here is why would Ted Cruz give an opponent running for the White House $500,000? (Source) […]

  2. […] To make matters worse, Mercer, the hedge fund magnate and owner of Cambridge Analytica, is also Cruz’s main benefactor that bankrolled his Make The Promise I Super PAC. But there is a little quirk in that slippery slope. Last June, Keep the Promise I Super PAC (the same PAC bankrolled by Robert Mercer of Cambridge Analytica) gave Republican presidential candidate Carly Fiorina a half million bucks. So the big question here is why would Ted Cruz give an opponent running for the White House $500,000? (Source) […]

  3. […] To make matters worse, Mercer, the hedge fund magnate and owner of Cambridge Analytica, is also Cruz’s main benefactor that bankrolled his Make The Promise I Super PAC. But there is a little quirk in that slippery slope. Last June, Keep the Promise I Super PAC (the same PAC bankrolled by Robert Mercer of Cambridge Analytica) gave Republican presidential candidate Carly Fiorina a half million bucks. So the big question here is why would Ted Cruz give an opponent running for the White House $500,000? (Source) […]

  4. […] Interestingly enough, Cruz was never challenged when he ran for Senate in 2012 and he never disclosed that he was a citizen of Canada during that time, an act some have said is a commission of fraud under both Texas and US Election law. […]

  5. […] Interestingly enough, Cruz was never challenged when he ran for Senate in 2012 and he never disclosed that he was a citizen of Canada during that time, an act some have said is a commission of fraud under both Texas and US Election law. […]

  6. […] read: Cruz Says ‘If Obama Can Do It, So Can I’ – One point about that excellent column – Cruz won’t talk about his eligibility, […]

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *