Hillary gets the Weiner

Oops, looks like the October surprise has arrived in the form of Anthony Weiner.

Hanna Kozlowska from Quartz.com in her column How did the FBI find new emails tied to its Hillary Clinton investigation? Two words: Anthony Weiner reports:

It turns out that emails newly uncovered by the FBI related to its investigation of Hillary Clinton’s use of her private server have nothing to do with Wikileaks or Russia, but a bogeyman that is much closer to home for the presidential candidate: notorious sexter and fallen star of the Democratic party Anthony Weiner.

Earlier today, FBI director James Comey told lawmakers that his agency was looking into new emails tied to its closed investigation of Clinton’s emails. His cryptic letter offered no details, and sources cited by NBC and CNN were quick to deny that the emails were connected to Russian hacking or the many thousands of private emails connected to Clinton and published by Wikileaks. Soon after, The New York Times reported that the discovery comes after the FBI seized the cellphones of Clinton’s top aide Huma Abedin and Weiner, her estranged husband, whose ascendant political career was destroyed by multiple sexting scandals.

Read more.

In this Washington Post video Democrat Hillary Clinton is asked about the FBI reopening its investigation into her emails. NOTE: Huma Albedin, Anthony Weiner’s estranged wife is standing to the left of Mrs. Clinton:

Rosalind S. Helderman, Matt Zapotosky and Sari Horwitz from the Washington Post wrote:

The announcement could reshape a presidential race that Clinton, the Democratic nominee, has been leading in most public polls. It was immediately hailed by Republican nominee Donald Trump, who told supporters at a New Hampshire rally that “perhaps, finally, justice will be done.” The crowd responded with pumped fists and chants of “Lock her up! Lock her up!”

In an American Thinker column titled 3 competing theories on why the FBI re-opened the Hillary email server investigation Thomas Lifson notes:

There is no question that re-opening the FBI Investigation into Hillary Clinton’s email server is a big deal. The FBI normally avoids acting just before an election in order to avoid charges of political manipulation.  NBC reports: The FBI is reviewing a new batch of Hillary Clinton emails, bureau director James Comey said in a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee on Friday. “In connection with an unrelated case, the FBI has learned of the existence of emails that appear to be pertinent to the investigation … I agreed that the FBI should take appropriate investigative steps designed to allow investigators to review these emails to determine whether they contain classified information, as well as to assess their importance to our investigation,” he wrote. The very first thing to note is that Comey made no mention of a grand jury.  The emails whose existence he learned of may have been the result of a subpoena in another investigation….(Read Full Post)

This revelation just before All Hallows Eve does not bode well for the Clinton campaign. Perhaps the Webster Dictionary will add a new term “Weinered”?

LETTER FROM FBI DIRECTOR COMEY TO THE U.S. CONGRESS:

letter-from-fbi-director-to-congress

EDITORS NOTE: The digitally altered featured image, less the Hillary Clinton logo, is courtesy of Whoops. (Reuters/Lucas Jackson). 

1 reply
  1. Jim Mayer
    Jim Mayer says:

    A.Weiner should find a hole to hide in & not pleasure self by constant in & out, going & coming. If Anthony contacted H by email, it’d probably be 1st time she’d come in contact with a Weiner.

    SeriousDude- run, hide, hire BGs, & watch 4 drones, bc if H thinks you cost her elec, you in danger- like Assange. H’s squirreled away $2Bil offshore, she’ll have $ to hire all the hitters 4 all her haters. Sec caught 1 scaling Assange’s Embsy but, ‘got away.’ Police response time- 2hrs. PoliceStation distance on foot- 120 secs.

    Re MedBias: I hate TheWeatherChannel bc they have an obvious far-wingnut pro-weather bias. They’re in the tank for Big Weather.

    1) Think of person you dislike most in life. Someone disgusting. If that person runs 2 you shouting, ‘The News just said a huge meteor is going to strike US in 4 hours!’ Do you say, ‘I despise this person so I won’t even check if it’s really true’?

    2)A low IQ person tells you 4+4=8. Do you say, ‘their IQ is SO low, 8 can’t be right.
    Is something automatically ‘not true’ just bc the source of the info is suspect? Instead of questioning the source, isn’t the better question, ‘Is the info true?’

    I’m tired of attempts by Dems 2 divert fr their scandals by bitching Russia’s behind leaked Ems. So The Hell What? Not a Rusky fan, & don’t know if they’re doing it, but I DO know how little effort Dems put into contesting Em Accuracy. They don’t even go, ‘Nuh uh!’ when confronted with them. They just throw up ‘Jazz Hands’ and shout, ‘RUSSIA!’ – How stupid do we are they think?

    Dem arrogance. It’s an unending gift. They wouldn’t b sweating now if they didn’t have so much schitt to hide fr the public in 1st place, & giving hackers so much delicious material 2 hack.
    .

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *