Georgia v. Scott: ‘Talking Dirty’ to a Child is Not Protected by the First Amendment

In January, the National Center on Sexual Exploitation submitted an amicus brief to the Georgia Supreme Court urging the court to uphold a statute criminalizing obscene Internet contact with minors.

This statute is vital to protecting children from sexual predators in the digital age but was facing a First Amendment challenge. The American Center for Law and Justice recognized the significance of this case as well and their Chief Counsel, Jay Sekulow, was appointed special district attorney to represent the state at the Georgia Supreme Court. Mr. Sekulow defended the statute eloquently at oral argument before the Court in February. In a huge victory for children, on Tuesday, July 5, 2016, the Georgia Supreme Court upheld the statute! This was a very important step in protecting children and curbing the vast amount of sexual exploitation occurring in Internet space.

The statute at issue criminalized Internet contact with a child, or a person believed to be a child, containing “explicit verbal descriptions or narrative account of sexually explicit nudity, sexual conduct, sexual excitement, or sadomasochistic abuse that is intended to arouse or satisfy the sexual desire of either the child or the person.”

The appellant, Jack Bernard Scott, who was arrested for violating this statute, challenged its constitutionality claiming it was overbroad on its face—that it criminalized lawful speech protected by the First Amendment. Among the arguments his defense counsel made to the Court was that Scott had a First Amendment right to “talk dirty” to a child as long as this talk did not rise to the level of obscenity. But the National Center on Sexual Exploitation wrote to inform the court that sexual objectification of children by adults is inherently harmful to children and a form of child exploitation that is not protected speech. The Court agreed.

This was a huge victory in a time when child predators have instant, anonymous access to children all over the country via the Internet while at the same time the Internet remains fairly unregulated and unchecked.

Since the Internet’s earliest beginnings child sex predators were some of theFirst Amendment Free Speech Childfirst adopters of the technology and we have seen massive harms to children occurring online. Not only can children be lured and solicited for sex acts via online communications, but also they are often gravely harmed without ever meeting their predator in person. Children are frequently exposed to hardcore pornography, images of adult sex organs and sex acts via live webcam chat, coerced into sending nude photos of themselves which are then used to blackmail these children into sending more and increasingly explicit photos, as well as remote sexual abuse.

As amazing and incredible as the Internet has been in promoting education, connecting humanity worldwide, and astronomically improving the free flow of ideas, it has also presented some very grave dangers. The First Amendment has always excluded child sexual exploitation and obscenity from its protection and it is important in our digital age that these same principles apply to online speech. The Georgia Supreme Court has recognized this and rightfully protected children from grave harm resulting from predatory and unprotected speech.

EDITORS NOTE: Readers may donate by clicking here to ensure the National Center on Sexual Exploitation’s Law Center continues to defend dignity across the nation.

2 replies
  1. John Markes
    John Markes says:


    My daughter was the victim in this case. 53 yr old Jack Bernard Scott was also prior law enforcement with the Winter Haven FL police department back in the 90’s. He was finally convicted of one felony count in Camden County GA at a bench trial held on October 5th 2016. He was sentenced to 4 years in prison with 6 years probation and having to register as a sex offender in the state of GA. The judge cited my daughter’s and my wife’s victim impact statements in his sentencing. The judge told him if this case had gone to trial Scott would have received much more time in prison. Scott’s and his defense team’s GA Supreme Court challenge were an attempt to get him off with no time. The defense does intend to challenge this up to the US Supreme Court. The judge called Jack B Scott a predator. There was over 350 pages of chat with my daughter before we caught him and put a stop to this. Very sexually explicit graphic chats with a 13 year old innocent girl. He asked her to marry him and he would buy her a wedding ring and wait until she was 16. He was following over a 1000 other young girls on social media. The police did not confiscate his FL home computer, his work computer or either of his 2 cell phones. This scumbag has a wife of over 20yrs, son and 2 daughters of his own.


Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *