The Democrat-controlled House approved a resolution late Thursday aimed at reining in President Donald Trump’s future actions on Iran and condemning him for not notifying Congress before last week’s drone strike that killed an Iranian terrorist leader, who was one of the country’s most senior officials.
The resolution passed 224 to 194, with three Republicans joining the Democratic majority in supporting it and eight Democrats opposed. Rep. Justin Amash of Michigan, a Republican-turned-independent, voted for the symbolic resolution.
“Last week, the Trump administration conducted a provocative and disproportionate military airstrike targeting high-level Iranian military officials, and he did so without consulting Congress,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said on the House floor.
Trump ordered a drone strike that killed Gen. Qassim Suleimani, head of the Quds Force, the terrorist arm of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, on Jan. 3. Suleimani commanded numerous terrorist attacks, which killed about 600 Americans, according to the State Department.
The demand for socialism is on the rise from young Americans today. But is socialism even morally sound? Find out more now >>
“When I first heard from the administration, the secretary of defense and chairman of the Joint Chiefs, I said, ‘Why did you not consult Congress?’” Pelosi said. “They said, ‘Because we had to keep this close.’ You had to keep it close from the ‘Gang of Eight,’ the leadership of Congress?”
The “Gang of Eight” comprises the House speaker and House minority leader, Senate majority and minority leaders, and the chairmen and ranking members of the House and Senate Intelligence committees.
The House on Thursday passed the measure as a concurrent resolution, which means it’s nonbinding and would not be forwarded to the Senate or president—who would be unlikely to sign it anyway—and would not carry the force of law. Rather, it’s a statement by the House against the administration’s action.
“We know full well, better than many in the administration, the importance of classified information,” Pelosi said. “So, who were they keeping it close from? They admitted they were keeping it close from the Congress of the United States.”
The nonbinding resolution was sponsored by freshman Rep. Elissa Slotkin, D-Mich., who has a background with the CIA and the Defense Department.
Today, we're voting on a resolution I introduced to make it clear that if the President wants to take us to war, he must get authorization from Congress.
If our loved ones are going to fight in any protracted war, the President owes the American people a public conversation: pic.twitter.com/zBFzU6wHMd
— Rep. Elissa Slotkin (@RepSlotkin) January 9, 2020
Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., has introduced companion legislation in the Senate. The Senate is controlled by Republicans, where it is unlikely to get a vote.
The War Powers Act is a 1973 law that obligates the president to provide notification to Congress about a military action within 48 hours and gives Congress limited ability to prohibit further action.
During the House floor debate, Trump retweeted former national security adviser John Bolton’s criticism of the War Powers Act, saying he agreed that the law was unconstitutional and should be repealed.
Smart analysis, I fully agree! https://t.co/0YMU7GunDt
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 9, 2020
Earlier Thursday, in remarks at the White House, Trump defended the decision to kill Suleimani.
"Iran will never have a nuclear weapon." pic.twitter.com/Zi9FF2K6x1
— The White House (@WhiteHouse) January 9, 2020
Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., noted that the administration took action to kill a dangerous terrorist and criticized the Democrats who are attacking him for it.
“I never thought that I would hear, on this House floor, an apology to the Iranian people for an action that we took that was justified, taking out a terrorist,” he said.
The North Carolina lawmaker noted the carnage caused by the Iranian general killed in the strike.
We have a gentleman who gave his legs in service to this country, and yet we are apologizing to the Iranians with a nonbinding resolution that is nothing more than a press release.
It has no effect. It doesn’t do anything. … All they are doing is trying to get a press release to keep them from having a primary opponent.
This is a sad, sad day. Yet here we are, having another speech to try to take on the president of the United States for actually taking out a terrorist.
I would ask my colleagues the opposite. How many Americans does a terrorist have to kill before they join with us? Is 600 not enough? Does it have to be 1,000, or 10,000? A million?
At some point, we have to stand up and let the long arm of justice go in and take out these terrorists.
In retaliation for the strike that killed Suleimani, Iran launched missiles at two U.S. military bases in Iraq on Tuesday, but there were no casualties. Trump announced on Wednesday he would be pushing more sanctions on Iran in response to the attack.
Fred Lucas is the White House correspondent for The Daily Signal and co-host of “The Right Side of History” podcast. Lucas is also the author of “Tainted by Suspicion: The Secret Deals and Electoral Chaos of Disputed Presidential Elections.” Send an email to Fred. Twitter: @FredLucasWH.
A Note for our Readers:
With the demand for socialism at an all-time high among our young people—our future leaders and decisionmakers—the experts at Heritage stopped and asked a question that not many have asked:
Is socialism really morally sound?
The researchers at The Heritage Foundation have put together a guide to help you and our fellow Americans better understand the 9 Ways That Socialism Will Morally Bankrupt America.
They’re making this guide available to all readers of The Daily Signal for free today!