GENOCIDE 2.0: Environmentalism Embraces Population Control to ‘Ecologically Right-sized the Number of Humans’

Genocide: The deliberate killing of a large number of people from a particular nation or ethnic group with the aim of destroying that nation or group.

“Of all the problems which will have to be faced in the future, in my opinion, the most difficult will be those concerning the treatment of the inferior races of mankind.” ― Leonard Darwin

“Soon it will be a sin for parents to have a child which carries the heavy burden of genetic disease.” ― Robert Edwards

Humans are considered carbon-based life forms. Our bodies are 18% carbon. According to the National Institute of General Medical Sciences, “By mass, about 96 percent of our bodies are made of four key elements: oxygen (65 percent), carbon (18.5 percent), hydrogen (9.5 percent) and nitrogen (3.3 percent).” Plants then use the carbon dioxide humans breathe out and create the oxygen humans and other creatures breathe in!

When we take a breath, we pull air into our lungs that contains mostly nitrogen and oxygen. When we exhale, we breathe out mostly carbon dioxide.

QUESTION: Do we need to cull the population, thereby cutting CO2, in order to save the planet?

Environmentalists, with the full assistance of the United Nations, want to literally eliminate CO2 (carbon) from the earth’s atmosphere in order to save it.

QUESTION: How do environmentalists want to reduce CO2?

ANSWER: First slow, then stop and finally reverse population growth by killing the born and unborn!

So how does this reversing of population growth impact you and me?

The Population Media Center’s website states:


Slowing down, stopping, and eventually reversing human population growth — these are ethical imperatives that will help improve the chances of future generations establishing sustainable living scenarios with the planet.

The most ethical gift we can give the people and creatures of the late 21st century and early 22nd century is a chance. In the realm of population, this means working across the generations to ensure a much smaller, more ecologically right-sized number of humans. [Emphasis added]

So we must reduce the population in order to save the planet? So what are the three types of population policies proposed by environmentalists? They are:

  1. Pro-natalist: A pro-natalist policy is a population policy which aims to encourage more births through the use of incentives.
  2. Anti-natalist: An anti-natalist policy is a population policy which aims to discourage births.
  3. Eugenics: Eugenics is the practice or advocacy of improving the human species by selectively mating people with specific desirable hereditary traits. Eugenics was popular in America during much of the first half of the twentieth century and was embraced by Adolf Hitler in attempt to create a superior Aryan race, while at the same time eliminating the undesirable. This lead to the holocaust.

So, if you are pro-life you would be pro-natalist. If you are anti-natalist you would be pro-abortion. If you believe that only the most worthy humans should bread you are pro-eugenics.

Environmentalism, Eugenics & the New Genocide

Professor Paul Sutton, of the University of Denver, was a delegate for the American Association of Geographers at COP26. He wrote in The Hill, the largest independent political news site in the U.S.:

[W]ithout population stabilization and eventually degrowth, all the other approaches to climate change will not work.

[ … ]

The least costly and most effective policy to control future CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion and thereby climate change is to curb global population growth by simply providing contraceptive care to all women in the world who want it but do not currently have access.

Daily Express columnist Leo McKinstry said, “curbing population explosion should be top of the COP26 agenda.” McKinstry went on to state:

“There are currently 7.9 billion people on Earth, a total expected to rise by at least one billion every 12 years. It is a level of growth whose insatiable demands not only put an intolerable strain on our natural resources, but also fuels the ruination of eco-systems, from rivers to rain forests. …

“The decision to avoid this question at COP26 is the equivalent of holding a conference on obesity without mentioning calorie intake or lack of exercise.”

These comments sound very much like the arguments used to promote Eugenics. In 1936 the United States Public Health Service (now the CDC) conducted an experiment:

[T]he government used 623 black men as human guinea pigs in a 40-year medical experiment. This in itself is bad enough, but for 40 years these black men, predominately poor and uneducated, were deliberately kept in the dark about what was happening to them. This “experiment” continued for 20 years after the Nuremburg trials and the set of standards that came out of the trials called the Nuremburg codes. The civilized world agreed that human beings would not be used as research animals and that doctors would never forget their first duty to heal their patients.

Covid, Vaccines & the New Holocaust

Google actually has a counter with information on Covid infections, deaths and vaccinations. According to Google there have been worldwide 219,456,675 cases of Covid,  4,547,782 deaths, and 3,108,880,373 fully vaccinate. reported that 9.2% of those vaccinated have “serious symptoms.” This means that to date 286,016,994 humans are having serious effects from being jabbed. The Mayo Clinic reports:

Serious side effects of the Janssen/Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine can occur within three weeks of vaccination and require emergency care. Possible symptoms include:

  • Shortness of breath
  • Persistent stomach pain
  • Severe or persistent headaches or blurred vision
  • Chest pain
  • Leg swelling
  • Easy bruising or tiny red spots on the skin beyond the injection site

In the United States VAERS has received 6,968 reports of death (0.0019%), according to the CDC. (Numbers as of Aug. 26, 2021.)We still do not know the serious side effects of getting jabbed.


Population control is the new way forward to save the planet. When people like Leo McKinstry compare people to calories we begin to see how environmentalists want to dehumanize humanity. This dehumanization leads to Eugenics which leads to depopulation by force, which leads to governments deciding who lives and who dies by mandate.

It’s happened so many times in history. Hundreds of millions have been slaughtered, like cattle, in the name of saving humanity. has an ongoing research project tracking the public’s attitudes and experiences with COVID-19 vaccinations.

Covid has become the hammer to drive the nails into the coffins of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. It has lead to a new age of rule by global government mandates presumably to save the people from themselves. Watch Dr. Lee Merritt speak about “The Heart of the Vaccine’s Darkness.”

It’s ironic that environmentalists use the term “human footprint” to symbolize their movement to eliminate CO2 from the atmosphere when of course what they really want are no more human footprints at all.

Remember what George Orwell wrote in his novel 1984:

“The object of terrorism is terrorism. The object of oppression is oppression. The object of torture is torture. The object of murder is murder. The object of power is power. Now do you begin to understand me?”

We all understand where this all leads, don’t we. The question is how do we stop Genocide 2.0?

©Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLE: List of links to Senate Hearings on Vaxx damage and cheated trials from November 1st 2021

2 replies
  1. Janet Levy
    Janet Levy says:

    What CANNOT be stated enough is that CO2 is a life force – humans expel it and plants take it in and release oxygen. Anyone who has taken 8th grade biology (in the past) knows the process as photosynthesis. Periods of higher CO2 levels were prosperous times as plants thrived and food (both animal and plant) was more plentiful.

    This is the biggest and most ignorant lie of the environMentalist movement.


Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *