Team Biden Joins the School Library Wars, Launching Federal Investigation

UPDATE:
Gay activist couple accused of sodomizing adopted sons, ages 1 and 9 and distributing home-made porn of the abuse.
Sick. Throw them in prison! https://t.co/MTmTtOKOVw— JBamajeansđșđžđłđ± (@45Jbama) January 18, 2023
âWhoever succeeds in telling the stories to the children gets to control the future.â That was Kirk Cameronâs answer to people wondering why heâs joined the debate over Americaâs libraries. As parents everywhere fight to keep graphic content out of their childrenâs hands, Texas officials are warning the battle is taking an ominous turn. Itâs not just the forces of the Left that communities will have to contend with. Itâs the federal government, whose new investigation into a local school district could upend every grassroots effort to protect kids.
For leaders in Texasâs Granbury School District, the bomb dropped shortly before Christmas. Officials in the Civil Rights Division of Bidenâs Department of Education (DOE) said theyâd received a formal complaint from the ACLU that the small community outside Fort Worth was somehow violating the governmentâs definition of âsexâ by pulling books from school library shelves.
The ACLUâs beef dates back to November 2021 when Texas Governor Greg Abbott (R) urged the stateâs association of school boards to âensure no child is exposed to pornography or other inappropriate content in a Texas public school.â His letter, which keyed off parentsâ growing outrage about the material on school shelves, insisted on greater transparency about the content students can access. Abbott said his office had been contacted by a number of moms and dads who were ârightfully angryâ about the âpornographic and obsceneâ content.
Granbury officials took the governorâs directive to heart, ordering a review of the districtâs book titles. But what ultimately landed the district in hot water was a candid conversation Superintendent Jeremy Glenn had with the schoolsâ librarians â which was eventually leaked to the press. He talked about the conservative make-up of the community and insisted that they would act accordingly. âWe do have a very conservative board,â Glenn said in a reference to the two new school board members. âThey are elected, and recently more conservative. And so thatâs what our community is. Thatâs what our job is.â
At the end of the day, Glenn insisted, âI donât want a kid picking up a book, whether itâs about homosexuality or heterosexuality, and reading about how to hook up sexually in our libraries. ⊠And Iâm going to take it a step further with you,â the superintendent went on. âThere are two genders. Thereâs male, and thereâs female. And I acknowledge that there are men that think theyâre women. And there are women that think theyâre men. And again, I donât have any issues with what people want to believe, but thereâs no place for it in our libraries. ⊠Iâm cutting to the chase on a lot of this,â Glenn insisted. âItâs the transgender, LGBTQ, and the sex â sexuality â in books. Thatâs what the governor has said that he will prosecute people for, and thatâs what weâre pulling out.â
Over the next two weeks, Granbury embarked on what the Texas Tribune called âone of the largest book removals in the country, pulling about 130 titles from library shelves for review.â Two months later, the volunteer review committee inexplicably voted to return all but three books that theyâd permanently banned.
By then, the audio of Glennâs meeting had made its way to the media, and liberal news outlets like the Texas Tribune, ProPublica, and NBC News pounced, accusing Glenn of anti-LGBT bias. Thatâs when the local chapter of the ACLU got involved, demanding an apology and calling for every book to be reinstated.
Glenn didnât oblige, conveying through district spokesman Jeff Meador that all the titles theyâd pulled from shelves are âsexually explicit and not age-appropriate.â That said, the libraries âcontinue to house a socially and culturally diverse collection of books for students to read, including,â he pointed out, âbooks that analyze and explore LGBTQ+ issues.â
Naturally, that didnât satisfy the ACLU, whose lawyers decided to involve the federal government in a local dispute that could have a chilling effect nationwide. âIf the government finds in the ACLUâs favor,â The Washington Post cautioned, âthe determination could have implications for schools nationwide, experts said, forcing libraries to stock more books about LGBTQ individuals and requiring administrators â amid a rising tide of book challenges and bans â to develop procedures ensuring student access to books that some Americans, especially right-leaning parents, deem unacceptable.â
Of course, the heart of the ACLUâs allegation â that Granbury (and Glenn, especially) is violating the Leftâs new definition of âsexâ â is a stretch by almost every legal standard. The Biden administration may have twisted the word âsexâ to mean âgender identityâ and âsexual orientation,â but that interpretation has never been passed into federal Title IX law.
And yet, the ACLUâs Chloe Kempf maintains (unconvincingly) that the âbook removals and also the comments create this pervasively hostile environment.â âBoth send a message to the entire community that LGBTQ identities are inherently obscene, worthy of stigmatization â and the book removals uniquely deprive LGBTQ students of the opportunity to read books that reflect their own experiences.â
Conservatives pushed back, insisting that this isnât about LGBT hostility but age-appropriate content. Meg Kilgannon, senior fellow for Education Studies at Family Research Council, insisted that this whole controversy amounts to a leftist intimidation campaign. âThe ACLU is bullying school districts who have responded to parental concerns about pornographic library books offered to children. Access to pornography at school is not a civil right.â Even if the law had been changed to include âsexual orientation and gender identityâ in Title IX, âchildren still do not have a right to sexually explicit or violent content in public school library books. And school systems are under no obligation to support a publishing industry who canât sell these books to parents and so sells them to librarians instead.â
Frankly, Kilgannon argued, âThis is federal overreach into the education system, which is supposed to be a state issue.â Not to mention that âBiden is weaponizing another government agency: the DOE.â
If the president does intervene, dictating how school libraries handle certain book titles, the issue will almost certainly end up in court. âThis isnât the sort of civil rights issue that requires federal intervention,â Will Flanders of the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty argued. âItâs a question about books in schools, not about individual rights being violated.â
Either way, it does show one thing: the potency of the parentsâ movement. Cameron, whoâs in his own fight to host story hours in the same libraries that allow drag queens, is witnessing the momentum firsthand. As many as 1,000 people turned out in Placentia, Calif. to hear the âGrowing Painsâ actor read his new book, âAs You Grow.â
âI know why parents and grandparents are coming out of the woodwork,â Cameron told The Federalist. âThey understand there is a war on children â and nobodyâs going to stop it but us.â So if thereâs one thing Americans can do, he told the crowd, itâs this: âDonât just talk about whatâs going on. Change whatâs going on.â
AUTHOR
Suzanne Bowdey
Suzanne Bowdey serves as editorial director and senior writer at The Washington Stand.
RELATED VIDEO: Frederik Jansen on the link between LGBTQ+ and the Frankfurt School – The Laughland Report
RELATED TWEET:
This video of Joe Biden inappropriately touching little kids was RTâd over 30,000x
I posted on my Instagram and it just got fact-checked by Politifact
ARE WE NOT ALLOWED TO CRITICIZE OUR GOVERNMENT?!
Especially when all I did was post *videos* of him
This is insane censorship https://t.co/FI736HBf7H pic.twitter.com/jOhossCXEn
— DC_Draino (@DC_Draino) January 17, 2023
EDITORS NOTE: This The Washington Stand column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved. The Washington Stand is Family Research Councilâs outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!