Badass Christianity

David Warren: We all fall – into Hell, as it were – when established truth is abandoned. We begin by challenging “spiritual” truth, but material truth follows down the hole.


At the present time, and under current conditions, in most public places, I would say that reciting the Athanasian Creed would be an example of “badass Christianity.”

There are other examples.

By extension, the statement of any of the multiple elements of the Christian creeds, and their application to “real world” questions (such as baby-killing or abortion), is an example of the “badass” approach, which will draw criticism from many of our contemporaries, including most bourgeois Christians, and the Catholic ones.

Mostly, it is the opposite of silence. To keep one’s mouth shut, in polite company, rather than saying something that could cause offense, might be considered the quintessence of the bourgeois creed. And verily, “silence is golden,” in almost every situation, except when the truth is in dispute.

The form of silence that is commanded by prudence should be carefully considered, where there is time. Is one being prudent? Or is one only (usually unsuccessfully) protecting one’s derriere? It would of course be bad-ass not to shield it.

One might try the Christian exercise of not protecting one’s behind, or even flinching for the kick. There is a higher and holier prudence, that is not the consequence of intimidation; nor of the expectation of intimidation.

An act of violence, on a supposedly Christian motive, will also be criticized, though as a crime. “Badass” isn’t technically a crime, but merely a sometimes-fashionable style, though in certain progressive jurisdictions it may soon be illegal. There are already calls to censor badass remarks, and I should think Christian badass is especially offensive, to the non-Christian “snowflake.”

But if Christianity is entirely uninvolved, the expression is generally flattering. We use it of sports personalities, and Mark Zuckerberg even included the almost-assassinated Donald Trump (who isn’t usually counted as a Christian).

The badass is “pushing it,” not actually committing a crime, when for instance he humorously declares, “Missed me!” after a balloon was exploded in Ronald Reagan’s presence. Christianity is, characteristically, not involved in any violent crime that I can imagine, or even in the popping of balloons, though perhaps a reader will correct me. It is more likely to courageously inspire  a violent act of defense against a crime, which, however, may be prosecuted.

I am from Canada, but Canada and the “Uniparty” in the United States, plus several uniparty states in Europe, frown upon a violent defense. But they do not punish it, as they still usually do the original act of murder or whatever, unless the perpetrator is, say, defending “mere property” in response to some physical act of aggression, by, for instance, fashionably woke rioters, or one’s home and family against violent intruders.

This is inevitable – that Christians will be prosecuted – once an originally Christian doctrine is interpreted, or re-interpreted, in an unambiguously materialist way. It is how the notion of “human freedom” can become “a woman’s right to control her own body,” so that it becomes the right to murder a body that isn’t hers.

But it could be interpreted more exactly. Imagine, if you will, that instead of referring to Jesus Christ as our moral authority, we were to consult only biologists on the question, “When does human life begin?” This would be a materialist interpretation, and non-violent, but indisputably “badass.”

I am focusing on abortion because it is almost the last issue in the category of the divine creation, expressed by the words, “Male and female created He them, and blessed them.” Like all the many other divine revelations, it is clear beyond the shadow of mistaking, even by material science. For instance, only some people are female. And only they can ever get pregnant. At least, this was formerly understood.

Live things are alive, according to our waning Christian philosophy; dead things are dead. We used to understand this, and for religious minorities this is still the case. But it nevertheless begins to slip out of our grasp, like the commandment, “Thou shalt do no murder,” as the definition of killing is made more subtle.

But murder is not merely badass. It involves the killing of another human being. And an innocent one, moreover.

A biologist who said that the question of when human life begins is disputed would be consciously lying, and doing so in contradiction even of official scientific doctrine. For does it not hold that scientists shouldn’t make things up? And does it not affirm candor?

Most, or rather, all doctrines, sacred and profane, can be ignored when they fail to suit our convenience, however. Scientific doctrines are no exception. Similarly, the Ten Commandments can be ignored, when personal convenience demands sin.

Only a tiny proportion of biologists will deny human conception – that human life begins there. But this may not officially remain true, given pressure on scientists to ignore, for instance, the definition of a woman. The idea that, in defiance of truth and fact, “men can also get pregnant” is an indication of the depth of intellectual depravity into which humans may drop, as Catholic  Christianity and all other religions fall away.

For we all fall – into Hell, as it were – when established truth is abandoned. We begin by challenging “spiritual” truth, but material truth follows down the hole.

The keepers of the truth have the advantage that they don’t have to lie, about anything, from a political or any other motive. They may have or be given legal penalties, but if they hold their ground, not everything is lost. They have only got to be “badass” for a little time, in this world.

Even in the circumstance of life and death – while the bullets are flying, for instance – the instruction, “Fight, fight, fight” is Saint Michael the Archangel’s badass motto. It does not require any violence; it is at best a reaction to it; nor is it “pacifist.” It is so perfectly badass.


You may also enjoy:

Anthony Esolen A Course of Action

Carrie Gress No One Envies Those Who Suffer


AUTHOR

David Warren

David Warren is a former editor of the Idler magazine and columnist in Canadian newspapers. He has extensive experience in the Near and Far East. His blog, Essays in Idleness, is now to be found at: davidwarrenonline.com.

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *