Marxist President of Mexico Claudia Sheinbaum Not Happy with U.S. Congressional Immigration Laws
The newly elected Marxist President of Mexico Claudia Sheinbaum is bashing U.S. Congressional immigration laws by stating that “Immigrants that entered the United States illegally should not be viewed as “criminals” but she did also state she has a ‘plan” for when our superb and strong leader, President elect Trump removes these illegal criminal immigration violators from United States soil and starts the process to restore law and order on our borders and restore U.S. sovereignty.
It’s important to remember that most of the illegal immigrants in the United States are from Mexico so Marxist President Claudia Sheinbaum better be ready for a massive repatriation of Mexicans back to where they belong – home back in Mexico. They are welcome back if they follow due process and qualify for the benefit.
Now Marxists always play the victim when things don’t go their way so it’s no surprise this new Mexican President is not going to call her fellow Mexicans “criminals” for breaking U.S. Immigration laws. Now let’s take a look at Mexican immigration laws and what would happen if 15 million gringos like myself from the United States all decided to move to Mexico illegally.
If I decided to enter Mexico illegally and get then I get captured by the Mexican police I would not be given a stipend, a free credit card with $2,000 on it a free hotel in Mexico City and free healthcare, My consequences would be a massive fine, and deportation after some jail time of of up to two years, Also If any Mexicans helped me enter Mexico illegally they too would be jailed and fined and convicted as a felon. Under Mexican law illegal immigration is considered a felony.
So you have to laugh at the hypocrisy of these Marxists like President Claudia Sheinbaum who despises fossil fuels and free market capitalism just as much as she despises our brave and honorable border patrol officers. When people like her attack US Congressional law and turn Mexican illegal immigrants into victims you have to chuckle at her low IQ mindset.
My wife is a legal green card holder from Venezuela and she went through a very strict vetting process to enter the USA which took over two years. For this reason I spent over 2 years myself living part time in Colombia legally and learning fluent Spanish while waiting for her visa approval. I too was vetted by the Colombian government in order to live legally part time in Bogota. Every country has strict immigration laws and borders are strictly controlled but not the United States during the Biden / Harris reign of intentional incompetence. Things are about to change though.
My legal Venezuelan green card holder wife and I look forward to the massive deportation of all these criminal illegal aliens that broke our sovereignty and our territorial integrity by illegally entering our republic. Perhaps if we applied the same laws here in the United States and enforced them like they do Mexico and other countries in South and Central America this illegal immigrant problem never would have occurred here.
Let’s get the buses gassed up the planes ready for boarding and send the bill for this massive deportation process to the President of Mexico. Cheers,
Copy to: Mexican Ambassador Esteban Moctezuma Barragan in Washington D.C. and the Mexican Director of the Organization of American States (OAS).
©2024 Geoff Ross USN retired Surface Warfare/Air Warfare. All rights reserved.
Sheinbaum’s criticism highlights the ongoing challenges surrounding immigration reform, which has been a contentious issue between the two countries for many years. She argues that the U.S. policies, especially those around border control and immigration laws, are negatively affecting Mexican nationals and creating an environment of uncertainty and distress.
Her stance emphasizes the broader debate about how immigration laws in the U.S. impact neighboring countries, especially those that share a lengthy and porous border. This situation is compounded by the varying political ideologies that influence both countries’ policies. Sheinbaum’s criticism could be seen as an attempt to address the rising concerns over the treatment of migrants and to call for a more compassionate and realistic approach to immigration reform.
The article also reflects the delicate balance between national interests and international diplomacy in addressing migration. As both nations face immigration-related challenges, it is critical to foster open dialogues and work together on solutions that support both national security and the rights of migrants.