Liberation Day verses Judicial Insurrectionists

INSURRECTIONIST JUDICIAL-ASSISTED NATIONAL SUICIDE

What sane society welcomes into its arms those who openly proclaim their intense intent to annihilate your nation – “Death to America”? There is only one answer to this rhetorical question.

What sane society permits violence against itself in the name of democracy and freedom of speech? Either the United States is insane or it must make a definitive choice against such “freedom of speech” and its inevitable death by dumbness.

At this point, America’s insurrectionist judges have ruled in favor of death by dumbness for 350 million persons who are to live at the mercy of wanton murderers and human traffickers. National suicide is the outcome of death by dumbness.

Starkly, America leads all nations in death by dumbness. It has no match of any other country so willing to kill itself by letting its judicial and prosecutorial elite convince the populace that crime enhances and uplifts the standards of living by glorifying freedom of speech, even when it is hate speech inciting extreme violence against a minority like the tiny population of Jews drowning in America’s melting pots of huddled masses.

The same judicial and prosecutorial insurrectionists who demand due process rights for illegal-entry convicted habitual violent criminals felt no compunction about imprisoning American grandmothers for years without due process hearings or trials. The keys to their confinement cells were simply thrown away, and these captives were disposed of and abandoned for eternity until receiving Presidential pardons.

Those who received Presidential pardons were hated nearly as much as the President who gave them. Where, oh where were the incessant judicial outcries against due process denied for legal Americans? Was there even one judicial outcry of indignation and unconstitutionality for due process denied to young and old never-convicted souls solely held in prison bondage without charges filed?

American national suicide is the highest Communist-Socialist prize for which their members and passive-aggressive supporters have been competing fiercely for scores of years. The prized goal that could not be attained militarily has been nearly met via education, socialization, and indoctrination across all pieces of our society.

But pieces do not bring peace. We are fractured into shrapnel fragments that cut the heart of morality and decency just as pornography shreds every family and institution in which it embeds itself. To be sure, pornography is a key plank of the Communist goal-sites for America’s demise, and the premise upon which it is grounded is freedom of speech.

Communist Plank No. 25 declares: “Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.” Thus, our littlest children are captive school audiences for drag queen shows of flesh and filth.

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that freedom of speech is not limitless and does not include the right:

• To incite imminent lawless action. Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969).
• To make or distribute obscene materials. Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 (1957).
• To burn draft cards as an anti-war protest. United States v. O’Brien, 391 U.S. 367 (1968).
• To permit students to print articles in a school newspaper over the objections of the school administration. Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier, 484 U.S. 260 (1988).
• For students to make an obscene speech at a school-sponsored event. Bethel School District #43 v. Fraser, 478 U.S. 675 (1986).
• For students to advocate illegal drug use at a school-sponsored event. Morse v. Frederick, __ U.S. __ (2007).

Source: The Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts

Where is the outcry by America’s judicial insurrectionists against forced sexualization indoctrination of children in our educational institutions? Where are our judicial insurrectionists who zealously defend the rights of children to wholesome, Happy-Days lives versus the rights of illegal-entry convicted criminals to commit heinous acts that permanently destroy children’s lives, hopes, trust, and sense of stability? Judicial insurrectionists care not. Their outcry against hideous crimes is not … not even a whisper.

At this critical point in human history and American destiny, any single insurrectionist judge can hold and is holding mountains of hate in his hands – hate against this nation, the American people, Jews, and children – while protecting the hater and sacrificing the hated.

When the hater proclaims love for genocide against the Jews like “Gas the Jews,” he is protected by the arm of the lawless insurrectionist judge, and Jewish safety is sacrificed for freedom of hate speech and violence incited upon Jews.
America’s national suicide is at hand when in the hands of black-robed insurrectionists whose hearts and hands cradle the haters that mercilessly throttle America’s littlest and oldest and most vulnerable citizens.

In our American journey to holiness and wholeness, there is no place for judicial insurrectionists to placate and protect any or all of those whose freedom of speech is nothing but freedom to break this nation into shrapnel shards from coast to coast, top to bottom, and eternity.

Lee Introduces the Restraining Judicial Insurrectionists Act of 2025

March 24, 2025

Bill would stop blanket injunctions from sabotaging President Trump’s legitimate constitutional authority as Commander in Chief

WASHINGTON – Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) today introduced the Restraining Judicial Insurrectionists Act of 2025, which establishes a three-judge panel to swiftly review injunctions or declaratory relief against the President of the United States and the Executive Branch, with quick appeal to the Supreme Court. This legislation comes in the wake of several decisions by district court judges usurping the role of the Chief Executive from President Donald Trump and attempting to thwart the will of the American people who elected him.

“America’s government cannot function if the legitimate orders of our Commander in Chief can be overridden at the whim of a single district court judge,” said Senator Lee. “They have presumed to run the military, the civil service, foreign aid, and HR departments across the Executive Branch—blatantly unconstitutional overreach. This legislation will create a judicial panel to expedite Supreme Court review of these blanket injunctions, preventing unelected radicals in robes from sabotaging the separation of powers.”

BACKGROUND ON THE RESTRAINING JUDICIAL INSURRECTIONISTS ACT OF 2025

• The bill amends 28 USC 2284 to state that any action commenced against the executive seeking injunctive or declaratory relief against the Executive will go to a three-judge district court.

• Next, it requires that upon filing any covered action, the district judge who received the complaint and/or motion for preliminary injunction will refer the matter to the Chief Justice. The Chief Justice will then be required to select three judges in active service to preside over the case.

• Additionally, the bill requires that a majority of the judges must agree to issue any form of relief, preliminary or permanent.
• Finally, because this is a three-judge district court, all orders are directly appealable to the Supreme Court without discretion—so they must take up the case.

You can read the bill text HERE.

You can read the Washington Examiner’s exclusive coverage HERE.

RELATED ARTICLE: Man Who Tried to Assassinate Kavanaugh Pleads Guilty

RELATED VIDEOS:

U.S. veteran sounds the alarm on the infiltration of Islam into America’s education system

Biden Insider Exposes ‘The Most Evil Thing in the Biden White House’

©2025 Beverly Newman, Ed. D. All rights reserved.