There is No Debate with the Almighty — His Word is Eternal, Everlasting — Never to be Put Assunder by Man

“Israel’s land is Covenant land. Dividing it has consistently led to instability.” — Genesis 15:18; Joel 3:2.

THE HOLY LAND IS UNDER DIVINE ETERNAL CONTRACT WITH THE ALMIGHTY AND THE JEWISH PEOPLE TO PERPETUITY. LET NO MAN PUT IT ASUNDER.

“What G-d has joined together, let no man put asunder” in a Jewish wedding ceremony is a powerful statement about the sanctity, permanence, and Divine nature of the marriage contract …. (just as is the Covenant between the Land of Israel and the Children of Israel, as commanded by the G-d of Israel).

Gen 12.1–3, 12:7; 15:7, 15:18; 17:6-8:

“I will make you into a great nation, and I will bless you; I will make your name great, and you will be a blessing. I will bless those who bless you, and whoever curses you I will curse; and all peoples on earth will be blessed through you.”
And the L-RD appeared unto Abram, and said: ‘Unto thy seed will I give this land’; and he builded there an altar unto the L-RD, who appeared unto him.
And He said unto him: ‘I am the L-RD that brought thee out of Ur of the Chaldees, to give thee this land to inherit it.’
In that day the L-RD made a covenant with Abram, saying: ‘Unto thy seed
I have given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates;
And I will make thee exceeding fruitful, and I will make nations of thee, and kings shall come out of thee.
And I will establish My covenant between Me and thee and thy seed after thee throughout their generations for an everlasting covenant, to be a G-d unto thee and to thy seed after thee.
And I will give unto thee, and to thy seed after thee, the land of thy sojournings, all the land of Canaan, for an everlasting possession; and I will be their
G-d.’

Letter to President Trump: The Covenant Land of Israel and the Consequences of Dividing It

Dear President Trump,

We write to you with gratitude for your unwavering support of Israel during your first term. No American president has done more to recognize Jerusalem, affirm Israeli sovereignty, and stand up to Iran’s aggression. For that reason, we respectfully appeal to you regarding the potential revival of the “Peace to Prosperity” plan or any new proposal that includes land concessions or the outline of a future Palestinian state.

When this vision was first introduced in January 2020, it was hailed by many as bold. But it included a significant shift: a detailed map of a future Palestinian state. This was not symbolic. It formalized an expectation that the heartland of Judea and Samaria be divided and handed over under international oversight. Even if the intent was to preserve Israel’s security, the blueprint suggested that the path to peace runs through surrender of territory that has historical, legal, and biblical significance to the Jewish people.

We are deeply concerned that such an approach may again be taking shape. A phased plan with Arab state buy-in, tied to Palestinian reforms, still moves toward division. Israel’s right to these territories was recognized in 1967 and remains uncontested under historical precedent. Peace cannot be secured by redrawing these lines.

We have seen what followed the initial rollout. While causality is complex, the sequence was undeniable. National disruption, economic upheaval, and political confusion surged in the months after the map was released. At minimum, it deserves caution. And at most, it demands a serious reevaluation.

We respectfully present the following ten points for your reflection:

TEN CORE POINTS:

1. Israel’s land is covenant land. Dividing it has consistently led to instability (Genesis 15:18; Joel 3:2).
2. Gaza was relinquished for peace. It was turned into a launchpad for attacks. It is now being retaken at great cost.
3. No president or nation can override the historic, legal, and biblical title to Judea and Samaria.
4. The consequences following the first plan’s release—whether political or providential—were deeply disruptive.
5. Proposals based on conditional two-state frameworks, even phased, still project division.
6. The Abraham Accords paused Israel’s sovereignty over key Jewish communities. That pause should not become a permanent policy.
7. Land division has not produced peace—it has entrenched hostility.
8. Israel’s presence in Judea and Samaria is lawful under international law, not an obstacle to peace.
9. U.S. policy should affirm Israel’s security and integrity—not pressure it into future withdrawals.
10. This is a decisive moment to strengthen Israel’s sovereignty, not place it back on the table.

Mr. President, we urge you to consider the precedent and resist any initiative—however repackaged—that asks Israel to give up its land in exchange for uncertain promises.
We believe the United States is at its best when it stands with clarity and conviction alongside Israel—not drawing maps, but defending them.

Respectfully,

Michele Bachmann
Bill Koenig and Tania Curado Koenig
Rabbi Tuly Weisz
Rabbi Pesach Wolicki

CLICK HERE: To sign this letter if you wish.

©2025 Beverly Newman, Ed. D. All rights reserved.