Every Criminal Illegal Alien Deported is One Less Vote for the Democrat Socialist Party

When ICE goes into a community and arrests a criminal illegal alien that ends up being one less vote for the Democrat Socialist Party in 2026 Midterm and 2028 General Elections.

The whole reason that Biden opened our borders was to bring in illegal voters, period.

WATCH:

STEPHEN MILLER: ‘This was the plan all along… get them here illegally then give them access to the voting booth!

Biden Let ‘Immigration Activist’ Turn America Into an Open-Borders Country | Victor Davis Hanson

The  Democrat Socialist Party Plan

The Prison Policy Iniative in report titled “New ICE arrest data show the power of state and local governments to curtail mass deportations” reports:

Local jails and police departments are key to the Trump administration’s mass deportation agenda because they facilitate ICE arrests of people who are already in police custody. In the first year of Trump’s second term, the administration has intensified the criminalization of asylum seekers and immigrants, pushed immigrant detention to all-time highs, and indiscriminately raided city after city. Despite all of this, the Trump administration remains well behind their mass deportation goals, in large part due to state and local efforts to protect immigrant communities and limit cooperation with ICE, Border Patrol, and other federal agencies.

A whirlwind of developments in the past year have changed how the immigration system works. The Trump administration has made it harder for people to make claims in immigration court, and deployed plain-clothes federal agents to arrest people that show up for hearings. They have limited access to legal information and attorneys while people are detained, and tried to eliminate regular types of release from detention like bail. Further, they fired immigration judges unaligned with their mass deportation agenda, and advertised their positions as those of “deportation judges.” Accordingly, immigration judges now frequently function as a rubber stamp on the regime’s actions; the case-by-case, inherently individualized decision of whether or not to detain and deport someone has shifted away from judges in courtrooms to the cops on the streets.

Meanwhile, ICE agents are given arrest quotas and required to detain nearly everyone they suspect lacks U.S. citizenship. They are heavily reliant on local police to arrest people and identify them for later pick up from the local jail by ICE agents, often before any criminal charges have been resolved (whether dismissed, acquitted, or convicted). To be clear, large numbers of ICE arrests at local jails are not an indication that immigrants and asylum seekers are more likely to be arrested for a crime; robust data from Texas, for example, showed that undocumented immigrants had much lower arrest rates than U.S.-born citizens. In too many cases, a traffic stop can mean deportation.

Nonetheless, these changes mean that local law enforcement across the U.S. have day-to-day operational discretion about who is detained and deported from communities. States like Florida, Texas, Louisiana, and Georgia have required local law enforcement to deputize staff to serve ICE, leading to high numbers of arrests. Others like Illinois, New York, and Oregon have managed to suppress arrests by limiting cooperation and blocking access to sensitive areas of public buildings. And states like New Jersey, which have prohibited formal deputization while allowing federal agents informal access to people in custody, have swept hundreds of people out of local jails and into the hands of ICE.

[ … ]

Conclusion

Despite overwhelming displays of power and intimidating rhetoric, the federal government nonetheless relies heavily on state and local collaboration to enact its mass deportation agenda. The Trump administration is therefore vulnerable to state and local policy action that goes beyond merely limiting sheriffs and police from deputizing officers to work as immigration agents. This weakness is evident in the data, which show significantly smaller jumps in arrest rates in states where advocates have most aggressively worked to reject collaboration, and much higher rates in states that have embraced it. In the case of New Jersey, it’s clear that moderation on ICE collaboration does little to stem rates of arrest. Advocates targeting ICE’s reliance on local jails could potentially save thousands of people from the horrors of torture and abuse in federal custody and deportation.

Click here to read the full report.

Here’s the Data by State

Blue states do not want criminal illegal aliens deported, while red states work closely with ICE. The data proves it.

This charts show the differences by state:

Jan. 20 – May 20, 2025 May 21 – Oct. 15, 2025
State name  Jails and other lock-ups  Workplaces, homes, community, courts, others  Total arrests    Jails and other lock-ups  Workplaces, homes, community, courts, others  Total arrests 
Alabama 1114 224 1338 1572 492 2064
Alaska 3 22 25 4 22 26
Arizona 1513 946 2459 2754 1858 4612
Arkansas 674 357 1031 960 452 1412
California 1541 2842 4383 3379 12152 15531
Colorado 481 917 1398 603 1667 2270
Connecticut 26 275 301 47 428 475
Delaware 40 102 142 58 237 295
Florida 5560 3577 9137 9613 4693 14306
Georgia 1880 1277 3157 2108 3477 5585
Hawaii 32 79 111 31 55 86
Idaho 204 69 273 352 76 428
Illinois 210 747 957 496 2311 2807
Indiana 874 249 1123 1242 378 1620
Iowa 369 61 430 703 127 830
Kansas 517 258 775 832 274 1106
Kentucky 587 196 783 919 310 1229
Louisiana 848 571 1419 1207 945 2152
Maine 19 58 77 39 109 148
Maryland 418 775 1193 496 1444 1940
Massachusetts 128 1786 1914 254 2961 3215
Michigan 331 447 778 589 1039 1628
Minnesota 253 340 593 316 864 1180
Mississippi 613 125 738 782 163 945
Missouri 518 192 710 735 254 989
Montana 36 14 50 51 2 53
Nebraska 294 182 476 432 337 769
Nevada 634 298 932 1098 346 1444
New Hampshire 36 103 139 46 88 134
New Jersey 1248 729 1977 2002 2033 4035
New Mexico 148 146 294 237 248 485
New York 258 1611 1869 591 4927 5518
North Carolina 918 446 1364 1364 661 2025
North Dakota 70 12 82 82 61 143
Northern Mariana Islands 32 12 44 36 34 70
Ohio 615 269 884 930 848 1778
Oklahoma 774 510 1284 1176 1147 2323
Oregon 13 203 216 61 534 595
Pennsylvania 536 1314 1850 759 2856 3615
Puerto Rico 0 2 2 0 0 0
Rhode Island 76 140 216 66 196 262
South Carolina 1042 233 1275 1460 363 1823
South Dakota 147 32 179 211 32 243
Tennessee 1841 668 2509 2754 988 3742
Texas 13330 4697 18027 21137 15103 36240
Utah 823 369 1192 1278 547 1825
Vermont 0 2 2 1 4 5
Washington 135 403 538 336 1127 1463
West Virginia 74 44 118 153 81 234
Wisconsin 239 77 316 406 219 625
Wyoming 113 34 147 220 37 257
Combined Virginia and Washington D.C. 1070 1822 2892 1776 4063 5839
Total 43326 31217 74543 68770 74205 142975
Jan. 20 – May 20, 2025 May 21 – Oct. 15, 2025
State name  Jails and other lock-ups  Workplaces, homes, community, courts, others  Total arrest rate per 100,000 residents    Jails and other lock-ups  Workplaces, homes, community, courts, others  Total arrest rate per 100,000 residents 
Alabama 21.7 4.4 26.1 29.0 9.1 38.0
Alaska 0.4 3.0 3.4 0.5 2.8 3.3
Arizona 20.1 12.5 32.6 34.5 23.3 57.8
Arkansas 21.9 11.6 33.6 29.5 13.9 43.5
California 3.9 7.2 11.2 8.1 29.3 37.4
Colorado 8.1 15.5 23.6 9.6 26.6 36.2
Connecticut 0.7 7.5 8.2 1.2 11.1 12.3
Delaware 3.8 9.8 13.6 5.2 21.4 26.7
Florida 23.9 15.4 39.3 39.1 19.1 58.2
Georgia 16.9 11.5 28.4 17.9 29.6 47.5
Hawaii 2.2 5.5 7.7 2.0 3.6 5.7
Idaho 10.2 3.5 13.7 16.7 3.6 20.3
Illinois 1.7 5.9 7.6 3.7 17.3 21.0
Indiana 12.7 3.6 16.3 17.0 5.2 22.2
Iowa 11.4 1.9 13.3 20.6 3.7 24.3
Kansas 17.5 8.7 26.2 26.6 8.8 35.4
Kentucky 12.9 4.3 17.2 19.0 6.4 25.5
Louisiana 18.5 12.5 31.0 25.0 19.5 44.5
Maine 1.4 4.2 5.5 2.6 7.4 10.0
Maryland 6.7 12.4 19.2 7.5 21.9 29.4
Massachusetts 1.8 25.2 27.0 3.4 39.4 42.8
Michigan 3.3 4.4 7.7 5.5 9.7 15.3
Minnesota 4.4 5.9 10.3 5.2 14.2 19.4
Mississippi 20.9 4.3 25.2 25.3 5.3 30.5
Missouri 8.3 3.1 11.4 11.2 3.9 15.1
Montana 3.2 1.2 4.4 4.3 0.2 4.4
Nebraska 14.7 9.1 23.9 20.5 16.0 36.4
Nevada 19.5 9.2 28.7 31.9 10.1 42.0
New Hampshire 2.6 7.4 9.9 3.1 5.9 9.0
New Jersey 13.2 7.7 20.9 20.0 20.3 40.4
New Mexico 7.0 6.9 13.9 10.6 11.1 21.6
New York 1.3 8.2 9.5 2.8 23.6 26.4
North Carolina 8.4 4.1 12.4 11.7 5.7 17.4
North Dakota 8.8 1.5 10.4 9.8 7.3 17.1
Ohio 5.2 2.3 7.5 7.4 6.8 14.2
Oklahoma 19.0 12.5 31.5 27.3 26.6 53.9
Oregon 0.3 4.8 5.1 1.4 11.9 13.2
Pennsylvania 4.1 10.1 14.2 5.5 20.8 26.3
Puerto Rico 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
Rhode Island 6.9 12.7 19.5 5.6 16.7 22.4
South Carolina 19.1 4.3 23.4 25.3 6.3 31.6
South Dakota 16.0 3.5 19.5 21.7 3.3 25.0
Tennessee 25.6 9.3 34.9 36.2 13.0 49.2
Texas 42.8 15.1 57.9 64.2 45.9 110.1
Utah 23.6 10.6 34.2 34.7 14.8 49.5
Vermont 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.6 0.7
Washington 1.7 5.1 6.8 4.0 13.5 17.5
West Virginia 4.2 2.5 6.7 8.2 4.3 12.6
Wisconsin 4.0 1.3 5.3 6.5 3.5 10.0
Wyoming 19.3 5.8 25.2 35.6 6.0 41.6
Combined Virginia and Washington D.C. 11.3 19.3 30.6 17.7 40.6 58.3
Total 12.8 9.2 22.0 19.2 20.7 40.0

The Bottom Line

The nation wide initiative to find, arrest and deport criminal illegal aliens is just one of the needed steps to have free and fair elections.

Every criminal illegal is a voter for Democrats. 

While this effort is ongoing and will impact the 2026 Midterm Elections, it will have a major impact on the 2028 General Election and who becomes our next president and the number of House and Senate seats held by each party.

This is why deportations are critical, as are  impementing Real Voter IDs, purging voter rolls of illegal alien voters, and other efforts by this administration to secure our election process to keep our Contitutional Republic intact.

So when you see Democrat Socialist Party members, i.e. the DeMS13 Party, and its anti-ICE terrorists, think of our future and vote accordinly.

©2026 . All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Here’s Why There Are More ICE Raids in Blue States

ICE Agents Chowed Down At Local Mexican Restaurant Then Detained Its Illegal Workers

DOJ Reportedly Investigating Tim Walz, Jacob Frey For Obstruction

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *