100 Days of NYC Socialism, 100 Years of Worldwide Socialism Cataclysms, and 100 Million Deaths

How do “bad ideas” become deadly to the masses?

Jihadist socialist realities are authoritarian means to misery and poverty and catastrophe ….

The “Socialist-Jihadist” Critique: Some ideologies argue that both Islamic jihadism and radical socialism gain traction by opposing Western imperialism and capitalist inequality, often framing their struggle in terms of fighting for the poor against elite corruption.

Over the past century, various implementations of socialist and communist systems have resulted in massive human suffering, economic failure, and widespread loss of life, with estimates suggesting over 100 million deaths worldwide due to famine, purges, and forced labor. Major disasters include Soviet collectivization, Mao’s Cultural Revolution, and crises in Venezuela, Cambodia, and North Korea. Wheaton College

Key Historical Disasters and Failures:

• Soviet Union (1917–1991): Initiated under Lenin and continued by Stalin, industrial-scale repression included 20 million deaths from executions, the Gulag, and man-made famines (like the Holodomor). Collectivization caused massive food shortages.
• Maoist China (1949–1976): Policies such as the “Great Leap Forward” led to widespread famine, resulting in tens of millions of deaths, while the “Red Guard” executed countless skeptics.
• Cambodia (1975–1979): The Khmer Rouge, under Pol Pot, caused the death of 1.5–2 million people (over a quarter of the population) through forced labor and direct slaughter.
• Venezuela (21st Century): Under Chavez and Maduro, policies led to extreme economic collapse, hyperinflation, and severe food/medicine shortages.
• Eastern Europe (Cold War era): Soviet satellite states experienced severe economic inefficiency, resulting in stagnant economies, shortages, and lack of innovation behind the Iron Curtain.

Common Drivers of Failure:

• Centralized Planning: The lack of market incentives resulted in systemic inefficiencies, producing goods nobody needed while failing to meet demand for necessities.
• Elimination of Property Rights: Abolishing private ownership of farms and businesses destroyed production incentives.
• Authoritarian Repression: Resistance to failed policies was met with political violence, surveillance, and purges of “class enemies”.

WATCH: Mamdani’s ideas are ‘stupid’ and just plain ‘bad’: John Stossel | Elizabeth Vargas Reports

WATCH: Mamdani’s Bad Ideas, Part 2: Free Buses, $30 Minimum Wage, and Rent Freezes

The Islamist-Socialist at the Gates

Two poisonous ideologies are wedded in the leading candidate to be mayor of New York City

As the sun sets on this crisp November eve in 2025, shadows lengthen over New York City—not from Manhattan’s spires, but from the storm of a radical transformation. Zohran Mamdani, the 34-year-old democratic socialist and unapologetic Muslim activist, stands on the brink of history.

Fresh polls show him surging with a 25-point lead over independent challenger Andrew Cuomo. On Tuesday, November 4, this Ugandan-born immigrant could become the first Muslim and socialist to lead the world’s financial capital—a city still scarred by 9/11.But this isn’t just a local upset; it’s the Democratic Party’s plunge into the abyss, with Mamdani emerging as its new face, dragging the once-moderate machine to the far-left fringe. What began as a romantic primary insurgency has metastasized into a national fever dream.Mamdani’s ascent signals the Squad’s triumph over the party’s gray eminences. Establishment figures like Sen. Chuck Schumer have tiptoed around endorsements, their silence deafening amid the radical roar.

Framing Mamdani as their choice, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Sen. Bernie Sanders thundered “Tax the Rich!” before adoring crowds in Queens. Muslim Rep. Ilhan Omar piled on, blasting Schumer for his reluctance to endorse Mamdani and accusing him of betraying the party’s soul to Zionists.This isn’t coalition-building; it’s a purge. The Democrats—once the party of working-class ethnics and urban strivers—now bow to Islamist networks, bolstered by Muslim Reps. Rashida Tlaib, Ilhan Omar, André Carson, and Lateefah Simon, fused with socialist zealots in an unholy alliance.

Their joint statement dismissed attacks on Mamdani as “vile, anti-Muslim smears,” mobilizing Muslim voters in Brooklyn and Queens and turning mosques into de facto campaign HQs.Critics have long branded Mamdani a swindler—a chameleon who sheds his skin to match the light. Born to privilege (his father a Columbia professor, his mother an Oscar-nominated filmmaker), he peddles a rags-to-radical myth that crumbles under scrutiny.

This Muslim socialist changes accents and stances as needed. What he once called “universal rent control” is now conveniently conditional. This isn’t evolution; it’s opportunism. Sound the alarm, New Yorkers: this Islamist-socialist cocktail doesn’t just fizz—it ferments in the soil of American naivety. New Yorkers celebrate the “new”—the immigrant striver, the fresh face—yet forget that novelty without wisdom is folly.Mamdani’s blueprint isn’t reform; it’s a Trojan horse for upheaval.Recently, outside a Bronx mosque, Mamdani wept, declaring, “I will not change who I am. … I will be a Muslim man in New York City.”

Noble words on the surface, but unmask the rhetoric and history screams a warning, as seen in his grotesque 9/11 pivot. Mamdani doesn’t mourn the 2,977 souls lost to al-Qaeda Islamic terrorists; he laments his aunt’s post-attack fears, spinning Islamic terror into a tale of American bigotry and Islamophobia—the buzzword shield that deflects scrutiny by protecting Islam from evaluation. This is Mamdani’s masterstroke—grievance theater turning tragedy into political gold. His victimhood refrain pierces a guilt-soaked city. He shouts “Islamophobia,” and progressives nod in suicidal empathy, blind to the power play.Americans must pierce the PR veil on Mamdani’s propaganda. His words ring hollow when traced:

He elevates Islamic values—ummah, submission to Sharia—above America’s pluralism. In pro-Palestine chants, he praises Islamic “resistance” others call terror, and in multiple interviews declines to condemn the term “globalize the intifada.” This isn’t assimilation but Islamic supremacy disguised in a political campaign, priming an Islamist overthrow of liberties Mamdani views inadequate. His stance on Israel is problematic, and his invocation of Islamophobia is a deflection.

Islamism and socialism have ruined nations, and now they are wedded in Mamdani. We’ve seen the Taliban’s Afghanistan, where women’s rights vanished; Cuba’s hollow paradise; Iran’s fusion of Quranic edicts and Marxist fury birthing a theocratic dystopia. Mamdani’s vision—rent freezes, free transit, decriminalized sex work—sounds utopian until you calculate the cost: gutted police budgets, rising crime, a city massacred by a poisonous ideology.

Mamdani’s blueprint isn’t reform; it’s a Trojan horse for upheaval. He is a jihadist-socialist in a suit-and-tie, viewing Islam’s political tenets—many overlapping with socialism—as superior to Western norms. Islam isn’t merely a religion but an ideology, with sharp intent on advancing and replacing. Electing Mamdani would subject New York to that creed and its ambitious and numerous influencers who view Islam and its tenets as superior to American ideals.

Wake up, New Yorkers—don’t mistake inexperience for vision.

Yet there is hope in this cloudy midnight of politics. Until the polls close Tuesday, you, New Yorkers, hold the gavel. The field is flawed: Cuomo’s scandals linger, and Sliwa lacks gravitas. None is perfect, but Mamdani? He’d be a nightmare—a chameleon mayor whose “new dawn” would darken into an Islamist-Socialist authoritarian dusk. Choose wisely, New Yorkers. Your meritocracy, your melting pot, your miracle on the Hudson scream loud for it. America’s genius isn’t blind novelty—it’s discerning renewal. Let Tuesday prove we’re wiser than the polls predict.