The Best Debate Take

Donald Trump is, was and will always be Donald Trump. It’s why we love him. All this hand wringing, once again, about him not taking this opportunity to not be Donald Trump is just a recycle of a well worn smear.

“Harris came out calm, exceeded low expectations, repeated well her memorized talking points, avoided until the last 20 minutes her trademark word-salads, and repeatedly baited and incited an increasingly angrier Trump.” Yes, he got angry. I’m angry. What rational American isn’t angry? These evil clowns are whistling, cackling past the graveyard…..but those whose eyes have been opened are enraged.

As for ‘moving the dial,’ the left will never be moved to reason. It’s a mental illness. I’m sure you saw the clip of the parents whose young son was killed by a Haitian migrant who said they wish a white person killed him because it reflects badly on the migrants. This is beyond irrationality. It’s madness.

The takeaway from the debate is the media is the gravest threat to America. ABC moderators presented a Kafkaesque show of bias, one sided “fact checks” and debate rigging. Trump was debating the moderators not the flapping-tongued Harris. If they could have pulled a Crooks, they would have.

Victor Davis Hanson’s post debate analysis is spot on:

The Candy Crowley Debate

What do we remember, if anything now, about the second presidential debate of 2012?

Not whether Obama or Romney won.

But only how CNN’s Candy Crowley blew up her career and embarrassed CNN—by outrageously hijacking the debate, and as a partisan, fact-checking (and erroneously so) Romney in efforts to help Obama.

So, too, we won’t remember much of these debate details, given the shameful role of the two ABC moderators.

Harris came out calm, exceeded low expectations, repeated well her memorized talking points, avoided until the last 20 minutes her trademark word-salads, and repeatedly baited and incited an increasingly angrier Trump.

Harris called for unity, while smearing him as a racist and repeating the old lies about Charlottesville, “bloodbath,” the 2025 project, and Trump’s supposed support for a federal ban on abortion.

Trump might seem to have matched or beaten Harris if one only reads a transcript of the entire debate—given she never honestly would or could reconcile her past and antithetical present positions.

Nor could Harris explain why she simply did not implement her visions either the last three years or would do so in the next five months.

An irritated Trump started well and ended well; she in-between calmly and successfully at times baited and got Trump’s goat.

But all that will neither matter nor be recalled.

The debate will instead be remembered as a three-on-one pile-on, given the unprofessional and biased team of ABC moderators David Muir and Linsey Davis. Rather than refuting pre-debate fears that their past anti-Trump biases would warp the debate, they only confirmed them.

Both disrupted the tempo to fact check (sometimes in error), and to editorialize Trump’s statements, while letting Harris’s Charlottesville, IVF, national abortion ban, “bloodbath” or 2025 lies go unchecked.

Often their disruptive fact checks of Trump were simply wrong, such as their preposterous claim that no states allow partial birth or late abortions where the viable baby is terminated—when at least six states put no limitations on any abortions.

The questions addressed to Trump on January 6 were designed to provoke. They had no counterpart addressed to Harris—as for example, would she distance herself from Biden, or how she came to win the nomination without winning any elected delegates, or her last person in the room on Afghanistan boast, or if she wished to retract any of her inflammatory past statements, such as bragging that the deadly 2020 demonstrations would not and should not stop, or her tweets to help bail out violent 2020 rioters, or her lie that the border patrol whipped immigrants in the manner reminiscent of slavery and the Klan, or her boast that she was a radical and woke.

Instead, Muir and Davis only asked Trump about supposedly controversial past statements.

Harris was never reprimanded for trying to speak over Trump. Trump was reminded to address the question asked; not so Harris who rarely did.

Watching the entire debate may have aided Harris, given her low expectations. Yet the better sound bites in the next week may help Trump. But the moderators’ shameless bias may swing empathy toward Trump.

So, the real story was how ABC’s moderators ruined the debate, their own reputations, and their network’s brand.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Presidential Debate: 3 Against 1 – Majority Loses

FRACK YOU KAMALA!

Kamala Harris and Treason Unknown to the American Public

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

‘A New Way Forward’? Harris Campaign [Finally] Announces 2024 Policies

One day ahead of her debate with former President Donald Trump, Vice President Kamala Harris has unveiled a policy agenda that could compel Christian businesses to participate in abortion and LGBT events that violate biblical morality, sign a national abortion expansion bill, pack the Supreme Court, give amnesty to the entire illegal immigrant population of the United States, strip law-abiding U.S. citizens of their Second Amendment rights without due process, double-down on inflationary economic policies, continue criminal lawfare against Trump, and promote universal daycare.

Until Monday morning, the “issues” section of Kamala Harris’s campaign website did not exist 49 days after the Democratic Party coronated Harris without a primary. Harris has dubbed her policy plan “A New Way Forward” — the same name President George W. Bush gave to his 2007 surge in Iraq, intended to end terrorism against U.S. soldiers and transform Muslim Iraq into a pluralistic Western democracy.

Equity for the LGBTQ movement, bankruptcy for Christian businesses: The cornerstone of Harris’s LGBTQ policy, which she brands as promoting “civil rights,” would prevent Christian business people from living out their faith in the private sector and economically impoverish believers. After noting she began unlawfully officiating same-sex marriage in 2004 as California attorney general and “refused to defend” a marriage protection amendment democratically passed by California voters, Harris promises “to pass the Equality Act to enshrine anti-discrimination protections for LGBTQI+ Americans in health care, housing, education, and more into law.” The so-called Equality Act would add sexual preference and, in some versions, gender identity, to landmark civil rights legislation designed to protect racial minorities and women from discrimination. By raising homosexuality and transgenderism to the same legal status as race and religion, the Equality Act could force Christian doctors to perform gender-reassignment surgeries and require Christian business owners to take part in services that violate their religious beliefs — or go out of business. State and local statutes modeled after this bill have resulted in such lawfare prosecutions as the never-ending legal disputes of Masterpiece Cakeshop owner Jack Phillips.

Throughout the issues section, Harris contrasts her policy positions, not with the radically truncated 2024 Republican Party platform which Trump campaign operatives foisted on rank-and-file delegates at the Republican National Committee on July 8, but with “Trump’s Project 2025 Agenda.” The Trump campaign publicly opposed the project, which the Heritage Foundation subsequently shut down. Trump replaced GOP’s historic commitment to a Human Life Amendment, and Republican vice presidential candidate Senator J.D. Vance (R-Ohio) confirmed that Trump will veto any national pro-life protections that cross his desk during the next four years.

The “Project 2025 agenda will eliminate federal rules that protect LGBTQI+ Americans from discrimination,” says the website, referring to laws like the SAFE Act that prevent the predatory transgender industry from targeting minors for puberty blocks, cross-sex hormone injections, and life-altering surgeries.

A national abortion expansion act: The website continues the Harris campaign’s rebranding of abortion as “reproductive freedom,” vowing that, as president, “she will never allow a national abortion ban to become law. And when Congress passes a bill to restore reproductive freedom nationwide, she will sign it.” The Biden-Harris administration has endorsed the so-called “Women’s Health Protection” Act (WHPA), which would strike down more than 1,300 state pro-life protections including laws protecting children from late-term abortions (including some after the point of viability), repealing parental consent and notification laws, and repealing conscience protections for pro-life healers.

“If elected, Trump will ban abortion nationwide, restrict access to birth control, force states to report on women’s miscarriages and abortions, and jeopardize access to IVF,” it claims, although no law nor proposal would curtail IVF, and Trump controversially promised to force insurance plans, or U.S. taxpayers, to fund the procedure, which has resulted in unknown millions of abortions and abandoned embryos.

“He even called for punishment for women who have an abortion,” says the website — based on an off-the-cuff remark Trump reversed the day after he made it in a March 2016 interview with Chris Matthews, who resigned from MSNBC four years ago. Trump explained during the 2016 campaign, “I didn’t mean punishment for women like prison” but rather that women who have abortions “punish themselves.” Numerous surveys show women suffer psychologically, and often physically, after enduring an abortion.

The section apparently praises her own administration’s foray into compelling taxpayers to fund abortion. “Vice President Harris and Governor Walz believe we have a sacred obligation to care for our nation’s service members, veterans, [and] their families,” says the website. Last July, the Biden-Harris administration Pentagon spokesman, John Kirby, called paying for abortions a “foundational, sacred obligation of military leaders.”

Amnesty for millions of illegal immigrants: Harris promises to “secure our borders and fix our broken immigration system,” which her website ranks below promoting gun control. She “will bring back the bipartisan border security bill,” which she called “the strongest reform in decades.” Harris promises to reward tens of millions of illegal immigrants who broke U.S. immigration law with U.S. citizenship, calling her amnesty plan “an earned pathway to citizenship.” The Biden-Harris administration has presided over record-breaking levels of illegal immigration every year in office, not counting new legal pathways they have been established for immigrants from nations such as Haiti. Previous historic levels of illegal immigration came when candidates promised, or delivered, amnesty. This “is her attempt to make permanent what we have seen, which is lawlessness,” Rep. Laurel Lee (R-Fla.) told Fox Business on Tuesday morning.

The Democratic candidate blames the broken border on Donald Trump. “Trump fail to tackle violence in our communities or fix our broken immigration system — he will make us less safe,” the Harris website states. “He’ll advance his cruel immigration agenda which includes separating children from their parents,” a policy carried out by the Obama-Biden administration and continued by the Biden-Harris administration.

The fentanyl crisis: “This past year, the number of overdose deaths in the United States declined for the first time in five years,” the website boasts. But the Biden-Harris administration presided over record-breaking numbers of overdoses, largely driven by fentanyl crossing the Southern border from Mexico. The administration’s drug policy aimed to decriminalize marijuana and promoted so-called “harm reduction” policies, which distributed crack pipes to addicts as part of taxpayer-funded “smoking kits.”

Supreme Court packing: Harris supports a plan that would overhaul the U.S. Supreme Court by “requiring [j]ustices to comply with ethics rules that other federal judges are bound by and imposing term limits.” The recent term limits plan embraced by prominent Democrats would sideline the most conservative justices and transform the court from a lifetime appointment to one continually threatened by, and responding to, political pressure.

More gun control: Harris promises to “ban assault weapons and high-capacity magazines.” The Biden-Harris administration has applied the term “assault rifle” to America’s most popular rifle, the AR-15; California law also bans magazines that hold more than 10 rounds of ammunition. The vice president’s pledge to “require universal background checks” would require the government to pry into all sales, and potentially gifts, of guns between private individuals. She also vows to pass “red flag laws,” which unconstitutionally remove guns from the home of law-abiding citizens without due process, if their neighbors, criminals, or vengeful ex-boyfriends report them as mentally troubled. The laws would render those reported defenseless in their own homes.

The website notes, “As head of the first-ever White House Office of Gun Violence Prevention, she spearheaded policies to expand background checks and close the gun show loophole. Under her and President Biden’s leadership, violent crime is at a 50-year low, with the largest single-year drop in murders ever.” In fact, the U.S. homicide rate rose again in 2021 to 8.2 out of 100,00 according to the CDC. The homicide rate in 2022, the most recent year for which data are available, stood at 7.7, significantly higher than the 5.9 rate in 2018.

The website complains that Donald Trump “wants to arm teachers in our classrooms” in response to an ongoing string of school shootings.

Prosecuting Donald Trump? The Harris campaign website promises the Democratic presidential candidate will “fight to ensure that no former president has immunity for crimes committed while in the White House.” That comes in response to a Supreme Court ruling which granted presidents extremely limited immunity for actions carried out in his official capacity as president of the United States — not for private actions. Legal experts warn the threat of prosecution would criminalize political differences and turn the United States into a banana republic.

Nonetheless, the website claims President Trump will “bring the Department of Justice and the FBI under his direct control so he can give himself unchecked legal power and go after his opponents.” Similarly, at the first night of the Democratic National Convention, Michigan State Senator Mallory McMorrow (D) warned, “Under Project 2025, Donald Trump would be able to weaponize the Department of Justice to go after his political opponents.”

“Donald Trump is a convicted criminal who only cares about himself,” the website says.

Recycling lies about Donald Trump: The issues section also misleads about the two candidates’ biographies and policy positions. “Vice President Harris grew up in a middle[-]class home as the daughter of a working mom,” says the website. But Kamala Harris grew up in the famously left-wing city of Berkeley where her father, Donald J. Harris, was “a renowned Marxist professor” and her mother, Shyamala Gopalan, was a cancer researcher. The vice president also grew up in Montreal.

Donald Trump has “said he would let Russia ‘do whatever the hell they want’ to our NATO allies. And he calls soldiers who gave their lives in defense of American democracy ‘suckers’ and ‘losers,’” it says. Trump’s former national security adviser, John Bolton — a neoconservative who has persistently criticized Trump’s non-interventionist foreign policy — called reports that President Trump disparaged fallen U.S. soldiers “simply false.” The comments from Trump, a master of overstatement, about NATO came in response to a question from a foreign leader about whether the U.S. would defend a nation that steadfastly refused to meet its obligations under the treaty to spend a requisite amount of funds on its own national defense. For decades, Trump has criticized one-sided deals in which foreign nations freeload off U.S. taxpayers.

Demonizing Trump: “Someone as dangerous as Donald Trump should never again be allowed to serve as commander-in-chief,” says the website. “Top American military generals and national security officials — including those who worked for Trump — have warned that he is ‘dangerous’ and ‘unfit’ to lead, and now he is surrounded by ultra-loyalists who enable his worst impulses.” These remarks come despite a near-fatal assassination attempt against the former president in Butler, Pennsylvania, on July 13, which missed by a fraction of an inch, something the president has credited to divine intervention.

Civil rights: Kamala Harris commits herself to securing “$2 billion in funding for Offices of Civil Rights across the federal government,” which will supersize federal lawsuits against private employers who refuse to implement Woke policies on the basis of race, sexual preference, and gender identity.

Inflationary economics and price controls: Kamala Harris says that “guilding up the middle class will be a defining goal of her presidency.” Yet on her watch, inflation reached a 40-year high of 9.1% in 2022, lifting costs and squeezing families across the nation. Overall groceries have risen nearly 20% over four years. The median price of a new house has more than doubled since Joe Biden and Kamala Harris took office. Americans must spend an extra $13,000 a year under the Biden-Harris administration to have the same standard of living they enjoyed under the Trump administration, according to one expert analysis. The spike in prices, which critics dub Bidenflation, has reduced Americans’ savings levels by 3.2%. The website notes “[h]er tie-breaking vote on the Inflation Reduction Act,” which economists say carried a real price tag of $1.2 trillion and sparked inflation, in addition to piling more money onto the $35 trillion national debt. As the site also points out, “Vice President Harris cast the deciding vote on the” $1.9 trillion “American Rescue Plan.”

Harris has promised to implement national price controls on food and rent. She will implement the “first-ever federal ban on corporate price gouging on food and groceries,” says the website, although grocers have an extremely thin profit margin. She also promises national rent control. “Vice President Harris knows rent is too high and will sign legislation to outlaw new forms of price fixing by corporate landlords.” She claims she’ll build three million more rental units and “Vice President Harris will provide first-time homebuyers with up to $25,000 to help with their down payments, with more generous support for first-generation homeowners.” Economists agree the policy will simply raise the price of houses by $25,000 while price controls, which failed in the 1970s, will restrict supply.

“Trump would raise rents and add $1,200 a year to the typical American mortgage,” she claims without proof.

Harris’s campaign promises she “will take on Big Pharma,” although the Biden-Harris administration passed vaccination mandates that the White House claimed applied to two-thirds of all U.S. workers, including attempting to force the approximately 25 million people employed at a workplace with at least 100 employees to take the COVID-19 shot or be fired. They also dismissed 8,400 members of the U.S. armed forces who refused to take the shot. Researchers have subsequently linked the injection to an increased risk of myocarditis and excess deaths.

“Vice President Harris will protect Social Security and Medicare against relentless attacks from Donald Trump,” who has steadfastly opposed any reform of the entitlement programs. Social Security is scheduled to become insolvent in 2033. Medicare faces the same fate in 2036.

Environmental globalism: Meeting the “global challenge” of climate change “will require global cooperation,” and she is committed to continuing “the United States’ international climate leadership,” says the Harris campaign website. The U.S. will lead global compacts on fossil fuels. “[S]he will unite Americans to tackle the climate crisis as she builds on this historic work, advances environmental justice.” Harris, who promised she would “absolutely” end fracking in the 2020 Democratic primaries, claims this will result in “lowering household energy costs” and “record energy production.”

Kamala warns Trump will increase gasoline prices: “Trump asked Big Oil executives to give his campaign money so he could roll back regulations and cut taxes for Big Oil to boost their profits, and Trump’s plans would push gas prices up,” she asserts. The cost of a gallon of gasoline has increased from $2.33 when President Donald Trump left office in January 2021 to a record high of $5.02 in June 2022 under Biden-Harris, despite releasing nearly half of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. The cost now sits at $3.62 a gallon.

“Trump’s economic plans would also trigger a recession by mid-2025,” she said, although some economists agree America is already in a recession. The U.S. experienced the textbook definition of a recession — two consecutive quarters of economic contraction — under the Biden-Harris administration in the first two quarters of 2022. But the administration has denied the recession took place, since the panel tasked with declaring a recession, the Business Cycle Dating Committee at the National Bureau of Economic Research, did not formally make such a pronouncement.

PRO Act/public sector unions: “She’ll sign landmark pro-union legislation, including the PRO Act to support workers who choose to organize and bargain and the Public Service Freedom to Negotiate Act to make the freedom for public service workers to form unions the law of the land.” The PRO Act would force millions of workers to pay union dues against their will, cripple freelance work, erase free speech and privacy rights, skew elections in favor of unionization, and radically increase the federal government’s intervention into everyday workplace disputes. President Franklin D. Roosevelt, who signed the 1935 Wagner Act codifying Americans’ right to union representation, believed public-sector unions should not exist and called militant labor tactics “unthinkable and intolerable.”

“She’ll fight to raise the minimum wage, end sub-minimum wages for tipped workers,” radically altering the landscape of tipped work.

Harris’s agenda will be paid for by “making millionaires and billionaires pay their fair share in taxes.” The top 1% of U.S. income earners pay 46% of all federal income taxes, while the bottom 50% pays 2% of taxes.

Manufacturing jobs: “Under the Biden-Harris Administration, more than 1.6 million manufacturing and construction jobs have been created,” Harris claims. But most of these are jobs destroyed during COVID-19 lockdowns coming back online. The Biden-Harris administration has in fact added 147,000 manufacturing jobs above the level in January 2020.

Universal preschool: “Vice President Harris will fight to ensure parents can afford high-quality child care and preschool for their children. … [E]nsuring hardworking families can afford high-quality child care, all while ensuring that care workers are paid a living wage and treated with the dignity and respect they deserve,” the website states. However, surveys consistently show most mothers would like to remain home with their own children, at least part of the time, during their child’s formative years.

Transferring student loan debt and medical costs to taxpayers: Harris will “continue working to end the unreasonable burden of student loan debt,” she promises. “As Vice President, she also announced that medical debt will be removed from credit reports, and helped cancel $7 billion of medical debt for 3 million Americans. As President, she’ll work with states to cancel medical debt for even more Americans.”

Promising not to raise taxes on most Americans, but … : Harris is also “committed to ensuring no one earning less than $400,000 a year will pay more in taxes.” But the Biden-Harris administration has already raised fees on the middle class and working poor by:

  • expanding the number of items that must be registered under the National Firearms Act, with a $200 fee for each item;
  • reinstating the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate and $695-per-person penalty, which President Trump eliminated;
  • imposing a carbon and/or methane tax. One proposal would charge companies $1,800 per ton of methane they handle (not emit), with the cost rising 2% above inflation each year;
  • increasing corporate taxes, which pass on approximately one-third of increased costs to consumers by raising prices (and another third by reducing payroll costs/hours); and
  • hiking cigarette taxes, which fall disproportionately on the working class.

She also praises tax-and-spend policies, claiming that “when the government encourages investment, it leads to broad-based economic growth and creates jobs, which makes our economy stronger.” But Paul Mueller of the American Institute for Economic Research (AIER) described Harris’s economic interventionism as “extensive government involvement, huge amounts of spending,” and “a giveaway campaign.”

She also plans more Woke equity, pledging to “increase access to capital for small businesses and bring venture capital to parts of middle America that have for too long been overlooked … tripling the Small Business Administration’s lending to [b]lack-owned businesses, and more than doubling small-dollar lending to Latino and women-owned businesses.”

Harris also supports increasing taxpayer-funded subsidies for the Obamacare health care exchanges.

Foreign policy: Harris says she “will always stand up for American interests in the face of China’s threats.”

“Vice President Harris will always stand up for Israel’s right to defend itself,” the website avers. “She and President Biden are working to end the war in Gaza, such that Israel is secure, the hostages are released, the suffering in Gaza ends, and the Palestinian people can realize their right to dignity, security, freedom, and self-determination.”

The vice president’s website also notes her strong support for Ukraine. Under the Biden-Harris administration, U.S. taxpayers have spent more than $175 billion aiding Ukraine, despite its stalled war with Russia, the Zelensky government’s well-documented corruption, and persecution of the canonical Ukrainian Orthodox Church.

The website boasts that Kamala Harris has been “advising on tough decisions in the Oval Office and the Situation Room.” Harris bragged about being “the last person in the room” before Joe Biden decided on the details of the calamitous withdrawal from Afghanistan, which cost the lives of 13 U.S. service members and left an unknown number of Americans stranded behind the Taliban’s lines.

AUTHOR

Ben Johnson

Ben Johnson is senior reporter and editor at The Washington Stand.

RELATED VIDEO: President Trump ROASTS the ABC moderators for not debunking Kamala’s lies!

RELATED PODCAST: The Deep State with Eric Teetsel

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2024 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

Bill Gates says he has no plans to retire, ever, while joining the chorus for crackdowns on online speech

Much work still to be done for man who talks about need for depopulation while investing in toxic mRNA shots under guise of ‘saving’ lives. Now he’s demanding digital IDs to rein in ‘misinformation’. 

For Bill Gates, the thought of growing older and having to scale back his work to less than full-time scares him to death.

In fact, he says he wants to work another 20 to 30 years.

Gates, who recently turned 68, says he hopes to follow in the footsteps of his longtime friend Warren Buffett, who serves as chairman and CEO of Berkshire Hathaway at age 94 and has no imminent plans to retire. Buffet has donated at least $43 billion to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation over the years, roughly half of all the money taken in by the foundation, so it’s easy to see why Bill Gates considers Buffett such a good friend.

Gates told CNBC:

“My friend Warren Buffett still comes into the office six days a week. So, I hope my health allows me to be like Warren.”

Gates told the outlet he still has so much he wants to accomplish. He remains a technology advisor for Microsoft and spends much of his time using his net worth — estimated at $128 billion— to fund potential solutions for the global issues he sees as most pressing. These include creating new synthetic mRNA “vaccines” for nearly every disease known to man, ending poverty, and pushing the climate change agenda, part of which involves a war on food (at least real food) and global depopulation.

Gates has openly called for depopulating the earth by “10 to 15 percent.”

So, unless the Lord decides otherwise, the world apparently has many more years to endure Bill Gates.

Folks like Gates, Fauci, Buffett, George Soros, Henry Kissinger, Klaus Schwab, they don’t tend to take their billions and ride off into the sunset. They stay busy. Kissinger lived to 100 and worked a full schedule almost to the end.

What’s that saying? Evil never rests?

Gates has also gone public recently with his antagonistic view of the First Amendment’s free speech protections, which he says hinder efforts to combat online “misinformation.”

According to Reclaim the Net, Gates erroneously cited the example that shouting “fire” in a crowded theater as an exception to free speech protections, a misrepresentation that has been clarified legally over time to be more nuanced in its application.

In his discussions, highlighted in an upcoming Netflix series and through dialogue with Stanford experts, Gates argues in favor of digital IDs to verify online identities to help curb this “misinformation.”

Reclaim the Net reports that the Gates Foundation has donated money to digital ID projects in the pastusing parts of Africa as a testing ground. The outlet writes:

“Gates’ proposed approach ostensibly aims to curb the spread of fake content and ensure that only verified individuals can publish information which means that online content can be matched to real-life identities.

“However, this raises significant concerns about privacy and the potential for excessive surveillance and control over digital spaces, something Gates has never been too keen to defend.”

Gates explained, as reported by CNET:

“The US is a tough one because we have the notion of the First Amendment and what are the exceptions like yelling ‘fire’ in a theater.”

Reclaim the Net rightly notes that Gates’ commentary on the First Amendment, using the flawed “fire in a theater” analogy suggests a readiness to dilute foundational free speech principles to implement digital solutions.

Gates added:

“I do think over time, with things like deepfakes, most of the time you’re online you’re going to want to be in an environment where the people are truly identified, that is they’re connected to a real-world identity that you trust, instead of just people saying whatever they want.”

Imagine that. People “saying whatever they want.” That used to be a bedrock American freedom that everyone took for granted — the right to express one’s opinion, anonymously or not.

Gates is just one of many elitist globalists in the West who have decided it’s time to declare war on freedom of speech.

France just recently arrested Telegram CEO Pavel Durov, because his platform does not allow the government to have a back door into the Telegram system for censorship.

Brazil just banned Elon Musk’s X platform.

Antony Blinken, the U.S. Secretary of State, recently admitted his federal agency is working on a project to use A.I. to monitor the internet and flag content considered by the federal government to be “misinformation.”

The United Nations has called for a crackdown on “misinformation” as has Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum.

Former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair, a notorious globalist, has also taken up the cause, calling in a recent interview for further restrictions on online speech.

Now is the time to speak up louder and more boldly than ever in favor of free speech. It might not be around much longer even in the limited doses we see today.

©2024. Leo Hohmann. All rights reserved.


Please visit Leo’s Newsletter Substack.

‘Cleaning Up Kamala’ | TRAILER OUT NOW

A couple months ago, Kamala Harris was the worst VP in American history. Now, she’s heralded as the Savior of the Republic.

Suffering from whiplash? We are too. That’s why we set out to expose how this inexplicable 180 happened.

The Daily Caller’s new documentary, “Cleaning Up Kamala,” shows that one doesn’t just become a warm, joyful “Momala” overnight. It takes a whole billion-dollar media effort.

“Cleaning Up Kamala” debuts Sept 13. and is available exclusively for Patriots subscribers. Catch a first glimpse below.

First, the Daily Caller uncovered the true cost of the Defund the Police movement in “Lawless.”  Then “Rigged” exposed the issue Democrats fear most: how their political machine managed to secure Joe Biden the presidency in 2020. Now, with “Cleaning Up Kamala,” we take on a corrupt corporate media establishment that built a new presidential candidate, their candidate, out of whole cloth.

Harris was nobody’s first choice. Voters resoundingly rejected her in the 2020 primaries. Joe Biden chose her as VP to check an identity box, but she proved more incompetent than anyone could have imagine. A revolving door of staffers found it unbearable to work with her. She failed miserably as the border czar and her cackle made everyone uncomfortable. Unsurprisingly, her approval rating stood deep underwater — until she was made into the new Queen of the Democratic Party.

With hilarious clips and insightful interviews, “Cleaning Up Kamala” shows how the media turned this trainwreck into a tulip.

The Daily Caller’s documentary productions are made possible by our faithful Patriots members, and we wouldn’t be able to do it without them. To watch “Cleaning Up Kamala” on Sept. 13, and to help support future investigative documentaries, please consider subscribing.

AUTHOR

Gage Klipper

Commentary and analysis writer.

RELATED VIDEOS:

CNN—yes CNN—exposes just how far left Kamala Harris is.

RFK JR.’S BOTTOM LINE: ‘No matter what state you live in, VOTE TRUMP!’

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column with video is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

A Surprising Instance of Election Interference Thwarted

Judge Delays Trump’s Sentencing Until After November Election

New York judge delays sentencing until Nov. 26.

Sam Dorman | The Epoch Times

New York Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan said on Sept. 6 that he would delay sentencing in former President Donald Trump’s criminal trial until after the 2024 presidential election.

The new date is Nov. 26 instead of Sept. 18. It was initially scheduled for July but got pushed back following motions related to immunity and Merchan’s recusal.

In a letter to Trump’s attorney and the New York District Attorney’s office, Merchan described the court as a “fair, impartial, and apolitical institution” while explaining that it sought to delay sentencing to avoid the appearance of bias.

“The imposition of sentence will be adjourned to avoid any appearance—however unwarranted—that the proceeding has been affected by or seeks to affect the approaching Presidential election in which the Defendant is a candidate,” he said.

Merchan added that “adjourning decision on the motion and sentencing, if such is required, should dispel any suggestion that the Court will have issued any decision or imposed sentence either to give an advantage to, or to create a disadvantage for, any political party and for any candidate for any office.”

Trump was found guilty in May on 34 counts of falsifying business records. Merchan had scheduled sentencing for July but postponed the date after the Supreme Court’s ruling on presidential immunity.

Trump and his legal team have repeatedly called for Merchan’s recusal, citing his daughter’s leadership in a Democratic political consulting firm. His attorneys have also sought to challenge the verdict based on the Supreme Court’s July ruling on presidential immunity. Trump v. United States saw the Supreme Court holding that presidents did not enjoy criminal immunity for unofficial acts.

Merchan’s letter set Nov. 12, also after the election, as the date for him to issue a decision on immunity.

Trump had attempted to delay sentencing by requesting to stay a federal judge’s dismissal of his attempt to relocate the case. Also on Sept. 6, he denied Trump’s request for a stay on his order related to the rejection.

U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein issued an opinion on Sept. 3 stating that the Supreme Court’s immunity ruling in Trump v. United States hadn’t changed his determination that the conduct under question in the New York case was unofficial.

Hellerstein also said it would be inappropriate for his court “to evaluate issues of unfairness or error in the state trial.” Trump had alleged that Merchan mishandled allegations surrounding purported violations of federal election law—namely by misdirecting the jury and withholding certain evidence from their consideration.

“The public’s confidence in the integrity of our judicial system demands a sentencing hearing that is entirely focused on the verdict of the jury and the weighing of aggravating and mitigating factors free from distraction or distortion,” he told the attorneys.

“The members of this jury served diligently on this case, and their verdict must be respected and addressed in a manner that is not diluted by the enormity of the upcoming presidential election. Likewise, if one is necessary, the Defendant has the right to a sentencing hearing that respects and protects his constitutional rights.”

His letter came on the same day that Trump’s appeal in the E. Jean Carroll defamation case came before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, where Trump is seeking an appeal of Hellerstein’s decision on relocating the case that Merchan is overseeing.

During a press conference, Trump denounced the various lawsuits against him while alleging a vast abuse of the justice system. His case before Merchan is the only one of his four criminal cases to reach a verdict. Merchan’s decision all but foreclosed the possibility that he would be running for president from a jail cell.

If he wins, he’s expected to withdraw the two federal cases against him. Even if he is sentenced in his state cases—in New York and Georgia—legal experts have told The Epoch Times that the Constitution would preclude him from completing those sentences as president.

Merchan’s sentencing delay came just a day after U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan outlined a new schedule for proceeding with Trump’s federal election interference case in the District of Columbia after the Supreme Court’s decision on immunity. Chutkan’s latest set of deadlines extended only until the end of November.

During a status conference on Sept. 5, she said the timing of the election was not relevant and that she wouldn’t consider that factor in scheduling pretrial proceedings. “This case has been pending for over a year,” Chutkan said. The judge said that the court was “hardly sprinting” toward the finish line.


TAKE ACTION NOW⇒ Overturn Trump’s Conviction!


©2024. ACT For America! All rights reserved.


Please visit the Act for America Substack.

The Orwellian Mentally Challenged United Nation’s WIPO Bans the words Midwife, Lumberjack and Fisherman

Dear United Nations World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) headquartered in New York City.

It has come to our understanding that the United Nations governing your organization has banned a group of words and WIPO is now prohibited from using them in future adjudications, cases and correspondence.

Well, we are a group of lumberjacks here in upstate New York but the United Nations has now banned the word “lumberjack” from your approved WIPO word list so how do we communicate with you ?

We also have two Englishmen here working on site cutting down trees but the United Nations has also banned the word “Englishman” from its approved list of words. Another problem right ?

We also have dogs with us which we classify as our “man’s best friend” but this expression too has been banned by the United Nations. So what do we call our dogs now?

After work we also go fishing to relax but the United Nations has also banned the word fishermen. Seriously.

My lumberjack workmate, well his mom is a midwife and she delivers lots of babies but the United Nations has also just banned the word “midwife”.

They, the UN, have renamed the word midwife to birth attendant. Very strange right very Orwellian ?

The United Nations is saying that masculine-specific terms give an impression that women do not posses certain skills so the UN is banning these words and phrases and forms of expression.

Well, we masculine guys that know which bathroom to use are warning the United Nations your days are numbered roosting in New York City trying to oppress and destroy the very fabric of the masculine male.

It would be in your best interest to leave the United States sooner rather than later and relocate to some gay friendly feminine country like Saudi Arabia.

The United Nations is a communist, irrational and mentally deranged organization that does not belong in this republic let alone take our American tax payers money for your insane political agenda and ideology.

So we masculine male lumberjacks here in upstate New York with our mans best friends look forward to Donald Trump returning to the White House so with the stroke of a pen you United Nations Commie retards will be defunded and removed from the United States.

©2024. Geoff Ross. All rights reserved.

VIDEO: Aristotle on Tyranny in 12 minutes

The tactics used by tyrants are ancient. Recognizing them in time might allow us to defend ourselves. That is, if we allow ourselves to recognize them. Recent experience shows that we will not allow ourselves to recognize it.

WATCH: The Timeless Truth About Tyranny According to Aristotle—Why Tyrants Prefer Foreigners

RELATED ARTICLE: 9 States Where the Cost of Living Has Increased Most During Biden’s Presidency

EDITORS NOTE: This Vlad Tepes Blog column with video posted by is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

‘Witness Protection’: Media-Friendly Tim Walz Has Disappeared From Airwaves Since Joining Harris Ticket

Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz rose to prominence by making the rounds in mainstream media interviews, but since being named Kamala Harris’s running mate, the “folksy”, “midwestern dad” has been missing from the airwaves.

From July 22 to Aug. 6, about two weeks before he was added to the ticket, Walz appeared on MSNBC, PBS, CNN and Fox News a total of ten times, an analysis by Newsbusters’ Curtis Houck, shared with the Daily Caller, showed. Since Harris chose Walz as her running mate on Aug. 6, the governor has not appeared on the networks he flocked to during the vetting process, according to Houck’s analysis.

“It’s no surprise that Tim Walz has gone into the witness protection program first started by the Biden-Harris 2020 campaign after blanketing the liberal cable networks during the vetting process to show Kamala Harris his loyalty to her,” Houck told the Caller.

“Between July 23 and August 6, he appeared on CNN and MSNBC at least seven times, with an additional hit on taxpayer-funded PBS. Morning and evening, Walz made sure Harris and her team saw him at all hours of the day. Importantly, none came after July 30 as the vetting intensified and Harris conducted final round interviews,” he continued.

The shift is a jarring departure from Walz’s pre-nomination media blitz, which skyrocketed him into liberal stardom and separated him from the other contenders in the VP sweepstakes.

Walz has done one tv appearance since being named Harris’ running mate; his joint interview on CNN alongside the vice president. Over the first month of her presidential campaign, Harris faced scrutiny for a lack of unscripted moments. The pressure forced Harris to commit to setting up an interview by the end of August, though rather than doing a one-on-one sit-down, she brought Walz along.

Neither Harris nor Walz have held a press conference since beginning their run, only taking a few questions from reporters in gaggles when on the road.

While Harris and Walz have done one media appearance together, Senator J.D. Vance has done 94 interviews, press conferences and gaggles with the media since Trump named him his running mate on July 15, according to Axios. In the month of August, Vance did all five major Sunday shows, the outlet reported.

“Tim Walz is in hiding, just like Kamala Harris, because Harris is a San Francisco liberal desperately pretending not to be one, and no one trusts Walz to remember every part of the fictional record the campaign staff has created for both of them. They are both radical leftists, whose policies would only send the American economy into a deeper and faster spiral, and the last thing they want anyone to do is answer questions about anything,” Tim Murtaugh, senior adviser to the Trump campaign, told the Caller.

“Walz has lied about so much that they have no idea what piece of his embellished life story he’ll roll out next. Next thing you know he’ll claim to have quarterbacked the Minnesota Vikings to the Super Bowl while simultaneously serving in Afghanistan,” he added.

Before Walz was shielded from mainstream media appearances, the governor was going viral for his line of attack on Republicans. During his July 23 hit with MSNBC, Walz deemed Vance, Trump and other Republicans “weird,” a message that would prove to be a bit troublesome for Vance as he started to hit the campaign trail.

“Walz sat with incredibly friendly liberal journalists who saw no problem in helping Walz advance his case, including his astroturfed insult against former President Trump, Senator Vance and the Republican ticket as being ‘weird.’ The moniker kept Walz in the minds of liberal journalists like star-crossed lovers being unable to think of anything else after laying eyes on each other. Why? He said exactly how they feel about conservatives,” Houck told the Caller.

Scott Jenningsa longtime GOP adviser in Kentucky and veteran of numerous campaigns, told the Caller that the Harris campaign must have judged Walz as a risk to the operation and chose to sideline him as a result.

“They’ve obviously judged him to be a huge risk. His limited engagement on the CNN sit-down was ridiculously bad,” Jennings told the Caller.

After Harris named Walz her running mate, the Minnesota governor has been caught in several lies, including some about his service record.

The Harris campaign unknowingly began the unraveling of Walz’s military story after unearthing a 2018 video of the governor pushing for gun control, saying that “those weapons of war, that I carried in war” should stay only in combat. Social media users were quick to point out despite Walz’s statement, he never saw war.

Veterans in Walz’s unit previously accused him during his run for office in 2018 of retiring from the National Guard to run for Congress once it was revealed that he would be deployed to Iraq. Vance has lobbed attacks at Walz on the campaign trail, questioning why Americans should trust a guy who lied about his military record.

Veteran who knew Walz unloads on him on the @MegynKellyShow: “He’s not brave, I call him a coward because he is” pic.twitter.com/efGKk1fHjm

The Minnesota Governor is also the subject of a congressional investigation relating to his ties to the Chinese government. House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer wrote a letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray to request all documents relating to any Chinese entities that the now-governor may have interacted with while on his dozens of trips to China.

Lies aside, Jennings told the Caller that another reason for sidelining Walz could be because he would be pressed about a policy platform Harris is yet to define. More than a month into her campaign, Harris has only unveiled her economic policy and has yet to put a platform on her website. The Trump campaign, by contrast, features the Republican National Committee’s platform as its own.

“In his defense, she has no idea what her positions are so how could he be expected to know anything?” Jennings said.

AUTHOR

Reagan Reese

White House reporter. Follow Reagan on Twitter.

RELATED ARTICLES:

9 States Where the Cost of Living Has Increased Most During Biden’s Presidency

Veterans Who Knew Walz Tear Him Apart: ‘Military Impersonator,’ ‘Habitual Liar,’ ‘Coward,’ And Worse

‘Can We Get A Question At Some Point?’: Walz Ignores Shouted Question About Lowering Prices During Campaign Stop

Tim Walz Claimed He Has A Family ‘Because Of’ IVF — But His Wife Used A Different Fertility Treatment

‘Putting In The Work’: Republicans View JD Vance As Invaluable Asset As Campaign Enters Home Stretch

CNN Data Guru Says ‘Weird Attack Line’ Against JD Vance Is ‘Absolutely’ Hurting His Favorability

Attacks On Walz’s Service Lies Are Only Just Beginning, Trump Insiders Say

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Skip Hall the Marxist Mayor of Surprise, Arizona Violated A Citizens 1st Amendment Rights

Greetings Mayor Skip Hall, supreme ruler of Surprise Arizona.

I understand you had an American citizen arrested and trespassed for upholding her 1st Amendment right to question you regarding the city attorneys pay at a recent city hall meeting.

You do understand the 1st Amendment of the US constitution allows for such questions. The 20 years I spent in the Navy was to protect this young lady from bottom feeding Marxist Cockroaches like you.

I do believe your term as Mayor ends in December which is enough time for me to continue the discussion where the lady left off before you illegally and unconstitutionally had her removed by the deputy.

I will also reeducate the Police Captain in Surprise Arizona to prevent the next brave court deputy from following your unconstitutional orders in the future.

He actually should have arrested your sorry ass for violating the rights of the honorable citizen.

It’s good to see the young lady has filed a lawsuit against you for being a snot nosed Communist rectal sphincter. She will bury you in litigation comrade – my advice is to beg for a plea deal. I’ll send her a nice donation.

Also make a dentist appointment, your horrible toothy smile could be used on Halloween as a poster child to scare the neighbors kids. I bet you were bullied in high school.

My advice is renounce your US citizenship and relocate to a nice retirement home in Communist Cuba where your ideology is welcomed.

See you soon.

Best wishes
Senior Chief Geoff Ross
USN (Ret)
Surface Warfare / Air Warfare
SEAL Team support
Veteran Operation Desert Storm
Life Time Member VFW

©2024. Geoff Ross. All rights reserved.

Kamala says quiet part out loud: Government ‘oversight’ needed to police the internet and rein in thought crimes

Watch video of the stunning admission from VP Harris as she goes full communist in broad daylight.

The global crackdown on free speech continues unabated and if you think it’s relegated to countries like China, Cuba and North Korea, think again.

A Brazilian Supreme Court panel on Monday upheld a decision to suspend Elon Musk’s social media platform X in the country.

Last Friday, Justice Alexandre de Moraes ordered the platform blocked.

Since the decision, Musk and his supporters have tried to paint de Moraes as a renegade and an authoritarian censor of political speech. But Brazil is no outlier. The European Union is also cracking down on free speech with its Online Service Act and we have our own free-speech haters here in the United States.

In fact, one of them is a candidate for president.

Kamala Harris came out over the weekend and admitted in the wide open that she wants to see the same type of state-sponsored censorship implemented in the United States as what we see taking shape in Brazil.

The government, Harris believes, should have ultimate control over what you and I are allowed to post on the internet, as well as more control over what we are allowed to see and hear. She doesn’t trust us to decide for ourselves as to the truth or accuracy of what we see or read online.

Take a look at this VIDEO and let the gravity of what Harris is saying sink in.

Kamala will shut down X if she wins

She’s very impressed with the socialist government of Brazil’s legal action to shut down Twitter, now called X.

She’s telling us that social media platforms, which are where most people get their news today, are “directly speaking to millions of people without any level of oversight or regulation, and that has to stop.”

That means, in her view, all voices must be sifted through a filter. The question becomes, who should we allow to be the official filter of news and information? Who should be allowed to be the overseer? I think Kamala is pretty clear on that. It’s the government. And that is as anti-American and unconstitutional as you can get.

But it’s not just Kamala Harris who thinks this way. This is the majority viewpoint among the self-appointed globalist elites worldwide.

Robert Reich, the former secretary of the U.S. Department of Labor under Bill Clinton, said in an August 30th op-ed for The Guardian that Elon Musk should be dealt with harshly for his commitment to free speech on his X platform, which Reich described as “out of control.”

Reich listed six things that can be done to “rein him in,” and one of them was for governments around the world to “threaten Musk with arrest if he doesn’t stop disseminating lies and hate on X.” He cited France’s arrest of Telegram CEO Pavel Durov last week as the model for what should be done to Musk and anyone else who dares to question the official globalist narratives on key issues such as vaccines, LGBTQ issues, certain election results, NATO’s wars of aggression, etc.

Current Secretary of State Antony Blinken said in a July 2 statement that his department is working to create a program run by AI that will scan the internet looking for posts that counter the government’s official narratives (he calls it disinformation) and then somehow punish or marginalize the authors of the unauthorized remarks.

Only outright communists and techno-tyrants would admit to supporting such authoritarian ideas and concepts.

Unfortunately, that’s what today’s puppet politicians have become as they continue to shill for the globalists at the World Economic Forum and United Nations. Both the WEF and UN are in the midst of a global campaign to wipe out all voices of dissent and redefine them as criminals. The regimes in China, North Korea, Iran and Cuba have never allowed people to speak critically of government authorities so nothing is changing there. It’s the Western so-called “democracies” that are in the crosshairs of this global campaign.

Will you submit to this beast system? Or will you double down on courage and speak truth to power, submitting only to the higher authority of God and His Son, Jesus Christ?

©2024. Leo Hohmann. All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLE: ROOKE: Kamala’s Campaign Crossed The Line, And Now She’s Paying The Price


Please visit Leo’s Newsletter Substack.

Kamala Harris Hates You, and Wants You to Shut Up and Do What She Says

It has been clear for quite some time that the Biden-Harris regime is no friend of the freedom of speech and dislikes the idea of dissent. It has tried on more than one occasion to curtail Americans’ Constitutional freedoms, all under the guise of protecting us. Making us blind slaves of the authoritarian state will save “our democracy,” you see. And now Kamala Harris, in complaining about free speech on X (formerly Twitter), has made it clear: her administration would be frankly and unapologetically authoritarian. It would, in short, be the end of America as a free society, and Kamala and her minions would say “Good riddance.”

As the far-left Brazilian government shut down X in order to silence dissidents in that country, Harris signaled that she was considering doing the same thing here if she wins in November. In a video that circulated on X Friday, we see Harris telling Jake Tapper: “He has, he has lost his privileges and it should be taken down.” It’s unclear whom she has in mind for this punishment, but the more she talks, the more it seems likely that she was referring to Elon Musk, and to taking down X.

Harris continued: “And the bottom line is that you can’t say that you have one rule for Facebook and you have a different rule for Twitter. The same rule has to apply, which is that there has to be, a, uh, er, uh, a responsibility that is placed on these social media sites to understand their power. They are directly speaking to millions and millions of people without any level of, of, of oversight or regulation. And that has to stop.”

WATCH: Kamala will shut down X if she wins

Ever since Elon Musk took over Twitter/X, it has broken out of the lockstep in which the other social media giants march. They all went along willingly, and even eagerly, with the Biden regime’s determination to silence COVID dissidents, although Mark Zuckerberg has now broken ranks and claimed that he would have stood for the freedom of speech, but ultimately buckled under heavy pressure from the regime. Zuckerberg’s new stance strains credulity, especially in light of the fact that after Musk made Twitter/X into a bastion of the freedom of speech, Zuckerberg went so far as to set up a shadow Twitter called Threads, where users were warned openly that they might be silenced if their speech displeased the political elites.

Now Harris is calling for all the social media giants to march in lockstep again, just as they did in the good old days before Musk muddied the waters by disrupting their unanimity and at least slowing the progression toward total authoritarian control of speech. Harris wants the social media giants to submit to “oversight” and “regulation,” which means they will say what the leftist intelligentsia wants them to say, and only that. Other voices will be deplatformed, marginalized, and silence, just as they were everywhere before Musk and still are on most platforms.

This is just the latest indication of this regime’s authoritarian bent. In addition to its work for censorship on social media, the Biden-Harris regime is the first presidential administration to see its principal opponent indicted, and on charges that many see as flimsy and politically motivated. The Biden-Harris regime also tried and failed to establish a Disinformation Governance Board that would have effectively stamped out opposition to regime policies by labeling such opposition “disinformation” and silencing it accordingly.

Harris would no doubt insist, if she were suddenly overcome by a bout of coherence, that all she wants to do is helping the public by distinguishing truth from “disinformation.” The glaring problem with this claim is that what the regime and its henchmen call “disinformation” has more than once turned out to consist of truths that were inconvenient for the regime’s agenda and policies.  One of the most notorious examples of this came in 2020, when Twitter, in an all-out effort to ensure that Biden would win the presidency, labeled the Hunter Biden laptop story “disinformation” and censored it accordingly. Fifty-one top intelligence professionals, all also avid to elect Biden, agreed that the laptop was “disinformation,” and Russian disinfo to boot, and that was that. Except the laptop was real.

We could soon be seeing many more instances of truths that harm the leftist elites being censored. The New York Post reported as far back as last February that the Biden-Harris regime was “spending millions on artificial intelligence research designed to make anti ‘misinformation’ tools which could then be passed to social media giants.” “Misinformation,” that is, in the eyes of the far-left wonks who are working on this project, and their overseers within the regime.

As always, such initiatives stem from a frank contempt for the American people, as does Harris’ taste for oversight and regulation of the only social media platform that allows for views that dissent from those of the dominant left. Harris and her fellow leftist elitists hold the American people in utter contempt, believing that we’re simply too stupid to be trusted to know right from wrong and choose our leaders properly. So Harris stands ready to silence dissent and make all our decisions for us, in accord with the will of her own handlers. That’s how totalitarian regimes work.

AUTHOR

 

RELATED ARTICLES:

Dems endorse plan to offer amnesty to illegal aliens who were deported under Trump and invite them back to US

Black Californians warn of ‘direct impact’ on Harris’ election chances after Democrats kill slavery reparations bills

RFK Jr. sues North Carolina to remove name from ballot — they’re keeping it on to throw the state to Harris

RELATED VIDEOS:

RFK Jr, exposes Kamala Harris with this video

Donald Trump pledges to ‘expose’ Kamala Harris at first debate

Watch How CNN Treated J.D. Vance vs How They Treated Kamala and Walz

Hugh Hewitt: Harris’ ‘Word Salad’ on CNN Tells Us She Doesn’t Have the Minimum Skill Set to Be POTUS

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

In a World Obsessed with Feelings, Whose Feelings Matter?

Globalism is a replacement ideology that seeks to reorder the world into one singular, planetary Unistate, ruled by the globalist elite. The globalist war on nation-states cannot succeed without collapsing the United States of America. The long-term strategic attack plan moves America incrementally from constitutional republic to socialism to globalism to feudalism. The tactical attack plan uses asymmetric psychological and informational warfare to destabilize Americans and drive society out of objective reality into the madness of subjective reality. America’s children are the primary target of the globalist predators.


Hidden deep within the Gospel of Yuval Harari is the question “Do children belong to their parents or to the state?” Harari’s position clearly favors the state, because the “intelligent design” he describes is an arm of the state body politic. To repeat what he said at the World Economic Forum’s Annual Meeting in Davos on January 24, 2020:

In the coming decades, AI and biotechnology will give us godlike abilities to reengineer life, and even to create completely new life-forms. After four billion years of organic life shaped by natural selection, we are about to enter a new era of inorganic life shaped by intelligent design.

Harari’s “evolutionary” biology sees human beings as hackable animals whose future will be shaped by artificial intelligence, biotechnology, and the reengineering of life into new life-forms. The new life-forms Harari refers to are transhumanist beings totally controlled by the globalist elite—the “intelligent designers.”

To “transcend” means to go beyond the range or limits of something. Transhuman means going beyond the current limits of being human and acquiring the powers and abilities of an enhanced human being in what the World Economic Forum calls “Humanity 2.0″—the stated goal of “intelligent design.” Harari’s narrative is grooming your children for Humanity 2.0.

To understand the insidious plan to move humanity from Humanity 1.0 to Humanity 2.0, it is necessary to examine the tactical shift away from meritocracy—the traditional metric of achievement foundational to American life, progress, and success.

In a society that eliminates meritocracy by shifting its metrics from achievement to feelings, whose feelings actually matter? What is the political purpose of the shift?

Competence is the mother of self-esteem. We know this is true by simply observing the delight of young children as they learn to dress themselves, feed themselves, or sound out their first words and realize they can read! Each achievement increases the child’s competence and enhances his developing sense of self. Achievement makes little Johnny feel proud of himself and good about himself. Let’s consider what incentivizes competence and achievement, and what doesn’t. Let’s also consider the motivations for either incentivizing or discouraging competence.

If you want to know the motive, look at the result. What made America great was having its cultural roots in meritocracy. Our society awarded achievement with upward mobility. It was called the American Dream, and America was the land where American dreams came true. In every sector of society, little Johnny was encouraged to become an independent, autonomous, rational adult, capable of living a life of ordered liberty in our constitutional republic. In other words, little Johnny was encouraged to grow up and perpetuate the American Dream.

Each of little Johnny’s achievements was rewarded with praise. As he grew older, he earned grades in school that marked his achievements. Then he competed in sports with friends, and games with family. His grades were awarded with certificates of achievement or advanced placement. His sports achievements were awarded with trophies, and his wins in family games were rewarded with admiration.

The competitions all served to incentivize achievement. As an adult, Johnny competed for jobs and advancement. Winning and losing were part of everybody’s private and public life. Meritocracy was society’s infrastructure, rooted in achievement. Those who lost were encouraged to try harder, work harder, study more, and try again.

The association between individual achievement and self-esteem was unmistakable. Winning and losing were part of America’s infrastructure that anyone and everyone could identify with. Individual and team play were instrumental in teaching the valuable lessons of cooperation and teamwork. This is no small thing. Whether in a classroom, on a baseball field, or in an orchestra hall, competition encourages both individual and team competence, cooperation, and achievement.

In the 1970s, ABC’s Wide World of Sports announcer Jim McKay immortalized the words “the thrill of victory and the agony of defeat.” His words described the drama caught on televised sports, but they also apply to the everyday lives of everyday people, describing how it feels to win and how it feels to lose. In the past, American culture supported a can-do spirit of encouragement, an ethos that insisted the agony of defeat need not triumph: anyone and everyone could experience the thrill of victory through hard work and practice. It was the same ethos that made America the greatest, freest, wealthiest nation on Earth.

But we are a world at war, whether people acknowledge it or not—a war between globalism and the nation-state. The globalist war on the nation-state is a multifaceted culture war, fought without bullets, that targets the world’s children. In an unconscionable humanitarian hoax, the globalist social engineers advanced the deceitful narrative that little Johnny’s feelings must always be protected.

To remind the reader, a humanitarian hoax is the deliberate and deceitful tactic of presenting a destructive policy as altruistic. The humanitarian huckster presents himself as a compassionate advocate when in fact he is the disguised enemy. America’s humanitarian hucksters, under the guidance of the globalist social engineers, simply eliminated competition in order to “protect” little Johnny’s feelings. No winning. No losing. No grades. No competition. No incentive for achievement. No competence. No self-esteem. No thrill of victory. Participation trophies do not incentivize achievement; they just blur the boundary between trying and doing.

Eliminating competition does not protect little Johnny from hurt feelings, or save big Johnny from the agony of defeat. Eliminating competition just disincentivizes his achievements and robs him of self-esteem. It produces a society of incompetent, dependent, childlike, fragile citizens who are very easy to manipulate and control—precisely the goal of a caretaker government.

We are born without the ability to survive on our own, entirely dependent upon our caretakers to teach us the necessary survival skills to live in society. Today, a battle is being fought in America over who are the rightful caretakers of our nation’s children.

Historically, it was the parents who had the responsibility to protect their children and prepare them for life in our constitutional republic. Increasingly, the caretakers in America are no longer the parents, because the traditional family of stay-at-home Mom and working Dad is no longer the norm. Non-traditional families are reliant on daycare, preschools, babysitters, and after-school programs to provide child care and instruction for America’s children.

Since 1979, when Jimmy Carter established the Department of Education, the government began taking an increasingly active role in children’s education. Today, the National Education Association (NEA),[i] the largest professional-employee organization in America, with over 3 million members, is a major political player. Ninety-seven percent of its millions of dollars in donations from membership dues go to Democrat and liberal political candidates. The politicization of American education is funded by labor unions as well as federal and state funding. A stunning March 31, 2023, article by journalist and political analyst Daniel Greenfield, “Whose Children? Our Children,”[ii] asserts:

The shift from the single-income family to the two-income family with preschool encompassing children as young as 18 months and then to an ever more intensive chain of state educational institutions happened gradually enough that most parents thought it was their own idea. But what the Soviet Union and Communist China had failed to accomplish, happened in America.

Children, from even before they could talk, were being raised either directly by the state or by the institutions that it closely regulated. The unintended consequences of that, emotional fragility, a lack of healthy models for interpersonal relationships, and an obsession with ‘snitching’ on others that persists well into adulthood, were only the collateral damage….

Such children raised by the state become adults who want the state to go on raising them. When they’re hungry, the state feeds them, when they’re cold, the state shelters them and when they’re unhappy, the state tells them whom to blame. When their relationships fall apart or when their feelings are hurt, they turn to the state to soothe them with a dose of revenge.

The infantilization of America is a leftist/globalist weapon of mass destruction. The American Dream has been replaced by regressive dreams for eternal childhood. The old Soviet Union and today’s Communist China share the collectivist ideology that prioritizes the state above the individual, so what is good for the state is good for the individual. America has increasingly adopted communism’s collectivist “ethic” and its self-destructive Marxist messaging, most evident in politicized education and medicine.

The battle over who is the rightful caretaker of America’s children is a battle over ideologies. The Biden-Obama-Harris regime has eliminated meritocracy and stopped incentivizing competence, competition, achievement, success, independence, upward mobility, and the thrill of victory to obtain the American Dream. Instead, the regime incentivizes eternal childhood, incompetence, and lifelong dependence upon the government. The objective is to destabilize and destroy America’s infrastructure of family, seen as a competing ideology, and collapse the country internally. Remember, in order to “build back better,” one must first destroy what exists.

Substituting compliance for competence is collapsing America from within. So, in the end, Johnny’s feelings don’t matter at all. Little Johnny is the target of the duplicity, being groomed to become a permanently dependent, unthinking, unproductive drone for the globalist elite—a worker bee. In a world obsessed with feelings, the only people whose feelings actually matter are the globalist elite.

©2024. Linda Goudsmit. All rights reserved.

SOURSES:

[i]  National Education Associationhttps://www.influencewatch.org/labor-union/national-education-association-nea/

[ii]  Whose Children? Our Childrenhttp://www.danielgreenfield.org/2023/03/whose-children-our-children.html?utm_source=MadMimi&utm_medium=email&utm_content=Daniel+Greenfield+Article:+Whose+Children?+Our+Children&utm_campaign=20230331_m172639745_Daniel+Greenfield+Article:+(post_title)&utm_term=Whose+Children_3F+Our+Children


• Space Is No Longer the Final Frontier—Reality Is is available in paperback, hardback, and eBook formats on barnesandnoble.comamazon.com, and directly from Ingram in paperback.


Please visit Linda’s Pundicity page: goudsmit.pundicity.com  and her website: lindagoudsmit.com 

WATCH: Kamala Will Shut Down Twitter If Elected

“The principle of free speech is not concerned with the content of a man speech and does not protect only the expression of good ideas, but all ideas. If it were otherwise who would determine which ideas are good and which are forbidden? The government?” — Ayn Rand

“If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.” ― George Orwell

“Censorship is to art as lynching is to justice.” ― Henry Louis Gates Jr.

“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.” ― Theodore Roosevelt


The concept of political rights is vanishing.

Kamala is a silly, incompetent placeholder for a totalitarian party systematically taking down the only republic in human history based on individual rights and freedoms.

When you lose the distinction between action and speech, you lose, eventually, the freedom of both.

Freedom of speech is worth fighting for, worth dying for. Our once-great nation was founded on it, and it’s the hill we must die on.

Freedom of speech is the foundation of a free society. Without it, a tyrant can wreak havoc unopposed, while his opponents are silenced.

The left cannot permit the free exchange of ideas because their failed ideas cannot stand up to scrutiny and challenge.

Putting up with being offended is essential in a pluralistic society in which people differ on basic truths. If a group will not bear being offended without resorting to violence, that group will rule unopposed while everyone else lives in fear, while other groups curtail their activities to appease the violent group. This results in the violent group being able to tyrannize the others.

If speech that offends a group is outlawed, that group has absolute power, and a free society is destroyed. A group that cannot be criticized cannot be opposed. It can work its will no matter what it is, and no one will be able to say anything to stop it.

Inoffensive speech needs no protection. The First Amendment was developed precisely in order to protect speech that was offensive to some, in order to prevent those who had power from claiming they were offended by speech opposing them and silencing the powerless.

A free society is by its nature one in which people put up with others being uncivil and offensive. The alternative is a quiet authoritarian society in which only one opinion is allowed and the others are silenced, and ultimately sent to the camps.

WATCH: Kamala will shut down X if she wins

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Trump Rips ‘Stupid People’ Allowing Illegal Migrant Gangs To Take Over Colorado Apartments, Promises “We’re Going to Get Them [The Gangs] the Hell Out of Here!”

Kamala’s Armed Illegal Migrant Gangs Have Taken Over Whole Apartment Buildings in Colorado, Evicted Tenants, Democrat Governor Ridicules Concerns

WATCH: Deranged Democrat Tries to Charge at Trump During Pennsylvania Rally

RELATED VIDEO: Gold Star family members blamed Harris for the deaths of their loved ones in Afghanistan

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. All rights reserved.

Carbon Copy of Maduro, Castro, Lula… Meet Comrade VP Kamala

There is nothing new under the sun. Everything is just copied, reworked, duplicated, and redesigned to meet the needs of the moment. Napoleon Hill, author of “Think and Grow Rich”, tells his readers that if they want to be successful, they should find a leader and copy their policies. I wonder if the DNC took Hill’s advice?  It seems as though Kamala took a few lessons from Joe, and learned to plagiarize. Kamala doesn’t have enough creativity to come up with ideas on her own. Maybe, they both have the same puppet master?

How many times have they called Trump “Hitler, a Nazi, a Fascist”? While we are looking for their new plans, programs, and policies, they are busy copying Trump.   What will they do to fix the America that they broke? Stealing the plans of Trump, maybe they should just forward her website to Trump’s policy site. It seems to me that is all they have.

During the DNC convention, we were constantly reminded of the Joy we were feeling, as our country falls apart. How much JOY there was, “Strength through Joy” is their theme.

The government will bring you joy. Really! What better JOY than to watch as the prices of everything we need escalates daily? The Joy of choosing Food, Gas, Medicine, or Rent.  The Joy of paying thousands a month to live in a shoebox.  The Joy of watching our country be invaded by 3rd world illegals, and listening to them complain that the 4-star hotel should be a 5-star hotel that Americans are paying for them to stay in. The Joy of watching America’s children give up their seat in school to a child that is taught to hate America. In the meantime, we listen to Snopes-biased garbage tell us what is True and what is False, and basically, we are wrong. It is False to believe that the DNC copied this phrase from the Nazi play book.

Please look it up. “Strength Through Joy

Well guess where that phrase Strength Through Joy come from?

We see what can beunburdened by what has been.”

I was determined to find out where this phrase came from. This phrase is a modified version or interpretation of the verbiage from Communist leader Mao Tse-tung (Zedong), a motto of his regime to justify killing or starving millions in an attempt to bring about a socialist utopia in China.

Have you noticed that every Kamala solution for the mess she creates, ends in the destruction of the very program she proposes to fix?  This is because it is the goal of the Communists to destroy the West.. They hate free thought. You can’t show the group you are trying to conquer that, if they learn the skill of individual free thought, they won’t need the government. Their want us to believe that we are too stupid to exist without the government. So in the name of fixing things, they instead, destroy.

Kamala’s tax proposal to tax unearned income will cause the loss of private property.  In order for us to pay for the invaders, she intends to tax the equity of our property, regardless of whether or not we sold it.  Example; You bought a house for $200,000. The next year it is valued at $300,000. You made $100,000 if you sell it. Whoa, not in Kamala’s eyes!

You owe taxes on $100,000 whether or not you sold the house! 25% please,  or $25,000, where are you getting $25,000.m? What happens if the house drops in value the next year? Will the government give you back that money? HA. Not in this lifetime!! Many people use the equity in their homes to start a business. How can you do that if you start out owning the government money?

The Education Unions have destroyed the schools. Hatred of family and country is taught daily. This is evident by the amount of uneducated gangs we see in our cities.

Regarding the wonderful border bill everyone is bitching about, supported by the RINOS, Globalists, and Commie Dems in Congress:  Did you ever read it? It guarantees 5K illegals a day, that we, the taxpayer in debt for $35Trillion, have to pay for.

It gives no money to complete the Wall and turned CBP into application takers, with no power to turn anyone away, since there could be no vetting. It guarantees more drugs and cartel members flood America. But not to worry, it’s DTJ’s fault for not passing it. Last I looked,  DJT is not President.

Why are there massive amounts of murders, rapes, robberies, car jacs and cartel members in America? (Rapes have increased 60% in the U.S.). Oh, I forgot, the MSM says we are crazy, again. Many people don’t believe the crime exists, because MSM doesn’t report it. They want us to believe that crime is down.

Sorry, the invaders are here doing their job to harm, scare, rob, rape, and kill the Americans. Joe and Kamala invited them and does not prosecute them, turning a blind eye to the crimes they commit. In America, immigrants have a permanent Get-Out-Of-Jail-Free card, no matter what they do.

Aurora is not the only city in America with violence!

WATCH:

This never reported demise of America is due to the Globalist policies of outsourcing and illegal immigration. Both parties are at fault. The Defund the Police policy of the Harris administration exacerbated lawlessness.  Will she fix the problem she created? No she can’t because all of her policies rely on the people being dependent on the government programs. The programs once in place will deplete the resources of the middle class while feeding the upper class. That is called communism.

As more people investigate and realize what these fake policies will cost them, their life/freedom, liberty and prosperity, they are beginning to turn to MAGA. Trump is just a place holder putting in place policies that will enable MAGA to grow and prosper on their own.

This week we have 2 wonderful people who escaped communism. They will tell you their life experience. Hopefully we will be smart enough not to experience the same.

Make sure you vote. Is America worth saving? Do everything you can to energize you and your family and friends to vote.  Your life and freedoms depend upon it. Over the weekend listen to the show.

©2024. Karen Schoen. All rights reserved.


Join the Florida Citizens Alliance  goflca.org    Help save America mentor a child.

Show Link https://www.americaoutloud.news/the-prism-of-americas-education/

Show: Sat and Sun 7AM ET and 5PM ET on  https://www.americaoutloud.news/

Podcasts and Articles:    karenbschoen.com      karenschoen.substack.com

Guest:  Jennifer Zeng, was born in Sichuan province, China in 1966. She was arrested four times and held as a prisoner of conscience in a labor camp for a year.  In the camp, she was physically and mentally abused, and subjected to attempted brainwashing and electroshock treatment.  She fled China in 2001 for Australia, wrote a book about her experiences, and eventually settled in the United States.  There is also a documentary about her life.  You can find Jennifer’s current reporting on China and her other work on the Web at JenniferZengBlog.com and on her YouTube channel (Inconvenient Truths by Jennifer Zeng 2.0).

Websites:  Inconvenient TruthsJennifer’s World

Guest:   Ciprian Ivanof, was born in communist Romania to ethnic Russian parents in a poor village. He got sick, was put in the notoriously bad orphanage system, and then was adopted after the fall of communism. He lived in poor neighborhoods in DC, moved back to post-communist Romania from 2001-2006, studied History at the University of Minnesota Twin-Cities, and then studied law at American University in DC.

Email:  ciprian.ivanof@gmail.com

Guest:  Chris Wright, is an independent liberty activist in the leadership of Potomac Tea Party, a national Tea Party based in Northern Virginia. He founded and is president of the first and only nonprofit formed to empower grassroots activists with small financial grants.  He founded the Anticommunism Action Team (ACAT) in 2013 to counter communist influence at home and abroad.  ACAT’s Speakers Bureau has presented to the Heritage Foundation and Leadership Institute, and been on Breitbart and LevinTV.  Mr. Wright has also formed a number of national teams fighting the Woke Mob

How I Get the Word Out You can help!

I had an engaging conversation with a young Millennial the other day and she was fascinated by the breadth and content of my involvement in several societal issues. (These are topics like our Energy options, the truth about Climate, K-12 Education, Election Integrity, our Health Policies [e.g., COVID], Science, Religion, etc.)

She then asked: How do you communicate all the good information you have, so that more people can profit from it? That’s a great question! What good are insightful ideas if few people know about them?

My answer was, here are some ways that I’m trying to communicate with the public:

1 – I have three major websites where there are studies, articles, videos, and other worthwhile materials pertaining to the website’s topic (WiseEnergy.orgElection-Integrity.info, and C19Science.info).

2 – I have published a twice-a-month Media Balance Newsletter for fifteen (15) years now! In each of these, I pass on what I believe are interesting studies, reports, and articles (generally from other people) about the topics I cover. I emphasize having materials that you will not likely find in mainstream media. Although it takes me a LOT of time to research and put together every issue, it’s free. To my knowledge, there is no other publication like this in the US.

Note: I’ve given permission for several sites to republish my Newsletter — e.g., Dr. Rich Swier and Master Resource. These increase the coverage, and the more citizens are educated, the better our chances are of prevailing on these issues. If you’d like to republish my Newsletter, please send me an email.

3 – I have a Substack column (here!) where I write commentary roughly twice a week. The subject is Critically Thinking about Select Societal Issues. Although most Substack authors charge for their content, mine is free.

Check out the Archives of my Substack, which is a chronological list of my prior commentaries over the last 2± years. You can easily search these by topic (e.g., “wind energy”).

4 – I have written over a hundred articles, that have been published in other sources. For example, this post on the popular Master Resource blog has reportedly had more views than any other article they have published since its inception. (Note: I do this less now that most of my writings appear in this Substack column.)

5 – In some cases I’ve put together Reports, which are much more detailed research and analyses of important topics. Here is an example, which is about fixing our K-12 education system. I list some of these in my Newsletter, and periodically here.

6 – I have given well over a hundred talks in the US and Canada, on a variety of issues (Energy to Education to Election Integrity). For example, I spoke at the world famous Chautauqua Institution, on election integrity.) I’ve never charged for any of those.

7 – I have been on over two hundred podcasts, radio, and TV shows. These cover the same topics I cover — and here is a relatively recent example, from Australia.

8 – Personal interactions. These would be communications via emails, texts, phone calls and/or in-person discussions — like I was having with this young lady. Although I get 200+ emails a day, I peruse them all and respond where it seems appropriate.

9 – Due to severe time constraints, etc., I’m very selective about what organizations I belong to. For example, I’m a member of the CO2 Coalition as they appreciate and pass on my contributions. They have a committee on K-12 education, which I actively participate in.

10- I support political candidates who are on the same page about these societal issues. I often communicate with them so that their understanding of such matters is more refined.

A good example is that I am actively working with underdog Conservative candidate, Michele Morrow, to help her become the next North Carolina Superintendent of K-12 schools. (Your financial support would be greatly appreciated!)

11 – Misc. For example, I have been appointed to a State (NC) Commission. This gives me an opportunity to not only share my views, but to also have some small influence on state policies (in this case energy matters).

12 – YOU! Yes, you are the most important vehicle for countering mainstream media misinformation.

I’m a BIG believer that informed allies working together is what’s needed to win on these important issues. In other words, the more good people who are current on societal issues, the better our chances are of fixing them. Your help in getting your friends and associates signed up for the Newsletter and this Substack is appreciated and helpful. (See this recent commentary where I offered some incentives!)

©2024. John Droz, Jr. All rights reserved.


Here are other materials by this scientist that you might find interesting:

Check out the Archives of this Critical Thinking substack.

WiseEnergy.orgdiscusses the Science (or lack thereof) behind our energy options.

C19Science.infocovers the lack of genuine Science behind our COVID-19 policies.

Election-Integrity.infomultiple major reports on the election integrity issue.

Media Balance Newsletter: a free, twice-a-month newsletter that covers what the mainstream media does not do, on issues from COVID to climate, elections to education, renewables to religion, etc. Here are the Newsletter’s 2024 Archives. Please send me an email to get your free copy. When emailing me, please make sure to include your full name and the state where you live. (Of course, you can cancel the Media Balance Newsletter at any time – but why would you?