Iran to Hang Abused Child Bride — World Must Stop This!

/in , , , , , , , , , , , , , , /by

Halt the Execution of Goli Kouhkan Now

The Islamic Republic of Iran stands poised to unleash yet another atrocity, dangling the life of Goli Kouhkan — a 25-year-old Baluch warrior forged in the fires of child marriage and unrelenting abuse — from the gallows of injustice. This regime, a fortress of oppression built on the bones of women, children, and ethnic minorities, condemns her to death for daring to strike back against her tormentor. The United Nations human rights experts roar in unison: Iran must smash this execution order to pieces, or etch another bloodstain on its tyrannical ledger. Kouhkan’s blade in 2018 ended her husband’s reign of terror, but Iran’s courts — blind to her scars, deaf to her cries — branded her a murderer under their twisted qisas (Retaliation) law. This is no justice; this is state-sanctioned slaughter.

Goli Kouhkan’s saga erupts from the depths of hellish tradition. At just 12 years old, this undocumented Baluch girl was sold like chattel into marriage with her cousin — a predator who crushed her spirit and body without mercy. By 13, she birthed a child in agony, denied even the whisper of medical aid, her illiterate mind trapped in isolation. For years, she toiled as a farm laborer under the lash of physical beatings, sexual violations, and psychological warfare. Her family? They abandoned her to the wolves, rejecting her pleas for escape. Society’s chains — discriminatory divorce laws, the threat of honor killings — locked her in tighter. Undocumented and voiceless, she navigated a labyrinth of ethnic marginalization and gender warfare, where Baluch women like her are erased from state protections, education, and basic humanity.

In 2018, the storm broke. During a brutal confrontation, Kouhkan defended herself and her child, felling her abuser. Iranian interrogators pounced, coercing a confession from her lips without a shred of legal counsel. Now, at 25, she faces the noose unless her husband’s family pockets 10 billion tomans — roughly $90,000 in blood money. She can’t pay; poverty seals her fate. This isn’t retribution; it’s a rigged auction where women’s lives are bartered to the highest bidder. UN experts thunder: “Her execution would constitute a grave violation of international human rights law.” They expose the rot: Iran’s qisas system discriminates ruthlessly based on gender and wealth, executing survivors while shielding abusers.

Kouhkan’s torment mirrors a genocide against women in Iran. Between 2010 and 2024, the regime hanged at least 241 women, 114 under qisas for homicide. The vast majority? Victims like Kouhkan, who killed husbands or partners in self-defense after enduring child marriages, forced unions, and endless violence. Iranian courts obliterate evidence of abuse, ignoring self-defense claims and patterns of terror. Domestic violence thrives unchecked – no shelters, no laws, no escape. Women fleeing face death at the family’s hands or state execution. This intersects with ethnic erasure: Baluch, Kurdish, and other minorities suffer amplified horrors, denied documentation, services, and justice. UN Rapporteur Mai Sato and her allies declare: “This is a woman who was sold into marriage as a child, brutalized for years, and then abandoned by her family and the justice system.” They condemn the regime’s failure to protect, its bias that turns survivors into criminals.

The experts — Reem Alsalem on violence against women, Tomoya Obokata on slavery, and the Working Group on discrimination against women and girls — hammer the truth: Kouhkan embodies systemic genocide. “Goli Kouhkan is a survivor of domestic violence and a victim of the justice system,” they proclaim. “Her execution would represent a profound injustice.” They’ve bombarded Iranian authorities with demands for intervention, exposing how gender, ethnicity, and poverty forge chains of doom. Child marriage isn’t a relic; it’s a weapon, stripping girls of childhood, health, and freedom. Kouhkan’s case shatters illusions: Iran’s theocracy weaponizes law to crush the vulnerable, executing those who fight back while abusers walk free.

This outrage demands global fury. The world must not whisper condolences; it must unleash a torrent of pressure. Governments, activists, human rights warriors – rise and bombard Tehran with ultimatums. Halt Kouhkan’s execution now, or stand condemned as accomplices to murder. Provide her sanctuary, compensation, and a path to rebuild. Dismantle the qisas abomination, enact ironclad protections against child marriage and domestic terror. Iran’s regime thrives on silence; shatter it with thunderous condemnation. Kouhkan’s life hangs by a thread — cut it, and the blood floods the streets of history.

But this fight surges beyond one woman. Iran’s women rise like a tidal wave, defying veils of oppression in protests that shake the mullahs’ thrones. From Mahsa Amini’s martyrdom to the underground networks smuggling hope, resistance boils. Kouhkan’s survival fuels that fire, proving no chain unbreakable. The UN’s call echoes: Spare her, comply with human rights covenants, end this barbarism. Failure? It cements Iran’s rogue status, inviting sanctions, isolation, and the wrath of free peoples.

Goli Kouhkan endures as a beacon of defiance. Her story scorches the regime’s facade, revealing a machine that devours its daughters. We declare: No more. Halt the execution. Liberate the oppressed. The revolution against this tyranny ignites today – unyielding, absolute, victorious.

©2025 . All rights reserved.

Meta’s X-Rated Secret Exposed in Court

/in , , , , , , , , , , , , , , /by

How Silicon Valley protected predators while pretending to protect children.

When people talk about protecting kids online, Silicon Valley executives usually picture themselves as the heroes. They give congressional speeches. They release glossy “safety reports.” They hold press events to show how much they care.

But according to newly unsealed testimony, the world’s biggest social media company quietly tolerated one of the evilest crimes imaginable.

Not once. Not twice. But sixteen times!

The unredacted filing from a national child-safety lawsuit reveals that Meta had a policy that allowed accounts to commit the “trafficking of humans for sex” up to sixteen violations before facing suspension.

Only the seventeenth violation triggered action.

This detail did not come from conspiracy theorists or angry parents. It came from Meta’s former head of safety and well-being, speaking under oath.

If a convenience store clerk ignored a shoplifter just once, they would be fired. Meta looked the other way over a dozen times, and only then did they consider doing something.

A system built for engagement, not safety

The testimony gets worse. The former safety leader said Instagram did not even have a clear way for users to report child sexual abuse material. Despite raising the issue repeatedly, she was told it would be too much work to fix and to review reports.

Too much work to stop child predators?
Never too much work to push through paperwork?

And that is the heart of the story. Whenever Meta studied ways to make teens safer, the company repeatedly abandoned the reforms if they hurt engagement numbers.

When you boil it down, the company protected the addictive machinery, not the children caught inside it.

A child-safety crisis created in Silicon Valley

These revelations were revealed in a sweeping lawsuit filed by school districts, attorneys general, and parents who say Big Tech is fueling a youth mental-health crisis by designing platforms that are dangerous by nature.

Meta’s response has been predictable. Their spokesperson called the allegations “misleading” and insisted the company has made “real changes.”

If the testimony is accurate, the “real changes” came far too late, only after the public began asking questions that lawmakers should have asked ten years earlier.

Families have been told again and again that Meta is on their side. They were told the company was working to protect teens, block predators, and reduce harmful content.

Yet behind the curtain, executives were protecting engagement metrics, image filters, and corporate profits.

Children were left unprotected.

Human trafficking was given sixteen warnings.

And Silicon Valley kept cashing in.

AUTHOR

Martin Mawyer

Martin Mawyer is the President of Christian Action Network, host of the “Shout Out Patriots” podcast, and author of When Evil Stops Hiding.

©2025 . All rights reserved.

Please visit the Patriot Majority Report substack.

Subscribe for more action alerts, cultural commentary, and real-world campaigns defending faith, family, and freedom.

Democrats’ Epstein Gamble Backfires as New Document Release Expose Their Own Ties

/in , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , /by

For years, Democrats and their allies in the corporate media have seized on every opportunity to embarrass, undermine, or politically wound President Donald J. Trump. From the Russia collusion hoax — a narrative that collapsed under scrutiny — to the endless stream of negative coverage, the liberal media establishment has never hidden its bitterness over Trump’s resilience and historic comeback.

Now, they appear ready to weaponize the Jeffrey Epstein case in the same way they used the Russia narrative during Trump’s first term. For months, Democrats were agitating for the release of the remaining Epstein files, convinced that doing so would deliver a blow to Trump. The media echoed this drumbeat, framing the release as yet another opportunity to tarnish his image.

But the tables have turned.

With President Trump committed to full transparency — and with both the House and Senate having approved the release of the documents — the political winds have shifted dramatically. The emerging evidence suggests that Democrats may be far more entangled in the Epstein sphere than they expected. If there were anything in those files that could incriminate Trump, President Joe Biden’s Justice Department would have weaponized it long ago, especially during the peak of the election season when Democrats were desperate to boost Vice President Kamala Harris.

Instead, what we are seeing is deeply uncomfortable for the left.

Newly released documents reveal that during Michael Cohen’s February 2019 House Oversight testimony, Democrat Del. Stacey Plaskett exchanged messages with Epstein before, during, and after her questioning. Epstein coached her on what to ask — even instructing her to focus on Trump’s longtime assistant, Rhona Graff. When she finished, he texted back: “Good work.”

This alone should alarm anyone concerned about foreign influence, undue pressure, or shadowy connections in congressional proceedings.

Additionally, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries is now facing scrutiny after a 2013 email surfaced in which Jeffrey Epstein was invited to a Democratic dinner — raising questions about whether Jeffries sought political or financial support from Epstein.

These revelations undercut the narrative that Democrats tried to build. Instead of harming Trump, the truth appears to be swinging the spotlight squarely back onto the Democratic establishment.

The fear inside Democratic circles is obvious. They set out to weaponize the Epstein case against Trump, but now the blowback threatens to engulf their own ranks. If this political gamble ultimately exposes hypocrisy, hidden alliances, and quiet favors, Democrats may come to regret ever turning this into a Trump-centered spectacle.

And when all is said and done, I firmly believe President Trump should consider legal action against news networks and individuals who recklessly labeled him a “pedophile” in an attempt to smear his character. Free speech does not cover deliberate defamation. Actions must have consequences.

In the end, the truth is catching up — and it is not falling on Trump.

©2025 . All rights reserved.

RELATED VIDEO: Rep. Byron Donalds: Hakeem Jeffries accepted campaign money from Jeffrey Epstein in 2013

Congress Votes to RELEASE THE EPSTEIN FILES

/in , , , , , , , , , , , , , /by

Heads to Trump’s desk. Get the popcorn, the Dems are going down.

Senate unanimously agrees to send bill demanding Epstein file release to Trump’s desk.

Resolution passed both chambers with unanimous support, heads to Trump’s desk.

Trump: “I have nothing to do with Epstein. I threw him out of my club many years ago because I thought he was a sick pervert. I turned out to be right. I have a list of democrats who received money from Epstein. I’ve received NONE. The license should be REVOKED from ABC.” 🔥

Trump: “Now I just got a little report, and I put it in my pocket, of all the money that [Epstein] has given to Democrats. He gave me none… and people are wise to your hoax, and ABC — your company, your crappy company — is one of the perpetrators.”

And the dirty Dems knew – at the time – to cover their dirty deeds. Disgraced former FBI Director James Comey would purposely misspell names in his communications to prevent you from uncovering them in FOIA requests? Dr. Fauci did it too. Time for Congress to stop the practice.

Senate unanimously agrees to send bill demanding Epstein file release to Trump’s desk

Resolution passed both chambers with unanimous support, heads to Trump’s desk

By Alex Miller, Fox News, November 18, 2025 5:28pm EST

Trump threatens to pull ABC’s license after clash with reporter over Epstein files
President Donald Trump sparred with an ABC News reporter who pressed him about the Jeffrey Epstein files during his meeting with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman at the White House.

No Senate Republicans blocked an attempt to force a vote on a resolution that would compel the release of documents and files related to Jeffrey Epstein.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., made good on his vow to force a vote on the resolution just hours after it passed through the House behind a near unanimous wave of support.

Schumer argued on the floor that the Senate “should pass this bill as soon as possible, as written and without a hint of delay.”

Now, as soon as the House transfers the bill to the Senate, it will go straight to President Donald Trump’s desk for his signature.

The resolution from Reps. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., and Ro Khanna, D-Calif., would require that the Department of Justice (DOJ) release all unclassified records, documents, communications and investigative materials “publicly available in a searchable and downloadable format” related to the late financier and convicted pedophile and his accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell within 30 days of the bill being signed into law.

The Epstein fervor has not had nearly the impact in the Senate as the House, which was thrust into chaos by the bipartisan push to see the release of the files. Earlier this year, House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., put the House into recess to quell the Epstein drama and has since been accused of running from a vote on the issue.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., said that Republicans were already mulling the bill through the hotline process, which is where legislation is considered among lawmakers before making it to the floor. Thune said the plan, if the bill clears the hotline, would be to have it on the floor before lawmakers leave for Thanksgiving recess at the end of this week.

“We’ll see what the Democrats have to say,” he said. “But it’s the kind of thing, probably, that could perhaps move by unanimous consent.”

That ended up not being necessary, with bill making its way through the upper chamber without a full vote.

The calculus surrounding the Epstein bill changed in the Senate, too, given that President Donald Trump, who for months railed against attempts to release the files, threw his support behind Massie and Khanna’s legislation over the weekend.

He charged that it was a “Democrat Hoax perpetrated by Radical Left Lunatics in order to deflect from the Great Success of the Republican Party.”

Continue reading

AUTHOR

Pamela Geller

RELATED ARTICLES:

Epstein-Tied Democrat Delegate Digs Hole Even Deeper For Herself

Senate Unanimously Sends Epstein Files Bill To Trump’s Desk

Democrat Who ‘Colluded’ With Jeffrey Epstein To Face House Censure

Trump Backs House GOP in Releasing Long-Awaited Epstein Files

Epstein Files Show Close Ties With Hakeem Jeffries and Dem. Governor Pritzker

President Trump Calls on House Republicans to “Vote to Release the Epstein Files,” “We Have Nothing to Hide”

Democrat Jamie Raskin Rocked By Epstein/Maxwell Email Scheme

EPSTEIN BOMBSHELL HITS DEMS: THEY WERE TEXTING EPSTEIN DURING ANTI-TRUMP HEARING

RELATED VIDEO: Jim Jordan just went FULL NUKE on the House floor and exposed the Democrats’ latest Epstein charade

POSTS ON X:

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Modern-Day Slavery in Collier County, Florida

/in , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , /by

United States Court — Middle District of Florida

Unskilled farm labor jobs attract immigrants who are easily exploited. Many don’t know their rights or may fear calling authorities if they’re here illegally. Since 1997, the United States Department of Justice Civil Rights Division(link is external) has prosecuted several labor servitude cases in Florida, prompting one federal official to label the state “ground zero for modern slavery.”

The Tecum Case

For years, Jose Tecum stalked a girl in her Guatemalan village. In the summer of 1999, he kidnapped her.

Tecum used witchcraft, or brujeria, native to their culture to ensure that she never left his side. The girl believed she and her family would be hurt if she didn’t live with him. He raped her, locking the girl inside his house. With no police in her village, the girl had no place to get help.

Soon after, Tecum smuggled the girl to Immokalee to live with him and his wife, Maria, and their three children, to do domestic chores in the couple’s home. He destroyed her identification papers.

Tecum told the girl she would have to work in farm labor and in his home for a year to pay off the smuggling debt, demanding the girl sign over her paychecks to him. Tecum forced her to have sex with him when his wife was not at home.

In November 1999, Maria Tecum returned to find her husband with the girl in the bedroom. Maria confronted Jose and he pushed and grabbed his wife. Their domestic dispute brought authorities to the couple’s home. Jose Tecum was arrested on a battery charge and booked into the Collier jail.

The next morning the deputy went to check on Maria Tecum. There she noticed the girl Maria Tecum had found with her husband the night before. The teenager told the deputy she felt like a slave. She said:

“I don’t even have money to buy a Coca-Cola because he takes my money.”

The deputy pieced together the girl’s story and convinced her she was free to leave the Tecum home. The young woman left with a single plastic grocery bag holding all of her belongings.

A federal jury convicted Tecum of kidnapping, slavery, immigration violations, and fraud and misuse of visas.

Tecum was sentenced to nine years in federal prison.

Douglas Molloy

Assistant United States District Attorney

As an assistant United States attorney with the United States Department of Justice(link is external), Douglas Molloy prosecuted the case against Jose Tecum and continues to prosecute many others involved in human trafficking in Florida.

“One of the most compelling things that occurred during the trial had to do with information the victim divulged to the victim advocate. After he raped her, the defendant cut off a lock of her hair, telling the girl, ‘Now, I own your soul.’

The terrified victim said the defendant kept that lock of hair on him always to remind her she was his slave. When the prosecution team learned of this information, we thought: if he had it with him always, he must have had it when he was arrested, and went back to the booking sheet that listed the items taken from the defendant upon arrest.

Sure enough, one of the items listed was a plastic envelope with a lock of hair. This evidence was presented to the jury as more proof the victim was telling the truth, and the defendant found it very hard to explain his witchcraft on cross-examination.”

“Many Americans do not know that slavery still exists in their country, but as more and more people become aware, the chances a person involved in the trafficking of humans will be caught and prosecuted will be increased, and the victims of slavery will be empowered and able to have their lives and souls back.”

Why Here?

Greed and the high demand for unskilled laborers feed the spread of human trafficking in Collier County. Wealthy residents and unscrupulous hotel, spa, and restaurant owners cut expenses with indentured servants. Farm workers are often smuggled illegally in this country with the promise of good-paying jobs and are scared to report abuse. The victims are often invisible. Trafficking victims could be changing sheets at beach hotels, filling restaurant orders, or picking tomatoes.

Miami-Dade Cannabis Nursery | 6 ± Acres | 181,595 ± SF Covered Growing Space | For Sale in Miami, FL

©2025   All rights reserved.

EPSTEIN BOMBSHELL HITS DEMS: They Were Texting Epstein During Anti-Trump Hearing

/in , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , /by

Hoisted on their own petard.

The Democrats were colluding with Jeffrey Epstein to get Trump — actually texting with them during the hearings.

How is this not the biggest story in America? Democrats were texting with Jeffrey Epstein during a congressional hearing aimed at taking down Trump. The enemedia is the enemy of the people.

Newly released documents from Jeffrey Epstein’s estate, disclosed on November 13, 2025, by the House Oversight Committee, reveal that the convicted sex offender exchanged real-time text messages with Democratic Delegate Stacey Plaskett during a February 27, 2019, House hearing where she questioned Michael Cohen about Donald Trump’s associates. Epstein suggested focusing on Trump Organization figures like Rhona Graff and Allen Weisselberg, which aligned with Plaskett’s subsequent inquiries into those individuals. Plaskett’s office described the messages as one of many inputs received during the proceedings, noting her ongoing advocacy for Epstein’s victims while serving on relevant oversight committees.

And in a vote to release the files: Every Democrat voted against releasing the Epstein files.

Epstein texted with House Democrat during Cohen hearing, documents show

Newly released documents from the convicted sex offender’s estate include text messages from him that appear to influence the lawmaker’s questions to Trump’s personal attorney at a 2019 congressional hearing.

By:  Washington Post, November 15, 2025:
The newly released documents from Jeffrey Epstein’s estate show that the convicted sex offender texted with a Democratic member of Congress, Del. Stacey Plaskett of the U.S. Virgin Islands, during a congressional hearing with Michael Cohen, and that those text messages may have influenced the congresswoman’s questions of Cohen, President Donald Trump’s former personal attorney and fixer.

Continue reading

AUTHOR

Pamela Geller

RELATED ARTICLES:

Democrat Jamie Raskin Rocked By Epstein/Maxwell Email Scheme

PERKINS: The Epstein Storm That Won’t Blow Over

POSTS ON X:

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Trump Will Order DOJ To Investigate Epstein’s Links To Bill Clinton, Major Banks

/in , , , , , , , , , , , , /by

President Donald Trump said he will order the Justice Department to investigate Jeffrey Epstein’s ties to Bill Clinton and major financial institutions.

Trump said he’d direct Attorney General Pam Bondi to examine Epstein’s connections to the former president, other high-profile Democrats and a range of banks. In a Truth Social post, Trump accused Democrats of weaponizing emails released by the House Oversight Committee from the Epstein estate, dismissing the trove of thousands of messages — which include references to Trump’s own interactions with Epstein — as a “hoax.”

Trump accused Democrats of trying to spin the leaked correspondence, writing, “Now that the Democrats are using the Epstein Hoax, involving Democrats, not Republicans, to try and deflect from their disastrous SHUTDOWN, and all of their other failures, I will be asking A.G. Pam Bondi, and the Department of Justice, together with our great patriots at the FBI, to investigate Jeffrey Epstein’s involvement and relationship with Bill Clinton, Larry Summers, Reid Hoffman, JPMorgan Chase, and many other people and institutions, to determine what was going on with them, and him.”

He likened the situation to past investigations, calling it “another Russia, Russia, Russia Scam with all arrows pointing to the Democrats.”

In one email, Epstein said Trump “knew about the girls,” though he did not directly accuse him of any wrongdoing. In another, he said Trump had been to his home “many times” but “never got a massage.”

In another, Epstein, referring to Trump during his first term as president, wrote, “I am the one able to take him down,” an exchange that lacked context and occurred roughly six months before Epstein’s arrest on federal sex-trafficking charges.

JPMorgan Chase, Epstein’s banker for 15 years, agreed in 2023 to a $290 million class-action settlement with sexual abuse victims of the late child trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, and the bank did not admit liability.

Trump’s announcement follows the successful passage of a discharge petition that will enable the House to vote on the “Epstein Files Transparency Act.” The bill, introduced by Democratic California Rep. Ro Khanna and cosponsored by Republican Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie, aims to refer legislation requiring the full public release of all unclassified records related to Jeffrey Epstein to the House Rules Committee.

The final signature was secured just as Democratic Arizona Rep. Adelita Grijalva was sworn in as the newest member of the House on Wednesday. Only four Republicans in the House signed the petition, compared with 214 House Democrats: Colorado Rep. Lauren Boebert, South Carolina Rep. Nancy Mace, Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene and Massie.

The House Oversight Committee is conducting a separate investigation into how the federal government managed its probe into Epstein.

AUTHOR

Ashley Brasfield

Reporter

RELATED ARTICLES:

MAGA Isn’t Buying Pam Bondi’s Explanation On Epstein Video Footage

Judge Approves JPMorgan’s $290 Million Settlement To Nearly 200 Victims Of Jeffrey Epstein

The Latest FAILED Trump Democrat Media Hoax

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

The Latest FAILED Trump Democrat Media Hoax

/in , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , /by

I’m loathe to waste ink on the Democrats’ latest Trump hoax (Epstein, again), but ignoring it only rewards the media machine that decides—for all of us—what counts as “news.” For more than half a century, the party of destruction has gripped the American narrative in a chokehold, tearing this once-great nation down brick by brick while their stenographers in the press nod along.

Now they’re at it again. Another fabrication, conjured out of thin air, and once more the entire media ecosystem snaps to attention, dutifully amplifying the lie they’ve been handed.

The Democrat-engineered government shutdown has been crushed but the media stooges aren’t talking about that. They blew up a lie that actually, in fact, exonerates President Trump.

The Democrats’ released a redacted version of an email supplanting the name “Virginia” with “VICTIM”, knowing full well the original estate documents included “Virginia Giuffre implying Giuffre was Trump’s “victim.”

The unredacted version shows that it was Virginia Guiffre. Guiffre had testified multiple times that President Trump did nothing and that she never even saw him at Epstein’s house.

This is from Virginia Giuffre herself in a 2016 deposition:

— “Trump didn’t partake in any sex with us, and it’s not true that he flirted with me… I didn’t see him have sex with any of the girls. Trump was never in the presence of ‘other girls’.”

Their “VICTIM” Virginia Giuffre fully vindicated Donald Trump 2016 and many times in the years to come.

Democrats intentionally redacted the name of the “victim” in the Epstein emails they released.

The “release the files” crowd remind me of the “release the tax returns” crowd. There was no wrongdoing in the president’s tax returns, but they were leaked. And if there was wrongdoing by Trump in those so-called Epstein files, the question I keep asking is why wasn’t a single example of wrongdoing raised by the Biden regime or anyone else? Even now.

So, why not release the files? Exactly what “files” are they talking about? And what of Epstein’s victims? Do they get a say in whether files are released? It seems a lot more complicated to me. That said, the smearing of the president is totally unwarranted, even by his worst enemies, and certainly by his supposed friends and allies.

But media was implicated in the new emails. The New York Times:

Epstein emails: The Dems and their lapdogs with laptops cry Wolff again

By: NY Post Editorial Board, Nov. 12, 2025:

A newly released email from disgraced late financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, referencing his former companion Ghislaine Maxwell.

What a low and cynical move by Democrats on the House Oversight Committee — releasing just enough of a Jeffrey Epstein email early Wednesday to inspire the most hysterical possible Trump-smearing coverage.

Even as they knew the full facts told a completely different story.

Of course all manner of “responsible” media played along: These lapdogs with laptops offered a host of headlines with some variation of “Trump spent hours alone with Epstein victim” — dirt that in this age of the internet will be the lasting impression many Americans take away, even though it’s centrally false.

Specifically, Dems circulated this carefully redacted email from the vile procurer:

“i want you to realize that that dog that hasn’t barked is trump..[VICTIM] spent hours at my house with him ,, he has never once been mentioned.”

Looks terrible — until you learn that [VICTIM] is the late Virginia Giuffre, who had worked for Trump before she fell into Epstein’s clutches, and had publicly said time and again that the future president never misbehaved in the least toward her.

Plus: Since Giuffre is dead, and so can’t possibly be hurt by any revelations, the only reason to block out her name was to conceal the fact that this gun had no smoke.

Fact is, the full record shows plainly that Epstein hated Trump, resentful that The Donald banned him from Mar-a-Lago long before even his first conviction.

Indeed, another email Dems released confirms that: In a 2016 exchange where salacious gossip-fabricating “journalist” Michael Wolff seems to have been advising Epstein on how to blackmail Trump, the sex criminal admits “trump said he asked me to resign,” then claims “he knew about the girls as he asked ghislaine to stop.”

(The Democrats expect people to trust Epstein’s word, since they’ll believe anyone as long he’s smearing Orange Man.)

After Dems’ bomb dropped, the White House rushed to get the full facts out, and the committee Republicans released 20,000 pages of Epstein documents to let the public see a far fuller story and so decide for itself — but too late to prevent the initial smear from making a vital first impression.

Indeed, it looks like the committee Dems released their carefully-curated smear precisely to minimize the impact of the full record, which includes (for example) emails that make ex-President Bill Clinton look bad.

Dems have done this “boy who cried wolf (ahem, Wolff)” routine so many times with “new Trump scandals” that no reasonable outlet should run claims like this without extensive checking to get the full, real story — but the media still went crazy Wednesday morning.

Continued…..

Technofog breaks it down:

Another day, another Democrat attempt to tie Donald Trump to Jeffrey Epstein.

This time, it comes from Epstein’s emails – one with his disgraced criminal co-conspirator, Ghislaine Maxwell, and others with serial fabricator and author Michael Wolff.

In a 2011 email between Epstein and Maxwell, Epstein alleges that Virginia Giuffre “spent hours at my house” with Trump. Epstein further alleges the “dog that hasn’t barked is trump.” Here is the email in full:

Of course, context is necessary. Epstein’s email contains serious allegations – allegations that were denied by Virginia Giuffre, the redacted “Victim” named in the email.

Giuffre was deposed in November 2016 as part of her lawsuit against Ghislaine Maxwell. You can read excerpts from her deposition here (starts on page 12).

Giuffre was asked specific questions about Donald Trump – his familiarity with Epstein, whether Trump committed any wrongdoing, etc. And Giuffre cleared Trump. Here are the relevant excerpts from a discussion about Giuffre’s previous interview with a reporter:

Q. All right. What’s inaccurate about the last statement on that page?

Giuffre: “Donald Trump was also a good friend of Jeffrey’s.” That part is true.” “He didn’t partake in any” of — “any sex with any of us but he flirted with me.” It’s true that he didn’t partake in any sex with us, and but it’s not true that he flirted with me. Donald Trump never flirted with me.

Giuffre: Then the next sentence is, “He’d laugh and tell Jeffrey, ‘you’ve got the life.’” I never said that to her.

Q. When you say, “he didn’t partake in any sex with any of us,” who is “us”?

Giuffre: Girls. Just —

Q. How do you know who Donald Trump — Trump had sex with?

Giuffre: Oh, I didn’t physically see him have sex with any of the girls, so I can’t say who he had sex with in his whole life or not, but I just know it wasn’t with me when I was with other girls.

Q. And who were the other girls that you were with in Donald Trump’s presence?

Giuffre: None. There — I worked for Donald Trump, and I’ve met him probably a few times.

Q. When have you met him?

Giuffre: At Mar-a-Lago. My dad and him, I wouldn’t say they were friends, but my dad knew him and they would talk all the time — well, not all the time but when they saw each other.

Q. Have you ever been in Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein’s presence with one another?

Giuffre: No.

Q. What is your basis for your statement that Donald Trump is a good friend of Jeffrey’s?

Giuffre: Jeffrey told me that Donald Trump is a good friend of his.

Q. But you never observed them together?

Giuffre: No, that that I can actually remember. I mean, not off the top of my head, no.

Q. When did Donald Trump flirt with you?

Giuffre: He didn’t. That’s what’s inaccurate.

Q. Did you ever see Donald Trump at Jeffrey’s home?

Giuffre: Not that I can remember.

There you have it. Trump never flirted with or had relations with Virginia Giuffre. She never saw Trump in Epstein’s presence or at his residence. She never saw Trump or met with Trump outside of Mar-a-Lago – certainly not at Epstein’s home.

But the fabrications don’t stop there. From another email released today, in 2019, Epstein would spin a different story about Trump: that Epstein was never asked to resign because he was not a member, that “of course he [Trump] knew about the girls as he asked ghislaine to stop.”

But that’s false – Epstein was a member. And as we know from Trump’s own statements and from reporting from anti-Trump authors of “The Grifter’s Club: Trump, Mar-a-Lago, and the Selling of the Presidency”, Trump banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago after Epstein was hitting on the teenage daughter of a club member.

And as to asking Ghislaine “to stop”? It is public knowledge that Epstein/Maxwell were recruiting spa workers from Mar-a-Lago – Trump last discussed that issue this past summer. That was part of the dispute between Trump and Esptein. There is no allegation that Trump or anyone else at Mar-a-Lago knew of Epstein’s true motives.

Finally, there are these emails between Epstein and Wolff, where Wolff tips Epstein off to CNN’s planned questions to Trump about Epstein. When asked by Epstein what Trump’s answer should be, Wolff suggests: “I think you should let him hang himself.” Wolff further explains how Trump could potentially blackmail Trump, depending on Trump’s answers.

It should be noted that Wolff does not mention scandalous ties between Epstein and Trump that could be used as leverage. Instead, Wolff references Trump and Epstein’s connection (by way of a home or plane) that predated the disclose of Epstein’s crimes. It was a plan of guilt by association, not guilt from any of Trump’s conduct.

Add to that the fact that Wolff is assisting Epstein with public relations advice against Trump. A real upstanding member of the media.

Here’s a different slant: this is not a Trump scandal but a Democrat scandal.

Virginia Giuffre was a victim of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. She cleared Trump of all wrongdoing under penalty of perjury. And in April 2025 she committed suicide. Giuffre is no longer here to defend her statements – but Democrats, through Epstein, are saying she lied under oath.

And then there is this: Obama.

There is someone who needs to do some explaining, NY Times reporter Michael Wolff  who spent time huge swaths of time with Jeffery Epstein.

Big news the media isn’t talking about:

Democrat Goverment Shutdown is OVER

Congressional Bill H.R. 5371 Signed into Law

NEW DATA: Lower Prices, Bigger Paychecks

Trump Administration Cracks Down on Foreign-Owned Meat Packing Cartels

Anti-Communism Week, 2025

President Donald J. Trump Secures Major Settlement with Cornell

Democrats Are to Blame for Airport Chaos

Mark Levin’s scathing take: The reporting is outrageous, and the headlines are grotesquely dishonest. The victim whose name is redacted is well known, Virginia Giuffre, who testified under oath and under penalty of perjury that Donald Trump never so much as flirted with her. We also read the sleazy efforts by certain reporters to push a false narrative and smear Trump. So, the question is: why did the Democrats release these emails, why did they release them now, why did they redact Giuffre’s name, and why are the media acting like there’s some bombshell?

AUTHOR

Pamela Geller

RELATED ARTICLES:

Harvard Publishes Piece: Shun the Jews

CROOK-IN-CHIEF: Gavin Newsom Chief of Staff ARRESTED In 23-Count Conspiracy Indictment

IT’S OVER

RELATED VIDEO: SPECIAL: What Do Newly Released Epstein Emails Prove – Nightly Scroll w/ Hayley Caronia

POSTS ON X:

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Commemorations as Israel Marks Two Years Since October 7 Attack

/in , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , /by

The attack on the lone democracy in the region—and how it’s understood—has become something of a Rorschach test for Western Civilization. We saw a horrific massacre that defied laws of warfare and morality. We saw the face Islamic terror. We also saw the vulnerability of Israel—a beacon of hope in the region and, increasingly, our nation’s most strategic ally.

New documentary: “October 7: Bearing Witness to the Massacre” (Amazon).

Two Years Later: The Diaspora Ministry has published the October 7th Files, a collection of never before seen documents that emphasize the meticulous planning that went into the October 7th massacre. The documents are available for public viewing at October7files.com.

And yet: On university campuses in the US and in Europe, we saw protestors come out in force to celebrate the barbarism. The world had changed more than many recognized. What any individual makes of October 7 says a lot about their broader worldview. Jerusalem Post: Jewish communities around the world commemorated the second anniversary of the October 7 Massacre ahead of the date, which fell on the holiday of Sukkot. Events were held across France on Sunday, according to Representative Council of Jewish Institutions of France (CRIF) President Yonathan Arfi. In Paris CRIF held a demonstration with the families of hostages, and in the evening there was a tribute to the victims of the Hamas-led pogrom in southern Israel. Arfi said that programming was held in coordination with the Interior Ministry and police would be present. While tensions were high after Thursday’s Manchester synagogue terrorist attack, Jewish events and culture had to continue “We don’t want fear to win,” said Arfi (Jerusalem Post).

GRAPHIC IMAGES OF THE OCTOBER 7TH ATTACK ON ISRAEL BY HAMAS [WARNING GRAPHIC]

AUTHOR

Pamela Geller

RELATED ARTICLES:

October 7 Attack, Two Years On: Americans and The World Should Be Grateful to Israel

Two Years After the October 7 Massacre, Israel Remains a Strategic Asset, Not a Liability

How the October 7, 2023, Attack Reshaped Israeli Society

The Western Left Is on the Wrong Side of History

Israeli volunteer medics reveal never-before-told stories of battling Hamas, rushing to save lives on Oct. 7: ‘Like a scene out of the Walking Dead’

Muslims Stage Rallies Across America on October 7th to Call For More Monstrous Atrocities Against Jews

One of the ‘Top 50 Influential Muslims,’ DEI Explains Why Jews Can Be Killed in Synagogues

Muslims Stage Rallies Across America on October 7th to Call For More Monstrous Atrocities Against Jews

US Rep. Ro Khanna Blasts AIPAC at Anti-Israel Conference Where Speakers Defend Hamas, Oct. 7 Attack

HARD TO STOMACH: Israel’s Most Dangerous Prisoner On the Way to Freedom As Hamas Demands Release of October 7th Terror Chiefs

RELATED VIDEOS:

PROPHECY AND WAR: THE ANCIENT BATTLE OVER ISRAEL REVEALED | Jonathan Cahn The Dragon’s Prophecy

Co-Founder of the Israel Rafts Project Greta Berlin captured boasting that their method is to lie

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Elon Musk Wants You To Cancel Your Netflix Subscription — Here Are 5 Good Reasons Why

/in , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , /by

Elon Musk wants you to cancel your Netflix subscription.

The tech billionaire urged his 227 million followers to “[c]ancel Netflix for the health of your kids” in an Oct. 1 post on X. Musk has shared numerous posts criticizing transgender themes in children’s television shows available on Netflix.

If you’re on the fence, here are five good reasons to never give another penny to Netflix.

1. An Obama-Produced Gay Wedding

Ada Twist, Scientist follows an “eight-year-old Black scientist” as she “explores people through scientific discovery, collaboration, and friendship” according to Rotten Tomatoes. The cartoon is rated TV-Y, according to Netflix, indicating the content is appropriate for children of all ages.

Ada Twist is produced by former President Barack Obama and former first lady Michelle Obama’s production company, Higher Ground.

One episode of the show features young students working together to throw a gay wedding.

“Everyone’s favorite karate instructor, Sensei Dave, will be marrying mixed martial arts champion, Jiu Jitsu Joe,” an animated reporter gushes.

After the men tell each other, “I do” and “I definitely do,” the reporter pronounces them “husband and husband.” The men kiss, confetti explodes, the children applaud.

2. Crossdressing Toddler Musical 

“Something that we know about you, you love to get up and dance,” sing two animated men to a young boy in CoComelon Lane. The boy is supposed to be their son.

“How about you break out those moves for you two biggest fans?”

The young boy does just that, putting on a tutu and a tiara, performing for the gay men.

The boy then considers which outfit to wear. One of the men tells the boy, “Just be you.”

“Just be me?” The boy questions.

“Yep.”

The show is rated TV-Y, according to the Netflix catalog.

3. Rocko’s Very Modern Life 

I’ll concede that Rocko’s life is very modern. I won’t concede it’s appropriate for children aged seven or older, as Rocko’s Modern Life: Static Cling is rated on Netflix.

The Nickelodeon reboot features a “prominent trans character,” according to Gay Times.

Ralph Bighead, a character in the original series, is now Rachel Bighead.

Series creator Joe Murray told Entertainment Weekly that an episode in the original series, in which Bighead tries to hide his identity as a clown in a town of jesterphobes, was intended as a gay allegory.

“We were still playing by the rules, so to speak, and still trying to interject those situations [into the cartoon],” Murray told Entertainment Weekly.

Oh, neat. Children’s television has been corrupted for decades. Producers and writers just feel no need to disguise their intentions anymore.

4. Dead End

Where to start with this one.

Netflix cancelled Dead End: Paranormal Park in 2023, according to show creator Hamish Steele. It remains available on their site and is rated TV-Y7.

Protagonist Barney Guttman is a “a gay Jewish teenage trans boy finding love and acceptance while struggling with unaccepting family members,” according to a review in Paste Magazine.

Paste praises the show for its “groundbreaking trans representation.”

“Despite bigots complaining about the show being ‘inappropriate’ for kids, Dead End: Paranormal Park is definitely targeted at a younger audience than its source comics,” Paste writes.

“Targeted” feels like the right word choice here.

“Before making the show, I’d developed quite a few shows, and I love kids’ shows 100 percent, so we try to make it so that there’s nothing in the show that is inappropriate for an 8-year-old. But I think there’s an age group that cartoons just sort of abandoned for a long time, and assumed that when you get to about 12 or 13, you’re just watching adult shows,” show creator Steele told the Hollywood Reporter.

See, silly bigots. The show isn’t “inappropriate.” It’s only sowing confusion in kids on the edge of puberty and leading them down a path of irreversible damage.

5. Fund For Creative Perversion

If you remain unperturbed by Netflix’s catalogue of kid’s shows, consider the following business decision.

Netflix’s Fund for Creative Equity funds the Transgender Film Center, a “nonprofit advancing the work of transgender film creators,” according to Netflix.

“Our mission is to bring more trans-made stories to the world, and we designed the lab to address the root of the opportunity, by helping more transgender creators find career success in TV and film,” said Sav Rodgers, the Transgender Film Center’s executive director, according to Netflix.

The Transgender Film Center’s 2024 “career development lab participants” consists of eight diversely pronoun-ed individuals, including “Sir Lex Kennedy,” whom you may refer to as “he,” “they,” or “sir.”

Kennedy is a “vegan, queer, black trans masculine media content creator,” according to Netflix.

Then there’s Xoài Pham, a “a Vietnamese trans woman descended from warriors, healers, and shamans.”

Another in the cohort is a “transfemme Iranian-American filmmaker” with a “dissociative adolescence” who tells stories of “aloof trans girls force-feminizing bigoted men.”

…It’s just fetishes all the way down, isn’t it.

AUTHOR

Natalie Sandoval

Patriots Writer. Follow Natalie Sandoval on X: @NatSandovalDC.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Ohio LGBT Activists Want To Make Sure Gender-Confused Kids Only Have One Option

Popular Kids’ Show CoComelon Lane Features Boy In Tutu And Tiara Dancing For 2 Gay Dads

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

SIX MONTHS IN HELL: Hezbollah’s Sex Slaves

/in , , , , , , , , , , , , /by

A woman in Syria describes her abduction, rape, and months-long captivity by Hezbollah, shedding unprecedented light on the militia’s sex trafficking network. 

Hezbollah maintains control by wielding lethal force to silence dissenting voices, especially among the Lebanese Shi’ites it claims to represent. Yet these voices want to be heard—and the world needs to hear them, for the sake of a new conversation about how to end the harm Hezbollah does to Arabs and Israelis alike.

Over the past year, the Center for Peace Communications, a New York nonprofit, interviewed Shi’ite opponents of Hezbollah in Lebanon, and Sunni victims of Hezbollah in Syria, each of whom in their own way has fought back against the group’s depredations. At great personal risk, they let us record and film them bearing witness to the reality Hezbollah hides.

To obscure the identity of these brave people, we have illustrated their stories with striking animation. The voices you hear, however, are theirs.

WATCH: SIX MONTHS IN HELL: Hezbollah’s Sex Slaves

EDITORS NOTE: This Newsrael News Desk column with video is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Meta’s Broken Promises: Children Pay the Price

/in , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , /by

Maya was only 12 years old when she first started receiving direct messages on Instagram from a “nice” man she didn’t know. This man was 28 years old – over twice her age. A seemingly harmless virtual connection for Maya quickly led to the darkest moments of her life. The 12-year-old girl was groomed, sex trafficked, and raped repeatedly for months, all under the control of this man.

Even worse? Maya is only one of countless other children experiencing this nightmare on Instagram and other Meta platforms.

And the nightmare continues. Meta has been consistently informed of the rampant child sex trafficking, such as what happened to Maya, taking place on its platform. Yet they’re standing by idly, holding the door open for child predators.

Meta is Not True to its Word

Meta owns Facebook, Instagram, Threads, Messenger, and WhatsApp, making it the most influential Big Tech company there is. With this massive power comes big responsibilities. However, Meta is not living up to the responsibilities they claim to uphold, and their actions are simply not lining up with the promises they make when it comes to protecting against the harms of sexual exploitation.

So, what does Meta promise to do in order to protect children from online predators? How are they breaking those promises and what is the reality of what’s actually happening on our children’s phones?

The following outlines five of the many promises Meta has made and how its actions, or lack thereof, have led to countless stories like Maya’s.

5 of Meta’s Broken Promises 

Promise #1 – “Meta will work to ensure that no more parents would have to endure the kind of loss that [you] and others live with.” 

This was a statement Mark Zuckerberg made before an audience of parents whose children had lost their lives due to the harms they encountered on social media. But since making this promise, Meta has not only failed to prevent further harm, they have ramped up the harms and made them worse.

In a recent Senate Judiciary Hearing, Meta whistleblower Cayce Savage said:

“Meta has promised it would change. I’m here to tell you today that Meta has changed, but for the worse. Meta has spent the time and money it could have spent making its products safer [on] shielding itself instead. All the while developing emerging technologies which pose even greater risk to children than Instagram.”

Savage and another Meta whistleblower, Jason Sattizhan, went on to explain how Meta suppressed, altered, and even destroyed research that showed just how harmful their products were to children. They also explained how Meta’s new VR technologies have served to increase the harms caused to children, manyfold.

Savage’s claims that Meta chooses to invest money in shielding itself, instead of making its products safer, are further substantiated by how much money Meta spends on political lobbying. In the last three years, Meta and Google spent nearly $90 million in lobbying, especially to stop the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA), a bill that creates accountability for tech platforms to keep children safe online.

Mary Rodee, a mother whose son died by suicide after sexual extortion on Facebook said, “If KOSA were law, it would have saved my son’s life.” Meta falsely promises parents they care about their children, all while investing millions in stalling child safety bills.

ACTION: Call on Congress to Pass KOSA!

Promise #2 – “We work to find, remove, and report child sexual abuse material and disrupt the networks of criminals behind it.”

A moderator at Meta reported that “on one post I reviewed, there was a picture of this girl that looked about 12, wearing the smallest lingerie you could imagine. It listed prices for different [sexual acts]. It was obvious it was trafficking.” This moderator’s supervisor later told her no further action had been taken in this case. 

In another case, New Mexico investigators created a fake FB account of a 13-year-old girl named Issa Bee. One of Issa’s Facebook friends added her to a group chat, “providing pornographic videos and naked photos of underage girls.” Issa reported this group to Facebook multiple times, yet it remained active. After Issa’s last report, Facebook simply instructed Issa to leave the group.

Promise #3 – “At Meta, child protection is always a top priority.”

In 2020, an employee at Meta asked colleagues in an internal chat what the company was doing to address child grooming. Another employee responded, “Somewhere between zero and negligible. Child safety is an explicit non-goal this half.” 

Examples have already been given of Meta’s blatant failure to prioritize child protection. Another chilling example was when it was revealed that Meta was internally aware that the People You May Know (PYMK) algorithm “contributed up to 75% of all inappropriate adult-minor contact.” Meta is claiming child protection is their top priority, yet they won’t even implement a safety feature as simple as turning off PYMK between adults and children.

Promise #4 – “We’re committed to making Facebook, Instagram, Messenger and Threads safe places.” 

In 2023, Meta began rolling out end to end encryption on its platforms. They did this despite being warned that this would virtually nullify their ability to detect child sexual abuse material (CSAM), leading to 92% of CSAM reports from Facebook and 85% from Instagram being lost.

In 2023, a Meta child safety expert strongly advised against moving forward with end-to-end encryption on youth accounts due to the increased protection it would give child predators.  He was quickly removed from his role and Meta proceeded with implementation.

With end-to-end encryption in place on youth accounts, evidence of child exploitation has become inaccessible to law enforcement. Does this sound like Meta is working to make its platforms safe places?

Promise #5 – “We invest in the best tools and expert teams to detect and respond to suspicious activity.” 

UC Berkeley professor Hany Farid partnered with Microsoft to invent PhotoDNA, the technology Meta still uses today to identify harmful content like child sexual abuse material. But in 2023, Farid said that Meta could be doing much more to invest in better safety tools, such as technology that “flag suspicious words and phrases on unencrypted parts of the platform – including coded language around grooming.” Farid said Meta’s failure to combat sexual exploitation on its platform “is, fundamentally, not a technological problem, but one of corporate priorities.”

Additionally, when interviewed, former Meta moderators revealed their negligent protocols for identifying child sexual abuse material:

“If a human trafficker is using a codeword for selling girls, we didn’t get into that. We didn’t really get trained on those. You don’t even give it a second thought or even dig into that kind of stuff at all.”

In 2024, a serious case of child sexual abuse on Facebook was discovered not by Meta moderators, but by Kik Messenger, another social media platform. If other social media companies are finding child abuse content on Meta’s platforms, Meta’s tools and protocols on detecting child sexual exploitation are clearly not even up to industry standard, let alone the best in the industry as claimed.

What’s the Takeaway? 

Meta’s promises don’t line up with their actions. And who’s paying the price for their irresponsibility? Maya. Your friends. Your neighbors. Your children.

Meta’s business model of profit over child safety is an affront to human dignity. As a former Facebook employee turned whistleblower, Frances Haugen, said, “If the platforms actually wanted to keep these kids safe, they could.”

Meta must be held accountable for the harms it inflicts on children and be required to make its platforms safe for children. However, because of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, Meta has been allowed to ignore blatant sex trafficking.

The courts have interpreted Section 230 as providing blanket immunity for Big Tech so they cannot be sued for facilitating rampant sexual abuse and exploitation. These tech corporations, such as Meta, have no incentive to make their products safer until Section 230 is repealed.

ACTION: Call on Congress to Repeal Section 230! 

TAKE ACTION!

EDITORS NOTE: This NCOSE column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Part 7: The Final Round — Gilbert Baker vs. The Church

/in , , , , , , , , , , , , /by

This is Part 7 of a 7-part series introducing Stolen Rainbow: The Great Unmasking — a powerful new film exposing how the LGBT movement hijacked God’s covenant symbol and turned it into a political weapon. See Part 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.

The film premieres September 25 at the Republican Capitol Hill Club in Washington, D.C.

How the man behind the rainbow flag declared war on Christianity… and why it’s time to fight back

It’s not just a flag. It’s not just a movement. It’s a fight.

And it didn’t start in Washington. Or Hollywood. Or TikTok.

It started in the mind of a man who openly declared war on Christianity — and waved God’s rainbow like a middle finger at the sky.

His name was Gilbert Baker, the self-proclaimed designer of the LGBT rainbow flag.

And to understand how deep the deception goes — you have to understand him.

The First Punch: “Working Every Last Nerve of the Church”

Gilbert Baker wasn’t just an artist. He wasn’t just gay.

He was a provocateur with a vendetta — and he said so out loud:

“I’m all about working every last nerve of the Church.”

He didn’t want peace with Christianity. He wanted to irritate it to death.

So he joined the grotesque drag troupe The Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence, who dressed as demonic nuns and held events like the Hunky Jesus Contest — mocking Christ’s resurrection with blasphemous performances every Easter in San Francisco.

But Baker didn’t stop there.

In 1990, he dressed as a pink homosexual Jesus, parading through the streets as a crucified gay messiah.

And when artist Andres Serrano submerged a crucifix in urine and called it art — the infamous Piss Christ — Gilbert Baker praised it.

“A very beautiful photograph,” Baker said.
“We need more.”
“We need gay Jesus.”

This is the man who created the rainbow flag.

And today, that flag flies above churches across America.

The Church Takes the Hit

In 1966, Muhammad Ali fought Cleveland Williams — a man once hailed as a fierce contender.

But by fight night, Williams had already been shot in the gut, lost over 60 pounds, and barely trained.

Ali knocked him down four times in three rounds. It wasn’t a fight. It was a dismantling.

And that’s what the modern Church looks like.

Cleveland Williams on the ropes.

Bruised. Winded. Disoriented.
Taking punches from Gilbert Baker’s legacy — and hardly swinging back.

Rainbow flags on pulpits.
“Affirming” sermons that skip over Romans 1.
Pastors more afraid of media backlash than the judgment of God.

While the enemy throws uppercuts of mockery, sexual confusion, and spiritual deceit, much of the Church is curled up in the corner, waiting for the bell to save them.

The Final Round Begins Now

But this match isn’t over.

Stolen Rainbow: The Great Unmasking is the Church’s training camp — and the bell that signals Round One of a comeback.

Because let’s be clear: we’re not fighting Gilbert Baker anymore.
He died in 2017.

But the spirit he carried — the one that mocked God, desecrated the sacred, and paraded sin beneath a stolen covenant — is alive and well.

And it still hates the Church.

This isn’t just a cultural fight. It’s a spiritual one.

It’s Ephesians 6.
It’s 2 Thessalonians 2.
It’s Revelation 13.

And it’s time for the Church to get back in the ring.

No More Shadowboxing

We don’t need more “dialogue.”
We don’t need more diversity panels.

We need pastors who preach the Word with fire.
Parents who train up their children in truth.
Christians who fear God more than being called names.

We need pulpits to stop waving white flags and start sounding the trumpet.

“Resist the devil, and he will flee from you.” — James 4:7
“Be strong in the Lord and in the power of His might.” — Ephesians 6:10

This isn’t just about reclaiming a symbol.

It’s about reclaiming courage.

Step into the Fight — September 25

Join us in Washington, D.C. at the Republican Capitol Hill Club for the world premiere of Stolen Rainbow: The Great Unmasking.

It’s not just a documentary.
It’s the Church’s wake-up call.

The final round has begun.

Let’s stop flinching.
Let’s stop ducking.
And let’s throw the truth like a knockout punch.

Because the rainbow belongs to God — and we’re taking it back.

I hope to see you there! Martin Mawyer, president, Christian Action Network.

AUTHOR

Martin Mawyer

©2025 . All rights reserved.

Final call. To attend, visit christianaction.org/stolen-rainbow-rsvp-film-premiere/

Please visit the Majority Report substack.

EXCLUSIVE: FEMA Employees Discharged For Sending Filthy Sexts, Watching Porn On The Clock

/in , , , , , , , , , , , , /by

Two employees at the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) were fired after investigators found they had engaged in sexually explicit online conversations, or “sexting,” with foreign nationals, according to an internal probe.

A review by FEMA’s Insider Threat Program (ITP) flagged one IT Services Division worker — who held a top secret clearance — for logging into Facebook Messenger on the agency’s unclassified network and sexting with someone believed to be in the Philippines, records show.

Between Aug. 19 and 27, the employee allegedly exchanged multiple messages with the presumed Filipino national, documents obtained by the Daily Caller show. In one, he wrote, “I saw your post on a Philippine dating group here, so I messaged you,” and later referenced “Manila Philippines,” saying he hoped to visit in “November or December.”

Investigators found the messages were part of a broader pattern of explicit online communications, underscoring both the extent and frequency of the employee’s conduct. User Activity Monitoring (UAM) also showed that on Aug. 25 he searched Google Maps and Hotels.com for Cavite, a city in the Calabarzon region of the Philippines.

A follow-up UAM review turned up another exchange on Aug. 28 in which the employee told the foreign contact, “but I can’t bring my phone inside my workplace, so I leave it in the car. Only chat here on FB Messenger while I’m working.”

In the same Aug. 28 exchange, the employee wrote, “I wish you were here sitting in my lap while I work,” and, “I want to hug your waist while I work and smell your hair, kiss your neck.”

A separate case involved an Environmental Protection Specialist in FEMA’s Environmental Historic Preservation office in Alabama. Monitoring showed the employee repeatedly accessed a pornography site on the agency’s unclassified network and engaged in explicit chats with multiple users.

Investigators later found the employee had made numerous sexual comments and even uploaded a pornographic image from a file labeled “work memes” to a user identified as “tooMessyForMe” during conversations on Aug. 30-31.

Two FEMA employees — whose duties included safeguarding the nation from terrorism and nuclear threats — were fired Tuesday after the internal probe confirmed they had accessed sexually explicit material at work, the New York Post reported.

Both employees were based at FEMA’s remote Mount Weather Emergency Operations Center near Bluemont, Virginia — a hardened facility built to protect the country during national emergencies, terror attacks and even nuclear strikes.

The Department of Homeland Security’s Insider Threat Operations Center led the probe and flagged at least one worker for accessing “deviant pornography,” including bestiality content, according to DHS officials who oversee FEMA.

AUTHOR

Ashley Brasfield

Reporter

RELATED ARTICLES:

FEMA Chief Gets Canned After Contradicting Noem On Future Of Agency

EXCLUSIVE: Kristi Noem Cutting Thousands Of DEI, Wasteful Spending Contracts

Christians, Jews Take Matters Into Their Own Hands Amid Surge In Attacks

‘She Was A Force’: Beloved Veterinary Professor Killed While Walking Dog In Alabama Park

Mainstream Media Could Care Less About Most Heinous Story Of The Week

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

PART SIX: LGBT Goes Where the Children Are

/in , , , , , , , /by

This is Part 6 of a 7-part series introducing Stolen Rainbow: The Great Unmasking — a powerful new film exposing how the LGBT movement hijacked God’s covenant symbol and turned it into a political weapon. See Part 1, 2, 3, 5.

RSVP today. A complimentary lunch is included!

If you really want to know what the LGBT movement is after — watch where it goes.

It doesn’t just march through the streets.
It doesn’t just climb the steps of Congress.
It doesn’t just plaster flags across cereal boxes and cartoon shows.

No — it goes where the children are.

  • Church youth ministries
  • Scouting organizations
  • Christian schools and libraries
  • Nurseries, classrooms, pulpits — even Sunday School Bibles

Because deep down, the goal isn’t tolerance. It’s indoctrination.

It’s not about “rights.” It’s about rewiring the next generation — morally, spiritually, sexually.

And they’re not hiding it anymore.

“We’re Coming for Your Children” — Their Words, Not Ours

In July 2021, the San Francisco Gay Men’s Chorus released a music video online.

The title?

“We’re Coming for Your Children.”

It was meant to sound satirical. But the lyrics made it clear they weren’t joking:

“You think that we’ll corrupt your kids if our agenda goes unchecked?
Funny — just this once, you’re correct.”

“We’ll convert your children — happens bit by bit, quietly and subtly — and you will barely notice it.”

Let that sink in.

They’re not denying it. They’re bragging about it.

And if you think this was just one fringe choir’s performance, think again.

It was the quiet part said out loud — the musical version of what has already happened across America’s institutions.

The Fall of the Boy Scouts

Once upon a time, the Boy Scouts of America stood for honor, courage, and moral integrity.

Today, they stand as a cautionary tale.

In 2013, under intense pressure from the LGBT lobby and corporate donors, the Scouts lifted their ban on openly gay members.

In 2015, they dropped their ban on gay adult leaders — ignoring the long-documented link between homosexual abuse and male youth mentorship.

What happened next?

Tens of thousands of child sexual abuse claims came pouring in.

By 2020, the Boy Scouts of America was forced into bankruptcy, agreeing to a $850 million settlement — the largest of its kind in U.S. history.

The once-venerable institution is now a shell of its former self.

It was infiltrated.
It was broken.

It was even forced to change its name to Scouting America earlier this year in a desperate attempt to reboot its image.
All was discarded. All for the sake of “inclusion.”

Targeting the Church from the Inside

The LGBT movement doesn’t just target secular institutions.
It also infiltrates the Church.

From drag queen pastors to pride parades inside sanctuaries, the goal is not just acceptance — it’s submission.

And it’s working.

Mainline denominations now fly rainbow flags from their pulpits.
Some have “reimagined” Jesus as gay or gender-fluid.
Others have rewritten Scripture to make homosexuality not just acceptable, but sacred.

In 2019, a shocking exposé by French sociologist Frédéric Martel claimed that 80% of Vatican priests are homosexual.

And in the U.S.?

As of 2019, nearly 1,700 active homosexual priests continued to serve in churches, schools, and youth ministries — many in close proximity to children.

The Catholic Church alone has paid nearly $4 billion in settlements related to child sex abuse, much of it linked to predatory homosexual clergy.

This isn’t accidental.
It’s not random.

It’s strategic infiltration — with the goal of silencing moral opposition from the inside.

Scripture Under Siege

You can remove a rainbow from a flagpole.

You can clean out a corrupt scout troop.

But what happens when the movement gets into the Word of God itself?

That’s the ultimate battleground.

Today, Christian bookstores sell “gender-affirming” children’s Bibles.
Liberal seminaries promote “queer theology” as a valid lens for interpreting Scripture.
Pastors are told to stop quoting Romans 1, 1 Corinthians 6, or Genesis 19 — lest they be labeled “hateful.”

Some churches now proudly recite this twisted motto:

“Love is love. God is love. Therefore, all love is holy.”

But here’s the truth:

Not all love is holy.
Some love is rebellion.
Some love is sin.
And when the Church forgets that, it ceases to be the Church.

They Know Children Are the Prize

If you want to reshape a culture, you don’t argue with the adults.

You go after the kids.

You capture their language.
You redefine their heroes.
You plant doubt about their parents, their pastors, their biology — and their Bibles.

And that’s exactly what the LGBT movement has done.

  • Gay-themed baby clothes? Available.
  • Rainbow flags in kindergarten classrooms? Commonplace.
  • Drag queen story hours for toddlers? Celebrated.
  • Sexually explicit “queer-friendly” books in school libraries? Defended.
  • Teachers pledging allegiance to the rainbow flag instead of the American flag? Filmed, posted, and applauded.

It’s not subtle.
It’s not accidental.
It’s not compassionate.

It’s predatory.

It’s Time for the Church to Stop Pretending

The rainbow isn’t just waving from rooftops anymore.
It’s sneaking through back doors — into the nursery, the sanctuary, and the seminary.

We must call it what it is: a demonic deception aimed at children and designed to dismantle the Church.

And we must protect those who cannot protect themselves.

This isn’t optional.
It’s biblical.

“Rescue the weak and the needy; deliver them from the hand of the wicked.” — Psalm 82:4

See the Full Truth at the Premiere

In Stolen Rainbow: The Great Unmasking, we expose how the LGBT movement has invaded the very places that were once safe for children — and how they’re using those strongholds to destroy innocence, shame the Church, and rewrite God’s truth.

Join us for a complimentary lunch and the world premiere on September 25 at the Republican Capitol Hill Club in Washington, D.C.

👉 Reserve your seat now at christianaction.org/stolen-rainbow-rsvp-film-premiere/

Because if we don’t fight for our children,
we will lose them.

I hope to see you there! Martin Mawyer, president, Christian Action Network

©2025 . All rights reserved.

The film Stolen Rainbow: The Great Unmasking premieres September 25 at the Republican Capitol Hill Club in Washington, D.C.

To attend, visit christianaction.org/stolen-rainbow-rsvp-film-premiere/

Please visit the Majority Report substack.