I’m loathe to waste ink on the Democrats’ latest Trump hoax (Epstein, again), but ignoring it only rewards the media machine that decides—for all of us—what counts as “news.” For more than half a century, the party of destruction has gripped the American narrative in a chokehold, tearing this once-great nation down brick by brick while their stenographers in the press nod along.
Now they’re at it again. Another fabrication, conjured out of thin air, and once more the entire media ecosystem snaps to attention, dutifully amplifying the lie they’ve been handed.
The Democrat-engineered government shutdown has been crushed but the media stooges aren’t talking about that. They blew up a lie that actually, in fact, exonerates President Trump.
The Democrats’ released a redacted version of an email supplanting the name “Virginia” with “VICTIM”, knowing full well the original estate documents included “Virginia Giuffre implying Giuffre was Trump’s “victim.”
The unredacted version shows that it was Virginia Guiffre. Guiffre had testified multiple times that President Trump did nothing and that she never even saw him at Epstein’s house.
This is from Virginia Giuffre herself in a 2016 deposition:
— “Trump didn’t partake in any sex with us, and it’s not true that he flirted with me… I didn’t see him have sex with any of the girls. Trump was never in the presence of ‘other girls’.”
Their “VICTIM” Virginia Giuffre fully vindicated Donald Trump 2016 and many times in the years to come.
Democrats intentionally redacted the name of the “victim” in the Epstein emails they released.
The “release the files” crowd remind me of the “release the tax returns” crowd. There was no wrongdoing in the president’s tax returns, but they were leaked. And if there was wrongdoing by Trump in those so-called Epstein files, the question I keep asking is why wasn’t a single example of wrongdoing raised by the Biden regime or anyone else? Even now.
So, why not release the files? Exactly what “files” are they talking about? And what of Epstein’s victims? Do they get a say in whether files are released? It seems a lot more complicated to me. That said, the smearing of the president is totally unwarranted, even by his worst enemies, and certainly by his supposed friends and allies.
But media was implicated in the new emails. The New York Times:
By: NY Post Editorial Board, Nov. 12, 2025:
A newly released email from disgraced late financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, referencing his former companion Ghislaine Maxwell.
What a low and cynical move by Democrats on the House Oversight Committee — releasing just enough of a Jeffrey Epstein email early Wednesday to inspire the most hysterical possible Trump-smearing coverage.
Even as they knew the full facts told a completely different story.
Of course all manner of “responsible” media played along: These lapdogs with laptops offered a host of headlines with some variation of “Trump spent hours alone with Epstein victim” — dirt that in this age of the internet will be the lasting impression many Americans take away, even though it’s centrally false.
Specifically, Dems circulated this carefully redacted email from the vile procurer:
“i want you to realize that that dog that hasn’t barked is trump..[VICTIM] spent hours at my house with him ,, he has never once been mentioned.”
Looks terrible — until you learn that [VICTIM] is the late Virginia Giuffre, who had worked for Trump before she fell into Epstein’s clutches, and had publicly said time and again that the future president never misbehaved in the least toward her.
Plus: Since Giuffre is dead, and so can’t possibly be hurt by any revelations, the only reason to block out her name was to conceal the fact that this gun had no smoke.
Fact is, the full record shows plainly that Epstein hated Trump, resentful that The Donald banned him from Mar-a-Lago long before even his first conviction.
Indeed, another email Dems released confirms that: In a 2016 exchange where salacious gossip-fabricating “journalist” Michael Wolff seems to have been advising Epstein on how to blackmail Trump, the sex criminal admits “trump said he asked me to resign,” then claims “he knew about the girls as he asked ghislaine to stop.”
(The Democrats expect people to trust Epstein’s word, since they’ll believe anyone as long he’s smearing Orange Man.)
After Dems’ bomb dropped, the White House rushed to get the full facts out, and the committee Republicans released 20,000 pages of Epstein documents to let the public see a far fuller story and so decide for itself — but too late to prevent the initial smear from making a vital first impression.
Indeed, it looks like the committee Dems released their carefully-curated smear precisely to minimize the impact of the full record, which includes (for example) emails that make ex-President Bill Clinton look bad.
Dems have done this “boy who cried wolf (ahem, Wolff)” routine so many times with “new Trump scandals” that no reasonable outlet should run claims like this without extensive checking to get the full, real story — but the media still went crazy Wednesday morning.
Continued…..
Another day, another Democrat attempt to tie Donald Trump to Jeffrey Epstein.
This time, it comes from Epstein’s emails – one with his disgraced criminal co-conspirator, Ghislaine Maxwell, and others with serial fabricator and author Michael Wolff.
In a 2011 email between Epstein and Maxwell, Epstein alleges that Virginia Giuffre “spent hours at my house” with Trump. Epstein further alleges the “dog that hasn’t barked is trump.” Here is the email in full:
Of course, context is necessary. Epstein’s email contains serious allegations – allegations that were denied by Virginia Giuffre, the redacted “Victim” named in the email.
Giuffre was deposed in November 2016 as part of her lawsuit against Ghislaine Maxwell. You can read excerpts from her deposition here (starts on page 12).
Giuffre was asked specific questions about Donald Trump – his familiarity with Epstein, whether Trump committed any wrongdoing, etc. And Giuffre cleared Trump. Here are the relevant excerpts from a discussion about Giuffre’s previous interview with a reporter:
Q. All right. What’s inaccurate about the last statement on that page?
Giuffre: “Donald Trump was also a good friend of Jeffrey’s.” That part is true.” “He didn’t partake in any” of — “any sex with any of us but he flirted with me.” It’s true that he didn’t partake in any sex with us, and but it’s not true that he flirted with me. Donald Trump never flirted with me.
Giuffre: Then the next sentence is, “He’d laugh and tell Jeffrey, ‘you’ve got the life.’” I never said that to her.
Q. When you say, “he didn’t partake in any sex with any of us,” who is “us”?
Giuffre: Girls. Just —
Q. How do you know who Donald Trump — Trump had sex with?
Giuffre: Oh, I didn’t physically see him have sex with any of the girls, so I can’t say who he had sex with in his whole life or not, but I just know it wasn’t with me when I was with other girls.
Q. And who were the other girls that you were with in Donald Trump’s presence?
Giuffre: None. There — I worked for Donald Trump, and I’ve met him probably a few times.
Q. When have you met him?
Giuffre: At Mar-a-Lago. My dad and him, I wouldn’t say they were friends, but my dad knew him and they would talk all the time — well, not all the time but when they saw each other.
Q. Have you ever been in Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein’s presence with one another?
Giuffre: No.
Q. What is your basis for your statement that Donald Trump is a good friend of Jeffrey’s?
Giuffre: Jeffrey told me that Donald Trump is a good friend of his.
Q. But you never observed them together?
Giuffre: No, that that I can actually remember. I mean, not off the top of my head, no.
Q. When did Donald Trump flirt with you?
Giuffre: He didn’t. That’s what’s inaccurate.
Q. Did you ever see Donald Trump at Jeffrey’s home?
Giuffre: Not that I can remember.
There you have it. Trump never flirted with or had relations with Virginia Giuffre. She never saw Trump in Epstein’s presence or at his residence. She never saw Trump or met with Trump outside of Mar-a-Lago – certainly not at Epstein’s home.
But the fabrications don’t stop there. From another email released today, in 2019, Epstein would spin a different story about Trump: that Epstein was never asked to resign because he was not a member, that “of course he [Trump] knew about the girls as he asked ghislaine to stop.”
But that’s false – Epstein was a member. And as we know from Trump’s own statements and from reporting from anti-Trump authors of “The Grifter’s Club: Trump, Mar-a-Lago, and the Selling of the Presidency”, Trump banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago after Epstein was hitting on the teenage daughter of a club member.
And as to asking Ghislaine “to stop”? It is public knowledge that Epstein/Maxwell were recruiting spa workers from Mar-a-Lago – Trump last discussed that issue this past summer. That was part of the dispute between Trump and Esptein. There is no allegation that Trump or anyone else at Mar-a-Lago knew of Epstein’s true motives.
Finally, there are these emails between Epstein and Wolff, where Wolff tips Epstein off to CNN’s planned questions to Trump about Epstein. When asked by Epstein what Trump’s answer should be, Wolff suggests: “I think you should let him hang himself.” Wolff further explains how Trump could potentially blackmail Trump, depending on Trump’s answers.
It should be noted that Wolff does not mention scandalous ties between Epstein and Trump that could be used as leverage. Instead, Wolff references Trump and Epstein’s connection (by way of a home or plane) that predated the disclose of Epstein’s crimes. It was a plan of guilt by association, not guilt from any of Trump’s conduct.
Add to that the fact that Wolff is assisting Epstein with public relations advice against Trump. A real upstanding member of the media.
Here’s a different slant: this is not a Trump scandal but a Democrat scandal.
Virginia Giuffre was a victim of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. She cleared Trump of all wrongdoing under penalty of perjury. And in April 2025 she committed suicide. Giuffre is no longer here to defend her statements – but Democrats, through Epstein, are saying she lied under oath.
And then there is this: Obama.
There is someone who needs to do some explaining, NY Times reporter Michael Wolff who spent time huge swaths of time with Jeffery Epstein.
Big news the media isn’t talking about:
Democrat Goverment Shutdown is OVER
Congressional Bill H.R. 5371 Signed into Law
NEW DATA: Lower Prices, Bigger Paychecks
Trump Administration Cracks Down on Foreign-Owned Meat Packing Cartels
Anti-Communism Week, 2025
President Donald J. Trump Secures Major Settlement with Cornell
Democrats Are to Blame for Airport Chaos
Mark Levin’s scathing take: The reporting is outrageous, and the headlines are grotesquely dishonest. The victim whose name is redacted is well known, Virginia Giuffre, who testified under oath and under penalty of perjury that Donald Trump never so much as flirted with her. We also read the sleazy efforts by certain reporters to push a false narrative and smear Trump. So, the question is: why did the Democrats release these emails, why did they release them now, why did they redact Giuffre’s name, and why are the media acting like there’s some bombshell?
AUTHOR
RELATED ARTICLES:
Harvard Publishes Piece: Shun the Jews
CROOK-IN-CHIEF: Gavin Newsom Chief of Staff ARRESTED In 23-Count Conspiracy Indictment
IT’S OVER
RELATED VIDEO: SPECIAL: What Do Newly Released Epstein Emails Prove – Nightly Scroll w/ Hayley Caronia
POSTS ON X:
EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.
