Will Joe Biden become a Derelict President?

DERELICT:  Noun – something voluntarily abandoned

SYNONYMS: Adjective – careless, disregardful, lax, lazy, neglectful, neglecting, negligent, remiss, slack


A reader sent me an email titled “Derelict President: Biden.” There is growing concern that Biden, his party and his administration, will voluntarily abandon America internationally, abandon American’s working class domestically, abandon the Bill of Rights of the U.S. Constitution and eventually even betray and abandon those 80 million who voted for him.

QUESTION: How will Biden become a Derelict President?

Joe Biden has called for unity but his actions, and those of his supporters, indicated that is the last thing they want. What Biden and Democrats want is vengeance. Vengeance against anyone who disagrees with their policies and politics. Even from those who voted for him and support the Democrat Party.

The Potential for Biden’s Dereliction of Duty

Early indicators are that Biden wants to undo everything that his predecessor has done to make America great. The America first policy will be replaced, that much is clear.

By replacing an America first policy Biden puts America and Americans at great risk.

The Democrats in Congress have already shown that they want to implement policies that will harm American workers, especially minorities, the working class and small business owners. For example, Biden has supported a minimum wage of “at least $15.”

In a September, 2019 column titled “7 Quotes That Reveal the Racist Origins of Minimum Wage Laws” Jon Miltimore warned:

Minimum wage laws are suddenly vogue. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, 18 states began 2019 with a new minimum wage. Three states have since passed legislation to increase the minimum wage to $15 an hour, a wage floor the House of Representatives is seeking to make the law of the land.

The age-old lesson of Econ 101, that, to quote Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman in 1998, “the higher wage reduces the quantity of labor demanded, and hence leads to unemployment,” is no longer considered rock solid.

A minimum wage is the new Eugenics. It kills jobs and therefore kills lives. Arthur Holcombe of Harvard University, a member of the Massachusetts Minimum Wage Commission, speaking approvingly of Australia’s minimum wage legislation in 1912, quoted from “Eugenics and Economics in the Progressive Era” stated:

“[The minimum wage will] protect the white Australian’s standard of living from the invidious competition of the colored races, particularly of the Chinese.”

In an April 2nd, 2018 article titled “The Racist Roots Behind the Minimum Wage” wrote:

Economist Walter Williams has called the minimum wage “one of the most effective tools in the arsenal of racists everywhere in the world.”

Yet today’s “Fight for $15” has placed a federal minimum wage increase at center stage.

“The federal minimum wage of $7.25 is a starvation wage,” Sen. Bernie Sanders tweeted. “If you work 40 hours a week, you should not live in poverty.”

Legislation to increase the federal minimum wage to $15 an hour also gained the support of 2020 Democratic Presidential nominees including Elizabeth Warren, Kamala Harris and Cory Booker.

As documented in this Cato Institute research paper, the first minimum wage law, the Davis-Bacon Act of 1931, had racist origins. According to researcher David E. Bernstein, the story begins in 1927 when a contractor from Alabama “won a bid to build a Veteran’s Bureau hospital in Long Island, New York. He brought a crew of black construction workers from Alabama to work on the project. Appalled that blacks from the South were working on a federal project in his district, Representative Robert Bacon of Long Island submitted H.R. 17069.”

Kamala Harris, who claims to be black, is now Vice-President elect and supports a higher minimum wage.

Dereliction and Biden’s Ukrainian Problem

Joe Biden, his brother James Biden and his son Hunter Biden have both a Ukrainian and a China problem.

The problem is that they have taken money from both Ukrainian businesses and the Communist Chinese Party and its affiliated organizations in order to enrich themselves at the expense of American businesses.

In a November 3rd, 2020 column titled “Hunter Biden Emails, Texts Raise Questions That Need Answers” GianCarlo Canaparo and Hans von Spakovsky wrote:

The New York Post published an article Oct. 14 that summarizes the contents of an unencrypted laptop reportedly abandoned at a Delaware computer repair store in April 2019 by Hunter Biden. Both Facebook and Twitter blocked access to this Post article.

The laptop contained “a treasure trove of top-secret material,” according to the Daily Mail, including personal phone numbers for Joe Biden, the Clintons, Secret Service officers, and other senior executive officials. It was secured simply by the password “Hunter02.”

Among the information retrieved from the laptop was an email—its authenticity confirmed by cybersecurity expert Robert Graham—from Vadym Pozharskyi to Hunter Biden thanking him for the opportunity to meet with his father, Joe Biden, while he was vice president.

Dereliction and Biden’s China Problem

OANN Newsroom, on September 7th, 2020 reported:

A resurfaced video from the Obama-era White House shows Joe Biden joking about asking Mainland China to help him become president.

Biden made those remarks at a U.S.-Chinese forum in Washington back in 2013 while referring to his earlier meeting with Xi Jinping who had just become Chinese president.

WATCH:

Conclusion

President Obama promised that with his election he would “fundamentally transform America.” It now appears that Biden will carry out this transformation beginning on January 20, 2021.

Biden’s party now controls both houses of Congress. Anything that happens from Wednesday, January 20th, 2021 falls on the shoulders of Biden, Harris and the Democrat Party. They have no one else to blame for what happens.

Biden’s dereliction will become crystal clear soon enough!

©Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.

RELATED VIDEO: The Plan Exposed! BLM, Government Workers, Media Leaks, Breaking Windows, They Planned It!

RELATED ARTICLES:

WATCH: Biden’s First Migrant Caravan Is Already Thrashing Its Way Across Central America

READ: Memo Reveals Biden’s Actions During His First 10 Days In Office

Unfettered Immigration Imperils Job Prospects, Wages, and Security for all Americans

Sen. Rand Paul Warns About a Mass Exodus from the Republican Party

Fascism Comes to the U.S.


The destruction of the freedom of speech in America today is being carried out by the Leftist establishment that dominates the political sphere, the social media giants, the establishment media, the educational system – virtually everything, really. The Left is using the Capitol riot of January 6 as its Reichstag Fire moment to criminalize, silence, and destroy utterly not just President Trump, but all Americans who still dare to oppose its sinister woke totalitarianism. In doing so, Leftists are revealing themselves, for all their rhetoric about how Trump and his supporters are fascists, to be quintessential fascists themselves.

This fact is all too often waved away by those who insist, quite correctly on one level, “They’re not fascists, they’re Communists.” The National Socialists of Germany strongly identified with Mussolini’s Fascists in Italy, and brawled on the street with the Communists. Hitler made his determination to destroy Communism in Europe a centerpiece of his agenda. So many assume that Leftists today, carrying the banner of Antifa, an organization that was born in 1920s street fights with the National Socialists, could not possibly be fascists.

Yet they can be and they are. Contrary to what many believe, being a Communist and a fascist is not a contradiction in terms, like being a Republican Democrat or an honest journalist. Communists and National Socialists were bitter enemies in Weimar Germany in large part because they were competitors in the same arena: in the late 1920s and early 1930s, they were the two major German parties that wanted to destroy the Weimar Republic and impose authoritarian rule. They just disagreed over who would be in charge.

They disagreed about more than that as well, of course. Marxism is based on total government control of the means of production, whereas the National Socialists, although they flirted with this idea in various ways for years before coming to power, allowed for private enterprise. However, this, too, was not as large a gap between the two as many people assume it to be. Hitler biographer Peter Longerich notes that “six months after the ‘seizure of power’ with its various upheavals, Hitler had reached a deal with German business, according to which their authority within their enterprises was increased in return for an agreement to submit to overall direction by the state.” The means of production were still privately owned, but they were wholly under the control of the National Socialist state.

This deal between Hitler and the German business titans was one of the principal reasons why his regime is called “fascist” at all. The word “fascist” comes from the Latin fasces, “bundles,” usually bundles of wooden rods. It might seem at first glance to be an odd name for a political movement, but the idea was that the disparate forces in society were bundled together in a unity of purpose and allegiance. Thus for the ancient Romans the fasces were a symbol of governmental authority, and from that Mussolini took the name of his movement. In ensuring that private businesses could remain private but had to work for the good of the state as a whole and under direction of the National Socialist government, Hitler was bundling together the titans of business, unifying them in service to his agenda.

So it is today. The social media giants and the Leftist government elites, the swamp that has reasserted its hegemony by installing Old Joe in the White House, are working in lockstep. The government doesn’t own the social media outlets, and it doesn’t have to: whether Big Tech is submitting to overall direction by the state or the state is submitting to overall direction by Big Tech, the outcome is the same: every major force in American society is marching in the same direction, while dissenters are stigmatized, demonized, framed for crimes they didn’t commit, silenced, and isolated.

Thus what we are seeing in the last few days, with the banning of the president of the United States from the main means of communication today, and the unity of purpose between the media, Big Tech, and the Democratic Party in propagating the Big Lie that Trump incited violence and attempted a coup on January 6, is fascism in action. And if the fascists aren’t stopped soon, what we have already seen will be just the beginning.

RELATED VIDEO: A New Leninism Is Gripping America—James Lindsay on Repressive Tolerance & Free Speech

RELATED ARTICLES:

Turkey seeks ‘healthier’ relationship with Biden administration, requests that US sanctions be dropped

Germany: Muslim ‘known to police’ screams ‘I’ll kill you all, Allahu akbar,’ cops search for motive

UK: Muslim celebrated for work during pandemic awarded $5475 for ‘injury to feelings’ over criticism of Islam

Congo: Muslims murder 46 civilians in jihad attack on village

Nigeria: Child Protection Bill exempts Muslim girls, so that they can be married off as children

UK: Three jailed jihadis assault police officer at maximum security prison

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Law and Disorder

Americans were shocked by the assault on the U. S. Capitol that took place on January 6th, ostensibly by Trump supporters.

The US Capitol Police Chief, who has since resigned, stated:

“The violent attack on the U.S. Capitol was unlike any I have ever experienced in my 30 years in law enforcement here in Washington, D. C.”

Pat Buchanan noted: “What Americans watched was a mob occupation and desecration of the temple of the American Republic. And the event will be forever exploited to discredit not only Trump but the movement he led and the achievements of his presidency. He will be demonized as no one else in our history since Richard Nixon or Joe McCarthy.”

The fallout from last Wednesday will likely continue for a long time. The pitchfork brigade that frightened those in the Capitol for a few hours will likely become the face of “conservatives” on direct mail pieces of the Southern Poverty Law Center and their ilk.

But those inside the Capitol were not typical of the vast majority of conservatives, including those who attended the D. C. meeting. Pastor and columnist Larry Tomczak was there.

For wnd.com (1/6/21), he writes:

“The diverse crowd was overwhelmingly respectful but righteously angry. The gathered multitudes were a far cry from the boisterous, violent and destructive protests of Black Lives Matter, Antifa and far-left extremists.”

How are we to process all this? Dr. Richard Land, president of Southern Evangelical Seminary, commented on the attack: “Americans must always reject the resort to violence in pursuit of political goals. It is literally ‘un-American’ to engage in, or resort to, violent disregard of the law. This is not a question of conservative vs. liberal or Democrat vs. Republican. This is right vs. wrong.”

One now-repentant participant inside the Capitol is quoted in the New York Post (1/8/21): “My decision to enter the Capitol was wrong, and I am deeply regretful to have done so. Without qualification and as a peaceful and law-abiding citizen, I condemn the violence and destruction that took place in Washington.”

But, of course, if he’s looking for forgiveness from the left, he will not find it. There is no redemption from the left.

Part of the story that is so difficult to stomach is the double standard—the way the media treats protesters on the right versus those on the left.

Tristan Justice of The Federalist.com notes that in the last year there were 28 times that “media and Democrats excused or endorsed violence committed by left-wing activists.” He points out:

“Democrats and their allies in the media are ready to condemn riots now that the turmoil has shifted to fit their narrative.”

Justice adds,

“Incoming Vice President Kamala Harris encouraged her supporters last summer to donate to the Minnesota Freedom Fund, which provided bail money to the militant anarchists facing charges for setting fire to Minneapolis.”

Looting and stealing and killing and violence for months was called “mostly peaceful protests.” Some of the reporters saying these riots were “mostly peaceful protests” had burning buildings behind them. They were reminiscent of Baghdad Bob, spokesman for Saddam Hussein in 2003, who would report that his forces were winning while the viewer could see the exact opposite behind Bob.

For months, we saw looting and unprecedented destruction of people’s livelihoods. Many of the people financially hurt were the working poor, including minorities, whose businesses and dreams went up in smoke.

America is all about the rule of law. The creation of the U.S. Constitution was in response to a riotous situation.

Some commentators note that the frustrated Capitol protesters did not go as far as trying to spark an insurrection. But, interestingly, the Constitution came about because of a true insurrection. It was called Shays’s Rebellion (1786).

In her 1986 book on the creation of the Constitution, Miracle at Philadelphia, author Catherine Drinker Bowen says,

“Desperate farmers, ruinously taxed—‘by Boston,’ they said—and seeing their cattle and their land distrained by the bailiffs, had risen in revolt. With staves and pitchforks they had marched on county courthouses after the best Revolutionary technique, frightening sound-money men out of their wits and rousing General Washington to express disgust and anger that a country which had won a difficult war was not able to keep order in peacetime.”

Response to this ultimately led to the creation of the Constitution—something good out of the ashes of calamity.

Meanwhile, America’s need to repent and return to God could not be clearer. One of the worst potential outcomes would be to encourage more Christian apathy on politics. It is never a good time to quit doing the right thing, even after major setbacks. After all, as Calvin Coolidge said,

“If good men don’t hold office, bad men will.”

©Jerry Newcombe. All rights reserved.

How Cultural Marxism is Grinding Down the Military

“Cultural Marxism” refers to the process of grinding down western democracies by subverting the pillars of their culture, the structures and institutions of family, religion, education, politics, law, the arts and the media, as they provide the social cohesion necessary to a functioning society. Undermine the principles these structural institutions embody, and a capitalist society can be overthrown from within without firing a shot.

Like termites destroying the foundation of a house, cultural Marxists in our midst have since the 1960s worked via stealth and deception to radically transform every structural institution in America, including its armed forces.  When Barack Obama was elected president, radical transformation of the military accelerated at warp speed.

The military exists to fight and win wars, with its senior commanders responsible for ensuring their respective branch is fully prepared to pull its weight in carrying out that national imperative. While President Obama was staffing the Pentagon with progressive activists more committed to social justice than combat readiness, America’s highest-ranking generals and admirals offered little pushback, perhaps in fear of being called racist and seeing their career abruptly end at a time not of their own choosing.

In deciding whose career would flourish and whose wouldn’t, Obama had military promotion boards select officers willing to aggressively implement his stated intent to “fundamentally transform the United States of America.”  With the military’s topmost commanders afraid of speaking out, Obama’s social justice warriors at the Pentagon were free to subordinate military preparedness to an endless trail of political objectives that methodically ground down one of America’s most vital institutions, its armed forces.

Column left

In an April 2016 article titled “Obama marches armed forces leftward,” the Washington Times reported this: “President Obama has become one of the nation’s most successful commanders in chief when it comes to at least one battlefield: the liberal agenda. Perhaps not since Harry S. Truman’s landmark 1948 order to racially integrate the military has a president unleashed his own collective social revolution on the Pentagon with such success.  In the process, the building also has become one of the administration’s loudest voices on battling climate change, even as its ability to fight one major war is in doubt due to budget cuts.”

White privilege indoctrination

Climate change wasn’t the only part of Obama’s progressive agenda meekly acquiesced to by compliant Pentagon brass. According to the same Washington Times article, Obama also had the military indoctrinate troops with “white privilege,” a real phenomenon that deserves discussion, but is exploited by cultural Marxists as a political bludgeon to create feelings of guilt and self-hatred among whites. A virtue-signaling Tweet by woke Hollywood actress Rosanna Arquette revealed the mindset that white privilege ideology seeks to create: “I am so sorry I was born white and privileged. It disgusts me. And I feel so much shame.”

“I’m being taught how not to be a man.”

Nearly four years after Obama left office, cultural Marxists at the Pentagon are still influencing military decisions.  FrontPageMag reported that the United States Military Academy is brainwashing the cadet corps with “toxic masculinity,” a theoretical male defect invented by militant feminists to make men more docile. The author of the report put it this way: “To emasculate a civilization, you indoctrinate its youth to believe that the natural traits typically associated with masculinity – such as aggression, competitiveness, and emotional self-control – are poisonous to society and even to boys and men themselves. You convince men – especially society’s warriors – to reject their very nature altogether.” As one West Point cadet said under condition of anonymity, “I’m being taught how not to be a man.”

Political correctness rules the military roost

Obama’s cultural Marxists in the Pentagon, including many who’re still there, infected every branch of the armed forces with stage 4 political correctness.  As reported by the Air Force Times, poor morale among stateside military units can be traced to politically correct changes in military culture.  The Air Force staff sergeant who wrote the article said this: “You’re allowed to be proud, and even proclaim that pride, in being black, Latino, homosexual, atheist or transgender, yet I cannot proclaim my pride in being a white, heterosexual, male Christian without serious reprimand.  This division is encouraged and supported by the Air Force.”

Military used to diminish Christianity

Obama’s social justice warriors at the Pentagon were tasked with purging vestiges of America’s predominant religion from military life, including the following unsettling instances, each of which ground down the morale of Christians in uniform:

  • Ordered removal of Nativity scene in dining hall of Guantanamo Naval Base.
  • Prohibited a Christian chaplain from ministering to the family of dead soldier.
  • Court-martialed a Marine for refusing to remove a Bible verse from her computer.
  • Threatened to punish an Air Force Academy cadet leader for writing a Bible verse on the whiteboard outside his dorm room.
  • Threatened to court-martial soldiers who share their Christian faith with colleagues.
  • Ordered the Air Force to remove a video tribute to First Sergeants because it mentioned the word “God.”
  • Ordered an Air Force colonel relieved of duty for opposing gay marriage on religious grounds.
  • Ordered a VA hospital to ban a high school choir from singing Christmas carols to sick and wounded soldiers.

Cultural Marxists in civilian society pile on

The Pentagon isn’t the only place in our society where cultural Marxists grind down the spirit of those who serve:

  • Using victim vs. oppressor ideology as an excuse, Marxist students at City College of New York demanded that the school’s ROTC program be kicked off campus.
  • San Francisco’s school board voted to dump the JROTC program from the city’s high schools.
  • Addressing a student who wore a Marine shirt to class, a public school teacher in California referred to members of the military as “the lowest of the low.”
  • Two men were arrested in Alabama for urinating on a war memorial.
  • In a letter dripping with anti-military hated, a group of 50 Microsoft employees demanded that the company cancel a weapons enhancement contract with the Pentagon.
  •  Former Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry suggested that military enlistees aren’t very smart.

While Russia and China were developing new and massively lethal weapons systems aimed squarely at America, President Obama allowed every branch of the military to fall into a shocking state of disrepair.  In 2018, the year after Obama left office, a jaw-dropping report by the bi-partisan National Defense Strategy Commission found that due to the atrophied condition of its armed forces, America could struggle to win, or could lose – lose! – a war against Russia or China.

Frontline troops witnessed the military’s decline under Obama:  “The Army I joined during Barack Obama’s first term was nothing like the Army I left at the end of his second,” former Army Ranger captain and Afghanistan War veteran James Hasson told Fox News.  Hasson’s book, “Stand Down: How Social Justice Warriors Are Sabotaging America’s Military,” describes how cultural Marxists in the Pentagon continue to grind down one of America’s most indispensable institutions, its military.

A video worth watching and sharing

Produced in 2010 by Curtis Bowers, a former Republican member of the Idaho House of Representatives, the feature-length documentary “AGENDA: Grinding America Down” shows how close the Marxists in our midst are to finishing off America once and for all.

©John Edison. All rights reserved.

VIDEO OF CNN COLLUDING With Antifa/BLM Leaders To Incite Capitol Siege

Video shows CNN reporter and Antifa/BLM rioter celebrating and shouting “We did it!”

Followed up with Anderson Cooper giving them a national platform to then spew their lies.

CNN Was In On It! Reporter Disguised Herself As Trump Supporter And Plotted With BLM Member

On Thursday night, damning new footage showed CNN’s Jade Sacker inside of the Capitol with John Sullivan, the BLM member who was charged by federal prosecutors for inciting chaos on January 6th.

By Trending Politics, January 14, 2020:

Sacker co-conspired with the liberal activist in order to cause chaos and make Trump supporters look bad.

The shocking video shows her and Sullivan celebrating and shouting “We did it!” when they got the footage they were looking for. When she asked Sullivan if he was filming, he said was going to delete it. He never did.

As you can see, Sacker and Sullivan are overjoyed with the fact that they got footage of Trump supporters “rioting”.

Is this not gonna be the best film you’ve ever made in your life?!” Sullivan asks her.

Verified twitter user Amuse breaks everything down in further detail in a series of tweets.

“To make this clear. CNN was embedded with BLM/Antifa pretending to be Trump supporters taping them incite a riot. This is freaking huge. If CNN is allowed to maintain its press access anywhere in DC there needs to be a serious overhaul of our entire system,” he tweeted.

“According to sources she was working on a CNN project, but she’s done a lot of work for NBC and NPR. Sadly, as a ‘reporter’ she is exempt from every regulation and lockdown in the nation. She’s allowed to keep working while you and your children are stuck at home,” he concluded.

After helping to incite the wild protests, she was INTERVIEWED on CNN:

This is just more proof of how biased and evil the liberal media is.

Stay tuned for more from this fast developing story…

RELATED TWEET:

RELATED ARTICLES:

20,000 Troops Stationed in DC For ‘Inauguration’ With No Private Citizens

Wyoming Republican Party Condemns Representative Liz Cheney

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved. Quick note: Tech giants are snuffing us out. You know this. Facebook, Twitter, Google et al have shadowbanned, suspended and in some cases deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here. Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s critical NOW more than ever.

What Shakespeare foresaw about Donald Trump’s impeachment

‘Julius Caesar’ offers political lessons for Nancy Pelosi.


“What means that Trump?” asks Timon in Shakespeare’s play Timon of Athens. Good question, that, and one that all of America and all of the world is asking. But the answer is in another play, the oft-performed Julius Caesar.

It was written more than 400 years ago, but its story about a fight to the death over control of the Roman world has eerie similarities to the news coming from Washington DC. Its characters could be talking heads on CNN: an authoritarian leader, humiliated senators, a cynical elite, and the “rabblement”, the deplorables.

CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE CARTOON BY BRIAN DOYLE

Begin with Caesar. High school English classes have transformed Julius Caesar into a noble martyr. But that is not how his contemporaries saw him. Rome was a kingdom once, like neighbouring nations. But — so the legends tell — the rape of Lucrece (narrated in one of Shakespeare’s long poems) by the son of a despotic king sparked a rebellion. Lucius Brutus — an ancestor of Marcus Brutus — established the Republic. The Romans had a visceral hatred of government by monarchs.

Times changed; Rome ruled over vast territories; powerful men were tempted to seize the reins. And chief amongst them was Julius Caesar. He was idolised by the mob. “If Caesar had stabbed their mothers”, the people would have forgiven him, observes Casca, one of the conspirators. This sounds very much like Trump’s boast that: “I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn’t lose voters”.

Caesar was a clear and present danger to the ancient freedoms of the Republic. He had to be eliminated to stop him from mounting a coup. Sound familiar?

And the senators? Chief among them was Caesar’s dear friend Marcus Brutus, “the noblest Roman of them all”, a true patriot who thought only of the “common good” of the Republic. But his fellow conspirators, Casca, Cassius, Cinna, Decimus Brutus et al, are spurred on by spite and resentment.

Amazingly, what they lacked was a plan, any sense of how the assassination would alter the balance of power in Rome. With Caesar out of the way, they thought, their own privileges would be secure. They failed to craft a media strategy to win over the “tag-rag people” with their “stinking breath”.

That naivete is spectacularly exposed after the assassination. Brutus declares, in a moment of characteristic simplemindness:

Stoop, Romans, stoop,
And let us bathe our hands in Caesar’s blood Up to the elbows,
and besmear our swords:
Then walk we forth, even to the market-place, And, waving our red weapons o’er our heads,
Let’s all cry ‘Peace, freedom and liberty’!

His bumbling media strategy sets up the climax of the play. He addresses the people in logical, laboured prose, outlining the reasons why Caesar had to be killed. “Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more.” It all makes sense; it’s very rational. And it’s not persuasive.

When Brutus leaves, Marc Antony whips the crowd into a frenzy of rage against the honourable conspirators. He plays on the emotions of the rabble like a violin. Using every trick in classical rhetoric, he wins their sympathy; he makes them weep; he turns them against the senators. He even uses fake news about Caesar’s will to win them over. His media strategy is masterful.

What happens is perfectly predictable. The crowd goes wild, burning and looting. The conspirators flee for their lives. An innocent poet named Cinna is torn to pieces. He protests that he had nothing to do with the Caesar’s murder. No matter. “Tear him for his bad verses, tear him for his bad verses,” the enraged citizens shout.

There will be no peaceful return to the golden days of the Republic. Instead, in the last two acts an army led by Brutus and Cassius meets an army led by Marc Antony and Octavius on “the plains of Philippi”. The two conspirators quarrel on the eve of the battle; Caesar’s ghost warns Brutus that he is doomed. Both Brutus and Cassius end up committing suicide when their troops are overwhelmed.

“So call the field to rest; and let’s away, To part the glories of this happy day,” says the victorious Octavius. But as Shakespeare’s audience knew, there was no rest once Rome’s political conventions had been shattered. For 12 more years the Roman world was torn apart as Marc Antony and Octavius battled for supremacy. Hundreds of thousands of soldiers died. Marc Antony (and Cleopatra) committed suicide when he was defeated by Octavius, who ended up as Augustus, the first Roman emperor.

Shakespeare named the play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, but it is really The Tragedy of Marcus Brutus. A noble but clueless politician executes a tyrant and unleashes forces that he had never anticipated and is completely unable to control.

In 2017 Julius Caesar was staged in Central Park with a Donald Trump lookalike as Julius Caesar and an actress with a vaguely Slovenian accent as his wife Calpurnia. The theatre company explained that the play’s message was that “those who attempt to defend democracy by undemocratic means pay a terrible price and destroy the very thing they are fighting to save”.

But that misinterprets Julius Caesar. It’s not about the death of democracy; neither the Romans nor the Elizabethans had any experience of democracy. It’s about how the law of unintended consequences kicks in after violent political change. Brutus became a murderer to preserve the Roman Republic and paved the way for a tyrant who was revered as a god.

It’s a play that Nancy Pelosi ought to study carefully. She has managed to have President Trump impeached for “incitement of insurrection”. Her next move will be a trial in the Senate and blocking him from running for President in 2024. Much as Brutus thought about Caesar, Pelosi thinks that removing Trump will remove the discontents of the Republic. Good luck with that!

COLUMN BY

Michael Cook

Michael Cook is the editor of MercatorNet 

EDITORS NOTE: This MercatorNet column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved. This content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license.

VIDEO: When The Wicked Seize a Nation

©Bill Finley. All rights reserved.

Wasted Lives

The Muslim Brotherhood produced The Project, a document that contains its plan for radical Islam to infiltrate and dominate the west.  Among their aspirations is to make “Palestinians” a cause célèbre, and to instigate a constant campaign of inciting hatred against Jews, by any means. As a member of BDS (Boycott Divestment, Sanctions) and SJP (Students for Justice in Palestine), Susan Abulhawa, a jihada, advocates the economic and civilizational destruction of Israel.  The inexact and skewed information in her book, Mornings in Jenin, is Da’wa, a strategy of silent jihad, designed to delegitimize Israel and invite non-Muslims to accept Islam as a peaceful religion.

Following their Prophet, Muslims may never accept the world’s transformation after the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire and birth of Israel.  To delegitimize Israel, they must maintain that Palestine and Palestinians have always existed, yet there is no documentation of any governance, language, customs, currency, artifacts, or date and cause of its demise.  These are Bedouin Arabs descended from nomads of the Arabian Peninsula and Syrian Desert living in Judea and Samaria, who yielded to the armies’ directions and were then abandoned, leaving their abused, traumatized children to wage jihad – Holy War.  Abulhawa’s book follows the lives of four generations of the fictional terrorist family of Yehya Mohammad Abulheja.

In each generation, the Abulheja family is bound to wage jihad and establish their god’s authority on the earth. “The Holy War (Islamic Jihad) in Islamic Jurisprudence is basically an offensive war. . . the duty of Muslims in every age . . .”  This story’s oldest generation, Grandfather Yehya traces his ties to the land since 1189, AD, its founding attributed to a general of Saladin’s.  Had he gone further back, he’d have discovered a Jewish Kingdom that lasted for thousands of years, beginning with the reign of King Saul, 11th c. BCE.  Had he gone forward, he’d have had to contend with the Saladin dynasty’s conquest by the Mamluks.

In 1953, Yehya dons his newly whitened clothes and his Bedouin kafiyyah.  As an aside, I recognize this as the same attire worn by U.S. Army Major Hasan on his murderous rampage at Fort Hood on November 5, 2009.  Despite his son’s plea to stay, Yehya leaves Jenin refugee camp for Ein Hod, returning with olives and fruit from property he owned years before.  On his second foray, he is killed by residents of the artists’ colony, hailed as a martyr as his body is returned to his home by the Red Crescent.  The author is deceptive with half-truths.  Yehye did not have his clothes whitened for harvest.  His first trip would have been an investigative mission.  Though not disclosed, we can be certain that he was armed for his second venture, dressed for holy war, and prepared to die as a shahada, a martyr.

The next generation is his two sons.  Darweesh is the first to meet beautiful Dalia, the 14-year-old Gypsy Bedouin, but her father prohibits the clandestine relationship and, to enforce his point, puts a hot iron to the palm of her hand, warning her not to scream or cry.  She pulls her pain inward.  In Islamic reality, her hand would have been chopped off or her father would have murdered her for his honor.  Dr. Tawfik Hamid explains the severe suppression of conscience and desensitization to or acceptance of violence without remorse, as displayed by Dalia’s father.

Before long, Yehya’s other son, Hasan, announces he will marry Dalia.  His mother blames the Zionists for his not accepting the family’s choice of bride and for the world’s turmoil.

Hasan’s best friend is Ari Perlstein who, with his parents, fled Germany in 1937, after his leg was permanently injured by a Brownshirt.  Ten years later, the author predictably uses Ari’s Jewish voice to announce that the Jews are heavily armed and on the attack.  Factually, Britain embargoed weapons for Jewish forces and surrendered strategic locations and arms to the Arab Liberation Army for Palestine.

Thousands of Jews arrived on the shores of what was then called Palestine.  Having survived torture, starvation and disease, the loss of loved ones and belongings, the war-damaged Holocaust refugees wanted only to return to their G-d-ordained sliver of land, two-tenths of one percent of the Islamic landmass. Ill-equipped to fight five armies with the remnants of WW II munitions, they suffered huge losses.

War is upheaval.  Those who reached Israel had to again fight for their survival.  By the 1948 War’s end, 400,000+ Arabs flee the area and 450,000 Jews flee Arab lands. Abulhawa’s information is deficient.

The Jews accepted and the Arabs rejected recommendations of the special UN General Assembly in November 1947.  When the British withdrew, the Arabs attacked the new state of Israel on May 14, 1948.  Abdul Rahman Azzam Pasha announced, “This will be a war of extermination and momentous massacre,” and Israel launched a (retaliatory) massive artillery and aerial bombardment of villages, which Abulhawa, in her fiction, mischaracterizes.  More than 400,000 Arabs heeded their leaders and evacuated, expecting to return victoriously.  The 1947 UN resolution would have meant two states, no refugees, and full and equal citizenship in Israel.  Cairo called for Holy War.

In her novel, as the Israelis enter Ein Hod, Arab families flee on foot and with carts.  Hasan carries five-year-old Yousef while Dalia follows, carrying  baby Ismail, when he is swiftly ripped from her arms.  She screams her deepest agony, but he is lost to them forever.  The author conjures up an Israeli soldier, Moshe, who “believes himself on a mission from G-d” and “envious” of the Arab women’s many children.  He impulsively snatches Ismail and flees home to his wife Jolanta, who’d been made barren by Nazi cruelty.  She embraces the child and names him David.  The author, in a moment of “creative genius,” calls the baby’s discerning feature, a scar on his cheek from a protruding crib nail, “the scar of David.”

The logicality of a soldier carrying a baby while dutifully looting the village with his unit is more than ludicrous; it is a case of projection.  It was Mohammed’s warriors who kidnapped for slavery, conversion, and booty.  Realistically, Moshe and Jolanta would have welcomed one of the many parentless children who were brought to Israel.

Considering her father’s brutality, her shock by an explosion and minor leg injury, and the kidnapping of her six-month-old son, Dalia begins displaying symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder.  She rallies with the birth of her daughter, Amal, in 1955, but gradually sinks into dementia, as her husband and first-born Yousef join the wars.  Dalia eventually becomes unraveled, needing Amal’s constant care, and dies before Amal turns 14.

Returning to real facts, in 1966, Soviet Intelligence incorrectly reported Israel’s imminent campaign against Syria, heightening tensions and causing fledgling Palestinian guerilla groups to increase in Syria, Lebanon and Jordan, and Israel retaliated in the Jordanian West Bank in November.  On May 14, 1967, Abdel Nasser mobilized Egyptian forces in the Sinai, requested that UNEF (UN Emergency Forces) leave, and, joined by Jordan and Iraq, blockaded the Gulf of Aqaba to Israeli shipping. To the endless overt threats, Israel launched a preemptive assault against Egyptian and Syrian air forces on June 5, and captured Sinai Peninsula, Golan Heights, Gaza Strip, and the West Bank, including East Jerusalem.

In the fictional account, Hasan mobilizes to defend against Zionist aggression, and that contrary to reason and truth, Israel singlehandedly attacks Egypt, Jordan, Syria, and Iraq.  After removing his cache of 20 weapons from beneath the kitchen floorboards, Hasan and Yousef leave the twelve-year-old Amal and her friend Huda behind, hidden under the floor, with only each other for comfort through the terrifying sounds of war.  It is this act that haunts Yousef for the rest of his life, the guilt that he was unable to stay and comfort them as they trembled until the bombing abated.  Abulhawa fails to perceive that these children are steeped in dread, their lives consumed with war and death.

Part Two

1967: Despite being outnumbered, Israel regained Judea and Samaria.  In the story, when Yousef returns briefly, he tells Amal that he has seen a scarred Israeli soldier, undoubtedly their lost brother Ismail, called David.  David hears his own friend remark about their likeness, and Moshe is burdened with his secret, admitting it to David only on his deathbed, begging forgiveness.  He is haunted by Dalia’s cries, the awful evictions, killings and rapes.

The rape accusation is projection, customarily a Muslim action against their enemy’s women.  Islam teaches and justifies violence against women.  Quran 2:223, “Women are your fields, go, then unto your fields when and how you please.”  Quran 8:60: “Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power . . . to strike terror (into the hearts of) the enemies of God.”  Islamic rape is steeped in hatred and vengeance. Jihadis are trained to dehumanize and inflict great physical harm on women, one method being Taharrush.  Islamic apartheid also fosters rape of boys by older men “of status,” an age-old, self-perpetuating Islamic practice of humiliation and emasculation.

Strangely, in 2017, an anti-Israel activist declared that Israelis are racist because they don’t rape Palestinian women!  Notwithstanding military purpose, Israelis pursue a high moral culture, attested by Colonel Richard Kemp.  All capable Israeli youths are required to serve in the armed forces, re-enter society to become devoted spouses and parents, and contribute to their country’s growth.

Abulhawa has her creation, Amal, riding through Jerusalem and witnessing the destruction of ancient houses, but omits clarifying that this is not senseless injustice, but Israel’s way of punishing residents responsible for deadly terrorist attacks.

It is 1982, and the author brings her family to the next accusation, that Israel provoked the PLO to strike.  The historical facts are that Israel had been  harassed, shelled, attacked and raided by PLO guerrillas in Lebanon, a major component of the Lebanese Civil War, which triggered Syria’s intervention and limited occupation.  Israel provoked the PLO actions that would justify their full-scale invasion of Lebanon, in order to bomb the PLO targets in Beirut and southern Lebanon, headquarters for 14,000 armed fighters.

In August, the Christian Phalangist militia, the PLO’s bitter enemies, massacred as many as 3,500 Palestinians, Lebanese, Pakistanis, Iranians, Syrians and Algerians in Sabra and Shatila, 400,000 made homeless, infrastructure devastated.  Women and children were evacuated to Lebanon, the PLO exiled to Tunisia.  Had there been no raid, the Palestinians would have continued their homicidal jihad unimpeded.  The author appears to be lacking in understanding.

Amal, now living in Philadelphia, receives a call from her brother, Yousef, screaming vengeance for the massacre in both refugee camps.  He screams that his wife and daughter have been killed, as was Amal’s husband, Majid.    Amal gives birth to Sara, and suffers from depression, remaining a traumatized, emotionally distant mother, as Dalia had been.

Amal is next contacted by her long-lost brother Ismail, now called David, who has come to America to meet his sister for the first time, and the author has a field day inventing unfound slurs against Israel.  David is convinced that “Israel is a lie,” and that “Palestinians paid the price for the Jewish Holocaust,”  the author’s vicious trope.   No.  Palestinians are paying the “price” for Mohammed’s desire for world triumph and the  Palestinian all-or-nothing conquest strategy, with a strong faction that is unable to live in peace. The women suffer desperately for their inferior position in Islamic societies.  Amal and David promise to meet again soon.

Amal and 19-year-old Sara visit “Palestine” and are met by David and his son, Jacob.  They visit Dr. Ari Perlstein who suggests that Hasan was killed in the 1967 war and that Yousef bombed the US embassy in 1983.  Amal sees the “Judaizing of Jerusalem,” never alluding to Jerusalem’s (Yerushalayim in Hebrew) being one of the oldest cities in the world, est. 4th millennium BCE), and the religious and administrative center of the Kingdom of Judah in 10th C BCE.

The four continue their drive to Jenin, population 45,000, an infamous den of terror, and visit Huda, whose husband and mute son, Mansour, were taken by Israelis for terrorist activities.  Suicide bombings and attacks had been increasing in intensity, followed by two Israeli incursions, arrests, demolitions and curfews.  They hear destruction of nearby homes and buildings, proving the Israeli policy of bulldozing homes of terrorists, when an Israeli soldier enters this terrorist home, aims his weapon at Sara and Amal runs to take the bullet.   Amal is killed.

Israel had endured approximately 16 bombings, many of them suicide attacks.  Following the Battle of Jenin, in 2002, however, there were cries worldwide of massacre and genocide, when Israel conducted two waves of incursions with ground troops, helicopters, tanks, and fighter jets.  Of the camps’ 15,000 residents, 25 terrorists, 26 civilians, and 25 IDF soldiers were killed, far fewer than the thousands killed in Kosovo by Muslims or from the suicide bombing at an Israeli hotel (28 killed, 140 injured) by Palestinians.  The IDF were ambushed with explosive devices in the Jenin homes and on the roads, and women helped to lure the soldiers into traps.

The next generation will live in Philadelphia.  Sara and Jacob return to her mother’s home in Philadelphia, and Mansour, Huda’s only surviving son, will join them while also studying art.  Yousef to remain unidentified and kill no more. Still, this author’s inaccuracies or misinformation, accusations, and slander, are stealth jihad, intended to encourage violent jihad.  The ambition of a depraved warlord of the 5th century continues to waste the lives of Muslims and their victims in the 21st century.

After visiting Israel, John LeCarre wisely said, “No nation on earth was more deserving of peace — or more condemned to fight for it.”

©Tabitha Korol. All rights reserved.

The Final Attacks On Trump Are Aimed At Trump Supporters

President Trump’s remarks last Thursday were everything anyone could want out of an American President following Wednesday’s Capitol mob. As presidential as presidential comes, as have been his following statements. Exactly what the coastal media glitterati have been clamoring for.

But it doesn’t mean a wit to the Democrat leaders and media howling for Trump’s head since November 2016, who even with only 12 days left in his presidency are screaming at the sky for impeachment or the 25th Amendment, completely out of touch with reality and certainly disconnected from what would be good for America. Healing? Please. What Democrat leaders ultimately still want is submission. Submission from Trump supporters. Submission from Republicans. Deleting President Trump’s personal Twitter and Facebook accounts started the wave of purges of conservatives on censor media platforms.

What is driving all of this is what is key. Sure, there is vitriolic hatred of Trump. But it always has been, and remains, a growing, deep disdain for the America that Trump and the emerging GOP represents. Working Americans. Middle class Americans. Traditionalist Americans. Religious Americans. Non-college Americans. Skilled trades Americans. Flyover Americans. Deplorables, in a word.

I know there are exceptions to this among my Democrat and media friends. And I still have many of both, though our divisions increase the strain and the tribalism. But those exceptions are among basic voters who are Democrat, not the hard-core Democrat and leadership. As it pertains to Democrat leadership in Washington, D.C., in the media, in academia, in Hollywood, in public education, in the permanent bureaucratic state.

It was the Democrat leadership in Congress that officially changed House rules to the most idiotic form of woke speech, eliminating all genders and replacing them with vomitous nonsense. From Aunt Mary to Parent’s Sibling Mary and so on. It was the same leadership that brought in a man who ended the opening Congressional session prayer with amen and awomen. My rank-and-file Democrat friends agreed those were stupid and wrong. But my friends are not Democratic leaders.

It’s the same leadership that still wants to institute the Green New Deal, which is a fantasy that would turn to a dystopian nightmare. Sheer insanity, unhinged from reality. This is not about tax rates or health care coverage or level of military spending or even abortion; those traditional differences between right and left. This is something terribly different from the Democratic Party.

That’s why the Democrat direction is more and more frequently associated with radical elitists, not regular Democrats, certainly not old-line Democrats. Trump represented the opposite of those elitist interests — and they despised him because of those he represents. “They” in this case are an amalgamation of the extremists like AOC, the power-crazed like Nancy Pelosi, the dishonest media and the entrenched permanent staters protecting their turf, such as James Comey and Andrew McCabe.

So the culmination at the Capitol is blamed by all those folks solely on Trump. But while his incautious language on the day of the event was not helpful, it was obviously not incitement. The reaction is so much bigger than Trump, and growing. But the incalculably damaging actions of a handful last week will allow Democrats and the media to ignore the underlying dynamic.

Trump realized it is bigger than him with his speech following the mob actino, which was pitch perfect and needed. But it is irrelevant because in the end, as we will see in coming months and years, it was never about Trump in the end. He was just the willing lightning rod.

None of the “elites” have made any attempt to understand what the hundreds of thousands of peaceful demonstrators last week represented. By Democrats and the media focusing on the few who acted illegally and should be prosecuted, just like BLM and Antifa should be — people that Democrats frequently defended — they will perpetuate the two Americas. Maybe that is actually what they want. I doubt it is what most Democrats want. I know it is not what Republicans want. But perhaps open warfare on the supporters of their political opponents is precisely their goal.

Learning no lessons, making no attempt to understand, will doom us to deepening the divides and repeating this terrible dynamic with worse and worse outcomes. Because they are not seeking unity or reconciliation in any way other than complete submission.

EDITORS NOTE: This Revolutionary Act column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

PODCAST: AWoman?

As most of you have heard by now, at the opening of the 117th Congress on Sunday, January 3rd, Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-MO), who also happens to be a United Methodist pastor, was asked to do the invocation at the start of the meeting, as is customary. However, he surprised a lot of people when he ended his prayer by saying “Amen and Awomen.” Awomen? I think this was done by design, not by accident, nor was it intended to be a joke. At first, this triggered a lot of puns, such as “A-moron,” and “Maniac” vs. “Wo-maniac,” and I’m sure we’ll hear many more in the days ahead.

The term “Amen” is gender neutral and is an ancient expression used by the Israelites to mean “it is true” or “so be it.” Frankly, “Awomen” is a nonsense word without meaning. Trying to introduce gender into the description simply doesn’t make sense.

There is something more sinister going on here. As part of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s (D-CA) agenda for the new Congress, she introduced and passed legislation to eliminate what the Democrats consider gender-specific terms, such as: “father, mother, son, daughter, brother, sister, uncle, aunt, first cousin, nephew, niece, husband, wife, father-in-law, mother-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, stepfather, stepmother, stepson, stepdaughter, stepbrother, stepsister, half brother, half-sister, grandson, or granddaughter.”

I interpret this as a refutation of the family unit. Are they trying to make us feel ashamed of our mother, father, and all our other relatives? Instead, the Speaker proposes to use more “inclusive” terms, such as, “parent, child, sibling, parent’s sibling, first cousin, sibling’s child, spouse, parent-in-law, child-in-law, sibling-in-law, stepparent, stepchild, stepsibling, half-sibling, or grandchild.” This is just plain silly, and something I certainly will not be adopting.

This reminds me of the Coneheads from Saturday Night Live who described themselves as “Parental Units” to their daughter Connie. Then again, the Coneheads introduced a lot of terms the Democrats would embrace, such as “Zythron the Insistent” (to supplant American historical figures), “Fiberglass” (something people like to bite), “consuming mass quantities” (of beer and eggs, a well balanced source of food), and of course “France” (a deceptive reference to their true love and home planet, “Remulak.”)

Is the Speaker suggesting the Ten Commandments is wrong when it states, “Honour thy father and thy mother”? Is she saying we should change it to “Honour thy Parental Units”? Maybe Democrats are nothing more than Coneheads in disguise. I am also confused on how she should be addressed; e.g., “Mister or Madam Speaker”? Perhaps, “Transgen Speaker”? How about her personal life, is she “Mr. or Mrs. Pelosi” or even “Ms.”?

Seriously, now that the Democrats are in control of the government, they are stepping up their war on American culture. This will include attacks on religion, history, vocabulary, family, race, and any group or person opposing their agenda. All of this is intended is to keep Americans in line, suppress independent thought, and promote Socialism.

As for me, I’ll borrow an expression from the late, great George M. Cohen, “My mother thanks you, my father thanks you, my sister thanks you, and I thank you.”

Keep the Faith!

P.S. – For a listing of my books, click HERE.

EDITORS NOTE: This Bryce is Right podcast is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved. All trademarks both marked and unmarked belong to their respective companies.

President Trump supporters flock to MeWe, Gab, and Rumble after Parler goes offline

Millions of Americans are joining the alternative social media platforms, in response to Twitter and Facebook censoring President Trump. Once President Trump migrates to these social media platforms it’s game on. That is because millions of President Trump’s followers will join him. We must support platforms such as Parler (when they are live), MeWe, Gab, Rumble, and others who believe in freedom of speech and freedom of expression. That is the only way we will be able to circulate conservative content.

Trump supporters flock to MeWe, Gab, and Rumble after Parler goes offline

By Fortune.com, January 13, 2020

Our mission to make business better is fueled by readers like you. To enjoy unlimited access to our journalism, subscribe today.

Trump supporters are flocking to social media sites MeWe, Gab, and Rumble amid a crackdown by Big Tech on violent posts.

Gab, a service that claims to champion free speech, said it added 600,000 new users over the weekend. Meanwhile, MeWe, a similar service, said it has added 400,000 users every day since Saturday and now has more than 14 million members.

The gains follow Sunday’s shut down of conservative social network Parler, which went offline after Amazon web hosting service dumped Parler as a customer because of violent posts and threats in wake of the Capitol riot. Shortly before, Apple and Google had banned Parler from their app stores.

Adding to the increased interest in alternative social media sites are bans by Twitter and Facebook on President Trump and other high-profile conservative personalities. After the Capitol riots, Twitter and Facebook both booted Trump from their services for inciting the violence.

On Monday, Facebook went to the additional step of removing content containing the phrase “stop the steal” in hopes of preventing future violence. The phrase is a popular rallying call of Trump supporters who falsely believe there was widespread fraud in the presidential election.

“It’s almost like the perfect storm,” said MeWe CEO Mark Weinstein. “The melting pot of people coming to MeWe are coming from all directions.”

MeWe was the fifth most popular free app on Apple’s App Store and Google Play on Monday. Weinstein hammered home the point that his goal is to be “more vigilant” in moderating content on his service, and that he does not want to be an “anything goes” app—a thinly veiled swipe at Parler’s lax approach.

He said that MeWe has just shy of 100 content moderators who review posts on its service, and that they actually adhere to “strict” terms of service that includes the possibility that they’ll alert authorities about any concerning posts. But on Monday, several QAnon and “patriot” private groups could be found, one of which called Patriots Unleashed asked users if they were “armed and ready” before allowing them to join. MeWe removed Patriots Unleashed from its service after Fortune‘s story published.

Weinstein acknowledged that some of MeWe’s user growth has been due to Parler shutting down. But he added that the app was growing prior to the election and riots. As a result, he said MeWe’s users have a wide array of political views, and are not just Trumpists.

RELATED ARTICLE: Rep. Jim Jordan calls for Liz Cheney to be removed as conference chair

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved. Quick note: Tech giants are snuffing us out. You know this. Facebook, Twitter, Google et al have shadowbanned, suspended and in some cases deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here. Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s critical NOW more than ever.

PEOPLE WILL DO WHAT THEY DO: The Story of Nervous Nancy

I am proud to come from Baltimore despite the crime and theft

we’re proud of our folks even the ones that left

Lord knows it’s poor and nothing fancy

And for us Dems we’re proud of our feisty Nancy.

 

But from the time she moved to the San Francisco estate

She seems to see herself as the Queen of hate

Every time she attacks our President Trump

It is like she is taking all our votes to throw in the dump.

 

She keeps saying that Trump thinks he is above the law

But our Nancy made her hair-stylist break the lockdown, ha, ha

Impeaching the President is more important than reigning in the Chinese

Of course her husband and Joe Biden both are into the sleaze.

 

She loves to keep impeaching the President until his last day

But about the riots of Antifa and BLM she had nothing to say

To those who tore down Baltimore’s Columbus statue

Her brilliant response was that “People will do what they do.”

©Howard Rotberg. All rights reserved.

THE BEST DEFENSE IS A GOOD OFFENSE: Time for All American Patriots to Go on the Offensive!

“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”  –  Edmund Burke

“There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.” – Isaac Asimov


As we approach January 20, 2021 I have been asked by many of my readers: What now?

My answer: The best defense is a good offense!

There comes a time when all those who love America and have prospered because of their beliefs in life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness to stand up and be counted. Doing nothing is not an option. Doing something has become an imperative.

It is now clear that members of Congress are not willing or able to do anything about the obvious 2020 election fraud. The judiciary has shown that it will do nothing to investigate election fraud. The Democrat Party and its leadership are pleased that they got away with murder. The murder of our free and fair election process. The murder of our Constitutional Republic.

The Democrats will continue to lie, cheat and steal from We The People. That’s what they do to gain and keep power.

The Forces Against All Good Men and Women

There are great forces arrayed against good and moral men and women in America and across the globe. This is not new. It is just history repeating itself.

What is new is that this is the first time since 1775 that we have seen this kind a tyranny in our nation. This tyranny is one where they tyrants have been elected to the highest offices in our federal government. The federal government is now a wholly owned subsidiary of the Democrat Party and its media, technology and globalist factions.

The tyrants talk about saving democracy when in fact all they want is power and an American autocracy of the new ruling class. This new autocracy wants to control you and me. As German–American poet, novelist, and short story writer Charles Bukowski stated:

The difference between a democracy and a dictatorship is that in a democracy you vote first and take orders later; in a dictatorship you don’t have to waste your time voting.

The only thing that will save our Constitutional Republic is to go on the offensive against the ruling class.

Who Is Our Quarterback?

Who will lead us in this offensive? There are doubts about any of those elected to the U.S. Congress, with some notable exceptions, who can lead this offensive.

Clearly Donald J. Trump, and his family, have the gravitas to be the team that we need. There are also others who have been fighting the battles for decades. They are the generals, colonels, sergeants and soldiers of this new team.

America is MAGA country. Donald J. Trump is its leader. Period.

Conclusion

The Democrats, and some Republicans in name only, are hell bent on destroying our Constitutional Republican form of government. We are already seeing some Republicans cave to the false flag of what happened in the U.S. Capital on January 6th.

Biden is filling his cabinet with extremists hell bent on revenge. They will attack anyone who has supported President Trump.

Corporations are falling in line because they have no stomach or more courage and strength to fight what will become a Communist doctrine slowly, but surely, implemented in the US if A.

The only ones who can stop this are American First Patriots. If we do not stand up for the truth then who will.

Today people sleep peacefully in their beds at night only because rough men and women are willing to stand ready to do violence on their behalf. Now is the time if there ever was as time to do violence in order to protect our Republic from the tyrants in Washington, D.C.

As President Thomas Jefferson wrote in a letter to William S. Smith, a diplomatic official in London, on November 13, 1787,

The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is it’s natural manure.

The American patriot spirit is alive and well. We’ve had enough. It’s time to refresh the tree of liberty.

©Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.

WARNING: Do Not Attend Supposed ‘Armed’ Protests Leading up to Biden’s Inauguration!

Whoever these people are, and I believe they are involved in a massive psyops operation to further suck decent, patriotic and angry Trump supporters into legal trouble, they are not Patriots.

Frankly, I couldn’t believe my eyes when I saw that the FBI was warning that rally goers in all 50 states and at the US Capitol would be armed.

What!  Is the FBI trying to instigate trouble?

Here at the Baltimore Sun  (breathlessly reporting the news):

FBI warns of plans for armed protests at all 50 state capitals next week

WASHINGTON — The FBI is warning of plans for armed protests at all 50 state capitals and in Washington, D.C., in the days leading up to President-elect Joe Biden’s inauguration, stoking fears of more bloodshed after last week’s deadly siege at the U.S. Capitol.

An internal FBI bulletin warned, as of Sunday, that the nationwide protests may start later this week and extend through Biden’s Jan. 20 inauguration, according to two law enforcement officials who read details of the memo to The Associated Press. Investigators believe some of the people are members of extremist groups, the officials said. The bulletin was first reported by ABC.

“Armed protests are being planned at all 50 state capitols from 16 January through at least 20 January, and at the U.S. Capitol from 17 January through 20 January,” the bulletin said, according to one official. The officials were not authorized to speak publicly and spoke to the AP on condition of anonymity.

Fortunately the word has gone out to true members of the Patriot movement to stay away.

I saw many alerts on Twitter from reputable people warning that these events (likely fictitious) are not connected to the President but involve shadow groups whose mission it seems is to destabilize the government (as if it isn’t destabilized enough), and to further paint Patriots as wild gun-toting crazies.

Here is what Jim Hoft at Gateway Pundit is saying:

Who Is Behind the Planned “Armed March on Capitol Hill” and Is It a Deep State Plot? –UPDATED

WARNING! There are several armed protests at state capitols across the country before inaugural ceremonies next week.

WE ARE URGING YOU NOT TO ATTEND!

Think about this– The far-left tech giants took away President Trump’s ability to communicate freely to the American public following the storming of the US Capitol by Trump supporters, Antifa and other individuals.  [Be sure to follow that Antifa link—ed]

[…]

For the record, these “armed protests” in the coming days ARE NOT sanctioned by the Trump Campaign.

We are looking more into who is behind this movement.

CLICK HERE: This is the flyer you may have seen.

Hoft continues…

Notice there is no organizing group listed on the flyer.
That’s weird.

And The Sun posted a social media post on Parler by “Kenneth Brooks” @KennethBrooks1911 who posted the flyer.

Kenneth includes the hashtag “boogaloo” in his announcement.

That is suspect in itself.

The “boogaloo” group is a mysterious group that popped up in the last few years since Trump became president. Although, it does not appear to be a large group, its name pops up frequently in liberal media reports.

More here.

After seeing that the AP reported that MOST of the 120 arrested in the immediate aftermath of the Capitol riot were “longtime” Trump supporters I wanted to know who are the others who are not Trump supporters, how many and why were they there.

I do believe that some Patriots were sucked into the chaos, but clearly something else was going on.

For example, why was Black Lives Matter activist John Sullivan there? Why was he released after taken in for questioning? Very interesting that he was near the scene of the only murder victim.

I was planning to write about Sullivan and some of the others involved, but realized the media morass was too complex for lowly me to unravel.

Will we ever see a thorough and honest investigation of what happened that day?  I’m afraid we might not. Trump’s enemies are making sure that Trump will forever be blamed for the violence.

My recommendation to Patriots is to stay away from any rallies this week.

Read, read, read!  Keep investigating and exposing where you can through social media, the bias, the fraud and corruption that mainstream media refuses to cover.

LOL! I know we aren’t James O’Keefe, but you must do what you can to spread his superb work far and wide.

Like this news yesterday:

SUCCESS: James O’Keefe catches PBS lawyer inciting violence, PBS quickly fires him [VIDEO]

James O’Keefe published a video today where his operatives caught a lawyer working for PBS inciting violence and wanting to take the children of Trump supporters put them in a re-education camp.

And, quietly find like-minded people in your communities and make plans to support each other if the Leftwingers make their move now that they control the government.

I’m looking forward to having a laugh (Leftists do not like to be ridiculed!)  next week as Biden is installed surrounded by a veritable Army of National Guardsmen from all surrounding states and even from as far away as Nevada.  And, they will be armed we are told!

Heck, they might likely out-number legitimate Biden voters.

EDITORS NOTE: This Frauds, Crooks and Criminals column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Amazon Banned From Amazon Servers For Selling Trump’s Art Of The Deal

SEATTLE, WA—In a devastating move to the multi-billion dollar company Amazon, the entire Amazon website has been kicked off Amazon Web Services. This happened after it was found that Amazon.com was selling President Donald Trump’s book The Art of the Deal, a book that financially contributes to the menace Donald Trump while also causing people to think like the deranged maniac.

“Our policies are very clear,” said Steve, an admin for AWS who made the decisions. “They’re on a webpage somewhere, and they say something like, ‘Don’t do bad stuff.’ So we had no choice but to kick that website off of AWS until they stop being bad.”

Amazon founder Jeff Bezos denounced the decision. “Huh?” he said, quickly adding, “Wait… what just happened?”

The ban is likely to have a huge, deleterious effect to Amazon.com, as it’s unlikely to find servers big enough to host the world’s biggest commerce site anytime soon. As for the impetus of the ban, President Trump is said to be isolated and alone in the Oval Office, his almost complete internet ban meaning he has no electronics to play with except the nuclear launch button.

Critics are saying this is censorship, while opponents of the move are just saying Amazon should build their own web servers.

EDITORS NOTE: This political satire column by The Babylon Bee is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.