The Ideology of Soviet Fascism vs. Trump

/in , , , /by

“If we are to guard against ignorance and remain free, it is responsibility of   every American to be informed” – Thomas Jefferson, the third president of the United States

We are at war in an asymmetrical war against multiple enemies and ignorance is one of them, helping our principal foe–a fraudulent Socialism fighting against our democracy. Ideas are not spread by air or wind—people have brought to our country a fraudulent philosophy to deceive us and destroy the American Republic. When I saw America’s children singing song about our ‘leader’ Obama, I thought I would have a heart attack, because I had sung the song about my leader Comrade Stalin in the 1940s and 50s. Socialist Obama with the help of an ignorant part of the population, was very vocal and effective in destroying the American republic. He hated all successful capitalists, especially Donald Trump and you are watching now how the Dems are carrying this exact hate throughout Trump’s impeachment, which is as fraudulent as Socialism itself …   Ignorance is running the ball…

Soviet Fascism and its Origin

As a diligent student, Vladimir Putin learned a great deal at Law School and then from his teacher the KGB Chairman Yuri Andropov how to undermine and destroy Western civilization from within. A devoted disciple of Stalinist Soviet Socialism, Andropov strongly believed in the ideology and even more strongly believed in their own superiority over “imperialistic capitalism”—that ideology united the two for life. Putin has begun practices his believes worked in Europe in the 1970s. The collapse of the Soviet Union deeply shocked him, but it did not change his mind–the teaching he got as a devoted disciple of Stalinism only doubled his hatred toward capitalism and his asymmetrical war got a new hateful impulse and effort to destroy the enemy from within.

As a matter of fact, the Soviet Union did not collapse in 1991—it was Socialist economy, unable to produce that collapsed. Yet, in other parts of the system, all security services have survived. In my writing, I use the term KGB talking about them. We, the former citizens of the USSR had known the KGB as a mind-control agency. It was the force of the KGB that helped Socialism to deceive people for seventy years—in 1991 the fraud died in the country where it was born. The people of the KGB and the bureaucracy of Socialist mafia were usurping ultimate power and prolonging the life of the fake ideology…

In the labyrinth of the Soviet history and politics the KGB catapulted Putin to the Presidency of the Russian Federation… The knowledge he obtained from his teacher came with him to the Kremlin. Not a lot has changed in Russia, instead of failed Socialism Russia has now a Crony capitalism. The war against Western civilization is still intact and history should determine a new term identifying the system of giant hate based on the militant, aggressive and expansionist force in Russia. I did it many years ago calling the dogma Soviet fascism and knowledge of Stalinism had provided me with the adequate definition of the ideology.

A lot has changed in the world for the last thirty years, new technology, industry, and culture, yet the Soviet objectives, tactics, methods, and tricks remain the same in the Kremlin. The target now is bigger and wider–the U.S.A. has become a central target of that war. The Chief Commissar of this war is Vladimir Putin and the countries of the Axis of Evil including China are all under his ideological command. Yes, China militarily and economically is a major threat for us, but the ideology, tactics, agenda, methods, and tricks inculcated by the KGB in all countries of the Axis of Evil plays a crucial role. It took Stalin 29 years to create the Chinese Communist State…Do you remember the Gulag in Russia? China has the same Gulag on a quadrupled scale.

Professor Niall Ferguson calls this war—the Cold War II, I strongly disagree. Writing about this war for the last thirty years, I called it WW III and defined it as “Recruitment, infiltration, drugs and assassinations”. If the Cold War was officially between U.S. and Russia, today it is multi-national aggressive and disruptive global forces under Russian ideological command, attacking Western civilization every day since 1949.

In 1949 I was a young girl, but…  December 21, 1949 was a very unusual day–Stalin’s 70th birthday and I remember it. I lived in Leningrad, today St. Petersburg. That day the city was so well illuminated and decorated that I have remembered the picture for a long time. The entire country celebrated Stalin’s birthday, even some food appeared on the stores’ shelfs. Though a young girl, I knew that Stalin was a zealous Anti-Semite. He hated Israel and, researching Stalinism seventy years later in America, I found another zealous Anti-Semite in the Middle East. As new information has gradually come to me, here is a shot summary of an event in 1949:

The Great Mufti of Jerusalem Haj el-Hosseini was an Egyptian and a member of the Muslim Brotherhood: their close connection with Nazi Germany had been established since the 1930s. The German Army had an Arab Division of “SS” that participated in WW II. Grand Mufti of Jerusalem Haj el-Hosseini visited one of the Muslim “SS” Divisions (photo). Though the Nazi’s were defeated in the war, Stalin invited the Great Mufti of Jerusalem Haj el-Hosseini to the Kremlin on his birthday in 1949. After that the Muslim Brotherhood moved its headquarters from Berlin to Moscow with directions from the Kremlin ever since. Stalin’s global design and love for Muslim culture presented a real opportunity for him to bring it to fruition. Soviet intelligence structured the Muslim Brotherhood as a Politburo of the Islamic World with many branches across the World.

Today you know the names of those branches: Al-Qaeda, Al-Shabaab, Boko Haram, Taliban, ISIS, Hezbollah and many others… Sen. Cotton is right: “Afghanistan is the place from which the 911 attacks were launched and the place that has the largest concentration of terrorist organizations than anywhere else in the world, the reason we’re in Afghanistan is to protect our own citizens here at home.” Please, take a map and see a large extend of the border of the former USSR’s Muslim Republics and Afghanistan. Also, please, remember that all those Republics are still run by the KGB. Multiple terrorist attacks across the world are coordinated in the Kremlin. The hatred of Jews united them all. That is why the adequate name of the ideology today should be Soviet Fascism—The Axis of Evil is a consortium of countries adhering to the ideology sponsoring terrorism globally in fighting Western civilization.

To prove my point, please read an opinion of the former KGB member who defected to the West, Konstantin Preobrazhensky:

“A key distinction between Russian and American attitudes towards Islamic terrorism is that while for America terrorism is largely seen as an exterior menace, Russia uses terrorism as an object as a tool of the state for manipulation in and outside the home country. Islamic terrorism is only part of the world of terrorism. Long before Islamic terrorism became a global threat, the KGB had used terrorism to facilitate the victory of world Communism. This leads to the logical connection between Russian and Islamic terrorism.” Russia and Islam are not Separate, Published by Gerard Group International, Intel Analyses, August 31, 2007)

America’s Enemy Within—The Democrat Party

The world is constantly talking about the Evil Axis’ political ideology, yet, no one put a name to it. I did, writing about Soviet Fascism for over thirty years… Soviet Fascism has infiltrated half of the world, including America. In my books and columns, I am trying to give you the knowledge of Soviet Fascism, for you to recognize how it looks, sounds, and smells and what its objectives are: to know its successful Soviet propaganda, agenda, intrigues, methods, tactics, and tricks. The ideology infiltrated every corner of our society from Obama’s White House to Smollett’s scam, from a Communist CIA Director John Brannon to the Democrat Party paying $150 to the thugs for disrupting Trump’s rallies, from America’s Socialist mafia collaborating with Ukrainian, meddling in the 2016 our election to help Putin’s operation to interfere and harm both countries.

Like Obama, Putin mortally despises Trump, and never helped him. I found a striking similarity of the Dems’ agenda with the outline of Stalinist devoted disciples, including Putin, to destroy our country from within. It is not “a lunatic plan,” it has the direct intent to destroy the American Republic from within.

Just look at the Dems’ agenda:

  1. Abolish the Electoral Collage
  2. Abolish ICE
  3. Open our borders
  4. Free Health Care for illegal aliens

Besides many others, these four elements are completely dismantling the political system design left to us by our Founding Fathers–the agenda of the Democrat Party. The Dems are not only selling our country to the Axis of Evil run by Russia, they are also using the manner and routine of Stalinist Political Correctness to do so, keeping you deceived. I dedicated to the subject dozens of my columns. Here is my definition of PC:

“… Political correctness is a Stalinist policy, driven by the political agenda, a skillfully crafted design of a quintessential system of lies, fraud, and a long-term strategy of war against Western civilization to create of One World Socialist Government under Kremlin’s rule.” Political Correctness and Socialist Revolution in America, October 31, 2019

In the script created by Schiff, Brennon, and others, I have recognized Stalinist PC and the KGB’ Soviet technics—they were forming, coordinating, and cooking up a saga of Trump’s guilt, a myth with circumstances they were making up. In his “parody” Schiff had already demonstrated how to lie, wrapping it in the load words–a typical Stalinist PC to hide the Truth. Impeachment is Putin’s latest weapon against Trump and the means to cover up the crime the Dems leadership have been committing by collaborating with Putin for several decades. Deception and lies are the foundation of the ideology. Do you remember the accusations against Justice Kavanagh? Everything was planned to use deception and people who lie easily. That exact system, of closed-door meetings, secrecy, hiding exculpatory evidence and many other things, we, the former citizens of the socialist countries had gone through in our former lives. Welcome to the Soviet Union and Stalinist mentality, America!!

Guard Against Ignorance!

I suspected the Dems in the Congress as well. During the impeachment inquiry, for the first time I had the opportunity to watch and hear them. I was very disappointed—it was a complete swamp of ignorance in term of Russia, Ukraine, and the world. Some of them reminded me of Soviet apparatchiks. Alan West counted seventy Socialists in the Congress, I believe there are many more Socialists and Communists betraying America. Watching the “Squad” I recognized another real enemy of America– another swamp. Who is voting for those people? Poor America, ignorance is running the ball! American CIA and FBI have been infiltrated and paralyzed, they submitted my name to FISA Court in 2002 to ban my writings and deprive you from needed knowledge of the Truth.

In attempting to silence me and hide my words from my fellow citizens, the American traitors deprived the world of learning the Truth about Russia and its KGB, to act accordingly, and prevent enormous damage done to our country and the world. The shooting in American schools has continued, as I predicted. We are not dealing only with Russia or China now— Western civilization is targeted by a huge and well equipped army of global terror, I called this army—the Axis of Evil. Those governments adhere to the expansionist ideology of Soviet Fascism—Trump is an existential threat to them. By 2020 the fight across our globe will escalate trying to prevent President Trump from winning reelection… We are in an ongoing asymmetrical war: Soviet Fascism is waging this war against Western civilization and capitalism… People should know that!!!

All leaders of NATO should read this column!!!

To be continued www.simonapipko1.com or at www.drrichswier.com/author/spipko/

© All rights reserved.

Transgenderism: Technology and role reversals have made both sexes unattractive

/in , , , , , , , /by

Exactly what we should have expected from radical feminism.

Transsexuality affects around 0.6% or an estimated 1.4 million of the 327 million people in the U.S. and yet the media and the radical left has curiously made trans people’s experience central to our imaginations and regularly propose policy changes that purport to benefit them. I am skeptical.

From my (admittedly not very broad) experience of trans people they actually just want to be the other gender and are actually not interested in destroying gender itself. I sometimes wonder if trans people are being used by the left and that these proposals are actually less about helping a vulnerable minority and more about deconstructing the majority.

Nevertheless, I think we ought to take responsibility for the ways our own behavior may have contributed to the mess we are currently in. I have listed below eight ways in which mainstream behavior of the last hundred years might have influenced or even brought about this current public trend.

Radical feminism

For nearly a century, feminists have spread the idea that men, just by virtue of their sex, are against women and keep them in servile roles. As women achieve more freedoms and rights, now beyond what men have, feminists have only become more insistent about that oppression. Instead of more rights making women happier, polls show an alarming downward slope since the 1970s, precisely when one would have expected women’s lot to have improved by their own estimation.

Any discussion of this fact insinuates that because men’s unhappiness has not fallen as steeply as women’s it must be men’s fault. In light of this, conscientious boys and men who love the women in their lives will undoubtedly begin to distrust themselves, and females may feel the need to avoid femininity and a future of being the inherently vulnerable sex.

Feminism has also forbidden any discussion of the vulnerabilities of men unless it is to make those entirely his own fault or the fault of “the patriarchy”. Feminism has also forbidden any discussion of the inherent strengths of women over men, other women and children. By presenting these parodies of male and female, feminism makes both sexes unattractive.

Society redefines female and male

For more than 50 years women themselves have regarded men’s bodies as normative, using long term hormonal treatments and surgical means to avoid menstruation, achieve non-fertility or to avoid or destroy pregnancies. In a relatively short time women went from being overwhelmed with the necessity of caring for children for nearly half of their lives – and probably helping other women with the necessities of caring for children and the sick and elderly for the other half (during their girlhood and post-menopausal years) – to a very new reality.

Since women now see themselves primarily as people who interact in the markets and pursue serial, non-fruitful encounters with men, should we be surprised when others begin to see us as not that complicated; indeed, easily imitated? Why wouldn’t biological males say to themselves, Well, I can do that!

Life today is generally less strenuous and less dangerous. The rare dangerous event is not likely to be fatal, but is likely to be met with plenty of infrastructure and technology, safety nets, police, first responders, power tools and labor-saving devices. Women contemplating these challenges are less likely than ever to be pregnant or saddled with several clinging young children; as a result they are quicker to look at the historical expectation that men will take care of the hard and dangerous situations and think, Well, I can do that!

The influence of porn

Pornography is enormously influential and those who make money out of it do so by the industry’s continual ramping up of graphic content to produce the next “high”. Porn suggests means of sexual arousal that might not otherwise have been pursued by an individual. Some porn actually suggests feminization to men as a means of sexual arousal, and some anecdotal reports are speculating this promotes and suggests male-to-female transition.

Single motherhood and divorce

Some 40% of all children are born on purpose into single mother households. A single mom is caught in a daily frustrating grind of trying to do the job of two people and likely to get impatient and even tyrannical in that frustration (I am a widow myself and know this situation first-hand). The children no longer have the chance to see a daily example of compromise between men and women and could easily begin to believe it’s not possible. Women and men like this are beginning to open up and tell the sad stories of the potential tyranny of female led households.

A deeply divisive and broken family of origin where mothers and fathers are locked in a perpetual fight and demonization of each other causes deep doubt in children’s understanding of their own gender as good.

Children cannot escape the fact that they are a physical manifestation of both their mother and their father. If one or both parents hate the other the children will internalize this hatred as a hatred of themselves in spite of the parents’ attempts to the contrary. Transsexuality might be a perceived way to personally and physically reconcile the disharmony experienced by the child of a violent and divisive couple. And so a boy could end up wanting to be anything but a male and a girl might seek to avoid being as vulnerable as she perceives her mother to be.

Lost mother-infant bonds

A mother’s love is essential to a person having a sense of themselves as a loveable person just in who they are. This is unique, relative to the father, because a mother is the child’s entire world in pregnancy but also in the first years of life.

If the infant experiences loss, either from a mother’s depressive withdrawal from the infant, or isolation through the mother’s attention being shifted to market production, or some other distraction such as care of another sick child or other worry, the child may not have a deep and abiding sense of their own worth and may not be able to convince themselves that they are loveable just as they are. They may seek a sex change as way of finding love and acceptance they never experienced.

Drawbacks of all-female nurturing

As children are being more and more raised entirely by women instead of both men and women, not just by single mothers but also by teachers, doctors, therapists, social workers, because all the helping professions are predominately female, it is possible that children will take on the knee jerk fears and concerns of unreflective females. According to the data collected in the The Boy Crisis, in a female-led environment children of both sexes may become more risk adverse, and be less likely to learn delayed gratification.

For these reasons they may have lower self-esteem from repeated failure and lack of accomplishment. Boys especially may see competent achievement as something to be avoided so as not to become oppressive. It may become more apparent to modern children that one must remain safe at all costs. If one sex is seen as safer than the other a change may be required.

The need to break the feminist monopoly

Extreme feminism, with its one-sided story that refuses to admit female evil and oppression as surely as it refuses to admit the many positive contributions of men to civilization, has reigned for too long. It leaves one asking: “What must I do to neither oppress or be oppressed if what causes the oppression or the victim status is my sex? To what lengths am I willing to go to avoid oppressing another person or being oppressed myself?”

The trans phenomenon is the ultimate challenge to extreme feminist claims. If women are completely and totally oppressed by men, why would a man choose to be a woman? If women have nothing but suffering under men’s oppression and men get all the breaks, why doesn’t a woman just become a man? Radical feminist insistence upon women’s perpetual oppression is being unmasked now that changing one’s sex is an actual option.

Loss of Christianity

Trans people are suffering people just like everyone. We are all plagued by self-hatred, though it can be expressed in different ways. We all have a great desire to start again, to find forgiveness and redemption. If we present Christianity to the world as a club for the self-righteous rather than a hospital for the broken, if Christians remain untransformed by their own faith, why should they be surprised when people seek transformation and personal integration in other ways?

We should all refrain from indulging in disgust toward human beings, be they other people or ourselves. To my trans friends I want to say:

Forgive me for the ways I created a world in which you feel you must mutilate yourself or hide yourself to be loveable. Forgive me for not being transformed as I should be. I am not sure how to love you best but I am unable to join you in your rejection of yourself. I hope you can also help me the same way. Perhaps not indulging in the self-hatred of another person is part of the definition of friend.

COLUMN BY

KATHERINE BAKER

Katherine Baker is a freelance writer who lives in Western Pennsylvania.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Saving Private Ryan: virtue and valour against ‘toxic masculinity’

Deadbeat dads, draft-dodgers and the pro-choice argument

Female sex traffickers and feminist contradictions

Feminists Exalt the Wonder of Abortion

EDITORS NOTE: This MercatorNet column is republished with permission. All rights reserved.

DEM’S IMPEACHMENT: Stupid is as Stupid does

/in , , , , , /by

While watching the professors giving their opinions before the House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday, December 4th, 2019 the film Forrest Gump came to my mind. The one phrase used by Forrest (played by Tom Hanks) several times in the film is “stupid is as stupid does.”

“Stupid is as stupid does” implies that a person should be judged by his actions, not their appearance. But in the case of Democrats stupid is a word that cuts both ways.

The Democrats want to project the appearance that they are protecting our Constitutional Republican form of government that established three co-equal branches of the federal government. While at the same time their actions are undermining our Constitutional Republican form of government. Democrats are using their House majority in the Congress to undermine the will of the voters while shredding the due process rights of the President of the United States.

The House Democrats have gone all in to try to overturn the will of the people who elected Donald J. Trump. The House Democrats have used tactics that give hearsay greater weight than facts, present witnesses who have little or no first hand knowledge of events that led to the impeachment “inquiry” and have now called four professors to give their opinions on Section 4 of Article Two of the United States Constitution which reads:

“The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”

What House Democrats don’t want to discuss are those high crimes an misdemeanors committed by their fellow Democrats including but not limited to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former Secretary of State John Kerry, former President Barack Obama and former Vice President Joe Biden.

Stupid is as stupid does.

Dem’s Impeachment

Beth Baumann in a Townhall.com column titled “Impeachment Hearings Are Clearly a Doozy When Even the Chairman Fails to Stay Awake” writes:

Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) – now the Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee – spent the last two-and-a-half years telling us that President Trump deserved to be impeached for colluding with Russia. The Democrats got their way and had Robert Mueller – the guy who was supposed to deliver the “smoking gun” – as their special counsel. After spending a buttload of money and issuing hundreds of subpoenas, Mueller found that the Trump campaign did not collude with Russia.

Instead of letting things go, what do the Democrats do? They double down. They seize onto Trump’s call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, saying he threatened to withhold military aid unless Zelensky investigated former Vice President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter. While the veep was handling international relations with Ukraine on behalf of the Obama administration, Hunter was being paid $50,000 a month by corrupt Ukrainian gas company Burisma. The real kicker: Hunter had no natural energy experience.

Stupid is as stupid does!

Bauman goes on to note:

Wednesday’s impeachment “hearing” was another bogus sham. It included four impeachment “experts.” Three out of four were Democratic shills. But the real kicker: the chairman overseeing the hearing, Jerry Nadler (D-NJ) was caught dozing off.

Stupid is as stupid does.

Exhibit A: When Professors look stupid

Matt Vespa in a Townhall.com article titled “Law Professor’s Remarks Only Further Exposed the Democrats’ Trump Impeachment Push as a Clown Show” writes:

So, here was have three supposed constitutional law experts, who are really just anti-Trump clowns, giving their testimony on how this whole nothingburger allegation is really just as serious as the kidnapping of the Lindbergh baby. In fact, this may be the crime of the century, even more, serious that when O.J. Simpson allegedly quasi-decapitated his ex-wife in 1994. I mean this isn’t Watergate. This isn’t even impeachable. There was no quid pro quo. There was no bribery. It’s just Democrats and their allies being totally and utterly insane. Take one of their law experts yesterday, Noah Feldman, who looks like actor Benedict Cumberbatch, who said that if we don’t impeach Trump, then we’re no longer living in a democracy. Yeah, this is the type of silliness that’s going to cost Democrats the 2020 election. No one believes that for a second. Also, we’re not a democracy; we have a republic. And as Ed noted, we have term-limits and elections. Again, Democrats have no grasp of history, which is why it’s always amusing when they have their so-called constitutional experts try and lecture us about our nation’s history, which deep down they hate. It’s almost always wrong, and here you have Exhibit A.

Stupid is as stupid does.

Conclusion

According to Eotvos Lorand University psychologists Balazs Aczel, Bence Palfi and Zoltan Kekecs there are three categories of stupid:

  1. Confident ignorance – when a person’s self-perceived ability to do something far outweighs that person’s actual ability to do it, and it’s associated with the highest level of stupidity.
  2. He couldn’t help himself/herself – when someone does something because they have, on some level, lost their ability to do otherwise.
  3. Absentmindedness/lack of practicality. – an either/or scenario, in which someone does something that’s clearly irrational, but for a reason that could be one of two things: they either weren’t paying attention or simply weren’t aware of something.

I contend that those Democrats who support the impeachment inquiry fit all of the above kinds of stupid.

As Mark Twain said, “Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.

Some Democrats appear to have a lot of experience with stupid.

© All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Trump’s Opposition Has Lost their Grip and Their Minds

The Democrats’ Massive Impeachment Fail

Law Professor’s Remarks Only Further Exposed the Democrats’ Trump Impeachment Push as a Clown Show

Melania Trump Blasts Pamela Karlan For Barron Trump Joke: ‘You Should Be Ashamed’

RELATED VIDEO: Gaetz explodes at impeachment witnesses: You don’t get to interrupt me.

Biden’s Popularity Skyrockets Among Coveted 1920s Working Class Demographic

/in , , /by

U.S.—Many have criticized Joe Biden’s new campaign slogan, “No Malarkey,” for being out of touch and old-fashioned.

But new polls show that the slogan is actually a huge hit among the working class in the 1920s. While a minority said Trump was their man and a few liked some of the other Democratic candidates, over 92% of the 1920s demographic said that they were “real keen on Biden.”

“I like this Biden fellow, see?” said one man smoking a cigar in a speakeasy as he cleaned his Tommy gun. “No balderdash, no malarkey, not on his watch, ya got it, toots? He’s the real deal, the bee’s knees, the cat’s pajamas, a real nifty gent, and I ain’t no pushover, ya see?”

“These other candidates are always givin’ us the runaround, fillin’ our heads with hornswoggle, codswallop, fiddlesticks, and balderdash. But not Joe — he’s just like us. You could see yourself havin’ a spot o’ moonshine with Joe, or picking’ up dames down on the boardwalk, or even rollin’ around with the chopper squad rubbin’ out coppers.”

“Joe ain’t no stool pigeon, I’d bet my life on it, see?”

Though the men passed away long ago, they are all registered Democrats and are expected to turn out in huge numbers in 2020.

 Readers of the Bee,

If you value The Babylon Bee and want to see us prevail against Snopes and anyone else who might seek to discredit or deplatform us, please consider becoming a subscriber. Your support really will make a difference.

Support Us                    Learn More

EDITORS NOTE: This political satire by The Babylon Bee is republished with permission. © All rights reserved.

One Key Reason Why Trump Is a Truly Great American President

/in , , , , /by

My latest in PJ Media:

Assessments of Donald Trump’s presidency vary widely depending on who is doing the assessing. But if future generations of historians aren’t total social justice warriors — as is likely given the fact that the socialist bubble bursts almost immediately every time socialism is implemented — Trump will almost certainly be judged as one of America’s greatest presidents, barring economic or other disaster while he is in the White House. One key reason for this is his departure from what had been standard “Israeli/Palestinian peace process” procedure.

Ever since since the British incited riots against Jews in Palestine in 1920, the standard approach has been this: Western powers demand substantive concessions from the Israelis and promises from the Palestinian Arabs, and continue to do so even as Palestinians flout all agreements and promises they made, never holding Palestinians accountable for their actions or attaching any consequences to them.

After nearly a century of this, Trump began to reward the Israelis for their commitment to peace and penalize the Palestinians for their commitment to war. As the new book The Palestinian Delusion: The Catastrophic History of the Middle East Peace Process details, Trump fulfilled a campaign promise and shocked the world on December 6, 2017 by recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital and announcing that the U.S. embassy would move there. “When I came into office,” Trump said, “I promised to look at the world’s challenges with open eyes and very fresh thinking. We cannot solve our problems by making the same failed assumptions and repeating the same failed strategies of the past. Old challenges demand new approaches.” If that were true of anything, it was true of the “peace process.”

There is much more. Read the rest here.

RELATED ARTICLE: Trump’s Canny Diplomatic and Psychological Feints on the International Stage

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. All rights reserved.

John Podesta Set Up Fundraising Meetings For Fusion GPS After Trump’s Election Victory

/in , , , , , /by

Former Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta was one of Fusion GPS’s “most helpful” resources in an effort to raise money after the 2016 election to continue investigating President Donald Trump, the co-founders of the opposition research firm revealed in a book released on Nov. 26.

Glenn Simpson and Peter Fritsch, the co-founders of Fusion GPS, wrote in “Crime in Progress” that Podesta provided welcome support in early 2017 for an effort to raise money to fund The Democracy Integrity Project (TDIP), a nonprofit group former Senate Intelligence Committee staffer Daniel Jones created on Jan. 31, 2017.

The Fusion GPS book provides the most detailed account to date of the Simpson-Podesta meeting, which The New York Times first reported on Nov. 10, 2017. The book also raises questions about what Podesta knew of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and Clinton campaign funding the dossier.

Podesta reportedly told the Senate Intelligence Committee in October 2017 that he did not know who paid Fusion GPS to investigate Trump. Days after Podesta’s interview, news outlets reported that Perkins Coie, the law firm for the Clinton campaign and DNC, was the Fusion GPS client. Marc Elias, the Perkins Coie partner who hired Fusion, represented Podesta in the Senate interview.

Simpson met with Jones just after Trump’s inauguration on Jan. 20, 2017 and briefed him on Fusion’s work during the campaign, according to Simpson and Fritsch. Jones eagerly agreed to continue the investigation and formed TDIP on Jan. 31, 2017.

Jones told the FBI in March 2017 about his partnership with Fusion GPS and Christopher Steele, a former British spy who wrote the anti-Trump dossier. Jones said the consortium had secured $50 million in funding from between seven and 10 wealthy donors in California and New York, according to a summary of his FBI interview.

Jones told the FBI that the group planned to provide information to lawmakers, government investigators and the media.

Simpson and Fritsch do not identify TDIP’s donors in the book, but a spokesman for George Soros told The NYT in 2018 that the billionaire financier gave $1 million to TDIP in 2017. A nonprofit group called Fund for a Better Future contributed about $2.1 million to TDIP.

TDIP paid more than $3.3 million to Fusion GPS and more than $250,000 to Steele in 2017, according to the group’s tax returns.

COLUMN BY

Chuck Ross

Chuck Ross is a reporter at The Daily Caller.

RELATED ARTICLE: Firms Tied To Fusion GPS, Steele Were Paid $3.8 Million By Soros-Backed Group

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. © All rights reserved. Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

Conservative Media Killing Operation Mockingbird

/in , , , , , , /by

While visiting a relative, CBS evening news was on TV in the background. It felt like water torture hearing arrogant reporters authoritatively lie about president Trump and every political issue. Their deceptive message was Republicans are mean and Democrats are good. Incredibly, 95% of the broadcast was fake news.

Could I escape being bombarded with fake news in my car? No. Every news-break on the radio was crafted to imply that Trump is guilty of everything and Republicans are mean.

Clearly, there is a coordinated fake news media campaign to instill hatred for Trump, America, Christians, Conservatives, Republicans, Trump supporters and straight white men. It is as if a daily memo is sent to Democrat media operatives. “Okay everyone, the phrase of the day is “Trump is an existential threat.” Every news broadcast finds a way to fit it in.

“Here’s Amy with the weather report.” “Thanks Jim. It will be stormy today. And speaking of stormy, Trump is an existential threat.” No one knows what “existential threat” means. But it sounds smart and is intended to sell the lie that Trump is extremely dangerous.

Democrats are currently blitzing the media with their lie, “Trump is a cult leader”. What they are really promoting is Trump supporters are a small minority of mind-controlled hateful crazies.

I remember seeing “The FBI Story” 1959 movie starring Jimmy Stewart. As a child, I thought FBI agents were awesome men. We’ve learned that there are bad actors in the FBI and CIA. Allegedly, Operation Mockingbird is a program launched by the CIA in the 1950s to manipulate media to spread propaganda. Writer Deborah Davis said Operation Mockingbird recruited prominent American journalists and oversaw front groups.

Evidence suggest Operation Mockingbird is alive and well today. Shockingly, we have learned that the FBI and CIA played major roles in spreading the lie that Trump colluded with Russia to steal the election from Hillary.

Hillary paid for a lie-filled dossier written about Trump. Hillary’s gross dossier even claimed Trump paid prostitutes to urinate on a bed slept in by Obama. Her operatives in the FBI used the gross dossier to illegally acquire warrants to investigate whether or not Trump stole the election. The absurd investigation lasted 3 years, costing taxpayers $32 million.

CNN and MSNBC victimized their tiny leftist audiences 24/7 for the 3 year bogus investigation. They promised Trump’s guilt would be confirmed and he would be humiliatingly booted out of office. The Trump resistance movement was devastated when the investigation concluded that Trump won the election fair and square.

Moving on to their next treasonous scheme to remove Trump, Democrats launched a news narrative claiming Trump committed impeachable crimes during a phone call with the president of Ukraine. Democrat Adam Schiff read Trump’s extreme bullying outrageous demands on national TV. I watched it on TV in the doctor’s office waiting room. I thought, “Oh my gosh. Trump said that?” Schiff assumed he could get away with lying about the content of the phone call because presidents do not released the content of conversations with foreign leaders. Trump blew Schiff’s scheme by releasing the transcript of the phone call. But here is where it gets really crazy and unbelievably arrogant.

Democrats and fake news media simply ignored the transcript. Based on Schiff’s lying version of the phone call, Schiff held impeachment hearings on national TV for two weeks. In essence, Schiff and fake news media told the American people, you are too stupid and unsophisticated to detect Trump’s obvious crimes during the phone call.

After each day of Schiff’s hearings, fake news media excitedly reported that “bombshell” testimony confirmed Trump’s guilt. In truth, none of Schiff’s witnesses could name a crime committed by Trump.

Displaying their off-the-chain arrogance, everything fake news media reported about the impeachment hearings were lies.

If we did not have conservative media countering fake news media lies, millions would be clamoring for Trump’s head to be placed into the impeachment guillotine. Remarkably, Trump’s approval rating rose after the impeachment hearings.

I wish to express my utmost respect and thanks to conservative media and congressional republicans for daily fighting and explaining Democrats’ and fake news media’s coup to remove our president via Schiff’s kangaroo court impeachment hearings.”

Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, Laura Ingraham, Tucker Carlson, conservative talk radio, Fox News and the internet.

Fake news media is not all powerful. Despite a fake news media blackout, 1.7 million of us showed up in 2010 for a Washington DC Tea Party rally to protest Obamacare.

In 2016, fake news media gifted Hillary’s presidential campaign a billion dollars worth of lie-filled news stories designed to destroy candidate Trump and Trump the man. They failed. Hillary and her minions were devastated when Trump defeated her in an electoral landslide. We are well on our way to killing Operation Mockingbird.

We remember where we were during important events. It was 1988. During my lunch break, I returned a VHS movie to the video store – got back into my car and turned on the radio to listen to conservative talk show host Tom Marr on WCBM, 680AM in Baltimore. To my shock and disappointment, Tom’s show was replaced with some new guy, Rush Limbaugh.

This song cracks me up. I love it. The Rush Hawkins Singers’, “Thank the Lord Rush Limbaugh’s On.”

© All rights reserved.

Impeachment Crusade Is Bound to Backfire on the Left

/in , , , , , /by

As the impeachment season drones on, and Democrats continue down the path of self-destruction, one wonders if there is an exit ramp for them.

Before Donald Trump was even the Republican nominee for president, people in positions of power started their malevolent acts against him and his campaign, mostly in private. Democrats and the left entered this path and have been locked onto that course for more than three years now.

Democrats have publicly sprinted down this path since the day after Trump was elected. It is well documented, for instance, that Rep. Al Green, D-Texas, expressed his desire to impeach the president within mere months of his assuming office.

Hillary Clinton then stoked the “Russian collusion” hoax to explain what was inexplicable to her: the American voters had rejected her in favor of political outsider Donald J. Trump.

Congress is moving to impeach the president. But will their plan to remove him from office succeed? Find out more now >>

The left’s first major goals out of the box were (1) to remove the president from office and, if that didn’t work, (2) declare Trump’s presidency to be illegitimate due to foreign influence in the 2016 election.

Friendly left-wing media outlets constantly reinforced the collusion narrative. Meanwhile, leftist groups exploited the Antifa and Resistance movements to cause political unrest. Some educators even encouraged their students to express outrage that Clinton lost and Trump won.

The earliest ideas often receive the most traction, even if they are not the best ideas. Suboptimal trajectories build up over time, not necessarily because they are the right course, but because they were first and get locked in even as better options come along.

So here we are. It’s 2019 and Democrats have committed themselves to expelling Trump from office, or if that fails, simply dragging his name through the mud.

It is folly to try to remove a president from office when the people will be able to make their own decision in less than a year. And despite Democrats’ best efforts to throw allegations at him, Trump receives consistently favorable numbers in regular polling.

Recent polling further suggests that voters are souring on the idea of impeachment.

This week, the House Judiciary Committee is bringing in several law professors to harangue the committee and to provide justification for impeachment. Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., has suggested that he might need to bring in additional witnesses.

Every time he has brought in witnesses promising blockbuster revelations, he has only produced duds. Democrats have yet to see these hearings produce any overwhelming evidence in their favor.

An alarm bell should be going off among Democrats when their chosen path to remove a sitting president is not bicameral or bipartisan, and opposition to impeachment is both. The facts scream that they are marching on a suboptimal path that might lead them over a cliff.

Why do Democrats persist?

It is likely that they believe the short-term cost of political embarrassment and demoralizing their base is too high. But stubbornly adhering to their chosen course is reckless if they want to appeal to a broader America. This won’t end well for them.

COMMENTARY BY

Rep. Andy Biggs

Rep. Andy Biggs a Republican, represents Arizona’s 5th Congressional District in the U.S. House. He is chairman of the House Freedom Caucus and serves on the Judiciary and Science, Space and Technology committees. Twitter: .

Ted Budd

Ted Budd is the U.S. representative for North Carolina’s 13th district. Twitter: .

RELATED ARTICLE: House GOP Report Contends Impeachment Drive Advances Rule by Bureaucrats

A Note for our Readers:

As we speak, Congress is moving to impeach the president.

We do not have all the facts yet, but based on what we know now, there does not seem to be an impeachable offense.

The questions stand: In drafting the Constitution, how did America’s founders intend for impeachment to be used? How does the impeachment process work, and what can history tell us about whether or not President Trump faces the real threat of being removed from office?

The Heritage Foundation is making this guide available to all readers of The Daily Signal for free today!

GET YOUR FREE COPY NOW! >>

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Signal column is republished with permission. © All rights reserved.

People ‘Not to Learn Islam From’ — Really?

/in , , , , , /by

On October 7, 2019, Muslim American and veteran Mansoor Shams tweeted out a list of people titled, “Who NOT to learn Islam from.” On November 26, 2019, he tweeted the same list. The tweet received mixed reactions, including my own.

The first time I supported the tweet on the premise that unless Muslims themselves brave speaking critically of our theology, others will do it for us. Seeing the tweet again, it’s time to unpack the question of who not to learn Islam from.

Both times, the list is simple, and there is no follow up thread. It doesn’t offer any more conversation that distinguishes one person on the list from another. It’s an incomplete conversation, and it was my mistake to support the initial tweet without taking the time to unpack it in my own thread. So, I will do that here.

To tweet that same list twice now (two unique tweets instead of simply a retweet of the original tweet) without further context, makes the list less of a confessional Muslims can align with and more of an attack. Let’s talk about the people on the list.

How the List Misses the Mark

The people who drive these conversations are just as important as the conversations themselves. We’re not just looking at what Islam is or was, we also need to look at who we are.

And if you’re not interested in people (like the ones on the list), in understanding and humanizing them, then I’m afraid you’re missing what’s really important here. What’s really important here isn’t religion; it’s people. Are we looking at how people are changing over time, or have we boxed them in the same way we complain they’ve boxed us or their interpretation of our faith in?

I would argue that it is more valuable that we understand and humanize each other, that we start learning how to get along and work together, than it is to shield Islam within some forcefield. Something that isn’t challenged, cannot evolve and thrive.

I would argue that Islam is an organic idea. It (and we) do better when challenged than when kept in some bubble, like some insipid organism that cannot survive a contagion called the 21st century.

Some people on that list have shown depth, inquiry, and journey — and it’s deeply unfair to paint them, carte blanche, in a the broad stroke of a collective.

As Muslims, we don’t like it when it’s done to us; why do it to another?

Let’s look at some of the people on that list who were treated unfairly.

Sam Harris –– While I don’t agree with everything Sam Harris says, I do respect his own story of inquiry that led him to become who he is today. The type of questions Sam raises, the type of guests he brings on, tells us that’s someone who isn’t resting on the laurels of celebrity. He’s still very much asking questions. He’s still very much searching.

Ayaan Hirsi Ali – Ali is another name on that list of someone that deserves being looked into.  While I don’t agree with some of her views, and I don’t think that poor personal experience is the totality of a faith, she has shifted her views over time. She has softened her stances. She went from someone who didn’t believe in reform to someone who did. I am more aligned with who she is today than who she was even just five years ago. 

Robert Spencer — Spencer doesn’t seem to have changed from the first time I learned of him over 17 years ago. Yet, when I first started asking about Islam, there was nothing out there that I could dig into that let me look at Islam with a critical eye. Social media hadn’t yet become a portal for learning and connectivity. But there was Robert Spencer’s work, which throws you into the deep end of Islam. There wasn’t anywhere I could go to at that time in the so called “Muslim world” that would be honest with me about the shortcomings of our faith. Robert Spencer also presents Muslims with a foil, a character so immersed in a rigid narrative that that narrative can be leaned on to build the counter-narrative. 

Steven Emerson — Emerson might not be the person to learn Islam from, but he’s the person to understand the complex structures of the dark underbelly Islam has given rise to: the terror networks. His website, The Investigative Project on Terrorism, is one of the best sources for in-depth analysis on issues that impact Islam. You will never learn about that through any traditional Islamic study or through anyone who can otherwise teach on the theology in principle.

(Here’s a vignette of Emerson and my mother at a wedding. My mom has zero interest in my work and no understanding of our world, but she’s a Pakistani woman who loves cooking. Emerson was trying to navigate the Pakistani cuisine at the buffet. Here’s a 6-foot something, white-haired man next to a four-foot nothing Pakistani woman who delighted and took pride in being able to lead the conversation. And he stood there, engaged her and listened respectfully. I watched. It was beautiful and human. We forget that every single one of us is human; we’re not superheroes and supervillains. We are human first.)

Laura Loomer — Loomer is another person who has to be looked at through multiple lenses. I don’t agree with her on a lot of the basic principles of Islam, but I do respect her as a voice with incredible courage who tries to draw attention to Islamist figures. Loomer and I have gotten to be friends over the last year, and in every single act of engagement, we have been very supportive of the other. If in a call, for example, she shares some inconsequential details that I don’t necessarily agree with, I don’t need to fight her on it. I listen. On the same note, if I say something she might not agree with, she listens. There is no need to be combative and defensive, but there is a need to start listening to each other. 

These Issues Deserve to be Led With Humanity

As a Muslim Reformer, my role is to stand on the horizon of human experience and look at things as objectively as possible. As Muslims with some legitimate frustrations in how Islam and Muslims are talked about, it doesn’t help if we start marginalizing and labeling other people without looking to have a conversation with them, understand them and find their value. 

And above all, we have to take off our armor. We have to start being willing to feel. Just like our skin responds to the warmth of the sun or the piercing sensation of cold, in the same way we have to be able to feel each other, to give pause and observe our own reactions, our thoughts, the process of how our mind resists or envelopes a new thought. We can’t do that if we’re only working from within our own silos.

In a follow up tweet from the public asking who we can learn Islam from, Mansoor directs the tweeter to his website where he shares resources. Unfortunately those resources lean toward Ahmadi Muslim publications mixed with propaganda reports attacking the conservative right. I’m deeply disappointed: The response to feeling like you’re not being heard or seen isn’t to not hear or see another.

We don’t shift the needle by mirroring the same behavior that frustrates us.

We have a duty to do better, which I feel Mansoor does understand, considering he routinely leads with integrity on discussing the American Muslim experience, especially as a veteran and a member of an oppressed minority in the faith. 

Islamic teachings tell us to condemn behavior, not people. However, shooting out an attack list without any further context is a form of condemning a list of people without (I’m guessing) ever having had a real conversation with anyone on that list. 

COLUMN BY

Shireen Qudosi

Shireen Qudosi is Clarion Project’s National Correspondent.

RELATED STORIES:

Shireen Qudosi: Taking Muslim Reform to the Next Level 

Viability of Muslim Reform in the U.S.

Zuhdi Jasser: Muslim Reform Can Work

RELATED VIDEO: Jason Hill Video: The Barbarians Are Among Us.

EDITORS NOTE: This Clarion Project column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Georgia on My Mind

/in , , , /by

Georgia Governor Brian Kemp is poised to select Kelly Loeffler to replace Georgia’s retiring Republican Senator Johnny Isakson. Kemp’s choice has provoked vehement opposition from conservative Georgians and the White House. Why is Kemp’s choice so controversial?

For starters, President Trump helped Kemp get elected, and POTUS has made it widely known his preference to fill the senate vacancy is conservative Rep. Doug Collins.

So, who is Kelly Loeffler and why is she controversial?

Businesswoman Kelly Loeffler is the chief executive of Bakkt, a subsidiary of Atlanta-based Intercontinental Exchange Inc (ICE) and co-owner of Georgia’s Women’s National Basketball Association team the Atlanta Dream. Atlanta News Now reports that Loeffler’s application to Governor Kemp states:

“From working on the family farm to creating jobs and opportunity in the business world, I have been blessed to live the American Dream. I am offering myself to serve hardworking Georgians as a political outsider in the United States Senate to protect that dream for everyone.”

But that’s not all!

Kelly Loeffler is married to Jeffrey Sprecher the Founder, Chairman, and CEO of Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (NYSE: ICE) and Chairman of the New York Stock Exchange. Jeffrey Sprecher owns the NYSE? Yep!

A December 12, 2013 Reuters article, ICE completes takeover of NYSE, describes the transaction, “The deal, which was worth $10.9 billion as of November 1, gives ICE control of Liffe, Europe’s No. 2 derivatives market, as well as the New York Stock Exchange, which has been at the center of American capitalism since it was started in 1792.

According to Wikipedia, “Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) is an American company that owns exchanges for financial and commodity markets, and operates 12 regulated exchanges and marketplaces. This includes ICE futures exchanges in the United States, Canada and Europe, the Liffe futures exchanges in Europe, the New York Stock Exchange, equity options exchanges and OTC energy, credit and equity markets. ICE also owns and operates 6 central clearing houses: ICE Clear U.S., ICE Clear Europe, ICE Clear Singapore, ICE Clear Credit, ICE Clear Netherlands and ICE NGX.” 

According to Fortune Magazine, “In August 2018 Intercontinental Exchange announced it was forming the new company Bakkt, which is intended to leverage Microsoft online servers to manage digital assets. Bakkt was said to be working with Boston Consulting Group (BCG), Microsoft, Starbucks, and others to create a software platform. The Bakkt ecosystem is expected to include federally regulated markets and warehousing along with merchant and consumer applications. Its first use cases will be for trading and conversion of Bitcoin (BTC) versus fiat currencies. Kelly Loeffler is Bakkt’s CEO.

Bakkt, a subsidiary of Sprecher’s Intercontinental Exchange, was valued at $740 million after series A funding round March 2019. So what is the problem and why does it matter that Loeffler is Bakkt’s CEO?

Kelly Loeffler and Jeffrey Sprecher’s personal wealth is not the problem, their philosophical aspirations regarding globalized trading with global cryptocurrency like Bitcoin through Bakkt is the problem.

Today’s worldwide clash between globalism and national sovereignty is reflected in American politics. The Leftist/Globalist axis has attacked the America-first agenda of President Donald Trump and repeatedly attempted to unseat him through impeachment, or defeat him in the 2020 presidential election.

The unsuccessful coup attempts against President Donald Trump have been coordinated by the deep state through the intelligence community to destabilize and overthrow the president because of his America-first policies. President Donald J. Trump is the existential enemy of globalism and is unapologetically committed to American freedom and American sovereignty. His presidency is challenged by the Democrat party support for open borders and uncontrolled immigration that facilitates the one-world government envisioned by the globalist political elite.

The difference between global trade and globalism is being intentionally blurred to disguise globalism’s sinister objective of a New World Order of internationalized one-world government. One of the essential requirements for national sovereignty is a national currency. The United States dollar is our country’s national currency. Globalists Kelly Loeffler and her husband Jeffrey Sprecher support the internationalized cryptocurrency they are promoting with Bakkt where trades will be conducted with Bitcoin instead of fiat currency like the U.S. dollar.

Bitcoin is the world’s first global, digital currency. Its use eliminates the need for central banks or even the nation-state’s government that regulate banks. Bitcoin is the global currency of an internationalized planet. It is the currency of globalism’s New World Order and one-world government.

The fact that Kelly Loeffler is a woman, a business leader, and a registered Republican cannot erase her $750,000 support for globalist RINO Romney in 2012, or the globalist ambitions of the Bitcoin exchange she leads. Kelly Loeffler is a globalist and a dangerous choice for American sovereignty because her Senate vote could theoretically tip the scale against President Trump’s America-first agenda.

Globalists are determined to stack the political deck with senate seats of Romney supporters like Loeffler rather than republicans who support President Trump’s America-first agenda like Georgia Rep. Doug Collins.

So, who is Governor Brian Kemp and why would he choose a globalist like Kelly Loeffler? Georgians want to know – and so do I.

RELATED ARTICLE: Doug Collins Won’t Rule Out Primary Bid Against Governor’s Choice For Senate

EDITORS NOTE: This Goudsmit Pundicity column is republished with permission. © All rights reserved.

Where Light Falls.

/in , , , /by

(These are my views as a woman living in England, on how the culture and spirit of my country has changed over 50 years.   Why the country does not feel protected or strong any more, how it has lost, and is losing it values and decency, and how we are daily losing our free speech.)

It is winter, and the dark nights are here.   But on these damp misty mornings, as I leave my home for work in the dark and as I return home later in the dark, I can but rest assured for I know that someone loves me.   The energy providers, whose faces I never see know that I need them.   They write to me often, and some of them even fight over me for attention.   They know like millions of others, the first thing I will do on these cold dark nights is go around my home switching lamps and heating on. It is quite a ritual.  As I do so, I sometimes smile as I hear my late father’s voice scolding me “It’s like Blackpool Illuminations” in here.   “Turn that light off”

We were frugal back then.   Leaving the landing light on because you were scared to go upstairs in the dark was a luxury.   These days it stays on.   However, there are also solar lights along the driveway, which cost £3.99 from the local petrol station and an inexpensive sensor light for unexpected guests.   Sometimes, it can be quite disconcerting as you hear it switch on in the very early hours as some stray cat or badger takes a short cut home across your property.

Yes, artificial lights have a down side too.

Historic England, a UK organization which is dedicated to preserving English heritage, by way of our buildings and historical sites, recently highlighted two famous buildings in their ‘loss and destruction’ season, by illuminating St Paul’s Cathedral, London and Coventry Cathedral with a spectacular light display impregnated against its ancient, and not so ancient brickwork.  The electricity bill must have been extremely high.

St Paul’s Cathedral which survived the war intact was illuminated with reminiscent scenes from the blitz.  Coventry Cathedral, which was bombed and ruined, also depicted a light show which highlighted its loss and destruction, together with the restoration of the new Cathedral that was built alongside the site.

Coventry is very well known for suffering more than any other city in England during the Luftwaffe raids in what the Germans called Operation Moonlight Sonata.  The moonlight on the 14th November 1940 allowed 500 Luftwaffe bombers to target Coventry for a straight 11 hours and totally destroy it.

If you visit Coventry today, you will find it to be a very modern urban city, dotted with 60’s style precincts and the odd historical building which survived the war.   Like many new cities it can, in my opinion feel predominantly soul-less, concrete and cold. It is also a University City and has been dedicated to be the City of Culture for 2021.

The Cathedral, which is one of the main attractions for visitors to Coventry, is also very modern, although it does have a vintage style restaurant alongside it, which people really like, and the ruins of the previous Cathedral are also attached to it.

The ruins are probably the most honest representation of what has happened to the faith of the United Kingdom since the war.  It stands as a testimony to that.

The roofless structure allows natural light to shine upon a ruined and broken place which epitomizes what evil can do to something it hates.    When you stand in the open air there you see the reality of an altar with a single wooden cross still standing.   For some people, it will speak to them more than all of the modern artwork in the adjoining cathedral.  It is simple and honest.

The organization, Historic England may be fighting to save our historical buildings, but no one seems to be fighting for people’s souls or attempting to re-capture the true comradeship and morality which once existed.

In a nutshell the site of Coventry Cathedral, with the new and the old living alongside each other is a microcosm of what the whole of the UK is.   There is a false light which is artificial in nature attempting to displace the genuine.

Our Need for Light

An inner light which does not require the reflective glare of a computer, a mobile phone, or a bright orange street lamp resides inside the hearts of many people.   Their direction is not ultimately governed or stolen by the goddess Alexa or her dashboard doubter Thomas; Tom for short.

A still small voice illuminates their way when they are still, plugged in, and not swayed by the distractions of life.

However, it is written and now illuminated, that there is an enemy intent on putting that light out for good.  It does not, like my father once stated, request this for the sake of saving on energy bills.

Its intention is to annihilate every man; woman and child who may carry even the smallest flicker of a light which at its core possesses ‘Truth’.   It wants to steal your life force.

The UK may be losing many souls which have carried this light but also there are many genuine souls which are becoming brighter, or suddenly having their lights internally switched on to the darkness which is posing as ‘light’ in our modern day world.

Sometimes the question is ‘how tired are you of suffering’ and how switched on are you to a light force which gives you real energy and illumination in the darkest of days.

Let there be Light

The shortest day in terms of daylight hours in the UK is the 21st December.   Days will then start their cycle of becoming lighter and lighter by a few minutes each day.   For some, there is sometimes a sigh of relief and a sense of hope that new beginnings are just around the corner.   Is it possible that a Creator designed the planets and the seasons in this fashion to remind us of our needs and that somewhere along the line ‘sun worship’ and idolatry became more fashionable?

As twinkling lights now start to appear in many homes in preparation for the event of Christmas, there are so many people who will miss the meaning of what Light really is; and who it is.

There will also be some religious persuasions who will point out the pagan roots of celebrating Christmas, and the obvious fact that Jesus was probably not born on the 25th December.

However, the question should be on what day was you born, and when did you wake up?   When did you really realize the need for light and truth on those days when darkness and depression threatened to overwhelm you?

A Light Shining in the Darkness

As I think of my late father’s insistence on turning all the lights of, I sometimes also remember the small torch I would use to read a little Gideon’s bible which I had.   At night, and as a child, when I was afraid of the dark, I always read Page 6, as I quoted it back then.   This little verse has kept a small light burning for many years, and it is probably the only verse I can ever truly remember.

Now when Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of Herod the king, behold, there came wise men from the east to Jerusalem, Saying, Where is he that is born King of the Jews? for we have seen his star in the east, and are come to worship him.  (Matthew 2:1-2)

Based on this story of Light, we can remember the source of where real hope and joy comes from and whatever the season find Peace on the darkest of days……..is.

© All rights reserved.

First Lady Dissed by Wimpy Snowflakes

/in , , , , , , /by

First Lady Melania Trump was booed by students when she spoke at an opioid awareness summit in Baltimore. Snowflake adults said the students were justified because Melania’s husband hurt their feelings by saying bad things about their city.

Folks, this infuriated me. I am so sick of snowflake adults who create dumb-down, brain-dead and wimpy snowflake youths. Taught to believe they are entitled, snowflakes are unable to submit to authority or deal with the normal pressures of life; living in their parent’s basement playing video games at age 30.

Liberal Democrats have controlled Baltimore for the past 50 years, transforming it into a hellhole of poverty, fatherless households, failing schools, economic decline and record breaking black on black homicides.

As a child, I lived in the Baltimore projects. I don’t remember any neighborhood so horribly out-of-control that no one dared to venture after dark. And yet, that is the ridiculous situation in Baltimore today.

Visiting Baltimore for my dad’s funeral, it was shocking to see endless blocks of empty rundown row-houses, rats and trash. What the heck happened to my beloved hometown once renowned as “Charm City”?

In the 1980s, Baltimore’s first black mayor, Kurt Schmoke ordered that my song “Hello Baltimore” be placed into the city’s time capsule. To illustrate Charm City’s shocking transformation, I made a music video of my song using footage of recent Baltimore riots.

Back in the day, the neighborhood around Pimlico Race Track where the Preakness Race is held was safe and upscale. Today, the Pimlico neighborhood has dramatically declined, infested with drugs and crime.

In the 1990s, I saw the beginning of the end for Baltimore because of stupid liberal Democrat policies. Park Avenue was the place to enjoy dinner at an upscale restaurant. Smelly, dirty vagrants began sleeping on the sidewalks and aggressively pestering patrons outside of the beautiful restaurants. Due to the city’s commitment to political correctness, restaurant owners could do nothing to save their businesses. Finally, every restaurant closed or moved away.

Living in the projects as a child, I loved exploring Park Avenue downtown. “The lights are much brighter there. You can forget all your troubles, forgot all your cares. Downtown, things’ll be great when you’re downtown. Everything’s waiting for you.”  Park Avenue has become another depressed section of the city unsafe after dark.

Incredibly, liberal Democrats who run Baltimore still have not learned to be friendly to businesses. During the recent Baltimore riots the mayor ordered the police to stand down and allow thugs to destroy businesses to express their frustrations regarding racial injustice. Unbelievable.

Late Democrat congressman Elijah Cummings received billions in federal grants to clean up his rat and crime infested district. The money was wasted or stolen. By the way, idiot black relatives of mine who live in Baltimore still praise Cummings for his wonderful service to the black community. Sorry, I had to get that off my chest.

Cummings’ wife also emits a putrid odor of corruption; using the suffering of her fellow blacks to get rich.

White liberals in fake news media claim to be advocates for black empowerment. The liberal Congressional Black Caucus and NAACP also lie about their commitment to black empowerment. These black and white liberals viciously attack anyone who dares to address problems which plague blacks in cities controlled by Democrats.

Thank God president Trump cares enough to address the problems of blacks who are suffering in Democrat urban plantations. Therefore, I don’t give a rat’s derriere about the hurt feelings of spoiled-brat snowflake youths, upset because Trump told the truth about their cesspool city run by corrupt Democrats. Adults who defended the students for booing our first lady are a part of our nation’s morally bankrupt and wimpy culture. They should be ashamed of themselves.

This hypersensitivity to “hurt feelings” turns my stomach. For crying out loud, adults need to start instructing wimpy youths to grow a spine.

World War II Americans are turning over in their graves in disgust of this new generation of snowflake Americans. My black dad passed away at age 90. When my brother was a teen, he quit his summer job because his boss hurt his feelings by yelling at him.

Dad could hardly believe his ears. Annoyed at my brother, Dad said, “He hurt your feelings? Boy, you had better go back and get your job!” Dad was teaching my brother to be a man!

As a black civil rights pioneer in the Merchant Marines and Baltimore City Fire Department, Dad endured all kinds of humiliation and hurt feelings. But Dad knew a man has to do what a man has to do. He had a wife and five kids to feed. His hurt feelings were irrelevant.

To restore our youths, we need to have zero tolerance for all this hypersensitivity, wimpy-ness and entitlement that liberals have instilled in our youths.

A snowflake reading this article will probably say, “Lloyd you sound angry. I feel triggered. Your toxic masculinity makes me feel unsafe. You should be silenced and jailed.”

Can you imagine what a nightmare it would be if a snowflake ever became president?

Thank God president Trump is a real man.

Merited mistrust?

/in , , , , , , /by

“There is something sick in the State Prosecutor’s Office; Shai Nitzan is not fit to be the State Prosecutor” – Judge Hila Gerstel, former Commissioner for Prosecutorial Oversight

Sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes? (But who will guard the guardians themselves?) Juvenal, a Roman poet (circa 55 CE- circa 127 CE), Satire VI, line 347.

Public trust in the police – the lowest in the West…only 22% of Israelis believe that judges don’t take bribes – Haaretz, Oct. 31, 2011.

Public approval of the police at all time low – below all other public services – Haaretz, July 7, 2013.

Last Thursday (Nov. 21, 2019), Attorney-General Avichai Mandelblit dropped a long-awaited bombshell on Israel’s political system.

Emotions erupt

After months of speculation, he announced his intent to indict Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for bribery, fraud and breach of trust in Case 4000 (the Bezeq-Walla Affair); for breach of trust in Case 1000 (the Illegal Gifts Affair); and for breach of trust in Case 2000 (the Yediot Aharonot-Israel Hayom Affair).

The announcement ignited an eruption of divergent public emotions. The Bibiphobes applauded it with undisguised glee, the Bibiphiles rejected it with unmasked abhorrence.

Netanyahu himself lambasted the decision. After a bland statement expressing generic “respect” for “the legal authorities”, he launched a bitter attack against specific sectors of those same authorities: “…you have to be blind not to see that something bad has happened to the police investigators and to the people in the State Attorney’s Office.”

Continuing his condemnation, he alleged: “We are witnessing an attempted coup against a prime minister on trumped-up charges and a tainted and tendentious investigation process…They didn’t pursue the truth; they pursued me.”

According to Netanyahu:

“[The} tainted investigation process, including inventing new crimes, has reached its apex today. It horrifies not only me, but masses of citizens in Israel, and not only on the right…This tainted process raises questions among the public about the police’s investigations and the prosecution. The public has lost trust in these institutions…This is selective enforcement on steroids. It’s enforcement just for me.”

Similar sentiments

I confess that I find that Netanyahu’s words of censure resonate with me.

Indeed, over the past two years I have expressed similar sentiments myself. For example, in February 2018, I wrote a piece entitled Coup d’etat, in which I warned :

“If he is … forced out of office, many will see this as naked politicization of law enforcement in the country, in effect, a legalistic coup d’état, designed to annul the outcome of elections — and will deal a mortal blow to their faith in the democratic process”.

Shortly thereafter, in The police, the press and a politicized “Putsch”?, I wrote: “The unrelenting drive to bring an indictment — any indictment — against Netanyahu has long exceeded the bounds of reasonable law enforcement”.

In March this year, in Will the “Deep-State” destroy democracy, I cited the prominent legal expert, Prof Alan Dershowitz, who sharply criticized the legal action against Netanyahu: “ The first probe, also known as case 1000, involves gifts of cigars and champagne Netanyahu received from close friends…I strongly believe that the appropriate criteria for criminal prosecution have not been met in the cigar and champagne case against Netanyahu…The other investigations (dubbed 2000 and 4000) pose even greater dangers to democratic governance and civil liberties…”

Earlier this month, in Democracy devoid of the demos?, I recalled the warning articulated by former Justice Minister, ‘Tommy’ Lapid (father of MK Yair Lapid of the Blue & White faction) : “…the legal system in Israel is being undermined by an over-zealous State Prosecutor’s Office, that is losing esteem and credibility with each additional trial…”; while the current Justice Minister expressed concern over a “dangerous symbiosis between elements in the police Major Crimes Unit, the State Prosecutor’s Office and the media”.

Understandable uproar

The hullabaloo is not difficult to understand.

Indeed, for the layman, the indictments appear to be uncompelling—to say the least.

After all, as I have written elsewhere, to “anyone but a rabid “Bibiphobe”, they appear transparently contrived, indeed, a thinly veiled attempt at a legalistic coup…creating a deep sense of unease that Israel’s legal establishment is being exploited for patent political ends — i.e. that unelected elites are using their positions of influence and authority to bring about political outcomes that do not correspond to — even contradict — the election results, depleting the influence of the demos in Israeli democracy.”

With regard to Case 1000, it is a little difficult to grasp why gifts of perishable goods from well-heeled acquaintances, even if inappropriately excessive, should be grounds for removing an incumbent prime minister from office. Indeed, even if punitive measures are called for, it would seem far more appropriate to impose administrative measures such as monetary penalties, rather than criminal ones.

With regards to Case 2000 involving a discussion between Netanyahu and Arnon Mozes, owner of Yediot Aharonot, it seems more than a little puzzling as to why any legal action is merited because of a meeting that produced no concrete result or even concrete action towards achieving that result—especially when over 40 other MKs did in fact act to do Mozes’s bidding , while Netanyahu opposed it! Perversely, no charges have been, or will be, filed against the 43 members of Knesset, who actually attempted to give Mozes what he asked for.

Case 4000 is a little more abstruse, involving Netanyahu’s actions in his role of Minister of Communications, and in which he is alleged to have bestowed on Shaul Elovitch, owner of the popular Walla channel, commercial benefits in exchange for improved coverage of Netanyahu and his family. However, not only did Netanyahu’s actions fall well within the bounds of his role as Minister of Communications, but as Caroline Glick and Alex Traiman point out, nowhere in the democratic world, has any prosecutor ever indicted – or even investigated – a politician or media organization of having committed bribery for providing positive coverage—even when such coverage came in direct exchange for legislation.

Puzzling precedent

A layman’s puzzlement might well by increased by the fact that the State Prosecution has as good as admitted that Netanyahu could not be indicted on the basis of well-established legal practice—and to do so, new legal precedents needed to be invoked.

This emerges clearly from an interview (May 8, 2019) with Shai Nitzan, the State Prosecutor, leading the legal action against Netanyahu.

During the interview, Nitzan was asked: “The determination that positive media coverage should be considered “bribery” is a legal precedent. Is it appropriate to set such a precedent for the first time in a case against a prime minister?”

His stunning, almost self-contradictory, response was:

“Every legal precedent has to begin at some point. For example, in Case 4000 [involving positive coverage in the Walla site], there was no disagreement and everyone agreed that it was right to indict on bribery, despite the fact that it did not involve envelopes filled with cash, but influencing media coverage. So, just because it involves the prime minister, we should delay the precedent for another time? I do not think that this decision involves a widening of the charge of bribery or breach of trust.”

This leaves one to ponder over why, if the decision was in fact unprecedented, how could it possibly not involve widening the charges?

Bursting the bubble?

Significantly, grave questions have been raised over the functioning of the State Prosecutor’s Office, in general, and of the State Prosecutor Nitzan, in particular—by none other than the person appointed to oversee them—retired Judge Hila Gerstel, who resigned from her role as Commissioner for Prosecutorial Oversight—after an acrimonious relationship with the State Prosecutor’s Office.

In an interview in the business daily, The Marker (owned by the far-left Haaretz), headlined There is something sick in the State Prosecutor’s Office; Shai Nitzan is not fit to be the State Prosecutor, Gerstel was sharply critical of both.

Asked how she felt about what she had experienced as Prosecutorial Oversight Commissioner, she replied: “As if the bubble, in which I had lived for 24 years, had burst. I believed that there were systems that worked properly in the country and I discovered that the particular system, over which I was appointed to inspect, was not functioning as it should.”

Gerstel admitted that, despite the fact that her fellow judges warned her that she did not know what she was getting into, she believed that the State Prosecutor’s Office was a body of honest diligent people, which focused exclusively on the public interest and were not willing to “cut corners” . Later, however, this changed: “We got the feeling that no-one cared about the system.”

As for Shai Nitzan, Gerstel was brusque and harsh: “In the contacts between us there were several times I got the impression that there was a problem with him being precise and truthful. I believe that the State Prosecutor must be a manager and a leader. This was not what I discovered. There is no leadership in the State Prosecutor’s Office.”

In response to the question whether Shai Nitzan should be State Prosecutor, she answered bluntly: “According to my criteria: No. From my knowledge of him: No.”

Experts excoriate

The profound sense of unease, which all the preceding accumulation of troubling question marks generates, is heightened by the fact that an impressive battery of internationally renowned legal experts has excoriated the legal action against Netanyahu—in no uncertain terms.

Thus, in a detailed critique in Tablet Magazine, Prof. Avi Bell warned: “Mandelblit’s announcement inserts law enforcement officials into the political arena in an unprecedented way, and on a very shaky legal foundation. If the legal theories that the attorney general is introducing against Netanyahu become general law, a considerable part of the democratic life of Israel will have to pass through police interrogation rooms. If they remain restricted to Netanyahu, the partisanship will permanently damage public trust in the Israeli legal system.”

According to Bell: “…the danger in the novel legal theories introduced by Mandelblit is stark. The criminal charges against the prime minister lack legal substance, and they threaten both the rule of law in Israel and the health of its democracy.”

Prof. Alan Dershowitz, who has written several critical op-eds and an open letter to Mandelblit, calling on him to drop the indictments, warned that “we’re seeing the weaponization of criminal justice for political purposes.”

According to Deshowitz:

“The relationship between politics and the media—and between politicians and publishers—is too nuanced, subtle and complex to be subject to the heavy hand of criminal law…To empower prosecutors to probe these mixed motivations is to empower them to exercise undemocratic control over crucial institutions of democracy.”

Capacious crimes?

Prof. Bell concludes his Table Magazine critique in dour tones: “The dispiriting truth is that there have always been two ways to understand the investigations against Netanyahu, and the implications for Israeli democracy are alarming.”

According to Bell:

“One way to look at the investigation is as a neutral application of a new understanding of the traditional crimes of bribery and breach of public trust. Under this interpretation, Mandelblit’s capacious understanding of the crimes of breach of trust and bribery may be unprecedented, but will now be applied across the board to all public officials and politicians. The horrifying result will be police oversight of nearly all interactions between media and public officials.”

Underscoring the absurdity of the situation likely to arise, Bell points out: “When the evening news devotes 15 minutes of generally positive coverage to Benny Gantz or to Mandelblit himself, producers and reporters may have to expect a summons to a police interrogation where they will be asked to demonstrate the purity of their motives. Politicians and public officials in constant touch with the media—that is, everyone in public life—will always find themselves on the verge of conviction of the felony of taking bribes, or, at least, ‘breach of public trust’. The center of Israeli political life will move to [police] interrogation rooms ….”

As Bell explains:

“The other interpretation is that the investigations should be seen as Netanyahu and his supporters paint them: special rules that are meant to apply only to Netanyahu. Israeli political life will not move to the police station, but will face the constant threat that law enforcement authorities may suddenly decide to apply “Bibi rules.”

He warns sternly:

“The harm to Israeli democracy of double standards in the criminal law based on prosecutor’s will would be incalculable. And law enforcement officials could never be seen as nonpartisan again.”

Contrived criminality

It was Dershowitz who astutely remarked:

“If somebody were to introduce legislation saying that it is a crime for a politician to seek good coverage and it came for a vote, it wouldn’t get a single vote in the Knesset. And that’s the best proof that it shouldn’t be prosecuted as a crime under today’s law…If you couldn’t get the Knesset to pass as law criminalizing this, you shouldn’t be punishing it.”

One thing is beyond doubt: No good result can come out of these indictments.

If Netanyahu is found guilty, roughly half the Israeli public will feel that there has been a gross miscarriage of justice—and the already tenuous public trust in Israel’s arms of law and order with be undermined even further.

On the other hand, if he is acquitted, roughly (the other) half of the Israeli public will feel that has been a gross miscarriage of justice-and the already tenuous faith in Israel’s system of law and order will eroded even further.

Among the biggest losers will be those who launched this ill-considered initiative in the first place. The mistrust it will generate in them, will be certainly be well merited.

© All rights reserved.

Recently Pardoned Turkey Found Dead After Claiming To Have Dirt On Hillary Clinton

/in , /by

WASHINGTON, D.C.—A turkey recently pardoned by President Trump was found dead after claiming to have dirt on the Clintons, sources at the FBI confirmed today.

The official cause of death was suicide, though the bullet wounds were in the back of the turkey’s head and the bird lacked opposable thumbs with which to operate a firearm.

The turkey had been publicly pardoned for the crime of being delicious and set free by Trump in a popular White House Thanksgiving tradition. Shortly after being released, the turkey confirmed its possession of “credible” information that would lead to the indictment of Hillary Clinton, posting on the bird’s social media account that it was a good thing Trump had pardoned the turkey, so the world could find the truth out about the Clintons.

Metro police discovered the turkey’s body later, shot twice in the back of the head and stabbed in the back. There was a nearby handwritten note confirming that the death was “not fowl play.”

RELATED SATIRE:

Global Warming Pinned On Kid Who Keeps Leaving The Front Door Wide Open While The Heater Is On

Conservative Slams Liberal Policies He’ll Support Five Years From Now

Nation’s Progressives Give Thanks That They Have So Much To Be Angry About This Year

Press Narrowly Escapes White House Lawn After Trump Releases The Hounds

Readers of the Bee,

If you value The Babylon Bee and want to see us prevail against Snopes and anyone else who might seek to discredit or deplatform us, please consider becoming a subscriber. Your support really will make a difference.

Support Us                                        Learn More

EDITORS NOTE: This political satire by The Babylon Bee is republished with permission. All rights reserved.

FEMINISM: The Second Bite of the Forbidden Fruit

/in , , , , , /by

Genesis 2 KJV

23 And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.

24 Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.

25 And they were both naked, the man and his wife, and were not ashamed.

While in our local theatre I saw a promotion for the new season of the ” L Word: Generation Q.” L Word is an LGBTQIA+ (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, Intersex, Asexual +) drama on Showtime.

After seeing the promo it struck me how far women have fallen into the abyss by eating of the forbidden fruit a second time.

The forbidden fruit’s name is “feminism.”

Ultimate Goals of Feminism

The Feminist/Women’s Rights/Women’s Liberation movement began primarily in America. Encyclopaedia Britannica defines feminism as:

The women’s movement of the 1960s and ’70s, the so-called “second wave” of feminism, represented a seemingly abrupt break with the tranquil suburban life pictured in American popular culture. Yet the roots of the new rebellion were buried in the frustrations of college-educated mothers whose discontent impelled their daughters in a new direction. If first-wave feminists were inspired by the abolition movement, their great-granddaughters were swept into feminism by the civil rights movement, the attendant discussion of principles such as equality and justice, and the revolutionary ferment caused by protests against the Vietnam War. [Emphasis added]

Question: Are women more equal and treated more justly today than they were in the 1960s? Are women today less frustrated?

Answer: In many ways yes but in others decidedly no.

Feminism: The Second Bite of the Forbidden Fruit

Genesis 3 KJV:

And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.

Question: Since the 1960s women have become more educated but are they wiser?

The answer lies in where women are today socially, culturally and politically.

Some women today have taken a second bite of the forbidden fruit of feminism. Feminism has morphed into the “social justice” movement with the latest iteration being the Women’s March. The Women’s March mission statement reads as follows:

The mission of Women’s March is to harness the political power of diverse women and their communities to create transformative social change. Women’s March is a women-led movement providing intersectional education on a diverse range of issues and creating entry points for new grassroots activists & organizers to engage in their local communities through trainings, outreach programs and events. Women’s March is committed to dismantling systems of oppression through nonviolent resistance and building inclusive structures guided by self-determination, dignity and respect.

The Women’s March is primarily a socialist political movement.

The Women’s March demands “self-determination, dignity and respect” for some but not all women.

According to Wikipedia the Women’s March was a “worldwide protest on January 21, 2017, the day after the inauguration of President Donald Trump. Tensions rose due to his statements, considered by many as anti-women or otherwise offensive. It was the largest single-day protest in U.S. history.”

The Women’s March:

The goal of the annual marches is to advocate legislation and policies regarding human rights and other issues, including women’s rights, immigration reform, healthcare reform, reproductive rights, the environment, LGBTQ rights, racial equality, freedom of religion, workers’ rights and tolerance. According to organizers, the goal was to “send a bold message to our new [Trump] administration on their first day in office, and to the world that women’s rights are human rights”.

The goals of the Women’t March do not coincide with the goals of most let alone all women. The goals of the Women’s March are not bi-partisan. Rather the goals of the neo-feminist/Women’s March coincide with the goals of one major political party in America.

Where Feminism, and the Women’s March, have failed women

Unlike the Woman Suffrage Movement, which “began in 1848, when a women’s rights convention was held in Seneca Falls, New York,” to give women the right to vote the current Women’s March movement is about some women and not ALL women. The Woman Suffrage Movement resulted in the passage of the 19th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. However, the Women’s March and neo-feminists support legislation, human rights issues, religions, LGBTQ rights and tolerance that have harmed women.

Here are examples of how the neo-feminists and Women’s March harm women:

  1. Divorce. Divorce by its very nature harms women the most. The good news is women are waking up to the dead end of divorce. According to the U.S. Center for Disease Control’s latest report the divorce rate has declined from 8.2 per one thousand in 2000 to 6.9 per one thousand in 2017.
  2. Single parent homes. One of the myths of the neo-feminist movement is the need to “create transformative social change.” This social change has resulted in the deconstruction of the nuclear family. In a study released in 2010 the CDC reported on family structure in the United Sates. The study reported on the percent distribution of family structure for children under age 18: United States, 2001–2007. The study found that only 48.4% of children were part of a nuclear (traditional) family. However, the study found that the percent distribution of nuclear family structure for non-Hispanic black children under age 18 is only 20.5%.
  3. The misogynistic myth of “intersectionality.” Intersectionality diminishes the value of being a women. When women are thrown into the same category as other minority groups based upon race, class, gender, ethnicity, language, age, sexuality and ability, they lose the one thing that holds them together, being a woman. A woman is a woman regardless of her race, class, gender, ethnicity, language, age, sexuality or ability. A woman has great value because she is a woman. Just as a man has great value because he is a man.
  4. The misogynistic myth of LGBTQ rights. Gender diaspora is by its very nature misogynistic. When one denies one’s biological sex at birth in the name of LGBTQ rights, then that person denies what makes them unique. Women are most harmed by the LGBTQ movement. Women have become infected with HIV/AIDS by having sex with bi-sexual men. Women are seeing transgender men beat them in “women’s sporting events.” Too many women, girls and boys will never know the real love of a traditional nuclear family.
  5. The misogynistic myth of reproductive rights. Killing one’s unborn, and even born, child is premeditated murder. Women have many ways to prevent pregnancy before conception. Women have the final say when it comes to becoming pregnant. Once pregnant a woman has a duty to carry her baby to term. If she does not want to keep her child there are many couples willing to adopt. Finally, abortion is not healthcare. In abortion the patient dies, sometimes with the mother.
  6. The misogyny of pedophiles and pederasts. The sons and daughters of women being abused by members of both the LGBTQ (i.e. pederasts) community and pedophiles. But neo-feminists do not give the same treatment to all children who have been abused. They do not speak with one clear voice that these behaviors will no longer be tolerated.
  7. The myth of tolerance. Tolerance must be a two way street. Women cannot demand tolerance and be intolerant of other women because this leads to cultural suicide. Rape, incest and other crimes against humanity do not differ because of the political affiliation of a woman or a group of women. Wrong is simply wrong. All women must stand against wrong.
  8. The misogyny of Islam. Islam views and treats women differently than any other major religious system. The neo-feminists and Women’s March have fully embraced Islam and its tenants. Unlike women living in Muslim majority nations, feminists in America have no idea what the true believers and followers of Mohammed can do to a woman.

Conclusion

One would think that the Women’s March would be focused on reducing the divorce rate even further, working to strengthen the nuclear family unit (especially among blacks), divest itself of the intersectionality and LGBTQ rights issues which are misogynistic, fight against pornography, work to enact laws that provide harsh punishment for pedophiles and pederasts and support the women in Iran, Hong Kong, Cuba, Valenzuela who are fighting and dying in the streets in the quest for freedom.

You would think that the Women’s March would be for the civil rights of the unborn!

Today women are seeing greater opportunities than ever before. There are more career women, more job opportunities for women in the digital world, and more freedom for women to be all that they can be. Even the sky is no longer the limit for women. Space.com notes:

The first woman in space, Valentina Tereshkova, blazed a trail for the many female spaceflyers who would follow. Tereshkova, a Soviet cosmonaut, was selected from more than 400 applicants to launch on the Vostok 6 mission June 16, 1963.

In June 1983, NASA astronaut Sally Ride became the first U.S. woman in space when she launched on the STS-7 mission of the space shuttle Challenger.

[ … ]

NASA astronaut Kathryn D. Sullivan became the first American woman to do a spacewalk when she floated outside the space shuttle Challenger during mission STS-41-G on Oct. 11, 1984.

[ … ]

NASA astronaut Mae Jemison flew on space shuttle Endeavour in September 1992, becoming the first African-American woman to travel to space.

[ … ]

NASA astronaut Eileen Collins was the first woman to command a space shuttle mission, a role that required an astronaut to have at least 1,000 hours of experience piloting jet aircraft. Collins commanded the STS-93 space shuttle mission in July 1999, and went on to command a second time in July 2005.

Women do not need to compete with men. Women and men have a greater calling.

To paraphrase Belgian poet Émile Cammaerts,

“When people cease believing in God, it’s not that they start to believe in nothing; it’s that they’ll believe in anything.”

Remember Genesis 2:24, “Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.”

© All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Feminists Exalt the Wonder of Abortion

Blacks Hesitant to Vote for Homosexual Candidate

Obama Rejected Race-Based Politics. The Woke Left Demands It.

Saving Private Ryan: Virtue and valour against ‘toxic masculinity’

Self-pity: The Hidden Root of Transgender Rage

Trump Signs Pro-Hong Kong Legislation

RELATED VIDEO: My Forced-Hijab Nightmare.