The Era of the Ungrateful American

/in , , , , , /by

Talk about biting the hand that feeds you. I can’t fathom the ingratitude of American soccer star Meghan Rapinoe’s attitude toward America.

Writer Warner Todd Huston notes,

“Rapinoe raised eyebrows in the 2018 season by taking a knee during the playing of the national anthem even though she is playing for the U.S. Women’s National soccer team. Her taking a knee only came to an end starting in the 2019 season because the team passed a rule requiring players to stand during the anthem. But she right away said that she would never sing the ‘Star Spangled Banner’ again, nor would she place her hand over her heart because she hates America.”

Sadly, she is by no means alone. There are millions of ungrateful Americans today.

I remember years ago seeing one of The Far Side cartoons by Gary Larson which showed one dog in his den showing another dog his mounted, stuffed trophies on his wall. There were a couple of stuffed cat heads and bird heads and also a human hand mounted on the wall. The host dog was saying to his guest, “And that’s the hand that fed me.”

What a fascinating contrast. Last week a man and his infant daughter tragically drowned trying to get to this country through illegal means. And yet the soccer star who was born here has nothing but contempt for the land of opportunity that has given her so many opportunities.

This reminds me of people who are ungrateful to the Lord, even though every beat of their heart is by His grace. When He says, “Enough,” it is over and then comes the judgment.

President Lincoln reminded us of our need for thankfulness to God when he called for a day of fasting and prayer during the conflict that tore this country apart.

On March 30, 1863, he wrote,

“We have been the recipients of the choicest bounties of Heaven ….But we have forgotten God. We have forgotten the gracious hand which preserved us in peace, and multiplied and enriched and strengthened us; and we have vainly imagined, in the deceitfulness of our hearts, that all these blessings were produced by some superior wisdom and virtue of our own.” [Emphasis added]

Our own prosperity as a nation has caused us to forget the Lord, said our 16th president: “Intoxicated with unbroken success, we have become too self-sufficient to feel the necessity of redeeming and preserving grace, too proud to pray to the God that made us!”

With another Fourth of July upon us, I think it is a good time to recall why we should be grateful as Americans. This country was born through the sacrifices of those who went before us.

What is the Fourth of July? It commemorates that date in 1776 when 56 men in Philadelphia, representing three million people, agreed by voice vote to adopt the final wording of our national birth certificate, the Declaration of Independence.

They knew their lives were on the line by voting for independence from England, and a handful of them paid the ultimate price for this declaration. Several of them were specifically targeted by the British.

The document declared that the rights of man come not from the king or the state, but from the Creator. It declared that when a government interferes too much with God-given rights, the government ultimately becomes illegitimate.

This declaration came years after futile attempts to work with the king to bring about an acceptable peace. But as the “men of Boston” put it, according to the great 19th century historian, George Bancroft:

“While America is still on her knees, the king aims a dagger at her heart.”

We seem to forget the sacrifices of the founding fathers who bequeathed the freedoms, and subsequently, the prosperity we enjoy in this country.

A key founding father John Adams declared:

“It is the will of heaven that the two countries should be sundered forever…” America would become its own nation, separate from England.”

Adams adds that if we have to endure hardship because of it, God will still help see us through:

“[I]t may be the will of heaven that America shall suffer calamities still more wasting and distresses yet more dreadful. If this is to be the case, the furnace of affliction produces refinement in states as well as individuals; but I submit all my hopes and fears to an overruling Providence, in which, unfashionable as the faith may be, I firmly believe.”

The men who birthed America and declared independence laid everything on line, as they trusted in God.

Why should Meghan Rapinhoe be grateful? Because she was born in a country which gave her opportunity to “write her own script” as some might put it. It is hard for me to comprehend  ungrateful Americans.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Democrat Lawmaker Speaks Out Against Nike

Nike’s Betsy Ross Flag Freak-Out Shows Moral Inconsistency of Left

A Look at Addiction to Social Media

/in , , , /by

Social media use has become a hot topic in recent years as the amount of profiles across platforms have skyrocketed globally.

The debate here is whether or not this indicates an unhealthy level of addiction. Many younger users in particular (who either do not remember life before social media or literally were not even born when it was introduced) defend it as simply both a modern equivalent of leisure time like television or radio and also a phenomenal tool to communicate and exchange knowledge.

The clear advantages and benefits of social media aside, let’s take a look at how addicted we are and how it’s impacted us as a global society.

Are We Addicted?

While this question is mostly answered through opinion rather than objective fact, there are definitely statistics that could help provide insight.

One way we can determine the level of reliance and addiction is through the age of exposure. In other words, how young are children being exposed to social media nowadays?

According to a report by Influence Central, the average child acquires a smartphone by the age of 10 and opens their first social media account by 11. By the age of 12, a shocking 50% of children have an account on at least one social media platform.

These statistics show that social media isn’t simply a platform for teenagers and adults to interact with each other and exchange information, but also a tool that children often use by the time they reach middle school.

The second way that we can determine this is through the amount of exposure. Of course, everyone is different (some people will be on constantly throughout the day while others aren’t even particularly interested), but the average can speak volumes.

As of April 2019, the number of active users on the top social media platforms are as follows:

  • Facebook: 2.32 billion
  • YouTube: 1.9 billion
  • Instagram: 1 billion
  • Twitter: 330 million
  • LinkedIn: 303 million
  • Snapchat: 287 million

This is just a broad look at social media usage since there are still many other platforms (and, of course, many users overlap), but considering the fact that the current world population is just under 7.4 billion, the numbers become much more startling as percentages:

  • Facebook: 31.6%
  • YouTube: 25.9%
  • Instagram: 13.6%
  • Twitter: 4.5%
  • LinkedIn: 4.1%
  • Snapchat: 3.9%

As a reminder, these statistics are for monthly users, meaning this is the amount of the world (including rural areas who may not even have access) who actively uses these platforms.

What Does This Mean Socially and Culturally?

Though humankind has always had means of distraction (books, newspapers, etc.) that they could turn to as a way to temporarily isolate or entertain themselves, social media has really brought this to a whole new level.

On the positive side of things, the boom of social media has made it insanely easier to experience other worldviews by connecting people from all walks of life in one place. Prior to this technology, many people would fail to ever interact with people from vastly different cultures and life experiences, making it harder to understand different perspectives.

However, that is the “ideal” more than the reality. Many platforms analyze the information that users use and share, providing them with similar content that they know they will enjoy. This seems simple, but it also leads to a problem of echo chambers since people will be receiving viewpoints from the circles and groups they are already a part of, diminishing the benefit of cultural and political exchange.

Additionally, social media has given people a chance to hide behind their screens and even behind fake profiles, opening up an entirely new problem for things like cyberbullying, scamming and general attitudes that they would never exhibit offline.

Social media has also made unhealthy shifts in societal standards since “perfection” is at everyone’s fingertips. People tend to exhibit their highlights on social media, making it seem like everyone is succeeding and thriving except for you. This on top of a constant barrage of social media models, advertisements and other influences can cause a massive hit to self-esteem.

Lastly, you may already realize that social media also threatens real-time interactions. Many people will find themselves distracted by their phones when they are at events or spending time with loved ones rather than living in the moment. Many people will even busy themselves with filming events like concerts to post to their social media stories rather than enjoying it in the moment itself.

This has caused a boost in things like social anxiety and isolation as well as a decline in physical interaction and expertise in things like body language, social cues and even patience.

What Does This Mean Economically?

Any shift throughout history eventually has an impact on the economy, sometimes even completely shifting jobs to new sectors.

For social media, one of the many areas that is deeply impacted by the prevalent use of social media is marketing. With technology and social media making everything exponentially more accessible at your fingertips, everything is consumed much more quickly and superficially, so both goods and their respective marketing strategies are pressured to be more quickly digestible.

Digital marketing is becoming increasingly necessary, and ad campaigns are feeling more and more pressure to focus on things like promo models, internet trends, data mining and quick, quirky sound bites and images/video to catch consumers’ attention.

Lastly, social media addiction is hugely responsible for the spike in online shopping. Companies like Amazon (or any company’s website and delivery features) are able to thrive by advertising on social media platforms (either directly or through influencers) since a simple click can drive consumers to their website.

This is a huge contrast to the way that prior marketing (TV, radio, newspaper, etc.) functioned because even if consumers are successfully influenced, they still actually have to follow through and travel to the business to receive the good or service, leaving room for them to either change their mind or decide against the effort if they are too preoccupied with other responsibilities.

The overall convenience of social media has prompted this shift in the marketplace and in marketing strategies for businesses across industries.

In Summary

The addiction to social media that has developed over recent years is alarming due to its massive reach and influence on social, cultural and economic factors in our society.

Not only is this something that impacts our day to day lives, it affects us on a bigger scale. Currently, the companies who most dominate society are social media tycoons like Facebook, technology providers like Apple or online shopping platforms like Amazon.

Of course, there is good and bad that comes with such a shift. But at what point does progress turn into addiction, and what are we giving up in the process?

For more great and informative topics, be sure to browse through the rest of our posts and check back for updates.

© All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLE: A Comprehensive Cyberbullying Guide for Parents

How Hollywood has Fallen into the Abyss by promoting the Seven Deadly Sins

/in , , , , /by

Today, Hollywood no longer makes films like the 1956 movie The Ten Commandments, rather it looks for ways to fully embrace the Seven Deadly Sins in its films.

The Guardian’s Henry Barns did an interview with John Cusack about his 2014 film Maps to the Stars. During the interview Cusack stated, “Hollywood is a whorehouse and people go mad.” Three years later we saw unfolding how producer Harvey Weinstein became the poster child for Hollywood as “a whorehouse.” Lust is one of the Seven Deadly Sins along with: Gluttony, Greed, Laziness, Wrath, Envy and Pride. Notably gay pride.

When you watch any film look for Hollywood to promote one or more of the Seven Deadly Sins.

We saw the film industry lose its audience in 2017 as it fell deeper into the abyss. While attendance grew in 2018 it may have been because of a company called MoviePass which offered unlimited movie tickets at select theatres for $9.99 a month. Today MoviePass is struggling to stay in business.

Recently Hollywood studios announced that it would not film in Georgia because the state legislature passed, and Governor Brian Kemp signed into law, a heart beat bill to protect the unborn. There is at least one exception. One man is standing against Hollywood, his name is Clint Eastwood. Eastwood will be in Georgia filming The Ballad of Richard Jewell. The movie is about American security guard, Richard Jewell, who heroically saved thousands of lives from an exploding bomb at the 1996 Olympics in Atlanta, Georgia. Jewell was unjustly vilified by the media, which falsely reported that he was a terrorist responsible for the bombing.

Hollywood is all about envy and pride.

Hollywood rewards itself with the Emmy, a golden idol, for making films that violate not only the Seven Deadly Sins but also the Ten Commandments. Murder, rape, incest, hate, pride, envy, gluttony, greed, wrath and sloth are common themes in films today. Add to this list the glorification of man over God, drug and alcohol abuse and of course homosexuality.

Even worse is that these Seven Deadly Sins and the Ten Commandments have cartoon characters in animime games and videos that our children play. Children are being exposed to every known sin in video games, on the silver screen and even in our public school classrooms with Comprehensive Sexuality Education (CSE). Watch:

Perhaps Hollywood will come to its senses and begin making more and more movies that emphasize Faith, Purity, Patience, Love, Selflessness, Truth, Repose, Pacifism, Reticence and Piety? Films like Toy Story 4, Catching Faith and Yesterday or the television series The Chosen.

We as parents, grandparents and citizens can only be watchful and go to see those movies that present a positive and loving message.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Americans Vastly Overestimates Gay Population, Gallup Poll Finds

Johns Hopkins Psychiatrist: Transgender is ‘Mental Disorder;’ Sex Change ‘Biologically Impossible’

Soviet Socialism in the 21st Century — Part 2

/in , , /by

Marxist theory, which opened Pandora’s Box in the 19th century in Europe, marched across the globe during the 20th century. Marxism had a dramatic impact on life in this world. Aggressive mob leaders fed on the public disorder and violence and their leadership produced the first socialist revolution in France. This was the period of the “Paris Commune” with enormous casualties which then failed very quickly. Those events were followed by socialist revolts in Hungary and German Bavaria. Both of them failed as well. Western civilization rejected their violent and destructive ideology–capitalism continued its development in those countries.

I agree with Nietzsche that the envy of the poor is usually the main impulse to revolt. Furthermore, history shows that the leadership of any political movement plays a crucial role in shaping the outcome of a revolt–Lenin is a prime example of that concept, contrary to Marx’s “Marxist theory can be applied only to industrially develop European countries…. “ Any popular revolt was used by adventurers, charlatans, and criminals to acquire power, to fool, mislead, manipulate, and then to abuse, corrupt, and exploit people around the globe. The one leader who had all these negative human characteristics was Joseph Stalin of Russia.

Ironically, despite not meeting the requirements of any of Marx’s four postulates, the first Socialist Revolution took power in 1917 Russia. To the contrary by perverting all of them while at the same time using Marxist rhetoric to further his ends, Joseph Stalin created his own ideology and established a criminal syndicate, a totalitarian terror-machine called Soviet Socialism… For decades this aggressive and expansionist ideology was corrupting, abusing, and defrauding people of the world. This is one of the main reasons I am renaming Soviet Socialism as Soviet Fascism…

A Malignant Regime of Political Correctness

If you are watching the discussions on TV and radio today, you will be overwhelmed by the variety of opinions on how to deal with Terrorism, al-Qaeda, ISIS, Syria, Iran and Russia. Yet, all the participant PhD’s, Generals, politicians, and journalists are missing the major topic, the root cause of all events in the world–Stalin and Soviet Socialism. And, who was the author and architect of Political Correctness? We, people emigrated from Russia and other former Socialist countries know well Political Correctness–we lived through it half of our adult lives. It is a Stalinist policy, driven by a political agenda, a skillfully crafted design and a long-term strategy of war against Western civilization and the creation of a One World Socialist Government under the Kremlin’s rule.

Today America is stunned by two stories that bespeak the “achievements” of Political Correctness. The first story is the sad picture of a drowned Father and daughter at our border with Mexico. For your information the Muslim invasion in Europe was perpetrated by the Russian Intel, as well as all Caravans on our Southern border. The second story is Google’s promise to stop Trump’s 2020 reelection. The story has the same culprit. Read my column Soviet Fascism in America: Guard Your Freedoms. Yes, both stories are the confirmation of the war waged by the Socialist mafia to change our value system, to stop the social mobility of capitalism, to lower the standards of morality in our culture, and to sabotage the political system left to us by our Founding Fathers.

When my proficiency in English allowed me to grasp the current politics, I was stunned by the deeply rooted Political Correctness in America. How could that happen? Where was the usual common sense of the nation? Where were all American intelligence agencies? If logically, ‘Knowledge is Power’, we have permitted Political Correctness to allow Ignorance to rein in America… And that makes me angry, because I have spent thirty years of my life and money to give the American people needed knowledge about Russia and Stalin to warn you. But our Intelligence Service sabotaged my books and my numerous articles to block the information conveyed in them. Yet nothing can stop me in my mission to provide you with the Truth, because I believe there will be a major American re-awakening in the era of Trump’s Presidency…

So, you are perhaps asking yourself: what does Political Correctness have to do with everyday life of the American people or with our national security? It has to do with everything and it affects the life of each citizen of America, because Political Correctness is a central part of the ongoing asymmetrical war of Socialism against Western civilization waged under Russia’s supervision. I researching the subject, academia presented only a surface commentary and a vague interpretation on the matter. To present a credible explanation, I had to find a linguistic and historical definition of Political Correctness. Finally, I found explanation more close to reality that gave the concept itself and the period of the history in which it was born. Timing is the key issue to comprehend the subject.

“In the early-to-mid 20th century, contemporary uses of the phrase “Politically Correct” were associated with the dogmatic application of Stalinist doctrine, debated between formal Communists (members of the Communist Party) and Socialists.” Encyclopedia.

Moreover, I found an informed man: “In the early-to-mid 20th century, contemporary uses of the phrase “Politically Correct” were associated with the dogmatic application of Stalinist doctrine, debated between formal communists (members of the Communist Party) and socialists. The phrase was a colloquialism referring to the communist party line, which provided for “correct” positions on many matters of politics, according to American educator Herbert Kohl writing about debates in New York in the late 1940s and early 1950s.” Thank you Herbert Kohl, you knew the truth seventy years ago. Alas, contemporary academicians don’t even mentioning Stalin and his legacy, discussing politics and economy today.

In order to have an understanding of the topic, you have to know the Soviet history of those days, the real history, not the history presented in the Soviet books. As you know, I am a child of Stalinism, I lived through that history. The timing–”In the early—to- mid 20th century” is telling you almost everything–at the time, Stalin was building his cult of personality and one party system of Soviet Socialism in the country. All the methods and devices were directed to those goals.

It should be mentioned that in 1923 prior to Lenin’s death, as leader of the Revolution, he stated that Russia was an agricultural country and it can’t go down the Marxist path. After Lenin’s death in 1924, Stalin began the immediate elimination of all political opposition–leaders and people from different parties with political agendas contrary to his. Nobody could compete with him in the art of double-dealing and intrigue. Trotsky was the first target, exiled by 1927. Stalin called him a “Fascist,” and the elimination of the Bolsheviks was begun.

The liquidation of the leaders was going on at full speed. The history of that time tells the methods, tools, and devices the Stalinist regime used to liquidate millions of innocents–Show Trials, Purges, Gulags, imprisonments, deportations to Siberia and Central Asia, and many other horrifying methods. Yet, his first method was—Political Correctness. The first stage of Stalin’s system was designed to affect human minds: Political Correctness. That’s right, the same Political Correctness we have been talking about in America for the last three decades was Stalin’s invention aimed at his opposition and ultimately at the destruction of Western civilization and the American Republic, left to us by our Founding Fathers…

 “… Political correctness is a Stalinist policy, driven by the political agenda, a skillfully crafted design of a quintessential system of lies, fraud, and a long-term strategy of war against Western civilization to create of One World Socialist Government under Kremlin’s rule.”

Political Correctness was Stalinist social engineering using semantics, to use and affect the human emotional core, with touching scenes that play on your emotions, while deceiving you. I dedicated pages to give you examples of Political Correctness in Socialist Lies: Please, read Chapter 29 to learn how Political Correctness operates and how the Democrat’s policy of abortion was using Stalinist methods against Republicans to lower the standards of morality in our country. As a psychological method, Stalin’s Political Correctness has helped Democrats to fool and deceive you, using a cosmetic definition of Socialism, created by socialist-professors, contrary to existing knowledge of the source of PC in the 1950s.

Ideas are not spreading by wind or air–people disseminate them. Unfortunately, Republicans and our Media are focused on the ideology and agenda of Saul Alinsky, who is only one example of Stalin’s agents of influence (KGB political operatives). In fact, there are thousands of them, spreading and implementing the Stalinist concepts. Look at our culture: what we used to define as the greatness of America now is under siege–the heroes have become criminals, the criminals become heroes, like in the Soviet Union. We are destroying historic buildings and monuments, revising history of America, as it was in Russia under Stalin.

Remember the agenda, essence and devices of Political Correctness to cover-up the Truth by propagating Stalinist ideology with arsenal of different devices: lies, fraud, deceit, distortion, fabrication, perjury, and so on to substitute the Truth with the process. It is a process of diverting you attention from the important issues by the cascades of lies and fraud: climate change, the “Green New Deal” –a colossal fraud aimed at stopping the social mobility of Trump’s capitalism. We have only 24/7, and AOC and others are providing us with one absurdity after another to occupy our time with fraud.  Just look back at the Obama administration and you will find the exact formula of the Stalinist Political Correctness in the 21st century. I hope Attorney General will expose the actors of that historic fraud…

Another Root of Soviet Fascism—Vicious Violence

In this respect, it should be mentioned that after the collapse of the Soviet Union, nothing substantial was changed in Russia, except the name of a country. We are dealing now with the Russian Federation under the leadership of a former KGB counterintelligence officer Vladimir Putin. The old regime of the Soviet System is running the country: Socialist economy that had collapsed was replaced by oligarchic-crony capitalism under the KGB’s leadership. Moreover, a substantial number of problems continue to plague the world as they have for a hundred years—Soviet Socialism is fighting capitalism of Western civilization and its bastion, the American Republic. Writing about that for a long time and analyzing the current events, I have renamed Soviet Socialism as Soviet Fascism.

As nothing has changed in Russia, I am using the term KGB, uniting the images of all Soviet/Russian agencies—as the term is familiar to Americans. The entire Russian Intel is a para-military apparatus under a military Doctrine. It is for that reason, I have been writing about former KGB Chairman Yuri Andropov and his Operation Barbarossa, a design to simultaneously penetrate America’s social media and the top brass of America’s security apparatus by KGB’ political operatives, agents of influence, as Stalin called them. Read my description of Andropov’s Operation Barbarossa to grasp the America’s predicament in the 21st century…

Andropov was a conduit between Stalin and Putin and as a devoted disciple of Andropov. Putin, a counterintelligence officer, was very successful as an agent of influence in Germany, penetrating deeply the entire government. It is not a coincident that we can’t recognize Truman Party any longer: Putin’s friends from the KGB had been working very hard for the last several decades to repeat the German experiment in America. Putin hates successful capitalist-Trump and never helped him in any way—he, in fact, has had a long alliance and bond with the Clinton Mafia. Get it? Watching contemporary predicament in America you will be the Judges…

Only now we can go to the second stage of the Stalinist system: it was an appalling and revolting excessive use of violence. And if you read my books and columns, you know the “criminal cabal” of the Soviet System—the KGB and other agencies of the Russian Intel that carried out those methods. You will be surprised, as I found some similarity of the KGB methods used by our American Intel lately. I have already written about that in my 20-25 latest columns. Though we don’t have yet mass deportation of the citizens to Siberia and Tundra, the signs of cultural changes with increased violence are very visible: Antifa, the gangs attacking Trump’s rally, the attempted assassination of Rep. Scalisi, and so on. Those all coming from the Dems. It will worsen at the time of elections–we have a part of the population already inculcated and equipped with Political Correctness.

Just assess the functionality of the American Socialist mafia in the second phase of Stalinist Soviet System. The second phase was possible only after the human brain was psychologically manipulated and equipped with Political Correctness. The multiplicity of inhuman methods used within the Stalinist Soviet system is staggering in its brutality. And if you read my books and columns, you know the “criminal cabal” of the Soviet System—the KGB and other agencies of the Russian Intel that carried out those methods. That was Stalin’s Soviet Socialism fighting the people of Russia to establish the fraud, the only known Socialism practiced in the world…

Fake News is the enemy of the people, because Fake News is nothing other than the old KGB “Operation Disinformation” exercised by the KGB for several decades through the media-mob. It is one of a thousand KGB methods and tricks aimed at subverting capitalism: they have different forms, sizes, and colors, always using lies, intimidation, fraud or threat, and all have the same agenda of dismantling our free market economic system and transform it to control by the government. The execution of this transformation has been going on for the last several decades, now it is in its final stage of preparation for the Socialist revolution in America. The main doer is the Dems’ Socialist Mafia in collaboration with the KGB’s political operatives on our soil.

Yes, Bernie Sanders is a liar–Socialism is not love and compassion it is just the opposite of that—Socialism is corruption, abuse and fraud. Just look at Bernie, who calls himself a Democratic Socialist. The term itself is an oxymoron—a democrat can’t be a socialist, a socialist can’t be democratic. The term reveals a total absence of the knowledge of socialist policy– Socialism means a dictatorship. Authoritarianism in a struggle to end individual liberty and private property, which is the opposite of democracy. Yet the incompetent and timid Republican establishment doesn’t even attempt to argue and reject the fraud. The Trojan Horse Bernie is openly driving us to Socialism, by fooling and deceiving our youngsters…

The Dems agenda and their ideological program are clear to me: they want to change America’s future social development, and stop the social mobility afforded by of capitalism. Just look at the “Green New Deal” –a colossal fraud aimed at bringing the free market economy to its knees, an economy which has already shown its enormous ability to resurrect our nation from Obama’s Socialism. Yet, the Dems demonized capitalism and corporations, they morphs into the party of “Abolish ICE,” “open the borders,” “give away healthcare,” “give away college,” “guarantee everyone a green job,” and a fraud of “reproductive Justice.”

The Democrats openly pronounced all of that during two recent debates.

This is a direct path to a Socialist agenda to demolish and destroy the American Republic: plus also consider Obamacare, copied from the Soviet medical system, provided by the Russian Academy of Science to Obama’s administration. Charlatans in the Democrat Party are the No.1 enemy of the American Republic and Americans! Their methods are easily recognizable: lies, fraud, deceit, cheating, and alike identifying them as charlatans fooling, deceiving, corrupting, and inculcating decent people. I wonder why Democrats hate America the Beautiful and want to dismantle the unique and humane system designed by our Founding Fathers…

The ideology of Soviet fascism and its hatred had been vividly illustrated by two recent Democrat Party debates, demonstrating appalling ignorance in cahoots with arrogance—a very grave combination. The aggressive tone and level of hatred toward contemporary America prevailed on the debates. Have you seen one American flag in the facility? Do you understand now why I renamed Soviet Socialism to Soviet fascism? Without awareness of Soviet fascism on America’s soil, we can lose the American Republic and a political system left to us by our Founding Fathers to Putin’s friends in America.

To be continued www.simonapipko1.com

READ: Soviet Socialism in the 21st century — Part 1

93 year old Holocaust survivor wants AOC out of Congress ‘given ‘Nobel Prize in stupidity’ for concentration camp comments.

/in , , , , /by

Alexandria Ocasio Cortez is one of the most powerful Democrats in congress today. She was invited to visit a concentration camp by a 93 year old survivor after her concentration camp remark. She refused, claiming the unspeakable horrors this 93 year old survivor mentioned was part of a  “far right ” plot against her.

Read the interview and explain to the American people why the Democrat leadership and so many members of congress have embraced AOC a virulent Holocaust denier and anti-Semite making her one of the most powerful people in the Democrat Party . The Democrat Party of my youth no longer exists.

This is what this 93 year old Holocaust survivor has to say:

93-year-old Holocaust survivor wants AOC out of congress, given ‘Nobel Prize in stupidity’ for concentration camp comments

“She doesn’t want to learn — she’s looking for excuses.”

While Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and her friends in the media, are quintupling down on comparing American detention facilities to concentration camps, a survivor of the real concentration camps in Nazi Germany is livid, and speaking out.

Ed Mosberg is 93 years old, and is one of the few people still alive who survived the Nazi camps. He lives in Morris Plains, NJ, and he spoke to the New York Post about the freshman congresswoman’s comments.

“She should be removed from Congress. She’s spreading anti-Semitism, hatred and stupidity,” he said to the paper. “The people on the border aren’t forced to be there — they go there on their own will. If someone doesn’t know the difference, either they’re playing stupid or they just don’t care.”

Read more.

Dead End at Bernie’s: Sanders Will Never be President

/in , , , , /by

For those still feeling the Bern, I’ve some bad news: Bernie Sanders will never be president. This is first and foremost because he’ll never, ever be the Democrat nominee. The man who never really was yesterday’s candidate (except in Vermont) is nonetheless yesterday’s news.

While I wrote about this prior to Thursday’s Star Wars bar scene (a.k.a. the Democratic Debate), that no one is talking about Sanders after that event tells the tale. His case is a curious one, too.

When Sanders crashed the 2016 Democrat primaries, he seemed a breath of fresh Green Mountain State air up against Mrs. Establishment. Sure, he had no charisma, but, hey, what are we talking about here? His opponent was Ice Maiden Hillary.

Moreover, Sanders’ message’s time had come. He demonstrated that open socialism (as opposed to the Democrats’ erstwhile closeted variety) now sells. He was a bit like Donald Trump, who captured the GOP nomination partially because on immigration he was willing to go where no modern Republican had gone before. The senator was the first American Fabian in the field.

But having seen this, two years later Democrat hopefuls essentially quoted 19th-century Brit Sir William Harcourt and declared, “We’re all socialists now.” So why would the Democrat Party, which hates old white males almost as much as dead white males, need Sanders?

From their panoply of panderers they can choose a woman. They can choose a minority. They can choose a minority woman. They can choose a woman who claimed to be a minority woman; a man who claims to have a husband; a minority man who claimed to be an ancient Greek gladiator; or a blonde, two-brain-cell-wonder woman who’ll claim to be anything you want. Who could ask for anything less?

Yet Sanders is less. More wizened than wise, gray but not gay, more white than woke, he’s now reaching for others’ radicalism. For all his manifold flaws, his message had traditionally been more economic than racial, but now he has embraced the idea of reparations for slaves who don’t exist. He supports free healthcare for aliens who’ve broken into our country. And while he partied in a Soviet Union that might lock men masquerading as women up, earlier this year he hung a “transgender” flag at his office.

So what does Sanders have to recommend him? The voice in the wilderness has become the toothless lion among the wild things. Bernie is now the crazy old uncle at the table, a walking, talking anachronism trying to seem hip by copying the young.

Sanders’ next major problem concerns decrepitude vs. pulchritude: He’s the antithesis of what in 2011 I called “that presidential look.” Like it or not, many people vote on superficial bases, and being unattractive will likely cost you enough votes to turn an otherwise winnable election. Just consider: When was the last time a white-haired man, a bald man or one sporting glasses won a presidential contest?

Answer: Prior to the television age.

Of course, Sanders is white-haired, bald and bespectacled. When President Jimmy Carter tried to make Ronald Reagan’s age an issue during the 1980 election and asked him, “Ronnie, how come you look younger every day I see a new picture of you riding on horseback?” Reagan replied, “Jimmy, that’s easy. I just keep riding older horses.”

Well, there’s not a horse around that could make Sanders look good — not since the old gray mare who ain’t what she used to be in 2016, anyway.

Oh, note, Reagan was 68 in 1980. Sanders will be 79 at election time 2020.

The senator’s last major deficit is that, to quote what commentator Pat Buchanan quipped about Bob Dole, “he’s like Richard Nixon — without the charm.” Sanders’ personality never really seems to thaw from the Vermont winters, as he exudes all the warmth of a 50s-era Soviet commissar. And in politics, charisma is king.

Add to this Democrats’ governance by prejudice — they don’t like white men, the aged or Jews — and, hey, it’s Dead End at Bernie’s. Similar to the ’89 film that characterization is patterned after, some of Sanders’ underlings may know he’s dead, but they have reasons to pretend otherwise.

Of course, the old white male can still go back to Vermont and remain senator until he’s a dead white male. But if you’re still feeling the Bern, well, it’s probably something you ate.

Contact Selwyn Duke, follow him on Gab (preferably) or Twitter, or log on to SelwynDuke.com.

The Humanitarian Hoax of Planned Parenthood: Killing America With Kindness

/in , , , , , , /by

The Humanitarian Hoax is a deliberate and deceitful tactic of presenting a destructive policy as altruistic. The humanitarian huckster presents himself as a compassionate advocate when in fact he is the disguised enemy.

Planned Parenthood began in 1916 as the American Birth Control League when Margaret Sanger and her two sisters opened the first birth control clinic in Brooklyn, NY. They distributed birth control, birth control advice, and birth control information. Abortion was illegal and throughout her incumbency Margaret Sanger maintained that abortion would not be necessary if women had access to birth control. In 1942 the name American Birth Control League was changed to Planned Parenthood Federation of America. What happened?

Planned Parenthood began advocating for abortion law reform in the early 1950s. At first they focused on therapeutic abortions – medically necessary abortions in the first trimester before the fetus is viable outside the womb. By the 1960s, Planned Parenthood advocated liberalizing abortion laws to include non-therapeutic abortions.

The first birth control pill was commissioned by Margaret Sanger and funded by suffragist Katherine McCormick, heir to the International Harvester fortune. On May 9, 1960 the FDA approved the pill and women’s reproductive freedom became foundational to the Women’s Liberation Movement, the sexual revolution, and the anti-establishment counterculture movement which supported Planned Parenthood’s rejection of all limits on abortion.

By 1969 Planned Parenthood was demanding total repeal of all abortion laws.

In 1973 the Supreme Court issued its landmark decision in Roe vs Wade and abortion was legalized in America. Women had the right to choose whether to have an abortion, but the right was not absolute because of the competing interests of protecting prenatal life, and also the government’s interest in protecting women’s health. The Court issued restrictions that addressed the complexity of the issue in what is known as a balancing test.

“The Court resolved this balancing test by tying state regulation of abortion to the three trimesters of pregnancy: during the first trimester, governments could not prohibit abortions at all; during the second trimester, governments could require reasonable health regulations; during the third trimester, abortions could be prohibited entirely so long as the laws contained exceptions for cases when they were necessary to save the life or health of the mother.”

In 2019 New York lifted every restriction and legalized all abortions including late term abortions. Seven states and Washington, D.C. followed New York’s horrifying example:

  • New York
  • Alaska
  • Colorado
  • New Hampshire
  • New Jersey
  • New Mexico
  • Oregon
  • Vermont
  • Washington, D.C.

This unnerving decision means it is legal to abort a viable baby up to birth and even after birth in some cases. Late term abortions are NO ONE’S RIGHT TO CHOOSE – they are legalized murder. A baby just before birth is not a cluster of undifferentiated cells – it is a fully formed viable human being. How did murder become legal in the United States of America?

Planned Parenthood began as Margaret Sanger’s women’s health initiative to provide necessary birth control, birth control advice, and birth control information. It has become radicalized along with the radicalization of the Democrat party which sponsors its initiatives. Why is this important?

One of these initiatives is SIECUS Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States.

SIECUS was started in 1964 by Dr. Mary Calderone who was the Medical Director for the Planned Parenthood Federation. SIECUS publishes books and journals on sexuality and sex education that are used by professionals, parents, and the public. They have developed curricula for medical schools and college students. SIECUS is responsible for the Guidelines for Comprehensive Education: Kindergarten-12th Grade that are part of the Common Core curriculum taught in public schools throughout America. Here is the problem.

Planned Parenthood is in the education business and is actively indoctrinating American children in their radical views on sex, sexuality, and gender. SIECUS interim president Christine Soyong Harley unapologetically announced the group’s conviction that “Sex ed is a vehicle for social change.” WHAT???

I will repeat: SIECUS interim president stated that sex education is a vehicle for social change and promotes her activism saying:

“While sex education is a necessary sexual health tool, it can (and should) be so much more than that. With sex education, we have a golden opportunity to create a culture shift-tackling the misinformation, shame, and stigma that create the basis for many of today’s sexual and reproductive health and rights issues, like:

  • Reproductive justice
  • LGBTQ equality
  • Sexual violence prevention
  • Gender equity
  • Dismantling white supremacy”

Harley goes on to say that they already have the way to do this – it is their Comprehensive Sexuality Education (CSE) that is currently indoctrinating your children K-12! REALLY??

It gets worse. Planned Parenthood is no longer the Sanger sisters’ birth control clinic in their Brooklyn clinic. Planned Parenthood is now a global health provider and the single biggest provider of reproductive health services, including abortion, in the United States. Planned Parenthood is an activist political organization disguised as a women’s health initiative.

“Planned Parenthood consists of 159 medical and non-medical affiliates, which operate over 600 health clinics in the United States. It partners with organizations in 12 countries globally. The organization directly provides a variety of reproductive health services and sexual education, contributes to research in reproductive technology and advocates for the protection and expansion of reproductive rights.”

Planned Parenthood’s international outreach is conducted by Planned Parenthood Global, and by The International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF) which has 149 Member Associations working in over 189 countries. So what is the problem?

Planned Parenthood is an active participant in UN Agenda 2030 and its globalized educational programs designed to create a New World Order. Planned Parenthood has a globalist agenda.

Using sex education to indoctrinate children into radical leftist/globalist ideology is a colossal abuse of power and exploitation of young children. What Planned Parenthood considers appropriate sex education is very different from what most parents worldwide consider appropriate especially for young children. Let’s take a look.

This shocking video will help the uninitiated become acquainted with the sinister humanitarian hoax of Planned Parenthood worldwide. Planned Parenthood presents itself as a humanitarian organization dedicated to advancing women’s health while they target your children using perverse sex education as their vehicle to effect seismic social change.

Dr. Duke Pesta has written a scathing assessment of Common Core’s sex ed in “Shocking K-12 Common Core Sexual Education Standards.” Pesta explains that sex education is integrated into every subject taught including English, language, science, math, social studies, and biology. There is no opting out of their perverse sex ed because it crosses all subjects. Pesta writes, “According to child psychologists, the children are not mentally equipped to understand the detailed sexual indoctrination starting in kindergarten, they are indoctrinated in sexual practices that they should never be exposed to.”

Now let’s look at the misleading marketing campaign used by Planned Parenthood’s SIECUS to sell its destructive sexual indoctrination.

The National Sexuality Education Standard: Core content and skills K-12 provides the rationale, standards, and goal for sexuality education in public schools:

“The goal of the National Sexuality Education Standards: Core Content and Skills K-12 is to provide clear, consistent and straightforward guidance on the essential minimum, core content for sexuality education that is age-appropriate for students in grades K-12.”

Sounds great – but then humanitarian hoaxes always do.

The stated goals do not reflect the broader culture shift that is the actual goal of the leftist/globalist sexual education program. Sexual identity is the first thing that is announced in any language anywhere in the world when a baby is born. “It’s a boy!” ”It’s a girl!” There is a minuscule portion of the world’s population that has ambiguous sex organs that would leave the baby’s sexual identity unclear.

The perverse movement to confuse children about their primary identity is a sinister attempt to destabilize society and create social chaos. Social chaos is the prerequisite for imposing a new world order envisioned by the globalist elite. The New World Order is not so new. Bertrand Russel wrote about it in his 1952 classic, The Impact of Science on Society. The New World Order is an internationalized world with one language, one currency, one flag, one language, one educational system, one culture, one country ruled by the globalist elite themselves under the auspices of the United Nations.

Dr. John Coleman describes the nexus of the conspiratorial elite seeking world domination in his books Conspirators’ Hierarchy: The Story of The Committee of 300, and Tavistock Institute: Social Engineering the Masses.

The attack on sexuality was articulated decades ago by Tavistock Institute as an effective tactic in their efforts to breakdown the psychological strength of the individual and render him helpless to oppose the rulers of the new world order. The strategy of the Culture War is to attack the infrastructure of American life – family, religion, patriotism, and sexual behavior. Why sexual behavior?

Sexual behavior is a reflection of social norms in society. Monogamous sex in marriage is a commitment that values loyalty to the spouse and family unit. It is also a reflection of the Judeo-Christian moral prohibition against infidelity. Not all couples manage fidelity but it is still considered immoral. The breakdown of the family and the rejection of the moral teachings of religion invite detachment and promiscuous sex. The destruction of traditional morality and the normalization of deviance is a deliberate strategy in the Culture War against America.

The humanitarian hoax of Planned Parenthood is a sinister attack designed to destroy America from within that has gone global with the help of the United Nations and their Agenda 2030. The New World Order is impossible without the breakdown of American society. Planned Parenthood and SIECUS are soldiers in the leftist Culture War against America.

Tactical accusations of white supremacy are foundational to the leftist narrative. They are even part of the destructive sexual education program designed to create chaos in America. This is how it works.

The leftist narrative is designed to collapse American and create catastrophic tensions that will erupt in a race war – the goal of the white supremacy narrative. The race war will lead to anarchy and the country will become ungovernable. At that point Martial law will be declared and the leftist objective of socialism will be imposed.

The problem, of course, is that the leftists are just useful idiots for the globalists. Leaders like Christine Soyong Harley will no longer be useful to the revolution. They are collateral damage. The globalists will then impose one world government which was their goal all along – no more leftists – no more Islamists – no more Planned Parenthood. Just a catastrophic return to feudalism with a very small ruling elite – and the mass population who serve them. There is no middle class in feudalism – no upward mobility – no freedom of any kind. Just masters and slaves as the globalist elite desired.

Planned Parenthood is doing the dirty work of the globalist elite – they are just too arrogant and too angry to notice that they are participating in their own destruction. The noisy leftist Democrats who support Planned Parenthood and promote its destructive agenda are also useful idiots of the globalist elite who fund their pricey political campaigns. The duped Democrats are mercenaries who haven’t figured out that when this war is over they will also be dispensable.

The winner in the fight for the soul of America will be determined by the election outcome in 2020. America-first President Donald Trump is the existential enemy of the leftist/Islamist/globalist axis that is trying to collapse our country and establish a new world order. Do not let them. Do not be fooled by the humanitarian hoax of Planned Parenthood. Vote straight Republican and take back the House so that President Trump can keep America great.

EDITORS NOTE: This Goudsmit Pundicity column is republished with permission. All rights reserved.

Left in a Lurch at Dem Shock-fest

/in , , , , , /by

When Democrats were putting together their first two debates, it probably didn’t occur to anyone that they could bomb both. But in a span of 24 hours, the party desperate to take down Donald Trump just proved that Democrats can put 20 options on the stage — and there still isn’t a sane one in the bunch.

The analysis from Round Two ranged from “space cadets” to “freak show” — and that was from the mainstream press! The night was so surreal that the consensus winner, if you asked most talking heads, is a woman who believes prostitution is a worthwhile career, the Boston Bomber should be allowed to vote, and killing newborn children is “a personal choice.” Those were tame positions compared to some of the field, Dan Gainor points out, in his column of “what the heck?” moments.

After Wednesday, when the Democrats’ highlights included lobbying for taxpayer-funded abortions for men and abolishing private health care, the other 10 candidates had nowhere to go but up. Instead, the conversation was so outlandish that the party is actually losing more voters than it’s gained. One Washington Post reporter tweeted that when the Democrats all raised their hand to support free health care for illegal immigrants, a woman next to her said, “I don’t think I’m a Democrat anymore.”

And she can’t be the only one. With the party light years to the Left of any reasonable American, more people are starting to wonder, is 2020 even a contest? “Just twelve years ago, Democratic candidates for president competed with each other on how tough and realistic they could be on illegal immigration. The leading candidates for president advertised not just their opposition to same-sex marriage but also their opposition to drivers’ licenses for illegal immigrants. Dennis Kucinich quoted from the Bible,” NRO’s Michael Dougherty marveled. “Over the last two nights, we saw a completely different Democratic party.”

Even Joe Biden, who was supposed to be the grown-up in the room, still hasn’t recovered from his 40-plus year reversal on the Hyde Amendment, his sprint to the Left on climate change, and his inability to stand by his “decent guy” assessment of Mike Pence. His night was a disaster, and he seemed to know it — even imposing his own time limit when he stopped thinking coherently. In one of the funnier moments of the night (not for his campaign manager, I’m sure), the former vice president was asked what “first issue” he would tackle in office. “The first thing I would do is make sure that we defeat Donald Trump, period.” “One would presume if he took office,” Gainor jabbed, “he would have beaten Trump. But that concept was a fantasy by the end of the debate and I’m betting even Biden knew it. Watching him was like watching the Titanic after it hit the iceberg.”

When the candidates weren’t lobbying to turn our borders into welcome mats, people like Mayor Pete Buttigieg were busy bashing the faith they claim to espouse: Christianity. “We have got to talk about one other thing because the Republican Party likes to cloak itself in the language of religion. Now our party doesn’t talk about that as much largely for a very good reason which was we are committed to the separation of church… But we should call out hypocrisy when we see it in for a party that associates itself with Christianity…”

If there was a real stand out from Thursday night, it was probably the Democratic platform, which spelled out most of this radicalism in 2016. A lot of Americans make the mistake that those documents hammered out at the party conventions don’t mean anything. But the platform is an anchor that helps tether the nominees to the core conservative principles of their party — in the Democrats’ case, things like taxpayer-funded abortion and animosity toward Israel.

Not too long ago, Lee Payne from Stephen Austin University combed through all of the parties’ platforms from 1980 until 2004. “He identified every ‘direct promise’ in those platform — pledges he thought amounted to concrete policy positions — and then compared those promises with all of the votes taken on either the House or Senate floor… What Payne found might stun some cynics: In 25 years, both Democratic and Republican lawmakers in Congress voted in accordance with their platforms 82 percent of the time.”

Platforms matter. That’s why the FRC Action team worked so hard three years ago to ensure that the document ratified in Cleveland was just as strong — if not more so — than 2012’s. Against all odds (and even more Establishment money), a coalition of pro-family groups led by FRC Action beat back the attacks on our values and emerged with a document clearer and more compelling than any in party history on life, marriage, and religious liberty. Because in the end, that’s what shapes the legacy. The differences between the two parties’ documents couldn’t be starker — just like the choice in 2020 is turning out to be.

Tony Perkins’ Washington Update is written with the aid of FRC Action senior writers.

Also in the June 28 Washington Update:

China’s Human Butcher Shop

Call2Fall: Worship with Us!

EDITORS NOTE: This FRC column is republished with permission. All rights reserved.

PODCAST: Techs and Balances

/in , , , , , /by

The rest of the country knows it as the 2020 election. To the leaders at Google, it’s the “Trump situation.” And based on new undercover video, they’ll do anything to prevent this president’s history from repeating.

Americans knew there was a censorship problem at places like Google and Pinterest. Now, thanks to James O’Keefe and Project Veritas, they see just how bad it is. Turns out, platforms like this search engine aren’t in the browsing business — they’re in the political business. And not as an unbiased observer. In the footage released Monday, Jen Gennai, head of Google’s Responsible Innovation team, has been innovative all right — especially when it comes to trying to alter the president’s reelection chances.

“Elizabeth Warren is saying we should break up Google,” Gennai was caught saying on tape. “And I love her, but she’s very misguided. That will not make it better, it will make it worse, because now all these smaller companies who don’t have the same resources that we do will be charged with preventing the next Trump situation.” And according to the footage, those resources have been hard at work since 2016 “to make sure that we are ready for 2020.”

To conservatives like Senator Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), the surprise is not that companies like Google are trying to interfere with the election. The surprise is that they’re being so candid about it. There’s plenty of evidence from three years ago, he told me on “Washington Watch” that the search engine had rigged their algorithms to favor Hillary Clinton results over Donald Trump’s. But here’s the scary thing, he said. “More and more voters, especially undecided voters, get their news from Google search right? So this platform with its monopoly power has the ability to swing undecided voter could potentially swing an election… [T]his is something that we should all be concerned about.”

It’s time to take seriously what liberals in Big Tech are doing, he insisted — “let alone what they’re doing that we don’t know about.” After all, “we’re talking about democracy. I mean, “You’ve got Google executives and Google employees saying, ‘We want to manipulate the information that goes to voters, so that they will vote the way that we Google want them to vote. That’s not democracy. That’s not the rule of the people. That’s rule by this multinational corporation.”

If people were unconvinced about these leaders’ motivations before, Project Veritas is making believers out of more every day. This morning, most of us woke up to the headlines that one leaked Google document compared conservatives like Ben Shapiro, PragerU, and others to “Nazis using dog whistles.” And just as O’Keefe’s post was approaching a million views, guess what? YouTube, which happens to be owned by Google, pulled it.

Here’s the thing, Senator Hawley told me. Google is a private company, and it can do what it wants. But it certainly shouldn’t be getting special deals and immunity from the federal government if they’re going to try to influence the outcome of an election or silence conservatives. Under his new bill, the Internet Censorship Act, major tech platforms would have to start being politically neutral toward what content they allow or disallow. If they want to keep operating under this unique status, they should have to submit to an audit that proves they aren’t discriminating against conservatives or the conservative viewpoint.

“And if Google doesn’t want to do that because they’re private company and they want to be out there as a progressive Left-wing company, that’s fine. But then they shouldn’t [get this special status from the] government…” And it’s not just Google, Senator Hawley explains. It’s Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Pinterest, and others too. Right now, he points out, “If Twitter takes away your account or Facebook takes down your post because they don’t like that it’s pro-life, there’s currently nothing you could do to Facebook or to Twitter. They have immunity from liability.” The traditional media, on the other hand, doesn’t. “Whether it’s television or newspapers or even online journalists… if they print stuff that’s not true, if they slander you, if they discriminate against you, you can sue them [to hold them] accountable.”

Every platform should be playing by the same rules. Either Google and the rest of Big Tech need to embrace the First Amendment and treat people fairly or they can wave goodbye to their cozy government deals.

Tony Perkins’ Washington Update is written with the aid of FRC senior writers.

RELATED ARTICLES:

A Leap over Faith by House Dems

Unchartered Territory: Voucher School Fined for Faith

EDITORS NOTE: This FRC column is republished with permission. All rights reserved.

Islam: America’s Trojan Horse

/in , , , , /by

Allegorically, a “Trojan Horse” has come to mean any trick or plot that causes a target to summon an enemy into a firmly enduring fortress or place. The Greeks tricked the people of Troy by pretending that they had abandoned the war. Meanwhile, the Greek army rolled a giant wooden horse outside the gates of Troy, and then sailed off to the island of Tenedos nearby. One unarmed Greek stayed behind to convince the Trojans that the horse was indeed a present. Exulted by the gift, Trojans hauled the wooden horse inside the city walls and locked the gates.

Using it as a mental model, we can apply the Trojan Horse story to a range of restraints and situations. As a theory, it can be used for both good and evil.

The Islamic doctrine of Hijrah or conquest via immigration is still alive, active and well. The recent arrival of Muslim migrants in Western countries, who don’t migrant here to embrace our Western civilization, but to enforce their own barbaric dogma on the host country has been compared to a Trojan Horse.

The Islamic hydra, with Saudi Arabia and the oil-money bloated Emirs and Sheiks of the Persian Gulf lead the Sunni charge from one side and the end-of-the-worlder bomb-seeking Shiites of the Islamic Republic of Iran along with its proxies of Hamas, Lebanese Hezbollah, Houthis of Yemen and the Sadrists in Iraq closing from the other side, have the intention of devouring the free world.

Meanwhile, America is under the effect of Islamic subversion, Muslim escapees of the misery of Islamic countries, exhibit such incredible gall and audacity as to shamelessly demand that their benevolent hosts surrender their liberty and legalize and adopt Sharia in our society.

The Muslims’ presence in countries such as Canada, Great Britain, the Netherlands, Sweden, Norway and Belgium, represent the tip of the sword of the Islamists protruding from the Trojan horse. Once Sharia is recognized to any extent, it will reach out to rule, not only on matters that concern Muslims, but also those that may involve a Muslim and non-Muslim. Presently, America is faced with a formidable enemy in a Trojan Horse: Islam.

Islam was birthed by primitives some 1400 years ago and over time invaded much of the world at the point of the sword. Presently, Islamists, with their treasuries flushed with petrodollars, are in a great position to realize their ongoing dream of bringing the world under the rule of Muhammad’s Ummah. On the one hand, Pakistan is already a nuclear power and the Islamic Republic of Iran aims to be one before too long. On the other hand, Muslim governments and wealthy Sheikhs are funding Islamic schools, centers and front organizations in the West to work from within at the unraveling of non-Islamic democratic systems.

This danger makes it imperative to revisit the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and make the necessary adjustments to legally defeat Islam’s subversion of our democratic system.

Some people may ask, why others on our planet are not subjected to severe restriction? Because Muslims have been taught to ignore the laws of the host country and never assimilate. To a Muslim there is only one law and that is Sharia law. Muslims, like other nationalities, do not migrate in order to live in peace and achieve the Western dream. They migrate in order to change the host country, in a manner they have been indoctrinated from their childhood. They can’t help it. It is part of their identity. Wherever Muslims go, so goes their ethos.  This has become a huge problem for the 21st century civilized world.

As more and more Muslims arrive in non-Islamic lands, as they reproduce with great fertility, as they convert the disenchanted and minorities, (Muslims in non-Muslim lands proselytize relentlessly and convert others while any Muslim who leaves Islam is judged as an apostate and automatically condemned to death) and as petrodollar-flush Muslims and Muslim treasuries supply generous funds, Muslims gather more power to undermine the democratic rule of a host country.

The hydra of Islam reveals itself when Muslim jihadist lash out with sophisticated and well-funded lawyers, terrorist groups, and terror-sponsoring governments who have the bomb and those who race non-stop to acquire the ultimate weapon. There is no time to waste. We must steadfastly confront Islam since it is the only way to defeat a fanatical enemy who does not believe in negotiation or compromise. For Islam, it is winner take all. And the way that permissive, oblivious, and well-meaning free societies are reacting does not bode well for liberty.

Islam must be recognized for what it is: a Trojan Horse carrying in its belly what will assuredly slaughter any and all who stand in its way without compunction.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Latest News Reports Remind Us of the Jihadist Threat on the Southern Border

Nigerian Victims tell the truth about Jihadist Violence

Rep. Ilhan Omar’s Ideological Attacks on 2 Christian Pastors

Dalai Lama: ‘Europe is for Europeans,’ EU will become ‘Muslim’ or ‘African’ if migrants allowed to stay

/in , , , , , , /by

“Europe is for Europeans”

With too many Muslim migrants, “the continent could become ‘Muslim’ or ‘African.’”

“Only a ‘limited number’ of migrants should be permitted to reside in Europe”

According to globalist labels, these are the “racist“, “Islamophobic“, “intolerant“, “EU democracy-threatening“, “far right“, “Nazi” words of populists like Hungarian leader Viktor Orban, and Italy’s Matteo Salvini right?  Throw in Donald Trump too. Except, that they are not the words of  “populists” who have been logically and responsibly aiming to protect their citizenry and democratic heritage, but are constantly attacked and disparaged, even by the Pope–the blind guide sitting comfortably, wealthy and walled in at the Vatican. These words have been issued by a global leader that is deemed to be a top peacemaker who also teaches the young about how to be peacemakers: “The Dalai Lama”. His words of warning about Muslim migration should be on front pages of the news everywhere, but they won’t be, because they are not what globalists want to hear nor convey to the public. They fear that the Dalai Lama might influence citizens who have been duped into thinking that kindness and charity means to throw out all logic and fling open the doors to every and anyone regardless of their background activity or their goals.

The Dalai Lama went on to instruct:

“Receive them, help them, educate them, but ultimately they should develop their own country….I think Europe belongs to the Europeans.”

“Dalai Lama: Europe Will Become ‘Muslim’ if Migrants Allowed to Stay”, by Thomas D. Williams, Breitbart, June 27, 2019:

The Dalai Lama insisted Wednesday that “Europe is for Europeans,” warning that if too many migrants are allowed to stay, the continent could become “Muslim” or “African.”

The Buddhist spiritual leader, who has been living as a refugee in India since fleeing Tibet in 1959, told the BBC that only a “limited number” of migrants should be permitted to reside in Europe.

The 83-year-old said Europe should take in refugees and offer them an education, but then send them back to their homelands.

“European countries should take these refugees and give them education and training, then the aim is return to their own land,” he said.

The BBC host asked what should happen if migrants want to stay in their adopted countries, to which the Dalai Lama replied:

“A limited number is OK, but whole Europe eventually become Muslim country? Impossible. Or African country? Also impossible.”

Asked what was wrong with the scenario of Europe becoming Muslim or African, he said: “They themselves I think better to their own land. Keep Europe for Europeans.”

This was not the first time the Tibetan leader has voiced these opinions……

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. All rights reserved.

Israel: The Small, Great Country

/in , , , , /by

By Rami Dabbas.

When US President Donald Trump finally admitted that Jerusalem is the eternal capital of Israel, he was merely acknowledging what everyone already knew. Jerusalem has been the heart of Israel for over 3,000 years, and, like it or not, has served as the Jewish state’s administrative center for the past 70 years.

But that didn’t stop the Arab nations from condemning, vilifying and even threatening Trump for his audacity. This despite the fact that under Israel’s control, Jerusalem has been a city open to people of all religious backgrounds, and its holy sites are open to everyone without restriction. This certainly was not the case when the city was ruled by Arab Muslims.

Let us not forget that the Arabs rejected the UN Partition Plan of 1947 that would have already back then created a Palestinian state. The Arabs wanted war so that they could throw the Jews into the sea. But they failed. And so, the Arabs tried again, and again, and again, each time losing more and more territory to Israel.

Only Egyptian President Anwar Sadat was smart enough to try a different approach, and managed to regain the Sinai Peninsula from Israel by offering peace. All Israel wants, surrounded as it is by 22 Arab countries, is to live quietly in its little corner of the Middle East.

Arabs say that Jerusalem is sacred to Muslims, but it is sacred also to the Jews and Christians. Muslims tend to sidestep the fact that they also have Mecca and Medina, in addition to numerous holy sites in Iraq, Iran, Syria and Egypt.

The Jews, meanwhile, have this one holy city, which they happily open to all. Arabs should instead focus on all the ways in which Israel has surpassed them. It is the only true democracy in the region, it is a first world country among a backward Middle East, and it is a world leader in technology, medicine and other fields of science. All theArab states have managed to export of late is terrorism.  And yet, many in the Middle East, from Gaza to Lebanon to Iraq to Iran, still believe that in order to achieve peace and stability in the region, Israel must be destroyed! Former Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir’s famous quote still rings true for me as an Arab living in this twisted reality: “We will only have peace with the Arabs when they love their children more than they hate us.” We Arabs should have taken a lesson from the Japanese, who knew that following World War II they could not continue to view America as an enemy if they wanted to move forward. And so, despite the fact that America had nuked two of their cities, the Japanese began a new chapter in which America was portrayed as a friend, partner and, eventually, an ally. It was this courageous first step that enabled Japan to emerge from the ashes of World War II and become the advanced first-world nation it is today.

ABOUT RAMI DABBAS

Rami Dabbas is a Jordanian civil engineer, activist and writer. He was born to a Jordanian father and a Russian mother in the city of Astana in Kazakhstan. Rami is a sympathizer with the religious minorities in the Middle East.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Ground Zero Mosque Wife Now Expert Witness in Jihad Terror Trials

UK: Disabled grandfather fired from job for sharing “anti-Islamic” comedy sketch on Facebook

Sadiq Khan’s London: Acid attack on 3 people by “people wearing burqas”

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission.

Hey, “Trans” Men in Women’s Sports: Good Luck, Fellas’ — Go for the Gold!

/in , , , /by

“Equality” cries were cherished by feminists when they gave females entry into military academies, boardrooms and the ranks of police; prize-money parity in some sporting events; and access to boys’ athletics. But with these appeals now putting sexually confused men in women’s sports, well, feminists’ cries are a tad different. Equality can be a real downer when it’s principle and not ploy.

As for my position, I’ve devoted more ink to combating the made-up sexual status (MUSS, usually called “transgender”) agenda than most any other writer. In fact, almost first in the field — and almost alone there — inveighing against MUSS ideology 10 years ago, I was criticized for political incorrectness by conservatives (some of whom now sing my tune). It thus may be surprising that I today say to MUSSmen athletes everywhere:

Best of luck to you, lads — may the best man win!

No, I’m not now seeking the Democrat presidential nomination, Biden-style (I’m using the wrong pronouns for that). It’s that, to use a twist on a quotation attributed to Abe Lincoln, “The best way ‌to eliminate a bad law, or social law, is to apply it strictly.”

You see, I believe that anyone who wants equality should get equality — good and hard.

Up until the Rise of the MUSSmen, male-female Equality™ had been a one-way street called Feminism Way, sort of equality lecture+selective application=whatever advantage I darn well want at the moment. Prestige-oriented feminists could complain about too few female CEOs while never being asked about too few female garbage collectors, iron workers or loggers; or why women aren’t subject to selective-service registration. Politicians could bloviate about the workplace intersex wage gap, which somewhat favors men, and ignore the workplace intersex death gap, which greatly favors women. Activists could sanctimoniously agitate over men out earning women in acting while making nary a peep about women out earning men in modeling. Professional female soccer players (and other athletes) could lose to 14-year-old boys — lobby for the same pay as the men without being laughed at — and never be told the obvious: If you want the men’s money, emerge from your separate, protected athletic realm and try playing in the men’s arena and succeeding. Your separate ain’t equal, hon.

But enter the MUSSmen. They have won females’ competitions in track, weightlifting, golf long driving, cycling and are generally breaking barriers (and sometimes bones) in women’s sports everywhere. This is called unfair, but why?

As one commenter quoted here put it, “I’m constantly told that men and women are equal and that gender is a social construct. I’m constantly shown ‘bad[***] women’ on TV and in movies that can beat up men easily. I’m told a woman can do anything a man can do. So…[w]hy segregate sports?”

Yes, what’s the problem? I also grew up hearing, “A woman can do anything a man can do!” Case closed.

Oh, you weren’t really serious about that? I’m sorry. I guess I missed the joke hearing the line screeched over and over and over and over again, year after year, in any and all circles, in every relevant debate, whenever the least convenient. I suppose my humor meter was malfunctioning — for four decades straight.

You feminists said you were equal. Now you can put your money where your mouths are.

The culpability of feminism and its enablers in advancing the MUSS agenda goes beyond this, however. For a couple of generations the theory the Thought Police demanded assent to was “gender neutrality”; it dogmatically stated that the sexes are the same but for the superficial physical differences, and, therefore, if you raise boys and girls identically, they’ll end up identical in capacity.

So intense was this dogma that, related feminist Camille Paglia, angry feminists would corner her on college campuses and insist that hormones didn’t exist and that, even if they did, they couldn’t possibly influence behavior.

But “gender neutrality” was a theory of convenience. After all, if the sexes were the same beneath the skin, there could be little justification for traditional sex roles and excluding women from once-all-male arenas.

Of course, if feminists and their capon enablers hadn’t eschewed “white male linear logic,” they might have realized that ideas have consequences, that A can lead to B. In this case, A was the thesis that the “sexes are the same except for the superficial physical differences.”

B is the corollary, “Change the superficial physical differences, and you can be the ‘opposite sex.’”

It’s the logical (d)evolution from “gender neutrality” to the MUSSmen’s “gender identity” (misusing the term “gender” all the way through). The former absolutely led to the latter — and feminism absolutely laid the groundwork for it.

Thus, when I now hear complaints about MUSSmen’s athletic exploits, my very unmusical self plays the world’s smallest violin. These triumphant individuals are merely providing an object lesson in the consequences of advancing momentarily convenient lies.

Some will now mention that innocent women and girls suffer here along with the feminists. Yet while the age’s sins do “fall like black atomic rain on the just and unjust alike,” to quote English satirist Malcolm Muggeridge, there’s plenty of blame to go around.

For starters, women broke percentage wise for Democrats in last year’s midterms 59-40, meaning, well intentioned or not, six out of 10 women (and 47 percent of men) recently empowered a political group advancing the MUSS agenda. As for the rest of the ladies, ask yourselves: Did I ever say, even just in the heat of the moment, “A woman can do anything a man can”? Did I ever cheer those who do? Did I ever utter any other feminist battle cry? Insofar as anyone did, he helped MUSS up women’s sports — and society.

Don’t think I’m just placing an onus on women, because men allowed this to happen, too. The point is that people get the culture they deserve as much as the government they do, and too many of us, through mistakes of omission or commission, helped bring us to where we are now.

As for solutions, as long as many insist on talking equality’s talk, we should insist on walking its walk. For it’s easy to be idealistic when you don’t have to live with your ideals, and equality self-righteousness is all fun and games — until you’re no longer one of those people more equal than others.

Contact Selwyn Duke, follow him on Gab (preferably) or Twitter, or log on to SelwynDuke.com.

Soviet Socialism in the 21st century — Part 1

/in , , , /by

Bernie Sanders is a liar–Socialism is not love and compassion it is just the opposite of that—Socialism is corruption, abuse and fraud. Yet Socialism has become a legitimate philosophy in America, Alas! We have dozens Democrat-Socialists candidates for the U.S. presidency. Do they know what Socialism is really about? No, they don’t. As a result, their words are often deceptive, misleading, and confusing. Bernie Sanders doesn’t know a real Socialism is also or pretends that he doesn’t know it. He is a Trojan Horse, propagandist, who is fooling and deceiving you for decades. Just wait for AG William G. Barr completing his investigation of the investigators, you will be shocked by a massive fraud, deceit, distortion, and lies perpetrated by the leadership of the Democrat Party during the last decades…

To really understand Socialism, you must have lived through it. I am a survivor of Soviet socialism and I know what it truly means. I came to America to enjoy the individual liberty, freedoms and opportunities the country offers to humanity. I love this country with all my heart and I am concerned about the state of America’s national security, especially during this dangerous time for our country. This is the reason I want to share my personal experiences living under a socio-economic system called Socialism and expose the frequent lies, deception, and misrepresentations of what the term really means.

Marxism, Socialism, and Communism

For most Americans Socialism is an abstract notion—something they have never experienced. Not coincidentally, Americans wonder about the difference between Socialism and Communism, and it is very hard for them to find the truth on the internet or from the Academia. For those of us raised under the Communist system in the Soviet Union, Marxism-Leninism was a mandatory subject in all universities. Most Russian émigrés know the subject well, they have studied Marxism at least for two years. I have studied Marxism for all four years at law school and I loved it, because I lived behind the Iron Curtin and Marxism was the only information available from the West…

I was surprised by the various explanations of Marxist theory offered by American authors. Some of them were pure propaganda. One misleading presentation on Marxist theory and its comparison of Lenin with President Reagan stunned me the most. Other strange statements I read included such comments as, “Socialism is liberal…Communism is conservative.” This was news for me. We cannot compare liberals of the 19th century with leftists of the 21st century, just as we cannot compare Democrat President Harry Truman with Democrat President Barack Obama. Over the past sixty years, there has been a drastic transformation within the Democrat Party and this transformation itself requires a separate discussion.

Because there is an alarming need for real knowledge, I will present my view on Marxism to Americans who hunger for the truth. There is a spectacular ignorance pertaining Socialism in America–people do not understand basic civics. Socialism is a system of a big, centralized government within a mafia-like police state, which runs all means of production, and assumes absolute control of the people, and all methods of productivity. There are no freedoms, no personal liberty, nor First Amendment rights under Socialism. I can testify that at any courts, because I lived half of my life under real Socialism and knowing Marxism pretty well, I’d like to introduce my view on the subject.

The publication of The Communist Manifesto in 1848 provided a road map for the period’s leftist political activists and their comrades in Europe. Marx was the primary author of the Manifesto, while Engels’ exact contributions are unknown. They offered their views on how capitalism would eventually be replaced by socialism and then give way to communism, the purest form of socialism. Nevertheless, any potential details about what communism would look like were missing. I would say the Manifesto was a radical left-wing political program of the mid-19th century with some historical and social information not always honestly presented. Moreover—Manifesto has declared a war to Western civilization, which is still going on in the 21st century today…

Creating the Theory of Socialism and Communism as a means of rooting out the exploitation of man by man, Marx and Engels purposely divided it into two phases: the first phase was Socialism and the second –- Communism. They identified in detail the tasks, agendas, and ways to achieve them in their Theory, as follows.

First – the tasks and agenda—overthrowing the capitalist economic system and establishing Socialism as a basis for the creation of a classless Communist society in the future.

Second – how to fulfill the tasks and agenda—through World Revolution.

Third – the World Revolution would occur under the leadership of the proletariat.  “Proletariat of the world unite!” was their slogan.

Fourth – Marxist Theory can be applied only in industrially developed European countries…

The first task and the agenda, which I call the first Marxist postulate is clear—the overthrow of the existing Capitalist economic system and the creation of a new Socialist economic system under which all means of production would belonged to the government. As a survivor of Soviet Socialism, I can tell you how this was brought about — through the forcible confiscation and nationalization of all private property in the country.

Private Property is the main target of Marxism

The simple truth is that private property is a cornerstone of our democracy and our American economic system, as it’s declared by our Founding Fathers. “Capitalism is not a system of government, it is the practice and philosophy of transforming resources into capital goods for the purpose of producing consumer products.” Michael Barone is right talking about American economic system: “we have been a property-holders’ democracy.” A very important element of the Theory is missing–neither Marx nor Engels, identified over what time span Socialism would mature into the evolved and perfect classless Communist society. That is the crux of the matter—a dark hole in the theory and not the only one…

The second postulate, how to achieve the task, is also clear—through World Revolution. It is a radical and categorical approach to the matter entailing unrest, chaos, violence, and killings. I am vehemently against such an approach because I know the tragedy that occurred in Russia. Marx’s statement that “The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggle,” is simply not true. America’s Founding Fathers created a just and fair government and free country without any class struggle.

The third Marxist postulate is the leadership of the Proletariat. Class division is the wrong approach to the problem of leadership. And again, the example of America is the antithesis of the Marxist approach and suggests, to the contrary, that only competent, well-educated, and highly respected individuals — leaders who come from all walks of life with all kinds of talents — can provide a country true leadership, as was the case in America.  It is individual personality and human qualities alike George Washington or Thomas Jefferson that bring a leader to the forefront of a movement, not his or her identification with a certain class.

The fourth postulate is perhaps the only logical and economically sustainable position, i.e. that “Marxist theory can be applied only to industrially develop European countries…. “

Ironically, despite not meeting the requirements of any of Marx’s four postulates, the first Socialist Revolution took power in Russia in 1917. And despite failing to meet Marxist requirements, and on the contrary by perverting all of them while at the same time using Marxist rhetoric to further his ends, Joseph Stalin created his own ideology and established a criminal syndicate, a totalitarian terror-machine called Soviet Socialism… For decades the expansionist ideology was corrupting, abusing, and defrauding people of the world and this is one of the main reasons I am renaming the term Soviet Socialism to Soviet Fascism…

A more comprehensive explanation of this complex and important subject will follow. I will offer you a suggestion and a series of articles to learn about Soviet Socialism in the 21st century.

To learn a real life under Soviet Socialism, please read my book Baltic Winds: Testimony of a Soviet Attorney, Xlibris, 2002. Pay attention especially to pp 167-168 to learn the term “Blat” and how a famous defense attorney buys meet and other food in the country under Socialism, where private property is liquidated… Reading the book, you actually can find some similarity with what you are seeing in America today…

Please, read in addition 1. Chapter 2 Marxism: Utopianism, a Fraud or Both? Socialist Lies, From Stalin to the Clintons, Obamas, and Sanders, Xlibris, 2016

  1. Replacing Property as a Source of Wealth Creation, by Michael Barone, Townhall.com July, 4, 2011
  2. The Morality of Capitalism; What Your Professors Won’t Tell You by Tom G. Palmer.

To be continued www.simonapipko1.com

How the major social media platforms stifle free speech or push a political agenda

/in , , , /by

Yes – one of the tremendous contemporary battles for individual freedom of the press is being managed in cyberspace.

For example, Facebook frequently allows real hate speech while prohibiting websites that expose this speech.

Recently, political, journalistic and corporate are under the process of trying to control and even rewrite “story lines” of history, those current events with which they might disagree, and that they see slipping through their fingers.

We are going to highlight the specific portion relating to the speech and explain how this applies to the online community.

Do You Know What the Restrictions On Speech Are?

We argue that the government may impose few restrictions on speech to make sure that research meet standards of integrity & quality, and the most important that policy messages conveyed to the people are consistent. However, any restrictions on speech should be implemented carefully & cautiously to avoid undermining government acts.

A Philosophy of Freedom:

Freedom of Speech is three words that get thrown around & written about so often that the right to freedom of expression, and these expressions applies to the ideas which might be strongly offensive. But many numbers of people believe that it can be legitimately restricted just because it becomes with several responsibilities.

We’re seeing that people who work in a growingly online environment would never fly in the “real world.” Social psychologists possess a field day picking apart like status updates, tweets, and social network posts.

You see that people will say anything! Justified or not, the fact behind this, many people perceive safe in their cocoon of online anonymity.

According to the First Amendment, there is no right to say whatever we want, whenever we want, to whomever we want. But this Amendment doesn’t stop people from thinking otherwise.

More Facts You Need to Know:

Even more problematic is that social media platforms are free to delete the pages and posts of users anytime, and according to them, they’ve rights concerning “community standards.”

Yes, no one will own the public square, including of all social media platforms that are merely used for transporting members of that public to internet square.

What Speech Is Protected by the First Amendment?

The right to freedom of speech means you have permission to express yourself without interference or constraint by the government. And when this term seems very broad, the U.S. Supreme Court was involved in this debate & has decided that the government can restrict both the content of speech & the ability to engage in speech until the government has “substantial justification.”

What is NOT Protected Speech?

Fortunately, the U.S Supreme Court has mentioned several categories of speech which are not afforded protection. Means such types of speech are subject to prohibitions.

Types of speech That Isn’t protected By First Amendment:

  • Obscenity
  • Fighting words
  • Defamation (including libel and slander)
  • Child pornography
  • Perjury
  • Blackmail
  • Incitement to imminent lawless action
  • True threats
  • Solicitations to commit crimes

The Town Squares of the Internet:

You can and can’t say in the town squares of the internet:

Hate:

It is the speech through which people offends or attacks any individual based on ethnicity, sexual orientation, race, national origin, gender, disability, disease, or other traits.

According to the First Amendment – this type of speech protects from government censorship until hate speech incites or is likely to incite imminent lawless action.

Obscenity:

Obscenity is often hard to define, and it is the content which refers hardly offends the prevalent morality of the time.

According to the First Amendment – the obscenity protects from government censorship until it’s obscene. Whether obscene has any literary, artistic, political, or scientific value, and whether any factor is obscene depends on contemporary community standards – but nudity is just not enough to make it obscene.

Harassment:

Maybe you familiar with this term, it refers to unwanted behaviour that makes anyone feel degraded, humiliated or offended. We can’t define harassment to include true threats of violence, which are banned by all of the social media platforms and that are not protected by the First Amendment.

According to the First Amendment – the true threats “serious expressions of intent to commit acts of unlawful violence doesn’t protect from government censorship. But there are few anti-bullying laws which struck down for violating the First Amendment.

How Free Speech and Social Media Fit Together – You Needs to Know!

There are a different number of roles in social media platforms – As a business professional, there you might be monitoring several social platforms, possibly you’re an entrepreneur utilizing social networks to grow your business, or as an in-house employee or for clients.

It doesn’t matter whatever your role; it is straightforward that you are frequently on the front end of making & evaluating a variety of speech & expressions, both outgoing and incoming. Now, the point is that how to create rules and policies that don’t encroach on another’s rights.

There is Need:

  • User-Generated Content
  • Employee-Generated Content
  • Managing Defamatory Speech
  • Protecting Intellectual Property

Conclusion:

Yes – community building & social engagement are imperatively important to increasing business. While there should be a goal to get users, community and customers member talking, not all speech is created equal. When it comes to social media platforms, it’s not easy to highlight a list of what is or is not protected speech. The contexts that may indulge other areas of law limiting your right to silence detractors, there online speech & expressions are highly interwoven. Overall, though, censorship in corporate social media is often a necessity.

Ultimately, there should be the ability to discuss ideas that without fear as it is the only way to protecting the citizens of U.S. No doubt, if we neglect our freedom of expression on the internet, means we lose our democracy.