Someone’s Loss is Someone’s Gain

Being a Spanish speaking American by birth gives me a very unique stage to see the political area in three dimensions; as a native Puerto Rican, as an American citizen by birth, and as a woman.  It is not logical to me that my Republican Party that I have served for more than 26 years don’t get it as yet. They continue making the same mistakes over and over again. I have been part of races from National, State and local. Also have been a very strong advocated for education, juvenile justices our seniors as well as a candidate.

Being trained in Public Relations and International model, I was trained to learn how to read candidates body language; their hand shake is enough for me.  Candidates who are first time runners because they have not been mold by the establishment ideology or corruption.

This is the case with Donald J. Trump, knowing of him from the Miss America and Universe Pageants and Puerto Rico winning 5 tittles, the man is a household name. The amount of young women he has opened the doors to phenomenal futures and the dreams for little girls he has imprinted in their brains are the testaments of this man love for women and their future.

The man is a true genius in his own right. When years ago were rumors of him to running, I was ready to fold my sleeve and get to work. But it did not happen, and Romney came to be the one. Was great disappointment for me and many others not having Trump in the race. To me being involved in Romney’s race and see a winner-able race to a loser race was heart crushing, just because the people he surrounded with did not reach out to those who knew the ground game.

Florida is a very special animal, with 67 counties and not two are the same is a great mistake not to include the leaders instead of elected officials. This brings me to Trump’s Campaign; is Trumps campaign making the same mistake?   The Tampa rally where the Puerto Rican community continues growing the lack of volunteer and respectable leaders was not visible, last night event in Kissimmee, the heart of the Puerto Rican community paraded speakers who has no knowledge of the terrain, also big mistakes.  How dreadful that Spanish speaking Americans were not able to be part of a historical moment, because the lack of Spanish speaking Americans and advertising. It’s very sad when the supposed campaign workers, staff and volunteers do not understand the state makeup because they are from others states or counties.

Why the Florida Puerto Rican community is the make it or breaks it in these elections? Puerto Rico is a territory of USA, we are citizens by birth, we are legal citizens and we are not able to vote for the Presidential elections but yes for the primaries in Puerto Rico. As soon a Puerto Rican cross the ocean to the main land are able to immediately register and vote. Puerto Rico has a very serious problem when the democrats (PPD) infiltrated the REPUBLICANS (PNP) and now both parties are the same. It is a big disservice to the inhabitant of the islands, the future and the economy.

Upon arrival because the Democratic Party, they think that is democracy and we love democracy, so they register democrat. The soul of Puerto Ricans is Republican, we love family, we love the entrepreneurial spirit, and we believe the marriage between a man and a woman, WE LOVE GOD, NATION and FAMILY.

The event in Kissimmee was a great lost opportunity not to bring the right speakers who can and will make a difference, and bring aboard the Puerto Rican voters with the message of prosperity and small business, and the returned of companies which have left the island, with a commentary of empty buildings and an economy of bankruptcy.  Trump has been defamed even by people who were supporters of Jeb’s and Rubio in our island. Today you see them been part of Trumps Campaign.

My question is are they to help win or to sabotage Trumps opportunity to “Make America Great Again” Those of us who do work in the Path the Peaceful Warrior are concerned with Agenda 21 One World Government.


ALGUIEN PERDIO Y OTRO GANO

“ser un americana de habla española por nacimiento me da una única tarima para ver el arena política en tres dimensiones; como una nativa puertorriqueña, como un ciudadana americana por nacimiento y como mujer.  No es lógico para mí que mi partido republicano al cual he servido por más de 26 años no la adquiero todavía la responsabilidad de instruir a los Puertorriqueños la diferencia de los partidos. Siguen haciendo los mismos errores una y otra vez. He sido parte de las carreras políticas de los nacionales, estatales y locales. También he abogado con fervor por la educación, menores, nuestros ancianos y como candidata.

Adiestramiento en relaciones públicas y modelo internacional, fui entrenada para aprender a leer lenguaje corporal de los candidatos; su movimientos son suficiente para mí.  Los candidatos que son primerizos me interesan porque no han sido moldeados por la ideología del establecimiento o la corrupción.

Este es el caso de Donald, sabiendo él de la Miss América y Miss Universo concursos y Puerto Rico tiene 5 títulos de ganadoras, Mr. Trump es un hombre de nombre familiar en nuestra isla.

Puerto Rico es un territorio de Estados Unidos, somos ciudadanos por nacimiento, legales y no somos capaces de votar para las elecciones presidenciales en la isla pero sí para las primarias en Puerto Rico. Tan pronto un puertorriqueño cruzar el océano  a USA tienen el derecho de registrarse y votar de inmediato.

Puerto Rico tiene un problema muy grave cuando los demócratas en Puerto Rico (PPD) se infiltraron con los republicanos (PNP) y ahora ambos partidos son lo mismo demócratas (dos manos izquierdas no pueden aplaudir). Es una gran pérdida para los habitantes de las islas, y el futuro y la economía.  A su llegada piensan que el partido demócrata, es democracia y amor democracia, se registran demócratas. El alma de los Puertorriqueños  es republicana, amamos a familia, nos encanta al espíritu emprendedor, y creemos en el matrimonio entre un hombre y una mujer, amamos Dios, nación y familia.

El evento en Kissimmee fue una gran oportunidad que se perdió no llevaron los altavoces de la comunidad Puertorriqueña que puede hacer una gran diferencia y llevar a bordo los votantes puertorriqueños  en Florida con el mensaje de prosperidad y una economía abrumadora para la isla y la verdad, porque Trump es el único que puede ayudar a resolver la economía de Puerto Rico primo. Porque con Trump  América y Puerto Rico serán grandes otra vez.

UK: Massive Muslim voter fraud not challenged because of ‘political correctness’

The more we continue our “over-sensitivity about ethnicity and religion,” the more our Western democracies will continue their descent into crime, human rights abuses, and the general anarchy that is entrenched in the Islamic regimes that Muslim migrants have escaped. Now, massive voter fraud is reported in Muslim areas in the UK, a prevalent phenomenon from “back home” under corrupted regimes.

The Daily Mail also reported that an ex-Cabinet minister, Sir Eric Pickles, lambasted the police, election watchdogs and town halls for ignoring evidence of electoral abuse, and he stated that “the intimidation of voters on religious grounds was so bad that police should be allowed to put cordons outside polling stations to protect frightened voters.”

Leftists and cowards keep denying the truth about Islamic supremacist intimidation in the West, Sharia incursions, migrant crime, deadly jihad attacks, and the like; and according to Hillary Clinton, Muslims have “nothing to do with terrorism.”

A key point to note in the article below:

In 2014, Breitbart London reported on threats and chaos at Tower Hamlets polling stations.

Meanwhile…

First Lady of the U.S. Michelle Obama visited a school in Tower Hamlets in the summer of 2015 where she declared: “When I look out at all these young women, I see myself. In so many ways your story is my story”. She added, in her speech to the Mulberry School for Girls – most of whom where hijab-clad, that the area was full of “families [who] are tight knit… with strong values.”

Govt: Massive Voter Fraud In Muslim Areas, No Challenge Because Of ‘Political Correctness’”, by Raheem Kassam, Breitbart, August 12, 2016:

Massive levels of electoral fraud have gone unchallenged as a result of “political correctness”, according to an official new report from the UK government.
The Telegraph reports that a new report commissioned by former Communities Secretary Sir Eric Pickles reveals that UK authorities are in a “state of denial” and are “turning a blind eye” to election fraud in heavily populated Muslim areas.

According to the report, voter fraud is occurring “especially in communities of Pakistani and Bangladeshi background”, but concerns have been largely ignored due to “over-sensitivities about ethnicity and religion”.

The new information confirms reports repeatedly raised by Breitbart London. In 2014, Breitbart London reported on threats and chaos at Tower Hamlets polling stations.

First Lady of the U.S. Michelle Obama visited a school in Tower Hamlets in the summer of 2015 where she declared: “When I look out at all these young women, I see myself. In so many ways your story is my story”. She added, in her speech to the Mulberry School for Girls – most of whom where hijab-clad, that the area was full of “families [who] are tight knit… with strong values”.

According to the Telegraph, the new report sees Sir Eric warning that “challenging issues” over community cohesion should not be an “excuse” for failing to “uphold the rule of law and protect British liberties”.

His recommendations include banning officials from using any other language than English to communicate with voters at polling stations, as well as calling for voter identification and police cordons around polling stations.

According to Sir Eric, who was removed as Communities Secretary in May 2015, a lack of action by police to tackle electoral fraud “sends a worrying signal that the police are soft on tackling and prosecuting electoral fraud, when faced with competing operational demands”.

He said: “We should never be frightened to look under the rock when what is crawling underneath threatens us all. It is time to take action to take on the electoral crooks and defend Britain’s free and fair elections.”

And he specifically attacked “foreign languages” used to communicate with voters at polling stations.

The report highlights “abuses of postal voting” and “evidence” of “pressure being put on vulnerable members of some ethnic minority communities, particularly women and young people”.

“There were concerns that influence and intimidation within households may not be reported,” the report states, “and that state institutions had turned a blind eye to such behaviour because of ‘politically correct’ over-sensitivities about ethnicity and religion”….

RELATED ARTICLES:

Mayor bans burkinis on Cannes beaches: they show “allegiance to terrorist movements at war with us”

“Islamophobia” shock horror: Muslim Bollywood star detained at U.S. airports

Will the Liberal Media give Trump the White House like it did the GOP nomination?

I was speaking to a friend of mine who said that the liberal media gave Donald Trump the GOP nomination believing he was the weakest Republican candidate to go up against Hillary Clinton. The liberal media succeeded beyond all expectations. Donald Trump is now the GOP Presidential nominee.

Will the liberal media (e.g. NT Times, Facebook, Twitter, Apple, Instagram, CNN, MSNBC, CBS and ABC) give the Donald a twofer? Are they unknowingly helping propel Mr. Trump into the White House?

In their enthusiasm to support Hillary, at all cost, and make Trump look the buffoon they may have over stepped, causing a sympathetic backlash. Is the mainstream media proving Trump’s point that the political system is rigged?

The nightly media bias has now turned into a “rabid hate of all things Trump.”

In a Boston Herald column titled Media bias could wind up helping Donald Trump Chris Cassidy writes:

Rampant mainstream media bias against Donald Trump could play right into the GOP presidential candidate’s hands, sparking a sympathetic backlash from voters who see unfair press hits as a heavy-handed shadow campaign to boost Hillary Clinton, experts said 
yesterday.

“His way of thinking is, if I take a battering ram and hit the door long enough, it doesn’t matter what I say, they’ll distort it, and eventually that will hit critical mass and people will turn on the media and Hillary,” said Victor Davis Hanson, a senior fellow at the Hoover Institute at Stanford University.

“The ultimate objective would be sometime in October he will have succeeded to say, ‘You pick on me, but Hillary does the same or even worse and you don’t report or discredit it,’ and people will be more sympathetic to him,” Hanson said.

[ … ]

But overhyping Trump’s extreme comments may feed into the very narrative Trump is pushing — that the media is out to get him and put Clinton in the White House, 
political operatives said.

“It feeds into this system-is-rigged thing really well, that this is all the Washington media,” said New Hampshire Republican strategist Dave Carney. “Yeah, it will help him.”

Read more.

 from Observer Politics wrote in a column titled Tech Companies Apple, Twitter, Google, and Instagram Collude to Defeat Trump:

The usual suspects from left-leaning major media outlets like The New York Times, MSNBC, CNN and even entertainment networks are doing everything in their power to ensure a Clinton victory. Look no further than to Wolf Blitzer mincing around and drinking wine at the Democratic convention, celebrating Hillary’s nomination. But the propaganda skewing this election runs much deeper than just the media: our iPhones, iPads, social media networks, Google and even video games are all in the tank for Hillary Clinton—and it’s chilling.

Read more.

PODCAST: Boston Herald Radio Sam Clovis Joins Herald Drive Discussing The Latest In The Trump Campaign:

VIDEO: Hat tip to Centipede Productions for creating this compilation of CNN and MSNBC news personalities stopping critics of Hillary Clinton by cutting them off at the microphone.

Americans do not like it when they are lied to. Trump has labeled his opponent “lying Hillary.” It appears the media has labeled itself as the “Lying Reporting Liars.”

RELATED ARTICLES:

VIDEO: Trump Rally-Goer To CNN Reporter: “I Am A Patriot And You Are A Traitor!”

Tech Companies Apple, Twitter, Google, and Instagram Collude to Defeat Trump

Media bias could wind up helping Donald Trump

Pete Hoekstra: Trump Not Saying Obama Literal Founder of ISIS

Taliban sympathizer attends Clinton rally; MSM focuses on Trump Second Amendment comments

EDITORS NOTE: The featured image is of Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump waving to supporters during a rally in Kissimmee, Florida, on Thursday, Aug. 11, 2016. Photo: Loren Elliott/Tampa Bay Times via AP.

2016: The Election Bigger than any Candidate

In a nation intended to be self-governed by and for the people themselves under the Constitution and Bill of Rights, the tradition of becoming campaign star struck by any person seeking an office of public service is strange in and of itself. It seems Americans have developed a self-destructive habit of treating wannabe politicians like movie stars and elected public servants like royalty. Then they sit and wonder why their “heroes” see the people as mere peasants…

Much of the time, an election seems no more important than which restaurant to pick on date night, as life seems to just keep rolling along no matter the outcome of an election. But once in a while, an election is so critical that it threatens the very life, liberty and happiness of every American. That election is bigger than any candidate.

Such is the case in 2016…

I was born one of six children and have two of my own now, one in college, the other soon to be. Their K-12 experience was quite different than my own, almost every child they met, from a broken home, a family in some form and level of crisis, and we live in one of the finest areas of the country.

Unlike when I was growing up, some of their schoolmates died of a drug overdose or committed suicide before they could graduate high school. A few were pregnant before they could even enter high school. Many were “confused” about their sexuality, were bullied into a deep depression, or destroyed by the social media rumor mill, as they watched others their own age gunned down by classmates in cities across the country.

No, their America was not my America. We were experiencing two very different America’s.

In the America I grew up in, it took a good family to raise a decent human being. The America my kids were growing up in didn’t want good parents to raise children anymore… they wanted society at large, “the village” to raise the children and there was nothing decent about it. The commune was raising a generation of indecent young people and pitting them against their parents, their country and even themselves.

My kids called our home “Williams Island,” where things worked very differently from the rest of the world, according to my children, who were quite certain at the time that mom and I simply “did not understand how the real world works now.” Because the world was so different, my kids often thought of “Williams Island” as a maximum security prison. Much of what was acceptable in “the real world” was simply not acceptable on “Williams Island.”

My kids were right about one thing – the world is very different now. It’s not the America that I grew up in.

By 2016, a known card-carrying Marxist Bernie Sanders seemed the best hope for the future to the young voter. In their minds, having been raised by the commune and indoctrinated in K-12 and on the college campus to believe that freedom and liberty were evil imperialist ideas and the greater good of the commune was good, they gathered behind Sanders as if he was the pied piper of American Marxism.

In the end, they watched their hopes for a devoted Marxist go up in flames as Sanders sold them out by endorsing known criminal Marxist Hillary Clinton at the summer DNC Convention. Angered by the sell-out of their Marxist hero Bernie, they exited the convention in protest, leaving only a smattering of DNC delegates in the convention hall by the time Clinton took the stage for her “historic” speech as the “first female presidential nominee” in U.S. history.

History was being made alright enough… but the gender of the candidate had nothing to do with it. The open outright theft of a nomination was historical in nature and every Bernie Sanders supporter knew it. The young had just gotten their first taste of rotten DNC politics and they didn’t like it.

Meanwhile, over in the Republican Party, voters watched as a record seventeen GOP primary candidates were eliminated one-by-one, state-by-state until only one GOP candidate would remain standing, the dark horse outsider Donald Trump, who was drawing passionate reaction from both those who love him and those who hate him.

Throughout his private sector career as a builder of things, Trump was well-known as an unapologetic self-promoter – a loud and sometimes brash public figure who had seemed to master the art of free publicity by simply tossing verbal grenades into the news room and waiting for someone to react. Trump spent less money defeating sixteen GOP opponents than Clinton spent defeating Bernie Sanders, just because he knows how to play the media for free exposure.

But some of those antics frustrated some and confounded his opponents, while it mesmerized others. Many who had spoken out against political correctness in the past, were now calling for Trump to “tone it down” and become more “politically correct” (a.k.a. presidential) in his messaging. They wanted Trump to stop ruffling the feathers of DC insiders and their minions in the press.

Now that we have covered the “candidate” part of the 2016 election, let me get to the real issue of the 2016 election… an issue bigger than any candidate.

It does not matter if you love Trump or hate Trump. What matters is whether or not you love America… not the America my kids had to grow up in after decades of leftist influence in America, but the America that I grew up in, before leftists destroyed my country.

In the America that I grew up in, not only did we all own guns at a young age, many of us carried them with us to school because we were going hunting either before or after school. No one ever brandished a weapon at a schoolmate or shot anyone.

There was no social media, where kids could “cyber-bully” each other until someone shot their bullies or themselves. The victim didn’t receive the same punishment as the bully in a world where “equality” meant that both attacker and victim were guilty of the crime.

Authority figures had authority because they lived by and enforced the rule of law, not because they were above the law. The laws pertained to and were equally applied to everyone, regardless of race, creed or color. The pledge of allegiance and morning prayer was not only welcome in every classroom, but encouraged in every facet of American life.

Politicians weren’t movie stars or royalty, they were public servants, elected by the people to represent the will of the majority without any right to trample on any minority through political process. Lying and cheating was an unacceptable behavior, as opposed to today, when even tyranny, treachery and treason appear to be totally acceptable behaviors, seldom even reported by the press or held to account by the voters.

2016 must be a turning point election, or it will be the point of no return election.

The 2016 election is not an election about Hillary Clinton, the first criminal Marxist female candidate, or Donald Trump, the bombastic business mogul outsider. It is an election about much more than any candidate, party or partisan interest item.

2016 is the final tipping point for America.

The point at which America votes itself off the cliff, into a Marxist global abyss run by criminals and tyrants, or votes to inch its way back from the cliff, buying itself a little time, not for Trump to “Make America Great Again,” a worthy cause which no one person is capable of achieving alone, but for Americans to make America great again.

It really has very little if anything to do with Donald Trump. Love him, hate him, it makes no difference.

Trump is a human being… He is one man. He is less than perfect, just like every other human being. He may fully intend to “Make America Great Again,” and I hope he is sincere in that endeavor. He is a very capable human being, as proven by his personal track record of achievements. But he is still just one imperfect man, alone, incapable of the lofty goal he has set as the foundation of his campaign.

Only Americans can Make America Great Again

More than at any time in my life, the 2016 election is a make-or-break election. It’s not about Trump or Clinton. It’s about what kind of America we want as American citizens – The kind I grew up in, or the kind my kids were forced to grow up in, where “Williams Island” was the only safe and secure refuge from the so-called “real world” we all find ourselves forced to tolerate these days.

Do we want a decent America, or the indecent America that the global political left has forced upon us all for decades now? Do we want a free, sovereign and secure America, or do we want to be part of a borderless global Marxist commune where everyone is equally destitute?

The 2016 election is just that simple, and just that important.

trumped book coverThis column is why Timothy Harrington and I decided to write and release our first book, TRUMPED: The New American Revolution… not a book about mere politics, or a cheer leading book for any political candidate.

The American people simply must know the whole truth about who and what we are fighting in this country today, or they are certain to lose the 2016 election and their country forever. Like the election, the book TRUMPED has nothing to do with any candidate. It is about a movement spreading across America in a last ditch effort to walk America back from the brink of extinction.

I don’t believe that American voters can or will make the right choices in November without knowing what that choice is really all about. If voters allow themselves to be hoodwinked again by their press and the party machinery, they will get this election wrong, just as they did in 2008 and 2012.

This time, they will lose their country for good. If the price of TRUMPED is too high for the future of this election, then we have already lost this election. Lose this election and you lost your country.

When America is no longer sovereign, free and secure, no place on earth will be…

Here’s a comment about TRUMPED that just arrived this morning from an accomplished literary expert who simply signed, Char!

Dear JB,

TRUMPED is just splendid. It’s written with such dynamic momentum with no wandering around into side issues that many wannabe political writers use to expand less than solid presentations. Every paragraph is so well-crafted, and the facts supporting your reasoning are unassailable. Millions upon millions of American voters – ON BOTH SIDES! – should have this excellent political handbook – and ELECTION GUIDE! No one could vote for the deeply and irrevocably corrupt status quo after reading this valuable treatise.

Every chapter is a gem of analytical persuasion, but the section that focuses on the deadly harm that has been done over the past 15 years by unfettered immigration – both from over the southern border but from Islamic populations – is tremendous.

I sincerely hope that you, your colleague and close political allies have already targeted powerful groups who are working with you to get this book wide distribution. If enough Americans read it, it could be a game changer.

Be well. Have faith and trust in our Creator. I feel that there will be Divine Intervention in this season of poisonous snakes that – so far- has strangled our blessed America.

Sincerely…………and a big BRAVO to you!

Char

EDITORS NOTE: Shipping of “Trumped” from COFBooks.com is within 24-48 hours of each order!

Florida: A Black Guy Producing a Blue Lives Matter Rally? Please help!

Folks, I am sick of being told by people on our side to walk-on-eggshells when pushing back against Leftist activist’s super aggressive attacks on our traditions, values and heroes. Consequently, we continue to allow Leftists to demonize good guys and urinate on everything Americans have held dear for decades. Whenever we say no to Leftist’s attacks on our culture, the mainstream media runs to attack us with the Left’s red-hot branding iron. They burn an “H” in the middle of your forehead, marking you a hater.

Case in point: The horrific epidemic of assassinations of police caused by Black Lives Matter have inspired me to produce a Blue Lives Matter Rally: Honoring America’s Police – our brave men and women in blue. Can you believe that Leftists say celebrating our police is hateful? A few fearful conservatives have told me they want nothing to do with my rally. This is yet another example of how far we have fallen, allowing ourselves to be intimidated and controlled by evil.

You are probably as sick of hearing me state the following truth as I am sick of having to say it. Black Lives Matter was founded on a lie. Their lie says Michael Brown was murdered by a racist white cop while Michael had his hands up, pleading with the officer not to shoot him. The truth is Michael Brown was a 6 foot, 300 pound criminal. Brown was shot while attacking Officer Wilson inside his patrol car attempting to take his gun.

And yet, Obama, mainstream media, Hollywood and the Democrat party, all continue to do their part to promote the “hands up, don’t shoot” lie. Despite Black Lives Matter boldly declaring it open season on killing whites and police, Obama honored the hate group at the White House. Obama even praised them for their “outstanding work”. http://bit.ly/1Qv2H9W

The Democrat National Convention featured Michael Brown’s mom as a speaker, in essence, sending out a clarion call to young blacks across America to keep ambushing and assassinating cops. 

Meanwhile, some conservatives caution me not to produce an uplifting family event honoring cops because Leftists will deem the event hateful. It’s a crazy world we are living in folks.

Folks, I realize that bad cops exist, just as there are bad apples in every profession. For crying out loud, Jesus had 12 disciples and one of them was a fraud; Judas. Stats confirm that most cops are good guys daily laying their lives on the line to protect and defend us.

This experience I had as a black youth involving white cops bears repeating.

It was the 1970s. My black cousin had a nervous breakdown. His wife called me to their home. My 6 foot, over 200 pound, cousin held his two toddler sons hostage in his basement. He was an emotional wreck, crying while threatening to murder his boys and himself.

Two white Baltimore cops arrived first on the scene. One officer was young and energetic. The other was older, much slower and obese. The veteran cop struggled up the 8 front steps and hobbled into their row house to the basement doorway. After catching his breath, with wisdom and compassion, the cop reasoned with my cousin. “C’mon son, I know how you feel. But you do not want to do this.” Remarkably, my cousin surrendered to the fatherly cop. He did not spend a long time, if any time, in jail. My cousin is alive and well today.

Heather Mac Donald is author of, “The War on Cops: How the New Attack on Law and Order Makes Everyone Less Safe.” 

Mac Donald’s research has revealed that no government agency is more committed to saving black lives than police; saving tens of thousands of minority lives since the mid-1990s.

Folks, the truth is blacks pose the biggest threat to black lives. So many black men have been killed by other blacks in 2012 alone that it would take cops 40 years to match the number. 

Incredibly, the mainstream media basically ignored a mob of Black Lives Matter activists marching down a NY street boldly chanting, “What do we want? Dead cops! When do we want it? Now!

“But no Lloyd, having a rally honoring cops may anger Black Lives Matter. The media will spin it as a hate event.” Folks, we must counter evil with good.

I have booked the Ocean Convention Center in Daytona Beach Florida for a Blue Lives Matter Rally to honor America’s police, our brave men and women in blue. The date is Saturday, September 10th. The time is 11am to 2pm.

I hope to book Heather Mac Donald to speak and numerous other celebrities. Celebs who cannot physically attend will send their message on video. I plan to do a brief tribute to each officer who has been assassinated by BLM thugs.

I originally planned to have a black choir sing. My black conservative buddy from Racial Policy Center, Mychal Massie scolded me. “Don’t have a black choir. We have enough division. Have a choir of all Americans.” I like that.

It is going to be a great, fun, and uplifting event for the entire family. Hopefully, my buddy from Tim Allen’s Home Improvement TV sitcom, Jimmy Labriola, can come and do his hilarious stand-up act.

I have also asked Victoria Jackson from Saturday Night Live to participate.

We need funding to pull this off. The venue costs $2000. Then, there is the cost of the production company, sound company, house band and etc. Please visit our crowd funding page and give. 

All that is needed for evil to prosper is for good men to do nothing.” Let’s come together and do something good folks. 

Open Letter to Rep. Doug Broxson RE: Your vote to give illegal aliens Florida driver licenses

Dear State Representative Broxson,

Many folks in the local media contacted me in regards to the  thousands of dollars in payments from campaign funds which you gave to Kingfish Strategies an LLC set up in part by State Committee Woman Susan Moore a member of the Escambia county Republican Party leadership in Pensacola.

Instead of remaining neutral she decided to take payments from you to assist your campaign in direct conflict with the Republican Party of Florida ethical standards. The Gulf Breeze media is going to print an editorial about it as per the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

Now I am not sure if the Republican Party of Florida or the local Republican Party will investigate this massive conflict of interest by a leader in the Escambia County Republican Party who is or was getting pay offs from your campaign described as consulting fees because the GOP leadership in my option is pretty much as corrupt at the Democrat Party in some regards. But we shall see.

What is amazing though is the flyer your campaign sent out stating that Representatives Mike Hill supports in state tuition for illegal immigrants. It’s a lie but you know this. Politicians like you are slowly but surely being removed by the voters as the American people wake up.

The record does state though that you voted YES to give illegal immigrants access to state government buildings, access to federal buildings and access US airlines with your YES vote to give illegal immigrants a state issued drivers license.

mohammed atta driver license floridaWith this vote that advocates and enables federal immigration law breakers you did  not discriminate against which illegal immigrants you support with a state issued ID. So you are approving in effect a drivers licence to people like Mohammed Atta a terrorist and Saudi citizen and a former resident in Sarasota, Florida who overstayed his visa and flew one of the planes into the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001.

This man  would have been allowed to keep his state issued drivers license as per your vote because he was classified as an illegal immigrant when he overstayed his visa.

So your position from your voting record is to ignore federal immigration laws and enable and reward foreigners who break into our nation via our unsecured borders with a State ID – Drivers License.

This is un-American and would have placed Florida citizens at great risk.  Its is a national security issue and violates U.S. federal immigration law.

Now I don’t care how powerful your name is in this neck of the woods in Florida but when you support this blatant disregard for U.S. immigration law and try to reward those illegals who came here from nations like Syria, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Mexico, Honduras, Guatemala, etc. with a state issued ID you are part of the problem not part of the solution.

Thank goodness Governor Scott vetoed this attack on our sovereignty and national security. 

Your time is up and soon you will be removed from office by we the voters as will others who are working to embrace the Marxist/Progressive policies of Barack Obama and his heir apparent Hillary Clinton.

VIDEO: Obamacare and Death by Prescription Drugs

Seeing ObamaCare as a pending disaster, big insurers are cutting their support. It wasn’t a good deal for taxpayers when the only people who signed up were poorer people whose premiums were largely paid by taxpayers. (WSJ, 8-5-16)

“ObamaCare is taxation without representation,” and Dr. Ben Carson was right, ObamaCare is the worst thing since slavery.

Video: Know the TRUTH about the Government Health Care Bill H.R.3200 – Key Points.

Why should our taxes support medical care for people who eat, drink, smoke and abuse as they please?

We shouldn’t ‘Ask-our-doctor’ for a prescription when the huge majority of symptoms come from what people put in their mouths. It’s usually reversible if they know the cause and they change their habits.

But it’s easier said than done. Doing physicals on executives, several said sugar, cheese or meat bothered their joints, but when I got headaches, I didn’t know the cause. I consulted a neurologist who taught medical students and he said food was an unlikely cause of my tension headaches.

But an allergist, member of the American Academy of Environmental Medicine, tested me and found I was allergic to wheat—bread, pasta and pastry. When I quit those foods 100%, no more headaches! This concept applies to most chronic conditions when the doctor doesn’t know the cause, and I was board-certified in internal medicine.

The body builds a tolerance to the allergic food, like to cigarettes—people don’t get sick when they smoke—they get symptoms when they don’t smoke, and that’s how food allergy symptoms can manifest.

If I had started down the path of prescription drugs, I would probably be an addict now, as millions are dependent on drugs for relief of symptoms. A trial of avoiding suspected favorite foods or beverages is recommended (especially with caffeine as it can cause a wide range of problems). Avoidance for a minimum of a week will often increase one’s symptoms for 2-3 days before a person sees improvement by the 5th -7th day.

Alcohol, tobacco and caffeine can cause severe reactions on withdrawal, but fatality is rare. Withdrawal symptoms are just a natural response to the body cleansing itself.

“Drug action always represents artificial interference with the natural functioning of the organism. In the widest sense of the word, every drug is by definition a poison; pharmacology and toxicology are one, and the art of medicine is to use these poisons beneficially.” Drill’s Textbook of Pharmacology in Medicine, Possible Mechanisms of Drug Action, Chapter 5.

Toxicology was the science of how much chemical kills half the lab animals. The rules have changed, but the game is the same due to Adverse Drug Reactions as the leading cause of illness, disability and death, supported by the following medical reports:

Adverse Drug Reactions put 2.2 million people in hospitals and 106,000 died, “making these reactions between the fourth and sixth leading cause of death.” Journal of American Medical Assoc, 4-15-1998

But how many died at home? 199,000 according to the Western Journal of Medicine,  June, 2000. Deaths in and outside hospitals from prescription drugs totaled 305,000, with 8 million admissions to the hospital and 3 million for long-term care (nursing homes–these people were messed up for life, and the drug companies get a free pass from the Supreme Court—they usually can’t be sued for death or damages they caused.

“From 1998 through 2005, reported serious adverse drug events increased 2.6-fold…fatal adverse drug events increased 2.7-fold…” Archives of Internal Medicine, Sept 10, 2007, p 1752.

But if deaths increased 2.7 fold from 1998 to 2005, they are increased 6.9-fold by 2016, because the cause of the increase, TV drug ads approved in 1997, continue unabated—if anything, they are enhanced. 305,000 deaths/year in 1998 have become 2.1 million/year. These aren’t old people in nursing homes like those dying from heart disease –most of these people weren’t in the hospital when the drug was prescribed.

2,100,000 deaths/year is nearly 7000 deaths daily–like two 9-11′s daily! On 9-11, Congress grounded all planes. Why not stop the drugs or hold their makers responsible? For each death, 40 people are hospitalized with serious ADR, and 15 go to a nursing home, messed up for life in most cases.

Confronted with such figures, a U.S. Senator said I was wasting my time, saying “they own us,” referring to the pharmaceutical industry that spends $400 million/year on congressional re-election campaigns, (Marcia Angell, MD, former editor of New England Journal of Medicine, 60 Minutes’ interview).

Congress voted for ObamaCare—20,000 pages largely written by the drug companies, but Congress declines ObamaCare for themselves. How dumb can we be?

People should consider that the last call in the Bible to come out of Babylon, the confused systems of society, Revelation 18.  Verse 23 says all nations are deceived by [pharmakeia, Greek] Medical texts are filled with diseases of “unknown etiology.” They don’t know the cause, so how can the drug be the cure?

Drugs are substances foreign to the body of a poisonous nature. Some people need hormone help with insulin or thyroid and being natural to the body, they aren’t drugs in the same sense of this discussion, though they are regulated by the FDA.

Communist Party USA Nominates Hillary to be the First Communist President of the USA

cpusa logoThe Communist Party USA (CPUSA) is standing with Hillary. During the DNC/CPUSA convention they collectively nominated Hillary Clinton to become the first Communist President of the USA (CPUSA). CPUSA for CPUSA?

The CPUSA believes, “With Senator Bernie Sanders endorsing Secretary of State Hillary Clinton the message was loud and clear. We’re stronger together. That is what it will take to win in November.”

john bachtell cpusa chairman

John Bachtell national chair of the Communist Party USA. Photo: CPUSA website.

John Bachtell, National Chairman of CPUSA, at their National Board meeting on May 6, 2015 noted:

From being on the margins, socialism is part of the discussion, although how much remains to be seen. 52% of Democratic voters have no problem with it.

World Net Daily provided the following excerpts from the editorial produced as part of the DNC Convention coverage by the CPUSA media team credentialed by the Democratic Party:

Do not underestimate Trump and the Republicans. While the establishment GOP was surprised by the successful insurgency of so-called outsider Trump, they are united in purpose: delivering more inequality, more misery, more instability and violence against working-class people of all races, genders, religions and sexual orientations.

They are united with giant corporations and the billionaire class in their drive to lower wages and living conditions and increase their profits and power.

[ … ]

“Back in the day when Stalinists Gus Hall and Angela Davis were regularly nominated by the party as presidential and vice presidential candidates every four years, the U.S. Communists actually had beefs with the Democrats,” he [Joseph Farah, the founder of WND.com and a former revolutionary communist himself in his youth] said. “But, in recent years, the party ceased those efforts in favor of a united front with the Democrats, with whom they have very few differences, if any.”

Read more.

hillary red pantsuit

Hillary made in China and North Korea.

In honor of the CPUSA endorsement Hillary will now wear red pantsuits made in China and North Korea.

After a coughing spell, causing her to fall off a bar stool at a campaign stop, Mrs. Clinton stated to CNN, “I’m proud to receive the endorsement of the CPUSA. We’re stronger together because someone is always picking me up when I fall. I can’t seem to get it up alone, like my husband Bill. No pun intended.”

However, in a strange turn of events blacks are overwhelmingly supporting Republican David Duke, a former Ku Klux Klan grand wizard running for an open Senate seat in Louisiana. Duke has 14 percent support among black voters in the state, according to a survey by the University of New Orleans’ Survey Research Center. Politics does indeed make for strange bedfellows.

It doesn’t get any better than this folks.

With the support of the CPUSA, Hillary looks to turn America dark red on November 8th. Red like the former USSR red.

cpusa flag

Communist Party of the USA flag.

The CPUSA stated, “If Hillary is elected we are asking her to replace the American flag at the White House with the CPUSA flag. America is no longer red, white and blue, just red. Better red than dead.”

There appears to be no daylight between Hillary and the Communist Party USA. They collectively are standing together to Make America Red Again. The CPUSA is with her for the good of the collective.

The Trump campaign released a short statement noting, “Crooked Hillary is now Hillary the Red. Better dead than red. Vote Trump!”

Vladimir Putin on a visit to Syria noted the CPUSA endorsement of Hillary Clinton. Putin said, “Since resetting U.S. – Russian relations under Secretary of State Clinton, Hillary has become my protege who I will work with to paint the entire world red. I love her red pantsuit, she’s red hot, pun intended.”

RELATED VIDEO: While reading this column readers may wish to listen to the Rolling Stones singing – I See a Red Door and I want to Paint It, Black (Official Lyric Video).

RELATED ARTICLE: Purposeful Media Blackout: 100% Proof Hillary Clinton Is a Serious Health Risk and Unfit To Run Office… It’s Not Just Seizures | Politics

EDITORS NOTE: This political satire originally appeared in PRAVDA-USA the official publication of the DNC.

The Passion of Political Movements

Since the early years of the Great Depression in the late 20s, the United States has witnessed four great political movements in which the principal outcome of the movement was a lasting imprint on our political and cultural history.

The first of these was the Roosevelt administration and its signature program, the New Deal… a collection of social and economic experiments that changed forever the political and economic foundations of our great nation.  It was during those years, between 1933 and 1952, that Democrats initiated the long process of assembling a diverse coalition of special interests… each wanting something from government that they were unable to acquire through free and open competition… and to define Republicans in the hearts and minds of working men and women and the poor in terms that were totally unrelated to reality.

The false image of conservatives and Republicans created in that era remains to this day, while conservatives and Republicans continue to think of Franklin Delano Roosevelt as the man most responsible for bringing our nation to the tipping point of American greatness… the point in time when our great nation began to turn its back on the founding principles of our country.

Then, in the early 1960’s, following a long succession of Republican presidential candidates selected, promoted, and nominated by the so-called eastern liberal establishment, a small group of young Republican conservatives decided it was time for the Republican Party to send a true conservative to the White House.  Their goal was to find a way to nominate a conservative to challenge the 1964 reelection of John F. Kennedy.

It was during those years that this writer entered the political arena as a card-carrying member of the Draft Goldwater Committee.  Throughout 1963 and 1964, I made numerous weekend delegate-hunting forays, in company with other young conservatives, into key cities in Arkansas, Missouri, Iowa, Nebraska, and Kansas.  Organizing conservatives from the grassroots upward to the county and statewide level in every state of the nation, we were able to assemble enough delegates to win a first ballot nomination for Senator Goldwater at the July 1964 convention.

What we could not have foreseen was that John F. Kennedy would be assassinated in Dallas, Texas, on November 22, 1963.  On that day it was clear to us that Kennedy’s successor, Lyndon Johnson, armed with the “sympathy factor” resulting from Kennedy’s assassination, would not only win the 1964 General Election, but win by a landslide.  But for the assassination of Kennedy, the 1964 General Election would have been a highly competitive contest.

However, the eastern liberal establishment saw those developments as an opportunity to regain control of the party and the nominating process.  Accordingly, on July 15, the third day of the 1964 convention, they placed in nomination the name of Pennsylvania Governor William W. Scranton.  The Scranton nomination served only to infuriate the young conservatives who had engineered the Goldwater nomination.  Goldwater defeated Scranton by a vote of 883 to 214 on the first ballot and the liberal stranglehold on the GOP nominating process was broken.

The Goldwater nomination was the result of a conservative political movement designed to transform the GOP from a pale imitation of the Democrat Party.  It is what Ronald Reagan had in mind in a March 1, 1975 speech when he said, “Our people look for a cause to believe in.  Is it a third party we need, or is it a new and revitalized second party, raising a banner of no pale pastels, but bold colors which make it unmistakably clear where we stand on all of the issues troubling the people?”  The attempt to deny Senator Goldwater the 1964 nomination through the eleventh-hour nomination of William Scranton created such animosity within the ranks of young Republicans and other conservatives that the names Rockefeller and Scranton are as reviled in conservative circles today as they were in July 1964.

The 1964 conservative movement was followed twelve years later by a movement that arose out of an attempt by conservatives to deny incumbent president Gerald R. Ford, the candidate of the eastern Republican establishment, the 1976 Republican presidential nomination.  In September 1973, I was invited to participate in a meeting of ten or twelve young conservative leaders at the Crown Center Hotel in Kansas City.  The meeting was hosted by former Senator Tom Van Sickle, of Kansas, a regional coordinator for the Draft Goldwater Committee from 1961-64, and Judge Ed Failor, of Dubuque, Iowa, who served as deputy director of the Draft Goldwater Committee.

The purpose of the meeting was to determine whether we could unite behind a single conservative for the 1976 nomination… much as we had for Barry Goldwater in the early 60s.  The only 1976  presidential hopeful to send a representative to our Kansas City meeting was California Governor Ronald Reagan.  However, by the time we adjourned on Sunday afternoon, the consensus was that, as of September 1973, Governor Reagan did not possess the key political and financial network necessary to wage a successful national campaign for the 1976 nomination.

At the 1976 Kansas City convention, Reagan was narrowly defeated for the nomination by a vote of 1,187 to 1,070, falling just 59 votes short of the nomination.  But the intensity of the campaign for the 1976 nomination made it clear to all observers that yet another conservative movement was taking shape within the Republican Party.  And as Ronald Reagan set his sights on the 1980 nomination he was able to build on his growing cadre of western political/financial supporters, creating yet another political movement across the nation.

Reagan arrived at the 1980 national convention in Detroit, Michigan, with a sizable delegate advantage over his nearest competitor, George H.W. Bush, the candidate of the Republican establishment.  I was in Detroit as a senior aide to former Treasury Secretary William E. Simon who, along with former congressman Jack Kemp (R-NY) and former Defense Secretary Donald  Rumsfeld (R-IL), was on Reagan’s “short list” for vice president.  However on the second day of the convention, establishment Republicans, convinced that Reagan was incapable of leading the nation, created a groundswell of support for a proposal to force Reagan to select former president Gerald R. Ford as his running mate.

In order to put an end to that subversion and to unite the party, Reagan was forced to select George H.W. Bush as his running mate and the eastern Republican establishment was back in business.  The 1980 Bush vice presidential nomination cut short the Reagan conservative movement, giving the Republican Party 12 years of Republican presidents… from 1989-93, and from 2001-09… in which the tepid leadership style of Bush (41) and Bush (43) encouraged Democrats to continue unabated their long push toward collectivism.

Finally, the fourth major political movement occurred in the 2016 election year, a year in which the American people on the left and on the right made it clear that they were fed up with the apparent inability of inside-the-beltway Republicans and Democrats to solve any of our major national problems.  As a result, Senator Bernie Sanders, a disgruntled old man from Vermont… a self-described socialist… waged a highly-competitive campaign for the Democratic nomination.

However, when Sanders became a serious threat to frontrunner Hillary Clinton, defeating her in 23 primaries and caucuses and winning 46% of pledged delegates, a movement was born.  But when Sanders’ rabid young supporters became aware that, within the Democratic Party, 713 of the party’s 4,765 convention delegates (15%) were unelected “super delegates,” nearly all party leaders whose job it was to insure that the “fix” was in for Hillary Clinton, they staged angry street demonstrations outside the convention hall.  And when they learned through leaked emails that the leadership of the Democratic National Committee had conspired to “rig” the 2016 nominating process, a political rift was created that will likely last for generations.

On the Republican side, a parallel movement was created when disaffected conservatives and Reagan Democrats across the country nominated a totally untested political neophyte, billionaire Donald Trump, a man who, while promising to “make America great again,” quickly became the most unattractive and the most egocentric presidential candidate in U.S. history.

Running against Hillary Clinton, a woman who embodies all the worst characteristics of Lyndon Johnson, Barack Obama, and her husband, Bill Clinton, Trump was in a position to literally “waltz” into the White House by concentrating all of his energies on: a) restoring the economy and creating jobs, b) defeating the international threat of radical Islam, and c) solving the problem of illegal immigration… all issues that represent a toxic “poison pill” for Democrats.  Instead, he’s spent the majority of his time in childish name-calling, in “walking back” previous oratorical faux pas, and in alienating friend and foe alike.

Anyone who might still have doubts about the comparative value of the primary system versus the caucus/convention system might want to study the Trump nomination.  It was the primary system that allowed those least politically astute, those most informed by political generalities and 30-second sound bytes, to swing election after election to Trump.  His debate style was best characterized by a propensity to engage in unprecedented playground-level name-calling.

Now there is talk of a political “intervention,” a process in which party leaders would remind him of who his true enemies are and to point him once again in the direction of those who, like Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, would lead our nation down the path of no return.

But the question arises, if Trump is not smart enough to know that Hillary Clinton is almost certain to mop the floor with him in debate, is he smart enough to know when he’s being given good advice? And is he man enough to finally subordinate his own larger-than-life ego to what is in the best interests of the country and the American people?

That remains to be seen.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Former KKK leader has more support among black voters than Trump

Communist Party Unites Behind Hillary

Black Lives Matter Demands have Virtually Nothing to do with the Police by Daniel Bier

On August 1, the “Movement for Black Lives” (an umbrella organization for about 50 groups associated with the Black Lives Matter movement) released a list of demands going into the general election campaign. The New York Times reports,

The list of six platform demands is aimed at furthering their goals as the presidential campaign heads into the homestretch. … As part of the effort, the groups are demanding, among other things, reparations for what they say are past and continuing harms to African-Americans, an end to the death penalty, legislation to acknowledge the effects of slavery, as well as investments in education initiatives, mental health services and jobs programs.

If that sounds like a sprawling and unfocused wish list, that’s not the half of it.

The “six” demands actually contain 38 bullet points, most containing several different policies, including such pressing concerns as: forgiving student loans; restoring Glass-Steagall’s ban on affiliations between investment and commercial banks; ending the privatization of natural resources; ending charter schools; “reparations” for “food apartheid”; more universal-y universal health care; a “progressive restructuring of the tax code”; “radical and sustainable redistribution of wealth”; net neutrality; banning super PACs; public financing of elections; blocking the Trans Pacific Partnership; and, who could forget, “divestment from industrial multinational use of fossil fuels and investment in community-based sustainable energy solutions.”

Out of well over a hundred demands, only a handful are related to policing — including one demanding a ban (!) on police body cameras.

If you ever worry about your movement drifting off message, this is the apotheosis of that problem.

Demand Everything, Get Nothing

There are a number of demands about other aspects of criminal justice, but even where they are laudable, they are often unrealistic (abolishing all juvenile detention centers), counterproductive (abolishing money bail), marginal (ending the “privatization of police, prisons, jails, probation, parole, food, phone” and “all other criminal justice related services”), tangential (abolishing the death penalty), or just strange (a new constitutional amendment that guarantees “freedom from unwarranted search, seizure or arrest”).

Some demands were important, on message, and somewhat feasible. They call for decriminalizing drugs and prostitution, expunging drug and prostitution records, demilitarizing police, and establishing civilian oversight agencies for police.

But the trouble is that these urgent and critical reforms are buried under an avalanche of irrelevant policies, vague platitudes, and demands for free stuff — lots of free stuff: free daycare, free Internet, free health care, free elder care, free “high quality food,” a guaranteed minimum income, free college, ad infinitum.

For the most part, the demands read like recycled Bernie Sanders campaign literature — a hodgepodge of left-wing gripes about everything from climate change and Uber to banking and trade policy.

“Freedom Fighters and Political Prisoners”

The platform also calls for the release of “political prisoners” and the removal of “legitimate freedom fighters” from the FBI’s list of terrorist fugitives. Who are these persecuted heroes? The document refers to several former members of the Black Liberation Army, including:

  • Assata Shakur (aka Joanne Chesimard), convicted of murdering a New Jersey state trooper in 1973, who escaped prison in 1979 and fled to Cuba, where she still lives;
  • Kamau Sadiki (aka Freddie Hilton), captured in 2001 and sentenced to life in prison for the 1971 ambush murder of an Atlanta police officer;
  • Herman Bell and Jalil Muntaqim (aka Anthony Bottom), currently serving life sentences for killing two cops in New York in 1971, who also pled guilty to manslaughter charges in the killing of another cop in San Francisco;
  • Jamil Abdullah al-Amin (aka H. Rap Brown), former chairman of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee and one-time Minister of Justice for the Black Panther Party, currently serving life in prison for the 2000 murder of a Georgia sheriff’s deputy.

The platform doesn’t try to exonerate any of these figures, but simply declares them “freedom fighters,” and further insists that law enforcement “cease all current investigations and cold cases into former activists.”

These demands, perhaps more than anything else in the platform, do Black Lives Matter a grave disservice, especially in the wake of the Dallas sniper attack. Praising cop killers will not alleviate fears that Black Lives Matter supports killing cops.

When in an Emergency, Act Urgently 

Contrast the “Movement for Black Lives” demands with the agenda of “Campaign Zero,” another group founded by Black Lives Matter activists to reduce police killings. Last August, they presented a list of ten specific, sensible police reforms. As Radley Balko commented then:

Critics and police organizations have portrayed Black Lives Matter as radical, anti-police, and anti-white. But the policies Campaign Zero is pushing are none of those things. Instead, they’re practical, well-thought out, and in most cases, achievable. Most will also directly benefit everyone — not just black people.

In most cases, the policies Campaign Zero is suggesting are already in place in one or more police departments across the country… It makes it more difficult for police groups to portray those proposals as “anti-cop.” But it also makes it easier to pitch those ideas to policymakers and the public. They’ve already been field-tested. As a set, these policies are more a list of “best practices” than revolutionary reform.

A few of the proposals will be a tougher sell, but even those are far short of world-shaking. There are no calls to disarm the police. No calls to abolish law enforcement agencies. No demands that police unions be prohibited. This isn’t a fervid manifesto. It’s a serious effort to solve a problem.

So what does Campaign Zero want? Here’s their list:

  1. End Broken-Windows Policing
  2. Community Oversight
  3. Limit Use of Force
  4. Independent Investigations and Prosecutions
  5. Community Representation
  6. Body Cams/Film the Police
  7. End Policing for Profit
  8. Training
  9. Demilitarization
  10. Fair Police Union Contracts

(Read more about these here and here.)

Each of these policies has additional components, of course, and some will be harder to achieve than others. But all of them fit together as a coherent agenda, pointing towards a specific goal: reducing the number of violent police encounters.

By limiting unnecessary stops, ensuring transparency and accountability, and reining in use of force and military tactics, Campaign Zero hopes to improve community-police relations and stop violent encounters before they start. Their reforms are realistic and focused on the most crucial points: union contracts, use-of-force policies, public transparency, police training, independent oversight, and policies that treat citizens like cash registers and incentivize a lot of low-level harassment.

“Its practicality is undoubtedly born of urgency,” Balko writes. “There’s no time for wild-eyed ideology when people are dying.”

And that’s really the issue here: people are dying — over 1,300 last year alone — most “justifiable,” but surely not all necessary. If this is a crisis worth stopping traffic over, it deserves to be treated as an emergency, not as a façade for a refurbished Occupy Wall Street manifesto. It is incumbent on everyone to take it seriously and address it seriously. Campaign Zero does, and if you’re looking to understand what Black Lives Matter is all about, check out their proposals — and leave the Glass-Steagall debate for a different time.

Daniel Bier

Daniel Bier

Daniel Bier is the editor of FEE.org. He writes on issues relating to science, civil liberties, and economic freedom.

RELATED ARTICLE: Jewish groups shocked after Black Lives Matter releases manifesto accusing Israel of ‘genocide’

Fifth Anniversary of the Shoot Down of Extortion 17: Unfiltered Reflections

AUGUST 6, 2016 – Today, on the fifth anniversary of the shoot down of NAVY SEAL helicopter, call sign – Extortion 17. This video is from families of those who lost their lives on Extortion 17 and friend.

It is unfiltered and from the heart.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Obama administration accused of stonewalling in suit over downing of SEAL Team 6 Extortion 17 chopper

Extortion 17 Cover-up: Who were the Afghans?

SEAL Team Six – Extortion 17 “A Cover Up?”

The Koran Trumps Mr. Khan — Trump should give Mr. Khan a copy of the Koran as a gift

Mark Langfan wrote an interesting column in Israel National News titled “The Koran Trumps Mr. Khan“. Here are excerpts:

It is now the viral gotcha moment of the Clinton v. Trump Presidential campaign: Mr. Khan, the Muslim father of a U.S. soldier who was Muslim and who died defending the United States, proffering a booklet of the U.S. Constitution to Mr. Trump, and Mr. Trump reacting.

Of course, we all grieve for any U.S. soldier who gave the ultimate sacrifice for protecting this country.  However, it is not too late for Mr. Trump to turn his political misstep in his handling Mr. Khan into the ultimate political win, and focus America and the world on the true danger: the exact provisions of the Koran that exhort its followers to extreme wanton violence against not only non-Muslims, but Muslims as well.  Mr. Trump should proffer Mr. Khan a copy of the Koran that contains the violence-exhorting sections that modern-day Jihadists look to as their inspiration.

In this regard, one can find no better explanation of Islam as the religion of violence than in heroic Ayaan Hirsi Ali’s seminal article “Islam is a Religion of Violence” published in the renowned Foreign Policy magazine on November 9, 2015.

For those of you are not aware of Ms. Ali, she was born in Somalia as a Muslim and came to realize Islam as a new “fascism” and she has worked to stop female genital mutilation.  She lives under constant death threats.

In Ayaan Hirsi Ali’s Foreign Policy essay she explains:

“Anyone seeking support for armed jihad in the name of Allah will find ample support in the passages in the Quran and Hadith that relate to Mohammed’s Medina period. For example, Q4:95 states, “Allah hath granted a grade higher to those who strive and fight with their goods and persons than to those who sit (at home).”

Q8:60 advises Muslims “to strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemies, of Allah and your enemies, and others besides, whom ye may not know, but whom Allah doth know.” Finally, Q9:29 instructs Muslims: “Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.”

Mainstream Islamic jurisprudence continues to maintain that the “sword verses” (9:5 and 9:29) have “abrogated, canceled, and replaced” those verses in the Quran that call for “tolerance, compassion, and peace.”

To read Mr. Langfan’s full column click here.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Washington, D.C. Transit Cop Charged for Trying to Help ISIS

Brazil Arrests ‘Defenders of Shariah’ Terror Cell Ahead of Olympic Games

Iran Tricks Families of Newly Executed Prisoners

Number of American Girls At Risk of FGM Tripled Since 1990

It Is Time to Defend U.S. Sovereignty

If the Muslim dogma is to ever be considered anything but a breeding ground for seventh century level barbarian brutes, they can start by taking care of their own.  The United States of America is the most generous nation in human history.  But our Christian inspired generosity does not dictate that we must put up with horrendous hordes of illegal immigrants and Muslim terrorist who wants to come into America and blow us to smithereens, or burn us into charcoal.

In 1979, the Islamic leaders of Iran declared war on the west. Primarily America and Israel.  They have not to this point utilized a traditional standing army to engage the west in mortal combat.  Their skill levels are still not developed enough to take on a well-trained military like the United States (pre Obama.) However, they have become more effective in using cowardly terrorists methods that reflect their warped style of existing.  The Islamists have murdered hundreds of both American and European citizens.

So it does not make logical nor strategic sense for the federal government to abandon it’s enumerated duty to defend the United States from enemies, both foreign and domestic. Not bring in legions of Muslim refugees who do not agree with our constitutionally limited way of life.  No nation can prosper by placing the desires of non-sovereign citizens or enemies above the interests and safety of it’s people.  When it comes to dealing with Muslims who are at war with any nation that shows a modicum of civilized tendencies, the Islamists take that as a weakness and will never give up their goal of ultimately conquering them.

That is why I agree whole heartedly with retired Lt. Col. Allen West, who has advocated that American political leaders should create a safe zone in Syria and convince Middle East nations to take in and care for their own Syrian refugees.  The only problem is that Muslims do not have a natural or religious influenced tendency to help others in chronic need, even their own foolish America and Israeli hating fellow terrorists.  Even so, Col. West believes we should challenge Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and others to take in refugees.  America was not obligated to take in thousands of Nazis or Japanese during World War Two.  So again, during this time of war (according to the Islamists) America is not obligated to take in thousands and thousands of those whose religion dictates that they force us to submit to Allah, or die.

Unfortunately, it won’t be until January 20th, 2017, if Donald Trump wins the presidency that we will have a president that will govern on behalf of U.S. interests.  Until then, the White House Occupier, Berry Obama will continue to try and flood our republic with as many hate filled Muslim refugees as he can.  So far, Mr. Obama has funneled into America over seven thousand Islamic refugees and has only allowed in 32 Christian refugees.  Let us not overlook the fact that Muslims are murdering, burning, beheading, raping and enslaving hundreds of Christians every single week throughout the Middle East.  Yet the American dragon-establishment media and the Obama administration looks the other way and just doesn’t seem to give a damn.

It is awful how those who simply want our border protected are labeled as bigots by Americans who are either brainwashed or in agreement with the harm President Obama and his fellow progressives are perpetrating against our civilization.  Our enemies must be falling over in a constant state of amazement and laughter as they witness dummied down Americans turn against their fellow countrymen and women who only desire to protect our republic from being decimated.

The root of such tomfoolery can be traced directly to the government school system which has been allowed to systematically dumb down generation after generation.  So now, the average American student knows less about the Constitution, Bill of Rights, and the Federalist Papers than the mantra of special rights for illegal immigrants and diseased non-vetted Syrian, Muslim refugees.  Be assured, that many of those refugees that brainwashed Americans are willing to risk our existence for would engulf our nation in flames if given the chance.

This final note:  Those of us who claim to be Christians, are not required to be nicer than Jesus.  Like Jesus we must not be afraid to stand up too evil and for the good of America, beat it back into retreat.  Yes, we must love our enemies.  But we are not expected by God to let those seeking to destroy this great nation to achieve that goal, whether from within or externally.  Everyone else has boldly come out of the closet.  Thus it is time for Christians and patriots to no longer cower in the closet.  It is time to defend United States sovereignty.  God Bless America and May America Bless God.

EDITORS NOTE: Please join Ron Edwards every Friday on AM 1180 KCKQ Reno, Nevada and worldwide on www.americamatters.us at 5:00 PM EST and 2:00 PM PST.  This week Ron will be Blowing Away the Myths and Revealing the Truth concerning major issues of the day and drilling down on such topics as Obama’s $400 million giveaway to Iran.  Also he will be sharing a bit of True American history. You are invited to smile and dial and join the conversation at 844.790.8255.

DEAR AMERICA by Sean O’Loughlin

NEW YORK, New York /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — I am one of eleven people who donated the maximum amount under law to Donald Trump during the primaries. I am very conservative when it comes to issues related to the United States Constitution, supporting law enforcement and lowering taxes for businesses to grow. However, when it comes to social issues, I am probably more liberal and progressive than most Americans.

Although that I believe that abortion is morally wrong, I do not believe that the government should be involved with telling people what they can or can not do with their bodies. In terms of people and their sexual preferences, I could care less what people do behind closed doors and if two people love each other, the government should allow them to get married. In terms of racial relations, our neighborhoods, places of employment and public schools in New York City are more diverse than anywhere in the world. When people on the news call Donald Trump a racist, I find that statement difficult to believe.

Like myself, Donald Trump is a life-long New Yorker. Donald Trump lives, works, eats and employs people of all races and religions. Like many of my fellow New Yorkers, Donald Trump speaks his mind and that type of behavior can easily be misunderstood by people who are not New Yorkers. Defending yourself does not make you a bully. The real bullies are the people who are attacking Donald Trump and then claiming that they are the victims. The fact of the matter is that Donald Trump has rolled up his sleeves and he is trying to stir up debate to find real solutions to real problems.

It was Martin Luther King, Jr. who said “the ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy.”

The Republicans running away from Donald Trump are sending a message to the American people that they do not want to find real solutions to securing our borders, keeping security risks out of our country and bringing jobs back to our country.

Donald Trump is not dictating his beliefs, but he is rather stirring up debate. God bless him.

ABOUT SEAN O’LOUGHLIN

Sean O’Loughlin is a member of The Unites States Press Agency and The US Press Association.

The Hateful Meshugash of Jewish Apostates

Jews Against Themselves cover(1)Hat tip to Imre Herzog.  You may have read the tweet exchanges by Jeffrey Goldberg of The Atlantic with leftist anti-Zionist columnists at Ha’aretz who call Israel, ‘evil’.  Goldberg took both them and the publisher Amos Schocken to task for their bizarre commentaries. Ruthie Blum chronicled that in the Algemeiner yesterday.  That prompted University of Washington professor Edward Alexander, author of Jews against Themselves and colleague Paul Bogdanor, author of Kasztner’s Crime to expose two America academics of similar evil intent who have published in Ha’aretz: Professor Dina Hasia of NYU and Professor Marjorie Feld on Babson College near Boston.  They wrote a profile of both in an Algemeiner article appropriately entitled, “Jewish Apostates”for their hateful anti-Semitic anti-Israelism giving aid and comfort to the enemy of the Jewish nation. Note these scathing condemnations of both ‘apostates’:

Since the fury of Feld and Diner is aroused by Israel’s being a Jewish state, why do they not direct it also against Britain, a Christian state, with an official Protestant church, a Protestant monarch, and a Protestant state education system? Other self-declared Christian states with numerous non-Christian citizens include such progressive bastions as Denmark, Finland, Greece, and Norway. And let us not speak of all the states whose names begin with “Islamic Republic of…” or “United Arab…,” and who are among the most zealous supporters of such hate fests as “Israel Apartheid Week.”

Since Israel’s people have been under military as well as ideological siege throughout its existence, our professorial duo could hardly avoid the subject of atrocities. They deal with it, alas, just as one might have expected. Diner writes: “I abhor violence, bombings, stabbings, or whatever hurtful means oppressed individuals resort to out of anger and frustration. And yet, I am not surprised when they do so, after so many decades of occupation, with no evidence of progress.” Can these historians really be unaware that terrorism against Jews in the Jewish homeland began decades before the “occupation”? As Paul Berman observed about apologists of their ilk, “Each new act of murder and suicide testified to how oppressive the Israelis were. Palestinian terror, in this view, was the measure of Israeli guilt. The more grotesque the terror, the deeper the guilt…”

Feld and Diner are nothing if not frank. They do not even bother to hide the logical end-point of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) campaign. Diner not only boycotts everything Israeli, but also many of her co-religionists in the Diaspora. “I feel a sense of repulsion,” she explains, “when I enter a synagogue in front of which the congregation has planted a sign reading, ‘We Stand With Israel.’ I just do not go and avoid many Jewish settings where I know Israel will loom large as an icon of identity.”

As genocidal fanatics build nuclear bombs in Iran; as Hezbollah arms itself with over a hundred thousand missiles in Lebanon; as men, women, and children are butchered with knives in Israel; as small children in a Jewish school and shoppers in a kosher deli are massacred in Europe; as synagogues and community institutions are fortified against the never-ending nightmare of Islamist violence throughout the world, the Israel-haters take pride in their own perfidy by shunning their fellow Jews.

“One who separates himself from the [Jewish] community” – by showing indifference when it is in distress – “has no share in the world to come.” So declared Maimonides, the greatest of all Jewish sages, in the twelfth century (Laws of Repentance, iii). But if this verdict seems too remote and old-fashioned for Diner and Feld, let them ponder the following, delivered at the height of the Holocaust: “The history of our times will one day make bitter reading, when it records that some Jews were so morally uncertain that they denied they were obligated to risk their own safety in order to save other Jews who were being done to death abroad” (Ben Halpern, Jewish Frontier, August 1943).

Last October, we published in the Iconoclast blog of the New English Review, a review of Alexander’s “Jews against Themselves” by Phoenix-based David Isaac, “Why are Jews against Israel”. the creator of the video education series, “Zionism 101”that appeared in the Washington Free Beacon. We wrote:

Isaac’s review of Alexander‘s collection of jeremiads, “The Enemy Within” published in today’s Washington Free Beacon excoriates these diverse ‘shadtlanim’ beyond the usual suspects. Isaac pays tribute to Alexander withering and acerbic wit in these essays. He writes:

Alexander describes “the new forms taken by Jewish apostasy in an age when Jewish existence is threatened more starkly and immediately than at any time since the Nazi war against the Jews.” He notes that there are always readers astonished to learn that Israel-bashing Jews exist. But precisely these home-grown haters are the ones who “play a disproportionate role in basic

Isaac notes Alexander’s theme threading his oeuvre defending Israel against the usual and not so usual suspects:

Alexander is a staunch defender of Israel, the foundation of which he calls one of the “few redeeming events in a century of blood and shame, one of the greatest affirmations of the will to live ever made by a martyred people, and a uniquely hopeful sign for humanity itself.” As an English professor at the University of Washington, he wrote books on moral exemplars of the Victorian period like Matthew Arnold. He could have remained in his ivory tower, but instead he has delved into the muck. With pen in hand—happily Alexander is a superb writer and wields a very sharp pen—he has taken apart Israel’s enemies in books ranging from The Jewish Idea and Its Enemies to The Jewish Wars to The State of the Jews and The Jewish Divide Against Israel.

RELATED ARTICLE: Anti-Semitism on Campus 2016

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared in the New English Review.