Act Now or Be Enslaved

/in , , , /by

Hello my fellow Americans, we are now at a very important crossroads concerning the direction our republic will either proceed or crumble upon.  Right now because of recent developments, a majority of sovereign citizens throughout the United States are completely void of happiness or joy.  In fact it states in the holy-scriptures that when the wicked reign, the people mourn.  There is absolutely great mourning concerning the needless deaths of younger black people being slaughtered by other black Americans in predominantly black neighborhoods in American cities.

Despite the ongoing deceptive news reports of low unemployment in our nation, record numbers of Americans are simply existing without even participating in the workforce.  One of the main reasons is because millions of jobs are no longer available for Americans to return to.  The wicked application of oppressively high corporate taxes along with draconian Environmental Protection Agency measures have benefited competitor nations like Canada and China. They have either received corporate headquarters that have left the United States, or they have assumed economic advantages over America due to insane trade agreements that put our republic at a disadvantage.

Thanks but no thanks, to Obama’s socialist economic policies and a compliant congress that rarely challenged them, the refusal to allow the Keystone Pipeline, stopping new oil exploration and harvesting in Alaska, the selling of millions of acres of American farmland to foreign nations, particularly China could soon prove detrimental to U.S. food supplies and economic prowess.  Soon, more and more food gown in our nation will be shipped out to China and elsewhere, depleting food supplies.  If there is ever a nation-wide combination of droughts and mega storms, there may not be enough food to last during such long term setbacks.

Right now America continues to be invaded by legions of illegal immigrants and Islamic terrorists, all with the permission of the Obama administration and the United Nations.

After the recent shooting in Oregon, president Obama said he chose to politicize the gun control issue.  For him it was more important to try and drum up support for taking guns from law-abiding citizens than reaching out and showing gratitude toward Chris Mintz who bravely stood in the way of a cowardly shooter who elected to go after unarmed Christians who were hampered by stupid regulatory barriers to self-protection.

In other worldly developments, Russia has unveiled a new almost invincible army tank on the heels of usurping America’s onetime massive presence in the Middle East.  In the meantime, President Barack Hussein Obama continues to weaken the United States military by destroying morale, getting rid of important weapons system and booting out the most worthy Generals and other pro American military leaders.  To make matters worse Obama has turned the once mighty United States military into the world’s largest military social experiment for unnatural sexual practitioners, muslims, trannies atheists, witches and warlocks. Of course, Christian principles and Christianity itself has been ushered out of the armed forces.

It was embarrassing to witness the shameful display of the U.S. delegation at the United Nations during the riveting speech by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. They acted as if he was the scourge of the earth and joined the rest of the world in treating our greatest ally as if Israelis were the ones who said death to America.  I couldn’t help but think of Biblical prophecy that foretold of a time when all the nations of the world would turn against the nation that is the apple of God’s eye.

Equally crazy has been the five decades of bigoted progressive indoctrination in government schools against the United States, Liberty, God, free market economics and everything good.  For the most part, America’s black community remains chained on the spiritual and mental plantation that inspires self-fulfilling prophesies of gloom, doom and just a life of hard knocks very few learn from.  The evidence is the family breakdown, the massive murder rates of their own kind through abortion and the blowing away of scores of young black men by other blacks every single week.  Perhaps the most horrific development is the multi-generational cursing of blacks over their young and each other which has produced a segment of society that continues to fulfil those negative proclamations.

That form of self-induced slavery now voluntarily accepted and practiced by many black Americans pleases their elitist progressive big government masters beyond measure.  Unfortunately, an increasing number of young white Americans are beginning to accept and take on the Engels inspired philosophy that destroys a higher quality of life while diminishing personal liberty and societal stability.

But alas, the before mentioned developments do not have to be, nor should they be the final judgement upon our currently troubled republic turned mob ruled democracy.   It is high time for those of us who have chosen not to accept the mission of destruction and enslavement being waged against our republic to stand and fight against that madness.  “We the People” must force the reestablishment of government adherence to the U.S. Constitution and the recognition of our unalienable rights which come from God, not government.  By the way, it was God and those inspired by him who laid the framework for this great nation under God with liberty and justice for all.

Let us never forget, what is taught to one generation decides the direction the nation takes in the next.  What direction do you want, liberty or slavery?  The choice is up to you, so exercise it.

Calling all young Patriots! Build large families to save American culture!

/in , , , , , /by

I’m so sick of hearing that as the population ages we have to tolerate more and more immigration from the third world.  Heck, that thinking is what is destroying Europe. And, I am sick of us being on the defense.

How about a national campaign to encourage young American couples to have more babies!  Why not!

If you are my age, you know we college students were beaten over the head with the idea that we dare not over-populate the earth and we dutifully (many of us!) did what we were told, all the while, the whole system was geared for people with lower educations to have MORE babies (encouraged by the welfare system).

Let’s stop the madness.  How about rewards for the well-educated to have large families!  (Oh, I can hear the screaming and gnashing of teeth from the Left now!).

Maybe there is some (brave!) private foundation out there willing to promote such a campaign!

This post is archived in a rarely used category here called ‘creating a movement‘ which I would like to use more often!

Oops!  Should have reminded readers about this recent post—Death by Demography—when I initially posted this one.

RELATED ARTICLES:

It is official! Fiscal year 2015 Syrian resettlement: 97% Muslim

Sec. of State John Kerry: Climate refugees our next move to erase borders

Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) advances bill to bring in MORE Syrian refugees, more quickly

FBI Director confirms (again) that they can’t thoroughly screen Syrians entering the U.S.

In 1996 Playboy warned of ‘Sexual Attitude Restructuring’ in America

/in , , /by

Even Playboy said May 1996, that; “most of us would define as sexual harassment” (p. 42) what goes on at meetings of the “Society for the Scientific Study Of Sexuality.”  President of the SSSS, Naomi McCormic warned the sexpert attendees they should not really do certain things publicly. (There also used to be a warning that sex activity had to be done in a private setting)

Saying “the list is far from exhaustive” folks should please refrain from: nasty, hostile remarks about women (and men), belittling (straights?), calling people sex prudes, nipple comments, crotch comments, fondling, touching, sexual advances that had been rejected, and so on.

These are our human sexuality experts, credentialed, having passed the SAR (Sexual Attitude Restructuring) “Fu*karama” days, weeks, months of pornography viewing, and practica that most must take to be sexperts. These are the authors of the sex books we read, sex “studies” they conduct, school sex ed curricula and  sex guides.  These are colleagues in the sexuality field, many like Kinsey, sex addicts, pornography addicts, pedophiles, pederasts, expert witnesses in courtrooms, teachers, professors, judges, and many on the editorial board of Paidika, The Journal of Paedophilia.

RELATED VIDEO: The Kinsey Effect: How One Man Destroyed the Morality of America

sex ed experts article

So You Wanna Run For Congress?

/in , , /by

Having run two campaigns for federal office, one in the 2012 and the second in 2014, I regularly receive emails and other communications from prospective candidates asking me for advice on how to get a congressional campaign started.

I am always humbled that true American patriots looking to make a difference seek out my advice, but I am always straightforward and crystal clear with them. I preface these conversations by telling them that I am extremely proud of what my senate and congressional campaign teams accomplished but, the hard fact is, we came up short. And there are no silver medals in politics. Thankfully, it doesn’t take an Election Day victory to be able to assist others by providing some guidance based on personal campaign experiences and helping them to avoid common campaign pitfalls. If you are one of those American patriots out there thinking of running for office, this article is for you. It’s the good, the bad, and the ugly, of running for congress.

The Good

First, the good: Running for congress will present you with numerous opportunities to meet a network of grassroots activists and committed volunteers who are the real bedrock of the conservative movement and who will show you the positive side of politics rarely seen by others.

These are the people who are disregarded by many on the inside of the D.C. “bubble” because they don’t have the financial ability to buy influence but, the welcomed truth is, these are the people who, when they passionately believe in you, can work miracles (see Dave Brat in 2014, Ted Cruz in 2012, and Marco Rubio and Scott Brown in 2010). Grassroots volunteers knock on doors, march with you in parades, hand out your campaign literature at fairs, and fill your emotional gas tank when the political attacks begin to take their toll.

Misguided, cynical D.C. insiders will downplay the influence of the grassroots and cite numerous grassroots candidates that have come up short on Election Day, but this is silly. The establishment class has all of the built-in advantages when running their candidates and, the fact that in nearly every election cycle, grassroots candidates, with little money, second-rate access to media, shunned by influential elites, pull off miraculous upsets against all odds should be a clue to the insider class. If you are a principled, articulate, passionate candidate, these grassroots game-changers will never forget you, whether you win or lose your campaign. These people are some of the most loyal, dedicated and loving human beings you will ever have the privilege of meeting and will make your campaign experience one of the most memorable of your life.

On my campaigns, I had Dave, who was diagnosed with a deadly disease, and lost a loved-one during the election cycle, but never missed a door-knocking opportunity with me, even in the 90-plus degree Maryland summer heat. I had Jan, who had no political experience in campaigning, but through sheer will and determination taught herself how to organize walk-lists, parade and fair appearances, and fundraising events, and did it with such success that she probably could have run herself for office and given my opponent a run for his money. And I had Sharon and Maria, my incredible campaign management team, who simply refused to believe the numerous press reports that our race for congress was uncompetitive. They both left everything on the table to make it not only “competitive,” but one of the last congressional races in the country to be decided. These are just a few of the many loyal supporters I met running for office who I still consider close personal, not political, friends, and I will never forget what they did for me, and neither will you when you meet your Dave, Jan, Maria and Sharon.

The Bad

Here’s the bad: Campaigns for congress are no longer simply local elections. Gerrymandering, an expanded media universe due to a 24-hour news cycle, the Internet, and social media have turned the few competitive congressional districts left in the country into national elections. And although door knocking and retail politics are an absolutely invaluable component of a congressional campaign, they are simply not enough anymore to win an election. To prevail you are going to need the “big three”: money, media, and infrastructure. It’s not good enough to have just one of these three components, you must have all.

Before you make the decision to declare yourself a candidate for congress you need to ask yourself if you are capable of producing the money, media, and infrastructure necessary to win. Can you raise the roughly one to five million dollars or more you will need to purchase advertising space on television, radio, the Internet, music streaming sites such as Pandora, social media and more? Can you raise the money to pay a campaign staff which will ensure that the appropriate FEC reports are filled out properly and that the “trains run on time”? Can you convince 100,000 people to donate $10 to your campaign, or 1,000 people to donate $1,000? Can you generate local and possibly national media interest in your campaign?

Do you have the contact information for local reporters and radio and television bookers who may be interested in your campaign? Are you reaching out to local bloggers who may have a loyal audience themselves? And have you thought through the campaign infrastructure needs this is going to take to win? You are going to need a top-notch mail vendor for campaign fundraising mailers and possibly another mail company for issues-based mailers. You are going to need an updated and easy-to-use voter database with a voter scoring system which will enable you to target voters for issue-specific outreach. You are also going to need a creative marketing team which can design and film outstanding political ads that tell your story as well as you can tell it, which is no small task.

The Ugly

Finally, here’s the ugly: Politics is an ugly business that no article or book can prepare you for when your name goes on the campaign sign. Power absolutely corrupts, and the sinner in all of us takes on a louder voice in that ever-present internal debate between doing the right thing and the easy thing that we all deal with—amplified, I can promise, by the possibility of occupying a congressional office staring you in the face.

The first time you are in a situation where your conservative principles come into conflict with winning over a block of voters, it will be a harbinger of your future. Once you sell out the first time, and let the evil in, you have made the decision to do the easy thing and not the right thing. Once you choose this path, you own it, and it owns you. I know many of you reading this are convinced that you would make the right decision in this scenario, and I believe many of you would, but it is not as easy as it appears given our human failings. I have no regrets at all about running a conservative campaign in a heavily Democratic district, and nearly pulling off an incredible upset, although many pleaded with me to do otherwise. Principles matter to the people that matter, and this is all that matters in the fight for our constitutional republic.

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared in the Conservative Review. The featured image is by Patrick Semansky | AP Photo.

PODCAST: You Cannot Multiply Wealth By Dividing It

/in , , , , , /by

A sermon given in 1984 by Dr. Adrian Pierce Rogers, Baptist Pastor, Author, and Political Commentator titled, “God’s Way to Health, Wealth and Wisdom.”

“You cannot legislate the poor into freedom by legislating the industrious out of it. You don’t multiply wealth by dividing it. Government cannot give anything to anybody that it doesn’t first take from somebody else. Whenever somebody receives something without working for it, somebody else has to work for it without receiving. The worst thing that can happen to a nation is for half of the people to get the idea they don’t have to work because somebody else will work for them, and the other half to get the idea that it does no good to work because they don’t get to enjoy the fruits of their labor.”

Please listen to Dr. Roger’s entire sermon “God’s Way to Health, Wealth and Wisdom“:

WE THE PEOPLE have suffered the consequences because SOME chose not to vote

/in , /by

The crisp air signals the end of the summer weather for most of us especially in the North East because we are starting to see the color of the leaves change to brilliant hues of red, yellow and orange.  The farmer’s markets are overflowing with the harvest of the growing season and kids are frolicking in the pile of leaves you recently raked up.  Pumpkin patches are ablaze with the color of thousands of those round pumpkins used to make carved Jack-o-Lanterns and some may actually use those pumpkins to make wonderful fall favorites like pumpkin soup.

We begin to hang out more inside especially at night when the thermometer begins to dip lower and lower.  Many of us begin to light the fires in our fireplaces, wood stoves or turn on our furnaces or other heating devices. Yes, this is the time of year we like to call Harvest Season.

The season of plenty.  The season of apple picking.  The season of spiced cider.  The season of cute little ghouls and goblins and this is even the season of politics. The season of politics?  Yes, the season of politics.  You see this is when we should take stock of our political harvest because we planted the political seeds long ago and now it is time for us to harvest what we sowed.

Back in the year 2011, some four to five million registered Republicans did not vote in the presidential election and by them not voting it was actually like casting a vote for Barack Obama.  We The People are now reaping what we sowed that November because many of us find that this is a rotten harvest.

This is a harvest that has turned into our season of discontent.  As kids we may have hated to eat our peas, broccoli, and carrots but now as adults we are having to eat the likes of Obamacare, Higher Taxes, more Terrorist Activity, and the War on Cops.

The harvest is not yet done giving us the bounty from farmer Obama because we have more distasteful political veggies to come.  We The People will have to swallow things like Higher taxes, Unimaginable National Debt, a Stagnant Economy, High Real Unemployment, Greater World Instability, and the list goes on and on. We have all of this because some of us decided not to vote because we did not have the sweet tasting candidate that we wanted.

Now we must deal with the sour taste of the real world and not only harvest what we sowed but now we must also eat what we harvest.

Let that sink in as this political season heats up. So we can either choose to sow good stock for a grand and tasty harvest in 2016 or we can, as we did back in 2011, not vote and end up with bitter, sour, nasty tasting politics and relive that awful harvest all over again for the next four or five years.

The choice is yours, America.  I frankly like the tastier political veggies.  So do me a favor and don’t force me to eat political lima beans again.

Major Liberal Messaging Myths

/in , , , /by

It’s presidential election season and the liberal messaging machine is out in full force defending its failed agenda.

Having been both inside the inner-sanctum of presidential politics as a Secret Service agent through three presidential elections as well as a candidate for federal office myself, I’ve witnessed the creation of a deceptive political message. I’ve even been attacked personally.

But nothing aggravates me more than political lies that don’t seem to wear out with time, but stick around like the “gifts that keeps on giving.” Blinded by ideology, many left-leaning pseudo-journalists simply refuse to tell the public the truth about these lies. Given that the media refuses to do its job, I’ve put together this list of the top liberal messaging myths, used during election season, to help you correct the record when debating your liberal friends.

  1. President Clinton Generated a Federal Government “Surplus” (Used to discredit conservative fiscal philosophy) It’s disturbing enough that I hear this particular myth repeated by opinion writers and commentators, but I have also seen mainstream media outlets report this as fact. This is a lie so easily debunked that it surprises me that journalists are willing to risk the small amount of credibility they have left in repeating it.Here are the facts: President Clinton never ran a budget surplus in any year of his presidency. If you dispute this then please take the time to click this link which will direct you to the U.S. Treasury’s own website which provides detailed data on the national debt. Plug in the Clinton presidency years and you will notice that the national debt rose every year of the Clinton presidency. The national debt never went down. Now, ask yourself, how did the federal government manage to run a “surplus” while the national debt continued to increase? The answer is that they didn’t run a surplus. Social Security ran a surplus, and that surplus was spent by lawmakers when it was turned over to the U.S. Treasury. There was never a federal budget surplus.
  2. American CEOs Earn 300 Times the Average Worker’s Salary (Used to discredit capitalism) Far-left outlets love this talking point and use it often to highlight income inequality in America despite the fact that it’s categorically false. The study which reported this 300 to 1 ratio between CEO pay and employee pay studied the 350 largest American companies, but there are hundreds of thousands of CEOs in the United States whose salaries were left out of that sensational statistic.Here’s an analogy to highlight the absurdity of limiting the reporting of CEO pay to an infinitesimally-small portion of the business world: It would be similar to reporting that the players in the Major League Baseball All-Star Game are 300 times better than the players in the local senior softball league. Of course, when you cherry-pick the data to pre-select the biggest and best companies in America, and the biggest and best players in the Major Leagues, you will get large disparities. Here’s the truth: The real ratio of CEO pay to employee pay is closer to 4 to 1 when all of our CEOs are considered, not just the ones which advance the Left’s anti-capitalist agenda. Not exactly the eye-opening number you were expecting, is it? But the Left isn’t interested in opening eyes, they are more interested in blindfolds.
  1. The U.S. Infant Mortality Rate is the Highest Among High-Income Countries (Used to discredit free-market healthcare) Engage in any conversation with a liberal about Obamacare or single-payer healthcare and, undoubtedly, you will hear this false data point thrown out there as fact. They use this faux-statistic to discredit the small portion of the U.S. healthcare that remains open to the free market. This deliberately misleading talking point has even been debunked by the very same wealthy OECD countries quoted in the faux statistic, when they stated, “Some of the international variation in infant and neonatal mortality rates may be due to variations among countries in registering practices of premature infants (whether they are reported as live births or not).”In other words, this statistics is meaningless because it compares apples to oranges. If the countries measured in the study are not using the same characteristics to account for live births then the comparison is meaningless. Isn’t it odd how the Left claims to be on the side of “science” only when science supports some ends they wish to reach? When the real science proves the Left wrong, they resort to data manipulation and chicanery.
  2. President George W. Bush’s Tax Cuts Worsened the Deficit (Used to discredit tax cuts) During both of my political campaigns I had this whopper thrown at me by editorial board staff members of the Washington Post. Making an awkward interview even worse, the Washington Post staffers were unwilling to accept the fact that this proclamation about the Bush tax cuts was not factually accurate, despite my repeated protestations.Here is the truth: The George W. Bush tax cuts didn’t cost the federal government any tax revenue. In the four years following the Bush tax cuts, the federal government experienced record tax revenue growth. This piece of data is only in dispute by those who are either willingly ignorant or willingly engaging in a campaign of deception. There is no third option.

    There’s an important election right around the corner, please don’t let the Left dominate the conversation with false data. Each time one of these false statistics is repeated, without being challenged, its status as a pseudo-fact is calcified. Be a Paul or Paulette Revere for the truth and help correct the record by challenging these myths whenever the opportunity presents itself.

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared in the Conservative Review.

Stand By Me

/in , , /by

When the media jumped all over Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy last week for his comments about how the Benghazi hearings have driven Hillary Clinton’s polling numbers down; I couldn’t help but  reflect on what my buddy once told me:

When the night has come
And the land is dark
And the moon is the only light we’ll see
No I won’t be afraid, no I won’t be afraid
Just as long as you stand, stand by me

Oh darlin’, darlin’, stand by me, oh stand by me
Oh stand by me, stand by me

If the sky that we look upon
Should tumble and fall
And the mountains should crumble to the sea
I won’t cry, I won’t cry, no I won’t shed a tear
Just as long as you stand, stand by me

These are the partial lyrics to the smash hit by the late legendary soul singer Ben E. King, “Stand By Me (1961).”

Regardless of what you think about McCarthy, we, as Republicans, should never allow the Democrats to attack one of our own; and Republicans should never adopt the same language of our opposition.

I watched in horror as many Republicans sided with Democrats in their reaction to what McCarthy said; it got so bad that McCarthy was forced to apologize for his remarks.  My sister may be a drunk, but I will not allow you call her that.

As one who makes his living through communications, I am dumbfounded as to how Republicans allowed the Democrats to win the narrative over McCarthy’s remarks.  For the sake of discussion, let’s assume that the Benghazi investigation is all about the “vast right-wing conspiracy” against Hillary Clinton.

Last time I checked, Republicans don’t control the F.B.I. or the inspectors general of the State Department or the intelligence communities.  They are the ones who are investigating whether Clinton violated any laws, not Republicans.

So, the issue is not and should not be about McCarthy’s Benghazi remarks, but rather did Clinton break the law by mishandling classified information because she was arrogant enough to use a private email server in her home to avoid the public ever finding out about her and Bill’s private business dealings.

Message to Republicans, “Don’t let Hillary off the hook under the guise of being non-partisan.”  If Clinton had obeyed the law and followed her department’s own guidelines, then we would not be talking about her emails.  She is not a victim, but rather the perpetrator.

Clinton brought this on herself and the Democratic Party.  She will and should be held accountable for her exercising poor judgement because of her irrational belief that everyone is out to get her.

Democrats are obsessively loyal to their own.  It took them forever to denounce Bill Clinton publically over the Monica Lewinsky affair.  They even stood by former congressman Anthony Weiner and his sexting problem until public pressure became too great.

The point is very clear, we must not turn Hillary into a sympathetic figure.  We need to learn how to do a better job of standing by our own.  If you are a public speaker, at some point you are going to say something that you wish could be taken back; it’s just part of life.

I think McCarthy’s remarks should have been dealt with privately within the party; but publically we should have hammered in on the theme of Hillary’s poor judgement regarding the private email server.  She will not be the Democratic nominee, but we should not let the American people forget how her campaign has come to this point—by her own bad judgement.

She does not have the judgement to be president of the United States because America’s interest will always be subservient to the interests of the Clinton’s business interests.  Can you say Whitewater or the Rose Law Firm?  This is where I take my stand.

Takk fyrir — “Thank you very much” in Icelandic

/in , , , /by

Open Letter to the Honorable People of Iceland:

To the good people of Iceland, I offer our sincere appreciation for choosing righteousness over hate and the growing Islamic totalitarianism, and for voting against the Palestinian proposal to boycott Israel.  I confirmed the low-key news announcement with a call to your Washington Embassy on the morning of September 30.

However, to my letter of concern to the Islandic Ministry of Foreign Affairs, I had received a reply assuring me that “only one” city was boycotting Israel.  Following the logic device of where the slippery slope would lead, I feared that it would not be long before there might be “simply two.” In my lifetime, I have seen many “only ones” that have led to mass destruction, inconceivable carnage, and unimaginable misery. It continues to this day, in the Middle East, Africa, parts of Europe, and the current perpetrators are always Muslims who commit unspeakable crimes to spread Sharia to the world.

We understand that Iceland is anticipating in constructing her first formal mosque, supported by foreign funds, just as we in America welcomed our first formal mosque one hundred years ago, in 1915.  We now have upwards of 2,100 mosques, 80% of which were funded by Saudi funds. These edifices serve primarily not as prayer rooms, but as jihadi recruitment and training centers, and Reyjkovic’s prime location for their “Ground Zero” roots will further embolden your aggressors.

In the words of an Islamic poet, quoted by Turkey’s PM Erdogan, “The minarets are our bayonets, the domes our helmets, the mosques our barracks and the faithful our army.”  In addition, Col. Myuammar al-Gaddafi proclaimed, in 2006, “We have 50 million Muslims in Europe. There are signs that Allah will grant Islam victory in Europe – without swords, without guns, without conquest – will turn it into a Muslim continent within a few decades.”

How will Iceland respond to the next demand for boycott of Israel or some other targeted country, when the Muslim voices, population, and mosques are increased?  Germans and Swedes are already subjected to violence and rape and commanded to relinquish their homes to the illegal, violent “asylum seekers” (jihadists).  Assuredly, Icelanders are no less vulnerable than the Nordic countries, mainland Europe, or Israel, when they will be forced to relinquish their inalienable rights, homes, and property. .  This is the time to teach your children and inform and prepare the adults about democratic Israel and her battles with the scourges of fascism and Islamism, and reaffirm your own history and future. Your citizens should learn that Israel is a leader in innovations, science, technology, agricultural and medical advancements, and cultural progress; a First Responder to world emergencies.  The essence of Judaism is Torah, Life and good deeds.

Islam, by contrast, is guided by their Qur’an, containing the world’s most brutal laws, total and unqualified submission to the will of Allah, under penalties of whipping, stoning, limb amputations, and decapitations.  It is a supersessionist ideology that encroaches upon its host country in small increments and sets down roots to ultimately overcome and supplant the indigenous population.

Israel became a state in 1312 BCE, two thousand years before Islam, yet the conquest-driven Islamists continue to re-write history to promote the concept of an historically non-Jewish Jerusalem. Interestingly, the Qur’an clarifies that neither Allah nor Mohammed ever intended Jerusalem for Muslims.  From the beginning, Mohammed appropriated much of Jewish and Christian tradition for inclusion in his own religion, but never denied Jewish authority over Jerusalem.  When he fretted that Islam had no Holy City of its own, Allah, according to Islamic tradition (Surah 2:144-147), directed Muhammed toward Mecca. But because hard facts are meaningless to Islamists, there is no doubt that Iceland’s own history will also be rewritten unless you act now.

In modern times, the Balfour Declaration declared the legitimacy of Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, and a Jewish state in Palestine. As defined before the creation of Transjordan, they all derive from the same binding San Remo Resolution that was approved unanimously and signed by the League of Nations on April 25, 1920, and has never been abrogated. The Resolution recognized the exclusive national Jewish rights to the Land of Israel under international law, on the strength of the historical connection of the Jewish people to the territory previously known as Palestine.  Above all, the San Remo Conference gave Title to the land to the Jewish people. With the exception of a mere 19 years, when Jordan ruled Eastern Jerusalem, following its war of aggression in 1948, Jerusalem had been a united city for millennia. When Israel recaptured it in 1967, this ancient unity was re-established.

It was only then, in 1967, twenty years after the birth of modern Israel, that Arab refugees in Israel began identifying themselves as the Palestinian people. Not capable of militarily conquering Israel, they developed a new war strategy – convincing the rest of the world of their narrative of original inhabitance, and victimization and expulsion by the Jews. In fact, they were never expelled; some chose Israeli citizenship, while others fled the war begun by their co-religionists, their number being less than the number of Jews who, during the same passage of time, were compelled to flee the dangers of residing in Muslim countries.  Your people should be taught that Jerusalem has never been the capital of any Arab or Muslim land. Significantly, the city is mentioned more than 700 times in the Jewish Holy Scriptures, but not once in the Qur’an.

Sir Winston Churchill wrote in The River War: An Account of the Reconquest of Sudan, “How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property – either as a child, a wife, or a concubine – must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men . . . No stronger retrograde force exists in the world.”

Before the next boycott is attempted and you lose your freedoms and land to a foreign entity, I urge you to step to the fore and invest yourselves in saving both Israel and Iceland from the horrors of Islamic conquest.  It is time to enact laws that protect your people (the children! the women!), your land and your constitution from foreign influence and safeguard your principles from compromise.   As Iceland may slowly descend from the high ground of a constitutional republic into a morass of lawlessness followed by totalitarian sharia, the window of opportunity to do so is closing by the day.

VIDEO: Operation Jade Helm has Gone Bye Bye

/in , , , /by

Whatever happened to Operation Jade Helm?  I thought it was going to put Americans in concentration camps.  Perhaps its time to call out the panic mongers?

Either Defeat Evil Or Be Defeated

/in , , , /by

The Bible plainly states that when the evil reign, the people mourn.  The current leadership is so wicked that even Lady Liberty in New York City Harbor is crying so much she is rusting again.  Our onetime gleaming cities are once again chocked full of crime in mostly black neighborhoods and wherever illegal immigrants are trolling about.  Isn’t it ironic that in black neighborhoods where big government has the most influence via so called help that is where life is most miserable?

Whenever progressive democrats get the chance, they always prod society further away from the Biblical principles that were the foundation of American greatness.  They consistently harp on about an inclusive society that does not leave anyone out.  But the problem is, the inclusion the progressives are agitating to flood America with illegal immigrants and replace God’s Adam and Eve concept with Bubbah and Billy. The progressives seek to strengthen the likes of black lives matters loons, baby parts marketers, dedicated Muslims who torture animals, burn Christians and rape little boys to please themselves and their powerless god.  Yet the inclusive seekers feverishly work to extinguish the principles of true liberty and justice for all.

In the process of encircling America with the a fore mentioned societal sickness, the United States has devolved into a nation suffering a mostly self-induced unavoidable decline.  Sadly, most students now believe that God is irrelevant and communism is what America needs.  The Bible refers to calling what is good bad and what is bad good. A perfect example of that concept is president Obama.  Remember how he was portrayed as a great alternative to George W. Bush? Many of us in the growing alternative media warned Americans about the horrors Obama would unleash upon our republic.  May God help us!!

There are now scads of evidence that the warnings about Obama were correct.  Not only is he the most anti American president, (eclipsing both Woodrow Wilson and Jimmy Carter) but the most Biblically hostile as well.

Never before in American history has an administration exhibited a more unwilling or inhospitable attitude towards Christians, Catholics and Jews as well.  One example is when he tried to force Catholics to cow tow to his efforts to abortionize Catholicism.  On the other hand, his preferential treatment of Muslims, (particularly Shiites) those who dominate Iran, is commonly known around the world.

For too long and reasons I fail to comprehend, the Christian church and Christian oriented societies have played the role of patsy when it comes to resisting those acting on threats to dominate them, politically, or around the world through warfare and slavery.

Here in America, the onetime land of the free and home of the brave has succumbed to politically correct pressures to basically give in to Muslims who have a single focus goal of world domination.  When one considers the fundamentalist Islamic threats against the United States and Israel (with no major reaction from president Obama) It would be wise for patriotic American non-Muslims to take the Muslims at their word when they say “death to America and no to freedom and liberty.­­­”

In recent years, the federal government, at the behest of president Barack Hussein Obama has given every advantage possible to our Muslim adversaries, including allowing them to venture into our nation through the open border with Mexico and through the northern border with Canada as well.  I will never forget how the Obama administration threatened former Arizona governor Jan Brewer for daring to propose doing what the federal government is supposed to do according to the Constitution. Which is protect “We the People” from enemies both foreign and domestic.  The gall of Obama and others who threatened Americans who merely don’t want our country overrun by illegal immigrants and dedicated Muslim terrorists and of course agenda 21 is jaw dropping, to say the least.

In addition, under the guise of helping poor war ravaged refugees from battered nations, thousands upon thousands of American hating Muslims are being brought into our republic.  Of course this is being done at taxpayer expense without our permission whatsoever.  To add insult to injury, the government is not bothering to inform us taxpayers where in the U.S. they are putting the legions of Muslims.  This of course gives the Muslims who don’t want to assimilate into our American culture the strategic upper hand.

One of the latest insults to common sense and all that is right was the Obama administration refusal to even try to secure the release of Christian minister Saeed when they were supposedly negotiating the DEAL with Iran.  Thus Iran is holding all the cards on this and will reap a huge financial windfall and can build their desired long range nuclear tipped missiles that can reach targets in the United States.  Of course, President Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry is okay with that, much to our nation’s possible detriment.

What can truly be called or considered as a most accurate reflection of the mindset of Obama, a great U.S. marine was booted out of the military because he dared to rescue a little boy from being raped because the Obama administration operates according to muslim, not Christian or American principles that call for the protection of little children.

It is now high time for the church to put aside the stupid foibles of the past and reestablish it’s rightful place of salt and light.  So that once again, this will once again be one nation under God.

Hackers Reveil How Volkswagen Secretly Cheated Emissions Tests by Gary McGath

/in , , , , /by

Cars are part of the “Internet of Things.” They run not just on gas, which you’re free to analyze, but on computer code, which you aren’t. If this sounds worrisome, it is. Internal computers can greatly improve a car’s performance and safety, but they can have problems that show no symptoms under normal circumstances.

A couple of hackers, with a knowing volunteer at the wheel, took remote control of a Jeep Cherokee over the Internet and could have wrecked it at high speed if they hadn’t stopped when asked to. More recently, Volkswagen was caught rigging its emissions-control software to cheat during EPA testing, letting them publish false information about millions of cars.

Car computers are formally called “electronic control units” (ECUs). One car may have over a hundred of them, running millions of lines of code, networked together. Figuring out what they do takes determination; it’s necessary to pull out their memory chips, read them, and work backwards from machine code to the design logic.

But the biggest barrier may not be technical but legal; copyright laws make it illegal to do this kind of reverse engineering, and the EPA itself has helped automakers to keep their emissions-testing code secret.

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act puts restrictions on extracting copyrighted information from computers, even for legitimate diagnostic purposes. Car makers like this; it puts serious limits on independently created diagnostic tools and gives the advantage to shops that pay for licenses.

The EPA has formally opposed a DMCA exception for car systems, arguing that it would let people modify the code to circumvent limitations on emissions. It said that “the majority of modifications to engine software are being performed to increase power and/or boost fuel economy.” That’s just what Volkswagen did, and it was harder to catch them precisely because of those prohibitions.

The Alliance of Auto Manufacturers, which includes Volkswagen, has taken the same stand. Ironically, their statement declares:

Many of the ECUs embodied in today’s motor vehicles are carefully calibrated to satisfy federal or state regulatory requirements with respect to emissions control, fuel economy, or vehicle safety.

Allowing vehicle owners to add and remove programs at whim is highly likely to take vehicles out of compliance with these requirements, rendering the operation or re-sale of the vehicle legally problematic.

John Deere explicitly opposes a free market in car software:

In contrast to the seemingly benign stated purpose of the proposed exemption, the practical effect of circumventing the TPMs [Technical Protection Measures] at issue will stifle creativity and innovation for vehicle software. Third-party software developers, pirates, and competing vehicle manufacturers will be encouraged to free-ride off the creativity and significant investment in research and development of innovative and leading vehicle manufacturers, suppliers, and authors of vehicle software.

The way to promote creativity and innovation is, apparently, to make it illegal for anyone but themselves.

ECUs can be subject to external attacks as well as internal cheatware. Some devices are connected to the Internet for purposes like traffic alerts and entertainment. If they’re part of the car’s internal network, attackers might be able to subvert the whole car, as the Cherokee hackers did. Good design requires firewalls against such attacks, but developers struggling with requirements and hardware limits may neglect security. With no other eyes on their code, it’s easy to be sloppy.

People have tinkered with cars ever since they were first made. They swap in their own parts, making their cars faster, powerful, and sometimes a lot more annoying. This tradition has helped people to learn how the original parts work and catch problems with them. Spotting flaws and cheats in computer code isn’t as easy as catching bad brakes, but it’s easier when the only barriers are technical. When the government and car manufacturers combine to keep the software secret, the rest of us are stuck in the breakdown lane.

Gary McGath

Gary McGath is a freelance software engineer living in Nashua, New Hampshire.

MURDAH: A Stunning Advancement in the Right to Choose by Molotov Mimosa

/in , /by

Washington, DC – A child has grown up not how you envisioned? An elderly parent becoming a burden? Have you considered a post-birth abortion? Scientists at the Barack Obama Women’s Health Research Center have made an epic advancement in women’s health, and the right to choose.

Scientists have developed a method to allow abortions past the third trimester, as explained by the project’s lead scientist, Dr. Hillary Sanders: “Until now, women were limited to aborting only their own fetus, and only during the first three trimesters before birth. Our laboratory has pioneered the use of cloning human uterine epithelium and skin to create an external uterus we like to call the Membrane Uterus for Reclaiming Detrimental and Annoying Humans, or MURDAH bag for short.”

The new method allows to clone and grow the MURDAH bag in a lab from the woman’s own cells, and surgically attach it to her via a small tag on the sleeping bag-sized external uterus. Any post-third-trimester “fetus” of any age or relationship can simply be inserted into the bag, and after returning to the clinic, Dr. Hillary Sanders will exercise the woman’s choice and dispose of the contents. The MURDAH bag is then removed and the woman is free to use it again.

When probed on the ethics of such an invention, Dr. Sanders replied, “I see no ethical dilemma. Law allows that fetus within a woman’s body may simply be removed and disposed of. As we firmly believe in choice, along with reusing and recycling, we do harvest the fetus for further biomedical research. We do not profit off of these transactions like a greedy corporation would, but simply collect as much as we can in order to pay our laboratory and clinic overhead, along with our own generous salaries.”

As expected, opinions on Capitol Hill fall strictly along party lines, with Democratic leaders and presidential hopefuls applauding this leap forward in women’s health and removing the last barriers to the right to choose, while recalcitrant conservatives and their non-serious presidential candidates callously deny the real progress this advancement in science has given to humanity.

EDITORS NOTE: This political satire column originally appeared on The Peoples Cube.

Obama Denying Restitution for Victims of Iranian Terrorism

/in , , , /by

Thursday, October 1, 2015, Congress is scheduled to vote on the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) of 2016. However, President Obama has threatened to veto the NDAA because one of the provisions would bar him from lifting Iranian sanctions under the JCPOA.  Among several amendments incorporated in the NDAA that the President objects to  is the Justice for Victims of Iranian Terrorism  H.R.3457  sponsored by Rep. Pat Meeham (R-PA) as HR  and in the Senate by Senators Pat Toomey  (R-PA) and Mark Kirk (R-Ill) , S 2086.  As Ken Timmerman noted in his Threat Blog, the Act would:

Require the Islamic Republic of Iran to pay an estimated $43 billion to victims of terrorism before the U.S. government would unfreeze Iranian government assets under the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), otherwise known as the Iran nuclear deal.”

Adam Kredo in a Washington Free Beacon article on the legislation noted the background and comments of Senator Kirk:

The $43 billion in damages to American terror victims were assessed as a result of some 50 U.S. court cases in recent years, according to official government estimates.

[…]

Iranian-backed terrorist groups, for example, have killed more than 700 Americans, including at least 290 in Lebanon over the past several decades. This accounts for the 241 U.S. service members murdered during the 1983 Beirut barracks bombing, which Iran sponsored.

Kirk said in the statement on the legislation:

Iran-sponsored terrorists have killed more Americans than the Islamic State. Families of Americans killed by Iranian-backed terrorism have used U.S. laws to take Iran to court and lawfully win approximately $43.5 billion in unsatisfied damages, so if the United States fails to ensure Iran fully pays these judgments before Iranian terror financiers get over $100 billion in sanctions relief, we risk emboldening Iran and other state sponsors of terror to continue targeting and killing more Americans.

One of those Americans was US Navy diver Chief Petty Officer Robert Stethem, was murdered by Hezbollah terrorist mastermind Imad Mughniyah during the 1985 hijacking of Trans World Airlines Flight 847. Another was  teenager Danny Wultz of Weston, Florida  who was mortally wounded in a suicide bombing  by an operative of Iranian – sponsored  terror group, Palestine Islamic Jihad at  a Tel Aviv outdoor café in 2006 while vacationing with his father,Tuly,  who survived the blast.

Stethem’s brother Kenneth, a former Navy SEAL joined Rep. Meeham and other Members of Congress Wednesday to draw attention to tomorrow’s vote on the NDAA incorporating the Iran Victims Terror Act.  The Washington Free Beacon cited  Kenneth Stethem’s comments:

Terrorism has become something more and more frequent because we haven’t developed an effective policy against it and we need to do that. I really believe this bill is the first step in doing that. He added that the passage of the legislation would offer “closure” for families of terror victims. My brother can never be brought back, but the people who perpetrated these acts on my brother and hundreds of other victims can and should be held accountable.

Watch this You Tube video that Rep. Meehan used to introduce the Justice for Iran Victims Act in the House:

Note what Meehan said:

We’re putting our victims to the side if we enable these dollars to be returned to Iran without any attachment to them.

Look, these are Marines who died protecting our barracks, these are American citizens who were sitting in cafes in Israel, and these are people who were hijacked in planes and murdered in cold blood after being tortured. It’s some small measure of accountability that [Iran] should be required to pay [these families] before the very money we now have some influence over is returned.

Rep. Meeham is running a Twitter campaign in support of the legislation using the hashtag, #NotOneCent.

Timmerman drew attention to the statement issued by the President’s Office of Management and Budget threatening a veto:

The Office of Management and Budget today issued a statement that it “strongly opposes” making Iran pay the terrorism claims, arguing that “obstructing implementation of the JCPOA would greatly undermine our national security interests.

President Obama will veto the bill if it makes it through to his desk, the OMB promised.

In the midst of Defense Secretary Ashton Carter’s Pentagon press conference over the controversial Russian bombing of Syrian targets, a thoughtful reporter, why the Administration would veto the NDAA incorporating the Justice for Victims of Iranian Terrorism Act.  Watch this C-Span video excerpt of Secretary Carter’s response:

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared in the New English Review. The featured image is of American victims of Iranian terrorism. Screenshot, U.S. Rep. Meeham Facebook, September 29, 2015.

Humanitarian Jihad: Dancing to the beat of the Islamic Street

/in , , , , /by

jihad[This is an excerpt from the last chapter of The Black Flag of Jihad stalks la République, scheduled for release on December 10th]

After the Arab Spring the September 2015 refugee crisis. Once again our media and allied opinion-makers dance to the beat of the Islamic street. Moved to ecstasy by compact masses of Muslim men leavened with a sprinkling of women and children trampling the ground we stand on, they incite the citizens of Europe and beyond to abject surrender in humanitarian guise.

The photo of a child victim triggered a massive onslaught on the West. The doll-like body of Aylan Shenu (a.k.a. Al Kurdi), face down at the water’s edge looking like a peaceful toddler sleeping the dreams of innocence, has produced the al Dura effect: a white flash of emotion, hasty judgment, swift punishment of the guilty, total impunity for the aggrieved party.

Why in fact was this child washed up on the beach? His parents embarked with their two boys on troubled seas in an overloaded inflated boat that would supposedly carry them from the Turkish beach of Bodum to the Greek island of Kos and from there to A New Life. The father survived, his wife and two sons drowned.

Apparently none of them had life jackets, though I have no way of judging the veracity of various contradictory accounts of the incident. The father, Abdullah, says the boat capsized because the passengers stood up. He was holding on to his wife and children, lost them one by one. Five year-old Galip died, the father had to let go of him; he saw Aylan’s eyes fill with blood, and bid him farewell; his wife was afloat, puffed up like a balloon, unrecognizable. Zeinab Abbas, an Iraqi who lost two of her three children in the shipwreck, claims that Abdullah is a people smuggler who was piloting the boat; he went too fast, causing the accident. The boat was overloaded, there weren’t enough life jackets to go around. Survivors of similar crossings testify that the smugglers are never aboard; they choose one of the passengers to act as captain. What, then, justifies the payment of thousands of euros for the perilous crossing? Why wouldn’t people buy their own boats and life jackets, and increase their chances of survival by traveling in small groups? Obviously they don’t, as can be seen by the constant stream of overloaded dinghies arriving on Greek shores. Often it is the children who don’t have life jackets.

But practical questions of this nature were strictly verboten as the lethal narrative of the refugee crisis triggered by the iconic figure of Aylan unfolded. No pas d’amalgame for the dead child. When a Muslim commits an attack, the chorus chants pas d’amalgame, don’t blame Muslims collectively and besides, it has nothing to do with Islam. When I first saw the photo I thought it was taken on a Greek or Italian beach. The addition of the word “touristic” gave the Turkish beach of Bodum extraterritoriality, like a foreign embassy. The poor child was crossing the waters in an inflatable boat instead of taking a plane like the tourists. What about the 38 tourists gunned down on a beach in Sousse? They weren’t icons of Tunisian indifference; Tunisia was the victim of “a small minority of extremists who pervert Islam.” The photo of Aylan Shenu produced the al Dura effect: Guilty of his death, we are fair game for anything anyone wants to do to punish us. The only acceptable reaction was to blame Europe for criminal negligence. The campaign was kicked off with hashtags, slogans in the sand, heart-rending reiteration, and self-satisfied indignation. All the oceans of the world could not contain the tears that Europe should shed. No gesture of atonement-hospitality was deep and broad enough to save us from eternal damnation. The punishment was rapid and severe. Europe was deprived of its sovereignty, its borders, and the right to enjoy its just deserts.

Even as the Finnish prime minister offered his summer home to two families (how would they be chosen out of the hundreds of thousands marching as to war?) and a French woman created a free-of-charge “Airbnb” to lodge all comers, Europe was beating its breast, covering its head with ashes, and accusing itself of heartless indifference to the plight of the victims. First identified as migrants to avoid the shameful accuracy of “illegal immigrants,” the masses arriving by land, sea, and air were anointed as refugees and the default emotion was uncritical compassion. No, it was more like infatuation, adoration…swooning submission.

At least that is how mass media framed the story in Phase One. Government officials, with notable exceptions, were tearing their hearts out of their breast pockets to demonstrate compassion. It will take time to determine the degree of sincerity on each level of their discourse and action—follow-the-media emotion, desperate EU attempts to impose quotas for resettlement of asylum seekers, promises that economic migrants ineligible for asylum would be deported, and the frantic restoration of border controls within the Schengen free-circulation region and on its outer frontiers. On intellectual territory, the slightest deviation from the party line by analysts, specialists, and philosophers provoked a virtual lynch mob.

Day after day the refugee crisis dominated the news stream. Zapping from one channel to another, one online media to the next, we were faced with the irresistible flow of refugees and the ongoing lethal narrative of their inalienable right to come, to see, and to conquer the good life. Excited journalists, some of whom had starred in the Arab Spring show, camped in the Munich train station, ran through Serbian fields, pushed up against Hungary’s security barrier, crammed into trains and buses, shouted with the mob, cuddled wide-eyed babies, filling the screen with outpourings that drowned rational thought in the capsized dinghy of an orchestrated craze.

And yet there has been no popular refugee-welcome enthusiasm in France. Hopes of rousing another Je Suis Charlie movement fell flat. An estimated 8,000 people gathered one evening at Place de la République, there was at least one “Je Suis Syrien” sign, a solidarity concert attracted a few hundred in the City Hall square, nothing to compare with Germany’s open arms. The pernicious effect of the operation is to be found elsewhere, in a sort of quiet resignation to the violation of the basic attributes of sovereignty. The current unprecedented stampede is simplistically equated with previous waves of immigration, deliberately or unwittingly ignoring the difference in scope, context, attitude, and circumstances. One commentator compared it to the “immigration” of pieds noirs from the Maghreb. Never mind that the pieds noirs were French, forced to flee a newly independent Algeria, and the Maghrebi Jews that fled with them were not only French but also indigenous to the region where they had settled long before the Muslim conquest.

As could be expected, European Jews are caught in the crossfire. Again. Future victims of these Muslims that will add their dose of genocidal anti-Zionism to the abiding strain, Jews may well turn into the refugee’s refugees. At least we will be welcome in Israel! After each major atrocity – murders by Mohamed Merah, Mehdi Nemmouche, Amhadou Koulibaly respectively – Prime Minister Netanyahu invited European Jews to make Aliyah. This provoked an outcry from the same people who are melting with bounty today as they invite essentially Muslim refugees to make “aliyah” to Europe, their promised land. The Jews, defined by the Shoah, are enjoined to hand over their refugee costumes to the no less deserving newcomers. Shocked by the wishes of certain French local officials to give preference to Christian over Muslim refugees, the speaker of the Parliament Claude Bartalone exhaled: “After the yellow star the green crescent.”

Why is this stampede into Europe different from all previous immigrations?

RELATED ARTICLE: Concealing the Facts on Refugee Resettlement: A case study on how the media and duplicitous politicians hide the truth from the public

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared in the New English Review. Nidra Poller’s book Karimi Hotel is now available in English and Al Dura: long range ballistic myth is available in paperback and on Kindle.