PROOF: Desperate Cover-Ups Prove Criminal Conspiracy to Overthrow Election

“Where’s the proof?” the MSM collectively chants, while pocketing their “mockingbird” blood money. Well, now we’ve got plenty. In addition to the bounty of evidence the media continues to ignore, we now have the most helpful evidence to ever inform any investigation: sloppy cover-ups by the criminals themselves.

In a word, the “proof” can be found in the many disparate “cover-ups” surrounding Dominion voting machines.

One by one, every warehouse, every repository of impounded equipment containing proof of Dominion’s widely documented, top-down role in awarding states to Joe Biden fraudulently — is attacked, raided, or destroyed, along with the proverbial “paper trail” leading inexorably to justice for these most seedy of crooks: the men willing to sell out America, for money. Judas would blush. Benedict Arnold would marvel at the audacity.

Dominion’s own IT chief is a documented member of ANTIFA who was observed saying he’d fixed the election to ensure a loss by Pres. Donald J. Trump. Dominion’s own manuals promote the ability to change vote tallies after the fact, as a desirable feature of their software. Dominion training videos show company employees instructing poll workers in the means of cheating and switching votes.

There’s more. Every state where Dominion equipment was used reported mathematically IMPOSSIBLE vote surges 100% for Joe Biden all between 10 pm and 3 am, and all supplying the exact number of votes needed to break Trump’s sizable leads in those states. Still not convinced?

Then, consider that when polls closed, Trump led in every one of those states. What happened? Dominion happened. The witching hour struck, and “presto,” Dominion machines logged voodoo Biden landslides (with higher support than even Obama received in 2012) in every one of the states in question.

Moreover, in excess of half (greater than 60%) of precincts were “reporting” (that means “all done counting”) in each of those states when polls closed, making the bumps for Biden wholly impossible without accepting voter fraud as the explanation.

CLICK HERE FOR AN INFOGRAPHIC OF THE ELECTION RESULTS IN 4 SWING STATES.
For example, Michigan’s 100k+ votes for Biden at 3 am all came from Detroit precincts showing 0% of registered voters. This is in spite of counties needed to win the state all going for Trump in 2016, and all going for Trump in 2020 — with even higher turnout this year. But 100k votes from 0% of registered voters and all mail-in, and all for Biden and none for Trump logged on Dominion machines — and we are supposed to believe the blue-collar counties which turn the state blue or red suddenly don’t matter? “Nothing to see here”? “Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain; the great and powerful Oz has spoken.” Funny, the “wizard” of Oz was an old geezer with borderline dementia and a penchant for lying his ass off, too.

Dominion knows it is in deep water. But the smart(matic) move would’ve been to stay quiet, not give critics any more ammo, and make the FBI obtain subpoenas for every additional piece of incriminating evidence sought by Trump. Like an episode of “Columbo,” however, Dominion just couldn’t handle the heat, couldn’t take the stress. Dominion leadership just couldn’t keep their nerve. They made a “run” for it, so to speak, and in more ways than one.

Some examples include: Blowing up warehouses in Nashville, wiping the machines in Georgia in time for the runoff, moving its corporate offices multiple times and changing its DBA — all since the US election was concluded. In short, Dominion is engaged in a huge number of overt, in-our-faces, blatant cover-ups. But far from “covering” anything “up,” these actions signal desperation, and above all, prove Dominion is guilty.

Dominion might as well have signed a confession, and turned states evidence. Dominion’s actions arguably prove that its corporate officers, and by extension, the entire Democratic party / Biden machine, perpetrated massive and historic vote fraud on the American people.

In the animal kingdom, there are species that cannot see their prey unless the prey moves. If there is no flight, there is no dinner for some of nature’s predators. But like the quail in the Disney classic “Bambi,” who nervously exclaims, “I can’t take it! I can’t take it!” before flying into a hunter’s line of fire, Dominion was unable to wait out the inquest, to gracefully accept the discomfort of “hiding in plain sight.” In its efforts to conceal criminal conspiracy, Dominion has unwittingly made itself an easy target for Trump’s metaphorical “buckshot.” And Trump is taking aim.

Thanks Dominion, for confirming what we already knew: your company perpetrated an unparalleled, unprecedented, and historically unmatched criminal conspiracy against the American people to destroy their voice and steal their vote.

Smoking guns this obvious used to belong in a Woodward and Bernstein blockbuster. Too bad, since those schmucks sold out. Pamela Geller has all the moral high ground these days. Let’s hope her next book thoroughly unravels the mess that is the 2020 US presidential election.

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

READ: Electoral Statement from Senators Cruz, Johnson, Lankford, Daines, Kennedy, Blackburn, Braun, Senators-Elect Lummis, Marshall, Hagerty, Tuberville

Joint Statement from Senators Cruz, Johnson, Lankford, Daines, Kennedy, Blackburn, Braun, Senators-Elect Lummis, Marshall, Hagerty, Tuberville

January 2, 2021
WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senators Ted Cruz (R-Texas), Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), James Lankford (R-Okla.), Steve Daines (R-Mont.), John Kennedy (R-La.), Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), and Mike Braun (R-Ind.), and Senators-Elect Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.), Roger Marshall (R-Kan.), Bill Hagerty (R-Tenn.), and Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) issued the following statement in advance of the Electoral College certification process on January 6, 2021:

“America is a Republic whose leaders are chosen in democratic elections. Those elections, in turn, must comply with the Constitution and with federal and state law.

“When the voters fairly decide an election, pursuant to the rule of law, the losing candidate should acknowledge and respect the legitimacy of that election. And, if the voters choose to elect a new office-holder, our Nation should have a peaceful transfer of power.

“The election of 2020, like the election of 2016, was hard fought and, in many swing states, narrowly decided. The 2020 election, however, featured unprecedented allegations of voter fraud, violations and lax enforcement of election law, and other voting irregularities.

“Voter fraud has posed a persistent challenge in our elections, although its breadth and scope are disputed. By any measure, the allegations of fraud and irregularities in the 2020 election exceed any in our lifetimes.

“And those allegations are not believed just by one individual candidate. Instead, they are widespread. Reuters/Ipsos polling, tragically, shows that 39% of Americans believe ‘the election was rigged.’ That belief is held by Republicans (67%), Democrats (17%), and Independents (31%).

“Some Members of Congress disagree with that assessment, as do many members of the media.

“But, whether or not our elected officials or journalists believe it, that deep distrust of our democratic processes will not magically disappear. It should concern us all. And it poses an ongoing threat to the legitimacy of any subsequent administrations.

“Ideally, the courts would have heard evidence and resolved these claims of serious election fraud. Twice, the Supreme Court had the opportunity to do so; twice, the Court declined.

“On January 6, it is incumbent on Congress to vote on whether to certify the 2020 election results. That vote is the lone constitutional power remaining to consider and force resolution of the multiple allegations of serious voter fraud.

“At that quadrennial joint session, there is long precedent of Democratic Members of Congress raising objections to presidential election results, as they did in 1969, 2001, 2005, and 2017. And, in both 1969 and 2005, a Democratic Senator joined with a Democratic House Member in forcing votes in both houses on whether to accept the presidential electors being challenged.

“The most direct precedent on this question arose in 1877, following serious allegations of fraud and illegal conduct in the Hayes-Tilden presidential race. Specifically, the elections in three states-Florida, Louisiana, and South Carolina-were alleged to have been conducted illegally.

“In 1877, Congress did not ignore those allegations, nor did the media simply dismiss those raising them as radicals trying to undermine democracy. Instead, Congress appointed an Electoral Commission-consisting of five Senators, five House Members, and five Supreme Court Justices-to consider and resolve the disputed returns.

“We should follow that precedent. To wit, Congress should immediately appoint an Electoral Commission, with full investigatory and fact-finding authority, to conduct an emergency 10-day audit of the election returns in the disputed states. Once completed, individual states would evaluate the Commission’s findings and could convene a special legislative session to certify a change in their vote, if needed.

“Accordingly, we intend to vote on January 6 to reject the electors from disputed states as not ‘regularly given’ and ‘lawfully certified’ (the statutory requisite), unless and until that emergency 10-day audit is completed.

“We are not naïve. We fully expect most if not all Democrats, and perhaps more than a few Republicans, to vote otherwise. But support of election integrity should not be a partisan issue. A fair and credible audit-conducted expeditiously and completed well before January 20-would dramatically improve Americans’ faith in our electoral process and would significantly enhance the legitimacy of whoever becomes our next President. We owe that to the People.

“These are matters worthy of the Congress, and entrusted to us to defend. We do not take this action lightly. We are acting not to thwart the democratic process, but rather to protect it. And every one of us should act together to ensure that the election was lawfully conducted under the Constitution and to do everything we can to restore faith in our Democracy.”

RELATED TWEET:

RELATED ARTICLES:

Here Are the Dems Having a Fit Over Cruz’s Plans to Challenge the Election Results

If enough senators challenge the election results, Trump wins

Georgia Election Data Shows 17,650 Votes Switched From Trump to Biden: Data Scientists

YES!! A Dozen GOP Senators, Led by Ted Cruz, To OBJECT to Electoral College Certification, Demand Emergency Audit

PROOF: Desperate Cover-Ups Prove Criminal Conspiracy to Overthrow Election

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Gohmert Says Over 140 Members Of Congress Will Object To Biden’s Electors On January 6

Republican Texas Rep. Louie Gohmert said over 140 members of Congress will object during Congress’s counting of the Electoral College vote on Jan. 6.

Gohmert and a group of other GOP figures filed a brief Friday in a Texas court against Vice President Mike Pence in an effort to overturn the 2020 presidential election. The lawsuit focuses on Pence, who will oversee the upcoming Jan. 6 meeting of Congress to count states’ electoral votes and finalize President-elect Joe Biden’s victory over President Donald Trump.

In the brief, Gohmert claims there are 140 members of Congress who will object during the Jan. 6 meeting of Congress.

READ THE FULL COURT FILING HERE: 

Gohmert Court Filing by Henry Rodgers on Scribd

Republican Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley became the first Senator to say he will object during Congress’s counting of the Electoral College vote on Jan. 6, in a statement released Wednesday. (RELATED: Sen. Josh Hawley To Object Electoral College Certification Process On January 6)

Republican Alabama Republican Rep. Mo Brooks and a group of House Republicans said they will try to overturn the results of the presidential election on Jan. 6 by objecting, with Hawley’s support there will now likely be a vote on the issue, The Hill reported.

Gohmert and the group filed the lawsuit against Pence in his capacity as vice president in a federal Texas court Sunday. The lawsuit reportedly asks for the judge to overturn Trump’s losses in battleground states.

Along with Gohmert and Arizona Republican Party Chairwoman Kelli Ward, Students for Trump COO Tyler Bowyer, Arizona Republican Party Executive Director Greg Safsten and Maricopa County Republicans Second Vice Chair Nancy Cottle are asking federal Judge Jeremy Kernodle to let Pence declare who the electors are on Jan. 6, according to The Daily Beast.

COLUMN BY

HENRY RODGERS

Senior Congressional correspondent. Follow Henry Rodgers On Twitter

RELATED VIDEO: Leigh Dundas – Election update, December 29th, 2020

RELATED ARTICLES:

Rep. Louie Gohmert, Group Of Republicans Sue Pence In Last-Ditch Effort To Overturn Presidential Election

‘We Need New Leadership’ — Ocasio-Cortez Blasts Pelosi, Schumer

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

The Treasonous Reasons Behind the Theft of Our 2020 Election

First create crises which will allow changes in the voting process that will be favorable to whatever plans and strategy are envisioned for success.

Secondly, develop a narrative concerning the forthcoming charges of election tampering irregularities, out-right stealing from the opposition; presenting the subjects as sore losers who are grasping at straws.

Have authorities lined up who will respond publicly that there is no evidence of any election fraud, and if there is any, it isn’t enough to overturn an election. Have the friendly courts prepared to dismiss all charges brought before them regardless of the amount and validity of evidence.

As we have seen, the multi-faceted so-called, “Covid-19 pandemic” was the concocted crisis which resulted in the left, communists, socialists, progressives, democrats, and the powers above them, to have the opportunity to steal the 2020 Presidential Election.

At the very outset, this so-called crisis resulted in the excuse for rule changes allowing mail-in ballots. This resulted in an untold number of fraudulent ballots being collected and submitted into the vote tallying process at various locations and intervals as needed to overturn the Trump landslide.

All was planned and coordinated. Many of us have observed and noted that at a certain point in the vote tallying process on the night of Nov. 3rd, several states stopped counting votes at almost the same time. This had to have been preplanned and coordinated from a central command position.  This suggests the possibility as well as the probability that the theft of the election did not come about because of the existence of the pandemic, but rather, the pandemic was concocted for the purpose of stealing the election.

There is much evidence which suggests that there were many other objectives that were sought. The forced submission to vaccination in order to work and travel is in the plan, and that is only a starter. Plans are being made the world over to place “non-vaxers,” those who refuse to be vaccinated, in camps.  In fact, one writer, Rob Pue, in an article, “The ‘Dark Winter’ is at the Door,” published by News with Views states that it is already happening in Canada. Also, in addition, there were supposed to be 20,000 Chinese Communist troops in Canada and for training with Canadian troops, but it was cancelled by their Defense Minister.

According to an article in Natural News.com, the Canadian government has published a bid request for “programmable hydraulic guillotines “needed in support of Canada’s response to Covid-19” Now, if this report is true it suggests some very scary times are in the future; what we might call – shadows of the French Revolution, in which 25,000 French citizens lost their heads by guillotine for allegedly violating a public safety law.

Also, if the report was true that Chinese troops were to be Canada, then here’s something which could be a clue concerning why they are there. During the Obama Administration, he made a deal with Canada for them to supply a military back-up to the U.S. in case there was an uprising of its citizens against what was planned. This could be what Canada is preparing for by making a deal with China.

We don’t know what was planned, but Obama did, and evidently, he reasoned that the American people might not stand for what he was up to. So, he was preparing for the possibility and maybe even the probability of an uprising of the American people against whatever plans that were on the table, which could likely be implemented against the people.

It was Obama who stated that, he was going to “fundamentally transform America,” and everything he initiated was to that end which is currently referred to as “The Great Reset.”  I heartily recommend reading this article. Everyone needs to prepare themselves and their family for the advent of this anti-God, anti-human thing that is coming down the pike with no one to stop it.

I realize that God could prevent this from happening; however, if he did it would prevent the playing-out of the principle mandated from Creation which holds that all choices result in consequences. Millions made the choice many years ago to reject God and his principles. Subsequently, in the eons of time, He incrementally gave up on those who made these choices and turned them over to a reprobate mind. It seems that we are well into experiencing the consequences resulting from worldly choices by society as a whole, including government, both federal and state, along with businesses occupying high plateaus, all have become infiltrated with reprobates. These increases further hasten the consequences we will ultimately deal with.

The constant gravitation into government and high places of influence upon society, including our pulpits who are infiltrated by the enemies of freedom, leads me to believe that America is most likely 90 percent controlled by these anti-God agents.

The only way to prepare for it is to turn our eyes to God and his Son, Jesus Christ. I am thankful that all my children and grandchildren are spiritually prepared, but I shudder to think of the millions, especially of the children, who aren’t prepared spiritually.  Too many have never been confronted with the knowledge of Christ and how we have to learn of him and accept him as our personal Savior to escape eternal damnation in the fires of Hell.

Open and digest your Bibles, and when you read it you will be better able to explain to others, and especially your children how a reprobate thinks for they are those who God has turned over to a reprobate mind.  Once this happens, they’ll never repent and come to the Lord because to do so one has to be visited by the Holy Spirit of God Almighty.

The Deep State

Only a few of us knew about the Deep State at the time Obama surfaced, but I’m sure Obama did. The Deep State hasn’t just recently come into being; it’s been there all along, in organized form, all the way back to 1921. The forces which set the stage to bring it into existence were in the making eons before.

The globalists planned to use the horrors of world war one as an impetus which would result in the League of Nations, and from that the gradual incremental culmination of events which would finally usher in world government. The United States Senate, upon reading the charter, rejected the U.S. becoming a part of it. The members of the senate which led the opposition to it were referred to by the “fake news” of that time, as the “Irreconcilables.”

This led to the proponents of world government having to go to plan B, which was the instituting of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), with John Foster Dulles being the head of it. His brother, Allen Dulles was brought in to head up the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the initial implementation which brought about the Deep State.  Nothing has changed; today’s CIA Director is Gina Haspel whose mentor was John Brennan.

About 30 years later, Dan Smoot, assistant to J. Edgar Hoover, wrote, “The Invisible Government” about the CFR and its goal for world government. He really called it right; at the time the CFR had about one thousand very high profiled members – but it was invisible. Currently the membership is reportedly somewhere between five and six thousand but it is still practically invisible. Here are details on how it was able to take over the State Department of the United States and now practically the entire governmental operations. This resulted via their members being in positions of authority where they could bring in others and have them placed in governmental positions of authority. For a better understanding of what has happened, see “What next Mr. President” – Part 1.

In the fall of 1953, Norman Dodd, Director of Research for the Reese Committee, was informed by the President of the Ford Foundation, H. Rowan Gaither (CFR member) that the Foundation operated under the directives from the White House. The substance was, “that we shall use our grant-making power to alter our life in the United States so we can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union.” Guess who was in the White House in 1953. It was Dwight D. Eisenhower.

What does all this have to do with stealing the 2020 Presidential Election?

As I previously stated, the CFR was brought into existence specifically for the purpose of changing U.S. policies to coincide with specific government programs, both foreign and domestic, which were designed to incrementally bring to fruition the long sought-after goal of a one world government. To simply state it, Donald Trump was in the way; the agenda for the new world order could not allow him to remain in the White House for a second term. It is estimated that the globalist’s agenda for world government, has already been set-back as much as 30 years because of Donald Trump’s presidency.

Thus, it was imperative that a full all-out attack with everything in the arsenal of the globalist’s agenda must be made against the entire world, and especially the people of America. And the fake pandemic fueled by a bioweapon developed virus – COVID-19, for the purpose of bringing about a contrived “crisis” designed to force people to take a vaccine that will purposely have multiple side effects of disastrous proportions.  Why?  Because the COVID-19 virus has never been isolated, so how could they make a vaccine to target it?

If you are even just considering getting vaccinated for the Wuhan coronavirus Robert f. Kennedy Jr. has a message for you: don’t do it.  Robert Kennedy Jr. recently issued a public statement urging people everywhere to avoid the COVID-19 jab at all costs because it contains an untested new technology known as mRNA, the long-term side effects of which are completely unknown. Everyone needs to read what Mr. Kennedy says about this issue by going to the link above, it is very informative.

Shortly afterward, there was a correction concerning Kennedy’s statement to the effect that, “He didn’t state it quite like that,” but more to his position that everyone had their right to make the choice whether to take the vaccine or not.

There’s also the article by Dr. Yeadon, where he states there is no need for a vaccine, the so-called pandemic is nearly over, if in fact, it ever was a pandemic. Dr. Yeadon points out many things which have been improperly reported.

Dr. Michael Yeadon, who spent over 30 years leading new allergy and respiratory medicines research in some of the world’s largest pharmaceutical companies, and retired from Pfizer with “the most senior research position in this field, wrote:

There is absolutely no need for vaccines to extinguish the pandemic.  I’ve never heard such nonsense talked about vaccines.  You do not vaccinate people who aren’t at risk from a disease.  You also don’t set about planning to vaccinate millions of fit and healthy people with a vaccine that hasn’t been extensively tested on human subjects.

His comments come at the end of a comprehensive criticism of the Scientific Advisor Group for Emergencies (SAGE), a government agency of the U.K. tasked with advising the central government in emergencies. SAGE has played a predominate role in determining public lockdown policies in the U.K., including those recently implemented, as a response to the COVID-19 virus.

The articles of Robert Kennedy and Dr. Yeadon are extensive, but should be read by every American considering this new vaccine. Please pass this on to your fellow citizens so they can make an educated decision about their lives and vaccines.

©J.W. Bryan. All rights reserved.

Stunning Turn of Events in Pennsylvania May Lead to Trump Victory

January 6th – a day that will change history.

Stunning turn of events in PA may lead to Trump victory

By James Arlandson, The American Thinker, December 31, 2020:

On Dec. 28, Pennsylvania lawmakers concluded that “Numbers Don’t Add Up, Certification Of Presidential Results Premature and In Error.”

President Trump tweeted about it:

Breaking News: In Pennsylvania there were 205,000 more votes than there were voters. This alone flips the state to President Trump.

The key paragraphs from the PA lawmakers’ two-page statement:

A comparison of official county election results to the total number of voters who voted on November 3, 2020 as recorded by the Department of State shows that 6,962,607 total ballots were reported as being cast, while DoS/SURE system records indicate that only 6,760,230 total voters actually voted. Among the 6,962,607 total ballots cast, 6,931,060 total votes were counted in the presidential race, including all three candidates on the ballot and write-in candidates.

The difference of 202,377 more votes cast than voters voting, together with the 31,547 over- and under-votes in the presidential race, adds up to an alarming discrepancy of 170,830 votes, which is more than twice the reported statewide difference between the two major candidates for President of the United States.

On November 24, 2020, Boockvar certified election results, and Wolf issued a certificate of ascertainment of presidential electors, stating that Vice President Joe Biden received 80,555 more votes than President Donald Trump.

The PA lawmakers have done their job (so far). Now what is the next step? These lawmakers need to recall the slate of electors and tell the House and Senate that the election results cannot be ascertained in their state. They should probably hold a vote that overturns the certification of the awful election. The bottom line is that the slate of electors is not permitted to vote on Jan. 6.

This reasonable and fair action may have a domino effect on the other embattled states, whose lawmakers should follow suit. If this happens, Trump will win in the Electoral College. (I had erroneously stated that if no one reaches 270 votes, then the House decides.) Instead, the Twelfth Amendment states: “[T]he votes shall then be counted[.] … The person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President[.]”

But will PA’s Legislature, where the real power resides, do this? And will the other embattled states do the same? If so, then Trump (rightly) wins: 232 to 222. This is the best, constitutionally speaking, and probably the only real option remaining for Trump.

Therefore, the solution is, once again, that we the people need to put maximum pressure on the heroic and truthful PA legislators to send word to the House and Senate, reminding them that the legislatures decide things, not a governor or a secretary of state. They should even hold a vote, overturning the certification of the election. And we need to put the same pressure on the legislatures of the other embattled states, where fraud obviously happened, to follow Pennsylvania’s lead.

RELATED ARTICLE: BREAKING: Three Arrested for Brutal Beating and Torture of Former GOP Senate Candidate

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. All rights reserved.

Across America Car Caravans Forming, Will Arrive in Washington on January 6th! [Video]

UpdateStop the Steal calendar and contacts here.

The Epoch Times has a very informative story about the car caravans organizing in the eastern half of the United States to descend on the Capitol to protest the Election Steal.

At the request of President Trump they will join hundreds of thousands who will arrive by bus, train, or plane in what I’m guessing may be the largest rally for any President ever.

From the Epoch Times:

Car Caravans Forming for ‘Historic’ Protest in Washington

Sixty-year-old Robin, a retail merchandiser in rural Virginia, hasn’t visited the nation’s capital in more than two decades or ever taken part in organizing a political event, although she was quick to volunteer to manage a stop for one of the four vehicle caravans headed to Washington for what many are calling a historic protest on Jan. 6, 2021.

In an unprecedented request, President Donald Trump asked his supporters to travel to Washington for a “big protest” on Jan. 6, when a joint session of Congress will be held, during which lawmakers will vet the Electoral College votes cast three weeks prior.

A number of House Republicans have committed to challenge the slates of electors from six states where the president has disputed the validity of the election’s outcome.

This story was written before news broke yesterday that Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri would support the President in the Senate.

But frankly, we better see Senators Ted Cruz, Mike Lee, Marsha Blackburn, Tom Cotton, Rand Paul and other REPUBLICANS standing up for us as well.

Car Caravans Forming for ‘Historic’ Protest in Washington

Sixty-year-old Robin, a retail merchandiser in rural Virginia, hasn’t visited the nation’s capital in more than two decades or ever taken part in organizing a political event, although she was quick to volunteer to manage a stop for one of the four vehicle caravans headed to Washington for what many are calling a historic protest on Jan. 6, 2021.

In an unprecedented request, President Donald Trump asked his supporters to travel to Washington for a “big protest” on Jan. 6, when a joint session of Congress will be held, during which lawmakers will vet the Electoral College votes cast three weeks prior.

A number of House Republicans have committed to challenge the slates of electors from six states where the president has disputed the validity of the election’s outcome.

This story was written before news broke yesterday that Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri would support the President in the Senate.

But frankly, we better see Senators Ted Cruz, Mike Lee, Marsha Blackburn, Tom Cotton, Rand Paul and other REPUBLICANS standing up for us as well.

“Be there, will be wild!” the president wrote on Twitter on Dec. 19. A week later, he added, “See you in Washington, DC, on January 6th. Don’t miss it. Information to follow!”

A Michigan man who goes by the nickname Dr. ENoCH on Twitter is organizing the larger caravan effort, which encompasses 20 cities along four routes. He told The Epoch Times that considering the size of the two prior post-election Trump events in Washington—which the president didn’t call for or endorse ahead of time—the Jan. 6 event is on pace to become the biggest Trump rally so far.

“There are two things that Trump’s ever asked us to do. One was to vote for him and now, the other one is to be in D.C. on the 6th,” Enoch said. “That’s why I started organizing this.”

Here is info. from DR ENoCH on Twitter:

Continue reading because there is a lot of information in the Epoch Times story about who is organizing and where.  They may ask for your e-mail address before you can read it for free.

If you have a problem, you can get the story here.

What do you do if you can’t travel to Washington?

I know it is hard for most of you to go to Washington, DC on the spur of the moment. But you must find other avenues of activism in this last week.

Start calling all of your elected officials in Washington, your Members of the House and your Senators and tell them you believe the election was stolen. Shut down the phone lines! 

Go to Stop the Steal for contact information and what you might say to your elected officials.

Use social media even if you hate it.  Most Members of the House and Senate have Twitter and Facebook accounts.  Find them and tell them what you think.

They have local offices too, so on Wednesday, rally with as many people as you can round up in front of their local offices, even a few people will make an impact. Take pictures of your protest and post them on whatever social media you have. Get your local newspaper/TV to cover your local protest.

At minimum, watch the events unfold on January 6th on CSPAN, Newsmax, or One America News. History is being made, don’t miss it!

And, when the dust settles, vow to become engaged in supporting a powerful Patriot movement, a MAGA movement, to get rid of anyone in the Washington swamp who was complicit in the great Election Steal of 2020, or who was too chicken to speak up.

Happy New Year!

EDITORS NOTE: This Frauds, Crooks and Criminals column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

VIDEO: ‘Stop the Steal’ has the Skinny on Historic Upcoming Week in America

As I said in my post this morning. Find out what you can do to be part of history in the first week of what will be a pivotal year for America.

Stop the Steal‘s website is the place to start.  There are planned events in most every state this coming week. There is a schedule for the events in Washington on the 6th and a directory of contact information for your legislators.

See here.

RELATED TWEET:

EDITORS NOTE: This Frauds, Crooks and Criminals column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Amid claims of unexplained ballots, Pennsylvania officials unsure how many voted in 2020

The Democrats have utterly destroyed our election system. Corrupt Pennsylvania must be disqualified.

Amid claims of unexplained ballots, Pennsylvania officials unsure how many voted in 2020

Several counties have not uploaded full “voter histories,” said a spokesperson.

By Daniel Payne, Just the News, December 31, 2020:

The state of Pennsylvania is still uncertain just how many residents voted in the 2020 election, a state official revealed this week, amid allegations of discrepancies between ballots and voter rolls in the battleground state.

Pennsylvania was thrown back into the limelight this week when a group of Republican state representatives claimed to have found “troubling discrepancies between the numbers of total votes counted and total number of voters who voted” in the state last month.

“A comparison of official county election results to the total number of voters who voted on November 3, 2020 as recorded by the Department of State shows that 6,962,607 total ballots were reported as being cast,” a press release announcing the findings said, “while DoS/SURE system records indicate that only 6,760,230 total voters actually voted.”

SURE is Pennsylvania’s Statewide Uniform Registry of Electors, the state’s voter registration database. That databank is run by the state’s Bureau of Election Security and Technology, itself administered by the Department of State.

The Pennsylvania State Department strongly disputed the representatives’ allegations of mismatched vote totals, with spokeswoman Wanda Murren calling it “uninformed, lay analysis combined with a basic lack of election administration knowledge.”

“This obvious misinformation put forth by [the representatives] is the hallmark of so many of the claims made about this year’s presidential election,” Murren continued, calling the allegations “wholly without basis.”

Voter histories still incomplete for 2020

Multiple representatives who signed onto the analysis would not comment on its conclusions, pointing Just the News toward Rep. Frank Ryan, who appeared to have spearheaded the initiative. Ryan did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

But Murren in her statement and in interviews with Just the News revealed that, even as the year comes to a close nearly two months after the election itself, the state is still ultimately not in possession of the exact number of voters who cast a ballot in Pennsylvania this year.

In her statement disputing the findings of Ryan and the other representatives, Murren said: “We are unclear as to what data the legislators used for this most recent ‘analysis’. But the only way to determine the number of voters who voted in November from the SURE system is through the vote histories.”

“At this time,” she continued, “there are still a few counties that have not completed uploading their vote histories to the SURE system. These counties, which include Philadelphia, Allegheny, Butler and Cambria, would account for a significant number of voters.”

In email and phone interviews with Just the News, Murren confirmed that voting histories “are each tied to an individual voter” and that those histories are “the only way to determine exactly how many voters voted in the election.”

Asked to clarify how the Department of State certified the election without apparently knowing how many voters ultimately voted in the election, Murren replied: “Each county certifies the vote totals for each individual candidate. The secretary’s certification is based on the certifications from each county. In Pennsylvania, it is the counties that are authorized to administer all aspects of elections — from voter registration to canvassing the ballots.”

Murren pointed to the Department of State’s website, which lists just under seven million ballots cast in the election this year.

That figure is reflective of “the number of votes cast for each candidate,” she said. “Those numbers come from the scanners. And those scanners are totally anonymous. It’s just the votes cast for individual candidates.”

“What the counties are doing now,” she continued, “is strictly administrative. They are now going back and telling our database which voters voted.”

“We don’t know which candidates they voted for,” she added of the administrative lists, as “those counts are already established” in the scanner tallies.

The number of ballots cast is not necessarily going to match up exactly with the number of all the voters who voted, Murren said. Still, the number of ballots on the state’s website should be considered a rough estimate of the number of people who voted, she said.

“We have to keep in mind those people whose ballots were cast and not counted,” she added. “That’s going to be one of the differences. And there are people who cast a ballot and don’t vote—not a lot, but it happens.”

“This is not uncommon,” she said of the delay, “and especially with the volume of ballots we had this year.”

Pennsylvania has been at the center of much of the controversy since last month’s election. The state was named, along with three others, in a major litigation effort by Texas and 18 other states earlier this month to delay the certification of the 2020 election results pending investigations into alleged voting irregularities there.

The state was also the site for what the Trump campaign legal team argued was a two-tiered voting system leading up to the election, with multiple counties adopting last-minute rule changes to ballot curing procedures and numerous other counties declining to change those rules prior to Nov. 3.

The state also weathered multiple accusations that election watchers and poll workers were stymied from properly surveying ballot-counting procedures and other election work.

Two of the localities Murren said have not yet submitted their voter histories — Philadelphia and Allegheny — are reliable Democratic strongholds. Philadelphia has reliably voted Democratic in presidential elections for decades, with the city itself voting 81% in favor of Joe Biden this year.

RELATED ARTICLE: Harris County: Multiple Ballots, Same Handwriting

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Sen. Josh Hawley Isn’t The First — And Won’t Be The Last — To Object To The Electoral College Certification

Jan. 6 won’t be the first time partisan lawmakers alleged that a wide conspiracy should nullify the results of a presidential election.

As Americans witnessed in 2017, such challenges also have the effect of weakening American trust in institutions. Two out of three Democrats, for example, believed Russia actually changed vote tallies despite no credible evidence, according to a 2018 poll from YouGov. Similarly, Trump’s crusade has led nearly 80 percent of Republicans to believe the election was stolen.

Just this week, Republican Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley set off a flurry of criticism when he announced Wednesday his intent to object to the Electoral College certification Jan. 6. Hawley cited suppression from big-tech platforms as interference in the election along with election laws in Pennsylvania.

Hawley’s objection isn’t quite on the same level that we’ve seen from elements of the #stopthesteal movement, namely that somehow George Soros teamed up with Venezuela to rig voting machines (another election anxiety with a long history).

Still, the sentiment recalls liberal efforts in January 2017 to cast poorly made Russian memes on Facebook and mean emails about Chelsea Clinton as the deciders of 2016’s election, rather than the plurality of Americans who voted for Trump over Hillary Clinton.

America saw a situation similar to Hawley’s Pennsylvania contention in 2005, when a group of Democrats objected to counting Ohio’s 20 electoral votes after insisting Ohio’s election was riddled with widespread “irregularities” that favored former President George W. Bush, according to CNN.

Joined by Democratic California Sen. Barbara Boxer, objectors, including Ohio Rep. Stephanie Tubbs Jones, said that a report by Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee found “numerous, serious election irregularities” in Ohio that led to “a significant disenfranchisement of voters,” according to CNN.

“How can we possibly tell millions of Americans who registered to vote, who came to the polls in record numbers, particularly our young people … to simply get over it and move in,” Tubbs Jones said at a press conference with Boxer, according to the report.

In order for a formal objection to be considered, a member of both the House and the Senate must question a state’s electoral votes in writing, according to The New York Times (NYT).

As required by the rules, lawmakers were sent back to their chambers for two hours to debate the challenge and vote on it, CNN reported. Ultimately Ohio’s electoral votes were awarded to Bush.

Bush’s 2001 highly contested win in the Supreme Court also led to attempts to object to the certification of electoral votes.

The 2000 election was overshadowed by conspiracies, including one that then-Governor of Florida Jeb Bush threw the election to his brother.

During the 36-day recount period, the governor’s office made 95 phone calls to Bush’s presidential campaign, according to the Des Moines Register. While the governor was said to have recused himself “from any involvement in what happened after Nov.7, he did not recuse himself from his role as a brother,” Bush’s communications director Katie Baur said, according to the report. It’s unclear what his “role as a brother” entailed.

There were also questions over whether then-Florida Secretary of State Katherine Harris presented a conflict of interest since she was also a co-chair on the Bush campaign, according to the report.

A dozen members of the Congressional Black Caucus, along with a few other representatives, tried to block the counting of Florida’s electoral votes, arguing black voters had been disenfranchised, according to the NYT. Democratic Illinois Rep. Jesse L. Jackson Jr. said it was a “sad day in America” after no senator signed the objection, which is required in order for a vote on the matter to occur.

Democratic Florida Rep. Alcee L. Hastings also attempted to object, saying there was “overwhelming evidence of official misconduct” before then-Vice President Al Gore silenced him from speaking because he lacked support from a senator, according to the report.

Hawley’s recent announcement that he would be objecting to the certification of results is the latest attempt to overturn the results of the 2020 election by Republicans and has received criticism from both Republicans and Democrats.

Former Democratic presidential candidate and Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar called his objection a “coup attempt” in a tweet.

Republican Nebraska Sen. Ben Sasse called congressional Republicans’ attempt to reverse President-elect Joe Biden’s victory a “dangerous ploy” in a statement posted to Facebook.

“All the clever arguments and rhetorical gymnastics in the world won’t change the fact that this January 6th effort is designed to disenfranchise millions of Americans simply because they voted for someone in a different party,” Sasse wrote. “We ought to be better than that.”

Republican Alabama Rep. Mo Brooks and a handful of other House Republicans are planning on objecting the electoral votes, meaning a vote on the issue is likely, according to The Hill.

Hawley noted that he is “entitled” to object to the certification of votes just as “Democrats in Congress objected during the certification of electoral votes in order to raise concerns about election integrity” following both the 2004 and 2016 elections.

“I cannot vote to certify the electoral college results on January 6 without raising the fact that some states, particularly Pennsylvania, failed to follow their own state election laws,” Hawley said in a statement. “And I cannot vote to certify without pointing out the unprecedented effort of mega corporations, including Facebook and Twitter, to interfere in this election, in support of Joe Biden.”

Hawley’s attempt to question an official Biden victory comes just four years after then-Vice President Biden himself was forced to gavel down House Democrats.

Democratic Massachusetts Rep. Jim McGovern objected to the certification of Alabama’s votes, arguing “the electors were not lawfully certified, especially given the confirmed and illegal activities engaged by the government of Russia,” according to CNN. Biden gaveled down his objection because he did not have any backing from a senator.

Democratic Washington Rep. Pramila Jayapal objected to Georgia’s vote certification, with Biden telling her “it is over,” according to the report.

Biden interrupted Democratic Texas Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee when she attempted to object to the certification of votes after New York’s tally was read.

“I object on the massive voter suppression that included-” she began.

Biden interrupted her, saying “the debate is not in order” as the congresswoman lacked the required senator signature, CNN reported.

In 11 instances, Biden was forced to make it clear that objections were moot if not backed by a senator as a handful of representatives attempted to block the vote.

“There is no debate. There is no debate. There is no debate,” Biden said as he continued to throw down the gavel.

The only question remains, like Gore and Biden before him, will Vice President Mike Pence do the same?

COLUMN BY

BRIANNA LYMAN

Reporter. Follow Brianna on Twitter.

RELATED TWEET:

RELATED ARTICLES:

Explosive Testimony Exposes MORE Evidence of Election Fraud!

Podesta: Calling Chelsea ‘Not Smart’ Would Be ‘Understatement’

Madison Cawthorn Says He’s Contesting The Election, Will Fund Primary Opponents Against GOP Reps Who Don’t Speak Out

Biden Overruled Objections To Trump’s 2017 Electoral College Win — Will Pence Do The Same For Biden? His Office Won’t Say

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

VIDEO: Rep. Collins blasts Warnock, Abrams ahead of Georgia elections

Republican lawmaker tells ‘Hannity’ that Abrams has voter suppression allegations backward.

WATCH:

©All rights reserved.

PODCAST: D.C. Swamp Ready To Pass Gun Control!

GUESTS AND TOPICS:

DUDLEY BROWN

Dudley Brown President NATIONAL ASSP. FOR GUN RIGHTS, has nearly three decades of professional experience in political activism with 25 years as a gun lobbyist, firearms instructor, and expert in American firearms laws and legislation. He founded Rocky Mountain Gun Owners in 1996, which is one of the most successful — and feared — state gun rights groups in the country. Throughout his career, Dudley has worked in the trenches of State Legislatures across the nation as a leader for gun rights.

TOPIC: D.C. Swamp Ready To Pass Gun Control!

ALFREDO ORTIZ

Alfredo Ortiz is the president and CEO of the Job Creators Network, where he has led the defense of small businesses from the onslaught of bad government policies. Alfredo has testified before legislative committees about the impact of taxation and regulation on small business growth, and speaks frequently to business organizations across the nation about the need for job creators to seize responsibility for defending free enterprise.
He has been widely published in major media outlets, including The Wall Street Journal, USA Today, CNBC, The Hill, and U.S. News & World Report and is a frequent guest on cable news networks and national radio talk shows, including CNN, Fox News, Hugh Hewitt, Mike Gallagher, and the Dennis Prager Show.

TOPIC: Pundits cheering for a recession.

RAYNARD JACKSON

Raynard Jackson is a Pulitzer Prize nominated columnist and President & CEO of Raynard Jackson & Associates, LLC, an internationally recognized political consulting, government affairs, and PR firm based in Washington, DC. Jackson is an internationally recognized radio talk show host and TV commentator. He has coined the phrase “straticist.” As a straticist, he has merged strategic planning with public relations.

TOPIC: Black Americans for a Better Future.

©Conservative Commandoes Radio. All rights reserved

EXCELSIOR! Congressman Jeff Duncan plans to object to Electoral College certification

Another Spartacus steps forward.

LAURENS, S.C. (WSPA) — Congressman Jeff Duncan (SC-03) announced Wednesday he intends to object to the Electoral College certification in the House of Representatives on Jan. 6.

Duncan released the following statement announcing his decision:

I swore an oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States as a Member of Congress, and with that oath comes the vital role of ensuring the legality and integrity of our free and fair election system. The 2020 election saw unprecedented institutional issues like states changing their voting systems in violation of their state constitutions, unelected bureaucrats changing election law instead of lawmakers themselves, poll watchers prohibited from doing their jobs, failure to properly scrutinize the validity of mail-in voting, and the list goes on. We need to shed light on the issues that took place during the 2020 election to preserve our electoral system for generations to come. Our mission is simple: Count every legal vote, throw out every illegal vote, and investigate every irregularity and allegation. All Americans should be on board with this mission.“On January 6, 2021, I plan to object to the Electoral College certification from states that experienced these unprecedented issues like Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. I plan to object for the people of the Third District of South Carolina and the millions of Americans who are demanding transparency into the 2020 election. We the People know this is a pivotal decision for our great country. May God bless the United States of America.

RELATED TWEET:

RELATED ARTICLE: Election Fraud Legal Team Wants to Present ‘Specific Evidence’ on Jan. 6

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Eyewitness Testimony: 136,000 votes for Joe Biden “appeared” after poll watchers were dismissed from the State Farm Arena.

BREAKING NEWS: Dominion voting machines LIVE HACKED during Georgia Senate hearing.

https://twitter.com/LeahR77/status/1344513396906070018


The steal is real.

Witness says 136,000 votes for Joe Biden “appeared” after poll watchers were dismissed from the State Farm Arena.

Click here to view Image 1 and Image 2.

RELATED TWEET:

RELATED VIDEO: Sidney Powell on Rush Limbaugh Show: “This Was a Masterful Machiavellian Scheme.”

RELATED ARTICLES:

Election Fraud Legal Team Wants to Present ‘Specific Evidence’ on Jan. 6

STUNNING: All Major Western Media Outlets Take ‘Private Dinners’, ‘Sponsored Trips’ from Chinese Communist Propaganda Front

Georgia Senate Judiciary Subcommittee Unanimously Passes Motion to Audit Fulton County’s Absentee Ballots Using Method Outlined by Jovan Pulitzer

Expert Witness Says His Team Has Hacked into the Georgia Senate Runoff Elections — “We are in.” Witness Says Voting System Is Connected to Internet

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

PENNSYLVANIA: Certification of Presidential Results Premature and In Error

Pennsylvania Lawmakers: Numbers Don’t Add Up.


HARRISBURG – A group of state lawmakers performing extensive analysis of election data today revealed troubling discrepancies between the numbers of total votes counted and total number of voters who voted in the 2020 General Election, and as a result are questioning how the results of the presidential election could possibly have been certified by Secretary of the Commonwealth Kathy Boockvar and Governor Tom Wolf. These findings are in addition to prior concerns regarding actions by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, the Secretary, and others impacting the conduct of the election.

A comparison of official county election results to the total number of voters who voted on November 3, 2020 as recorded by the Department of State shows that 6,962,607 total ballots were reported as being cast, while DoS/SURE system records indicate that only 6,760,230 total voters actually voted. Among the 6,962,607 total ballots cast, 6,931,060 total votes were counted in the presidential race, including all three candidates on the ballot and write-in candidates.

The difference of 202,377 more votes cast than voters voting, together with the 31,547 over- and under-votes in the presidential race, adds up to an alarming discrepancy of 170,830 votes, which is more than twice the reported statewide difference between the two major candidates for President of the United States. On November 24, 2020, Boockvar certified election results, and Wolf issued a certificate of ascertainment of presidential electors, stating that Vice President Joe Biden received 80,555 more votes than President Donald Trump.

The lawmakers issued the following statement in response to their findings:

“We were already concerned with the actions of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, the Executive branch, and election officials in certain counties contravening and undermining the Pennsylvania Election Code by eliminating signature verification, postmarks, and due dates while allowing the proliferation of drop boxes with questionable security measures and the unauthorized curing of ballots, as well as the questionable treatment of poll watchers, all of which created wholesale opportunities for irregularities in the 2020 presidential election.”

“However, we are now seeing discrepancies on the retail level which raise even more troubling questions regarding irregularities in the election returns. These findings call into question the accuracy of the SURE system, consistency in the application of the Pennsylvania Election Code from county to county, and the competency of those charged with oversight of elections in our Commonwealth.

“These numbers just don’t add up, and the alleged certification of Pennsylvania’s presidential election results was absolutely premature, unconfirmed, and in error.”

State Representative Frank Ryan indicated that state legislators sponsoring and participating in this analysis were himself, Rep. Russ Diamond, Rep. Dave Zimmerman, Rep. Barb Gleim, Rep. Stephanie Borowicz, Rep. Dan Moul, Rep. Paul Schemel, Rep. Dawn Keefer, Rep. Eric Nelson, Rep. Mike Jones, Rep. Rob Kauffman, Rep. David Maloney, Rep. David Rowe, Rep. Kathy Rapp, Rep. Daryl Metcalfe, Rep. Jim Cox and Rep Brett Miller.

©Wallace Bruschweiler. All rights reserved.

RELATED TWEET:

Radical Stacey Abrams’ Sister Blocks Georgia Officials From Removing 4,000 Voters From Rolls Before Election

VIDEO: Exclusive: Exam Indicates Georgia Tabulating Machine Sent Results to China.


The once respected state is a a cesspool of corruption. Hey, that’s what Democrats do. Destroy.

Stacey Abrams’ Sister Blocks Georgia Officials From Removing 4,000 Voters From Rolls Before Election

By Howard Roark, CPT, December 29, 2020

A federal judge on Monday ordered two Georgia counties to reverse a decision purging more than 4,000 voters from the rolls ahead of the Jan. 5 runoff elections.

The judge, Leslie Abrams Gardner, is the sister of former Dem candidate for governor in Georgia Stacy Abrams.

“I believe that each of the individuals named as a result of registering their name and change of address to a location outside of Muscogee County, removed to another state with the intention of making the new state their residence,” a local voter named Ralph Russell who made the challenge said.

“Thus, each individual has lost their residence in Muscogee County, and consequently, each individual is ineligible to vote in Muscogee County.”

From Politico:

Gardner’s 11-page ruling released Monday night noted that the removals of the voters appeared to violate federal law because they were not given proper notice and because they qualify as the type of systematic voter roll cleaning that is not permitted within 90 days of a federal election.

The Muscogee board filed a motion earlier Monday arguing that Gardner must remove herself from the case based on her relationship with her sister, Abrams.

Lawyers for the board, described Abrams as “a Georgia politician and voting rights activist who was the Democratic candidate in the 2018 Georgia gubernatorial election and has since engaged in various highly publicized efforts to increase voter registration and turnout for the 2020 general election in Georgia.”

The motion requesting Gardner’s recusal noted that a voter registration group affiliated with Abrams, Fair Fight, filed a suit in another federal court in Georgia last week complaining that a national organization dedicated to targeting voter fraud, True the Vote, is making unjustified challenges to Georgia voters in the lead-up to the Jan. 5 runoffs.

“Abrams’ involvement in the Fair Fight Litigation … is sufficient to satisfy the standard for mandatory judicial recusal,” the board’s attorneys wrote. “Abrams has a clear interest in the outcome of this proceeding and other similarly situated litigation in Georgia due to her voting advocacy through projects such as Fair Fight and the New Georgia Project.”

RELATED TWEET:

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.