In Nevada, the Trump legal team just scored a significant court win that could actually change the outcome in the blue state. From MSN:
In its first court victory, a Nevada judge has agreed to let the Trump campaign present its evidence that fraud and illegalities plagued the state’s election, enough to reverse Joe Biden’s win and set an example for other state challenges.
Trump’s Chief of Staff Mark Meadows tweeted out the major update:
BIG news in Nevada: a Judge has allowed NV Republicans to present findings of widespread voter fraud in a Dec. 3rd hearing. Americans will now hear evidence from those who saw firsthand what happened—a critical step for transparency and remedying illegal ballots. Stay tuned.
That doesn’t sound like a team ready to throw the towel in yet. Many people on the ground are signing affidavits swearing they saw some major problems on the ground.
And finally one of these blue states is pausing their rush to certify the election and move on, instead being willing to listen to the evidence.
I was an electronic intelligence analyst under 305th Military Intelligence with experience gathering SAM missile system electronic intelligence. I have extensive experience as a white hat hacker used by some of the top election specialists in the world. The methodologies I have employed represent industry standard cyber operation toolkits for digital forensics and OSINT, which are commonly used to certify connections between servers, network nodes and other digital properties and probe to network system vulnerabilities.
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00Vlad Tepes Bloghttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngVlad Tepes Blog2020-11-28 07:17:412021-10-07 21:20:10Four Items Suggesting Something Rotten in the Swing States for Biden
— Crossroads with Joshua Philipp (@crossroads_josh) November 27, 2020
“We ran six different analyses, in fact seven in Pennsylvania, and all of them showed problems.” —@MattBraynard@JoshJPhilipp has more on the 2020 #election.
The conclusion of our findings, in the words of the @nytimes: "no one can say with confidence which candidate was the deserved winner." https://t.co/FBwKATs9qu
Video: Matt Braynard: Evidence of Vote Fraud Enough to Flip States
By Joshua Philipp, The Epoch Times, November 26, 2020Updated: November 27, 2020
Significant evidence of vote fraud was revealed through data analysis and investigations by Matt Braynard, executive director of Look Ahead America. We had the pleasure of sitting down with Matt Braynard to look over his data and discuss his findings.
These stories and more in this episode of Crossroads.
“I can show you the names of the people on the record having voted in multiple states in the raw data the states make available, so this isn't speculative, this is just what the data shows.” —@MattBraynard@JoshJPhilipp has more in this FULL INTERVIEW: https://t.co/DJphxsJKmcpic.twitter.com/GjlHXfCNzQ
It is clear the Pennsylvania 2020 election was wrought with fraud and criminal conduct.
President Trump led by nearly 700,000 votes on election night.
Democrats dumped hundreds of thousands of votes to steal the state from the Trump Campaign.
On Wednesday the Pennsylvania state legislature held a hearing on the 2020 election issues and irregularities.
One witness described the huge “spikes” in Pennsylvania during the hearing and the crowd gasped.
.@RudyGiuliani: Of the 600K votes added during curious "spikes" in PA, how many went to Biden?
Witness: "I think our figures were about 570-some-odd-thousand."
With mounting evidence of election fraud now visible, members of the Pennsylvania legislature have drafted a joint resolution [SEE HERE] to overturn election results, reverse the previous state certification, and the sponsors promise they will take it to the Supreme Court if necessary.
The Resolution
Declaring the results of statewide electoral contests in the 2020 General Election to be in dispute.
WHEREAS, Article I, Section 4, Clause 1 of the United States Constitution empowers state legislatures, including the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, to prescribe the “Times, Places, and Manner” of conducting elections; and
WHEREAS, Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution empowers state legislatures, including the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, to direct the manner of appointing electors for President and Vice President of the United States; and
WHEREAS, the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania has exercised its authority to establish election administration procedures for the Commonwealth, known as the Pennsylvania Election Code; and
WHEREAS, the Pennsylvania Election Code requires all mail-in ballots to be received by eight o’clock P.M. on the day of the election; and
WHEREAS, the Pennsylvania Election Code requires election officials at polling places to authenticate the signatures of in-person voters; and
WHEREAS, the Pennsylvania Election Code requires that county boards of elections shall not meet to conduct a pre-canvass of all absentee and mail-in ballots until seven o’clock A.M. on Election Day, during which time defects on mail-in ballots would be identified; and
WHEREAS, the Pennsylvania Election Code prohibits the counting of defective absentee or mail-in ballots; and
WHEREAS, the Pennsylvania Election Code authorizes “watchers,” selected by candidates and political parties, to observe the process of canvassing absentee and mail-in ballots; and
WHEREAS, the Commonwealth conducted an election on November 3, 2020 for federal offices, including selecting electors for President and Vice President of the United States; and
WHEREAS, officials in the Executive and Judicial Branches of the Commonwealth infringed upon the General Assembly’s authority under the United States Constitution by unlawfully changing the rules governing the November 3, 2020 election in the Commonwealth; and
WHEREAS, on September 17, 2020, less than seven weeks before the November 3, 2020 election, the partisan majority on the Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania unlawfully and unilaterally extended the deadline for mail-in ballots to be received, mandated that ballots mailed without a postmark would be presumed to be received timely, and could be accepted without a verified voter signature; and
WHEREAS, on October 23, 2020, less than two weeks before the November 3, 2020 election and upon a petition from the Secretary of the Commonwealth, the Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania ruled that mail-in ballots need not authenticate signatures for mail-in ballots, thereby treating in-person and mail-in voters dissimilarly and eliminating a critical safeguard against potential election crime; and
WHEREAS, on November 2, 2020, the night before the November 3, 2020 election and prior to the prescribed time for pre-canvassing mail-in ballots, the office of the Secretary of the Commonwealth encouraged certain counties to notify party and candidate representatives of mail-in voters whose ballots contained defects; and
WHEREAS, heavily Democrat counties permitted mail-in voters to cure ballot defects while heavily Republican counties followed the law and invalidated defective ballots; and
WHEREAS, in certain counties in the Commonwealth, watchers were not allowed to meaningfully observe the pre-canvassing and canvassing activities relating to absentee and mail-in ballots; and
WHEREAS, in other parts of the Commonwealth, watchers observed irregularities concerning the pre-canvassing and canvassing of absentee and mail-in ballots; and
WHEREAS, postal employees in Pennsylvania have reported anomalies relating to mail-in ballots, including multiple ballots delivered to a single address with unfamiliar addressees, ballots mailed to vacant homes, empty lots, and addresses that did not exist; and
WHEREAS, witnesses testifying before the Pennsylvania Senate Majority Policy Committee on November 25, 2020 have provided additional compelling information regarding the questionable nature of the administration of the 2020 General Election; and
WHEREAS, there remains ongoing litigation concerning the administration of the November 3, 2020 election in the Commonwealth; and
WHEREAS, in 2016, Pennsylvania’s general election results were certified on December 12, 2016, and on November 24, 2020, the Secretary of the Commonwealth unilaterally and prematurely certified results of the November 3, 2020 election regarding presidential electors despite ongoing litigation; and
WHEREAS, the Pennsylvania House of Representatives has the duty to ensure that no citizen of this Commonwealth is disenfranchised, to insist that all elections are conducted according to the law, and to satisfy the general public that every legal vote is counted accurately;
THEREFORE, be it RESOLVED that the Pennsylvania House of Representatives—
1. Recognizes substantial irregularities and improprieties associated with mail-in balloting, pre-canvassing, and canvassing during the November 3, 2020 election; and
2. Disapproves of the infringement on the General Assembly’s authority pursuant to the United States Constitution to regulate elections; and
3. Disapproves of and disagrees with the Secretary of the Commonwealth’s premature certification of the results of the November 3, 2020 election regarding presidential electors; and
4. Declares that the selection of presidential electors and other statewide electoral contest results in this Commonwealth is in dispute; and
5. Urges the Secretary of the Commonwealth and the Governor to withdraw or vacate the certification of presidential electors and to delay certification of results in other statewide electoral contests voted on at the 2020 General Election; and
6. Urges the United States Congress to declare the selection of presidential electors in this Commonwealth to be in dispute. (link)
RELATED TWEETS:
Here's what a Pennsylvania data scientist and fraud expert says he saw as a poll watcher: pic.twitter.com/3t6G4wtb8S
President Donald Trump appeared to walk back his Thursday commitment to a peaceful transfer of power with a Friday morning tweet.
Trump, on his way to a round of golf at Trump National Golf Club, wrote that President-elect Joe Biden “Biden can only enter the White House as President if he can prove that his ridiculous “80,000,000 votes” were not fraudulently or illegally obtained.”
“When you see what happened in Detroit, Atlanta, Philadelphia & Milwaukee, massive voter fraud,” the president continued. “He’s got a big unsolvable problem!”
Trump originally said during a pool spray on Thanksgiving that he “certainly” will vacate the White House if the Electoral College declares Biden the victor of the 2020 election. It was his first time taking questions since Election Day.
He claimed later Thursday night that the “Fake News Media coordinates so that the real message” of his press appearance “never gets out.”
“You have a fraudulent system,” he continued before announcing he will hold a rally supporting Loeffler and Perdue in Georgia on December 5. “I think it’s very dangerous.”
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00Vlad Tepes Bloghttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngVlad Tepes Blog2020-11-27 05:07:182021-10-07 21:20:13VIDEOS: Testimony of Key Witnesses and Legal Council on the 2020 Election Fraud
Mayor Rudy Giulinai asked Phil Waldron, retired Army spending first half of his career just as a cavalry officer, conducting armed reconnaissance counter reconnaissance. Here is an excerpt from the Q & A:
Mayor GIULIANI: I believe that Greg Stenstrom mentioned earlier, the processing of these ballots through machines. There’s a manufacturer’s specified rate of speed that a number of ballots can image, be imaged and processed. These spike anomalies in this chart of Pennsylvania really show where for us to look forensically
GIULIANI: Could you explain at the very beginning what that line means? “Biden injection” at the very very beginning of the chart …..
WALDRON: So at the very beginning of the chart they all have, where there’s a circle that says on election day. What that indicates is there is a spike in loaded votes of 337,000 plus or minus some votes that were added in there. In one big batch. So that was an anomaly in the reporting normally you would expect to see a smooth curve going up. Not any not any big, big spikes, that’s kind of what what Greg was talking about the the anomalies of loading And uploading those those votes. So that big spike that occurs there is a prime indicator of fraudulent voting.
GIULIANI: And that’s 604,000 votes in 90 minutes, is that right?
WALDRON: Correct. This is the 337,000 votes in that period of time
GIULIANI: Yes. And when you look In this entire curve with all these spikes, can you calculate how much of a vote that accounted for Biden and how much for Trump
WALDRON: CLOSE TO 600,000. I THINK OUR FIGURES WERE ABOUT 570 SOME ODD THOUSAND THAT ALL THOSE SPIKES REPRESENTED OVER TIME FOR BIDEN. CORRECT AND HOW MUCH FOR TRUMP? I THINK IT WAS A LITTLE OVER 3200
GIULIANI: Now just just to go back to your original, your original document, this one pager that they all have mail in ballots counted without being observed. Those are the ballots can we’re talking about that when not observed in Allegheny County and In Philadelphia, correct all right 682,770. Now this is the part that is a mystery, mailed ballots sent out 1,823,148 but when you go to the final count of the vote, there are 2,589,242 mail ballots. What happened ….. how do you account for the 700,000 mail ballots that appeared from nowhere.
In its first court victory, a Nevada judge has agreed to let the Trump campaign present its evidence that fraud and illegalities plagued the state’s election, enough to reverse Joe Biden’s win and set an example for other state challenges.
According to Trump officials, the judge set a Dec. 3 hearing date and is allowing 15 depositions. What’s more, the campaign plans to present its evidence that could result in the rejection of tens of thousands of mail in ballots in Democratic Clark County where Biden ballots outnumbered Trump ballots by 91,000 in unofficial results.
“BIG news in Nevada: a Judge has allowed NV Republicans to present findings of widespread voter fraud in a Dec. 3rd hearing. Americans will now hear evidence from those who saw firsthand what happened — a critical step for transparency and remedying illegal ballots. Stay tuned,” White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows tweeted.
American Conservative Union Chairman Matt Schlapp, one of those heading the Nevada case, told Secrets, “it gives us a real chance, if to do nothing else, to begin to show this historic level of fraud.”
BIG news in Nevada: a Judge has allowed NV Republicans to present findings of widespread voter fraud in a Dec. 3rd hearing. Americans will now hear evidence from those who saw firsthand what happened—a critical step for transparency and remedying illegal ballots. Stay tuned.— Mark Meadows (@MarkMeadows) November 25, 2020
Oddly, there has been a virtual news blackout of the Trump court victory. However, there were major headlines on the state Supreme Court’s certification of Biden’s victory Tuesday.
In its court filing from Nov. 17, the Trump team made several allegations of voter fraud, including votes by non-residents and the dead.
But its biggest claim was that the signatures on hundreds of thousands of mail-in ballots were not verified by human officials, as required by law.
What’s more, they found that officials used a machine to verify signatures, apparently against the rules, … (Read more)
Tweets mentioned:
BIG news in Nevada: a Judge has allowed NV Republicans to present findings of widespread voter fraud in a Dec. 3rd hearing. Americans will now hear evidence from those who saw firsthand what happened—a critical step for transparency and remedying illegal ballots. Stay tuned.
Breaking News: NV judge agrees to hear evidence of illegal voting and allow Republicans/Trump campaign to depose those who know about the dirty deeds of campaign 2020. Big News! 🚨🚨 pic.twitter.com/53bbWGD5gY
Media has been crowing over Trump’s latest legal setbacks in Pennsylvania, with public personas focusing their scorn on Trump’s attorney, Rudy Giuliani. Former New Jersey governor Chris Christie called him and his legal team a “national embarrassment.” CNN host Chris Cuomo said of Giuliani, “He became a metaphor for the campaign melting into a dark puddle of deception.”
But the all-important state is still in play, despite what the pundits say. Not only did the federal judge in Pennsylvania fail to give a hearing on the evidence before ruling to dismiss Trump’s lawsuit, legal scholars believe Trump has strong legal arguments that may prevail once the lawsuits come before the U.S. Supreme Court. Even more, the Trump team has considerable evidence for election fraud, which could call hundreds of thousands of ballots into question.
‘Winning’ Legal Arguments
Harvard professor and legal scholar Alan Dershowitz — no fan of Trump — believes Trump’s legal team has potentially “winning arguments” in Pennsylvania.
“They have two very strong legal arguments: one, that the courts changed what the legislature did about counting ballots after Election Day,” said Dershowitz on Fox News Futures with Maria Bartiromo on Monday.
“It’s a winning issue in the Supreme Court, and Justice Alito has already hinted that that’s a winning issue,” he noted.
Indeed, Alito’s opinion is shared by Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch, who joined a public statement written by Alito several weeks ago on the lawsuit brought by the Pennsylvania GOP, which contests the state supreme court’s deadline extension for mail-in ballots.
“It would be highly desirable to issue a ruling on the constitutionality of the State Supreme Court’s decision before the election,” Alito wrote in his Oct. 28 statement on Republican Party of Pennsylvania v. Boockvar. “That question has national importance, and there is a strong likelihood that the State Supreme Court decision violates the Federal Constitution.”
That opinion is also shared by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who made clear in a separate statement that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court overstepped its bounds and usurped the authority of the state legislature.
“[U]nder the U.S. Constitution, the state courts do not have a blank check to rewrite state election laws for federal elections,” Kavanaugh noted in footnote 1 in his Oct. 26 statement on Democratic National Committee v. Wisconsin, a 5–3 case that struck down a federal court’s ruling to extend the deadline for mail-in ballots in Wisconsin.
Thus, four justices are on the record indicating they’ll overturn the Pennsylvania State Supreme Court decision that rewrote state election law. Newly confirmed Justice Amy Coney Barrett, whose judicial philosophy closely matches that of the four conservative justices, is likely to join in on their opinion, leading to a 5–4 ruling striking down the state high court and tossing out the ballots in question.
While media claims only 10,000 mail-in ballots are in question, that number is disputed, as it’s unclear whether mail-in ballots received after 8 p.m. on Election Night were properly segregated from other ballots. If the counties failed to segregate those ballots, another possible remedy by the Supreme Court could be to discount all ballots counted after 8 p.m. on Election Night, when Trump was ahead by approximately 800,000 votes — leaving him the victor to capture the state’s 20 electoral votes.
Another strong legal argument, according to Dershowitz, involves the Equal Protection Clause, which protects voters from being treated differently based on their political affiliation. The Trump team has evidence that Democrats were treated favorably by election officials while Republicans were disadvantaged.
They provided evidence in their amended complaint that half a dozen Pennsylvania counties — in violation of state law — contacted Democrats to cure defective ballots before Election Day while Republican-controlled counties followed the law and did not reach out to GOP voters.
“Democratic-controlled counties violated the mandates of the Election Code and the determinations of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, advantaging voters in Democratic-heavy counties as compared to those in Republican-heavy counties,” reads the amended complaint, going on to explain how Republican voters were unfairly disadvantaged by election officials:
Democratic-controlled counties engaged in pre-canvass activities prior to November 3, 2020, by reviewing received mail-in ballots for deficiencies, such as lacking the inner secrecy envelope or lacking a signature of the elector on the outer declaration envelope. Those offending Counties then would notify those voters in order to allow them to cure their ballot deficiencies by voting provisionally on Election Day or cancelling their previously mailed ballot and issuing a replacement. In other words, those counties provided their mail-in voters with the opportunity to cure mail-in and absentee ballot deficiencies, while Republican-controlled counties followed the law and did not provide a notice and cure process.
The Trump team cited the 2000 case Bush v. Gore as support.
“The right to vote is protected in more than the initial allocation of the franchise,” the complaint notes. “Equal protection applies as well to the manner of its exercise. Having once granted the right to vote on equal terms, the State may not, by later arbitrary and disparate treatment, value one person’s vote over that of another.”
Evidence of Election Fraud
But in a blistering ruling last week, Judge Matthew Brann dismissed these claims, accusing Trump’s legal team of offering “strained legal arguments without merit … unsupported by evidence.”
According to Ellis and Giuliani, however, Brann never heard the evidence.
“His opinion made a judgment on the merits of the evidence, but he hasn’t even seen it,” said Ellis on Greg Kelly’s show on Newsmax. “That’s remarkable for a judge to pretend that he has heard all of this and make a judgment on it when he hasn’t even seen it.”
Brann, a Republican and an Obama appointee, had refused to grant Giuliani an evidentiary hearing.
“I don’t know how the judge could’ve concluded that the facts aren’t substantial when they haven’t even been presented yet,” Giuliani said on Fox News host Lou Dobbs’ show Monday. “Unfortunately, we haven’t yet gotten a fair decision. We will. We’ve got to be a little patient.”
“One fair decision, one good hearing, and this will turn all around,” he added.
In Gettysburg Wednesday, state lawmakers are holding a public hearing, with state senators offering a five-minute opening speech before witnesses who have submitted affidavits testifying to voter fraud take to the podium.
Giuliani will be speaking, and it’s rumored that President Trump will also be making an appearance.
Christine was born in Saigon, Vietnam one year before it fell to the Communists, and has lived in France and the United States. She has degrees from Notre Dame Law School and Oxford University. She is a senior producer and investigative reporter at Church Militant.
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00Church Militanthttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngChurch Militant2020-11-25 11:58:382021-10-07 21:20:18Pennsylvania Still in Play
If you are advocating for lockdowns, you are complicit in tearing families apart. You are complicit in inflicting untold suffering on millions of people around the world. You are complicit in casting the poorest and most vulnerable in our societies into even further grinding poverty. You are complicit in murder.
In 2006, a 15-year-old high school student from Albuquerque, New Mexico won third place in the Intel science and engineering fair for her project on slowing the spread of an infectious pathogen during a pandemic emergency. Using a computer simulation that she developed with the help of her father, she argued that in order to slow the spread of the disease, governments should implement school shutdowns, keep kids at home and enforce social distancing.
Incredibly, that third place high school science fair project can be tied directly to the lockdown policies being implemented by governments around the world today. You see, that father that she developed her computer simulation with was no average doting dad, but a senior researcher at Sandia National Laboratories who at that time was working on pandemic emergency response plans for the US Department of Homeland Security. His proposal to implement school shutdowns and, if need be, workplace shutdowns in the event of a pandemic emergency was developed at least in part in response to his daughter’s high school project.
Now those advocating for lockdowns have seen the destruction and death that those policies have wrought this year and we are living through that right now. Not only are people being deprived of their livelihoods and forced into grinding poverty as a direct result of these shutdowns, but now the undeniable truth is that if you are advocating for lockdowns, you are advocating for some portion of the population to be consigned to death.
This is no longer debatable. It is even openly admitted—although months too late by the World Health Organization.
DAVID NABARRO: I want to say it again: we in the World Health Organization do not advocate lockdowns as a primary means of control of this virus. [. . .] We may well have a doubling of world poverty by early next year. We may well have at least a doubling of child malnutrition because children are not getting meals at school and their parents and poor families are not able to afford it.
This is a terrible, ghastly global catastrophe, actually. And so we really do appeal to all world leaders: stop using lockdown as your primary control method. Develop better systems for doing it. Work together and learn from each other. But remember, lockdowns just have one consequence that you must never, ever belittle, and that is making poor people an awful lot poorer.
This is the point at which, no doubt, I’ll be expected to produce the data to back up the non-controversial observation that lockdowns kill, even though that data will do precisely nothing to penetrate the consciousness of those who have already decided that they occupy the moral high ground for advocating locking billions of people around the globe as prisoners inside their own homes. But persevere I will.
I’ll point, for example, to the letter signed by hundreds of doctors calling the lockdowns themselves a “mass casualty incident” and exhorting politicians to end the shutdowns.
I’ll point to the research that shows that thousands of people will die because of delays to cancer surgery treatments as a result of the medical shutdowns.
I’ll point to the research of the Well-Being Trust showing that 75,000 Americans are expected to die deaths of despair—including alcohol and drug misuse and suicide—this year alone as a result of the lockdowns.
I will point to the research of The Lancet showing that 265 million people are expected to be thrown into severe food insecurity as a result of these lockdowns.
I will even point to the research showing 125,000 children are expected to die from malnutrition as a result of these lockdowns.
But, as I say, none of these deaths will matter to those who have already decided that they are right and virtuous for advocating locking vast swathes of the human population inside their own homes to starve to death in the name of slowing the spread of a disease that even the epidemiologists who have been wrong about everything this year tell us will kill less than one percent of the infected.
Yes, slowing the spread, not stopping the spread. This was never about stopping a pandemic. Even the lockdown advocates never advocated that. But somehow that has been forgotten and “15 days to flatten the curve” has turned into a never-ending carte blanche for the biosecurity state to implement any number of draconian policies on its population, any number of policies on the checklist of the would-be dictator. Not only locking people inside their own homes, but constant surveillance of the population through the contact tracing and tracking apps that are increasingly being implemented around the globe, and, inevitably, the proposals for mandating the experimental vaccines which agents of the state will forcibly inject into people against their will.
This is not acceptable.
We cannot allow this to stand.
If we forsake this, our most basic right—the right to step foot outside of our own homes—then we forsake our humanity itself. An important part of what makes us human is being taken away from us in the name of stopping the spread of COVID-19.
But there is good news for those who have managed to retain their sanity in the time of insanity. We do not need a complicated plan in order to subvert this agenda. We do not need special deputization or to ask permission from the government. We do not need to join any particular political party or even any particular protest movement.
All we have to do is disobey these unlawful “orders.”
CASSIE ZERVOS: The persistent anti-lockdown protesters said they will not forget Melbourne’s strict 112 day measures as they took to the steps of Parliament. They carried signs saying “Don’t trust the government” and chanted for police to join them in their rally.
Rick Gates is the former deputy campaign chairman for Donald Trump in 2016. He then served as the deputy chairman for the president’s inaugural committee. Rick is the author of “Wicked Game: An Insider’s Story on How Trump Won, Mueller Failed, and America Lost.” @rickwgates.
TOPIC: Trump’s Final Stand And the Legacy of the Supreme Court!
JEFF CROUERE
Jeff Crouere is the host of “Ringside Politics,” which airs weekdays on WGSO 990-AM in New Orleans. He is a political columnist, the author of America’s Last Chance and provides regular commentaries on the Jeff Crouere YouTube channel and on www.JeffCrouere.com.
TOPIC: 2020 ELECTION SHOWED LIMITS OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM!!
PHILLP W. MAGNESS
PHILLIP W. MAGNESS is a Research Fellow at the Independent Institute and Senior Research Fellow at the American Institute for Economic Research.
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00Dr. Rich Swierhttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngDr. Rich Swier2020-11-25 04:55:342021-10-07 21:20:20PODCAST: Trump’s Final Stand and the Legacy of the Supreme Court
Venezuelan immigrant Elizabeth Rogliani warns that what Democrats and the political Left are doing in America is the same thing that happened to Venezuela when the socialists took over and the country collapsed. pic.twitter.com/v0sakaWQSd
— Jason Rantz on KTTH Radio (@jasonrantz) June 29, 2020
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00The Geller Reporthttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngThe Geller Report2020-11-25 04:40:032021-10-07 21:20:20GSA Letter Forces Biden to Disclose Conflicts of Interest with Himself and His Team to ‘Foreign Nationals, and Other Foreign Agents…’
http://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.png00The Geller Reporthttp://drrich.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/logo_264x69.pngThe Geller Report2020-11-25 04:22:532021-10-07 21:20:21Lin Wood Announces Sidney Powell Will File Her Lawsuit in Georgia on November 25th
“We are not on either team.” “I did not vote for Trump”
“The odd thing is the DHS was warned of all this in August.”
” I’ve funded a team of hackers and cybersleuths and other people with odd skills. We’ve been on this since August. One side story we’ll pursue one day is DHS was warned of all this in August and September. We tried very hard to….. but it was all crammed down from high levels.
RION: The experts Byrne is funding is an elite cyber security team that has been hired by the state of Texas to investigate a series of irregularities in the Dallas elections in 2018. The team consisted of members with backgrounds in military intelligence and federal law enforcement, for instance, the electronic irregularities in Dallas 2018 was rooted in Dallas as use of Dominion voting machines.
This group has been on Dominion’s trail over two years.
BYRNE: I’ve been up there since without since August and expanding and funding further and deeper investigations. So we really, I felt, kind of had the answer when everyone woke up November 4 and saying, “what happened?”. We couldn’t quite believe we couldn’t get anyone to listen to us.
RION: Their findings include a detailed list of impossibilities Dominion machines processing more ballots than is physically possible. Real time data showing Biden vote dumps that are statistically impossible and dozens of backdoor ways in which votes by the thousands can be changed, manipulated or deleted.
BYRNE: When you’re talking about, you know, thousands of votes in a row for one candidate. Just to give you. Just to give you the mathematical odds against it. If you’re talking about a group that has a 96% percent affinity for vitamins or go magic which I’m very heavily Biden board. The chance of having 100 votes in a row for Biden if it’s not if the chance of every vote is 96% for Biden, the chance he would have 100 in a row is about 1.6%, the chances you would have 1000 in a row, goes to about a couple quadrillion to one, and the chances that you would have the kinds of numbers we were seeing were there a place where there were 10s of thousands of votes in a row for Biden, the chances are quadrillions of quadrillions of quadrillions against that could ever happen in nature
RION: You didn’t necessarily vote, you did not vote for Donald Trump. You are a libertarian
BYRNE: That’s correct.
RION: And you are doing this, why?
BRYNE: I never voted Democrat or Republican or Democrat in my life. This is about the Constitution. These are goons. If we lose this moment, the Constitution is done. We are never back. We will never have a free and fair election again.
RION: I’ve spoken to your, your guys behind the scenes, they’re very, they seem very knowledgeable and they’ve pulled incredible data and you see a clear pattern between the major swing states in this regard…
BYRNE: It’s more of a clear pattern, we know exactly what happened. its everything – its just just a matter of how quickly can we get it all built up and explained in such a way, it’s absolutely clear there’s no, there’s no, there’s no shades of gray about this,
RION: Byrne says the lecture was 100% rigged and it’s not just real time data proving this.
BYRNE: We have more more than the data we have the data. We have hundreds of affidavits. We’ve been we’ve also had people gathering and organizing that effort. And we have the, the analysis of the equipment itself so that’s really the three buckets. And we’re getting it out but first feeding it to, you know, those who want it, which are basically Sydney’s and Rudy’s people.
I want to emphasize we’re not on other team where we’re independent.
RION: To that end, Byrne as a free agent has been feeding his groups, intel and findings to any group who can use it in court against dominion, it’s supporting anyone who wants to data and
BYRNE: I’m putting it up on my own website which is called the deep capture. I’m putting these different stories and facts and write ups on there so anyone can go there and find them. But this isn’t even close I want to show people that this isn’t even close. If you could freeze time and let this all play out through the courts what would be exposed is 100% clear this whole thing was rigged.
“We are not on either team.” “I did not vote for Trump”
“The odd thing is the DHS was warned of all this in August.”
RION: As the media continue to ignore claims of election fraud. One millionaire has set out to prove their cover up in support of the truth. One America’s Chanel Rion has more.
Patrick Byrne founder and former CEO of overstock.com has long considered himself a libertarian tech entrepreneur. For now finds himself more than entrepreneur, he’s on a mission to save the Republic, from a deadly virus widespread machine, widespread software election fraud. He’s doing this by funding a niche group of experts and the Trump legal team has been listening,
BREAKING: Group files emergency petition in Wisconsin after finding 150,000 potentially fraudulent ballots
By: Just The News, August 24, 2020;
Group files emergency petition in Wisconsin after finding 150,000 potentially fraudulent ballots
“These discrepancies were a direct result of Wisconsin election officials’ willful violation of state law” – Amistad Project’s Phil Kline
The national conservative group Amistad Project filed an emergency petition Tuesday with the Wisconsin Supreme Court challenging the state’s unofficial results in the 2020 presidential election, saying it has identified over 150,000 potentially fraudulent ballots.
Results from the Nov. 3 balloting in the state show…
It ain’t over till it’s over and it’s not even close to being over.
President Donald Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani offered an explanation on why Trump’s legal team issued a statement saying lawyer Sidney Powell is not with the campaign.
“I think it’s because we’re pursuing two different theories,” Giuliani said when he was asked about the situation by Fox News host Lou Dobbs. The Trump legal team, he said, is focused on “misconduct of the election” by state officials in places like Pennsylvania, Michigan, Georgia, and elsewhere.
Giuliani argued that Trump’s constitutional rights were deprived in some of these states, and he predicted that some of their lawsuits will…
President Trump is not abandoning his supporters, and his supporters must not abandon him. President Trump’s lawyers must have the opportunity to present their evidence at the Supreme Court of the United States.
What does GSA being allowed to preliminarily work with the Dems have to do with continuing to pursue our various cases on what will go down as the most corrupt election in American political history? We are moving full speed ahead. Will never concede to fake ballots & “Dominion”.
Lin Wood Drops Late-NightBombshell: “Would someone ask my never-to-be friend Brad Raffensperger @GaSecofState if he has seen this tape of election fraud at State Farm Arena in Fulton Co., GA?”
Lin Wood and Sidney Powell have both been promising big things would be happening in Georgia very soon. It looks like Lin Wood has dropped his first bombshell tonight.
Lin Wood and Sidney Powell have both been promising big things would be happening in Georgia very soon. It looks like Lin Wood has dropped his first bombshell tonight.
In a surprise, late-night tweet, Attorney Lin Wood, who’s been warning Georgia Governor Brian Kemp (R) and GA Secretary…
