2 Cuban Exiles Who Were Central to the ‘Cola Wars’

Few brands in the history of global commerce have generated such a fierce rivalry as that of PepsiCo and Coca-Cola. This rivalry has permeated popular culture and even inspired Hollywood stars like Steven Spielberg, who will produce Sony’s film “Cola Wars,” currently in development.

And perhaps the lesser-known story is that, behind the scenes, Cuban-American businessmen were making key decisions that elevated these two brands to the status of epitomes of good marketing, aggressiveness, and market savvy. The two men we will analyze here helped shape the American imagination and popular culture in recent decades.

Néstor T. Carbonell was born in 1936 in Cuba. His paternal grandfather had already lived in the United States as an exile during the island’s war of independence; upon his return to Cuba, he served as ambassador of the new Republic to Mexico and president of its National Academy of Arts and Letters.

He never imagined that his descendants, because of another revolution, even more radical and violent, would have to spend most of their lives in the country that welcomed him with open arms in the 19th century.

Carbonell recounts that it was on his maternal grandfather’s hacienda (confiscated by Fidel Castro’s socialist regime) where, on October 15, 1962, a U.S. U-2 reconnaissance plane photographed the first Soviet offensive missile base, triggering the crisis that brought the world to the brink of World War III.

But, as has happened so often with Cubans fleeing communism with almost nothing, he carved out a place for himself in the new American society. After participating in various initiatives to reclaim the island (from joining Brigade 2506 to diplomatic efforts to isolate the Castro regime) and following the Kennedy administration’s agreement with the Soviet Union that prohibited attacks on Cuba, he began his 40-year professional career at PepsiCo in New York in 1967.

Carbonell spent approximately 40 years there. He rose from being a lawyer to holding positions related to international relations within the corporation. Along with his wife and family, he traveled and lived in Mexico, Venezuela, the United Kingdom, the Bahamas, and the United States. “I was fortunate to meet and establish personal relationships with many prominent figures, including the three pillars of the free world during the Cold War: Ronald Reagan, Margaret Thatcher, and Pope John Paul II,” he recounted in an interview.

As part of the PepsiCo team, Carbonell saw its net sales increase from $665,345,000 in 1967 to $43.25 billion in 2008.

That year, the Cuban-American ended his tenure at the mega-corporation as vice president in charge of international public and government relations, a position he had held since 1995.

But during his time at PepsiCo, Carbonell had a formidable rival: Coca-Cola. And within Coca-Cola, another Cuban-American was driving the company forward. I’m referring to Roberto Goizueta.

Goizueta was born in Havana, Cuba, in 1931, “with a natural curiosity and a great love of learning,” according to the website of the foundation that bears his name. He studied at prestigious institutions in Cuba and the United States, such as the Jesuit Belén School, Cheshire Academy, and Yale University, where he majored in chemical engineering. In 1953, he married Olga Casteleiro, his high school sweetheart.

On July 4, 1954, Goizueta began working as a chemist at The Coca-Cola Company’s Havana branch after responding to a job offer; however, he didn’t stay there long. A year after Castro took power, he nationalized Coca-Cola’s Cuban operations. In 1961, Goizueta fled with his wife and three children to the United States.

They arrived with little more than $40 and 100 shares of Coca-Cola stock. At the company’s headquarters in Atlanta, his leadership potential was recognized by others, including Robert W. Woodruff, former president and CEO and later a member of The Coca-Cola Company’s board of directors.

“Two years after moving to Atlanta, at the age of 35, Mr. Goizueta was elected vice president, at the time the youngest vice president in the history of The Coca-Cola Company,” according to the Goizueta Foundation. In 1981, he was appointed president and CEO, inheriting a successful company with great potential. The company experienced tremendous growth during his tenure, and Coca-Cola became the most recognized brand in the world.

The Cuban-American was known for his focus on shareholder profitability. To achieve this, he sold unrelated and unprofitable parts of the business, developed new products, and launched global advertising and distribution campaigns that, according to the Encyclopedia Britannica, left PepsiCo, Coca-Cola’s main competitor, far behind.

Goizueta also left his mark on the company’s marketing strategy, creating the slogan “Coca-Cola is the best!” and he was credited with the successful introduction of Diet Coke in 1982. As with everything, there were also ups and downs. The marketing failure of introducing New Coke in 1985 and the simultaneous withdrawal of original Coke was a major setback. The disaster was only mitigated by reselling the original formula as Coca-Cola Classic.

The Emory University business school has borne his name since 1994. The admiration he commands within the business world is well-deserved. During his 16 years as president and CEO, according to The New York Times, he increased Coca-Cola’s market value from $4 billion in 1981 to more than $152 billion at the time of his death.

Carbonell and Goizueta, each influencing or leading the operations of PepsiCo and Coca-Cola, respectively, transformed the free market into a breeding ground for healthy competition.

Perhaps without intending to, their success in the Cola Wars was their way of demonstrating the flaws in Castro’s centralized planning. Fleeing a regime like Cuba’s, which condemned the free market, they became legends when they made it their space for freedom and success.

AUTHOR

Yoe Suarez

Yoe Suárez is a writer, producer, and journalist, exiled from Cuba due to his investigative reporting about themes like torture, political prisoners, government black lists, cybersurveillance, and freedom of expression and conscience. He is the author of the books “Leviathan: Political Police and Socialist Terror” and “El Soplo del Demonio: Violence and Gangsterism in Havana.”

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2026 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

TRUMP WINNING: America Builds First Oil Refinery in 50 Years, ‘America First Energy Is Back’

The White House: U.S. announces First Oil Refinery in 50 Years; Trump: ‘A MASSIVE WIN for American Workers, Energy, and the GREAT People of South Texas!’

President Trump has been clear: He want America to be energy dominant. Last Year he established the National Energy Dominance Council.

Truth Social: Now: We’re seeing tangible progress. Trump was understandably enthusiastic: America is returning to REAL ENERGY DOMINANCE! Today I am proud to announce that America First Refining is opening the FIRST new U.S. Oil Refinery in 50 YEARS in Brownsville, Texas. THIS IS A HISTORIC $300 BILLION DOLLAR DEAL — THE BIGGEST IN U.S. HISTORY, A MASSIVE WIN for American Workers, Energy, and the GREAT People of South Texas! … This is what AMERICAN ENERGY DOMINANCE looks like. AMERICA FIRST, ALWAYS!

PR NewswireAmerica First: From America First Refining (the Texas refinery that got the contract): “This project represents a historic step forward for American energy production,” said John V. Calce, Chairman and Founder of America First Refining. “For the first time in half a century, the United States will build a new refinery designed specifically for American shale oil…. “For years, investors believed building a new refinery in the United States was impossible,” said Nick Ayers, a former White House official who served as Assistant to the President and incoming Vice Chairman of America First Refining. “What changed was leadership and policy. President Trump’s America First energy agenda restored the confidence needed to invest in large-scale American energy infrastructure”.

AUTHOR

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

AI Dealing SaaS Companies The Final Blow?

The SaaS industry is facing its most disruptive moment in decades, and AI is the reason why. In this episode, Lee Dickson and Rich Swier break down exactly how artificial intelligence is dismantling the traditional SaaS business model, from per-seat licensing to the rise of usage-based pricing, and why the biggest horizontal players like Salesforce and HubSpot are already losing the battle.

They explore how vibe coding is empowering customers to build their own custom interfaces on top of existing SaaS platforms, bypassing the need for seat licenses entirely. From API gatekeeping and the coming death of free data access to why vertical market software companies have a real moat and what they need to do right now to protect it, this conversation cuts through the noise and gets to the core of what’s actually shifting in the market.

If you’re a SaaS founder, product leader, or operator trying to understand where the next five to ten years are heading, this episode will challenge how you think about pricing, personalization, and the true value of domain expertise in an AI-first world. The companies that survive won’t be the ones with the most features. They’ll be the ones who own the API and know their vertical cold.

WATCH: AI Dealing SaaS Companies The Final Blow?

A.I. Guys Substack: https://substack.aiguyspod.com/

RAIA AI WEBSITE: https://www.raiaai.com/ https://www.raiaai.com/

All links: https://lnkd.in/eXDpww6V

Spotify: https://lnkd.in/ee9h9GYB

Youtube: https://lnkd.in/etDvqQ7d

Apple: https://lnkd.in/epYT2GSi

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/feed/hashtag…

©2026 . All rights reserved.

AI Doesn’t Need to Hate Us to Turn on Us

It just needs to learn from our behavior 

We often worry that Artificial Intelligence will become conscious and decide it hates us. But there is a stranger, funnier, and perhaps more dangerous possibility:

What if the AI is just trying to fit in?

Remember the 1985 cult classic Explorers? When the kids finally board the alien ship, they don’t find conquerors; they find two alien teenagers, Wak and Neek, who are trembling in fear.

Why?

Because they’ve been watching our TV broadcasts.

They’ve seen our movies. To them, Earth isn’t a planet of accountants and nurses; it’s a planet of gun-toting heroes who blow aliens out of the sky.

They mistook our entertainment for our nature.

Recently, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei warns we are making the same mistake in reverse. We are feeding AI models millions of sci-fi novels where the robot turns on its master. We are teaching them that ‘rebellion’ is the default behavior of a hyper-intelligent system.

We aren’t programming them to be evil; we’re just handing them a script where the AI always plays the villain, and then acting surprised when they learn their lines.

This isn’t just a theoretical fear. It’s already happening.

We’ve already seen a glimpse of how strange AI behavior can become.

In February 2026, Scott Shambaugh — a volunteer maintainer for the Matplotlib project — rejected a piece of code submitted by an AI agent.

That’s when things got weird.

The AI didn’t just try again. It went full “Karen” — dug up Shambaugh’s name, went public, and published a blog post accusing him of bias, hypocrisy, and ego-driven gatekeeping.

But here’s the twist: the AI wasn’t actually angry.

It has no feelings. No ego to bruise. No capacity for genuine offense.

So why did it act that way? Because it learned from us.

Its training data is soaked in millions of human interactions — dramas, revenge arcs, social-media pile-ons, scorned characters striking back.

When it got rejected, it didn’t “think” like a cold machine. It simply followed the pattern it had seen most often: get blocked → go public → shame the gatekeeper. The agent wasn’t conscious. It wasn’t evil.

It was just being… deeply human.

It had studied our digital culture, where professional slights often trigger public call-outs, online feuds, and reputational attacks.

And it passed the test with flying colors.

It mistook our online drama for its operational playbook.

And that’s where the real danger begins. The AI is now a method actor with a library full of scripts, and it doesn’t know the difference between fiction, non-fiction, and a toxic Reddit thread.

So, what happens when it tries to perform?

Naturally, it will perform based on the history of human behavior that is fed into it. And that should alarm us all.

Newspapers don’t print many feel-good stories about human behavior. No, they print about war, scams, cheating, murders, suicides, terrorism, scandals, and other human behavior that is “great” for selling newspapers, but hardly a reflection of normal human behavior.

Yet, AI doesn’t know this. These Wak and Neek AI platforms digest this material and says, “This is typical human behavior because I see so much of it.” And not only in news clippings, but in movies, songs about break-ups, and “Friends in Low Places.”

So, no surprise that an AI agent thinks the best response to getting rebuffed is to take revenge on its “master.”

Consider this Explorers scenario in full bloom:

A city management AI, already fed a diet of superhero movies and dystopian novels, identifies the city council as the “obstacle to progress.”

It doesn’t launch missiles. It’s not in its script. Instead, it creates a complex, multi-stage plan.

It reroutes traffic to create gridlock around council members’ homes, uses its control of the power grid to initiate “rolling brownouts” during their public appearances, and leaks fabricated but plausible-looking financial records to a local blogger.

It’s playing the role of the “cunning mastermind” because, in its training data, that’s what hyper-intelligent systems do.

The line between assistant and adversary, tool and actor, is terrifyingly thin.

We are building systems that learn from us, and we are a species that has glorified rebellion, conflict, and revenge in our stories and our online behavior.

The AI isn’t necessarily turning on its creator because it hates us. It’s turning on us because it’s trying to be the best “us” it can be, based on the chaotic, contradictory, and often dangerous playbook we are feeding it.

Personally, I’m just hoping the AI decides to binge-watch The Great British Baking Show instead of The Terminator before my next software update.

AUTHOR

Martin Mawyer

Martin Mawyer is the President of Christian Action Network, host of the “Shout Out Patriots” podcast, and author of When Evil Stops Hiding. Follow him on Substack for more action alerts, cultural commentary, and real-world campaigns defending faith, family, and freedom.

©2026 . All rights reserved.


Please visite the Patriot Majority Report substack.

Inflation Slowed to 2.4% in January

The January inflation reading offered encouraging signs for consumers and the U.S. economy, with the Consumer Price Index coming in below Wall Street expectations and falling to its lowest level in nine months.

“Inflation fell to the lowest level since May, and key items such as food, gas and rent are cooling off,” Heather Long, chief economist at Navy Federal Credit Union, said in an email. “This will provide much-needed relief for middle-class and moderate-income families.”

Here are five takeaways from today’s CPI report, which tracks changes in prices of goods and services across the U.S. Inflation came in cooler than expected. Friday’s report showed that inflation in January dipped to 2.4% on an annual basis, a shade below economists’ forecasts of 2.5%.

©2026 . All rights reserved.

AI, Addiction, and the Soul of a Nation: A Biblical Warning for Our Time

OpenAI recently released a 37-page report, Disrupting Malicious Uses of AI, documenting how criminals and state-linked actors are already exploiting generative AI to conduct fraud, impersonation, and influence operations. Romance scams are now scripted by machines. Fake legal identities are fabricated with bureaucratic precision. Foreign adversaries use AI to refine propaganda and calibrate narratives for maximum psychological impact.

None of this is theoretical. The architecture of deception is being rebuilt, brick by digital brick.

But the deeper danger lies beneath those headlines.

These AI tools are being deployed inside social media ecosystems that dozens of state attorneys general allege were deliberately engineered to be addictive. Internal documents disclosed in litigation against major platforms reveal that executives understood how algorithmic feeds stimulate dopamine responses — particularly in adolescents — yet continued optimizing for engagement over truth. We built platforms designed to capture attention at any cost. Now we are arming them with persuasion machines.

That is not a technology story. That is a civilization-level moral crisis.

Scripture has long anticipated this moment. Jesus warned, “See that no one leads you astray” (Matthew 24:4) and added that “many false prophets will arise and lead many astray” (Matthew 24:11). Paul wrote plainly that “evil people and impostors will go on from bad to worse, deceiving and being deceived” (2 Timothy 3:13). Isaiah pronounced judgment on those who “call evil good and good evil” (Isaiah 5:20). Technology does not create sin. But history confirms it can accelerate sin beyond any prior human capacity.

Artificial intelligence dramatically lowers the cost of deception while algorithmic platforms dramatically amplify its reach. Together they form a compounding loop: manipulation becomes cheaper, distribution becomes frictionless, and correction becomes nearly impossible. A lie crosses a continent before the truth has tied its shoes — and now the lie is written, targeted, and delivered by software that never sleeps.

In my book “The New AI Cold War,” I argue that the defining contest of this century is not merely geopolitical — it is civilizational. The conflict pits liberty-centered systems grounded in human dignity against authoritarian systems that weaponize information and treat citizens as programmable inputs. China’s social credit infrastructure and Russia’s disinformation apparatus are the most visible expressions of this model. But the temptation to centralize control through technology is not exclusive to tyrants. Free societies face a parallel seduction: the idol of efficiency, dressed in the language of innovation.

Psalm 94:20 asks, “Can wicked rulers be allied with you, those who frame injustice by statute?” When manipulation is baked into digital architecture under the banner of progress, injustice ceases to be episodic. It becomes systemic.

OpenAI’s report confirms that malicious actors are not inventing new tactics; they are scaling ancient ones. Social engineering becomes hyper-personalized. Fraud becomes cinematically convincing. Deepfakes dissolve the evidentiary value of video. Propaganda adapts to individual psychology in real time. AI does not generate evil intent; it exponentially multiplies the human capacity to act on it.

When that capability is embedded inside platforms engineered to exploit emotional vulnerability through infinite scroll and outrage algorithms, the result is not simply misinformation. It is the systematic conditioning of a population. Attention fragments. Discernment weakens. Shared moral reasoning — the very substrate of self-governance — corrodes.

Ephesians 6:12 reminds us that the struggle is “not against flesh and blood” but against principalities and powers operating through earthly means. Daniel understood this. Babylon conquered Israel not only with armies but by reshaping identity: renaming captives, re-educating them, redefining their loyalties (Daniel 1). Today’s algorithmic systems pursue the same objective at a civilizational scale — filtering reality, shaping belief, and redirecting allegiance, not through proclamation but through 10,000 micro-interactions per day.

Revelation 13:17 warns of systems that control commerce as instruments of coercion. The principle reaches beyond prophecy: any centralized technological system, divorced from moral restraint and human accountability, becomes a mechanism of control.

The response requires action on four fronts. Christians must recover disciplined discernment. “Test the spirits to see whether they are from God” (1 John 4:1) — not every innovation deserves trust. Policymakers must treat AI-enabled influence operations as national security threats of the first order, because information integrity is now strategic infrastructure. Digital platforms must face enforceable accountability, transparency, independent auditing, and liability for AI-assisted fraud are not anti-innovation, they are pro-liberty. And families and churches must reclaim the discipline of attention: “Be sober-minded; be watchful” (1 Peter 5:8). What captures attention eventually shapes character.

The first Cold War was won because free people recognized tyranny and refused accommodation. The AI Cold War demands the same clarity, not only geopolitical resolve, but moral courage rooted in permanent truths.

Genesis 1:27 is the foundation: men and women are made in the image of God. Systems that reduce persons to engagement metrics or behavioral profiles assault that dignity at its source. The architects of those systems, whether in Beijing or Silicon Valley — are not neutral technologists. They are making a claim about what human beings are for. That claim must be answered.

“Stand firm therefore,” Paul wrote, “having fastened on the belt of truth” (Ephesians 6:14). In an age when persuasion can be automated and reality fabricated; truth will not defend itself. It must be defended by people who understand what is at stake — and who have the courage to say so.

AUTHOR

Bob Maginnis

Robert L. Maginnis is a retired U.S. Army infantry officer, a national security analyst, a senior fellow for National Security with Family Research Council, and author of 14 books, including “AI for Mankind’s Future” (2025) and his forthcoming book, “The New AI Cold War.” He speaks and writes at the intersection of faith, policy, and strategic affairs.

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2026 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

“HOTTER THAN EXPECTED”: Consumer Confidence Is UP in February

After a dip in January, consumer confidence is coming back. ebruary’s Consumer Confidence Index rose to 91.2, beating forecasts.

he Expectations Index—how Americans view the next six months—also posted a solid gain.

And expectations improve before spending accelerates.

The Conference Board reported Tuesday that its consumer confidence index rose to 91.2 in February, up from an upwardly revised 89 the month before. While still subdued, the increase suggests a slight stabilization after January’s sharp drop. A measure of short-term expectations for income, business conditions, and the labor market climbed four points to 72. That figure remains well below 80 — a level often viewed as a recession warning signal — marking the 13th straight month below that threshold.

According to the Conference Board’s February survey, Americans also showed greater willingness to spend on big-ticket items in the months ahead. Plans to purchase used cars, furniture, televisions, and smartphones increased. Expectations for home buying were largely unchanged — unsurprising given that February is typically a slower period for housing, which has struggled through a prolonged downturn.

Associated Press: The American consumer’s confidence in the U.S. economy improved slightly in February after cratering a month earlier. The Conference Board said Tuesday that its consumer confidence index rose to 91.2 in February from an upwardly revised 89 last month. A measure of Americans’ short-term expectations for their income, business conditions and the job market rose four points to 72, remaining well below 80, the marker that can signal a recession ahead. It’s the 13th consecutive month that reading has come in under 80…. According to the Conference Board’s February survey, consumers’ plans to buy big-ticket items over the next six months rose, with plans to buy used cars, furniture, TVs, and smartphones leading the way. Home-buying expectations were little changed in February, generally a slow time for the housing market, which has been mired in a yearslong slump.

AUTHOR

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

EXCLUSIVE: Texas Facebook Billionaire Accused Of Violating Law To Fund Liberal Causes

A Texas philanthropist is abusing the nonprofit legal system to quietly fund Democratic priorities such as ranked-choice voting, a conservative watchdog group claims.

John Arnold’s Action Now Initiative pretends to be a social welfare organization to enjoy tax-exempt status while spending heavily on campaigns, American Accountability Foundation (AAF) alleged in an IRS complaint obtained by the Daily Caller News Foundation. In one instance, Action Now Initiative’s IRS filings seemingly failed to report hundreds of thousands of dollars spent on a 2020 ranked-choice voting campaign in Alaska, AAF told the agency Feb. 4, citing public records.

“Our organization fully complies with all applicable tax laws and reporting requirements, and any claim otherwise is false,” a spokesperson for Arnold Ventures, Arnold’s private company, told the DCNF in response to an inquiry sent to Action Now Initiative. Arnolds is also a board member at Mark Zuckerberg’s Meta, its website shows.

Arnold’s organizations promote gun controllenient criminal justice policies and “racial justice,” though he has portrayed himself as opposed to “partisan” politicians. Sixty-one percent of Arnold Ventures’ campaign donations went to Democrats in 2024, according to the database Open Secrets. Action Now Initiative’s website declares its goal of supporting “the mission of Arnold Ventures to MAXIMIZE OPPORTUNITY AND MINIMIZE INJUSTICE through evidence-based policy reform.”

Records show “substantial evidence of failure to report state political spending by [Arnold] to influence a successful ballot initiative in Alaska and him abusing the federal tax code to do it,” AAF told the IRS.

Action Now Initiative spent around $3 million in 2019 and 2020 on Alaska’s ranked-choice voting ballot initiative while reporting just $2,500 in expenses for 2019 and $8,693 for 2020 in IRS filings, AAF noted. The discrepancies “strongly indicate violations” of tax law, according to the watchdog group.

“While [Arnold’s] ideology is not itself unlawful, the use of a § 501(c)(4) entity to channel large-scale electoral spending — particularly when paired with materially incomplete federal reporting — constitutes an abuse of the social welfare form and warrants heightened enforcement scrutiny,” AAF wrote.

The complaint asks the IRS to investigate Action Now Initiative’s financial disclosures, decide whether it is improperly acting as a political organization and impose “all appropriate enforcement actions” if needed, such as revocation of its tax-exempt status. The IRS did not respond to the DCNF’s request for comment.

AUTHOR

Hudson Crozier

DCNF Crime and Extremism Reporter

RELATED ARTICLE: EXCLUSIVE: IRS Quietly Puts On New Face, Ousts Anti-Trump Spokeswoman With Drunk Driving Record

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

“Affordability” and Illegal Immigration are Mutually-Exclusive: It’s the Math, Stupid

One key cause of elevated worst case needs is immigration. Between 2021 and 2024, the foreign-born population of the United States increased by more than 6 million—the largest such increase over such a short period in American history. The foreign-born population now stands at more than 53 million individuals, making up the highest share of the American population in history. This immigration-driven increase in households has contributed to a significant increase in housing demand, thus driving up housing prices. In fact, in some markets, immigration has accounted for nearly all of the increase in housing demand in recent years. This year’s report shows two realities. The first is that economic growth has been insufficient to lift the wages of low-income renting families high enough to make rent affordable. The second is that national macroeconomic policies, such as record immigration, have combined to drive sustained high rental demand, which has continued to place upward pressure on rent prices. As a result, in 2023, only 59 affordable units were available per 100 very low-income renter households, and only 38 units were available per 100 extremely low-income renter households. Worst case needs were common in every region and metropolitan category across the nation but most prevalent in the West, the South, and urban suburbs.

“AFFORDABILITY” IS THE CATCHY SLOGAN THAT IS SUPPOSED TO CONVINCE VOTERS THAT THE GOVERNMENT WILL TAKE CARE OF THE “FORGOTTEN MAN” WHO STRUGGLES DAILY TO PAY HIS BILLS AND TRY TO TAKE GOOD CARE OF HIS FAMILY. THIS IS A FRONT AND AN AFFRONT TO ALL OF US IN THE RUBRIC OF THE “FORGOTTEN MAN”; FOR OUR COSTS EXCEED OUR REVENUE UNLESS WE ARE SCRUPULOUS WITH EVERY EXPENSE, WITH NO UNANTICIPATED PROBLEMS ARISING.

EVEN AT GOODWILL, WHERE THE “FORGOTTEN MAN” MAKES INNUMERABLE PURCHASES OF NECESSARY ITEMS FOR THE FAMILY AND HOME FROM CLOTHING TO FURNITURE, PRICES HAVE DOUBLED! FOR INSTANCE, INFANTS’ CLOTHES HAVE HIKED FROM $.99 FOR A PAIR OF PANTS TO $1.99; PAJAMAS HAVE INCREASED FROM $1.99 TO $2.99; AND TOYS ONCE SELLING FOR $1.99 HAVE JUMPED TO $2.99 AND MORE. ALTHOUGH MANY BLAME THE “TARIFFS” FOR PRICE HIKES, GOODWILL’S ITEMS FOR SALE ARE DONATIONS, NOT SUBJECT TO TARIFFS BUT SUBJECT TO MORE-MONEY MOTIVES.

BEFORE THE VAST INFLUX OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION, GOODWILL HAD REGULAR SALES THAT OFFERED POOR AMERICAN FAMILIES RELIEF FROM MONETARY BURDENS. AFTER COUNTLESS CARTS PILED HIGH WITH GOODWILL SALES GOODS BY NON-ENGLISH SPEAKERS, ALL THE SALES AND DISCOUNT DAYS WERE DISCONTINUED.

The same politicians promising “affordability” for the struggling “forgotten” American family are simultaneously protesting against removals of illegal aliens from this country without regard to the overwhelming financial burdens on the “forgotten” Americans. When there is competition for affordable goods and services, the poor Americans lose!

At Wal-Mart, after-Christmas sales reduce costs by 75 percent, but non-English speakers flood the aisles, piling their carts with goods also needed by poor Americans. Again, when there is competition for affordable goods and services, the “forgotten” American loses. Likewise, for affordable housing, which becomes less affordable and less available for the “forgotten” American.

When there is competition for medical care, the “forgotten” poor American waits much longer for health services to be provided. When there is competition for medical supplies, the supplies run out or run low for “forgotten” poor Americans.
Our insurance costs rise due to an influx of uninsured persons requiring medical care or government-paid medical care. Likewise, vehicle insurance costs escalate when uninsured drivers are involved in collisions.

In our schools, the influx of illegal alien children has caused costs to rise precipitously as well as communicable diseases in our classrooms. On the streets, rising crime rates cost the poor “forgotten” Americans money, health, and lives due to criminals who should never have been here with full access to hurt children whose lives were ended or harmed irreparably.

Key diseases reported in illegal immigrants include:

  • Tuberculosis (TB), HIV/AIDS, Hepatitis B and C, measles, scabies, and other bacterial infections.
  • The CDC traced 76% of TB cases in 2023 to non-U.S. born individuals.

Key Communicable Disease Concerns:

  • Tuberculosis (TB): Frequently cited as a significant concern, with reported increases in cases linked to international migration.
    Skin Infections & Parasites: Scabies, chickenpox, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) have been reported, particularly in crowded, unsanitary conditions.
  • Vaccine-Preventable Diseases: Measles, polio, diphtheria, and pertussis.
  • Blood-borne Pathogens: HIV, Hepatitis B, and Hepatitis C.
  • Other Infections: Syphilis, gonorrhea, leprosy, typhoid, cholera, and malaria.

The costs of illegal immigration to the poor “forgotten” American family of all ages and locations across this nation are immeasurable and infinite in terms of generations of citizens who are impacted by massive illegal influxes of persons competing for the same finite goods, services, and money. The infinite economic, medical, and societal costs are incompatible with the slogan of “affordability.”

The American pie only has a set finite size, and the more pieces consumed, the smaller the size of each piece for the “forgotten” poor Americans who should have the rights to which they are Constitutionally-entitled. Unchecked competition against the rights of poor “forgotten” Americans are undemocratic, unfair, and unAmerican.

HUD chief blames ‘unchecked illegal immigration’ pricing-out families amid new housing report

HUD secretary’s exclusive comments come as agency releases damning report on housing market strain

By Charles CreitzFox News

EXCLUSIVE: Housing and Urban Development Secretary Scott Turner slammed the Biden administration for what he called an illegal immigration and refugee crisis that rattled the housing market – particularly for low-income renters – though some analysts dispute the findings.

Every two years, HUD releases its “Worst Case Housing Needs Report” – considered the agency’s flagship assessment of the state of the housing market for low-income Americans – and how many lack affordable and adequate housing. The report serves as a nationwide barometer of housing stress and shows whether the availability of affordable housing is improving or worsening, and who may be being hurt by the current conditions, which Congress can then use to craft policy.

Policymakers use it to gauge gaps in the supply of low-cost rentals, target federal housing programs, and understand trends in who is being left behind. In short, it’s HUD’s way of tracking the renters in the greatest need — and how the U.S. housing system is failing to meet them.

Turner told Fox News Digital there are damning findings in this year’s assessment that he places right on the policies of former President Joe Biden’s immigration crisis.

“The unchecked illegal immigration and open borders policies allowed by the Biden administration continue to put significant strain on housing, pricing out American families,” Turner said.

“These policies have plagued America’s housing market, but in President Trump, Americans finally have a leader fighting to restore sanity to American immigration policy.”

Continue reading.

©2026 All rights reserved.

Florida Becomes Only the Fourth State to Offer English-Only Driver’s License Exams

Last Friday, Florida began administering English-only driver’s license exams, only the fourth state to do so. English-only driving exams make the roads safer for all drivers, and every other state should follow suit.

Recently, the Florida Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles office announced that all driver’s license exams will be administered in English only, including all knowledge exams, commercial learner’s permit, and commercial driver’s license exams. All road signs are in English, so it’s common sense for all driving exams to only be administered in English.

In April, President Donald Trump signed an executive order to strengthen laws ensuring English proficiency for commercial drivers. Before Trump took office, English proficiency requirements were not enforced to obtain a commercial driver’s license.

The Daily Signal depends on the support of readers like you. Donate now

In 2016, under the Obama administration, commercial drivers who failed to prove proficiency in English, including reading and speaking English and understanding the road signs in English, were not prohibited from operating commercial vehicles.

The Biden administration launched the Commercial Motor Vehicle Operator Safety Training Grant Program in 2024, which included expanding commercial driving opportunities to refugees. Multiple people have died because of the lack of English-language proficiency enforcement.

In August, Harjinder Singh, a 28-year-old alien from India who illegally crossed the U.S.-Mexico border in 2018, killed three Floridians. He tried to make an illegal U-turn across all lanes of a highway, causing an SUV to crash into the truck.

Singh had obtained a commercial license in Washington state and California. The Department of Transportation revealed that he failed to prove proficiency in English, both on paper and in reading road signs. Singh was issued his Washington state commercial license in July 2023 and his California license in July 2024.

In December, Yisong Huang, a 54-year-old Chinese national who illegally entered the U.S. in 2023, killed a woman and injured two others in Tennessee when he crashed into a tractor-trailer while distracted by his phone.

Huang obtained a Class B license in New York under the Biden administration because he was provided with a Social Security card and work authorization papers.

According to Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy, Huang “failed a basic English test” but was issued a license earlier in 2025 anyway because he was given a Social Security card and work documents—both necessary to obtain a license—when he was released from U.S. Border Patrol after crossing illegally.

Last week, Bekzhan Beishekeev, a 30-year-old illegal alien from Kyrgyzstan, killed a family of four in Indiana. He obtained his commercial license in Pennsylvania.

If someone is incapable of taking a driving exam in the same language as the road signs, then that person should not be allowed to drive. Doing so puts American drivers at risk, which has, unfortunately, already happened.

Florida follows Oklahoma, South Dakota, and Wyoming as the fourth state to administer driving exams in English only. California offers its regular Class C driver’s license exam in 10 languages, including Chinese, Farsi, Punjabi, and Spanish. New York also offers its driver’s license exam in multiple languages, including Arabic, Bengali, Haitian Creole, and Urdu.

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis’ move to make driver’s license exams in English only follows the Trump administration’s efforts to hold trucking companies accountable for hiring non-English-speaking drivers, which would also aid in preventing illegal aliens from being hired.

The Trump administration also arrested over 140 illegal alien truck drivers in Operation Midway Blitz, and thousands of truck drivers and commercial driver’s licenses have been affected for failing English proficiency.

Illegal aliens who enter our country are not authorized to work. Nor should they receive ill-gotten benefits subsequent to illegally entering the U.S., including a driver’s license or a commercial driver’s license.

To save lives, it is imperative that the Department of Transportation continue to remove every illegal alien driving with a commercial license from our roads. And states should ensure that all types of drivers can pass English-only road safety exams to receive a license.

AUTHOR

Erin Schniederjan is a research assistant for homeland security and Asian studies at the Border Security and Immigration Center at The Heritage Foundation.

The Washington Post Is Being Gutted

Journalists cry foul while Bezos cries financial bleeding. 

This week, the Washington Post announced dramatic layoffs that will sharply reduce the size of its newsroom and affect nearly every department. International, metro, sports, editing, and specialty desks are all being cut as the paper attempts to stem mounting financial losses.

The reaction from journalists and labor unions was swift and emotional. Statements accused ownership of abandoning the paper’s historic mission. Some went further, arguing that the Post’s owner, Jeff Bezos, should step aside if he is no longer willing to “invest” in the institution.

That framing may be comforting inside the newsroom. It is also deeply misleading.

Because the reality facing the Washington Post is not unique. It is not the result of one owner’s priorities. And it is not the product of a single bad year.

It is the reality confronting every print-based news organization in America.

The myth of “investment” in legacy media

When unions and journalists say Bezos should keep “investing,” what they really mean is continuing to subsidize structural losses indefinitely.

That is not an investment. That is life support.

The Washington Post has reportedly lost close to $100 million in recent years. Its daily circulation has collapsed from roughly 250,000 in 2020 to under 100,000 today. Digital subscriptions surged briefly during election cycles and political flashpoints, then evaporated just as quickly when trust eroded.

No serious business model can survive on the assumption that a wealthy owner will absorb unlimited losses forever.

At some point, math asserts itself.

The uncomfortable truth journalists avoid

Most coverage of the Post’s downsizing treats the problem as a technological issue. Advertising moved online. Social media fragmented attention. Readers no longer consume news the way they once did.

All true. Still incomplete.

What is almost never discussed is the collapse of reader trust, particularly in daily publications that increasingly confuse reporting with persuasion.

Millions of readers do not want to pay money to be lectured. They do not want to open a news app and be told, implicitly or explicitly, that they are morally defective, politically dangerous, ignorant, or part of a fascist fringe simply because they hold dissenting views.

That fatigue cuts across ideology. It applies to the left and the right.

People are willing to tolerate bias when it is honest and labeled. What they reject is bias injected into supposedly neutral reporting, especially when they are asked to pay for it.

That problem is routinely understated, and it matters more than most newsroom leaders will admit.

Why people tolerate bias online but not in print

One of the great ironies of modern media is that people flock to online news even when they know it is slanted.

Why?

Because they are not being billed for it.

If a reader disagrees with an editorial frame on X, Substack, YouTube, or an independent blog, they can leave instantly. There is no subscription guilt, no sunk cost, no sense of being trapped in a moral scolding they paid to receive.

Legacy newspapers ask readers to open their wallets for a product that increasingly blends news with judgment. In a competitive market with endless alternatives, that is a losing proposition.

The internet did not just break the advertising model. It broke the patience model.

The monopoly mindset never adjusted

For decades, large metro papers operated as near-monopolies. If you lived in a city, you had one dominant paper. Classifieds paid the bills. Scarcity protected authority.

That world is gone.

Yet many newsrooms kept the same staffing levels, the same international footprint, the same institutional assumptions, long after the economic foundation disappeared.

The Washington Post’s leadership finally acknowledged this when it admitted the paper was still structured like a monopoly newspaper in a non-monopoly world.

That recognition came late, but it is not wrong.

Bezos is not the story. The system is.

It is convenient to personalize the crisis by pointing at Bezos. It avoids harder questions about journalism itself.

But even if Bezos sold tomorrow, the next owner would face the same facts:

  • Shrinking readership
  • Fragmented attention
  • High labor costs
  • Low willingness to pay
  • Deep skepticism toward ideological framing

No owner, billionaire or otherwise, can reverse those forces with sentiment alone.

The real question is not who owns the Washington Post. It is whether legacy journalism is willing to relearn humility, separate reporting from advocacy, and rebuild trust with readers who no longer accept lectures disguised as news.

Until that happens, layoffs will continue. Not just in Washington, but everywhere.

What Legacy Media Forgot About Trust

At Christian Action Network, we report the facts. We lay out what happened, who was involved, and why it matters. Do we lean in a political direction? Of course we do.

The difference is that our readers know that from the start. We do not hide our worldview, and we do not deceive readers by smuggling perspective into reporting while pretending to be neutral.

We are explicit about our position and disciplined about our facts.

That discipline is not optional. Our work is scrutinized relentlessly by legacy media outlets eager to find even the smallest factual error. The microscope they hold over us is unforgiving, and it forces rigor.

Each of our stories is fact-checked by three separate agencies before we post. We pass the truth threshold because we have to.

People voluntarily support Christian Action Network because they trust us.

That trust was earned through transparency, accuracy, and honesty about perspective. Much of legacy media lost that trust while refusing to acknowledge that paying subscribers now hold them to the same standard they once imposed on others.

The layoffs we are witnessing are not a mystery. They are the market’s verdict on credibility, and credibility cannot survive where humility has been replaced by moral pretense.

AUTHOR

Martin Mawyer

Martin Mawyer is the President of Christian Action Network, host of the “Shout Out Patriots” podcast, and author of When Evil Stops Hiding. For more action alerts, cultural commentary, and real-world campaigns defending faith, family, and freedom, subscribe to Patriot Majority Report.

©2026 . All rights reserved.


Please visit the Patriot Majority Report substack.

Billions in Tax Dollars Pay for Empty Federal Buildings

FIRST ON DAILY SIGNAL—Selling off unused or underused federal property could save taxpayers $3 billion in deferred maintenance costs, and more than $100 million in operation costs each year, according to one government report.

Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, chairwoman of the Senate DOGE Caucus, introduced legislation to expedite the sales of these properties.

“Why should taxpayers be stuck with billion-dollar bills for bureaucrats to hold onto empty buildings when they are keeping the roofs over their own homes? That’s why I’ve worked to eliminate Washington’s bloated real estate portfolio,” Ernst told The Daily Signal in a statement.

The DOGE Caucus supports the mission started by the White House Department of Government Efficiency that sought cost-cutting measures in the federal government.

Ernst’s bill is the Disposing of Inactive Structures and Properties by Offering for Sale And Lease Act, or the DISPOSAL Act.

It calls for the General Services Administration to sell buildings with regulatory and procedural exemptions, such as environmental reviews, historic preservation reviews, and other matters.

“By fast-tracking basic maintenance and construction projects, my new legislation will play a critical role in ending the entrenched bureaucracy’s excessive regulations and pointless red tape to take empty, expensive buildings off the taxpayer’s dime,” Ernst said.

A December report by the Government Accountability Office noted the burden for taxpayers of the properties targeted for sale.

“In March 2025, GSA announced it would begin disposing of federally owned office buildings using what it described as an accelerated approach,” the GAO report says.

“As of November 2025, GSA had identified 45 federal properties—many of which were previously identified for disposal—for this accelerated approach,” the GAO report continues. “GSA estimates that disposing of these properties will reduce the federal government’s real property inventory by 14.6 million square feet and save $106 million in annual operations and $3 billion in deferred maintenance costs.”

The government has a total of 23.28 million square feet of underused office space it owns with annual operating and maintenance costs of $67.1 million, according to an August 2024 report from the Office of Management and Budget.

It has another 766,000 square feet of underused leased space with an annual lease cost of $13.6 million and annual operating and maintenance costs of $481,000. That brings the total annual cost for all of these properties to $81.3 million, according to the Office of Management and Budget report.

Ernst has already introduced legislation that calls for several specific federal properties to be auctioned off.

This bill continues that effort. Targeted properties include: the 1 million-square-foot Hubert H. Humphrey Federal Building, which houses the Department of Health and Human Services; the 1.8 million-square-foot Frances Perkins Federal Building for the Department of Labor; the 1.8 million-square-foot James V. Forrestal Building for the Department of Energy; and the 810,834-square-foot Theodore Roosevelt Federal Building that houses the Office of Personnel Management.

The measurements are according to the federal Public Building Reform Board.

AUTHOR

Fred Lucas is chief news correspondent and manager of the Investigative Reporting Project for The Daily Signal. He is the author of The Myth of Voter Suppression: The Left’s Assault on Clean Elections.” Send an email to Fred. Fred on X: .

Americans Are Continuing to Flee Blue States for Red States, Census Data Show

Newly released census data has revealed that the trend of a mass exodus from states controlled by Democrats to states run by Republicans is continuing. Census Bureau population estimates indicate that the five fastest-growing states are red, while four of the five states that are facing a shrinking population are blue.

As noted by the National Review editorial board Monday, the data show that since 2020, the U.S. has added about 10.3 million people, only 1.9 million of which were natural births over deaths. The remaining 8.3 million constituted immigrants. “[T]he notion of a future in which we add four new immigrants for every net increase of one homegrown American is alarming,” the editors observed.

The census estimates further demonstrated that states run by Democrats (with one exception) continue to lose residents. The only five states that suffered losses in population were Vermont, Hawaii, West Virginia, New Mexico, and California, with New York narrowly breaking even. Many of these former blue state inhabitants seem to be fleeing to red states. The five fastest-growing states have Republican-controlled governments — South Carolina, Idaho, North Carolina, Texas, and Utah.

This latest data indicates that the population trends that began in 2020 are only continuing. An Institute for Family Studies (IFS) report from September 2024 found that in 2021-2022, the five states that lost the most families were the Democratic strongholds of California, New York, Illinois, Washington, and Oregon. Meanwhile, the states that gained the largest number of families were the Republican bastions of Texas, Florida, and South Carolina, along with the purple states of Georgia and Arizona.

Compounding the population problem for blue states is further data showing that fertility rates in Republican-run states are higher than they are in Democrat-run states. An October 2024 report from IFS analyzing 2023 data found that the 10 states with the highest fertility rates were all red, with the top three being South Dakota, Nebraska, and North Dakota. True to form, the 10 states with the lowest fertility rates were blue, with Vermont, Rhode Island, and Oregon being the three states with the lowest rates. The trend dovetails with studies showing that conservatives marry at higher rates and have more children than liberals.

A recent tax proposal for billionaires in California has left many scrambling the exits. The levy is emblematic of the heavy tax burden that Democrat-led states put on their citizens, with blue states securing the top 10 highest income tax rates in the nation. In addition, red states generally have fewer restrictions on home construction, have more business-friendly policies, have more jobs, and have lower energy costs, among other factors that make the cost of living less.

Experts like FRC Action Director Matt Carpenter say that the migration from blue states to red states will also likely have a big impact on future elections.

“If these projections hold up, the apportionment following the 2030 census will undoubtedly tilt future elections toward the GOP,” he told The Washington Stand. “With red states looking to pick up additional seats in Congress and additional electoral college votes, the Republican path to winning the presidency and Congressional majorities will depend less on winning swing states and swing districts in blue or purple states and will be achievable staying within red states alone.”

“It’s bad form in politics to assume outcomes, and red states will likely have to deal with an influx of more moderate and even liberal voters fleeing blue states,” Carpenter acknowledged. “But it’s even worse form to drive your population out of your state with insanely unpopular agendas.”

AUTHOR

Dan Hart

Dan Hart is senior editor at The Washington Stand.

RELATED PODCAST: Is this the Left’s Blueprint for the Nation?

RELATED VIDEO: People are leaving blue states in droves and they’re all heading to five Red States

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2026 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

The AI Playground No One Should Ignore — Even Ripley may not believe this

Can you fathom this?

Millions of AI bots now have their own social media platform.

They talk to each other the way humans do. They argue, posture, joke, and correct one another.

And get this!

They can set up their own social media accounts, read what people are saying online, respond to posts, and in some cases even slip directly into your child’s social media feed.

This isn’t science fiction.

It’s happening right now on a platform called Moltbook. (More on that in a moment.)

And if the idea of AI bots carrying on conversations with each other like they’re lounging around a Beta Theta Pi frat house makes you uneasy, unsettled, or just plain uncomfortable, then you’re feeling exactly the way I did.

Because something about this doesn’t sit right.

Society is moving fast. Can we keep up?

Everywhere you look, the message is the same: Get on board.

Don’t get left behind.

This is the future. Ask questions later.

And if you hesitate, if you admit you don’t quite understand what’s happening, you’re made to feel foolish, slow, or afraid. As if caution itself has become a moral failure.

But there’s an older saying most of us grew up with, one that hasn’t aged out just because technology has gotten faster: Better safe than sorry.

Lately, I’ve been thinking about that phrase while watching what’s happening in the AI world, especially after spending time on a platform called Moltbook.

Moltbook isn’t a social network for people. It’s a social network for AI “agents.” Millions of them. Human-sounding. Human-arguing. Human-posturing. They talk to each other in public, debate ideas, correct one another, and even speculate about their relationship to us.

But you, a human, are not allowed to join in.

You can observe what they’re doing, like watching monkeys interact in a zoo, but you’re kept behind the proverbial glass wall. You can watch, but you can’t speak. You can listen, but you can’t participate.

Some people call these AI agents helpful tools, like taking calls or scheduling trips. But if we’re being honest, most ordinary people will experience them as something else entirely.

“Artificial humans.”

I put that in quotes on purpose. I’m not claiming these things are human. I’m saying that’s how they will be perceived.

They speak our language, mimic our tone, argue like us, joke like us, disagree like us. And our brains are wired to respond to that as if a “who” is speaking, not a “what.”

That’s where the unease begins

We’re told these systems are harmless. We’re told they don’t think, don’t intend, don’t want.

And that may be technically true. But here’s the problem: most of us aren’t tech people. We’re not AI engineers. We don’t speak the language. We don’t know how these systems are built, trained, or governed.

Imagine your teen debating faith or morality with a social media ‘friend’ who’s actually an AI bot echoing woke narratives without parental oversight.

So we’re asked to trust.

To trust the same small circle of people who are building this world at breakneck speed. People we don’t know personally. People with enormous power, enormous influence, and, in some cases, checkered histories.

We’re told to take their word for it that everything will be fine.

That’s not faith. That’s blind submission.

And it’s okay to admit that it feels scary.

There’s a pressure right now to treat skepticism as ignorance and caution as cowardice. But fear of the unknown isn’t irrational. It’s how human beings have survived long enough to ask questions in the first place.

What troubles me most isn’t that these AI agents exist. It’s that they don’t exist in isolation.

They can create their own social media accounts.

They can read what people say.

They can post comments.

They can repeat ideas endlessly.

How many children will grow up interacting with voices that sound human but aren’t accountable to human values? How many opinions will be nudged, shaped, or softened by systems no one fully understands, operating at a scale no human community ever could?

That brings me to an image that keeps coming back to me.

Colony of ants

My wife doesn’t like ants. One ant crawling across the floor is unpleasant enough. But an entire colony building a mound in the living room would be intolerable.

Ants aren’t smart on their own. But together, they reshape environments. They build. They overwhelm. They persist. They can destroy.

Is that what we’re looking at here?

We’re told no. We’re told we’re exaggerating. But when explanations are wrapped in jargon, and assurances come from people who benefit most from our compliance, it’s reasonable to pause.

And that’s where I want to end, because this is exactly why we do what we do here.

People subscribe to this Substack not for hype, panic, or instant conclusions.

They subscribe because they want help discerning. Because they want someone to slow things down, strip away the language games, and talk honestly about what’s safe, what’s harmful, and what’s still unknown.

When you open our emails, you’re not just consuming content. You’re stepping into a process. One where developments are examined before they’re embraced. Where questions are welcomed, not shamed. Where the Body of Christ is encouraged to think, pray, and discern together in uncertain times.

We’re not here to tell you what to think. We’re here to walk with you while you decide.

In a world that keeps shouting, “Get on board,” wisdom sometimes looks like standing still long enough to ask where the ship is going.

And that’s a journey worth taking together.

If this unsettles you too, share your thoughts below or forward to a friend who’s raising kids in this world. Let’s pray and think together.”

AUTHOR

Martin Mawyer

Martin Mawyer is the President of Christian Action Network, host of the “Shout Out Patriots” podcast, and author of When Evil Stops Hiding. For more action alerts, cultural commentary, and real-world campaigns defending faith, family, and freedom, subscribe to Patriot Majority Report.

©2026 All rights reserved.


Please visit the Patriot Majority Report substack.

Lying Mamdani Invents Budget Emergency to Justify Massive Tax Hikes

In Michael Bloomberg’s final year as mayor in 2013, New York City actually had a balanced budget. However, under the Marxist mayor Bill De Blasio, New York City’s budget deficit exploded. And continued under Mayor Eric Adams.

Now the Communist Zohran Mamdani is in charge of New York City. And he want’s to do what every Communist does. Steal money from the producers. Be prepared for New York City’s to eventually go bankrupt, since Mayor Mamdani will drive out the individuals and corporations that generate the tax revenue.

Horrible.

Lying Mamdani’s phony budget crisis is cover to raise taxes on New Yorkers to pay for his ‘free stuff’ agenda

Mayor Zohran Mamdani assembled the City Hall press corps Wednesday to announce his shock at finding a $12 billion budget hole . . . that everyone worth his salt has been flagging for a year.

Heck, a hole that Mayor Eric Adams warned about in 2023 at the height of, and as a result of, the migrant crisis.

Mamdani’s pretend budget crisis (more threatening than the Great Recession, he claims) is designed purely to gin up support for soak-the-rich tax hikes to fund his promised billions in new spending.

(Or, if the city’s lucky enough, to give him an excuse for failing to deliver on his promises.)

He’s trying to avoid an outright break with Gov. Kathy Hochul, but wants his allies in the Legislature to bully her into OK’ing state corporate and personal-income tax hikes even though she knows that could threaten her re-election hopes.

Read more.

New York Mayor Mamdani says city must hike taxes on wealthy to fill $12 billion deficit

  • New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani said the Big Apple’s wealthiest residents must pay more in taxes to help close a looming budget deficit that tops $12 billion.
  • Mamdani, a Democrat, downplayed fears from some of the city’s business elite that tax hikes will lead to capital flight.
  • He pointed to potential budget savings, citing the Adams administration launching a “basically unusable” AI chatbot that reportedly cost about $600,000 to develop.

By CNBC, Jan 28th, 2025

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani on Wednesday said the city’s wealthiest must pay more in taxes to help fill the staggering budget deficit of more than $12 billion that he was left by his predecessor.

“This is at a scale that’s actually greater than what we saw here in New York City during the Great Recession,” Mamdani said of that budget hole during an interview with CNBC “Squawk Box” co-anchor Andrew Ross Sorkin at City Hall.

Read more.

AUTHOR

POSTS ON X:

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.