Hillary Clinton Claims Florida ‘Isn’t Safe’ for Black or LGBT People

/in , , , , , , , , /by

Twice-failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton tweeted on Tuesday that Florida “isn’t safe” for black or LGBT people following the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) issuing a travel advisory for the state claiming ludicrously that “Florida is openly hostile toward African Americans, people of color and LGBTQ+ individuals.”

“Ron DeSantis’s ultra-MAGA Florida isn’t safe for people of color, LGBTQ+ people, or even multi-billion dollar corporations,” Hillary wrote, providing screenshot images of articles detailing the travel advisory, as well as Gov. Ron DeSantis’s ongoing battle with Disney.

DeSantis recently signed a series of anti-groomer bills passed by the legislature, designed to protect children from the radical woke transgender agenda continually pushed by the far-left.

“Before traveling to Florida, please understand that the state of Florida devalues and marginalizes the contributions of, and the challenges faced by African Americans and other communities of color,” reads the NAACP travel advisory. Ironically, organization’s chairman Leon W. Russell lives in Florida.

“True leadership is being willing to do what you ask others to do… time to step up and MOVE. If you think our state is so bad, the @FloridaGOP will help with moving costs,” Republican Party of Florida Chairman Christian Ziegler said.

Hillary Rodham Clinton

291 Known Connections

Clinton Was Willing to Accept a Massive Foreign Donation to Her Foundation, from a Source Notorious for Its Human Rights Abuses

In a January 18, 2015 email to John Podesta and Robby Mook, Huma Abedin wrote that the King of Morocco – a nation where human rights abuses were widespread – had agreed to give the Clinton Foundation $12 million in exchange for a meeting with Hillary; this occurred 6 months before Morocco acquired weapons from the United states. Wrote Abedin: “Just to give you some context, the condition upon which the Moroccans agreed to host the meeting was her participation. If hrc [Hillary Rodham Clinton] was not part if it, meeting was a non-starter. CGI [Clinton Global Initiative] also wasn’t pushing for a meeting in Morocco and it wasn’t their first choice. This was HRC’s idea, our office approached the Moroccans and they 100 percent believe they are doing this at her request. The King has personally committed approx $12 million both for the endowment and to support the meeting. It will break a lot of china to back out now when we had so many opportunities to do it in the past few months. She created this mess and she knows it.”

To learn more about Hillary Clinton, click here.

RELATED ARTICLES:

AOC heckled, booed as NYC town hall descends into chaos

Florida Black Owner Destroys NAACP’s Recent Travel Advisory

‘Genderfluid’ Former Biden Official to Be Held in Men’s Jail

L.A. DA Gascón Has 10,000-Case Backlog as ‘No Cash Bail’ Returns

Hochul Touts Illegal Immigration as Victory for Corporate Interests

Adams Asks Court to Suspend NYC’s ‘Right to Shelter’ Rule Amid Migrant Crisis

EDITORS NOTE: This Discover the Networks column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Exiled Cuban Journalist: ‘Socialism Is Institutionalized Envy’

/in , , , , , , , , /by

Approximately 36% of young Americans, ages 18 to 22, hold a positive view of socialism. However, for exiled Cuban journalist Yoe Suárez, this positive view of socialism is not based on reality. On a recent episode of the Outstanding podcast hosted by Joseph Backholm, Suárez and Washington Stand Editor-in-Chief Jared Bridges discuss their firsthand experiences with socialism and its wide-ranging consequences.

“The first time I ate a tangerine in years was here in [the] USA,” Suárez said. “It’s amazing because Cuba is a tropical island, you know? It should have fruits there. That’s an image that can maybe portray what’s happening in Cuba.” Suárez went on to discuss the various crises Cubans endure, including blackouts, inaccessible medicine, and a lack of necessities like food and milk for families. When Backholm asked Suárez what the government’s objective was, he replied, “The principal goal is political control. And then they have to build a narrative of goodness behind that.”

Bridges shared his experience living under a socialist government in Minsk, Belarus. “At the time, the things I ran into was just seeing how that system for that long a time oppressed people,” he said. He discussed his inability to find prescribed medicine after going to seven different pharmacies. “To put it in perspective today, here in America, I’ll go to the drug store and get upset if I have to wait 15 minutes.” Bridges further noted that his experience shed light on how, rather than everyone being equal in their belongings and opportunities under socialism, people are stripped of basic needs including medicine. “What became evident to me was that something is not what it says it is,” Bridges stated.

Backholm wondered how to change the phenomenon happening “here in the United States where you have a growing number of young people who actually seem enthusiastic about socialism,” with Bridges adding how this enthusiasm takes place amongst Christians as well.

“The saddest thing is that socialism takes a lot from envy,” Suárez said. People want what they can’t have, and, for Suárez, socialism feeds the flame of envy toward those who have more. “Socialism is institutionalized envy. It’s that. Socialism is just that.” He went on to observe that the fundamental issue is when too much power is centralized in one place. Sharing is good, but it must come from a place of voluntary charity. As Suárez stated, “If it’s voluntary, it’s charity. And charity is good.” But as Backholm added, “Compelled generosity is not generosity, it is theft. It is totalitarian. It is robbery.”

Backholm further pointed out how our sinful nature, whether living under capitalism or socialism, leads to the exploitation of others and often manifests into greed. “If our hearts are unregulated, we will take advantage of other people to our own benefit,” Backholm stated. “What a biblical worldview argues for is a decentralization of power. … The free marketplace, by nature, decentralizes power.” In response, Bridges reflected on how a free market society also gives us the ability to speak out.

When the discussion turned to equality, it was noted that the desire for ultimate equality does not have an end because nothing will ever be enough to satisfy. Suárez, for instance, was kicked out of his home country for speaking out against socialism. As Bridges pointed out, this socialist view of equality does not lead to actual equality, but rather a totalitarian sense of political control where the government tells you what you can and cannot do with your goods, needs, and opinions.

For Backholm, Suárez, and Bridges, the ability to distinguish between voluntary charity and compelled generosity is the difference between socialism and capitalism. Neither is without flaw, but as Suárez stated, “The solution to a headache is not cancer.”

AUTHOR

Sarah Holliday

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2023 Family Research Council.

The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

‘They’re Forced to Celebrate It’: Parents of Girls Losing to Boys Speak Out

/in , , , , , , , , /by

“How do you not understand that’s unfair?” It’s a question parents across the country are asking, as more and more of their daughters watch everything they train for vanish. For moms and dads at California’s CIF-North Coast Section Meet, the outrage reverberated across the stands. They watched as Adeline Johnson, an 18-year-old senior, was eliminated from the state track and field championships — all because a biological boy decided to compete as a girl. “There’s no way this should be allowed,” one parent fumed. And yet, if Joe Biden has his way, it will be the future of sports for every girl in America.

Until recently, the boy named Athena Ryan competed in men’s cross country, finishing a distant 63rd in the 2021 men’s 5,000 meters. But this past weekend, running as a girl, he placed second in the 1,600 — knocking real women down or off the podium. After the race, Ryan told reporters he wasn’t “expecting” to run as well as he did. “I dropped like 17 seconds on my season’s best in the past two weeks,” he bragged. “I was just coming here trying to break 5 — just glad I finished it out.”

People in the stands watched as Ryan blew past runners in the backfield toward the end of the race. “You either think that he is holding back,” a parent said, “or it’s his lactic threshold — which means he can access energy in the final part of the race. Girls can’t do that,” the spectator continued. “There is a physical way in which they race. Having a boy in there just throws off the mechanics of the race.”

To the families who’ve helped their daughters train and shuttled them back and forth to meets, the whole sport is becoming a sham. “I 100% percent empathize with the need to belong and the desire to compete,” another anonymous parent said. “[But] you have to understand how hard these girls work to do this.”

Johnson, who will watch Ryan take her place at the state finals later this spring, went viral for giving a subtle thumbs-down during the medal ceremony for her race. To some parents, that was a bold gesture since the girls have been advised to ignore the unfairness of it all and smile along.

“It’s heartbreaking to see what happens to these kids and how scared they are to even show the slightest bit of body language that might indicate they aren’t happy with it,” a family member told The Daily Caller. “They’re, like, forced to celebrate it.”

Worse, that protocol seems to extend to parents, who explain, “We have all been advised that we are not protected. As a family, anything we say falls under the student code of conduct [which demands conformity to the trans agenda]. If we don’t follow the guidelines, then it is considered bullying.” And since “they can’t protect our girls from being disqualified,” it makes sense “why no one wants to speak out.”

“Everybody is too terrified to challenge it. There is the fear of what will happen, what will be taken away, and if you won’t be allowed to race — or if you’ll be canceled.”

Even spectators were silenced, after security decided to remove a group of protestors holding a long banner that read, “Protect Female Sports.” The video, which got plenty of attention on social media, shows the group being confronted by another woman, who calls their sign “disgusting” and “offensive.” For others, however, the escort out of the stadium was a moment of clarity. “Many parents were completely unaware there was a boy competing in girls’ races,” the Independent Council on Women’s Sports (ICONS) explained.

And not just one boy, as former University of Kentucky swimmer and Title IX advocate Riley Gaines pointed out. A “2nd trans-identifying male, Lorelei Barrett is headed to the @CIFState CA track championships next weekend,” she tweeted. “Along with male Athena Ryan, he’s also qualified in the ‘Girls 1600m’ race. Barrett had qualified for the girls state cross country championships last fall …”

Meanwhile, the Biden administration is continuing its obsession on erasing women with a new rule that would wipe away state protections for girls’ sports. Now that public comments have been collected, it’s only a matter of time before Title IX is effectively wiped away.

This, critics say, despite a resurfaced study from the federal government’s own National Institutes of Health which found that biological boys are “faster, stronger, fitter” after taking female hormones.

“A major review quietly re-shared by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) last August suggests that early exposure to testosterone means trans women possess at least eight physical and mental attributes that could give them an advantage in sports — even if they make the change relatively early.

“Findings showed trans women had greater muscle mass and bone density, which aid strength, power and durability, plus bigger lungs and higher oxygen levels, which help with endurance, as well as increased connections in the brain responsible for spatial awareness, which could help with agility.”

In other words, Family Research Council’s Meg Kilgannon says, “The Biden administration is further confusing and pressuring schools to adopt these policies, while acknowledging that boys and girls are different and boys have an advantage over girls in competitive sports.”

Parents need to understand, she told The Washington Stand, this isn’t just happening at public schools. “This story is an example of what can happen in private schools when decision-making authority is outsourced to sports’ governing bodies or academic associations. Some of the most woke schools in the country are exclusive prep schools [like Sonoma Academy where these athletes were from].”

There’s a lesson here for religious schools, Kilgannon urged: “Make sure your governing documents are sufficient to withstand an attack from within. Mary Hasson’s work at Person and Identity Project is a great example of the kinds of safeguards, programs, and professional development religious schools need to protect your children and your institution against this ideology.”

AUTHOR

Suzanne Bowdey

Suzanne Bowdey serves as editorial director and senior writer at The Washington Stand.

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2023 Family Research Council.

The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

Supreme Court Rolls Back Biden EPA’s Expansive Water Regulation

/in , , , , , , , , , , /by

The Supreme Court rolled back the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) authority to regulate under the Clean Water Act (CWA) in a unanimous decision Thursday.

Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency, brought by a couple prevented by the EPA from building a home on their own land near Priest Lake, Idaho because it contained wetlands, considered the scope of the agency’s “waters of the United States” (WOTUS) rule, which defines what “navigable waters” can be regulated under the CWA. Plaintiffs Chantell and Mike Sackett, who have spent 15 years fighting the agency’s rule in court, allege the EPA has overstepped the authority it was granted when Congress enacted the CWA in 1972—forcing them to stop construction on their land or face fines.

The Supreme Court sided with the Sacketts, determining their land is not covered under the text of the CWA, which gives the EPA authority to regulate “navigable waters.”

Justice Samuel Alito wrote in the majority opinion, which was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barett, that the EPA’s interpretation “provides little notice to landowners of their obligations under the CWA.” The Court held that the CWA applies to only wetlands that are “as a practical matter indistinguishable from waters of the United States,” maintaining a “continuous surface connection.”

Though justices were united in their judgement, they maintained disagreements on definitions. Justice Brett Kavanaugh, in an opinion concurring in judgement that was joined by Justices Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson, thought the majority went too far in its test for which wetlands are included.

“By narrowing the Act’s coverage of wetlands to only adjoining wetlands, the Court’s new test will leave some long-regulated adjacent wetlands no longer covered by the Clean Water Act, with significant repercussions for water quality and flood control throughout the United States,” he wrote.

Kagan similarly said in an opinion joined by Sotomayor and Jackson that the majority has appointed itself as “the national decision-maker on environmental policy” by choosing a test that “prevents the EPA from keeping our country’s waters clean by regulating adjacent wetlands.”

“The eight administrations since 1977 have maintained dramatically different views of how to regulate the environment, including under the Clean Water Act,” she wrote, noting some “promulgated very broad interpretations of adjacent wetlands.”

“Yet all of those eight different administrations have recognized as a matter of law that the Clean Water Act’s coverage of adjacent wetlands means more than adjoining wetlands and also includes wetlands separated from covered waters by man-made dikes or barriers, natural river berms, beach dunes, or the like,” she wrote. “That consistency in interpretation is strong confirmation of the ordinary meaning of adjacent wetlands.”

The decision likely means that the Biden administration will need to go back to the drawing board on its new WOTUS rule issued in January, which Republicans and some Democrats have criticized for placing a burden on landowners, ranchers and farmers while dramatically expanding the EPA’s authority. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell called it a “radical power grab that would give federal bureaucrats sweeping control over nearly every piece of land that touches a pothole, ditch, or puddle.”

In April, President Joe Biden vetoed a bipartisan bill to limit his administration’s WOTUS rule. Just days later, a federal court blocked the rule for 24 states that sued pending the Supreme Court’s decision.

“The Court’s ruling returns the scope of the Clean Water Act to its original and proper limits,” said Damien Schiff, a senior attorney at Pacific Legal Foundation who argued the case, in a statement. “Courts now have a clear measuring stick for fairness and consistency by federal regulators. Today’s ruling is a profound win for property rights and the constitutional separation of powers.”

AUTHOR

KATELYNN RICHARDSON

Contributor.

RELATED ARTICLE: Biden’s EPA Chief Says ‘Environmental Justice’ Is In Agency’s ‘DNA’

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

Watch as an Illegal Alien says, ‘F**k the people of the United States!’

/in , , , , , , , , , /by

Americans for Legal Immigration PAC (ALIPAC) posted the below video interview with illegal aliens and commentary. One illegal says, “F**k the people of the United States!”

WATCH:

Congress is considering raising the debt ceiling beyond the current obsene 32 trillion to give more money to Biden Harris to further wreck America!

Don’t believe the Democrat hype about turning off food stamps & social security checks, as that would not happen until 2024, nor never depending on how the money is handled.

You can help us today by calling every GOP lawmaker you can (Contact Info Here) to say…

“Shut Down the Biden Harris failed government! Demand Democrats stop the invasion before any debt deal.”

And you can share the political cartoon at the top of this email alert that says it all with ease by email and social media using the links we provide.

Special thanks to our ALIPAC supporters who are backing our renewed efforts on Twitter. Here is a video we spotted and shared this morning of an interview with an illegal alien invader who says “F (Bleep) the people of the US”

You can also see on our Twitter account that the illegal alien who rammed the White House barricades while sporting a nazi flag with a swastika on it has had his charges reduced. Please join, monitor, and share our content at…ttps://twitter.com/ALIPAC

Please visit ALIPAC.us often and post there, too to stay informed.

The ALIPAC Team

©2023. Americans for Legal Immigration PAC. All rights reserved.

 

 

The Media’s Latest ‘Book Ban’ Story Appears To Be Completely Unfounded

/in , , , , , , , , /by

Numerous major media outlets quickly seized on a story claiming that a Florida school had “banned” a poem, but according to a message sent to school parents and obtained by the Daily Caller News Foundation, the book is accessible to “all students.”

The Associated Press, USA Today, NPR, Politico, The New York Times, CNN and the Guardian ran headlines claiming a school within Miami-Dade County Public Schools (MDCPS) had “banned,” “block[ed]” and “restrict[ed] access” to “The Hill We Climb,” a poem read at President Joe Biden’s inauguration, after a parent complained it contained “hate messages.” However, it appears elementary school students can still access the book; MDCPS sent a letter Wednesday, obtained by the DCNF, that informed parents that though the poem had been moved from the elementary school section to the middle school section, the poem is still accessible to “all” students.

“Recently, there has been media coverage regarding one of the books in our collection entitled The Hill We Climb,” the message read. “This text was reviewed and placed in the middle grades area of our school media center. As an additional point of information, The Hill We Climb is classified as Young Adult in Titlewave by Follet and categorized as Middle Grades in Accelerated Reader. However, to be clear, even though The Hill We Climb is located in the middle grades area of our media center, it remains accessible to all students.”

Prior to the Wednesday statement, the school district clarified in a tweet Tuesday that the book had not been “banned” or “removed” from any schools.

Moreover, Ana Rhodes, a spokesperson for Miami-Dade County Public Schools, told The Washington Post that elementary school students must request the book from a media specialist and prove they read at a middle school level, but can otherwise access the text.

The origin of the news story appears to be a Miami Herald report, based on documents obtained by the Florida Freedom to Read Project, which said that elementary school students’ access to the poem was restricted.

Nowhere in the documents does it say that the poem was ever banned. Instead, the documents merely say that the poem was deemed “educational” and its vocabulary was “of value” for middle school students, and would be placed under the older age group’s section of the library. There does not appear to be any evidence for the assertion that the poem was ever banned.

Politico included the school district’s original tweet and issued a correction clarifying that the poem was not “outright banned.” USA Today wrote that the poem was now only available to middle school students, but included the school district’s original tweet.

The AP, which described the poem as “banned,” wrote that the poem had been placed on a “restricted list” and that the school district said the poem is available to middle school students.

The Guardian’s headline states that the poem was “ban[ned]” and that it “was removed for reading by elementary school children.”

The book was deemed more age-appropriate for older students after a parent of a student at Bob Graham Education Center, a K-8 school within the district, challenged the poem stating it was “not educational and have (sic) indirectly hate messages,” and would “cause confusion and indoctrinate students,” according to documents released by the the Florida Freedom to Read Project.

The parent challenged four additional books and poems, though the school district’s materials-review panel decided to not completely remove the material, a Florida Freedom to Read Project report stated.

“So they ban my book from young readers, confuse me with Oprah, fail to specify what parts of my poetry they object to, refuse to read any reviews, and offer no alternatives … Unnecessary book bans like these are on the rise, and we must fight back,” Amanda Gorman, the author of the poem, said in a tweet.

The Associated Press, USA Today, NPR, Politico, The New York Times and CNN did not immediately respond to the Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.

Editor’s note: This article has been updated to include comments a Miami-Dade County Public Schools spokesperson made to The Washington Post.

AUTHOR

REAGAN REESE

Contributor.

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

PODCAST: The fight to ensure election integrity continues with a profound national announcement from Arizona.

/in , , , , , , , /by

The fight to ensure election integrity continues with a profound national announcement from Arizona. Under the guidance of Arizona Sen. Sonny Borrelli, the legislature passed Senate Concurrent Resolution 1037. This resolution prescribed by the U.S. Constitution grants the State Legislature in each state of the union, plenary (ultimate authority) to proclaim Time, Place, and Manner of elections in national and statewide contests.

You are about to learn more as to what this means, what also is stipulated in the Concurrent Resolution 1037, and why state legislatures across the country can follow Arizona’s lead. Both Arizona Sen. Sonny Borrelli and former Arizona Rep. Mark Finchem; still candidate for Arizona Secretary of State, have fought this good fight since the beginning in November 2020. They have not been deterred.

This ARIZONA TODAY SPECIAL REPORT is valid in your state if your legislators choose. WE THE PEOPLE have tools at our disposal, given to us by our forefathers if we would but use them. You are about to listen to a conversation discussing one of the tools we have as citizens. Now I ask you to distribute this program far and wide. I ask you to take it to your state legislators, and impress upon them.

WATCH:

Please consider helping me remain in the fight. Distribute these shows; pray for wisdom and guidance developing these shows; please make an contribution going to my website: arizona2day.com and contribute at the PayPal button. Thank you most sincerely for your support and care to save our Republic.

©2023. Lyle J. Rapacki, Ph.D. All rights reserved.

Another Illegal Immigrant Protected by Local Sanctuary Laws Charged with Violent Crimes

/in , , , , , , , , , , /by

In yet another disturbing example of the devastation caused by open border policies, an illegal immigrant who entered the U.S. as a child a decade ago has been charged with first-degree rape, kidnapping and armed robbery in a county that proudly offers migrants sanctuary. The 20-year-old, Jose Roberto Hernandez-Penal, is accused of raping a woman and robbing her friend this month at a Maryland park after threatening the women with a machete. Days earlier police say he raped a 15-year-old girl at the same park in Montgomery County, which has long protected illegal aliens from federal authorities.

The illegal immigrant lives in Hyattsville, which sits in another Maryland county—Prince George’s—famous for its sanctuary policies. The measures protect illegal aliens by, among other things, releasing even the most dangerous criminals from jail to shield them from deportation. Hernandez-Penal, a native of El Salvador, entered the country illegally in 2013, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) told a local media outlet, and was “ordered removed in absentia by an immigration judge” about a year later and again approximately seven months after that. Nevertheless, he remained in the country and committed heinous crimes against unsuspecting residents. Police say at approximately 2:40 p.m. on May 16 Hernandez-Penal approached two adult females on the Northwest Brach Trail of Burnt Mills East Special Park, displayed a machete, stole their property and sexually assaulted one of the victims. Upon leaving the scene, the illegal immigrant assaulted an adult male. Officials told several local news outlets that Hernandez-Penal is also suspected of raping a 15-year-old girl on the same trail of the two-acre facility a week earlier. The park is one of hundreds operated by Montgomery County along with other recreational facilities such as basketball courts, campsites, tennis courts and playgrounds.

Detectives handling the case for the Montgomery County Police Department believe there may be additional victims of sexual assault by Hernandez-Penal that have not contacted authorities. The agency reveals that the illegal immigrant “made statements of involvement” during interviews with detectives after his recent arrest. He was then transported to the Montgomery County Central Processing Unit where he was charged with first degree rape, first degree assault, second degree assault, armed robbery, kidnapping, and weapons-related crimes. In its news release detectives urge anyone who may have been a victim of Hernandez-Penal to contact the agency’s Special Victims Investigations Division (SVID).

It is important to note that this is the same law enforcement agency that regularly releases dangerous criminals like Hernandez-Penal from jail to protect them from federal authorities. For example, a few years ago an illegal immigrant from El Salvador who raped a seven-year-old girl multiple times was released because under Montgomery County’s sanctuary law police is banned from cooperating with the feds. Rather than honor a detainer issued by ICE under a partnership known as 287(g) that notifies the federal agency of inmates in the country illegally so that they can be deported, local officials freed the child rapist on bond. Not surprisingly, the rapist vanished. Prince George’s County, where Hernandez-Penal lives, practices the same sanctuary measures. In fact, ICE has resorted to unconventional methods to capture criminals in both jurisdictions. In one instance the agency preempted Montgomery and Prince George’s counties’ imminent release of a batch of illegal immigrant offenders by publicly disclosing their identity, complete with mug shots. Most were incarcerated for sexual crimes involving children, including rape and serious physical abuse that resulted in death. A couple were jailed for murder and assault.

The Maryland cases are part of a national crises generated by local governments around the country that offer violent illegal immigrants sanctuary. Under 287(g), ICE is notified of jail inmates in the country illegally so that they can be deported after serving time for state crimes or making bail. Unfortunately, a growing number of city and county law enforcement agencies are instead releasing the illegal aliens—many with serious convictions such as child sex offenses, rape and murder—rather than turn them over to federal authorities for removal.

RELATED ARTICLES:

‘Demonic’ MS-13 gangster who decapitated Uber Eats driver stabbed victim ‘35 times’

Judicial Watch Sues National Archives for Biden Family Business Records

Judicial Watch Sues Treasury Department for Records on Communications with Failed Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Bank

Lack of high-profile prosecutions in Durham probe leaves Republicans fuming

Judicial Watch: Pentagon IG Concludes Naval Academy Superintendent Made False Statements in Effort to End Career of Midshipman

RELATED TWEET:

EDITORS NOTE: This Judicial Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Radical Jayapal Threatens ‘Huge Backlash…in the Streets’ if Biden Negotiates Budget Cuts

/in , , , , , , , , /by

During ongoing talks to raise the debt ceiling, radical Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) told CNN on Tuesday that any cuts to wasteful spending, including obsolete pandemic funding, would bring a backlash in the streets.

Although the White House claimed Biden would not negotiate with Republicans on reducing wasteful spending, the administration engaged with House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) on spending cuts, an idea that enraged the far left.

“I think there would be a huge backlash from our entire House democratic caucus, certainly the progressives — but also in the streets,” Jayapal  warned.

She tried to couch her statement by pinning Biden to the previously passed reckless spending that fueled systemic inflation.

“It’s important we don’t take steps back from the very strong agenda that president himself shepherd and led over the past two years,” she said.

Pramila Jayapal

49 Known Connections

In January 2019, Jayapal stated that President Trump’s “ultimate goal is … to make America pure in the sense of not having immigrants, not having folks of color here and shutting down every form of legal immigration.…”  Trump’s policies, she said, were “deeply offensive” to the “soul” and “psyche” of “people of color” who “are seeking asylum [and] who can no longer can get in, even though it’s legal to seek asylum, and not just at a legal port of entry.”

To learn more about Pramila Jayapal, click here.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Jeffries: Dems Willing to Consider Freezing Spending at 2023 Levels

Illegal MS-13 Gang Member Freed into U.S. by Biden’s DHS

EDITORS NOTE: This Discover the Networks column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Report: Hundreds of Thousands of Non-Citizens PLAGUE Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Arizona’s Maricopa County, Texas Voter Rolls

/in , , , , , , , , , , /by

Without election reform, it’s over. Nothing else matters.

The Democrats blew up our election system. But we are expected to participate in the Democrat media’s prevaricated election show for the next 18 months when the rigged election is already in the bag.

Report: Thousands of non-citizens PLAGUE PA voter rolls

By Summer Lane, RSBN,  May 22, 2023:

A new report from the Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF) has found that tens of thousands of non-citizen voters have been potentially identified in several counties across the country, casting further doubt on the already tarnished election processes in America today, Just the News reported.

The outlet revealed that in 2017, a Philadelphia city commissioner told a Pennsylvania Senate committee that there were more than 100,000 voter registration matches to Pennsylvania driver’s license numbers that included indicators for the Immigration and Naturalization Service.

Even worse, non-citizens have been found on the voter rolls in North Carolina, Arizona’s Maricopa County, and Texas.

As reported by RSBN, Pennsylvania recently settled a lawsuit with constitutional watchdog group Judicial Watch, after finding 178,258 “ineligible” voter registrations. The state agreed to settle the case and pay $15,000 to Judicial Watch with the agreement that they would remove all erroneous voter registrations identified in the suit.

Per Just the News, most of the non-citizens on the Pennsylvania voter rolls are “motor voter registrations,” which means these individuals signed up to vote when they were submitting their driver’s license applications.[…]

In the Keystone State, election processes have become increasingly muddied over the past few years, as mail-in ballots have added a new level of complexity to vote counting. In November 2022, President Trump slammed the long-winded vote-counting process in the midterms, when then-Senate candidate Dr. Mehmet Oz was running for office.

Keep reading.

AUTHOR

Pamela Geller

RELATED ARTICLE: OUT OF CONTROL: Video Shows Machete-Wielding NYC Professor Shellyne Rodriguez Chase Post Reporters Down The Street

RELATED TWEET:

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Former Deputy National Security Adviser: FBI, DOJ, CIA Planning To Rig 2024 Presidential Election

/in , , , , , , , , , /by

K. T. McFarland, a former Deputy National Security Advisor, says the FBI, Justice Department, and CIA will rig the 2024 U.S. presidential election, following their success in rigging 2016 and 2020, because they won’t allow any candidate to win that would hold them accountable:

The question isn’t, will they? They been doing it and getting away with it both here and abroad for years, why wouldn’t they?

At the risk of sounding like a broken record, without election reform, it’s over. It’s not everything, it’s the only thing.

KT McFarland: We Now Have Hard Evidence Of Election Interference By Intel Agencies In 2016 And 2020

By: Real Clear Politics, May, 23 2023

K.T. McFarland, who served as President Trump’s deputy national security advisor under Mike Flynn for the first few months of the Trump administration, told FBN’s Maria Bartiromo on Sunday that she believes the FBI, CIA, and the intelligence community will try to interfere in the 2024 election to “protect their own hides” by covering up evidence of interference in 2016 and 2020.

“They will absolutely interfere in 2024. We’re not sure how but they will absolutely interfere, not only because they’re not going to like whoever the Republican candidate is, but to protect their own hides,” McFarland said. “They knew they were doing stuff wrong. They knew they were going to be liable for prosecution.”

“They can’t possibly admit they were wrong because that undercuts their whole reason for being. So they’re going to continue to have this fake narrative and continue to cover up and pretend that nothing bad went on,” she said.

K.T. MCFARLAND: Well, I knew because I was a victim of it. When the Mueller investigation and the FBI came after me in the early days of the Trump administration, they knew I hadn’t committed any crime but that didn’t matter. They just wanted to go after anybody associated with President Trump in hopes they could break them or get them to lie, or at a minimum bankrupt them.

But I think, as I take a step back, and it’s not just about me, it’s not just about President Trump, what is it about?

We now have black-and-white evidence that the FBI interfered in the 2016 election. And then when they failed to get their candidate elected, Hillary Clinton, they set out to destroy the Trump administration.

So then go back up to 2020. This time, it was the CIA that got involved in the 2020 election with those 51 former intel agents who talked about the Hunter Biden laptop as “total Russian disinformation.”

So they’ve gotten away with it for two elections. They will for sure get away with it — try and get away with it in 2024, right? Because there are no consequences. The difference is in 2024, the evidence is there. We now have the Durham investigation and all the Congressional investigations.

There is now hard evidence that there was election interference by the U.S. intelligence agencies and the Department of Justice. Those individuals have got to be terrified. Those individuals have to be terrified that a Republican president comes in in the 2024 election, with a Republican Attorney General, and investigates them and charges them with all of the crimes they have committed over the last eight years.

MARIA BARTIROMO: Well, we’ll see if you’re right. There are questions about these elections because of this interference. Do you think there will be election interference in 2024?

K.T. MCFARLAND: Take it to the bank. They will absolutely interfere in 2024. We’re not sure how but they will absolutely interfere, not only because they’re not going to like whoever the Republican candidate is, but to protect their own hides.

That’s why they were talking to their own people, and the whistleblower brought this up, they were told “Don’t put anything on paper, just tell us orally.” They knew they were doing stuff wrong. They knew they were going to be liable for prosecution.

MARIA BARTIROMO: Yeah, it’s too bad. I wish the media were more curious about all of this. Unfortunately, the media takes the narrative of the Democratic Party and runs with it and then tries to cancel anybody who’s not on board.

K.T. MCFARLAND: Well, they’re in the same position. They can’t possibly admit they were wrong because that undercuts their whole reason for being. So they’re going to continue to have this fake narrative and continue to cover up and pretend that nothing bad went on.

They’re all in it together. This is what the terrible thing is. These people are selling us out. Not only to foreign leaders, but they are interfering in our elections. They are tearing up the Constitution. Why? Because they want to protect their jobs and protect their ratings.

I never thought I would be this upset about how anybody in the government was performing, but this is just a gut punch to the American people. [Emphasis added]

AUTHOR

Pamela Geller

RELATED ARTICLE: Report: Hundreds of Thousands of Non-Citizens PLAGUE Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Arizona’s Maricopa County, Texas Voter Rolls

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Is America Still Worth Fighting For?

/in , , , , , , , /by

With another Memorial Day upon us, we may consider the question: Is America still worth fighting for?

On November 21, 1864, President Lincoln wrote to a Mrs. Bixby of Massachusetts, who had lost five sons in the Civil War.

He penned, “I pray that our Heavenly Father may assuage the anguish of your bereavement, and leave you only the cherished memory of the loved and lost, and the solemn pride that must be yours to have laid so costly a sacrifice upon the altar of freedom.”

But, alas, today’s military—like so many institutions in our country—is going “woke.” That is to say that they are being infected with a cultural Marxism that has re-written our history, making America out to be irredeemably evil.

One regular contributor to NPR said several months ago: “[T]he United States does not yet have the stomach to look over its shoulder and stare directly at the evil on which this great country stands. That is why slavery is not well taught in our schools.”

To this sentiment, conservative commentator and author Michael Medved responded: “Dr. Martin Luther King, by contrast, never dismissed his American heritage and identity. He summoned his nation to honor its highest ideals, rather than disparaging its claims to greatness and goodness. His example stressed American possibilities and promises, not guilt or accusations concerning its multiple shortcomings.”

But what the cultural Marxists propagate is that we’re just as racist a nation as we’ve ever been. There’s been no progress, supposedly. If you deny that, then you’re a racist, they say.

No doubt America has had many flaws. But the brilliance of this nation is the foundation the founders laid whereby we could correct these flaws.

America is a grand experiment, encapsulated by an idea which flies in the face of Marxism: self-rule under God. Remove either part, the “self-rule” or the “under God” (as our internal and external enemies would like to see happen) and we would no longer have America as founded.

As noted, wokeism is infesting today’s military. Even the U.S. Navy partnered with a Drag Queen influencer on social media to promote recruitment.

The offices of Senator Marco Rubio and Congressman Chip Roy have produced an eye-opening report called, Woke Warfighters: How Political Ideology is Weakening America’s Military.

They write, “Our military’s singular purpose is to ‘provide for the common defense’ of our nation. It cannot be turned into a left-wing social experiment. It cannot be used as a cudgel against America itself. And it cannot be paralyzed by fear of offending the sensibilities of Ivy League faculty lounges of progressive pundits.”

After all, they add, “The world is a dangerous place.”

Basically we’re raising up young people to hate their own country, warns Dr. William Donohue, the president of the Catholic League, in his new book, The War on Virtue: How the Ruling Class Is Killing the American Dream. I got to speak with him on a radio segment recently.

In The War on Virtue, he writes, “If Americans become convinced that their country is fatally flawed, why will they defend it?”

I asked him to elaborate on this quote. First, he mentioned how the military is down 25% in reaching its recruitment goal.

Then he told me, “We’re teaching kids to hate America, not in every school but in too many of them. And they’re starting in kindergarten, going right through to graduate school. That’s what they teach—that America is a racist country that rips people off.”

Donohue elaborated, “If you teach people to hate their own country, the greatest country in the history of the world, then don’t be surprised when some young people—who’ve been indoctrinated, basically brainwashed, by these left wing college professors and in high school—don’t be surprised if they say, ‘Hey, why would I want to defend this country? After all, we’re not any better than anybody else?’ It’s almost a form of national suicide.”

Donohue said ordinary Americans need to push back, like what we saw in the recent response to Bud Light giving in to “transgender mania.”

“It’s a dangerous time,” said Dr. Peter Lillback, the founder of Providence Forum, for which I serve as executive director.

But he also told me, “There’s never a last word for a nation until God’s Providence says ‘You’re done.’ I’m not ready to give up on America, there’s too much treasure of great freedoms, of wisdom, of biblical truth, of even of sending the Gospel out to the nations. There’s always a chance for revival, reformation, new beginnings.”

Because the foundation is still there, America is even yet worth fighting for. But those foundations are being eroded, day by day. It would seem that we are faced with a choice of two options for our national future: revival or ruin.

©2023. Dr. Jerry Newcombe, D. Minn. All rights reserved.

RELATED VIDEO: Theodore Dalrymple | Historiography and the State of the Western Mind | NatCon UK

Ron DeSantis Files To Run For President

/in , , , , , , /by

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis filed paperwork with the Federal Election Commission (FEC) Wednesday to run for president in 2024.

DeSantis has been widely expected to jump in the Republican primaries for months and has consistently polled in the double digits alongside former President Donald Trump. The FEC filing comes ahead of his highly-anticipated presidential announcement at 6 p.m. Wednesday on Twitter Spaces with CEO Elon Musk, the Daily Caller News Foundation confirmed.

The governor has been traveling to key early primary states, touting his book “The Courage To Be Free” and pitching his “Florida Blueprint” agenda. DeSantis has already secured key endorsements from state legislators in Iowa, New Hampshire and Florida, as well as top Republicans in Congress like Reps. Chip Roy of Texas, Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Bob Good of Virginia.

DeSantis’ entrance into the Republican primaries comes after he wrapped up Florida’s legislative session filled with GOP-backed bills. The governor scored conservative wins on parental rights in education, school choice, gun rights, immigration, the death penalty, abortion and plenty more.

The governor changed his political Twitter account handle Monday, preceding with his imminent presidential launch. The governor’s account had previously been used for both Florida gubernatorial campaigns, so he dropped the “FL” from his handle “@RonDeSantisFL.”

On a private phone call last week held by Never Back Down, the political action committee tasked with drafting DeSantis into the race, DeSantis indicated that he is the only Republican contender who can win the GOP primary and beat President Joe Biden in a general election.

“You have basically three people at this point that are credible in this whole thing,” DeSantis said. “Biden, Trump and me. And I think of those three, two have a chance to get elected president — Biden and me, based on all the data in the swing states, which is not great for the former president and probably insurmountable because people aren’t going to change their view of him.”

The Real Clear Politics (RCP) average for a 2024 national Republican primary, based on polls conducted between April 21 and May 18, indicates that DeSantis has 19.4% support.

The governor joins a growing GOP primary field with former President Donald Trump, former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley, former Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson, South Carolina Sen. Tim Scott, conservative businessman Vivek Ramaswamy and conservative radio personality Larry Elder, with former Vice President Mike Pence soon to follow.

DeSantis was elected to Congress in 2012 where he served until he narrowly won the governorship in 2018, beating former Democratic Mayor of Tallahassee Andrew Gillum 49.6% to 49.2%, according to Ballotpedia. The governor handily won reelection in 2022 by nearly 20 points, trouncing former Democratic Rep. Charlie Christ.

DeSantis’ political team did not immediately respond to the DCNF’s request for comment.

AUTHOR

MARY LOU MASTERS

Contributor.

RELATED ARTICLES:

‘Stay Tuned’: Ron DeSantis Quietly Changes Twitter Handle Ahead Of Expected 2024 Run

Ron DeSantis made a guarantee about Donald Trump that made everyone sit up and take notice

RELATED TWEET:

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

FL Rep. Anna Paulina Luna DEMANDS Adam Schiff Pay $16 Million in H. Res. 437 for Spreading Trump-Russia Collusion Lies

/in , , , , , /by

It appears that some Republican members of Congress are taking action after the revelations of collusion, lies and myths spread by Democrats, with the help of the FBI, during the so called “Trump-Russian Collusion” propaganda campaign spearheaded by Adam Schiff.

Florida Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna introduced H. Res. 437. Luna is a veteran of the U.S. Air Force and conservative media personality before being elected to Congress.

The D.C. Enquirer’s Sterling Mosley on May 23rd, 2023 reported,

On Tuesday, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) filed a privileged resolution against Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) to censor, condemn, and fine the California Democrat $16 million for his efforts in fueling the Trump-Russia collusion hoax.

“I just filed a privileged resolution, H. Res. 437, to censure, condemn, & fine Rep. Adam Schiff $16 million (1/2 the cost of Russia investigation) for his egregious abuse of trust,” wrote the Republican firebrand on Twitter. “I, with my GOP colleagues, look forward to an imminent vote to hold this feckless man accountable.”

Read more.

Representative Anna Paulina Luna’s  Congressional website states:

This afternoon, Rep. Luna filed a privileged resolution, H. Res. 437, to censure, condemn, and fine Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) $16 million dollars (half the cost of the Russia investigation) for his egregious abuse of the trust of the American people.

Rep. Luna anticipates that House Leadership will hold this spineless man accountable for his deceitful actions.

“It is the obligation of House Leadership to back up this motion for the American people and hold this feckless man accountable,” Rep. Luna said.

“This is a privileged resolution and it is the right thing for House Leadership to support and bring accountability and respect back to the House of Representatives. ALL Members of Congress must be held to this standard.

The GOP Conference agrees that Adam Schiff has betrayed the trust of the American people, purposely abused positions of extreme authority, lied continuously, and as such, must be held to account.

Accordingly, the resolution requires Rep. Schiff to pay a $16 million dollar fine, half of the cost American taxpayers were forced to pay for the Russia hoax investigation.

I, alongside my Republican colleagues, look forward to an imminent vote coming to the floor to hold Rep. Schiff accountable.”

At the same time five other Articles of Impeachment resolutions have been introduced by Republicans against Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr., Alejandro Nicholas Mayorkas, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Attorney General Merrick Garland, Christopher Asher Wray, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Matthew M. Graves, United States Attorney for the District of Columbia.

Please call, text or write to your member of Congress and ask that he or she co-sponsor H. Res. 437 as well as each of the below House Impeachment Resolutions:

H.Res420 — Against Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr.

H.Res411 — Against Alejandro Nicholas Mayorkas, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security.

H.Res410 — Against Attorney General Merrick Garland.

H.Res406 — Against Christopher Asher Wray, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

H.Res.405 — Against Matthew M. Graves, United States Attorney for the District of Columbia.

Time for a little less talk and a lot more action.

©2023. Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.

ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT FILED AGAINST: Biden, Garland, Mayorkas, Graves, Wary. Ask your Representative to Co-Sponsor!

/in , , , , , , , /by

Articles of impeachment, below, have been filed against Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr., Alejandro Nicholas Mayorkas, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Attorney General Merrick Garland, Christopher Asher Wray, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Matthew M. Graves, United States Attorney for the District of Columbia.

Please call, text or write to your member of Congress and demand he or she sign on to each of these House Resolutions:

H.Res420 — Against Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr.

H.Res411 — Against Alejandro Nicholas Mayorkas, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security.

H.Res410 — Against Attorney General Merrick Garland.

H.Res406 — Against Christopher Asher Wray, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

H.Res.405 — Against Matthew M. Graves, United States Attorney for the District of Columbia.

You know what to do. Just do it!

©2023. Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.

List of current U.S. House members

Office Name Party
U.S. House Alabama District 1 Jerry Carl Republican
U.S. House Alabama District 2 Barry Moore Republican
U.S. House Alabama District 3 Mike Rogers Republican
U.S. House Alabama District 4 Robert Aderholt Republican
U.S. House Alabama District 5 Dale Strong Republican
U.S. House Alabama District 6 Gary Palmer Republican
U.S. House Alabama District 7 Terri Sewell Democratic
U.S. House Alaska At-large District Mary Peltola Democratic
U.S. House American Samoa At-large District Aumua Amata Radewagen Republican
U.S. House Arizona District 1 David Schweikert Republican
U.S. House Arizona District 2 Eli Crane Republican
U.S. House Arizona District 3 Ruben Gallego Democratic
U.S. House Arizona District 4 Greg Stanton Democratic
U.S. House Arizona District 5 Andy Biggs Republican
U.S. House Arizona District 6 Juan Ciscomani Republican
U.S. House Arizona District 7 Raúl Grijalva Democratic
U.S. House Arizona District 8 Debbie Lesko Republican
U.S. House Arizona District 9 Paul Gosar Republican
U.S. House Arkansas District 1 Rick Crawford Republican
U.S. House Arkansas District 2 French Hill Republican
U.S. House Arkansas District 3 Steve Womack Republican
U.S. House Arkansas District 4 Bruce Westerman Republican
U.S. House California District 1 Doug LaMalfa Republican
U.S. House California District 2 Jared Huffman Democratic
U.S. House California District 3 Kevin Kiley Republican
U.S. House California District 4 Mike Thompson Democratic
U.S. House California District 5 Tom McClintock Republican
U.S. House California District 6 Ami Bera Democratic
U.S. House California District 7 Doris Matsui Democratic
U.S. House California District 8 John Garamendi Democratic
U.S. House California District 9 Josh Harder Democratic
U.S. House California District 10 Mark DeSaulnier Democratic
U.S. House California District 11 Nancy Pelosi Democratic
U.S. House California District 12 Barbara Lee Democratic
U.S. House California District 13 John Duarte Republican
U.S. House California District 14 Eric Swalwell Democratic
U.S. House California District 15 Kevin Mullin Democratic
U.S. House California District 16 Anna Eshoo Democratic
U.S. House California District 17 Ro Khanna Democratic
U.S. House California District 18 Zoe Lofgren Democratic
U.S. House California District 19 Jimmy Panetta Democratic
U.S. House California District 20 Kevin McCarthy Republican
U.S. House California District 21 Jim Costa Democratic
U.S. House California District 22 David G. Valadao Republican
U.S. House California District 23 Jay Obernolte Republican
U.S. House California District 24 Salud Carbajal Democratic
U.S. House California District 25 Raul Ruiz Democratic
U.S. House California District 26 Julia Brownley Democratic
U.S. House California District 27 Mike Garcia Republican
U.S. House California District 28 Judy Chu Democratic
U.S. House California District 29 Tony Cárdenas Democratic
U.S. House California District 30 Adam Schiff Democratic
U.S. House California District 31 Grace Napolitano Democratic
U.S. House California District 32 Brad Sherman Democratic
U.S. House California District 33 Pete Aguilar Democratic
U.S. House California District 34 Jimmy Gomez Democratic
U.S. House California District 35 Norma Torres Democratic
U.S. House California District 36 Ted Lieu Democratic
U.S. House California District 37 Sydney Kamlager Democratic
U.S. House California District 38 Linda Sánchez Democratic
U.S. House California District 39 Mark Takano Democratic
U.S. House California District 40 Young Kim Republican
U.S. House California District 41 Ken Calvert Republican
U.S. House California District 42 Robert Garcia Democratic
U.S. House California District 43 Maxine Waters Democratic
U.S. House California District 44 Nanette Barragán Democratic
U.S. House California District 45 Michelle Steel Republican
U.S. House California District 46 Lou Correa Democratic
U.S. House California District 47 Katie Porter Democratic
U.S. House California District 48 Darrell Issa Republican
U.S. House California District 49 Mike Levin Democratic
U.S. House California District 50 Scott Peters Democratic
U.S. House California District 51 Sara Jacobs Democratic
U.S. House California District 52 Juan Vargas Democratic
U.S. House Colorado District 1 Diana DeGette Democratic
U.S. House Colorado District 2 Joe Neguse Democratic
U.S. House Colorado District 3 Lauren Boebert Republican
U.S. House Colorado District 4 Ken Buck Republican
U.S. House Colorado District 5 Doug Lamborn Republican
U.S. House Colorado District 6 Jason Crow Democratic
U.S. House Colorado District 7 Brittany Pettersen Democratic
U.S. House Colorado District 8 Yadira Caraveo Democratic
U.S. House Connecticut District 1 John Larson Democratic
U.S. House Connecticut District 2 Joe Courtney Democratic
U.S. House Connecticut District 3 Rosa L. DeLauro Democratic
U.S. House Connecticut District 4 Jim Himes Democratic
U.S. House Connecticut District 5 Jahana Hayes Democratic
U.S. House Delaware At-large District Lisa Blunt Rochester Democratic
U.S. House Florida District 1 Matt Gaetz Republican
U.S. House Florida District 2 Neal Dunn Republican
U.S. House Florida District 3 Kat Cammack Republican
U.S. House Florida District 4 Aaron Bean Republican
U.S. House Florida District 5 John Rutherford Republican
U.S. House Florida District 6 Michael Waltz Republican
U.S. House Florida District 7 Cory Mills Republican
U.S. House Florida District 8 Bill Posey Republican
U.S. House Florida District 9 Darren Soto Democratic
U.S. House Florida District 10 Maxwell Alejandro Frost Democratic
U.S. House Florida District 11 Daniel Webster Republican
U.S. House Florida District 12 Gus M. Bilirakis Republican
U.S. House Florida District 13 Anna Paulina Luna Republican
U.S. House Florida District 14 Kathy Castor Democratic
U.S. House Florida District 15 Laurel Lee Republican
U.S. House Florida District 16 Vern Buchanan Republican
U.S. House Florida District 17 Greg Steube Republican
U.S. House Florida District 18 Scott Franklin Republican
U.S. House Florida District 19 Byron Donalds Republican
U.S. House Florida District 20 Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick Democratic
U.S. House Florida District 21 Brian Mast Republican
U.S. House Florida District 22 Lois Frankel Democratic
U.S. House Florida District 23 Jared Evan Moskowitz Democratic
U.S. House Florida District 24 Frederica S. Wilson Democratic
U.S. House Florida District 25 Debbie Wasserman Schultz Democratic
U.S. House Florida District 26 Mario Diaz-Balart Republican
U.S. House Florida District 27 Maria Elvira Salazar Republican
U.S. House Florida District 28 Carlos Gimenez Republican
U.S. House Georgia District 1 Earl Carter Republican
U.S. House Georgia District 2 Sanford Bishop Jr. Democratic
U.S. House Georgia District 3 Drew Ferguson Republican
U.S. House Georgia District 4 Hank Johnson Democratic
U.S. House Georgia District 5 Nikema Williams Democratic
U.S. House Georgia District 6 Rich McCormick Republican
U.S. House Georgia District 7 Lucy McBath Democratic
U.S. House Georgia District 8 Austin Scott Republican
U.S. House Georgia District 9 Andrew Clyde Republican
U.S. House Georgia District 10 Mike Collins Republican
U.S. House Georgia District 11 Barry Loudermilk Republican
U.S. House Georgia District 12 Rick Allen Republican
U.S. House Georgia District 13 David Scott Democratic
U.S. House Georgia District 14 Marjorie Taylor Greene Republican
U.S. House Guam At-large District James Moylan Republican
U.S. House Hawaii District 1 Ed Case Democratic
U.S. House Hawaii District 2 Jill Tokuda Democratic
U.S. House Idaho District 1 Russ Fulcher Republican
U.S. House Idaho District 2 Michael K. Simpson Republican
U.S. House Illinois District 1 Jonathan Jackson Democratic
U.S. House Illinois District 2 Robin Kelly Democratic
U.S. House Illinois District 3 Delia Ramirez Democratic
U.S. House Illinois District 4 Jesus Garcia Democratic
U.S. House Illinois District 5 Mike Quigley Democratic
U.S. House Illinois District 6 Sean Casten Democratic
U.S. House Illinois District 7 Danny K. Davis Democratic
U.S. House Illinois District 8 Raja Krishnamoorthi Democratic
U.S. House Illinois District 9 Jan Schakowsky Democratic
U.S. House Illinois District 10 Brad Schneider Democratic
U.S. House Illinois District 11 Bill Foster Democratic
U.S. House Illinois District 12 Mike Bost Republican
U.S. House Illinois District 13 Nikki Budzinski Democratic
U.S. House Illinois District 14 Lauren Underwood Democratic
U.S. House Illinois District 15 Mary Miller Republican
U.S. House Illinois District 16 Darin LaHood Republican
U.S. House Illinois District 17 Eric Sorensen Democratic
U.S. House Indiana District 1 Frank Mrvan Democratic
U.S. House Indiana District 2 Rudy Yakym Republican
U.S. House Indiana District 3 Jim Banks Republican
U.S. House Indiana District 4 Jim Baird Republican
U.S. House Indiana District 5 Victoria Spartz Republican
U.S. House Indiana District 6 Greg Pence Republican
U.S. House Indiana District 7 André Carson Democratic
U.S. House Indiana District 8 Larry Bucshon Republican
U.S. House Indiana District 9 Erin Houchin Republican
U.S. House Iowa District 1 Mariannette Miller-Meeks Republican
U.S. House Iowa District 2 Ashley Hinson Republican
U.S. House Iowa District 3 Zach Nunn Republican
U.S. House Iowa District 4 Randy Feenstra Republican
U.S. House Kansas District 1 Tracey Mann Republican
U.S. House Kansas District 2 Jacob LaTurner Republican
U.S. House Kansas District 3 Sharice Davids Democratic
U.S. House Kansas District 4 Ron Estes Republican
U.S. House Kentucky District 1 James Comer Jr. Republican
U.S. House Kentucky District 2 Brett Guthrie Republican
U.S. House Kentucky District 3 Morgan McGarvey Democratic
U.S. House Kentucky District 4 Thomas Massie Republican
U.S. House Kentucky District 5 Hal Rogers Republican
U.S. House Kentucky District 6 Andy Barr Republican
U.S. House Louisiana District 1 Steve Scalise Republican
U.S. House Louisiana District 2 Troy Carter Democratic
U.S. House Louisiana District 3 Clay Higgins Republican
U.S. House Louisiana District 4 Mike Johnson Republican
U.S. House Louisiana District 5 Julia Letlow Republican
U.S. House Louisiana District 6 Garret Graves Republican
U.S. House Maine District 1 Chellie Pingree Democratic
U.S. House Maine District 2 Jared Golden Democratic
U.S. House Maryland District 1 Andrew Harris Republican
U.S. House Maryland District 2 Dutch Ruppersberger Democratic
U.S. House Maryland District 3 John Sarbanes Democratic
U.S. House Maryland District 4 Glenn Ivey Democratic
U.S. House Maryland District 5 Steny Hoyer Democratic
U.S. House Maryland District 6 David Trone Democratic
U.S. House Maryland District 7 Kweisi Mfume Democratic
U.S. House Maryland District 8 Jamie Raskin Democratic
U.S. House Massachusetts District 1 Richard Neal Democratic
U.S. House Massachusetts District 2 Jim McGovern Democratic
U.S. House Massachusetts District 3 Lori Trahan Democratic
U.S. House Massachusetts District 4 Jake Auchincloss Democratic
U.S. House Massachusetts District 5 Katherine Clark Democratic
U.S. House Massachusetts District 6 Seth Moulton Democratic
U.S. House Massachusetts District 7 Ayanna Pressley Democratic
U.S. House Massachusetts District 8 Stephen Lynch Democratic
U.S. House Massachusetts District 9 Bill Keating Democratic
U.S. House Michigan District 1 Jack Bergman Republican
U.S. House Michigan District 2 John Moolenaar Republican
U.S. House Michigan District 3 Hillary Scholten Democratic
U.S. House Michigan District 4 Bill Huizenga Republican
U.S. House Michigan District 5 Tim Walberg Republican
U.S. House Michigan District 6 Debbie Dingell Democratic
U.S. House Michigan District 7 Elissa Slotkin Democratic
U.S. House Michigan District 8 Dan Kildee Democratic
U.S. House Michigan District 9 Lisa McClain Republican
U.S. House Michigan District 10 John James Republican
U.S. House Michigan District 11 Haley Stevens Democratic
U.S. House Michigan District 12 Rashida Tlaib Democratic
U.S. House Michigan District 13 Shri Thanedar Democratic
U.S. House Minnesota District 1 Brad Finstad Republican
U.S. House Minnesota District 2 Angie Craig Democratic
U.S. House Minnesota District 3 Dean Phillips Democratic
U.S. House Minnesota District 4 Betty McCollum Democratic
U.S. House Minnesota District 5 Ilhan Omar Democratic
U.S. House Minnesota District 6 Tom Emmer Republican
U.S. House Minnesota District 7 Michelle Fischbach Republican
U.S. House Minnesota District 8 Pete Stauber Republican
U.S. House Mississippi District 1 Trent Kelly Republican
U.S. House Mississippi District 2 Bennie Thompson Democratic
U.S. House Mississippi District 3 Michael Guest Republican
U.S. House Mississippi District 4 Mike Ezell Republican
U.S. House Missouri District 1 Cori Bush Democratic
U.S. House Missouri District 2 Ann Wagner Republican
U.S. House Missouri District 3 Blaine Luetkemeyer Republican
U.S. House Missouri District 4 Mark Alford Republican
U.S. House Missouri District 5 Emanuel Cleaver Democratic
U.S. House Missouri District 6 Sam Graves Republican
U.S. House Missouri District 7 Eric Burlison Republican
U.S. House Missouri District 8 Jason Smith Republican
U.S. House Montana District 1 Ryan Zinke Republican
U.S. House Montana District 2 Matt Rosendale Republican
U.S. House Nebraska District 1 Mike Flood Republican
U.S. House Nebraska District 2 Don Bacon Republican
U.S. House Nebraska District 3 Adrian Smith Republican
U.S. House Nevada District 1 Dina Titus Democratic
U.S. House Nevada District 2 Mark Amodei Republican
U.S. House Nevada District 3 Susie Lee Democratic
U.S. House Nevada District 4 Steven Horsford Democratic
U.S. House New Hampshire District 1 Chris Pappas Democratic
U.S. House New Hampshire District 2 Annie Kuster Democratic
U.S. House New Jersey District 1 Donald Norcross Democratic
U.S. House New Jersey District 2 Jeff Van Drew Republican
U.S. House New Jersey District 3 Andrew Kim Democratic
U.S. House New Jersey District 4 Chris Smith Republican
U.S. House New Jersey District 5 Josh Gottheimer Democratic
U.S. House New Jersey District 6 Frank Pallone Jr. Democratic
U.S. House New Jersey District 7 Thomas Kean Jr. Republican
U.S. House New Jersey District 8 Robert Menendez Jr. Democratic
U.S. House New Jersey District 9 Bill Pascrell Democratic
U.S. House New Jersey District 10 Donald Payne Jr. Democratic
U.S. House New Jersey District 11 Mikie Sherrill Democratic
U.S. House New Jersey District 12 Bonnie Watson Coleman Democratic
U.S. House New Mexico District 1 Melanie Ann Stansbury Democratic
U.S. House New Mexico District 2 Gabriel Vasquez Democratic
U.S. House New Mexico District 3 Teresa Leger Fernandez Democratic
U.S. House New York District 1 Nicholas J. LaLota Republican
U.S. House New York District 2 Andrew Garbarino Republican
U.S. House New York District 3 George Devolder-Santos Republican
U.S. House New York District 4 Anthony D’Esposito Republican
U.S. House New York District 5 Gregory W. Meeks Democratic
U.S. House New York District 6 Grace Meng Democratic
U.S. House New York District 7 Nydia Velazquez Democratic
U.S. House New York District 8 Hakeem Jeffries Democratic
U.S. House New York District 9 Yvette D. Clarke Democratic
U.S. House New York District 10 Daniel Goldman Democratic
U.S. House New York District 11 Nicole Malliotakis Republican
U.S. House New York District 12 Jerrold Nadler Democratic
U.S. House New York District 13 Adriano Espaillat Democratic
U.S. House New York District 14 Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Democratic
U.S. House New York District 15 Ritchie Torres Democratic
U.S. House New York District 16 Jamaal Bowman Democratic
U.S. House New York District 17 Michael Lawler Republican
U.S. House New York District 18 Pat Ryan Democratic
U.S. House New York District 19 Marcus Molinaro Republican
U.S. House New York District 20 Paul Tonko Democratic
U.S. House New York District 21 Elise Stefanik Republican
U.S. House New York District 22 Brandon Williams Republican
U.S. House New York District 23 Nicholas A. Langworthy Republican
U.S. House New York District 24 Claudia Tenney Republican
U.S. House New York District 25 Joseph Morelle Democratic
U.S. House New York District 26 Brian Higgins Democratic
U.S. House Non-Voting Delegate District of Columbia Eleanor Holmes Norton Democratic
U.S. House North Carolina District 1 Donald Davis Democratic
U.S. House North Carolina District 2 Deborah Ross Democratic
U.S. House North Carolina District 3 Gregory Murphy Republican
U.S. House North Carolina District 4 Valerie Foushee Democratic
U.S. House North Carolina District 5 Virginia Foxx Republican
U.S. House North Carolina District 6 Kathy Manning Democratic
U.S. House North Carolina District 7 David Rouzer Republican
U.S. House North Carolina District 8 Dan Bishop Republican
U.S. House North Carolina District 9 Richard Hudson Republican
U.S. House North Carolina District 10 Patrick T. McHenry Republican
U.S. House North Carolina District 11 Chuck Edwards Republican
U.S. House North Carolina District 12 Alma Adams Democratic
U.S. House North Carolina District 13 Wiley Nickel Democratic
U.S. House North Carolina District 14 Jeff Jackson Democratic
U.S. House North Dakota At-large District Kelly Armstrong Republican
U.S. House Northern Mariana Islands At-large District Gregorio Kilili Camacho Sablan Democratic
U.S. House Ohio District 1 Greg Landsman Democratic
U.S. House Ohio District 2 Brad Wenstrup Republican
U.S. House Ohio District 3 Joyce Beatty Democratic
U.S. House Ohio District 4 Jim Jordan Republican
U.S. House Ohio District 5 Bob Latta Republican
U.S. House Ohio District 6 Bill Johnson Republican
U.S. House Ohio District 7 Max Miller Republican
U.S. House Ohio District 8 Warren Davidson Republican
U.S. House Ohio District 9 Marcy Kaptur Democratic
U.S. House Ohio District 10 Michael Turner Republican
U.S. House Ohio District 11 Shontel Brown Democratic
U.S. House Ohio District 12 Troy Balderson Republican
U.S. House Ohio District 13 Emilia Sykes Democratic
U.S. House Ohio District 14 David Joyce Republican
U.S. House Ohio District 15 Mike Carey Republican
U.S. House Oklahoma District 1 Kevin Hern Republican
U.S. House Oklahoma District 2 Josh Brecheen Republican
U.S. House Oklahoma District 3 Frank Lucas Republican
U.S. House Oklahoma District 4 Tom Cole Republican
U.S. House Oklahoma District 5 Stephanie Bice Republican
U.S. House Oregon District 1 Suzanne Bonamici Democratic
U.S. House Oregon District 2 Cliff Bentz Republican
U.S. House Oregon District 3 Earl Blumenauer Democratic
U.S. House Oregon District 4 Val Hoyle Democratic
U.S. House Oregon District 5 Lori Chavez-DeRemer Republican
U.S. House Oregon District 6 Andrea Salinas Democratic
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 1 Brian Fitzpatrick Republican
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 2 Brendan Boyle Democratic
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 3 Dwight Evans Democratic
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 4 Madeleine Dean Democratic
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 5 Mary Gay Scanlon Democratic
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 6 Chrissy Houlahan Democratic
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 7 Susan Wild Democratic
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 8 Matt Cartwright Democratic
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 9 Dan Meuser Republican
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 10 Scott Perry Republican
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 11 Lloyd Smucker Republican
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 12 Summer Lee Democratic
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 13 John Joyce Republican
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 14 Guy Reschenthaler Republican
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 15 Glenn Thompson Republican
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 16 Mike Kelly Republican
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 17 Christopher Deluzio Democratic
U.S. House Rhode Island District 1 David N. Cicilline Democratic
U.S. House Rhode Island District 2 Seth Magaziner Democratic
U.S. House South Carolina District 1 Nancy Mace Republican
U.S. House South Carolina District 2 Joe Wilson Republican
U.S. House South Carolina District 3 Jeff Duncan Republican
U.S. House South Carolina District 4 William Timmons Republican
U.S. House South Carolina District 5 Ralph Norman Republican
U.S. House South Carolina District 6 James Clyburn Democratic
U.S. House South Carolina District 7 Russell Fry Republican
U.S. House South Dakota At-large District Dusty Johnson Republican
U.S. House Tennessee District 1 Diana Harshbarger Republican
U.S. House Tennessee District 2 Tim Burchett Republican
U.S. House Tennessee District 3 Charles J. Fleischmann Republican
U.S. House Tennessee District 4 Scott DesJarlais Republican
U.S. House Tennessee District 5 Andy Ogles Republican
U.S. House Tennessee District 6 John Rose Republican
U.S. House Tennessee District 7 Mark Green Republican
U.S. House Tennessee District 8 David Kustoff Republican
U.S. House Tennessee District 9 Steve Cohen Democratic
U.S. House Texas District 1 Nathaniel Moran Republican
U.S. House Texas District 2 Daniel Crenshaw Republican
U.S. House Texas District 3 Keith Self Republican
U.S. House Texas District 4 Pat Fallon Republican
U.S. House Texas District 5 Lance Gooden Republican
U.S. House Texas District 6 Jake Ellzey Republican
U.S. House Texas District 7 Lizzie Pannill Fletcher Democratic
U.S. House Texas District 8 Morgan Luttrell Republican
U.S. House Texas District 9 Al Green Democratic
U.S. House Texas District 10 Michael McCaul Republican
U.S. House Texas District 11 August Pfluger Republican
U.S. House Texas District 12 Kay Granger Republican
U.S. House Texas District 13 Ronny L. Jackson Republican
U.S. House Texas District 14 Randy Weber Republican
U.S. House Texas District 15 Monica De La Cruz Republican
U.S. House Texas District 16 Veronica Escobar Democratic
U.S. House Texas District 17 Pete Sessions Republican
U.S. House Texas District 18 Sheila Jackson Lee Democratic
U.S. House Texas District 19 Jodey Arrington Republican
U.S. House Texas District 20 Joaquin Castro Democratic
U.S. House Texas District 21 Chip Roy Republican
U.S. House Texas District 22 Troy Nehls Republican
U.S. House Texas District 23 Tony Gonzales Republican
U.S. House Texas District 24 Beth Van Duyne Republican
U.S. House Texas District 25 Roger Williams Republican
U.S. House Texas District 26 Michael C. Burgess Republican
U.S. House Texas District 27 Michael Cloud Republican
U.S. House Texas District 28 Henry Cuellar Democratic
U.S. House Texas District 29 Sylvia Garcia Democratic
U.S. House Texas District 30 Jasmine Crockett Democratic
U.S. House Texas District 31 John Carter Republican
U.S. House Texas District 32 Colin Allred Democratic
U.S. House Texas District 33 Marc Veasey Democratic
U.S. House Texas District 34 Vicente Gonzalez Jr. Democratic
U.S. House Texas District 35 Greg Casar Democratic
U.S. House Texas District 36 Brian Babin Republican
U.S. House Texas District 37 Lloyd Doggett Democratic
U.S. House Texas District 38 Wesley Hunt Republican
U.S. House Utah District 1 Blake Moore Republican
U.S. House Utah District 2 Chris Stewart Republican
U.S. House Utah District 3 John Curtis Republican
U.S. House Utah District 4 Burgess Owens Republican
U.S. House Vermont At-large District Becca Balint Democratic
U.S. House Virgin Islands At-large District Stacey Plaskett Democratic
U.S. House Virginia District 1 Robert J. Wittman Republican
U.S. House Virginia District 2 Jennifer Kiggans Republican
U.S. House Virginia District 3 Robert C. Scott Democratic
U.S. House Virginia District 4 Jennifer McClellan Democratic
U.S. House Virginia District 5 Bob Good Republican
U.S. House Virginia District 6 Benjamin Lee Cline Republican
U.S. House Virginia District 7 Abigail Spanberger Democratic
U.S. House Virginia District 8 Donald Sternoff Beyer Jr. Democratic
U.S. House Virginia District 9 H. Morgan Griffith Republican
U.S. House Virginia District 10 Jennifer Wexton Democratic
U.S. House Virginia District 11 Gerald Edward Connolly Democratic
U.S. House Washington District 1 Suzan DelBene Democratic
U.S. House Washington District 2 Rick Larsen Democratic
U.S. House Washington District 3 Marie Gluesenkamp Pérez Democratic
U.S. House Washington District 4 Dan Newhouse Republican
U.S. House Washington District 5 Cathy McMorris Rodgers Republican
U.S. House Washington District 6 Derek Kilmer Democratic
U.S. House Washington District 7 Pramila Jayapal Democratic
U.S. House Washington District 8 Kim Schrier Democratic
U.S. House Washington District 9 D. Adam Smith Democratic
U.S. House Washington District 10 Marilyn Strickland Democratic
U.S. House West Virginia District 1 Carol Miller Republican
U.S. House West Virginia District 2 Alexander Mooney Republican
U.S. House Wisconsin District 1 Bryan Steil Republican
U.S. House Wisconsin District 2 Mark Pocan Democratic
U.S. House Wisconsin District 3 Derrick Van Orden Republican
U.S. House Wisconsin District 4 Gwen Moore Democratic
U.S. House Wisconsin District 5 Scott Fitzgerald Republican
U.S. House Wisconsin District 6 Glenn Grothman Republican
U.S. House Wisconsin District 7 Tom Tiffany Republican
U.S. House Wisconsin District 8 Mike Gallagher Republican
U.S. House Wyoming At-large District Harriet Hageman Republican