GAG Order Failed | Forensic Results of Dominion Machines Stealing Votes Leaked

Cyber teams which examined Dominion Voting Systems machines in Antrim County, Michigan last weekend have found concrete proof of massive cyber election fraud, according to CDMedia.

The forensic audit of 22 Dominion Voting Systems machines had been authorized on December 4th by an Antrim County judge after it was found that the Dominion machines had flipped 6,000 votes in the historically Republican county from Trump to Biden.

On December 12th, another judge allowed Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel and Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson to block the results of this forensic audit. However, some of the team’s findings were leaked to CDMedia, who published it yesterday.

It was found that the voting machines had been connected to the Internet (which is illegal in the United States) and that fake ballots were sent in batches for “adjudication” in either Germany or Spain. “Adjudication” is a Dominion override function that is meant for a marginal number of ballots – not for 106,000 ballots, as was the case in Fulton County, Georgia.

CDMedia’s source, who took “great risk” in getting out this information said, “The evidence of fraud was not where we were looking. It was cleverly hidden in the error rate.”

The error rate for ballot verification was set to 1000s of times the legal rate and then massive amounts of fake ballots were sent to Europe, where they were “approved” and tabulated.

In this video, Salty Cracker – who’s called “salty” for a reason, as you’ll soon see – reports that, “Now, this information is in the hands of Gen Flynn and his team…

“These BLM people [working at the polls], they scanned the votes into the machine and the machine was like, ‘Error! Error! Error!’ and so they said, ‘OK,’ set it off to the side for adjudication, all of these errored ballots, which were dumped into these places.

“These errored ballots went over to Spain, went over to Germany, probably through our CIA and they worked out the math. They needed to make sure that there were enough stolen ballots…that wouldn’t be too easy to catch – but we broke the algorithm.

“So they panicked and they adjudicated hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of thousands of these bullshit ballots into the system for Joe Biden. And now, it’s all breaking! We got the f***ing machines! We audited 22 of these machines, we’ve got the receipts! It’s all breaking out!

“This is why they put a gag order on us, this is why they silenced us!..This is why the censorship is skyrocketing up! This video can’t even be on YouTube, even if I wasn’t banned on YouTube right now. There’s no way this video would be allowed on YouTube. You’re not going to be able to talk about this on Twitter, you aren’t going to be able to talk about this on Facebook.

“FFS, yesterday, Donald Trump put a tweet out – they banned the likes and the comments section for his tweet!…

“The ‘Safe Harbor’ deadline [YouTube’s justification for removing all videos that refer to election fraud] don’t mean sh**. The Electoral College on the 14th – that don’t mean sh**! The 20th – the Inauguration, at this point – I don’t think that means sh**!

“If Donald Trump declares war on China and identifies Joe Biden, Dominion, the DNC, all of these poll workers…as enemy combatants, you’re not gonna get a f***ing Inauguaration on the 20th! None of these deadlines matter when you’re in f***ing war!

“What was it? The Election of 1860 wasn’t settled until 1865? We might be in that situation, right now! We might get 12 more years of Trump, because it might take a while to work all this sh** out of the system.

“But there you have it. We have these people dead-to-rights. This is why none of the courts want to hear the information that we have…they don’t want to be blown up. We’ll take it to the military courts, to dudes that are used to being blown up! Who want to make sure that this country isn’t overthrown by these ChiComs.

“There’s a bunch of people that would rather fight China in a military tribunal…than on a military battlefield. And we’ll take it to those people – we’ve got the receipts!

“Again, the f***ing receipts have now been leaked. It’s over, Joe!…You better concede or we’re going to throw your ass in prison!”

On September 12, 2018, President Trump issued an Executive Order to impose sanctions for interference in our elections by foreign powers. It calls for the Director of National Intelligence, who is currently John Ratcliffe to issue a report no later than 45 days after the election, on December 18th, which is next Friday.

If Ratcliffe admits this evidence, the EO calls for the blocking of all property held in the US by the perpetrators.

Contributed by 

Contact

RELATED ARTICLES:

Dominion Voting Machines Have the Ability to Create Ballots

Nevada DMV Records Suggest 3,987 Non-Citizens Voted in 2020 Election

EDITORS NOTE: This Forbidden Knowledge TV column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

VIDEO: Exposé on the Fraud Rev. Raphael Warnock, Democrat’s Senate Candidate in Georgia

In a National Review article titled “Raphael Warnock’s Lifelong Education in Black Liberation Theology and Radical Politics wrote:

A trained preacher and the senior pastor at the historic Ebenezer Baptist Church in Atlanta – Martin Luther King Jr.’s church – Warnock had likely presided over hundreds of funerals by that point in his career. But this funeral, on a Monday in early May 2018, was different. It was the funeral for his mentor, James Hal Cone, the founding father of “black liberation theology” who had personally requested that Warnock deliver his eulogy.

Warnock praised Cone for his scholarship, for his passion, and for his fire. While most academics write and speak, “Dr. Cone roared.” Cone, he said, was “the best classroom teacher I ever had.”

[ … ]

As evidence of Warnock’s radicalism, critics have pointed to sermons and statements in which he has defended socialism as simply “things we have in common,” called gun-rights legislation dumb, declared that “nobody can serve God and the military,” likened Israeli tactics to those used by “apartheid South Africa,” and compared police officers to gangsters, thugs, and bullies.

Read more.

WATCH: Is Raphael Warnock Really a Radical?

©BuzzSaw Media. All rights reserved.

Rudy Giuliani: President Trump Bringing More Lawsuits Today

We are fighting for the greatest nation in the history of humankind.

Never give up.
Never give in.
Never surrender.

Giuliani Says Trump Bringing More Lawsuits Today

By The Wiz • December 12, 2020 |

Rudy Giuliani joined Steve Bannon’s War Room on Saturday morning to discuss President Trump’s strategy for moving forward.

Bannon asked Giuliani where the President goes after the Supreme Court dismissed the Texas election lawsuit. Giuliani said the Trump team is switching to “Plan B.” Giuliani told Bannon that last night, President Trump authorized his legal team to bring re-tooled Texas-style election challenges in Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Georgia.

Giuliani said the suits are imminent and could be brought as soon as today.

RELATED TWEETS:

https://twitter.com/gatewaypundit/status/1337951463952281601

RELATED ARTICLES:

Watch: Crowd Goes WILD As President Trump Arrives at Army-Navy game

Attorney: Michigan Vote Flip Happened Due to Computer Program, Not Human ‘Error’

President Trump Approves Filing Re-Tooled Texas Style Lawsuit to SCOTUS

WATCH LIVE: MASSIVE MARCH FOR TRUMP IN WASHINGTON, D.C.

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Seriously? As Trump Announces Another Mideast Peace Deal, Biden Named Person of the Year

Time magazine has named Joe Biden and Kamala Harris “Person of the Year,” in a tacit acknowledgment that they are, for all their individual differences, essentially a single cog in the socialist internationalist machine that is poised to roll all over us. And there is no doubt that driving the American republic to the point of near-death with election chicanery on a breathtaking scale is indeed a significant achievement, but amid all the excitement, it was barely noticed that President Trump had delivered yet another rebuke to the massively failed foreign policy establishment that is poised to get back in the saddle and start failing some more, by engineering peace between Israel and another Arab state, Morocco.

Trump tweeted Thursday: “Another HISTORIC breakthrough today! Our two GREAT friends Israel and the Kingdom of Morocco have agreed to full diplomatic relations – a massive breakthrough for peace in the Middle East!” The Morocco deal, like the previous one between Israel and Sudan, seems to be a straightforward bargain. Trump also tweeted Friday: “Today, I signed a proclamation recognizing Moroccan sovereignty over the Western Sahara. Morocco’s serious, credible, and realistic autonomy proposal is the ONLY basis for a just and lasting solution for enduring peace and prosperity!” So Morocco gets recognition of its sovereignty over the Western Sahara, and the world gets another step toward peace between Israel and its Arab neighbors.

That makes four agreements between Israel and Arab nations, something John Kerry confidently stated was not even remotely possible. Isn’t it great that Kerry is about to go back to work for the Person of the Year (what pronouns does that beast with two backs use?) and start showing us how it’s done again?

No one thought it could be done, except, of course, Donald Trump. Back in September, when Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates signed their deals with Israel, Trump stated: “We’re here this afternoon to change the course of history. After decades of division and conflict we mark the dawn of a new Middle East.” This was accurate. These “Abraham Accords” have already changed the entire landscape of the Middle East as, for the first time in decades, pragmatic considerations are taking precedence over the fixed ideas that have guided the foreign policy stances of all the Muslim and Arab countries regarding Israel.

Although this aspect of the conflict has been little noted and is still routinely ignored by foreign policy analysts, the Muslim world’s opposition to Israel has not been based upon conflicting claims for land or anything else, but upon core principles of the Islamic religion. As The Palestinian Delusion: The Catastrophic History of the Middle East Peace Process shows, the Qur’an commands Muslims to “drive them out from where they drove you out” (2:191). Even though it is a historical fiction that Israel actually drove Muslim Arabs out, this claim is a staple of pro-Palestinian propaganda, and hence it is a divine imperative, no more negotiable than the Ten Commandments are for Jews and Christians, that Muslims must destroy Israel and “drive out” the Israelis.

That means that as long as pious, believing, knowledgeable Muslims are in charge in Muslim countries, which is by no means always the case, no negotiated settlement will ever establish Israel securely and end the jihad against it. That in turn is why analysts ignore Islam when considering the conflict: people don’t like bad news, or problems that cannot be solved. Nonetheless, this is the reality of the situation, and no good can ever come from ignoring reality.

Why, then, did Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates, Sudan, and now Morocco normalize relations with Israel? Because it was in their interests to do so. Sudan was taken off the terror list in exchange for normalization. The Islamic Republic of Iran has for years claimed Bahrain as Iran’s nineteenth province, and the UAE likewise feels the heat of being in close proximity to one of the world’s leading state sponsors of terror. In a certain sense, these deals with Israel are a byproduct of Barack Obama’s decision to send billions to the mullahs’ tottering regime: a newly secure and empowered mullahcracy threatens Bahrain and the UAE, and so it was in their best interests to look for assistance from a country that Iran also menaces.

Now, with the mullahs expecting The Person of the Year and their minions to prop them up again, there are numerous indications that many in the Islamic world have had quite enough of the Palestinians’ jihadist intransigence and resistance to all peace accords, and are willing to proceed on a pragmatic basis, quite aside from what Islamic doctrine and law say, in order to secure their own countries against the threat from Iran.

And so maybe Old Joe deserves the credit for Middle East peace that the establishment media is certain to give him no matter what: if he hadn’t publicly stated his intention to empower and enable the Islamic Republic, Sunni Arab states wouldn’t see the need to make accords with Israel to protect themselves from the mullahs. Make that man, uh, those people, Person of the Year!

Meanwhile, it’s too bad that there is no unbiased, trustworthy organization giving out prizes for efforts toward world peace. If there were, Trump would be a shoo-in. But that would require a sane world.

RELATED TWEET:

RELATED ARTICLES:

France: Former top general says he fears civil war due to ‘Islamist radicals’

France unveils new law to fight ‘those that distort religion to challenge the values of the Republic’

UK: Manchester jihad bomber’s brother says he supports violent jihad and imposition of Sharia through violence

Osama bin Laden associate is back on UK streets after being freed from US prison for being too fat

Iran Violates 2015 Agreement Again, and Even the Europeans are Alarmed

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Will the President of these United States be Chosen by Congress?

On Friday, December 11th, the U.S. Supreme Court kicked the ball back to the state legislatures to resolve their election issues by refusing to hear the Texas case. In its Order In Pending Case the SCOTUS  stated:

The State of Texas’s motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution.

Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections. All other pending motions are dismissed as moot.

QUESTION: What happens now?

Right now, according to EveryLegalVote.com President Trump leads Joe Biden by 18 electoral college votes. There are seven states where lawsuits, recounts, forensic audits and legislative actions are still pending. These states are: Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Wisconsin.

Some of these states may add votes to the Trump column. There is still a slim chance that the U.S. Supreme Court may get a second bite at the 2020 Election apple from one or more of the pending lawsuits from these states, like Georgia.

In addition, The Amistad Project has filed litigation in several key swing states arguing that illegal conduct by state and local officials led to more than 1.2 million potentially fraudulent ballots, including illegal votes that were counted and legal votes that were not counted. In each state, the number of potentially fraudulent ballots far exceeds the margin separating the leading presidential candidate.

The Bottom Line

The Amistad Project issued a research paper on the deadlines set for the electoral college titled “Set In Stone? — A Historical, Constitutional, and Legal examination of Electoral College Deadlines and their implications for the 2020 Presidential Election.”

The authoritative Amistad Project research paper breaks down the history of Electoral College deadlines and makes clear that this election’s December 8 and December 14 deadlines for the selection of Electors, the assembly of the Electoral College, and the tallying of its votes, respectively, are not only elements of of a 72-year old federal statute with zero Constitutional basis, but are also actively preventing the states from fulfilling their constitutional — and ethical — obligation to hold free and fair elections. Experts believe that the primary basis for these dates was to provide enough time to affect the presidential transition of power, a concern which is fully obsolete in the age of internet and air travel.

The white paper also shows that the December 8 “safe harbor” deadline for appointing presidential Electors does not apply to states where flagrant violations of state election laws affected the outcome of the popular vote.

In fact, the only Constitutionally-set date in the election process is the assumption of office by the President on January 20.

The 12th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution

If either Trump or Biden achieve the magic 270 number of electoral  college votes then that man becomes the president.

However, if neither Trump or Biden get to the 270 electoral college votes then the determination of the election goes to Congress for a vote. The 12th Amendment of Constitution of United States of America 1789 (rev. 1992) states:

The person having the greatest Number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice.

There is a possibility given the number of lawsuits, recounts and legislative actions that are pending that neither candidate gets to the magic 270 majority of the “whole number of Electors appointed” or the Electoral College is not convened to cast their votes by January 19th, 2021.

Conclusion

In simple terms here are the only four possible outcomes:

    1. Joseph Robinette (Joe) Biden Jr. gets 270 electoral college votes and becomes president.
    2. Donald J. Trump gets 270 electoral college votes and becomes president for a second term.
    3. Neither candidate gets a majority of electoral college votes.
    4. If #3 occurs then the U.S. Congress will meet and vote on who would become president.

This would be a historic moment. This would be a moment when, given all of the turmoil, the final decision on electing the president would end up in the United States Congress.

Every American, on both sides of the political aisle, is waiting with bated breath to see what the final outcome is.

Stay tuned.

©Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.

RELATED VIDEO:  Trump’s 136 special powers if state of national emergency declared; Will Julian Assange be pardoned?

RELATED TWEETS:

RELATED ARTICLES:

THE PATH TO VICTORY: The President’s Constitutional Plan

‘New California’ And ‘New Nevada’ File Brief In Support Of Texas-Led Lawsuit Seeking To Overturn Election Results

Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett Joins Majority In Rejecting Texas-Led Suit To Overturn Election Results

Texas GOP Suggests ‘Law-Abiding States’ Form Their Own Union After Supreme Court Rejects Lawsuit To Overturn Election Results

VIDEO: Ossoff’s Deceitful Campaign in Georgia EXPOSED

Project Veritas Action Fund released a new video today exposing Jon Ossoff’s U.S. Senate campaign’s deceitful tactics in Georgia.

Here are some of the highlights from today’s video:

  • Max Harris, Ossoff deputy political director: “I can’t say that here today [pack the Supreme Court], but…Well, it’s not the official – the official position of the party right now is not ‘aggressively pack the court.’ It’s ‘we’re waiting and seeing how the nomination process goes’ and then we’ll go from there.”
  • Harris: “I think that privately, a lot of people [in the campaign] share that [packing the Supreme Court] feeling.”
  • Harris: I think that ‘Defund the Police’ slogan is bad branding.
  • Harris: “So I think that the slogan [Defund the Police] is over-simplified and it doesn’t help Democrats.”
  • Harris: “Why don’t we start being creative about the way we’re framing these [Defund the Police] issues so that people who might not agree with us, in theory, can start seeing the light.”

You can watch the full video here:

How many dishonest people has Ossoff hired to work in his staff?

This is not the first time we have exposed his campaign for misleading voters.

Project Veritas Action Fund continues its investigation into campaign corruption ahead of the Jan. 5 Georgia Senate runoffs.

RELATED ARTICLE: Democrat Official Arrested for Election Fraud 

EDITORS NOTE: This Project Veritas report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

PODCAST: Election litigation before the Supreme Court and the Chinese Spy who Shagged Eric Swalwell!

GUESTS AND TOPICS:

HANS VON SPAKOWSKY

Hans von Spakovsky is a former member of the Federal Election Commission (FEC). He is the manager of the Heritage Foundation’s Election Law Reform Initiative and a senior legal fellow in Heritage’s Meese Center for Legal and Judicial Studies. President Donald J. Trump named him to be a member of the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity.

Topic: Election litigation before the Supreme Court.

ANGELA BOX

Angela Box is a popular conservative personality and host of the radio show Angela’s Soap Box. She’s also a political consultant who works to help conservatives get elected in all levels of government. Angela is a former teacher and actress. And she writes original content for her own website — www.AngelasSoapBox.com. We will discuss with Angela the case that the State of Texas has brought against Georgia, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan for violating the Constitution in how it conducted the 2020 presidential election.

TOPIC: Chinese spy scandal and Congress Erik Swalwell!

©Conservative Commandoes Radio. All rights reserved.

RELATED VIDEO: Who Leaked This Information” Shameless Eric Swalwell Blames Trump Tucker Carlson Tonight

VIDEO: The Vortex — M&M’s

They all taste the same because they are the same.


TRANSCRIPT

Church Militant (a 501(c)4 corporation) is responsible for the content of this commentary.

Each day here at Church Militant, as part of our ongoing Novena to the Holy Spirit for Justice and our Rosary (also for justice in the nation), we pray for increased strength to fight two specific evils rampaging through the Church and the culture — modernism and Marxism.

And, understand, these two are little else than different sides of the same coin, intimately connected. One does its damage in the theological realm, the other in the secular realm, but they are both moving to the same goal. That goal is the de-spiritualization of man, the reducing of human dignity to being merely a servant of the State.

This is why the Church must be “merged” with the State: To present the facade of some spiritual aspect or dynamic to the assault on human dignity (which is, of course, ultimately from God since we are made in his image and likeness). Modernism and Marxism are like M&M’s candy — peanut or plain — slightly different looking on the outside, although still very close in appearance, on the inside, they are identical.

You can’t tell the difference once you’ve popped them into your mouth, and that’s because there is no difference. Under that thin candy veneer, every one is identical to every other one in the pack, just like modernism and Marxism. This is why the Marxist cardinals in the Church, not to mention bishops and priests, are so enthralled with modernism.

Likewise, this is why the modernist cardinals in the Church — not to mention bishops and priests — are so enthralled with Marxism. It’s why when you go to Mass and there is a modernist priest blathering on, he hits all the Marxist talking points about immigration and climate change and the rest of the lies from the Left.

Listen closely sometimes to the prayers of the faithful, which half the time aren’t really prayers and which seldom reflect the ideas of the authentic faithful. Little in some of those prayers reflects anything related to authentic Catholicism but read like a Saul Alinsky introductory class on class warfare or racism.

Likewise, the Marxist media can’t stop themselves from having on modernist clergy for interviews (like James Martin). These aren’t just separate ideologies with some areas of overlap. They are the same ideologies with very slightly different ways of presenting themselves. Take off the robes and put on a suit and tie, and James Martin could run for office on the Democratic party ticket.

Likewise, slap a miter on Biden’s head and he could easily be Bishop Joe. They all talk the same, say the same things, talk about the same topics. Identical on the inside, very slightly different looking on the outside — just to make you think you’re getting something different. You aren’t.

This is why there is the rush on the part of bishops to go along with anything a government mandates, and in some cases (like the weirdo bishop in Ontario Canada’s London diocese, Ronald Fabbro) bishops are going way beyond even totalitarian governments’ COVID rules. He’s ordering parishes, meaning his priests, to set up what amounts to “snitch squads,” where ushers must refuse you entry into the Church for Mass if you don’t have a mask.

Ushers will be informed of your name and will be on the lookout for you. Likewise, Fabbro has ordered that a pencil and piece of paper be supplied at confessionals so after you have confessed, you can leave your name and number for contact tracing purposes. And no, we are not kidding.

That’s outrageous. But when it comes to weirdness around confession, Fabbro and his staff are refusing to reveal to Catholics in the diocese that a certain priest was excommunicated for breaking the seal of confession. Then, a few months later, blatantly in violation of canon law, Fabbro asked Rome to lift the excommunication without having fulfilled one of three requirements necessary before any lifting of the sentence could be done.

While Fabbro stomps around the diocese imposing dictatorial mandates on the flock, he conveniently — for more than a year — has kept to himself that one of his priests, at least, is not trustworthy in the confessional. But hey, just make sure you put down your name and address after confession, it makes it so much easier to break the seal that way.

And get this: Your information then goes into a sealed envelope and is given to the parish staff who will never open it, unless they have to. Sure. So much for anonymity around the sacrament of confession. Any bishop who would hide behind “procedure” to mask the identity of a priest who breaks the seal of confession is a disgrace.

Likewise, he keeps no tabs on this priest, who supposedly unknown to Fabbro, just up and presented himself to another diocese, where, inexplicably, the bishop there just accepted him and let him go “serve” at a religious community and offer public Mass on Sundays and hear confessions.

Not until his presence was reported (and there was fear of news getting out about the whole affair) did Fabbro “spring into action” and order the priest back to the London diocese. But man, he’s all over the COVID “crisis.”

No mask, no eucharist. No contact tracing, no confession of sins. No bare hands, no reception of Holy Communion. COVID crisis? Got it covered. Catholic crisis? No big deal. Men like this long ago gave up the ghost on the Church. Fabbro even joked once at a fundraiser for the seminary that all the numbers across the board for the Church were dismal, in the toilet. Fewer weddings, baptisms, you name it.

But, he added, the one number where they saw improvement was in cemetery plot sales, adding — to uncomfortable laughter from hundreds in attendance — that even if we lose you coming in, we still get you going out. Modernism dumps the authentic Faith. Marxism replaces it.

The things of God matter not at all to either Marxists or modernists. Their single concern is being in the elite crowd when the rest of humanity is subjected to their one-world new order. Neither cares what your favorite color M&M is — because they are all the same.

EDITORS NOTE: This Church Militant video is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

The Time for Talking with the Left is Long, Long Past

“People who cannot be reasoned with can only be fought.” It’s an age-old truth, one good people ignore at their own peril. It too often is ignored, though, since good people are mostly reasonable and, in accordance with man’s nature, engage in projection. They thus assume that others are as reasonable as they are.

It’s reasonable to assume that mentioning right now the futility of reasoning with the Left is motivated by the election. It’s also, in my case, untrue. I’ve for decades recognized that devout leftists, emotion-driven and vice-ridden, operate by occultist Aleister Crowley’s “principle,” “Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law.” But now, with the Left stealing an election after have stolen our whole culture and increasingly achieving its ends through violence, more people may accept this message.

When presenting logical arguments to advance a position, which is what I as a commentator do, I’ve at times heard from readers who’d lament that it was a waste of time because leftists wouldn’t listen. What they misunderstood is that those arguments were never, ever intended for the Left.

What must be applied here is “political/cultural triage.” This paradigm’s first group is the “Choir”; while its members are on your side, it still is beneficial “preaching” to them to “fire up the troops” and because “iron sharpens iron.”

The second group is the “Middlers”; not wholly blinded by ideology and being at least somewhat open-minded, they often can be reached with logos, ethos or pathos or a good combination thereof.

Then there’s the last group: the Initiated. Called “leftists” today, they have disordered thinking; married to misbegotten passions and, disconnected from reason and operating emotionally, they’re the sort that inspired the Jonathan Swift sentiment (I’m paraphrasing), “You cannot reason a man out of a position he has not reasoned himself into.”

Of course, one here and there may see the light if they experience something akin to a religious conversion. But you will not reach them with logic or anything else — and it’s a waste of time trying. They are, so to speak, damned.

So how should we regard vanguard leftists, the Machiavellian destroyers of civilizations? How can you be prepared for them? Well, pretend you’re dealing with Satan.

You can view this purely as a thought exercise if you’re non-religious. But know that the enemy — and that is what leftists are — is above nothing and beneath contempt. They will say anything and do anything to achieve their ends, which they believe justify the means; no lie is too great, no theft too grand, no contradiction too bold, no sacrifice of life too unpalatable. Moral relativists/nihilists to the core, they have boiled their behavioral guide down to, “If it feels good, do it.”

Conservatives must accept this hard reality and avoid the aforementioned instinctive, very human but in this case deadly habit: projection. This is when you ascribe your own mindset, priorities and sense of virtue to others. But vanguard leftists aren’t like you. As with the Devil, they can’t be talked out of their passions or reasoned out of their malevolence. They are as aliens — and they do not come in peace.

Their no-holds-barred attitude is apparent to all with eyes to see. They have

  • continually attacked us traditionalists and fomented unrest at our political events while accusing us of authoring violence;
  • visited career and reputational destruction upon those who dare speak unfashionable truths while accusing those Truth-tellers of intolerance;
  • used government agencies such as the IRS and FBI to persecute us while accusing us of endangering the republic;
  • played the identity politics card and demonized whites while accusing conservatives of being divisive, racist and bigoted;
  • conspired with foreign powers to undermine our nation while accusing us of treasonous behavior;
  • enabled China, an imperialistic foe and a clear and present danger to our country;
  • endeavored to steal an election after having wrongly accused conservatives of thus doing in 2016;
  • abetted an invasion of our nation in order to raise an alien electoral army that can help them seize power;
  • mismanaged a pandemic and caused death while using it as a pretext for stripping our liberties, “locking down” the country and destroying people’s livelihoods;
  • corrupted our children with perversion and scarred their bodies, minds and souls;
  • facilitated the murder of the unborn while accusing us of indifference to the vulnerable;
  • prosecuted conservatives on trumped up charges while shielding their co-ideologists from justice;
  • called Truth “hateful” or “misinformation” and censored it via Big Tech while presenting convenient lies as “fact”;
  • encouraged violent mobs to create mayhem and attempted to strip the imperiled of the capacity for self-defense while sometimes being protected themselves by armed details;
  • attacked our history and heroes and destroyed our cultural heritage while effecting their own “Year Zero,” dystopian transformation;
  • indoctrinated the young in schools to transform them into foot soldiers in the leftist campaign of civilizational rape;
  • attacked our nation’s foundational faith, Christianity, while spreading corruptive moral relativism and destructive theologies; and
  • degraded society with perverted science while accusing us of scientific obscurantism.

In a saner world, people could talk things out, seeking that ethereal common ground called Truth. But morally nihilistic leftists scoff at absolutes and have thus turned themselves into glorified animals, driven by their base instincts and consuming freedom, virtue and goodness like demonic locusts. They won’t stop until they are stopped, and if people cannot talk things out, they are left to fight them out. And our leftists are ensuring that we cannot talk things out.

The reality is that if the United States were a marriage, there would have been a divorce long ago. Leftists are as alien to more traditional people as a race of aggressive, invasive extraterrestrials, and they’ve made coexistence impossible.

So what does this mean from a practical standpoint? How should we proceed? First, conservatives must stop being “conservative” (as in defensive) and realize that you can’t follow Queensberry rules when the adversary fights no-holds-barred. As an example, leftists can govern contrary to the Constitution, sure — and we act contrary to their governance.

To this end, traditionalist states/counties/cities should employ nullification, that ignoring of governmental enjoinments that Thomas Jefferson called the “rightful” remedy for all unconstitutional directives.

Note here that the latter will encompass much, as most of the federal government’s business (and some state business) involves unconstitutional endeavors. There is, for instance, no constitutional provision for bureaucracies such as the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the Department of Education, and federal anti-discrimination law and “transgender”-accommodation mandates should be considered null and void; so should the Obergefell v. Hodges “marriage” opinion, to cite just a few examples. For leftists can con their way to an election victory, but if we let them con us into obeying them, that’s on us.

As to this, conservatives fancy themselves rules-oriented, but too many have been fooling themselves, following not the rule of law but the rule of lawyers (in legislatures and on courts). If leftists can consider the Constitution’s dictates “living,” we can consider their unconstitutional dictates living — and tell ‘em to go pound sand.

Lastly, be ready if leftists attack you, and defend yourself, viciously if necessary. If they push, push back harder; if they strike, strike back harder. Understand that this is war, and as in all wars hot or cold, this is only and ultimately about one thing: power.

Our second president, John Adams, said in 1798, “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” “Moral and religious” leaves leftists out, and we should leave them out as well — from any of our future plans. Dead to us they should be.

Contact Selwyn Duke, follow him on Gab or Parler (preferably) or Twitter, or log on to SelwynDuke.com.

©Selwyn Duke. All rights reserved.

RELATED VIDEO: Tucker’s BOMBSHELL Segment Exposes Chinese Spies Inside Our Government

RELATED TWEET:

THE THREE FACES OF EVE[L]: Facebook, Twitter and Google/YouTube

The social media platforms of Facebook, Twitter and Google/YouTube have morphed into something other than a place where individuals can freely share their views, opinions and personal feelings about certain things. On these platforms free speech has been replaced with their speech.

The Three Tech Tyrants

https://twitter.com/scrowder/status/1337197392802803713

Since 2016 these social media platforms have joined the traditional mainstream media platforms by:

  1. Censoring one person or group based upon their political views.
  2. Banning one person or group based upon their political views.
  3. De-platforming one person or group based upon their political views.
  4. Restricting access to information posted by certain people or groups based upon their political views.
  5. Actively promoting their own political views in order to support one political party over another.
  6. Via algorithms made certain information either difficult to find or disappear entirely from their platforms.
  7. Kept valid news from the public that can change the outcome of an election.
  8. Unilaterally removed content under various “community standards” and policies that provide another political view
  9. Unilaterally removed news posted by major news organizations in order to keep their members uninformed.
  10. Becoming activists for the Democrat Party and their policies.

Some Examples

Some examples of important information that has been either promoted, censored, hidden or completely wiped clean include, but are not limited to:

  1. Pushing the narrative of Russian Collusion by the Trump campaign.
  2. Pushing the Democrat impeachment narrative.
  3. Pushing the Democrat Party notion that President Trump is illegitimate.
  4. Hiding, censoring the Hunter Biden laptop story.
  5. Hiding, censoring China’s involvement in undermining the POTUS, members of the U.S. Congress and our allies.
  6. Hiding, censoring any negative information about the Dominion Voting system.
  7. Hiding, censoring any valid allegations of voter fraud during the 2020 election.
  8. Hiding, censoring any sworn allegations of massive election fraud in the 2020 election.
  9. Pushing the narrative that Joe Biden is president elect.
  10. Removing any and all content that paints the Democrat Party and its leadership in a negative light.

Some Real News

WATCH: The Social Dilemma Is Dangerously Wrong… Part I by the Foundation for Economic Education.

BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: More on Georgia Water Main Break Scam on Election Day – There’s No Evidence to Show It Even Occurred

https://twitter.com/MarkDice/status/1337196377302917122

Conclusion

Facebook, Twitter and Google/YouTube have become anti-social if you disagree with them and their world views. They will use any and all means to silence you for posting, re-posting or telling the truth. Your truth, not their truth.

You will be wiped clean from their servers if you fail to obey them. It is as simple as that. Revolt and face their form of a permanent gulag under the guise of Facebook’s this post is “disputed.” Facebook jail is seeing more and more prisoners each day. Twitter simply removes you, like it did the New York Post, for publishing information important about the family of one candidate, but allows any and all tweets about the other candidate, true or not.

Facebook, Twitter and Google/YouTube have become tyrannical in their policies.

But there is hope. 

President Trump has been adamant that repeal of Section 230 be added to the funding for our military bill. What is Section 230? Watch this pro-Section 230 propaganda posted by the Internet Association:

Without the protections these laws provide, two things would happen:

  1. Companies could be held legally responsible for EVERYTHING people say.
  2. Companies would face legal risks for enforcing community standards or voluntarily restricting access to or deleting inappropriate or illegal content.

Other social media platforms such as Parler, MeWe, Spreely, and Gab are growing as people leave the Tech Tyrants’ gulags and seek real freedom of speech.

©Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.

RELATED VIDEO: Election Supervisor Shows on Video How Dominion Software Allows Changing, Adding Votes

RELATED ARTICLES:

EXCLUSIVE: YouTube Employs Chinese Communist ‘State Secrecy Bureau’ Software Engineers

California Conducted a Fatally Flawed Election in at Least 53 Counties of its 58 Counties

Six States Formally Join Texas’ Election Lawsuit Against GA, MI, PA, WI

Arizona Senate Will Hold Official Legislative Hearing Into Election Fraud, Complete With Subpoena Power

We are the majority. Act like it.

VICTORY: Arizona Senate Will Hold Official Legislative Hearing Into Election Fraud, Complete With Subpoena Power

Members of the Arizona Legislature are finally working to expose voter fraud within the state

By: Jack Hadfield, National Pulse, December 10., 2020:

The Arizona Senate will hold an official legislative hearing on election integrity complete with subpoena power on Friday morning, National File understands.

Arizona State Representative Mark Finchem made the announcement regarding the legislative hearing to be held in the Senate on Thursday morning.

The Arizona Senate Judiciary Committee will “take testimony (and issue subpoenas as deemed appropriate) regarding election integrity) from 9AM on Friday morning, Finchem revealed in a tweet.

This would mark a significant step in the election integrity process. A previous hearing, in which President Trump’s legal team participated, involved multiple witnesses and serious analysis of the election, but did not have the full powers that a legislative hearing could provide, most notably the power to subpoena, and the requirement for sworn testimony.

The hearing would likely have been called by Arizona Senate President Karen Fann. National File understands that only her and Arizona House Speaker Rusty Bowers have the power to do so in their respective chambers. Bowers had been subject to serious criticism, following comments that showed a poor understanding of the Constitution, along with a lack of committment to calling the hearing.

Finchem’s announcement follows repeated calls for a full legislative hearing from Dr Kelli Ward, the chairman of the Arizona GOP, who has been consistently doing so since last week. Ward had argued that a full legislative hearing with subpoena powers will not “interefere with any legal cases,” and should therefore happen as soon as possible.

Only minutes before State Representative Finchem revealed the timing of the hearings, Ward reacted to a post from State Senator-Elect Wendy Rogers about the possibility of an incoming legislative hearing, and encouraged the hearings to take place today.

National File reported on Wednesday that Arizona had become the 18th state to join Texas in their SCOTUS lawsuit against Pennsylvania, Michigan, Georgia and Wisconsin, for their alleged violation of their electoral processes, most notably regarding mail-in ballots, that allowed widespread voter fraud to take place.

RELATED TWEET:

RELATED ARTICLES:

Unsupervised Election Workers Messed with Voting Machines in Georgia After False Claim of Water Main Break Sent People Home – ALL CAUGHT ON VIDEO

GA Election Officials Demonstrate Changing Votes On Voting Machines

Fox News Loses Ratings Battle to Competitor Newsmax for the First Time Ever

YouTube Employs Chinese Communist ‘State Secrecy Bureau’ Software Engineers

LISTEN LIVE: Trump v. Biden Wisconsin Federal Evidentiary Hearing

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Maybe this explains what’s going on in Georgia

Most conservatives in Georgia are furious with GOP governor Biran Kemp for dragging his feet at taking decisive steps to fully verify the validity of the presidential election in the state.

According to the article below, Kemp met with Li Qiangmin, Houston Consul General of the People’s Republic of China, on July 12, 2019.

Two weeks later, the state announced it had entered into a contract with Dominion Voting Systems prior to Georgia’s March 2020 presidential primaries, a deal that was opposed by both Democrats and Republicans in the Georgia legislature. Dominion equipment is suspected of having switched votes from Trump to Biden in key battleground states.

China is no fan of President Trump, and neither is Kemp.

Was Georgia’s purchase of Dominion’s voting machines merely coincidental to Kemp’s meeting with an official of the Chinese government?

The article below doesn’t answer that question, but may provide clues.

Georgia Gov. Kemp Awarded $107 Million Contract to Dominion Two Weeks After Meeting With People’s Republic of China Consul General

by Debra Heine

Georgia Governor Brian Kemp awarded a $107 million contract to Dominion Voting Systems two weeks after he met with the Houston-based Consul General of the People’s Republic of China in Atlanta.

Kemp met with Li Qiangmin, Houston Consul General of the People’s Republic of China, on July 12, 2019.

The Secretary of State’s office announced on July 29, 2019 that Dominion’s election services were procured to implement a “verified paper ballot system” in the state prior to the March 2020 presidential primaries.

https://twitter.com/CodeMonkeyZ/status/1336175895837478912?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1336175895837478912%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftennesseestar.com%2F2020%2F12%2F10%2Fgeorgia-gov-kemp-awarded-107-million-contract-to-dominion-two-weeks-after-meeting-with-peoples-republic-of-china-consul-general%2F

Dominion Voting Systems, which operates voting machines in 28 states, has been accused of switching Trump votes to Biden in the 2020 election.

According to reports, the voting software company has multiple links to China, including a $400 million filing in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) one month before the election that links Dominion, UBS Securities LLC, and China.

Read more.

©John Edison. All rights reserved.

VIDEO: Who is Behind The Great Reset?

What is the great resent and who is behind it? Watch, listen and learn from Sean Stone.

ABOUT SEAN STONE

Sean Stone majored in American History, studying at Oxford and Princeton University. Sean grew up in the film world, acting in many of his father Oliver Stone’s films before becoming a director in his own right with Greystone Park. Sean also hosted the online show Buzzsaw. Sean is an author, documentary filmmaker. Sean begins the conversation with how the New World Order lineage are connected and they have been planning the great reset for a long time. Their mission is to remove the rights of the people and move the current world into their world. There is one problem, Trump, he stands in their way of completing their plan.

©X22Report.com. All rights reserved.

EDITORS NOTE: All source links to the report can be found on the X22Report.com website.

Is It ‘Dangerous’ to Fight Voter Fraud?

I feel disenfranchised with last month’s vote because of such apparent widespread voter fraud in six key swing states. But the media says, “There’s nothing to see here.” As of this writing, 40 court decisions seem to agree with them.

Thank God for the alternative media which is a lifeline of information, which big tech, big media, and the cultural elites are doing their best to suppress. But you can’t suppress the truth forever.

A congresswoman from Florida says that Trump’s attempts to expose allegations of voter fraud are undermining our nation.

Stephanie Murphy (D-Florida), whose family fled Vietnam in the late 1970s, is a U. S. Representative in the greater Orlando area. She said, “My family fled a communist dictatorship, so I’ve never taken America’s democracy for granted. The President’s claims of election fraud are discredited and dangerous, nothing more than a cynical attempt to subvert the will of the American people.”

She was responding to this tweet (12/1/20) from NPR that said the election was fair and not stolen. NPR Politics: “‘This was a secure election,’ Christopher Krebs, the former top federal government election security official, said. ‘That is a success story. That is something everyone in the administration should be proud of.’”

  • Forget those suitcases captured on video brought out in the middle of election night in Atlanta, presumably chock full of Biden ballots.
  • Forget all those dead people that voted in Pennsylvania—even people who lived through the Civil War.
  • Forget the “over 400 affidavits documenting vote fraud and polling place irregularities, documenting that there were more votes cast than registered voters in quite a number of jurisdictions,” to quote Scott Powell, American Thinker (12/5/20).
  • Forget the Detroit Democrat poll-workers who muscled Republicans out of the room in the middle of the night and then taped up the windows so no one could see what was going on.

Gary Bauer notes (12/3/20): “…in numerous progressive cities, left-wing operatives systematically threw out GOP observers one by one. The vote counters, who are government employees, often erupted in applause as the conservatives were shown the door.”

Forget all that—nothing to see here. Time to move on. To question the mainstream media’s coronation of Joe Biden as president is “dangerous,” says Rep. Murphy.

Trump lawyers Rudy Giuliani and Jenna Ellis have held hearings providing all sorts of evidence of voter fraud that took place primarily in the wee hours of the early morning of November 4 in key swing states such as Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Arizona.

Regardless of one’s opinions on Donald Trump, I would think virtually all Americans of good will would oppose election fraud. Election security is critical.

I showed my wife a compilation of highlights of the Giuliani-Ellis Michigan hearings of alleged voter fraud. After a while, she almost wept, wondering how this could happen in her adopted country? She was originally from Norway and gladly became a U. S. citizen many years ago.

Democracy is messy. But to ensure voter integrity, it’s worth sorting through this mess.

One man noted, “If we don’t root out the fraud…we don’t have a country anymore.” That was Al Gore in 2000. But in the case of Al Gore’s challenge of Bush’s victory—which was predicated on Bush’s taking Florida—Bush won every single vote recount in Florida. Every single one, even those conducted by liberal (anti-Bush) newspapers, like The New York Times.

Jenna Ellis said “We’re a nation of rules, not a nation of rulers.” Ellis referred Americans to look up Federalist #68, which I did. This “Federalist Paper” was written by Alexander Hamilton, and he states: “…every practicable obstacle should be opposed to cabal, intrigue, and corruption.” He calls these underhanded deeds the “most deadly adversaries of republican government.”

Was there a cabal at work in the wee hours on the day after the election to bring in bundles of thousands of votes for Biden in the key swing states?

Twenty congressmen are demanding voter integrity, especially after they saw the footage of the Georgia suitcases. They wrote an open letter (12/4/20) to Bill Barr with this lead: “Dear Attorney General Barr, Two pillars of a successful republic are election integrity and confidence in our democratic processes.” [Emphasis theirs]

Gary Bauer notes (12/6/20), “After the election, a shocking 70% of Republicans don’t believe the 2020 election was free and fair….30% of Democrats believe it is likely the election was stolen from President Trump! These figures undermine confidence in our electoral process.”

Congresswoman Murphy is wrong. Until the many allegations—including more than a thousand affidavits where many people (including Democrats) report on the cheating they themselves witnessed on behalf of the Biden campaign—have their day in court, it is not “dangerous” to explore these accusations. It is dangerous not to.

©Jerry Newcombe. All rights reserved.

RELATED TWEET:

https://twitter.com/EvanAKilgore/status/1336858321966542850