The TEA Party, Trump and the Loss of a Great Patriot

I was in the paint department. I placed the color sample next to the vase I brought from home. “Excuse me ma’am. Do these colors match? My wife says I’m color blind.” She replied, “Yes.” Then she said, “Lloyd? You are Lloyd, right?”

It was Lisa Feroli, one of the originators of the Orlando Tea Party. We had not seen each other since 2009. After catching up a bit, Lisa made a few interesting comments about the Tea Party movement. Not as active as she once was, Lisa feels some of the passion is gone. She said the movement was started by and should have remained controlled by We The People. Lisa said unfortunately, politicians were allowed to worm their way in; citing a rally at which RINO John Boehner spoke. Lisa feels, and I concur, that too many people made the movement about them. However, I do not think opportunists jumping on the Tea Party bandwagon did any serious damage to the movement.

Republican betrayals discouraged and harmed the movement. After we tea party activists worked our butts off to award the GOP the House and Senate, they broke their vow to repeal Obamacare and stop Obama’s executive amnesty. Outrageously, the GOP even supported Obama’s anti-American policies. Now, arrogant GOP knuckleheads are puzzled why so many tea partiers have said screw you to professional politicians, we’re backing Trump.

Sadly, Sen Ted Cruz, a true warrior for the Constitution and We the People became a casualty of conservative’s/tea partier’s frustration and anger with politicians. Still, I am confident that Cruz will be back, strengthened by his faith and his struggle.

There is good news in Trump’s remarkable popularity crossing all demographics. For decades, liberals have used their control of mainstream media and public education to drill into our heads that America is the greatest source of evil on the planet. Every day, liberal media bombards us with fabricated news stories designed to sell us their lie that a majority of Americans hate their country as much as liberals hate it. Liberal media’s message is America is sexist, racist, mean and must be punished.

Liberals’ mantra is the world has too little because America has too much. They say this is why the world hates us (USA). It is only fair that we open our borders and welcome all the world in to share our misbegotten stuff.

Then, along comes presidential candidate Donald Trump who vows to put America’s best interest first. The American people respond with wildly overwhelming approval. This tells me that American patriotism has survived despite decades of liberals’ attempts to cause Americans to hate their country. A majority of Americans still love their country and long to see it restored to A-number-one, top of the heap, top of the list, king of the hill – A-number-ooooonnnneeee!!! That feels good folks.

It is probably a bit much to declare that Trump won the general election with his response to the terrorist attack at the Orlando nightclub. However, I believe millions, including me, cheered him on. In his speech void of political correctness, Trump told the truth while offering common sense solutions to terrorism. Trump defined the bad guys who seek to kill as many Americans as possible. Trump called out Obama and Hillary for their typical ridiculous liberal blame America first response. He explained the dangerous consequences of Obama and Hillary’s weak mamsy-pamsy ways of dealing with terrorism. Trump was refreshing.

Listening to news feeds of Obama’s and Hillary’s responses vs Trump’s, I thought, “These guys (Obama, Hillary and their media operatives) still don’t get it; clueless regarding the hearts, minds and concerns of everyday Americans. Trump gets it. Trump may have just won the presidency.”

Orlando Tea Party organizer, Lisa and I agreed that we will vote for Trump.

As for the Tea Party movement, it is alive and well and will never go away. We tea partiers have simply matured – become more politically savvy – more focused and specialized in our efforts to take back our country. No, Trump is not a conservative. However, for the moment, Trump is our best weapon against another Democrat president vomiting more vile anti-Americanism upon the American people.

Speaking of the Tea Party, June 5, 2016 we lost a great patriot. Danita Kilcullen, founder of Tea Party Fort Lauderdale, America’s longest running tea party went to be with her Lord and Savior Jesus Christ due to complications with Multiple Myeloma Cancer.

I spoke and sang for Danita’s tea party group a year ago. Danita and her group were as passionate and engaged as ever. Danita and her group loves America and are committed to saving her. A week before Danita passed, I thought she was on the road to recovery. Her email said something like she hoped to be back fighting for freedom at their next meeting. I was shocked to hear she had passed.

Wow, what a great patriot sister.

Mr. Trump: Here is how you politically fell two birds (Hillary and Barack) with one stone

In this episode of DML Unfiltered Dennis Michael Lynch discusses Obama’s “fundamental transformation of America.” He also reads an email he sent to Donald Trump, the GOP nominee for president. In the email he explains how Mr. Trump can politically fell two birds with one stone.

Lynch explains that by exposing Obama’s father and his radicalism will force not only Obama to become unhinged but will force Hillary Clinton into either defend Obama or distancing herself from him, a lose lose situation for her and the Democratic Party.

Watch and listen:

Coalition formed to Ensure Adoption of a Conservative Republican Party Platform

WASHINGTON, D.C. /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — FRC Action, the legislative arm of Family Research Council, today announced the formation of a coalition designed to ensure the Republican Party’s platform remains a solidly conservative document.

FRC Action will be joined in Cleveland by Concerned Women for America, LAC, March for Life, and a consortium of Eagle Forum representatives along with platform delegates including Len Munsil (Arizona);Carolyn McLarty (Oklahoma); and David Barton (Texas).

FRC Action President Tony Perkins, who will again be serving on the platform committee as a delegate fromLouisiana said, “I am confident that given the statements and actions of RNC officials, combined with skilled conservative delegates, advanced planning, and on the ground support will ensure that the GOP once again drafts and adopts a document built upon the conservative principles that helps draw a sharp contrast between the nation’s two major parties.”

Perkins said that while he expects the party to remain committed to the core values of life, marriage and family and religious freedom, the platform does need to be updated to reflect changes over the past four years. “The current RNC leadership has done a great job working to ensure conservative principles are protected,” saidTony Perkins. “There may be some areas of the platform that will need to be updated to address problems created by the Obama administration over the past four years — for instance, by calling for an end to the Department of Education to address the ever expanding intrusion of the federal government into local education. We look forward to working with the delegates to pass a strong conservative platform showing a contrast with the Democratic Party’s extremist positions that have led to the moral and economic decline of the last 8 years,” concluded Perkins.

Platform delegate Carolyn McLarty noted, “It is very encouraging to know that there will be platform committee delegates who represent several independent conservative organizations coming with the shared goal to preserve the Republican Party’s conservative platform.” She continued, “Input from these committee members will be very helpful to positively influence the debate and votes on several major issues,” concluded McLarty.

The organizations in the coalition will have a strong policy presence in Cleveland to assist and advise delegates who are coalition members on a variety of public policy matters and platform committee procedures. Platform committee delegate David Barton added, “Currently, 42 percent of the nation identifies as Republican, but 54 percent of the U.S. Senate is Republican, 57 percent of the U.S. House, 62 percent of state governors, and 68 percent of state legislative chambers. Republicans perform so well because Americans are drawn to our principles. There are those who would like to see us weaken or abandon key principles, especially in social and moral areas, but as a delegate on the platform committee, I will work to ensure that we retain and strengthen our position on those principles,” concluded Barton.

“Political parties are formed around ideas, and those ideas are contained in the party platform,” said platform delegate Len Munsil. “I’m looking forward to working with this coalition of fellow delegates to ensure the platform remains a conservative document, reflecting constitutional principles, the values of our party and the ideas that have made America the most free, most prosperous and most virtuous nation in history,” concluded Musil.

First They Came and I Did Not Speak Out

German Lutheran Pastor Martin Niemöller (1892–1984) wrote a poem titled “First They Came.” Niemöller was the brother-in-law of Lutheran Pastor Dietrich Bonhoeffer who was implicated in the Valkyrie plot to assassinate Adolf Hitler. On the personal order of Adolf Hitler, Pastor Bonhoeffer was one of the last Germans executed by the Nazis on April 9, 1945. Bonhoeffer while in a Nazi prison wrote:

“Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless. Not to speak is to speak. Not to act is to act.”

“First they came” is a famous statement and provocative poem about the cowardice of German intellectuals following the Nazis’ rise to power and the subsequent purging of their chosen targets, group after group. Many variations and adaptations in the spirit of the original have been published in the English language. It deals with the themes of persecution, guilt and responsibility.

First they came for the Communists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Communist
Then they came for the Socialists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Socialist
Then they came for the trade unionists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a trade unionist
Then they came for the Jews
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Jew
Then they came for me
And there was no one left
To speak out for me

Today we find the rise of the new Democrat Party. An allegiance of three key factions, the Socialists, Islamists and Homosexualists. Each faction has made it their goal to:

  1. Make America Communist for as Vladimir Lenin wrote, “The goal of Socialism is Communism.”
  2. Make America an Islamic State for the goal of the Muslim is to implement Islamic (shariah) laws in the country to which they migrate.
  3. Make America Godless, for the homosexualists hate all religions because they are held accountable for their actions.

These three factions are fundamentally incompatible one with the other. We are now seeing the Islamist faction turning against the Homosexualist faction. Soon the Socialist faction will turn against the Islamist faction, out of political necessity. Only one faction can survive in the end.

America is witness to a new cowardice of American intellectuals following the Democrat rise to power and the subsequent purging of their chosen targets, group after group.

Here is a modern day version of Niemöller’s poem:

First they came for the TEA Party
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a member of the TEA Party
Then they came for the Jews
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Jew
Then they came for the Christians
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Christian
Then they came for the gays
And I did not speak out
Because I was not gay
Then they came for me
And there was no one left
To speak out for me

Christians want to save gays from Hell — Islam wants to send gays to Hell!

I have written about Islam for over a decade. One thing I have learned is that the more Islamic (shariah law) compliant an individual, organization or nation state the more dangerous and deadly they are. I have also written about how the Democratic Party is made up of groups that are fundamentally at odds with one another. However, they have joined together because the enemy of my enemy is my friend.

The Church Militant’s Michael Voris did a compelling analysis of what happened in Orlando. Voris points out:

The liberal alliance has brought various factions together, with one common goal: to end Catholic morality’s influence on Western civilization.

There are indeed some strange pairings in this liberal alliance: homosexualists, the Democratic Party, the mainstream media and Islam. Whatever differences Islam and liberals have, they have been willing to overlook them to join forces against the common enemy of Christianity, specifically Catholicism.

[ … ]

One point needs to become very clear to all those who wish to paint the Church as an enemy of gays: We want you saved. Islam wants you dead. And let’s be very clear: The Catholic Church wants to save gays from Hell. Islam wants to send gays to Hell. [Emphasis added]

That liberal alliance has been sorely tested after the massacre in Orlando by Omar Mateen, a devout follower of Mohammed.

In my May 14,  2016 column New Democrat Party: The Red–Green–Rainbow Troika I noted:

I have written that President Obama’s greatest political achievement has been to fundamentally transform the Democratic Party. The New Democratic Party (NDP) is an alliance which I call the Red-Green-Rainbow Troika or RGRT. It consists of new groups that Democrats have not historically allied themselves with, until now.

The NDP has made it its mission to protect the “civil rights and civil liberties” of groups that are both incompatible with one another and with mainstream America.

The groups are incompatible for a number of reasons including:

  1. Communists hate Muslims and gays.
  2. Muslims hate Communists and execute gays (sodomites).
  3. Gays hate all religions, but make an exception for Islam (i.e. the enemy of my enemy is my friend).

At some point these divergent groups will turn on one another.

As Ayn Rand wrote:

The uncontested absurdities of today are the accepted slogans of tomorrow. They come to be accepted by degrees, by dint of constant pressure on one side and constant retreat on the other – until one day when they are suddenly declared to be the country’s official ideology.

Here are some of the absurdities that have become the official ideology of the neo-Democrat Party:

  • The greatest national security threat is climate change (i.e. formerly global warming).
  • White Christian men are a greater threat than the Islamic State, Iran and the Black Lives Matter movement.
  • Spending on social programs is more important than spending on national security.
  • Engagement and dialogue with America’s enemies (i.e. Iran) is preferred to any form of confrontation.
  • Nationalized health care (the Affordable Care Act) is affordable.
  • Deficit spending is good for the economy and will create jobs.
  • Putting more Americans on the public dole is good for creating more government jobs.
  • Anyone who disagrees with the neo-Democrat Party policies is racist, homophobic, Islamophobic and a national security threat.
  • People don’t kill people, guns kill people (e.g. need to outlaw guns).
  • Public schools must teach children what to think, not how to think (i.e. Common Core).
  • Aborting the unborn and selling their body parts is noble.
  • Bigger government, more regulations and centralized powers and greater control over the behaviors of citizens is good.
  • Coal, oil and natural gas are evil.
  • Saving the planet is more important than saving the human race.
  • A weak America is good for world peace.
  • The Judeo/Christian God is dead.

On November 8th, 2016 millions will vote for the RGRT candidate for president. If that happens then the policies of the current administration will become the new social order.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Under Obama: 8 Islamic Terror Attacks That Could Have Been Prevented

Orlando Attack Is a Failure of Obama’s ‘Politically Correct’ Policy, Analysts Say

The Danger of the “Black Lives Matter” Movement

Black Lives Matter’s LGBTQ Agenda

Donald J. Trump: On Terrorism, Immigration and National Security [Video]

Donald J. Trump gave a major national security speech at Saint Anselm College in Manchester, New Hampshire on June 13, 2016 one day after the massacre in Florida by Omar Mateen, a Muslim who pledged allegiance to the Islamic State.

David Horowitz characterized Trump’s speech as follows:

Donald Trump’s speech on national security, which he delivered the day after the terrorist attack in Orlando, Florida, will change the dynamic of this election.

The speech was specific, detailed, and on the money. Trump showed how strategic securing the border is, how important stopping immigration from terror zones like Syria is, and how deadly political correctness has become.

Political correctness – which transforms the Islamic world, which has a lot to answer for, from aggressors into innocent victims – functions as a shield for Islamic terrorists, and handcuffs law-abiding citizens prompting them not to report suspicious activities by Muslims for fear of being called racist.

Read more.

Watch Donald J. Trump’s speech:

FULL TEXT OF REMARKS BY DONALD J. TRUMP

Thank you for joining me today.

This was going to be a speech on Hillary Clinton and how bad a President, especially in these times of Radical Islamic Terrorism, she would be.

Even her former Secret Service Agent, who has seen her under pressure and in times of stress, has stated that she lacks the temperament and integrity to be president.

There will be plenty of opportunity to discuss these important issues at a later time, and I will deliver that speech soon.

But today there is only one thing to discuss: the growing threat of terrorism inside of our borders.

The attack on the Pulse Nightclub in Orlando, Florida, was the worst terrorist strike on our soil since September 11th, and the worst mass shooting in our country’s history.

So many people dead, so many people gravely injured, so much carnage, such a disgrace.

The horror is beyond description.

The families of these wonderful people are totally devastated. Likewise, our whole nation, and indeed the whole world, is devastated.

We express our deepest sympathies to the victims, the wounded, and their families.

We mourn, as one people, for our nation’s loss – and pledge our support to any and all who need it.

I would like to ask now that we all observe a moment of silence for the victims of the attack.

[SILENCE]

Our nation stands together in solidarity with the members of Orlando’s LGBT Community.

This is a very dark moment in America’s history.

A radical Islamic terrorist targeted the nightclub not only because he wanted to kill Americans, but in order to execute gay and lesbian citizens because of their sexual orientation.

It is a strike at the heart and soul of who we are as a nation.

It is an assault on the ability of free people to live their lives, love who they want and express their identity.

It is an attack on the right of every single American to live in peace and safety in their own country.

We need to respond to this attack on America as one united people – with force, purpose and determination.

But the current politically correct response cripples our ability to talk and think and act clearly.

If we don’t get tough, and we don’t get smart – and fast – we’re not going to have a country anymore — there will be nothing left.

The killer, whose name I will not use, or ever say, was born to Afghan parents who immigrated to the United States. His father published support for the Afghan Taliban, a regime which murders those who don’t share its radical views. The father even said he was running for President of that country.

The bottom line is that the only reason the killer was in America in the first place was because we allowed his family to come here.

That is a fact, and it’s a fact we need to talk about.

We have a dysfunctional immigration system which does not permit us to know who we let into our country, and it does not permit us to protect our citizens.

We have an incompetent administration, and if I am not elected President, that will not change over the next four years — but it must change, and it must change now.

With fifty people dead, and dozens more wounded, we cannot afford to talk around the issue anymore — we have to address it head on.

I called for a ban after San Bernardino, and was met with great scorn and anger but now, many are saying I was right to do so — and although the pause is temporary, we must find out what is going on. The ban will be lifted when we as a nation are in a position to properly and perfectly screen those people coming into our country.

The immigration laws of the United States give the President the power to suspend entry into the country of any class of persons that the President deems detrimental to the interests or security of the United States, as he deems appropriate.

I will use this power to protect the American people. When I am elected, I will suspend immigration from areas of the world when there is a proven history of terrorism against the United States, Europe or our allies, until we understand how to end these threats.

After a full, impartial and long overdue security assessment, we will develop a responsible immigration policy that serves the interests and values of America.

We cannot continue to allow thousands upon thousands of people to pour into our country, many of whom have the same thought process as this savage killer.

Many of the principles of Radical Islam are incompatible with Western values and institutions.

Radical Islam is anti-woman, anti-gay and anti-American.

I refuse to allow America to become a place where gay people, Christian people, and Jewish people, are the targets of persecution and intimidation by Radical Islamic preachers of hate and violence.

It’s not just a national security issue. It is a quality of life issue.

If we want to protect the quality of life for all Americans – women and children, gay and straight, Jews and Christians and all people – then we need to tell the truth about Radical Islam.

We need to tell the truth, also, about how Radical Islam is coming to our shores.

We are importing Radical Islamic Terrorism into the West through a failed immigration system — and through an intelligence community held back by our president.

Even our own FBI Director has admitted that we cannot effectively check the backgrounds of the people we are letting into America.

All of the September 11th hijackers were issued visas.

Large numbers of Somali refugees in Minnesota have tried to join ISIS.

The Boston Bombers came here through political asylum.

The male shooter in San Bernardino – again, whose name I won’t mention — was the child of immigrants from Pakistan, and he brought his wife – the other terrorist – from Saudi Arabia, through another one of our easily exploited visa programs.

Immigration from Afghanistan into the United States has increased nearly five-fold in just one year. According to Pew Research, 99% of people in Afghanistan support oppressive Sharia Law.

We admit many more from other countries in the region who share these same oppressive views.

If we want to remain a free and open society, then we have to control our borders.

Yet, Hillary Clinton – for months and despite so many attacks – repeatedly refused to even say the words “radical Islam,” until I challenged her yesterday to say the words or leave the race.

However, Hillary Clinton – who has been forced to say the words today after policies she supports have caused us so much damage – still has no clue what Radical Islam is, and won’t speak honestly about what it is.

She is in total denial, and her continuing reluctance to ever name the enemy broadcasts weakness across the world.

In fact, just a few weeks before the San Bernardino slaughter, Hillary Clinton explained her refusal to say the words Radical Islam. Here is what she said: “Muslims are peaceful and tolerant people, and have nothing whatsoever to do with terrorism.”

Hillary Clinton says the solution is to ban guns. They tried that in France, which has among the toughest gun laws in the world, and 130 were brutally murdered by Islamic terrorists in cold blood. Her plan is to disarm law-abiding Americans, abolishing the 2nd amendment, and leaving only the bad guys and terrorists with guns. She wants to take away Americans’ guns, then admit the very people who want to slaughter us.

I will be meeting with the NRA, which has given me their earliest endorsement in a Presidential race, to discuss how to ensure Americans have the means to protect themselves in this age of terror.

The bottom line is that Hillary supports the policies that bring the threat of Radical Islam into America, and allow it to grow overseas.

In fact, Hillary Clinton’s catastrophic immigration plan will bring vastly more Radical Islamic immigration into this country, threatening not only our security but our way of life.

When it comes to Radical Islamic terrorism, ignorance is not bliss – it’s deadly.

The Obama Administration, with the support of Hillary Clinton and others, has also damaged our security by restraining our intelligence-gathering and failing to support law enforcement. They have put political correctness above common sense, above your safety, and above all else.

I refuse to be politically correct.

I will do the right thing–I want to straighten things out and to Make America Great Again.

The days of deadly ignorance will end, and they will end soon.

As President I will give our intelligence community, law enforcement and military the tools they need to prevent terrorist attacks.

We need an intelligence-gathering system second to none. That includes better cooperation between state, local and federal officials – and with our allies.

I will have an Attorney General, a Director of National Intelligence, and a Secretary of Defense who will know how to fight the war on Radical Islamic Terrorism – and who will have the support they require to get the job done.

We also must ensure the American people are provided the information they need to understand the threat.

The Senate Subcommittee on Immigration has already identified hundreds of immigrants charged with terrorist activities inside the United States since September 11th.

Nearly a year ago, the Senate Subcommittee asked President Obama’s Departments of Justice, State and Homeland Security to provide the immigration history of all terrorists inside the United States.

These Departments refused to comply.

President Obama must release the full and complete immigration histories of all individuals implicated in terrorist activity of any kind since 9/11.

The public has a right to know how these people got here.

We have to screen applicants to know whether they are affiliated with, or support, radical groups and beliefs.

We have to control the amount of future immigration into this country to prevent large pockets of radicalization from forming inside America.

Even a single individual can be devastating, just look at what happened in Orlando. Can you imagine large groups?

Truly, our President doesn’t know what he is doing. He has failed us, and failed us badly, and under his leadership, this situation will not get any better — it will only get worse.

Each year, the United States permanently admits more than 100,000 immigrants from the Middle East, and many more from Muslim countries outside the Middle East. Our government has been admitting ever-growing numbers, year after year, without any effective plan for our security.

In fact, Clinton’s State Department was in charge of the admissions process for people applying to enter from overseas.

Having learned nothing from these attacks, she now plans to massively increase admissions without a screening plan, including a 500% increase in Syrian refugees.

This could be a better, bigger version of the legendary Trojan Horse.

We can’t let this happen.

Altogether, under the Clinton plan, you’d be admitting hundreds of thousands of refugees from the Middle East with no system to vet them, or to prevent the radicalization of their children.

The burden is on Hillary Clinton to tell us why she believes immigration from these dangerous countries should be increased without any effective system to screen who we are bringing in.

The burden is on Hillary Clinton to tell us why we should admit anyone into our country who supports violence of any kind against gay and lesbian Americans.

The burden is also on Hillary Clinton to tell us how she will pay for it. Her plan will cost Americans hundreds of billions of dollars long-term.

Wouldn’t this money be better spent on rebuilding America for our current population, including the many poor people already living here?

We have to stop the tremendous flow of Syrian refugees into the United States – we don’t know who they are, they have no documentation, and we don’t know what they’re planning.

What I want is common sense. I want a mainstream immigration policy that promotes American values.

That is the choice I put before the American people: a mainstream immigration policy designed to benefit America, or Hillary Clinton’s radical immigration policy designed to benefit politically-correct special interests.

We’ve got to get smart, and tough, and vigilant, and we’ve got to do it now, because later is too late.

Ask yourself, who is really the friend of women and the LGBT community, Donald Trump with his actions, or Hillary Clinton with her words? Clinton wants to allow Radical Islamic terrorists to pour into our country—they enslave women, and murder gays.

I don’t want them in our country.

The terrorist attack on the Pulse Night Club demands a full and complete investigation into every aspect of the assault.

In San Bernardino, as an example, people knew what was going on, but they used the excuse of racial profiling for not reporting it.

We need to know what the killer discussed with his relatives, parents, friends and associates.

We need to know if he was affiliated with any radical Mosques or radical activists and what, if any, is their immigration status.

We need to know if he travelled anywhere, and who he travelled with.

We need to make sure every single last person involved in this plan – including anyone who knew something but didn’t tell us – is brought to justice.

If it can be proven that somebody had information about any attack, and did not give this information to authorities, they must serve prison time .

America must do more – much more – to protect its citizens, especially people who are potential victims of crimes based on their backgrounds or sexual orientations.

It also means we must change our foreign policy.

The decision to overthrow the regime in Libya, then pushing for the overthrow of the regime in Syria, among other things, without plans for the day after, have created space for ISIS to expand and grow.

These actions, along with our disastrous Iran deal, have also reduced our ability to work in partnership with our Muslim allies in the region.

That is why our new goal must be to defeat Islamic terrorism, not nation-building.

For instance, the last major NATO mission was Hillary Clinton’s war in Libya. That mission helped unleash ISIS on a new continent.

I’ve said NATO needs to change its focus to stopping terrorism. Since I’ve raised that criticism, NATO has since announced a new initiative focused on just that.

America must unite the whole civilized world in the fight against Islamic terrorism, just like we did against communism in the Cold War.

We’ve tried it President Obama’s way. He gave the world his apology tour, we got ISIS, and many other problems, in return.

I’d like to conclude my remarks today by again expressing our solidarity with the people of Orlando who have come under attack.

When I am President, I pledge to protect and defend all Americans who live inside of our borders. Wherever they come from, wherever they were born, all Americans living here and following our laws will be protected.

America will be a tolerant and open society.

America will also be a safe society.

We will protect our borders at home.

We will defeat ISIS overseas.

We will ensure every parent can raise their children in peace and safety.

We will make America rich again.

We will make America safe again.

We will make American Great Again.

Thank you.

The media talks about “homegrown,” terrorism, but Islamic radicalism, and the networks that nurture it, are imports from overseas.

Yes, there are many radicalized people already inside our country as a result of the poor policies of the past. But the whole point is that it will be much, much easier to deal with our current problem if we don’t keep on bringing in people who add to the problem.

For instance, the controversial Mosque attended by the Boston Bombers had as its founder an immigrant from overseas charged in an assassination plot.

This shooter in Orlando was the child of an immigrant father who supported one of the most repressive regimes on Earth. Why would we admit people who support violent hatred?

Hillary Clinton can never claim to be a friend of the gay community as long as she continues to support immigration policies that bring Islamic extremists to our country who suppress women, gays and anyone who doesn’t share their views.

She can’t have it both ways. She can’t claim to be supportive of these communities while trying to increase the number of people coming in who want to oppress them.

How does this kind of immigration make our life better? How does this kind of immigration make our country better?

Why does Hillary Clinton want to bring people here—in vast numbers—who reject our values?

Immigration is a privilege, and we should not let anyone into this country who doesn’t support our communities – all of our communities.

America has already admitted four times more immigrants than any country on earth, and we continue to admit millions more with no real checks or scrutiny.

Not surprisingly, wages for our workers haven’t budged in many years.

So whether it’s matter of national security, or financial security, we can’t afford to keep on going like this. We owe $19 trillion in debt, and no longer have options.

All our communities, from all backgrounds, are ready for some relief. This is not an act of offense against anyone; it is an act of defense.

I want us all to work together, including in partnership with our Muslim communities. But Muslim communities must cooperate with law enforcement and turn in the people who they know are bad – and they do know where they are.

I want to fix our schools, roads, bridges and job market. I want every American to succeed. Hillary Clinton wants to empty out the Treasury to bring people into the country that include individuals who preach hate against our own citizens.

I want to protect our citizens – all of our citizens.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Trump and Democratic Political Incorrectness

Horowitz: Donald Trump’s Speech Is a Game Changer

4 Reasons Why We Need Another 9/11 Commission After Orlando

What If the Orlando Murderer Was a Christian?

Planned Parenthood, Leader in Violence Against Humans, Defends Islamic Terrorism

EDITORS NOTE: The featured image is of Donald Trump on cover of his new book ‘Crippled America.’

Five Things that The Republican Party Gets Totally Wrong about Race

While there is no denying that Donald Trump has had a terrible past couple of weeks with his dogged focus on some obscure federal judge in San Diego, I think Trump can right the ship, but he has an extremely narrow window to do so.

I will deal with that in a future column.

This controversy with Trump and the judge has revealed yet again how unprepared the Republican Party is, in the 21st century, in dealing with the issue of race, especially, relative to the Black community.

I have advised some of the biggest names in politics, business, sports, and entertainment on racial and other career threatening crises.

The first thing I have noticed with Republicans dealing with the issue of race is that they deny that whatever happened was racist. Why does this happen? Well, that’s an easy question to answer. Republicans are surrounded by White staffers, who think they know more about the Black community than Black people do. And I’m speaking from personal experience, as recently as last month.

Memo to Republicans # 1:

Never, I mean never say to the media, “I am not a racist.” That means you are losing the argument. Remember former President Nixon’s famous rejoinder, “I am not a crook?”

Again, for purposes of this column, I am not specifically talking about Trump and the judge, but rather the Republican Party in general when it comes to issues that have a racial component.

There are absolutely no Blacks in positions of power or influence anywhere within the Republican Party. There are none within the Republican National Committee (RNC), National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC), the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC), nor any of the presidential campaigns.

Republicans have all White advisors and consultants trying to advise them on racial matters impacting the Black community, and they can’t understand why things keep blowing up in their faces. Duhhhhh!

Memo to Republicans # 2:

Don’t just go out and grab the first Black person you see and come back to me and say, “Now we have a Black, so please shut up.”

Many Black Republicans are whiter than their White counterparts, and this is by design. Many Black Republicans have absolutely no connection to the Black community; nor any skill set to put them in a position of advising the party on racial matters.

The Republican Party wants Blacks around them who they are “comfortable” with, not Blacks who will speak their mind and who know what the hell they are talking about.

You have Black Republicans being pimped by the media to constantly denounce Donald Trump, because they are media whores who are looking for the proverbial pat on the head from “massa,” but these same Black Republicans have laryngitis when it comes to the lack of “real” Black staffers, consultants, and advisors within the party.

I have no record of these same Blacks speaking about how White our upcoming national convention is going to be, how there has been little, if any, opportunities for Black Republicans to do business with the upcoming convention. Seems like you have more opportunity to do business with the convention if you are a Black Democrat—go figure.

How can you have a White twenty-something writing a speech about civil rights or voting rights for a Republican leader to give? I am not exaggerating, this is actually happening.

The party needs a plethora of “real” Blacks who have a connection to the Black community, who understand messaging in terms of communications, and who have personal relationships with the media, and understand how to connect all of these into a coherent strategy.

The party has virtually no Black surrogates who can push back in the media against all the Black liberals on MSNBC and CNN, so a lie that is repeated enough, becomes the truth.

So, while many in the party are speaking out against Trump (some of it is well deserved and warranted), I wish these same people would be just as vehement in fighting against the radical liberal agenda that President Obama and Hillary Clinton have been promoting.

And to my Black Republican friends, I don’t think all of your denunciations of some of Trump’s comments are not legitimate, but where are your voices on other issues that impact the Black community relative to the party?

What have you done to get more Black students internships with our congressional members? What have you done to promote legislative solutions to address issues of particular concern to Blacks (access to capital for Black entrepreneurs, aide to HBCUs, promotion of school choice, etc.)?

And finally, Memo # 3:

To my Black Republicans, always remember, when all is said and done, there is more said than done.

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared in Black Press USA.

VIDEO: The Long Road to the White House (1980 – 2015)

This video done by Chris Emerson captures the statements made by Donald J. Trump from 1980 to his decision to run for the Republican nomination for President in 2015.

Emerson writes:

I know a lot of other videos out there have some of these clips in them (some far more artfully done by the way! ) … but I wanted one with ALL of them spliced together chronologically because I think the story they tell is really fascinating and inspiring. Whatever you choose to believe or not on what the media reports about him in 2016, weigh that against Mr. Trump’s own words from interviews going back 30+ years.

Time stamps to each segment:

* 1980 Rona Barrett Interview 00:10
* 1987 Oprah Interview 00:47
* 1988 GOP Convention 01:58
* 1989 Interview 02:55
* 1991 C-Span Interview 04:59
* 1999 Press Interview 06:05
* 2004 CNN Interview 06:27
* 2007 Larry King Live 07:00
* 2011 Steve Forbes Interview 07:27
* 2012 CNN Comments on Romney 09:08
* 2012 CNBC Interview on Economy 09:22
* 2014 Speaking at CPAC 11:18
* 2015 Press Event 14:17

Copies/Reposts (just for reference, view counts):

* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BuiW_…
* https://twitter.com/JaredWyand/status…

Credits, etc.

* Music: Daylight (PON II) http://freemusicarchive.org/music/Kai
* Trump’s NYT ad from 1987: https://goo.gl/tm39ja
* Video Clips: All video clip credit/copyright goes to each clip’s respective owner.

EDITORS NOTE: The featured image of Donald Trump is from Tumbler.

What the Post won’t Post

The Washington Post, in its Standards and Ethics, committed itself to “an aggressive, responsible and fair pursuit of the truth,” so that the reader may be “without fear of any special interest,” but it has abandoned its pledge.  Pursuant to the recent wave of deadly Palestinian attacks against Israelis, the newspaper’s Beirut correspondent Hugh Naylor had utterly ignored the terror victims’ horrific sufferings and, instead, focused on the discomfort claimed by Palestinians.

Since September 2015, four hundred and forty-four Jews have been injured, some quite seriously, and 34 killed in what the Palestinians arrogantly call the Knife Intifada. There were also at least 851 stone-throwings and 337 petrol bomb-throwings, with many more that had gone unreported. Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, a despicable, deceitful man who indoctrinates his people from toddlerhood to hate Jews, incites them to attack and kill civilians with an assortment of weaponry (knives, axes, meat cleavers, screwdrivers). This time the fabricated threat is that Israel was plotting to close down the Al Aqsa Mosque.

Israel is a democracy, however, and under Israeli rule, no religious group has ever been deprived of visiting its sacred sites. By contrast, during the 19 years of Jordanian rule, Jews were forbidden entry and Christians were under such strict government repression that they were forced to emigrate, severely dwindling the Christian population. When the Jews regained East Jerusalem in 1967, all but one of 35 synagogues were completely ravaged and used for stables and filth, Jewish tombstones on the Mount of Olives cemetery were broken, and holy books burned. More than mere vandalism or the allegation that they must destroy idols, these behaviors are intended to erase the memory and proof of existence of all religions but Islam.

The Washington Post and its journalists surely know that under Israeli rule, Muslims may practice Islam in Israel’s capital, Jerusalem, even though Muslims forcibly turn away Jews from their holiest site, the Temple Mount (location of the Al Aqsa Mosque). Israel also recently issued nearly 90,000 travel permits to Palestinians who wish to visit family and the Al Aqsa in deference to their religious month of Ramadan.  The Palestinians responded with another terrorist attack, killing four and injuring at least six, possibly 17, in an upscale Tel Aviv marketplace – another challenge for Israel’s compassion and the journalists who eschew the truth.

The identity of the recent Intifada victims are known, but Naylor ignores them. They include several young rabbis who left behind wives, each with several young children; one whose wife and one child were also critically injured; and a rabbi and his son who were both killed en route to celebrate his daughter’s wedding.

Others were a professor of economics, son of Holocaust survivors; a Palestinian woman returning home from work; a 21-year-old theater major who had just completed her national service; the owner of a recording studio, married with two daughters; a civil employee of the IDF, murdered during a celebratory weekend for a friend’s birthday; a 26-year-old law student; a taxi-driver; a nurse and mother of six, age 38; a 30-year-old pregnant woman; a youth-group leader, age 24; a member of the Golani Brigade and sole support of his mother and two siblings; and a young border policeman. The list could cover many pages, each name representing an empty space at a table, a beloved child or parent who will never return, the private tears and sorrow that the world never sees.

Foreign-born citizens were not invulnerable, and included an Iraqi silversmith, father of five; an Azerbaijani security guard; a Uzbekistani man who was shopping in a Judaica store; an Argentinean rabbi, teacher, husband and father of seven; an American peace activist, English teacher and father, who had marched for civil rights and desegregation in the American South with Dr. Martin Luther King. Jr.; a US citizen, age 18, who was planning to attend Rutgers University; an American West Point Academy graduate, 29, who had served in Iraq and Afghanistan, and was signed up for the Vanderbilt MBA Program, and whose wife was among the injured.  When the news hit, the callous Palestinians celebrated in the streets, but this was also not reported.

Neither did Naylor attempt to interview the new widows and widowers, the parents who must cope with the loss of a child, or the children traumatized by the loss of a parent.  He gives no voice to the severely injured, whose planned futures have suddenly been forever changed or erased, and who must now deal with significant and still life-threatening injuries, including severe and extensive burns from bus explosions. Rather, he confers with Palestinian Arabs, who speak of the inconvenience of additional checkpoints that turn a job commute into an “hour-long ordeal.” Indifferent to how their co-religionists are murdering Jews and Christians worldwide, they lament about the increased military patrols and raids, or having to face deserved, but non-existent, Jewish retaliation – and the Washington Post and its agents buy into their trifling presumption of victimhood.

Feigning ignorance of 3,000 years of continuous Jewish presence in Jerusalem, Naylor chooses to grumble about “Jewish settlements” in East Jerusalem, an inappropriate term for the indigenous people. But there were no “settlements” or “occupation” or sovereign Israel when the barbarians conducted deadly pogroms against Jews in 1920, ’21, ’29, and ’36. Naylor should know Israel became a sovereign nation in 1948, and these are not “settlements” but normal neighborhood development.  He should know that there was never a Palestinian people or nation prior to 1967, when these Arabs reinvented themselves after losing their aggressive war. He should also know that Judea and Samaria were called the West Bank for merely 19 years of Jordanian occupation, and that the Palestinians are settlers in a land that was never theirs.  He should know, and he does, but his objective is to market the Post’s view. The major obstacle to the creation of an independent Palestinian state has been and remains Palestinian. They have consistently refused peace and turned land offers into war zones for their eternal jihad, mandated in their Koran, intensified by their President and drilled home during their five daily prayer times.

Naylor parrots the Palestinian narrative that Israel captured and annexed Jerusalem during the 1967 Arab-Israeli War, but fails to make clear that this was the result of defending herself against the joint forces of five Arab countries whose purpose was to obliterate Israel. Military control of the West Bank was clearly the result of a defensive war: “International jurists generally draw a distinction between situations of “aggressive conquest” and territorial disputes that arise after a war of self-defense. Former State Department Legal Advisor Stephen Schwebel, who later headed the International Court of Justice in The Hague, wrote in 1970 regarding Israel’s case: “Where the prior holder of territory had seized that territory unlawfully (in this case, Jordan), the state which subsequently takes that territory in the lawful exercise of self-defense has, against the prior holder, better title.” For this reason, the term “occupation” is wrong and misleading. Israel did not decide to “occupy” the land; her presence resulted from a war executed by Syria, Egypt, Lebanon, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia, and backed by Russian supplies to Kuwait, Algeria, Iraq and Saudi Arabia.

In defense of attacking Israelis with knives, Naylor falsely claims that Palestinians face discrimination in public spending on infrastructure and zoning restrictions, but, to repeat, Judea and Samaria have not been annexed or occupied by Israel. In fact, Israel has withdrawn from about 94% of the territory it captured in 1967. Naylor needs to consider that no other group resorts to such violence during times of inconvenience, and that this behavior is inherent in the Islamic ideology and culture, dictating violence not merely in Israel but throughout the world, where killing is done in the name of Allah, not Jesus, not Jehovah or Moses or Buddha or any other deities.  The hate is embedded in the collective consciousness of Islam, along with their jubilation at bloodshed.

It is the Washington Post and other biased newspapers as well as BDS groups on American campuses that provide a platform for Palestinians to whine about vague (never specific) regulations, deliberately ignoring the fact that these Palestinians are not citizens of Israel at all and have no claim to citizenship rights. Their actual position is that they are under military law administered by the Israel Defense Forces Central Command in disputed territory, and they remain so because of their unwillingness to end violence against Israel. Palestinians have had many opportunities, but refused to negotiate a final settlement for a peaceful future for all.

And the options for Palestinians are many: to recognize and work to overcome the directives of hate and death in the Koran; to start teaching the truth about their history to all their citizens, beginning with the children; to stop living under the inhumane threat of Sharia law; to cease the constant incitement through their mosques, schools and media; and to learn and accept how to live in peace with non-Muslims.

Throughout their Koran, they are instructed to follow in the footsteps of their prophet – to kill Jews and Christians for the ultimate goal of Islamic world domination. Their goal is to destroy Israel, implement Sharia worldwide and to re-establish the global Islamic State (caliphate).

o9:0  JIHAD “Jihad means to war against non-Muslims and is etymologically derived from the word mujahada, signifying warfare to establish the religion. (1) “Fighting is prescribed for you” (Koran 2:216); “Slay them wherever you find them” (Koran 4:89); “Fight the idolators utterly” (Koran 9:36).

The entire world is at risk and the Washington Post is the spokesman for savagery.

(With appreciation to CAMERA for calling out deceitful media.)

Gun Owners All-in for Trump

BELLEVUE, Wash. /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — Gun owners responding to an online presidential preference poll conducted by the KeepAndBearArms.com website show an overwhelming preference for presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump over prospective Democrat candidate Hillary Clinton, the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms reported today.

During the first week of polling, the lopsided response shows gun owners by a margin of almost 28-to-1 say they should vote for Trump (86.4%) rather than Clinton (3.1%). Meanwhile 10.5% of poll respondents think gun owners should vote for “another” candidate, but did not specifically say who. The survey will continue at the KeepAndBearArms.com website, which is jointly owned by CCRKBA and the Second Amendment Foundation.

Voting is continuing at KeepAndBearArms.com.

“The most important conclusion to be drawn from the poll results so far,” said CCRKBA Chairman Alan Gottlieb, “is that America’s gun owners understand the critical nature of this election and what is at stake if Clinton gains the presidency. She would be making cabinet appointments and nominating judges and Supreme Court justices, and there is every indication that none of her appointments would be friendly to the Second Amendment.”

Clinton was caught on audio at a private gathering last fall, stating that in her opinion “the Supreme Court was wrong on the Second Amendment.” She further stated that she would “make that case” every chance she gets.

“Instead of just making that case,” Gottlieb observed, “a ‘President Hillary Clinton‘ would be able to make appointments to the Supreme Court that could undo the progress we’ve made over the past eight years. Since the 2008 Heller ruling, and the 2010 McDonald decision, we have been fighting unjust and unconstitutional gun laws across the country. From the first-week poll results, it appears gun owners realize that the Second Amendment is on the ballot in November.

“We recognize that many people are not sure about Trump,” he noted, “but they appear to be absolutely certain about Clinton, and in a very negative way. The poll results show how important it will be for every gun owner to be a registered voter this fall, and to cast a ballot in the Nov. 8 general election.”

ABOUT THE CITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS

With more than 650,000 members and supporters nationwide, the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms (www.ccrkba.org) is one of the nation’s premier gun rights organizations. As a non-profit organization, the Citizens Committee is dedicated to preserving firearms freedoms through active lobbying of elected officials and facilitating grass-roots organization of gun rights activists in local communities throughout the United States.

Put the Wall in the Platform by Phyllis Schlafly

The promise to build a wall along America’s southern border with Mexico has carried Donald Trump to his remarkable victory in the Republican primaries for president. Now it’s time to put that promise into the official Republican Party Platform.

Many would be surprised to learn that a border security fence or wall was not already in the Republican platform. After all, President George W. Bush signed the Secure Fence Act which Congress passed in 2006 with the support of many Democrats including then-Senators Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.

In the 10 years since Bush signed that law in a staged photo-op, the government has actually built only 36 miles of secure double fencing instead of the 700 miles authorized by that bipartisan, high-profile law. As a result, our southern border is penetrated daily by wave after wave of drug smuggling, human trafficking, people with incurable or infectious diseases such as the Zika virus, and even Muslims and Chinese people who somehow made their way to Mexico.

Business lobbyists and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, who hold too much influence in the Republican party, oppose a wall because it would interfere with their continued exploitation of cheap foreign labor at the expense of American workers. In addition to tolerating the flow of illegal labor, the Chamber wants to expand every category of visas for foreign workers, both skilled and unskilled.

According to Politico, Republican power brokers have convened “as many as 10 closed-door huddles with business lobbyists to discuss the party’s platform.” Attendees were warned not to discuss details with the press, but you can bet that building a wall was not on their agenda.

The big-business lobbyists also expressed alarm at Trump’s promise to “discourage companies from moving jobs outside the United States.” One participant said his colleagues are “pretty much aghast” at Trump’s proposals to protect Americans against rampant cheating by our so-called “trading partners.”

House Speaker Paul Ryan, meanwhile, has been developing his own agenda for Republicans in an effort to compete with Trump’s. Under the slogan “A Better Way,” Ryan’s proposals include old chestnuts like cutting taxes, entitlements and regulations, but nothing about limiting immigration or the hemorrhage of jobs to foreign countries.

The Ryan agenda is basically the same as what Jeb Bush and 15 other failed presidential candidates campaigned on, but those ideas obviously didn’t sell to the Republican electorate. The voters have spoken, and the future of the Republican Party starts with a wall along our southern border.

Even some members of the Republican National Committee are resisting the wall as a political statement that belongs in the party platform. One RNC member called the wall “a symbolic thing” rather than “a physical thing,” while another member said the border wall is not to be taken “literally” because “it is a metaphor.”

The two RNC members are right that the border wall would be a powerful symbol, but only if and when it is actually built. Once completed, the wall on our southern border would stand as a “metaphor” for the fact that coming to America requires the invitation and permission of the American citizens who are already here.

The 2012 platform has many good provisions, including opposition to “any form of amnesty” and support for states using their authority to enforce federal immigration laws. But building a wall is now the foundation of Republican immigration policy – and yes, Mexico will pay for the wall.

Yet the Chamber of Commerce calls it a “myth” that “building a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border, and deporting all undocumented immigrants from the United States, would enhance national security.” The Chamber’s analysis asserts that a border security wall would cost between $15 and $25 billion to build, and not even $1 billion to maintain, but those are small sums compared to the real costs of illegal immigration.

The federal, state, and local costs of criminal justice to process and incarcerate criminal aliens is at least $15 billion a year, not to mention the harm caused by those crimes, such as horrific crashes that have occurred when smugglers drive the wrong way on freeways at night with their headlights turned off. Even deportation is not as expensive as opponents of border security pretend.

A wall along the border would reduce illegal immigration and cause real wages to increase for average American workers for the first time in more than a decade. That may not be something the U.S. Chamber of Commerce wants for big business, but it’s something that would attract American workers to vote Republican.

New Super PAC Championing Trump’s Truth-Telling about ‘La Raza’ linked Judge

BETHESDA, Md. /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — As final GOP primary votes are cast in states from California to New Jersey, Law Professor Victor Williams issues a fulsome and unreserved endorsement of Donald Trump.

Professor Williams began his June 7 endorsement by championing Trump’s decision to expose the bias and conflict of interest demonstrated by federal judge Gonzalo Curiel.  Williams states:  “Donald Trump has again dared to speak truth to power.”

Former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales has also supported Trump’s right to challenge the judge’s bias.  Gonzales reminds that a judge is ethically required not only to avoid conflicts but also to void even the appearance of impropriety.

Judge Curiel is a Member of the Leftist San Diego La Raza Lawyers Association. (La Raza is Translated and Politically Promoted as “the Race.”)

Judge Curiel is a longtime member/leader of the pro-illegal immigration group — San Diego La Raza Lawyers Association. The direct translation and self-promoted political meaning of La Raza by such groups is “the Race.”

(Since its founding, the leftist San Diego lawyers’ group has divisively self-branded as La Raza – “the Race.”)

The San Diego La Raza lawyers’ group claims as an affiliate the even more radical National Council of La Raza.  And the national La Raza umbrella organization is virulently anti-Trump.  La Raza groups nationwide are in obdurate opposition to Trump’s pledge to secure the nation’s southern border.

Victor Williams argues that in the Trump University class-action lawsuit, Judge Curiel has consistently demonstrated a prejudice against Trump.  The judge’s latest ruling — effectuating a document dump to the media while noting Trump’s public positions — was obviously orchestrated to harm Trump’s campaign.

Even Judge Curiel soon acknowledged that he had gone too far this time.

Donald Trump – the non-politician — dared to connect the dots to point out that the judge was being unfair.  Professor Williams is adamant that the “La Raza” judge should be recused.

The double-dealing media and GOP political elites are (once again) apoplectic by such Trump truth-telling.

An Early Trump Supporter Became the Last Trump Competitor Standing; Professor Williams Now Goes All-In for Trump

Victor Williams is the Washington, D.C law professor who launched a spring 2016  “write-in” campaign for the GOP nomination in several late primary states.

As the media widely reported, Williams’ purpose in the effort was to establish “competitor candidate” legal standing to challenge the Canadian-born Ted Cruz’s ballot eligibility in court.

(As the CPI/Daily Beast recently profiled, Williams finally left the Democratic Party after its shameful Irancapitulation.  Williams became a Trump supporter in December 2015.)

Even after Cruz “suspended,” the law professor remained a formal candidate so as to play-out the resulting litigation.  Williams v. Cruz is now before a New Jersey appellate court to resolve the “natural born Citizen” controversy.

With the primaries over, Williams gladly ends his “write-in” campaign.

A “Micro” Pro-Trump Super PAC:  Williams’ Next Project

Victor Williams will soon launch his next disruptive project to support Trump.  Professor Williams plans a “micro-focused, pro-Trump Super PAC.”

Williams’ presidential campaign garnered substantial free media exposure from the left and right with ultra-minimal expenditures.  Not crossing the Federal Election Commission’s $5000 spent/raised filing threshold, Williams was not even required to make the initial FEC candidate filing.

With a $7.35 average individual contribution, Williams even beat Bernie Sander’s historically low individual donation-average.

However election law will allow Professor Williams’ independent, pro-Trump Super PAC unlimited contributions and expenditures (although with detailed FEC reporting).

Williams will raise and spend heavily for the campaign against Hillary Clinton – but he pledges continued cost effectiveness for this Super PAC. It is the Trump/Sanders 2016-campaign-frugality model.

ABOUT VICTOR WILLIAMS

Victor Williams is a long-time attorney, law professor, and prolific scholar in Washington, D.C., and 2014 founder of www.disruptivejustice.orgHis campaign website is www.victorwilliamsforpresident.com.

RELATED ARTICLE: “La Raza” means “Master Race”

RELATED VIDEO: The Truth About Trump University and Judge Gonzalo Curiel

The Brainwashing and Brainwashed Media and its End Results

By Wallace Bruschweiler and William Palumbo –

Is the American population at large capable of independent thought anymore?  With politics going the way they are today, it’s a question worth asking.

As the 2016 election season progresses, it becomes more and more apparent on a daily basis that a vast majority of Americans on both the left and the right require their news to be ruminated, masticated, hashed and rehashed prior to consumption.  Instead of using their brains to consume and synthesize facts concerning their country’s politics and politicians, Americans – more often than not – have consigned themselves to a state of cerebral laziness.

For such people, what the news says is the truth, period.  Should you be mentally engaged reading this right now, “sheep” may come to mind.

Let’s take, for example, the latest kerfuffle involving Donald Trump and a certain judge.  If you were to gauge public opinion by what you see and hear on the news networks, you would conclude that Donald Trump has been outed as a racist after criticizing the judge, Gonzalo Curiel, who is presiding over the Trump University case.

Yet according to the judge’s own CV, Curiel is affiliated with the Hispanic National Bar Association (HNBA).  In July 2015, this organization issued a press release boasting of its intentions to target ultimately Trump’s business interests.

The judge’s flagrant inability to rule impartially is even acknowledged by former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, who wrote in defense of Trump:  “These circumstances, while not necessarily conclusive, at least raise a legitimate question to be considered.”

If you ever find yourself wondering why your friends, family, colleagues or peers cannot digest a basic factual political truth despite being otherwise intelligent, consider this: intelligence has little chance in overpowering regular and systematic brainwashing.

On the right, conservative pundits in the media have conditioned millions of loyal listeners and viewers to hang on and eat their every word.  Their daily appearances amount to a priestly sermon for far too many conservatives, and it is absorbed, sans critique, as Gospel.  Should the fickle media gods decide to turn on an issue or individual, however threadbare their reasoning, they surely bring the majority of their jelly-headed listeners.

On the left, the mainstream media has conditioned millions to selectively disregard inconvenient episodes (i.e. Benghazi, State Dept. emails, etc.).  This intellectually dishonest environment creates lopsided narratives: e.g., despite Hillary (and Bill) Clinton’s seemingly endless scandals, a few malcontents who attended Trump University overshadow Benghazi, the Arab Spring, the Clinton Foundation, Bill’s philandering, mysterious deaths, and decades of ongoing lies to the American public.

What happens when a country’s citizens lose their ability to think for themselves?  The media and political class are applying the methods used successfully in the past by Communist regimes and Goebbels; they mold and shape minds to accept things uncritically and unconditionally.  What is presented today as supposedly newsworthy are politically pre-selected events.  This creates the inevitable end result of cerebral torpor and mass-media conditioning.

Come November 8, 2016, we unfortunately will see if the brainwashing was too widespread and too deep to be overcome.  Amen.

VIDEO: Hispanic Republican FL State Senator attacks Trump’s rhetoric calls him a ‘racist’

Florida State Senator Rene Garcia (R-District 38), Chairman of Board of Hispanic Caucus Chairs (BHCC), is leading the attack against Donald Trump, who has questioned the impartiality of Judge Gonzalo Curiel.

Perhaps it is time to connect-the-dots on this effort to characterize Donald Trump as a racist. In Saul Alinsky’s book Rules for Radicals, RULE 5 states: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.”

Why discredit Donald Trump? Answer: Because Trump’s rhetoric resonates with voters.

fl senator rene garcia

Rene Garcia, Florida State Senator (R) and Chair, Board of Hispanic Caucus Chairs

The BHCC in a press release warns:

This toxic rhetoric is neither productive nor beneficial to the national election-year dialogue, and unjustifiably serve to use Mr. Trump’s newly found political influence to put unwarranted pressure on a member of the federal judiciary to influence the outcome of a private civil matter.  Additionally, this nation was built on the contributions and advancements of many diverse cultures and ethnicities, to forget this is to forget what makes our nation exceptional. We compel Mr. Trump to not forget this significant part of our history, and we encourage him to retract his statements.

If you go to the Board of Hispanic Caucus Chairs website you will find the profile of Chairman (Senator) Rene Garcia with a quick link to the National Council of La Raza.

A Discover the Networks profile on La Raza (The Race) states:

Behind the respectable front of the National Council of La Raza lies the real agenda of the La Raza movement, the agenda that led to those thousands of illegal immigrants in the streets of American cities, waving Mexican flags, brazenly defying our laws, and demanding concessions.

Key among the secondary organizations is the radical racist group Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlan, or Chicano Student Movement of Aztlan (MEChA), one of the most anti-American groups in the country, which has permeated U.S. campuses since the 1960s, and continues its push to carve a racist nation out of the American West.

One of America’s greatest strengths has always been taking in immigrants from cultures around the world, and assimilating them into our country as Americans. By being citizens of the U.S. we are Americans first, and only, in our national loyalties.

This is totally opposed by MEChA for the hordes of illegal immigrants pouring across our borders, to whom they say:

“Chicano is our identity; it defines who we are as people. It rejects the notion that we…should assimilate into the Anglo-American melting pot…Aztlan was the legendary homeland of the Aztecas … It became synonymous with the vast territories of the Southwest, brutally stolen from a Mexican people marginalized and betrayed by the hostile custodians of the Manifest Destiny.” (Statement on University of Oregon MEChA Website, Jan. 3, 2006)

MEChA isn’t at all shy about their goals, or their views of other races. Their founding principles are contained in these words in “El Plan Espiritual de Aztlan” (The Spiritual Plan for Aztlan):

“In the spirit of a new people that is conscious not only of its proud historical heritage but also of the brutal gringo invasion of our territories, we, the Chicano inhabitants and civilizers of the northern land of Aztlan from whence came our forefathers, reclaiming the land of their birth and consecrating the determination of our people of the sun, declare that the call of our blood is our power, our responsibility, and our inevitable destiny. … Aztlan belongs to those who plant the seeds, water the fields, and gather the crops and not to the foreign Europeans. … We are a bronze people with a bronze culture. Before the world, before all of North America, before all our brothers in the bronze continent, we are a nation, we are a union of free pueblos, we are Aztlan. For La Raza todo. Fuera de La Raza nada.”

That closing two-sentence motto is chilling to everyone who values equal rights for all. It says: “For The Race everything. Outside The Race, nothing.”

Dennis Michael Lynch links Judge Curiel to La Raza (Spanish for “The Race”) in the below video:

Jim Kouri in an article titled Trump’s Judge Gonzalo Curiel is a suspected lawbreaker reports:

What they [the media] failed to cover is the fact Curiel broke the very laws he swore to uphold and enforce. By this own admission, Judge Curiel helped an illegal alien get a scholarship to an American university, thereby aiding and abetting a lawbreaker.

Judge Curiel has been praised for such alleged illegal actions that were used by the Bush administration to arrest and incarcerate U.S. businessmen who were frequently targeted by the Immigration and Customs Enforcement directorate of the Homeland Security Department.

In Sufficient evidence exists to require Judge Curiel to recuse himself from any litigation involving Trump Sierra Rayne states:

The most important argument in favor of forcing U.S. district judge Gonzalo Curiel to recuse himself from the Trump University lawsuits was published today by the Conservative Treehouse.

The Treehouse linked to a copy of Judge Curiel’s “United States Senate: Committee on the Judiciary – Questionnaire for Judicial Nominees” in which, on page four of his response, Judge Curiel states that he is a “Life-time Member” of the “Hispanic National Bar Association [HNBA].”

The HNBA made public a press release in July 2015 that called for the following actions against Donald Trump and his enterprises:

“The HNBA calls for a boycott of all of Trump business ventures, including golf courses, hotels, and restaurants. We salute NBC/Universal, Univision and Macy’s for ending their association with Trump, and we join them in standing up against bigotry and racist rhetoric. Other businesses and corporations should follow the lead of NBC/Universal, Univision and Macy’s and take similar actions against Donald Trump’s business interests.”

[ … ]

By being a lifetime member of the HNBA, and via the HNBA’s press release making critical statements specifically against Trump while also calling for a general boycott of Trump’s businesses, there are reasonable concerns that Judge Curiel is acting as “a judge in his own cause” (i.e., the “cause” of harming Trump’s business interests).  At the very least, Judge Curiel’s “conduct or behaviour may give rise to a suspicion that he is not impartial … because of his friendship with a party” such as the HNBA, which has called for open economic warfare against Trump.

Read the full article by clicking here.

Readers may connect the dots between the Hispanic National Bar Association, the Board of Hispanic Caucus Chairs and the National Council of La Raza.

We report, you decide.

RELATED ARTICLES:

“La Raza” means “Master Race”

Trump Shatters Republican Primary Vote Record by 1.4 Million Votes

Hispanic activists’ anti-Trump efforts fall flat as citizenship push sputters – Washington Times

Stunning New Development!! Media calls Trump Racist

La Raza Circulates State-By-State Guide On Where To Vote Without ID

Meet The Pro-Illegal Immigrant Groups The La Raza Lawyers Of San Diego Consider Part Of Their ‘Community’

Trump’s ‘rhetoric resonates’ with Democrats, Independents and Republicans alike

SHELTON, Conn. /PRNewswire/ — Since announcing his run for president last June, Donald J. Trump’s public remarks have had the world talking. In a recent online study of 1,500 voters, SSI, the global leader in research data collection, measured respondent agreement and disagreement with 200 policy statements made by Trump. Several of his statements received positive responses from voters across the political spectrum.

After reading each statement, respondents indicated whether it increased, decreased or had no impact on their likelihood to vote for Trump. Respondents selected “has no impact” 49 percent of the time, “increases” 29 percent of the time and “decreases” their likelihood of voting for Trump 22 percent of the time.

“Although Trump is often regarded as a polarizing figure, our study shows that the sentiment and substance of many of his statements do resonate with most Americans,” said Paul Johnson, director of analytics, SSI. “Voters are aware of what Trump has said and they like many elements. In fact, Trump’s rhetoric persuades more swing voters than it pushes away.”

In particular, several of Trump’s populist statements scored high across all party affiliations. Republicans, Democrats and Independents in the study were unanimous in their positive response to the following: “We need to once again have a government that is of the people, for the people and by the people.” Respondents from every party also reacted positively to this statement: “The only special interest not being served by our government is the American people.”

Trump’s Top Ranking Statements — All Parties

1. Our country needs a truly great leader, and we need a truly great leader now.

2. One of the key problems today is that politics is such a disgrace. Good people don’t go into government.

3. We need to once again have a government that is of the people, for the people and by the people.

4. I want to save Medicare and Social Security.

5. Too few Americans are working, too many jobs have been shipped overseas and too many middle class families cannot make ends meet.

Many of Trump’s statements had a strong impact on Independent voters. “While only a minority of people, less than five percent, switched their preferred candidate after reading the Trump statements, 56 percent of them were Independents,” said Johnson. “Eighteen percent of these switchers went away from Trump, but 30 percent switched to Trump, giving him a net positive take among undecided voters.”

Two policy themes that resonated strongly with both Independents and Republicans were domestic job protection and budget discipline. However, Independents reacted negatively to statements around waterboarding and global warming denial.

Trump’s Top Ranking Statements — Independents

1. Our country needs a truly great leader, and we need a truly great leader now.

2. One of the key problems today is that politics is such a disgrace. Good people don’t go into government.

3. We need to once again have a government that is of the people, for the people and by the people.

4. If you tax something you get less of it. It’s as simple as that. The more you tax work, the less people are willing to work. The more you tax investments, the fewer investments you’ll get. This isn’t rocket science.

5. We’ve got to bring on the competition. Education reformers call this school choice, charter schools, vouchers, even opportunity scholarships. I call it competition—the American way.

The remaining top statements vary significantly by Republican versus Democratic audiences. Respondents who identify themselves as Republicans agree most with statements emphasizing the importance of building a wall along the Mexico border, building up the military and imposing budget discipline.

Those who identify as Democrats agree most with statements promoting universal healthcare, unions, Medicare, Social Security, Planned Parenthood and LGBT rights. In several cases, top statements for Republicans appeared as lowest ranking statements for Democrats and vice versa.

About the Study

SSI tested 200 statements made by Trump (regarding a variety of policy topics and positions). The study measured respondent agreement and disagreement with between 30 to 200 different policy statements. All respondents were exposed to at least 30 statements, with some respondents opting into additional rounds of exposure to more statements.

Initially, respondents were not aware that the statements had been made by Trump. Following statement exposure, respondents were informed that all statements were, in fact, from Trump. Respondents were asked both before and after statement testing who was their preferred candidate. Switchers were those who were not consistent pre- and post-statement attribution.

SSI is the premier global provider of data solutions and technology for consumer and business-to-business survey research, reaching respondents in 100+ countries via Internet, telephone, mobile/wireless and mixed-access offerings. SSI staff operates from 30 offices in 21 countries, offering sample, data collection, CATI, questionnaire design consultation, programming and hosting, online custom reporting and data processing. SSI’s 3,600 employees serve more than 2,500 clients worldwide. Visit SSI at www.surveysampling.com.

RELATED ARTICLES:

In Robust Response to Tel Aviv Terror, Trump Rips ‘Uncivilized’ Palestinians Who Praised Attack

“La Raza” means “Master Race”

Trump Shatters Republican Primary Vote Record by 1.4 Million Votes

Hispanic activists’ anti-Trump efforts fall flat as citizenship push sputters – Washington Times

Stunning New Development!! Media calls Trump Racist

La Raza Circulates State-By-State Guide On Where To Vote Without ID

Meet The Pro-Illegal Immigrant Groups The La Raza Lawyers Of San Diego Consider Part Of Their ‘Community’