Covid Vax: Largest Human Biological Experiment in World History with Unknown Long-term Consequences

The truth about the vaccines for the Wuhan Coronavirus is not being told to the American people. And the truth is this is not a true vaccine; it is a synthetic medical device that is being injected into more than 200-million U.S. citizens. The facts behind the vaccines are being blocked by your government, the mainstream media and big tech (social media). Graham Ledger peaks with Dr. Bryan Ardis, CEO of Ardis Labs, about the truth behind these experimental vaccines.

WATCH:

©Graham Ledger. All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLE: Don’t Let Them Bully You Into Accepting Vaccine Passports

Planned Parenthood Recommits to Founder’s Eugenicist Mission

Alexis McGill Johnson, president and chief executive of Planned Parenthood, recently wrote an op-ed in the New York Times titled, “I’m the Head of Planned Parenthood. We’re Done Making Excuses for Our Founder. We must reckon with Margaret Sanger’s association with white supremacist groups and eugenics.”

Yet this title proves to be more than a little misleading, when several lines into the article Johnson states, “whether our founder was a racist is not a simple yes or no question.”

Well, Margaret Sanger spoke at a Ku Klux Klan rally, she said, “We don’t want the word to get out that we want to exterminate the Negro Population,” and she referred to birth control as, “nothing more or less than the facilitation of the process of weeding out the unfit, of preventing the birth of defectives or of those who will become defectives.” So maybe the answer is not simple to Johnson, but Sanger’s actions and words speak for themselves.

Johnson goes on to acknowledge that Sanger caused harm “to generations of people with disabilities and Black, Latino, Asian-American, and Indigenous people.” But sadly, she proves the first words of the op-ed, “we need to talk about Margaret Sanger” true when throughout the rest of the article, Johnson — who promised to reckon with Sanger’s actions — simply talks.

In all of her talking, Johnson promises not to ignore women of color, but not once does she mention that as the largest provider of abortions in America, Planned Parenthood targets people of color by locating 79 percent of their surgical abortion facilities within walking distance of African American or Hispanic/Latino neighborhoods.

Johnson commits to fighting dehumanization including the “dehumanization of transgender people,” but fails to confess that by becoming the second largest provider of cross-sex hormones in the country, Planned Parenthood is putting people who identify as transgender at risk of serious dangers including interference with brain development, inhibition of normal bone-density development, and sterilization.

Johnson concedes that Sanger caused harm to people with disabilities, but she fails to admit that in America, abortions — which in America are performed primarily by Planned Parenthood — target people with disabilities in the womb and that 67 percent of parents who receive a pre-natal diagnosis of Down syndrome abort their child, 63 percent of parents who receive a prenatal diagnosis of Spina Bifida abort their child, at least 65 percent of parents who receive a prenatal diagnosis of cystic fibrosis abort their child, and 83 percent of parents who receive a prenatal diagnosis of anencephaly abort their child.

Not surprisingly, among the many things Johnson fails to remember in her op-ed is that when Missouri tried to pass legislation banning abortion because of race, gender or prenatal diagnosis indicating Down syndrome, she responded on behalf of Planned Parenthood saying, “Let’s be very clear: these severe restrictions on abortion access do nothing to address disability rights or discrimination.” This statement identifies the root of why Planned Parenthood has not and will not “reckon with,” and depart from Margaret Sanger’s beliefs. Planned Parenthood believes that killing innocent babies in the womb because they are black, because they are a woman, or because they have Down Syndrome, is not a form of discrimination.

As Johnson said, “Margaret Sanger harmed generations with her beliefs. In our second century, Planned Parenthood has the chance to heal those harms.” Perhaps not dehumanizing and killing the most innocent among us, the unborn, would be a good place to start.

COLUMN BY

Mary Szoch

Director of the Center for Human Dignity

Mary Szoch serves as the Director of the Center for Human Dignity at Family Research Council. In this position, Mary researches, writes, and coordinates collaborative efforts with other pro-life advocates on policies surrounding life and human dignity.

Prior to joining Family Research Council, Mary was the Director of the D.C. Catholic Conference and the Manager of Catholic Policy and Advocacy for the Archdiocese of Washington. In her role, Mary led the Archdiocese’s public policy work in D.C. including the fight against the legalization of prostitution, the complete deregulation of the abortion industry, and limitations on the freedoms of religious organizations. Mary also directed the Department of Life Issues for the Archdiocese where she collaborated with churches and pro-life organizations to educate and raise awareness on the life issues including abortion, assisted suicide, and discrimination against people with disabilities.

Mary received her master’s in education through the University of Notre Dame’s ACE program where she taught history and English to high school students at an under-resourced school. In 2015, while teaching at St. Peter’s on Capitol Hill, Mary founded a non-profit, Teaching Together, that provides meaningful jobs in schools to adults with special needs.

Mary is a graduate of the University of Notre Dame where she majored in political science and philosophy. While at the University of Notre Dame, Mary played basketball for the Fighting Irish and lettered on the 2010-2011 National Championship Runner-Up team. A native of Altoona, Pennsylvania, Mary currently lives in D.C. with her husband, Ben.

EDITORS NOTE: This FRC column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Democrats Furious Over Stanford Study that Found Masks are Useless Against COVID

Covid-19 Vaccine – Branding Humans Like Cows.

So much for leftists caring about “science.”

The Democrats have destroyed every respected institution in America.

Liberals Furious Over Stanford Study that Found Masks are Useless Against COVID

Stanford University quietly published a study that found that paper masks don’t help at all to prevent transmission of the coronavirus.

By: Warner Todd Huston, Flag and Cross, April 19, 2021:

Stanford University quietly published a study that found that paper masks don’t help at all to prevent transmission of the coronavirus. And leftist outlets such as Twitter are working hard to hide the study from the American people.

The study was posted on the the National Center for Biological Information government website.

One key part of the study notes: “The data suggest that both medical and non-medical facemasks are ineffective of viral and infectious disease such as SARS-CoV-2 and COVID -19.”

This is the same conclusion that nearly every mask study has ever come to — at least before “science” was corrupted by COVIDiots who wish to use the virus as a weapon to control the people.

The study added:

According to the current knowledge, the virus SARS-CoV-2 has a diameter of 60 nm to 140 nm [nanometers (billionth of a meter)] [16], [17], while medical and non-medical facemasks’ thread diameter ranges from 55 µm to 440 µm [micrometers (one millionth of a meter), which is more than 1000 times larger [25]. Due to the difference in sizes between SARS-CoV-2 diameter and facemasks thread diameter (the virus is 1000 times smaller), SARS-CoV-2 can easily pass through any facemask

In other words, the virus can just seep right through these absurd masks we are all wearing, and the masks can’t stop it.

What did Twitter do? This anti-science social media platform tried to suppress the study.

Former Trump adviser Steve Cortez tied to share the study, and Twitter suspended him for it.

RELATED ARTICLES: 

‘MASKS ARE DIRTY, DANGEROUS, DEHUMANIZING’

TYRANNY: Michigan Set To Make China Virus Restrictions on Businesses PERMANENT – Geller Report News

Israel Will Offer Oxygen Machines to Lebanon – Geller Report News

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved. Quick note: Tech giants are snuffing us out. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense permenently banned us. Facebook, Twitter, Google search et al have shadowbanned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here. Help us fight. Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here — it’s free and it’s critical NOW more than ever. Share our posts on social and with your email contacts.

VIDEO: Mick Jagger released ANTI-LOCKDOWN song!

That means both Mick Jagger and Van Morrison remember when music was about promoting freedom and against a state narrative. Good on ya Mick. So happy to be a Stones fan today.

WATCH Mick Jagger:

BORN TO BE FREE by Van Morrison

EDITORS NOTE: This Vlad Tepes Blog column posted by Eeyore is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Scientists Predict Death Spike in Vaccinated: Modelers are ‘following the science’ down a rabbit hole

WESTMINSTER, England (ChurchMilitant.com) – The most deaths in a third coronavirus wave will consist of people who have received two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine, British scientists are warning in a new doomsday report.

“The resurgence in both hospitalizations and deaths is dominated by those that have received two doses of the vaccine, comprising around 60% and 70% of the wave respectively,” the study predicts.

To combat the spike in mortality, the scientists are calling for new vaccines in the medium-term as measures to extend the period of lockdown before new vaccines are deployed.

The pessimistic scenario modeled by scientists at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM) foresees deaths and hospital admissions on a scale similar to January 2021 — despite a high uptake of the experimental jab.

The mortality surge is expected to occur in the later stages of the U.K. government’s roadmap out of the lockdown, beginning around mid-May and peaking in late July or early August, according to the study reported in the British Medical Journal (BMJ) last Wednesday.

The predictions studied by the government’s Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE), warn that the gloom-and-doom scenario is conservative as it does not take into account the “growth of an immune escape variant or a more rapidly spreading variant.”

A large proportion of Britain’s population would be susceptible to B.1.351 — the South African variant of the SARS-CoV-2 — whether they have been vaccinated or not, the modelers warn.

Speaking to Church Militant, academic and mental-health ethicist Niall McCrae noted that “the report’s prediction that 70% of COVID-19 deaths will be of dual-vaccinated people is quite startling.”

“Clearly these pseudo-scientific modelers would like us to be locked down ad infinitum, but do they know something that governments and public-health authorities aren’t telling us?” Dr. McCrae asked.

The academic slammed the study’s “Alice-in-Wonderland logic, ‘following the science’ down a rabbit hole” since “the report states, ‘this is because vaccine uptake has been so high in the oldest age groups,’ and that ‘this is not the result of vaccines being ineffective, merely uptake being so high.'”

McCrae elaborated:

We already know that for two to three weeks after the injection, elderly and vulnerable people are at increased risk of serious respiratory infection, due to lowering of immunity. That’s why there was a surge in deaths after vaccination rollout, with the evidence most stark in countries with the highest vaccination numbers; such as Hungary, Israel, Serbia, Gibraltar and the United Arab Emirates.

The report, however, suggests a longer-term risk to the vaccinated. Will they be more prone to COVID-19 variants or to other viruses? In the old joke when someone asks an Irishman for directions, and he says, “I wouldn’t start from here,” I fear for those who took the jab and thought that the road ahead would be safe and straightforward.

A SAGE source told Britain’s The Telegraph that the vaccines were not efficacious enough to allow a return to normal social mixing “without a big epidemic,” despite the jabs significantly reducing illness and deaths.

Addressing the question of low vaccine uptake among ethnic minorities in Britain, the report notes that “even if vaccination successfully drives down mortality and morbidity overall, it is highly likely that outbreaks will still happen in some communities.”

SAGE also reviewed models from scientists at Imperial College London and Warwick University that assumed lower virus transmission after all restrictions are lifted and used higher vaccine efficacy to make predictions.

Meanwhile, a new Israeli study involving 28 scientists has confirmed that those vaccinated with the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine were more likely to become infected with B.1.1.7 (Kent variant) or B.1.351 compared with unvaccinated individuals.

In fact, vaccine recipients infected at least a week after the second dose were disproportionally infected with B.1.351, while those infected between two weeks after the first dose and one week after the second dose were disproportionally infected by B.1.1.7, the study revealed.

Despite the Pfizer vaccine showing high protection levels, apprehension exists that several variants of concern can surmount the immune defenses generated by the vaccines, the Tel Aviv University researchers concluded.

RELATED ARTICLE: ‘Pause’ on Johnson & Johnson Vaccine Reveals One Systemic Flaw Plaguing the FDA

EDITORS NOTE: This Church Militant column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

YouTube purges Florida Governor video for ‘Covid-19 medical misinformation’

 

Who has the authority to declare a ‘scientific consensus’?


At what point does Big Tech’s authority extend too far?

Last week, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, whose state has faced the challenge of covid-19 considerably well despite media criticism, had a video removed by YouTube for allegedly spreading “medical misinformation”.

DeSantis had hosted a roundtable discussion in a video uploaded by the American Institute for Economic Research. In it, he and “a handful of medical experts questioned the effectiveness of having children wear masks to stop the spread of COVID-19,” according to The Wrap. A representative from YouTube confirmed to The Wrap that,

The video was removed due to multiple instances where the doctors said children didn’t need to wear masks. This position… violated the Google-owned video site’s “COVID-19 medical misinformation” policies.

The video was removed due to multiple instances where the doctors said children didn’t need to wear masks. This position… violated the Google-owned video site’s “COVID-19 medical misinformation” policies.

At the risk of stating the obvious, it is rather odd for a social media site to take a scientific stance on an issue where consensus is lacking and new data is constantly emerging.

Ironically, the World Health Organisation (WHO) itself advises that children under five should not be required to wear masks and that those between ages six and 11 need only wear masks in areas of “widespread transmission”.

Since when is an IT company better informed than the world’s peak health body? More to the point, even if YouTube’s guidance agreed with WHO, since when is it YouTube’s role to silence dissent? It seems that the proverbial Galileo affair, like so much else of Western history, has been cast aside in our giddy rush towards “progress”.

Far more certain than the efficacy of masks are basic facts of the universe like the law of gravity or that 2 + 2 = 4. That YouTube chooses not to censor dissent on these and yet targets a Republican Governor for a different stance on mask-wearing exposes much about the cultural revolution quickly enveloping us.

It is another reminder— in the unlikely case that we needed it—that in Wokeworld, everything is political. Science especially.

Consider also Facebook’s clampdown on vaccine dissent. Recently, Facebook announced, “we are expanding our efforts to remove false claims on Facebook and Instagram about Covid-19, Covid-19 vaccines and vaccines in general during the pandemic.”

Under this rubric, as recently as Monday, it was presumably a purgeable offence to post on Facebook suggesting, for example, that people could experience severe blood clotting if they took the Johnson & Johnson vaccine. But on Tuesday, we can only assume that this suddenly became permissible, once the US Food and Drug Administration recommended a pause in its use for precisely this reason.

Not only is Silicon Valley creating piddling dictatorships that threaten to chase off half their client base: they a forging a rod for their own back as this volatile pandemic requires a constant re-write of what constitutes the “scientific consensus” and what is to be condemned as “disinformation”.

The notion of consensus is in part what is causing so much confusion.

Consensus is a powerful factor when it comes to ascertaining scientific facts. But it is not everything. Again, ask Galileo, who was put under house arrest by the authorities of his day for discovering compelling evidence that the earth revolved around the sun. Eventually, he was proven right—but he had to challenge the Aristotelian consensus to achieve this.

We also do ourselves a disservice by lumping all “science” together, as though the law of gravity and our rapidly expanding knowledge of Covid-19 somehow hold the same authority. They don’t, and we’re only fooling ourselves if we pretend that they do.

A decade and a half ago, social media’s gift to the world was the democratisation of information. Anyone could post. Anyone could play journalist or commentator. Discernment was required—as it always is in thinking cultures. But the freedom afforded by these platforms created untold opportunity for media start-ups, everyday entrepreneurs, and global communication.

Now all of this is threatened as Big Tech steamrolls anyone who doesn’t agree with their subjective and ever-changing opinions. They are playing a game of petty postmodern tyranny, and it is hurting everyone.

It’s time to bring back dissent and robust debate in the public square. If we don’t, we will silence the next Galileo, and whom does that help?

COLUMN BY

Kurt Mahlburg is a writer and author, and an emerging Australian voice on culture and the Christian faith. He has a passion for both the philosophical and the personal, drawing on his background as a graduate… 

EDITORS NOTE: This MercatorNet column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Unraveling The Lies And Dropping The Masks

“In our age there is no such thing as ‘keeping out of politics.’ All issues are political issues, and politics itself is a mass of lies, evasions, folly, hatred and schizophrenia.” – George Orwell

“If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face—forever.”  – George Orwell

“The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated Communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists.” –  Hannah Arendt


Last week, I received a lovely note from Les Fradkin, world-famous award-winning composer and virtuoso MIDI guitarist and so much more. He said, “I read your NewsWithViews columns all the time. You really need to hear this. Quote it if you like in your column. My gift to you.”  I loved it because he sang about what is happening to our country, and for us to “turn to the truth and turn to the light.”  We know who that is…the good Lord God Almighty.  Listen here.

I’ve been blessed with readers like Les Fradkin, a brilliant musician and entertainer, and the many folks who comment on my articles and instill in me the courage and tenacity to continue researching and writing.  Without them, I’d have given it up long ago.

Now to the subject at hand.

Fear and Submission

When I enter grocery stores, the malls, the garden center at Home Depot or any other retailer and see my fellow Tennesseans with face diapers, sometimes two, even when they’re outside in the fresh air, it breaks my heart.  I’m shocked at their docile and obsequious attitude for a virus that has a 99.75 percent recovery. Their blind obedience to the perfidious media, Dr. Fauci and the socialist democrats make me cringe.  I never thought this many of my fellow Americans would be so compliant.  They have been deluded into accepting control, the restrictions and the totalitarian destruction of our God-given rights.

Animals will never allow the dumbest of the herd to lead them.  Unfortunately, America’s so-called representatives have their heads up their backsides and the worst of the lot are leading them, all fraudulently and unconstitutionally, all working to destroy our unalienable Bill of Rights.

There is no science-based reason for wearing a mask, but the mask Nazis have no fear of getting in your face should you not don the diaper.  I’ve been accosted several times, but I’ve found the best response is one of two… “I don’t live in China…yet,” or “I’m sorry, I’m not one of the lemmings.”  Then walk away from the nutcase who believes he’s better than you because he wears a mask that will eventually make him sick…as has been exposed time and again.  If the mask Nazi believes the mask actually saves him from getting sick or passing on the virus, ask him why he’s worried about someone without a mask…

Whenever I see a mask-less face, I tell them that it is so wonderful to see their face and invariably, we end up talking.  This has happened several times in the grocery store and these folks have become like-minded friends.

Realize that workers around the world have lost $3.7 trillion in the alleged pandemic, but billionaires have gained $3.9 trillion.  This is the largest one-year wealth transfer in history, yet no one is talking about the millions of destroyed middle class small businesses that build our economy.

Worldwide Virology Labs

The Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences is a research institute on virology administered by the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), which reports to the State Council of the People’s Republic of China. Located in Wuhan, Hubei, it opened mainland China’s first biosafety level 4 (BSL-4) laboratory.  The institute has strong ties to the Galveston national Laboratory in Galveston, Texas and the Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie in Lyon, France and the National Microbiology Laboratory in Canada. The Wuhan institute has been an active research center for the study of coronaviruses.

The Galveston National Laboratory (GNL) is an anchor lab of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Biodefense Laboratory Network, which includes laboratories built by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) at 14 universities throughout the U.S. with containment capabilities for biodefense research. Dr. Anthony Fauci is the head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID).  Dr. Fauci’s NIAID funded the Wuhan Institute of Virology at $7.4 million after it was moved from the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill.

The GNL is one of two labs with Biosafety Level 4 (BSL4) capabilities located on a U.S. university campus. The other is the National Emerging Infectious Disease Laboratory (NEIDL) located at Boston University. In addition, the GNL has extensive BSL3 capabilities where work on highly infectious pathogens, including SARS-CoV2, are studied and medical countermeasures such as antiviral and antibody therapies and vaccines are developed.

Dr. James LeDuc is a former U.S. Centers for Disease Control official who once led the office responsible for preventing deaths from viral disease.  He is now the director of the Galveston National Laboratory.

The Galveston lab has worked with China since 2013, when construction began on the Wuhan laboratory. Both the Galveston and Wuhan research facilities operate Biosafety Level 4 laboratories, which are designed to safely contain the most lethal and infectious pathogens for research.  Apparently, it didn’t work too well, did it…

Dr. LeDuc stated, “While the Wuhan lab was under construction, the National Lab provided “short-term training experiences” to the staff. The Galveston lab also hosted two Chinese post-doctoral students, who were trained to work safely in BSL-4 laboratories and who returned to China to work in the Wuhan lab.”  He added that those students started a biosafety and biocontainment training program for the Wuhan lab.

As mentioned in the Alex Newman interview with Dr. Lee Merritt, there were hundreds of Chinese communist virologists working with vaccine makers, Moderna, Pfizer, Astra Zeneca and GSK.

GlaxoSmithKline and Pfizer

The Wuhan Institute of Virology is not owned by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) as some have claimed.  However, GSK has a 100-year legacy of helping to transform the health, lives and futures of people around China.  Since 2010, GSK has achieved 14 Food and Drug Administration registrations in China.

GSK is in a joint venture with Pfizer, but does not own them; they completed a 2019 transaction with Pfizer to form a new world-leading consumer healthcare joint venture. The Joint Venture brings together two portfolios of consumer health brands, including GSK’s Sensodyne, Voltaren and Panadol and Pfizer’s Advil, Centrum and Caltrate.  This venture makes them the global leader in over-the-counter products and gives them number one or two market share positions in all key geographies, including the US and China.

Pfizer is one of the manufacturers of the mRNA Covid vaccine and none of them have been approved; they’ve only received emergency authorization.  Recently, the Times of Israel carried an article saying the Pfizer “experimental” vaccine worked well in the trials on 2,260 American adolescents, ages 12-15, and recipients have shown strong antibodies to the virus.  Pfizer is eyeing FDA approval.

GSK and BlackRock, Inc.

BlackRock, Inc. is an American multinational investment management corporation based in New York City and owned by Democrat Larry Fink. Founded in 1988, initially as a risk management and fixed income institutional asset manager, BlackRock is the world’s largest asset manager, with $8.67 trillion in assets under management as of January 2021.

BlackRock Inc. has filed an SC 13G/A form with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) disclosing ownership of 377,284,263 shares of GlaxoSmithKline plc (US: GSK). This represents 7.5 percent ownership of the company. In their previous filing dated 2020-02-05, BlackRock Inc. had reported owning 376,159,235 shares, indicating an increase of 0.30 percent.

Why do I mention BlackRock Inc?  Because in 2018, Soros Fund Management also dramatically boosted its shares in BlackRock Inc., overseeing $6 trillion by nearly 60 percent to 12,983 total shares in the second quarter of 2018.

BlackRock, Inc. also manages the French AXA, a French multinational insurance firm who strongly backs climate control.  Axa has called for the creation of a “net zero underwriting alliance” that would see member companies from across the insurance sector align their business activities with the 1.5 Celsius warming pathway required under the Paris Agreement, fundamentally reshaping the global economy.

Larry Fink wants member companies from across the insurance sector to align their business activities with the 1.5C warming pathway required under the Paris Agreement. Realize all of this nonsense is about money and taxes…not about global warming or climate change which is cyclical. Link  In late 2019, BlackRock, Inc. named Sebastien Herzog, a senior official at French insurer Axa’s investment management arm, as its operations director for France, Belgium and Luxembourg.  Spiderwebs of pharma control. Birds of a feather…stick together with climate change lies.

Deadly Vaccines

Veteran investigative reporter Leo Hohmann discovered a 2017 Ted Talk presentation by Dr. Tal Zaks, the chief medical officer at Moderna Inc., where he clearly explains in layperson’s language just what the mRNA technology does in vaccines. Zaks states, they are “hacking the software of life,” by injecting their own genetic code into humans. What we are witnessing in this new class of “vaccines” is clearly the wedding together of digital technology born out of the computer age, with Darwinian biology and medicine. It is transhumanism.

People who received the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine reported more side effects than those who got the Pfizer/BioNTech shot, according to a recent study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

There’s more….

Dr. Michael Yeadon, Pfizer’s former Vice President and Chief Scientist for Allergy and Respiratory who spent 32 years in the industry leading new medicines research and retired from the pharmaceutical giant with “the most senior research position” in his field, spoke with LifeSiteNews. Please read the entire article…

He addressed the “demonstrably false” propaganda from governments in response to Covid-19, including the “lie” of dangerous variants, the totalitarian potential for “vaccine passports,” and the strong possibility we are dealing with a “conspiracy” which could lead to something far beyond the carnage experienced in the wars and massacres of the 20th century.  Variants of vaccines are three percent of the original virus, and are miniscule compared to the original virus.  They are not a danger once the virus has passed through the citizenry.

Yes, our government is lying to us, just as they lied to us about polio vaccines grown on Simian monkey kidneys that caused soft tissue cancers to recipients and their descendants.

Dr. Yeadon’s main points are stated in this magnificent article by Patrick Delaney.

His main points included:

  1. There is “no possibility” current variants of COVID-19 will escape immunity. It is “just a lie.”
  2. Yet, governments around the world are repeating this lie, indicating that we are witnessing not just “convergent opportunism,” but a “conspiracy.” Meanwhile media outlets and Big Tech platforms are committed to the same propaganda and the censorship of the truth.
  3. Pharmaceutical companies have already begun to develop unneeded “top-up” (“booster”) vaccines for the “variants.” The companies are planning to manufacture billions of vials, in addition to the current experimental COVID-19 “vaccine” campaign.
  4. Regulatory agencies like the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency, have announced that since these “top-up” vaccines will be so similar to the prior injections which were approved for emergency use authorization, drug companies will not be required to “perform any clinical safety studies.”
  5. Thus, this virtually means that design and implementation of repeated and coerced mRNA vaccines “go from the computer screen of a pharmaceutical company into the arms of hundreds of millions of people, [injecting] some superfluous genetic sequence for which there is absolutely no need or justification.”
  6. Why are they doing this? Since no benign reason is apparent, the use of vaccine passports along with a “banking reset” could issue in a totalitarianism unlike the world has ever seen. Recalling the evil of Stalin, Mao, and Hitler, “mass depopulation” remains a logical outcome.
  7. The fact that this at least could be true means everyone must “fight like crazy to make sure that system never forms.”

Dr. Yeadon states, as I have in previous articles, “The eugenicists have got hold of the levers of power and this is a really artful way of getting you to line-up and receive some unspecified thing that will damage you.” And here’s a list of the very dangers of the criminal past of vaccine makers.

EUA Vaccines Not Mandatory

Ever since the Food and Drug Administration granted “emergency use authorization” (EUA) for two new vaccines in December 2020, (Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna) employers, schools, and other organizations are grappling with whether to require Covid-19 vaccination.

While organizations are certainly free to encourage their employees, students, and other members to be vaccinated, federal law provides that, at least until the vaccine is licensed, individuals must have the option to accept or decline to be vaccinated.

The clinical trials the FDA will rely upon to ultimately decide whether to license these vaccines are still underway and are designed to last for approximately two years to collect adequate data to establish if these vaccines are safe and effective enough for the FDA to license.

Given the uncertainty about the two vaccines, their EUAs are explicit that each is “an investigational vaccine not licensed for any indication” and require that all “promotional material relating to the Covid-19 Vaccine clearly and conspicuously … state that this product has not been approved or licensed by the FDA, but has been authorized for emergency use by FDA” (emphasis added).

When Dr. Amanda Cohn, the executive secretary of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, was asked if Covid-19 vaccination can be required, she responded that under an EUA, “vaccines are not allowed to be mandatory. So, early in this vaccination phase, individuals will have to be consented and they won’t be able to be mandatory.” Cohn later affirmed that this prohibition on requiring the vaccines applies to organizations, including hospitalsLink

Conclusion

Speaking of great entertainers as in the opening of this article, one of my all-time favorite actors was Alan Rickman.  He said this, “And it’s a human need to be told stories.  The more we’re governed by idiots and have no control over our destinies, the more we need to tell stories to each other about who we are, why we are, where we came from, and what might be possible.”

Alan has passed onto glory, but I would urge my readers to rent his magnificent true story movie, “Something the Lord Made” about the black cardiac pioneer Vivien Thomas (1910–1985) and his complex and volatile partnership with white surgeon Alfred Blalock (1899–1964), the “Blue Baby doctor” who pioneered modern heart surgery.

It is magnificent.  I sent it to my momma’s cousin years ago whose husband is a retired psychiatrist and their eldest child a cardiac physician…they loved it.

©Kelleigh Nelson. All rights reserved.

Why the Push Is On To Make Pandemic Life ‘Permanent’

One year after Americans were ordered to close down society for “two weeks to flatten the curve,” Bloomberg columnist Andreas Kluth warned, “We Must Start Planning for a Permanent Pandemic.”

Because new variants of SARS-COV-2 are impervious to existing vaccines, says Kluth, and pharmaceutical companies will never be able to develop new vaccines fast enough to keep up, we will never be able to get “back to normal.”

“Get back to normal” means recovering the relative liberty we had in our already overregulated, pre-Covid lives. This is just the latest in a long series of crises that always seem to lead our wise rulers to the same conclusion: we just cannot afford freedom anymore.

Covid-19 certainly wasn’t the beginning. Americans were told “the world changed” after 9/11. Basic pillars of the American system, like the Fourth and Fifth Amendments, were too antiquated to deal with the “new threat of terrorism.” Warrantless surveillance of our phone, e-mail, and financial records and physical searches of our persons without probable cause of a crime became the norm. A few principled civil libertarians dissented, but the public largely complied without protest.

“Keep us safe,” they told the government, no matter the cost in dollars or liberty.

Perhaps seeing how willingly the public rolled over for the political right during the “War on Terror,” authoritarians on the left turbocharged their own war on “climate change.” Previously interested in merely significantly raising taxes and heavily regulating industry, they now wish to ban all sorts of things, including air travelgasoline-powered cars, and even eating meat.

Since Covid-19, however, even the freedom to assemble and see each other’s faces may be permanently banned to help the government “keep us safe.”

Assaulting our liberty isn’t the only characteristic these crisis narratives have in common. They share at least two others: dire predictions that turn out to be false and proposed solutions that turn out to be ineffective.

George W. Bush warned Saddam Hussein had “weapons of mass destruction” capable of hitting New York City within 45 minutes. He created the Department of Homeland Security and the TSA to prevent, among other things, a “mushroom cloud” over a major American city.

Twenty years later, we know there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, the terrorist threat was grossly exaggerated, and the TSA has still never caught a terrorist, not even the two people who tried to set off explosives concealed in their shoes and underwear, respectively.

The only effective deterrent of terrorism so far has been the relatively calmer foreign policy during the four years of the Trump administration, during which regime change operations ceased and major terrorist attacks in the United States virtually disappeared.

Predictions of environmental catastrophe have similarly proven false. Younger people may not remember that in the early 1970s, long before Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez was born, environmentalists were predicting worldwide disasters that subsequently failed to materialize. In 1989, the Associated Press reported, “A senior U.N. environmental official says entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not reversed by the year 2000.” The same official predicted the Earth’s temperature would rise 1 to 7 degrees in the next 30 years.

Ocasio-Cortez is famous for predicting in 2019, “The world is gonna end in 12 years if we don’t address climate change.” But Al Gore had warned in 2006 that “unless drastic measures to reduce greenhouse gases are taken within the next 10 years, the world will reach a point of no return.” So, isn’t it too late anyway?

As with the war on terrorism, the war on climate change asks us to give up our freedom for solutions that don’t work. Assuming climate change proponents have diagnosed the problem correctly and haven’t exaggerated the threat—huge assumptions by themselves— implementing their proposed solution won’t solve the problem, even by their own standards.

Its proponents know this. The U.S. has already led the world in reducing carbon emissions without the draconian provisions of the Green New Deal. If you listen to them carefully, the Green New Deal’s proponents propose the U.S. give up what freedom and prosperity remain to them merely as an example to developing nations, whom they assume will forego the benefits of industrialization already enjoyed by developed countries because of the shining example of an America in chains and brought to its economic knees to “save the earth.”

Fat chance, that.

The latest remake of this horror movie is Covid-19. While undeniably a serious pathogen that has likely killed more people than even the worst flu epidemics of the past several decades (although this is hard to confirm since public health officials changed the methodology for determining a virus-caused death), the government and its minions have still managed to grossly exaggerate this threat.

Gone is any sense of proportion when discussing Covid-19. Yes, it is certainly possible to spread the virus after one has been vaccinated or acquired natural immunity. But how likely is it? Is it any more likely than spreading other pathogens after immunity?

If not, then why are we treating people with immunity differently than we have during more dangerous pandemics in the past? Similarly, it is likely possible for asymptomatic people to spread the virus—a key pillar of the lockdown argument—but again, how likely is it?

The theory Covid-19 could be spread by asymptomatic people was originally based on the case of a single woman who supposedly infected four other people while experiencing no symptoms. Anthony Fauci said this case “lays the question to rest.”

The only problem was no one had asked the woman in question if she had symptoms at the time. When it turned out she did, the study on her was retracted. A subsequent study “did not link any COVID-19 cases to asymptomatic carriers,” and yet another after that concluded transmission of the disease by asymptomatic carriers “is not a major driver of spread.” Yet, policies based on this falsehood, like lockdowns and forcing asymptomatic people to wear masks, remain in place.

Most importantly, none of the government-mandated Covid-19 mitigation policies work. No retrospective review conducted with any semblance of the scientific method has found a relationship between lockdowns, mask mandates, or social distancing and the spread of Covid-19. In fact, the most recent study suggests lockdowns may have increased Covid-19 infections, in addition to all the non-Covid excess deaths they caused.

Over and over, authoritarians overhype crises to scare the living daylights out of the public and propose solutions that have two things in common: they demand more of our freedom and they don’t work. It’s always all pain and no gain. One wonders how many repetitions of this crisis drill it will take before the citizens of the so-called “land of the free” finally think to ask:

Why is freedom always the problem?

This article was republished with permission.

COLUMN BY

Tom Mullen

Tom Mullen is the author of Where Do Conservatives and Liberals Come From? And What Ever Happened to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness? and A Return to Common  Sense: Reawakening Liberty in the Inhabitants of America. For more information and more of Tom’s writing, visit www.tommullen.net.

EDITORS NOTE: This FEE column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

VIDEO: Vaccine Is Trojan Horse For Totalitarian Takeover

CANTERBURY, England (ChurchMilitant.com) – The former vice president of Pfizer is raising the alarm over a coercive regime of mass gene-based vaccinations resulting in a global digital database that will “provide the perfect tool for totalitarian control” over every human being on earth.

In a lengthy interview Friday with British journalist James Delingpole, distinguished biochemist and pharmacologist Dr. Mike Yeadon described the COVID-19 vaccine as a Trojan horse that would be used to build “a common platform database” at a “supranational level.”

Not Really ‘Vaccines’: Purpose Questioned

Yeadon, who worked as Chief Scientific Officer for Allergy and Respiratory Research at the pharma giant Pfizer, said he couldn’t think of any “arguable medical reason whatsoever” for coercing entire populations from infants to the elderly to take the jab.

“Our government is lying to us in a way that is frightening,” Yeadon repeated throughout the interview, warning listeners of the deception of the government’s scientific advisers saying, “every single number put out is unreliable, untrustworthy and scientifically meaningless.”

The scientist explained that the new technology was a radical departure from traditional vaccines and “should be called gene-based vaccines just to emphasize there’s something quite different about them.”

“The fact that we’ve got this little word ‘vaccine’ at the end does not mean any of the things you think you understand about vaccines will apply to this one,” he emphasized.


Every single number put out by the government and its scientific advisors is unreliable, untrustworthy and scientifically meaningless.GabTweet


“These are either mRNA technologies or DNA with a viral vector,” Yeadon noted. “I’ve always found it an amazing coincidence that you didn’t have any coronavirus vaccine at all and then suddenly we end up with more or less three similar ones, and they all came through within the space of a few weeks.”

The expert, who has spent 32 years in the area of respiratory infections, explained how “the gene-based vaccines cause the body to manufacture the spike protein or a piece of it,” causing cells to stick together and initiate blood coagulation — which is why a number of people taking the AstraZeneca shots were dying of cerebral vein thrombosis.

“Not everyone is getting blood clots. But it’s Russian roulette. We do not know which people will develop blood clots,” Yeadon clarified.

Real Aim is Passports, Control

The scientist asked why governments were so insistent that everyone take a COVID shot.

“Why would you want to take the risk of a new technology that is a few months old and give it to millions of children? The answer cannot be to save them from coronavirus because they don’t catch it or they don’t get ill, so there must be another reason.”


If you allow the government to get away with this, they’ll gradually tighten the screws to effectively coerce the last few percent refusing the vaccine.GabTweet


 

But he urged: “I think I know what the answer is. Vaccine passports!” The identity documents, he explained, will have “your name, a unique digital identity number and at least one flag which will say you have been vaccinated.”

“And they are going to change your privileges according to whether or not your flag is up or it is down, and the reason they’ll do it is to coerce the other people who haven’t had vaccination to come on to the platform,” Yeadon added.

The passport could then be used for banking through a smartphone and spending would be permitted only through this unique ID on the common platform, “so you could live a bare life outside the system, or you could enjoy yourself in society,” he warned.

‘Variant’ Fear: Ruse to Depopulate?

Yeadon explained how governments were taking citizens down a “rabbit hole” by using the fear of Brazilian, South African, Kent and other variants or mutants to create new top-up vaccines and reinforce their goal of a global database.

The fear of variants was entirely spurious since the variants were just three-tenths of a percent different from the original virus, Yeadon explained, describing how a person who put on a baseball cap and then turned it the other way would still be easily recognizable by family and friends.

The top-up shots could then be used to introduce new genes — which could be either beneficial or harmful.

Yeadon elaborated:

If you wanted to depopulate a significant proportion of the world and wanted to do it in a way that wouldn’t require destruction of the environment with nuclear weapons or poisoning everyone with anthrax and you wanted plausible deniability whilst you had an ongoing infectious disease crisis, I don’t think you could come up with a better plan.

“I won’t be able to sleep properly until someone comes up with a benign explanation,” the scientist exclaimed.

When asked by Delingpole if it was theoretically possible to exterminate some races using this technology, Yeadon replied: “People have already been saying it would be difficult to keep planet Earth in good order and maintaining a good standard of living while protecting biodiversity and not running out of non-renewable resources.”

Urgent Warning: Resist Now

Yeadon pleaded with listeners not to take the shots for “trivial reasons” like going on holiday or entering a pub, because “if you allow the government to get away with this, they’ll gradually tighten the screws to effectively coerce and mandate the last few percent refusing the vaccine.”


I think they’ll put the rest of us in a prison camp. I am not going to stop until I tell this to as many people as possible.GabTweet


“I think they’ll put the rest of us in a prison camp,” he said, noting that the elite controlling the game won’t be taking the vaccines.

“I am not going to stop until I tell this to as many people as possible,” Yeadon said, calling upon the medical fraternity to stand against the vaccination regime.

“Where is your medical ethics? Stop giving these experimental vaccines to people when you don’t know what the side effects will be. Stop giving them to people who are not at risk of dying from the virus. Just stop! People are dying,” he pleaded.

The mainstream media and government spokespersons have attempted to discredit Dr. Yeadon’s earlier interviews and statements by dismissing them as “false, dangerous and deeply irresponsible.”

“Why Yeadon transformed from mainstream scientist to COVID-19 vaccine skeptic remains a mystery. Thousands of his tweets stretching back to the start of the pandemic document a dramatic shift in his views — early on, he supported a vaccine strategy. But they offer few clues to explain his radical turnabout,” the left-wing news agency Reuters notes in an extended hit piece on Yeadon.

When Pfizer announced the closure of its research operations in Sandwich, England, Yeadon pioneered his own start-up company with several former colleagues. His company, Ziarco, licensed several former Pfizer compounds and secured £16.8 million in venture funding.

In December 2016, the pharma company Novartis bought Ziarco for an estimated $1 billion in a combination of upfront payments, milestones and royalties.

EDITORS NOTE: This Church Militant column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

America’s Vaccine Passports and China’s Social Credit System

“No one should suffer from the great delusion that any form of communism or socialism which promotes the dictatorship of the few instead of the initiative of the millions can produce a happier or more prosperous society.” – Charles E. Wilson, President Eisenhower’s Secretary of Defense

“God is on your side? Is he a conservative? The Devil is on my side, he’s a good communist.” – Joseph Stalin, Soviet leader, to Winston Churchill at Tehran, November 1943

“If you don’t like us then don’t accept our invitations and don’t invite us to come to see you. Whether you like it or not, history is on our side. We will bury you.” – Nikita Khrushchev, Soviet leader, November 1956


Do you love freedom?  Do you love liberty?  Do you love owning property?  Do you love your privacy?  Do you love being able to speak freely?  Do you love going to synagogue or church?  Do you love medical freedom?  And do you love being able to associate with whomever you choose?  Do you love our Constitution and our God-Given freedoms explicitly spelled out in the first ten unalienable amendments in our Bill of Rights?

We are about to lose all those freedoms, and far more.  George Orwell wrote 1984 in 1949.  Seventy-two years later we are living his dystopian tale, and patriotic, conservative and knowledgeable Americans are distraught that the majority of American citizens are docile and acquiescent.

That same majority of Americans, and the world, bought the fake fear, went along with the unnecessary lockdowns, stayed in their homes, donned their masks – which they’re still wearing, sometimes even two, and fell for the lies. Now our compliant and submissive citizens are lining up to receive the most evil experimental vaccine for a virus that has never even been isolated and has a 99.75 percent recovery.  I want to scream!

Krispy Crème is offering their sweet fattening donuts, one a day, if you only show your vaccine passport!  What unbelievable chutzpah…promoting sweets for your obedience to the evil of our federal government, the CDC, the NIH, Bill Gates, Dr. Fauci, WHO, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, ModeRNA, Johnson and Johnson and countless others, sadly including our former president.  I pray that his entire family has not taken this jab!

Naomi Wolf

The following video by Naomi Wolf, a Democrat and feminist, has exposed exactly what will happen if the American public accepts vaccine passports.  We will have locked into China’s communist control via social credits for every American citizen who once believed our country was the land of the free and the home of the brave.  If you haven’t listened to Naomi’s 15 min. presentation about these evil covid passports, please do…what she explains is the total control of every American.  The fact that she is a democrat makes what she is saying even more important.  There is however, a caveat.

Naomi is uninformed regarding Israeli vaccine passports and should have done more research before claiming she knew about what was happening in Israel.  A friend who lives in Israel listened to the video and clarified their situation, which is nothing like what is being reported by so many.  She rightly blasts those who are repeating the false reports. Here’s what she wrote…

We just now went to a Jerusalem Bagel Restaurant, without any passport and no one said or asked for any ID. The only question they asked was “What would you like?” As I’ve said before, Israel follows the Nuremberg Laws which forbid businesses and govts from forcing people to get vaccines. Naomi is just copying what someone else said, and it’s not true reporting. It’s propaganda spreading fear.

The only scenario in Israel which allegedly has been allowed by our Labor Court is for an employer’s right to require employees to get the vaccine. It’s possible that will be appealed to a higher court. But regardless, restaurants so far, and malls and grocery stores etc., have not asked to see any green card.

The rule here for the airlines and some private clubs is you either need a green card or a test result saying you are negative for Corona, taken within the last 72 hours. Naomi just blew any cred she may have had, which she didn’t in my book, since she’s such a lefty.

The journalists claiming the totalitarian actions via vaccine passports in Israel either haven’t done their homework or any actual research. Sadly enough, they are spreading disgusting information that blackens a country that long ago moved away from socialism toward a capitalist society.

That doesn’t mean that what Naomi Wolfe reported about social credits cannot happen in America.  The despotic and totalitarian actions of the democratic socialists, and many of their comrades on the right, were exposed with their open hatred and hostility of President Trump.

Remember Claire Wolf’s statement from 1996… “America is at that awkward stage where it’s too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards.”  She made this statement a quarter of a century ago…where do you believe we are now?

Social Credit Systems

China’s plan for a social credit system is much like our financial credit system, but this system is about analyzing your character and trustworthiness toward the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).  It’s an idea straight out of Orwell’s 1984.  The original Chinese proposal for the system, titled “Planning Outline for the Construction of a Social Credit System is ungodly control. Unfortunately, the second half of the paper is in Chinese, but the point is…every Chinese citizen must be a good little communist or else there are consequences.

Here is just one paragraph from this evil and obnoxious system.

Accelerating the construction of a social credit system is an important basis for comprehensively implementing the scientific development view and building a harmonious Socialist society, it is an important method to perfect the Socialist market economy system, accelerating and innovating social governance, and it has an important significance for strengthening the sincerity consciousness of the members of society, forging a desirable credit environment, raising the overall competitiveness of the country and stimulating the development of society and the progress of civilization.

Naomi Wolfe talks about the CCP’s social credit system coming to America via vaccine passports.  She believes social credit systems are part of the passport plans!

All three branches of our government are held today by hardcore Democratic Socialists, who are extremely fond of Marx and Engels.  Their followers immigrated to America in 1848 after the failure of socialism in Europe and have assiduously worked to change America into a communist state, one that too closely resembles the massive citizen control in the CCP.   In America, the parasite elements of the ruling elite want total control of all citizens and the entire plan was fomented and engineered via the “pandemic” of Covid-19.

Mainland China’s “social credit” system is the most extensive program of government surveillance the world has ever seen—one that should caution not only Hong Kong but also America and the West against further intrusions on privacy, but those in charge of our government today are thrilled with the constant surveillance and wish to implement China’s policies as soon as possible.

A Wall Street Journal article estimated that 10% of East Germans were Stasi spies, but that’s nothing compared with China’s oversight on their people.  In 2020, an additional 600 million cameras were installed in China … one for every two citizens.  Through facial recognition software, Beijing will be able to identify everyone within three seconds of anything happening.  Chinese citizens do not own their lives, their government, run by Xi Jinping, knows their every move, and monitors people they believe may go against the ideological beliefs of the CCP.  In Taiwan, the people tear down the hated spy cameras, longing to keep their freedom from the mainland.

Falun Gong members, and dissident Christians are closely watched and tracked and this is where this social credit system steps in.  The Muslim Uyghurs are recognized as native to the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region in Northwest China and their population has felt the heavy hand of Xi Jinping. In 2017, China began a massive political reeducation program, with more than one million Uyghurs from all walks of life taken into 85 identified detention camps in Xinjiang.

The government nips any democracy movement in the bud and knows your every move via their social credit system.  Chinese citizens are ranked via merits and demerits regarding their behavior towards their masters.  Should they too often criticize their leaders, put their garbage in the wrong bin, or go against the rules of their masters, they will incur sanctions to discourage their improper and bad behavior.  The totalitarian state controls them completely…they’re denied good jobs, internet speed is cut, they’re kept out of prestigious schools and their pets can even be taken from them…thus the citizenry must be submissive to the state or they will pay dearly and that can mean imprisonment.

A recent Western Journal article exposed the cries for help from Chinese prisoners.  Notes from prisoners found hidden in decorations within holiday products made for Americans told of their imprisonment resulting from actions against the state.  Many of the prisoners are Falun Gong members and suffer more punishment than others because of their beliefs.

According to the New York Post, the letters read, “Please kindly resend this letter to the World Human Right[s] Organization. Thousands [of] people here who are under the persecution of the Chinese Communist Party Government will thank and remember you forever.”

Libertarians

Although I’m not a libertarian, our Tennessee Libertarians, unlike our democrats and republicans, stand firmly against vaccination passports and reject their implementation by the government at every level. They are right in saying passports are antithetical to individual liberty and they will erode our inherent rights.

We have God given sovereignty over our bodies, our property and our privacy. Our founders included those unalienable rights in the first ten amendments of our constitution.  We the people are not the servants of those elected to represent us who have shown their true totalitarian and dictatorial colors.  Their passport proposals are antithetical to individual freedoms and an infringement on liberty in a free society.

Passports will empower the state should we fail to comply.  This includes business licenses, tracking technologies that violate privacy and possibly HIPAA violations. Federal, state and local governments will increase their control and powers, none of which are enumerated under their respective constitutions.  Individual liberty will be lost.

Conclusion

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) introduced a proposal on April 1st that would ban COVID-19 vaccination mandates as well as so-called vaccine passports. I am afraid few will sign onto her “We Will Not Comply Act.”  We must act now…and that means telling your elected officials you want this bill passed.  State legislatures need to be heavily encouraged to write the same kinds of bills, and strongly urge their governors to sign them.

Projects like China’s Social Credit System should worry people for a number of reasons. But just like Orwell’s 1984 dystopian hell it’s being likened to, it scares us because we innately understand that it is a world we’re familiar with — only with the control and surveillance massively cranked up.

©Kelleigh Nelson. All rights reserved.

Texas Has Fewer COVID Cases Than Michigan—Despite Nearly 20M More People and No Restrictions

In Texas, COVID cases continue to fall. Meanwhile, many other states are fighting a resurgence of the virus despite state attempts to tame it.


On March 2, former US Senator Al Franken mocked Texas for lifting all its remaining COVID-19 restrictions.

“Gee, we here in Texas haven’t screwed up royally in a whole two weeks!” Franken tweeted. “I know! Let’s lift the mask mandate!”

Despite what Franken and many other critics predicted, Texas didn’t see an explosion in COVID cases. Instead, the Lone Star state saw cases reach a record low. Indeed, in the month since Franken mocked the announcement, daily cases in Texas fell from 6,834 to 2,078. That’s a 70 percent drop.

Meanwhile, Franken’s home state of Minnesota has experienced the opposite trajectory.

Like Senator Franken, I have a Minnesota connection. I live here, and have for more than a decade. It’s a beautiful state with wonderful people. But unlike many parts of the country, the Gopher State is far from open.

Governor Tim Walz’s “Stay Safe Plan” remains in force. The order limits indoor social gatherings to 15 people (outdoor gatherings to 50). Social distancing “must be maintained” when people from different households gather. Many businesses, such as restaurants, operate under capacity limits (both indoors and outdoors). Masks are required virtually everywhere indoors.

Despite these restrictions, Minnesota is seeing a surge in coronavirus cases. On March 2, the day Texas announced it was lifting all pandemic restrictions, Minnesota’s daily case count was at 425. A month later, on April 2, that number had swelled to more than 2,500.

Across the Mississippi River in the state of Wisconsin, cases remain quite low, even in the absence of state mandates (despite Gov. Tony Evers’s wishes). In fact, if you look at the three-day rolling average (April 2-4), Minnesota now has nearly as many daily cases as Texas.

Minnesota is hardly alone. Several other states with restrictions are seeing similar rises in cases to varying degrees, including Massachusetts (mild increase) and Michigan (a sharp increase).

In Michigan, CNN reports that state statics show its case count hit 9,350 on Saturday, the highest since December 7. Its 3-day rolling average on April 4 was 6,995.

In Texas, it was 1,646.

In other words, as of Sunday, Texas has about one-fourth as many cases as Michigan even though it has zero restrictions—and 20 million more people.

Can other factors help explain the discrepancy? Certainly.

Numbers often lie, or at least don’t tell the full story. Reports show Texas has been testing less amid the COVID-19 vaccine rollout, which means the government might be missing more positive cases. This might explain why COVID deaths have not fallen quite as fast as cases (though the drop since lifting restrictions is still profound).

In fact, if you compare raw figures (3-day rolling average) Texas actually has more COVID deaths than Michigan, though mortality is still lower on a per capita basis.

Still, no matter how you slice the data, Texas’s numbers are falling rapidly in the absence of restrictions of any kind, contra to what was predicted.

It’s tragic to see coronavirus cases rise anywhere. (I had the virus recently. It was not fun.) But highlighting the increase in states such as Michigan and Minnesota in contrast to the drop in Texas is important because it’s precisely the opposite of what lockdown proponents predicted.

Al Franklin was hardly alone in criticizing Texas Gov. Greg Abbott’s decision to lift all restrictions. Drew Holden, a DC-based communications professional, documented in a Twitter thread some of the reactions, which were legion.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom called Texas’s action “reckless.” President Joe Biden called it “Neanderthal thinking.” Former Rep. Beto O’Rourke said Abbott’s decision was “a death warrant” for the state.

The scary predictions, fortunately, did not come to pass in Texas. The question is why.

When Al Franken and company warn that lifting government restrictions will have dire health consequences, it’s fair to assume they believe this to be true. No one, after all, wants to make failed predictions.

Their mistake was having a misplaced faith in the efficacy of lockdowns and other government restrictions. And the word faith—defined as “complete trust or confidence in someone or something”—matters.

Lockdown proponents are fond of saying they are simply “following the science,” but in reality, they are operating more on faith than science—faith that government planners can effectively mitigate the spread of the coronavirus if given the right tools (namely, coercion).

In doing so, they overestimate the proficiency of government planners and underestimate the complexity of human society. This is why their predictions on lifting restrictions have been so wrong so consistently. And it’s also why they struggle to explain a fact the Washington Post reported last month when comparing Florida and California—“why states with greater government-imposed restrictions have not always fared better than those without them.”

To follow the science would be to acknowledge that dozens of academic studies call into question the effectiveness of lockdowns (and other restrictive measures) and admit government restrictions come with serious collateral damage. This is not happening, at least not enough.

Instead, lockdown proponents continue to operate mostly under the Good Intentions Fallacy (also known as the Righteousness Fallacy). They assume these restrictions must be working because they are passed in good faith by smart people who care.

This is a perennial trap in policymaking, the famed Milton Friedman once observed.

“One of the great mistakes is to judge policies and programs by their intentions rather than their results,” the Nobel Laureate economist explained.

The widespread faith in lockdown effectiveness won’t die easily. Faith never does. But with every state that opens up and doesn’t see a surge in cases, the lockdown fallacy dies a little more.

As more and more data come in, it’s only a matter of time before Americans remember a truth they briefly forgot—freedom isn’t just a good principle. It actually works.

COLUMN BY

Jon Miltimore

Jonathan Miltimore is the Managing Editor of FEE.org. His writing/reporting has been the subject of articles in TIME magazine, The Wall Street Journal, CNN, Forbes, Fox News, and the Star Tribune. Bylines: Newsweek, The Washington Times, MSN.com, The Washington Examiner, The Daily Caller, The Federalist, the Epoch Times.

EDITORS NOTE: This FEE column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

SEGREGATION: Vermont Opens Early COVID Vaccine Access On Explicitly RACIAL LINES

I think I am going to be sick.

Vermont causes controversy by opening early COVID vaccine access on explicitly racial lines

Not a great look

By: Leon Wolf, The Blaze, April 2, 2021:

The state of Vermont has caused controversy by announcing that access to the COVID-19 vaccine will be opened early along explicitly racial lines, with “Black, indigenous, or a person of color” residents receiving early access to the vaccine, along with anyone in their family.

Vermont Gov. Phil Scott (R) publicized the announcement on Twitter Thursday, saying, “If you or anyone in your household identifies as Black, Indigenous, or a person of color (BIPOC), including anyone with Abenaki or other First Nations heritage, all household members who are 16 years or older can sign up to get a vaccine!”

RELATED ARTICLE: The 10 Radical New Rules That Are Changing America

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. Quick note: Tech giants are snuffing us out. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense permenently banned us. Facebook, Twitter, Google search et al have shadowbanned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here. Help us fight. Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here — it’s free and it’s critical NOW more than ever. Share our posts on social and with your email contacts.

A Smorgasbord Of COVID Corruption — Part One

I don’t know if it is still in operation, but at one time and over many years there was a Swedish restaurant in northwest Arkansas that was very famous for its smorgasbord, which was a massive buffet loaded with many varieties of good food.

We are now confronted with a situation in America that we might call a smorgasbord of corruption; a buffet of government promotion and sponsorship of literally the most evil and abhorrent practices imaginable. It reminds me of Genesis 6:5, where God saw that the thoughts and inclinations of the people were continually turning more wicked.

We are incessantly told by our so-called health authorities that we have a health crisis which is caused by the COVID-19 viral pandemic. However, many health officials, both physicians and scientists refute this. Many are currently proclaiming that there is no pandemic and no COVID, that it is all a concoction to create a climate of fear. The goal of the health authorities in this country is the agenda for world government, i.e., the great reset, the acquiescence, by the people of total control of our health, resulting in a license to do anything that will bring about the New World Order and the fulfillment of UN Agenda 21.

There are many reports from doctors, scientists and health authorities, not connected to government, who take issue with the propaganda that we all need a vaccine to protect us from this “pandemic.”  The recovery rate of this virus is 98 to 99.75 percent, so why is a vaccine necessary?  Even those who have taken this vaccine are still getting COVID. Is there an ulterior motive for this vaccine?  It certainly appears to be true.

There are recent reports from very reputable sources that what people are being vaccinated with is not a normal vaccine, but rather a number of proteins designed to alter our DNA so that our immune system could be changed. Actually, we don’t know the full result of this global experiment but many of us understand the main goal of the globalists is to reduce and manage the population through any means necessary, including via vaccines.

In an interview with the New American Magazine’s Senior Editor, Alex Newman, famous Rockstar-turned-Pastor Casper McCloud explains how the Bible relates to the issue of the day – in particular the COVID pandemic, the vaccination campaign, and the push towards transhumanism. According to McCloud, the prophetic of this is huge, and this is the time for believers to shine.  McCloud also shows how Bill Gates is a key player in the transforming of society and mankind, including in the ongoing development of technologies that may be linked to the infamous “mark of the beast” described in the book of Revelation. For details watch the amazing 11 minutes of video.

Another health authority interviewed by Alex Newman was internationally renowned physician, Carrie Madej. In this interview she explains the enormous unknown risks of the mRNA COVID “vaccines” being injected into people all across the globe. She says this is a giant global experiment, and everyone who takes the experimental jabs, is participating in something unprecedented in human history. Dr. Madej also warns that these shots include code and nanotechnology that will have drastic effects on the functioning of the human body, the immune system, and even human cells. “You will literally be making part of this virus in your body.” She said “This has never happened in the history of humanity.”

She also warned that because these shots are not approved by the FDA, people should consult their life-insurance policy before taking a shot, since it may not pay out if you die. There is also a risk of infertility as the immune system is trained to target particular elements of the reproductive system. “We need to put a moratorium on this,” she said. Download and share this 15-minute video everywhere.

Three star General Thomas McInerny also has a strong video warning against the COVID vaccines.  This video is a bit longer, but well worth the time to listen, be informed and share with family and friends.

The Greg Reese video, “Forbidden knowledge/The age of modified humans has arrived,” is shocking despite the fact it is only six minutes long.

Here is just a portion of what is told in this video:

Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, is a think tank started 23 years ago in 1998. It has conducted dozens of exercises on simulated pandemics and bioweapon attacks, including Operation Dark Winter in 2001, where one of the main objectives was how to force-vaccinate an uncooperative population.

On October 18, 2019, Johns Hopkins partnered with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to sponsor event 201, a simulation wherein an outbreak of a bat coronavirus kills 65 million people.

This is only a smidgen of what is contained in the video; there are many more operations that Johns Hopkins simulated on pandemics.

The culmination of all these studies was published in November 2019. The CSIS Commission on Strengthening America’s Health Security urges the US Government to, “Replace the cycle of crises and complacency that has long plagued health security preparedness with a doctrine of continuous prevention, protection and resilience.”

In other words, they’re calling for the medical tyranny we’re now seeing being manifested around us. Signed by former military, big Pharma and US Representatives, the CSIS document calls for continuous rapid vaccines, while also warning that the vaccines may go wrong and start spreading more disease. How lovely for the American people!

This would play right into their agenda. We have to remember that these are examples of the kind of people whose intentions are to completely control the lives of all who are below them, we the people, who they consider the “unwashed masses.”  I would venture to say that at least 98 plus percent of them have been turned over to a reprobate mind by the Lord God Almighty.  That tells us what their future is, but it also reveals the character of the forces who plan to control our lives.

Dr. Fauci, who has been placed over this fake pandemic, is now saying that the COVID vaccine could be ready for babies and children under 12 by early 2022. Just who and what is Dr. Anthony Fauci? And why children when they don’t get it; is this to destroy their ability to procreate?  Fauci is an American physician, who hasn’t practiced in decades, an immunologist who has served as the Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, within the National Institutes of Health. For more on Dr. Fauci see my article of June 20th, 2020. Scroll down to the section on Dr. Fauci. Also please check out Kelleigh Nelson’s article, Is Anthony Fauci Guilty of Negligent Homicide?, and my article, “The Cover-up of The Contaminated Blood Supply” of July 25, 2020 regarding Fauci’s activities in the Dr. Judy Mikovits case.

Dr. Fauci has been closely connected with the United Nations through the World Health Organization (WHO) for quite a while. From a conservative perspective, is it reasonable to believe that at the beginning of the so-called “pandemic,” he would be placed in the position as head of President Trump’s Coronavirus task force?  Of course not!  But he was, and he was chosen by none other than Vice President Pence! There is nothing reasonable about this, it equates to putting the fox in the hen house.

To our dismay, this is an example of what the Trump Administration has been plagued with all along – advice from the wrong people, people who stabbed him in the back and smiled while doing so, people who should have been vetted and were not. Nevertheless, Trump, literally all by himself gave us four years of a Nineveh, a respite of evil, despite being continually harassed and bludgeoned by the left and the mainstream media, an arm of the communist Democrat Party.

They had an objective in concocting and deploying the “pandemic.”  Of course, the primary objective was the stealing of the presidential election which they were able to successfully pull-off via the COVID -19 virus and producing the climate of fear. This resulted in the destruction of our “rule of law.”  We know this planned crisis created the ability of blue states to change their voting laws to mail-in ballots and steal the election for Biden.

All this was coordinated from a central position. Authorities of law were prepared to respond publicly that there is no evidence of any election fraud, and if there is any it isn’t enough to overturn the election. Almost all the courts, including the Supreme Court, were prepared to dismiss all charges of election fraud without viewing the evidence regardless of the amount and validity.

As a result of all this and more, we are now confronted with having to continue resisting the plans of an illegitimate entity who accessed power and control by destroying legitimate voting, i.e., one man, one vote.

We must change the politics in the very areas we live…evil starts at the bottom, and that’s where we must work…run good people for office, check them out, and if you can’t find good people, run for office yourself.  Go to your County Commission meetings, your City Council meetings…get involved.  The time is now or your children and grandchildren will live under full-blown communism.

It is evident that the goal of this pandemic was to bring in a mandatory vaccine that would ultimately help to depopulate America and bring in a one world government.

In view of a massive number of reports from physicians and scientists, there is no isolated COVID-19. It is only a concoction presented for the purpose of bringing about a climate of fear, and fear is NOT from God. Since the virus cannot be identified and isolated, then any so-called vaccine for it is false. We now have evidence of a great many deaths and adverse affects resulting from the vaccine which makes it clear that the current vaccines are not only unsafe but probably far more dangerous than what we see thus far.

Please watch the videos and check out the links I’ve supplied.  We need an educated people who understand that a medical apartheid is taking place.

Share widely!

More to come in Part Two.

©J.W. Bryan. All rights reserved.

Texas Hits Record Low COVID Cases, 3 Weeks After Lifting All Pandemic Restrictions

On March 2, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott announced he was lifting all government restrictions aimed at limiting the spread of COVID-19.

“I just announced Texas is OPEN 100%, Abbott tweeted. “EVERYTHING. I also ended the statewide mask mandate.”

Abbott’s decision caused a stir among politicians and public health experts, though numerous other states had been operating without restrictions for months.

“Governor Abbott’s failure to listen to science and medical advice will cost Texans their lives,” Rep. Joaquin Castro warned in a statement. “The easiest thing everyone can do to slow the spread of COVID is to wear a mask and keep a social distance.”

“These states’ lifting of measures … are quite premature,” Jennifer Nuzzo, a senior scholar at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, told the BBC.

“They’re trying to do a good job of keeping everybody safe. Of course they want to open up. But getting rid of masks just seems ignorant to me,” said San Antonio Spurs coach Gregg Popovich.

Nearly a month after Abbott’s announcement, the data are in.

“Coronavirus cases have dropped to a record low in Texas roughly three weeks after the state lifted its mask mandate and reopened businesses,” Newsweek reports.

The news magazine was referencing new data touted by Abbott showing that the Lone Star state saw its 7-day COVID positivity rate, the percent of tests coming in positive, hit a new low—4.95 percent—while hospitalizations reached a six-month low.

“According to the Texas Department of State Health Services, at least 1,900 new virus cases were reported on Sunday, which is the lowest daily number the state has seen since early June,” Newsweek reports. “Data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention shows that the seven-day moving average number of cases in Texas dropped to the lowest level since mid-June.”

Texas’s numbers are encouraging, but they are not particularly unique.

The same day Abbott made his announcement, Mississippi declared that it too was lifting all state restrictions. Mississippi’s case pattern looks markedly similar to Texas’s.

Despite the widespread warnings that Texas and Mississippi were needlessly risking the lives of their citizens, both states saw cases and deaths decline after lifting all restrictions. Why?

One answer might be that residents in Texas and Mississippi continued to take sensible precautions, as public health officials in these states recommended.

For example, Thomas Dobbs, Mississippi’s state health officer, urged people to continue to use discretion and exercise caution despite the absence of legal restrictions.

“Do stuff outdoors, don’t group together indoors with a lot of folks,” Dobbs said at a press conference with the governor when it was announced restrictions were ending. “You can catch COVID. And we can mess this up.”

From the beginning of the pandemic, there was a fear that Americans wouldn’t exercise caution and prudence absent the heavy hand of force. But this concern was always overblown. Evidence shows Americans were taking precautions well before government officials imposed sweeping restrictions.

“Americans living in red states appear to have taken the crisis plenty seriously; data shows that residents there were staying home well before their governors issued stay-at-home orders,” FiveThirtyEight pointed out back in May, citing research from Cuebiq, a private data company that assessed the movement of people via GPS data.

This suggests that people are more than capable of taking precautions—maintaining space, washing hands, wearing a mask—that they feel are reasonable without being forced.

Using force in the case of the pandemic seemed natural to many because it sprang from a desire to protect people from a deadly virus, but this was a mistake.

“Whenever we depart from voluntary cooperation and try to do good by using force, the bad moral value of force triumphs over good intentions,” the Nobel Laureate economist Milton Friedman observed in his book Is Capitalism Humane?

The data coming out of Texas and Mississippi (as well as Florida) are yet more evidence that the benefits of this force have been oversold. An abundance of research suggests lockdowns achieve very little (if anything); meanwhile, their harms are clear (though often ignored by lockdown proponents).

It’s time Americans recognized that lockdowns are policies born of fear that have caused irreparable damage: economic destruction, surging suicide, drug and alcohol abuse, and increased poverty.

Fortunately, because of the system of federalism, which distributes power across the states, this truth is finally being revealed. Soon, it will be recognized.

“All truth passes through three stages,” the German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer reputedly said (perhaps apocryphally). “First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.”

The failure of lockdowns and other various government restrictions are still in stage two. But stage three is rapidly approaching.

COLUMN BY

Jon Miltimore

Jonathan Miltimore is the Managing Editor of FEE.org. His writing/reporting has been the subject of articles in TIME magazine, The Wall Street Journal, CNN, Forbes, Fox News, and the Star Tribune. Bylines: Newsweek, The Washington Times, MSN.com, The Washington Examiner, The Daily Caller, The Federalist, the Epoch Times.

More on this topic:
Lockdowns Are Ineffective at Slowing COVID-19

FEE Testifies Before the Senate: The Life-Threatening Unintended Consequences of Pandemic Lockdowns

Media Are (Finally) Starting to Reconsider Florida’s Pandemic Strategy

Lockdowns Come from a Place of Privilege

5 Charts That Show Sweden’s Strategy Worked. The Lockdowns Failed

EDITORS NOTE: This FEE column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

EXCLUSIVE: Fired for Refusing Flu Vaccination

This email I received from a Geller Report reader shows how totalitarian the system already is, and with Covid it’s rapidly getting worse.

Hello Pamela,

My name is Lisa Amorosi. I was a 27 year Veteran at my local hospital (Glens Falls Hospital) in Glens Falls, NY. I started there in 1993, and was Terminated December 1,2020 after they changed Policy in 2020 mandating every employee receive a flu vaccination and stating that the only exception would be a NYS medical exemption letter from our own Doctors. As I and many others like myself had medical reasons and documentation why this vaccine was not for our medical highest good, we obtained the required NYS Medical exemption formed signed by our doctors.

The Hospital Center of Occupational Health then denied these letters over ruling our doctors exemptions. We were told that we had until December 1,2020 to get the shot or resign.  I advised them that I would do neither. They then bullied and harassed us by not only threatening us by us loosing our jobs, they expected us to choose our job over our own health??? This is a health facility that is no longer concerned about individual health??? What? They are now in the wrong business!

About 5 years ago, NYS passed a law that would now mandate (never before) any health care worker to wear a mask once the CDC “deemed” it official flu season unless they chose to get the flu shot then no mask would be required. There are basically 4 kinds people prior to this mandate –

1- didn’t get them for medical reasons
2- didn’t for personal reasons
3- didn’t for Religious reasons
4- could careless either way (but now got the flu vax because they didn’t want to wear a mask)

So for the past 5 years I choose not to get the flu vax due to 3 different years in past of trying it and I had compromising health quality of life for 8-10 months out of the year all 3 years I had received this flu vax.

So myself and others that chose not to get the flu shot for whatever reason have been wearing the mask for about 6 months out of the year for past 5 years.  But this year (2020) we were all in masks 😷 anyway, hence the policy change? What? Now the masks do not work for flu? This is now about money flo and  kick back! Saratoga Hospital (in NY) and Glens Falls Hospital (GFH) are partnered with Albany Medical center (in NY). Saratoga has been since 2011 ish but GFH only 2020.

Per Albany medical staff that hospital has mandated the flu vax for years or termination (I did not know this until this until after my termination) but Saratoga Hospital along with GFH adopted this policy 2020 as per pressure from Albany Med. but Albany Med. denies this.

Either way, to my point this is not only unethical for a health care not to care about individual health. It is now discrimination. As I and others like me can no longer work at any of these places. Not to mention what a HIPPA violation on our medical information it was that for years due to having to wear a different color sticker on our badges to signify who had the flu shot and who didn’t (because the mask wasn’t obvious enough) but we didn’t even realize what was happening with this segregation until this “plandemic”

And now I can’t unsee it! People need to wake up and know what is really going on! The local news (Post Star of Glens falls) had my story on front page but like most media these days they didn’t report the real story of the Facility Denying our medical exemptions.  They reported me getting fired over the flu shot after 27 years employment and how it was before Christmas so they made me out like Tiny Tim and the Cratchit aboys.

Yes the hospital made us go to an allergist (Worked for partner Saratoga Hospital) and Basically if you didn’t have anaphylactic shock right out of gate.. you were not qualified for exemption.. I was told “I didn’t fit in the box” because my symptoms lasted all year so there was no test for me. They would not give me an exemption even though they believed me and said “I didn’t fit in the box”.  I was offered the flu shot by my employer in several smaller doses?? What aren’t they  getting? My health matters , I am the one taking care of me and my boys! I was told “do your part by keeping the community safe”. I am the community and “doing your part” comes in many different forms it’s not a one size fits all. I did what I needed to do for my own health so I could continue to serve the community.  I got let go because I had to honor my truth and my well being. I am still unemployed and sadly the Medical field has now discriminated where myself and others like me can work based on a flu shot and our own medical needs. The medical field is no longer in it for medical reasons and peoples individual health. It has gone Dark for money, power and greed!

This is NOT acceptable and the Truth NEEDS TO BE TOLD!!

RELATED ARTICLE: HERO: Governor Ron DeSantis REJECTS Biden vaccine passport plan and will ban them in Florida via executive order

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved. Quick note: Tech giants are snuffing us out. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense permenently banned us. Facebook, Twitter, Google search et al have shadowbanned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here. Help us fight. Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here — it’s free and it’s critical NOW more than ever. Share our posts on social and with your email contacts.