U.S. Business Execs Give Chinese Dictator Multiple Standing Ovations During Exclusive Dinner

Following President Biden’s and Chinese President Xi Jinping’s summit on Wednesday, the communist dictator, whose government has perpetrated extensive, well-documented crimes against humanity, was warmly received with multiple standing ovations at a lavish dinner that evening in San Francisco attended by prominent U.S. business executives and government officials.

The dinner, which was hosted by the U.S.-China Business Council (USCBC) and the National Committee on U.S.-China Relations, was attended by about 300 people. General admission to the dinner cost $2,000, and a group of “Corporate Sponsors” sat at the “Guest of Honor’s” table for a $40,000 fee. The business executives at the table included:

  • Tim Cook, CEO of Apple
  • Stephen Schwarzman, chairman and CEO of Blackstone
  • Larry Fink, chairman and CEO of BlackRock
  • Stanley Deal, president and CEO of Boeing Commercial Airplanes
  • Merit Janow, chair of Mastercard
  • Milind Pant, CEO of Amway
  • Darius Adamczyk, executive chairman of Honeywell
  • Hock Tan, president and CEO of Broadcom
  • Robert Goldstein, chairman and CEO of Las Vegas Sands
  • Joseph Bae, co-CEO of KKR
  • Daniel O’Day, chairman and CEO of Gilead Sciences
  • Ming Hsieh, chairman and CEO of Fulgent Genetics

Video of the event reveals a parade of three executives and a U.S. official introducing Xi and showering the communist dictator with praise, including Ambassador Craig Allen, president of the USCBC; Marc Casper, CEO of Thermo Fisher Scientific; U.S. Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo; and Evan Greenberg, CEO of Chubb Insurance. As Xi entered the Hyatt Regency banquet hall, the guests stood and applauded for almost a full minute. Then, after 20 minutes of laudatory introductory remarks, the crowd gave another standing ovation to the authoritarian that lasted over 40 seconds. A third standing ovation at the end of Xi’s remarks lasted another half minute.

While the executives presumably attended the dinner to curry favor with the head of the world’s second largest economy, they were likely disappointed. “[Xi] offered no hints of concessions to business or even interest in more investment in the Chinese economy,” a senior American business executive who attended the dinner told The Wall Street Journal. “The speech was propaganda at its finest.”

Meanwhile, the laundry list of egregious human rights abuses that have occurred in China under the 10-year rule of Xi’s dictatorship is extensive and well-documented. Since he assumed office in 2013, China has “seen a strong reduction in freedom in all sectors of society,” according to the religious freedom advocacy organization Open Doors.

Most infamously, a tribunal has determined the communist regime has forcibly cut open tens of thousands of people — while still alive — in order to harvest their organs. The victims are mostly adherents to disfavored religious groups such as Falun Gong, but also others such as the Uyghurs. It is estimated that at least 65,000 Falun Gong practitioners have been killed for their organs since 2001, but the number is likely much higher as of today.

In addition, China’s “one-child policy,” in which the communist regime forcibly sterilized and aborted the unborn children of women who did not comply, lasted for three years into Xi’s tenure until 2016. The government has since a instituted a “two-child policy,” followed by a “three-child policy” in 2021, but the government still imposes restrictions on the number of children families can have. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) revealed in 2013 that 336 million abortions were carried out under one child the policy since 1979.

Under Xi’s government, China has seen a drastic increase in persecution of religious believers. For Christians, this has included the demolition of churches, the raiding of house churches, the use of facial recognition technology, mass incarceration, and forced indoctrination of atheistic allegiance to the CCP.

For ethnic Uyghur Muslims living in the Xinjiang region, Xi’s government has engaged in a level of persecution so drastic that the U.S. government, in a parting move by Donald Trump’s administration, declared in 2021 that the regime is committing genocide. Since 2017, up to two million Uyghurs and other ethnic minorities have been arbitrarily detained in “re-education” camps. As has been reported, detainees are subject to forced indoctrination and renunciation of their religious beliefs, sterilization, rape, torture, and execution, often in order to have their organs harvested.

Once they are allowed to leave the camps, these ethnic minorities are often compelled into forced labor. As has been documented, over 80 corporations from all over the world have been linked to the factories in which this forced labor occurs, including American companies such as Apple, Nike, Patagonia, Polo Ralph Lauren, Gap, L.L. Bean, and many others.

Seamus Bruner, director of research at the Government Accountability Institute, further explained how the corporate world has partnered with China to gain enormous financial profit during Thursday’s edition of “Washington Watch.”

“Whether it’s Apple computers, whether it’s Nike with their factories over in China, whether it’s Jeff Bezos [at] Amazon, they have all built enormous fortunes for themselves and for their companies at the expense of the Chinese people,” he observed. “… [I]t is a deep partnership. Men like Bill Gates have helped the Chinese Communist Party censor journalists … with Skype, which is a Microsoft company. … So the partnership seems even more than financial. … And in exchange, [they get] cheap labor.”

Arielle Del Turco, director of the Center for Religious Liberty at Family Research Council, also expressed grave concern over the willingness of U.S. business leaders to openly applaud the authoritarian leader of a communist regime that continues to commit atrocities on a mass scale.

“This was a shameless display by American corporate executives,” she told The Washington Stand. “It demonstrates what we always knew to be true about most American corporations. They really don’t care about what atrocities are currently going on in China, as long as they can cash in on their ties to the Chinese economy. This doesn’t benefit the United States, and it certainly doesn’t benefit those suffering from forced labor as a part of the Chinese supply chain.”

Del Turco continued, “The U.S. officially determined in 2021 that the Chinese government was committing genocide against Uyghur Muslims. That is still in effect, which means that American business leaders were applauding an authoritarian leader who is still responsible for an ongoing genocide, according to the U.S. government. Genocidal rulers don’t deserve standing ovations.”

AUTHOR

Dan Hart

Dan Hart is senior editor at The Washington Stand.

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2023 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

The Biden Years At A Glance

A reader mcmast sent us an email titled Biden POTUS years at a glance. Here’s what mcmast wrote about Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr.’s time in office to date.

Hasty withdrawal from Afghanistan which gave our enemies $80 billion of USA weapons and killed several American soldiers.

Highest inflation in 40 years.  Inflation increased 20% more than wages under Biden after wages increased 6% more than inflation under Trump.

Highest interest rates in a generation to fix the Biden inflation.

Employment participation rate is still less than under Trump as all jobs under Biden have been to replace jobs that were lost during COVID.

Loss of USA energy/oil independence that was gained under Trump.

Record number of regulations/laws reversed by the courts including:  DACA.  Affirmative action for college entrance.  Gun rights.  Cancelling student debt. Ignoring immigration laws.

Anti-Semitic demonstrations.  The Squad.

Record amount of illegal immigrants entering the USA.

Highest % of federal debt vs GDP in the history of the USA, including WWII.

Highest % of USA workforce employed as government employees in the history of the USA.

DoJ and FBI used as political weapons which set a precedence for future presidents.

Lies about his knowledge and participation in his son’s businesses.

Lies about his son’s laptop.

Thousands of classified documents kept in several unsecured locations for more than 20 years that he stole as a Senator and as a VP.

WOKE military and education system.

Cocaine found in the family portion of the White House.  No perpetrators identified by the FBI despite hundreds of cameras all over the White House.

What has Biden done well?

He left the Trump tax reforms in place.

He left the Trump tariffs on products from China in place.

He left the Trump USMCA in place.

He continued Trump spending on military.

If you disagree with any of these items please leave a comment below.

©2023. Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.

Speaker Johnson Releases January 6th Capitol Tapes

House Speaker Mike Johnson released a tranche of tapes of the January 6th, 2021 Capitol riot on a website so Americans could watch the footage for themselves.

Speaker Johnson announced Friday on X he was going to be releasing the tapes and proceeded to post a link to them on the Committee on House Administration’s website.

“Follow the link below to view the January 6th tapes for yourself,” Johnson said on X. “To restore America’s trust and faith in their Government we must have transparency. This is another step towards keeping the promises I made when I was elected to be your Speaker.”

Former Speaker Kevin McCarthy previously turned over some of the January 6th footage to former Fox News host and Daily Caller co-founder Tucker Carlson.

Beginning on Nov. 20, the Committee on House Administration’s Subcommittee on Oversight will allow Americans to access the January 6th footage in person, the subcommittee said in a press release.

“This decision will provide millions of Americans, criminal defendants, public interest organizations, and the media an ability to see for themselves what happened that day, rather than having to rely upon the interpretation of a small group of government officials.” Johnson wrote in another X post. “Processing will involve blurring the faces of private citizens on the yet unreleased tapes to avoid any persons from being targeted for retaliation of any kind and segregating an estimated 5% of the videos that may involve sensitive security information related to the building architecture.”

U.S. Capitol Police security cameras captured footage of the Capitol riot, and it includes the videos released by Tucker Carlson. Additional footage will continue to be uploaded to the website following the initial tranche of footage released Friday.

“The goal of our investigation has been to provide the American people with transparency on what happened at the Capitol on January 6, 2021 and this includes all official video from that day,” Republican Georgia Rep. Barry Loudermilk, Chairman of the Committee on House Administration’s Subcommittee on Oversight, said.

“We will continue loading video footage as we conduct our investigation and continue to review footage. As I’ve said all along — the American people deserve transparency, accountability, and real answers supported by facts instead [of] a predetermined political narrative,” Loudermilk added.

The Department of Justice (DOJ) has prosecuted more than 1,200 individuals from nearly all 50 states in connection with the Jan. 6th riot as of Nov. 6, 2023.

This story has been updated to include statements from Republican lawmakers and additional context surrounding Jan. 6.

AUTHOR

JAMES LYNCH

Investigative reporter. James Lynch can be reached on Twitter @jameslynch32.

RELATED POSTS ON X:

RELATED ARTICLES:

‘All In’: Speaker Mike Johnson Endorses Donald Trump For President

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Secret Service Photos of Cocaine Found inside the White House – Documents Suggest the Cocaine Evidence Was Set for ‘Destruction’

Washington, D.C. – Judicial Watch announced today it received 112 pages of Secret Service records in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) that show photos and communications regarding cocaine found inside the Biden White House in July. The DHS withheld 34 pages in their entirety under the “foreseeable harm” standard, which states “the agency reasonably foresees that disclosure would harm an interest protected by an exemption …” and/or the Privacy Act.

Judicial Watch obtained the records in a July 13 FOIA request filed with the Department of Homeland Security for records, about:

  • A white powdery substance found inside the West Wing of the White House on July 2, 2023, determined through testing to be the illegal drug cocaine.

The cocaine was found in a West Wing phone locker while the Biden family was away for the Fourth of July weekend at Camp David.

The investigative photos include the bag of cocaine found near the White House’s West Executive entrance.

A Secret Service “crime scene examination section evidence report” indicates that the photos were taken on July 2.

The records include July 2 email sent by a Secret Service public information officer whose name is redacted regarding a “suspicious substance at [the] White House:”

A 1″ by 1″ bag of white powdery substance was found near where pass holders put their phones when going into the [redacted] here. UD [Uniformed Division] Crime Scene tested it for drugs but came back inconclusive. TSD couldn’t determine what it was. Closures were made for caution.

DCFEMS [DC Fire & Emergency Medical Services] HAZMAT is on scene as of this email.

An incident report written on July 2 regarding a “suspicious package/incident” details the activities undertaken by the Secret Service Crime Scene Search Unit, the DC Hazmat team and the FBI’s WMD [Weapons of Mass Destruction] Directorate in handling the then-undetermined substance.

An additional July 2 incident report indicates the investigation lasted 12 days and that “cocaine and sodium bicarbonate were identified within the Item 1-1 powder,” also DNA “test results did not identify an individual responsible for the placement of the item within the West Wing of the White House Complex.” The report states that on July 14 the cocaine was “placed on the property/evidence book for ‘destruction.’”

A July 3 email from a person in the Technical Security Division whose name is redacted states:

Starting time Approx. 1745 [5:45 p.m.] UD [Uniform Division] advised of a small Ziploc bag approximately less than 1″ in by 1″ in the cell phone lockers by [redacted] was confident it was drug related thus the phone call to UD CRIME SCENE.

A July 10 email indicates that no identifiable prints were found on the bag.

On July 13, the Deputy Chief of the U.S. Secret Service Foreign Missions Branch sent a report to the Uniform Division, indicating that the bag of “unknown white powdery substance” was identified as cocaine by the FBI laboratory.

“These photos and documents detail the disruption and expense of the Biden White House cocaine scandal,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “Few Americans buy that the Biden administration can’t figure out who brought this cocaine into the West Wing. Indeed, the lack of documentation about the ‘investigation’ of who was responsible is striking.”

RELATED ARTICLES:

Secret Service Confirms Cocaine Found In White House Following Hunter Biden Visit

The White Powder House Cocaine Cover Up

The Highest Office: Cocaine Found in the White House

EDITORS NOTE: This Judicial Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Violence Flares in the U.S. in the Wake of 10/7

Across America in the wake of the horrific 7 October Hamas attack in Israel in which 1,400 unarmed Israeli civilians were murdered by marauding Jihadis, we have seen numerous highly organized protests and demonstrations seemingly spring up out of nowhere.

More than a few of these protests have turned violent, notably one in California in which a Jewish man was killed by a pro-Hamas protester when he was struck in the head.

The violence also occurred in Louisiana when protesters on Freret Street in New Orleans, which runs through Loyola and Tulane campuses turned their protest into an Israeli flag-burning riot in which some 40 members of Louisiana’s law enforcement community were called in to disperse the mob.

It’s more than a little curious that within days of one of the most bloody Jihadi terrorist attacks in modern history, scores of highly organized protest marches involving thousands of participants took to the streets of America coast to coast chanting the pro-Hamas slogan: “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free.”

For anyone who doubts that these protests are in support of Hamas, take some time to understand what the slogan means: the river is the Jordan River, the sea is the Mediterranean Sea. What the slogan says is that Israel will be replaced by a Palestinian state.

That happens to be the stated goal in the Hamas charter when the Muslim Brotherhood formed Hamas more than 30 years ago: to destroy the state of Israel and replace it with an Islamic State ruled by sharia.

Which brings us to these “spontaneous” eruptions of pro-Hamas unrest across America. Maybe, just maybe, they aren’t so spontaneous.

The Muslim Brotherhood has an extensive network of organizations and allied organizations established across America and as the Muslim Brotherhood has shown in other parts of the world, they have the ability to activate their network quickly for a variety of purposes, some decidedly nefarious…especially on college campuses, where much of the violence and unrest in the US has been occurring.

Given that, Americans should take a look at the Muslim Brotherhood organization most prevalent on US campuses…the Muslim Students Association (MSA).

A Short History of the Muslim Student Association in America

The first chapter of the MSA was founded way back in 1963 at the University of Illinois-Urbana/Champaign. It was founded by members of the Muslim Brotherhood, an organization that most Americans would not even be remotely aware of for another half century.

Among the founders of the MSA in America Hisham Al Talib, a man who would later go on to become a co-founder of the SAAR Foundation, an organization that was dissolved in 2000 when it became the target of an FBI investigation for providing funding to HAMAS, Hezbollah, Palestinian Islamic Jihad and Al Qaeda.

Another founder of the MSA was Jamal Barzinji, who, in 1991 was also the founder of the Dar al-Hijrah mosque in Falls Church, Virginia. Dar al-Hijrah is perhaps most famous for being the mosque at which Nidal Malik Hasan (the Fort Hood shooter) worshipped under Anwar al-Awlaki, who later became the head of Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (more on Awlaki shortly).

According to a 2008 New York Times report, right from the outset the MSA received its funding and direction from Saudi Arabia. The MSA was a product of the Saudi Wahhabi-run Muslim World League, a Saudi NGO with a history of ties to Jihadist terrorism. In fact, the MSA was the first effort in America by the Saudis to establish Islamic organizations around the world to promote Wahhabi Islam, the strain of Islam that would eventually give birth to Al Qaeda.

In other words, the MSA was founded and established in the USA by what should have rightly been considered at the time a hostile foreign power, namely Saudi Arabia.

MSA solicited donations for the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development, whose assets the U.S. government seized in December 2001 because that organization was giving financial support to the terrorist group Hamas. MSA also has strong ties to the World Assembly of Muslim Youth (WAMY), a Saudi-based Islamic organization with chapters in 57 countries, including the US chapter, which was founded by Osama Bin Laden’s nephew. WAMY promotes jihad and anti-semitism and has raised funds for HAMAS.

The Muslim Brotherhood’s (MB) modus operandi is to pose as a friendly entity and its leaders as friendly to the community while working on the clearly stated objectives of waging “civilization jihad” against those communities.  The evidence is clear and is a matter of legal record, specifically in the US v Holy Land Foundation – the largest terrorism financing and Hamas trial ever successfully prosecuted in American history.

Evidence lists MSA as a Muslim Brotherhood entity and numerous documents state the MSAs serve the MB’s objectives.

Not only does the MSA have a troubling history, its members and leaders have included jihadists:

  • On October 22, 2000, Ahmed Shama, president of the UCLA Muslim Students Association, led a crowd of demonstrators at the Israeli consulate in chants of “Death to Israel!” and “Death to the Jews!”
  • The University of Southern California MSA invited Taliban ambassador Sayyid Hashimi to speak on campus six months before 9/11.
  • In 2003, University of Idaho MSA president Sami Omar Al-Hussayen, who had sought access to a chemical lab containing nuclear material, was ordered deported because he worked for the al Qaeda-tied Islamic Assembly of North America.
  • In April 2003, FBI agents, who had secretly videotaped foreign student members of MSA who were illegally engaged in weapons training, raided the apartment of Hassan Alrefae and Jaber Al-Thukair, Arizona State’s MSA president and vice president, respectively.
  • In June 2006, Ali Asad Chandia, who had served as president of the Montgomery College (Maryland) MSA in 1998 and 1999, was convicted on terror charges as part of a Northern Virginia jihad network; he was sentenced to 15 years in prison for three separate counts of conspiracy and material support to the Pakistani terrorist group Lashkar-e-Taiba.
  • Abdurahman Alamoudi, who served as MSA national president in 1982 and 1983, is currently serving a 23-year prison sentence for his extensive international terrorist activities, which included fundraising for al Qaeda.
  • In February 2010, Aafia Siddiqui – a woman who had been captured in 2008 with explosives, deadly chemicals, and a list of New York City landmarks – was convicted of attempting to murder a U.S. Army captain while she was incarcerated and being interrogated by authorities at a prison in Afghanistan. Described variously as “al-Qaeda’s Mata Hari” and “Lady al-Qaeda,” Siddiqui had previously been radicalized by the MSA chapter at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where she studied neuroscience.
  • Wael Hamza Julaidan, who served as president of the University of Arizona MSA in the mid-1980s, went on to become one of al Qaeda’s co-founders and its logistics chief. In September 2002, the U.S. government listed Julaidan as a specially designated global terrorist, identifying him as a close associate of Osama bin Laden and other al-Qaeda leaders, and as a director of the Rabita Trust, which had already been designated a terrorist finance entity that supported al-Qaeda.
  • University of Idaho MSA president Sami Omar Al-Hussayen, who operated nearly a dozen Arabic-language websites for anti-American, pro-suicide-bombing clerics, was accused by federal authorities of using his academic studies as a cover for terrorist support activities. Al-Hussayen was deported to Saudi Arabia in June 2004 after agreeing to a deal with federal prosecutors.
  • In December 2009, Howard University dental student Ramy Zamzam, who had served as the president of MSA’s D.C. Council, was arrested in Pakistan along with four other D.C.-area men (all of whom were also active in MSA). All five were charged with plotting to join the Jaish-e-Muhammed terrorist group with plans to attack U.S. soldiers in Afghanistan; all five were convicted in a Pakistani court in June 2010 and sentenced to at least 10 years in prison.
  • Syed Maaz Shah, secretary of the University of Texas-Dallas MSA chapter, was arrested in December 2006, for his involvement in paramilitary training at an Islamic campground, where he was preparing to join the Taliban in order to fight U.S. troops in Afghanistan. Shah was convicted on weapons charges in May 2007.
  • Ziyad Khaleel, president of the Columbia College (Missouri) MSA, was a representative of the Islamic Association for Palestine (a Hamas front). He also registered and operated the English-language website for Hamas, and served as al Qaeda’s chief procurement agent in the United States during the 1990s. Among the items Khaleel purchased was a $7,500 satellite phone for Osama bin Laden. That phone, dubbed by intelligence authorities as the “jihad phone,” was used to plan the 1998 U.S. embassy bombings.
  • Anwar Al-Awlaki served as president of the Colorado State University MSA in the early 1990s, and as chaplain of the George Washington University MSA in 2001. In Washington, DC, he delivered sermons that were attended by two of the 9/11 hijackers and by Fort Hood shooter Nidal Malik Hasan. In 2002 Alwaki fled the U.S. for Yemen, where he developed ties to al Qaeda and reportedly played a role in the Fort Hood massacre of 2009, the failed Christmas Day underwear-bomber plot of 2009, and the attempted Times Square bombing of 2010.
  • Carlos Bledsoe, aka Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad, was a member of the MSA as a student at Tennessee State University in Nashville, TN. Bledsoe went on to receive terrorist training at a jihadist training camp in Yemen and returned to the US and murdered US Army Private Andy Long outside a Little Rock, Arkansas recruiting office on June 1, 2009.
  • Abu Mansoor al-Amriki, aka Omar Hammami is an American-born member of al Shahab, a Somali Islamic militant group aligned with al Qaeda. Hammami served as president of the MSA chapter at the University of South Alabama.
  • Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who would later go on to mastermind the September 11th terrorist attacks as the number 3 man in Al Qaeda, was a member of the MSA chapter at North Carolina A&T in 1986.

The MB is making every effort to turn the Hamas Jihadi attack of October 7 into a discussion of the “civil rights” of the Muslim community, which is a non-sensical argument.  Unfortunately U.S. national leadership is bending over backwards to ensure the Muslim community in America is not “offended” which is a smokescreen for pushing their agenda forward.

Muslim Brotherhood organizations like the MSA and organizations like Students for Justice in Palestine are playing a leading role in that effort, organizing and leading protests and demonstrations–which have too often turned violent in the month since Hamas jihadis marauded through Israel’s streets slaughtering women and children.

Given the history of the MSA right from the point of its founding, and the activities of its members and leaders in recent years in particular, there is every reason to be concerned about the MSA expanding its presence in schools, colleges and universities.

Originally published by The Hayride

AUTHOR

Senior Analyst and Director of State Outreach.

RELATED ARTICLES:

The truth is Israel’s narrative

Seven ways China can benefit from the Israel-Hamas war

March for Israel in Washington, D.C.

EDITORS NOTE: This Center for Security Policy column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Texas: Muslim on Terror Watch List Murders SWAT Cop and Two Hostages, Had Bomb-Making Materials

If a Muslim in Texas had been able to carry out his plans, there could have been dozens, even hundreds killed. He was stopped, but others will keep trying.

Ahmed Mohamed Nassar, 35, a resident of South Austin, was on the terror watch list, but the feds clearly weren’t watching. They were too busy hunting for Jan. 6 “insurrectionists” and “white supremacists.” CBS Austin reported that on Saturday, “the incident began at 2:49 a.m. with a 911 call from a stabbing victim.” Police arrived within about ten minutes, and discovered that two others had been hurt as well. They were inside the house with Nassar.

The situation escalated quickly. CBS’s report adds that “a third victim of Nassar escaped and was located by officers, reporting the suspect still possessed a knife. APD officers attempted a rescue at around 3 a.m., but were fired upon by Nassar, leading to a SWAT callout.” Once the SWAT team arrived, Nassar, who was wearing body armor and had a rifle, started firing upon it as well.

In the melee, two police officers were shot. “Despite medical efforts, Officer Jorge ‘George’ Pastore, 38, died from his injuries. The second officer was treated and later released from the hospital.” And inside the home, there were two more victims: Eman Ahmed El Nemr-Nassar, 63, and Riad Mohamed Nassar, 32. Ahmed Mohamed Nassar was also found dead, apparently killed in his gun battle with police.

Austin’s KXAN reported Tuesday that once Austin police “inspected the scene on Nov. 11, it was determined it would be beneficial to have the Evidence Recovery Team with the Federal Bureau of Investigation assist in the processing of the scene.” They found “body armor and protective plates to include ballistic helmets as well as arm or leg protection; night vision goggles, firearms, and ammunition; targets that have been shot by a firearm,” and most importantly, “explosive devices or bomb-making materials.” The local police and the FBI also searched neighbors’ yards but wouldn’t say what they found.

The New York Post on Wednesday added the piquant detail that Ahmed Mohamed Nassar “was on the FBI’s terror watchlist.” What’s more, “a local organization called the Round Rock Area Muslims said they were all family members of a ‘beloved brother’ who was well-known in the local community.” That message, which was later deleted, said blandly that “three of the family members of the beloved brother Mohamed Nassar, passed away.” It identified the victims as the killer’s mother (Eman Ahmed El Nemr-Nassar) and brother (Riad Mohamed Nassar). The father was Mohamed Nassar, who reportedly moved out several months ago.

The spectacle of a son killing his mother suggests that this could have been an honor killing, in which a father, brother, or sometimes son kills a woman in order to cleanse the family’s honor after she has stained it by some sexual indiscretion or simply by wanting a divorce. Muslims commit 91% of honor killings worldwide, and some majority-Muslim countries give reduced sentences to murderers if they can show that they were committing an honor killing.

But Western authorities have seldom, if ever, paid any attention to the possibility that this phenomenon could travel West with the large numbers of Muslim migrants who have been entering Europe and, to a lesser degree, North America. On the other hand, the Post says Nassar was holding his relatives hostage, so maybe something else altogether was at play here.

Then there is the fact that Ahmed Mohamed Nassar was on the FBI terror watch list and fired upon the cops. Apparently, all the FBI does is watch, if it even does that. Of course, it’s busy with other matters. Old Joe Biden has said it repeatedly, as he claimed last May: “The most dangerous terrorist threat to our homeland is white supremacy.” Old Joe has told this particular whopper before, as have Gestapo chief Merrick Garland and the FBI.

And so even after the Oct. 7 jihad massacre in Israel, many Americans assume that a large-scale jihad massacre of that kind cannot or will not happen again in the United States. Why, it’s a religion of peace, and what about those white supremacists?

Even many who reject the left’s blinkers see Muslims in America as valuable allies in the fight against the trans and LGBTQETC madness being forced upon our nation’s children. Some of them may be just that. Others, unfortunately, are like Ahmed Mohamed Nassar.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Far-Left Philly Lawyer Shocked, Shocked to Discover His Son Is Accused Terrorist

Al-Azhar fatwa committee top dog: ‘Rejoice in the demise of the descendants of the pigs’

Israel says it could take weeks to uncover extent of Hamas’s command centre beneath Al-Shifa hospital

Macron Turns Turk, Abandons His ‘Unwavering Support’ For Israel’s War Against Hamas

Antisemitic Black Celeb ‘Boots Riley’ Discovers He’s ‘Jewish’ in Time to Support Hamas

Gaza human shields: Rockets inside girl’s bed, weapons transferred inside baby strollers

George Galloway, Antisemitic and Demented, Denies October 7 Atrocities Ever Happened

Germany: Muslim migrants sing anti-Israel songs on Eurobahn, beat passengers who object

Seven ways China can benefit from the Israel-Hamas war

RELATED VIDEO: Robert Spencer on Islam and the War on Israel

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

‘THEY FAILED US’: Women’s Organizations SILENT as Shocking Scale of Hamas’s Sexual Violence Against Jewish Women Becomes Horrifyingly Clear

I have long called out the feminist movement as anti-women, rooted in Lenin Marxist dogma. The “women’s movement” has done more incalculable harm to women so their indifference to the rape jihad and sexual horrors suffered by Jewish women in the Hamas atrocities shocks the senses but is in keeping with their hypocrisy and misogyny.

Where Are the International Women’s Organizations as the Shocking Scale of Hamas’s Sexual Violence Against Israeli Women on October 7 Becomes Horrifyingly Clear?

‘They failed us,’ one distinguished scholar says of international women’s rights groups who have refused to call out the atrocities. ‘They failed us.’

By Caroline McCaughey, NY Sun,  November 16, 2023:

One of the first videos uploaded to social media of the Hamas terrorist attacks on October 7 showed the kidnapping of a 26-year-old Israeli, Noa Argamani, on the back of a motorcycle as she reaches out and screams, “Don’t kill me!”

Another was of 23-year-old German national, Shani Louk, whose partially clothed, contorted body in the back of a pickup truck led to speculation she was already dead. The Israeli government later confirmed she was beheaded. A third video showed Hamas terrorists dragging  a 19-year-old Israeli, Na’ama Levy, out of a Jeep in Gaza, her arms tied behind her back, blood pooling between the legs of her gray sweatpants.

The targeting of civilians — and women in particular — was clear from day one of this war. Hamas members posted their savagery online for the world to see. Yet those first videos were only the tip of the iceberg. In the weeks since the October 7 attacks, more evidence has come to light that Hamas intentionally used rape and sexual violence as a weapon of war. Rape is a war crime and a violation of international human rights law. So where are the major international women’s rights organizations in condemning it?

UN Women, the United Nations’s leading organization for the protection of women’s rights internationally, issued its first statement on the Hamas attacks on October 13. There is no mention of Hamas in the statement. There is no mention of sexual violence. It does call for the “immediate release of the hostages,” but the majority of the text is devoted to the “dire” situation in Gaza.

“Within a month following the Russian invasion to Ukraine, UN Women expressed grave concern over evidence of rapes and other conflict related sexual violence and called for an investigation into these allegations. Likewise, they reacted immediately to the reports of rapes of Yazidi women by ISIS, which was referred to as a terrorist group,” the academic director of the Rackman Center for the Advancement of Women at Bar-Ilan University, Ruth Halperin-Kaddari, tells the Sun. “Their failure to acknowledge what actually took place on October 7 adds fuel to the propaganda, to the campaign of denial, in which we find ourselves now.”

A UN Women statement released on October 20 calls for a ceasefire and again doesn’t name Hamas. The statement, though, does address “depression levels” from “a deep sense of hopelessness” in Gaza.

Another of the leading United Nations women’s rights organizations, the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women, issued a similarly equivocating statement on October 27, condemning “the escalating violence in the Middle East” and calling “upon all parties to systematically address the gender dimension of the conflict.” Hamas is not mentioned. Neither is rape. Like UN Women, the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women calls for “peace talks” and a ceasefire.

Ms. Halperin-Kaddari is a former vice president of the UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women. At a Harvard Medical School symposium over the weekend, a group of Israeli panelists, including Ms. Halperin-Kaddari, called out these international women’s rights organizations for their failure to recognize and condemn gender-based war crimes committed by Hamas.

“I could never understand how Holocaust denial could actually take place. And what we are now experiencing is a denial of the most atrocious events that took place only a month ago, and were filmed in real time and broadcast in real time,” Ms. Halperin-Kaddari said at the Harvard event.

Keep reading.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Osama Bin Laden’s 2002 Letter to America Goes Viral on TikTok, The Guardian Removes It After 21 years

Ahmed Mohamed Nassar Who Shot and Killed Hero Austin SWAT Officer Was On FBI’s JIHAD TERROR Watchlist

Biden Approves ANOTHER $10 Billion To Hamas-Funding Iran  (After Iran Attacks US Forces for the 57th Time since Mid-Oct)

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Newly released video from Jan 6 shows protestors LED THROUGH BUILDING by POLICE!

WHO started the “insurrection?

Release all of the J6 political prisoners, now!

 

EDITORS NOTE: This Vlad Tepes Blog column posted by Eeyore is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

A Second Trump Term will ‘Destroy Democracy in America’. Good I Say.

Joe Manchin warns second Trump term will “destroy democracy in America.”

I say I hope so. Why? Because Joe, America is not a democracy. America is a constitutional republic where we the people elect legislators to represent our wishes. But do they? Sadly because most of us do not pay attention, as we were taught to be the silent majority, our representatives do not listen. Too many of us due to the lack of a civics education have no idea where to start. We think government is overwhelming, scary, and feel legislators won’t listen.

I promise you it is not.

The most important thing I learned is that in my area of expertise I know more than my legislator. Once my legislator realized I presented well researched, factual information in a well thought out professional manner, they were willing to listen. Sometime they agreed, sometimes they did not but the lines of communication were always open. I also always made friends and included the chief of staff in all emails and I followed up.  I started locally in my county.

Recently I spend a day in Tallahassee, Florida’s capital, lobbying with the team from Defend Florida for election integrity and the Florida Citizen’s Alliance for education. The goal was to present our bills, get a legislator sponsor who would get the bills into the House and Senate Bill Drafting where they could be viewed by legislators and turned into the appropriate language.  Fortunately our bills were well received and we found sponsors for both the house and senate.

I was also able to go to a rules workshop which allows for citizen input.  The committee was writing the rules regarding a form for procedure of vote by mail. How many of you know that you as a private citizen can influence the rule making process? Too often the Bills are written in a manner open to too much interpretation, but the rule are very precise. We can have a great deal of input in how a bill is implemented.

Did you know that in Florida you can track committees, legislators and bills.  For the House go to : https://www.myfloridahouse.gov/ and for the senate go to https://flsenate.gov/

Go to tracking first and sign in. When you select who or what you are tracking you will get a notice every time there is movement on your subject.

The Florida Citizen Alliance has focused on 3 bills. A soon as they are accepted and have numbers I will tract them.

  1. A Harmful to Minors materials bill strengthening Florida’s Obscenity Chapter 847 for Minors; to prevent exposure to pornographic and sexually explicit material. These materials harm children and potentially groom them to be trafficked.
  2. A strong opt-in bill putting parents in control of their child’s education. This is consistent with and expands parents’ rights in education by changing all current opt-out options to opt-in. Among other things such a bill would allow parents to prevent their children from being exposed to sexually explicit materials being used in the classroom or recommended on any K-12 reading list.
  3. Expand HOPE Scholarships to allow students to use the Hope Scholarship for home education as defined by FS 1002.41. This expands parents’ rights and educational freedom by allowing students to attend a private school or choose home education.

Defend Florida, https://defendflorida.org has focused on 4 aspects of election integrity:

  1. Citizenship Packet *
  2. Voter Roll Accuracy Packet
  3. Absentee Voting Packet
  4. Technology Packet

3 Bills already have sponsors

The ones with numbers can be tracked

This is the legislative season. Our state government is out of control just like the federal government. It is easier to conduct oversight on your local and state government so start there. Work local, then move up to the state. Remember in the eyes of your legislator every time you call with any opinion they count you as 100 people.  It’s up to us to vet our candidates and then make sure they follow our direction. Doing nothing gets you nothing. Is America worth saving?

Everything is connected. Nothing is random, Everything has a plan. All plans are lies. All Globalists want is MONEY, POWER, CONTROL Don’t give them yours. Challenge them with the truth. Doing Nothing is affirmation.

©2023. Karen Schoen. All rights reserved.

WATCH: German TV Show Busts Media Propaganda, Islam and Migration

Thank you very much Oz-Rita for both finding this video, and taking the massive effort to translate it for us. Also thanks to Brunhilde for helping with the timing and Gates of Vienna for the edits.

Please take the time to watch this one. I think most of you will find it somewhat cathartic that there is at least one TV show in Western Europe that has a grip on reality.

WATCH: German video busting media propaganda, Islam, and migration

A write-up and some details are available at RAIR Foundation.

RELATED ARTICLE: Orbán Rejects Mass Migration: ‘Hungary Belongs to the Hungarians’

EDITORS NOTE: This Vlad Tepes Blog column published by  is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

FBI Records Show Top Officials Rushing to Craft a Response to Leaked Memo Revealing its Targeting of Catholics

Washington, D.C. – Judicial Watch announced today that it, along with CatholicVote Civic Action,  received 131 heavily redacted pages of records from the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) showing top officials rushing to craft a public response to the leaked FBI intelligence memo that revealed its targeting of Catholics who adhere to traditional beliefs on church issues.

Judicial Watch received the records in response to an April 2023 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit it filed along with CatholicVote Civic Action against the FBI and the Department of Justice after their failure to respond to  March 2023 requests for records about an FBI intelligence memo targeting “radical traditionalist” Catholics (CatholicVote Civic Action and Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Federal Bureau of Investigations and Department of Justice (No. 1:23-cv-01166)).

In February 2023, an FBI intelligence document was leaked that revealed FBI targeting of Catholics who adhere to traditional beliefs on abortion and other cultural issues. The Catholic News Agency reported: “The leaked document has been condemned by several federal and state officials, as well as clergy, including Bishop Barry Knestout of the Diocese of Richmond, who recently called the memo a ‘threat to religious liberty.’”

The newly obtained records include a February 8, 2023, email with the subject line “Media Request: FBI Richmond Document cites SPLC” from the FBI’s National Press Office alerting FBI officials regarding media inquiries:

We have inquiries from the Washington Examiner and The Daily Signal (Heritage Foundation) about an article written by [redacted]. It references a January intelligence product from the Richmond Field office. After speaking with SC Goodwater, I am alerting all of you so we can get a copy of the actual document and hear any recommendations on how to respond. I am attaching a cut and paste of the [redacted] article.

Miriam Coakley of the Office of General Counsel then forwards the email on to other FBI officials, noting, “Adding InTo [Insider Threat Office], SecD [Security Division] and OPR [Office of Professional Responsibility]. The date of the leaked domain perspective appears to be 23 Jan. 2023.”

Further along the chain, an official in the Office of Public Affairs forwards the chain to more people, saying, “Adding Pamela Bryon from the DI. [Deputy Asst. Director of Intelligence Pamela Byron.] Any info on how this product came about would be appreciated.”

In a heavily redacted reply, Byron responds:

As mentioned on FBINET, the type of product leaked is a Domain Perspective (DP) – the purpose of DPs is to offer information and/or highlight how a shift or new development in an AOR (domain) related to an environmental variable could impact the threat. Environmental variables include demographic shifts, technology development, economic conditions, special events, social/cultural conditions, etc. In particular the analysis in DPs (as in FBI products in general) is focused on the activity of identified or potential threat actors, not on the environmental variables themselves, and how those threat actors react to shifts in the environment, and the subsequent impact on the threat posed by those actors.

In that context, there are a couple of things to note with this situation: [redacted].

We stand by to assist on any other questions.

The records include a February 9 email with the subject line “Coordination of Draft statement regarding leaked RH intel document” from Office of Public Affairs official Douglas Goodwater to top FBI officials, including FBI Chief of Staff Johathan Lenzner, Asst. Dir. for Intelligence Tonya Ugoretz, Asst. Dir. for Counterterrorism Robert Wells and others:

Draft/pre decision, Coordination for media statement – DI/CTD/OGC [Directorate of Intelligence/Counterterrorism Division/Office of General Counsel]

Potential statement for review/edits-: [Redacted].

Asst. Director for Public Affairs Catherine Milhoan then responds:

All, we have received two new inquiries in addition to the three last night and are making the decision to respond in the next hour. We want to get our statement out before this picks up any steam.

DI/CTD/OCG,

Please review the draft and let us know if you have any edits or concerns.

Later in the email chain, Stanley Meador, Special Agent-in-Charge of the Richmond Field Office, replies, “Looks good. One small suggestion in yellow. I would send it out. It is migrating onto Fox. https://www.foxnews.com/media/purported-fbi-document-suggests-agency-targeting-catholics-attend-latin-mass.”

On February 10, 2023, FBI Chief of Staff Jonathan Lenzner emails FBI colleagues with the subject “intel piece that has been withdrawn,” saying, “I don’t know if we are there yet, [redacted].”

Lenzner then follows up on February 13, writing, “Looks like at least one religious organization is speaking out publicly: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/catholic-league-condemns-fbi-internal-memo-targeting-catholics.”

Ryan T. Young, the Executive Assistant Director of the Intelligence Branch replies to Lenzner, “Not a good look … Real frustrating when it is self-inflicted. I’ll be back in town Wednesday. We can look into next best steps.”

“After seven months of delay and more to come, Joe Biden’s FBI remains committed to one thing: covering up their un-American spying on Catholic citizens,” said former Congressman Huelskamp, Ph.D., Senior Advisor to CatholicVote. “By fully withholding more than 200 pages of public documents, the Biden administration is more interested in hiding the truth than ending this unconstitutional witch hunt of Catholics and other faithful Americans.”

“The FBI launched a vicious spy effort against Catholics and sought to spy on parishioners as they sat in church pews,” stated Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “These records show top FBI officials were panicked in response about their domestic spying abuse leaking out.”

CatholicVote.org is a community of patriotic Americans who believe that the timeless truths of the Catholic faith are good for America. It makes its mission “to inspire every Catholic in America to live out the truths of our faith in public life.”

EDITORS NOTE: This Judicial Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

‘Falling On Deaf Ears’: CNN Political Director Throws Cold Water On GOP Candidates Who Say Trump Can’t Win

CNN’s Political Director David Chalian on Thursday threw cold water on Republican presidential hopefuls who say former President Donald Trump can’t win.

Chalian broke down a new CNN poll that found Trump leading his opponents among New Hampshire voters in a poll conducted by the University of New Hampshire and CNN. Former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley trails Trump by 22%, garnering 20% of the vote. Both Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and businessman Vivek Ramaswamy are in the single digits.

Chalian then explained that 52% of those polled said they have definitely made up their minds on who to vote for while 35% are leaning toward a candidate and just 12% remain undecided.

“But if you add in Trump supporters here, just take a look. Those who say Donald Trump is their choice in this primary, 83%, Dana, say they are solidly locked in. That is the stickiness of his support. Eleven percent of Trump supporters are leaning to someone, they consider themselves sort of leaners, five percent still deciding. And as you know, one of the main arguments that we’re hearing from candidates not named Trump is that he can’t win and that argument is falling on deaf ears with this New Hampshire Republican primary electorate,” Chalian said.

“Look at this movement. Donald Trump back in September, 51% of likely Republican primary voters said he had the best chance of winning a general election. That’s now up to 57%. So he’s up six points on electability,” he continued. “It’s not an argument that people are hearing that Donald Trump can’t win the general election.”

Haley has seen her support increase, jumping 14 points to second place in New Hampshire, according to an Emerson College poll. Trump received 49%, according to the poll. A new Quinnipiac poll also shows the former president leading President Joe Biden by two points, the first ever for that poll.

AUTHOR

BRIANNA LYMAN

News and commentary writer. Follow Brianna on Twitter.

RELATED ARTICLES:

New York Appeals Judge Temporarily Lifts Gag Order On Trump In Civil Fraud Trial

Voter Tells CNN That Biden Needs To Be Held Accountable The Same Way Trump Was

‘They Know He’s Going To Lose’: Biden Challenger Calls Out Dems For ‘Dancing Around’ Elections

Hey, KJP! Here’s All The Evidence You Can’t Seem To Find On Your Boss

Special Counsel Investigating Biden Classified Docs Reportedly Unlikely To Charge Anybody

RELATED VIDEOS:

Anti-Semitic Agenda Exposed | Activate America

TAKE A STAND!

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Why do American Jews still support Democrats? Here’s some background and an answer!

The Sebastian Gorka post on X below says it all about Jews supporting the people who hate them. But why?

I recently spoke to the Republican Club of Solivita, Florida on what is happening between Hamas and Israel and how this conflict in Gaza has gone global and now impacts not only the world but American Jews in particular.

After my presentation and during the Q&A a member asked, “Why do so many Jews still vote for the Democrats?

My answer was I don’t really know why any Jew, given what is happening today, would support any Democrat, especially Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr. and his administration’s pro-Iran policies.

After the presentation a Jewish couple came up to me with their answer to the question.

The wife said that she was a Democrat because her grandfather and father were Democrats. They were Democrats because it was the Democrats who allowed her grandfather to emigrate to America.

This is not exactly what happened to many Jews who wanted to immigrate to America from Nazi, Germany.

In a November 18, 2015 Smithsonian Magazine article titled “The U.S. Government Turned Away Thousands of Jewish Refugees, Fearing That They Were Nazi SpiesDaniel A. Gross reported,

In a long tradition of “persecuting the refugee,” the State Department and FDR claimed that Jewish immigrants could threaten national security.

In the summer of 1942, the SS Drottningholm set sail carrying hundreds of desperate Jewish refugees, en route to New York City from Sweden. Among them was Herbert Karl Friedrich Bahr, a 28-year-old from Germany, who was also seeking entry to the United States. When he arrived, he told the same story as his fellow passengers: As a victim of persecution, he wanted asylum from Nazi violence.

But during a meticulous interview process that involved five separate government agencies, Bahr’s story began to unravel. Days later, the FBI accused Bahr of being a Nazi spy. They said the Gestapo had given him $7,000 to steal American industrial secrets—and that he’d posed as a refugee in order to sneak into the country unnoticed. His case was rushed to trial, and the prosecution called for the death penalty.

What Bahr didn’t know, or perhaps didn’t mind, was that his story would be used as an excuse to deny visas to thousands of Jews fleeing the horrors of the Nazi regime.

World War II prompted the largest displacement of human beings the world has ever seen—although today’s refugee crisis is starting to approach its unprecedented scale. But even with millions of European Jews displaced from their homes, the United States had a poor track record offering asylum. Most notoriously, in June 1939, the German ocean liner St. Louis and its 937 passengers, almost all Jewish, were turned away from the port of Miami, forcing the ship to return to Europe; more than a quarter died in the Holocaust.

Government officials from the State Department to the FBI to President Franklin Roosevelt himself argued that refugees posed a serious threat to national security. Yet today, historians believe that Bahr’s case was practically unique—and the concern about refugee spies was blown far out of proportion. [Emphasis added]

Read more.

President Franklin D. Roosevelt was a Democrat.

The Holocaust Museum in an article titled “REFUGES” reports,

KEY FACTS:

  1. From 1933 to fall 1941 Nazi Germany pursued an aggressive policy of forced emigration for the Reich’s Jews.
  2. More than 340,000 Jews emigrated from Germany and Austria. Of these, about 100,000 who fled to other European countries subsequently were killed in the Holocaust.
  3. Refugees faced enormous obstacles in finding safe havens during the Great Depression and World War II.

After Germany annexed Austria in March 1938 and particularly after the Kristallnacht pogroms of November 9–10, 1938, nations in western Europe and the Americas feared an influx of refugees. About 85,000 Jewish refugees (out of 120,000 Jewish emigrants) reached the United States between March 1938 and September 1939, but this level of immigration was far below the number seeking refuge. In late 1938, 125,000 applicants lined up outside US consulates hoping to obtain 27,000 visas under the existing immigration quota. By June 1939, the number of applicants had increased to over 300,000. Most visa applicants were unsuccessful. At the Evian Conference in July 1938, only the Dominican Republic stated that it was prepared to admit significant numbers of refugees, although Bolivia would admit around 30,000 Jewish immigrants between 1938 and 1941.

In a highly publicized event in May–June 1939, the United States refused to admit over 900 Jewish refugees who had sailed from Hamburg, Germany, on the St. Louis. The St. Louis appeared off the coast of Florida shortly after Cuban authorities cancelled the refugees’ transit visas and denied entry to most of the passengers, who were still waiting to receive visas to enter the United States. Denied permission to land in the United States, the ship was forced to return to Europe.

[ … ]

Over 60,000 German Jews immigrated to Palestine during the 1930s, most under the terms of the Haavara (Transfer) Agreement. This agreement between Germany and the Jewish authorities in Palestine facilitated Jewish emigration to Palestine. The main obstacle to emigration of Jews from Germany was German legislation banning the export of foreign currency. According to the agreement, Jewish assets in Germany would be disposed of in an orderly manner and the resulting capital transferred to Palestine through the export of German products. The British White Paper in May 1939, a policy statement approved by the British Parliament, contained measures that severely limited Jewish entry into Palestine.  [Emphasis added]

Read the full article.

The Bottom Line

The Holocaust Museum concludes with this,

After the war, hundreds of thousands of survivors found shelter as displaced persons in camps administered by the western Allies in Germany, Austria, and Italy. In the US, immigration restrictions were still in effect, although the Truman Directive of 1945, which authorized priority to be given within the quota system to displaced persons, permitted 16,000 Jewish DPs to enter the United States.

I had to wait three long years. There were quotas. There were always quotas.” — Charlene Schiff.

Watch as Charlene Schiff describes difficulties in gaining entry to the United States in the aftermath of the Holocaust

Immigration to Palestine (Aliyah) remained severely limited until the establishment of the State of Israel in May 1948. Thousands of Jewish displaced persons sought to enter Palestine illegally: between 1945 and 1948, the British authorities interned many of these would-be immigrants to Palestine in detention camps on Cyprus.

With the establishment of Israel in May 1948, Jewish refugees began streaming into that new sovereign state. Some 140,000 Holocaust survivors entered Israel during the next few years. The United States admitted 400,000 displaced persons between 1945 and 1952. Approximately 96,000 (roughly 24 percent) of them were Jews who had survived the Holocaust. [Emphasis added]

Read the full article.

While this Jewish American couple’s family may have immigrated to America it was by shear happenstance that they were granted a visa.

It appears this Jewish woman really believes this because she trusted what was said by her father and grandfather without knowing what really happened.

But given the unprovoked attack by Hamas on Israel on October 7th, 2023 — a date that will live in infamy — and the subsequent attacks across America and the world we are seeing the coming of a second Holocaust.

If Jews in America do not understand this threat to their very lives then they are blinded by party loyalty rather than reality.

The reality is one side wants the other side dead.

Jews vote for your security, not by what your family did. Times have changed.

The party of Harry S. Truman and John F. Kennedy is long gone. 

The New York Times reports that more than 500 U.S. officials signed a letter protesting Biden’s Israel Policy. The signers, representing some 40 government agencies, reflect growing internal dissent over the administration’s support of Israel’s military campaign in Gaza.

Under pressure from the Democrat party’s left wing, including the 68% of Jews who support the Democrats, Biden is justifying support for Israel’s war on Hamas by reviving the two-state myth. This is a prescription for another Oct. 7th, 2023 or worse.

These 500, and perhaps more, are the pro-Hamas enemies within our own government.

If you want to avoid a Holocaust 2.0 vote accordingly.

©2023. Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLE: Judicial Watch: FBI Records Show Top Officials Rushing to Craft a Response to Leaked Memo Revealing its Targeting of Catholics

Obama’s Financial Legacy – A Shift from Bank Bailouts to Bail-Ins

Bail-ins, they say, are like financial gymnastics gone wild – saving failing banks with the equivalent of a fiscal somersault.

According to Fortune magazine:

A bail-in is a form of financial relief for banks that are in danger of collapsing or going bankrupt. The relief comes from canceling some or all of the bank’s debt by reducing the value of bank shares, bonds, and uninsured deposits. (Note: The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insures most bank deposits up to $250,000 per individual.)

A bail-in is the opposite of a bailout. Instead of relief funds coming from outside (taxpayers), the funds come from inside (shareholders and depositors). Although bail-in relief has been implemented in Europe, it has never been used in the U.S.
Even so, bail-in relief was legalized in the U.S. with passage of the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, following the 2007–2008 financial crisis in which banks deemed “too big to fail” were bailed out by the U.S. government. The specific section of Dodd-Frank that deals with bail-ins is Title II: Orderly Liquidation Authority (OLA).

It’s the anti-bailout, where instead of Uncle Sam swooping in with taxpayers’ cash, they tap into your wallet. Picture this: the bank’s equity gets trashed, and debts? They’re tossed into the financial blender, ready to absorb losses. What’s left? If you will, a bank trying to rise from the ashes, debtholders turning into equity holders, a financial phoenix.

Depositors, brace yourselves because a bail-in isn’t just a banking term for the elite. Your deposits might get a haircut – a trim that leaves you with less green. It’s like a cash version of a bad haircut; only you pay for it. Debt into equity, they say. So, if you had a loan, part of it might morph into a share in the bank. Congratulations, you’re a shareholder now. Dividends, risks, the whole shareholder shindig – welcome to the rollercoaster.

Oh, but there’s a VIP section in the world of deposits – a priority ranking. Some deposits get a golden ticket, a front-row seat in the insolvency show. If the bank goes belly-up, these priority deposits might have a better chance of survival. It’s like a financial Hunger Games, where your deposit category decides if you’ll survive.

And then there’s the tax twist. Bail-ins come with tax consequences, a fiscal aftershock. The government’s got its magnifying glass out, looking at how it affects shareholders and creditors. It’s like a financial detective story, trying to figure out if the tax system is playing favorites or just playing fair.

Now, rewind to the U.K., where Northern Rock pulled a spectacular bail-in move. A bank turned building society turned bank again; it danced on the edge during the 2008 financial crisis. The U.K. government swooped in, not with a bailout, but a bail-in. Debts to equity, customers turned shareholders – a financial plot twist.

So, here’s the burning question: How do you dodge the financial thunderstorms of a bail-in? Step one: decode the bail-in process. Know the drill because you’ll want to know how to stay afloat when the financial flood comes. Keep an eye on your bank’s health – financial checkups are crucial. Spot red flags, like a nosedive in assets or a debt rise. It’s like monitoring your bank’s vital signs; a healthy bank keeps the financial doctor away today.

Deposit insurance is like a financial superhero cape. In the UK, the FSCS rides to the rescue, covering deposits up to £85,000. It’s like a financial safety net, ready to catch you if your bank takes a leap off the fiscal cliff. Diversify, they say. Spread your financial wings across stocks, bonds, and real estate – a financial buffet to avoid putting all your eggs in one risky basket.

Consider this: if your bank’s on shaky ground, they might offer you a golden ticket to convert your debt into equity. It’s like a backstage pass to the financial show, but beware – being a shareholder isn’t all glitz and glamor. Risks, dividends, and the financial roller coaster are part of the deal.

Stay informed, they say. Know the financial rules of the game in your country. It’s like a financial playbook; knowing the rules helps you navigate the financial field. But remember, even with all these steps, there are no guarantees. Consulting a financial wizard might be your best bet when the financial storm hits.

And now, the origin story: the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010. A financial superhero born out of the 2008 financial crisis. It banned bank bailouts, opening the door to bail-ins. No more taxpayers’ cash rescues; instead, banks tap into the pockets of depositors and bondholders. It’s a financial power shift, a change in the financial rescue script. A shift from Uncle Sam’s wallet to yours because it’s survival of the financial fittest in the financial world. This monumental legislation, a brainchild of the Obama administration, marked a turning point in financial history, aiming to prevent a repeat of the financial calamities that led to the “Too Big To Fail” bailouts.

Thanks a lot, Obama.

©2023. Amil Imani. All rights reserved.

Shocker: Gen Z’s Support for Same-Sex Marriage Falls Precipitously

Gen Z is said to be the most LGBTQ generation in American history, but a new poll shows young people’s support for a pillar of the sexual revolution has fallen precipitously.

Gen Z’s support for same-sex marriage has plummeted by 11 percentage points in two years, according to a new survey released last Thursday by the American Enterprise Institute’s Survey Center on American Life. “At one time, the issue of same-sex marriage sharply divided Americans by age, with younger adults expressing the most intense support and older Americans far more opposed,” states the survey. “There is some indication that this generational gap is contracting, with Gen Z adults expressing lower support for same-sex marriage than they once did.”

Gen Z now supports same-sex marriage by a 69% margin, but “[a]s recently as 2021, eight in 10 (80 percent) Gen Z adults reported supporting same-sex marriage,” the poll notes. “There is no evidence of a similar drop among any other generation.”

America’s youngest generation, Gen Z is defined as those born since 1997. The Supreme Court discovered the “right” to same-sex marriage in the Constitution only in 2015’s Obergefell v. Hodges decision. Gen Z would be the generation most likely to have been raised by a same-sex married couple.

“Today, Gen Z adults are not much more supportive of same-sex marriage than are baby boomers,” says the poll.

In fact, Gen Z is less likely to support same-sex marriage than their older siblings, the millennials (those born between 1981 and 1996). The survey found 73% of millennials back redefined marriage, compared with 69% of Gen Z, 65% of Generation X, and 61% of Baby Boomers.

Overall, 66% of Americans support same-sex marriage, while 31% somewhat (13%) or strongly (18%) oppose redefining marriage, according to the survey.

The numbers came as a surprise even to those who study the subject intently. The often-erudite Brad Wilcox, professor of Sociology at the University of Virginia, replied with one word: “Whoa.”

“I didn’t have ‘Gen Z supporting same-sex marriage less than Millennials’ on my 2023 bingo card,” said another commentator. Bloomberg columnist Matthew Yglesias acknowledges that “we now have a good amount of evidence that Zoomers are gonna be more conservative than Millennials” but writes off the same-sex marriage finding as a “statistical fluke.”

Yet the poll would fit with other polls showing the LGBTQ agenda losing support:

Gen Z’s reduced support for same-sex unions does not come from their rejection of homosexuality; younger Americans are the most likely to say they identify as something other than heterosexual. Roughly 3% of all Americans identify as gay or lesbian, but 23% of Gen Z adults identify as LGBTQ — four times higher than Generation X. A whopping 31% of Gen Z women identify as lesbian, bisexual, or “something else,” the study states.

That sexual “fluidity” impacts Gen Z’s left-leaning politics, AEI said. “Sexual identity is strongly associated with political ideology, especially among younger Americans. Young liberals are far more likely than political moderates or conservatives to identify as something other than heterosexual,” the study notes. “Nearly half (48 percent) of liberal Gen Z women and 29 percent of liberal Gen Z men identify as gay or lesbian, bisexual, or something else. Just over half (51 percent) of liberal Gen Z women identify as heterosexual or straight, compared to 69 percent of liberal Gen Z men.”

Politics also impacts one’s view of whether same-sex attraction is a choice: 67% of liberals believe sexual attraction is innate, inborn, and immutable, while 51% of conservatives say environmental factors hold the greatest influence over sexual preference. Most Gen Z women (54%) say sexual orientation is fixed and genetic, compared with just over one in three (38%) of Gen Z men.

Experts cautioned that the surface-level numbers do not explain the reasons that moved Gen Z’s hearts.

“There is really no way to tell from these data why their support has declined,” Dr. Jennifer Roback Morse, founder and president of The Ruth Institute, told The Washington Stand. “It is possible that this is not uniquely about declining support for same-sex marriage: It could just be declining support for marriage itself. No firm conclusions are possible, based on what we see here.”

AUTHOR

Ben Johnson

Ben Johnson is senior reporter and editor at The Washington Stand.

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2023 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.