Biden Regime Opposes Merit-Based Military Promotions in Favor of Race

The White House has come out against a provision in the annual defense spending bill that would require the military to base promotion decisions on who is the best candidate for the job, regardless of their race.

The Democrats are hurling us back to a discriminatory, race based society. We defeated them in the civil war – how were they allowed to triumph? And didn’t the Supreme Court just rule that racist policies are unconstitutional?

Biden Administration Opposes Merit-Based Military Promotions in Favor of Race Quotas

By Eric Lendrum, AM Greatness, July 12, 2023

The Biden Administration has publicly voiced its opposition to a measure in the annual defense spending bill that would mandate promotions based on merit and forbid promotions based on race.

As the New York Post reports, the provision in question is one of eight measures in the overall proposal that was officially opposed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), as it would essentially undo many of the pro-DEIA (diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility) initiatives that the Biden Administration has been pushing for since first taking power.

“A candidate shall be evaluated on the bases of qualifications, performance, integrity, fitness, training and conduct,” the proposed rule reads. “No determination may be based on favoritism or nepotism; and no quota may be used.”

“The administration strongly opposes the House’s sweeping attempts to eliminate the [Defense Department’s] longstanding DEIA efforts and related initiatives to promote a cohesive and inclusive force,” OMB wrote in its response. “DoD’s strategic advantage in a complex global security environment is the diverse and dynamic talent pool from which we draw.”

Other proposals by House Republicans that drew the White House’s ire include a ban on funding for the teaching of critical race theory (CRT), a ban on performing drag shows in the military, and outright eliminating the newly-created position of DEI Chief at the Pentagon. Another measure would forbid Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin from “appointing or employing a military or civilian employee whose duties include diversity, equity, and inclusion” to any high-ranking position.

Congressman Jim Banks (R-Ind.), the member who wrote two of the provisions in question, including the merit proposal, said that he “considers the White House’s opposition to my amendments a badge of honor.”

“Wokeness is a cancer that will destroy our military from the inside out if we don’t stop it,” said Banks, who is currently running for the open U.S. Senate seat in Indiana next year

Read more.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

WRAY LIED: Newest Twitter Files Shows Twitter ‘Immediately’ Took Down Accounts FBI Requested Without Investigation Based on False Charges

Disney Theme Parks Sizes ‘Shockingly Low’ Amid Woke Backlash

RELATED TWEET: WATCH: Matt Gaetz Grilling FBI Director Wray is FIRE, “Are You Protecting the Bidens?”

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Biden’s DOJ Removes ‘International Sex Trafficking of Minors’ as an ‘Area of Concern’

Villainy. By their acts we shall know them, and so we know these degenerates.

81 million votes!

Biden’s DOJ Removes ‘International Sex Trafficking of Minors’ as an ‘Area of Concern’

Democrat President Joe Biden’s Department of Justice (DOJ) has removed child sex trafficking from a list of crimes it considers to be an “area of concern.”

By: Slay News, July 12, 2023:

In late May, the DOJ erased content from its webpage on child sex trafficking.

The section had been added by President Donald Trump’s administration and highlighted that cracking down on the “international sex trafficking of minors” was a top priority for the U.S. government.

However, it has just been revealed that the information was scrubbed and the horrifying crime is no longer listed as a “concern” for Biden’s DOJ.

The stunning revision was exposed by journalist Natalie Winters of Steve Bannon’s Warroom.

The change in policy comes amid mounting scrutiny of Biden’s continued incitement of mass migration via America’s porous southern border.

The border is a prime avenue for child sex trafficking, as Slay News has reported.

It also coincides with the recent release of the hit anti-child trafficking film “Sound of Freedom.”

The Department of Justice’s (DOJ) webpage chronicling what constitutes child sex trafficking and how the department is combatting it underwent severe revisions on May 12th, 2023, including the erasure of the three sections: “International Sex Trafficking of Minors”; “Domestic Sex Trafficking of Minors,” and “Child Victims of Prostitution.”

Keep reading.

5 THINGS YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT HUMAN TRAFFICKING

By: Arielle Del Turco and Alaina Cothran, Washington Standard, July 11, 2023:

Human trafficking — both sex trafficking and labor trafficking, including of children — remains a widespread global problem, and America is not left untouched. Here is what you should know about human trafficking.

1. Human Trafficking Is More Prevalent Than You Think

The U.S. Department of Justice defines human trafficking as “a crime that involves compelling or coercing a person to provide labor or services, or to engage in commercial sex acts.” This coercion can be presented as “subtle or overt, physical or psychological.” The breadth of the issue creates a complex web of victims with different experiences, the majority of which never receive justice for the evil committed against them.

It is estimated that nearly 28 million individuals are trafficked globally at any given time. Human trafficking creates a global profit of $150 billion each year, making it “the most lucrative crime after drug trafficking.” Even so, only a fraction of traffickers are punished for their crimes. In 2022, there were 15,159 prosecutions worldwide for trafficking, yet these culminated in only 5,577 convictions. In the United States specifically, the National Human Trafficking Hotline received over 10,000 reports regarding 16,554 victims throughout 2021.

While human trafficking is not limited just to sex crimes, statistics reveal that the U.S. is a top consumer of child sex in the world. In the U.S. alone, the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children received more than 17,200 reports of child sex trafficking in the United States in 2021. Geoff Rogers, co-founder of the United States Against Human Trafficking, reports how the “United States is the No. 1 consumer of sex worldwide,” and demand is often being driven with children. Rogers asserts there are “a multitude of kids that are being sold as sex slaves today in America,” over half of which come from the foster care system. These statistics confirm the somber reality of this evil; child sex trafficking not only exists in foreign nations, but it thrives here in our communities.

2. Porn Creates Demand for Sex trafficking, Including for Child Sex Trafficking

Studies have shown the consumption of pornography contributes to the objectification of human beings and an “acceptance of sexual mistreatment.” In a lecture on the link between pornography and sex trafficking conducted by the Family Research Council, Arina Grossu emphasized the addictive nature of pornography, which fuels the demand for more pornographic material and sex acts. Many of these commodities are provided by individuals who are sex trafficked.

Specifically, research shows that those who observe pornography most often were also the ones to purchase women in prostitution for sex acts. Journalist John-Henry Westen asserts that viewership creates increased acceptance for violent, disturbing pornography, ultimately culminating in a clientele for the sex trafficking industry. With desensitization — and even broad acceptance — of porn consumption and engaging in pornographic activity, sex trafficking victims are used to meet the demand and produce content without the opportunity to express true consent. With the worldwide pornography industry worth $97 billion — its success largely attributed to its addictive nature — traffickers have an incentive to continue using victims for continued economic profit.

Even more startling is the growing success of online child pornography consumption. Of those who view child pornography, between 40-80% have in fact molested a minor themselves. Further research concludes 66-90% of women used to create pornographic material were victims of sexual abuse at some point during their childhood. This connection between childhood abuse and increased likelihood of being sex trafficked for pornographic material in the future draws attention to the crisis our society faces in protecting children from this evil.

3. Current U.S. Border Policy Is Enabling Human Traffickers

It is estimated upwards of 72% of all human trafficking victims in the U.S. are immigrants, many of which are transported across the border between the U.S. and Mexico. With the current status of the border, many girls, some as young as 14, are abducted prior to their arrival at the border then smuggled across to perform sex acts at a price. Approximately 60% of children who enter the U.S. illegally and unaccompanied are caught by cartel members and used in the production of child pornography.

In terms of the legislative process, the issues of illegal immigration and human trafficking are generally dealt with separately to pass bipartisan legislation more easily. The recently passed version of the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act grants unaccompanied minors “special accommodations, such as expedited processing and benefits.” Unfortunately, these opportunities provided to unaccompanied minors incentivize minors to cross the border, ultimately creating minimal restrictions and increased opportunities for cartels to seize these children. To effectively address human trafficking in the U.S., we must also take measures to address rampant illegal border crossings, especially when unaccompanied minors are involved.

Keep reading.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

‘Sound of Freedom’ hero says child traffickers, ‘woke Left’ share same playbook

Corroborating Evidence of Pedophilia on Hunter’s Laptop, His Depravity Beggars Belief

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev: The Nuclear ‘Apocalypse’ Is ‘Possible’ and ‘Quite Probable’

On July 2, 2023, Dmitry Medvedev, deputy chairman of the Russian Security Council and former president of Russia, published an article, titled “The Age Of Confrontation,” in the official Russian government daily Rossiyskaya Gazeta. In the article, Medvedev wrote that the world is in a confrontation far worse than that during the Cuban Missile Crisis. For this reason, a nuclear “apocalypse” is not only “possible,” but quite “probable.” After all, Medvedev wrote, nuclear weapons have already been used by the United States, therefore “there is no taboo.”


Following is Medvedev’s article:[1]

“Why Are Western Politicians Again Blabbing Nonsense?”

“When it seems that the whole world is against you, remember that the plane does not take off in the wind, but against it. – source unknown but attributed to Henry Ford and mentioned by Ayn Rand.”

“Once again, the West has raised a white noise and continues to hurl accusations against Russia with all its might. Everyone is trying, from the senile members of the U.S. Senate, heavily sick with Russophobia, to the unstable old men in the White House. It would seem that everything has long been said and done. So, why are Western politicians again blabbing nonsense about the need for a ‘strong signal’ about Kiev’s protectorate membership in NATO? Why do they continue to strive for peace for Ukraine only on the terms of the Nazi Kiev regime? Why so much rage after almost a year and a half of the SVO [‘Spizialnayay Voennaya Operatziya’ Special Military Operation in Ukraine i.e., the Russian invasion of Ukraine]?

“Naturally, our enemies, both external and internal, were hardly pleased with the result of the recent armed revolt.[2] The Russian authorities has convincingly proved their strength and resilience, and the people of the country have demonstrated their willingness to rally around Supreme Commander-in-Chief Vladimir Putin for the defend of the Motherland.

“On the other hand, it is unlikely that our adversaries got very upset by the seizure of the city of Artemivsk, aka Bakhmut, by our troops. The ZSU’s [‘Zbroini Sily Ukraini,’ the Armed Forces of Ukraine]  defeat on that front was a foregone conclusion. Another thing is that [the result of the] beginning of the [Ukrainian] counteroffensive was unexpected for the Western political morons. They have put too much trust in the genius of their instructors, the omnipotence of unlimited money and the power of the vaunted NATO technology.

“Nonetheless, here and there, Western officials and ‘not-so-officials (but by no means less disgusting figures) say ad nauseam, ‘Russia has already lost, we have won.’ Why all the sudden they started to sing such ‘bravura songs’? Facts are stubborn things; there is no place for illusions now. First, let us examine their arguments.”

“Russia Is In Isolation, Not At All”

“1.’Russia is in isolation.’ Not at all. Political contacts with Asia, Africa, and Latin America are developing quite actively. Their markets are open to us, their companies are very active in our country, despite the sanctions. The end of the era of the almighty dollar is nigh. The transition to national and digital currencies is on the agenda.

“True, ties with Europe have significantly decreased (but let’s be frank, have not disappeared completely). In turn, [ties] with the global South and the equally global East, have intensified considerably. Goods from Europe that we needed have been replaced by other products. The Europeans lost our market for a very long time, their investments went down the drain, although the industries themselves remained. I want to thank them for free or seriously devalued facilities that have been taken over by Russian companies.

“The [Western] firms are ‘biting their senile elbows,’[3] trying to offset losses in their balance sheets, but due to notorious political correctness and, let’s be blunt here, cowardice to the overseas suzerain [i.e., the US], they keep silent, swallowing tears of lost income.”

“The Russian Economy Is Collapsing, Not At All”

“2. ‘The Russian economy is collapsing.’ Not at all. Manufacturing growth is much higher than in Europe. Even Reuters news agency admitted that in April of 2023, Russia’s manufacturing sector demonstrated a growth for 12 consecutive months. Wherein, inflation [in Russia] is much lower than that in many Western countries. It is close to a historic low of 2.9%. It will not exceed the 5% mark by the end of the year. In turn, the European Commission forecasts that inflation in the eurozone will be close to 6% in 2023. The unemployment rate in Russia is at a historical low: 3.3%.

“We record development in all sectors of the economy. According to Rosstat [the Russian Federal State Statistics Service], in March this year, industrial output increased by 1.2% compared to last March. In April, [the industrial output] already grew by 5.2%. There have been impressive results in construction [sector] too. In 2022 alone, the volume of construction work rose by 5.2%. Last year, agricultural production grew by more than 10%. And concerning all commodity positions in this sector, we cover our own needs, and we are actively developing exports.

“By the way, a dependence on agricultural products and food goods produced in our country has been recognized around the world, hence the endless chants on the ‘grain deal’ [i.e., Black Sea Grain Initiative]. Although it is clear to everyone that it is unnecessary in its current form and should be terminated by all means possible. We will be able to help our partners anyway, it is not our job to feed the potbellied European burghers. They have their own old and bald ‘liverwurst’ [i.e., German chancellor Olaf Scholz] for that, as well as a mass of highly educated gynecologists, who are brilliantly managing the European economy [a reference to President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen, who has worked as an assistant physician at the Women’s Clinic of the Hannover Medical School].”

“We Have Never Engaged In NATO Containment”

“3.’Russia wanted to contain NATO, however, the alliance expanded due to Sweden’s and Finland’s entry.’ This is a bold lie. We have never engaged in NATO containment. It is beyond our powers and capabilities. And these two Scandinavian countries were already associated with the alliance anyway. We were always asking for one thing only: to consider our concerns and not to invite former parts of our country into NATO, especially those with which we have territorial disputes. Hence, our goal is simple – to remove the threat of Ukraine’s membership in NATO. And we will achieve it… one way or another.

“Today, even the stoned leaders of the Kiev regime admitted that, while in a state of conflict, Bandera Ukraine (or whatever is customary nowadays to call its rotting remains) will not be accepted into the alliance.[4] Hence, however, comes a very simple and sad conclusion: if the conflicting countries are not accepted into NATO, it means that the conflict [in Ukraine] will be permanent, because it is a question of Russia’s existence.

“So, the reasons for their resentment are obvious. Russia has not been broken; the anti-Russian front has failed. And it was not about politics, nor about strategy nor even about tactics. To simply put it, the end is very near. The final hour has come. Our eternal ideological opponents are one step away from losing what they value most of all. First and foremost, their global dominance, on which their prosperity has been based for centuries. This is why Western politicians are trying to increase the feeling of fear [in people]. But in fact, the characters of Orwell’s ‘Animal Farm: A Fairy Story,’ the impudent English pigs and the rest of their subordinate cattle, are themselves in complete animal terror. They strive, as they have always done before, to demonstrate their power to the world. But this time, their actions are only evident to their own impotence. They create a lot of information noise, but it has, practically, no content. It is obvious: their time is up. Not even today belongs to them, let alone tomorrow. I will list three things that the Anglo-Saxon world should finally realize.”

“First: The Opposition To The Collective West Has Become Global”

The years 2022-2023 will go down in history as a time of the most powerful civilizational rift, as the peak of humanity’s existential crisis of the 21st century. Its direct consequence was the start of the special military operation (SVO) in Ukraine. Russia was forced to undertake it to protect its sovereignty and territorial integrity, for the sake of the security of millions of its citizens. Our country, as we know, exercised its right to self-defense in accordance with Article 51 of the UN Charter.

“The events unfolding now in Ukraine and in Donbass are not just a ‘regional conflict’ but something quite different. It is a total confrontation between the conventional collective West and the rest of the world. It is caused by diametrically opposed views on the further development of humanity.

“On the one side, there are the Western countries, unwilling to accept that the world has changed radically and to lose their dominance. The hybrid war they are now waging against us is their last chance to maintain a favorable status quo for themselves, i.e., not to lose their weakened power and influence. On the other side, there are not only Russia, but also the global East and South. The population of [these regions] make up almost two-thirds of the global one.

“These are countries that continue to acquire strength, gradually overcoming the economic and political consequences of their colonial past. They advocate the equal development of all countries without choosing ‘senior’ and ‘junior’ partners, without the cynical division into historically developed and poorly developed countries, without division into ‘genuine’ democracies and ‘authoritarian regimes’ (naturally, from the point of view of the West).

“Their desire for independence is much disliked by the former colonizers. They are clinging to the past with all their might. The new conflict has already caused a magnitude of more tension than during the previous cold war and extremely negative consequences. In fact, it brought the world to the brink of WWIII.

“What’s more, with the start of the conflict in Ukraine, the full package of ‘double standards’ has once again been deployed at the U.S. suggestion. This is nothing new, everything is as usual: according to the collective West, independence and territorial integrity can be defended only by those to whom this right was been supremely granted [by the West]. The rest must be subdued, crushed, and their bloody parts should, preferably, be smeared all over their own territory. Russia did not want to recognize this logic. It did not submit to the will of others. And it fought back, harshly, and unambiguously.

“Today’s new degenerate generation of Western politicians is clearly unaware of what they are doing and what they are calling for. And they seem to have forgotten what our response will be if the provocations go too far.

“Fortunately, in rare cases, rarer than last year’s snow [meaning extremely rare], some of them still have common sense. God forbid, it will not ‘melt’ completely [as last year’s snow did], because then it will really be the end.”

“Second – The Confrontation Will Be A Very Long One, And It Is Too Late To Tame The Obstinate (That Is, Us)”

“The tectonic rift that has formed in the understanding of the future, in different parts of the world, will only exacerbate. It does not take a visionary to realize that the phase of confrontation will be a very long one. The standoff will last for decades. One way of resolving it is a third world war. But this is, obviously, not a good one, as the victorious party is not at all guaranteed continued prosperity, as has been the case after previous world wars.

“Most likely, there will simply be no winners. It is impossible to consider as a victory a world in which a nuclear winter has come, in which cities once populated by millions lie in ruins, where there is no electricity due to enormous electromagnetic pulse, and huge number of people have died from shock waves, light radiation, penetrating radiation and radioactive contamination. [A world,] where terrible epidemics and famine reign.

“Here I would like to note one thing that politicians of all kinds do not like to admit: such an Apocalypse is not only possible, but also quite probable. Why? There are at least two reasons:

“First. The world is in a confrontation far worse than that during the Cuban Missile Crisis, for our adversaries have decided to actually defeat the biggest nuclear power, Russia. They are, no doubt, total idiots, but that’s true. And the second reason is quite prosaic – nuclear weapons have already been used (you know well by whom and where) so there is no taboo!

“The second way of resolving this total confrontation is by seeking the most difficult compromises over a long period of time. The formation of a new respectful world order, which would be based on a balance of interests of all countries. Wherein, it certainly would be not the infamous ‘rules-based order’ that can cause nothing but a gag reflex for a country independent of the United States. True, we will have to endure a lot of communication, patience, restraint, withdrawal from negotiations and return to them, but in the end, we will be able to create the international contours of an equitable and secure world of the twenty-first century. It will probably take years, perhaps decades. But it is certainly better than all dying together on Apocalypse Day.”

“And Thus, The Third – What Are We Prepared To Do To Get Out Of The Phase Of Total Confrontation?”

“True, we are ready to search for reasonable compromises, as the president of Russia has repeatedly stated. They are possible, but provided several fundamental points are understood.

“First, our interests must be taken into account to the maximus extent possible: there must be no more ‘Anti-Russia’ [i.e., a Ukraine that supports ‘anti-Russian’ stances] in principle, otherwise, things will end very badly sooner or later. The Kiev Nazi regime must be annihilated. In a civilized Europe, it should be legally banned as a fascist one. It should be thrown away like a rotten piece of lard to the ‘dustbin’ of world history. We do not know what will replace it, nor do we know what will be left of the former Nezalezhnaya [pejorative term in Russia for Ukraine, based on a Russified version of the Ukrainian word for ‘independence’]. But the West will have to accept this, provided it does not want to see an apocalyptic end to our imperfect civilization.

“Second, all the hard-won outcomes of the total confrontation need to be enshrined in a new document similar to the Helsinki Act, which ended the famous 1975 Helsinki Conference.

“Only the Helsinki Act itself, alas, is no good for obvious reasons. As Finland, which was created by Lenin due to an ill-thought-out plan and has now joined NATO, is now a hostile country. It would be better to temporarily suspend diplomatic relations with Finland and its likes (i.e., Poland, the Baltic states and, of course, Great Britain), or at least to lower the level of such relations for the time being.

“Third, a careful reassembly of the UN and other international organizations is likely to be necessary. This is only possible with full respect for the rights of the permanent members of the Security Council, otherwise it will be totally ineffective. In the latter case, the UN will fade into oblivion as an institution that has failed to live up to the expectations of free peoples. I’m not even mentioning the fate of the current international freaks like the ICC, the Council of Europe or the OSCE. They are already in the stinking dumpster of world development.

“I do not know whether it will be possible to choose the path of compromises. I am not sure. For now, the totally degenerate Western political class is trying to up the ante in a bloody clown horror [meaning Zelenskyy]. In a state of persistent dementia, Western political class pushes our little world toward WWIII. The stoned Kiev regime is inciting the war till the very last Ukrainian.

“In other words, I am not an optimist. It was not without reason that Anton Pavlovich Chekhov once remarked that ‘life is essentially a very simple thing, and it takes a lot of effort for a man to screw it up.’

“But there is always hope.”

SOURCES:

[1] Rg.ru/2023/07/02/epoha-protivostoianiia.html?fbclid=IwAR0Vs7twSB1aTq5R64IkVx3cySkvQPDwbKCmZDwNDFDDK1YhCsKd_AILsQ0, July 2, 2023.

[2] See MEMRI Daily Brief No. 499, The Russian Elite Would Prefer To Let Putin Go His Way – And To Overtake The Country After A Collapse, By Dr. Vladislav L. Inozemtsev, July 6, 2023.

[3] “To bite one’s elbow” is an expression meaning “to deeply regret something,” or “to want something you cannot reach.”

[4] On July 9, 2023, U.S. President Joe Biden told CNN that Ukraine is not yet ready for NATO membership, saying that Russia’s war in Ukraine needs to end before the alliance can consider adding Kiev to its ranks. See: Edition.cnn.com/2023/07/09/politics/joe-biden-ukraine-nato-russia-cnntv/index.html, July 9, 2023.

RELATED TWEET:

EDITORS NOTE: This MEMRI column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Leftists Argue Government Censorship is the Highest Form of Speech

 

The Left will fight to the death for the right of the government to silence you. 


When Judge Terry Doughty issued an injunction in Missouri v. Biden that banned the government from “specifically flagging content or posts on social-media platforms and/or forwarding such to social-media companies urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner for removal, deletion, suppression”, all hell broke loose.

Evelyn Douek, a Stanford law professor, formerly of the Knight First Amendment Institute, warned that preventing the government from colluding with corporations to censor citizens would have a “chilling effect on communication between the government and platforms.”

In traditional free speech jurisprudence, ‘chilling effects’ were inflicted by the government, but Douek is worried that free speech might have a chilling effect on government censorship. After advocating, in cases like Lamont v. Postmaster General, that any interference with speech, no matter how odious including, in the aforementioned Supreme Court case, asking recipients of Communist propaganda to affirmatively agree to receive it, entailed a ‘chilling effect’, liberals don’t want to chill the censors, instead they’re worried that civil rights will chill censorship.

Even though it’s the height of summer, chilling effects on censorship were on display.

Liberals who might have once worried about free speech now fret that the government will be inhibited from censoring free speech. According to CNN, “Legal experts say that the order is overly broad and scholars on online misinformation warned that it could have a chilling effect on the government’s efforts to curtail lies about public health emergencies and elections.”

Nina Jankowicz, Biden’s former disinformation czar, popped up to argue that, ”it’ll have a chilling effect on government and academia, ensuring that officials and researchers think twice before trying to counter those spreading conspiracies and false information.”

The axis of concern had shifted from worrying that government action would inhibit free speech to agonizing that judicial interference would prevent the government from inhibiting free speech.

The existence of ‘chilling effects’ in free speech cases testified to the degree to which we protected free speech from even the faintest tinge of indirect discouragement. Now, lefty academics and experts want to not only reverse the polarities of free speech, but they are just as worried that any protection for free speech will interfere with government censorship.

Its new victims are not civilians who engage in political speech, but government censors.

To justify this inversion of civil rights, they have also inverted the concept of censorship so that the true form of free speech is to prevent others from speaking.

According to Leah Litman, a law professor at the University of Michigan, preventing the government from censoring citizens was… censorship.

Litman told NPR that the injunction “literally prevents the federal government from sending emails to social media companies about their content moderation policies or having meetings with social media companies about taking down speech and posts. And so that prevents speech, really important speech, from ever happening.”

The most important speech is government speech that suppresses the speech of the public.

If government censorship is speech, then any interference with government censorship is a violation of free speech. And the government must be allowed to censor everyone lest its really important speech be restrained from taking place. And then where would we be, except free?

Judge Terry Doughty was attacked by pro-censorship leftists for invoking George Orwell’s 1984 and yet that same faction insists on ‘literally’ arguing that censorship is speech.

Crying censorship has become the last resort of censors who demand the right to censor.

When Gov. Ron DeSantis and other governors signed laws barring Big Tech monopolies from deplatforming candidates for public office, the Computer and Communications Industry Association, whose members include Amazon, Google and Facebook, sued in the name of free speech.

“We are bringing this suit to safeguard the industry’s free speech,” CCIA boss Matt Schruers claimed. “A digital service that declines to host harmful content is exercising its own First Amendment rights.”

“Section 7 does not chill speech; if anything, it chills censorship,” the Fifth Circuit court replied.

“We reject the Platforms’ efforts to reframe their censorship as speech. It is undisputed that the Platforms want to eliminate speech—not promote or protect it. And no amount of doctrinal gymnastics can turn the First Amendment’s protections for free speech into protections for free censoring.” But that hasn’t stopped the totalitarian gymnastics from going forward.

After arguing that censorship by some of the biggest companies in the world was really speech, lefty legal scholars are arguing that government censorship is free speech, and that when judges prevent the government from censoring, the government’s speech is being violated.

The official Biden administration position is that it is entitled to censor in the event of emergencies.

“We’re not going to apologize for promoting responsible actions to protect public health, safety and security when confronted by challenges like a deadly pandemic or foreign attacks on our elections,” Sharon Yang, a White House spokeswoman, argued.

These deadly challenges and foreign attacks included a video mocking Jill Biden and a Twitter account impersonating Biden’s granddaughter. Biden officials insisted on having these and many other posts, accounts and materials that they disliked taken down.

Emergencies have never been anything other than an excuse for a broad censorship scheme.

Liberals have abandoned even the pretense of caring about free speech. Laurence Tribe, a lefty constitutional law professor, co-authored an op-ed complaining that the injunction “seems to maintain that the government cannot even politely ask companies not to publish verifiable misinformation.”

What would Tribe’s view be on the Nixon administration “politely” asking the media not to spread lies about the Vietnam War, the Reagan administration “politely” asking the media not to lie about the War on Drugs, and the Bush administration “politely” asking the media not to lie about the War on Terror? Any such suggestions, no matter how mild, were greeted with rabid rage.

“The First Amendment certainly doesn’t prevent them from merely asking,” Tribe contends, and preventing the government from doing so “would turn the Constitution’s protection of free expression in an open society into an obstacle course for some of the most valuable exchanges of information and ideas we can imagine.” The most valuable exchanges of ideas apparently involve asking social media monopolies to take down content mocking the president.

Lefty legal scholars keep arguing that government censorship is the highest form of speech.

After abandoning free speech, lefty legal scholars now celebrate the virtues of censorship in the glowing language once used for promoting reverence for a free exchange of ideas. Forget an open society, a truly valuable exchange of ideas consists of government officials telling huge corporations whom to censor this morning.

None of this is remarkable when you go back to the origins of lefty support for free speech.

In 1934, Roger Nash Baldwin, Co-Founder and Executive Director of the ACLU, quite clearly explained why he was fighting for civil liberties. “I champion civil liberty as the best of the non-violent means of building the power on which worker’s rule must be based. If I aid the reactionaries to get free speech now and then, if I go outside the class struggle to fight against censorship, it is only because those liberties help to create a more hospitable atmosphere for working class liberties. The class struggle is the central conflict of the world; all others are incidental. When that power of the working class is once achieved, as it has been only in the Soviet Union, I am for maintaining it by any means whatever.”

The American Left believes it has gained enough power that it no longer sees any value in maintaining protections for free speech, at least at a federal level, and has publicly switched its enthusiasm from speech to censorship. It now lovingly speaks of the valuable “speech” of government censors and of the ‘chilling effects’ of extremist judges who interfere with them.

There are still select conservative enclaves where the Left pretends to care about free speech. Should parents persuade a middle school library to pull a work of hard core LGBTQ pornography off the shelves, the Left will describe this as an attack on the First Amendment. But otherwise, freedom of speech has been buried in the same unmarked grave as freedom of religion with the bulk of the First Amendment soon set to join the Second Amendment.

Censorship is becoming speech and speech is becoming censorship. The real threat to civil liberties comes from people interfering with the speech of censors telling them to “shut up”.

In a world where governments have rights and people have none, the right to censor is the only right. And if they disagree with you, liberals will fight to the death for the right of the government to silence you.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLE: WRAY LIED: Newest Twitter Files Shows Twitter ‘Immediately’ Took Down Accounts FBI Requested Without Investigation Based on False Charges

RELATED TWEET:

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Turning Bad News Into Good News

News: noo͞z, nyoo͞z

noun plural

  1. Information about recent events or happenings, especially as reported by means of newspapers, websites, radio, television, and other forms of media.
  2. A presentation of such information, as in a newspaper or on a newscast.
  3. New information of any kind.

As can be seen from the definitions above found in the American Heritage Dictionary, the word “information” can be interchanged for the word “news”. The only “media” not mentioned in any of the definitions is the word “book”, so I guess the world does not see books as sources of information. How wrong they are.

No matter where you get your “news”, any good news is becoming very difficult to find these days. Whether it is political, cultural or educational in nature, it is mostly negative and inspires negativity in the listener, viewer or reader.

The Bad News

Educational –  In the U.S., the basics of education have been more or less forgotten or replaced by what now passes for education. The three R’s, readin’, ‘riting and ‘rithmetic, were dominant when I was a youngster and WERE the basis of education and were the critical subjects that all students were expected to gradually master as they progressed from grade to grade. Now, very few high school graduates can even read at a third grade level. Writing in cursive is not even taught in schools, having been replaced with the twenty-six letters, ten numbers and various symbol keys on a computer keyboard. Ask a young adult to even write his name in cursive and you’ll be met with a “deer in the headlights” stare and the unasked question in response: “What is cursive”? Indeed, it is becoming a lost art for anyone under 40 years of age.

Cultural – Racial division in the U.S. is everywhere, with hatred for one group or another being the norm, and no one seeming to care to tackle the big question: “Why can we not solve the racism problem”? Even though every so-called spokesman for each ethnic group has opinions, usually based on their own life experiences, good or bad, they have no actual solutions to the problems facing and dividing the groups. The problems just seem to be unsolvable.

Nothing seems to change: the rich get richer and the poor get political promises. The disparity in economic status from one ethnic group to another is always blamed on the appearance of racism in one form or another

Political –  It seems every nation on the Earth is either in turmoil or chaos; either entering into a period of instability or upheaval, already in one, or, less and less, recovering from one. Stability seems as elusive now as it ever has been. Here in the U.S., the political system may appear to be organized chaos, but in actuality, it IS highly organized and the chaos is for appearance only. It is a masterful performance for so many people in one U.S. Congress to claim exclusive membership in one or the other of the two major parties while they are all pretty much in agreement on nearly every issue they debate.

If there were an Academy Award ceremony for “political drama” and political actors, it would be impossible to choose which one would win the most “Oscars”. Of course, in today’s “woke culture”, they would all demand an award just for participating.

What is still so surprising is that so many seemingly intelligent, educated people are fooled by the whole Kabuki Theater, thinking those politicians in D.C. are actually there to represent their constituents. Hah! Once people are “fooled” into believing that nonsense, it is easy to keep them fooled.

The past several paragraphs have only brushed the surface of what I consider bad news. To cover every bad news issue would require more time than I have to write it or anyone has to read it.

If  the standard reporting that now passes for journalism is your source for important information, understand that it is very difficult to get the “truth” about The Good News since most reporting is based on lies and will not provide much, if any, truth.

Mark Twain famously said: “If you don’t read the newspaper you are uninformed; if you do, you are misinformed”. The same could be said of all news media outlets now, and you alone must assume responsibility for what you allow to enter your mind.

But, we all have had enough exposure to the “propaganda news” crap, with some still embedded in there somewhere, to some extent, and until it is addressed it will still continue to influence our thoughts and our decisions.

The reason you find so little good news IN the news is that, to actually admit that good news is real, the “newsies” would need to admit the existence of a God who has already provided the basis for all the good news one could ever want.

Enter The Good News, The ONLY Good News

Way back when Television was in its infancy (as was I) the programming was mostly wholesome and entertaining and the technology was building a huge following among the masses. As the years passed and the morals of a large segment of the populace declined and that was coupled with the addition of many new channels of programming, many of which were definitely NOT wholesome. Many viewers, especially parents with small children began to be turned off by the crap flowing out of some of those channels with many becoming irate and complaining loudly about it.

It occurred to many, myself included, that the best way to handle it  is to simply change the channel or shut the TV off if the information offends you. That allows you to be in charge of what you see and hear. You must determine what passes for good info versus bad info, or good news versus bad news, especially when your children are being subjected to it.

The good news is that you do not have to read, view or hear any of the bad news. I sincerely believe every person would be better off if most of what we do read, view or hear from all news media just went in one ear and out the other. Or better yet, understand ahead of time that the junk coming from all those sources is misinformation at best and evil propaganda at worst. In either case, none of it should ever be allowed to enter our consciousness in the first place.

However, the fact is that with so many unsupervised children watching TV or other media on their iPads, phones and other electronic gadgets, unless some controls and regulations are placed on  the content media outlets can broadcast, the young minds of kids will be inundated with the most evil junk imaginable.

One Source of Good News (Truth)

Even though most dictionaries do not list books as sources of information or news, every believer should know that the only source for truly good news/information is the Word of God, you know, that “book” called The Holy Bible? The information in it has stood the test of time for thousands of years and it is still the best source of life-saving, life-changing information.

As much as the actions of the current news media are exercises in obfuscation, either completely ignoring, or covering up the facts of any matter, The Holy Bible, God’s word has never done so. The most evil acts of man throughout history are clearly detailed in its pages by the authors, inspired by The Holy Spirit; God has always completely exposed the sins of man, resulting from Satan’s temptation, as the source of all bad news. But He also weaves the good news throughout the Bible, starting with His pronouncement of Satan’s judgment and eternal fate in Genesis 3:14. In that verse we see the prophecy about Satan bruising the heel of the “seed of the woman”, Jesus Christ, but also the same seed bruising Satan’s head. That is GOOD NEWS, but the BETTER GOOD NEWS is that, in God’s perfect time, that prophecy was partially fulfilled when God’s only begotten Son was sent into this world as a God-man who literally lived a perfect righteous life, was crucified as a sacrifice for all our sins, was buried for three days but then rose from the grave after defeating Satan and taking all his authority back. The prophecy about the bruising of Satan’s head was fulfilled and now we only await the fulfillment of other prophecies that will finally end Satan’s reign of terror on this Earth, and THAT is the BEST GOOD NEWS of all time!

God exposed all the bad news of man’s defeat BY evil and turned it into the good news of Jesus’s triumph OVER evil! Amen and Amen!

Even though there were no computers when the Bible was being written, the Apostle Paul specifically explained how to avoid being deceived and led astray by the voices of demons and false teachers and preachers.  As recorded in Romans 12, he said this: “I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that ye present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God, which is your reasonable service. And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God” (Romans 12:1-2).

You will not receive any truth from the MSM information, only more propaganda being spewed out, and without truth, there will be no transformation of your mind and you WILL be conformed to the world’s lies leading to the condition and the ultimate fate of the world.

While the world is deeply entrenched in the “bad news cycles” that seem to continue on forever, the good news is that the people in this world do not have to remain trapped in these cycles. They can become the recipients of the good news of Jesus and His redemption, but their minds are closed to the good news and it therefore eludes them. They are the victims of the propaganda that passes for news and sadly, they have been programmed to believe they are hearing  truth.

Unless their minds are reached by someone with a different message than the ones that trapped them, they will ultimately die in their lost and blinded condition.

Multitudes of people, trapped in the “bad news cycles” that issue from, and are promoted by, the so-called journalists of today are desperate for truth but are unable to separate the  lies, deception and evil propaganda from anything that remotely passes for truth. The media are nothing more than pushers of the bad news cycles being used to keep the minds of these multitudes blinded. Unless the true Church reaches them with the Good News from God’s word, they have little hope of ever being freed.

There is still much work for the Body of Christ, the true church on Earth, to do before we will see His final triumph over evil, but until that day and hour arrives, we must follow the example of Jesus who said, I must work the works of him that sent me, while it is day: the night cometh, when no man can work.  As long as I am in the world, I am the light of the world” (John 9:4).

Jesus physically left this world when, days after His resurrection from the grave, He ascended into heaven, so now the only light the world has IS the Church, and if that light goes out, millions more may perish without Christ.

There is only a small window of opportunity between day and night and it is fast closing; I can assure you, the day is waning and the night is closer than anyone imagines! Let’s gear up and get to work!

Blessings and Maranatha!

©2023. Bud Hancock. All rights reserved.

The War on Fathers

A British cleric created a stir recently by accusing Jesus of teaching something wrong. Jesus told us that when we pray, we should say, “Our Father…”

But the Archbishop of York told his fellow clergymen: “I know the word ‘father’ is problematic for those whose experience of earthly fathers has been destructive and abusive, and for all of us who have laboured rather too much from an oppressively patriarchal grip on life.”

The U.K. Guardian notes further: “In February, the [Church of England] said it would consider whether to stop referring to God as ‘he,’ after priests asked to be allowed to use gender-neutral terms instead.”

The prelate said in effect that there are so many bad fathers out there that Jesus has brought harm to the world through this teaching. Ironically, the cleric said the main purpose of his talk was to promote unity among Christians.

Is it true that fathers have been overall “destructive and abusive” and that humanity must be freed from “an oppressively patriarchal grip”?

For a “Christian” leader to so disregard God’s self-revelation in the Scriptures, in which God presents Himself as Father and uses masculine pronouns, is quite hubristic in my humble opinion. Don’t they have any Biblical standards any more at the Church of England in terms of leadership?

But what about the issue he raises as to dads? Are fathers part of the problem of society or a major part of the solution?

I remember once visiting a liberal evangelical church—that sounds like an oxymoron. This was about 40 years ago in Chicago. A lay minister offered a prayer, saying, “Our Father, our Mother….” I asked him about this after the service, and he explained that it was because they were so close to Cabrini Green, the notorious housing project (so bad that it eventually was torn down) where many of the residents did not know a good father.

Week in and week out, what happens in Chicago and Baltimore and Detroit? There are multiple shootings, including many fatalities. The left blames the guns. But in reality, it is largely fatherlessness at work.

Many young men join gangs because in effect the gang leaders provide the male leadership they desperately crave. The gang leaders become surrogate fathers.

The vast majority of prisoners come from broken homes.

In fact, nolongerfatherless.org reports some troubling statistics related to fatherlessness. (These are based on the research of the National Center for Fatherlessness and The Fatherless Generation):

  • 85% of youths in prison come from fatherless homes.
  • 71% of high school dropouts come from fatherless homes.
  • 90% of all homeless and runaway children come from fatherless homes.
  • 60% of youth suicides come from fatherless homes.

In short, we don’t need less fathers—we need more fathers—to stay in the home.

In his End of Day Report, Gary Bauer pens, “If you were to make a list of the top problems we’re facing in America today, one of them would have to be the epidemic of children being raised without a father in the home. Fatherlessness is associated with higher rates of poverty and virtually every other social ill.”

In our society, we’ve gone from “Father Knows Best” to Archie Bunker, who was a bigoted dad, to “father’s a complete idiot,” as in Homer Simpson.

Our view of our Heavenly Father is often linked to our view of our earthly father.

I once had the privilege to interview Dr. Paul Vitz, psychology professor emeritus at New York University. He has gone on to teach at Divine Mercy University in Sterling, Virginia.

I interviewed him because of his classic book, Faith of the Fatherless: The Psychology of Atheism, in which he documents the link between fatherlessness or bad fathers and bad results for the children—including atheism.

Vitz told me, “I would say the biggest problem in the country is the breakdown of the family, and the biggest problem in the breakdown in the family is the absence of the father. Our answer is to recover the faith, particularly for men, and we’ll recover fatherhood. And if we recover fatherhood, we’ll recover the family. We recover the family, we’ll recover our society.”

In this country, we often talk about the “founding fathers.” George Washington was “the father of the country.” James Madison is often described as “the father of the Constitution.” Even the word patriotism is derived from the word patra—as in father.

Today’s society is in chaos. It is in rebellion against God’s order for society. Even one of the Ten Commandments admonishes us, Honor your father and your mother that you may live long lives.

Contrary to what some Church of England officials say, we need to strengthen our view of the father, including our Heavenly Father, not to continue to emasculate it.

©2023. Jerry Newcombe, D.Min. All rights reserved.

House GOP Is About To Drop A Massive Report Alleging That Biden’s DHS Chief Broke The Law

House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Mark Green is set to release a lengthy report detailing his initial findings of his probe into Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas that details ways he believes he broke the law, he told the Daily Caller News Foundation in an exclusive interview.

Green launched a probe into Mayorkas on June 14 with the initial phase focusing on the DHS secretary’s alleged “dereliction of duty.” Green says the more than 100 pages of findings from the first phase of his ongoing probe will be released within the next couple of weeks.

“The list of everything that we’ve learned so far in phase one, the dereliction of duty phase will be published here very shortly. In fact, I’m proofing the final document, which is like 111 pages, but laws that have been violated. In some cases, we believe that Mayorkas has broken the law himself,” Green told the DCNF.

Green cited several instances where he believes Mayorkas has committed “intentional” and “willful dereliction of duty,” he said, referring to DHS’ use of the CBP One phone application to allow tens of thousands of migrants to enter the country each month through ports of entry at the southern border. He also believes Mayorkas lied to Congress when he asserted that DHS had “operational control” of the U.S.-Mexico border.

“There’s the lying to Congress, there’s the CBP One app, which is just this big shell game to produce automatic mass parole in violation of the laws passed by Congress. It is a wanton disregard for the separation of powers and the Constitution of the United States,” Green said.

“There’s also sort of negligent dereliction of duty. He admitted in the Senate that he didn’t understand the cartel strategy despite the fact that Merrick Garland very clearly understood it when he testified. If you’re the guy who’s in charge of homeland security and protecting the borders and going against the cartels, you probably ought to understand the major strategies of the drug cartels,” Green said, referring to Mayorkas seemingly not knowing about cartel wristbands used to track migrants crossing the southern border when previously pressed by Republican Texas Sen. Ted Cruz.

WATCH:

Despite some House Republicans already having filed articles of impeachment against Mayorkas, Green stopped short of calling for such action until his investigation concludes.

Green said the final phase of the probe will include information from anonymous U.S. officials who have been speaking with the committee that he hopes will become whistleblowers and testify publicly. He told the DCNF in May that he was speaking with the officials and that they had shared evidence of “potential fraud” Mayorkas committed.

“Ideally, they would become whistleblowers, get protection and testify. They have reluctance to do so because of what’s happened at the DOJ with the guys who came clean there and then got bullied by the leadership,” Green said.

“So they’re obviously very concerned. I mean this administration has no concept of law and order and so these people are very concerned. We just have to figure out a way to make sure we can guarantee the protection because some of these people they have their retirements on the line,” Green added.

The second phase of Green’s investigation into Mayorkas will begin with a subcommittee hearing entitled “Biden and Mayorkas’ Open Border: Advancing Cartel Crime in America” Wednesday that will spotlight the fentanyl crisis, the DCNF first reported. It will be followed by a full committee hearing on July 19 “to examine how this administration’s reckless open-border policies have empowered cartels in Mexico to seize operational control of the Southwest border,” a committee spokesperson told the DCNF.

AUTHOR

JENNIE TAER

Investigative reporter.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Top GOP Rep Says There’s Evidence The Biden Admin Released Migrants With Chinese Military Ties Into The U.S.

China’s Massive ‘Terracotta Army’ Invasion of the U.S.A.

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

5 Things You Should Know about Human Trafficking

Released in theaters last week, “Sound of Freedom” tells the true story of Tim Ballard, a Homeland Security agent who quits his job and joins forces with local Latin American law enforcement and underground contacts to rescue children caught in human trafficking. The film portrays Ballard as he sets up a sting operation that successfully frees a young Honduran boy and reunites him with his father. When the boy tells him about his sister who is still in captivity, Ballard becomes determined to find her. The heartfelt thriller has proven surprisingly successful, beating “Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny” at the box office on July 4.

Despite the heavy subject matter, “Sound of Freedom” leaves viewers feeling hopeful and motivated to make a difference. In the film, Ballard’s character expresses understandable frustration that more is not being done to free enslaved children, saying, “And every day, ordinary people don’t want to hear it. It’s too ugly for polite conversation.” The film’s early success will hopefully prove that thinking false.

Human trafficking — both sex trafficking and labor trafficking, including of children — remains a widespread global problem, and America is not left untouched. Here is what you should know about human trafficking.

1. Human Trafficking Is More Prevalent Than You Think

The U.S. Department of Justice defines human trafficking as “a crime that involves compelling or coercing a person to provide labor or services, or to engage in commercial sex acts.” This coercion can be presented as “subtle or overt, physical or psychological.” The breadth of the issue creates a complex web of victims with different experiences, the majority of which never receive justice for the evil committed against them.

It is estimated that nearly 28 million individuals are trafficked globally at any given time. Human trafficking creates a global profit of $150 billion each year, making it “the most lucrative crime after drug trafficking.” Even so, only a fraction of traffickers are punished for their crimes. In 2022, there were 15,159 prosecutions worldwide for trafficking, yet these culminated in only 5,577 convictions. In the United States specifically, the National Human Trafficking Hotline received over 10,000 reports regarding 16,554 victims throughout 2021.

While human trafficking is not limited just to sex crimes, statistics reveal that the U.S. is a top consumer of child sex in the world. In the U.S. alone, the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children received more than 17,200 reports of child sex trafficking in the United States in 2021. Geoff Rogers, co-founder of the United States Against Human Trafficking, reports how the “United States is the No. 1 consumer of sex worldwide,” and demand is often being driven with children. Rogers asserts there are “a multitude of kids that are being sold as sex slaves today in America,” over half of which come from the foster care system. These statistics confirm the somber reality of this evil; child sex trafficking not only exists in foreign nations, but it thrives here in our communities.

2. Porn Creates Demand for Sex trafficking, Including for Child Sex Trafficking

Studies have shown the consumption of pornography contributes to the objectification of human beings and an “acceptance of sexual mistreatment.” In a lecture on the link between pornography and sex trafficking conducted by the Family Research Council, Arina Grossu emphasized the addictive nature of pornography, which fuels the demand for more pornographic material and sex acts. Many of these commodities are provided by individuals who are sex trafficked.

Specifically, research shows that those who observe pornography most often were also the ones to purchase women in prostitution for sex acts. Journalist John-Henry Westen asserts that viewership creates increased acceptance for violent, disturbing pornography, ultimately culminating in a clientele for the sex trafficking industry. With desensitization — and even broad acceptance — of porn consumption and engaging in pornographic activity, sex trafficking victims are used to meet the demand and produce content without the opportunity to express true consent. With the worldwide pornography industry worth $97 billion — its success largely attributed to its addictive nature — traffickers have an incentive to continue using victims for continued economic profit.

Even more startling is the growing success of online child pornography consumption. Of those who view child pornography, between 40-80% have in fact molested a minor themselves. Further research concludes 66-90% of women used to create pornographic material were victims of sexual abuse at some point during their childhood. This connection between childhood abuse and increased likelihood of being sex trafficked for pornographic material in the future draws attention to the crisis our society faces in protecting children from this evil.

3. Current U.S. Border Policy Is Enabling Human Traffickers

It is estimated upwards of 72% of all human trafficking victims in the U.S. are immigrants, many of which are transported across the border between the U.S. and Mexico. With the current status of the border, many girls, some as young as 14, are abducted prior to their arrival at the border then smuggled across to perform sex acts at a price. Approximately 60% of children who enter the U.S. illegally and unaccompanied are caught by cartel members and used in the production of child pornography.

In terms of the legislative process, the issues of illegal immigration and human trafficking are generally dealt with separately to pass bipartisan legislation more easily. The recently passed version of the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act grants unaccompanied minors “special accommodations, such as expedited processing and benefits.” Unfortunately, these opportunities provided to unaccompanied minors incentivize minors to cross the border, ultimately creating minimal restrictions and increased opportunities for cartels to seize these children. To effectively address human trafficking in the U.S., we must also take measures to address rampant illegal border crossings, especially when unaccompanied minors are involved.

4. God Cares Deeply about Those Trapped in Slavery

In “Sound of Freedom,” Tim Ballard’s character successfully catches a pedophile attempting to traffic a child in a sting operation. The film’s representation of these real-world scenarios rightfully creates a stomach-churning reaction. Witnessing the cruelty of humanity in this way draws us to John 3:19: “And this is the judgment: the light has come into the world, and people loved the darkness rather than the light because their works were evil.” It’s a verse that naturally comes to mind when confronted with the evil of child exploitation. In this industry that so overtly disregards the value of human life — especially that of a child — let us remember that they reside in the darkness. For our fight is not against earthly foes, but it is “against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places” (Ephesians 6:12). That is why we should make every effort to administer justice to those in need and to deliver them from the wickedness of this fallen world (Psalm 82:3-4).

Human trafficking of those of any age is an assault on the human dignity of women and men and girls and boys made in the image of God (Genesis 1:27). We are right to be grieved by news of human trafficking and to seek justice for those who are oppressed (Isaiah 1:17).

5. You Can Be a Part of the Solution

If you feel a burden to make a difference on behalf of victims of human trafficking, a first step you can take is learning more about what the current challenges are. Then pray about what God might be calling you to do in your daily life. That may be donating to an organization that fights human trafficking, researching your states’ anti-trafficking laws and encouraging local leaders to make them stronger if needed, or praying with your small group from church.

For more on what you can do to fight trafficking, visit the National Center on Sexual Exploitation’s resources page. It includes action steps like how you can report suspected trafficking, how to upload images of your hotel room to a national database, and more.

Elected representatives at the state or federal level will often not prioritize an issue unless they think that their constituents are prioritizing it. Sharing information about human trafficking on social media, encouraging friends to see the “Sound of Freedom” movie, and telling your representatives you want to see more action done on fight human trafficking can all go a long way towards calling attention to human trafficking.

A quote often attributed to Mother Teresa reminds us, “I can do things you cannot, you can do things I cannot; together we can do great things.” We all can play a part in building momentum to address this evil.

AUTHORS

Arielle Del Turco 

Arielle Del Turco is Director of the Center for Religious Liberty at Family Research Council, and co-author of “Heroic Faith: Hope Amid Global Persecution.”

Alaina Cothran

RELATED ARTICLE: NIH Grants $3.3 Million for Boston Children’s Hospital to Promote Gender Transitions to Out-of-State Minors

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2023 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

Bud Light’s Death Star at Costco

American patriots are being silent no more. Costco not restocking Bud Light. Bud Light is dead. 


Bud Light at Costco and the so called “Death Star” [*] in upper right of the price signage means it will not be restocked.

It appears that Costco will not be stocking up on Bud Light since Anheuser-Busch‘s queer guy “Mulvaney Debacle.”

Photos Show Bud Light With Costco ‘Death Star’ Amid Plummeting Sales

BY 

Photos shared on social media show that Bud Light has allegedly received Costco‘s so-called “star of death”—a small asterisk at the top right-hand corner of items’ price tags which the retailer uses to signal a product will no longer be restocked once it is sold out.

Images shared on Twitter showed the price tags for Bud Light beer at different Costco stores, all marked with the “star of death.” It’s unclear where the stores are located. One of the pictures shows the beer being sold at $14.97 for a 2 x 12 pack, which a Twitter user said was Costco “practically giving away Bud Light.”

The photos were shared as the boycott against Bud Light by conservative customers angered by a sponsorship deal with trans activist and influencer Dylan Mulvaney earlier this year continues, with a significant negative impact on the brand.

According to new sales data seen by Newsweek earlier this week, Bud Light has seen a percentage drop in revenue from sales for June, compared with the same time last year.

NielsenIQ sales data, obtained by Newsweek via industry consultancy firm Bump Williams Consulting, showed that over a four-week period ending July 1, Bud Light saw a 28 percent decrease in revenue sales. Bud Light’s volume—the number of units of beer sold—was down 31.2 percent compared with the same time last year.

Read more.

FINALLY! Anheuser-Busch Says Mulvaney Was A Mistake

The Global Chief Marketing Officer of Anheuser-Busch (AB), Marcel Marcondes, told Newsmax on Monday that the campaign with transgender Dylan Mulvaney was a “wake-up call” for the company. Hopefully, for the brand, he will realize that his effort against Mulvaney did not cause the Bud Light boycott. It was merely a symptom. The cause of the boycott was Bud Light made one of the biggest brand mistakes possible—ignoring and disparaging the brand’s primary audience.

AB CEO Marcel Marcondes accepted the “Creative Marketer of the Year” award at Cannes Lions, an event held in France described as the “Oscars for the adverting industry.” It seemed ironic that Marcondes was getting this award, however, given that his company lost $27 billion in the wake of the Mulvaney ad campaign.

Mr. Marcondes said told Newmax:

“In times like this, when things get divisive and controversial so easily, I think it’s an important wake-up call to all of us marketers first of all to be very humble. That’s what we’re doing, being very humble, and really reminding ourselves of what we should do best every day, which is to really understand our consumers. Which is to really celebrate and appreciate every consumer that loves our brands — but in a way that can make them be together, not apart,” the marketing exec continued.

Read more.

©2023. Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLES:

It Just Keeps Getting Laughably Worse! Bud Light Hit Again With A Wave Of Embarrassment After Another Twitter Roasting

Bud Light Sales Collapse Over July 4th Holiday

FBI Colludes with Ukrainian Intel to Censor Americans under Biden Misinformation Campaign

In the most recently exposed Biden administration scheme to combat misinformation, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) colluded with a compromised Ukrainian intelligence agency to censor the speech of Americans. The federal agency responsible for protecting the nation against terrorists, violent street gangs and serial killers joined forces with the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU), which is widely known to be infiltrated by Russian-aligned forces, to take down the authentic social media accounts of Americans. This includes a verified U.S. State Department profile and those belonging to American journalists. Interestingly, accounts targeted for removal by the SBU and FBI criticized Russian President Vladimir Putin and expressed pro-Ukrainian views.

Details of the illicit operation are outlined in a new congressional report made public this week by the House Judiciary Committee. The document also exposes how the FBI offered Facebook and Instagram legal cover to delete social media accounts singled out by the SBU. The two agencies routinely sent the popular social media platforms spreadsheets and other documents identifying thousands of profiles to eliminate. “Regardless of its intended purpose in endorsing the SBU’s requests, the FBI had no legal justification for facilitating the censorship of Americans’ protected speech on social media,” the report states. “In contrast to the Biden Administration’s stated support for Ukraine, the FBI, on behalf of the SBU, flagged Americans’ accounts and posts that were critical of Vladimir Putin and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.”

The report says that the FBI also delivered censorship orders from the SBU to Google and YouTube and reveals that a senior cybersecurity employee at Google said the company was “deluged with various requests” for content removal after Russia invaded Ukraine. The primary liaison between the FBI and Silicon Valley is Elvis Chan, a San Francisco-based assistant special agent in charge of the division’s cyber branch. The congressional probe highlights the FBI’s unconstitutional role in enabling the SBU’s censorship regime and raises grave concerns about the agency’s credibility and competence as the nation’s premier law enforcement organization. “Put simply, the FBI worked with and on behalf of a foreign intelligence agency—widely known to be compromised by Moscow at the time—and directly abetted efforts to censor Americans engaging in protected speech,” the report says. “As a result, the FBI agents’ actions had the potential to render substantial aid to the Kremlin’s war effort.”

Strangely—or perhaps not surprisingly—the alarming document has received scant coverage from the mainstream media. One national outlet that did publish a story about it, dismissed it as “the latest in a series of Republican efforts to attack the Biden administration’s work with social media platforms, which ramped up over intervention on stories about Hunter Biden’s laptop.” The operation is hardly the first involving the administration’s highly questionable efforts to control information. Just days ago, a federal judge issued an order prohibiting the Biden administration from pressuring social media companies to suppress free speech protected under the Constitution. The ruling involves a lawsuit filed by states accusing the federal government of going too far to supposedly combat COVID-19 disinformation. In the decision, the judge wrote that there was “substantial evidence” of a far-reaching censorship campaign.

It is part of a broader effort to divert public funds for a fictitious crisis created by the Biden administration to control information. The movement started with a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) panel known as the Disinformation Governance Board, which was technically dismantled after major backlash. Taxpayer dollars keep flowing to related causes, however. Millions in DHS terrorism prevention grants have gone to combat “misinformation and disinformation” and to create media disinformation networks worldwide. Large sums have also gone to related projects such as fighting science misinformation and misperceptions in black communities and, of course, COVID-19 misinformation, especially involving minorities and vaccines.

RELATED ARTICLE: FBI Director Admits Censorship Scheme Was Halted by Federal Judge

EDITORS NOTE: This Judicial Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

The Venezuelan/Smartmatic-Bizta/Florida Links to the Great Election Fraud of 2020

“Smartmatic has helped hundreds of millions of voters cast 6.5 billion votes in thousands of elections around the world.” — Smartmatic website


Watch Smartmatic CEO Antonio Mugica Rivero admitting to “manipulating turnout numbers’ in July 2017 Venezuela election – 59 to 41.

According to Wikipedia,

In 2017, Los Angeles County signed a $282 million contract with Smartmatic to create an election system to be used for future elections,[97][98] and became the first publicly owned voting system in the United States.[99] The system will be used for the first time during the 2020 California Democratic primary.[97][98] Both software and hardware were developed in the United States by Smartmatic, while ownership of all products and intellectual properties were then given to Los Angeles County.[97] The machines developed incorporate an interactive ballot that is printed by each voter to validate results, and then deposited back into voting machines.[99][100] According to VSAP, interest in the voting system was expressed by other districts in the United States and internationally.[99]

In a column titled “Smartmatic: All Things ConnectedAlek Boyd wrote,

The Miami Herald reported on Friday May 28, 2004 :

A large and powerful investor in the software company that will design electronic ballots and record votes for Venezuela’s new and much criticized election system is the Venezuelan government itself…Venezuela’s investment in Bizta Corp., the ballot software firm, gives the government 28 percent ownership of the company it will use to help deliver voting results in future elections, including the possible recall referendum against President Hugo Chavez, according to records obtained by The Herald…Until a year ago, the Bizta Corp. was a struggling Venezuelan software company with barely a sales deal to its name, records show. Then, the Venezuelan government — through a venture capital fund — invested about $200,000 and bought 28 percent of it” (sic).

Further the Herald also shed light upon shareholders and registered addresses of both Smartmatic and Bizta thusly:

Three companies will build and execute Venezuela’s new touch-screen voting system. Two are incorporated in Florida, though neither does most of its business here.

* Smartmatic Corp., which will build the machines, incorporated in Florida in 2000 and lists its world headquarters at 6400 Congress Ave. in Boca Raton. Its president is Antonio Mugica Rivero, 30, and its vice president is Alfredo Anzola, 30.

Bizta Corp., which will provide software for the new machines, incorporated in Florida in 2001, and lists its address as 19591 Dinner Key Dr., Boca Raton, a residential property owned by Mugica’s father. Mugica is listed as president, and Anzola is vice president, according to Florida records. Venezuelan records, however, indicate Anzola is president. In Caracas, Bizta shares its office with Smartmatic.

* CANTV, Venezuela’s publicly held phone company, will provide phone lines to connect the system and election day technical support. It would have been part of any voting system selected for the elections contract.

Venezuelan journalist Orlando Ochoa Teran investigated the claims published by the Miami Herald and discovered that Venezuelan officials were behind the incorporation of Smartmatic. Vice President Jose Vicente Rangel and Venezuelan Ambassador to the USA Bernardo Alvarez Herrera are intimately related, either through long time friendship or consanguinity relationship, to the directors of Smartmatic. According to registry documents, that went missing after the Herald blew the whistle, the names associated to the company are Alfredo Anzola, Antonio Mugica and families Gabaldon-Anzola and Herrera-Oropeza [3]. The incorporation of Smartmatic took place in the Fifth Mercantile Registry, located in the ground floor of tower B in “Cubo Negro” building in Chuao Caracas. Vice President Jose Vicente Rangel’s daughter, lawyer Gisela Rangel Avalos de D’Armas was, at the time, the head of the said registry.

Since March 2004 the CNE has disbursed at least $131 million to Smartmatic [4].

Read more.

The Guardian in an April 22, 2019 article by Jordan Wilkie titled America’s new voting machines bring new fears of election tampering reported,

By design, tens of millions of votes are cast across America on machines that cannot be audited, where the votes cannot be verified, and there is no meaningful paper trail to catch problems – such as a major error or a hack.

For almost 17 years, states and counties around the country have conducted elections on machines that have been repeatedly shown to be vulnerable to hacking, errors and breakdowns, and that leave behind no proof that the votes counted actually match the votes that were cast.

Read more

“At the end of January – beginning of February 2004, the apparent contracting of the SBC Consortium (Smartmatic-Bizta-CanTV) for 112 million US$ took place, of which 91 million would be for Smartmatic-Bizta, in fact sixty-three (63) million would be for Smartmatic (purchase of the machines) and thirty-one (31) for Bizta (local processes)  [See Annex 6 – El Carabobeño].   

The exact amounts and responsibilities of each entity could not be specified as there was no access to the contract documents or the letters of credit apparently opened before the Bank of America in favor of Smartmatic and Bizta: They were opened before the Bank of America.

In any case, what is essential is the impossibility of trusting a company in which the government is not only a shareholderbut has appointed as its representative and Director not just any official from the public administration, but a person clearly linked to the most radical of Chavismo, Eng. Omar Montilla Castillo, which is evidenced by the following  [see Annex 5].

He was a militant and operational member during the electoral campaign in 1998 and 1999 of UNEPAD –  (Unit for Strategy and Electoral Register of the Patriotic Pole).

The director of UNEPAD was the current Minister of production and Commerce Wilmer Castro Soteldo, remember that Foncrei (owner of SCR) is attached to this ministry. 

For Castro Soteldoengineers Jorge Berrizbeitia and Omar Castillo worked in the computer science area of this unit 1, who today serve as President and General Director of the National Center for Information Technology (CNTI), an organization attached to the Ministry of Science and Technology.

Smartmatic Consortium (SBC) Founders Connected to Radical Venezuelan Communist Government

Relationship of the actors:

CNE: National Electoral Council, Public Power of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela directed by a board of five members (Francisco Carrasqueño-President, Ezequiel Zamora-Vice President, Jorge Rodríguez, Oscar Battaglini, Sobella Mejias,)

Smartmatic Corporation: Company registered in the State of Delaware on April II-2000 under file number 3209993 by Antonio Mugica Rivero (Chairman), Alfredo Anzola (Vice Chairman), Roger Piñate (Director) and Antonio Mugica Sesma (Director). It operates with Antonio Mugica and Alfredo Anzola as President and Vice President. The company applied for permission to operate as Edge Act Corporation in the State of Florida on September 11, 2000. It is a very small company that has carried out work in the area of automation. (Look at annex 1)

Bizta Corporation: Company registered in the State of Delaware on April 12, 2000 under file number 3211192 by Antonio Mugica Rivero (Chairman) without any other Director. It operates with Antonio Mugica and Alfredo Anzola as President and Vice President. The company applied for permission to operate as Edge Act Corporation in the State of Florida on January 24, 2001. It has not been possible to locate any record of any work carried out by this company. It has the same physical address and directors as Smartmatic. (Appendix 2)

Bizta R&D Software C.A.: In Caracas on October 15, 1997, the company “Software Softer C.A” was registered with a subscribed capital of five million bolivars and paid twenty percent (one million bolivars), its shareholders are Antonio Mugica Rivero and Antonio Mugica Sesma (the father). The company’s commercial registry does not show any activity until June 22, 2001, in which an Extraordinary Shareholders’ Meeting was held with the presence of these, and also Alfredo Anzola Jaumotte, Eduardo Correia and Sol Rivero de Mugica. In said meeting (June 22, 2001) the name was changed to Bizta R&D Software C.A., increasing the capital by 515 million bolivars to 520 million, through capitalization of the “shareholders’ credit” account and. Proceeding the sale of the entire capital stock to Bizta Corporation (Delaware, April 12, 2000- Alfredo Anzola). In this session, Eduardo Correia is appointed as President and Antonio Mugica (father) as Vice President. Ten days later (July 2, 2001) another Extraordinary Shareholders’ Meeting was held and Mugica (father) was replaced as Vice President. The commercial registry remains without activities until March 20, 2003, date on which the capital is increased again, now to 775 million bolivars, with the same figure of the “capitalization of shareholders’ debts”, and with the particularity that Bizta Corporation sells all the shares to the following people: Antonio Mugica R., Antonio Mugica S., Eduardo Correia and Alfredo Anzola. Eduardo Correia is maintained as President and Alfredo Anzola is appointed as Vice President.

Three months later (June 10, 2003) another Shareholders’ Meeting was held, with the shareholders present and with Marieta Maarroui de Bolívar, president of Foncrei and SCR (wife of Didalco Bolívar-Governor of Aragua), in which it is decided to increase the capital of the company by 300 million bolivars up to one thousand seventy-five million bolivars (1,075 million); noting that these three hundred million bolivars are contributed in cash by the Venezuelan State, very different from the rest of the “capital increases” that had previously been carried out, I finish. In this assembly, a group of directors is appointed, whose presence is mandatory (operating quorum 3 out of 3) for decision-making in the company’s administration. These directors are Alfredo Anzola-President, Eduardo Correia-VP and Antonio Mugica-Director. According to the meeting minutes, this meeting was to remain until June 2004. However, the next and until now last performance in the company registry is another Extraordinary Shareholders Meeting in which the Board of Directors is modified again, leaving the same Pdte and VP, but naming Omar Montilla Castillo as Director to replace Antonio Mugica. (See annex 3)

Cantv: Telefónica de Venezuela, its largest shareholder is Verizon (USA).

SCR: Venture Capital Society (not to be confused with SBC), Foncrei Subsidiary registered in Caracas on November 14, 2001, with a subscribed and fully paid capital of five billion bolivars. Its shareholders are Foncrei (4,998 shares), Anfico (Corpoindustria) (One share) and Fonpyme (One share). Its audited balance sheet as of June 2003 indicates that it only has shareholdings in two companies, a roasting company (200 million bolivars) and shares in Bizta R&D Software C.A. (Three hundred million bolivars). Several of its directors signed against the opposition deputies. It owns 28% of Bizta R&D Software C.A. (See annex 4 statutes, balance and signatures against deputies).

The hiring

Since the appointment by the TSJ of the CNE board (August 2093) the selection of the companies and systems to be used in eventual elections and referenda that would take place in Venezuela began. At the end of January – beginning of February 2004, the apparent contracting of the SBC Consortium (Smartmatic-Bizta-Cantv) for 112 million US$ took place, of which 91 million would be for Smartmatic-Bizta, in fact sixty-three million would be for Smartmatic (purchase of the machines) and thirty-one for Bizta (local processes) (See annex 6-El Carabobeño). The exact amounts and responsibilities of each entity could not be specified as there was no access to the contract documents or the letters of credit that were apparently opened before the Bank of America in favor of Smartmatic and Biz:La.

In any case, what is essential is the impossibility of trusting a company in which the government is not only a shareholder, but has appointed as its representative and Director not just any official from the public administration, but a person clearly linked to the The most radical of Chavismo, Eng. Omar Montilla Castillo, which is evidenced by the following (see Annex 5).

  1. He was a militant and operational member during the electoral campaign in 1998 and 1999 of UNEPAD (Unit for Strategy and Electoral Register of the Patriotic Pole). The director of UNEPAD was the current Minister of Production and Commerce Wilmer Castro Soteldo, remember that Foncrei (owner of SCR) is attached to this ministry. For Castro Soteldo, engineers Jorge Berrizbeitia and Omar Castillo worked in the computer science area of this unit 1, who today serve as President and General Director of the National Center for Information Technology (CNTI), an organization attached to the Ministry of Science and Technology. .
  2. His father worked in the Secretary of the Council of Ministers and in the Directorate of Registries and Notaries.
  3. In recent signature collections, he requested the recall of Liliana Hernández and Henry Ramos. Likewise, several of the members

Annexes

Appendix 1

Smartmatic:

  • Registration of Incorporation in Delaware USA (II‑April‑2000)
  • Application for authorization to carry out business in Florida (Sep-11, 2000)
  • Annual reports (2003 and 2004)

Appendix 2

bizta

  • Registration of Incorporation in Delaware USA (12‑April‑2000)
  • Application for authorization to carry out business in Florida (January 24, 2001)
  • Annual report (2004)

Annex 3

Bizta R&D Software C.A:

  • Mercantile Registry (Caracas 1997) with all its modifications.

Annex 4

SCR‑Venture Capital Company (Froncrei Subsidiary):

• Mercantile Registry (2001) with all its modifications.

• Audited Balance (June‑2003) where the only two investments are shown (Torrefactora and Bizta)

• Signature of several of the members of its Board of Directors against the: S deputies of the opposition.

Annex 5

Omar Montilla

  • Sample of the existence of the UNEPAD-Polo Patriotico headed by Castro Soteldo (report El Universal, Yolanda Valery, 1998).
  • List of ex-members of UNEPAD-Polo Patriotico who are part of the CNTI board together with Montilla.
  • Signature of Montilla against opposition deputies (2004)
  • Official Gazette of the appointments of the father in various government positions.

Annex 6

News

  • News (Aporrea, El Carabobeño, El Universal) on the recent contracting of the Smartmatic-Bizta-Cantv consortium.

Annex 7

laws

Comments on the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act

  • Applicability of the Rico Act.

back to documents

©2023. DEACON. All rights reserved.

Texas Republicans Betray Most Conservative Man in Texas

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is one of the most conservative politicians in Texas. He has been a staunch defender of the Second Amendment, religious freedom, and traditional values. However, in recent months, Paxton has been betrayed by some of his own Republican colleagues.

Indictment and Impeachment

Paxton was indicted on securities fraud charges. The charges stem from a 2011 investment deal that Paxton was involved in. Paxton has denied any wrongdoing and vowed to fight the charges. However, the sham impeachment has injured his reputation and made it more difficult for him to do his job.

Despite the indictment, Paxton has continued to be a vocal critic of the Biden administration. He has sued the administration over several policies, including its vaccine mandates and immigration policies. Paxton has also been a vocal supporter of former President Donald Trump.

Paxton’s conservative views have not favored him over his Republican colleagues. In recent months, some Republicans have backstabbed him. They have argued that the indictment has made it impossible for Paxton to do his job effectively.

Tinderholt’s campaign also sheds light on the role of individual lawmakers in shaping public opinion and the political narrative. As a respected Republican representative, his actions carry weight and resonate with the party’s base. By actively engaging with Republican voters and encouraging them to express their opposition to Paxton’s impeachment, Tinderholt seeks to counter the negative perception of the charges brought against Paxton. His efforts are a powerful reminder that individual lawmakers can play a significant role in influencing public opinion and shaping the outcome of critical political events.

Moreover, the consequences of Tinderholt’s mobilization efforts extend beyond the immediate impeachment trial. They highlight the broader significance of public engagement and political activism in our democratic process. Grassroots mobilization allows citizens to participate in politics actively, express their views, and influence decision-making. These efforts can strengthen the bond between elected officials and their constituents, deepening democratic engagement within the Republican Party and beyond.

The Betrayal

The betrayal of Paxton by some of his Republican colleagues is a sad day for Texas. Paxton is a man who has dedicated his life to fighting for conservative values. He is a true conservative warrior, and he deserves the support of his fellow Republicans.

Paxton has defended dozens of lawsuits related to election fraud. Democrats wanted to open the elections to mail-in ballots and ID-free elections and sued Texas for instituting these unconstitutional practices in our elections. He and his office won every single one of these cases and prevented Democrats from stealing Texas as they did in Georgia, Arizona, and many other states.

When progressives left across the country, including in Texas, attacked our freedom of religion daily, he stood firm and stopped them. He has defended the rights of religious Texans to worship freely, without government interference.

At a time when both parties and too many activist judges play politics and refuse to defend our constitutional rights, his strong stance is particularly welcome. He has been a tireless advocate for the Constitution, and he has always put the rights of the people first.

The allegations against Paxton are still unproven. He has not been convicted of any crime and has the right to a fair trial. However, the indictment has damaged his reputation and made it more difficult for him to do his job.

Unveiling the Viciousness

Some blame Karl Rove and the Bushes for using their power against him. Their tactics were not merely the result of political competition but deliberate acts of aggression. Rove’s relentless pursuit of power and the Bush family’s disregard for the nation’s well-being has left lasting scars on American democracy.

By highlighting the viciousness of these individuals, it becomes apparent that their actions were driven by a thirst for power and a willingness to manipulate the system to their advantage. The negative consequences of their policies and decisions cannot be understated. From the lives lost in unnecessary wars to the erosion of civil liberties, their viciousness becomes apparent when we delve beneath the surface.

Karl Rove, the Bushes, and their political legacies are riddled with deception, self-interest, and a relentless pursuit of power. Their tactics have left a lasting impact on the American political landscape, with repercussions that continue to resonate today. By shedding light on their Machiavellian strategies and destructive policies, we must remain vigilant, ensuring that such individuals are held accountable and that our democracy is safeguarded from their insidious influence. We can only strive for a more just and equitable political future through an informed and critical assessment of their actions.

The betrayal of Paxton by some of his Republican colleagues is a sad day for Texas.

©2023. Amil Imani. All rights reserved.

France Rioters: ‘We are Muslims…We Have the Right to Kill, It Is Written in the Koran!’

The coming civil war in France…Ahead of Bastille Day, France Fears Firestorm of New Riots 

France on the Verge of Chaos?

By Guy Millière, Gatestone, July 11, 2023:

The riots grew bigger. Schools and theaters were destroyed…. churches were burned to the ground; graffiti in red paint on a church in Marseilles declared: “Mohammed was the last prophet”. Bank branches were ransacked and ATMs opened with chainsaws. Slogans were shouted: “death to the police”, “death to France”, “death to the Jews!”

“We are Muslims,” one angry protester shouted, “if the police kill us we have the right to kill; it is written in the Koran!”

Since the 1970s, France has welcomed an ever-increasing number of immigrants from the Muslim world… Only a tiny minority have assimilated into French society. The others live as they lived in their countries of origin. — Sorbonne University Professor Bernard Rougier, author of the book Les territoires conquis de l’islamisme (“The Conquered Territories of Islamism”).

Radical imams came from the Muslim world and allege that France is guilty of having colonized their countries, that Muslims should continue to live according to the law of Islam and that, in the imams’ view, France should pay for its crimes. Many politicians have told the newcomers that France is racist and had exploited them.

Criminal gangs formed and began ruling these neighborhoods. Radical imams justified the gangs’ criminal activities by claiming that the French must pay for what they did in the Muslim world. French political leaders closed their eyes. Meanwhile, these Muslim neighborhoods have grown and crime from them increased.

During the riots of 2005, then President Jacques Chirac asked imams to restore calm and promised to give even more money to Muslim neighborhoods. The police were ordered not to intervene in them at all; they fell entirely under the control of gangs and imams. It was then that these neighborhoods effectively became lawless “no-go zones” (zones urbaines sensibles), of which there are 750.

President Emmanuel Macron suggested that creating a “French Islam,” supposedly quite different from Islam in the rest of the world, would be the solution, but he quickly gave up on that plan. He then said he wanted to fight against what he called “Islamic separatism” (the no-go zones, neighborhoods where Muslims live separately from the rest of the population). He, too, has done nothing.

Macron seems to imagine that he has found explanations for these problems: Parents of rioters, he said, do not exercise their parental authority, and video games poison the minds of young people. His comments seemed completely disconnected from reality…

“The violence is increasing day by day… those who run our country must imperatively find the courage necessary to eradicate the dangers.” — Open letter by 20 retired French army generals to the French government and Macron, April 26, 2023.

Read the whole thing.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Islamists Gloat and Applaud Rioting and Vandalism in France

Another Catholic Church BURNED to the Ground in France

Granny Spills the Beans

Terror-Linked CAIR Calls for Jihad Revolution In France, Incites To More Rioting, Violence and Destruction

France is Finished: Rioters Burn Down Largest Library in France, 1,000 Buildings Burnt, 5,600 Vehicles Destroyed

Day Seven Of Jihad Rioting Ravages War-Torn France, Legacy Media Blames ….. The French For Not Being Welcoming Enough

JIHAD: Violent Rioters Chant ‘Allahu Akbar’ as They Torch France, Vandalize Churches, “The Last Prophet is Mohamed”

French President Macron Imposes Total Ban on Social Media Reporting of Events in France

WARNING GRAPHIC: Scenes From War Torn France, “APOCALYPTIC”, Mayor and His Family Escape Assassination

France: Muslim Rioters Threaten Jews with New Holocaust

FRANCE IS BURNING: The Leftist-Islamic Alliance Makes Its Move In France

Muslim rioters attack LGBT bar, ‘We burn the whores, by the Qur’an’

France: Muslims ransack church, smash windows, write ‘The last prophet is Mohamed’ on white board

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Poll Shows Trump has 20-Point Lead Over DeSantis Among FLORIDA Republicans

Governor Ron DeSantis has made a potentially disastrous mistake. He listened to the Trump-hating Republican Party establishment, and launched a presidential campaign against President Trump.

Governor DeSantis needs to suspend his presidential campaign and endorse President Trump, before he completely destroys any chance he has at running for POTUS in 2028.

Poll shows Trump has 20-point lead over DeSantis among Florida Republicans

By Yahoo, July 10th, 2023

Florida Republican voters gave Gov. Ron DeSantis an huge reelection victory in 2022, but a poll released Monday shows they overwhelmingly prefer former President Donald Trump for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination.

Trump has a 20-point lead over DeSantis.

The Florida Atlantic University/Mainstreet Research/PolCom Lab poll showed Trump at 50% among the state’s Republican voters. DeSantis was in a distant second place, with 30%.

That’s almost the same as RealClearPolitics average of national polls, which show a 32-point lead for Trump, with 33% for the former president and 21% for the Florida governor.

Read more.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Ruy Teixeira: How the Democrats Became the Party of the Ruling Class

Trump dominates Republican primaries in Texas

OP-ED: It is time to dispel a silly talking point

RELATED TWEETS:

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Biden, Whose Regime Includes Terrorists, Blasts Israeli Government as ‘Extreme’

“This is one of the most extreme members of cabinets that I have… seen.”

Biden’s Bureau of Land Management Director, Tracy Stone-Manning, is a former spokeswoman for an eco-terrorist group.

Hady Amr, Biden’s special representative for “Palestinian” affairs, claimed that he was “inspired by the Palestinian intifada.”

Ramzi Kassem, a White House Policy Council adviser, was a Gitmo terror lawyer who threw stones at Israel.

Those are just three examples from the Biden White House.

But in a recent CNN interview, Biden falsely claimed that “this is one of the most extreme members of cabinets that I have… seen.”

“They are a part of the problem, and particularly those individuals in the cabinet who say, they have no right to— we— we can settle anywhere we want.”

When asked about inviting Prime Minister Netanyahu, Biden mumbled something about meeting with leftist figurehead Herzog, a longtime Democrat associate and not an elected Israeli leader.

“This is one of the most extreme cabinets I’ve seen and I go back to Golda Meir,” Biden opined.

Biden has a lot of Golda Meir stories. Most of them made up. Like the time he claimed Golda asked him to mediate between Israel and Egypt. That said, Golda’s cabinet included Jabr Muadi, a Druze, whose family settled a dispute over a parliamentary seat with an assassination. I don’t recall anyone in the current Israeli doing that.

Biden’s decision to turn a cold shoulder to Israel’s democratically elected government is another act of hostility.

It was the Obama administration that began trying to create a breach between Israel and America by repeatedly and falsely claiming that Israel was an extremist place under an extremist government.

The Obama administration was actually extreme as its successor, the Biden administration. And its policy toward Israel has included resuming funding terrorists which has led to two dozen murders.

Now that’s actually extreme.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Former French Intelligence Head Warns Again About the Maghrebins’ ‘Colonizing Immigration’

Toronto Star accuses Muslims against LGBTQ agenda of ‘intolerance’

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.