Left-Wing Billionaire Spends $200,000,000 Of Own Money To Become Governor Only To Lose To Fox News Host

Billionaire climate activist Tom Steyer came in third in the California gubernatorial primary despite pouring hundreds of millions of his own dollars into his campaign.

Steyer, a Democrat, self-funded his failed campaign for governor $213 million, according to CalMatters. One week after polls closed, outlets called that former Fox News host Steve Hilton, a Republican backed by President Donald Trump, had edged out Steyer for the second spot in the November general election.

Former Biden-era Secretary of Health and Human Services Xavier Becerra clinched a runoff spot days earlier with a first-place finish in the all-party primary. Like Steyer, Becerra is a Democrat.

Steyer has spent the most a candidate has ever spent of their own money on a California gubernatorial campaign since digital campaign finance records were first recorded back in 1999, CalMatters reported. Former eBay CEO Meg Whitman set a record for personal wealth spent on a California gubernatorial campaign when she spent $140 million of her own money on her failed 2010 run.

During the 2026 midterms, candidates have spent more of their own personal fortune on campaigns across state and congressional offices than ever before, the outlet reported.

Steyer has a net worth of $2.4 billion, according to Forbes. He founded and ran Farallon Capital Management, a San Francisco-based hedge fund, for 26 years, before he sold his stake in 2012 and got involved in politics.

Steyer’s campaign emphasized around affordability, planning to lower the cost of housing and electricity in California. The climate activist planned to lower electricity costs by breaking utility company monopolies. He also cofounded an investing firm, Galvanize Climate Solutions, which promotes “energy transition.”

The billionaire’s campaign manager called him a “progressive changemaker” in a May press release. He had plans to “build 1 million homes over four years and fundamentally transform affordability” in California, according to his website.

Steyer was an unsuccessfully candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2020.

In May, Steyer praised a biological male track and field athlete who took two girls’ state titles in 2025.

AUTHOR

Faith Miller

Contributor

RELATED ARTICLES:

COUNTING UNTIL THEY WIN: They Did it – Spencer Pratt OUT, Mamdani-Socialist Unknown Secures Spot in LA Mayoral Election

Mamdani-Backed Congress Candidate Defends Joining Oct. 8 Rally Celebrating Hamas Atrocities

Republican’s Bid To Succeed Newsom Hangs On By Thread With Race Called One Week After Election

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

In Iran, the Real Sexual Torture

While Nicholas Kristof recently published in the New York Times his baseless accusation that the IDF engages in sexual torture, including his claim that Israeli soldiers “train dogs to rape Palestinian prisoners,” the real victims of sexual torture in the Middle East are to be found elsewhere.

These are the prisoners that the Islamic Republic of Iran holds in Evin Prison and similar torture houses. And the New York Times, that continues to defend Kristof’s infamous column and to accuse his critics of trying to “stifle journalism,” when all they are trying to do is to point out his lies, has failed completely to report on the sexual torture inflicted on prisoners in Iran.

More on that torture can be found here: “Iranian men and women describe horrific abuse at the hands of regime guards specialising in ‘sexual torture,’” by Eliana Silver, Daily Mail, May 17, 2026:

Detainees in Iran’s prisons are being subjected to beatings, rape and psychological abuse, according to testimonies that lay bare the lengths the Islamic Republic will go to crush dissent.

Despite the regime’s long-standing reputation for brutality, accounts of sexual violence and intimidation reveal a particularly disturbing pattern of abuse.

In a harrowing account to The Australian, a woman identified as Mina, a pseudonym, described her experience inside one of Iran’s notorious prisons.

‘They repeatedly struck my head with a Koran so hard that my nose began to bleed. The interrogator also touched my body under my clothes while using disgusting sexual language, and repeatedly asked which newspaper editors I had slept with.’

She added: ‘He told me, “I will bring your 12-year-old son here and make him rape you. Then you will confess on television”.’

Such accounts are not isolated, with a report by Amnesty International last month finding that thousands of Iranians are at risk of sexual violence, with children as young as 14 among those assaulted by IRGC-linked forces during the January protests.

Evidence suggests this pattern stretches back decades.

Researcher and former political prisoner Iraj Mesdaghi has documented abuses from the 1980s, including testimony from a 14-year-old boy tortured by Mohammad Mehrayin, known as the ‘Butcher of Evin’….

The mainstream media in the United States — television, radio, newspapers, news sites online — should have reported on so many cases of sexual torture in Iran, that so many different sources have reported on, including those who were its victims, but until now their stories have received very little attention. Why is that? And why has Nicholas Kristof, with his great interest in the use of sexual torture, and his bully pulpit at the most prestigious American newspaper, not provided a single report on how that torture has been inflicted on prisoners, including children, in Iran?

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Israeli strike in central Gaza kills three top Palestinian Islamic Jihad members

NYC prof defends Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, says of U.S. ‘We need to bring the empire down’

In UK, a Police Officer Is Fired After Asking a Few Questions About Islam

Islamic scholar calls on Sunnis to collaborate with Shia in working to destroy Israel

Denmark: Founder of popular clothing company apologizes for expressing negative view of Islam

Netherlands: Muslim woman convicted of war crimes for letting her son become Islamic State jihadi

Somalia: Muslim woman converts to Christianity, her relatives beat her, breaking her nose and seriously injuring her

Calls for Oxford Union President to Step Down

RELATED VIDEO: Islamic regime in Iran threatens Israel, Israel’s response was wiping out dozens of Hezbollah terrorists

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

New U.S. Counterterrorism Strategy Comes Up Way Short

The White House 2026 U.S. Counterterrorism Strategy

Some very real and current terrorism threats seem to be either missing or somehow downgraded in this new document. Islamic terror, for example, is cited on page 5 as “Legacy Islamist Terrorists”, although Al-Qa’eda and the Islamic State are named briefly and specifically later on. In what seems a glaring omission, in the Regional breakdown of Counterterrorism threats, neither Iran nor its terror proxies are mentioned at all, even as the documented presence of Islamic Revolutionary Guard Force hit teams inside the U.S. remains unresolved and the extensive network of Hizballah operatives gets no mention at all. Neither is the role of the FBI in the domestic counterterrorism mission mentioned while DHS gets only cursory mention.

Iran-Backed Iraqi Militia Commander Busted by FBI, Plotted Attacks on Americans and Jews Over Iran War” by Terresa Monroe-Hamilton at RAIR Foundation USA, May 16, 2026

  • This is a recent example of both the ongoing Iran proxy threat as well as the key role of the FBI in thwarting it.

 “The Bureau of Missed Clues Strikes Again — Failure to Anticipate Old Dominion Shooting Shows Glaring Holes in FBI’s Lackluster Approach to Counterterrorism” by Liberato.us, Federal Government Watch, May 27, 2026 

  • This one is an unfortunate example of the failure of FBI and law enforcement to monitor this shooter, who’d previously been convicted of terrorism in 2017, but then was released from prison in December 2024.

 “Obama secretly gave thousands of Green Cards to Iran’s Islamic regime leaders in disastrous nuke deal” by Christine Douglass-Williams at Jihad Watch, June 2, 2026

  • This alert cites to a report from The Gateway Pundit (below) that ties into concern about the lack of mention of the Iranian regime or its terror proxies in the new White House 2026 Counterterrorism Strategy, noted above.
  • Obama Secretly Gifted Thousands of Green Cards to Radical Iranian Regime Leaders in Disastrous Iran Nuclear Deal — Dissident Who Exposed It Was Brutally Executed”, by Jim Hoft at The Gateway Pundit, June 1, 2026
    • We have to question whether the Department of Homeland Security, the FBI, or local law enforcement across the U.S. are even aware that any number of Iranian regime figures and/or their children may still be here in the homeland.

 “Trump: ‘We Seem To Be Getting Along Quite Well’ With Mojtaba Khamenei” by Robert Spencer at Front Page Magazine, June 3, 2026 

  • President Trump is known to troll our adversaries often—but does he or does he not really mean he’ll ‘probably meet with Iran’s Ayatollah at some point’?  (It may be noted here that neither Mojtaba Khamenei nor his late father Ali Khamenei ever achieved the Shi’ite clerical rank of ayatollah, but both only made it to the middling rank of hojatoleslam.)

 “Why Did Trump Demand that Netanyahu Stop IDF Attack on Hezbollah Sites in Beirut?” by Hugh Fitzgerald at Front Page Magazine, June 3, 2026

  • Events in Iran as well as Lebanon continue to play out, so this ultimately may be seen as just one U.S. move in a multi-dimensional operation against the Tehran regime. But it does raise questions about the U.S.-Israeli relationship and the long-game U.S. strategy against Iran.

©2026 . All rights reserved.

Report: Parents Remain Essential to Instilling Authentic Faith in Next Generation

With the rate of religious practice among young people in the U.S. at levels significantly below older generations, concerns are growing over a likely future America of diminished church attendance and a higher proportion of morally ungrounded citizens. A new report released last week identifies ways that parents can help mitigate a continued decline in religious practice by passing their faith on to their children.

According to data compiled by the Pew Research Center last December, Americans in the youngest age bracket (18-30) surveyed the lowest of any other age bracket in response to four questions about faith, including the percentage identifying with a religion (57%), those that pray daily (32%), those that say religion is “very important in their lives” (33%), and those who attend religious services at least monthly (tied for second lowest at 31%).

“While belief has not disappeared, it has become more individualized and less connected to church life,” write sociologists Jesse Smith and Jane Lankes Smith, who authored the report “Passing the Torch: How Faith Moves Across Generations” published by the Institute for Family Studies (IFS) and Communio. “As a result, many religious communities now face a sustained pattern of generational decline rather than temporary fluctuation, raising concerns for churches and church members alike about the long-term vitality of their congregation.”

The authors go on to note, “Research consistently shows that families are the single most important factor in whether children adopt and maintain faith into adulthood.” They argue that regular church attendance when children are young is key to attendance as adults, observing that “when parents reported attending church weekly while raising their children, a predicted 26% of their children did the same in their 30s and 40s, compared to only 12% whose parents were not weekly attenders.”

Additionally, they highlight data showing that “when parents identified religion as being very important in their lives, nearly two-thirds of their children were predicted to say the same as adults, compared to less than half of those whose parents did not affirm the high importance of religion.” What’s more, “parents who prayed daily had a 47% chance of having children who did the same as adults, compared to less than one-third when parents did not pray daily.”

Another key aspect identified by the report is the importance of parents regularly discussing faith amid their daily lives. The authors point out that many Christian parents in today’s culture have tended to shy away from emphasizing religious discussion with their kids for fear of pushing them away from the faith by “jamming it down their throats.” But “according to the data, efforts to pass on the faith are more often undermined not by parents laying it on too thick, but by taking too light a touch,” they highlight. Since Christianity is rarely uplifted and often denigrated in modern society, Smith and Lankes Smith urge parents to “set a tone in the household where talk of religion is normal and to prepare for the hard theological or moral conversations, especially as their kids get older.”

The strength of the marriage of the mother and father was identified as another key factor in children’s faith formation. “Parents in troubled marriages are likely to have more difficulty coordinating the time and effort needed for effective faith formation,” the authors explained. “When children see loving, harmonious marriages preached at church but witness marital strife at home, this creates cognitive dissonance that makes Christianity harder to internalize.” Data analyzed in the report showed more faith-related conversations with their kids happening per week and a higher probability of their kids praying daily with couples who reported being in happy and satisfying marriages.

But faith transmission cannot rest solely upon the shoulders of moms and dads, the report noted. Smith and Lankes Smith also underscored that an engaged church community is similarly integral to forming the faith of children. They write that pastors must minister to families by offering ongoing religious education to parents (not just to children), expand marriage ministries, create space for community, and invest in youth ministry. This will foster congregational involvement for both parents and adolescents, which “is linked to higher levels of faith commitment when children reach adulthood.”

Experts like Family Research Council Senior Fellow Joseph Backholm say that the IFS/Communio report further proves the principle that faith is primarily passed on through lived witness, not merely through words and exhortations.

“These results seem to communicate that children are watching their parents’ lives and deciding whether they like what they see,” he told The Washington Stand. “If we enjoy being with our parents, and believe their marriage is something we’d like to have ourselves, it makes sense that we’d be more interested in what they tell us about the purpose of life and what we should believe. Of course, the gospel is true despite the fact that people are hypocrites, but there’s little doubt that a life in which actions match words is more compelling to those who are watching. That includes our children.”

AUTHOR

Dan Hart

Dan Hart is senior editor at The Washington Stand.

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2026 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

How California’s Election Procedures Turn Early Leads Into Late Losses

Delayed vote tallies in California are attributable to the vote-by-mail system and weeklong deadlines for receiving ballots, which undermines confidence in results, election experts say.

Tuesday is the deadline for the last of California’s ballots to arrive, where about 80% vote by mail and about 40% of ballots arrive after Election Day in the nation’s most populous state. These are among the factors that contribute to repeatedly delayed results.

On Sunday, it appeared that Republican mayoral candidate Spencer Pratt would fall out of contention for the general election after several days of appearing in the top two vote recipients along with Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, a Democrat. Another Democrat candidate, Nithya Raman, appeared to overtake Pratt for second place to face Bass in the general election. The state’s primaries allow the top two vote-getters, rather than party nominees, to advance to the general election.

California also doesn’t allow local jurisdictions to require voter ID and allows 22 days for “curing” ballots. Curing is when a voter’s ballot needs to be corrected or clarified to count, such as fixing illegible marks on the ballot or inserting a missing signature on the ballot envelope.

“There are a lot of consequential House races in the general election. We are likely going to have a similar conversation in November,” Andrew Bahl, a law team staff writer for Ballotpedia, which monitors election procedures, told the Daily Signal.

Similar apparent flips have occurred in previous elections in the state, including in races for the U.S. House of Representatives. On election night in 2024, Republican incumbent Rep. Michelle Steel was leading, but that lead turned into a loss days later as Democrat Derek Tran won the seat 22 days after the election.

In 2024, 80.8% of voters used mail-in voting in California. This figure does not include early in-person voting, according to a Ballotpedia report that contrasted California’s election procedures with Florida’s.

Both states have large voter populations. Among the biggest differences between them is that Florida has strict timelines for tabulating and reporting results, Bahl said. Florida also allows election officials to count, but not report, early in-person and mail votes before Election Day, in contrast to California, which requires tabulation to wait until after the Election Day polls close.

California became an all-mail voting state during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, and the state Legislature codified all-mail elections in 2021. After this act, every registered voter in the state automatically received a ballot.

As long as ballots are postmarked by Election Day, they can arrive up to seven days after the election.

“About 23 million ballots were sent to California voters and only about 7 million came back,” Jason Snead, executive director of the Honest Elections Project, told the Daily Signal.

“California has created a system that is at every stage as insecure as possible,” Snead, executive director of the Honest Elections Project, told the Daily Signal.

He added that California has no laws against ballot harvesting or against third parties delivering or picking up ballots in large quantities.

“The desire to get election results on election night cuts across every party,” Snead added. “When people repeatedly see results change, or one candidate concedes and then becomes a victor, it opens the door for speculation.”

Over the weekend, President Donald Trump did far more than speculate, effectively declaring the California elections “crooked.”

“Thousands of homeless may be fueling Nithya Raman’s impossible late surge in LA. Voter fraud was just busted on Skid Row,” Trump posted on Truth Social. “This is why nobody trusts their elections anymore.”

During an interview on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Trump said: “Look at what’s happening in California. Do you think it’s appropriate that they have an election and five days later they’re nowhere close to picking a winner?”

California Secretary of State Shirley Weber’s office did not respond to an inquiry from the Daily Signal by publication time.

Weber posted on X Monday that elections in California are secure, asserting there is “rigorous testing of machines,” “strict chain of custody,” and “all signatures are verified.”

“Los Angeles County’s focus is not on any particular race or outcome; our focus is on the process. California law provides a canvass period to ensure every valid ballot is properly received, verified, processed, and counted, and that is exactly what we are doing,” Mike Sanchez, spokesman for Los Angeles County, told the Daily Signal. “While there is often significant public attention and commentary surrounding election results, our office remains committed to transparency, accuracy, and ensuring every eligible voter has their ballot counted. We will continue to process and count all timely and valid ballots in accordance with California law.”

There is no evidence of impropriety, but the procedures negatively impact voter confidence, said Don Palmer, a former chairman of the U.S. Election Assistance Commission, now a senior legal fellow at The Heritage Foundation.

“California needs to reform its system because it is not designed for voter confidence,” Palmer, a former director of Florida elections, told the Daily Signal. “After the 2024 election, the California Legislature was forced to make some slight modifications after the long counts. But the system is designed for California Democrats, not California voters.”

The problem has affected several U.S. House races in California, including Tran’s late-breaking victory in 2024.

In 2020, Republican Young Kim was declared the winner over Democrat incumbent Rep. Gil Cisneros 10 days after the election.

In 2018, it took nine days for Democrat Katie Porter to officially win the election over Republican incumbent Rep. Mimi Walters. For nearly a full week after election night, Walters led Porter in the vote count.

This story was updated to include a comment from a spokesman for Los Angeles County, California.

AUTHOR

Fred Lucas

Fred Lucas is senior investigative reporter for the Daily Signal. He is the author of “The Myth of Voter Suppression: The Left’s Assault on Clean Elections.” Follow on X FredLucasWH.

RELATED ARTICLES:

‘It’s Happening Again’: Trump Reacts as Raman Overtakes Pratt in LA Mayoral Race

Ongoing California Ballot Counting Sparks Allegations of Election Fraud

RELATED VIDEO: Spencer Pratt: “I have a good relationship with the IRS criminal investigation team

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Signal column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

CEASEFIRE SHATTERED: Iran Firing Missiles at Israel, Trump Pushes De-Escalation, Netanyahu Strikes Back, Hits Multiple Regime Targets

Iran has been firing missiles at its Gulf neighbors throughout the cease-fire, but refrained from hitting Israel until now. If Iran thinks it can circumvent the ‘ceasefire” by hitting Israel, they are sadly mistaken.

Israel struck several military targets in Iran on Sunday, hours after the Islamic Republic launched a barrage launched a number of ballistic missiles at Israel on Sunday night for the first time since the U.S. and Iran reached a tenuous ceasefire in early April.

The Israeli Defense Forces said its air force struck targets “belonging to the Iranian terror regime” in western and central Iran in a statement on X Sunday evening.

Jewish Insider: 

Millions of people across northern Israel heard a familiar sound from their phones late Sunday night: an alert from Israel’s Homefront Command, notifying them for the first time in two months, of an incoming ballistic missile attack from Iran.

Just after sunrise, residents of Israel’s center — from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem — received the same notification, and groggily huddled in shelters as Iran, joined by its Houthi proxy in Yemen, launched fresh salvos at Israel. Shortly after, Israel struck a petrochemical plant in southwest Iran.

Iran state media separately reported that explosions were heard in Tehran, Tabriz and Isfahan after Israel fired “air-launched ballistic missiles,” citing the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps.

The Israeli military hit Iranian surface-to-surface missile launch sites and non-energy infrastructure, Israel’s ambassador to the US, Yechiel Leiter, said.

Axios: President Trump told Axios he was going to call Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and press him not to retaliate for Iran’s missile attack.

“I am going to call Bibi right now and tell him not to retaliate. Each of them had their fun. Israel had its strike, and Iran had its strike. We don’t need another one,” Trump said. Why it matters: The ceasefire in the Middle East is teetering after Israel struck Beirut and Iran fired multiple waves of missiles in response. Trump is racing to stop the escalations from killing his hopes at a lasting deal with Iran. Netanyahu’s answer will measure how much sway the American president still holds over Israel. Driving the news: Iran fired missiles at Israel on Sunday in retaliation for the Israeli strike on Beirut’s southern suburbs. It’s Iran’s first direct attack since the April 8 ceasefire. Israel says it has intercepted the missiles. Trump’s demand that Israel not retaliate is highly unusual. Without U.S. support, any Israeli strike in Iran will be much more difficult and risky. A U.S. official told Axios: “We are not part of this,” but it is unclear whether Trump will order the U.S. military not to assist Israel in a strike in Iran, especially when it comes to air refueling and other kinds of military coordination. (Axios.)

Late Sunday night, Israel bombed northern and Western Iran in retaliation for missile strikes.

Would America tolerate this? Of course not. So why should Israel have to tolerate missile attacks from Iran? Israel is a sovereign state and has every right and duty to defend itself. President Trump must stop the asinine nuke negotiations with Iran, and allow the U.S and Israeli Air forces to finish off Iran’s leaders for good.

Israel strikes Iran military targets after Iranian missile attack

By Axios, June 7th, 2026

The Israeli Air Force conducted strikes on military targets in central and Western Iran on Monday morning local time, Israel Defense Forces said in a statement.

Why it matters: The strikes, in retaliation for an Iranian missile attack against Israel, mark a new phase in a growing escalation that started on Sunday morning. This is the first time Israel has struck Iran since the April 8 ceasefire

The Israeli Air Force conducted strikes on military targets in central and Western Iran on Monday morning local time, Israel Defense Forces said in a statement. Why it matters: The strikes, in retaliation for an Iranian missile attack against Israel, mark a new phase in a growing escalation that started on Sunday morning. This is the first time Israel has struck Iran since the April 8 ceasefire. Iran had threatened to expand its attacks and target U.S. bases in the region if Israel retaliated. Further exchanges of fire could unravel the negotiations between the U.S. and Iran and lead to the resumption of the war. President Trump told Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu several hours before the strikes to stand down and refrain from retaliating. State of play: Explosions were heard in the Iranian cities of Tehran, Karaj, Isfahan, Tabriz and Kermanshah, according to Iranian state media. A U.S. official said the Israel strikes were “relatively limited” in their scope. (Axios.)

As per Iranian opposition news, Israeli Air Forces targeted an underground command and control center in Kermanshah, this morning in retaliatory strike against Iran. Reports claim that multiple senior IRGC officials were killed while discussing attack plans.

Israel strikes back at Iran military targets hours after missile barrage over Lebanon attack

NY Post: Nearly two hours later, the Israel Air Force said that it was intercepting a missile “from the direction of Yemen toward Israeli territory.”

Iran bombards Israel with missiles, threatening to reignite all-out conflict

A missile hasn’t been launched from Yemen at Israel since April 4 – just four days before the Pakistan-brokered ceasefire between the US and Iran went into effect.

Earlier, Iran fired at least 10 missiles at Israel, all of which were intercepted. Iranian officials claimed responsibility and asserted the attack was in response to Israel’s bombardment of Lebanon that morning.

Israel’s strike violated its delicate cease-fire with Lebanon. Both countries agreed to the US-brokered cease-fire last week, but Iran-backed terror group Hezbollah rejected it.

Financial Times that he’s still the one “calling the shots.”

“He won’t have any choice,” Trump said.

Israel, however, has insisted on maintaining its military presence in Lebanon despite US officials’ demands for deescalation.

On Sunday, IDF officials defiantly announced they would “continue to operate” and “intensify its actions against the Hezbollah terrorist organization” in Lebanon, even though Israel agreed to a cease-fire that stipulated a decrease in hostility between the warring countries.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Iran Calls Trump’s Bluff, Launches Direct Missile Assault on Israel

HEZB’ALLAH FIRES, ISRAEL RESPONDS: Beirut Strike Targets Hezb’Allah Command Center After Rocket Attack

Leftist President Declares ‘HEIL HITLER!” As Trump Backed, Pro-Israel Conservative Candidate Surges In Latest Round

British Doctor: My Colleagues Said They Would Refuse to Treat Dying Israelis

Greece Thwarts Hamas Terrorist Cell Bent on Israeli Targets

RELATED VIDEO: Islamic regime in Iran threatens Israel, Israel’s response was wiping out dozens of Hezbollah terrorists

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Who Are the 13 Patriots Honored in Freedom Plaza?

With America’s 250th Independence Day less than a month away, President Donald Trump is honoring the heroes who fought to bring forth this great nation, erecting statues of the often-overlooked patriots in Washington, D.C.’s Freedom Plaza. The U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) erected 13 statues last week, part of a temporary display commemorating the 250th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence. At the center of the display is a statue of Caesar Rodney, one of the signers of the declaration, surrounded by 12 Revolutionary War soldiers, ranging from freed slaves to physicians, from teenagers to retirees, from pastors to spies.

“Diverse as they were, what this eclectic group had in common was a strong patriotism and love for their country — a fierce patriotism that hated tyranny,” the DOI said in a statement announcing the display. “These stories reinvigorate the spirit of patriotism and sacrifice that gave birth to the most prosperous, most stable, and most benevolent nation in the history of the world. Although the names represented by these statues are largely unknown today, they have never been lost to history,” the statement continued. “These twelve heroes are waiting for a new generation to rediscover, appreciate, and be inspired by their courage, sacrifice, and faith.”

Who are the patriots commemorated in Freedom Plaza?

Caesar Rodney

Perhaps the best-known name on the list, Rodney was a Delaware lawyer and militia officer. Born in modern-day Kent County in Delaware, Rodney was the grandson of William Rodney, who accompanied William Penn to the colonies and represented Delaware politically in the early 18th century. When he was 18 years old, Rodney’s father, a wealthy plantation owner, died, and his son’s care and education were entrusted to Delaware Supreme Court Justice Nicholas Ridgely, who ensured that Rodney received a formal classical education.

Following in the footsteps of his deceased father and Ridgely, the young Rodney became involved in Delaware politics, serving as Kent County Sheriff, a judge in the colonial courts, and an officer in the Delaware militia during the French and Indian War. While Rodney showed interest in several Delaware women during his early adulthood, he soon withdrew from courtship altogether and remained a bachelor for the remainder of his life, likely due to a disease (believed to have been a form of skin cancer) that severely damaged the flesh of his face. Later in life, Rodney would wrap his head and face in bandages and handkerchiefs to cover up scarred skin and open sores.

At the time, Delaware was divided politically between the elitist, Anglican “Court Party” and the more populist “Country Party,” which eventually advocated for American independence, while the Court Party supported British rule. Despite his affluence, wealth, education, and Anglican faith, Rodney, along with his younger brother Thomas, aligned himself with the Country Party, a minority faction in Kent County. This set Rodney in opposition early on to George Read, a Court Party-affiliated Delaware representative in both the First and Second Continental Congresses. Read repeatedly advocated for reconciliation with Britain and initially opposed independence, but once the colonists decided to sever ties with Britain, Read exerted all of his intellectual and political prowess to help establish the United States of America.

Famously, when the Second Continental Congress was voting on the matter of independence, Read was opposed, while the only other Delaware representative present, Thomas McKean, was in favor. The deadlock would have kept Delaware from joining the cause and thus kept the decision for independence from being a unanimous one among the colonies. On July 2, 1776, Rodney was managing militia duties and fighting Loyalist rioters when he received word from McKean about the vote. Despite illness, Rodney quickly mounted a horse and rode through the night, through a thunderstorm, to cast the deciding vote in Philadelphia. He and McKean were joined by Read in signing the Declaration of Independence.

Throughout the Revolutionary War, Rodney served as a brigadier general in the Kent County militia and a major general in the Delaware militia, suppressing Loyalist rebellions and supplying George Washington with troops, weapons, munitions, supplies, and funding. Rodney and Washington became close friends and carried on a lengthy correspondence throughout the course of the war. Later, Rodney served as the wartime governor of Delaware. Following the war, he served as both a Delaware legislator and a Delaware Supreme Court justice, before passing away on June 26, 1784, at age 55. Rodney was beloved and honored by the people of Delaware, who named him Speaker of the Legislative Council in his final year of life. Even though he was bedridden from his cancer, fellow legislators gathered in his home to conduct their business and allow him to be a part of it.

Joseph Warren

Sometimes called the “forgotten Founding Father,” Warren was a Boston physician and a leader in the Massachusetts militia who gave his life fighting at Bunker Hill. Born in Massachusetts more than three decades before the Revolutionary War began, Warren studied medicine as a young man and soon became one of the colony’s best-known and most respected physicians. His patients included John Adams and his family and John Hancock and his family.

In the 1760s, amid the Stamp Act crisis, Warren emerged as a fierce advocate for American liberty, aligning himself with Hancock and Samuel Adams and organizing protests and demonstrations throughout Boston. He also authored the Suffolk Resolves in 1774, which proved to be critical in furthering the revolution, rallying patriots, and even influencing the Declaration of Independence. It was Warren who, as president of the Massachusetts Provincial Congress, sent Paul Revere on his notorious midnight ride.

At the age of 34, Warren led patriot militiamen against the British at Bunker Hill. Rallying his men, he was struck in the head by a British musket ball. As the British took the hill, they mutilated Warren’s body before hastily burying him. News of Warren’s death prompted Adams, then in Philadelphia, to lead the Continental Congress to form a Continental Army led by Washington.

Simon Knowles

One of the youngest soldiers of the Revolutionary War, Simon Knowles was only 15 years old when he signed up to fight in the Continental Army. Knowles’s father fought in the Battle of Bunker Hill, where he was critically wounded and later died of his injuries. A month later, the young Knowles joined a Massachusetts militia regiment and, shortly afterwards, the Continental Army to fight for the nation for which his father had given his life.

Knowles served through the remainder of the Revolutionary War, nearly eight years. He crossed the Delaware River with Washington, participated in the attack on Trenton, the Battle of Princeton, the Saratoga campaign, and the conclusive Battle of Yorktown. At the time, most terms of enlistment in the Continental Army were only one year long, while terms of enlistment in militias were generally only six months. Knowles continually reenlisted, until he finally achieved the goal for which his father had fought and died: winning the independence of the United States of America.

After the war, Knowles moved to what is today Northport, Maine, which had been part of Massachusetts until 1820. He married a young woman named Lydia, raised several children with her, and lived and worked as a farmer until his death in 1834. His descendants today include The Daily Wire podcast host and author Michael Knowles. His gravestone reads, simply, “Solider of the Revolution.”

Samuel Whittemore

While Knowles may have been among the youngest soldiers of the Revolution, Whittemore holds the distinction of being the oldest. At the age of 78, Whittemore signed up to fight in the Continental Army, becoming a Massachusetts military legend. In 1775, Whittemore ambushed a group of British grenadiers. Armed with a musket, pistol, and sword, he shot and killed three before charging the remaining troops with his sword. The British responded by shooting Whittemore in the face, stabbing his body with bayonets repeatedly (at least six times and as many as 14 times), and clubbing his head with the butts of their rifles. Miraculously, the 78-year-old patriot not only survived, but dragged himself to a doctor and proceeded to live for another nearly 20 years. Whittemore was 96 years old when he passed away in 1793.

While this story has earned the Continental Army’s oldest recruit status as a legend, Whittemore was active in support of the patriot cause long before the signing of the Declaration of Independence. A farmer and former British dragoon who had seen service in King George’s War and the French and Indian War, Whittemore was a Massachusetts politician and a vocal opponent of the Stamp Act who advocated that the colonial legislatures introduce viewing galleries in a bid to increase transparency — and hold accountable elected representatives who voted against the will of the people.

Whittemore was elected to multiple positions representing his town of Cambridge in Massachusetts politics, including being entrusted with authoring multiple letters to the British government and to the colonial leaders of other Massachusetts towns, negotiating with British authorities, and representing Cambridge at revolutionary conventions.

Caesar Glover

Kidnapped as a child in Africa and sold into slavery, Caesar Glover was purchased by John Miles in Marblehead, Massachusetts. Following Miles’s death, he was purchased by merchant Jonathan Glover, who allowed the enslaved Glover to enlist in the Continental Army, where he fought under his master, a captain, and the celebrated Colonel Henry Jackson. He left the Continental Army in 1778, after having served three years, and was awarded his freedom.

Glover settled in Boston, where he worked as a wharf laborer near Beacon Hill. He married a woman named Susannah Hill in 1801, and they had one daughter together before Hill died of tuberculosis in 1817. At the age of 76, unable to work and providing for his 48-year-old daughter, Glover applied for a soldier’s pension, which he was awarded and which sustained him through the remainder of his life. Glover passed away in 1822, having not only fought for America’s independence, but earned his own.

Jude Hall

Another enslaved patriot, Jude Hall, earned a reputation as one of the longest-serving black soldiers in the Continental Army. Likely born into slavery in New Hampshire, Hall enlisted with the Continental Army in 1775, fighting in the Battles of Bunker Hill, Ticonderoga, Trenton, Hubbardton, Saratoga, Monmouth, and more. Like Knowles, Hall reenlisted again and again, serving until 1783, when the Treaty of Paris officially ended the Revolutionary War.

Having won his freedom fighting, Hall returned to New Hampshire, built a home, married, and raised a family. Three of his sons, tragically, were kidnapped and sold into slavery in the largely British-controlled West Indies. Hall died in 1827, but left a legacy as a black patriot unwilling to die a slave. Three of his grandsons later fought in the Civil War.

James Armistead Lafayette

Born into slavery in Virginia, Armistead was 21 years old when, with his master’s encouragement, he became a spy for the Marquis de Lafayette. The young slave pretended to be a runaway in order to infiltrate British ranks. He relayed critical information to Lafayette regarding the treachery and movements of former Continental Army officer Benedict Arnold, who had defected to the British and was wreaking havoc on colonial Virginia. Having been taught by his master to read and write, Armistead became employed by the British as a courier and often overheard officers discussing plans, strategies, troop movements, and even the state of supplies or weaponry. All of this he reported back to the Continental Army.

Once Arnold was forced to flee Virginia, Armistead stayed behind to spy on Lord General Charles Cornwallis, delivering written reports to Lafayette and other officials with the Continental Army. Information collected and reported by Armistead proved crucial in the American victory at Yorktown, where Cornwallis admitted defeat and surrendered.

While a Virginia law granted freedom to slaves who had served in the Revolutionary War, it was amended to only extend freedom to those who had carried firearms, leaving Armistead still enslaved. However, his master lobbied the Virginia government to recognize the enslaved spy’s freedom, and Lafayette himself personally testified in support of Armistead’s liberty. Upon receiving his freedom, Armistead added “Lafayette” to his name, in honor of the French general. Twenty-seven years later, when Lafayette was touring the U.S. at the invitation of President James Monroe, he spotted his faithful spy in a crowd in Richmond. The French commander halted his carriage, leapt into the crowd, and rushed to embrace Armistead.

Armistead purchased land in Virginia and ran a farm with his wife and several children. He also purchased several slaves. There is some dispute over where — Virginia or Baltimore, Maryland — and when — 1830 or 1832 — Armistead died, but Virginia erected a historical marker at the site of the historic New Kent County courthouse honoring Armistead’s service.

Jack Sisson

A slave from Rhode Island, Jack Sisson was as devoted to the cause of freedom as the most ardent of colonial patriots. In 1777, Sisson volunteered to join the Rhode Island militia and Lieutenant Colonel William Barton’s daring raid on British-held Newport and aided in the capture of British Lieutenant General Richard Prescott, who was exchanged for the return of captured Continental Army General Charles Lee. Sisson served as the pilot for one of the boats used to reach Prescott’s residence and, upon reaching the British officer’s quarters, he used his head to smash the door open.

Sisson then joined the Continental Army and fought in several battles, including the Battle of Rhode Island and the Battle of Yorktown, and was awarded his freedom by the end of the war. Sisson’s heroics in the capture of Prescott led his fellow patriots to write songs in his honor. He died in 1821.

Peter Salem

Born into slavery in 1750 in Massachusetts, Salem was freed by his master prior to enlisting in the Continental Army. He first served in the local militia, where he fought at the Battles of Lexington and Concord and Bunker Hill. At the Battle of Bunker Hill, Salem was credited with killing British Major John Pitcairn, and he is depicted in the painting “The Death of General Warren at the Battle of Bunker’s Hill” by John Trumbull, who personally witnessed the battle. Salem continued fighting for the Continental Army until the war’s end, including fighting at the Battles of Saratoga and Stony Point.

Following the war, Salem returned to Massachusetts and settled in Leicester, where he worked as a cane weaver and received a military pension. He died in 1816.

Salem Poor

Also born into slavery in Massachusetts, Salem Poor purchased his own freedom in 1769 for £27 (the equivalent of roughly $8,600 today) and, six years later, joined the Massachusetts minutemen. He fought at Bunker Hill and is credited with killing British Lieutenant Colonel James Abercrombie. When patriot soldiers were forced to retreat, Poor was one of those who volunteered to cover the retreat, risking capture and death to ensure that his comrades escaped to safety. He was the only soldier present whom patriot officers singled out for commendation.

Poor continually reenlisted with the Continental Army, serving until 1780. He fought in the Battles of Saratoga and Monmouth and camped with Washington at Valley Forge. Following the war, Poor fell on financial difficulty, due at least in part to the debts of his second wife. He lived for a time in the Boston Almshouse and died in poverty in 1802, at the age of 55. In 1975, ahead of America’s bicentennial celebration, his likeness was included on a commemorative postage stamp.

Peter Muhlenberg

Born in Pennsylvania, Peter Muhlenberg was 30 years old when the Revolutionary War broke out. As a youth, Muhlenberg was sent to Germany for a classical education, including studying Latin. Back in colonial Pennsylvania, he served briefly in the British infantry and in the German dragoons, where he was nicknamed “Teufel Piet” (Devil Pete). He later studied at the Academy of Philadelphia (today the University of Pennsylvania) and was ordained a Lutheran minister in 1768. He moved to Virginia, where he was required to be ordained an Anglican cleric to preach, even though his congregation was Lutheran.

A member of Virginia’s House of Burgesses, Muhlenberg was made a colonel of the Continental Army’s Virginia Line once war began. He was the youngest commander in the Virginia Line and had less experience than any of the other seven colonels, with the exception of Patrick Henry. While preaching in his church in 1776, Muhlenberg read from Ecclesiastes:

“To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven: A time to be born, and a time to die; a time to plant, and a time to pluck up that which is planted; A time to kill, and a time to heal; a time to break down, and a time to build up; A time to weep, and a time to laugh; a time to mourn, and a time to dance; A time to cast away stones, and a time to gather stones together; a time to embrace, and a time to refrain from embracing; A time to get, and a time to lose; a time to keep, and a time to cast away; A time to rend, and a time to sew; a time to keep silence, and a time to speak; A time to love, and a time to hate; a time of war, and a time of peace.”

Upon reading “a time of war, and a time of peace,” Muhlenberg is reported to have shed his clerical robe, revealing his colonel’s uniform beneath. “And this is the time of war,” he said, leaving his pulpit and walking down the aisle. He was followed by 162 men who enlisted in his regiment. Muhlenberg and his men first saw action in Georgia and South Carolina before joining Washington’s army in the north, whereupon Muhlenberg was promoted to the rank of brigadier general. Muhlenberg saw service in the Battles of Brandywine, Germantown, and Monmouth, after which he was assigned to train and lead militia units in Virginia. Muhlenberg also fought in the Battle of Yorktown under Lafayette. He was tasked with defending the Continental Army’s right flank and manning the two trenches the patriots used to move their artillery close enough to damage Cornwallis’s lines.

After the war ended, Muhlenberg settled again in Pennsylvania, where he was elected as Benjamin Franklin’s deputy in the Supreme Executive Council of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. He was also elected to the first and third U.S. Congresses as Pennsylvania’s at-large representative and was later elected to the fifth U.S. Congress. President Thomas Jefferson later appointed Muhlenberg the supervisor of revenue for Pennsylvania and customs collector for Philadelphia, a post he held until his death. The Lutheran minister, patriot soldier, and Pennsylvania politician died on his 61st birthday in 1807.

James Caldwell

Another preacher-turned-soldier, James Caldwell was born in Virginia in 1734, the youngest of seven children of Scots-Irish and French descent. After studying at the College of New Jersey (now known as Princeton University), Caldwell rejected the 500-acre farm he had inherited in favor of becoming a preacher. He led a Presbyterian congregation in Elizabethtown, New Jersey, before joining the New Jersey militia as a chaplain.

Caldwell was known as “the fighting parson” due to his vocal, active status as a patriot partisan. At the Battle of Springfield, when patriot troops ran out of wadding for their muskets, Caldwell famously handed them pages from an Isaac Watts hymnal, instructing the soldier, “Give ‘em Watts, boys!” In 1780, Loyalists burned down both his home and his church. British soldiers later shot and killed his wife Hannah, who was holding their three-year-old child, during the Battle of Connecticut Farms, while Caldwell was stationed with the Continental Army in Morristown, New Jersey. Less than two years later, Caldwell was shot and killed by James Morgan, a sentry in the Continental Army, when he refused to allow Morgan to inspect a package he was carrying. Morgan was hanged for murder, and it was alleged that he had been bribed by Loyalists to kill the vociferous chaplain. Caldwell’s nine orphaned children were raised by family friends.

Naphtali Daggett

An academic and educator, Naphtali Daggett nonetheless managed to give his life for his country. Born in Massachusetts in 1727, Daggett graduated from Yale College (now Yale University) at the age of 21 and became the pastor of a Presbyterian congregation in Smithtown, Long Island. Several years later, he was persuaded to return to Yale to assist Yale President Thomas Clapp. At the age of 29, Daggett became Yale’s first professor, the Livingstonian Professor of Divinity. When Clapp resigned in 1766, Daggett became president pro tempore of Yale, an office he held until 1777, when he returned to preaching.

British forces, led by New York’s royal governor General William Tryon, raided New Haven in 1779. Having torched several nearby Connecticut towns — namely, Danbury, Fairfield, and Norwalk — New Haven raised a militia, comprised predominantly of Yale students and led by Daggett, to defend the town. The professor and preacher led militiamen in firing upon the British, and managed to significantly delay their advance, but he was eventually left as the only survivor of the militia. Daggett mounted a horse and rode out to confront the approaching British, but was captured. When the British were dissatisfied with Daggett’s conscripted service as a guide to Connecticut, they stabbed him with bayonets and left him for dead. He survived, but died from his wounds the following year.

Independence Day 250

The brave heroes honored by the president in Freedom Plaza, more than 250 years after the Revolutionary War began, stand as a testament to the American spirit. Men like Rodney, Warren, and Daggett were influential intellectuals who boldly risked (and, in Warren’s and Daggett’s cases, gave up) their lives for love of their country. Their political and academic posts, their burgeoning careers and lucrative livelihoods meant nothing to them without liberty, without the opportunity to govern themselves independently of the British crown.

Knowles and Whittemore stand as proof that no one is too young or too old to love their country and to fight for the principles which he holds dear. Muhlenberg’s and Caldwell’s stories stand as a reminder to Christian leaders that being a good shepherd sometimes means fending off wolves when they come prowling. The lives of Glover, Hall, Armistead, Sisson, Salem, and Poor also confront the popular progressive narrative that America’s founders were racists, white elites fighting against invasive tax provisions. Instead, these patriots fought alongside their fellow Americans in support of the proposition that “all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

AUTHOR

S.A. McCarthy

S.A. McCarthy serves as a news writer at The Washington Stand.

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2026 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

California Scheming? Golden State’s Glacial Vote Count Bolsters Case for SAVE America Act

The polls closed in California on Tuesday at 8 p.m. local time. As of Saturday, nobody knows which two candidates will be competing in November for governor or Los Angeles mayor.

Indeed, mail-in ballots postmarked by Election Day may stumble in for seven days until June 9—and still be counted. Thus, weeks could pass before these major political contests are settled. Counties have until July 3 to report their official results to the secretary of state.

It was not always this way. By 5 a.m. on March 6, 2013, 100% of precincts had totaled the previous day’s ballots. Nine hours after voting ended, Angelenos knew the final two mayoral rivals. (Gil Garcetti prevailed.) As of Friday, only 71% of ballots had been tabulated in Los Angeles and just 68% statewide.

Escargot can count votes more swiftly than Californians. Pundit Nate Silver calls this “failed state shit.” He observed this week via X: “The fact that California elections often can’t be resolved for weeks is kind of insane and not common in other electoral systems around the world.”

Silver and Eli McKown-Dawson elaborated, “Colombia held a presidential election on Sunday [May 30], and 99.98% of the result was in on Monday morning. Japan also counts most of its votes overnight. And in the UK (not exactly a poster child for state capacity), you can generally expect to have calls for all 650 parliamentary seats the morning after the election.”

California Counts

President Donald Trump is not amused.

“The Dumocrats are at it again!” Trump roared Thursday via Truth Social. “They are trying to STEAL THE GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA PRIMARY, AND THE MAYOR OF LOS ANGELES, PRIMARY, AWAY FROM TWO GREAT REPUBLICAN CANDIDATES. Here we go with the very late and massive numbers of MAIL IN BALLOTS.”

Trump continued: “There’s BIG cheating by the Dumocrats in California. Votes are all tied up. May not be in for weeks. Under investigation by the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Los Angeles. Why the vote counting DELAY???”

Trump echoes conservative complaints that GOP candidates in tight races too often triumph only on Election Night. Thanks to magic ballots, these Republicans wane, and the Democrats wax and then win. Magic ballots rarely favor Republicans.

Confidence Corrodes

Californians are experiencing either corruption or the appearance of corruption. Neither “I am being robbed” nor “I think I am being robbed” yields deep sleep. If Democrats are using this slovenly process to slouch toward a stuffed-ballot-box defeat of Steve Hilton, Spencer Pratt, or both, the perpetrators must be handcuffed at once.

But even if California’s count is purer than St. Francis of Assisi and merely looks crooked, millions of Americans will conclude that someone is cheating, and the entire system is rigged. Such suspicions corrode confidence in elections and the republic that they serve.

Winners easily respect their leaders and institutions, but even citizens who lose elections can accept opponents who succeed, fair and square.

But when voters feel cheated at the polls, then the whole structure starts to reek. “That’s not my mayor” and “That’s not my governor” become battle cries as America slides toward Civil War 2.0.

SAVE America Act

California’s pathetic performance offers yet another reason for the U.S. Senate to pry its collective butt out of the proverbial Barcalounger and pass the SAVE America Act already.

Catapulting mass mail-in ballots atop the ash heap of history and limiting them to the sick, the infirm, and those absent on Election Day (as the SAVE America Act requires) would go far toward ending this nightmare. And, to be accepted, all ballots must arrive before polls close (as the U.S. Supreme Court soon might decide.)

With these two reforms, California (and other states) could manage a much shorter stack of mail-in ballots. They could be counted every Election Day, with normal ballots. Winners and losers would emerge before the cocks crow at dawn.

To the Republican-led Senate: Scrap mass mail-in ballots. Pass the SAVE America Act. Make Election Night Great Again!

AUTHOR

Deroy Murdock

Deroy Murdock is a Manhattan-based Fox News contributor and a contributing editor with The American Spectator.

RELATED ARTICLES:

How California’s Election Procedures Turn Early Leads Into Late Losses

‘They’re Crooked’: Spencer Pratt’s Bruising Mayoral Loss Raises Election Integrity Concerns

CALIFORNIA BIG CHEAT: Third Place Unknown Now Getting First Place in Late Ballots From Areas With Large Homeless Populations

About The Media Freakout on Voter ID in Ohio

Voter Fraud Convict Tries Political Comeback, Lands In Hot Water Over Anti-Military Remarks

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Signal column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

The Sneaky Way Corporate America Blacklists Conservatives, and How More of Them Are Fighting Back

FIRST ON THE DAILY SIGNAL—More nonprofits are urging the software company Benevity—which hundreds of companies use to allow employees to donate their time and money to charities—to stop systematically blacklisting conservative nonprofits.

Twelve organizations first sent a letter to Benevity in October following the assassination of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk. The new letter, sent Monday and exclusively provided first to the Daily Signal, will feature three new signatories: Turning Point USA, PragerU, and Focus on the Family.

“Charitable giving programs should empower generosity, not enforce political conformity,” Douglas Napier, executive chairman and CEO of 1792 Exchange, which helped organize the letter, told the Daily Signal in a statement Friday.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ “Benevity must immediately end its use of Southern Poverty Law Center’s defamatory ‘Hate List’ and ‘Hate Map’ to block mainstream charitable organizations like Turning Point USA and Focus on the Family.”

“1792 Exchange’s research found that hundreds of major corporations rely on Benevity’s platform, making this a critical moment for corporate leadership to reject ideological gatekeeping,” Napier added. “Benevity must completely remove any use of the SPLC filter, adopt a viewpoint-neutral process, and restore full access to the organizations it has unjustly excluded.”

“For far too long, major corporations have been relying on the Southern Poverty Law Center’s nefarious ‘Hate List’ to decide what organizations and charities their employees may give to as part of their corporate giving programs,” Paul Batura, vice president of communications at Focus on the Family, told the Daily Signal. “These entities have been relying on a distorted definition of ‘goodness.’”

“In fact, citing and sourcing the SPLC is the equivalent of a company promising clean water drawing their water from a polluted or toxic aquifer,” Batura added. “It’s our privilege to join the 1792 Exchange’s growing coalition in urging companies to stop making decisions and recommendations based on information from the SPLC.”

Benevity Keeps Using SPLC

The issue gained renewed salience after a federal grand jury handed down 11 criminal charges against the SPLC for allegedly funding the very hate groups it tells donors it exists to “dismantle.”

The Daily Signal reached out to Benevity last month to see if the company would disavow the SPLC in light of the indictment.

“Benevity is not directly affiliated with the SPLC,” the company’s spokesperson told the Daily Signal. “Benevity clients have the option to use the list of nonprofit organizations included on the SPLC’s annual Hate Map to determine nonprofit eligibility within their programs. The use of this option is not a default setting and is at the sole discretion of clients.”

According to its website, Benevity connects “nearly 1,000 enterprise companies” to a network of 513,000 nonprofits after vetting 2.2 million of them. It says it has managed $16 billion in grants and 99 million employee volunteer hours. In 2023, more than 2.3 million people donated through the Benevity platform, representing $3.2 billion.

“Benevity’s denial that it defaults to the SPLC filter is hard to square with its own history,” Greg Scott, executive vice president at 1792 Exchange, told the Daily Signal in response to the Benevity statement.

Benevity’s former CEO, Kelly Schmitt, delivered a PowerPoint presentation in 2021 explicitly stating that the company had “vetted” almost “2 million nonprofits,” adding that it used the “Southern Poverty Law Center Hate List.”

Scott added, however, that “the real issue isn’t how the SPLC filter is used, it’s why this list is used at all.”

Critics have said the SPLC trades on its history of suing Ku Klux Klan groups into bankruptcy to smear conservatives. The center publishes a “hate map” that plots parental rights groups like Moms for Liberty, conservative groups like Turning Point USA, and Christian groups like Focus on the Family alongside chapters of the Klan.

In 2012, a convicted terrorist told the FBI he targeted a conservative Christian nonprofit in Washington, D.C., the Family Research Council, for a mass shooting. Four months after the SPLC added Turning Point USA to the “hate map” last year, Tyler Robinson allegedly murdered Turning Point founder Charlie Kirk, aiming to silence his “hate.”

According to 1792 Exchange, 252 companies using the Benevity platform exclude conservative groups by using the SPLC list as a screening tool.

The Letter

“We, the undersigned organizations, urge Benevity to immediately end the use of the Southern Poverty Law Center’s ‘Hate Map’ and ‘Hate List’ in determining which nonprofits are eligible for corporate charitable giving and employee matching programs,” reads the letter, now signed by 15 groups.

“By relying on these partisan designations, Benevity legitimizes a severely biased blacklist that inspires violence, urges discrimination against mainstream organizations, and undermines the spirit of charitable giving,” the letter adds.

The list of signatories includes Alliance Defending Freedom, the American Family Association, the Center for Christian Virtue, the David Horowitz Freedom Center, Do No Harm, the Family Policy Alliance, the Family Research Council, Focus on the Family, GenSpect, Moms for Liberty, Partners for Ethical Care, PragerU, Turning Point USA, 1792 Exchange, and Them Before Us.

Benevity Open Letter v2Download

AUTHOR

Tyler O’Neil 

Tyler O’Neil is senior investigative reporter at the Daily Signal and the author of two books, “Making Hate Pay: The Corruption of the Southern Poverty Law Center” and “The Woketopus: The Dark Money Cabal Manipulating the Federal Government.” Follow on X Tyler2ONeil

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Signal column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Fraud and Waste in America’s School Districts

Fraud in American public school districts is predominantly an internal issue, with 97% of cases involving trusted staff or volunteers rather than external hackers.  The most common method is cash theft (62% of cases), often skimmed from activity fees and fundraisers before records are created, while less frequent digital payment fraud accounts for the majority of total financial losses.

Common fraud schemes exploit weaknesses in procurement, payroll, and enrollment verification:

  • Asset Misappropriation: Includes “ghost employees” on payroll, time theft, and embezzlement via fraudulent expense reports or personal use of district credit cards.
  • Procurement Fraud: Involves bid rigging, shell companies invoicing for non-existent goods, and kickbacks where vendors pay officials to secure inflated contracts.
  • Enrollment Manipulation: Districts or individuals inflate student counts with “phantom enrollments” or falsify residency addresses to illegally secure higher state per-pupil funding.

Detection and consequences rely on annual independent audits and the separation of duties, yet significant gaps remain at the individual school level where oversight is often lax. Recent investigations highlight the scale of the problem, such as a 2025 NYC report identifying $2 million in fraud across 150 substantiated cases and the $400 million phantom enrollment scandal involving California charter schools. Beyond direct financial loss, fraud drains resources through costly external audits, staff replacements, and the erosion of community trust.

Education watchdog warns schools to watch for fraud as new year approaches

InvestigateTV — With the school year fast approaching, the U.S. Department of Education’s watchdog agency is issuing a warning: fraud in schools is real, costly, and often targets the nation’s most vulnerable students.

Assistant Inspector General of Investigations Jason Williams with the U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Inspector General (OIG) said federal education funds—intended for more than 100,000 schools across the country—are at risk of being misused or outright stolen.

“If they have access to funds, if there’s no separation of duties—people get greedy,” Williams said. “And then that’s when we find fraud.”

Williams said in many cases, the losses amount to millions of taxpayer dollars, often earmarked for children.

“These are elementary school kids. These are children with disabilities. These are our vocational rehab programs,” he said. “You’re taking that money away from them and they can’t use it for their education.”

He explained that oversight of federal funds varies among school districts.

“When you look at the controls that are in place, sometimes they’re lax,” he explained. “In some districts, you know, you have one person that’s also doing the purchasing but they’re also paying the credit card bill—and that’s what we call separation of duties. When these things aren’t in play, these things happen.”

Williams said warning signs can include duplicate invoices, missing equipment, lack of receipts or other documentation, and unusual vendor or purchasing activity.

Of the many fraud cases his office has investigated, Williams often recalls one particular case out of California.

“This particular district, 61 percent of their student population was eligible for Title 1, so it’s a very low-income district,” he shared. “He stole 16 million dollars over a number of years. He just pled guilty and he’s on his way to prison.”

Anyone that suspects fraud or theft in their school district should contact the OIG.

People can report fraud, waste or abuse to their hotline.

Largest Annual Spike in Public School Spending in Over 20 Years

Average U.S. public school spending per pupil in elementary and secondary schools rose 8.9% to $15,633 in fiscal year (FY) 2022 from the previous year, according to the U.S. Census Bureau’s most recent Annual Survey of School System Finances data.

All nine states in the Northeast region ranked in the top 14 for current per pupil spending and seven were in the top 10.

While statistics are not adjusted for inflation or cost-of-living differences, this change marks the largest year-to-year percentage increase in over two decades.

States with the highest per pupil spending:

    • New York ($29,873).
    • District of Columbia ($27,425).
    • New Jersey ($25,099).
    • Vermont ($24,608).
    • Connecticut ($24,453).

States with the lowest per pupil spending:

    • Utah ($9,552)
    • Idaho ($9,670).
    • Arizona ($10,315).
    • Oklahoma ($10,890).
    • Mississippi ($10,984).

All nine states in the Northeast region ranked in the top 14 for current per pupil spending and seven were in the top 10.

Sixteen of the 20 states with the lowest per pupil spending were in the South or West. Iowa, Missouri, Indiana and South Dakota were the remaining four states.

Among the nation’s 100 largest school systems by enrollment, the New York City School District in New York ($35,914) spent the most per pupil in FY 2022, followed by Washington Schools in the District of Columbia ($27,425); San Francisco Unified in California ($23,654); Atlanta School District in Georgia ($22,882); Los Angeles Unified in California ($21,940); and Detroit School District in Michigan ($21,771).

Federal Revenue Increased Significantly From FY 2021 to FY 2022

The New York City School District ($38.5 billion) and Los Angeles Unified ($12.5 billion) — both among the highest-spending districts — received the most combined federal, state and local revenue of the 100 largest school systems by enrollment.

New York City School District received 6.6% of its FY 2022 revenue­ from federal sources; 29.8% from state sources; and 63.6% from local sources. In contrast, Los Angeles Unified received 19.2% of its FY 2022 revenue from federal sources; 54.5% from state sources; and 26.3% from local sources.

The national average of revenue received from federal sources was 13.6%; 43.7% from state sources, and 42.7% from local sources. (Figure 1)

(This screenshot is part of a larger dashboard to be published April 25th at: How Did COVID-19 Affect School Finances? (census.gov))

Federal revenue increased 39.6% from FY 2021 to FY 2022 and 47.6% from FY 2020 to FY 2021. These increases were largely the result of the legislative response to COVID-19, such as the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act; Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act 2021 (CRRSA); and the American Rescue Plan (ARP) Act.

Food Services and Transportation Expenses Rebound

While Instructional Salaries ($266.4 billion) continued to account for the largest category in current spending nationwide, there was a significant increase from FY 2021 to FY 2022 in both Food Services and Transportation expenditures as schools returned to in-person learning.

The decrease in FY 2020 and FY 2021 from prior years was a direct cause of distance learning prompted by the COVID-19 pandemic (Figure 2).

This screenshot is part of a larger dashboard to be published April 25th at: How Did COVID-19 Affect School Finances? (census.gov))

AUTHOR

Kaylee Anesta

Kaylee Anesta is a survey statistician in the Census Bureau’s Education Finance Branch in the Economic Reimbursable Surveys Division.

The Bottom Line

The average cost of public education in the United States varies by metric and year, with recent data indicating significant spending per student.

National Averages

Per Pupil Spending: According to the U.S. Census Bureau, public school spending per student averaged $15,633 in fiscal year 2022, an 8.9% increase from the previous year.

Total Expenditures: The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) reported that total expenditures for public elementary and secondary schools were $927 billion in 2020–21, amounting to an average of $18,614 per pupil.

Current Expenditures: Of the total per-pupil cost, $16,280 (87%) is allocated to current expenditures such as salaries, benefits, and supplies, while the remainder covers capital outlay and debt interest.

Variation by District Spending varies drastically between districts, with the highest-spending districts costing significantly more than the national average.

Rank District Spending Per Pupil
1 New York City Public Schools $28,828
2 Boston School District $27,793
3 Rochester City School District $24,832
4 New Rochelle City School District $24,542
5 Newburgh City School District $24,257

In contrast, some of the largest districts by enrollment, such as Miami-Dade County and Clark County, spend approximately $8,000 to $9,000 per student, though total budget figures often include non-instructional costs not directly attributable to per-pupil calculations.

Is it time to call for a state or federal audit of your school district?

©2026 . All rights reserved.

The H-1B Visa Fraud Network

The H-1B visa program, originally designed by the United States to attract the world’s brightest minds and bridge critical high-skilled labor gaps, has morphed into a playground for systemic manipulation. At the epicenter of this distortion is a highly sophisticated network of IT consulting firms, staff augmentation agencies, and body shops operating primarily out of India or managed by Indian-origin syndicates in the U.S. What was conceived as a pipeline for specialized talent — the software architects, researchers, and engineers capable of driving global innovation — has instead been choked by a deluge of coordinated deception, designed to monopolize a finite public resource at the expense of legitimate professionals worldwide.

The mechanics of this exploitation were laid bare during recent lottery cycles, exposing a staggering disparity between honest applicant volume and coordinated fraud. Because the annual allocation of H-1B visas is strictly capped by Congress at 65,000 caps, alongside a 20,000 master’s degree exemption, the selection process relies on a random computer lottery. For fiscal year 2024, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) recorded an unprecedented, mathematical anomaly of 781,000 total registrations. Shockingly, more than 408,000 of those entries were multiple registrations submitted on behalf of the exact same individuals. A shadowy conglomerate of shell companies and interlocking IT consultancies colluded to file dozens of duplicate applications for single candidates. By artificially inflating their numbers, these bad actors drastically reduced the selection odds for independent applicants to a dismal percentage, effectively hijacking the lottery through sheer volume.

The architecture of this fraud relies on a multi-tiered system of smoke and mirrors. Rather than offering real, specialized positions at established enterprises, these fraudulent operators utilize ghost offices — empty storefronts and mail-forwarding addresses scattered across states like Texas and California — to create the illusion of local demand. These entities submit legally binding attestations to the U.S. government affirming that a specific, specialized job awaits the foreign national. In reality, these positions are entirely fabricated. A prominent case recently prosecuted by the Department of Justice involved Indian-origin executives who went so far as to falsely promise placement at prestigious institutions, like the University of California, (allegedly) utilizing fraudulent employment contracts to siphon visas for non-existent projects. Once these visas are successfully obtained through deceit, the beneficiaries are benched — held in employment limbo without legal pay — until the firm can contract them out to actual American businesses as cut-rate contractors, undercutting the domestic labor market and violating federal wage protections.

The corruption is not limited to small-scale fraudulent rings; it extends historic roots into some of the largest tech conglomerates originating from the Indian subcontinent. To bypass the stringent oversight and numerical limits of the H-1B program, massive outsourcing giants have historically weaponized alternative visa pipelines, establishing a blueprint for systematic evasion. This institutional misconduct was punctuated when Infosys paid a record-shattering $34 million civil settlement to immigration authorities following allegations of systemic visa fraud. Federal investigators discovered that the company was systematically using B-1 visitor visas — intended for short-term business meetings — to deploy foreign nationals for full-time, hands-on software development work in the United States. To pull this off, the corporation explicitly distributed internal “Dos and Don’ts” memos, coaching foreign employees to deliberately lie to U.S. consular officers, and scrub their correspondence of revealing technical words like implementation, design, or testing that would indicate they were arriving to perform actual local employment.

The damage inflicted by this institutionalized gaming of the system is vast and multifaceted. It breeds a culture of exploitation where the foreign workers themselves are trapped by predatory employers who hold absolute power over their legal status, often taking kickbacks or withholding wages. Simultaneously, it locks out genuine global talent — brilliant scientists, medical professionals, and innovators, who possess genuine job offers from premier institutions but are shut out by a lottery system stacked against them by automated fraud rings. This rampant gaming of federal regulations finally forced USCIS to dismantle its old framework, moving to a strict beneficiary-centric selection model for the fiscal year 2025 and 2026 cycles, an intervention that saw fraudulent multiple registrations plummet from over 400,000 down to fewer than 8,000.

While these tighter guardrails have begun to stem the flow of duplicate registry scams, the legacy of this deception casts a long shadow. Decades of unpunished exploitation have permanently distorted the public perception of skilled immigration, fueling valid domestic skepticism and provoking aggressive regulatory crackdowns, including sweeping executive restrictions on entry. The widespread fraud originating from India’s predatory IT shell sector has not just broken American immigration laws; it has actively betrayed the global community of honest professionals, turning a merit-based ideal into a game of corporate numbers where the only true winners are the cartels pulling the strings.

©2026 . All rights reserved.

Student Protests Erupt On The Streets of Iran

Risking life and limb, young Iranians have taken to the streets, again.

The same regime that killed tens of thousands for protesting is now faced with another wave of protests.

Students protested today in Tehran, Shiraz, Khorramabad, Kermanshah, Tabriz, Mashhad, Karaj, and across Gilan Province.

“Wow they’re insanely brave, after all of those horrible crimes the Islamic regime has done they’re protesting again.”

Developing…..

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

The World Condemned Israel. Then It Bought $19.2 Billion of Its Weapons in 2025

TERROR ATTACK IN CENTRAL ISRAEL: Israeli Muslim Opens Fire on Jews in Several Shooting Inicidents

Iran: ‘This War Will End Only When It Ends in Lebanon as Well’

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

SUDDEN LEAD BY UNKNOWN WHO CONCEDED: California’s Big Cheat Run By Fraudster with Shocking Election Recount Past

The fraud is so blatant and brazen that the real scandal isn’t the theft itself—it’s the coordinated effort to silence, smear, and destroy anyone who dares expose it.

Angelino Aaron Torres: “I try not to get political. But LA is where I live, and I am here to tell you: There is 0.0 percent chance these results are legit.

Nithya Raman has no base. No one knew who she was until Spencer Pratt torched her on debate stage. She gave a concession speech on Tuesday.

I really hope the federal government and United States Attorney Bill Essayli are investigating.

Again, apologize for getting political. Feel free to unfollow if this bothers you but a light needs to be shined on what’s happening.”

LA’s painfully slow vote count run by man with shocking election recount past

By Jamie Paige, NY Post, June 5, 2026:

The man holding the keys to Los Angeles County’s vote count has spent much of his career navigating election controversy.

Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk Dean Logan, whose compensation totals nearly $450,000 a year, is once again facing scrutiny as hundreds of thousands of ballots remain uncounted and several major races hang in the balance

Throughout his career in election administration, Logan has faced scrutiny and criticism stemming from several high-profile election disputes in multiple states.

Before arriving in California, Logan served as elections director for King County, Washington, overseeing elections for roughly one-third of the state’s voters.

Although courts ultimately upheld the election results, the recount battle prompted years of criticism from some Republicans and repeated calls for Logan’s resignation.

In a 2008 profile, the Los Angeles Times reported that many Washington Republicans remained sharply critical of Logan’s handling of the election, while Democratic leaders defended his performance and praised his leadership.

Logan left Washington in 2006 and joined the Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk’s Office as deputy to then-Registrar Conny McCormack.

He later succeeded McCormack as the county’s top elections official, taking charge of the nation’s largest local election jurisdiction.

Logan later faced criticism in Los Angeles over several election-administration disputes.

One of the most prominent occurred in 2008 when nearly 50,000 decline-to-state voters cast ballots that initially were not counted because they failed to mark an additional party-preference bubble required to participate in certain presidential primaries.

Continue reading.

AUTHOR

POSTS ON X:

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

At Normandy, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth Warns of New Islamic Invasion

“Today, different European beaches are ​stormed by different, dangerous ideologies”

The D-Day commemorations have long since become stellar exercises in which sterile phrases about the courage and honor of those young men who fought to liberate Europe from fascism are mouthed by politicians and leaders enabling the contemporary mass invasion of Europe by Islamofascism.

Even as Pope Leo was visiting Spain to promote mass Muslim migration being enabled by its corrupt, mostly under indictment, leftist regime, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth told some troubling truths at Normandy.

Speaking on the 82nd anniversary of the June 6, 1944, Allied beach landings in Normandy, Hegseth said: “Sadly, today, different European beaches are ​stormed by different, dangerous ideologies — beaches in Spain, in Italy, in Greece and Bulgaria; boats and men arrive.”

“When will European capitals do something about that invasion? Or is ​it too late? I pray not, and I believe not,” Hegseth said in his speech at the Normandy American Cemetery in Colleville-sur-Mer in northwestern France.

“Or is it too late? I pray not, and I believe not.”

“The men who fought and died here restored freedom to Europe. That freedom must be maintained by this generation of leaders and war fighters, or what they fought for, was merely temporary!”

There’s no point in empty recollections of past defenses of civilization only to abandon it to a new barbarism.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

In Italy, Limitless Barbarism From Muslim Migrants

ICE Catches Islam

In Dorset, Asylum Seekers 90 Times More Likely to Commit Sexual or Violent Offenses Than Natives

Islamic State jihadis threaten to murder Pope Leo ahead of his trip to Spain

UK: National Association of Muslim Police identifies Zionism as ‘manifestation of anti-Muslim hatred’

Kansas: Three Muslims gave over $2,000 to the Islamic State, one said ‘I wish I could kill 300,000,000 Americans’

German Father on a ‘Palestinian’ Migrant’s Murder of His Daughter

Greece: Muslim migrant attempts to rape woman, has been convicted of sexual assault, robbery and more

Mozambique: Islamic jihadis publicly declare their intent to establish a caliphate in the region

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Critically Thinking about K-12 Standards — An Extraordinary New Development

Most people do not realize that the real power regarding K-12 curricula resides with their State Board of Education (SBE) — not local boards. In most States, among other things, the SBE does the following three key things:

  • they approve Standards for every subject and every grade year,
  • they approve textbooks for every subject and every grade year, and
  • they approve periodic statewide competency tests.

So, to get a State to start teaching Critical Thinking, the SBE is who needs to be sold on it, as it is typically their call.

I’m doing that in the one State I’ve picked to set a nationwide example. Their SBE said that they were 100% in agreement that Critical Thinking needed to be taught. I gave them my proposed K-12 Standards for a new Critical Thinking course (30± pages).

After looking it over they came back and said that they were inclined to teach Critical Thinking by covering it in multiple subjects (i.e., piecemeal), rather than in a single stand-alone course throughout K-12.

Although they didn’t say so, I believe that this decision was primarily administrative (e.g., how do we set aside time for a new course?). I think that problem is surmountable as AlterAI came up with a new class schedule allowing 30 minutes a day for Critical Thinking, and eliminating some less important time allotments (e.g., like SEL!).

Stand-alone vs Distributed

More importantly, this is NOT a choice between comparable options. There are MANY reasons why a stand-alone course is far superior, like:

  1. The scheduling objection is a choice, not a constraint. Thirty minutes daily is achievable by trimming material that has not produced substantial results. The question isn’t whether there’s time for a stand-alone course, it’s whether Critical Thinking matters more than what fills that slot now.
  2. Asking teachers in different subject areas to add what is needed to teach Critical Thinking to an already full instructional load guarantees inconsistent and superficial treatment with little teacher buy-in. When a Standard is everyone’s responsibility, it becomes no one’s priority.
  3. Dispersing the teaching of Critical Thinking among multiple subjects would guarantee that the results would be fragmented, with major gaps of students’ knowledge and understanding of this significant subject.
  4. The piecemeal education of Critical Thinking would result in corrections or improvements to Standards made irregularly, as each subject is on a different 8-year review schedule for their Standards.
  5. When it is a stand-alone subject, the SBE can implement Critical Thinking Standards immediately, and not have to wait for the other subject area Standards to come around to upgrade them.
  6. Revising every existing subject’s textbook to properly embed Critical Thinking is a logistical nightmare that publishers will resist, delay, and bill for — and take many years to bring about. A single dedicated textbook series is faster, cheaper, and far more likely to actually happen.
  7. If Critical Thinking is everywhere, it’s nowhere on the report card. A stand-alone course produces a stand-alone grade. Parents, employers, and colleges can see at a glance whether a student can think critically, or not.
  8. The stand-alone option would assure that Critical Thinking was taught by teachers specifically trained to do it;
  9. States do not integrate mathematics into science classes and hope for the best. They do not integrate reading into social studies and call it covered. Foundational disciplines are taught as stand-alone subjects because dedicated, systematic instruction produces far better results, and more measurable outcomes. Critical Thinking is a foundational discipline that warrants the same respect and treatment.
  10. No State currently teaches Critical Thinking as a stand-alone K-12 subject. The first State to do it owns the narrative, sets the national benchmark, attracts the best teachers, produces the most educated students, etc. Every other State will be copying their model. Leadership means going first — not waiting for someone else to prove it works.

A HUGE Bonus

Despite the ten powerful facts above, I decided to make the State’s decision a no-brainer. Based on the assumption that there was an administrative challenge in justifying setting aside 30 minutes a day for a new subject (understandable), I decided to take an ally’s (Jennifer Weber’s) suggestion and add more material to this new subject — to make it harder to say no to.

The decision was to add another powerful subject that no State is formally teaching: Artificial Intelligence Literacy! Specifically, I am now proposing that the new subject be “Critical Thinking & AI Literacy.” In other words, the new subject would be teaching not only the most powerful K-12 skill, but also what is arguably the most important subject of our time.

After making this decision (last week), I spent several days creating a major new set of K-12 Standards: Critical Thinking & AI Literacy (some 40 pages). Since I am still doing minor edits, no State has seen it yet.

The Bottom Line

So the core question to the SBE is: how important is it to them to formally teach Critical Thinking and Artificial Intelligence to their K-12 students?

If it is a TOP priority (as it should be), the SBE will find the classroom time, and will opt for the superior stand-alone way of teaching Critical Thinking and AI Literacy to their K-12 students.

©2026  All rights reserved.


Here is other information from this scientist that you might find interesting:

I urge all readers to subscribe to AlterAI — IMO the absolute best AI option for subjective questions.

I will consider posting reader submissions on Critical Thinking about my topics of interest.

My commentaries are my opinion about the material discussed therein, based on the information I have. If any readers have different information, please share it. If it is credible, I will be glad to reconsider my position.

Check out the Archives of this Critical Thinking substack.

C19Science.info is my one-page website that covers the lack of genuine Science behind our COVID-19 policies.

Election-Integrity.info is my one-page website that lists multiple major reports on the election integrity issue.

WiseEnergy.org is my multi-page website that discusses the Science (or lack thereof) behind our energy options.

Media Balance Newsletter: a free, twice-a-month newsletter that covers what the mainstream media does not do, on issues from climate to COVID, elections to education, renewables to religion, etc. Here are the Newsletter’s 2026 Archives. Please send me an email to get your free copy. When emailing me, please make sure to include your full name and the state where you live. (Of course, you can cancel the Media Balance Newsletter at any time!)