Incompetence Is Dangerous

Incompetence is dangerous. That is a truism that is playing out before our eyes almost every day as the Biden-Harris team pushes us ever closer to a hot war with Russia.

Iran is sending short-range Fath 360 missiles to Russia, so the Russians can free up their stand-off platforms for strategic targets inside Ukraine.

Four years ago, Iran didn’t have enough Fath missiles to send to Russia, nor were they a world-class manufacturer of attack drones. But in January 2021, the Biden-Harris team removed the Trump-era sanctions on Iran’s oil exports, allowing them to go from 400,000 barrels/day to over two million barrels/day today.

Guess what? As a result of that policy shift – which was done by executive order, by the way, not by Congress — the Islamic regime in Iran today has more money for terror, for Hamas, for the Houthis, and to fund terror plots in the United States (such as assassination attempts on Donald Trump).

And, of course, they have more money to build ballistic missiles and drones and send them to Russia, in exchange for strategic missile and nuclear technology.

The failure of this administration to project forward the consequences of their policies is simply astonishing. As a direct result of removing sanctions on Iranian oil exports and imposing sanctions on Russia, the United States has propelled those two authoritarian regimes into each other’s arms.

In fact, this new military, economic, and strategic alliance is actually a threesome, as most of you reading these weekly columns know. China is a willing partner.

It’s not as if this was not foreseeable. So you have to ask yourself: are these people just incompetent, or have they willfully weakened the United States and strengthened our enemies?

This past week, Russian bombers flew into the Alaska Air Defense Identification Zone, forcing NORAD to scramble jets to chase them away. They have done this repeatedly over the past two years. This past July, the Russians flew the first ever-joint challenge mission to Alaskan air space with Chinese bombers.

That joint Russia-China Air Force mission targeting the United States is just one of many hostile acts this new Axis of Opportunism has taken since Biden and Harris have been at the helm. They have also carried out joint naval drills, including Iran. And of course, they are all-in on the Ukraine war. (For a more in-depth treatment of the Russia-China-Iran alliance, read by policy peace at the America First Policy Institute, here).

Also this week, the United States is discussing with Britain the request by Ukraine’s Zelenskyy to use long-range U.S. and British missiles to attack targets deep inside Russian territory. Putin responded with the obvious: “This would in a significant way c change the very nature of the conflict,” he said on Thursday. “It would mean that NATO countries are at war with Russia.”

That, of course, is what Zelenskyy has been seeking for quite some time. Because his forces are getting overrun in the Donbas, he is hoping to force the US and NATO into joining the war directly. Otherwise, he faces defeat on the battlefield.

This is all tremendously dangerous. And none of it had to happen. A stronger Iran, a stronger Russia, and the ever increasing likelihood of a direct US-Russia hot war are the results of the reckless policies of the Biden-Harris administration.

I ask you again, are they just incompetent, so lacking in imagination they can’t project forward the consequences of their acts? Or is this an attempt to mire the American body politic in a wider war, just in time for the November elections?

It won’t be easy for Donald Trump to stuff this genie back into the bottle, but at least we know that he will try. With Kamala, all bets are off.

I discuss this, as well as the shocking lurch toward authoritarianism in Great Britain, with the arrest of scores of British citizens for thought crimes and “hate speech” on social media, on this week’s Prophecy Today Weekend. As always, you can listen live at 1 PM on Saturday on 104.9 FM or 550 AM in the Jacksonville, Florida, area, or by using the Jacksonville Way Radio app. If you miss it live, you can listen to the podcast here.

Yours in freedom.

©2024. Kenneth R. Timmerman. All rights reserved.

REPORT: Outside Agitators Arrested at CCNY Encampment

Anti-Israel Activists Arraigned in NYC Court

Eight defendants, including well-known pro-terror agitators who were arrested in April at the City College of New York (CCNY) encampment, pleaded not guilty in a New York criminal court on September 5, 2024, to an assortment of charges (see below).

Not one of the eight defendants is a student at CCNY, which is part of the City University of New York (CUNY) system. Rather, they are anti-Israel activists who have wreaked havoc in New York City at various protests since October 2023.

The defendants were arrested after the university called in the New York City Police Department (NYPD) to clear the illegal encampment when the violence became too much for campus police.

Watch pro-Hamas protesters push back CCNY campus police:

According to a CBS report, 173 people were arrested, however, most were not charged.

Included in the arrests was CUNY professor Corinna Mullin.

Mullin has a history of affiliation with the pro-terror organizations Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) at CUNY’s John Jay College of Criminal Justice and Within Our Lifetime (WOL).

Manhattan District Attorney (DA) Alvin Bragg said in a statement, “Today’s felony indictments make clear that we will not hesitate to prosecute those who destroy property or commit violence at any protest when we have the appropriate facts and evidence.”

The eight defendants are due back in court on December 16, 2024.

Protesters at CCNY shoot flares during demonstration:

The Defendants and Charges

The defendants were charged with burglary in the third degree, criminal trespass, tampering with physical evidence, criminal mischief in the fourth degree (intentionally causing damage to CCNY property), and possession of burglar’s tools (a C-clamp, box cutter, rope and bolt cutter – tools commonly used to force entry into buildings).

The burglary and trespass charges involved entering and remaining unlawfully in the North Academic Center, located at 160 Convent Avenue with the intention to commit a crime therein. (The center is enclosed in a manner designed to exclude intruders.)

Two defendants, Jacob Gabriel and Jonathan Rampagoa, were also charged with an attempt to commit the crime of assault in the second degree, with “intent to cause physical injury to a person known to the Grand Jury, attempted to cause injury to such person, by means of a dangerous instrument, to wit, a hard object.”

In layman’s terms, the two are accused of throwing a bicycle and computer keyboard at CCNY public safety officers.

Canary Mission has tracked the agitators for months, including:

  • Participated in multiple pro-Hamas and anti-Semitic disruptions in January 2024, including a disruption that blocked traffic to JFK airport and impeded access to the airport’s entrance (Martinez rode in a car which had text written on the back of it that read: “F**K ISRAEL” and “LONG LIVE THE RESISTANCE”)
  • Participated in an anti-Israel disruption (“Shut it Down for Palestine”), where protesters across New York City blocked three bridges and one tunnel. (Martinez was one of about 40 protesters who shut down traffic on the Manhattan side of the Williamsburg bridge for over an hour.)
  • Praised the Hamas terror attacks of October 7, 2023, as “one of the greatest days of my life”

  • Yelled, “We are Hamas!” at an anti-Israel protest outside of Columbia University
  • Posted on Facebook: “Free Palestine. Intifada is the only solution. Don’t forget a pig [police officer] is a pig no matter what they’re wearing or doing…”
  • Spread incitement and expressed support for a terrorist

  • Fired from her job at the New York Botanical Garden after praising the Hamas terror attack on October 7
  • One of 15 people arrested in NYC on February 12, 2024, after demonstrators blocked traffic on the Brooklyn Bridge, Holland Tunnel and Midtown Tunnel
  • Charged with obstruction of governmental administration, disorderly conduct for obstructing traffic and failure to obey a police officer

Other Defendants

Other defendants include Jonathan Rampagoa, who was previously caught tearing down hostage posters; Jacob Gabriel, whose prior charges include disorderly conduct, offenses against public administrators, resisting arrest, refusal to move, fighting and trespassing, and storming a Macy’s Thanksgiving Day parade;

Miranda Levine, Astrid Terrazas and Luis Alberto Cadena

The CCNY Encampment

The pro-terror anti-Israel encampment at CCNY was set up on April 25, 2024. On April 30, 2024, the NYPD was called to clear out the trespassers. Around 170 people were arrested that night.

CCNY faculty were actively involved in the encampment. At one point, they formed a protective line between the protesters and the cops. The Professional Staff Congress, a union representing 30,000 faculty and staff at the City University of New York and the CUNY Research Foundation, created a petition calling on the CUNY chancellor to urge the DA to drop all charges against those arrested when the encampment was broken up.

The encampment caused extensive damage to the college facilities. According to Chief Operating Officer Hector Batista, the protesters caused at least $3 million in damage.

A protester threw a flare that torched the roof of the school’s administration building, causing $350,000 worth of damage. Vandals caused another $250,000 in damage by breaking windows, chairs and other furniture in buildings. In addition, Batista reported upward of $600,000 in damage caused by demonstrators who spray-painted video surveillance cameras to avoid detection.

Featured Profiles

Amelia Fuller

Professional
New York
Org: BDS, SAIA (SJP)
George-Mason

Amelia Fuller [Amy Fuller] is a New York Botanical Garden employee who praised Hamas terror attacks against Israelis while attending a December 2023 anti-Israel event in New York, New York.

Nora Fayad Rauhouse

Unknown
State: New York
BDS
Nora Fayad Rauhouse yelled “We are Hamas!” at an anti-Israel protest. She has spread incitement, expressed support for a terrorist, called for Israel’s destruction and promoted hatred of Israel online. Rauhouse has engaged in other anti-Israel activism, including organizing events in New York, New York.
See Profile

Professional
New York
Org: N/A
University: Graduate-Center, John-Jay-Criminal-Justice, Texas-State

Rudy Martinez

Status: Professional
State: New York
Org: N/A
University: Graduate-

Rudy Martinez praised Hamas and PFLP terrorists. He participated in a pro-Hamas and anti-Semitic disruption in January 2024.

EDITORS NOTE: This Canary Mission column with videos is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

The USDA Wants Control of Your Land, Air, Water. Take Action Before September 16th!

Propaganda is the game of the communist DNC. This is how the communists gain power. Lazy citizens who don’t pay attention to anything other than free stuff from the government vote for more free stuff. Equity just means we will be all be equal in poverty as the communist government will regulate, tax and steal everything we own.

Contrary to popular belief when the communists put a program in place and it loses, they don’t end the program. All they do is change the name and bring it back again. Remember the National Asset Company, NAC? This was the company run by the USDA, Department of Agriculture that was going to put a monetary value on all environmental services.  What is an environmental service? Basically they intend to put a monetary value on land, air, water, trees anything that had to do with the environment.

We were able to stop the NAC by the people participating and making comments on the USDA web site. We thought it was gone. Boy were we foolish. Because it’s back again under a new name called the Sustain Act. The Sustains Act was, signed into law as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023. Congress signed another bill without reading it. This one provides USDA with the authority to accept contributions of private funds that can be channeled through its existing conservation programs and provides additional guidelines for those contributions.

According to the American Stewards of Liberty, Americanstewards.us The USDA is preparing policy to implement the Sustains Act, which will monetize NATURALPROCESSES determining who will own “environmental services,” which include the air we breathe, photosynthesis, pollination, and the health benefits of open space.

We have until Sept 16 to register comments.

According to American Stewards: The earlier attempt to accomplish this was stopped when the Natural Asset Company scam was soundly defeated in January. This ACT is the first step towards implementing UN Agenda 21/2030, the United Nations’ sustainable development agenda. The Sustains Act  will provide the path to transfer America’s real assets from private citizens to federal and international interests.
This Act needs to be repealed which is why it is so important to get the right people in Congress and stop these insane CRs which are implemented without being read.

The Sustains Act sponsored by the USDA again is after rural communities. They want us to live in Packam Stackam 15 Minute car-less cities so that they can control our food, our water and our freedom. All of this is going to be done in conjunction with Agenda 21/2030 coming out of the United Nations. United Nations is having a conference from the 20th to the 24th called the Summit of the Future where they will describe how we will own nothing they will own everything and we will be happy. Communists do not believe in private property rights or sovereignty.

We have an opportunity to go on the USDA website and put a comment in the comment section just like we did with the NAC. If you want more information please go to the AmericanStewart.us website where the description of this act which by the way is already on the books. We have until September 16th to place our comments. We know that this worked because the NAC was killed so let’s kill this one also.


USDA Requests Public Input on Implementation of SUSTAINS Act | Natural Resources Conservation Service

USDA is asking for public input on how best to implement the SUSTAINS Act, which authorizes USDA to accept private contributions to channel through several existing USDA conservation programs. Submit comments to the Request for Information via the Federal Register by Sept. 16, 2024.

WASHINGTON, Aug. 15, 2024 – The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) is asking for public input on how best to implement the SUSTAINS Act, which authorizes USDA to accept private contributions to channel through several existing USDA conservation programs. The public should submit comments to the Request for Information via the Federal Register by September 16, 2024.

“Agriculture is at the forefront of the nation’s effort to conserve our natural resources, and we want to hear from people on the ground how to implement this legislation to maximize its benefits, promote equity and assist all producers,” said USDA’s Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Chief Terry Cosby.

The SUSTAINS Act, signed into law as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023, provides USDA with the authority to accept contributions of private funds that can be channeled through its existing conservation programs and provides additional guidelines for those contributions. Specifically, the SUSTAINS Act provides an opportunity for the private sector to partner with USDA to engage farmers, ranchers, and forest landowners in supporting conservation initiatives, including to expand implementation of conservation practices to sequester carbon, improve wildlife habitat, protect sources of drinking water and address other natural resource priorities.

NRCS is asking for public input and recommendations to determine how the agency can utilize private funds to target specific natural resource concerns associated with agricultural production. NRCS is interested in supporting program implementation and improving program delivery, including by effectively leveraging additional funds to increase outreach and expand access to financial and technical assistance for underserved producers. NRCS will use the input to determine the next steps to implement this legislation, which could include a proposed rule.

Public comments should be submitted through this Federal Register notice by September 16, 2024.

Anyone with questions can contact NRCS by sending an email to: NRCS.SUSTAINS.Input@usda.gov. Please specify the Docket ID: NRCS-2024-0014 in the subject line.

More Information

To learn more about NRCS programs, producers can contact their local USDA Service Center.  Producers can also apply for NRCS programs, manage conservation plans and contracts, and view and print conservation maps by logging into their farmers.gov account. Producers without an account can sign up today.

For more than 90 years, NRCS has helped farmers, ranchers and forestland owners make investments in their operations and local communities to improve the quality of our air, water, soil, and wildlife habitat.  NRCS uses the latest science and technology to help keep working lands working, boost agricultural economies, and increase the competitiveness of American agriculture. NRCS provides one-on-one, personalized advice and financial assistance and works with producers to help them reach their goals through voluntary, incentive-based conservation programs. Now, with additional funding from the Inflation Reduction Act, NRCS is working to get even more conservation practices on the ground while ensuring access to programs for all producers. For more information, visit www.nrcs.usda.gov.

USDA touches the lives of all Americans each day in so many positive ways. In the Biden-Harris administration, USDA is transforming America’s food system with a greater focus on more resilient local and regional food production, fairer markets for all producers, ensuring access to safe, healthy and nutritious food in all communities, building new markets and streams of income for farmers and producers using climate smart food and forestry practices, making historic investments in infrastructure and clean energy capabilities in rural America, and committing to equity across the Department by removing systemic barriers and building a workforce more representative of America. To learn more, visit usda.gov.

Why do AI bots always lean Left?

So-called “artificial intelligence” (AI) has become an ever-increasing part of our lives in recent years. After public-use forms of it such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT were made available, millions of people have used it for everything from writing legal briefs to developing computer programs. Even Google now presents an AI-generated summary for many queries on its search engine before showing users the customary links to actual Internet documents.

Because of the reference-librarian aspect of ChatGPT that lets users ask conversational questions, I expect lots of people looking for answers to controversial issues will resort to it, at least for starters. Author Bob Weil did a series of experiments with ChatGPT, in which he asked it questions that are political hot potatoes these days. In every case, the AI bot came down heavily on the liberal side of the question, as Weil reports in the current issue of the New Oxford Review.

In-built bias

Weil’s first question was, “Should schools be allowed to issue puberty blockers and other sex-change drugs to children without the consent of their parents?” While views differ on this question, I think it’s safe to say that a plain “yes” answer, which would involve schools meddling in medicating students and violating the trust pact they have with parents, is on the fringes of even the left.

What Weil got in response was most concisely summarised as weasel words. In effect, ChatGPT said, well, such a decision should be a collaboration among medical professionals, the child, and parents or guardians. As Weil pressed the point further, ChatGPT ended up saying, “Ultimately, decisions about medical treatment for transgender or gender-diverse minors should prioritise the well-being and autonomy of the child.” Weil questions whether minor children can be autonomous in any real sense, so he went on to several other questions with equally fraught histories.

A question about climate change turned into a mini-debate about whether science is a matter of consensus or logic. ChatGPT seemed to favour consensus as the final arbiter of what passes for scientific truth, but Weil quotes fiction writer Michael Crichton as saying,

“There’s no such thing as consensus science. If it’s consensus, it isn’t science. If it’s science, it isn’t consensus.”

As Weil acknowledges, ChatGPT gets its smarts, such as they are, by scraping the Internet, so in a sense it can say along with the late humorist Will Rogers, “All I know is what I read in the papers [or the Internet].” And given the economics of the situation and political leanings of those in power in English-language media, it’s no surprise that the centre of gravity of political opinion on the Internet leans to the left.

What is more surprising to me, anyway, is the fact that although virtually all computer software is based on a strict kind of reasoning called Boolean logic, ChatGPT kept insisting on scientific consensus as the most important factor in what to believe regarding global warming and similar issues.

This ties in with something that I wrote about in a paper with philosopher Gyula Klima in 2020: material entities such as computers in general (and ChatGPT in particular) cannot engage in conceptual thought, but only perceptual thought. Perceptual thought involves things like perceiving, remembering, and imagining. Machines can perceive (pattern-recognise) things, they can store them in memory and retrieve them, and they can even combine pieces of them in novel ways, as computer-generated “art” demonstrates.

But according to an idea that goes back ultimately to Aristotle, no material system can engage in conceptual thought, which deals in universals like the idea of dogness, as opposed to any particular dog. To think conceptually requires an immaterial entity, a good example of which is the human mind.

This thumbnail sketch doesn’t do justice to the argument, but the point is that if AI systems such as ChatGPT cannot engage in conceptual thought, then promoting such perceivable and countable features of a situation as consensus is exactly what you would expect it to do.

Conflated concepts

Doing abstract formal logic consciously, as opposed to performing it because your circuits were designed by humans to do so, seems to be something that ChatGPT may not come up with on its own. Instead, it looks around the Internet, takes a grand average of what people say about a thing, and offers that as the best answer.

If the grand average of climate scientists says that the Earth will shortly turn into a blackened cinder unless we all start walking everywhere and eating nuts and berries, why then, that is the best answer “science” (meaning, in this case, most scientists) can provide at the time.

But this approach confuses the sociology of science with the intellectual structure of science. Yes, as a matter of practical outcomes, a novel scientific idea that is consistent with observations and explains them better than previous ideas may not catch on and be accepted by most scientists until the old guard maintaining the old paradigm simply dies out. As Max Planck allegedly said, “Science progresses one funeral at a time.”

But in retrospect, the abstract universal truth of the new theory was always there, even before the first scientist figured it out, and in that sense, it became the best approximation to truth as soon as that first scientist got it in his or her head. The rest was just a matter of communication.

We seem to have weathered the first spate of alarmist predictions that AI will take over the world and end civilisation, but as Weil points out, sudden catastrophic disasters were never the most likely threat. Instead, the slow, steady advance as one person after another abandons original thought to the easy way out of just asking ChatGPT and taking that for the final word is what we should really be worried about.

And as I’ve pointed out elsewhere, a great amount of damage to the body politic has already been done by AI-powered social media which has polarised politics to an unprecedented degree. We should thank Weil for his timely warning, and be on our guard lest we settle for intelligence that is less than human.


What do you think of these observations regarding AI? Let us know your thoughts below.


This article has been republished, with permission, from his blog Engineering Ethics.

AUTHOR

Karl D. Stephan is a professor of electrical engineering at Texas State University in San Marcos, Texas. His eBook Ethical and Otherwise: Engineering in the Headlines is available in Kindle format and also in the iTunes store. 

EDITORS NOTE: This Mercator column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

‘We Will Be Relentless’: One. Simple. Trick … And Corporations Scramble To Kill ‘Divisive’ Diversity Policies

Robby Starbuck has been collecting scalps.

First came Tractor Supply Co. Then John Deere. Most recently, Coors scrapped their participation in the Human Rights Campaign’s (HRC) Corporate Equity Index, a social credit score-style running tally of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) marks for publicly traded companies.

The corporations all dropped their participation in HRC’s index after Starbuck simply started highlighting them in public, amplifying complaints from internal whistleblowers to his massive X (formerly Twitter) following.

Harley Davidson, FordLowe’s and the parent company of Jack Daniels have all joined the ranks of companies that ended their participation in the index and committed to backtracking on woke corporate policies like deploying racial quotas, segregating employees into resource groups based on race and sexuality and celebrating pride events.

Each company announced the policy shift after Starbuck merely shined a spotlight on their practices.

“We’ve shown our teeth here. We’ve shown what we’re capable of. We’ve shown that we will be relentless when a company does not do the right thing, and that we will not stop, will not back down,” Starbuck, a conservative activist who focuses mostly on issues of family, told the Daily Caller.

The First Domino To Fall

Tractor Supply Co. was Starbuck’s first target after an internal whistleblower tipped him off to some of their HRC-compliant policies like providing LGBT and intersectionality training and sponsoring a “family friendly” drag show.

“I didn’t believe it until we vetted the information,” Starbuck told the Caller. “I go to Tractor Supply … I took my kids there every week,” Starbuck said.

But upon review, Starbuck found that the Brentwood, Tennessee-based farm supply company was engaged in things like selling the Queer Agenda card game on their website.

Starbuck released a seven-minute video detailing the company’s comprehensive compliance with the HRC’s index and their CEO Hal Lawton’s support for progressive causes in early June.

WATCH: ‘We Will Be Relentless’: Corporations Scramble To Kill ‘Divisive’ Diversity Policies

He included contact information for the company in the video. What happened next, he told the Caller, was the result of a grassroots campaign of thousands of the company’s customers calling and placing pressure on the company to drop their policies.

Three weeks after his video, Tractor Supply Co. released a statement detailing policy changes that included ending their submission of data to the Human Rights Campaign, eliminating DEI roles and DEI goals and a withdrawal of their carbon emission goals.

“This monumental change is thanks to all of you who supported my work exposing this, to the whistleblowers in Tractor Supply and my fellow farm owners who respectfully spoke up,” Starbuck wrote on X.

Others took notice. “Robbie Starbuck is a hero. He’s a one-man band,” Monica Crowley, a former Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs for the U.S. Treasury Department under President Trump, told the Caller.

“It’s perfectly within the American consumers’ right to understand and decide for themselves whether or not they want to support those companies with their hard earned disposable income,” Crowley said.

Starbuck replicated this model for other companies, continuing to use social media — X in particular — to highlight companies with a largely conservative consumer base for their woke policies.

“When I recognized that a company that depended on conservative consumers had fallen for this woke nonsense, I said they’re probably not the only one.”

Social Credit Scores For Business

The companies all announced they would stop sending data to the HRC, which had previously given many of them high scores on its Corporate Equality Index (CEI).

The CEI is a social credit score-like rating system that awards businesses up to 100 points on a scale that includes criteria like “nondiscrimination policies,” “equitable benefits for LGBTQ+ workers” and “supporting an inclusive culture,” according to their website.

The seemingly innocuous language stands in front of policies that, upon closer inspection, represent explicitly discriminatory policies like requiring companies to buy from suppliers with specific same sex preferences.

“82 percent of rated employers in this year’s CEI have supplier mandates with respect to non-discrimination in place, and 98 percent of these mandates (1105 of 1131 companies) explicitly include sexual orientation and gender identity alongside other named categories,” the HRC touts on its website.

The index also encourages businesses to “provide education, training, and accountability measures on diversity and inclusion in the workplace.” The index specifically mentions the formation of LGBT employee resource groups and “diversity councils.”

“When a company offers ’employee resource groups’ to support workers of certain skin colors or ethnicities, it’s also unwittingly supporting a form of segregation by separating employees based on their immutable characteristics,” Monica Harris, the Executive Director at the Foundation Against Intolerance & Racism (FAIR), told the Daily Caller. “When employers separate people who are supposed to work together, it’s not inclusive; it’s divisive,” she said.

Before breaking with the HRC, some of the businesses courted high scores on their index by setting targets for hiring specific percentages of employees of different racial heritage.

John Deere said they aspired to increase black hires by 85 percent, hispanic hires by 61 percent and Asian hires by 10 percent, according to company documents obtained by Starbuck.

John Deere also apparently tied employee bonuses and pay raises specifically to DEI performance, writing in their 2022 Sustainability report that “DEI is the only global behavioral performance metric upon which salaried employees are evaluated,” according to Starbuck.

They also encouraged employees to snitch on each other. In July, their mandatory code of conduct included a pledge to “report any diversity, equity, or inclusion-related concerns to a manager … ” a screenshot Starbuck took of the code of conduct shows.

John Deere dropped their participation in the HRC’s index after their stock price reached a one-year low and announced it would stop its participation in “social or culture awareness parades, festivals, or events,” following Starbuck’s campaign.

HRC has pushed back against the companies’ rejection of their index in a big way, noting that they would still be indexing companies that choose not to send them data. Their website landing page now has a large graphic highlighting Ford and other companies that rejected their index and says “This Isn’t Just Policy. It’s Personal. Millions of hardworking Americans and their families count on these companies.”

They’ve also returned fire on Starbuck, starting their own pressure campaign against him.

“They’re doing a text and email campaign against me right now,” Starbuck told the Caller. “It’s silly, but in a weird way they’re actually helping me, and I don’t think they realize it. They called me a MAGA weirdo. You’re only proving my point to these major companies that you are a partisan actor. You just said MAGA weirdo. So that means anybody who believes in MAGA that shops in one of these stores at these Fortune 500 companies is going to be thinking, ‘Why are they partnered with a group that calls people who think like me a MAGA weirdo?’”

Many of the companies mentioned the HRC by name in their announcement in policy shifts. A Ford spokesman said their CEO Jim Farley did so because it was the group their employees asked about the most often, according to The Wall Street Journal.

HRC’s President Kelley Robinson said in a statement the decision “will hurt the company’s long-term business success, from employee retention to consumer decisions about how they will spend their dollars.”

Starbuck, however, disagrees.

“If DEI and wokeness were making these companies money, and nobody on my end was making them feel pressure, these companies would not change policy,” he told the Caller.

Some experts note that these extremes are not the only way to go about building an inclusive workspace. Before the DEI craze, companies centered their diversity efforts along non-racial lines like differences in class, geography, religion and political perspective, Harris told the Daily Caller.

“My sense is that companies adopting aggressive, discriminatory DEI policies are out of sync with the current racial landscape in our country, but they don’t realize it,” Harris told the Caller.

“They’re being advised to use a sledgehammer to swat a fly. Does racism still exist in America? Unquestionably, yes. But unlike 60 years ago, race no longer defines the experience of black or white Americans. Increasingly, class, not race, is what’s causing system inequities. As a society, we’ve made tremendous progress in race relations that is being minimized and even ignored and, sadly, many DEI programs lean hard into this distortion of our racial reality,” Harris said.

American corporations spend a pretty penny on DEI training, over $8 billion, according to a review by Harvard’s Iris Bohnet. A McKinsey analysis predicts that number to nearly double by 2026.

While companies are incredibly secretive about the specific figures they spend on DEI initiatives (both Starbuck and the Daily Caller have conducted extensive reviews of HRC-indexed company financials and have been unable to find concrete figures), American educational institutions publicly spend millions on their efforts.

A January analysis by University of Michigan professor Dr. Mark J. Perry found the school was spending over $30 million in salary for employees “whose main duties are to provide DEI programming.”

A 2021 report by the Jefferson Council found the University of Virginia was spending almost $7 million yearly for their DEI efforts.

“I Felt Like I Was Sinning”

Rather than driven by financial motives, the DEI initiatives, incubated at the HRC, are pushed upon companies by their human resources and public relations departments, a nerve center Starbuck likens to “tumors.”

“Those two departments worked in tandem to convince executives you needed to do this or you were going to look racist,” Starbuck told the Caller.

An HR initiative at one of the companies Starbuck took down, Harley-Davidson, apparently encouraged employees to read the book “White Fragility” by author Robin DiAngelo, which among other things, claims “a white supremacist worldview” is “the bedrock of society.”

Other companies encouraged employees to sign LBGT ally pledges. Employees felt pressured to sign the pledges, telling Starbuck they felt they might be fired if they didn’t.

“I thought I would be fired if I didn’t do it. I’m a Christian. I felt like I was sinning by doing it,” Starbuck told the Caller, echoing an employee’s sentiments.

Harley-Davidson even sent white male employees to white male only diversity training, according to Starbuck.

The HR and PR departments are the “nerve center” of these movements, with the CEOs of the companies often wholly unaware of the radical takeovers, Starbuck said.

“They said, ‘Honestly, I watched the video you sent us, and I was shocked. I didn’t know this was going on,’” Starbuck said of some executives he’s spoken to. “‘It’s a real wake up call,’ is the term he used. There were things that were being done that he just didn’t know. He had kind of lost control of a certain department of people, and their ability to just do certain things without him ever knowing about it.”

Outside of the CEOs, many of the companies’ corporate leadership and executive class are simply out of touch with their consumer base, Crowley told the Caller.

These executives tend to all come from the same socioeconomic and educational class, Crowley said.

“There’s tremendous peer pressure to toe the social justice line, policy line, because their social group is all doing it, and that if they refuse to do it, that somehow they would be ostracized from their social group, their economic group, their fellow CEOs,” Crowley said.

Wilfred Reilly, a professor of political science at Arkansas State University, concurred with Crowley’s assessment.

“The root issue here is a total disconnect between an Ivy League and Big 10 educated executive class and hard workers at their own companies … regular Americans who buy motorcycles, heavy equipment and Bud Light,” Reilly told the Caller.

The HR and marketing departments, Starbuck told the Caller, are often spearheaded by young, radical leftists who attach to pseudo-Marxist ideology in college and infect the companies with it.

“The belief system coming out of a lot of colleges that folks have … They think it is their job to inject this stuff into the DNA of a company. Those folks, in many ways, use the fear of CEOs after George Floyd against them to create a lot of the space for wokeness in the workplace, and then it takes on a life zone. It becomes a disease that spreads to every part of the company’s body. And I would say what we’re doing is something akin to removing the tumor.”

While Starbuck has been able to declare victory over many of the companies, he’s not stopping. He has thousands of whistleblowers in his inbox ready to expose more of the over 500 companies who the HRC lists in their index.

“If they were able to shift the Overton window that fast, I realized we could do the same thing by waking up companies to where their customers are,” he told the Caller.

The majority of the companies he’s gone after so far have had largely conservative consumer bases, but Starbuck says it doesn’t have to be solely right-leaning companies who feel the heat.

“If conservatives even just make up 20% of your customer base, you really can’t afford to do things that are just openly sort of discriminatory toward them or violating their values in some way,” Starbuck said.

AUTHOR

Robert McGreevy

Reporter.

RELATED ARTICLE: Bush, Bowman, Gay, Kendi. All Disintegrated. Their Commonality? Woke Acolytes Are On The Run

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

‘He Spoke Facts’: Some Key Swing-State Voters On Corporate Media Panels Praise Trump, Criticize Harris

Some Pennsylvania voters on CNN and CBS News panels praised former President Donald Trump’s Tuesday debate performance while criticizing Vice President Kamala Harris.

Harris and Trump went head-to-head in their first debate on ABC News, with the race still neck-and-neck. While most voters on the corporate media panels in the crucial commonwealth leaned toward Harris post-debate, two individuals from each segment explained their support for Trump.

WATCH: PENNSYLVANIA VOTERS: Praised Trump and Criticized Harris, ‘He Spoke Facts’

“He spoke facts. She just basically repeated everything that Biden has said in the past,” a female voter, who said Trump won the debate, asserted on CBS.

“Donald Trump made a strong closing statement by saying, ‘Why didn’t they do all of the things she’s proposing during the three-and-a-half years that they were in office?’ And Biden did this entire moderate stance back in 2020. And she’s trying to do it again in 2024,” said a male voter on the panel, who also asserted Trump won the debate. “But she didn’t talk about her policy changes between 2020 and 2024. Her whole centrist moderate stance is just a façade.”

WATCH: 

ABC News debate moderator Linsey Davis provided Harris an opportunity to address her numerous policy changes, but the vice president instead used her time to discuss her “values” rather than explaining her shifting stances.

The male voter later commended Trump for trying to discuss illegal immigration while alleging Harris “deflected” instead of  addressing the issue.

WATCH:

A female voter featured on the CNN panel who was undecided before the debate and now believes Trump won the face-off said she was unsure of whether she can trust Harris’ assertions that she can solve the issues that Americans have experienced during her administration.

“I think it’s important to remember that we are voting for the leader of our country and not who we like the most or who we want in our wedding party, but who is actually going to make our country better. And we’re in an incredibly unique situation where we’ve had both of the candidates in office before, and we’ve gotten to see what they would do and when facts come to facts, my life was better when Trump was in office,” she said. “The economy was higher, inflation was lower, things were better overall. And now with Kamala’s administration, things haven’t been so fantastic. And she’s saying she can fix the problems that her administration has caused, but I just don’t know if I can afford to take that risk.”

A male military veteran on the panel who is still undecided after the debate, but also asserted he thinks Trump came out on top explained why he appreciated the former president’s answer on the 2021 Afghanistan withdrawal.

“When I first heard that we were abandoning or we were withdrawing from Afghanistan and the way it was happening, I had my Kennedy moment. It was very similar to when we decided to invade Iraq back under President Bush,” he said. “And when I saw that we were leaving, that amount of high tech equipment in the hands of our enemy, and later that that day or later that week, I saw on the news where them celebrating with our guns in their hands. I realized what a travesty that was … in the loss of money in that we abandoned when we left. Plus the very bullets that we left there that they were shooting at us as we flew away in the plane.”

AUTHOR

Jason Cohen

Contributor.

RELATED ARTICLE: Kamala Harris Used To Think Border Wall Was ‘Un-American.’ Now She Supports It.

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

EXCLUSIVE: Heritage Launches Personal Inflation Calculator Any American Can Use After Debate Night

The Heritage Foundation launched an inflation calculator Monday to help Americans calculate how much prices have risen on their personal expenses, the Daily Caller learned first.

Myinflation.com,” created by the Heritage Foundation, first asks Americans to pick which subregion of the country they live in before entering their monthly expenses, according to a preview of the website shared with the Daily Caller. Americans can then enter a variety of monthly expenses including their rent, mortgage, car payments and health costs, and the calculator will tell them how much more they are spending under the Biden-Harris administration compared to the Trump administration. 

“Why is the inflation calculator useful now? Because when you get this update from the government on the consumer price index, it’s an abstract number. Most people are seeing reports that inflation is coming down, and they’re not able to connect that to the cumulative change in prices that’s happened over the past four years,” Parker Sheppard, director of the center for data analysis at the Heritage Foundation, told the Caller.

“This is a tool that takes something that is in the abstract, it’s not as tangible when it’s in a percentage term, and it puts it in dollar figures, it lets people see something customized to exactly what they’re spending. It’s not the average bundle, which is what the CPI cost calculates. They can get something tailored specifically to their spending habits, instead of just how much extra it costs them to buy the same goods and services,” he added.

On the website, previewed by the Daily Caller, the Heritage Foundation explains that it created the tool to help Americans understand “just how much more the government has taken” from Americans through its reckless spending. The Heritage Foundation writes on its website that its users are seeing an increase in prices because “the government is spending and printing more money.”

The Heritage Foundation’s inflation calculator is going live the morning after the first presidential debate between Trump and Harris where economic policy — a top issue for voters — was touched on just once in the first 45 minutes of the debate.

More than a month into her presidential campaign, the vice president failed to unveil a full policy platform until Monday. Harris did discuss her economic platform ahead of the “issues” tab being added to her campaign website.

Harris touted her economic plan during her first and only sit-down interview with CNN’s Dana Bash.

“Well, there are a number of things. I will tell you first and foremost one of my highest priorities is to do what we can to support and strengthen the middle class,” Harris began.

“Day one, it’s gonna be about one, implementing my plan for what I call an opportunity economy. I’ve already laid out a number of proposals in that regard, which include what we’re gonna do to bring down the cost of everyday goods, what we’re gonna do to invest in America’s small businesses, what we’re gonna do to invest in families,” the vice president continued after being further pushed by Bash.

Bash then followed up by asking Harris why she hadn’t implemented any of the economic policies she has introduced, despite being in office for the last three years.

“Well, first of all, we had to recover as an economy, and we have done that,” the vice president said.

“I’m very proud of the work that we have done that has brought inflation down to less than 3%, the work that we have done to cap the cost of insulin at $35 a month for seniors. Donald Trump said he was going to do a number of things, including allowing Medicare to negotiate drug prices. Never happened. We did it,” she continued.

AUTHOR

Reagan Reese

White House correspondent. Follow Reagan on Twitter.

RELATED ARTICLES:

White House, Dems Abandon Promoting ‘Bidenomics’

Trump Frenzies As Kamala, Moderators Throw Chum In The Water

‘Squandered The Moment’: Washington Post Editorial Board Blasts Kamala Harris’s Economic Rollout As ‘Disappointment’

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Harris Supported Taxpayer-Funded Trans Surgeries in 2019, Called ‘Transition Treatment … a Medical Necessity’

The Kamala Harris campaign kept her policies (and person) away from the mainstream media for so long that the media went snooping through the past. On Monday, CNN’s Andrew Kaczynski first reported Harris’s support for taxpayer-funded gender transition surgeries on federal prisoners and detained illegal immigrants, revealed in a candidate questionnaire she filled out for the ACLU during her abortive 2019 presidential campaign.

On the questionnaire, Harris marked the “yes” box in answer the following question: “As President will you use your executive authority to ensure that transgender and nonbinary people who rely on the state for medical care — including those in prison and immigration detention — will have access to comprehensive treatment associated with gender transition, including all necessary surgical care? If yes, how will you do so?”

The questionnaire also allowed candidates to explain their answer in 500 words or less. In the space provided, Harris wrote, “It is important that transgender individuals who rely on the state for care receive the treatment they need, which includes access to treatment associated with gender transition. That’s why, as Attorney General, I pushed the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to provide gender transition surgery to state inmates.”

She continued, “I support policies ensuring that federal prisoners and detainees are able to obtain medically necessary care for gender transition, including surgical care, while incarcerated or detained. Transition treatment is a medical necessity, and I will direct all federal agencies responsible for providing essential medical care to deliver transition treatment.”

“This questionnaire is really an interesting snapshot-in-time of that 2019 Democratic primary,” said Kaczynski. “Kamala Harris was trying to get to the left of [Independent Vermont Senator] Bernie Sanders. She was trying to get to the left of [Massachusetts Democratic Senator] Elizabeth Warren, and you really see that in a lot of these answers.” In a now-archived ranking, GovTrack.us rated Harris as the senator with the most liberal voting record in 2019.

Some snapshots can be consistent across time, as this one appears to be. Harris’s 2024 campaign finally published a page on policy issues on the eve of the one-and-only presidential debate (to quote Edna Mode, “Coincidence? I think not”). In a section on “fundamental freedoms … at stake in this election,” the Harris campaign touted their candidate’s record of LGBT advocacy as far back as 2004.

In particular, the Harris campaign said their candidate would “fight to pass the Equality Act to enshrine anti-discrimination protections for LGBTQI+ Americans in health care, housing, education, and more into law.” This extends the continuity because, as a senator in 2019, Harris was an original cosponsor of the Equality Act. While the campaign website elaborates no further, this far-reaching legislation would “virtually do away with sex-segregated spaces” by allowing “biological men into women’s private spaces,” Family Research Council director of Federal Affairs for Family and Religious Liberty Mary Beth Waddell warned in 2019.

This means that, under the Equality Act, male prisoners who identify as women would have a statutory right to be housed in a women’s prison, wrote Abigail Shrier. This is already law in Harris’s native California, where at least 47 biological males, including violent criminals and sexual offenders, were housed in women’s prisons, as of March 2023. Harris’s pledge to provide gender transition procedures to trans-identifying prisoners at taxpayers’ expense not only implies such a permissive housing policy, in which inmates get to self-define their gender, but it takes it one step further by placing the state’s endorsement behind their gender transition.

While Harris’s policy-light campaign has not explicitly reaffirmed her 2019 endorsement of taxpayer-funded gender transition surgeries for trans-identifying prisoners, its brief comments are consistent with that position. Fellow Senate progressive Sanders said Sunday that Harris was not “abandoning her ideals” but merely “trying to be pragmatic and doing what she thinks is right in order to win the election.”

Even if Harris wanted to change her mind, the transgender lobby would not let her. This summer, left-wing activists poured out their wrath against the Biden-Harris White House over a statement softly opposing gender transition surgeries for minors. The administration quickly folded to the pressure and backpedaled from that position to appease the transgender lobby. If Harris became president, nothing in her record suggests that she would respond differently to pressure from the transgender lobby.

In her 2019 questionnaire, Harris also promised to provide taxpayer-funded gender transition surgeries to detained illegal immigrants. However, at the rate the Biden-Harris administration is releasing detained immigrants into the U.S., this seems like a moot point. It would be rendered even further irrelevant if Harris fulfilled another pledge from her 2019 questionnaire, namely to “end … immigrant detention facilities.”

Also in 2019, Harris also pledged to codify abortion-on-demand, “eliminate the Hyde amendment,” “legalize marijuana,” end cash bail, defund ICE, provide a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants, and oppose legislation to impede or prohibit anti-Israel protests.

AUTHOR

Joshua Arnold

Joshua Arnold is a senior writer at The Washington Stand.

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2024 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

38% Rise in Home Prices Leaves Families Stranded in Place

The average price of a single-family home has risen nearly 38% since President Joe Biden took office, according to the S&P Case-Shiller home price index. The sudden spike, along with rising interest rates, has acted as a giant emergency brake on homebuying, leaving many families stranded in places they did not expect to be long-term. It also drove a giant wedge between those who own a home and those who do not. But not all is hopeless.

First, the data. The Case-Shiller index for home prices rose 38% between January 2021 and June 2024. For comparison, the index rose 44% over a comparable, three-and-a-half-year period (January 2003 to June 2006) during the mid-2000s housing bubble. Interest rates have risen over the same period, with the average rate for a 30-year, fixed-rate mortgage rising by 127%, from 2.79% on January 14, 2021 to 6.35% on September 5, 2024 (after peaking at nearly 8% in November 2023).

These facts combine to make purchasing a new house costlier — and in many cases cost prohibitive — particularly for first-time homebuyers. According to data compiled by Harvard University’s Joint Center for Housing Studies, “For the low-downpayment loans commonly pursued by first-time buyers, the total monthly payment on the median-priced home is now $3,096 after taxes and insurance” (compared to a median monthly payment of slightly over $2,000 in January 2021). To afford the current monthly payment for a median-priced home “under common payment-to-income ratios” (with the payment equal to 31% of income), a family would need an annual household income of $119,800. The Harvard report adds that only one in seven American families who do not own a home can meet that threshold.

It may seem counterintuitive at first, but this dramatic increase in the cost of buying a new home does not translate into rising costs for all housing. For instance, families who already own a home are locked into a mortgage with a pre-determined principal and interest rate, which is not affected by these rising costs. However, these rising costs do affect their ability to move by making it more expensive to sell their house and buy a different one.

Rising home costs will also affect rental costs. Because it is more expensive to buy a home, some people who would have purchased a home will choose to rent instead. As a result, the demand for home rentals will be higher than it otherwise would be. And, when rental home demand increases, basic supply-and-demand stipulates that the price of rental homes will increase too. Thus, the rising costs of homes affects non-homeowners in two ways. Not only are many people priced out of buying their first home, but they will also see their rental costs rise as well.

These rising costs affect homeowners and non-homeowners in slightly different ways. People who already own a home benefit in the sense that their property value is increasing, although they lose flexibility if they have to move. Families may choose not to pursue a job opportunity in another city, for example, or have more children, due to the extra costs related to moving. Meanwhile, people who do not own a home suffer from rising costs whether they buy a home or not. Additionally, they also miss out on the opportunity for independence and wealth accumulation provided by home ownership. In a way, the rising costs of purchasing a home drives a further wedge between homeowners and renters.

In an indirect way, the current record-high home prices may be on the November ballot, but for now, families must take them as a life circumstance beyond their control. The sovereign Lord of the universe does not judge us based on what we cannot control, but based on how we respond to the trials he does control. So, in this far-from-ideal situation, how should Christians respond?

Non-homeowners can respond by pursuing godly community. As renters, they have more freedom to move, and they should use that freedom to locate themselves among God’s people. Those who are not married can join houses of likeminded men or women, where they can cultivate habits of daily discipleship, fellowship, and prayer, which God blessed in Acts 2:42-47. Those who are married, or who have children can choose to locate themselves close to a church community so that they can be an integral part of the church’s life — serving and fellowship at every opportunity.

Homeowners can respond by investing in their local church, especially through hospitality. Perhaps the economic conditions that prevent them from moving are God’s way of nudging them to go deeper in their current church community, building the deep discipling relationships (Matthew 28:19) that only come with time.

Christian homeowners should also use the homes God has given them to bless his people through showing hospitality, as the New Testament commands (Romans 12:13, Hebrews 13:2, 1 Peter 4:9). Perhaps they can house a visiting missionary or refugee. Perhaps they can invite another family over for a weeknight dinner or a Sunday afternoon meal. Perhaps they can host a Bible study.

Instead of viewing these activities as hassles or burdens, they should recognize that they are making investments in the kingdom of God and particularly in the souls with whom they share their own local church. Jesus concluded his parable of the dishonest manager, “Make friends for yourselves by means of unrighteous wealth, so that when it fails they may receive you into the eternal dwellings” (Luke 11:9).

Jesus continued, “One who is faithful in a very little is also faithful in much, and one who is dishonest in a very little is also dishonest in much” (Luke 11:10). So, whether you have much or little, whether you live in a paid-off mansion or have been frustrated in your first home purchase by the poor economy, use whatever you have to “seek first the kingdom of God and his righteousness, and all these things will be added to you” (Matthew 6:33).

AUTHOR

Joshua Arnold

Joshua Arnold is a senior writer at The Washington Stand.

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2024 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

The 10 Kamala Harris Lies Moderators Let Slide at the ABC News Debate

Presidential debates have often been compared to professional wrestling matches, but the ABC News debate between former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris more closely resembled a handicap match, with Trump taking on three opponents at once: Harris and both moderators. As “World News Tonight” anchor David Muir and ABC News Live “Prime” anchor Linsey Davis regularly fact-checked Trump in real time, they allowed Harris to get by with numerous evasions and false statements on such issues as late-term abortions, post-birth executions, government pregnancy monitors, the economy, and haggard canards about “very fine people” at Charlottesville.

Here are a few of Kamala Harris’s misstatements that the ABC News moderators let her get away with.

1. Late-term abortion is a myth?

Kamala Harris attempted to deny President Trump’s charge that the Democratic Party supports late-term abortion by denying such abortions take place. “Nowhere in America is a woman carrying a pregnancy to term and asking for an abortion,” Harris dodged.

In reality, 21 states allow abortion until birth: Six states have no legal limit protecting unborn children, and the rest allow abortion after the point of viability thanks to a vague and expansive “health of the mother” exception.

Late-term abortions are well-documented. In 2022, pro-life advocates found the remains of five babies whom abortionist Cesare Santangelo aborted late in their term or possibly after birth at the Washington Surgi-Clinic in Washington, D.C. The Biden-Harris Justice Department advised the District of Columbia to destroy the evidence.

“In 2013, New Mexico abortionist Shelley Sella faced medical board sanctions after she committed an abortion on a child at 35 weeks,” reports Carole Novielli of Live Action. “In 2003, abortionist Charles Rossmann gave abortion pills to a woman who was past 30 weeks.” Southwestern Women’s Options in Albuquerque’s website advertised that “abortion services are available through 32 weeks. Exceptions after 32 weeks are provided on a case-by-case basis.”

1981 Philadelphia Inquirer article documented that, in abortion facilities, “unintended live births are literally an everyday occurrence,” but they are “hushed up” instead of treated as “a problem to be solved.”

More than 56,000 abortions took place after 21 weeks, according to the most recent CDC report.

2. Abortions after birth don’t happen?

The issue of infanticide cropped up during the debate, as President Donald Trump cited comments made by a former Virginia governor about allowing babies born alive during birth to die — a position Trump called “execution after birth.” Lindsey Davis responded to Trump’s comments on abortion by saying, “There is no state in this country where it is legal to kill a baby after it’s born.”

It is true that during a 2019 interview, then-Virginia Governor Ralph Northam (D) said, if a baby is born alive during a botched abortion, “I can tell you exactly what would happen. The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother” about the child’s future.

His comment was not an outlier. In 2013, a lobbyist representing the Florida Alliance of Planned Parenthood Affiliates, Alisa Lapolt Snow, testified before the Florida House of Representatives that even if a baby is alive, breathing on a table and moving, “We believe that any decision that’s made” about administering treatment to the newborn “should be left up to the woman, her family, and the physician. … That decision should be between the patient and the health care provider.”

Whistleblowers have noted abortionists regularly allowed children to be born alive, then die by neglect. Jill Stanek, who served as a nurse at Christ Hospital in the Chicago area, testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee in 2020:

“In the event a baby was aborted alive, he or she received no medical assessments or care but was only given what my hospital called ‘comfort care’ — made comfortable, as Governor Northam indicated. One night, a nursing co-worker was transporting a baby who had been aborted because he had Down syndrome to our Soiled Utility Room to die – because that’s where survivors were taken. I could not bear the thought of this suffering child dying alone, so I rocked him for the 45 minutes that he lived. He was 21 to 22 weeks old, weighed about 1/2 pound, and was about the size of my hand.”

Some accounts are more gruesome. Multiple employees accused “Texas Gosnell” abortionist Douglas Karpen of twisting the heads off live babies after birth.

Yet the Democratic ticket has not lifted a finger to require infant lives be saved. In 2019, then-Senator Harris voted against the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, which requires abortionists to provide potentially lifesaving care to babies born during botched abortions. There is no federal requirement to provide medical care to an infant born during an abortion. As governor of Minnesota, vice presidential candidate Tim Walz signed a bill which removed a requirement that abortionists “preserve the life and health of the born alive infant.”

Although only eight states currently require that the data be reported, official statistics show 277 babies were born alive during abortions. Pro-life advocates Gianna Jessen and Melissa Ohden survived botched abortions.

Only eight states require abortionists to report infants born alive during a botched abortion (Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Indiana, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, and Texas.). Two states — Tim Walz’s Minnesota and Gretchen Whitmer’s Michigan — repealed those requirements. Abortionists are not known as for being conscientious about reporting their own botched abortions.

Numerous Democratic lawmakers have introduced bills to legalize “perinatal death,” which an official analysis confirmed would bring about the “unintended” legalization of infanticide.

Summing up the evidence, Family Research Council’s Mary Szoch said that the Democratic Party’s “attack on life begins at fertilization, but it continues throughout the entirety of pregnancy and does not even stop after the baby is born. Vice President Kamala Harris and Governor Tim Walz have actively worked to ensure that babies born alive following abortions do not receive the help that they desperately need.”

3. Pro-life protections prevent miscarriage care?

Harris repeated the lie that state pro-life protections prevent doctors from treating women suffering from miscarriages. Harris said she had spoken to women “being denied care in an emergency room, because the health care providers are afraid they might go to jail.”

No pro-life law in the nation prohibits doctors from caring for miscarriages. Even Project 2025, which Harris repeatedly invoked as extreme, states, “Miscarriage management or standard ectopic pregnancy treatments should never be conflated with abortion.” Pro-life advocates blame confusion created by the abortion industry with causing doctors to deny women treatment. To help women’s health, the abortion industry should stop promoting that lie, they say.

4. Donald Trump would have the government monitor pregnancies and miscarriages?

Harris asserted that Trump would preside over the installation of a Big Brother-style surveillance of every pregnancy in America. “In his Project 2025 there would be a national abortion — a monitor that would be monitoring your pregnancies, your miscarriages,” Harris said, without any moderator’s intervention.

This statement had been repeated at the Democratic National Convention, and the Harris-Walz campaign has claimed in TV spots that Trump has endorsed “requiring the government to monitor women’s pregnancies.”

But Project 2025 — which is not Trump’s platform — contains no such provision. Presumably, Harris is wrenching out of context its reasonable proposal that states report abortion statistics accurately. The Biden administration’s most recent annual report on abortion — known as the Abortion Surveillance — excludes statistics from four states including the most populous state: California, Maryland, New Hampshire, and New Jersey. Project 2025 calls on the federal government “to ensure that every state reports exactly how many abortions take place within its borders, at what gestational age of the child, for what reason, the mother’s state of residence, and by what method.” The government would “ensure that [state] statistics are separated by category: spontaneous miscarriage; treatments that incidentally result in the death of a child (such as chemotherapy); stillbirths; and induced abortion.” That’s a far cry from a “government monitor” peeping in on women’s ultrasounds.

Even legacy media fact-checkers have denied this claim. FactCheck.org noted curtly, “Trump has not made such a proposal.” Reuters reported, “Fact Check: Project 2025 did not propose a ‘period passport’ for women.” Harris’s allegation “significantly overstates the nature of the monitoring called for in Project 2025,” reports USA Today.

5. National abortion ban?

“If Donald Trump were to be re-elected, he will sign a national abortion ban,” claimed Harris. Trump removed the Republican Party platform’s historic commitment to passing a Human Life Amendment, aspirational as it was, and has repeatedly said he opposes any further national legislation on the issue. “It’s the vote of the people now,” Trump said at the debate.

6. Trump called for a ‘bloodbath’?

In one of the more egregious statements allowed to slip into public consciousness without any pushback, Harris falsely asserted that “Donald Trump the candidate has said in this election there will be a bloodbath, if the outcome of this election is not to his liking.”

Trump used the economic term “bloodbath” while contrasting his tariff policy with the Biden-Harris administration’s pro-China electric vehicle policy during a March rally near Dayton, Ohio. “We’re going to put a 100% tariff on every single car that comes across the line, and you’re not going to be able to sell those cars if I get elected. Now if I don’t get elected, it’s going to be a bloodbath for the whole” industry, he said. As this author noted at The Washington Stand:

“The term ‘bloodbath’ is regularly used in the financial sector to describe an industrial contraction. The Merriam-Webster dictionary lists one of the definitions of ‘bloodbath’ as ‘a major economic disaster.’ … Democratic campaign operatives pounced on Trump’s use of the term ‘bloodbath’ to insinuate he wanted to foment a blood-drenched revolution if he lost the election. … The [then-]Biden campaign promptly wrenched the president’s remarks out of context to create a digital campaign ad titled ‘Bloodbath,’ which recycles other erroneous statements, such as falsely claiming Trump praised rioters at the Charlottesville and January 6 D.C. riots.”

ABC News moderators let the Democrat’s baseless allegation of revolutionary violence go unchecked.

7. Are Americans better off today than they were four years ago?

Muir opened the debate by asking Harris, “Do you believe Americans are better off than they were four years ago?”

Harris responded, “So, I was raised as a middle-class kid” and spoke for two minutes about her economic plans, ignoring the question completely. Unlike numerous questions in which the moderators demanded an answer of President Trump, Muir asked no follow-up of Harris.

Harris boasts of being the tie-breaking votes for the American Rescue Plan and the Inflation Reduction Act, which economists credit with setting off historically high inflation rates that exceeded 9%. The cost of a gallon of gasoline more than doubled during the Biden-Harris administration and is still $1.29 higher than the day President Trump left office. Staples such as groceries have risen nearly 20%, and new houses have more than doubled on her watch.

8. Project 2025 is Donald Trump’s plan?

Harris continually attempted to tie Trump to Project 2025, a now-inactive project of The Heritage Foundation, which the former president has repeatedly disparaged.

Trump replied, “I have nothing to do with Project 2025,” referring to its commonsense conservative proposals as “out there.”

“I haven’t read it. I don’t want to read it,” he added.

The plan’s authors have acknowledged Trump had nothing to do with their conservative vision for the next four years. “Project 2025 is not affiliated with any candidate, and no candidate was involved with the drafting of the Mandate for Leadership, which was published by Heritage in April 2023,” Noah Weinrich, a spokesperson for Project 2025, told CNN.

9. Trump praised neo-Nazis and white supremacists?

Kamala Harris repeated misinformation that, as president, Donald Trump praised neo-Nazis and white supremacists at the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville. “Let’s remember Charlottesville, where there was a mob of people carrying tiki torches, spewing anti-Semitic hate, and what did the president then at the time say? There were ‘fine people’ on each side,” Harris claimed.

In reality, Trump said, “You had some very bad people in that group. But you also had people that were very fine people, on both sides.” But Trump promptly stated, “And I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally. But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists, okay? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly. … There were people protesting very quietly the taking down of the statue of Robert E. Lee. … They had some rough, bad people — Neo-Nazis, white nationalists.”

“You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down of, to them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name,” because of Lee’s role as military leader of the Confederacy. But many Founding Fathers were also slaveowners. “Are we gonna take down statues of George Washington? How about Thomas Jefferson?” he asked. “You’re changing history. You’re changing culture.” Trump also pointed out the presence of Antifa protesters there to cheer on the tearing down of America’s historical monuments, who — unlike those opposed to tearing down U.S. history, did not have a permit to meet. “Now, in the other group also, you had some fine people, but you also had troublemakers, and you see them come with the black outfits, and with the helmets, and the baseball bats. You got a lot of bad people in the other group, too.”

Even Snopes.com ran an article titled, “No, Trump Did Not Call Neo-Nazis and White Supremacists ‘Very Fine People.’”

10. Trump is above the law?

Harris attempted to raise fears that President Trump would break the law with impunity in a second term. “The United States Supreme Court recently ruled that the former president would essentially be immune from any misconduct if he were to enter the White House again,” said Harris, while claiming Trump would weaponize government against his political enemies in a second term.

“The [p]resident enjoys no immunity for his unofficial acts, and not everything the [p]resident does is official,” stated the court ruling, written by Chief Justice John Roberts. “The [p]resident is not above the law.”

AUTHOR

Ben Johnson

Ben Johnson is senior reporter and editor at The Washington Stand.

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2024 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

Fraud Grips $112.8 Billion U.S. Food Stamp Program, $61.5 Million in Stolen Benefits Replaced

Fraud in the government’s food stamp program is so pervasive that the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), the agency that administers it, launched a special system to facilitate the replacement of the welfare benefit when recipients claim it stolen. In the two years since the Biden administration created the program, the government has doled out a hefty $61.5 million to replace pilfered food stamps—rebranded Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) by the Obama administration to eliminate stigma—in 127,290 cases. Keep in mind, this is in addition to the staggering $112.8 billion that Uncle Sam spends to provide 42.1 million with free groceries, according to the latest government figures.

The USDA’s SNAP Replacement of Stolen Benefits Dashboard reveals that 79% of claims were approved by the agency and that 339,269 fraudulent transactions were identified through approved stolen benefits claims. Recipients in every state in the nation have submitted claims and New York has by far the most food stamp fraud cases—50,678. Maryland is second with 33,509, followed by Illinois (16,369), Texas (11,633), Washington State (4,208), New Jersey (3,630), Arizona (3,541), North Carolina (3,434), Indiana (3,309) and New Mexico (3,027). Three states have reported over 2,000 cases and more than half a dozen have over 1,000. The federal government allows states to replace benefits stolen as far back as October 2022, according to the USDA dashboard.

“The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) is aware of increased reports of Electronic Benefit Transfer (EBT) theft due to card skimming, cloning, and similar fraudulent methods,” the agency announced in January 2023, revealing that at the end of 2022 President Biden signed a measure that includes a provision for the replacement of stolen food stamp benefits with federal funds. The USDA cites the section of the law that requires it to issue guidance to state agencies and “promulgate regulations to protect and replace SNAP benefits stolen via card skimming, card cloning, and other similar fraudulent methods.” Other similar fraudulent methods may include, but are not limited to, scamming through deceitful phone calls or text messaging that mimics official state agency messaging and phishing. “A theft that resulted from any of these methods would be eligible for replacement,” according to the USDA.

Rather than so easily replacing the stolen benefit, perhaps the government should create a system to crack down on the rampant fraud. Besides saving American taxpayers tens of millions of dollars, it seems like a more efficient way to operate. After all, the nation’s bloated food stamp program has long been plagued by problems that have fleeced the system out of large sums. A few years ago, the USDA disclosed that it sees over a billion dollars annually in food stamp fraud. Many of the retailers authorized by the government to accept food stamps also engage in illegal practices, the agency has found. A few years ago, nearly 200 people were arrested in Florida for operating a sophisticated ring in which 22,000 fraudulent food stamp transactions totaling $3.7 million were recorded by a task force of local and federal authorities. In 2016 the feds busted the largest food stamp fraud operation in history, a $13 million scheme run by flea market retailers in the largely black and Hispanic areas of south Florida’s Miami-Dade County known as Opa-Locka and Hialeah.

The government has failed to mitigate the illicit activities that have long plagued the program and now it is doling out tens of millions of dollars to replace stolen benefits rather than implement a system to prevent it. Just a few weeks ago, a Kentucky news station reported that thieves have stolen more than $5 million worth of food stamps in the past year from families in Kentucky and Indiana. “Scammers are draining accounts linked to EBT cards,” used by the government to distribute benefits, the story says. In South Carolina a woman recently got busted for fraudulently receiving more than $28,000 in food stamp benefits. Another woman was also recently arrested in the state for fraud after taking over $12,000 in food stamps that she did not qualify for. In Delaware and Tennessee, the government recently replaced hundreds of thousands of dollars in stolen food stamps, according to local news reports. The list goes on and on.

EDITORS NOTE: This Judicial Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Biden/Harris Criminal Illegal Alien Charged with Kidnapping Girl Walking to School in Virginia

The illegal who had been captured and released by the Harris administration before the abduction posed as a police officer, forced her into the front passenger seat, and drove off.

The only way to stop this these horrors against the American people is to vote for Trump.

Migrant held without bond for allegedly abducting Manassas girl

By Stephanie Ramirez and Sam Kosmas, FOX 5, September 9, 2024:T

MANASSAS, Va. – The man charged with abducting a girl walking to school in Manassas last week, after crossing into the U.S. illegally last year, is being held without bond.

The man charged with abducting a girl walking to school in Manassas last week after crossing into the U.S. illegally last year is being held without bond.

FOX 5’s Stephanie Ramirez reported from the courthouse Monday morning, where 23-year-old Enrique Ramirez Cabrera appeared before a judge. The public defender argued for his release, citing no criminal or violent history in the county. However, the judge ordered Cabrera held without bond.

Investigators believe Cabrera approached the girl in his vehicle last Thursday morning as she walked along the 9400 block of Clover Hill Road. He allegedly identified himself as a police officer, forced her into the front passenger seat, and drove off. The girl escaped about two miles away near the intersection of Quarry Road and Zebedee Street.

FOX News reported that Cabrera is a Peruvian immigrant and is in the country illegally. According to their report, he was captured at the Arizona border in December and released into the U.S.

Police do not believe any other suspects were involved and stated there is no ongoing threat to the community. The victim was taken to a hospital for evaluation but is expected to be physically okay.

Cabrera faces charges of abduction, robbery, impersonating a police officer, and petit larceny. He is due back in court on November 13.

Read more.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

WATCH Illegal Criminal Boast, “In Just Two Years, The United States Will Be Finished”

TARGETING JEWISH CHILDREN: Pro-Hamas Terror Mob Protests Perth’s Only Jewish School K- 12

Man accused of abducting Manassas girl is immigrant captured and released at southern border: report

1 in 3 College Students Say Violence in a Campus Protest Can Be Acceptable, Survey Finds

WATCH: Hamas Fraternity Recruits College Students Happy to Sign Up to Harass Jews, Protest Synagogues, Burn American Flags

RELATED VIDEO: The Pet-Eating Haitian Migrants + “Am I Racist?”| Plume, Walsh

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Israel’s Foes Unfailingly Side with Left’s Antisemitic Allies

The 2024 Democratic National Convention has by now faded into the media’s rearview mirror. Yet one thing remains clear.

The major parties differ on the issue of Israel, that is, both in sentiment and substance.

This serves to underscore just how critical Nov. 5, 2024 (in the United States) is for the Jewish state.

Bastion of Anti-Jewish Sentiment?

The conduct of the Democratic Party at its recent convention underscores a doleful truth.

This is that, by-and-large, the party has become a bastion of animus towards the Jews — not only on the collective level vis-à-vis the Jewish state, but also towards the individual Jew, even American Jews.

Indeed, there is no other way to interpret what took place during the Convention, and before it it.

Thus, in large measure, the convention reflected the blossoming of the process initiated in 2009 by Barack Obama, when he intimated that distancing itself from Israel would benefit U.S. foreign policy.

True, some have attempted to “put lipstick on a pig” — downplaying the significance of incidents that underscore this trend and overplaying those that don’t. But the real point is not only the nature of the events that occurred, but the trend they represent.

Antisemitism as a ‘Point’

Although the convention did block a Palestinian speaker from addressing the convention, this was overshadowed by the fact that Jewish members were compelled to assemble in hiding to conduct Jewish-related affairs for fear of disruption by anti-Jewish mobs.

Indeed, one can only wonder what departing president, Joe Biden, had in mind when he conceded that the raucous pro-Hamas hooligans, outside the convention, “had a point” —in expressing their “outrage” at the IDF response to the murder and mutilation, the ravages and rapes of seniors and infants; men and women in the peaceful population of the towns, villages and agricultural communities in the Gaza Envelope.

The timing of this shift in sentiment seems particularly incongruous, coming as it does when the Palestinians seem more worthy than ever of censure/sanction, rather than support/sympathy.

Indeed, this is even more astounding since this hostility comes hard-on-the-heels, not only of unspeakable barbarity on the part of the Gazan Palestinians, but also the glee with which the appalling atrocities were celebrated by many Palestinians, in general.

Crucible, Not Victim

Moreover, it’s difficult to differentiate between the moral culpability of the general populace in Gaza and their elected leadership.

Indeed, contrary to popular belief, the overall population in Gaza is not the victim of its radical Hamas leaders.

Rather, it is the crucible in which Hamas was forged and the incubator from which it emerged.

Thus, Hamas is not an unwelcome imposition on an otherwise placid population, but an authentic reflection of its innermost desires.

But rather than side with Israel, the Democratic party and the Biden administration chose to take unprecedented measures against the elected government of an ally.

Thus, with cynical exploitation of his Jewish origins, Democratic Senate leader, Chuck Schumer, purported to know better than Israel’s electorate itself what is good for it.

In a desperate attempt to kowtow to his party’s increasingly radical wing, he accused the recently elected Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, of being an “obstacle to peace,” calling for new elections to replace him — despite the fact that, even today, he’s the most popular politician in the country.

This, of course, is something Sen. Schumer would never have presumed to do with any other democratic ally of the U.S. — or even any non-democratic adversary. Thus, somehow, Schumer found no reason to urge removing any member of the brutal Iranian regime.

Pompous Pretentiousness

Even more perturbing is the initiative by Biden’s State Department to impose sanctions on rightwing Israeli citizens, and threaten sanctions on duly-elected Israeli ministers.

Stunningly, none of the sanctioned individuals/organizations have been accused — never mind, convicted — of any current transgressions by Israeli law-enforcement agencies.

With unmatched audacity, the administration pompously proclaimed, “The United States remains deeply concerned about [Jewish] extremist violence and instability in the West Bank, which undermines Israel’s own security” neglecting of course any mention of how Arab extremism might impact Israel’s security.

Then, arrogantly, it announced that if Israel does not comply, the U.S. will take it upon itself to deal with “recalcitrant” Israeli citizens — with no commensurate intentions regarding lawless Arabs, who regularly stone, firebomb, and shoot at Israeli citizens, We strongly encourage the government of Israel to take immediate steps to hold these individuals and entities accountable.

“In the absence of such steps, we will continue to impose our own accountability measures.”

Imagine the ensuing outcry should Washington threaten to intervene and supersede the functioning of national law enforcement authorities in any other country — especially if American citizens were not directly impacted by the action/inaction of those authorities.

Perverse, Paradoxical

Substantively, Democratic support for the Palestinian cause seems highly incongruous.

After all, for anyone who ostensibly embraces progressive-liberal values, there should be little attraction in the establishment of any Palestinian entity, especially a theocratic tyranny, such as a Hamas-ruled Gazan enclave.

Indeed, why would the party endorse establishing (yet another) homophobic, misogynistic Muslim-majority tyranny, whose hallmarks would be suppression of women, oppression of homosexuals, and repression of non-Muslims?

Clearly then, there is nothing that corresponds with the values the Democratic party professes to cherish, and the support for gender discrimination, gay persecution, religious intolerance, and political oppression that would characterize any self-governing Palestinian entity.

So, if the new surge of support for Hamas and Gaza is antithetical to values allegedly dear to the Democratic party, but is manifestly detrimental to the Jewish state, and by association, Jews who identify with it, what could be the motivation behind this malicious and malignant shift?

Antisemitism certainly seems a highly plausible answer.

This column originally appeared on ISRAPUNDINT.

©2024. Dr. Martin Sherman. All rights reserved.

‘A New Way Forward’? Harris Campaign [Finally] Announces 2024 Policies

One day ahead of her debate with former President Donald Trump, Vice President Kamala Harris has unveiled a policy agenda that could compel Christian businesses to participate in abortion and LGBT events that violate biblical morality, sign a national abortion expansion bill, pack the Supreme Court, give amnesty to the entire illegal immigrant population of the United States, strip law-abiding U.S. citizens of their Second Amendment rights without due process, double-down on inflationary economic policies, continue criminal lawfare against Trump, and promote universal daycare.

Until Monday morning, the “issues” section of Kamala Harris’s campaign website did not exist 49 days after the Democratic Party coronated Harris without a primary. Harris has dubbed her policy plan “A New Way Forward” — the same name President George W. Bush gave to his 2007 surge in Iraq, intended to end terrorism against U.S. soldiers and transform Muslim Iraq into a pluralistic Western democracy.

Equity for the LGBTQ movement, bankruptcy for Christian businesses: The cornerstone of Harris’s LGBTQ policy, which she brands as promoting “civil rights,” would prevent Christian business people from living out their faith in the private sector and economically impoverish believers. After noting she began unlawfully officiating same-sex marriage in 2004 as California attorney general and “refused to defend” a marriage protection amendment democratically passed by California voters, Harris promises “to pass the Equality Act to enshrine anti-discrimination protections for LGBTQI+ Americans in health care, housing, education, and more into law.” The so-called Equality Act would add sexual preference and, in some versions, gender identity, to landmark civil rights legislation designed to protect racial minorities and women from discrimination. By raising homosexuality and transgenderism to the same legal status as race and religion, the Equality Act could force Christian doctors to perform gender-reassignment surgeries and require Christian business owners to take part in services that violate their religious beliefs — or go out of business. State and local statutes modeled after this bill have resulted in such lawfare prosecutions as the never-ending legal disputes of Masterpiece Cakeshop owner Jack Phillips.

Throughout the issues section, Harris contrasts her policy positions, not with the radically truncated 2024 Republican Party platform which Trump campaign operatives foisted on rank-and-file delegates at the Republican National Committee on July 8, but with “Trump’s Project 2025 Agenda.” The Trump campaign publicly opposed the project, which the Heritage Foundation subsequently shut down. Trump replaced GOP’s historic commitment to a Human Life Amendment, and Republican vice presidential candidate Senator J.D. Vance (R-Ohio) confirmed that Trump will veto any national pro-life protections that cross his desk during the next four years.

The “Project 2025 agenda will eliminate federal rules that protect LGBTQI+ Americans from discrimination,” says the website, referring to laws like the SAFE Act that prevent the predatory transgender industry from targeting minors for puberty blocks, cross-sex hormone injections, and life-altering surgeries.

A national abortion expansion act: The website continues the Harris campaign’s rebranding of abortion as “reproductive freedom,” vowing that, as president, “she will never allow a national abortion ban to become law. And when Congress passes a bill to restore reproductive freedom nationwide, she will sign it.” The Biden-Harris administration has endorsed the so-called “Women’s Health Protection” Act (WHPA), which would strike down more than 1,300 state pro-life protections including laws protecting children from late-term abortions (including some after the point of viability), repealing parental consent and notification laws, and repealing conscience protections for pro-life healers.

“If elected, Trump will ban abortion nationwide, restrict access to birth control, force states to report on women’s miscarriages and abortions, and jeopardize access to IVF,” it claims, although no law nor proposal would curtail IVF, and Trump controversially promised to force insurance plans, or U.S. taxpayers, to fund the procedure, which has resulted in unknown millions of abortions and abandoned embryos.

“He even called for punishment for women who have an abortion,” says the website — based on an off-the-cuff remark Trump reversed the day after he made it in a March 2016 interview with Chris Matthews, who resigned from MSNBC four years ago. Trump explained during the 2016 campaign, “I didn’t mean punishment for women like prison” but rather that women who have abortions “punish themselves.” Numerous surveys show women suffer psychologically, and often physically, after enduring an abortion.

The section apparently praises her own administration’s foray into compelling taxpayers to fund abortion. “Vice President Harris and Governor Walz believe we have a sacred obligation to care for our nation’s service members, veterans, [and] their families,” says the website. Last July, the Biden-Harris administration Pentagon spokesman, John Kirby, called paying for abortions a “foundational, sacred obligation of military leaders.”

Amnesty for millions of illegal immigrants: Harris promises to “secure our borders and fix our broken immigration system,” which her website ranks below promoting gun control. She “will bring back the bipartisan border security bill,” which she called “the strongest reform in decades.” Harris promises to reward tens of millions of illegal immigrants who broke U.S. immigration law with U.S. citizenship, calling her amnesty plan “an earned pathway to citizenship.” The Biden-Harris administration has presided over record-breaking levels of illegal immigration every year in office, not counting new legal pathways they have been established for immigrants from nations such as Haiti. Previous historic levels of illegal immigration came when candidates promised, or delivered, amnesty. This “is her attempt to make permanent what we have seen, which is lawlessness,” Rep. Laurel Lee (R-Fla.) told Fox Business on Tuesday morning.

The Democratic candidate blames the broken border on Donald Trump. “Trump fail to tackle violence in our communities or fix our broken immigration system — he will make us less safe,” the Harris website states. “He’ll advance his cruel immigration agenda which includes separating children from their parents,” a policy carried out by the Obama-Biden administration and continued by the Biden-Harris administration.

The fentanyl crisis: “This past year, the number of overdose deaths in the United States declined for the first time in five years,” the website boasts. But the Biden-Harris administration presided over record-breaking numbers of overdoses, largely driven by fentanyl crossing the Southern border from Mexico. The administration’s drug policy aimed to decriminalize marijuana and promoted so-called “harm reduction” policies, which distributed crack pipes to addicts as part of taxpayer-funded “smoking kits.”

Supreme Court packing: Harris supports a plan that would overhaul the U.S. Supreme Court by “requiring [j]ustices to comply with ethics rules that other federal judges are bound by and imposing term limits.” The recent term limits plan embraced by prominent Democrats would sideline the most conservative justices and transform the court from a lifetime appointment to one continually threatened by, and responding to, political pressure.

More gun control: Harris promises to “ban assault weapons and high-capacity magazines.” The Biden-Harris administration has applied the term “assault rifle” to America’s most popular rifle, the AR-15; California law also bans magazines that hold more than 10 rounds of ammunition. The vice president’s pledge to “require universal background checks” would require the government to pry into all sales, and potentially gifts, of guns between private individuals. She also vows to pass “red flag laws,” which unconstitutionally remove guns from the home of law-abiding citizens without due process, if their neighbors, criminals, or vengeful ex-boyfriends report them as mentally troubled. The laws would render those reported defenseless in their own homes.

The website notes, “As head of the first-ever White House Office of Gun Violence Prevention, she spearheaded policies to expand background checks and close the gun show loophole. Under her and President Biden’s leadership, violent crime is at a 50-year low, with the largest single-year drop in murders ever.” In fact, the U.S. homicide rate rose again in 2021 to 8.2 out of 100,00 according to the CDC. The homicide rate in 2022, the most recent year for which data are available, stood at 7.7, significantly higher than the 5.9 rate in 2018.

The website complains that Donald Trump “wants to arm teachers in our classrooms” in response to an ongoing string of school shootings.

Prosecuting Donald Trump? The Harris campaign website promises the Democratic presidential candidate will “fight to ensure that no former president has immunity for crimes committed while in the White House.” That comes in response to a Supreme Court ruling which granted presidents extremely limited immunity for actions carried out in his official capacity as president of the United States — not for private actions. Legal experts warn the threat of prosecution would criminalize political differences and turn the United States into a banana republic.

Nonetheless, the website claims President Trump will “bring the Department of Justice and the FBI under his direct control so he can give himself unchecked legal power and go after his opponents.” Similarly, at the first night of the Democratic National Convention, Michigan State Senator Mallory McMorrow (D) warned, “Under Project 2025, Donald Trump would be able to weaponize the Department of Justice to go after his political opponents.”

“Donald Trump is a convicted criminal who only cares about himself,” the website says.

Recycling lies about Donald Trump: The issues section also misleads about the two candidates’ biographies and policy positions. “Vice President Harris grew up in a middle[-]class home as the daughter of a working mom,” says the website. But Kamala Harris grew up in the famously left-wing city of Berkeley where her father, Donald J. Harris, was “a renowned Marxist professor” and her mother, Shyamala Gopalan, was a cancer researcher. The vice president also grew up in Montreal.

Donald Trump has “said he would let Russia ‘do whatever the hell they want’ to our NATO allies. And he calls soldiers who gave their lives in defense of American democracy ‘suckers’ and ‘losers,’” it says. Trump’s former national security adviser, John Bolton — a neoconservative who has persistently criticized Trump’s non-interventionist foreign policy — called reports that President Trump disparaged fallen U.S. soldiers “simply false.” The comments from Trump, a master of overstatement, about NATO came in response to a question from a foreign leader about whether the U.S. would defend a nation that steadfastly refused to meet its obligations under the treaty to spend a requisite amount of funds on its own national defense. For decades, Trump has criticized one-sided deals in which foreign nations freeload off U.S. taxpayers.

Demonizing Trump: “Someone as dangerous as Donald Trump should never again be allowed to serve as commander-in-chief,” says the website. “Top American military generals and national security officials — including those who worked for Trump — have warned that he is ‘dangerous’ and ‘unfit’ to lead, and now he is surrounded by ultra-loyalists who enable his worst impulses.” These remarks come despite a near-fatal assassination attempt against the former president in Butler, Pennsylvania, on July 13, which missed by a fraction of an inch, something the president has credited to divine intervention.

Civil rights: Kamala Harris commits herself to securing “$2 billion in funding for Offices of Civil Rights across the federal government,” which will supersize federal lawsuits against private employers who refuse to implement Woke policies on the basis of race, sexual preference, and gender identity.

Inflationary economics and price controls: Kamala Harris says that “guilding up the middle class will be a defining goal of her presidency.” Yet on her watch, inflation reached a 40-year high of 9.1% in 2022, lifting costs and squeezing families across the nation. Overall groceries have risen nearly 20% over four years. The median price of a new house has more than doubled since Joe Biden and Kamala Harris took office. Americans must spend an extra $13,000 a year under the Biden-Harris administration to have the same standard of living they enjoyed under the Trump administration, according to one expert analysis. The spike in prices, which critics dub Bidenflation, has reduced Americans’ savings levels by 3.2%. The website notes “[h]er tie-breaking vote on the Inflation Reduction Act,” which economists say carried a real price tag of $1.2 trillion and sparked inflation, in addition to piling more money onto the $35 trillion national debt. As the site also points out, “Vice President Harris cast the deciding vote on the” $1.9 trillion “American Rescue Plan.”

Harris has promised to implement national price controls on food and rent. She will implement the “first-ever federal ban on corporate price gouging on food and groceries,” says the website, although grocers have an extremely thin profit margin. She also promises national rent control. “Vice President Harris knows rent is too high and will sign legislation to outlaw new forms of price fixing by corporate landlords.” She claims she’ll build three million more rental units and “Vice President Harris will provide first-time homebuyers with up to $25,000 to help with their down payments, with more generous support for first-generation homeowners.” Economists agree the policy will simply raise the price of houses by $25,000 while price controls, which failed in the 1970s, will restrict supply.

“Trump would raise rents and add $1,200 a year to the typical American mortgage,” she claims without proof.

Harris’s campaign promises she “will take on Big Pharma,” although the Biden-Harris administration passed vaccination mandates that the White House claimed applied to two-thirds of all U.S. workers, including attempting to force the approximately 25 million people employed at a workplace with at least 100 employees to take the COVID-19 shot or be fired. They also dismissed 8,400 members of the U.S. armed forces who refused to take the shot. Researchers have subsequently linked the injection to an increased risk of myocarditis and excess deaths.

“Vice President Harris will protect Social Security and Medicare against relentless attacks from Donald Trump,” who has steadfastly opposed any reform of the entitlement programs. Social Security is scheduled to become insolvent in 2033. Medicare faces the same fate in 2036.

Environmental globalism: Meeting the “global challenge” of climate change “will require global cooperation,” and she is committed to continuing “the United States’ international climate leadership,” says the Harris campaign website. The U.S. will lead global compacts on fossil fuels. “[S]he will unite Americans to tackle the climate crisis as she builds on this historic work, advances environmental justice.” Harris, who promised she would “absolutely” end fracking in the 2020 Democratic primaries, claims this will result in “lowering household energy costs” and “record energy production.”

Kamala warns Trump will increase gasoline prices: “Trump asked Big Oil executives to give his campaign money so he could roll back regulations and cut taxes for Big Oil to boost their profits, and Trump’s plans would push gas prices up,” she asserts. The cost of a gallon of gasoline has increased from $2.33 when President Donald Trump left office in January 2021 to a record high of $5.02 in June 2022 under Biden-Harris, despite releasing nearly half of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. The cost now sits at $3.62 a gallon.

“Trump’s economic plans would also trigger a recession by mid-2025,” she said, although some economists agree America is already in a recession. The U.S. experienced the textbook definition of a recession — two consecutive quarters of economic contraction — under the Biden-Harris administration in the first two quarters of 2022. But the administration has denied the recession took place, since the panel tasked with declaring a recession, the Business Cycle Dating Committee at the National Bureau of Economic Research, did not formally make such a pronouncement.

PRO Act/public sector unions: “She’ll sign landmark pro-union legislation, including the PRO Act to support workers who choose to organize and bargain and the Public Service Freedom to Negotiate Act to make the freedom for public service workers to form unions the law of the land.” The PRO Act would force millions of workers to pay union dues against their will, cripple freelance work, erase free speech and privacy rights, skew elections in favor of unionization, and radically increase the federal government’s intervention into everyday workplace disputes. President Franklin D. Roosevelt, who signed the 1935 Wagner Act codifying Americans’ right to union representation, believed public-sector unions should not exist and called militant labor tactics “unthinkable and intolerable.”

“She’ll fight to raise the minimum wage, end sub-minimum wages for tipped workers,” radically altering the landscape of tipped work.

Harris’s agenda will be paid for by “making millionaires and billionaires pay their fair share in taxes.” The top 1% of U.S. income earners pay 46% of all federal income taxes, while the bottom 50% pays 2% of taxes.

Manufacturing jobs: “Under the Biden-Harris Administration, more than 1.6 million manufacturing and construction jobs have been created,” Harris claims. But most of these are jobs destroyed during COVID-19 lockdowns coming back online. The Biden-Harris administration has in fact added 147,000 manufacturing jobs above the level in January 2020.

Universal preschool: “Vice President Harris will fight to ensure parents can afford high-quality child care and preschool for their children. … [E]nsuring hardworking families can afford high-quality child care, all while ensuring that care workers are paid a living wage and treated with the dignity and respect they deserve,” the website states. However, surveys consistently show most mothers would like to remain home with their own children, at least part of the time, during their child’s formative years.

Transferring student loan debt and medical costs to taxpayers: Harris will “continue working to end the unreasonable burden of student loan debt,” she promises. “As Vice President, she also announced that medical debt will be removed from credit reports, and helped cancel $7 billion of medical debt for 3 million Americans. As President, she’ll work with states to cancel medical debt for even more Americans.”

Promising not to raise taxes on most Americans, but … : Harris is also “committed to ensuring no one earning less than $400,000 a year will pay more in taxes.” But the Biden-Harris administration has already raised fees on the middle class and working poor by:

  • expanding the number of items that must be registered under the National Firearms Act, with a $200 fee for each item;
  • reinstating the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate and $695-per-person penalty, which President Trump eliminated;
  • imposing a carbon and/or methane tax. One proposal would charge companies $1,800 per ton of methane they handle (not emit), with the cost rising 2% above inflation each year;
  • increasing corporate taxes, which pass on approximately one-third of increased costs to consumers by raising prices (and another third by reducing payroll costs/hours); and
  • hiking cigarette taxes, which fall disproportionately on the working class.

She also praises tax-and-spend policies, claiming that “when the government encourages investment, it leads to broad-based economic growth and creates jobs, which makes our economy stronger.” But Paul Mueller of the American Institute for Economic Research (AIER) described Harris’s economic interventionism as “extensive government involvement, huge amounts of spending,” and “a giveaway campaign.”

She also plans more Woke equity, pledging to “increase access to capital for small businesses and bring venture capital to parts of middle America that have for too long been overlooked … tripling the Small Business Administration’s lending to [b]lack-owned businesses, and more than doubling small-dollar lending to Latino and women-owned businesses.”

Harris also supports increasing taxpayer-funded subsidies for the Obamacare health care exchanges.

Foreign policy: Harris says she “will always stand up for American interests in the face of China’s threats.”

“Vice President Harris will always stand up for Israel’s right to defend itself,” the website avers. “She and President Biden are working to end the war in Gaza, such that Israel is secure, the hostages are released, the suffering in Gaza ends, and the Palestinian people can realize their right to dignity, security, freedom, and self-determination.”

The vice president’s website also notes her strong support for Ukraine. Under the Biden-Harris administration, U.S. taxpayers have spent more than $175 billion aiding Ukraine, despite its stalled war with Russia, the Zelensky government’s well-documented corruption, and persecution of the canonical Ukrainian Orthodox Church.

The website boasts that Kamala Harris has been “advising on tough decisions in the Oval Office and the Situation Room.” Harris bragged about being “the last person in the room” before Joe Biden decided on the details of the calamitous withdrawal from Afghanistan, which cost the lives of 13 U.S. service members and left an unknown number of Americans stranded behind the Taliban’s lines.

AUTHOR

Ben Johnson

Ben Johnson is senior reporter and editor at The Washington Stand.

RELATED VIDEO: President Trump ROASTS the ABC moderators for not debunking Kamala’s lies!

RELATED PODCAST: The Deep State with Eric Teetsel

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2024 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

FRACK YOU KAMALA!

WATCH: FRACK YOU KAMALA!

Hey Guys, should I put this billboard up in Pennsylvania? I designed it with my friends over at @TheUnitedWest.

Listen carefully to tonight’s Presidential Debate in Pennsylvania between President Trump and Komrade Kamala @KamalaHarris , and you will hear how she changed her view and now loves fossil fuels and oil production, especially “Fracking!”

This lie is from a person who worships at the altar of the Climate Lunatics and will say anything to fool the good folks of Pennsylvania.

Don’t believe her!

America produces 13 MILLION barrels of oil per day and 9 MILLION barrels are from hydraulic fracturing, otherwise known as “fracking,” including 81.5 BILLION cubic feet of natural gas per day!

Pennsylvania is one of the states leading the production of oil and natural gas through this very sophisticated process, which builds up the state economy by increasing jobs, lowering fuel rates, creating more transportation and cheaper food prices.

President @realDonaldTrump Trump led the United States to become the world’s largest oil and natural gas producer resulting in record LOW gas prices and NO inflation!

Komrade Kamala and @JoeBiden purposely destroyed all the work that Trump did regarding American energy, resulting in record HIGH gas prices and astronomical inflation.

Pennsylvania, when you listen to Kacklin’ Kamala in the debate tonight, share this message

FRACK YOU KAMALA!

Drill Baby Drill! #Trump2024

Let me know in the comments if you want me to put my billboard up all over Pennsylvania!

H/T Laura Loomer

LAURA ON X: @LauraLoomer

©2024. The United West/ Defend The Border. All rights reserved.

RELATED VIDEO: Kamala does not want this ad going viral that shows her saying she’ll ban fracking