HOT FLASH: New York Times Reports Qatar Supporting Terror in Somalia

On July 22, 2019, al-arabiyya TV news reported that a NYT radio cast reported on Qatar’s support for terrorism in Somalia.  But, of course, at Americans for Intelligence Reform we have been reporting on Qatar’s (and Turkey’s) support for terrorism since the moment we joined.

This is a huge leap for the NYT which heretofore has been more than willing to overlook Qatar’s (and Turkey’s) support for terrorism in the Middle East/Africa sphere (and elsewhere).  So, this raises the question as to why now?  Why is the NYT suddenly so interested in reporting on Qatar’s support for terrorism?

The obvious answer is that just last week Trump warmly hosted the Emir of Qatar, and singed a “very nice” weapons deal with Qatar.   

And, reporting on Qatar’s support of terrorism gives them a tool with which to bludgeon Trump now that the Russia hoax has dried up.

Of course, this places the NYT in a delicate position.  Since many of their journalists have accepted payola from Qatar with the promise of never reporting anything bad about Qatar, what’s a self-respecting far Left rag supposed to do?  Well, just find a journalist who has not taken money from Qatar.  Or, perhaps the NYT felt that they would prefer risking Qatar’s ire if there is an opportunity to damage Trump.

Another interesting point coming out of this news story is that according to this al-arabiyya report, quoting the NYT story, this information came about from a phone call between a prominent Qatari businessman close to the Emir, and Qatar’s ambassador in Mogadishu.  Now, to a retired NSA guy, this raises the obvious question as to where in the h*%$ would a failing newspaper like the NYT get the resources necessary to intercept phone calls?   That’s a privilege (and skill) usually reserved for the intelligence agencies of major powers.

My guess is that someone from within the U.S. intelligence community  intentionally leaked that information to the NYT for the express purpose of giving the NYT and the rest of the Left a new club with which to pummel Trump.  My guess also is that this “someone” was someone very highly placed who might have a lot to lose when and if the FISA abuses and payments for the phony Steele dossier are investigated and made public.  This is a defensive move on the part of elements within the “Deep State.”

From this standpoint I will make a couple of predictions:  We will soon be seeing more articles in the NYT and/or other leftwing “news” entities tying Qatar (and possibly Nigeria and Turkey) to terrorism.  These will be followed by other news items linking Qatar’s support for terrorism with Trump’s cozy relation with the Qatar Emir, and the weapons sale.

This is almost laughable coming from a NYT (and other leftist entities) who overlooked Obama’s massive support for terrorist regimes.  But, all is fair in love, war, and politics.  I guess.

As for the Trump administration, for months we’ve been trying to warn them against following the Obama example of having close military relations with terrorist-supporting nations such as Qatar, Turkey, and Nigeria, yet they persist.

The morale to this story is that any policy maker who fails to keep up on the postings by Americans for Intelligence Reform do so at their own peril.

CLIMATE STUDY: ‘We have practically no anthropogenic [man made] climate change.’

It now appears that all of the worry that mankind is destroying planet earth is wrong. The world is not ending in 10 years. Aren’t you relieved?

So what is the main factor controlling global temperature? Low clouds!

A June 29, 2019 study titled “NO EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE FOR THE SIGNIFICANT ANTHROPOGENIC CLIMATE CHANGE” by J. Kauppinen and P. Malmi concluded,

We have proven that the GCM-models used in IPCC report AR5 cannot compute correctly the natural component included in the observed global temperature. The reason is that the models fail to derive the influences of low cloud cover fraction on the global temperature. A too small natural component results in a too large portion for the contribution of the greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide. That is why IPCC represents the climate sensitivity more than one order of magnitude larger
than our sensitivity 0.24°C. Because the anthropogenic portion in the increased CO2 is less than 10 %, we have practically no anthropogenic climate change. The low clouds control mainly the global temperature. [Emphasis added]

J. Kauppinen and P. Malmi in their Abstract state,

In this paper we will prove that GCM-models used in IPCC report AR5 fail to calculate the influences of the low cloud cover changes on the global temperature. That is why those models give a very small natural temperature change leaving a very large change for the contribution of the green house gases in the observed temperature. This is the reason why IPCC has to use a very large sensitivity to compensate a too small natural component. Further they have to leave out the strong negative feedback due to the clouds in order to magnify the sensitivity. In addition, this paper proves that the changes in the low cloud cover fraction practically control the global temperature. [Emphasis added]

Now you can rest easy and go on driving your SUV, enjoy eating beef, buy airplane tickets and turn your AC on.

All is well that ends well.

© All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLES:

The Fake Science of Global Warming

Climate Change Imploding As New Science Discovers Human Activity Has Zero Impact On Global Temperatures

Science and God

VIDEO: Someone Told Me, “Go Back to Where You Came From!”

It’s easy to laugh at people such as Democrat Georgia state representative Erica Thomas and her anguish at being told, as she relates it, that she should “go back” to where she came from.

That is, until it happens to you.

Here is my story:

Contact Selwyn Duke, follow him on Gab (preferably) or Twitter, or log on to SelwynDuke.com.

Democrats and Republicans Passed an Immigration Bill — But it went largely unreported.

It has been my contention, for many years, that contrary to the lies spewed in the mainstream media that the immigration system is broken while, in reality, the immigration system is not broken, but has become the most efficient delivery system in the United States rivaling Fed-Ex and UPS combined.

What the immigration system delivers is a virtually unlimited supply of cheap and exploitable labor, an unlimited supply of foreign tourists, of foreign students and, for the immigration lawyers, an unlimited supply of clients for immigration law firms.

This was the underlying premise to my article, Sanctuary Country – Immigration failures by design.

This past month, most of the coverage about the Congress focused on the war of words between President Trump and the Democrats, particularly the venomous and frequently Anti-Semitic statements spewed by “The Squad” that consists of four first-term female members of Congress, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, Ilhan Omar of Minnesota, Ayanna Pressley of Massachusetts and Rashida Tlaib of Michigan.

A virtual mantra has been created that the reason we have an immigration crisis is because the Democrats will not work with the Republicans (or visa versa).

You would think that if there was any movement to create immigration legislation that the media would jump all over it and put the story on page one in the newspapers and the “A Block” on television programs.  After all, the mythology goes, the Democrats and Republicans have steadfastly taken diametrically opposed positions on immigration.

Of course while the Republicans insist that a wall needs to be constructed on the U.S./Mexican border to secure that dangerous and highly porous border against the un-inspected entry of aliens and cargo including such contraband as narcotics, it is worth noting that when they controlled both houses of Congress for the first two years of the Trump administration, money was never provided for the construction of that wall.

As my mom taught me when I was growing up, “Actions speak louder than words.”

Then there were the highly publicized “migrant caravans” that transported more than one hundred thousand illegal aliens to the U.S./Mexican border and the argument between the Democrats and Republicans focused on whether or not there was a “crisis on the border.”

For the most part, the Republicans declared that there was an emergency on the border and that there was a humanitarian as well as a national security crisis along the border.  The Democrats, however, declared that the crisis was manufactured by the Trump administration.

And so it went, arguments and counterarguments hurled back and forth in a “war of words.”

However, what the media somehow managed to ignore was that on February 7, 2019 Zoe Lofgren, the Chairperson of the House Immigration Subcommittee, and former immigration lawyer, introduced a bill, H.R. 1044: Fairness for High-Skilled Immigrants Act of 2019.

Of course many bills get introduced during the course of a congressional session so, perhaps this bill was introduced but escaped detection.

The Center for Immigration Studies published a disconcerting analysis of this bill.

Clearly this bill does not provide good news for American high-tech workers or their families, nor does it provide good news for American college students who are running up huge student loans to acquire STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering or Mathematics) degrees to qualify them for high-tech jobs.

Under the provisions of H.R.1044 hundreds of thousands of nonimmigrant (temporary) foreign workers from India, in particular, who are currently working in the United States under the infamous H-1B visa will be fast-tracked for lawful immigrant status and provided with Green Cards.  In other words, they will become a permanent part of the U.S. labor pool.

Chinese investors will be able to more easily acquire lawful immigrant status by investing in the United States, increasing China’s already huge “footprint” in the United States.

There are additional provisions that are problematic.

Yet this bill went largely ignored by the mainstream media that even on July 10, 2019 when that legislative disaster was passed by the House of Representatives by a vote of 365-65, 57 Republicans voting against the bill.

Furthermore, the bill was voted on without a single hearing and without any amendments being added.

However, the Western Free Press certainly took note of this legislative betrayal in an article entitled, GOP Legislators Back Bill to Replace American Workers.  The subtitle completed the infuriating picture,  H.R. 1044 would flood the country with Indian tech workers and Chinese investors.

Here is an excerpt from the Western Free Press report:

House Resolution 1044 is a bill that will substantially change the scope of the U.S. immigration and green card distribution system. For starters, it removes a safeguard that prevents green card figures from being monopolized by people from a single country. This safeguard, known as the “per country cap,” ensures that visas are available to a diverse global pool of workers from a variety of different occupational industries. Such significant reform to our immigration system shouldn’t be fast-tracked but that’s just what happened Wednesday when the measure passed 365-65 with 57 Republicans voting “nay.”

GOP Legislators who backed the bill praised how it will help foreign workers, companies, and investments. The 65 Legislators who voted against it likely did so because it doesn’t do enough to help American workers and recent graduates. The bill will head to the Senate where Republican Senators are pushing a mirrored version of this bill.

H.R. 1044, called the Fairness for High-Skilled Immigrants Act, would over-flood visas from two types of applicants: Indian tech workers and Chinese investors. It’s not necessarily shocking that House Democrats were fanatical in their support for the bill but it should be newsworthy that several “America First” Republicans supported it, especially given the impact that H.R. 1044 will have on American workers.

The bill essentially rewards tech employers who replace American workers with lower cost contract workers who entered the country on temporary on visas. It creates a fast track to green cards for 300,000 Indian contract workers that are currently backlogged in waiting lines.

On April 30, 2009, the Senate Judiciary Committee then-chaired by Chuck Schumer, conducted a hearing on the topic, Comprehensive Immigration Reform in 2009, Can We Do It and How? Alan Greenspan, the former chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank testified.  His prepared testimony included the following infuriating excerpt that addressed the need and benefits to be derived by massively increasing the number of H-1B visa workers:

An accelerated influx of highly skilled immigrants would bridge that gap and moreover, carry with it two significant bonuses.

First, skilled workers and their families form new households. They will, of necessity, move into vacant housing units, the current glut of which is depressing prices of American homes. And, of course, house price declines are a major factor in mortgage foreclosures and the plunge in value of the vast quantity of U.S. mortgage-backed securities that has contributed substantially to the disabling of our banking system. The second bonus would address the increasing concentration of income in this country. Greatly expanding our quotas for the highly skilled would lower wage premiums of skilled over lesser skilled. Skill shortages in America exist because we are shielding our skilled labor force from world competition. Quotas have been substituted for the wage pricing mechanism. In the process, we have created a privileged elite whose incomes are being supported at noncompetitively high levels by immigration quotas on skilled professionals. Eliminating such restrictions would reduce at least some of our income inequality.

In a joint effort, demonstrating true collusion, the Democrats and Republicans have united to shaft Americans!

President Trump must be made aware of the irreparable damage this would do to Americans by undermining his promises and goals and the dreams and aspirations of Americans.

It is time for legislation with a somewhat different name, the “Fairness for High-Skilled Americans Act!”

RELATED ARTICLE: Trump admin plans to make it easier to deport illegal immigrants without a trial

EDITORS NOTE: This FrontPage Magazine column is republished with permission. All rights reserved.

Fred Fleitz: Don’t ignore Reps. Omar and Tlaib and their hateful anti-Semitic, anti-Israel rhetoric

Originally published at Fox News

Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., has once again acted on her virulent anti-Semitic and anti-Israel views by introducing a repugnant resolution in the House comparing Israel to Nazi Germany and supporting the Boycott Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement that seeks to wage economic warfare on the Jewish state.

While falsely labeling President Trump’s legitimate criticisms of her radical positions and bigoted statements as “racist,” Omar continues to demonize Israel and seek to turn it into a pariah state cut off from economic, cultural and academic ties with the rest of the world.

Omar said in her resolution: “Americans of conscience have a proud history of participating in boycotts to advocate for human rights abroad including … boycotting Nazi Germany from March 1933 to October 1941 in response to the dehumanization of the Jewish people in the lead-up to the Holocaust.”

Omar’s resolution was co-sponsored by Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., and Rep. John Lewis, D-Ga.

Omar and Tlaib – along with Democratic Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York and Ayanna Pressley of Massachusetts – call themselves “the squad” and have drawn criticism from mainstream Democratic politicians as well as President Trump for their extremist positions.

Even Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York – a staunch Democrat and no friend of President Trump – has called BDS anti-Semitic and anti-Israel.

“We must continue to stand firm against the profoundly biased campaign to delegitimize the state of Israel” through BDS, Schumer said in March. “When there is such a double standard, when the world treats everybody one way and the Jew or the Jewish state another way, there’s only one word for it: anti-Semitism.”

Michael Goodwin had an excellent take on this in a New York Post op-ed, writing: “Indeed, Omar, whom I regard as an unrepentant anti-Semite, further cemented her reputation by introducing legislation Thursday making it legal to organize boycotts against Israel. Predictably, she drew comparisons of the Jewish state to Nazi Germany and apartheid South Africa. Don’t expect more than a peep out of dissenting Dems. They’re afraid of her and of the shocking anti-Israel sentiment on the left.”

Omar submitted her resolution in response to five pro-Israel bills under consideration by the House and Senate that condemn the murderous Palestinian terrorist group Hamas, improve Israel’s security, and oppose the BDS movement.

While the anti-BDS resolutions are expected to pass both houses, Omar’s resolution is expected to go nowhere.  Rep. Brad Sherman, D-Calif., rejected Omar’s resolution out of hand, telling the Jerusalem Post: “I can’t imagine that any committee is going to mark up or take seriously any pro-BDS resolution.”

I wrote an article in March praising the fabulous speech by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., to the annual American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) in which she condemned the BDS movement. Pelosi noted correctly that BDS does not recognize the right of Jewish people to national self-determination or accept a two-state solution to create a Palestinian homeland living side by side in peace with the Jewish state of Israel.

Pelosi also praised Israel as “an ally for peace and security in the region,” and said “if you care about American security, you must care about Israel’s security.”

Sadly, Pelosi’s party appears to be moving in another direction. None of the Democratic presidential candidates spoke to the AIPAC conference because of pressure from far-left groups like MoveOn.org.

In fact, Pelosi was forced to water down a House resolution condemning anti-Semitism in response to statements by Omar because of opposition from House progressives. Rep. Lee Zeldin, R-N.Y., angrily condemned the watered-down resolution in a House floor speech as “spineless” and “disgusting.”

Even though it will never pass, Omar’s resolution should not be ignored. Not only does this indicate that she and Tlaib are not backing down from their anti-Semitic and anti-Israel views – I fear it represents the future of the Democratic Party, which is slowly being taken over by far-left, anti-Semitic, socialist radicals.

For decades, support for Israel was a bipartisan position held by Democrats and Republicans. Unfortunately, the ranks of Democratic supporters of Israel are shrinking.

Democratic leaders must start vocally opposing Omar and Tlaib and their hateful anti-Semitic and anti-Israel rhetoric.

Israel is a democracy and strong ally of the United States that deserves the support of all Americans. And anti-Semitism is an ancient and toxic prejudice that has no place in the United States.

About Fred Fleitz

Fred Fleitz is President and CEO of the Center for Security Policy. He recently served as a Deputy Assistant to President Trump and Chief of Staff to National Security Adviser John Bolton. He previously worked in national security positions for 25 years with CIA, DIA, the Department of State and the House Intelligence Committee staff. Read his complete bio here. Follow Fleitz on Twitter @fredfleitzView all posts by Fred Fleitz 

RELATED ARTICLES:

Inside the Muslim Brotherhood

Iran’s seizure of two oil tankers was a stupid move – It could boost European support for Trump

RELATED VIDEO: HAMAS Runs Espionage Ops in Turkey.

EDITORS NOTE: This Center for Security Policy column is republished with permission. All rights reserved.

VIDEO: Partners in Hatred — American Muslims for Palestine and IfNotNow

You have probably heard of campus anti-Israel group Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP), founded by UC Berkeley professor Hatem Bazian. However, you may not have heard of Bazian’s other virulently anti-Israel organization, American Muslims for Palestine (AMP).

In a brand new July 2019 report, Canary Mission reveals AMP’s national and local leadership to be rife with anti-Semitism and terror support.

In the course of the investigation, Canary Mission discovered that AMP has developed a close strategic partnership with Jewish anti-Israel organization IfNotNow (INN).

WATCH OUR NEW VIDEO:


DOWNLOAD: Comprehensive Summary of AMP & IfNotNow Interactions


The report highlights 25 AMP leaders and activists, all of whom have spread a wide variety of anti-Semitic hatred, and 58 INN members.

The close partnership between AMP and INN has included:

  • AMP training INN activists
  • Collaboration on events and protests
  • Expressing support for each other at demonstrations and on social media

AMP’s shocking anti-Semitism includes:

  • “I believe in [the] holocaust. One of my fav parts of history. – Leena Yousef, AMP-Chicago
  • “If you work with the yahood [jews] idc if you’re Muslim or atheist you’re a kalb [dog] and you deserve the worst in life.”- Mohamad Habehh, AMP-NJ
  • “We will resist until we get our freedom without your BS negotiations ! #كلنا_حماس [#We_Are_All_Hamas].” – Ahmad Aburas, AMP-NJ

The report comes at a pivotal time for INN. In June 2019, their leadership announced an attempt to directly influence the 2020 United States presidential elections. The group employed six full-time activists to follow the summer campaign trails of various Democratic candidates and lobby them to take a position against “the occupation.”

In July, Canary Mission exposed INN co-founder Max Berger for a 2013 tweet in which he said that he would be “friends with Hamas.” Berger is currently a Director of Progressive Partnerships for U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren’s presidential campaign.

Instead of harassing Democratic candidates to take positions against Israel, perhaps IfNotNow should spend their time apologizing to the Jewish community and answering for their partnership with AMP.

AMP activists spread vile hatred of Jews, express support for terror and take pleasure in the Holocaust. AMP is anti-Semitic to its core. IfNotNow is complicit.

To find out more about AMP and their close partnership with INN, read the Full Report.

RELATED ARTICLE: Fred Fleitz: Don’t Ignore Reps. Omar and Tlaib and their Hateful Anti-Semitic, Anti-Israel Rhetoric

EDITORS NOTE: This Canary Mission column is republished with permission. All rights reserved.

PODCAST: Understanding backyard wars. Selling Out to China? $15 Minimum Wage, Does More Harm Than Good.

GUESTS AND TOPICS:

Lt Col (R) Saris Sangari, retired U.S. Army, who saw extensive combat in the Middle East as a Special Operations Forces soldier and who, after retirement, continues to advise the fledgling Assyrian Christian Army in Iraq known as Dwekh Nawsha with his military expertise.

TOPIC…Understanding backyard wars!

Frank Vernuccio serves as editor-in-chief of the New York Analysis of Policy & Government, providing objective coverage of key issues facing the United States today. Frank is the co-host of the Vernuccio/Novak Report, nationally both on broadcast radio and the web at amfm247.com. FRANK also co-hosts of the “The American Political Zone,” Broadcast on cable in eastern Connecticut.

TOPIC...Selling Out to China!

Michael Busler, Ph.D., a public policy analyst and a Professor of Finance at Stockton University where he teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in Finance and Economics. He has written Op-ed columns in major newspapers for more than 35 years.

TOPIC…$15 Minimum Wage, More Harm Than Good!

Did Rep. Ilhan Omar Benefit from Massive Failure of US State Department’s Family Reunification Program?

If you have been following the controversy swirling around the charge that Rep. Ilhan Omar might have committed fraud by marrying her brother, there might have been a fraud committed years before that even.

Back in 2008 I began a series of reports on the so-called P-3 program that permits already resettled refugees in the US to apply to bring in ‘family’ members.

All of that was chronicled at Refugee Resettlement Watch that WordPress suspended.

However, here John Binder writing at Breitbart sums up the State Department scandal and points to an important report by a former ICE attorney who says of the fraud that tens of thousands of Somalis got into the US and once the fraud was revealed there there were no repercussions for the cheaters.

“This was staggering irresponsibility, possibly the biggest blunder in immigration history.”

Here is what Binder says at Breitbart:

A refugee program that allowed foreign relatives of already-arrived foreign refugees to the United States was halted, altogether, more than a decade ago due to mass fraud among applicants.

This week, Powerline blog’s David Steinberg suggested that Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) entered the U.S. in the mid-1990s as a third-priority, known as P-3, refugee — that is, a refugee who is admitted to the country due to their ties to an already-resettled refugee.

Steinberg’s report also claims that Omar committed immigration fraud when she falsely entered the country as a member of the “Omar” family that had already resettled in the U.S.

In 2008, after thousands of foreign nationals had entered as P-3 refugees, the program was halted by the *Bush administration* due to mass fraud wherein the State Department, through DNA testing, was able to confirm family relations between the program’s applicants in less than 20 percent of cases.

Overall, about 87 percent of P-3 refugees’ family relation claims turned out to be fraudulent.

BTW, guess who opposed DNA testing for family reunification?

If you guessed the nine federal resettlement contractors—groups like the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service and so forth, you would be correct!

Why? They claimed that the definition of ‘family’ is different in African culture and we should respect their ideas of family.

Binder continues….

Charles Thaddeus Fillinger, a former federal immigration official, has detailed the enormous fraud that has occurred among P-3 refugees in his 30-page policy paper, calling the program “the greatest refugee fraud crisis in modern times.”

More here.

Here is a link to Fillinger’s treatise on the massive fraud perpetrated mostly by Africans for possibly decades.

I am so glad to see that this era of fraud has not been swept under the rug.  Interesting that it would take a scandal swirling around a member of Congress to help bring it to light.

I had to laugh when I saw a guest on Fox News yesterday say that Rep. Ilhan Omar (or whatever her name is) did it right by entering the US legally!

Wonder if we can go back and identify the thousands of  immigration cheats.  Just dreaming!

See all of my previous posts on Rep. Ilhan Omar by clicking here.

EDITORS NOTE: This Frauds, Crooks and Criminals column is republished with permission. All rights reserved.

The Progressive Caucus’ push for a $15 Minimum Wage using Lies and Half Truths

The Congressional Progressive Caucus (which includes the four members of The Squad) sent out an email titled “JUST IN: Florida Minimum Wage update →.” The email targets U.S. Senators demanding that they bring up the Raise the Wage Act for a vote. The Raise the Wage Act has already passed by the House of Representatives.

There appear to be some white lies and half truths in the Progressive Caucus email. The email quotes a Common Dreams article stating:

A $15 minimum wage would reduce household and child poverty while increasing worker productivity and retention rates.

Sounds good until you look at the Congressional Budget Office report “The Effects on Employment and Family Income of Increasing the Federal Minimum Wage.” The CBO report states:

Effects of the $15 Option on Employment and Income. According to CBO’s median estimate, under the $15 option, 1.3 million workers who would otherwise be employed would be jobless in an average week in 2025. (That would equal a 0.8 percent reduction in the number of employed workers.) CBO estimates that there is about a two-thirds chance that the change in employment would lie between about zero and a reduction of 3.7 million workers. [Emphasis added]

The Bernie Sanders Effect

Senator Bernie Sanders, a member of the Progressive Caucus, has been pushing Senator McConnell to bring the Raise the Wage Act to the Senate floor for a vote. At the same time we have learned that Senator Sanders doesn’t pay his campaign staff a $15 minimum wage. According to their contract with the Sander’s campaign his field workers get an annual salary of $36,000, which is $15 an hour for a normal work week. But Sander’s staff complained that they are putting in 60 hour work weeks, which means they are making $13 an hour.

According to Vox Sanders got away with this bate and switch by making his field staff salaried and therefore not eligible for overtime pay. In a Vox column titled “The controversy over Bernie Sanders’s low-paid field staffers, explained. A moralist gets a taste of his own medicine” Matthew Yglesias notes:

But capitalism abhors a vacuum, so over time, more and more low-paid workers found themselves in the category of being salaried and ineligible for overtime. The Obama administration tried to tackle this with a Labor Department regulation mandating overtime for anyone earning less than $47,000, but it was challenged in court and the Trump administration elected not to defend the rule, instead writing a new rule that set the threshold at $35,000. At an annual salary just below that threshold, Sanders’s field staff would be collecting lots of overtime and thus earning more than $36,000, but instead, their salary was pegged (perhaps not coincidentally) to be just above the exempt threshold.

This is what I call the Bernie Sander effect – do as I say, not as I do.

Conclusion

Senator Bernie Sanders has proved what economists have been saying and now even Vox confirms,

“Beyond the question of campaign optics, however, this is exactly the point that opponents of minimum wage increases are always making — if you force employers to pay more, they’re going to respond by cutting back elsewhere.”

Bernie cut his own campaign staff’s hours understanding that a guaranteed minimum wage, while raising income for some, will cause others to lose income and their jobs. Senator Sanders is playing both sides against the middle. In this case passage of the Raise the Wage Act can, according to the CBO, cause as as many as 3.7 million workers to lose their jobs.

Are you feeling the Bern?

© All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Democrat Prospects Are Bleak As The Wacky Pack Takes Over

The Economic Devastation of Universal Basic Income

Wuh-Oh — The Squad’s Rashida Tlaib Calls For 20 Dollar Minimum Wage 

End the Spin in the Minimum Wage Debate

The Irrelevance of That “3 Billionaires Have More Wealth Than Half of America” Factoid

Democrats’ Long, Sordid History Of Falsely Charging Racism Explains Today’s Big Shrug

If you want to understand why Republicans and Trump supporters shrug off every accusation of racism against the president and the GOP, all you have to do is realize the long, sordid, vacuous history of Democrats calling the right racist over every major policy disagreement of the past 40 years.

From Ronald Reagan to George H.W. Bush, Newt Gingrich, George W. Bush, John McCain, Mitt Romney, Donald Trump, the Tea Party, the NRA and Republicans everywhere, Democrats have played the race card to tattered, unrecognizable bits. They have all but destroyed the ability to even have a constructive conversation about race.

But in the process, they and their media allies have inoculated most all Republicans from the charge of racism. We all just brush it aside.

But for some even on the right, we forget the smothering extent to which Democrats have constantly used this trope for personal, short-term political gain. And most on the left will never, ever be exposed to the following list — which self-explains why Republicans give no heed to the accusation anymore. (So, dear reader, share it with your Democratic friends, with anyone!)

We really don’t need to go back to the history of Democrats being the party of slavery through Jim Crow, and opposing the Civil Rights Act in higher percentages than Republicans, although those are all true. Let’s just launch into the list starting in the 1980s to see just how bad the Democrats have been — even while pursuing policies that have demonstrably harmed black, brown and poor people.


President Ronald Reagan — Racist

Reagan was tarred as a racist on two primary counts. One was his reference to the Chicago “welfare queen” he used in his speeches to make the case for welfare reform. But as both the Washington Post and the New York Times documented, Linda Taylor was indeed that, with a Cadillac limousine and a plethora of luxuries that she obtained through welfare fraud — which was rampant in the 80s.

Reagan’s launch of the “war on drugs” was also considered racist because black people distributed drugs and partook of drugs at a higher rate than white people. They were also harmed by drugs at a higher percentage, but that would not fit the narrative. Therefore it was really a war on black people. President Bill Clinton expanded that war and Sen. Joe Biden was a leader in the Senate of expanding the criminal penalties. While Reagan was called racist for his launching of the war, Clinton and Biden (at the time, anyway) were not racist for expanding it. See how it works?

This lie continues to this day.

Richard Cohen, a partisan Democrat masquerading as a newspaper columnist, wrote recently at the Washington Post: “Republicans must acknowledge: The party has been taken over by a racist. The Trump of the weekend’s tweet binge was the culmination of a racist electoral strategy going back to Richard Nixon’s “Southern strategy” and Ronald Reagan’s aw-shucks indifference to civil rights.”

It’s not true, but it works in the category of a lie told often enough becomes the truth.


President George H.W. Bush — Racist

H.W. Bush was called racist for running the “infamous” Willie Horton ad in his 1988 campaign for president.

“Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Los Angeles) Wednesday branded President Bush ‘a racist’ who has ‘polarized the races in this country,’” the Los Angeles Times reported in 1992. Some things never change.

The New Yorker magazine wrote a typical summation of the elder Bush:

“In the 1988 Presidential race, when he defeated Michael Dukakis, his campaign, under the direction of Lee Atwater, pioneered many of the slash-and-burn tactics that disfigure modern elections. (The racist Willie Horton ad was but one of many misleading attacks that the Bush campaign launched.)”

Crime was at its highest rate in American history in 1988 and Massachusetts Gov. Michael Dukakis was running a campaign of competent manager against Bush. But Dukakis had instituted a prison furlough program allowing dangerous criminals to get weekends out of prison. It was a disastrous program and his fellow Democrat in the primary, Al Gore, was the first to attack him on it.

But when the Bush campaign did so, using the picture of Willie Horton (not the great Detroit Tigers’ left fielder) who raped and murdered a woman while out on furlough, it was immediately labeled racist — and is to this day, according to Democrats and media, who are one and the same.

It’s worth remembering that Democrats now patronizingly hold up H.W. Bush as the very paragon of the decent Republican — because it is convenient to rewrite their history in order to make their attacks on Trump more believable.


House Speaker Newt Gingrich — Racist

Gingrich’s promise to voters, and efforts to keep those promises after Republicans won the House in 1994, turned out to be racist. The specific proposals that were racist were cutting taxes, pursuing welfare reform and pushing back the racial preference system Democrats had put in place. He and the GOP were branded the party of racists.

The New York Times attacked Gingrich for his “race-based, anger-charged politics” while comparing him to the infamous southern segregationist George Wallace — another trope that would become common fare for Democrats. New York Democratic congressman Charles Rangel attacked Republican tax cuts as pure race hatred. “It’s not ‘spic’ or ‘ni**er’ anymore,” Rangel growled.

Here’s a little roundup from City Journal on the overall reaction (note: the “worse than Hitler” bit):

“…attacks reached a fever pitch after Republicans won the House of Representatives in 1994. “What [conservative Republicans] want to do,” President Clinton said, “is make war on the kids of this country.” On NBC’s Today Show, to take another example, left-leaning host Bryant Gumbel asked liberal children’s advocate Marian Wright Edelman a classic leading question: “In light of the new welfare-reform bill, do you think the children need more prayers than ever before?” Former Democratic New York governor Mario Cuomo evoked the image of “Republican storm-troopers.” Another New York Democrat, Congressman Major Owens, went further: “These are the people,” he thundered, “who are practicing genocide with a smile: they’re worse than Hitler.” 

Worse than Hitler. That was in the 1990s.

Now of course, the principles of limited government, tax cuts, minimal welfare tied to responsible actions and deregulation are standard conservative fare, and not rationally tied in any way to Nazism, Hitler or the Holocaust. But see how the exact same cards are played over and over.


President George W. Bush — Racist

W. Bush was a racist because of the allegedly slow response of the Federal Emergency Management Agency to Hurricane Katrina’s devastation in New Orleans, a majority black city. Of course, it couldn’t possibly be that the gears of the gigantic federal bureaucracy grind slowly and incompetently and that New Orleans’ well-known corruption and mismanagement left the city in terrible shape. No, it was Bush secretly slowing everything down specifically so more black people would die.

Bush wanted Congress to provide more money for border security as more than four million illegal immigrants came to the U.S. between 2000-2005 — the highest five-year period in our history. He committed 6,000 National Guard troops to the border to strengthen security.

But Bush also pushed for the Comprehensive Immigration Reform which included elements awfully close to full amnesty and was opposed by the vast majority of Republicans for legalizing millions of people who came here illegally. The conversative position is that the rule of law matters. Getting in line matters. Knowing who is in our country matters. But GOP opposition, which eventually killed the bill, was labeled racist by Democrats.

Here’s the left-leaning Brookings Institute’s take on opposition to immigration reform by Republicans. This was to the 2013 “reform,” but it mirrors 2007:

“It’s because House Republicans aren’t motivated by true conservatism. Rather, they represent constituencies haunted by anxiety associated with the perception that they’re “losing their country” to immigrants from south of the border. The Republican Party is 89 percent white, and 97 percent of Republican House districts in the 113th Congress have white majorities.”

Many Republicans were well into yawning at the charges of racism by this point. But so much more came before Trump entered the stage.


Sen. John McCain — Racist

It’s interesting how beloved McCain is today by Democrats and the media. Well he wasn’t while running for President in 2008. He was…a racist! (Among the other now-common range of name-calling.)

The New York Times accused McCain of “racially tinged attacks.”

The Hill reminded us at the time of McCain’s death that, “In August 2008, the New York Times editorial page described an official McCain ad as ‘racially tinged’ because it included a photo of Obama juxtaposed with Paris Hilton and Britney Spears. The message the campaign was sending: Obama, with little experience and media adulation, was much more sizzle than steak, a paparazzi-obsessed celebrity.”

Then, liberal journalist Ezra Klein accused McCain of “running crypto-racist ads.” NPR journalist Bill Press called McCain’s ads “deliberately and deceptively racist.” Don Lemon, now a CNN anchor, charged that the McCain campaign was “creating a political environment that is inciting hate and hate speech.”

Rep. John Lewis said McCain was “sowing the seeds of hatred and division” and said McCain’s rhetoric harkened back to segregationist George Wallace. Another Wallace comparison.  Of McCain!

For good measure, Teen Vogue magazine called McCain “patently Islamaphobic” because of the threats he saw in Syrian of Islamic extremism — which ended up being right about.

So it’s worth remembering that the now beloved McCain, because before his death he hated Trump and opposed GOP conservatives, was called a racist by Democrats and their media when he was running for president as a Republican.


Gov. Mitt Romney — Racist

And then we have Romney, one of the nicest and most decent men ever to run for president, if a bit of a squish on actual conservative values and pretty unpopular now among Republicans.

The by-now very familiar refrain of the Democrats and their media was trotted out on schedule to label Romney a racist for wanting to repeal the financial regulation commonly referred to as Dodd-Frank — which has hamstrung community banks and startups and made the too big to fail even bigger.

It was none other than Vice President Joe Biden who told a heavily black audience in 2012 that Romney’s efforts were designed to “put y’all back in chains.” (Of course, this is why it’s such delicious justice that Biden gets attacked by Sen. Kamala Harris for being a racist.)

Romney pushed back after the comment by Biden, saying “this is what an angry and desperate presidency looks like.” Well naturally, that was racist!

U.S. News and World Report wrote at the time of Romney using the word “anger” twice, twice!

“You notice he said anger twice; he’s really trying to use racial coding and access some really deep stereotypes about the angry black man,” said Toure, an African-American co-host on MSNBC’s The Cycle, on Thursday. “This is part of the playbook against Obama, the ‘otherization,’ he’s not like us,” he continued. “I know it’s a heavy thing, I don’t say it lightly, but this is ‘niggerization.’ You are not one of us, you are like the scary black man who we’ve been trained to fear.”

Zerlina Maxwell, a Democratic strategist, said at the time that the Romney campaign was using race against Obama. “When you are ‘other-izing’ the first black president and saying he’s not one of us, you’re talking to a very specific segment of your base. But the danger is independents don’t like that. So he’s walking a fine line.”

Note the “other-izing” and racism had become a Democrat talking point against Romney when it was Biden who launched the race-baiting, and also that the natural state of Republicans is racist, but appealing to that could turn off independents. Now, predictably as we have seen, when Romney became a critic of Trump, all was forgotten by the media and Democrats and he was one of the good guys. Like McCain and even Bush.


All The Rest Of Us — Racists

Of course, it’s not just Republican presidents and presidential candidates. Democrat Rep. Hank Johnson said the NRA was racist for opposing Obama’s gun control proposals. Democrat Rep. Charlie Rangel, again, claimed the Tea Party was racist (it was literally founded on the huge bailouts and stimulus spending, wanting fiscal restraint and lower taxes. But that was racist.) Jesse Jackson stated that the Tea Party “should be called the “Fort Sumter Tea Party that sought to maintain states’ rights and slavery.”

When Republicans want borders that are secure, and people only coming legally, they are always portrayed by Democrats and the media as racist. Democrat Phil Ramos (D-NY), says that the word “illegal” is itself racist, a line that has since been picked up by others.

But when Sen. Obama, in 2005, said he opposed “undetected, undocumented, unchecked” immigration, there was nary a peep from the media and Democrats. Here’s Obama’s quote from that press conference:

“We all agree on the need to better secure the border and to punish employers who choose to hire illegal immigrants. We are a generous and welcoming people, here in the United States, but those who enter the country illegally, and those who employ them, disrespect the rule of law and they are showing disregard for those who are following the law. We simply cannot allow people to pour into the United States, undetected, undocumented, unchecked and circumventing the line of people who are waiting patiently, diligently and lawfully to become immigrants in this country.”

That sounds like not just the Republican position, but President Trump’s position. And in fact, it was said at a bi-partisan press conference made up of both Democrats and Republicans. But now that position is racist (well, if a Republican holds it.)

So when Donald Trump comes along, and the same old people — Democrats and the media — cry out that he is racist, Republicans basically yawn. It’s like they never read the story of the boy who cried wolf, or if they did their take away was something about white privilege or environmental destruction by meat-eaters.

We’re all just immune to the charge of racism.

Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham just puts it plainly in a recent tweet: “Something I have learned: If you are a Republican nominee for President — or President — you will be accused of being a racist.”

Yes, and this list makes that plain to see. But now it also extends to anyone who supports a Republican or Trump.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Race Card Slowly Loses Its Sting Through Overuse As We Head Toward 2020

Understanding Why ‘the Squad’ Screams ‘Racism’

EDITORS NOTE: This Revolutionary Act column is republished with permission. All rights reserved.

Behind the chiffon curtain: Drag queen story hours and child endangerment

Drag queen story hours (DQSHs) have quickly become one of the most divisive controversies in the 21st century culture war. Recent research revealed that these events are part of a much larger, intentional effort by the American Library Association to promote LGBTQ activism. New evidence from their recent annual conference shows how deep this promotion runs and how libraries are protecting themselves instead of protecting children. Communities are demanding to know: What’s really behind the values DQSHs are said to promote? Do DQSHs actually provide children with positive role models or expose them to dangerous men.

The initial exposure

In June, Personhood Alliance Education brought to light an intentional movement within the American Library Association (ALA) to bring DQSHs and other LGBTQ-promoting events into libraries across the country, even helping “secret librarian advocate operative[s]” sneak LGBTQ books and materials into current programs and use outside sponsors to host DQSHs in resistant communities. Over 43,000 people responded by signing our petition with LifeSite News. A similar petition partnership between CitizenGo and the Activist Mommy brought an additional 56,000 signatures. Both petitions were delivered to the ALA’s office in Washington, DC, on July 11th.

If you have not yet signed the petition to the ALA, which is now moving to Congress, click here to add your name.

Georgia Kijesky, leader of Personhood Maryland, was instrumental in bringing this issue to the forefront, as her local library in Lexington Park, Maryland is an active example of how larger forces are working to promote corrupted sexuality and gender to children. She also helped organize a well-attended prayer vigil on June 23rd during the DQSH and Drag 101 events at the library, which were led by a drag queen whose name was purposefully withheld from the public by the event sponsor.

The response to the research, the petition, and the vigil is one that has become familiar to Christian communities across the country. It’s a response shared by the ALA, LGBTQ advocacy groups, DQSH organizers and supporters, and even some churches:

  1. DQSHs reflect good values like inclusivity, acceptance, and freedom of expression.
  2. DQSHs are harmless and offer children positive role models.

Let’s examine what’s behind these claims.

The values beneath the veneer

At the 2019 ALA annual conference and exhibition, held in Washington, DC in June, intellectual freedom and inclusivity were front and center. Supported by the structures within the ALA that were created to normalize and promote the LGBTQ lifestyle, these rhetorical concepts—core values, according to the ALA—were woven throughout the workshops and exhibition hall. These core values were also worn proudly by ALA executives and attendees, even ALA president Loida Garcia-Febo, as they celebrated World Pride Month and the 50thanniversary of The Stonewall Riots. The Stonewall Uprising, as it’s also known, is a key milestone in the gay rights movement—six days of violent demonstrations started by drag queen Marsha P. Johnson against police who had raided a gay club in New York City in 1969.

More than 100 ALA conference workshops boasted an equality, diversity, and inclusivity theme; a reported one-third of the total workshop offerings. Sessions included:

Other workshops included, “A Child’s Room to Choose: Encouraging Gender Identity and Expression in School and Public Libraries” and “Are You Going to Tell My Parents?: The Minor’s Right to Privacy in the Library.”

It is important to note here that, under the guise of right-to-privacy, 1st Amendment protections, and anti-censorship, the ALA fought vigorously against requiring pornography blocking software on library computers in the early 2000s. This software was mandated for public libraries and schools through the federal Children’s Internet Protection Act. The ALA opposed porn filters all the way to the Supreme Court, but lost United States v. American Library Association in 2003. Today, the ALA is bypassing this decision, giving children access to pornography and age-inappropriate events and materials offline, in the form of DQSHs, Drag 101 events, explicit sex education workshops, and pornographic book displays.

The role models beneath the makeup

The ALA’s promotion of DQSHs legitimizes the idea that a man dressed as an exaggerated caricature of a woman promotes acceptance, inclusion, and children’s literacy. The DQSH website itself says that these events “capture the imagination and play of the gender fluidity of childhood and give kids glamorous, positive, and unabashedly queer role models.”

So what is a drag queen?

According to the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLADD), “Drag queens are men, typically gay men, who dress like women for the purpose of entertainment.” Drag queens perform for gay audiences in adult nightclubs and at other homosexual- and transgender-themed events and venues. They are performers who live other lives outside of their drag characters and may or may not be transgender, notes the National Center for Transgender Equality.

What about the “other life” of a drag queen, and does it matter in terms of having access to children?

This drag queen, Dylan Pontiff (aka Santana Pilar Andrews) says he can filter himself for different audiences—the gay men who pay money to see him in sexually charged drag attire and the children who sit in front of him as he reads children’s books that introduce homosexuality and gender-fluid concepts. Yet, he makes a startling admission: “[The DQSH] is going to be the grooming of the next generation. We are trying to groom the next generation.”

And what of the drag queen whose identity was purposefully withheld from the public prior to the June 23rd events at the Lexington Park Library in Maryland?

According to Samantha McGuire, the spokesperson for the event sponsor Southern Maryland Area Secular Humanists (SMASH), her organization ran a background check on Stormy Vain before the DQSH occurred, yet chose to withhold his identity because drag queens “get viciously attacked by trolls”. Once Stormy Vain posted about the DQSH on Facebook a few days later, it took an activist about 10 minutes to discover who he is.

Meet Todd Musick (aka Stormy Vain), who runs a lurid sex business that features gay males called Stormy’s Angels of Entertainment, dba Eroticasy. Though Musick has now taken his website offline and made all of his social media accounts private, here are just a few screenshots of his work, which was captured in a 70-page exposé (credit: Mass Resistance, at the request of Personhood Maryland’s Georgia Kijesky).

During a July 9th St. Mary’s County Commissioners’ meeting, SMASH’s Samantha McGuire presented an indirect defense of Stormy Vain, without addressing the issue of the background check, by accusing Personhood Maryland’s Georgia Kijesky of “doxxing.” She also thanked the commissioners for “listening over and over again to the same bigoted comments by a misinformed public.” McGuire went on to address Kijesky again: “Some of the people in this room expose themselves to be those very bigots.” You can watch her 4-minute response here.

Here’s what Kijesky had presented to the commissioners earlier in the meeting, regarding what had been uncovered about Stormy Vain.

The Lexington Park Library’s meeting room policy absolves the St. Mary’s County Library Board of Trustees from the responsibility of vetting who has access to children, because to avoid the controversy of sponsoring a DQSH, it allows third parties to reserve a room to do so. This has left a gray area as to who does background checks and whether they are even required. The Board of Trustees had even addressed the DQSH controversy beforehand, during its June 12th board meeting, saying that “talking points will be developed for Board members…We will not be putting out a press release since we do not want to draw attention to the event.” Here again, there was no mention of a background check on the men who would have access to children.

Kijesky explains:

“This is just another loophole library officials have created to circumvent community objections to such events at the library. They’re passing the buck onto the event organizers who are not obliged to provide proof that the background check was even done!”

Who is responsible then?

Who is responsible for protecting children at public libraries? The libraries? The ALA? The groups that sponsor the events? The parents? The police? The community?

The answer is all of the above.

Yet, evidence is mounting across the country, regarding the “other lives” of drag queens and how they are blurring the lines between adult sexual entertainment and children’s entertainment:

Drag queen culture is also pulling children into its world in other ways, like this video showing drag kid Nemis Quinn Mélançon-Golden (aka Queen Lactatia) getting his start on stage (caution, language warning). Nemis also recently posed with nude adult drag queen Violet Chachki. In another video, drag kid Desmond Napoles (aka Desmond is Amazing) is shown dancing provocatively at a gay nightclub in New York City. The mainstream media has been championing the drag kid phenomenon for some time, as shown in this recent clip of Good Morning America, where Desmond was praised for being a “trailblazer.”

Despite increasing evidence, supporters continue to claim that DQSHs and similar events, in general and as a concept, are harmless.

Are DQSHs harmless?

According to Jon K. Uhler, MS, LPC, who has worked for over 11 years with thousands of incarcerated sex offenders, DQSHs are not harmless. He took to Twitter to note that gay men who dress in drag give sufficient indication of being sexually deviant outside of DQSHs. Twitter has since screened and censored all of Uhler’s posts that suggest predators exist within the homosexual and transgender communities.

“Concerns about these men, who seem very interested in spending time up close and personal with other people’s kids, are not phobic. The issue is child safety…Keeping kids from sexual predators must become a priority. No longer is it acceptable for people to place children at risk to pacify or placate men who want to play dress-up and/or act sexualized in front of kids…Events such as [DQSHs] are the perfect invitation for predators to attend and access kids for ‘hands on’ interactions.”

Are communities singling out DQSHs in particular, and are those who oppose DQSHs “bigots,” as Samantha McGuire and many others charge? Uhler says, “Of course not!” and references recent pedophile scandals in the Boy Scouts and in Catholic and Southern Baptist churches as other venues where predators have gained access to children.

“The concern is to ensure that wherever men would want to access kids, there be close scrutiny, instead of ‘an open door’ policy. Protecting [kids] must take priority over men who desire access to them.”

American College of Pediatrics president, Dr. Michelle Cretella, recently spoke about the psychological dangers of DQSHs. Her organization has taken a bold stand against puberty blockers, hormone therapy, and surgeries for children diagnosed with gender dsyphoria.

“The idea of the permanence of biological sex doesn’t form in a child’s cognitive development until age 7… It takes up until age 7 for many children to think ‘I was born a boy, I am a boy. If I put on a dress that doesn’t make me a girl, it just makes me a boy in a dress.’ What is dangerous is that these young children are just developing the awareness of the fact that they are a boy or a girl… It’s dangerous because when you give young children fantasy picture books like this it indoctrinates them into thinking that their sex is all external. A preschool boy, for example, may think ‘The boy teddy bear became a girl when he turned his bow tie into a barrette. I can do that, too.’ Children will come to believe that their sex is whatever they think they want it to be. This is dangerous from a psychological point of view. It’s disrupting the natural process of gender identity formation.”

But that is precisely the point.

What about the parents?

Parents who bring their children to DQSHs genuinely believe they are teaching their children to love and accept everyone. Joelle Retener, author of Free to Be Incredible Mea book on the ALA’s 2019 Rainbow List, wrote this in an Instagram post:

“Some people might wonder why we celebrate pride with our kids. To us it’s pretty simple. Because teaching them to not just accept but to love and embrace people that are different from them means actually exposing them to those very people… Because here amidst all these beautifully diverse people from all walks of life, sexual orientations, gender identities, races and religions, my son is no longer a boy in a dress. He is just, a kid.” [emphasis added]

Retener is shown below with Stormy Vain at the June 23rd DQSH in Lexington Park, Maryland, where Stormy read her book.

Parents who bring their children to DQSHs are adamant that the events do not promote homosexuality or transgenderism. But the question must be raised:

Why allow children to be exposed to books that do just that?

Airlie Andersen, the author of Neither, another ALA-promoted book read by Stormy Vain at the Maryland DQSH, said this on the website LGBTQ Reads:

“I try to make books for everyone, but particularly for very young readers, children who need a jumping-off place to start talking about being different, feeling awkward, finding a special spot in the world. Someday my son may experience exclusion or pressure to make a choice one way or the other, when it’s his in-betweenness that should be celebrated.”

What can be done?

Personhood Alliance Education’s initial research listed several things local communities can do to detect, prevent, and where necessary, protest “cancel-proof” DQSHs in their libraries (scroll to the end of the article for the list). But can there be a larger effort to stop children from being put in harm’s way?

The Personhood Alliance is working with other groups on model legislation at the state level to protect children from DQSHs and to prohibit public resources from being used for the promotion and delivery of pornography and other age-inappropriate materials and events at libraries. This model legislation will be based on existing child endangerment and child welfare laws, which vary widely across the country. According to Personhood Alliance president, Gualberto Garcia Jones, a plan to go after the taxpayer funding the ALA receives at the federal level is also in the works, as well as legislation that applies the federal Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act to the DQSH phenomenon. “We will no longer sit by and allow this to be pushed onto children who are at a vulnerable place in their development and cannot consent to being exposed,” says Jones.

The Personhood Alliance currently has 22 state affiliates, with seven more states in the application process. “We will be working through our affiliates in different ways to put an end to the exploitation of children and the corruption of God-designed sexuality and gender by the American Library Association and activist library boards throughout the country.”

For more information on how to get involved in your state, find a Personhood Alliance affiliate or contact info@personhood.org.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Democrats’ Equality Act Could See Repeat Of Canada’s Transgender Genital Waxing Dispute

Should you bother reading privacy policies? Yes, and here’s why

EDITORS NOTE: This Personhood Alliance column is republished with permission. All rights reserved.

VIDEO: An altercation between two Georgia Democrats. Media Runs it as a Hate Crime?

It seems that the media would do some fact checking before they run with a story. Given the Jussie Smollett hoax and the Catholic student rampage one would believe that the legacy media would have learned a lesson. Talk to everyone involved, then run the full story.

Chris Enloe the weekend editor for TheBlaze reported on the incident between Georgia Rep. Erica Thomas (D) and Eric Sparkes, a Cuban American and Democrat. Enloe noted:

Mainstream media outlets, Twitterprominent presidential candidates, and even New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio rushed to condemn what Georgia Rep. Erica Thomas (D) claims was an incident of racism at her local Publix grocery store on Friday.

Now it appears the truth is not what she claimed or what the media initially reported.

Read the full article.

Watch as WSB-TV’s cameras caught Thomas verbally berating Sparkes, who remains calm during the interview:

UPDATE: Video of Georgia Lawmaker’s ‘Racism’ Incident Comes Out.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Trump, Baltimore, and the Diminishing Potency of the ‘Race Card’

Witness says Georgia lawmaker was the one who told man, ‘Go back’

Liar, Liar: Georgia House Minority Leader Caught In A Hate Hoax 

Trouble In Bernie Land: His Campaign Is Struggling To Fulfill A Major Policy Promise 

Social Media Censors Angel Mom For Asking Kamala One Question About Illegal Immigration 

REVEALED: The Democrats’ Blueprint To Steal 2020 From The Voters Of America

The Enemy Within

The weak grow strong by effrontery— the strong grow weak through inhibition.” Henry Kissinger


Watching what is going on in American House of Representative and social media, Vladimir Putin and his KGB cronies are laughing and chuckling at America’s incompetence. Three Directors of the FBI were unable to identify the Trump/Dossier as a KGB hoax-production and, nobody in the American Security Apparatus exposed this Russian fraud—Falshivka produced by the Russian Intel. What a Shame! I wrote about it for about three years. I recognized this fraud in two seconds, warning you constantly about a paralyzed American Intel, unwilling at the highest level to identify our foremost enemy—the KGB. I am using these three letters as they are familiar to vast majority of Americans, I have combined under this term the entire Russian Intelligence.

In addition to the shameful condition in our Intel, the laughing in the Kremlin become even more hysterical after “the squad” identified America as the worst place to live in the world, run by the occupant of the White House, who they scream is a racist. The Kremlin is in frantic hysterical laughter, because 90% of their agenda is completed. The rest 10% is coming—the preparation for a Socialist Revolution in the 2020 presidential election in America going on at full speed… And this is not news for me, I am writing about the political operatives of the KGB, fishing in the murky waters of the Washington D.C. and treason committed by the Dems for the last three decades.

Don’t be surprised that “the squad” is insisting on Trump’s impeachment, it has nothing with the “color” of four radical women, it is ideology. This is also Putin’s agenda; he mortally hates Trump and his political operatives illustrate it. Read my columns written in 2017-2018, discussing Putin. Don’t be surprised that all 2020 Dems candidates for the U.S. presidency end up praising “the squad.” Unlike them, look at the strong reaction of Senator Graham to “the squad” as he goes nuclear: Graham RIPS ‘Anti-Semitic, Anti-America’ Dems; Says They ‘Hate Their Own Country’ posted by Hannity staff. Senator Graham stated: They are running on an agenda that is disgusting… They’re socialist, they’re anti-Semitic, and they stand for all the things most Americans disagree with.”

Andropov’s Legacy: A Fraudulent and Phony Democrat Party

Sen. Graham is right, every person, who loves America is disgusted, watching those four radical liar-provocateurs. I did, too. Listening to their hateful speeches, trashing America I was stunned by four radical women, who were returning me to my past in the Soviet Union, where the policy “to blame America first” had indoctrinated us in the Stalinist ideology, with an arsenal of different devices: lies, fraud, deceit, distortion, fabrication, perjury, and so on. Mocking America and praising Russia was the central part of the ideology, a modus operandi in our lives, in a time when perverted truth was turning logic up-side-down for all 24/7. That way Russia became a model of goodness and America became a rotten country with an illegitimate political system. We knew they were deceiving us, but Russia was a totalitarian state and we were intimidated into silence…

Now, in America, listening to those four Representatives of the Congress, I was scared, my entire body has become covered with goose bumps and a cold snake crawling along my spine has frozen me—Stalinist Political Correctness is reigning and with arrogant effrontery they demonstrated it here on American soil. I was terrified, but continued listening, analyzing the familiar handiwork of the KGB…I couldn’t believe it was happening in America! There is a third reason for Putin and his “criminal cabal” to enjoy and laugh, watching their several people participating in the Dems debates as the candidates for the American presidency. We can expect a third Manchurian President…

Moreover, none of Dems had reacted to terrorist attacks in Colorado and Washington where Antifa has raised the Mexican flag over the ICE facilities and our flag up-side down. It was a typical fascist putsch by the criminals with masked faces. The same crime had been perpetrated by these fascist Antifa thugs in Berkeley, California several years ago with no lawful penalty for their fascist ferocity. Just look at the whole Democrat Party’s policies, actions and agenda. They don’t respect our flag and pledge of allegiance. They want to abolish ICE and DHS and install a policy of open borders, giving healthcare to all illegal migrants, Medicare for the rest of us, and “Green New Deal,” which costs $93 trillion. Everyone who disagreed with them is a “Racist”—a typical Soviet approach to politics. CNN, their mouthpiece, mentioned the word “Racist” 22 hundred times during one day…

Truman’s Democratic Party has dissolved into the current American Socialist Party in July 2019. Look at Washington D.C.—the term “Racist” is customized by the Dems and has become the worst possible crime committed in America. In fact, our Founding Fathers created a self-reappearing system that restored and mended the mistakes of the past. America has NO problem of racism any longer—we all have equal rights and enjoy living in the most humane and well-developed democracy with capitalist economic system in the world. This is not a feud with the socialists, we have been at war for a long time, an asymmetrical war waged by the Socialist mafia against Western civilization and its successful capitalist economy during the last hundred years. Yes, it began after the victory of Socialists in the Russian Revolution in 1917 and became extremely effective in the middle of the 1960s. The infiltrated Democrat Party brought this war to our soil…

I have been writing about this war in all my books and columns for over thirty years—the war is the main topic, to me it is WW III – its definition: ”WW III: Recruitments and Drugs, Infiltration and Assassinations.” I am writing about this war, because I am a witness of how this war was executed and perpetrated by the KGB, which is the major culprit in the propaganda of Racism in America… Please, read an Epilogue of my book What is Happening to America?  The Hidden Truth of Global Destruction. Xlibris, 2012. In this book, I am describing Soviet fascism and giving you the definition of the ideology on p.159. Yes, the Epilogue addresses the recent topic of “Racism” and its roots…

Epilogue

“Dear Reader,

I owe you an explanation. With some American participation, the year 2011 has brought so many violent events in the world that you are confused—who are we fighting against and who are we helping? No other author talks about or confirms the brand new terms I gave you: Soviet Fascism and WW III. By reading my book you have already gotten basic knowledge of Soviet Fascism; however, it has recently changed its tactics—WW III has taken a new spiral. As a result the Democrats, Republicans, and Independents are deceived and misled. Writing the Epilogue at the end of 2011, I am taking this opportunity to present my analysis and commentaries of the new spiral of WW III, waged by the Kremlin.

If you have any doubts in my identification of Soviet Fascism and WW III, the first person to confirm the identity of both will be the Chairman of the KGB, 1967-1982, Yuri Andropov. I will give you a conversation of Lt. General Ion Mihai Pacepa, the highest-ranking KGB officer ever to defect to the U.S, with Yuri Andropov:  “In 1972 the Kremlin decided to turn the whole Islamic world against Israel and the U.S. As KGB Chairman, Yuri Andropov told me a billion adversaries could inflict far greater damage on America that could a few millions. We needed to instill a Nazi-style hatred for Jews throughout the Islamic world, and to turn this weapon of the emotions into a terrorist bloodbath against Israel and its main supporter the United States. No one within the American/Zionist sphere of influence should any longer feel safe.  (“Russian Footprints,” by Ion Mihai Pacepa, National Review Online, August 24, 2008.)

General Pacepa wrote in the same article: “According to Andropov… the Muslims had a taste for nationalism, jingoism, and victimology. Their illiterate, oppressed mobs could be whipped up to a fever pitch. Terrorism and violence against Israel and her master, American Zionism, would flow naturally from the Muslims’ religious fervor, Andropov sermonized.” What can better confirm both of my terms Soviet Fascism and WW III than those words? They summarized my entire book. I remind you that under Andropov the infiltration into Western civilization had tripled. Under his watch occurred the bloodiest terrorists’ attacks in the world, from the Munich murder of Israelis in the Olympic Village to the Johnstown tragedy in America.”

Now you can see the personality and character of the KGB Chairman Yuri Andropov targeting America in different aspects. Yes, the Muslims mobs were “whipped up to a fever pitch” by the Andropov KGB. Moreover, the same races policy was targeting our Black population by the KGB document designed to instill and inflame the racial division in America in the 1960-70s, titled Message to the Black Movement, A Political Statement from the Black Underground. Please, read the document to see clear the propaganda of racism in the ideology of Soviet Fascism…

I am writing about the time of Yuri Andropov, the KGB Chairman, because I was a member of the legal community in USSR at the time of his tenure and familiar with all of the KGB’s criminal activities. The Epilogue is only a part of that to introduce you the personality of the KGB’s Chairman, under his leadership more sinister and nefarious crimes took place against America. The mentioned above Message to the Black Movement   was flooding America to divide and conquer in the best Stalinist traditions in the end of the 1960s. For you to understand where the term “White Oppressors” came from, please read the Message, I don’t want to describe it, you won’t believe me, and you have to read it for yourself to grasp the direct effect of it on the Black Caucus in our Congress and on recent events…

Do you remember what Khrushchev promised to you? “Your children will live under Communism!” He had in mind the socialist platform and leadership of “the squad” that is guiding the entire Socialist mafia to a direction of Socialist revolution against the system designed by our Founding Fathers. We have it today. The last 3-4 decades the Dems have been infiltrated by the KGB, a Socialist mafia has been created within the Party, nothing left from Truman’s Party. The current House of Representatives demonstrates its movement towards Socialism and definite action against capitalist economy, “the squad” is leading the movement. My conclusion: The Dems Party is a political fraud like any other Socialist entities. Moreover, Vladimir Putin and his KGB now control the Dems and lead the Anti-Trump criminal cabal.

By the way, a recent study from the University of Pennsylvania has found that America is actually LESS racist under President Donald Trump than it was under Barack Obama. The study was conducted by researchers Danial J. Hopkins and Samantha Washington, who found that anti-Black and anti-Hispanic prejudice declined after the 2016 campaign and election. “Racism is dying, as people become more educated, bigotry and hatred will become a thing of the past.” My conclusion: Knowledge is Power! President Donald J. Trump is not a “Racist!” Donald Trump is fighting Soviet Fascism!!!

Knowledge of Russia and its Intelligence is a Must

I am repeating this refrain for over thirty years, writing about Russia and the KGB, because most of the trouble in the world is derived from and caused by Russia. It is not a coincidence that my latest two columns were dedicated to Political Correctness in the column Soviet Socialism in the 21st Century. As you know, I have renamed Soviet Socialism to Soviet Fascism lately. Political Correctness and Social Engineering are two sides of the same coin of Soviet Fascism. Stalinist PC was aimed at hiding or masking the Truth and replacing it with Stalin’s ideological Dogma. You can read official definition in my latest column, here is my definition of Political Correctness:

 “… Political correctness is a Stalinist policy, driven by the political agenda, a skillfully crafted design of a quintessential system of lies, fraud, and a long-term strategy of war against Western civilization to create of One World Socialist Government under Kremlin’s rule.”

To achieve the result Stalin needed a force, a mind-control mechanism or apparatus to implement his PC and the KGB became that very force. This is the reason I write about the KGB in my books and columns for thirty years. Soviet Fascism had been alive for 70 years due to the force provided by the entire Intelligence apparatus working in collaboration with the lies and fraud of Political Correctness. It is the Soviet Socialist economy that collapsed in 1991—the Soviet System, the regime and the KGB survived and not a lot has changed in Russia since, where Putin and his KGB are running the country. Knowledge of the regime, its methods, tricks, and diabolical Political Correctness is a Must!

Political Correctness is Stalinist social engineering within semantics, to use and affect a human emotional core, with touching scenes that play on your emotions, while deceiving you. Returning to “the squad” of four women who were blaming America, their agenda is clear to me–to replace our political system left to us by our Founding Fathers. They were acting by the protocol PC requires—they aimed at hiding and masking their real agenda while deceiving you with their “love” for America. They are the Islamist part of the Socialist mafia aimed at replacing Capitalism with Soviet Socialism, which I renamed Soviet Fascism. Moreover, Socialist mafia has its combined military force to achieve the goal—Antifa and several other fascist gangs are comprising that force. They don’t wear black shirts, they wear black masks. The Socialist Revolution is in progress in America! Be ready for 2020! The Dems will use all methods and tricks of Soviet Fascism to win!

Knowledge of Russia is a Must in foreign policy as well, as we are dealing now with “the Axis of Evil” a coalition of the countries under Kremlin’s umbrella adhered to the ideology of Soviet fascism. To know how to deal with Iran, you have to know Soviet fascism, to deal with North Korea, China or Syria, you have to know the KGB and the ideology implemented by Russia in the countries of the “Axis of Evil.”

In front of you is a typical repetition of the 1980s Russian game, trouble and confrontation with the West. Iran, a member of “the Axis of Evil”, illustrates this game in the international waters now in 2019. Never forget: It took 29 years for Stalin to create a Chinese Communist State. Read What is Happening to America? Xlibris, 2012. This book was sabotaged by the corrupt FBI twice to prevent its publication–Soviet Fascism doesn’t tolerate the Truth!

Stalinist policy of distributing the ideology of Soviet Fascism throughout the world is strongly sustained by that devoted disciple of Andropov—Vladimir Putin. Do you know that people from former Soviet Republics are joining ISIS? The field commanders of ISIS are Chechen or the former Saddam’s security operatives, both were trained by the Russian security forces. There are some documents accusing Russia in designing the attacks of 9/11 and bombings in Kenya and Tanzania. Yet, this topic should be discussed separately.

Knowing the Russian methods, agenda, and its proclivity to mold Soviet style charlatan-leaders around the world to engineer cadres of fifth columnists, I believe there are two types of people committing betrayals: Those who do not like the political system established by our Founding Fathers and are trying to transform it– they are currently collaborating with the KGB to destroy the country, and those people who haven’t a clue about the KGB infiltrations, hence becoming their unwitting accomplices. Both groups are the enemy within, they constitute a huge help to President Putin, who is continued running the anti-Trump show today…

My fellow Americans!

God gave us this last chance to save our county—President Donald J. Trump! Don’t allow Soviet Fascism to take over the American Republic. Now you can recognize all so-called socialists, “the squad,” the Trojan Horse Bernie, AOC, Beto, Pete, other Soviet Socialists, and their leader Tom Perez. They are lying, fooling and deceiving you for decades. Be vigilant! Some of them are sponsored by the KGB. Fight the ideology of Soviet Fascism and save the legacy of our Founding Fathers and the American Republic!

Knowledge is Power! Good Luck my beloved America the Beautiful!

To be continued www.simonapipko1.com or at www.drrichswier.com/author/spipko/.

“Send Her Back” – Some People Said Something

About 911, someone once said that “some people did something” Oh yeah it was Ilhan Omar who once said that. Well on July 17, 2019 in Greenville, NC at the Trump rally, America responded, by chanting, “send her back”. Seems some people said something. You know what I say, If you don’t like this country – get the hell out!

Islamization of America Underway

In my book, Trump and the Resurrection of America”, I wrote about the Islamization of America. I encourage you to click here and have a look. Fast forward to the 2018 mid-term elections and you can see they are here and encroaching into our system of government. Click here and see just how many Muslims won elections in 2018, you will be shocked. Check out the mounting evidence. Omar the terrorist?

Investigate Her

Perjury? Fraud? Keep reading and click on the links. She makes blatant anti-semetic remarks? She married her brother? How did these documents pass through the system? There is much more. Just as Obama, (Barry Soetoro), was never truly vetted, let us not allow this to happen with this American hating now elected official Omar (and others). Investigate her now then send her back.  Why? Well for obvious reasons. And if this is not obvious enough, read this. Wake up America, wake up. We had better vote them all out in 2020. Enough said. Meanwhile the de-class will begin to dominate the narrative as these noisy distractions will end up taking a back seat. Epstein case will unfold and this is the tip of the iceberg.  Get ready, the battles have begun.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Outpouring of Support From Immigrants For Trump’s ‘You Can Leave’ Comments

‘The Squad’ Is Only the Beginning of Nancy Pelosi’s Problems

Trump On The ‘Squad’: They Are Not ‘Capable Of Loving Our Country’

Somali-Born Journalist Returned To Her Homeland To Document How ‘Safe’ The Country Is But Terrorists Killed Her

RELATED VIDEO: President Trump praises supporters as patriots.

A HISTORY LESSON: The Democratic Party’s ‘Squad’ and the American ‘Union of Russian Workers’

I received a petition from the Congressional Progressive Caucus titled “‘Right to Work’ laws are WRONG (read why).” The ninety-seven members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus include: Representatives Ilhan Omar (Whip), Rashida Tlaib (Special Order Hour Convener), Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ayanna Pressley (a.k.a. The Squad) and Senator Bernie Sanders.

The Progressive Caucus email states:

Republican “Right to Work” laws weaken the voices of working people and ensure that their wages are kept low. All they do is INCREASE the power of corporations, while LIMITING the power of workers to join unions.

[ … ]

So we’re asking 500 Progressives from each state to sign on and tell Congress to ban Right to Work laws.

You’ve been chosen to sign for Florida. Sign on immediately:

TELL CONGRESS: BAN RIGHT TO WORK LAWS →

Listen, unions bring justice and dignity to the workplace.

They allow individual employees to organize and protect their rights on the job.

They grant workers the power to advocate for themselves.

And they even the playing field between corporations and their employees.

But Republicans don’t care about all of the benefits of unions. Their main concern is giving even more power to giant companies and diminishing the voices of working Americans in our democracy.

As Progressives, we believe this is WRONG.

Currently 27 states and Guam have given workers a choice when it comes to union membership. Why is the Congressional Progressive Caucus pushing against right to work laws in states like Florida?

History may give us the answer.

The Role of the Labor Unions in the Russian Revolution.

In 1920 the Marxists Internet Archive published a paper written by A. Lozovsky titled “The Role of the Labor Unions in the Russian Revolution.” The Forward notes:

Comrade Lozovsky says that “it is impossible to accomplish a social revolution outside of the unions or against their will.” Lenin has also said that the Bolshevist Revolution could not have lasted two weeks without the aid of the unions.

[ … ]

It can safely be stated that had the Spartacists in Germany had a predominant influence in the labor movement, Germany would be a Soviet Republic by now. This points out the way for action in the American labor movement. Stress should be laid on revolutionary work in the unions that group the mass of the industrial proletariat.

We must have the unions not only during the period of actual combat with the capitalists and their governments but even after the Dictatorship shall have been established. The function of the unions as organs of disciplined and efficient production and distribution must be broadened and much of the task of Communist reconstruction and responsibility for the running of the industrial apparatus given into the unions.

The lesson from the Russian Revolution, which is so aptly put by Comrade Lozovsky is that the unions, being the natural grouping of the workers as producers, which develop the class consciousness and militancy of the workers, develop at the same time their sense of responsibility and discipline, preparing them for the difficult task of organizing production and exchange in the Communist society. [Emphasis added]

Read the full Marxists Internet Archive document here.

In a document titled “The Russian Workingmen’s Association, sometimes called the Union of Russian Workers (What It Is and How It Operates). [A Bureau of Investigation Internal Report]” dated April 8, 1919 by Edgar B. Speer we may find the answer.

Just as the National Socialist German Workers’ Party (Nazis) were socialists and the Russian Social Democratic Workers’ party (Rossiiskaia sotsial-demokraticheskaia rabochaia partiia, or RSDRP) was Marxist so too were the roots of the Union of Russian Workers.

According to the Speer report:

From the 6th to the 9th of January, 1919, the 2nd Convention of the Russian Colonies was held in New York City. One hundred twenty-three delegates participated in the convention and they represented 33,975 Russians, according to the Soviet of Workingmen’s Deputies of the US and Canada Weekly. The independent element was represented by 60 delegates; Union of Russian Workers, 49; Socialists, 9; Industrial Workers of the World, 2; and Anarchists, 3. During the convention, Peter Bianki, who represented the Union of Russian Workers of the United States and Canada and the Anarchists, declared from the convention floor: “The Union of Russian Workers deny any form of power and Government because where Government begins, Revolution ends and where there is Revolution there is no place for Government.” Bianki further declared that the Union of Russian Workers has found it possible to support the Bolsheviki in its struggle against the counterrevolution because the Bolsheviki undoubtedly are the most Revolutionary part of the Russian Social Democratic Party. The foregoing briefly sets forth the principles as they exist today of the Russian Workingmen’s Association, sometimes called the Union of Russian Workers.

Here is the preamble of the Union of Russian Workers:

Present society is divided into two opposing classes: the downtrodden Workers and Peasants, on the one side, producing by their work all the riches of the world; the rich people, on the other side, who have grabbed all the riches into their hands.

Many a time the Class of the Oppressed stood up against the rich parasites and their faithful servant and protector — the Government — to conquer its full Liberation from the yoke of Capitalism and Political Power; but every time it suffered defeat, not being fully conscious of its own final goal and means, by which victory can be accomplished, thus remaining only a weapon in the hands of its enemies.

The struggle between these two classes is being fought also at the present time and will end only when the Toiling Masses, organized as a class, will understand their true interests and will make themselves masters of all the riches of the world by means of a violent Social Revolution.

Having accomplished such a change and having annihilated at the same time all the institutions of the Government and State, the class of the disowned must establish the Society of Free Producers, aiming at satisfying the needs of every individual person who, on its side, is giving to the Society their labor and their knowledge.

For the attainment of these aims, we consider as of primary importance the necessity of building up a wide Revolutionary Organization of Toilers which, by conducting a direct struggle with all the Institutions of Capitalism and Government, must train the Working Class to initiative and independent action in all its acts, thus educating it in the consciousness of the absolute necessity of a General Strike — of the Social Revolution. [Emphasis added]

Is the Democratic Party’s Progressive Caucus calling for a revolution against state governments with right to work laws?

The email from the Progressive Caucus stating,

Republican “Right to Work” laws weaken the voices of working people and ensure that their wages are kept low. All they do is INCREASE the power of corporations, while LIMITING the power of workers to join unions.

[ … ]

Republican “Right to Work” laws weaken the voices of working people and ensure that their wages are kept low. All they do is INCREASE the power of corporations, while LIMITING the power of workers to join unions.

Sounds very much like the Union of Russian Workers of the United States and Canada and the Anarchists, who declared from their convention floor: “The Union of Russian Workers deny any form of power and Government because where Government begins, Revolution ends and where there is Revolution there is no place for Government.”

As Speer concluded in his report,

The Russian Workingmen’s Association as it exists today is divided between the advocates of Anarchist-Syndicalism and Anarchist-Communism.

It seems that history is repeating itself. The Democratic Party Progressive Caucus uses the same rhetoric as did the Union of Russian Workers.

RELATED ARTICLES:

‘The Squad’ Is Only the Beginning of Nancy Pelosi’s Problems

Trump On The ‘Squad’: They Are Not ‘Capable Of Loving Our Country’

The Socialist ‘Squad’ Does Not Like America. Take It From Them

Rashida Tlaib: National Security Risk?

Remember: Tlaib Interrupted A Trump Speech To Business Leaders… All In The Name Of ‘Doing Her Part’ 

Somali-Born Journalist Returned To Her Homeland To Document How ‘Safe’ The Country Is But Terrorists Killed Her 

RELATED VIDEO: The Bloody Story Of How May Day Became A Holiday For Workers | TIME