VIDEO: It’s Obama who’s to blame for Dallas Cops Being Killed and Black Lives Matter

In a Facebook post titled “OBAMA IS TO BLAME FOR DALLAS COPS BEING KILLED” Dennis Michael Lynch wrote, “DO NOT APOLOGIZE for being a COP, or for being WHITE. IT’S OBAMA WHO IS TO BLAME for Black Lives Matter, and for police being killed, and for the division in this country, and for the failure of black communities.”

In a DML Unfiltered video (below), Lynch explains how it is President Obama who created the Black Lives Matter movement that has led inextricably to a violent and radical black power movement, which has led to the killing of Cops.

Ben Shapiro in an article titled Is Barack Obama Responsible For The Dallas Anti-Cop Terror Attack?, writes:

On Thursday, President Obama reacted to the cell-phone-captured footage of the police killings of Alton Sterling in Louisiana and Philando Castile by suggesting that such killings were “not isolated incidents.” Instead, he said, “They are symptomatic of challenges within our criminal justice system, the racial disparities that appear across the system year after year, and the resulting lack of trust that exists between law enforcement and too many of the communities they serve.”

In effect, Obama said – just as he’s been saying for years – that what he believes are extrajudicial murders of black men by police officers are the result of systemic racism, reflected in disproportionate arrest and imprisonment statistics.

Then, on Thursday night, anti-white racist snipers began firing on white police officers in Dallas. When the smoke had cleared, five officers were dead and another seven were wounded, some grievously.

This raises an obvious question: what sort of responsibility does President Obama bear for the massacre?

Clearly word matter.

If the President of the United States takes sides with one group of Americans against another, against law enforcement against those who break  the law, then that gives those on that side a green light to do what they will.

The President of the United States is also the chief law enforcement officer and his duties are to follow the law and insure equality in justice system. Race, color, gender nor social status can cloud justice, because she is blind.

It seems that President Obama is blind when it comes to blacks committing violence against blacks, whites, Hispanics, Asians and the police. That cannot stand. Justice must be served not politics.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Here’s what liberals DON’T want you to know about the Baton Rouge, Louisiana shooting victim

Conservatives Blame Obama And Hillary Clinton For Dallas Shooting

Former GOP Rep. threatens and blames Obama, BLM for Dallas …

Wendy Long: Schumer, Clinton, Obama responsible for Dallas murders

Dallas shooting: Obama denies US divided after deaths – BBC News

Hillary and Deutch Trump Justice For Now

It appears that turn-around is fair play when you consider President Bill Clinton pardoned CIA John Deutch, for the same kind of careless behavior in which Hillary Clinton was involved as  FBI Director, James Comey, declares her innocence.

In fact one of the last measures of goodwill Bill Clinton accomplished leaving office was bestowing a pardon on the former CIA director John Deutch. His big no-no was retaining classified documents on his home computer in Maryland, as well as attempting to destroy some of them when he got caught.

When Deutch’s actions were discovered an almost immediate reaction occurred by federal investigators to retrieve the hard drive from his computer, and he didn’t have a lawyer picking and choosing which emails to hand over, nor did they take six months to get the investigation started as in Hillary’s case. But, everybody knows Hillary gets treated with kid gloves. It is simply to be expected.

In Deutch’s case the IG stepped in after they perceived the CIA was not acting appropriately in the investigation and opened their own probe. According to National Review,

“The Deutch IG report contains a useful discussion of federal laws that may be violated by handling classified material on a home computer. There’s 18 U.S.C. §793, which makes it a criminal offense ‘through gross negligence’to allow defense information ‘to be removed from its proper place of custody.’An unsecured personal computer is obviously not a “proper place of custody,” as John Deutch discovered. Note that no intentional misconduct is required; just gross negligence.”

Deutch supposedly had no intent to do wrong, just like Comey claims of Hillary, but he was going to be indicted on his actions regardless until Bill rushed in with his pardon. Maybe some of these past memories were what Bill and Loretta Lynch talked about the other day on their chance meeting at the airport.

Several websites referred to the commonalities of Deutch and Hillary’s infractions, and during a House Oversight Committee yesterday Rep. Stephen Lynch (D-Ma) queried Comey,

“We have a lot of comparisons in other cases and it seems like all the cases where prosecutions have gone forward, the subject of the investigation has demonstrated a clear intent to deliver classified information to a person or persons who were unauthorized to receive that…And even former Director of the CIA John Deutch, who retained classified information on a couple of servers, one in Belmont, Massachusetts, and one in Bethesda, Maryland, and that was after he became a private citizen.”

Lynch gives no evidence that Deutch was intending to deliver classified information, however Comey testified,

“He took a huge amount of documents, almost all of the TSSCI level, has in a hard copy at his house, had them on unclassed system connected to the internet, attempted to destroy some of them when he got caught, admitted I knew I wasn’t supposed to be doing this.”

Didn’t Hillary place documents in a burn bag to be destroyed, didn’t she lie about thousands of classified emails being sent or received over her private email, didn’t she lie about using only one device to send that classified material? Wouldn’t sending and receiving classified emails through private emails be considered not a proper place of custody?

Are the American people missing something here or has FBI Director Comey just declared that you can’t compare apples to apples anymore. Bottom line, there was classified material residing in places that were not safe, be that on a home computer in Maryland or floating around the internet over a private email. The only difference here is the fact that Deutch actually admits to the wrong, and the government official that is being considered here is a Clinton.

Hillary on the other hand will never admit that she makes any mistakes, because in her heart of hearts she is above the law. She held her head high with her nose in the air while withholding life saving measures from Americans under hostile fire in Benghazi and as she enabled the Russian government, via her State Department, to buy Uranium One from Canada to secure 20% of the U.S. uranium assets.

Hillary truly believes she is above all the petty rules of the law. And according to the top law enforcement officer James Comey, she is.

Americans were told what to do in times like these by Thomas Jefferson,

“But when a long line of abuses and usurpations pursuing the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security.” -Declaration of Independence

VIDEO: It Begins — Protesters burn Canadian flag during Canada Day Parade

CKWS Newswatch reports:

An unexpected scene took place during this morning’s Canada day parade in Kingston as a group of masked protesters took to princess street to burn a Canadian flag.

Some of the hundreds of Kingston residents who were marching in the parade voiced their displeasure with the act.

The group, which was also carrying a Mohawk Warrior Flag, quickly ran off as soon as the Canadian flag had burned up.

RELATED ARTICLE: Toronto Pro Palestinian rally – Al-Quds Day – under Police investigation

PODCAST: The Dallas Attack, Rio Olympics, FBI Director Comey, Bibi Netanyahu in Africa and More

Orlando, Istanbul, Dhaka, Baghdad, Medina, Qatif, and Israel (and New York?) – the specter of terrorism haunts our world in these dangerous times. Next month, Brazil takes center stage with the Olympic Games. How are authorities assessing the very real threat of terrorism?

FBI Director James Comey gave several valid reasons as to how the FBI knew that Hillary Clinton committed a series of crimes that directly compromised national security. Then, Comey absolved her in one of most troubling displays of naked corruption and/or coercion in modern history.

Attacks in Dallas have the nation on edge – how much responsibility does the White House and media bear?

Finally, what does Israel’s future look like in Africa?

Topics of Discussion:

  • Dallas Attack
  • Terrorism’s Threat to the Olympics
  • FBI Director Comey’s disgraceful absolution of Hillary Clinton
  • Netanyahu’s Trip to Uganda for Entebbe Anniversary
  • Israel’s future in Africa

RELATED ARTICLES:

‘Black Power group’ claims to be behind police killings and warns more to come

BLM Saint Alton Sterling: Child Rapist, Domestic Abuser, Bloods Gangbanger & Deadbeat Dad

Four snipers shoot 11 police officers in Dallas – killing at least FIVE – during furious nationwide protests over US police shootings of two black men: One gunman kills himself after siege with cops

2 Snipers Ambush, Kill 5 Officers, Injure 6 in Dallas Following Peaceful Protest

Dallas Police: Snipers Shoot 11 Officers, 5 Dead

BREAKING VIDEO: Dallas Shooter Filmed Firing on Police – Executing Police Officer

Georgia v. Scott: ‘Talking Dirty’ to a Child is Not Protected by the First Amendment

In January, the National Center on Sexual Exploitation submitted an amicus brief to the Georgia Supreme Court urging the court to uphold a statute criminalizing obscene Internet contact with minors.

This statute is vital to protecting children from sexual predators in the digital age but was facing a First Amendment challenge. The American Center for Law and Justice recognized the significance of this case as well and their Chief Counsel, Jay Sekulow, was appointed special district attorney to represent the state at the Georgia Supreme Court. Mr. Sekulow defended the statute eloquently at oral argument before the Court in February. In a huge victory for children, on Tuesday, July 5, 2016, the Georgia Supreme Court upheld the statute! This was a very important step in protecting children and curbing the vast amount of sexual exploitation occurring in Internet space.

The statute at issue criminalized Internet contact with a child, or a person believed to be a child, containing “explicit verbal descriptions or narrative account of sexually explicit nudity, sexual conduct, sexual excitement, or sadomasochistic abuse that is intended to arouse or satisfy the sexual desire of either the child or the person.”

The appellant, Jack Bernard Scott, who was arrested for violating this statute, challenged its constitutionality claiming it was overbroad on its face—that it criminalized lawful speech protected by the First Amendment. Among the arguments his defense counsel made to the Court was that Scott had a First Amendment right to “talk dirty” to a child as long as this talk did not rise to the level of obscenity. But the National Center on Sexual Exploitation wrote to inform the court that sexual objectification of children by adults is inherently harmful to children and a form of child exploitation that is not protected speech. The Court agreed.

This was a huge victory in a time when child predators have instant, anonymous access to children all over the country via the Internet while at the same time the Internet remains fairly unregulated and unchecked.

Since the Internet’s earliest beginnings child sex predators were some of theFirst Amendment Free Speech Childfirst adopters of the technology and we have seen massive harms to children occurring online. Not only can children be lured and solicited for sex acts via online communications, but also they are often gravely harmed without ever meeting their predator in person. Children are frequently exposed to hardcore pornography, images of adult sex organs and sex acts via live webcam chat, coerced into sending nude photos of themselves which are then used to blackmail these children into sending more and increasingly explicit photos, as well as remote sexual abuse.

As amazing and incredible as the Internet has been in promoting education, connecting humanity worldwide, and astronomically improving the free flow of ideas, it has also presented some very grave dangers. The First Amendment has always excluded child sexual exploitation and obscenity from its protection and it is important in our digital age that these same principles apply to online speech. The Georgia Supreme Court has recognized this and rightfully protected children from grave harm resulting from predatory and unprotected speech.

EDITORS NOTE: Readers may donate by clicking here to ensure the National Center on Sexual Exploitation’s Law Center continues to defend dignity across the nation.

VIDEO: Gay Conservative Milo Yiannnopoulos speaks at the site of the Orlando Terror Attack

Breitbart Senior Editor and rising star Milo Yiannopoulos speaks on the Islamic State terrorist attack at the Pulse gay nightclub in Orlando, Florida.

‘Milo’ as he’s known to his cult gives a frank and honest assessment of the ISIS inspired terrorist attack. Milo names the enemy who did this attack, their Islamic ideological motivations, without all the politically correct filters that defines our media today.

Milo is a gay conservative whose views are causing concern in the primarily liberal Democratic leaning gay community. Milo’s message is resonating with a large number of conservative and liberal gays who are shifting their support to conservative politicians and Donald Trump.

Sit down and enjoy one of the most impassioned warnings to America you will ever hear:

RELATED ARTICLES:

Twitter Permanently Bans Troll Milo Yiannopoulos

Douglas Murray on The Milo Yiannopoulos Show: Obama Should Say ‘We’re Sorry, We Got it Wrong’ on Islamic Terrorism

Gay conservative Milo Yiannopoulos makes eye-opening statement following Orlando attack

German couple among first victims of Merkel/Zuckerberg scheme to silence political speech

BLM Saint Alton Sterling: Child Rapist, Domestic Abuser, Bloods Gangbanger & Deadbeat Dad

EDITORS NOTE: Readers may wish to support The United West so we can continue to bring you this outstanding content and investigative reporting you will not find anywhere else. To learn more please visit: www.TheUnitedWest.org or contact Tom@TheUnitedWest.org

VIDEO: The Rise of the Citizen Journalism the Death Knell of ‘Legacy Media’

I have been a citizen journalist for over 14 years. I began as a blogger, was recruited to be the editor of two websites and now publish a e-Magazine with fifty contributors, all of them citizen journalists.

Citizen journalism is on the rise as the legacy media is in decline.

The shootings that took place in Dallas, Texas is a perfect example of how ordinary citizens with a smart phone can take videos of an incident,which become viral and are used by the legacy media to tell their story.

Citizen journalists are everywhere and they are now the provider of information that the traditional news outlets won’t or can’t print or put on television or discuss on the radio.

James O’Keefe from Project Veritas is the perfect example of a citizen journalist who is now mainstream. His investigative citizen journalism has changed the nature of reporting the news.

In an email O’Keefe states:

Today is a dark day in American history. An unbelievable series of reactionary events have just happened. We’ll have to wrestle with the consequences of these events for a long time while deciding what sort of world we want to live in. There is a toxic culture of fear and we are witnessing unbelievable back-to-back violence. We are often driven by narratives, rather than facts, by pathetic people at the national level who lack leadership.

Times are now turning because of the way news content is being produced and the mediums in which it is being shared. One thing to draw from all this is that there might be a glimmer of real hope for our society.

The Facebook Live video of the shooting of Philando Castile in Minnesota and the live streaming of images of bullets ricocheting off building columns in Dallas were all caught on camera by ordinary citizens with cameras. We are witnessing new technologies which are transforming the way we perceive the reality around us. Journalism is changing more than ever now.

Of course, legacy media reacting to social media is nothing new. But what makes us pause is how devastatingly effective the video can be; video that was taken by a courageous woman in Minnesota (you can see my commentary about her below).

RELATED VIDEO: James O’Keefe: Woman Who Filmed Minnesota Shooting Is A ‘Citizen Journalist, Hero.’

Organizer of Dallas BLM rally a ‘gay Islamist’ who wanted to ‘create space for rage’

I have written that Democratic Party policy is now being driven by three unlikely minority groups: the Collectivists (Socialists and Communists), the Homosexualists (both gay and straight) and the Islamists (those who follow the teaching of Mohammed).

Readers may learn more by reading: New Democrat Party: The Red–Green–Rainbow Troika.

It appears that these three forces came together in Dallas, Texas to slaughter police officers and other innocents. The leader of this Black Lives Matter protest was a gay man named Jeff Hood, who dresses link a Sunni Muslim.

Each of these groups are being given special status by President Obama and his administration. They now feel empowered to do whatever they need to take control. For you see this is all about control.

Bethany Blankley in her article “Homosexual Islamist ‘Pastor’ Organized Dallas Protest to “Create Space for Rage” published on Constitution.com reports:

jesus as a muslimJeff Hood, the organizer of the July 7th Dallas Black Lives Matter rally is a homosexual Islamist who calls himself a Christian pastor. To provide proper context– in 2015, after Americans protested the CAIR organized “Respect the Prophet” event in Dallas, Jeff Hood said“I think that Texas Muslims are the real Christians.”

After the Paris attacks, he wrote a blog entry about “The Call of the Muslim Jesus” sympathizing with the Islamists and ISIS who are marginalized by society. He wrote:

“In our Islamophobic society, I have no question that Jesus is so intimately incarnated with and connected to our Muslim friends that he has become one. If we want to walk with Jesus in this moment of extreme oppression and marginalization, we will too.”

Along with this post, Hood advocates that Jesus converted to Islam– and posted a picture of Jesus as a Muslim…

Read more.

dallas police 911

5 Dallas officers slain, deadliest day for police since 9/11.

Breitbart News also reported that the alleged pastor wanted to create a space for violence:

Breitbart points out that in a June 18 website post, Hood referred to Jesus being present to “Keep blowing sh#@ up baby!” He led a worship service about which he described:

Just this past week, I felt the hands again. One by one, the children of God at the Church at the Table in Fort Worth stopped to affirm and celebrate my ministry. In the midst of the reverence of it all, Jesus showed up. One of my dear friends shouted out, “Keep blowing shit up baby!” I will. Amen.

On his website, BelieveOutLoud, Hood describes himself as “the author of three books, The Queer: An Interaction with The Gospel of John, The Queering of an American Evangelical and The Sociopathic Jesus. A Southerner, Queer, and Christian, Jeff is a committed activist, visionary writer and radical prophetic voice to a closed society.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Leftist pastor behind Dallas Black Lives Matter protest wrote of becoming Muslim

‘Black Power group’ claims to be behind police killings and warns more to come

German couple among first victims of Merkel/Zuckerberg scheme to silence political speech

5 Dallas officers slain, deadliest day for police since 9/11

Black Lives Matter TO’s leader: “We’re looking at actively demilitarizing the Police”

Police say officers have been targeted in Missouri, Georgia and Tennessee

Cops killed by Dallas sniper receive Clinton, Democrats crocodile tears

HEALTH ALERT: Three Cases of Active TB in Vermont in the last seven months

And, their treatment expenses are coming out of your wallets! Isn’t diversity beautiful!

See our previous post—-what is Vermont hiding?

TB cdc

This CDC info graphic says even Latent TB cases entering the U.S. must be identified and treated. So what is all this costing us?

More from Michael Patrick Leahy at Breitbart:

A spokesperson for the Vermont Department of Health confirms to Breitbart News that “three refugees [have been] diagnosed with TB in Vermont over the past seven months.”

One case was diagnosed in December 2015, and the other two cases were diagnosed in 2016.

No one other than a refugee has been diagnosed with active TB in Vermont during the first six months of 2016, the spokesperson adds.

The stunning admission comes after Breitbart News reported that the number of active TB cases in Vermont tripled from two in 2014 to seven in 2015.

More here.

I don’t want to become an expert on refugee health, but you might be interested if you have some connection to the medical field or are in regular close contact with the refugees newly arriving in the US.

Just now I had a look at the Centers for Disease Control guidelines for refugee health screening and what I don’t get is this: refugees are domestically screened between 30 and 90 days of arrival.  How many people have interacted or come in contact with a refugee family and then don’t learn for 30 to 90 days that someone in the family has TB (or HIV or parasites or other transmittable health conditions)?

See our ‘health issues’ category with over 300 previous posts on the topic.

RELATED ARTICLE: Vermont’s Watchdog.org tells us more about VT Health Dept. response to TB in the state

GRAPHIC VIDEOS: Slaughter in Dallas

“A horrific video taken on a cell phone by a terrified Dallas resident shows a heroic policeman trying to shoot one of the gunmen. The officer is seen ducking behind a pillar but being shot by the gunman, who then stands over the cop and pumps another bullet into him,” report  Sarah Dean and Ollie Gillman for the DailyMail.com.

Read more:

RELATED VIDEO: Black Lives Matter (BLM) Threatens Violence Against Whites Who Vote Trump. Black lives Matter spokesmen, Tef Poe has always been the voice of the BLM group. In November 2014, Poe was flown to the United Nations offices in Geneva, Switzerland to speak about “police violence.” Poe is now inciting a race riot.


RELATED ARTICLES:

‘Black Power group’ claims to be behind police killings and warns more to come

BLM Saint Alton Sterling: Child Rapist, Domestic Abuser, Bloods Gangbanger & Deadbeat Dad

Four snipers shoot 11 police officers in Dallas – killing at least FIVE – during furious nationwide protests over US police shootings of two black men: One gunman kills himself after siege with cops

2 Snipers Ambush, Kill 5 Officers, Injure 6 in Dallas Following Peaceful Protest

Dallas Police: Snipers Shoot 11 Officers, 5 Dead

BREAKING VIDEO: Dallas Shooter Filmed Firing on Police – Executing Police Officer

VIDEO: Why Hillary Goes Free — If She Goes Down so does the Democrat Party

United States Code: Title 18. Section 2071:

(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record filed…in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States.

There is no question that Hillary is guilty, but will she be charged? Obama has said he didn’t think she did anything wrong. How could he think so when he was complicit in knowing about her arrangement?

Hillary said to Obama, “If I go down, you go down.” Since those do the charging are part of the administration, we can expect to see a dance around the facts while ignoring them.

Larry Nichols who knows Hillary, explains in first 3 minutes how this is working for herwhy Washington is full of fear.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Huge! Clinton Advisor “Spills the Beans” as to Why Hillary Is Walking Free—Take it From the Man Who Knows Her Secrets!

Why Hillary Goes Free

BREAKING: State Department REOPENS Investigation into Clinton Emails

The Curse Of American Elitism

It is not about what was done, if you are one of the chosen elites.  It used to be that the United States was a nation of laws.  At one time there was at least a strong perception that negligence was not an excuse for someone to completely avoid the long arm of the law.  General David Petraeous and Martha Stewart both learned that lesson the hard way.

In what was surely timed, whether intentionally or not, the day Hillary Clinton and President Obama gleefully hit the campaign trail together, FBI director James Coney decided to dethrone the stabilizing rule of law concept.  He refused to bring a criminal case against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for recklessly handling sensitive emails.

Amazingly that decision was made by the FBI director who plainly stated, “Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgement is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case.”  I find it alarming and disappointing that somehow the FBI did not find “clear evidence they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.”

You must consider the fact that extremely sensitive information is possibly in the hands of enemy nations and terrorist groups.  It is criminal that FBI director Comey did not recommend charges against Mrs. Clinton in regards to extreme negligence.  Even Comey himself said people doing what Mrs. Clinton did “are often subject to security or administrative sanctions.  But that is not what we’re deciding now.  As a result, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters like this, we are expressing to justify our view that no charges are appropriate in this case.”  Wow, Wow, Wow!

If any other American had committed such gross negligence, they would be facing time in front of a judge.  It is utterly shameful that an FBI director would kick the law to the curb in order to protect a dangerous self-centered, untrustworthy person, Mrs. Clinton.   In my opinion, she is not worthy of taking the trash out of the White House, let alone occupying the place as Commander in Chief.  Just the mere thought of Mrs. Clinton possibly becoming president makes my flesh want to crawl away.

So now, if you are Mrs. Hillary Clinton and you know you are going to be handling highly classified information, and then intentionally set up a private email server for such information to be read. That breaks all policies and protocol for such documentation, there is no “clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information.  To be frank, I believe FBI Director, James Comey was told to play ball, or else.  Think about it, who wants to end up like Vince Foster, Ron Brown, or the over 50 holistic doctors who all met their demise after daring to do the right thing or simply disagreed with horrendous government policies regarding healthcare.

John F. Kennedy died for objecting to the Federal Reserve System.  Richard Nixon was shamed more than some murderers and traitors.  Let us not forget Herman Cain.  The progressive media went on a non-stop reporting binge about an anonymous person who accused him of sexual harassment and he was forced to drop his campaign.  But here we have Mrs. Clinton’s negligence that potentially endangers our nation and definitely broke ethical principles.  Yet the FBI director recommends no legal action against crooked Mrs. Clinton.  What a shame and a bad president that may come back to bite America in the future.

This is one bold bunch who are only concerned with their own power and well being.  While at the same time are working on setting the United States up for a big fall she might not recover from.  Now they won’t prosecute anyone for mishandling information? Here is another possibility. I believe the FBI has demonstrated that almost any other American other than Mrs. Clinton would face charges and have demonstrated that even potential harm to our republic was not enough to recommend any action against Mrs. Clinton’s negligence.

I believe Many fence sitting republicans and even a tiny percentage of democrats that have a modicum of moral decency will end upthrow up voting for Donald Trump.  The reason being is they don’t want someone perceived to be above common decency to be president.  Especially after the disaster of the Obama presidency.

This final note:  May “We the People” look at the shameful decision by the FBI director to appease Mrs. Clinton and use it as an opportunity to teach our American children the importance of doing the right thing.  We must also seek Providential guidance in the effort to redeem and restore our republic to greatness.

God Bless America and may America Bless God.

U.S. Marine Major discharged for sending classified information via a personal email

A Navy leader upheld the decision to discharge U.S. Marine Major Jason Brezler from the Marine Corps. Brezler was found to have mishandled classified information when he sent a warning of a possible attack to other Marines in Afghanistan from a personal email address.

Major Brezler’s intent was to save the lives of his fellow Marines. Was his sharing classified information via a personal email account any different from Hillary Clinton having a personal email server with classified information on it?

It appears the system is rigged to protect the politically powerful, while a U.S. Marine is held accountable. Is there a double standard?

635845844283461406-MAR-Insider-Attack-Brezler

U.S. Marine Major Jason Brezler (left) in Afghanistan.

In a column titled “Marine who warned of insider attack to be discharged” Gina Harkins, Staff writer for the Marine Corps Times reports:

A lawyer for a Reserve Marine being forced out of the Marine Corps for mishandling classified information vowed to appeal the Department of the Navy’s decision to uphold the involuntary discharge, calling it “obvious retaliation.”

In a case that gained widespread notoriety, Maj. Jason Brezler, a civil affairs officer who had returned stateside, shared classified information with colleagues in Afghanistan in 2012 in an attempt to warn them about a suspected Taliban conspirator. Brezler’s fears proved well-founded two weeks later when an insider attack in Helmand province claimed the lives of three Marines.

Michael Bowe, the lawyer representing Brezler, told Marine Corps Times they learned via email Monday of the decision to uphold the separation. The decision, first reported by The Washington Post, was made by Scott Lutterloh, the acting assistant Navy secretary for manpower and reserve affairs. Made official on Nov. 24, the decision comes more than three years after Brezler was investigated for sending a classified document from a personal email account. [Emphasis added]

Read more.

United States Code: Title 18. Section 2071:

(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record filed…in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States.

U.S. Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) today issued the following statement following reports that the U.S. State Department is reopening its investigation of the mishandling of classified intelligence by Hillary Clinton and her top aides:

“I am glad that the State Department has heeded the concerns I and nine other senators raised earlier and is reportedly reviewing the status of the security clearances of Hillary Clinton and her top aides, given their ‘extremely careless’ handling of classified information. There’s no question they should all lose their security clearances if they are still active. The State Department now needs to show that it will not let politics interfere with its investigation and that any State Department employee who mishandles classified information will be punished regardless of their rank. No one should be above the rules when it comes to protecting our nation’s secrets, not even the Secretary of State or her top aides. I look forward to a complete response to the questions we raised in our letter to Secretary Kerry about the Department’s handling of this matter and a swift resolution of this case.”

RELATED ARTICLES: 

The Shoddy Legal Reasoning Used to Clear Clinton

Judicial Watch Seeks Testimony of Hillary Clinton

FBI Director Undermines the Rule of Law

Comey’s FBI Helped Convict Navy Reservist who “Handled Classified Materials Inappropriately”

2015: DOJ Prosecutes A Naval Reservist For Mishandling Classified Info WITHOUT MALICIOUS INTENT

EDITORS NOTE: The featured image of Major Jason Brezler in Afghanistan is by Cpl. Albert Hunt/Marine Corps.

VIDEO: Federal Agents Arrest Reporters for Exposing America’s Open Southern Border

Joe Biggs, Michael Zimmerman and Alejandra Gutierrez were all detained at the Texas Mexico Border and their guns were confiscated for trying to report the news on Illegal Immigrants.

EDITORS NOTE: Reader who wish to help spread the word about the liberty movement, we’re reaching millions help us reach millions more. Share the free live video feed link with your friends & family: http://www.infowars.com/show

The Truth-Telling Video About Jihad That YouTube Doesn’t Want You To See

Washington, D.C. – For ten years the world’s largest and most powerful Sharia-supremacist organization – not the Islamic State, not al Qaeda, not even the Muslim Brotherhood, but the Organization of Islamic Cooperation – has worked to compel the entire world to observe Sharia blasphemy restrictions.  In 2010, with help from Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, they succeeded in getting the UN Human Rights Council to adopt Resolution 16/18 which effectively calls on every nation to prohibit expression that offends Muslims and to punish those who do so.

The European Union adopted highly restrictive “hate speech” bans.  A number of the continent’s most prominent freedom-fighters have been prosecuted under these laws.

In 2011, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton announced that, notwithstanding the First Amendment, the U.S. government would use “old-fashioned techniques of shaming and peer pressure” to discourage such expression.

In response at least in part to such official pressure about offending Muslims, perhaps combined with corporate preferences, social media giants including Facebook, Twitter and YouTube recently announced the implementation of new “hate speech” prohibitions on their platforms.  Ostensibly, they would impede the extensive use IS and other terrorists have been making of their services.

It was predictable, however, that these new media organizations would wind up censoring those whom Islamists abhor – especially, those who tell the truth about and, therefore, help impede the Shariah-supremacists’ global jihad movement and agenda.

A case in point was the recent removal by YouTube of a powerful new video produced by the Center for Security Policy’s Counter Jihad Campaign.

CLICK HERE TO WATCH THIS POWERFUL VIDEO

Everyone in America should see this video – and demand that YouTube reinstate it at once.  The Center will be redoubling its efforts to prevent this sort of suppression of free, and necessary, speech.

ABOUT THE CENTER FOR SECURITY POLICY

The Center for Security Policy is a non-profit, non-partisan national security organization that specializes in identifying policies, actions, and resource needs that are vital to American security and then ensures that such issues are the subject of both focused, principled examination and effective action by recognized policy experts, appropriate officials, opinion leaders, and the general public.

For more information please visit www.securefreedom.org.