U.S. Marine Major discharged for sending classified information via a personal email

A Navy leader upheld the decision to discharge U.S. Marine Major Jason Brezler from the Marine Corps. Brezler was found to have mishandled classified information when he sent a warning of a possible attack to other Marines in Afghanistan from a personal email address.

Major Brezler’s intent was to save the lives of his fellow Marines. Was his sharing classified information via a personal email account any different from Hillary Clinton having a personal email server with classified information on it?

It appears the system is rigged to protect the politically powerful, while a U.S. Marine is held accountable. Is there a double standard?

635845844283461406-MAR-Insider-Attack-Brezler

U.S. Marine Major Jason Brezler (left) in Afghanistan.

In a column titled “Marine who warned of insider attack to be discharged” Gina Harkins, Staff writer for the Marine Corps Times reports:

A lawyer for a Reserve Marine being forced out of the Marine Corps for mishandling classified information vowed to appeal the Department of the Navy’s decision to uphold the involuntary discharge, calling it “obvious retaliation.”

In a case that gained widespread notoriety, Maj. Jason Brezler, a civil affairs officer who had returned stateside, shared classified information with colleagues in Afghanistan in 2012 in an attempt to warn them about a suspected Taliban conspirator. Brezler’s fears proved well-founded two weeks later when an insider attack in Helmand province claimed the lives of three Marines.

Michael Bowe, the lawyer representing Brezler, told Marine Corps Times they learned via email Monday of the decision to uphold the separation. The decision, first reported by The Washington Post, was made by Scott Lutterloh, the acting assistant Navy secretary for manpower and reserve affairs. Made official on Nov. 24, the decision comes more than three years after Brezler was investigated for sending a classified document from a personal email account. [Emphasis added]

Read more.

United States Code: Title 18. Section 2071:

(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record filed…in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States.

U.S. Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) today issued the following statement following reports that the U.S. State Department is reopening its investigation of the mishandling of classified intelligence by Hillary Clinton and her top aides:

“I am glad that the State Department has heeded the concerns I and nine other senators raised earlier and is reportedly reviewing the status of the security clearances of Hillary Clinton and her top aides, given their ‘extremely careless’ handling of classified information. There’s no question they should all lose their security clearances if they are still active. The State Department now needs to show that it will not let politics interfere with its investigation and that any State Department employee who mishandles classified information will be punished regardless of their rank. No one should be above the rules when it comes to protecting our nation’s secrets, not even the Secretary of State or her top aides. I look forward to a complete response to the questions we raised in our letter to Secretary Kerry about the Department’s handling of this matter and a swift resolution of this case.”

RELATED ARTICLES: 

The Shoddy Legal Reasoning Used to Clear Clinton

Judicial Watch Seeks Testimony of Hillary Clinton

FBI Director Undermines the Rule of Law

Comey’s FBI Helped Convict Navy Reservist who “Handled Classified Materials Inappropriately”

2015: DOJ Prosecutes A Naval Reservist For Mishandling Classified Info WITHOUT MALICIOUS INTENT

EDITORS NOTE: The featured image of Major Jason Brezler in Afghanistan is by Cpl. Albert Hunt/Marine Corps.

VIDEO: Federal Agents Arrest Reporters for Exposing America’s Open Southern Border

Joe Biggs, Michael Zimmerman and Alejandra Gutierrez were all detained at the Texas Mexico Border and their guns were confiscated for trying to report the news on Illegal Immigrants.

EDITORS NOTE: Reader who wish to help spread the word about the liberty movement, we’re reaching millions help us reach millions more. Share the free live video feed link with your friends & family: http://www.infowars.com/show

The Truth-Telling Video About Jihad That YouTube Doesn’t Want You To See

Washington, D.C. – For ten years the world’s largest and most powerful Sharia-supremacist organization – not the Islamic State, not al Qaeda, not even the Muslim Brotherhood, but the Organization of Islamic Cooperation – has worked to compel the entire world to observe Sharia blasphemy restrictions.  In 2010, with help from Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, they succeeded in getting the UN Human Rights Council to adopt Resolution 16/18 which effectively calls on every nation to prohibit expression that offends Muslims and to punish those who do so.

The European Union adopted highly restrictive “hate speech” bans.  A number of the continent’s most prominent freedom-fighters have been prosecuted under these laws.

In 2011, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton announced that, notwithstanding the First Amendment, the U.S. government would use “old-fashioned techniques of shaming and peer pressure” to discourage such expression.

In response at least in part to such official pressure about offending Muslims, perhaps combined with corporate preferences, social media giants including Facebook, Twitter and YouTube recently announced the implementation of new “hate speech” prohibitions on their platforms.  Ostensibly, they would impede the extensive use IS and other terrorists have been making of their services.

It was predictable, however, that these new media organizations would wind up censoring those whom Islamists abhor – especially, those who tell the truth about and, therefore, help impede the Shariah-supremacists’ global jihad movement and agenda.

A case in point was the recent removal by YouTube of a powerful new video produced by the Center for Security Policy’s Counter Jihad Campaign.

CLICK HERE TO WATCH THIS POWERFUL VIDEO

Everyone in America should see this video – and demand that YouTube reinstate it at once.  The Center will be redoubling its efforts to prevent this sort of suppression of free, and necessary, speech.

ABOUT THE CENTER FOR SECURITY POLICY

The Center for Security Policy is a non-profit, non-partisan national security organization that specializes in identifying policies, actions, and resource needs that are vital to American security and then ensures that such issues are the subject of both focused, principled examination and effective action by recognized policy experts, appropriate officials, opinion leaders, and the general public.

For more information please visit www.securefreedom.org.

BBQ Bushwa: When Liberals Drive Other Liberals More Batty than They Already Are

It’s funny that liberals try to advance the caricature of the stuffed-shirt conservative. It’s projection, actually, because “killjoy” could be synonymous with “progressive.” From demonizing toy guns to banning dodgeball and sweets to stigmatizing innocent jokes as “racist” to, generally, ensconcing everyone in bubble wrap, never was a rainbow born the libs couldn’t turn gray (except, you know, for the rainbow cause they’re obsessed with). A good example of this is a recent Lost Angeles Times article titled “How vegetarians, gluten-frees, grain-frees and other L.A. food tribes ruined my BBQ tradition” (a.k.a. “How Being around Liberals Really Stinks”).

It was written by one Robin Rauzi, who informs, “Anyone who knew my wife and me knew that on Friday night we would be on the patio, grill fired up.” Therein lies the first indication of the problem: Rauzi doesn’t have a wife.

Rauzi is female herself and apparently had a faux marriage, which means she has a wife as much as I did when, in first grade, I participated in a momentarily popular aping-adults pretend game and announced “I married Lisa.”

So when at issue are Lost Angeles liberals, is it any surprise they’d turn a barbeque into a bolsheque? Liberals have damaged the tradition (and institution) of marriage, foreign policy, the economy, education, entertainment, the media, our immigration regime, demographic integrity and, basically, everything meeting with their reverse-Midas touch. Why would barbeques be an exception? The only surprise is that Rauzi’s comrades haven’t ostracized her for emitting grill-disgorged greenhouse gases.

But Rauzi tells us that hot dogs and hamburgers were off the menu because her “wife” stopped eating beef; she also informs that due to a neighbor’s dietary restrictions — “no mammals” — they one summer “grilled a lot of variations on chicken and turkey sausage.” I’m not sure if this is driven merely by species-centric prejudice and patriotism (I’m assuming the neighbor is a mammal), but I’d like to hear the explanation of how it’s more moral to eat a mother hen than, let’s say, a dormouse, which was a delicacy in ancient Rome. The difference seems likely to be that, given our modern sensibilities, liberals may author mouse-like foreign policy but find eating one pretty disgusting. But they fancy chicken yummy.

Rauzi then writes of a new semi-vegetarian attendee who wouldn’t eat fish and of how the no-mammal-eating mammal “developed a mysterious stomach ailment that required avoiding hard-to-digest fibrous vegetables, such as lettuce, kale, spinach and pretty much anything else you’d use as the basis for a salad. And corn on the cob.” Rauzi also tells us, that Mrs. No-mammal’s “husband began contributing barley or bulgur grain salads. Around the same time, the book ‘Grain Brain’ became a bestseller, blaming whole grains for everything from Attention Deficit Disorder to dementia. He took home a lot of leftovers.” Then she informs that the next restriction involved the general fear of sugars and gluten, the latter of which is a huge money-making con (gluten is absolutely fine unless you’re the rare person with Celiac disease).

The result was that Rauzi’s bolsheque was suspended. She explained, “My communal barbecue was now fully populated by people who would not or could not eat the same food.” But here’s what escapes her: This is a metaphor for the problems of liberalism and what it visits on the wider society.

It’s what happens when you try pandering to every little minority, when you forget that the “good of the many outweighs the good of the few” and confuse minorities having rights with minority rule. You don’t make a barbeque a bolsheque because the odd person is confused about his eating any more than you should completely rewrite the whole of society’s bathroom policy because the odder person is confused about his sex.

As for food-oriented events, let’s get something straight: It’s extremely rude to expect a host to accommodate your every dietary whim. I eat what’s served when I’m a guest, to be polite, whether I like it or not. After all, what are we? Children?

Speaking of which, a commenter under Rauzi’s piece mentioned that it’s even worse if you have finicky youngsters, because then you have to jump through culinary hoops every day.

Huh?

This is also liberalism: treating kids as if they’re princes and princesses. I didn’t like everything my mother served — notably sweet potatoes — but I knew I had to eat it; there was no other option. Good training, too, because it teaches children the right kind of tolerance (for objectively good things you don’t happen to like) and reflects the idea that you appreciate whatever’s on your plate, as it’s a gift from God and someone labored to prepare it for you. And do you think children living for most of history, when diets were very limited, could choose their menus? For sure, an idle mind makes the Devil the chef.

As for barbeques, I attended one Sunday in another den of iniquity — New York City — and some at the gathering were certainly quite liberal. Guess what? There were pig-in-blanket hors d’oeuvres, tortilla chips, hot dogs, hamburgers, pork ribs, gluten-replete bread, soda and sweets for dessert. Everyone ate and no one complained. So here’s some advice: if you experience anaphylactic shock when a neighbor calls his daughter “Peanut,” if you won’t eat anything that “has a face” (nothing has a face by the time it’s on my plate), if you make diet your religion, if dinner to you is an occasion for moral preening,   gatherings centered around normal people consuming large quantities of food probably aren’t your bag. Stay at home and cuddle with your bean sprouts and tofu.

So liberals killed the Rauzi bolsheque just as they kill civilization. Oh, Rauzi desires to resurrect her event, even though it appears a fruitless endeavor, saying, “I want very much to have the kind of home where people can just stop by and feel welcome no matter what food tribe they are in.” But this is another liberal delusion. And it also has metaphorical meaning. You can’t have an event — or a country — in which every conceivable tribe will feel welcome. Something established is just that, a “something,” and a “something” always has a definition. And definitions limit; they exclude what doesn’t meet the definition. You can have tradition and exclude iconoclasts, or you can make today’s iconoclasm tomorrow’s norms and exclude traditionalists. But you can’t have your gluten-free cake and eat it, too.

As for health, every civilization has a nut allergy. The Rauzi realm’s dietary and voting decisions make plain that nuts abound in our nation today — and all of America is descending into anaphylactic shock.

Contact Selwyn Duke, follow him on Twitter or log on to SelwynDuke.com.

Obama whistleblower: Terror-linked Muslim groups helping set policy, costing lives

Malfeasance on a grand scale. I detailed in my 2013 book Arab Winter Comes to America how the Fort Hood and Boston Marathon jihad massacres could have been prevented, were it not for politically correct willful ignorance at the highest levels. And now Philip Haney is revealing that the situation is even worse than was previously known.

obama-fbi

“Obama Whistleblower: Terror-Linked Muslim Groups Helping Set Policy, Costing Lives,” by Philip B. Haney, Breitbart, July 6, 2016:

Last week I testified before the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Oversight, Agency Action, Federal Rights and Federal Courts at a hearing entitled, “Willful Blindness: Consequences of Agency Efforts To Deemphasize Radical Islam in Combating Terrorism.”

I am a recently retired Customs & Border Protection (CBP) agent. I was named a Founding Member of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) at its inception on March 01, 2003. During my 12 years serving inside DHS under two administrations, I witnessed a series of events which ultimately prompted me to become a whistleblower, releasing critical documents to Members of Congress as I felt necessary to comply with my oath to the Constitution.

First, in January of 2008, I received what is now known as the “Words Matter Memo,” which was circulated internally by the Civil Rights and Civil Liberties (CRCL) division of DHS. The full title of the document was “Terminology to Define the Terrorists: Recommendations from American Muslims,” and it read in part:

 [T]he experts counseled caution in using terms such as, “jihadist,” “Islamic terrorist,” “Islamist,” and “holy warrior” as grandiose descriptions.

Collapsing all terrorist organizations into a single enemy feeds the narrative that al-Qaeda represents Muslims worldwide.

We should not concede the terrorists’ claim that they are legitimate adherents of Islam. Therefore, when using the word [Islamic], it may be strategic to emphasize that many so-called “Islamic” terrorist groups twist and exploit the tenets of Islam to justify violence and to serve their own selfish political aims.

Regarding jihad, even if it is accurate to reference the term (putting aside polemics on its true nature), it may not be strategic because it glamorizes terrorism, imbues terrorists with religious authority they do not have, and damages relations with Muslims around the globe.

I submitted a seven-point response listing serious substantive concerns about this memo, but received no response.

On November 24, 2008, a decision came down in the Holy Land Foundation (HLF) trial, the largest terror financing case in American history. During that trial, the federal government had established that a number of organizations were appropriately named as unindicted co-conspirators along with HLF, including the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), and the North American Islamic Trust (NAIT).

Specifically, the judge ruled that federal prosecutors had “produced ample evidence to establish the associations of CAIR, ISNA and NAIT with HLF… and with Hamas.” In addition, the judge ruled that that these organizations had direct links to the Muslim Brotherhood, one of the oldest and largest Islamic fundamentalist organizations in the world, founded in 1928 in Egypt to reestablish the Caliphate, whose motto includes“Jihad is our way, and death in the service of Allah is the loftiest of our wishes.”

I made note of the decision, and explored links between these groups and potential extremist and terrorist activity. But on October 15, 2009, I was ordered by DHS to ‘modify’ linking information in about 820 subject records in the Treasury Enforcement Communications System, or “TECS records” to remove ‘unauthorized references to terrorism.’ I was further ordered not to input any more Memoranda of Information Received, or MOIRs, to create no more TECS records, and to do no further research on the topics I was exploring.

On November 5, 2009, at Ft. Hood, Texas, Nidal Hasan shot and killed 13 people, including one who was pregnant, and wounded 32 others, while calling out “Allahu Akbar!” meaning “God is great” in Arabic.

Hassan was a U.S. Army major who had exchanged emails with leading al Qaeda figure Anwar Awlaki – which the FBI had seen and decided not to take action – in which he asked whether those attacking fellow U.S. soldiers were martyrs. He had also given a presentation to Army doctors discussing Islam and suicide bombers during which he argued Muslims should be allowed to leave the armed forces as conscientious objectors to avoid “adverse events.” The Pentagon refused for five years to grant victims Purple Hearts, designating the attack “workplace violence.”

On January 27-28, 2010 an ‘Inaugural Meeting’ occurred between American Muslim leaders and DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano, hosted by DHS CRCL. The Inaugural Meeting created controversy because it included a number of Islamic fundamentalist individuals and organizations.

For instance, the meeting included at least one organization that was named as an unindicted co-conspirator in the 2008 HLF Trial and established to have associations with the now-shuttered HLF and with Hamas, namely ISNA. According to the Investigative Project on Terrorism (IPT), the group’s representative who attended the meeting, Ingrid Mattson, has “an established pattern of minimizing the nature of extremist forms of Islam and rationalizing the actions of Islamist terrorist movements.” Another invited group, the Muslim American Society (MAS), was actually formed as the United States chapter of the Muslim Brotherhood in 1993.

Likewise, in the Spring of 2010, the Administration convened the Countering Violent Extremism (CVE) Working Group under the authority of the Homeland Security Advisory Council (HSAC), again raising questions because of those named to it.

They included Omar Alomari, who once wrote that jihad was “the benign pursuit of personal betterment. It may be applied to physical conflict for Muslims, but only in the arena of Muslims defending themselves when attacked or when attempting to overthrow oppression and occupation,” asserting further that “”Jihad as a holy war is a European invention, spread in the West”; Mohamed Elibiary, who has asserted that it was “inevitable that [the] ‘Caliphate’ returns” and ultimately was let go from the HSAC amid charges he misused classified documents; and Dahlia Mogahed, who has decried“lethal cocktail of liberty and capitalism” and holds that “Islamic terrorism’ is really a contradiction in terms” to mainstream Muslims “because terrorism is not Islamic by definition.”

So by the Spring of 2010, we had come to the point that a CBP Officer was literally removing information connecting the dots on individuals with ties to known terror-linked groups from TECS, while the Administration was bringing the same individuals into positions of influence, to help create and implement our counter-terror policy, in the context of actual terror attacks taking place.

On August 30, 2011, the DHS Chief Council approved a project I initiated looking into Islamic fundamentalist group Tablighi Jamaat (TJ). On November 15, 2011, I began a temporary duty assignment at the National Targeting Center (NTC). A short time later, I was assigned to the Advanced Targeting Team, where I worked exclusively on the TJ Project, which was quickly upgraded to a global-level case.

On March 15, 2012, seven lawyers and three senior executive service (SES) administrators met with management personnel at the NTC to express concern for our focus on TJ, because it is not a designated terrorist group, and therefore the project might be “discriminating” against its members because they are Muslim. On June-July, 2012, the TJ Initiative was ‘taken in another direction,’ (i.e. shut down). The Administration took this action despite the fact that [1] in nine months, we had conducted 1,200 law enforcement actions, [2] I was formally commended for finding 300 individuals with possible connections to terrorism, and [3] 25% of the individuals in Guantanamo Bay had known links to Tablighi Jamaat.

On August 22, 2012, The Institute of Islamic Education (IIE) case that today links both the Darul Uloom Al-Islamiya mosque attended by Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik, the San Bernardino shooters, and the Fort Pierce mosque attended by Omar Mateen, the Orlando shooter, was entered into TECS. But once again, on September 21, 2012, all 67 records in the IIE case were completely deleted (not just ‘modified’) from TECS.

On September 21, 2014, I was relieved of my service weapon, all access to TECS and other programs was suspended, my Secret Clearance was revoked, and I was sequestered for the last 11 months of my career with no assigned duties.

On December 2, 2015, the San Bernardino shootings occurred, and I immediately linked the mosque in San Bernardino to the IIE case (with the 67 deleted records), and to the Tablighi Jamaat case (which was shut down).

On June 09, 2016, the Homeland Security Advisory Council Countering Violent Extremism (CVE) Subcommittee issued an Interim Report and Recommendations. The report recommended in part using American English instead of religious, legal and cultural terms like “jihad,” “sharia,” “takfir” or “umma.”

On June 12, 2016, the shootings in Orlando occurred, and I linked Omar Mateen’s mosque in Fort Pierce, FL to the IIE & TJ case. And on June 19, 2016, Attorney General Loretta Lynch announced that her Department of Justice would release redacted 9-11 call transcripts for Mr. Mateen.

The threat of Islamic terrorism does not just come from a network of armed organizations such as Hamas and ISIS, who are operating ‘over there’ in the Middle East. In fact, branches of the same global network have been established here in America, and they are operating in plain sight, at least to those of us who have been charged with the duty of protecting our country from threats, both foreign and domestic….

RELATED ARTICLES:

Robert Spencer: Muslims wouldn’t bomb Muhammad’s city, would they? Sure they would.

T&T President: Quran “not a handbook of violence but a repository of peace, harmony and reformative knowledge”<

Minnesota victim speaks about roving Somali Muslim rape gangs in upscale neighborhood

“I don’t think people realize how bad it is in Minnesota and what type of backdrop we have here.” (victim)

The upscale neighborhood at Lake Calhoun is only 5 miles from the Cedar Riverside Somali enclave  in downtown Minneapolis.

Lake calhoun map

Map of Lake Calhoun area.

We first mentioned this incredible scary story a couple of days ago pointing out that the mainstream media never reports news like this nationally, but here we learn from World Net Daily reporter, Leo Hohmann, who spoke with the primary target of the confrontation as at least 20 Somali men (self proclaimed jihadists) swarmed a neighborhood outside of Minneapolis, what happened on THREE separate occasions in the escalating “jihad” on a lakeside community.

Many outrageous and frightening things were shouted by Somali men, some of whom were dressed in traditional Islamic robes.

They said they practiced shariah law and could thus kidnap and rape the attractive target of their abusive language.

They were yelling the word “jihad” from their car windows as they careened across lawns and sidewalks.

They blasted the soundtrack of a woman being sexually assaulted from a car.

They carried duffel bags, held them as if they were guns and shot off bottle rockets to make the sounds of gun shots.

And, that is just a bit of what happened as this neighborhood was terrorized last week.

You must read the whole incredible story from the mouth of the primary victim and from other witnesses who confirmed the story to World New Daily.

Where is the Minneapolis Star Tribune? Where is the New York Times? Where is CNN? Where is Fox News? The whole country should be informed of what happens when a Muslim Somali population grows large enough to boldly attack the peace and quiet of a suburban neighborhood with shouts of “jihad.”

Somalis did not ‘find their way’ to Minnesota from East Africa!

If you are a new reader here today, know that the reason the Somali population is so high in Minnesota is because the UN/US State Department began resettling tens of thousands there over more than 25 years with the help initially of Catholic Charities, Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service and World Relief (Evangelicals).  There are now other federal contractors working day and night (along with the original three) to change Minnesota one town at a time!

If you live in towns newly contemplating ‘welcoming’ refugees from the Muslim world, take note!  Asheville, NC, Charleston, WV, Missoula, MT, Rutland, VT, Reno, NV, Fayetteville, AR etc… are you paying attention!

The feds and their contractors may tell you they will only bring your town a certain ethnic group, do not believe them, you will get a mix of refugees from all over the world, including Somalis!  About 750 additional Somalis arrive in the U.S. each month from all over the world!

RELATED ARTICLES:

Senate Democrats Block ‘Sanctuary’ City Bill, but the Issue Isn’t Going Away

Pastor Says Iowa State Law Threatens His Right to Teach the Bible in His Church

Minnesota: Muslim ‘refugees’ threaten community with rape, mainstream media covers up incident

North Carolina: Two Muslims imprisoned for plotting to go to Syria or Yemen to murder non-Muslims

Islam’s Inexorable Impulse by Matthew Hanley

We have ample occasion these days to be reminded that Christian martyrs can be a catalyst for a new rebirth. You know: “the blood of the martyrs is the seed of the Church.” There is undeniable historical truth to that, but unfortunately there is another way, pace Tertullian, to look at it: the blood of the martyrs also builds up the house of Islam.

Some may have heard that Islam “spread by the sword” way back when. Fewer realize the extent to which the unremitting threat of bloodshed and other indignities against those who break rank has provided more than sufficient inducement for inhabitants of vast swathes subjugated territories to remain Muslim. The stunted horizons imposed upon those masses down through the generations – an attenuated form of suffering – compounds the initial iniquity visited upon the slaughtered innocents.

Indeed, some leading figures in the Muslim world openly maintain that if the death penalty for apostasy were not built into Islam, it would not have originally become so entrenched and may have even faded long ago. Even if that seems implausible, the fact that, for all its force, Islam leans so heavily on compulsion, paradoxically bespeaks a certain fragility.

Myth_Andalusian_Paradise-198x300The point is that once Islam gobbles up new lands (or establishes beachheads in pockets of the West today), it imposes a highly effective death grip – Iberia being the most notable reversal. And anyone who thinks that Spain under Muslim rule was a golden moment of harmonious, enlightened multiculturalism – the shibboleth most people have been fed– should read Dario Fernandez-Morera’s new goldmine of a book The Myth of the Andalusian Paradise: Muslims, Christians, and Jews under Islamic Rule in Medieval Spain.

When, for example, the reconquista reached Valencia (1238) and Granada (1492), there were virtually no Christian inhabitants left. Remember, it all started with a modest number of jihadists, but pressure to submit to the ways of Islam (the word sharia actually means “the way,” thereby signaling a clear departure from Christian thought) inexorably mounted when and where it could. As it always does.

How they came to subjugate and the conditions that characterized their rule will sound familiar: the beheadings, crucifixions, horrific sexual abuse, material confiscations, and so forth. It’s all there. And authoritatively documented. That alone is eye opening, but Fernandez-Morera further educates by exposing the underlying motivations for the false “model of tolerance” narrative – which mirror today’s maddening “Baghdad Bob” like denial of obvious reality in the face of self-proclaimed Islamic atrocities.

Read more.

EDITORS NOTE: This column is published with permission from The Catholic Thing.

An Open Letter to Florida’s Only Openly Gay Legislator

Dear Representative Richardson:

Fl politics.pngSince your election to the Florida House of Representatives in 2012 until now, I have always known your reputation as a legislator to be one of nothing but respect for the dignity of the institution, for the legislative process and for your fellow colleagues.  Even those who firmly disagree with you on matters of public policy speak highly of you, of your talents as a legislator and the unique perspective you bring to the process.

However, after the tragic and despicable acts of evil which took place right down the street from my offices in Orlando on June 12, I was shocked to learn of your repeated statements accusing your fellow legislators of creating an environment that gives rise to such horrible violence when they speak out against any LGBT bills as bad public policy in the Legislature.

After the local NPR affiliate interviewed you, WFSU issued this report:

Florida’s only openly gay legislator says Orlando’s mass shooting is an example of a deranged individual taking anti-gay political rhetoric to the, “next level.” Democratic Representative David Richardson of Miami Beach says attempts by religious conservatives to roll back recent gains in gay civil rights encourages extremists… “[P]eople who are prone to committing violent acts are emboldened by speeches that they hear from policy makers that want to roll back our advances.” 

When I respectfully confronted you on another NPR affiliate radio debate for linking vocal opposition to new LGBT laws with violent acts such as the ones that occurred in Orlando, you initially denied these statements– until I read your words back to you on the air.  Then, instead of retracting or apologizing for these irresponsible remarks, you doubled down and repeated the same very offensive and incorrect argument again.  In that interview you said,

“I absolutely do think that people are emboldened, by the comments of certain lawmakers whether they are reacting in a violent way…”

While I realize the matter of the Orlando shooting and the topic of creating new LGBT rights are still raw, emotional, and highly personal matters for members of the LGBT community, this in no way justifies these inflammatory remarks which do nothing to foster good will, understanding or collegiality among fellow members of the Legislature, much less the general public.  On the contrary, your comments breed divisiveness, sow discord and are an attempt to manipulate and silence robust debate among the other elected leaders of our Legislature on these important policy decisions.

Additionally, you have also stunningly stated:

“It doesn’t help when they go to Tallahassee and spew hatred and rhetoric that is harmful to our community. I really wish we could get to a place where everyone can get along and respect the rights of everybody.”

I personally know many of the members of the Legislature who are known to be the most vocal and the most actively opposed to these bad gay-rights bills.

I have been in some of their homes.

I know their families.

None of them, even in private or casual conversation, make comments that “spew hatred” toward the LGBT community.  On the contrary, these are truly some of the finest, most loving and charitable people you could ever know.  Do you have specific examples of Florida legislators “spewing hatred” when debating in opposition to the creation of new LGBT rights?

The primary push by gay-rights activists after the Orlando tragedy, as you know, is the so-called “Competitive Workforce Act” (CWA) which seeks to create a new legal protected class for sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression.  These laws are being used all across the country as weapons to punish Christians who want to live out their constitutionally protected right to free exercise of religion in public life without government interference.  Even more egregiously, this CWA bill would also allow fully biological men to freely use women’s locker rooms and showers in any facility declared a public accommodation like YMCA’s, camps, LA Fitness & health clubs and domestic violence shelters.  This is a gross invasion of privacy, safety and security for women.  The more serious problem created with the CWA has not so much to do with transgendered persons themselves, as it does with actual criminals (voyeurs, sex offenders and pedophiles) who are looking for excuses to go into women’s intimate spaces, which the latest version of this bill would unquestionably allow.

These are just a few of the many legitimate and compelling public policy and constitutional problems which compel legislators to speak out publicly and strongly oppose the CWA.  For you to argue that when any legislator speaks out in debate against this dangerous bill they are “spewing hatred,” “encouraging extremism” and “make people prone to violent acts” is simply beyond the pale of decency for a member of the legislative branch of government.

Rep. Richardson, this sir– is not your finest moment.

Is there a way to disagree on these policies and not be judged as hateful or contributing to creating an environment of terror?  If we cannot disagree in civility without being slimmed with such accusations, then our civil society has a real problem.

Unless you can provide real examples of such “hateful” behavior, rather than talking about it in generalities, you should stop making these assertions. It is not helpful to this important debate, it is manipulative and pollutes the work we are hopefully both committed to, namely building a better Florida, even in the midst of our disagreements.

You have correctly stated that, “it does not help when [people] go to Tallahassee and spew rhetoric that is harmful.”  If you really mean that, please start by reexamining and reconsidering your own harmful words directed to your own colleagues and do not confuse “robust debate” with “hateful rhetoric” just because you disagree.

John Stemberger

Published at FloridaPolitics.com

Refugee Resettlement System Rigged: Favors Muslims over Christians

We have told you about a zillion times that the United Nations is now choosing the majority of refugees admitted to the US and here is one more confirmation of that (if we needed it!).

Fillipo Grandi

Fillipo Grandi

Patrick Goodenough, a reporter at CNS News, tells us every month what the stats look like for the number of Syrians entering the U.S. and what their ‘religious’ persuasion is and here is his June update which includes these few paragraphs well into the report.

Sunnis make up the vast majority of the refugees admitted to date – 5,099 (98.3 percent) of the 5,186.

The proportion of Syrian refugees admitted this year who are Christians – 0.38 percent – is much smaller than the roughly 10 percent of pre-war Syrians who were Christian.

Refugee advocacy groups say this anomaly is at least partly the result of the fact Christians among the fleeing Syrians are loathe to enter U.N. camps in surrounding countries for fear of their safety – something the U.N. refugee agency itself concedes is happening.

Because the U.N. refers applicants at the beginning of the process of seeking refugee status in the U.S., this may mean fewer Christians are referred in the first place.

[….]

Christians, Yazidis and Shi’a have been specifically targeted by the Sunni jihadists of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS/ISIL), in what the U.S. government has determined is a campaign of genocide.

So, we are taking the Sunni persecutors in to the U.S. (makes sense! NOT!).

More here and see their excellent graph [below].

refugees-fiscal2

Chart based on U.S. State Department data. Courtesy of CNS News.

There is nothing in refugee law to stop the US State Department from seeking out Syrian Christians/minorities. It is simply that we are now being led by the nose by the United Nations!  (which we largely support with your money!)

RELATED ARTICLES:

New Hampshire: Are they priming Laconia for a new resettlement site?

More on Obama and his crony corporate pals doing an end-run on refugee program

Syrian Refugees Admitted to U.S. More Than Doubled in June; 0.3 Percent Were Christians

Sweden: Muslim migrant mob sexually assaults children as young as 12 at festival

Don’t miss more on the Somali roving gang in Minneapolis suburb; Governor says love it or leave it

If Syrians safely go home (to Syria!) today for EID, are they still legitimate refugees?

It’s time to ditch Obama’s entire ‘Countering Violent Extremism’ strategy

Last week, Senator Ted Cruz’s hearings graphically revealed the true extent of the Obama administration’s politically correct denial and willful ignorance concerning the nature and magnitude of the jihad threat and the ongoing attempts to assert Sharia principles and practices over those of American law and culture. DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson in particular demonstrated a contemptuous indifference to the importance of identifying the enemy ideology properly.

Meanwhile, the role of Muslim Brotherhood-allied groups in influencing the Obama administration and guiding its hamstringing and deforming our response to the jihad threat has never yet been adequately addressed. The worst manifestation of this baneful influence is the administration’s “Countering Violent Extremism” policy, which pretends that “right-wingers” are as much or more of a terror threat than Islamic jihadis — and generally ignores the existence of Islamic jihad altogether.

But tomorrow Reps. Kevin McCarthy and Mike McCaul plan to make things even worse. They’re pushing for a rule to bring up a bill that will give Jeh Johnson an Assistant Secretary whose job will be to “partner” with “communities” against “radical Islamist terrorism” — a slightly more accurate and truthful phrase than “violent extremism,” but unfortunately, not one that heralds a positive change: this new Assistant Secretary’s office will have at least a $10 million budget for this “partnering,” and its “partners” will almost certainly be Muslim Brotherhood-linked and Hamas-linked groups such as the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) and the Council on American-Islamic Relations.

Enough is enough. Americans are fed up with the Obama administration’s denial, willful ignorance, and pandering to Islamic supremacist groups. It’s time to repudiate the entire “Countering Violent Extremism” and call Islamic jihad what it is: Islamic jihad.

McCarthy and McCaul’s travesty has to be stopped. In its place, we need legislation that will bar individuals or groups linked with Hamas and/or the Muslim Brotherhood, and that were named unindicted co-conspirators in the Holy Land Foundation trial, from ever “partnering” with U.S. government organizations in any way, and from receiving federal grants for countering “radical Islamic terrorism,” “violent extremism,” or anything else.

And beyond that, we must put an end to the “Countering Violent Extremism” approach, and devise one for “Countering Jihad.” The key premises of the “Countering Violent Extremism” strategy — that Islam is a religion of peace that has nothing to do with “violent extremism”; that those who engage in violence in its name are twisting and hijacking its peaceful tenets; that jihad is an interior spiritual struggle that has nothing to do with violence; that mosques are entirely benign places of worship, akin to churches and synagogues, and that it would be “Islamophobic” to subject them to surveillance; that intelligence and law enforcement agents must work to win the “trust” of Muslim communities, rather than the other way around; and that “right-wing extremists” are more of a threat than violent (and stealth) jihadists — must be decisively and explicitly rejected.

What should be put in its place? Reality.

The U.S. government should recognize that there are aspects of Islamic law (Sharia) that are directly contradictory to Constitutional freedoms and protections, and make it clear that preaching and spreading those aspects of Islamic law in the U.S. will be regarded as sedition. It must recognize the ideology of the jihadis as rooted in the Qur’an and Sunnah, and require U.S. mosques and Islamic schools to back up their pro-forma condemnations of jihad terror with genuine action, including honest and inspectable programs teaching against the ISIS/al-Qaeda understanding of Islam. Mosques must be monitored to ensure that sedition, violence, and hatred of unbelievers is not being preached. The government must also recognize that jihad and Islamic supremacism are global, and have no counterpart among returning veterans, Tea Party activists, etc.

The time is now. Please contact your Congressmen and exhort them to repudiate the McCarthy/McCaul initiative, and the entire “Countering Violent Extremism” superstructure. Obama’s fantasy-based policies are costing lives. One death for political correctness was one too many, and there have been many more than one. It is time to call a halt to this suicidal nonsense once and for all.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Jihadist group Hizballah has 100,000 missiles ready to strike Israel

Sweden: Muslim migrant mob sexually assaults children as young as 12 at festival

Former DOD Official: Islamic Terrorists are ‘weaponizing political correctness’

Despite the devastation being wrought throughout the globe by Islamic jihadists, and the accelerated threat to the West since the emergence of the Islamic State, Western leaders continue to minimize this threat, believe jihadist propaganda, and adhere to political correctness.

Jihadists were slaughtering long before the Islamic State appeared, but the Islamic State’s zeal for conquest and destruction have taken the savagery to new levels, particularly with the persuasiveness of its leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, who is well-grounded in Islamic theology and law, and wields them to stir fanaticism and militancy among his following.

Baghdadi — who has a Ph.D. in Islamic studies — is all the more dangerous particularly given the traditional rigidity of Islam, as Muslim scholars, leaders, mullahs and clerics are the only respected sources to interpret the immutable decrees of Islamic texts. Baghdadi is also well versed in the strategies of the more stealthy Muslim Brotherhood.

Leftist Westerners remain clueless as to the nature of this jihadist war against us. Former Department of Defense official Rich Higgins said in an interview that he knew that America was losing the war on terror when Omar Mateen pledged his allegiance to the Islamic State and went on his rampage at the Pulse nightclub. Higgins stated that jihadists are “‘weaponizing political correctness’ and using narratives to collapse our understanding of the enemy and how to battle them.”

“Former DOD Official Warns America Is On The Wrong Track To Fighting War On Terror [VIDEO],” by Ginni Thomas, Daily Caller, July 2, 2016:

Former Department of Defense official Rich Higgins knew America was losing the war on terror when a terrorist attacked the Pulse bar in Orlando, killing 49 people and injuring over 50.

Higgins’ sister-in-law asked him if he was doing all he could to fight this enemy after seeing the carnage of innocent life. Now, Higgins is taking considerable risk to speak truthfully about the lack of strategic policy in our government’s war on terror.

In this exclusive video interview with The Daily Caller News Foundation, the former Department of Defense official explains how Islamists are “weaponizing political correctness” and using narratives to collapse our understanding of the enemy and how to battle them.

His expertise is political warfare and developing strategies to battle against the ideologies and tactics used to carry out terror attacks.

Political warfare includes both non-violent and violent actions working in synthesis, Higgins says. The left, with enemy-friendly Muslim Brotherhood allies, is able to control the dominant cultural narrative with the media and the government, blinding us in the war on terror and impacting how Americans think, he argues.

Higgins calls for a “strategic and operational pause” in America’s misguided battle to stop the terror. He would, instead, ask new leadership to develop a comprehensive political warfare plan, while removing the subversive policies and personnel causing America to lose this paramount battle.

He cites the “purges” carried out by law enforcement and intelligence officials throughout government, which Phil HaneySebastian Gorka and Steve Coughlin have made public….

RELATED ARTICLES:

Islamic State beheads men for “mocking Islam,” “pledging allegiance to infidels”

Jihadist group Hizballah has 100,000 missiles ready to strike Israel

Wisconsin: Muslim Tuberculosis Capital of America

Michael Patrick Leahy has published one more investigative report on Tuberculosis in the U.S. refugee population. Go to our ‘health issues’ category by clicking here to see his previous reports.

Here is the latest, hot off the presses this morning:

Twenty-seven recently resettled refugees were among the 117 cases of active tuberculosis (TB) diagnosed in Wisconsin in 2014 and 2015, according to the Wisconsin Department of Health Services. That makes the Badger State the new refugee TB capital of the United States.

TB_poster

Wisconsin replaces Louisiana as the state with the most reported cases of active TB among recently resettled refugees in the country.

As Breitbart News has reported previously, twenty-one cases of active TB were diagnosed among recently resettled refugees in Louisiana between 2011 and 2015.

Six other states have reported recently resettled refugees have been diagnosed with active TB: Florida (eleven), Colorado (ten), Idaho (seven), Indiana (four), Kentucky (nine in one county), and North Dakota (four in one county).

Wisconsin may not be the actual leader, though. Only eight of the forty nine states that resettle refugees under the federal refugee resettlement program have responded to Breitbart News requests to provide this important public health data, which resettlement agencies are required by law to monitor and report in each state.

Lots more here!

One more HUGE example of the secrecy surrounding the Refugee Admissions Program in America!

EndNote: I’m going to ask again if anyone knows if volunteers working with the resettlement contractors are given any information on how to stay safe from health risks associated with refugees coming here directly from the third world.

RELATED ARTICLES: 

The system is rigged against Christian Syrians; UN chooses Sunni Muslims for US

Sweden: Muslim migrant mob sexually assaults children as young as 12 at festival

Don’t miss more on the Somali roving gang in Minneapolis suburb; Governor says love it or leave it

If Syrians safely go home (to Syria!) today for EID, are they still legitimate refugees?

Florida based Veritence Corporation’s Two Major Climate Predictions Come to Pass

John L. Casey, founder of Veritence Corporation and author of Dark Winter, on April 11, 2016 made two major climate predictions.

Prediction 1.  We can now add this new event and date to our memories – February 2016. This is the month when global temperatures began a final long term decline into a deep and potentially dangerous abyss of record cold that will last for thirty years. Read more.

Prediction 2. Like the past 200 years of relatively continuous growth in global temperatures, the 2015-2016 warm temperatures were caused by the Sun. Unfortunately, the last two decades of solar heating, which have simultaneously permitted bumper crops for the world’s hungry masses, is in my opinion, the last of its kind for at least the next 400 years. The warmth we have enjoyed and that of generations to come is over. Read more.

Casey notes,

As of today’s latest satellite global temperature data from Dr. Roy Spencer at the University of Alabama, Huntsville that is exactly what has happened – March, April, May and now June have seen dramatic drops in global temperatures -exactly as I predicted. I expect the rest of the year to continue to show this prediction was correct. According to Dr. Spencer, the last two month drop is the steepest in 37 years! See “drroyspencer.com.”

See Dr. Spencer’s chart below.

temperature chart

ABOUT VERITENCE CORPORATION

The mission of Veritence Corporation is to provide consulting advice and related services to the government, business community, and the general public in its areas of expertise. These areas include climate science, space programs and space policy, geophysics, and management advice in complex scientific and engineering projects.

To achieve the Veritence mission we will:

1. Become a vocal and visible public advocate for truth and integrity at all levels of government involving the mission areas.

2. Provide requisite consulting services to Veritence Corporation clients.

3. Make recommendations to the government and the public for establishment of important science and engineering goals.

The Stealth Religious War: Church of Liberalism vs Christianity

Much of my wife Mary and my time is spent traveling the country helping to elect conservatives to the House and Senate. I am chairman of the Conservative Campaign Committee.

On a rare stop back home in Florida, we decided to enjoy a day at our favorite New Smyrna Beach. After multiple stops for gas, banking and Walmart, we were finally on our way. It brought back fond childhood memories of hot summer family trips to the beach; mom, dad, fat Aunt Nee and five kids all crammed into a station-wagon with no air conditioning. The ritual included picking up Aunt Nee from her house and several stops for select foods to take with us. I remember the excitement I felt after all the stops and we were finally headed to Carr’s Beach; the only Maryland beach open to blacks.

godless cover ann coulterBack to present day. Before we left home, Mary said, “Don’t forget a book to read.” Scanning our book shelves, Ann Coulter’s book published in 2006, “Godless” caught my eye.

In her book, Coulter said, “If a Martian landed in America and set out to determine the nation’s official state religion, he would have to conclude it is Liberalism, while Christianity and Judaism are prohibited by law.” Coulter said Liberalism is the state-sanctioned religion and is a godless one. Ten years later, Liberalism has become the state-mandated religion. Remarkably, practicing biblical Christianity has become illegal. 

Coulter says despite liberals claims of being non-religious, Liberalism has all the attributes of a religion. Coulter exposes the “Church of Liberalism” in which “its sacraments (abortion), its holy writ (Roe v. Wade)…its clergy (public school teachers), its churches (government schools, where prayer is prohibited but condoms are free)…its cosmology (in which mankind is an inconsequential accident).”

I would included the LGBT agenda as sacraments of the Church of Liberalism.

Seemingly over night in America, our freedom of speech, freedom of religion and parental rights have been taken away. Obama’s DOJ says it will prosecute anyone who speaks badly about Islam. Christians are being persecuted and even jailed for not obeying sacraments of the Church of Liberalism. Federal judges have decreed that parents are not allowed to opt out even their preschool children from LGBT indoctrination in school curriculum

Just like the Hitler Youth, the Obama Administration has indoctrinated students to become Church of Liberalism spies. Students are instructed to report family members who make racist and politically incorrect comments around the dinner table.

My dad and Mary’s mom taught us that the democrats were for the little guy, the working man. Our parents are clueless regarding how far to the left their party has moved; becoming a godless cult – home of the Church of Liberalism.

The Church of Liberalism’s control of our government will dramatically increase if liberal zealot Hillary Clinton becomes president. Americans have been beaten down, forced to embrace the sacraments of this religious cult. A perfect example is ESPN awarding the Arthur Ashe Award to Bruce Jenner, a man in drag

C’mon folks, you can imagine what most of the men in that hall at the awards event were thinking. For the most part, pro sports is a celebration of maleness. And yet, those high testosterone pro-athletes knew they had better smile and applaud Bruce/Caitlyn Jenner or be forced into sensitivity training and risk losing their livelihood.

Typical of religious cults, the Church of Liberalism does not tolerant opposing points of view. Church of Liberalism zealots used the federal government to silence the Tea Party. The Church of Liberalism seeks to punish and silence Fox News. The Church of Liberalism brands all opposition, “hate speech” enabling them to use government to silence Christian pastors and close down Christian churches. http://bit.ly/1a5fb43

Decades of the Church of Liberalism controlling public education has reaped masses of dumbed-down Americans; brainwashed into embracing the Church of Liberalism’s tyranny. Dummies believe Church of Liberalism zealots are good guys, advocates for the disenfranchised; defending them against mean, selfish and racist Christians and Conservatives.

For example: Obama routinely trashes and rules against Christianity while forcing Christians to submit to the sacraments of the Church of Liberalism. Obama displays his utmost respect for Islam. And yet, Obama’s Administration has made it quite clear that speaking badly about Islam or any of the sacraments of the Church of Liberalism could land you in jail

Think about the folks. Church of Liberalism zealots are free to outrageously blame Christians and law-abiding American gun owners for a massacre they had nothing to do with. We have suffered numerous incidents of Islamic terrorists attacks; killing Americans on US soil. And yet, our federal government threatens to jail anyone caught speaking badly about either of these two religions (Church of Liberalism and Islam).

Christians are being banned from many jobs and jailed for not submitting to sacraments of the Church of Liberalism. 

Folks, the America we knew is gone. Prayer, repentance and a regime change should be our first baby steps towards restoring our nation. This is one of the many reasons why my battle cry is, “Never Hillary!”

Wikileaks releases Clinton emails — Guilty? You be the judge!

Hillary Clinton cares more about Hillary Clinton than the safety and security of the United States. Since setting foot on the public stage back in her Arkansas days, Hillary Clinton has placed Hillary Clinton first and foremost – in everything!

Times may change but Hillary does not. Her use of unauthorized servers and hand-held devices outside the scope of what is considered “safe practices” for anyone with access to sensitive information has been alarming and bewildering, as drip by drip over the past year the American public has learned multiple discoveries of this woman’s careless and arrogant sociopathic actions. The impression she repeatedly delivered was that rules are for the “little people” not we Elites.

So…continuing with an aberrant behavior that was evident since the day she was fired during the 1974 Watergate Hearings in Congress as a Congressional Staff Assistant for lying and tampering with evidence, through her term as Arkansas First Lady onto the White House, then the U.S. Senate, then as U.S. Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton has taken care of, well…Hillary Clinton!

With all the disclosures related to her sending and receiving emails from unauthorized, unsecured, private servers of questionable sophistication and security monitoring, the American People continued to hold their collective breaths that maybe, just maybe an adult with real authority, integrity, and lack of timidity would confront this reckless, power-addicted, self-absorbed woman.

criminal statuteEnter FBI Director James Comey.

Across the fruited-plains and from sea to shining sea, citizens began to feel again that maybe, just maybe Director Comey would do what no one else has been able to accomplish in Hillary’s life; namely, STOP her harmful ways, and hold her squarely accountable for the myriad lives and resources she has brought to destruction. But something happened to Director Comey, and again Hillary slipped out of the grasp of being held firmly and solely responsible for her actions.

Director Comey, you said: “We did not find Clinton’s email domain was ever hacked by hostile actors successfully since she began using it in 2009. But given the nature of such activity, we doubt we would ever see such activity.”

FBI Director Comey said: “There is evidence that they (Clinton and her senior aides) were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive highly classified information.” Mr. Comey also alluded to the possibility that enemies of the United States had gained access to her server, and then added there was “evidence of potential violations of the statues regarding the handling of classified information.”

Well…sir, I don’t have all the bells and whistles you have at your disposal, but mentioned below are just a few of Hillary’s emails that are making the rounds on the internet, courtesy of Wikileaks. To review the complete list of emails click here.

Doc ID Date Subject From To
1067 2010-11-26 22:00 (NYT) IRAQ’S PREMIER VOWS TO FORGE NEW GOVERNMENT Huma Abedin Hillary Clinton
1564 2010-09-29 23:15 (REUTERS) – IRAQ’S SHI’ITE-LED ALLIANCE CHOSE PRIME MINISTER NURI AL-MALIKI Huma Abedin Hillary Clinton
1862 2010-08-28 23:05 (REUTERS) U.S. VP BIDEN VISITS IRAQ AS TROOPS WITHDRAW Huma Abedin Hillary Clinton
5037 2012-03-17 00:48 CALL SUMMARY–AMCIT RELEASED IN IRAQ Jake Sullivan Hillary Clinton
5388 2011-12-20 20:52 AP: IRAQ’S PRIME MINISTER GRANTS SIX-MONTH EXTENSION ON DEADLINE TO CLOSE IRANIAN EXILES’ CAMP Hillary Clinton Jake Sullivan
5767 2011-12-20 20:55 AP: IRAQ’S PRIME MINISTER GRANTS SIX-MONTH EXTENSION ON DEADLINE TO CLOSE IRANIAN EXILES’ CAMP Jake Sullivan Hillary Clinton
5984 2011-10-13 21:00 IRAQ ENERGY ENGAGEMENT STRATEGY s/ciea:pascual and s/eee morningstar Hillary Clinton
11465 2012-09-03 11:17 BAGHDAD AND ERBIL Jake Sullivan Hillary Clinton
11974 2009-08-18 02:03 (AP) IRAQ: WAVE OF BAGHDAD BLASTS KILLS AT LEAST 95 Huma Abedin Hillary Clinton
13504 2009-11-28 22:00 CHILCOT INQUIRY: MANDARINS TAKE REVENGE ON TONY BLAIR OVER IRAQ Washington Post
14342 2009-08-28 00:06 TRUCK BOMBS KILL 16 PEOPLE IN IRAQ (AP) Huma Abedin Hillary Clinton
14558 2009-08-18 02:12 (AP) BAGHDAD UPDATE Huma Abedin Hillary Clinton
19521 2012-09-15 01:28 MOST IRANIAN DISSIDENTS MOVED FROM IRAQ CAMP (REUTERS) Cheryl Mills Hillary Clinton
20463 2012-06-12 08:23 THE CABLE – THREE U.S. AMBASSADORS TO IRAQ DEFEND MCGURK Cheryl Mills Hillary Clinton
21040 2010-11-07 22:09 IRAQ GOV. FORMATION STATUS AS OF 9:30 A.M. EST Jake Sullivan Hillary Clinton
21556 2010-10-29 03:33 THE SAUDI INITIATIVE ON IRAQ Jake Sullivan Hillary Clinton
21557 2010-10-29 03:32 THE SAUDI INITIATIVE ON IRAQ Jake Sullivan Hillary Clinton
21697 2010-06-18 20:49 CAR BOMBS IN CENTRAL BAGHDAD KILL 26 Huma Abedin Hillary Clinton
22286 2012-05-05 19:32 IRAQ COURT RULES TO RELEASE HEZBOLLAH PRISONER (AP) Cheryl Mills Hillary Clinton
23389 2012-01-17 02:04 IRAQ CABINET BARS MINISTERS, TESTING COALITION (REUTERS) Huma Abedin Hillary Clinton
23488 2012-01-06 04:18 IRAN GROUP SAY US RESPONSIBLE FOR MEMBERS IN IRAQ (REUTERS) Huma Abedin Hillary Clinton
23626 2011-12-16 10:36 IRAQ Hillary Clinton Melanne Verveer
23775 2011-10-14 09:13 NO DECISION YET ON FUTURE TROOP PRESENCE IN IRAQ-US (REUTERS) Hillary Clinton Huma Abedin
23824 2011-10-14 09:19 NO DECISION YET ON FUTURE TROOP PRESENCE IN IRAQ-US (REUTERS) Hillary Clinton Huma Abedin
24715 2011-12-27 22:00 IRANIAN EXILES IN IRAQ AGREE TO MOVE CAMPS (AP) Huma Abedin Hillary Clinton
24766 2011-12-27 22:37 NYT OP-ED ON IRAQ FROM ALLAWI, AL-NUJAIFI, AND AL-ESSAWI Jake Sullivan Hillary Clinton
24775 2011-12-25 05:21 MORTARS HIT IRANIAN DISSIDENT CAMP IN IRAQ (REUTERS) Huma Abedin Hillary Clinton
24776 2011-12-25 05:21 UN, IRAQ AGREE ON CAMP ASHRAF RESETTLEMENT PLAN (AP) Huma Abedin Hillary Clinton
24784 2011-12-28 03:08 IRANIAN EXILES IN IRAQ AGREE TO MOVE CAMPS (AP) Jake Sullivan Hillary Clinton
24789 2011-12-23 19:35 VP HASHEMI BLAMES IRAQ BLASTS ON GOVT FACTIONS -BBC (REUTERS) Huma Abedin Hillary Clinton
24818 2011-12-20 20:48 AP: IRAQ’S PRIME MINISTER GRANTS SIX-MONTH EXTENSION ON DEADLINE TO CLOSE IRANIAN EXILES’ CAMP Jake Sullivan Hillary Clinton
24894 2011-12-16 19:42 IRAQ SENDS DELEGATION TO SYRIA FOR CRISIS TALKS (REUTERS) Huma Abedin Hillary Clinton
24904 2011-12-16 19:42 HEZBOLLAH PRISONER HELD BY IRAQ FACES MINOR CHARGE (AP) Huma Abedin Hillary Clinton
24913 2011-12-11 20:38 IRAQ TRAVEL WARNING Patrick Kennedy Hillary Clinton
24960 2011-12-11 20:39 COMPLETE TEXT OF UK TRAVEL WARNING Patrick Kennedy Hillary Clinton
25301 2011-11-02 05:26 SADR SAYS TO RESIST ANY U.S. PRESENCE IN IRAQ (REUTERS) Huma Abedin Hillary Clinton
25474 2011-10-20 20:37 IRAQ PM: IMMUNITY ISSUE SCUTTLED US TROOP DEAL (AP) Huma Abedin Hillary Clinton
25476 2011-10-19 03:01 BOMBINGS IN EASTERN BAGHDAD KILL 3 (AP) Huma Abedin Hillary Clinton
26462 2011-10-14 09:16 NO DECISION YET ON FUTURE TROOP PRESENCE IN IRAQ-US (REUTERS) Huma Abedin Hillary Clinton
26507 2011-10-14 09:01 NO DECISION YET ON FUTURE TROOP PRESENCE IN IRAQ-US (REUTERS) Huma Abedin Hillary Clinton
26574 2011-10-07 04:07 IRAQ ARMY DELAYS PULLOUT FROM CITIES OVER SECURITY (AP) Huma Abedin Hillary Clinton
26703 2011-09-20 05:39 IRAQ NEEDS US TRAINERS AFTER TROOPS LEAVE – ZEBARI (REUTERS) Huma Abedin Hillary Clinton
27095 2011-08-13 18:44 WAVE OF ATTACKS IN IRAQ LEAVES AT LEAST 57 DEAD (NYT) Huma Abedin Hillary Clinton
27158 2011-08-04 02:44 GERMAN DIPLOMAT KOBLER TO BE NEW U.N. IRAQ ENVOY (REUTERS) Huma Abedin Hillary Clinton
27431 2011-07-09 00:49 EARLY DECISION ON US TROOPS UNLIKELY: IRAQ OFFICIAL (AFP) Huma Abedin Hillary Clinton
29194 2011-01-05 22:51 IRAN CALLS FOR IMMEDIATE PULLOUT OF FOREIGN TROOPS FROM IRAQ; CALLS FOR REGIONAL SECURITY TREATY Jake Sullivan Hillary Clinton
30112 2010-03-13 22:34 IRAQ Hillary Clinton
30151 2010-02-22 07:18 BAGHDAD STAFFING THOUGHTS (PERSONNEL SENSITIVE) Hillary Clinton
30152 2010-02-21 22:00 BAGHDAD STAFFING THOUGHTS (PERSONNEL SENSITIVE) Hillary Clinton
30235 2010-12-24 21:36 XMAS UPDATE FROM BAGHDAD Huma Abedin

To review the complete list of emails click here.

RELATED ARTICLE: The Explanation Americans Deserve From FBI on Clinton’s Server Use