PODCAST: Trump Unshackled

The line of the week goes to Donald J. Trump, who declared “the shackles are off!” He was talking about the shackles imposed on him by the politically correct GOP and the Hillary campaigning media.

Yes, despite WikiLeaks releasing thousands of emails proving that Hillary Clinton is indeed a crook, indeed a liar, indeed two-faced, and indeed guilty regarding Benghazi, somehow the media tells us that Trump is one who’s in trouble. And the sad thing is, the brainwashed, intellectually deficient among us believe it.

We’ll also discuss the latest with Wells Fargo and other big banks, who lately are teetering amongst media reports of fraud and averse market conditions. Finally, we remember the attack on the USS Cole, just nine months before 9-11-2001.

Join us Saturday for these topics and more…

Topics of Discussion:

  • Shackles are Off!
  • WikiLeaks Highlight Reel – Don’t Blame Russia!
  • Global Banking Crisis deepens
  • Qatar’s $1 million birthday gift to Bill Clinton
  • National and International Headlines…

and more . . .

RELATED ARTICLE: Warning – The Shackles are Off!

Podesta email leaks from Clinton campaign prove Democrats go low

Hillary Clinton has no public events on her schedule from here to election day, a strategy being characterized as “do no harm.”

She and her advisors apparently think she can coast to victory and let her surrogates do all the heavy lifting. And it’s true: Clinton has a lot of help, not only from the Obamas but from the national media and the establishment elites.

But with the daily dump from Wikileaks of the Podesta emails now in its seventh installment— and with much more promised to come — the sheer sordidness and cynicism of the corrupt Clinton machine is becoming harder to ignore.

We now know, for example, that the Clinton campaign coordinated with the New York Times earlier this year on a strategy to paint Donald Trump as “dangerous and bigoted.”

We also know thanks to the Podesta emails that the Clinton campaign regularly was tipped off by sources at the Justice Department into the FBI investigation into her private email server. (Brian Fallon, who forwarded this particular heads up to the campaign, was a DOJ spokesman before joining the Clinton campaign).

The emails show that the Clinton campaign set up at least two false-flag groups masquerading as Catholic organizations, with the sole purpose of undermining the Church — or as the campaign called it, provoking a “Catholic Spring” revolt against Church doctrines on same sex marriage and abortion.

The emails show that during her 2008 primary campaign against Barack Obama, Mrs. Clinton’s advisors devised a push poll to “test” claims that Obama was a Muslim, something she has tried to blame Trump for somehow inventing.

They show her staff colluding to obstruct justice after work-related emails from Sid Blumenthal relating to the Benghazi attacks were destroyed after receiving a subpoena from the Benghazi Select committee for those same emails. They also show her staff conspiring to destroy all emails from President Obama — who has claimed he didn’t even know Clinton’s private email address!

Why in the world would Clinton want to discuss such things, or face actual questions about them at a campaign event? And these are just some of the most recent revelations from her presidential campaign server.

There’s also the correspondence showing her knowledge that Saudi Arabia and Qatar were funding ISIS and other terrorist groups, and they contributed millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation in the years prior.

Does it get more corrupt than that?

I believe the polls are already showing that Hillary’s ghost strategy could very well backfire.

The first Rasmussen national poll taken after last Sunday’s debate shows Trump now leads by two points, whereas the same poll had him down by seven coming into the debate.

On Twitter, #WomenWhoVoteTrump was the top trending hashtag for most of Friday, with hundreds of photos and personal accounts of women fed up with the smear campaign against Donald Trump.

This is America. And believe it or not, voters still want to know who the candidates are. They want to see them and hear them — and gosh, they want to know their vision for the future of this country, too.

When you throw a bucket of slime, as Clinton and her surrogates have been doing, you’d better clean your shoes before going home so not to leave tracks all over the house.

RELATED ARTICLE: Leaked Podesta Emails Show Coordinated Voter Fraud Likely In Colorado

VIDEO: Hillary Clinton is an ‘Ameriphobe’

It is now abundantly clear that Progressivism is the only real mental illness to speak of, and it’s time Conservatives respond in kind. So when Democrats banish American flags from their Presidential convention, or when they condemn our police, how should Conservatives react? The answer is: fix the Liberal with a steady gaze, point a quivering finger, and declare loudly “you are an Ameriphobe!”

RELATED ARTICLE: HILLARY CLINTON PROMOTES AMERIPHOBIA – Here’s what Ameriphobes believe

EDITORS NOTE: This video was originally published by InfoWars.com.

The ‘Globalist Elite’ Threat to America by Jim McKinney

Make no mistake, this election may make or break America.  We, the American people, face a crisis of national unity, national security, and national survival from an elitist, mythical dream of “globalism.”

Americans are more divided than any time since the war and race riots of the 1960’s. We are fighting among ourselves.  Over 800,000 police serve our communities – but they fear for their lives.  Our own President and Department of Justice accept false accusations against our police. They inspire protest, division, and hatred of those who protect us.  We are losing trust in the FBI, our Justice system, and the Supreme Court to act constitutionally.  We are losing faith in our elected leaders.

Our national security is at grave risk.  Russians threaten us with nuclear weapons.  Iran mocks our armed forces and laughs at billions of dollars in US payoffs for nuclear negotiations.  China spends untold amounts to buy arms and global influence, greatly improving her militarily while threating America and her allies.  200 rich, elitist, communist power brokers, ruling 1.6 billion people in China, will soon rival the US in “global” influence, economic strength and military power.

In 2008, ISIS didn’t exist.  Al Qaeda in Iraq, the fore-runner of ISIS, was on its heels.  In 4 years the ISIS “JV team” became a global terror threat.  Today, ISIS has between 80 and 120 thousand well trained, resourced, experienced, devoted and blood thirsty fighters in multiple countries.  ISIS is growing, not shrinking.  It’s spreading in North Africa, Central Asia, and Western Europe.  The Caliphate is an idea; it’s not a place.  ISIS and its many surrogates hate America.  They will not go way with a bombing campaign.

Our leadership has no effective strategy, it has no commitment, and it has no idea what to do to solve the dilemma it created in the frantic 2011 pre-election withdrawal from Iraq.   The President, with the media’s help, is desperately trying to keep the American people distracted from foreign policy disasters through this election.  Meanwhile, he and his designated successor continually speak of a fictional, peaceful, integrated “global” economic world with open borders and a bright future. 

What does this integrated “global” world do for America? US Tech giants like Google, Microsoft, Apple, and US manufacturers like Ford, GM, GE get cheap labor and open trade borders – not to better this nation, but to better their profits.  They manipulate governments with histories of bad economic managers – not equal and fair trade partners.  And they pay-off corrupt officials to get their way.

America, like the rest of the developed world, is paying the bills with a Federal Reserve credit card.  But our incomes are down.  Our national debt has increased well over 80% in 8 years.  Our growth is staggeringly low, and we have gone from a manufacturing nation to a lower wage service economy in a single generation.  We have increased the numbers of poor in this nation 3 fold in 8 years.  We can’t borrow our way out of debt.  It just doesn’t work.  This is what globalization has done for America.

While we face terrible threats from abroad, our own President encourages internal strife, divisions, and forces tolerance – Forced tolerance is the worst form of intolerance.  His global trade policies and spending increases invite bankruptcy.  He promotes a mythical vision of an integrated world, and a false narrative of his designated heir that contradicts any measure of reality.  Who could do more harm?

Our unity, our security and our survival are at risk.  Make no mistake; to the “global elite” the independence of the American voter is an impediment to their vision of open borders, unrestricted global trade, and massive profits.  Freedom of speech is a problem.  Freedom of religion is a problem.  Freedom of thought is a problem.  “We, the People” are a problem for them.

The “globalist elite” strategy is obvious.  Divide us.  Undermine our security.  Distract us.  Keep us from the polls. Cut faith in the candidate who supports America first, and accuse supporters of intolerance.  They will use our honor, our integrity and our fear against us.  And the “globalist elite,” with immeasurable financial resources, the support of media moguls, naive idealists, and pseudo intellectuals, will win – if we, the American people, allow it.

For our unity, our security and the very survival of the United States of America, we cannot allow them to win.  We, our citizens, must control our future – as intended in the founding of this great Nation – not corporate giants, foreign dictators, international trade bodies or global elitists.  Speak out, get people in the street, out of the pews, in the neighborhood, and on the job – tell your friends to vote to make America united again, vote to make America safe again, and vote to make America great again!  And vote to hold ALL candidates, right and left, accountable to the Constitution of the United States of America.  And fear not, with faith in God, America and the American people will always prevail – he will fight with us!

 

RELATED ARTICLE: Bozell: NBC ‘Guilty of Journalistic Corruption of the Highest Order’

WIKILEAKS: Clinton’s Emails Reveal True Gun Control Intentions

No matter the outcome of the 2016 U.S. Senate and House races, Hillary Clinton, if victorious, intends to attack your gun rights. Recently leaked emails of Clinton campaign staffers published by WikiLeaks show that the candidate plans to bypass Congress to enact gun control by executive order. Moreover, undercover video of U.S. Senate candidate Russ Feingold, released this week by James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas, further exposed Clinton’s intent to impose new gun restrictions by executive fiat.

Starting on October 7, WikiLeaks began releasing batches of emails purportedly hacked from Hillary Clinton campaign chair John Podesta. The Clinton campaign emails have caused a great deal of controversy as they exposed the campaign’s collusion with a fawning press, its efforts to defeat Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), and campaign staffers’ disparaging remarks about Latinos and Catholics. Among the several thousand emails released by WikiLeaks were several dispatches that pertained to the campaign’s approach to gun control.

Of particular note is an October 4, 2015 email written by Clinton campaign press secretary Brian Fallon, which detailed the campaign’s intent to share with reporters the types of gun control proposals a President Clinton would support. The email stated:

Circling back around on guns as a follow up to the Friday morning discussion: the Today show has indicated they definitely plan to ask bout guns, and so to have the discussion be more of a news event than her previous times discussing guns, we are going to background reporters tonight on a few of the specific proposals she would support as President – universal background checks of course, but also closing the gun show loophole by executive order and imposing manufacturer liability.

Less than a week after WikiLeaks released this email, activist James O’Keefe released an undercover video filmed in August that bolsters the disturbing content of Fallon’s email. The video shows a disguised O’Keefe and a fellow activist attending a fundraiser for U.S. Senate candidate Russ Feingold of Wisconsin being held in Palo Alto, Calif. O’Keefe’s partner approaches Feingold and asks the candidate, in regards to guns, “If there’s still Republican control in Congress, and if Hillary is elected, is there anything she can do?” Feingold answers, “Well, there might be executive order.”

The video also includes footage of one of the hosts of the fundraiser, Integrated Archive Systems CEO Amy Rao, expressing how she thinks Clinton would pursue control. In regards to guns, Rao told O’Keefe, “Hillary wants to shut it down,” adding, “If we can get guns away from everyone in this country, she’ll close loopholes, she’ll get rid of assault weapons, she will get rid of being able to buy, you know, unlimited bullets…” Rao also hosted a fundraiser for Clinton last August.

That Clinton is intent on pursuing gun control by executive order shows not only her contempt for gun owners, but also the rule of law. The president does not have the legitimate authority to unilaterally restrict private firearm transfers at gun shows; and this fact is supported by the behavior of the Obama administration.

In their eagerness to burden gun owners, the Obama administration has already stretched existing federal law to, and in some cases far beyond, its limits. In late 2015, White House Deputy Press Secretary Eric Shultz told reporters that Obama “has asked his team to scrub existing legal authorities to see if there’s any additional action we can take administratively,” adding, “The president has made clear he’s not satisfied with where we are, and expects that work to be completed soon.” Given these statements and the Obama administration’s antipathy towards firearms, it is difficult to imagine that if an executive order of the type Clinton contemplates were permissible the Obama administration would not have pursued it. Perhaps Obama, unlike Clinton, acknowledges the Constitution imposes at least some limits on the power of the executive.

As is custom, the Washington Post rushed to defend Clinton from the gun control leaks. However, rather than deny Clinton’s illegitimate plans to restrict gun rights, the Post sought to brush it off as old news. Indeed, NRA has previously highlighted Clinton’s plans to unilaterally impose new gun controls. However, as is so often the case, the Post fails to grasp the concerns of gun owners and the fact that any further information regarding the contours of Clinton’s anti-gun efforts, and statements from a candidate for U.S. Senate on this matter, are of significant interest to those seeking to protect their fundamental rights.

Aside from the matter of executive gun controls, the Clinton campaign emails published by WikiLeaks include a number of other items of interest to gun rights supporters. Several emails detail the Clinton campaign’s orchestrated attacks on Sanders’ gun control record. An email titled “Sanders Hits,” contains a “Guns” “hit” to be “deployed” against Sanders. Other emails chronicle the campaign’s development of a Clinton anti-gun op-ed for the New York Daily News, including a debate over how hard to “hit Sanders.”

A leaked email that has received significant attention makes clear that Clinton believes “you need both a public and a private position” on a given policy. Other emails appear to show this strategy at work on gun control, as her aides expressed concern about the candidate publicly supporting New York’s ill-named SAFE Act.

On November 19, 2015, Clinton was presented with an award and spoke at a Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence gala in Manhattan. The event was also attended by N.Y. Governor Andrew Cuomo. In the run-up to the event, Clinton campaign research director Tony Carrk and policy advisor Corey Ciorciari discussed the extent to which Clinton should endorse the SAFE Act. Ciorciari emailed Carrk, “Don’t see a need to fully embrace the SAFE Act. There are some controversial items in there.” Carrk concurred, responding, “I agree. SAFE is not a safe bet.”

Throughout her career Clinton has supported gun controls that exceed the SAFE Act’s onerous restrictions. Illustrating Clinton’s dual nature, while at the Brady event Clinton was careful to navigate around the controversial SAFE Act, but less than two months earlier Clinton contended that the Second Amendment does not protect an individual right to bear arms when she told the attendees of a private Manhattan fundraiser, “the Supreme Court is wrong on the Second Amendment…” In District of Columbia v. Heller the court ruled that the federal government could not restrict an individual from keeping an operable handgun in their home for self-defense.

The recent email and undercover video revelations serve as just the latest entries in a voluminous and wide-ranging dossier of evidence showing that Clinton intends to demolish our fundamental rights. However they are important, as Clinton and her camp’s repeated acknowledgments that they intend to usurp Congress’ sole authority to legislate in order to attack our rights reveals the full character of the danger gun owners face.

Widers ‘Kafkaesque show trial’ to proceed over ‘fewer Moroccans’ statement

SkyNews reported that Geert Wilders will stand trial on criminal charges of violating the Dutch hate speech laws,”Geert Wilders hate speech charges upheld in court.” His counsel had filed a motion with the Hague court to dismiss the charges.

The case against Wilders arose  from petitions filed with the Hague prosecutors by Dutch Muslims and leftist allies that his 2014 local campaign remarks of ‘fewer  Moroccans” constituted prosecutable violations of hate speech laws in the Netherlands. Wilders’ counsel has also questioned possible bias in the three judge tribunal. Wilders had been acquitted of similar charges in a trial in the Amsterdam District Court in 2011.

The trial comes at a time where Wilders’ Freedom Party (PVV) has risen near the top of Dutch political polls close behind the ruling coalition of  PM Mark Rutte’s VVD party  in the Hague Parliament. Wilders’ counsel has also questioned the validity of the submitted petitioners that the Hague prosecutors have based their charges.

Sky News reported:

A court has upheld hate speech charges against Dutch far-right MP Geert Wilders over comments he made about Moroccans.

The leader of the Party for Freedom (PVV) sparked outrage when he asked supporters at a rally in 2014 whether they wanted “fewer or more Moroccans in your city and in the Netherlands?”

After the crowd shouted back “fewer” Mr Wilders said: “We’re going to organise that”.

The MP appealed to have the charges thrown out, but his objections were dismissed by The Hague District Court.

The comments triggered more than 6,400 complaints and criticism from within Mr Wilders’ party.

Five organisations and 56 people have registered as victims of the remarks, judges said.

Mr Wilders’ lawyers slammed the trial as a “political case” ahead of parliamentary elections in March.

They argued that the MP had merely “put forward his party’s political programme” and claimed the case could have “far reaching political consequences for democracy”.

At an earlier hearing, Geert-Jan Knoops, defending Mr Wilders, told judges that freedom of expression is “the last freedom Mr Wilders has left”.

But the court said that although politicians are entitled to freedom of expression they should “avoid public statements that feed intolerance.Judge Hendrik Steenhuis said: “Where the border lies between the two will be debated in this trial.”

He added that prosecuting Mr Wilders will “not affect his political freedoms or that of this Freedom Party”.

After the hearing, Mr Wilders claimed he was being prosecuted “for voicing the opinion of millions”.

He added: “The Netherlands is like Turkey. Displeasing political opinions are being silenced in court.”

The MP was previously cleared of five counts of inciting hatred in 2011, after he compared Islam to Nazism.

The comments caused Mr Wilders to be denied entry to the UK in February 2009 on public security grounds.

He attempted to visit anyway and was deported back to the Netherlands.

Mr Wilders later travelled to London after an immigration tribunal overturned the ban imposed by former Home Secretary Jacqui Smith.

The MP’s trial at The Hague District Court will start on 31 October.

Note our tweet regarding this latest development in the second trial of Geert Wilders for alleged hate speech:

Churches asked to Show Video Comparing Party Platforms

WASHINGTON, D.C. /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — Before Election Day, Family Research Council Action (FRC Action), announced that it plans to finish distributing nearly 4 million voter guides targeting supporters, churches, activist groups, and state/local organizations.

The voter guide outlines how the candidates stand on pivotal issues like Supreme Court nominations, religious liberty, Obamacare, marriage, abortion, taxes, education, the military, and free speech. A short video comparing the two party platforms is being distributed to thousands of churches to show during services prior to Election Day.

“These issues weigh on the minds and hearts of voters,” said Family Research Council Action President Tony Perkins. “It is crucial that voters get the facts before they vote.”

“With the next president selecting up to four Supreme Court justices, this is not a time to seek sanctuary on the sidelines. If we, as Christians, do not take our responsibility to be salt and light and exercise our right to cast an informed vote, we could see a further erosion of our fundamental freedoms,” added Perkins.

“The greatest distinguisher in this election cycle is where the candidates stand on their party’s platform. The GOP has the most conservative platform in recent history while the Democrats have the most liberal. While party platforms are often viewed as political platitudes that have little bearing on how the parties will govern, the reality is the platforms really matter. One study found that Democratic politicians voted about three quarters of the time with their platform while GOP politicians voted nearly 90 percent with theirs,” noted Perkins.

“The platforms are like a rudder on a boat, they guide and provide principles for elected leaders. While the media largely ignores the party platforms after the political conventions, they should play a major role in every voters’ decision-making for 2016,” concluded Perkins.

Click here download a copy of FRC Action’s Voter Guide

Watch a video comparing the 2016 Republican and Democratic Party platforms:

*Candidate positions were compiled from recorded votes and public information sources.

VIDEO: Make America Great Again is a Movement

On Rush’s radio show, VP nominee Mike Pence said when he and Trump pull into a venue greeted by huge crowds and long lines, Trump has often said to him, “This is a movement, and it’s about this country, and it’s about the American people.”

I say, “Amen and right on brother.” How else can you explain Trump defeating a respected black doctor and 15 politicians to win the GOP presidential nomination hands down? GOP voters simply were fed up with broken promises, betrayals and endless fruitless fund-raising. I get it.

Since writing the “American Tea Party Anthem”, I have been on the front lines fighting for freedom since 2008; speaking and singing at over 500 tea party rallies; over 15 national bus tours. Evolving into chairman of The Conservative Campaign Committee, I traveled state-to-state helping conservatives win elections, resulting in gifting the GOP control of the House and Senate.

Over the past 8 years, my wife Mary and I have spent so much time on the road leaving Sammy, our greyhound, with pet/house sitters that he does not even greet us anymore when we return home; only a disinterested glance from his doggy bed.

Like my fellow patriots, I did not know the GOP was playing us; afraid to oppose the black president on some issues while siding with Obama on others. For 8 years the GOP claimed they were powerless to stop Obama from being the most lawless president in U.S. History; powerless to keep their campaign promises to push back against Obama’s tyranny; powerless to stop Obama from using government to punish his opposition; powerless to stop Obama from destroying our economy; powerless to stop Obama from implementing policies which endanger American lives

And then, along came Trump, “I will make America great again!” The same way a dog-whistle can only be heard by dogs, Trump’s promise perked up the ears of the American people. The America-hating Left and political establishment could not hear the renewed hope that Americans heard in Trump’s proclamation.

Fat and happy with the “Washington cartel” status quo, politicians in both parties were outraged that a mere commoner who does not even know how to speak pro-politician would dare enter their domain.

Like millions of Americans, Trump’s “Make America Great Again” movement has given me hope. Leftists who control the airways pound patriots 24/7 with their message that America has unfairly exploited, dominated and destroyed the planet for far too long. Their brainwashing is so effective that American black millionaires believe themselves to be victims of evil America.

In the Left’s battle to enforce planetary justice, they are orchestrating America’s cultural and economic decline. The Left uses everything from bogus new reports and polls to TV sitcoms to dispirit patriots from fighting to restore America. The Left tells us 24/7, “You are outnumbered.” “Throw down your weapons.” “Resistance is futile.” Behold your new god: Progressive Thinking Man.

In the late 1960s, I was a rare black student from the Baltimore projects at the prestigious Maryland Institute College of Art; there on scholarship. I worked various jobs to cover the cost of my books and art supplies. The majority of my fellow collegians were white from wealthy families; totally funded by their parents. And yet, all I heard from them was endless vitriol for their country and parents.

The curriculum at MICA contributed to instilling anti-America, anti-parents and anti-God mindsets. A freshman required course was titled, “The History of Ideas”. In hindsight, I realize the professor was a nut with serious issues. Still, he was a professor so I assumed he was much smarter than my parents. That course shattered everything taught to me by my Christian parents.

Chuckling, Dad recently reminded me what I said to him about God after taking that college course. “Dad, I still believe, but not the way you believe.”

During my college years hating God, country and parents was cool. I still remember a white hippie buddy’s rant, “This f***ing country is so f***ed up. No f***ing way will I bring a f***ing baby into this f***ing country.” While I knew America had issues, I could not understand his passionate anger and deep hatred for our country.

Well guess who has been infiltrating and taking over government, media and education for the past 40 years? Answer: America hating hippies; filling generations with anti-Americanism and a perverted definition of fairness. The Left’s erroneous message is the world outside of America has too little because Americans have and use too much. This explains Obama’s desire to bring America down from her high horse.

Trump’s popularity which bridges all demographics tells me that the Left’s anti-America virus has not reached critical mass. Most Americans long to see a leader who will put our country’s best interest first.

Hillary Clinton is evil incarnate; exposed to “hate everyday Americans.” It is so repulsive watching Hillary’s TV ads and media operatives using standard democrat tactics; divide Americans into bogus victimized groups and portray the democrat candidate as the savior.

As I stated the Left is obsessed with bringing America down from her place in the world and implementing planetary justice. Therefore, the Left hides Hillary’s multiple insidious evil crimes and misdemeanors. Meanwhile, the Left blows up Trump’s shortcomings which are the equivalent of jay-walking or spitting on the sidewalk compared to Hillary’s.

The Left and political establishment still do not understand Trump’s infectious appeal; incapable of hearing the higher sound of hope for a renewed America. Trump is leading a serendipitous movement for such a time as this. No amount of crap thrown at him has stuck. Donald Trump will be our next president of the United States.

My patriot ears heard Trump’s message of renewed hope for America. I penned a parody song titled, “Trump Train”. 

Please enjoy the music video and spread far and wide. Encourage Americans of all stripes to hear Trump’s message and join the movement to “Make America Great Again!”

The Gathering Storm Clouds: FBI Director Comey Warns Terrorists Heading Our Way

One mission of our armed services is to work with our allies to locate, engage and eliminate terrorists overseas, while domestically our law enforcement agencies are tasked with protecting America and Americans within our borders. In the wake of the deadly terror attack in San Bernardino, California, I wrote an article, “Fighting the War on Terror Here, There and Everywhere,” in which I took on the false argument that by fighting the terrorists overseas we won’t have to fight them here.

On September 26, 2016, “Business Insider” warned, “FBI director: ISIS’ loss will create a ‘terrorist diaspora’ like we’ve never seen before,” while a day later NBC reported, “FBI’s Comey: Officials Worry About ‘Terrorist Diaspora’ from Syria, Iraq.”

FBI Director Comey is predicting that simply defeating ISIS and other terror organizations overseas, while an achievable objective, would likely have unintended consequences.  He warns that as greater pressure is brought to bear against the terrorists on their turf, they will head for the West, including the United States, to create as much death and destruction as possible.

America’s borders are our first line and last line of defense against these terrorists and transnational criminal organizations. Our borders, however, include far more than the U.S.-Mexican border. Our nation has 50 “Border States.” Any state that lies along the northern or southern borders of the United States is a border state, as are those states that have access to our nation’s 95,000 miles of coastline. Finally, any state that has an international airport must, of necessity, be deemed a border state.

The official report, “9/11 and  Terrorist TravelStaff Report of the National Commission onTerrorist Attacks Upon the United States” focused specifically on the ability of the terrorists to travel around the world, enter the U.S. and ultimately embed themselves here as they went about their deadly preparations to carry out an attack. The preface of this report begins with the following paragraph:

“It is perhaps obvious to state that terrorists cannot plan and carry out attacks in the United States if they are unable to enter the country. Yet prior to September 11, while there were efforts to enhance border security, no agency of the U.S. government thought of border security as a tool in the counterterrorism arsenal. Indeed, even after 19 hijackers demonstrated the relative ease of obtaining a U.S. visa and gaining admission into the United States, border security still is not considered a cornerstone of national security policy. We believe, for reasons we discuss in the following pages, that it must be made one.”

That report and the “9/11 Commission Report” made it clear that the multiple failures of the immigration system enabled terrorists to enter the U.S. and then embed themselves here in the country so that they could go about their deadly preparations without being detected.

For terrorists, acquiring identity documents and, especially, acquiring lawful immigration status are key to their quest to hide in plain sight. Justifiably, much concern has been expressed by Americans and some of our political leaders about the inability of our officials to vet Syrian refugees while the administration continues to admit ever more such refugees.

It is disconcerting that presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has promised that, if elected, she would greatly increase the number of such refugees she would admit into the U.S.

However, my recent article focuses on the fact that aliens who enter the U.S. without inspection, by running our borders, are not vetted at all, and their entries went unnoticed. My article was aptly titled, “Entry Without Inspection = Entry Without Vetting.”

This serious vulnerability is being ignored by both the administration and presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, who insists that if elected she would provide lawful status and a pathway to U.S. citizenship to unknown millions of such illegal aliens, who entered without inspection. The numbers would be so  huge that no interviews and no field investigations could be conducted.

When sensible people hear storm warnings that hurricanes are headed their way they may board up their windows and stock up on supplies. They may choose to evacuate altogether.

When residents of “Tornado Alley” hear blaring sirens alerting folks that tornadoes are forming, they take appropriate action and head for their storm cellars.

FBI Director Comey has sounded the alarm, but the administration and Hillary Clinton, for inexplicable reasons, continue to turn a blind eye and a deaf ear to his warnings and those of others, such as CIA Director Brennan who has warned that ISIS has embedded terrorists in refugee flows.

The time has long since come and passed for our politicians to set political goals aside and be true leaders whose primary concerns are the safety and well-being of America and Americans by taking to heart the findings and recommendations of the 9/11 Commission.

This includes enhancing border security, ending the Visa Waiver Program and ramping up the enforcement of our immigration laws from within the interior of the U.S. to arrest and remove illegal aliens, as well as weed out fraud in applications for immigration benefits.

‘Born again’ Muslim shoots two Boston police officers

Cue the stories about how this has nothing to do with Islam, and about how local mosques are now fearing an “Islamophobic backlash.”

kirkfigueroa

Kirk Figueroa

“5 Investigates: Suspect in Boston police shooting wrote of Islamic ‘rebirth,’ had several aliases,”WCVB, October 13, 2016 (thanks to Robert):

BOSTON —5 Investigates uncovered six aliases used by Kirk Figueroa, the man killed by Boston police after he shot two officers on Wednesday night in East Boston.

He took on an alias as he experienced what he called an Islamic “rebirth” in Africa.

The aliases, along with his seeming obsession with police and security, help make Figueroa a picture of contradictions and confusion: a 33-year-old man who started companies in Florida and other states focused on security and protection who yesterday nearly killed two police officers responding to a domestic violence call.

5 Investigates uncovered a job posting for “Police Protection” for one of those companies, Bailrunners. In it, Figueroa identifies himself as Muhummed Isa Al Mahdi. The ad said Al Mahdi was looking for people interested in helping him “hunt down fugitives and bring them to justice.”

5 Investigates also discovered a posting from Muhummed Isa on a website guide for mosques from October 2012. Isa wrote about his “rebirth as a baby into the Nation of Islam” following a trip to an area of Ethiopia and a mosque in South Africa.

Isa went on, writing that his unique and blessed journey was prepared and guided by Allah.

Most recently, Figueroa was using the name Kocoa Xango on social media, identifying himself as a police constable. His last post under that name came just a few hours before the fatal shooting, posting a video by Michelle Obama and then a picture of himself after getting a haircut….

RELATED ARTICLE: UK: Muslim bus driver put children’s lives at risk by stopping on busy road for prayer

Huma Abedin: The Islamist Ties of Hillary’s Closest Aide

Huma Abedin was born in 1976 in Kalamazoo, Michigan. Her father, Syed Abedin (1928-1993), was an Indian-born scholar who in the early 1970s had been affiliated with the Muslim Students Association at Western Michigan University.

Huma’s mother, Saleha Mahmood Abedin, is a sociologist known for her strong advocacy of Sharia Law. A member of the Muslim Sisterhood (i.e., the Muslim Brotherhood‘s division for women), Saleha is also a board member of the International Islamic Council for Dawa and Relief. This pro-Hamas entity is part of the Union of Good, which the U.S. government has formally designated as an international terrorist organization led by the Muslim Brotherhood luminary Yusuf al-Qaradawi.

When Huma was two, the Abedin family relocated from Michigan to Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. This move took place when Abdullah Omar Naseef, a major Muslim Brotherhood figure who served as vice president of Abdulaziz University (AU), recruited his former AU colleague, Syed Abedin, to work for the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs (IMMA), a Saudi-based Islamic think tank that Naseef was preparing to launch. A number of years later, Naseef would develop close ties to Osama bin Laden and the terrorist group al Qaeda. Naseef also spent time (beginning in the early 1980s) as secretary-general of the Muslim World League, which, as journalist Andrew C. McCarthy points out, “has long been the Muslim Brotherhood’s principal vehicle for the international propagation of Islamic supremacist ideology.” IMMA’s close ties to the Muslim World League are further evidenced by the fact that IMMA’s in-house publication, the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs (JMMA), has long listed its officialaddress as 46 Goodge Street in London — precisely the same address as that of the Muslim World League’s London office. In one noteworthy article written by Abedin’s mother,JMMA blamed America for having brought the 9/11 attacks upon itself. Another JMMA piece, from 1999, alleged that Jewish Americans who were pro-Israel had been able to “work the [political] system” in the United States to their own advantage, and had been “greatly aided by the American memory of the Holocaust.”

It is vital to note that IMMA’s “Muslim Minority Affairs” agenda was, and remains to this day, a calculated foreign policy of the Saudi Ministry of Religious Affairs, designed, as Andrew C. McCarthy explains, “to grow an unassimilated, aggressive population of Islamic supremacists who will gradually but dramatically alter the character of the West.” For details about this agenda, click here.

At age 18, Huma Abedin returned to the U.S. to attend George Washington University. In 1996 she began working as an intern in the Bill Clinton White House, where she was assigned to then-First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton. Abedin was eventually hired as an aide to Mrs. Clinton and has worked for her ever since, through Clinton’s successful Senate runs (in 2000 and 2006) and her failed presidential bid in 2008.

From 1997 until sometime before early 1999, Abedin, while still interning at the White House, was an executive board member of George Washington University‘s (GWU) Muslim Students Association (MSA), heading the organization’s “Social Committee.”

It is noteworthy that in 2001-02, soon after Abedin left that executive board, the chaplain and “spiritual guide” of GWU’s MSA was Anwar al-Awlaki, the al Qaeda operative who ministered to some of the men who were among the 9/11 hijackers. Another chaplain at GWU’s MSA (from at least October 1999 through April 2002) was Mohamed Omeish, who headed the International Islamic Relief Organization, which has been tied to the funding of al Qaeda. Omeish’sbrother, Esam, headed the Muslim American Society, the Muslim Brotherhood’s quasi-official branch in the United States. Both Omeish brothers were closely associated with Abdurahman Alamoudi, who would later be convicted and incarcerated on terrorism charges.

From 1996-2008, Abedin was employed by the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs (IMMA) as the assistant editor of its aforementioned publication, the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs (JMMA). At least the first seven of those years overlapped with the al Qaeda-affiliated Abdullah Omar Naseef’s active presence at IMMA. Abedin’s last six years at the Institute (2002-2008) were spent as a JMMA editorial board member; for one of those years, 2003, Naseef and Abedin served together on that board.

Throughout her years with IMMA, Abedin remained a close aide to Hillary Clinton. During Mrs. Clinton’s 2008 presidential primary campaign, a New York Observer profile of Abedin described her as “a trusted advisor to Mrs. Clinton, especially on issues pertaining to the Middle East, according to a number of Clinton associates.” “At meetings on the region,” continued the profile, “… Ms. Abedin’s perspective is always sought out.”

When Mrs. Clinton was appointed as President Barack Obama‘s Secretary of State in 2009, Abedin became her deputy chief of staff. At approximately that same point in time, Abedin’s name was removed from the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs‘ masthead.

Apart from their working relationship, Abedin and Mrs. Clinton have also developed a close personal bond over their years together, as reflected in Clinton’s 2010 assertion that: “I have one daughter. But if I had a second daughter, it would [be] Huma.” In 2011, Secretary Clinton paid a friendly visit to Abedin’s mother, Saleha, in Saudi Arabia. On that occasion, Mrs. Clinton publicly described her aide’s position as “very important and sensitive.”

On July 10, 2010, Huma Abedin, a practicing Muslim, married then-congressman Anthony Weiner in a ceremony officiated by former president Bill Clinton. A number of analysts have noted that it is extremely rare for Islamic women—particularly those whose families have ties to the Muslim Brotherhood—to marry non-Muslims like Weiner, who is Jewish. Indeed, Dr. Anwar Shoeb, the highest-ranking faculty authority at the prestigious College of Sharia and Islamic Studies in Kuwait, formally declared that Abedin’s marriage to Weiner was “null and void” under the dictates of Sharia Law, which explicitly forbids matrimony between a Muslim woman and an “infidel”; in fact, Shoeb classified the Abedin-Weiner union as a form of “adultery.”

Abedin went on maternity leave after giving birth to a baby boy in early December 2011. When she returned to work in June 2012, the State Department granted her an arrangement that allowed her to do earn outside income as a private consultant, even as she remained a top advisor in the Department. This arrangement was made possible when Mrs. Clinton personally signed off on documents—dated March 23, 2012—that changed Abedin’s title from “deputy chief off staff” to “special government employee.” Abedin’s outside clients included the U.S. State Department, Hillary Clinton, the Clinton Foundation, and Teneo (a New York-based global advisory firm co-founded by Doug Band, a former counselor for Bill Clinton).

Abedin did not disclose on her financial report either the special employment arrangement or the $135,000 she earned from it, in violation of a law mandating that public officials reveal significant sources of income. In fact, her title change did not become public knowledge until May 2013. Good-government groups warned of the potential conflict-of-interest inherent in an arrangement where a government employee maintains private clients.

Documents obtained by Judicial Watch in a Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit showed that both before and after Mrs. Clinton signed off on the special employment deal for Abedin in March 2012, Abedin repeatedly—for months on end—dodged State Department requests that she disclose financial and employment information about her husband, Anthony Weiner, who had left Congress amid personal scandal in June 2011. For details about Abedin’s repeated failures to comply with those requests, click here.

In June 2012, five Republican lawmakers (most prominently, Michele Bachmann) sent letters to the inspectors general at the Departments of Homeland Security, Justice, and State, asking that they investigate whether the Muslim Brotherhood was gaining undue influence over U.S. government officials. One letter, noting that Huma Abedin’s position with Hillary Clinton “affords her routine access to the secretary [of state] and to policymaking,” expressed concern over the fact that Abedin “has three family members—her late father, mother and her brother—connected to Muslim Brotherhood operatives and/or organizations.” Some other prominent Republicans such as John McCain and John Boehner disavowed the concerns articulated in the letters.

On February 1, 2013—Hillary Clinton’s final day as Secretary of State—Abedin resigned her post as Mrs. Clinton’s deputy chief of staff. Yet she would continue to serve as a close aide to Clinton.

On March 1, 2013, Abedin was tapped to run Clinton’s post-State Department transition team, comprised of a six-person “transition office” located in Washington.

In early March 2015, it was reported that throughout her entire four-year tenure as Secretary of State (SOS), HillaryClinton had never acquired or used a government email account, and instead had transmitted — in violation of government regulations — all of her official government correspondences via a personal email account that was housed on a private server. In addition, Abedin and Mrs. Clinton’s chief of staff, Cheryl Mills, also had email addresses on the secret server while employed at the State Department.

After Hillary Clinton announced in the spring of 2015 that she was running for president (2016), Abedin was named vice chair of the Clinton campaign.

On August 28, 2016, the New York Post published excerpts and photos from sexually explicit texting exchanges in which Weiner had engaged with two women in the summer of 2015. The next day, Huma Abedin announced that she was separating from Weiner. She said in a statement: “After long and painful consideration and work on my marriage, I have made the decision to separate from my husband. Anthony and I remain devoted to doing what is best for our son, who is the light of our life. During this difficult time, I ask for respect for our privacy.”

Huma Abedin’s brother, Hassan Abedin, has ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and is currently an associate editor with the JMMA. Hassan was once a fellow at the Oxford Center for Islamic Studies, at a time when the Center’s board included such Brotherhood-affiliated figures as Yusuf al-Qaradawi and Abdullah Omar Naseef.

Huma’s sister, Heba Abedin (formerly known as “Heba A. Khaled”), is an assistant editor with JMMA, where she served alongside Huma prior to the latter’s departure.

The Russian Connection

Those who are talking about “a New Cold War with Russia” have never read my books and articles. The war against Western civilization began a hundred years ago, after the victory of Socialist Revolution in Russia, 1917. It is a war of Socialism against Capitalism. The war and its variety of different fronts is a reality of our life today, being used as a milestone by the ideology of Socialism against Capitalism —the subject of my writings for the last twenty years. Moreover, it is a global war, involving different religions, races, and ethnicities: from Chechnya to Aleppo, from Paris to Orlando, from Brussels to Boston. And the predator in all of the above is Russia or the former Soviet Union.

New York is one of the world’s capital, a capital of successful capitalism. Donald Trump is a representative of the famous city, a successful and famous capitalist, a face of New York. Russia hates both equally—New York and Trump. Trump is a business man in several businesses revolving around women—his callous remarks about women are expected. The scandalous material about Trump came two days prior to the second presidential debate. More will come. What a coincidence! No. It was a calculated and coordinated effort to sabotage Trump’s presidential possibility—a modus operandi, familiar to former citizens from the socialist country. I call it Stalinism or Soviet fascism—Clinton’s mafia is a conduit of that into America, which is fighting for political power 24/7…

I am a former Russian defense attorney, a Mother and grandmother from New York City. I have heard and seen Donald Trump many times on TV. For me he was as familiar as a neighbor that I had known for the last thirty years. Of course, Trump’s sex talk disturbed me, but I was ready for it. There are serious issues before our country. To grasp the recent state of events, you must know about the war and its participants.

It is for this reason, I tried to focus your attention on the Clinton Mafia in my two preceding articles, as America’s Fifth Column is working in cahoots with Russia against American interests, and the Obama/Putin joint venture is an integral part of it. For your information, the Obama/Putin joint venture had already produced a “successful” transfer of arms in Benghazi and a smooth killing of bin-Laden, and a covering-up of the true cooperation with Russia as a joint operation. The subject of the Russian connection is going on throughout all my four books and articles. For the same reason, I dedicated my two last articles to the Clintons and his strange visit to Moscow in June of 1991, two months before he had announced his run for presidency of the U.S. There are many strange events connected to the Clintons and Russia I discussed in Socialist Lies, Xlibris, 2016 and in What is Happening to America? Xlibris, 2012.

I am a Trump supporter from the start of his candidacy, and my opinion of the Clinton Mafia was revealed twenty-five years ago, when I saw Bill’s picture among young people gathered by the KGB in the Soviet Union. Since then I have been talking about the Russian connection, following the Clintons for the last twenty-five years. Please read my conversation with Rush Limbaugh taking place a few days prior to the 1992 election, pp. 567-574. Baltic Winds: Testimony of A Soviet Attorney, Xlibris, 2002

And that is my main point in WW III—the Russian Connection. It began many decades ago and continues with the Clinton Mafia–Socialist Lies presents the Truth in details. Reading it you will grasp my point of knowledge and memory discussed in the book, which is connected to the article below:

The National Review, Did Britain Fall into Putin’s Trap in Prosecuting a Russian Dissident? By CLAIRE BERLINSKI, May 11, 2016

The author has a legitimate point describing the current predicament in the world: “Having failed to finish off conclusively the Communist system, we are now in danger of integrating the resulting monster into our world. It may not be called Communism anymore, but it has retained many of its dangerous characteristics. . . . Until a Nuremberg-style tribunal passes its judgment on all the crimes committed by Communism, it is not dead and the war is not over.”

From my experience this is absolutely correct! This is the reason I am identifying “the resulting monster” that has become post-Soviet Russia and writing about Soviet Fascism for the last twenty years. Several writers have caught the scent of Fascism about the regime, but nobody researched the issue and identified the ideology I have presented. Reading my books, you will learn the secret of our Libya’s invasion and see how the Clinton Mafia and the Obama/Putin joint venture operate together against the American interests, by implementing the ideology of Soviet Fascism on our soil. Furthermore, the Clinton mafia is leading a network of the media to prevent Trump’s presidency. You can see it today, after the WikiLeaks revelations—an exclusive showdown on the Russian Connection:

BREAKING – WikiLeaks Exposes Hillary’s TREASONOUS Deal With Russia, It’s TERRIFYING, Angry Patriot, October 12, 2016

“Hillary Clinton and her liberal pundit pals reference Russia about every other sentence. They blame Vladimir Putin’s country for email hacking and a myriad of other misdeeds and then try to convince voters he and Donald Trump are embroiled in an epic bromance. Their tactic just backfired—big league! The hacked emails from Hillary’s campaign manager, John Podesta, courtesy of WikiLeaks, revealed a thread of emails detailing an intricate, intimate series of actions between members of Hillary’s election staff, the Clinton Foundation, and representatives of Russia! One of their interactions appears to have involved a quickly processed deal on uranium deposits. Iowa Senator Charles Grassley raised concerns about the deal least June. The uranium deal, which involved 25 percent of Russia’s deposits, was discussed in an email conversation between Clinton Foundation communications head, Maura Pally, and Clinton campaign chief, John Podesta, Breitbart reports.”

Hillary’s treasonous approval of the deal with Russia is obvious and the name of John Podesta, a closest and longest member of the mafia is very important in this respect. Look at the content of his emails, anti-Catholic bigotry and infiltration into the Catholic Church reminiscent of the Soviet System described by me in my four books. Now you know who has inflamed and waged the war against Christianity in America, Mr. O’Reilly was talking about. Infiltration into the Catholic Church was a prime agenda of Stalin—in fact, the Catholic Church practically does not exist in Russia any longer. I described killing and prosecutions of the Russian clergy in Socialist Lies, Xlibris, 2916 and in What is Happening to America, Xlibris, 2012.

I also, presented in the books the members of the Clinton mafia. John Podesta and his brother Tony are the closest ideological members/friends of Bill, they established the Podesta Group.  It is a lobbying and public affairs firm based in Washington, D.C. It was founded in 1988 by brothers John Podesta and Tony Podesta and has a close connection to the Obama government. An interesting fact—Tony Podesta was working at the British Petroleum, when the blast killed the people and destroyed the drilling platform in the Gulf of Mexico. All of the above connections to oil remind me of the KGB playbook used by both Podesta.

Pay attention to the American media! They are in the tank for Hillary—a carbon copy of the old Soviet media serving a one-party system.

Don’t forget about George Soros, sponsoring 187 groups, fighting the Republicans for the last 30 years— all those predators came from the same source. The Obama socialist presidency has brought drastic changes to our country and culture allowing lies and deceits to flourish, like Stalin did. Government corruption grew tremendously during the Obama presidency, becoming an institutional corruption like under Soviet Socialism. I have the impression that Obama is running America by the direction from the Russian Academy of Science, which duplicated the Soviet Socialist negative experiences. Yet, both Podesta and Hillary are blaming Trump in cooperation with Russia!? What a KGB play-book of disinformation, the famous policy of the agency…

There is a couple of words about the Republican Establishment betrayal of the Truth. It began many years ago, when President George H. Bush looked at his watch during a presidential debate in 1992 and with the help of the KGB handed over America to “Slick Willy.” A former CIA Director did not know who Bill Clinton was—a spectacular ignorance of the Republican Establishment! Paul Ryan is just a continuation of the Republican incompetence in 2016. In this crucial time he deprived and divided the Republicans of their leader Donald J. Trump. Shame on him—he has no idea of the existential threat to America coming with Hillary’s presidency…

If Trump had a good consultant on Russia, he could’ve easily exposed the Clinton mafia. Alas, the womanizing activities are diverting attention from the criminality of the Clinton Mafia. Trump also could’ve exposed the KGB playbook about the Tim Kaine connection to the Muslin Brotherhood, of which I wrote a great deal. So, Soviet fascism and WW III are marching along on American soil, to stop it knowledge is a must…

My ideas about Russia and its Ideology are confirmed by the Russian scientist, analyst, a political writer, and human rights advocate Andrey Piontkovsky–Life After Decline July 6, 2016 09:18. For your information, it was this man who told us the story of how the KGB trained Tsarnaev Brother for all six months of his stay in Russia before returning to Boston and committing the terrorist act. Here is Andrey Piontkovsky—Life After Decline:

  “…it has become painfully obvious that the USSR’s policy of perestroika had a clear agenda: The Communist Party and the KGB nomenclature would seek to convert its collective and total political power into huge private fortunes for members of the nomenclature. They did so by tailoring the mafia state to their needs, which was deprived of any market-economy institutions, and, most important, of private property as its foundation. In Russia an “owner” succeeds by exploiting through proximity to, or direct association with, the authorities who control administrative resources (e.g. over a small or not very small segment of the state), and through complete loyalty to the ruling mafia and its honchos, rather than through efficient management and competition.

Criminal Putinomics is incapable of overcoming the addiction to oil money, and even with sky-high oil/gas prices, it would only stagnate for a long period. Any kind of successful development, business initiative, or innovation is totally unthinkable under Putin’s kleptocracy.”

It is a brilliant analysis and solemn verdict to Soviet fascism and the future of Russia. Unfortunately, our academia self-blinded themselves to the ideology of Soviet fascism and wrongly interpreted the collapse of the Soviet Union. It was a collapse of Socialist economy and the Soviet system. Putin and his KGB gang rescued Soviet fascism by using Stalinist Political Correctness. It was our ignorance that gave Russia time to develop Putinism, known to me as the contemporary Soviet fascism. We repeated the mistakes again in the last two decades. I want America to learn her mistakes, because the fate of the world is in her hands… Look at the end of the Piontkovsky piece:

“Eight centuries ago, in 1206 and 1215 (by historical standards almost at the same time), in two places very distant from each other on earth, two political bibles were composed: the Great Yassa of Genghis Khan and the Magna Carta. The choice between an independent, ethnically European Russian Republic of Siberia and a reborn Mongol Empire may again be the choice for the entire world order in the 21st century: the Magna Carta or the Great Yassa. This choice will to a great extent depend on decisions made in Washington, DC.”

To be continued at www.simonapipko1.com.

RELATED ARTICLE: Here are All 25 Answers Hillary Clinton Just Gave About Her Email Server Under Penalty of Perjury

Warning: The Shackles are Off!

By Wallace Bruschweiler and William Palumbo

Disclaimer: Like many pundits, despite the unusually dire times and unprecedented corruption in government, we have maintained a definite restrained tone (with great effort) through the duration of the Obama administration.  While it is usually sound advice not to show emotion in written journalism, we believe that if there was ever a time for candor, that time is now. 

  • The Media Has the media bias ever been so blatant?  Is the Republican fifth column even trying to disguise themselves anymore?  Have you ever seen a show trial in the USA such as the second presidential debate?  … the “three-on-one” – the leftist ménage-a-trois dead set against the one man standing up for sanity on the national and international stage?
  • The Shackles This week, following a brazen betrayal by the newsworthy reprobate Paul Ryan, Donald Trump said “the shackles have been taken off me.”  Note well that he did not say the more familiar “the gloves are off;” for taking off gloves calls to mind boxing, which is truly a gentlemanly sport.  “Shackles” are not for gentlemen – they’re for slaves.

We are less than a month away from the most consequential election in generations.  And slaves are what we’ll be rendered if it goes wrong.  Not only will the election decide the fate of the United States, if not the free world.  It will decide whether the United States remains part of the free world.  Consider: Obama has ignored our Constitution for the last eight years; if Hillary appoints the next justices, its death will be official (and “legal”).  Say goodbye to the Bill of Rights.  Laws criminalizing speech exist in much of the world – why should we remain unique?  The same is equally true for second amendment gun rights.

  • Rampant Stupidity Four more years implementing the current agenda spells doom across society – debt, terrorism, illegal immigration, lawlessness, rampant stupidity, stultifying regulations, and an “economy” without a pulse.  An uninterrupted leftist government for another term means a permanent voting majority – a true “one-party state,” a dictatorship – or worse, Bolshevism.  Mass immigration will forever alter the demographics, and the idea of America will be extinguished by continued brainwashing.*

Let’s be blunt:  Hillary’s candidacy does not even pass the laugh test.  She was and should still be under investigation by the FBI for mishandling classified information.  People who were working in national security and intelligence who committed similar offenses to hers are today spending time behind bars.  They are asking themselves: Why me, and not her?  Answer: Because Hillary is above the law.

The FBI’s phony recommendation not to prosecute aside, everybody with half a brain understands that the server was set up so Hillary could sell her influence at the State Department for personal profit.  Hence: the Clinton Foundation scandal, the two-faced policy positions, and the Clintons’ unexplainable wealth amassed since leaving the White House through corruption at the highest political levels.

Hillary’s an excellent, competent crook, but a totally incompetent leader.  She does very well for herself, but terribly for our country.  Despite the fact that she is blatantly pathological, and decades’ worth of reporting to prove it, the shabby media attacks Donald Trump for offensive comments on an eleven year old tape.

  • The Fifth Column Not one to take a challenge to their world-class disrepute lying down, the fifth column in the feckless Republican Party sided with Hillary and the majority of the national media.  Paul Ryan and multiple contemptible colleagues (the so-called RINOs) finally proved once and for all that they were never serious in opposing Obama.  What’s four more Obama years, right Paul?

Indeed, the only reliable ally that Trump has – other than his millions of normal (and deeply concerned) supporters – is Wikileaks.  To distract from the proof of Hillary’s criminality offered by Wikileaks, the administration conjures up an imaginary enemy in the bogeyman, a.k.a. Russia.  Yet who’s to say Wikileaks isn’t fueled by insiders with access, not Russian or other hackers?  Statistically, more than 80% of organizational theft comes from inside sources.

The media, the establishment (in both parties), and their comrades are desperately trying keep us from trusting ourselves.  For them to win, we must accept their constant propaganda.  Trump’s truth, in the crudest form possible, is a threat to them and especially their pockets.

With all the forces lined up against him, it’s worth asking: has the enemy ever been so scared as they are of Donald J. Trump and the movement he has so successfully created?

* Nowadays we often hear of political “indoctrination,” but we prefer the precise, punchy, and historically correct word – brainwashing.  Josef Goebbels showed what was possible when the State controls the media.  He would be proud of the approach taken by today’s totalitarians in America.

It’s official the radical Islamic Muslim Brotherhood is all in for Hillary

According to Discover the Networks:

CAIR [Council on American Islamic Relations] promotes a radical Islamic vision, as evidenced by the fact that its co-founder Omar Ahmad told a Fremont, California audience in July 1998: “Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Koran … should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on Earth.” In a similar spirit, co-founder Ibrahim Hooper told a reporter in 1993: “I wouldn’t want to create the impression that I wouldn’t like the government of the United States to be Islamic sometime in the future.” In 2003 Hooper stated that if Muslims ever become a majority in the United States, they will likely seek to replace the U.S. Constitution with Islamic law, which they deem superior to man-made law. In the late 1980s, Ihsan Bagby, who would later become a CAIR Board member, stated that Muslims “can never be full citizens of this country,” referring to the United States, “because there is no way we can be fully committed to the institutions and ideologies of this country.”

In 2003 CAIR invested, according to its own Form 990 filed with the Internal Revenue Service, $325,000 from its California offices with the North American Islamic Trust (NAIT). According to Newsweek, authorities say that over the years “NAIT money has helped the Saudi Arabian sect of Wahhabism — or Salafism, as the broader, pan-Islamic movement is called — to seize control of hundreds of mosques in U.S. Muslim communities.” A recent study by the Center for Religious Freedom found that a very large number of American mosques teach hatred of Jews and Christians, coupled with doctrines of Islamic supremacism.

Learn more about CAIR.

CAIR released the results of a nationwide survey of Muslim voters on the upcoming presidential election indicating a likely high turnout of Muslims at the polls on November 8 – more than 70 percent of whom say they will vote for Hillary Clinton – and concern about issues such as civil rights, education, the economy, bullying, a proposed ban on Muslims entering the U.S., and national security.

Here are highlights from CAIR’s survey:

  • 86 percent of registered Muslim voters intend to vote in this year’s presidential election.
  • 12 percent of Muslim voters are still undecided about who to vote for in this presidential election.
  • 72 percent of Muslim voters said they will vote to elect Hillary Clinton, while 4 percent said they will vote for Donald Trump, 3 percent will vote for Jill Stein, and 2 percent will vote for Gary Johnson.
  • The percentage of those Muslim voters who said they are closer to the Democratic Party remained constant, from 66 percent in a similar poll taken in 2012, to 67 percent today, after having increased from 49 percent in a similar poll taken in 2008.
  • Affiliation with the Republican Party remained relatively steady at 6 percent today, 9 percent in 2012 and 8 percent in 2008.
  • 62 percent of respondents said that the Republican Party was unfriendly toward Muslims (compared to 51 percent in 2012), while 2 percent said that the Democratic Party was unfriendly (compared to 6 percent in 2012).
  • The top six most important issues to American Muslim voters are civil rights, education, jobs and the economy, protecting students from bullying and harassment, a proposed ban on Muslims traveling to the U.S., and terrorism and national security.
  • 91 percent of respondents believe that Donald Trump’s proposed temporary ban on Muslim travelers entering the U.S. is the wrong decision and only 3 percent, within the margin of error, believe that it is the right decision.
  • 85 percent of respondents believe that Islamophobia and anti-Muslim sentiment in the U.S. has increased in the past year. Moreover, 30 percent of respondents say they have experienced discrimination or profiling in the past year.
  • 82 percent of Muslim voters support Syrian refugees resettling in the U.S.
  • Almost half of Muslim voters, 47 percent, said that the U.S. did not provide enough support in the past year to combat and defeat the terror group ISIS in Iraq and Syria
  • More than half, 62 percent, of those polled attend a mosque at least once a month.
  • 66 percent of respondents say they have a four-year or graduate degree.

The Muslim Brotherhood and HAMAS linked CAIR is all in for Hillary. What does that tell you?

RELATED ARTICLE: Here are All 25 Answers Hillary Clinton Just Gave About Her Email Server Under Penalty of Perjury

WikiLeaks emails show the true face of the Clinton campaign by Rodney Pelletier

“It’s an amazing bastardization of the faith”

DETROIT (ChurchMilitant.com) – A new release of Hillary Clinton campaign emails shows contempt for faithful Catholics.

The newest Wikileaks document dump is made up of nearly 2,000 emails between Clinton and her campaign chairman John Podesta, bringing the number of revealed Podesta emails to more than 5,000.

The email in question, sent April 11, 2011 and titled “Re: Conservative Catholicism,” shows a discussion among Podesta, Director of Communication Jennifer Palmieri and John Halpin of the liberal Center for American Progress (CAP).

hillary-catholics-email

Halpin writes to Podesta, “Many of the most powerful elements of the conservative movement are all Catholic (many converts) from the SC [Supreme Court] and think tanks to the media and social groups.”

It continues, “It’s an amazing bastardization of the faith. They must be attracted to the systematic thought and severely backwards gender relations and must be totally unaware of Christian democracy.”

Podesta answers, “Excellent point. They can throw around ‘Thomistic’ thought and ‘subsidiarity’ and sound sophisticated because no one knows what the hell they’re talking about.”

Palmieri interjects, “I imagine they think it is the most socially acceptable politically conservative religion. Their rich friends wouldn’t understand if they became evangelicals.”

ABOUT RODNEY PELLETIER

Rodney Pelletier is a staff writer for ChurchMilitant.comFollow Rodney on Twitter: @RodPelletier

RELATED ARTICLE: Here are All 25 Answers Hillary Clinton Just Gave About Her Email Server Under Penalty of Perjury