What does B.L.M. stand for? Barack Loses his Mind by Alec Rooney

The question really wasn’t whether the White House would be receptive to a petition asking that Black Lives Matter be formally recognized as a terrorist organization.

The question was only how long they would wait to dismiss it, and how contemptuous and sneering the dismissal would be.

We have our answer.

The petition was open only nine days, and amassed close to 150 percent of its initial goal of 100,000 signers. It was launched, coincidentally, the day before a sniper ambushed and killed five police officers as they did crowd control in Dallas … at a Black Lives Matter protest rally.

The little White House soldiers who sent out the response e-mail to all signers (we were one) began by citing their spiritual leader’s desire to “encourage frank conversations about the steps we can take together to build trust and ensure justice for all Americans.”

Move to the front of the line — this guy gets it.

Uh oh. Whenever leftists use brave-sounding terms like “frank conversations,” you know that there are a lot of things you’re not going to be allowed to talk about. Like astronomical black crime rates as a percentage of the whole population; the disproportionate incarceration rates of young black males; the way black male lives don’t seem to matter at all to other trigger-happy young black males.

It’s like talking with them about the links between Islam and terrorism, the role of welfare in the destruction of the family, the big difference between “immigration” and “illegal immigration” — none of which anyone on the left can grasp.

The White House response goes on to quote Swami Barack extensively, as he explains (with the usual numerous references to his own special self) how “Black Lives Matter” doesn’t mean that other lives don’t matter. It simply means, he lectures, that blacks have a “specific vulnerability” and a “particular vulnerability” when it comes to dealing with the nation’s police officers.

This “vulnerability” isn’t stated flat out, but we can infer the meaning: Cops all hate blacks (even black cops do!), and would just as soon shoot them as not. Because they’re racist, those police.

That is, all the crime, irresponsibility, thuggishness, misogyny, homicide, gangsta violence, drug use and selling, and mile-long rap sheets — that’s all the fault of the racist police.

Obama goes on to characterize Black Lives Matter as “people who are asking for fair treatment,” and that accusing them of racial discrimination (i.e. responding that “all lives matter”) is playing some kind of “game” to avoid the real situation: that everything’s the fault of the racist police.

The e-mail ends on a sort of lame, bureaucratic note, saying that “The White House plays no role in designating domestic terror organizations” and that it therefore can’t “address the formal request of your petition.”

The White House also plays no role in the activities of local police departments, but that hasn’t stopped the Obama administration from declaring that police are racist, unaccountable, ill-trained and in need of federal (i.e. his) supervision.

A little inconsistent, there.

But you almost have to admire a guy who is as baldly, proudly inconsistent — not to mention as frequently and spectacularly wrong — as Barack Obama is. It’s almost impressive the way he brazens it out, turns a blind eye to his wildly failed predictions, his prejudices, his bad logic and faulty comparisons. He just soldiers on as if none of it is really happening. He’s like the cartoon driver who gamely keeps gripping the steering wheel even when the rest of his vehicle is scattered in pieces for a mile behind him.

It’s as if Trayvon Martin really had been the fine, upstanding lad the media tried to feed us. It’s as if the “unarmed” Michael Brown hadn’t been in the process of trying — and nearly succeeding — to grab a Ferguson, Mo. cop’s pistol when he was shot to death in the street. It’s as if four Baltimore police officers accused of brutality in the death of a black suspect weren’t all allowed to walk free again — because the media-circus accusations couldn’t be proven in a court of law.

It’s as if Black Lives Matter doesn’t openly, repeatedly incite violence against the police, the thin line drawn between everyday, peaceful life and criminal chaos.

Never mind, President Obama’s White House says to all of that: It doesn’t fit our version of America, and reality.

Nor did the assertion of that petition: that Black Lives Matter uses fear, intimidation and violence to advance its agenda. That is … that they are a terrorist organization.

By definition.

ABOUT ALEC ROONEY

Alec Rooney serves as communications director for the Christian Action Network. He is a longtime journalist, with experience as a writer and editor at five daily newspapers over 25 years.

An award-winning print copy editor and copy desk chief, he also works as a freelance academic book editor. He is a 1986 graduate of the University of the South in Sewanee, Tenn., and holds an M.A. in English from the University of Kentucky.

Declassified Pages Link Muslim Brotherhood to 9/11 Network

FireShot-capture-702-Muslim-Brotherhood-Wikipedia-the-free-encyclopedia-en_wikipedia_org_wiki_Muslim_BrotherhoodMuslim Brotherhood — including Hamas — were part of the Saudi-linked Islamist network in America that assisted the 9/11 hijackers.

The recently-declassified 28 pages from the official U.S. report on the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks implicates the Muslim Brotherhood — including Hamas — as being part of the Saudi-linked Islamist network in America that assisted the 9/11 hijackers and Al-Qaeda in general.

On page 7, the report discusses how a suspected Saudi intelligence officer, Omar Al-Bayoumi, may have assisted two 9/11 hijackers and had links to Al-Qaeda and Osama Bin Laden. It then states:

“In addition, the FBI determined that al-Bayoumi was in contact with several individuals under investigation and with the Holy Land Foundation, which has been under investigation as a fundraising front for Hamas.”

The Holy Land Foundation was later successfully prosecuted and identified as a creation of the Muslim Brotherhood’s wing in the United States. It was set up to finance Hamas, the Brotherhood’s Palestinian wing, which is designated as a Foreign Terrorist Organization by the U.S. State Department.

(The Brotherhood more broadly is not designated as such, but over 80 members of Congress have endorsed recently-proposed legislation to change that.)

During the course of the Holy Land trial, numerous Brotherhood entities and members were identified. The Justice Department put together a long list of unidentified co-conspirators. The list specifically named Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) and the North American Islamic Trust (NAIT) as Brotherhood “entities.”

On page 8, a second suspected Saudi intelligence officer, Osama Bassnan, a known supporter of Osama Bin Laden, is mentioned. Bassnan admitted to an FBI asset that he assisted the 9/11 hijackers more than Omar Al-Bayoumi did. Multiple people from the Muslim-American community warned the U.S. government that they believed Bassnan was a secret Saudi agent.

The report states that the FBI had linked Bassnan to the “Blind Sheikh,” Omar Abdel-Rahman, the Muslim Brotherhood-linked terrorist who masterminded the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. Abdel-Rahman is currently serving a life sentence in a U.S. prison. His release is a top objective of the Muslim Brotherhood.  When Mohammed Morsi, an Islamist and member of the Brotherhood, was president of Egypt, he demanded Abdel-Rahman’s release.

When you connect the dots, you’ll see the error of the West’s distinguishing between violent and (ostensibly) non-violent Islamist groups. They use the same international network and are often inseparable operationally, linking back to the same addresses, fronts, preachers, financiers, state sponsors, etc.

The information in the declassified pages should teach us the only workable policy is one that broadly targets the Islamist ideological movement  — including its state sponsors.

ABOUT RYAN MAURO

Ryan Mauro is ClarionProject.org’s national security analyst, a fellow with Clarion Project and an adjunct professor of homeland security. Mauro is frequently interviewed on top-tier television and radio. Read more, contact or arrange a speaking engagement.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Obama Eid Celebration Again Empowers Islamists Over Reformers

Giuliani at RNC: ‘We Must Not Be Afraid to Define Our Enemy’

Sudanese Cleric: ISIS Is Implementing Brotherhood Strategy

Baton Rouge Cop-Killer Linked to Nation of Islam

Headlines Misleading Describing Declassified Pages of 9/11 Report

Giuliani at RNC: ‘We Must Not Be Afraid to Define Our Enemy’

Failure to call Islamist terror by name, he said, is ‘why our enemies see us as weak and vulnerable’ and ‘maligns decent Muslims around the world.’

Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani was one of the kick-off speakers at the Republican convention which began Monday in Cleveland.

Following the theme of the first night of the convention, “Make America Safe Again,” Giuliani gave a passionate speech that included the pressing topic of Islamist terror and how to defeat it.

“In the last seven months, there have been five major Islamic extremist terrorist attacks on us and our allies. We must not be afraid to define our enemy,” Giuliani said, referring to U.S. President Barack Obama’s policy of referring to Islamist terror as violent extremism without mentioning its connection to Islam.

Giuliani continued, “It is Islamic extremist terrorism. I did not say all of Islam. I said Islamic extremist terrorism.”

He explained why the current administration’s decision to leave Islamist terrorism unnamed is damaging.

“Failing to identify them properly maligns decent Muslims around the world,” Giuliani said. “It also sets up a fear of being politically incorrect that can have serious consequences. And it has.”

The former mayor was most likely referring to reports that came out after the San Bernardino massacre that neighbors of the terrorists had noticed their suspicious activity but decided not to alert law enforcement for fear of being branded racists.

Failure to call Islamist terror by name puts America in an untenable position, Giuliani continued. “This is why our enemies see us as weak and vulnerable.

“To defeat Islamic extremist terrorism we must put them on defense. If they are at war against us—which they have declared—we must commit ourselves to unconditional victory against them.”

Giuliani specifically called out the nuclear agreement that the U.S. and other world powers made with Iran last summer (“one of the worst deals America ever made”) and said that it needs to be undone.

He said the agreement allows Iran to eventually become a nuclear power and that it “put billions of dollars back into a country that is the world’s biggest state sponsor of terrorism.”

Giuliani pledged that the Republican Party’s candidate Donald Trump “will make sure that any agreement with Iran meets the original goals of the U.N and our allies: a non-nuclear Iran.”

The man who is credited with turning around New York city from one of the most crime-ridden metropolises in America to a city that has the lowest crime rate of any major city in the country pilloried Hillary Clinton, the presumptive Democratic candidate for president, for her role in the Benghazi attack and the overthrow of Libya’s leader Qaddafi.

See Rudy Giuliani’s speech here

That move is credited with plunging Libya into chaos and facilitating the rise of the Islamic State and other Islamist terror groups — not only in Libya but across the entire North African region.

Giuliani further questioned the character of Clinton, who – for political purposes — lied about the reason behind the Benghazi attack in which four Americans were killed, including the U.S. ambassador to Libya, Chris Stevens.

He expressed his outrage over a now-famous answer Clinton gave while testifying about the incident to Congress when, referring to the American deaths, she asked, “What difference at this point does it make?”

Giuliani also called out Clinton for being in favor of accepting refugees from Syria after the Islamic State explicitly said that they would embed terrorists within the refugees to carry out attacks in the U.S.

He concluded, “We can’t afford to repeat the mistakes of the past. Hillary Clinton’s experience is the basis for her campaign. Well, Hillary Clinton’s experience is exactly the reason she should not be our president.”

RELATED VIDEO: German Axe Attacker Pledges Allegiance to the Islamic State. A video has surfaced of the 17-year-old who injured four people with an axe on a train in Germany pledging allegiance to the Islamic State. Speaking about the attack the bishop of Würzburg, Friedhelm Hofmann, said, ‘One is speechless at such a moment. This fact can not be understood.’

RELATED ARTICLES:

Obama Eid Celebration Again Empowers Islamists Over Reformers

Trump advisers target Muslim Brotherhood on US soil: Assert ‘making America safe’ requires official terrorist designation

Baton Rouge Cop-Killer Linked to Nation of Islam

Headlines Misleading Describing Declassified Pages of 9/11 Report

Clinton, Bush Implicated in Covering Up Saudi Terror in U.S.

Declassified Pages Link Muslim Brotherhood to 9/11 Network

U.S. Backed Syrian Rebel Group Beheads Child

Syrian rebel fighters from the US-backed rebel group Nour-al-din el-Zanki have beheaded a child thought to be 11-13 in a shocking video.

Harakat_Nour_al-Din_al-Zenki_Logo

Nour-al-din el-Zanki logo.

US-backed Syrian rebels, screaming “Allahu Akbar,”  brutally beheaded a child named Abdullah Issa. The shocking clip shows fighters from Nour-al-din el-Zanki telling the camera, “These are the prisoners from Liwa al-Quds (Jerusalem Brigade – a Palestinian militia group). He [Assad] can’t stoop any lower. He sent us children today, are you sending us children?”

America funds Nour-al-din el-Zanki, which fights against the Assad regime.

Liwa al-Quds (The Jerusalem Brigade) is a pro-Assad Palestinian paramilitary group. The rebel group accused the boy of being a spy.

Referring to the prisoner, one jihadi says, “These are the dogs of Assad. These are your people Bashar.” Another says, “We shall not leave anyone in Handarat,” the Palestinian refugee camp where a battle between regime and rebel forces is currently taking place.

To shouts of “Takbir” and “Allahu Akbar,” a fighter from the group saws through the neck of Abdullah Issa. In a grisly scene, he then holds the head aloft and exclaims “Allahu Akbar” several more times.

Reports of Issa’s age vary between 11 and 13. Some say he was an 11-year old Palestinian from Handarat; others say he is a Syrian from the city of Homs.

Syrian Observatory for Human Rights manager Rami Abdel Rahman told France Press, “The child is no more than 13-years old. He was arrested today in the area of Handarat, but the slaughtering happened in el-Mashab neighborhood.

“This is one of the most terrible execution acts that I have seen since the revolution began in Syria,” he added.

Activists affiliated with the group which killed the boy claimed he was actually 19, and that the video makes him look a lot younger than he really is.

The beheading video was published in the early hours of Tuesday morning on social media networks, according to BBC Arabic.

The rebel group condemned the beheading and said it was perpetrated by individuals who do not represent the group. “All of the people who carried out this violation have been arrested and brought before a disciplinary tribunal,” the group said in a statement.

“The movement of Nour al-Din el-Zanki condemns the inhuman violation, since they believe in the principles and the targets of the revolution and the principle of human rights and the international agreements and the sharia. This violation doesn’t reflect us and a one-time mistake does not reflect the general policy of the movement,” the statement read.

The group also used the statement to blame international actors, saying the group “holds the international community fully responsible for keeping silent about the crimes regime forces are perpetrating which represent the lowest level of barbaric crimes committed under the ears and the eyes of the world and are represented by a killing machine which slaughters thousands of citizens.”

Liwa al-Quds denied any connection with the child. A spokesman for the group said, “We don’t recruit children, and all of our fighters wear military uniforms not civilian clothes. We are trying to locate the family of the child and find out his story and the place where he was kidnapped from.”

WARNING: Extremely Graphic Video:

RELATED ARTICLES:

Obama Eid Celebration Again Empowers Islamists Over Reformers

Women Demand Equality in Syria After Seeing Honor Diaries

The Islamic State Fines People Who Don’t Know the Quran

Christian Self-Defense Forces Emerge in Iraq & Syria

Report: ISIS Slayed 21 Christians in Syria

EDITORS NOTE: Nour al-Din al-Zenki was formed in late 2011 by Shaykh Tawfiq Shahabuddin in the Shaykh Salman area north-west of Aleppo. It was formed when Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State. The featured image is of Syrian rebels with their prisoner shortly before they beheaded him. Photo: Screenshot

It Isn’t ‘The Economy, Stupid’

ATLANTA, Georgia /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — The parties have their presumptive presidential nominees. Now, as with elections past, handicappers are looking at possible predictors of the outcome. They are trotting out all the usual factors: economic growth, inflation, unemployment—even the stock market. Beware: This year, none of them will help call the winner.

Back in 2012, researchers at the Socionomics Institute released a comprehensive study showing that major economic factors—namely, inflation and unemployment rates—have had no statistically significant bearing on presidential election results.

Study shows economy and markets cannot predict this year's election. Even a strongly improving GDP does not guarantee incumbent party success. (PRNewsFoto/The Socionomics Institute)

Study shows economy and markets cannot predict this year’s election. Even a strongly improving GDP does not guarantee incumbent party success. (PRNewsFoto/The Socionomics Institute)

“These findings are counter-intuitive, but there they are,” said Matt Lampert, the Institute’s director and one of the study’s authors. The authors did find an abiding, strong and statistically significant relationship between presidential election results and the stock market’s performance leading up to Election Day – but only when an incumbent ran.  When no incumbent ran, even the stock market was an ineffective barometer of which party’s candidate would win.

The authors also tested economic variables specifically when no incumbent was running. GDP, inflation and unemployment rates likewise had no statistically significant correlation to these election outcomes.

The study carried its analysis all the way back to 1824, the first year for which there are reliable popular vote data. Its analysis of unemployment begins in 1940, the first year for which those data are available.

In 2012, the Institute’s study became the third-most-downloaded paper of the year on the Social Science Research Network. Today it remains in SSRN’s top 2/100ths (0.02%) of all time. The paper is downloadable from SSRN’s website at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Papers.cfm?abstract_id=1987160.

Surprisingly, then, it is never “the economy, stupid,” as Bill Clinton’s campaign strategist James Carvillefamously intoned. And the stock market is useful for predicting elections only when an incumbent is running.  Since no incumbent is running in 2016, neither the economy nor the stock market can help you forecast who’s going to win the White House.

“Sometimes knowing what won’t work is just as valuable as knowing what will,” said Lampert.

ABOUT THE SOCIONOMICS INSTITUTE:

The Socionomics Institute studies social mood and its impact on social events.

Which presidential candidate is winning the Twitter War?

NEW YORK, New York /PRNewswire/ — As the race to the White House accelerates with the GOP convention, Brandwatch, the leading social intelligence company, today released an analysis of 100 million tweets to determine the key characteristics of the average supporters of presumptive presidential nominees,Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.

Brandwatch's 2016 U.S. Presidential Election Social Data Infographic: The Final Two - Hillary Clinton vs Donald Trump. (PRNewsFoto/Brandwatch)

Brandwatch’s 2016 U.S. Presidential Election Social Data Infographic: The Final Two – Hillary Clinton vs Donald Trump. (PRNewsFoto/Brandwatch)

Highlights include:

  • Surprisingly, Dennis Rodman is the most influential celebrity in Trump’s Twitter conversation
  • Clinton’s social supporters are most interested in family/parenting, books and music
  • Clinton rakes in the female social supporters with 61.7 percent female, while Trump’s are an even split between male and female
  • Trump’s social supporters can be found in South Carolina, Montana, and Alabama

Brandwatch is leveraging its social listening and analytics technology to track how the 2016 presidential elections are playing out on social media. As we count down to November, Brandwatch will be continuously collecting key data and insights including sentiments around candidates, key moments, volume of mentions, trending topics, popular hashtags, important issues and more. Data around key events like conventions, vice presidential appointment announcements, final debates, and election day itself will be tracked in real time and available for media.

“Social is clearly the new polling station and we are interested in the impact it has on the election. Combine this excessively dramatic election season with a very vocal – and social – public, and the data might actually predict the outcome,” said Kellan Terry, data analyst at Brandwatch.

Social is a valuable measure of how exactly the campaigns are playing out in the eyes of the public and the insights derived from the data is riveting. Be sure to visit Brandwatch’s 2016 U.S. Presidential Election Data Visualization which paints a picture of the public’s online conversation around each presidential candidate every week with real-time data.

Infographic Methodology

Brandwatch analyzed nearly 100 million Twitter mentions between January 1, 2016 and June 15, 2016 to better understand the traits of social supporters of the two presumptive presidential nominees. Cross-layering each candidate’s conversation with pro-candidate speech and hashtags, and assuming the aforementioned speech aligns with the definition of a typical conservative/liberal from a third-party research center, allowed Brandwatch to extract the insights represented within the infographic.

Brandwatch social intelligence. (PRNewsFoto/Brandwatch)

Brandwatch social intelligence. (PRNewsFoto/Brandwatch)

About Brandwatch

Brandwatch is the world’s leading social intelligence company. Brandwatch Analytics and Vizia products fuel smarter decision making around the world.

The Brandwatch Analytics platform gathers millions of online conversations every day and provides users with the tools to analyze them, empowering the world’s most admired brands and agencies to make insightful, data-driven business decisions. Vizia distributes visually-engaging insights to the physical places where the action happens.

The Brandwatch platform is used by over 1,200 brands and agencies, including Cisco, Whirlpool, British Airways, Heineken, Walmart and Dell. Brandwatch continues on its impressive business trajectory, recently named a global leader in enterprise social listening platforms by the latest reports from several independent research firms. Increasing its worldwide presence, the company has offices around the world including Brighton, New York, San Francisco, Berlin and Singapore.

Melania Wronged

Like the millions who tuned in this week on the first night of the Republican convention in Cleveland to see Melania Trump’s speech, I was dazzled by her beauty, struck by her sincerity, impressed by her fluency in a language not of her native tongue, touched by her obvious love for her husband and family and country, and impressed by her quiet confidence and sense of self.

In a lengthy interview I had seen a few weeks earlier of Melania with Fox News’ Greta van Susteren, it was clear that the former super model––who is formally educated, multilingual, world-traveled, and the embodiment of sophistication––was unpretentious, of a serene temperament, plain-spoken, strong in her convictions and values, and also funny and nice. And also not interested in the spotlight, but more in raising her 10-year-old son Barron with good values and morals.

So it was shocking when I woke up Tuesday morning to read and hear of the gigantic brouhaha about Melania’s alleged “plagiarism.”

Right away, I smelled a rat.

For one thing, it is almost impossible to find anything the leftist media say that is even marginally credible. Most of the lackeys, who pose as journalists, sound more like they’re on the payroll of the Hillary for President campaign or the Democratic National Committee than in the service of the American public.

Remember, these are the people who spent a full year vilifying, insulting, and lying about Donald Trump, fully confident that their viewers and readers would listen to their wisdom, only to be soundly repudiated by the American voting public.

No matter what they said, the voters, figuratively at least, spit in their faces. But in the “culture” of journalism, such repudiation never breeds self-reflection; it only breeds vengeance, and the desire to find something, anything, to take down their nemesis.

Second, it was impossible for me to picture Melania consulting a search engine and looking up the speeches of former First Ladies, finding the words of Michelle Obama, and saying to herself: “Aha…I think I’ll lift a few lines here!”

However, it was eminently plausible for me to picture a professional speechwriter that Melania admitted to Matt Lauer helped her “a little bit” being lazy and unprofessional enough to do just that, to look up former speeches and stick random sentences into the quite brilliant and original piece Melania had written herself––without her knowledge that the excerpts had been lifted!

John Hinderaker of Powerline.com, a site founded by Dartmouth College alumni and, mysteriously to me, not a fan of Mr. Trump, weighed in with an article that damned the craven media. Entitled “Plagiarism? Please,” the writer called Melania’s speech outstanding, and said that so-called lifted sentiments “are so commonplace that they probably could be drawn from any of a hundred speeches. But, is this supposed to be some kind of scandal? One could probably think of a less important issue, but it would take a while. And I wouldn’t think that either Barack Obama or Joe Biden would want to start a conversation about plagiarism.”

Citing an article in the NY Times headlined “Melania Trump’s Speech Bears Striking Similarities to Michelle Obama’s in 2008,” Hinderaker disagrees, writing that, “Michelle Obama’s best-remembered public pronouncement is her statement that `[f]or the first time in my adult life, I am proud of my country.’ Why? Because her husband was nominated for president. The heart of Melania Trump’s speech, on the other hand, was not the lines that she may have borrowed from Michelle Obama, but rather this tribute to America, delivered by an immigrant:

`After living and working in Milan and Paris, I arrived in New York City twenty years ago, and I saw both the joys and the hardships of daily life. On July 28th, 2006, I was very proud to become a citizen of the United States—the greatest privilege on planet Earth. I cannot, or will not, take the freedoms this country offers for granted.”

Hinderaker continues: “Do you think Michelle Obama (or Barack, for that matter) thinks it is the greatest privilege on planet Earth to be an American? No, I don’t either. I suspect that one of Melania Trump’s principal objectives in her speech was to draw that contrast between herself and Mr. and Mrs. Obama.”

Of course, a fulminating John Podhoretz from the NY Post and the obsessed anti-Trump writer Jonathan Tobin from Commentarymagazine.com put in their two-cents worth, jumping on the plagiarism charge…but to no avail.

By the time FNC’s Megyn Kelly got around to the subject at 9 p.m. on Tuesday night, it was old news, debunked by most people who recognized it as a manufactured and frivolous non-subject. Besides, two of Donald Trump’s five children were just about ready to speak on their father’s behalf.

Tiffany Trump, the 22-year-old recent Wharton Business School graduate, entranced the crowd with her beauty, articulateness, confidence and also modesty, and especially her full-hearted love and respect for her father.

And then came 38-year-old Donald J. Trump, Jr., who left every commentator on the political spectrum, as well as the entire Twitter world, either overflowing with positive “reviews” or predicting a stellar political future for the young mogul. He, too, was fulsome in his praise of and respect for his father.

The ultimate takeaway, however, was that the people who occupy the world of Donald Trump are the real thing. They are clear-eyed, confident in their views, authentically conservative, and “the real thing.”

So real, in fact, that it is unimaginable that Melanie copied anything from anyone. If any copying was done, it was by, as I said, a lazy or incompetent hire, and blame also goes to the negligent person who okayed her speech.

Or was it purposeful sabotage?! That cannot be ruled out, so egregious was this act. It remains to be seen if it was, indeed, sabotage, and if the Trump team found the culprit and promptly axed him or her.

Melania was wronged. But strong woman who she is, I have no doubt that she will go on to make dozens if not hundreds of important, inspiring, and empowering speeches as the next First Lady of the United States!

Melania Trump would be the 1st Immigrant to become a First Lady

Melania_Knauss-Trump

Melania Knauss Trump

Melania Trump made the keynote address at the Republican National Convention. Melania was introduced by her husband Donald.

Melania, if her husband is elected President, would be the 1st legal immigrant First Lady. She would also be the second First Lady born outside of the United States.

Melania, formerly Melanija Knauss, was born on April 26, 1970 in Sevnica in southeastern Slovenia (formerly part of Yugoslavia). Melania became a permanent resident of the United States in 2001 and a naturalized citizen in 2006 under the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1952.

After becoming engaged in 2004, Donald Trump and Melania Knauss were married on January 22, 2005, at The Episcopal Church of Bethesda-by-the-Sea in Palm Beach, Florida, followed by a reception in the ballroom at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate. The event was attended by celebrities such as Katie Couric, Matt Lauer, Rudy Giuliani, Heidi Klum, Star Jones, P. Diddy, Shaquille O’Neal, Barbara Walters, Conrad Black, Regis Philbin, Simon Cowell, Kelly Ripa, then-Senator Hillary Clinton, and former president Bill Clinton. At the reception, Billy Joel serenaded the crowd with “Just the Way You Are”.

Melania Trump would also be the second First Lady born outside of the United States. 

According to the White House website:

Louisa Catherine Johnson Adams, Born in London, Louisa Catherine Johnson Adams was the wife of the sixth President, John Quincy Adams (1825-1829). She is the only First Lady to have been born outside of the United States.

… Louisa Catherine Adams did not come to this country until four years after she had married John Quincy Adams. Political enemies sometimes called her English. She was born in London to an English mother, Catherine Nuth Johnson, but her father was American–Joshua Johnson, of Maryland–and he served as United States consul after 1790.

Melania Trump, businesswoman and wife of the GOP nominee for President, spoke Monday, July 18, 2016, at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland. Donald Trump introduced Melania after walking out to the song “We are the Champions” by Queen. Here are Melania Trump’s remarks at the Republican National Convention:

RELATED ARTICLE: Trump soars after nomination on day 2 of RNC

VIDEO: Unhyphenated American Nails Black Lives Matter

Lloyd Marcus The Unhyphenated American, Nails Black Lives Matter in this exclusive video. Please share it on your social media sites.

According to Black Lives Matter Exposed:

According to the BLM website, “Black Lives Matter is an ideological and political intervention in a world where Black lives are systematically and intentionally targeted for demise.  It is an affirmation of Black folks’ contributions to this society, our humanity, and our resilience in the face of deadly oppression.”

Patrisse Cullors, one of the three founders of the Black Lives Matter (BLM) Movement, married black, transgender immigrant Janaya Khan earlier this year, but her Facebook page states that she is “in an open relationship with Harriet Tubman.”

[ … ]

On her official bio on her website, the ending statement is bold: “Patrisse will continue to create, organize and shut it down until all Black lives matter.” As the nationwide protests, that have resulted in the closure of federal highways and numerous arrests that have taken place since the incident in Dallas, one can take that statement seriously.

Read more.

EDITORS NOTE: The featured image of Lloyd Marcus at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C. was taken by Harriet Baldwin.

This is Why ESPN Is the Republican Party of Sports Television

I am quite fond of saying about Republicans when it comes to Blacks, “Even when they try to do the right thing, they do it the wrong way.”

In a similar manner, ESPN has become the Republican Party of TV and sports.

Last week they had their annual ESPYs awards show. This is their annual celebration of achievement in the world of sports.

They opened the show trying to do the right thing, but definitely did it the wrong way.

The event opened with four of the top NBA players speaking out against police brutality and gun violence. This was very moving to the extent that you had four of the biggest names in sports taking a public stance on a relevant, social issue, which is very rare for today’s athletes. The players were LeBron James, Dwyane Wade, Chris Paul and Carmelo Anthony.

If this was such a good thing, you might be asking, then why am I criticizing the event?

All four of the above players are Black. This issue of police brutality and gun violence is not a “Black” issue, it is an American issue. Whites are subjected to these issues as well. Good and bad cuts across race and class.

In 2015, the NBA was 74.4 percent Black, 23.3 percent White, 1.8 percent Latino, and .2 percent Asian, this was based on a survey by Richard Lapchick.

It would have made more sense for the ESPN to have players from each of these groups on stage talking about these issues, sending the unmistakable message that this is not just a Black issue, but rather a societal issue.

The optics of the display were odd and quite offensive to me.

ESPN is owned by The Walt Disney Company, one of the top pro-homosexual companies in the world. When they were aggressively promoting former player Jason Collins for coming out of the closet, they used the full panoply of races in their promotion of their homosexual agenda.

But when it came to police brutality and gun violence, they made it into a “Black” issue, not a societal issue like homosexuality.

A few days before the event, LeBron James reached out to the ESPY’s producer, Maura Mandt, with the idea, thus the plan was agreed to by all the suits at ESPN’s corporate office.

From my research, ESPN and the ESPYs seem to have no diversity in leadership in terms of decision-makers, the decision-makers all seem to be White liberals.

Maybe, just maybe, if they had people from diverse backgrounds in the decision-making loop someone would have pointed out the optics of LeBron’s idea and encouraged him to have a diverse group of players on stage with him.
Diversity is not just about race or gender, it’s also about worldview.

To their credit, ESPN has a very diverse workforce as far as race goes, but it is without question that an overwhelming amount of that diversity is racial, not ideological.

Most of their decision-makers and on-air talent are extremely liberal, which is totally in line with their corporate view. My friends who work for ESPN never dispute my conservative views in my private conversations with them, but they would never admit that they hold such views in public.

For some, expressing those views would be career suicide at worst or at best lead to a very public excoriation from peers and fair-weather friends alike.

Exhibit “A” in my argument is Chris Broussard. He is an analyst for ESPN who focuses on the NBA. He has been profiled in many media outlets about his Christian faith and his positive family life. He is another version of Steph Curry.

When Jason Collins came out as homosexual, Broussard responded, “If you’re openly living in unrepentant sin, whatever it may be, not just homosexuality, (but) adultery, fornication, premarital sex between heterosexuals…I believe that’s walking in open rebellion to God and to Jesus Christ,” Broussard said. “I would not characterize that person as a Christian, because I don’t think the Bible would characterize them as a Christian.”

His simple expression of his faith caused a backlash like I have never seen before. So, as long as you are for homosexuality, your thoughts are welcomed on ESPN, but if you don’t agree with it, you are silenced.

I applaud these athletes for trying to take a principled stand at the ESPYs, but I fault ESPN for not having the foresight to fully understand and appreciate the optics of having all Black athletes on stage.

Now, mind you, ESPN is supposed to be experts in optics, after all, they are the world leader in sports and entertainment. But, because they are surrounded by people who all look and think like each other, there was no one to point out the obvious racial connotation of these optics.

Like the Republican Party, they tried to do the right thing, but did it the wrong way.

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared in Black Press USA.

Truck Jihad Strikes Nice

The 14 juillet National Holiday fireworks were over, the horror began in Nice. A 19-ton semi-trailer truck went around the barrier and barreled down the famous beachfront Promenade des Anglais. The monster truck drove 2 kilometers, zigzagging to make direct hits, deliberately picking off babies in their strollers, before the driver was stopped in a shootout with police. At this writing the toll stands at 84 dead; 50, including 10 children, with life threatening injuries; and 150, including 54 children, less seriously injured. The mass murderer has been identified as a 31 year-old Tunisian, Mohamed Lahouaiej Bouhlel, living in Nice on a residence permit, recently licensed to drive big trucks, father of three, separated from his wife since 2014. Bouhlel’s criminal record, including assault and battery, theft, and domestic violence, dates back to 2010, one year after he was granted a 10-year residence permit. He is under a restraining order obtained by his wife who has sued for divorce. He is described by several of his neighbors as a mean loner, with the exception of one who found him to be a nice guy, not at all religious, didn’t say his prayers, liked to dance the salsa and go out with the chicks.

On March 24th, Bouhlel was given a six-month suspended sentence for assaulting a motorist who had asked him to move his truck that was blocking traffic. The victim, Jean-Baptiste Ximenes, posted on Facebook his indignation that the man who had violently beaten him with a baseball bat, was left free…to commit mass murder.

An irascible young Tunisian armed with a 19-ton truck killed more than 80 civilians and the toll is expected to rise. In the truck he rented on July 11th –and was supposed to return on the 13th— Bouhlel was carrying two fake machine guns, a pierced grenade, a fake handgun and a real one that he used in the final shootout with the police. The death toll of the November 13th jihad attacks at the Bataclan, sidewalk cafés, and stadium in Paris is 130. That operation, masterminded from Syria, involved dozens of fighters trained in the caliphate or handling logistics in Europe. They traveled by complicated routes, some joined the “refugees” in Greece and snaked up to Belgium with them, probably recruiting a few shahids in the lot. They had safe houses, false passports, money, weapons, ammunition, explosive vests … Vastly disproportionate weapons and planning, give ghastly similar results Eighty-four dead, fifty maimed for life, the blue waters of the Côte d’Azur trembling with horror and outrage; 130 dead, countless maimed and marked for life, Parisian joie de vivre stunned….

But all of that may be nothing compared to what is coming next. Only the other day Interior Minister Bernard Cazeneuve warned that the “terrorists” might switch from “suicide” attacks to other methods like truck bombs and IEDS. The root motivation that inspires these mass killings passes through myriad disparate channels and achieves significant results. The focus on anecdotal details obscures that single source and delays our understanding of the war waged on the free world. It must be granted that the Hollande government, ineffectual as it may be, did not call for stricter control of semi-trailer truck rentals in the wake of the Nice attack. The investigation was handed over to Paris Prosecutor François Molins, and classified as a terrorist attack committed in collusion with a terrorist organization. In his first public declaration Molins explained: whether or not Bouhlel was in direct contact with Daesh, his heinous act responds to instructions given by the organization. Subsequently PM Manuel Valls maintained that Bouhlel was in fact connected to a radical Islamic movement.

Mournful ceremonials of sincere flowers & candles and solidarity light-shows in the colors of the afflicted nation after each mass killing give the illusion of exceptional incidents that can somehow be contained in a time frame, with a beginning a middle and an end. They are not appropriate to the reality of all-out war with no borders, no outlined battlefields, no predictable indicators except that the perpetrators will be Muslim, native born or converts. The most graphic illustration of this ceremonial confusion is the current state of la Place de la République in Paris. The national focal point of dignified grieving has been turned into a pigpen. Flowers, candles, and peace & love messages on the pedestal of the Marianne statue, symbol of the République, have been replaced by disgraceful graffiti left by the false hopes Nuit Debout movement. [http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/up-all-nightmare]

Unless and until democratic citizens have a comprehensive picture of jihad conquest they cannot be mobilized to defend their freedom and their lives. However dramatic, these mass killings have to be understood in their totality and accurately. We need determined leadership that will show the way to mobilization, not closure.

Background

In a climate of national unity after the November attacks, President Hollande solemnly promised to take vigorous measures to protect the population from terrorism. Prime Minister Valls named it Radical Islam. Among these measures was the controversial proposal to strip the citizenship of dual nationals involved in supporting, planning or perpetrating these attacks. Under pressure from his Socialist majority President Hollande abandoned most of the promises. The other day, in his July 14th message to the nation, the president announced that the state of emergency declared in the wake of the attacks and repeatedly extended for three-month periods would not be renewed when it expires on July 26th. As if the very real danger hanging over French civilians could be dissipated by a governmental decision. He reversed this decision on the 15th.

And that’s the least of the miscalculations. Since March 31st and despite its own state of emergency declaration, the government has allowed countless protest demonstrations against a labor reform law, even though every single march ended up with vicious attacks against the police. Hundreds of policemen were injured, some seriously. And all were humiliated. At least half a million euros worth of damage to public and private property was committed. On May 18th a policeman and woman narrowly escaped death when their patrol car was smashed and torched. The policeman was beaten as he fled the flames. On June 15th, seven two-story plate glass windows of the Necker Children’s Hospital were smashed, teargas seeped into the building, health care personnel were unable to reach the hospital, and young patients were terrified. The Nuit Debout movement occupied la Place de la République for months, damaging property, generating attacks on the police, preaching anarchy and sedition. The mass occupation of the public square made a mockery of the state of emergency, which was high on the movement’s list of sins against the people. “Down with the state of emergency, down with the state!” By allowing the Nuit Deboutniks to congregate, agitate, firebomb the police and deface the monument of the Republic the government displayed its lack of resolve. PM Valls had said we are at war. The atmosphere was bread and circuses.

Let the children play. Let the protestors march and holler. Let the smashers destroy. Unpleasant to be sure, but the very nastiness of that familiar violence was a way of saying we have things in hand. These are normal problems that can’t really be solved, they just fade away. The labor reform bill was watered down and pushed through (the government engaged its responsibility instead of letting the Parliament debate and vote). Strong measures were taken to protect the Euro 2016 soccer championship that went off almost without a hitch. Then came the fireworks!

Lagging behind reality

Just a short time ago there was debate on what should be done with the thousands of “S-flagged” individuals  marked as terror suspects and vaguely watched over until they slip under the radar and emerge with Kalashnikovs or turn to other occupations. Shouldn’t they be more closely followed, fitted with electronic bracelets, or even held in retention centers? What of jihadis sentenced to prison? Are they properly isolated from other prisoners? The top dog in this department, Salah Abdeslam, responsible for the logistics of the November 13 attacks, is held in solitary confinement with 24-hour video surveillance. He actually sued the government for violation of his privacy. His complaint was rejected. Meanwhile it was revealed that he has a three-cell complex, including a well-equipped workout room. This is justified by European human rights rules. Abdeslam has never given the slightest shred of information to investigators. Occasionally he promises he will talk, then backs down. He isn’t feeling good, doesn’t feel like talking, won’t talk until his detention conditions improve. He is defended by a court-appointed lawyer at public expense.

Then there are the futile de-radicalization programs. All part of a massive denial of reality. As if the genocidal Islamic rage that inspires lesser and greater mass murderers were some kind of misunderstanding that could be cleared up by heart to heart talking. Another example of focusing on things that can’t be done-like persuading jihadis to turn to basket weaving or making it impossible for 19-ton trucks to smash through barriers or Kalashnikov-armed killers to mow down under-armed security guards-instead of finally putting our countries on the appropriate war (that is, jihad conquest) footing.

Georges Fenech, president of the bipartisan Parliamentary Commission that published its investigation of the November 13th attacks last week, regrets the lack of interest from the Hollande administration in the Commission’s concrete recommendations. “Our country is not armed against Islamic terrorism.” One of the findings of the extensive report is that police forces preparing to intervene to stop the massacre at the Bataclan only had handguns. They begged the soldiers to either come with them or lend them their Famas assault weapons. The soldiers could do neither. They didn’t have orders. According to an official of the SCPN [Police Commissioners’ Union] the forces that finally stopped the killer truck in Nice did not have proper weapons. They fired repeatedly into the windshield but Bouhlel was able to continue 300 meters before they finally neutralized him. Christian Estrosi, former mayor of Nice and currently president of the PACA [Provence Alpes Côte d’Azur] region had alerted President Hollande, on July 13th, to the lack of proper protection for the July 14th fireworks display in Nice. The central government alone can mobilize national police forces, better armed and trained than the municipal agents.

Nice, for all its nostalgic elegance and beautiful beaches, is a jihad hotspot. An attack against the Carnival of Nice was foiled a few months ago. An assailant stabbed three soldiers guarding a Jewish Community Center in Nice.  One of the most vicious jihadi cells discovered in recent years, the “Torcy cell” based in Nice, was involved in the 2012 grenade attack against the Naouri kosher grocery store in Sarcelles, subsequently torched and burned to the ground in the summer of 2014.

Israel as a model

Though the Israeli connection may be brushed off as too hot to handle, Israel is more frequently and frankly mentioned in French debates as a model for dealing with the full range of jihad attacks: citizens are armed and have combat experience, intelligence services are exceptionally efficient, the society has learned to live fully and remain fully conscious of the danger. Olivier Rafowicz, IDF Reserves colonel, says he recently accompanied an Israeli delegation to Nice for security consultations. Private Israeli security agencies are quietly hired by French private and public companies.

The West will improve its defenses when Israel is recognized as the rampart in our defense against jihad conquest, standing for our values in the middle of a vast expanse of genocidal hatred. Israel has always lived in awareness of its perilous surroundings. Now the rest of the free world is in the same neighborhood. I remember the snide voices of French commentators in the early years of the jihad-intifada, spitting on “Israel’s sacrosanct concern for security.” This constant demonization of Israel is a rot that jams our weapons, weakens our military, and destabilizes our societies in Europe and, yes, even in the United States.

Daesh like a wireless mouse

It was reasonable to suppose that the French prime minister would not have forthrightly claimed a direct connection between Mohamed Bouhlel and a terrorist organization if he did not have evidence drawn from electronic devices seized after the Nice massacre. Did Bouhlel, like the Orlando killer, declare his allegiance to the caliphate just before going on the rampage? Saturday morning Daesh took responsibility for the brave operation conducted by its soldier in Nice. Some French media are reporting that this is a codified designation that follows strict rules and necessarily implies a pledge of allegiance. Several of the five people detained for questioning confirm Bouhlel’s “recent radicalization.” We will learn more in the coming days or weeks about the nature of that connection. Even if there is not a single incriminating document, conversation, or contact, it is essential to understand that Daesh operates like a wireless mouse: the message goes out from the higher echelons via communicators into the evil hearts of the masses of potential genocidal killers.

A telling personal experience

Saturday afternoon, after spending hours collecting information on the Nice attack from every available source, I took a walk to the post office, stopping on the way at a tobacconist’s shop to buy a book of métro tickets. I’ve been there at least five times in the past six months. Exchanges with the “buraliste” (proprietor or employee, one can’t be sure which) have always been cordial. I was reaching for my money, when the gentleman announced the price: 14.10 euros. “14.10,” I exclaimed! Had the price gone up again, or did I forget what I paid the last time?

“Don’t you ever take the métro?” he scolded. And got nastier as he went along, accusing me of accusing him of being a thief, telling me to go and buy my tickets at the métro station and never come to his shop again. I truly think that he could have reached out to slap me if I hadn’t been so calm and sunny.

“If I accused anyone it was the RATP [transport company] but that’s ok, I won’t come back anymore.” I said “au revoir,” revised it to “adieu,” and walked out.

I mention this because of the visible origins of the “buraliste.”  Apparently feeling unjustly suspected, for his however distant shared origins with the truck-killer, he found nothing better to do than to lash out at me!

EDITORS NOTE: This column originally appeared in Family Security Matters. Republished under Creative Commons License: Attribution.

Hillary’s Imam

In Front Page today, I reveal the Democratic nominee’s close ties to “the Turkish Khomeini.”
Gulen

The Daily Caller on Wednesday revealed numerous ties between Hillary Clinton and members of the shadowy network surrounding Fethullah Gulen, the controversial Muslim cleric who has been called “the Turkish Khomeini,” and whom the Erdogan regime is accusing of instigating the coup that nearly toppled it on Friday.

According to the Caller, the Gulen camp has been one of Hillary’s numerous sources of cash, in exchange for which she gave access to the President: “a Gulen follower named Gokhan Ozkok asked Clinton deputy chief of staff Huma Abedin for help in connecting one of his allies to President Obama….Ozkok served as national finance co-chair of the pro-Clinton Ready PAC. He gave $10,000 to the committee in 2014 and $2,700 to Clinton’s campaign last year. He is also listed on the Turkish Cultural Center’s website as a member of the Clinton Global Initiative, one of the non-profit arms of the Clinton Foundation. He’s given between $25,000 and $50,000 to the Clinton charity.”

Ozkok wrote to Huma Abedin in 2009: “Please tell Madam Secretary that it would be great if President Obama can include a 15 minutes [sic] meeting with Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, Secretary-General of the Organization of of [sic] the Islamic Conference (OIC), in his trip to Turkey.”

Obama did meet with Ihsanoglu, and later invited him to the White House. Ihsanoglu is a longtime foe of the freedom of speech; he once went so far as to liken the Danish cartoons of Muhammad to 9/11: “The Islamic world took the satirical drawings as a different version of the September 11 attacks against them.” He claimed that Muslims were “being targeted by a campaign of defamation, denigration, stereotyping, intolerance and discrimination,” and urged European legislators to criminalize “Islamophobia.”

In March 2011, Ihsanoglu gave a speech to the UN Council on Human Rights, calling upon it to set up “an Observatory at the Office of the High Commissioner to monitor acts of defamation of all religions . . . as a first step toward concerted action at the international level.” Then on April 12, 2011, the UN Council on Human Rights passedResolution 16/18, with full support from the Obama Administration. This resolution calls upon member states to impose laws against “discriminatory” speech, or speech involving “defamation of religion.” In June 2011, Ihsanoglu said that such laws were “a matter of extreme priority” for the OIC.

As Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton affirmed the Obama Administration’s support for this campaign on July 15, 2011, when she gave an address on the freedom of speech at an OIC conference on Combating Religious Intolerance. “Together,” she said, “we have begun to overcome the false divide that pits religious sensitivities against freedom of expression and we are pursuing a new approach.”

But how could both be protected? Ihsanoglu offered the answer: criminalizing what he considered to be hatred and incitement to violence. “We cannot and must not ignore the implications of hate speech and incitement of discrimination and violence.” But in restricting the freedom of speech, Clinton had a First Amendment to deal with, and so in place of legal restrictions on criticizing Islam, she suggested “old-fashioned techniques of peer pressure and shaming, so that people don’t feel that they have the support to do what we abhor.” She held a lengthy closed-door meeting with Ihsanoglu in December 2011 to facilitate the adoption of measures that would advance the OIC’s anti-free speech agenda, which amounted to an attempt to impose Sharia blasphemy laws upon the West. But what agreements she and Ihsanoglu made, if any, have never been disclosed. Hillary’s contact with Ihsanoglu was initiated by Gulen’s associate Ozkok.

That’s bad enough, but there is much more. According to the Daily Caller, “a Gulen-aligned group called the Alliance for Shared Values hired the Clinton-connected Podesta Group to lobby Congress on its behalf.” The executive director of the Alliance for Shared Values was also a Clinton donor. In fact, “numerous Gulen followers have donated to Clinton’s various political campaigns and to her family charity. One Gulen movement leader, Recep Ozkan, donated between $500,000 and $1 million to the Clinton Foundation.”

The Caller states that Gulen’s teachings are “relatively moderate and pro-Western,” but there are numerous reasons to approach such claims with skepticism. Turkey’s National Security Council condemned Gulen in 1998 for “trying to undermine the country’s secular institutions, concealing his methods behind a democratic and moderate image.”

Asia News reported in 2009 that Gulen had been “criticised by a large number of secularists who believe that underneath a veneer of humanist philosophy, Gulen plans to turn Turkey’s secular state into a theocracy. Secular Kemalists have compared him to Khomeini and fear that his return to Turkey might turn Ankara into another Tehran. The governments of Turkmenistan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan are also weary [sic] and suspicious of his ‘Turkish schools promoted by Islamic missionaries.’ At the basis of Gulen’s teachings is the notion that state and religion should be reconnected as they were in Ottoman times.”

Gulen and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan are former associates who are now bitter enemies, after Gulen backed a 2013 corruption probe targeting Erdogan’s regime. And so even though Erdogan has frequently been accused of wanting to destroy Turkish secularism and restore Islamic rule, his regime has leveled the same charge against Gulen, who now lives in a secluded compound in Pennsylvania. Referring to that corruption probe, Justice Minister Bekir Bozdağ last January echoed the “Turkish Khomeini” charge and said that it ended up exposing Gulen’s sinister agenda:

“If there had been no Dec. 17 [corruption probe], or if it had been delayed and the Turkish people had failed to realize the power of this structure within Turkey, then Fethullah Gülen would have returned from Pennsylvania to Turkey just like Khomeini returned to Iran. Looking from this perspective, Dec. 17 was the day when Turkey said ‘no’ to such a transformation. The state and all its institutions have taken positions accordingly as they realized the danger.”

Gulen’s response to the Khomeini comparison was oddly pedantic and revealed more in what it did not say than in what it did. He noted that he was not a Shi’ite and that Turkey was not Iran, but never addressed the question of whether he, like Khomeini, would like to return to his home country and establish the rule of Islamic law (Sharia) there.

Erdogan is now accusing Gulen of fomenting the coup attempt against him. This is, however, unlikely, as the coup was apparently an attempt to stop Erdogan’s efforts to restore Islamic rule in Turkey, and much as Gulen and Erdogan hate each other, they both apparently share the view that “state and religion should be reconnected as they were in Ottoman times.”

Should Hillary Clinton ever have accepted money from organizations connected with Gulen – much less exchanged influence for it? If she becomes our next President, she is unlikely to end such unsavory associations. Those who are contemplating voting for her should consider carefully the likelihood that a vote for Hillary is a vote for…Fethullah Gulen, the Turkish Khomeini.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Obama Eid Celebration Again Empowers Islamists Over Reformers

Secret document lifts Iran nuke constraints, halving time it will take for Iran to build a bomb

Major jihadist terror attack averted in downtown Jerusalem

Evangelicals support Donald Trump because of his ‘World View of Moral Clarity’

Dr. Michael Evans is the Founder of The Friends of Zion Museum in Jerusalem.

NEW YORK, New York /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — The eyes of the world this week will be focused on the Republican National Convention, but almost no one is talking about the vast majority of Trump-supporting delegates who are Evangelical Christians. The billion dollar question begging an answer is: Why are they supporting him? As an Evangelical journalist, the answer to me is clear, but since presidential candidates are not judged based upon this matter, few would know it.

The answer is worldview.

Trump’s worldview is one of moral clarity, or simply put: Good versus evil. Liberals such as President Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton have a difficult time seeing moral issues clearly because they are moral relativists. They reject absolute standards of good and evil right and wrong.

In their worldview man is capable of perfection, human nature is on a path toward enlightenment and the concept of original sin is primitive. Secular humanists make excuses for evil, or worse, deny evil exists and coddle it by refusing to confront it. Humanists invented Yasser Arafat as a peacemaker and gave him the facade of a freedom fighter, not a terrorist.

In Donald Trump’s worldview, America was attacked because it is a Christian nation, and Israel is attacked because it is a Jewish nation. The Liberal Left mocks such beliefs as simplistic and ignorant because they do not believe that evil really exists, that people are basically good, and it’s better to talk with people and show tolerance.

The Liberal Left hates both Israel’s obsession with a Jewish state, and the America in which evangelicals dream. They subject Christians to scorn, ridicule, and discrimination. The Liberal Left belief is that a perfect world is a weak and endemic America that embraces the perpetrator and castigates the victim.

The liberal left has convinced many Americans that the war on terror cannot be won. Conversely, Evangelicals believe that those who wage war against us are evil. The Left sees Americans as evil for retaliating against the malevolence of terrorists, and that self -loathing and appeasement should replace righteous indignation.

Evangelicals see the terror in Europe as a result of weak leftist immigration policies. They also see the cop killings in America as a result of Obama’s leftist policies of appeasement.

Evangelicals are uncompromisingly pro-Israel in their view. They believe that the vast majority of Gulf Oil states are simply family-owned corporations—thugocracies—funding terror as blackmail to keep the jihadists from attacking them. Many also deem Obama’s cowardly terror policy as emboldening terror.

I was invited to Donald Trump’s meeting with Evangelical leaders in New York on June 21 at the New York Marriot. While there, I met with Dr. Ben Carson and said to him, “Please tell Donald Trump to write the pope and tell him who he is.” I had met with the pope the day before in Rome, and was not asking Trump to send his bio, but rather to share his worldview based upon moral clarity.

Ronald Reagan had a similar worldview influenced by author C.S. Lewis in his book Mere Christianity, Right versus Wrong. He was also influenced by Alexander Solzhenitsyn, and especially his speech, “A World Set Apart,” at Harvard in 1978. Solzhenitsyn characterized the current global conflict as a physical and spiritual war that has already begun and cannot be won without dealing with the forces of evil. I was invited to briefly address the Republican Convention in 1984 in Dallas, Texas on a Sunday afternoon when Ronald Reagan was reelected. I asked him, “How will you defeat communism?” He smiled and replied, “Oh, I think I will bankrupt that evil empire.”

ABOUT DR. MICHAEL EVANS

Mike Evans, Founder of The Friends of Zion Museum in Jerusalem. Dr. Evans is a #1 New York Times bestselling author. His book, Islamic Infidels, is available at www.Timeworthybooks.com.

RELATED ARTICLE: Despite Efforts From LGBT Group, GOP Platform Retains Social Conservative Tenets

Dutch Free Speech Advocate attending GOP Convention — Islamic Supremacists outraged

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the nation’s largest Islamic supremacist organization, called on the Republic Party to disinvite Dutch Member of Parliament Geert Wilders from its national convention in Cleveland.

geert wilders guest at gop conventionWilders noted last night on Twitter that he had arrived to attend the convention at the invitation of Sen. Bill Ketron (R-Murfreesboro).

Wilders has said that the Quran is worse than Adolf Hitler’s autobiography, Mein Kampf.

Geert Wilders speaks about Islamic ideology, multiculturalism, Muslims. political correctness, immigration and Muslim assimilation into Western society and culture:

According to Discover the Networks:

CAIR has strong ties to the terrorist group Hamas:

  • “[CAIR] was formed not by Muslim religious leaders throughout the country, but as an offshoot of the Islamic Association of Palestine (IAP). Incorporated in Texas, the IAP has close ties to Hamas and has trumpeted its support for terrorist activities.” Former chief of the FBI’s counter terrorism section, Oliver Revell, called the IAP “a front organization for Hamas that engages in propaganda for Islamic militants.”
  • CAIR’s head, Nihad Awad asserted at a 1994 meeting at Barry University, “I am a supporter of the Hamas movement.”
  • Former FBI counter terrorism chief, Steven Pomerantz, stated publicly that, “CAIR, its leaders and its activities effectively give aid to international terrorist groups.”

CAIR promotes extremist views and a radical Islamic vision: At a speech in Fremont, California, Omar M. Ahmad of CAIR proclaimed that, “Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Koran…should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on Earth.”

CAIR recently demanded that Donald Trump “stop the bigotry” after he falsely claimed on Fox News that assimilation of American Muslims is “pretty close” to nonexistent and that a “percentage” of American Muslims “want to do what this maniac did in Orlando.” Trump also repeated his call for surveillance of American mosques.

CAIR is reluctant to condemn terrorists and terrorism:

  • In October 1998, the group demanded the removal of a Los Angeles billboard describing Osama bin Laden as “the sworn enemy,” finding this depiction “offensive to Muslims.”
  • In 1998, CAIR denied bin Laden’s responsibility for the two Al Queda African embassy bombings. According to CAIR spokesman Ibrahim Hooper, the bombings resulted from a “misunderstandings of both sides.”

CAIR supports organizations that fund terrorism:

  • When President Bush closed the Holy Land Foundation in December 2001 for collecting money that intelligence found was “used to support the Hamas terror organization,” CAIR decried his action as “unjust” and “disturbing.

Lean more about CAIR.

RELATED VIDEO: FITNA

The Latino Coalition Hosting Hispanic Leaders Event at the RNC Convention

WASHINGTON, D.C.  The Latino Coalition (TLC), the leading national non-partisan advocacy organization representing Hispanic businesses and consumers, will host the premier Latino event, “Honoring Hispanic Leaders,” on Wednesday, July 20 in Cleveland, OH during the Republican National Convention.

TLC’s event program will consist of a briefing entitled “Is it the Best of Times or the Worst of Times?” and an “Honoring Hispanic Leaders Luncheon“.  To date, the confirmed influential leaders and speakers include: former Presidential nominee New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, Congressman Bill Flores (R-TX), Congressman Keith Rothfus (R-PA), Congressman Sean Duffy (R-WI), The Libre Initiative Executive DirectorDaniel Garza and key leadership from the Republican National Committee.

The exciting day will also include the release of the TLC Rising Latino Electorate: Latinos and the 2016 Elections poll – an on-going election-year study revealing how conservative Latinos are not a monolithic voting bloc.  The poll sampling confirms that the country’s growing Republican and Independent Hispanic population does not have an overwhelming favorable view of either presidential candidate, to date.  The complete poll findings will be released July 20 during the briefing.

MEDIA RSVP: To cover the “Honoring Hispanic Leaders”, please submit each attendees name, outlet, contact number (s) and an email to ytorre@thelatinocoalition.com.

WHAT:                                  “Honoring Hispanic Leaders” Event

WHEN:                                  10:30 a.m.  – 2:30 p.m. ET, Wednesday, July 20th, 2016

WHERE:                                First Energy Powerhouse
2000 Sycamore Street
Cleveland, OH 44113

ON-SITE CONTACT:              Yohana de la Torre
(239) 896-4695

Abdiel Hernandez
(239) 218-3001

Check-In and Registration: All media must check in at the press registration table to receive a press badge.  A press badge is required to cover the conference and must be displayed at all times.

SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: Program will begin at 10:30 a.m. ET.  Please arrive on-site by 9:15 a.m. ET for check-in and set up on media risers.  Press riser and mult-box available at first-come, first-serve basis.

For more information on this or all of The Latino Coalition 2016 events, visit www.thelatinocoalition.com/events/.

The Latino Coalition would like to thank the following sponsors:  AT&T, Comcast Universal, Congressional Hispanic Leadership Institute, Microsoft, and National Hispanic Caucus of State Legislators.

ABOUT THE LATINO COALITION

The Latino Coalition (TLC) was founded in 1995 by a group of Hispanic business owners from across the country to research and develop policies solutions relevant to Latinos. TLC is a non-profit nationwide organization with offices in California, Washington, DC and Guadalajara, Mexico. Established to address and engage on key issues that directly affect the well-being of Hispanics in the United States, TLC’s agenda is to create and promote initiatives and partnerships that will foster economic equivalency and enhance and empower overall business, economic and social development for Latinos. Visit www.thelatinocoalition.com.