One of the Biggest Fraud Rings You Never Heard of: Social Adult Daycares — Billions in NYC alone

As a taxpayer I am sickened at the abuse and contempt of hardworking Americans.

CMS Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz joined investigative influencer Nick Shirley in New York City to confront operators of suspected Medicare and Medicaid fraud schemes. Visiting elderly daycare centers and medical equipment companies, there are major red flags,  including three medical supply companies allegedly operating out of a single apartment with no inventory. Calling the suspected scams a massive theft of taxpayer dollars, Oz said the government has failed to stop fraudsters who he claimed are making millions each month through bogus billing operations.

In NYC alone billions in fraud, sanctioned by Democrat politicians who are voting themselves massive raises, have been discovered.

‘Major Red Flags’: Dr. Oz Joins MAGA Influencer Nick Shirley to Confront Alleged Fraudsters

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz joined MAGA influencer Nick Shirley to confront alleged fraudsters in New York City, with Oz stressing that the experience showed “major red flags” in a video posted on Friday.

Oz, a member of President Donald Trump’s administration, accompanied Shirley to a variety of different elderly daycare centers and medical equipment companies across the city, confronting folks who they say are committing both Medicare and Medicaid fraud — many of whom either did not speak English or seemed hesitant to answer questions about the services they provide.

“One of the largest fraud schemes in America is taking place in New York City as billions of dollars are being defrauded by organized Korean and Chinese mafias, along with other foreigners operating and stealing taxpayer dollars,” Shirley claimed.

“It’s almost certainly fraud,” Oz said of an apartment they visited where three durable medical companies allegedly operate from, purporting that the benefactors make “$2 to $8 million a month.”

“These guys grow like vermin,” the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services administrator continued. “There are twice as many durable medical suppliers in South Florida as McDonald’s, because it’s easier to open one than a bank account,” alleging that there, “the Cuban government is involved.”

His and Shirley’s conversation continued:

OZ: To open three in one apartment makes no sense, especially when there’s no product there. All you’re doing is gaming the system, and the fact that we didn’t audit it, didn’t catch it, didn’t stop it, and they’re probably out there making money infuriates me. It should bother folks out there, ’cause it’s your tax dollars paying for this

SHIRLEY: So, it’s literally impossible for someone to be operating a durable medical company outside — inside of an apartment?

OZ: Inside of an apartment with no goods and two other durable medical equipment suppliers? That’s a major red flag — the kind you walk into battle with.

In one NYC neighborhood, dozens of adult daycares bill millions to taxpayers. Now the feds have questions.

By Laura Geller, Rachel Gold, Tom Hanson, CBS News, July 1, 2026:

Dozens of Medicaid-funded social adult daycare centers are packed into one New York City neighborhood, a CBS News data analysis has found.

The proliferation of the facilities has caught the attention of federal authorities, who confirmed they are investigating across New York whether the rapid spread of centers catering to seniors is indicative of fraud.

“[It] begs the question: How many social adult daycare centers do you need?” Dr. Mehmet Oz, administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, told CBS News.

Social daycare facilities offer meals, personal care, social activities and other assistance to seniors and people with disabilities. Those services are then billed to the state government and covered by federal and state tax dollars.

The costs have been rising — especially in New York state, a CBS News data analysis found. Medicaid paid adult daycare providers $3.35 billion nationwide in 2024, and 17% of that money went to the 375 facilities across New York state — more than any other state. New York spending on these adult daycares ballooned in recent years, with the bill to taxpayers nearly quadrupling from 2018 to 2024.

The facilities in Flushing bill Medicaid for the equivalent of more than 90% of local Medicaid-eligible seniors.

Those numbers have not gone unnoticed. Investigations are underway into some social adult daycare centers across New York with potential federal action against them anticipated, CBS News has learned.

The epicenter of the spike in spending is the bustling neighborhood of Flushing, Queens, the densest cluster of social adult daycare facilities in the country: 64 within a one-mile radius, according to a CBS News analysis of Medicaid data.

Dr Oz currently leads a sweeping federal crackdown on Medicare and Medicaid fraud in his role as the Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Here’s his latest:

And this:

Nick Shirley: Here is the full 53 minutes of my crew and I exposing New York fraud, we uncovered over $190,000,000 in fraud as these fraudsters use the elderly and needy to commit fraud through adult and personal home care scams in NYC. Your tax dollars are paying for elderly Koreans and Chinese to play ping pong and do tai chi, while the fraudsters give $ kickbacks to those who enroll. Like it and share this video, the fraud must STOP.

We ALL work way too hard and pay too much in taxes for fraudsters to steal from our pockets. These fraudsters have been able to defraud American taxpayers for years without any pushback from the public and politicians. Time is up.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

TRUMP’S LAST WILL Leaves Doomsday Order: If Iran Kills Me, ‘Bomb Them Like Never Before’

President Trump revealed he has already left standing orders for a devastating U.S. military response if Iran succeeds in assassinating him, warning the terror regime that any attack on his life would trigger bombing “at levels that they’ve never seen before.” The warning comes as Iran openly renews calls for Trump’s murder following the burial of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and after Tehran violated the U.S.-Iran cease-fire by attacking commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz.

Why wait for catastrophe? Do it now.

Trump tells The Post he’s ‘left instructions’ should Iran assassinate him: ‘Bomb them at levels’ never seen before

By Caitlin Doornbos, NY Post, July 10, 2026:

President Trump on Friday told The Post he has “left instructions” should Iran succeed in their plots to assassinate him — and there’ll be hell to pay.

“I’ve been on their list for a long time. That’s what we’re dealing with,” he said. “… The only thing is, I’ve left instructions — if anything happens, to just literally bomb them at levels that they’ve never seen before.”

Asked about recent reports that Israel this week flagged intel of a plot to take out the US president, Trump indicated there was no fresh plan from Iran — but said Tehran has wanted him dead for years.

Mourners carrying a banner against U.S. President Donald Trump at the burial of Iran’s late Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

“No, no. Israel came up with nothing. No, no,” he said. “I’ve been No. 1 [on Iran’s kill list] for a long time, and it’s the way life is, you know.”

“I hope you’ll miss me,” he added, sounding resigned to the reality that Tehran will never stop trying to off him.

Later Friday, CNN reported that the Israeli intelligence shared with the US was unspecified and did not include a formal plot, but rather involved information that Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Commander Ahmad Vahidi wanted Trump dead

Iran has openly sought the president’s assassination since 2020, when Trump directed the attack that killed Iranian military officer Qasem Soleimani.

There have also been multiple foiled assassination plots against Trump since an assassin’s bullet grazed his ear at a political rally in Butler, Pennsylvania on July 13, 2024.

“Why shouldn’t we kill the one who killed my imam and my leader?” a eulogist at one of the memorial events said this week, according to Iranian media. “Trump’s killing is our duty. … Why is the most despicable man in the world still alive?”

Trump in early 2025 mentioned leaving instructions to “obliterate” Iran should they assassinate him, but his comments on Friday seemed more urgent following the massive displays and calls for his death in Iran this week.

The latest remarks came days after Trump called off the US-Iran cease-fire and their nascent memorandum of understanding after Iran fired on three ships in the Strait of Hormuz on Monday and Tuesday.

In response, the president removed the US waiver on Iranian oil sanctions and launched nearly 200 strikes across Iran on Tuesday and Wednesday.

Trump’s frustration with the Iranians was on full display at the NATO summit in Ankara this week, calling them “evil” for unleashing attacks in the strait despite the cease-fire and an additional promise to ramp down tensions as they buried slain Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.

Despite his efforts to make a deal with Iran, Trump openly talked in Turkey that Iran was still out to kill him.

“They had leaders, they’re gone. Then they had another set of leaders, they’re gone. Now they have another set of leaders — they may be gone, who knows?” Trump said at the summit. “And you know what? I may be gone too. Because I’m their No. 1 target — it’s out all over the place. Because they’re scum.”

“That’s the way they act and that’s the way they’ve done it for 47 years,” he added.

The president then swapped planes on his route home from Ankara on Wednesday, with the White House later acknowledging it was a security tactic to ensure Trump’s safety after telling reporters that Iran wanted him dead.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Breaking: Trump Reinstates Naval Blockade on Iran in Strait of Hormuz as Attacks Ramp Up

HIGH TREASON: Mamdani’s Iran Scandal, Top Aide Set Meeting With Regime After Missile Attacks

Almost Half of Muslim Americans Have Favorable View of Terror Group

The Trillion-Dollar Jihad Against the West

Iranians in London hold candlelight vigil for Lindsey Graham outside US Embassy

RELATED VIDEO: IRANIAN CROWN PRINCE REZA PAHLAVI: “The people of Iran will not settle for anything less than the complete collapse of this regime.”

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Trump Wants Syria to ‘Fight Hezbollah’ in Lebanon

And both Israel and Lebanon are appalled. Trump sees Syrian leader Ahmed al-Sharaa as a “strong leader,” someone who can take on Hezbollah and deal better with it than Israel. That is not how either Beirut or Jerusalem sees things. More on Trump’s suggestion that Lebanon let Syria back in to crush Hezbollah can be found here: “Trump presses Syria to take on Hezbollah, raising alarm in both Lebanon and Israel, Associated Press, June 29, 2026:

As the White House has soured on Israel’s war with Hezbollah in Lebanon, U.S. President Donald Trump has shocked many in the region by pushing an alternative: Let Syria fight the Iran-backed militant group instead.

He has suggested that the battle-hardened and Islamist-led insurgents who overthrew Syria’s autocratic President Bashar Assad a year and a half ago and formed a new government would do a better job of rooting out Hezbollah than the Israeli army.

Syrian President Ahmad al-Sharaa has said he has no interest in doing so, and has asserted that Trump’s comments were misconstrued. But Trump has doubled down on the idea….

On the sidelines of the G7 summit earlier this month, Trump complained that Israel’s war with Hezbollah is dragging on too long and “too many people are being killed.”

More than 4,000 people have been killed by Israeli strikes in Lebanon since Hezbollah joined the wider Iran war with a March 2 attack on Israel, including hundreds of women and children. Israel says its strikes target Hezbollah and that it takes measures to protect civilians.

“You don’t have to knock down an apartment house every time you’re looking for somebody, because there are a lot of people in those apartment houses and they’re not all Hezbollah,” Trump said.

“I suggested to Israel to let Syria take care of Hezbollah. ‘Cause to be honest with you, I think they’d do a better job.”

Days later, on the first day of U.S.-Iran talks in Switzerland, Fox News’ Trey Yingst said that, during an interview, Trump had expressed disappointment that Israel can’t “put Hezbollah away” and said that he is “close to giving it to Syria” because he thinks al-Sharaa would be more precise….

If Trump thinks the Syrian army would be more precise in its strikes, and kill fewer civilians, than the IDF, then he is clearly unfamiliar with how the Syrian army has behaved since 1976, when it first entered Lebanon, guns blazing or when, during the Syrian civil war, it crushed Assad’s enemies. Think only of the 40,000 civilians that the Syrian army killed in 1982, when it flattened Hama.

In a June 21 interview with the Emirati network Al Mashhad, al-Sharaa said Trump’s remarks had been misunderstood.

Trump “spoke about Syria’s role in finding a safe and peaceful solution, but the statement was misinterpreted as if Syria were going to invade Lebanon tomorrow morning,” al-Sharaa said….

No, Trump meant what he said: he thinks Syria should enter Lebanon in order to subdue and disarm Hezbollah. And Syria has no intention of doing that. What we have here, as it says in Cool Hand Luke, is “a failure to communicate.”

Randa Slim, director of the Middle East Program at the Washington-based Stimson Center, said Trump’s proposal is, “at best, driven by a profound ignorance of the dynamics on the ground.”

“Syria needs to focus on a myriad of complex and daunting challenges — not least rebuilding a shattered country and repatriating millions of refugees,” she said. “Syrian forces are far from a coherent military institution; they include thousands of foreign jihadi fighters of uncertain loyalty and discipline.”…

In fact, Trump seems not to realize that al-Sharaa is a Sunni jihadist, and not the “moderate in a suit” that he pretends to be. Al-Sharaa has allowed the Syrian army to attack both the Alawites in Idlib province and also the Druze whose stronghold is the Sweida governorate, between Damascus and the border with northern Israel. Not only should al-Sharaa be concentrating on putting his own house in order, and protecting the country’s minorities — the Christians, Druze, and Kurds — instead of meddling in Lebanese matters, but he needs to be kept out of Lebanon for another reason. Once inside Lebanon, his army would likely remain in Lebanon, setting up permanent bases that will certainly alarm Israel. Fortunately, he’s made clear he doesn’t want to go into Lebanon. He has enough on his plate.

Many Lebanese also have bitter memories of the decades of Syrian occupation of Lebanon, which began during the Lebanese civil war, initially at the request of Lebanese authorities and with the backing of Arab states, ending in 2005.

That history remains firmly in Lebanese minds. They don’t want a repetition of the past, when Syria was invited in to impose a Pax Syriana on the warring parties in the Lebanese civil war, but ended up staying for 29 years, from 1976 to 2005, effectively ruling Lebanon for much of that time.

The [Israeli] official who spoke anonymously said that Israel is also concerned about some signs that Syria could assume its old role in Lebanese politics. But the official said while Israel is closely watching developments between Syria and Lebanon, its main concern is Hezbollah.

And it is not Syria, but the IDF and the newly-strengthened Lebanese Armed Forces that together will disarm Hezbollah, whatever our president may so bizarrely think.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Washington Post reporters falsify a Trump quote to demonize Israel

In Spain, Antisemitism Now Running With the Bulls: ‘Destroy Israel’ Banner at San Fermin Festival

Greek MEP: ‘Pretending Turkey is still a reliable ally is not a strategy. It is dangerous self-delusion.’

Honest Reporting on the Part-Time Journalists, Full-Time Terrorists, in Gaza

Tiny minority of extremists: 44% of Muslims in the U.S. have a favorable view of Hamas

Hamas-linked CAIR, Muslim Minneapolis City Council VP enraged that sheriff warned about Somali gangs

RELATED VIDEO: Robert Spencer Destroys Tucker Carlson’s Attempt To Whitewash Islam’s Treatment of Christians

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Trump’s HHS Sees ‘Values Issues’ as Key to Winning Midterms

The Trump administration’s record on “values issues” is key to winning the upcoming midterm elections, Assistant Secretary of Health Brian Christine told the Daily Signal.

Christine said the Department of Health and Human Services, in the lead-up to the November elections, is emphasizing its actions on social issues such as protecting kids with gender dysphoria from life-altering procedures, protecting women’s sports, and ending taxpayer-funded abortion. He called the actions “some of the best things the Trump administration has done.”

“I think these values issues are really, really important,” Christine said in an interview with the Daily Signal. “I do believe they’re winning issues. I do believe these are issues the vast majority of Americans agree with us on.”

The Office of the Assistant Secretary of Health last month terminated $67 million in teenage pregnancy prevention grants for “sexually explicit” curricula that promoted pornography, contraception, gender ideology, and abortion to middle and high school-aged audiences.

“Ultimately, we in the administration are here to serve; we’re here to serve our republic and the people, the citizens of our republic,” Christine said. “People do care about these things, so we are putting emphasis on these things.”

On June 10, the HHS office revised a grant program to treat frozen embryos created through in vitro fertilization as human children. Christine also promised to make sure federal dollars aren’t funding abortion.

“Federal dollars, obviously, should never ever go to abortion, abortion counseling, abortion services,” he said. “Federal dollars should be used to promote the health of the country and the health of the citizens in this country.”

Christine slammed Planned Parenthood for offering so-called gender-affirming care to minors but not supporting detransitioners, people who regret altering their bodies in an attempt to change their sex. The Department of Health and Human Services issued a report in November on the dangers of experimental transgender medical interventions referred to as “gender-affirming care.”

“It illustrates so much of what’s happening from Planned Parenthood, for instance, ‘No, we can’t help you now that you have these problems after, after you’ve been sold the lies of gender-affirming care,’ but we’ll be happy to provide you more hormones or more surgery,’” he said. “Really perverse, really perverse.”

AUTHOR

Elizabeth Troutman Mitchell

Elizabeth Troutman Mitchell is the White House correspondent for the Daily Signal. Follow on X TheElizMitchell.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Trump Says Communism Is America’s Next Enemy

Zeldin Unveils EPA Plan to Save Truckers $12 Billion

The Media’s Dangerous Minimization of the Left’s Radical Turn to Socialism

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Signal column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

How to Destroy Western Civilization and Other Ideas from the Cultural Abyss

Book lovers, how to you decide which book to read?

During your years of reading—or, even going back to your time as a student of an old-school English teacher—you may have picked up some helpful habits.

Perhaps a book is recommended by a fellow lectiophile. Maybe the subject or genre is one that interests you. An intriguing title could draw you in. Finally, you may have read other books by the same author.

Peter J. Kreeft’s How to Destroy Western Civilization could very well fit the bill for one or all of these reasons. If so, your choice will offer the reward of a thoughtful book to be read with interest, even passion.

There is yet another means of helping you in your decision, a method which must be taken with a grain of salt: book jacket recommendations. They can often be somewhat meaningless. For this book, however, they provide a summary of the book’s main points and an accurate assessment of its quality and thought.

“In describing how to destroy the West, which we’re doing a pretty good job of just now, Peter Kreeft also indicates how to save it, if what’s left is savable.” (1)

“Dr. Kreeft [makes an] explosive call for a renewal of family life, of a culture aware of what it is worshipping , and of a freedom that allows humans to embrace the fullness of life for which they have been created in Christ.” (2)

“A pithy, often very funny book, with a serious underlying purpose…Kreeft…our very own C. S. Lewis, is a keen diagnostician of our our moral and spiritual disorders…He doesn’t flinch or coddle. Truth is hard on those who deny it. (3) (Emphasis mine.)

“Dr. Kreeft shows that the diseases destroying Western civilization are indeed deadly, but need not be fatal.” (4)

There it is, in a nutshell: Kreeft’s analysis of our civilization’s destruction and possibilities of hope aptly summarized on the book jacket. We are destroying ourselves, we can recover, but we must rely on—and return to—Truth.

Dr. Peter J. Kreeft, Ph.D., is Professor of Philosophy at Boston College, where he has taught for over 60 years. He is the author of over 80 books on Christian philosophy and theology. (5)

If one is still undecided about selecting this book, or any book, take a look at the table of contents. In this case, the list of eclectic chapter titles presents a variety of ideas. Whether it’s “The Paradox of Poverty” or “C. S. Lewis, J. R. R. Tolkien, and the Culture Wars,” all focus on our destruction and, as the subtitle describes, Other Ideas from the Cultural Abyss. Most are essays; some are taken from talks by Kreeft.

Perhaps, as part of your decision, you might want to skim a chapter. In that case, don’t miss Chapter 3, “The Unmentionable Elephant in the Living Room of the Liberty Debate.” That would be sex—and yes, “[w]e are at war.” The roots of this war stem from the Obama Administration’s push for “sexual ‘liberty’ vs. religious liberty, which includes liberty of conscience.”

Or Chapter 5, “The Logic of Liberalism,” featuring pithy statements such as:

“You may worship any God but God.”;

“I love all human beings. I hate only conservatives.”; and

“We hate censorship. We love speech codes.”

Or Chapter 7, “Twelve Core Values” of the Lumen Institute. (6)

Should you decide to read the entire work of philosophy, morality and logic, you will be well-pleased. In fact, for Kreeft fans, you might just find that this is one of his best works, if not the best you have read. His writing is structured, logical and always thought-provoking. Wit and sarcasm make appearances in appropriate places.

Several main points of the book are of particularly interest to STARRS readers.

As in most books addressing the destruction of Western Civilization, Marx is mentioned in several chapters. So are Darwin and Freud. These are the “three most influential modern thinkers…all atheists, materialists, naturalists and immoralists.” For good measure, Nietzsche is mentioned for his “will to power that fascinated intellectuals, because intellectuals are usually physically weaker than ordinary people and need to compensate or cover this up.” (Yes, Kreeft expertly blends humor with truth.)

In a talk on the “Twelve Core Values” to the Lumen Institute, Kreeft describes three which echo the USAF core values of Integrity First, Service Before Self and Excellence in All We Do.

For Kreeft, these are clearly “leadership values” and are all related to Christ. Kreeft quotes the Lumen Institute Handbook: “Christ is your criterion of integrity.” Regarding Service Before Self, Kreeft states that “[M]agnanimity is…the very nature of God. The ultimate reason for giving yourself to other is that that is the nature of human reality.” Finally, “[E]xcellence in all things is Christocentric.”

The flip side of these, and other noble values discussed in the book, is demonstrated by Kreeft’s skewering of Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy’s famous (or, for some—infamous) writing in Casey vs. Planned Parenthood.

Kennedy wrote: “At the heart of liberty is the right to define one’s own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of human life.” Kreeft finds Kennedy’s words the “most foolish, idiotic, and even insane thing ever written by a Supreme Court Justice.

In his signature sarcasm, Kreeft visualizes Kennedy saying to God, “Move over, you’re sitting in my seat.”

Although this is a work of classic Kreeft logic, he contradicts himself in discussing Islam. He dedicates an entire chapter to “A Word about Islam, and a Defense of My Controversial Book about It.”

Elsewhere in the book, he admits that “there is much not to envy in Islam: terrorism, lack of respect for human life, for women, to reason and for freedom.” And yet, in the very next sentence, he states “But Muslims are almost always genuinely moral, though narrow.”

One might think that basic violations of morality are being overlooked here.

Nevertheless, as Kreeft emphasizes in his chapter on Islam, there are certain qualities of Islam which those of a Judeo-Christian faith are lacking. Kreeft respects and praises Islam for its “bare, simple essence” that is the “core of all authentic religion: total surrender, total submission, total conformity to the Will of God.”

Europe will become a Muslim continent because the “sophisticated, cultured, sensitive, advanced, compassionate continent…is dying because it has repudiated its ‘primitive’ roots.”

The qualities of Islam admired by Kreeft underscore deficiencies in Christianity, a subject which has been discussed in both an article and a book featured during STARRS Zoom meetings.

In “How ‘wet noodle Christians’ surrendered American to Marxists” (7), Gwen Anderson describes how many of today’s Christians are failing to publicly oppose evil and support a moral direction of society. She cites a “successful Marxist strategy” as a large part of this attitude; “Marxists understood the wet noodle instinct long before many Christians did.”

Contrast this thinking and attitude with the devotion, fervor and total dedication of Islam as described by Kreeft.

Furthermore, Eric Metaxas, in his Letter to the American Church, (8) echoes Anderson’s thoughts on the weakness of today’s church. He compares today’s church leaders’ lack of force is pushing back against immorality with the failure of church leaders to resist Hitler, as encouraged by Dietrich Bonhoeffer. The American church “has cheapened the ideas of belief and real faith.” Metaxas also cites the lies of Cultural Marxism as a factor in the weakness of today’s American church.

Again, contrast these weaknesses with the strengths of Islam.

While acknowledging that he admires aspects of Islam, Kreeft is clearly a devout Christian, and his beliefs permeate all pages of his book. The following key points address the strengths we need to build on in order to combat further destruction of Western Civilization.

In his first chapter, with the same title as the book, he emphatically states that the “one weapon that will infallibly win the future [is] children.” Having children is the “single most necessary thing to we can possible do to save our civilization.”

Regarding society, “the moral quality of individuals is the single most important cause of a good or bad society.”

And the most important influence on the quality of those members of society?

No surprise here, for many, but an influence that is not always recognized—and lived—by the general population: families…[s]table, loving families.” In addition, “religion has always been the strongest moral indicator in the world.”

Kreefts describes three classical types of freedom: political freedom, free will, and teleological freedom. Unfortunately, the most important freedom is one that is too often denied: “the freedom to become what we are designed to be and are supposed to be.”

In this denial, we live a fourth freedom, the “freedom to be God. That is the root of our insanity.” (Emphasis mine.) There is no longer objective truth, we are our own gods.

Enjoy this thought-provoking book. And, in doing so, introduce yourself to the logic, morality, philosophy and yes, even occasional humor, of Peter Kreeft.

Then keep the book on your bookshelf for future reference and as a reminder that your countercultural thinking—like his—is on the right track while we live in a “cultural abyss.”

AUTHOR

Lt Col Eric Vogel, USAF ret, USAFA ’73

STARRS Connecticut State Leader

RELATED ARTICLES:

Meritocracy, Marxism, and the Military

How America’s Military Academies Lost Their Way

It’s The Elections Stupid; The Apathy Will Destroy Us

2009 USAFA Grad/Air Force Major arrested on Capitol steps during protest calling for Trump impeachment

West Point cadets talk America250 on national TV

1999 West Point Grad Becomes New Commandant of Cadets

RELATED VIDEO: TERRIFYING: The Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) have released new policy platforms


SOURCES

(1) Robert Royal, Ph.D., Author, A Deeper Vision: The Catholic Intellectual Tradition in the Twentieth Century

(2) Fr. David Meconi, S.J. , Director, Catholic Studies Centre, Saint Louis University

(3) Robert Reilly, Author, America on Trial: A Defense of the Founding

(4) Fr. Robert McTeigue, S.J., Author, Real Philosophy for Real People: Tools for Truthful Living

(5) https://www.peterkreeft.com/

(6) https://lumeninstitute.org/

(7) https://www.theblaze.com/columns/opinion/how-wet-noodle-christians-surrendered-america-to-marxists

(8) https://www.amazon.com/dp/1684513898?lv=shuf&channelId=500&plpRedirect=mhFallback


How to Destroy Western Civilization and Other Ideas from the Cultural Abyss

by Peter Kreeft

Book Description:

Peter Kreeft presents a series of brilliant essays about many of the problems that undermine our Western civilization, along with ways to address them. “These essays are not new proposals or solutions to today’s problems,” he says. “They are old. They have been tried, and have worked. They have made people happy and good. That is what makes them so radical and so unusual today.”

In his witty, readable style, Kreeft implores us to gather wisdom and preserve it, as the monks did in the Middle Ages. He offers relevant philosophical precepts, divided into various categories, that can be collected and remembered in order to guide us and future generations in the days ahead.

Kreeft emphasizes that the most necessary thing to save our civilization is to have children. If we don’t have children, our civilization will cease to exist. The “unmentionable elephant in the room”, he tells us, is sex, properly understood. Religious liberty is being attacked in the name of “sexual liberty”, in other words, abortion. Kreeft encourages us to fight back—with joy and confidence—with the one weapon that will win the future: children.

EDITORS NOTE: This STARRS column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

26 House Republicans Earned an “F” on Amnesty

See 26 RINO Traitors below who favor amnensty for Illegal aliens.


The latest Grade Cards are flashing red. But first…

We won a victory today when House leadership pulled back a bill that would have effectively reauthorized loopholes that facilitate child trafficking, fake family claims, and abuse of visa programs. The bill would have authorized billions in funding without making needed reforms.

Instead, it would have left largely untouched the same system that existed during the Biden border crisis, when more than 500,000 unaccompanied children were released into the United States.

In many cases, those children were trafficked, lost, exploited, or placed in unsafe homes.

Your calls, emails and appeals on social media were heard. Speaker Mike Johnson stepped up to the plate and worked with NumbersUSA to understand our concerns, and your participation in the process helped us secure the win. Thank you!

Now, How About Some Offense?!?

The House missed its promised deadline to vote on permanent border security reforms. NumbersUSA has called on Congress to take up and pass H.R. 2, as they did in 2023. They have just 8 legislative days left before the August recess. A look at our Grade Cards helps explain the holdup.

Twenty-six House Republicans have an F in our Stop Amnesty Category. That’s twenty-six members of the majority who are working to keep illegal aliens in the country. Another thirty-six House Republicans have a D or D-Minus Amnesty Grade.

Just before the Independence Day holiday, 45 House Republicans cosponsored Rep. G.T. Thompson’s bill to give amnesty to more than 600,000 illegal workers and grow the H-2A temporary visa program by a million people over the next decade.

And because birthright citizenship remains in place, the long-term fiscal impact would extend beyond the workers themselves, including future educational and public service costs borne by taxpayers.

Share Their Grades

At the link, you can view the updated grade cards for the Members of Congress representing your area. Click the share button below the images to send them directly to the elected officials. Add a note about what you’d like to see them do better.

See all 535 Grades here.

Which Side Are They On?

Last Spring, Vice President Vance described cheap labor, imported by mass immigration, as “a drug that too many American firms got addicted to.”

Last week, Rep. Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez reminded us that lower wages are a feature of mass immigration, not a bug. “Who is going to be helping build your home?” She asked, adding that “Healthcare [cost] is going to rise” if workers who lose deportation protections are required to go home.

Oren Cass of American Compass once summed up the immigration labor debate like this: Worker Power, Loose Borders: Pick One.

This week, Cass argued that just as “the global economy doesn’t ‘need aliens from Mars to fill jobs’…the U.S. economy doesn’t ‘need immigrants to fill jobs.’ You may prefer cheaper labor. By all means argue for it. But don’t say we need it.”

Mass immigration is a choice, not a need. House Republicans, like the rest of Congress, need to choose a side. They need to vote. Failure to act is an endorsement of the status quo: loose borders and mass immigration.

Cheap labor may benefit some employers in the short term, but Americans pay for it in lower wages, higher housing costs, and weaker bargaining power.

Tell Congress: Cheap Labor Costs Americans Dearly

At the link — below the grade cards, you’ll find several new campaigns (each one offers an email, phone, and social media action) on the latest and most important immigration battles we’re waging, including:

Another Way to Limit Birthright: After the Supreme Court’s ruling on Birthright Citizenship, a national E-Verify mandate would dry up illegal paychecks and make it difficult for inadmissible aliens to stay here illegally long enough to cash in on the birthright citizenship reward. A party committed to American workers and borders would prioritize E-Verify and vote on the border security package.

Expansion Alert: America’s leisure and hospitality sector — the companies that lean most heavily on seasonal labor — lost 61,000 jobs in June. This is projected to be the worst summer job season for teenagers ever. Yet the Homeland Security funding bill (H.R. 9310) includes a doubling of seasonal H-2B guest workers.

Sanctuary Fallout: A man arrested for the rape and sexual abuse of a 16-year-old girl in New York had a 28-year-old final order of removal that was never carried out. ICE has requested a detainer. The Shut Down Sanctuary Policies Act passed out of committee, but like the border security/E-Verify package has not been placed on the calendar for a vote.

Affordability: A new Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas study concluded the border crisis drove roughly 30% of increased housing costs and 20% of rent increases during President Biden’s term. Congress’s housing bill – expected to become law tonight – is an attempt to accommodate mass immigration, not rein it in. Cheap labor or affordable housing: Choose one, Congress!

Quote of the Week

“For decades, powerful corporate interests have undermined workers by importing foreign labor, both legal and illegal.” – Rep. Riley Moore (WV-02), Compact

NumbersUSA In The News

Fox News featured NumbersUSA Co-President Michael Hough’s response to the Supreme Court’s birthright citizenship ruling.

“The people who drafted the 14th Amendment in the 1860s obviously weren’t contemplating wealthy foreign nationals creating children in the United States through modern reproductive technology. Those kinds of questions should be left to Congress, not decided by judges stretching constitutional language.”
Reuters highlighted NumbersUSA’s warning that the Court’s decision increases the importance of interior enforcement and E-Verify.
“Every illegal entry, visa overstay, and birth tourism visit carries a citizenship multiplier that Congress never intended.”
Newsweek covered NumbersUSA’s opposition to the proposed agricultural amnesty and guest worker expansion.
“Cheap captive labor is a feature of large-scale guest worker programs. Other countries facing the same labor questions have modernized instead–we’d be choosing captivity over innovation.”
Spread the word.
AUTHOR

Jeremy Beck

Co-President NumbersUSA

©2026 . All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLE: Desperate Democrats Take Eye Off Prize As Party Infighting Spreads Across US

Thune Accused of Excluding the SAVE America Act in ‘Must-Pass’ Bill

A major ally of President Donald Trump in the House of Representatives accused Senate Majority Leader John Thune of wanting to craft his own version of the National Defense Authorization Act to ensure it passes without the SAVE America Act attached.

“John Thune is planning on drafting his own version of the NDAA, actively working to try to block the SAVE AMERICA ACT,” Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., wrote on X Thursday.

She then called on House Rules Committee Chairwoman Virginia Foxx to file a manager’s amendment to attach the voter ID legislation if the alleged Senate version of the NDAA is sent over to the lower chamber. “This will now have to be done in conference,” Luna added. “A Manager’s Amendment from Chairwoman Foxx of Rules can force this in once the Senate sends us their version.”

Luna’s remarks come after the president called for the SAVE America Act to be attached to “must-pass bills” like the National Defense Authorization Act.

“We cannot, as a Country, put up with this any longer!!!” Trump wrote on Truth Social on Saturday. “Voter I.D., and Proof of Citizenship, must be approved, NOW. Crooked Mail-In Voting must be stopped!!! PUT IT ALL IN THE HOUSING AND FISA BILLS.”

Thune and Foxx did not respond to the Daily Signal’s request for comment.

Attaching the SAVE America Act to a larger bill could jeopardize the Senate’s ability to pass it. Earlier this month, Sen. Tommy Tuberville, R-Ala., told the Daily Signal that adding the act to any other “must-pass legislation” would put a death wish on it.

Regardless, Trump has continued to advocate for the passage of the SAVE America Act by any means necessary, including by abolishing the filibuster, the 60-vote threshold for cloture.

“THE SAVE AMERICA ACT’S non-passage is CRAZY, and a serious threat to any politician who votes against it,” Trump wrote on Truth Social on Friday.

“If the Dumocrats, or any RINO (or worse!) working with them, do not allow a positive Vote on SAVE AMERICA, [then] TERMINATE THE FILIBUSTER, and pass this, and every other Bill that true Republicans have ever dreamt of.”

Trump added, “The Dumocrats will TERMINATE THE FILIBUSTER, if and when they ever get the chance to do so, in their very first hour—And I will no longer be able to call them Dumocrats again!”

Echoing the president’s remarks, conservative members of the Senate have criticized Republican Senate leadership for their handling of the SAVE America Act. On Wednesday, Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., wrote on X that the real reason Senate leadership does not want to eliminate the 60-vote threshold is because of “control.”

“Despite numerous calls from the president to eliminate the filibuster and pressure from a strong conservative wing of the Republican Senate, the 60-vote threshold remains because of pushback from longtime Republican senators and the Democratic minority,” Scott said.

“Here’s why people in both parties don’t want to use or lose the filibuster: control,” he continued.

“Hiding behind the 60-vote threshold and the cloture rule makes it easier to control the chamber, control debate, and control the schedule,” Scott added. “That way, there are no surprises, and everyone gets to leave town after lunch on Thursday without fail.”

“Open debate, open amendments, and a majority threshold make things less predictable. And that makes comfortable people uncomfortable,” Scott’s post concluded. “If we want to secure our elections and pass the rest of the America First agenda, we’re going to need to shake some things up.”

Thune Accused of Defiance

House Republican staffers, despite not being able to confirm if Senate leadership is preparing legislation that purposefully excludes the SAVE America Act, provided insight into how House Republicans are responding to the latest rift between the lower and upper chamber.

“Leader Thune has repeatedly defied the American people’s clear demand for the SAVE America Act,” a source familiar with the matter told the Daily Signal. “Instead of shrugging and saying he lacks the votes, he should attach it to every must-pass bill, including next week in the NDAA, and force Democrats into the hot seat.”

“Senate Republicans shouldn’t fight harder to block the SAVE America Act than Democrats do. Americans would rather see Thune fight and lose than fail to fight at all,” the source added.

A senior GOP House staffer told the Daily Signal that “of course Thune will disobey President Trump’s orders,” and that “Thune has had multiple opportunities to force a real vote on SAVE America and has consistently chosen the path of least resistance.”

“Thune wants to pass the Senate NDAA so that he can steamroll the House in conference,” the staffer continued. “He has zero intention of putting the SAVE America Act in the NDAA,” the staffer speculated.

The staffer also claimed Senate leadership is “hiding behind the excuses that he doesn’t have the votes, and he will continue undermining Trump as it relates to either invoking the real taking filibuster or blowing up the filibuster.”

The staffer then added that the House should use the “leverage” at their disposal and not send the legislation back up to the Senate without reattaching the SAVE America Act to the NDAA, calling the inaction surrounding the legislation “political suicide.”

“The base is watching, and so is the president,” the staffer concluded. “This is an 80/20 issue. It’s political suicide for Republicans not to pass the SAVE America Act.”

AUTHOR

Pedro Rodriguez

Pedro Boccalato Rodriguez-Aparicio is a journalism fellow at the Daily Signal. Follow on X pedrobrodrigue7.

RELATED ARTICLES:

The Ghost of Graham Platner Will Haunt Establishment Democrats

Robed Tyrants Abuse the Law to Shield Pro-Transgender Medical Charlatans From Accountability

How One Duo Uses California Voting Rights Act to Flip Red Cities—With Your Tax Dollars

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Signal column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

The Trillion-Dollar Jihad Against the West

Melanie Phillips nails it here. My only criticism is the use of the term ‘islamist.’ I have pointed out repeatedly that Islamist and Islamism are western constructs, a fabrication, an artificial distinction. Islam is Islam. Nonetheless, she is closer to the truth than anyone else on the subject.

The trillion-dollar campaign to conquer the West

The Islamists are playing the longest civilisational war game in the world

By: Melanie Phillips, Jul 10, 2026:

More and more information is surfacing to reveal that the Islamic holy war against the West isn’t just being waged on the battleground of the Middle East.

Even more significantly, it’s also being waged through a trillion-dollar influence campaign to colonise and subvert the Western mind, organised by extremists from the Islamic world.

These have tunnelled into the West through a vast civic infrastructure whose real purpose and sources of funding have been as well concealed, and in their own way are just as deadly, as the subterranean genocide factories in Gaza and Lebanon.

To those with eyes to see, it was obvious from the start that the hate marches springing into existence after October 7, 2023 — even while the Hamas-led atrocities were still going on — weren’t spontaneous protests against Israel.

They were instead a globally co-ordinated campaign to turn gullible Westerners into the unwitting army of Islamic jihad through support for the Palestinian cause.

An important new report by NGO Monitor shows that this post-October 7 protest infrastructure in Britain has used the signature liberal causes of humanitarianism and human rights to launder the Islamic jihad against the West.

The report found that, through a series of concentric circles, just six groups have been involved in more than 80 per cent of the major protests.

In the innermost circle sit the states hostile to the West: Iran, China, Russia and Qatar; terrorist organisations such as Hamas, Hezbollah and al Qaeda; and extremist religious-political movements like the Muslim Brotherhood.

Lapping around them are charities, campaign groups, protest movements and advocacy organisations that provide legitimacy for these hostile forces, amplify their propaganda and transmit extremism to society.

Out of 40 organisations mapped in the report, at least 11 have links to extremist groups or officials who have co-operated with Hamas, Hezbollah, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC), the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine and the Muslim Brotherhood.

US-based progressive foundations and far-left activist groups, such as the Open Society Foundation, Action Network, Cultures of Resistance and the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, are providing significant funding and support, facilitating donations and strengthening the British protests.

Some of these groups have helped inspire violence in the United States. Last month, US prosecutors indicted eight current and former students at the University of Michigan for conspiring to threaten university leaders, law enforcement, businesses and the Jewish Federation.

The indictment stated that one of the internet websites used by the defendants to spread their demands belonged to Palestine Action, the UK group that continues to attract passionate support from otherwise respectable, middle-class Brits despite having been proscribed by the government as a terrorist outfit.

Well-meaning, if ignorant, people continue to support such organisations on the naive assumption that they help the oppressed.

The Islamist programme to subvert the Western mind has relentlessly focused for years on universities and schools. The Institute for the Study of Global Antisemitism and Policy has just published another vitally important report, Institutional Capture, which documents how anti-West, Islamist Qatar has reshaped American education in a devastating programme of cultural infiltration.

Over the past 16 years, according to the report, Qatar Foundation International (QFI), the US member of the Doha-based Qatar Foundation for Education, Science and Community Development, has conducted a systematic campaign to embed itself within American educational institutions.

Deploying at least $65.3 million across 220 documented initiatives between 2009 and 2025, it has been a “manipulator of thought” in social studies, science, technology, engineering, arts and mathematics, as well as in youth engagement, professional development and social activism initiatives.

Through corporate restructuring and strategic partnerships, it has leveraged the reputation of host organisations to embed the Qatari viewpoint on the Middle East in educational materials served up to students in both universities and K-12 schools.

At national conferences for social studies educators, it has stacked the proceedings with presenters trained by QFI to present Qatari talking points.

The result has been an educational echo chamber that “casts doubt on Israel’s very existence, rejects curriculum that teaches students about the efforts to normalise relations between Israel and Arab states, and normalises and relativizes terrorism”.

This is the template for the Muslim Brotherhood’s long-term strategy for civilisational jihad against Western society, turning educational institutions into a weapon of war by shaping, producing and normalising ideological positions that fit the agenda of conquering the West for Islam.

It’s scant wonder, therefore, that the West has fallen victim to a psychotic madness about Israel’s fictitious perfidies — a malevolent narrative of demonisation that is in turn a Trojan horse for suicidal anti-Western loathing and contempt among the elites. Millions of people are being manipulated on a staggering scale.

America is beginning to grapple with this. In March, the House Committee on Education and the Workforce released nearly 900 pages of documents detailing two major American university partnerships in Qatar.

As the Jewish Institute for National Security of America observed in its own analysis of these documents last month, they showed that Qatar has “used complex funding contracts with American universities to acquire access to intellectual property, governance deliberation, academic credentialing and institutional reputation, which it has used to help support Islamist movements hostile to the United States and its allies”.

The release of those documents galvanised the introduction last month of legislation to ban federal funding to colleges that operate branch campuses in adversarial countries, or accept research funding for sensitive fields like artificial intelligence, biotech and quantum computing.

That’s a welcome development, but acute concerns still remain. This process of jihadi infiltration has been going on for decades. Successive British governments and US administrations have refused to acknowledge the civilisational threat that it poses.

In large measure, this is because the West can’t understand Islamic religious fanaticism. It assumes that everyone in the world is, like itself, governed by self-interest. So it simply can’t get its collective head around the fact that Islamists are apocalyptic and messianic, and believe they have a divine command to conquer Israel, America and the West for Islam.

US President Donald Trump seems to make the same mistake. True, none of us can know what’s in his mind. Maybe he really does understand the Islamists’ mindset and is playing a long game to reel them in.

But maybe he believes that the Iranian regime and other Islamists are driven by the same self-interest as in his own world, and that therefore he can end all such conflict through his supposedly unmatched “art of the deal”.

Such concerns are exacerbated by the extremely troubling financial links between members of Trump’s circle and Qatar. Rather than treating it as the enemy of the civilisation that it is, Trump has used Qatar as a trusted interlocutor in talks with Hamas, the Taliban and Iran. His apparently unshakeable belief in the universality of venal self-interest presumably explains his disbelief that the Iranian regime won’t accept that its devastating military losses mean it’s lost the war.

It explains his view that Gaza’s Islamist lions would obviously be turned into lambs by the prospect of the Strip’s transformation into a property developer’s Riviera paradise.

And it may explain his support for Turkey’s menacing Islamist president, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. According to Trump, Erdoğan almost entered the war in support of Iran and against America, but the US president talked him out of it. Now, Trump reportedly intends to reward him for this by selling him F-35 warplanes.

Taking his words at their face value (which may always be a mistake), this suggests that narcissistic fantasies prevent this American president from understanding what being an Islamist means.

So as Trump continues to give us all political whiplash by his on-off-on Iran war, and as the West allows its mouth to be stuffed with Qatari gold, the Islamists fight on — as they’ve done ever since the seventh century — playing the longest civilisational war game in the world.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

TAX THE RICH: Democrat NYC Council Approves Massive Pay Raise for Mamdani and Themselves

Somali Daycare Boss Featured in Nick Shirley Video Pleads Guilty in $4 Million Fraud Scandal

Democrat Nazi Rapist Platner Drops Out Of Maine Senate Race

Jihad Mamdani’s Top Adviser Led All-Out Push for Nazi Platner’s Senate Run

Khamenei’s Funeral and the AI Mirage of the Mourning Millions

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Democrat Socialists Shocking New Platform: Scrap the Senate, Gut the Presidency

In other words, gutting the three pillars of the American system of governance.

Who votes for these destroyers?

There’s a madness afoot and yet the Cook Political report moves 4 of 5 gubernatorial races toward Democrats.

WATCH: TERRIFYING: The Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) have released new policy platforms

Socialists launch radical platform to abolish the US Senate in bid to fundamentally transform America

The radical update also calls for amnesty for all immigrants and defunding the Department of War, sources say

By: Peter Pinedo, Fox News, July 10, 2026;

As many of its candidates notch electoral wins nationwide, the pre-eminent socialist political group in the U.S., the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), plans to roll out an updated platform that includes eliminating the Senate and replacing the president and the Supreme Court with an executive and judiciary chosen by Congress.

According to a source familiar with the DSA’s planning, the organization plans to roll out an update next week to its long-term vision for a U.S. policy platform. The update includes eliminating the U.S. Senate and replacing the president and the Supreme Court with an executive branch and judiciary chosen by and subordinate to Congress.

Additionally, the updated platform would include amnesty for all immigrants and defunding the Department of War.

This would be in addition to the DSA’s current policy platform, which calls for an “immediate end to all deportations,” free migration between countries without restrictive immigration controls, and “extending full voting rights to people with criminal convictions and noncitizens.”

Once considered a fringe movement on the Democratic Party’s progressive wing, the DSA has been gaining relevance, with several of its members toppling longtime establishment party figures. This has prompted many to speculate that the DSA represents the Democratic Party’s future.

While the DSA has endorsed the likes of Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., and Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., perhaps the most prominent member of the group is New York City socialist Mayor Zohran Mamdani. Mamdani, an immigrant from Uganda, burst onto the national consciousness this year after he defeated former Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo in 2025.

Since Mamdani’s victory, the DSA has continued to gain momentum, with endorsed candidates such as Melat Kiros of Colorado and Darializa Avila-Chevalier of New York, defeating sitting Democratic members of Congress in recent months.

These and other victories have emboldened the DSA, which touts itself as a “working-class alternative to the Democratic Party.” After a recent round of primary victories, the DSA proclaimed that “only socialism can solve decades of capitalist mismanagement in the U.S.”

The group added that “our newly elected leaders will fight for the working class — not for crumbs.”

Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and New York City Mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani hold hands during the town hall “Fighting Oligarchy” event at Brooklyn College on Sept. 6, 2025. (Angela Weiss/AFP via Getty Images)

In addition to radically altering the country’s three-branch form of government, the DSA’s existing platform also advocates establishing a 32-hour work week “with no reduction in pay or benefits,” the passage of Medicare for All, canceling all student loan debt, the elimination of cash bail and universal rent control.

In its program for 2025–2026, the DSA calls for a “new democratic constitution” that it says would establish civil, political, and democratic rights for all based on proportional representation in a “single federal legislature.”

If you don’t think these commies present a problem – think again:




City councils and county commissions (or equivalent)

Current (110)

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Alert: Dem Sen. Fetterman and GOP Sen. McCormick Launch Joint Fundraising Project, Adding to Speculation Fetterman Will Switch Parties Soon

Mamdani Lists ‘Little Palestine’ as Immigrant Enclave, Ignores ‘Little Italy’

NYC first lady joins Muslim women’s retreat in Corsica centered on Islamic faith and ‘Palestine’

German Cardinal Müller: Spread of Islam in Europe Leads Inevitably to Confrontation

RELATED VIDEOS:

Italian American Civil Rights League President Mike Crispi SLAMS NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani

How to Spot a Communist, 2026

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Dems Fight Trump’s Push to Secure Mail-In Ballots

After a year-long redistricting blitz, Republicans have moved on to phase two of their election strategy: securing Americans’ ballots. After the Supreme Court delivered a surprising blow to the GOP in June, allowing mail-in votes to be counted almost a week after Election Day, there’s an understandable concern that the upcoming midterms will be ripe for fraud. While conservatives are making a desperate push for the SAVE America Act to address some of that panic, that’s not the only play in the Right’s book.

President Trump, frustrated by the tight margins in the House and Senate that are bogging down these bills, has gotten creative with the problems plaguing our elections — issuing several executive orders and rules that would close the loopholes Democrats are using to undermine legitimate voters. Of course, the courts have put the brakes on some of the White House’s ideas, including one very interesting plan to involve the U.S. Postal Service (USPS).

Piggybacking on a March 31 EO, the administration instructed the USPS to oversee and streamline the states’ mail-in ballots, putting it in charge of “standardiz[ing] envelope design for mailed ballots” and helping states use “a unique barcode to track ballots, thus significantly reducing the chain-of-custody problem” that makes it easier to cheat. “The rule would also create, for the first time, a standardized, nationwide auditing mechanism for mail-in voting,” Alabama’s attorney general’s office points out.

Part of Trump’s order also required state governments to provide their voter rolls to the federal government. “This provision will help determine adherence to federal law and facilitate law enforcement efforts,” USPS noted. “For example, the provided lists will evidence how many ballots have been mailed, and allow law enforcement officials to compare the total number of mailed ballots to the total number of received ballots to detect potential issues meriting further investigation.” If a blue state refused to comply, it wouldn’t have access to mail-in ballots.

A federal judge in Washington claimed that the order would give the federal government too much control over elections and put the order on ice. That infuriated several state attorneys general, who argue that mail-in voting has compromised election results and destroyed trust. Led by Alabama’s Steve Marshall, 13 of those AGs rallied behind the rule in a letter that emphasizes the USPS’s role in protecting ballots across the country.

“States are the leaders in regulating elections,” Marshall underscored, “and yet despite our best efforts to enact policies to deter and detect fraud, voter fraud continues to be a problem. We appreciate the federal government lending a helping hand to shore up our elections and help states provide Americans with confidence in our system,” he and his counterparts continued. “We support the Service’s proposed rule in full. It addresses real vulnerabilities inherent in mail-in voting, responds to legitimate and widespread public concerns about federal election integrity, and equips states with tools that strengthen their own oversight capabilities without displacing their authority. We urge the Service to promptly finalize the rule.”

Katherine Robertson, the chief counsel to AG Marshall, lamented that this is remotely controversial. “I think it’s very clear by the litigation against this rule so far that it has really become a red state, blue state issue,” she told “Washington Watch” guest host and former Congressman Jody Hice. “And you hate to think that election integrity is so polarizing and so partisan, but that is clearly the case. You saw a bevy of blue states immediately come in and sue. And you have to ask yourself, why is that? Why is it that the red states want election integrity, and the blue states don’t? And I think, you know, unfortunately, I think we all know the answer to that.”

As FRC Action’s Matt Carpenter told The Washington Stand, “Mail-in ballots are the main area of concern for Americans worried about the integrity of our elections. During the COVID era, we saw their use increase dramatically as emergency rules were implemented to expand access to them. Since then,” he continued, “we have seen proposals, and in some states, new laws, to enhance voter identification for those using mail-in ballots, and now we have a solid proposal to enhance the chain of custody issues at the heart of fraud with mail-in ballots. This move by Attorney General Marshall would immediately give Americans who choose to use mail-in ballots confidence that their votes will not just make it into the final count, but also will not be offset by potentially fraudulent mail-in ballots.”

Incredibly, 24 blue and purple state AGs are going to the mat to stop the USPS — or any government agency — from safeguarding the midterm elections in court. Oregon’s Dan Rayfield (D) griped that “President Trump wants to turn letter carriers into election gatekeepers,” and according to him, “that’s not a role the Postal Service was built for.”

Robertson disagrees, explaining that this is one of the powers the president has. “You know, he’s waiting on Congress to act on the SAVE Act, but he’s got tools at his disposal as the leader of our executive branch of government. And so, this particular rule is designed to utilize the authority of the United States Postal Service to strengthen the integrity of that part of voting. Obviously,” she acknowledged, “lots of ballots are cast by mail, absentee ballots, and otherwise. And so, what he’s proposed to do is to keep a national list, a national voter registry, that has to be checked before a ballot can be mailed out. And then he has proposed a barcode system that would help track ballots to ensure that they’re getting from point A to point B in a way that maintains ballot security. The states’ reaction to that — or at least the 13 states that joined our letter, is to say, ‘Thank you for being willing to do the part … that we cannot secure on our own.’”

In the meantime, multiple lawsuits over the idea are already in process in the most radically leftist states. “So there’s a long road ahead,” Robertson concedes. “[And] what’s interesting about this rule is that it is still in the comment period. This rule has not even been finalized yet. And yet, they’ve rushed in to prejudge.”

Regardless, she and others persist. “I think the goal would be to get this rule implemented and implemented quickly. But this is a fight not just for the next election. It’s a fight for future elections. … So we’re here for the long run,” Robertson vowed.

AUTHOR

Suzanne Bowdey

Suzanne Bowdey serves as editorial director and senior writer at The Washington Stand.

RELATED ARTICLE: Platner Drops Out of Maine Senate Race following Sexual Assault Allegations

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2026 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

Illegal Alien Child Predator Pardoned by Tim Walz Deported After Marco Rubio Intervenes

Just when you might think Minnesota Gov “Tampon Tim, Stolen Valor” Walz and AG Keith “the wife beating Muslim & Somali Cover-up expert”  Ellison couldn’t possibly be any more corrupt there is this.


Illegal Alien Child Predator Pardoned by Tim Walz Deported After Marco Rubio Intervenes

An illegal immigrant child rapist who was granted clemency this past week by Democratic Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz has been deported.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio intervened on behalf of the public to ensure that other children are safe after the foreign national predator was released from prison.

Tou Lue Vang, 42, of Laos, was convicted of sexually abusing a child years ago and was granted a pardon in June.

He was convicted of first-degree criminal sexual conduct against a child two decades ago, according to KMSP-TV.

The deviant pleaded for clemency last year.

Vang said at the time, “The shame and regret carry, especially as my children have grown older and learned about my past, run deep. If it were possible to undo what happened, would do so without hesitation.”

Vang had been in the U.S. since 1994.

His removal was ordered in 2006 after he was convicted.

The Department of Homeland Security laid into Walz and other Minnesota Democrats this week after Vang was released from prison.

“The Minnesota Clemency Review Commission voted to grant a pardon for Tou Lue Vang, a criminal illegal alien from Laos. Vang had been convicted in 2006 of first-degree criminal sexual conduct,” the agency said in a press release.

Continue reading.

©2026 . All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Florida Attorney General Calls to Impeach Judge Who Acquitted Murderous Mother

Illegal Alien Child Predator Pardoned by Tim Walz Deported After Marco Rubio Intervenes

Suicidally Empathetic Young Woman Beaten, Suffocated in Ireland as Palestinian Boyfriend Believed to Have Fled Country Hours After Murder

Maryland Man Sentenced to Prison for Scheming to Join ISIS, Sought to Kill ‘Jews and People Who Support Israel’

The Trump Trap

All the pundits agreed that Trump gave away the store to the Iranians with the June 17 Memorandum of Understanding.

He pledged to lift sanctions on Iranian oil exports and to release frozen oil revenues. He pledged to encourage Iran’s Gulf neighbors to pony up $300 billion in a reconstruction fund. He even pledged not to interfere in Iran’s domestic affairs.

The Iranians took all of that to the bank.

And then, nothing.

In fact, the Trump MoU set a trap. And the IRGC fell into it. And that is why we’ve had several days of intense U.S. (and perhaps Kuwaiti and Bahraini) bombings of Iran this week.

The MoU was performance based. You, the Iranians, will get all these goodies, but you have to do some very basic things, the first of which is to guarantee free navigation through the Strait of Hormuz for sixty days. And the Iranians — specifically, the IRGC — just couldn’t do it.

They thought that with the MoU the haggling had just begun. They tried to redefine what “freedom of navigation” and “no tolls” meant. They tried to force ships to use a new transit corridor fully within Iranian territorial waters, the so-called “northern route.”

And the U.S. said, no.

Without fanfare, the US Navy and the UAE have been escorting ships through a U.S.-protected “southern route” for the past three weeks, with great success. Despite the latest military flare-up, the oil markets are yawning. Brent crude has been trading on the spot market in the low 70s all week, and West Texas Intermediate is below $70/barrel.

Until the Treasury Department revoked Iran’s special license to sell oil earlier this week (because of the IRGC attacks on shipping), Iran had managed to load 67 million barrels of crude onto tankers and get most of it out through the Strait into international waters, where it is still looking for buyers.

Sanctions relief didn’t provide the immediate adrenaline boost the regime had counted on. And so the IRGC said, let’s use the cattle prod.

Long term, the Iranians are never going to give up their uranium. None of it. One of their state TV networks last week broadcast an AI image of a mushroom cloud rising from an unnamed city after a nuclear attack. Nuclear weapons remain their goal. They just thought, mistakenly, that the Trump MoU was another Obama nuclear deal that would allow them to achieve it.

Satellite photographs from late June show recent construction at one of the four major Iranian nuclear sites, Pickaxe Mountain, south of Natanz. Thanks to David Albright and his team at the Institute for Science and International Security, we now know that the Iranians have erected chicanes on the access roads in an attempt to make any evacuation of whatever is beneath the mountain by US Special Forces more difficult.

This also indicates that Iran is storing part or all of its HEU stockpile in this previously undisclosed (and unbombed) site. Unless, of course, the chicanes are a deception.

Foreign Minister Aragchi, one of the two “negotiators” meeting with Witkoff and Kusher, reportedly told the Americans this week he can’t convince the IRGC to stop attacking ships in the Strait of Hormuz.

For his efforts, Aragchi was forced by pro-regime hard-line protestors to flee one of the multiple funeral processions for the defunct Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei, after being greeted with chants of “traitor.”

Trump is clearly losing patience with Aragchi and Qalibaf. While at the NATO summit in Ankara this week he called them “scum” and “a cancer” that “had to be removed.” But— but — on Thursday as he was returning to Washington he said the Iranian negotiators had called him again, begging to make a deal.

Even the  Chinese are losing patience with the Iranians. On Friday, their Foreign Ministry spokesperson told the Iranians to knock off the attacks on international shipping and get back to the MoU. Sounds like the Chinese prefer secure oil supplies to chaos and the Imam Mahdi.

Aragchi and Qalibaf have been able to sell the carrots of the Trump MoU, but not the sticks that require IRGC performance.  As I have been saying for some time, I believe we are heading back to war — the big war, not negotiating with bombs, as we have been doing this week.

The big war means the discombobulator. It means dislocation. It means destruction of the IRGC. It means revolution.

I discuss all this, as well as the latest in the war in Ukraine and this week’s NATO summit in Ankara, on Prophecy Today Weekend. As always, you can listen live at 1 PM on Saturday on 104.9 FM or 550 AM in the Jacksonville, Florida, area, or internationally by using the Jacksonville Way Radio app.

Yours in freedom.

©2026  . All rights reserved.


Website: kentimmerman.com

Ken Timmerman’s 14th book of non-fiction, THE IRAN HOUSE: Tales of Revolution, Persecution, War, and Intrigue, can be ordered by clicking here or by viewing my author’s page, here. 

Raising Olives in Provence, can be ordered by clicking here.

The Ungrateful Urban Class Turning Into the New Democratic Socialist Party

Editor’s note: This is a lightly edited transcript of today’s video from Daily Signal senior contributor Victor Davis HansonSubscribe to our YouTube channel to see more of his videos.


Hello, this is Victor Davis Hanson for the Daily Signal.

Who are these Democratic Socialists of America that are so frequently mentioned in the news? Are they traditional European socialists? Are they anarchists? Are they communists? I think they don’t mind if you label them any of those three rubrics.

But let’s go through a diagnosis, a methodology, a therapy, prognosis, as if we’re doctors looking at a malady or a disease.

So, first of all, what are their symptoms?

Well, their symptoms are they have an agenda that’s way out of the norm. And what is that agenda?

Well, one, they want open borders, amnesty for illegal immigration, and the conflation of citizenship and mere residency.

They want vastly higher taxes, including on unrealized profits and net worth, which is new. They want much more entitlements. They want a resurrection of DEI, and they believe in the Marxist binary that the country has no middle. It’s basically 30% who are not white who are oppressed, and they have legitimate claims for reparatory treatment from the 70 percent who are oppressors-victimizers.

They want the Green New Deal. They want an end to fossil fuels. They want to have a socialist economy. They want to appropriate, in some cases, private property, utilities, airlines they’ve mentioned, private wealth.

They have a foreign policy that would disconnect us from probably Europe, unless Europe is completely communist or socialist.

But they especially are angry at Israel. They want no relationship whatsoever with Israel, and that is a thinly cloaked symptom of a deep antisemitism that they share. They can’t seem to erase their social media accounts quickly enough to disguise their past antisemitic remarks.

They have an anti-white theme that you see as well.

So, they want to align us with what I would call nations from the former Third World. That’s their symptomatology, and that tells us who these patients are.

Who are they? Who makes up the Democratic Socialists of America?

It’s roughly three groups.

No. 1, they’re urban people. They’re all urban people, whether it’s Denver or whether it’s Houston or Austin or Knoxville or New York or LA or San Francisco or Boston.

They’re urban creatures. They’re consumers. They’re not producers of things. They don’t know where their water, their food, or their fuel comes from.

And many of them, one-third of their support, I would imagine, are upscale white elites who went to college.

Most of them are degreed. About 60% or 70% of them are degreed, but they’re degreed in the social sciences for the most part: psychology, sociology, community studies, public policy.

And then they either have majors or minors as well in ethnic studies, peace studies, leisure studies, environmental studies.

These are not marketable degrees. So, they have large student debt. Their degrees show that they’re not educated, they’re not analytical, they’re not empirical, and they’re not applicable to the job market, and they live in very expensive urban environments.

And that means they cannot afford rent or to buy a home, much less. They can’t get married, they can’t have children, and they’re angry that the world didn’t appreciate their genius and didn’t work out.

There’s a second group.

These are immigrants, first and second generation, from what we used to call the former Third World, from Africa, the Western Hemisphere, the Caribbean, Asia, etc.

And they tend to come from failed states, mostly because, ironically, of communism or socialism.

Places like Haiti, places like Somalia, places like the Middle East, Palestine, places like Peru or Venezuela or Colombia or Mexico.

And they come up here.

Originally, their parents came to get out of those systems, and that’s the irony of it. They want to destroy the very system that they fled and reenact the system that they left behind that made them so impoverished and unsafe.

But they come up here and they are told by the universities and the media and the popular culture the United States was bad. It’s got worse, and now it’s terrible.

And they feel that, career-wise and culturally, it makes sense to join the Left because they don’t have a lot of money initially, and they’re going to get a lot of entitlements, and they’re going to get a lot of support from left-wing entitlement vested interests.

There’s a third group.

And that’s the DEI people.

These are people who identify that they’re in the 30% of victimized, and they want more affirmative action, more reparatory treatment.

All of them, again, are urban.

All of them are angry at the Democratic Party because they feel they lost power for the Left. They lost power in the White House, the Congress, the Supreme Court, and they blame them for allowing Donald Trump to take power away from them.

Their methodology is not to run in purple or red states for the most part, and not to run, for the most part, statewide Senate races.

They select blue cities and blue local elections, and they count on an off-year 7% to 10% or 15% support of the total residents or registered voters.

They feel they’re better organized, they’re better funded, and they’re more coherent than traditional Democrats, and they can win if the Democrats take them for granted, and they have in these primaries.

If they stay in their confines, in their neighborhoods that are, as I mentioned, these three constituencies, I don’t think that James Talarico will win in Texas.

I don’t think Graham Platner, I’m speaking today on Tuesday, I don’t think he will survive over the weekend.

And I do not think Mr. [Abdul] El-Sayed in Michigan can win.

So, they haven’t proven yet that they can win a statewide race, even in a purple state, much less a red state.

Let me just finish by offering a prognosis.

Traditionally, America had no stomach for communism, Marxism, statism.

Eugene Debs, the socialist of the ’20s and ’30s and at the turn of the century, he lost five consecutive races.

The American Communist Party, the American Socialist Party, were defunct.

They believe they can reenact socialism-communism because immigration has now brought in 53 million people who were foreign-born, 16% of the population.

And they say that, with mail-in voting, no voter ID, same-day registration and voting, they can reach their constituencies, legal or illegal perhaps.

And then especially they have confidence that 50 years of K-12 and higher education has indoctrinated two or three generations more toward the socialist or communist point of view.

So, they think, well, in the past, our message never resonated, but we’re different.

The good news is if they try a third-party candidacy, it never works.

Not Pat Buchanan on the right, Ross Perot on the right, not Ralph Nader on the left, none of these, Dennis Kucinich, none of that works.

So, there’s no third party that they can have an avenue.

Anytime either party has nominated a presidential candidate or senators—take, for example, Barry Goldwater in 1964 or George McGovern in 1972—who were felt to be by the independent middle-class voter on the extreme, they not only lost, they destroyed their party in the process.

And that’s good news.

The bad news is if they’re not exposed—that is, their agenda is not exposed—and people are not informed who funds them, and we don’t understand how they operate, they could surprise us and they’re gaining more momentum.

They have the media and the popular culture on their side.

And if you look at other contemporary Leftist movements, they are much better organized and more coherent than “the squad” or the Congressional Black Caucus or La Raza Caucus, any of those extreme groups.

They know when to be violent and when not to be violent much better than BLM or Antifa.

And they’re much more organized and serious than third-party candidates on the Left like Ralph Nader in the past.

So, the key is not to take them for granted, but also not to be unduly afraid of them.

We still have no tradition of accepting socialists and communists, and I don’t think that’s changed, no matter what their grand dreams are that it has.

So, the point is, talk about it, expose who they are, talk about their agendas, talk about their radicalism, and then get out to vote and raise money against them and they will not be a serious or existential threat.

We publish a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of the Daily Signal.

AUTHOR

Victor Davis Hanson 

Victor Davis Hanson is a Daily Signal senior contributor, hosting a podcast, producing video commentaries, and writing a weekly column. He is the author of “The Counterrevolution The Fall and Rise of Donald Trump and the MAGA Movement.” Follow on X VDHanson.

RELATED ARTICLES:

California Was Once the American Dream. Now It’s Ranked the 3rd Worst State to Move To

Mamdani Erases Little Italy … and (Of Course) the Jews

Ilhan Omar Aims at Repealing Alien Enemies Act, Blocking Military Force Against Designated Terrorist Organizations

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Signal column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Failed Obama Has-Been Rahm Emanuel Launches Vicious Attack on Netanyahu in Tel Aviv speech

The now irrelevant Obama has been means to get into the 2028 Presidential race. How does he make waves and get publicity? By attacking the Jewish state. Sick.

The Democrat party is now officially the party of Jew hatred. This is the hill they are prepared to die on.

The former failed mayor of Chicago and Obama chief of staff Rahm Emanuel blasted Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu in a loathsome speech at Tel Aviv University. Emanuel seeks to improve his credibility with Jew-haters in the U.S, so that he can boost his upcoming presidential campaign. The useful idiot Emanuel hates Netanyahu because he will not allow the genocidal Palestinian Authority to establish a terror state in Judea and Samaria. Fortunately, few in Israel care what Emanuel says. And Emanuel’s chances of being elected POTUS are slim to none.

Rahm Emanuel: ‘Israel will become a prisoner of its own tools’

By The Hill, July 8th, 2026

Former U.S. Ambassador to Japan Rahm Emanuel on Wednesday tore into Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, saying in a speech at Tel Aviv University that the prime minister has put Israel on the path of becoming “a prisoner of its own tools.”

Emanuel praised Israel’s achievements since it was established in 1948. He said the county he “grew up believing in was about making the impossible real. Having built the imagination and the tenacity to make the desert bloom.”

But he issued a warning about its current trajectory.

“In the United States, we have a saying: ‘If all you have is a hammer, everything you look at is a nail,’” he continued. “Israel will become a prisoner of its own tools. Your military is a hammer, such that, to the prime minister, Netanyahu, every security challenge is a nail.”

Directing his attention to Netanyahu, Emanuel said the prime minister and his government “have led Israel to a dead end … without conditions, without demands, without consequences” from Washington, a reaction he said was a “mistake.”

Continue reading.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLE: Rahm Emanuel and the persistent delusion of failed policies

POSTS ON X:

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Pope Leo Welcomes New Migrants to Europe, and Not Every Catholic Is Delighted

And not every Catholic is delighted. Pope Leo XIV went to the Italian island of Lampedusa to greet a large number of migrants from North and sub-Saharan Africa; the video has been seen by more than a million people, and it has elicited more than two thousand mostly negative comments.

More on the smiling immigrant-favoring, interfaith-racketing Pope can be found here: “Pope Leo welcomes migrants to Europe while Vatican keeps fortress-like borders,” LifeSiteNews

Images of Pope Leo XIV welcoming African migrants to Europe has sparked outrage, as some accuse the Pontiff of encouraging the weakening of western nations while maintaining Vatican City as an impenetrable fortress that threatens illegal migrants with huge fines and lengthy prison sentences.

In a widely viewed video posted by EWTN, the Pope can be seen greeting a large group of migrants who had just made their way by boat to the Sicilian Island of Lampedusa. He also prayed at a cemetery there for migrants who died making the perilous journey.

The viral video has been seen over 1.1 million times while triggering nearly 2,000 mostly negative comments because of the Vatican’s longstanding hypocrisy on migration and open borders.

“The Church’s silence regarding the threats European Christians face is already deafening. Combining it with telling Europeans that they must do more to ‘integrate and protect migrants’, is adding insult to injury,” declared Eva Vlaardingerbroek, conservative European commentator and founder of the Save Europe Act, responding to the video….

“It is a painful slap in the face of the Christian native peoples of Europe and all those who lost their children and loved ones as a result of mass migration,” Vlaardingerbroek said….

Pope Leo XIV is a kind man, but too kind to those mostly Muslim migrants he has been welcoming and whose presence in Europe has been catastrophic for the indigenous peoples of the Continent. He was raised in the U.S. He spent fifteen years of his life in Peru. Europe is not central to his mental makeup, as it has been for every other Pope. He does not feel the threat of a demographically triumphant Islam’s transformation of Europe that Eva Vlaardingerbroek feels, and the late Pope Benedict felt, and tens of millions of Europeans who have now awakened to that threat, now feel. Perhaps he will at least give Cardinal Muller’s warning his attention. One does not expect. One hopes.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Trump hanged in effigy, pelted with water bottles at Khamenei’s funeral

The trillion-dollar campaign to conquer the West

Ireland: ‘Palestinian’ Muslim Man Beats His Pro-‘Palestinian’ American Lover to Death

Letter to U.S. Secretary of Transportation: Ban In-flight Islamic Prayers in U.S. Planes (Part 1)

No Room at the Inn: BDS Hotels in Europe That Won’t Accept Israelis or Jews

RELATED VIDEO: Reza Pahlavi: ‘We honor the fallen by finishing what they started. A free Iran is no longer a matter of hope. It is a matter of fact.’

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.