The Ten Plagues of Socialism

  1. DECEPTION
  2. DISCRIMINATION
  3. DEATH
  4. DEPRIVATION
  5. DENIAL
  6. DESTITUTION
  7. DELUSIONS
  8. DARKNESS
  9. DREAD
  10. DISGUISE

Socialism artfully deceives its consumers with promises unkept — Just ask the true survivors of socialism.

Socialism is anti-social, discriminating against minorities throughout history, subjugating them, and/or eliminating them.

Socialism is inseparable from mass deaths of minority peoples and dissidents.

Socialism means mass deprivations of societal norms and necessities — Just watch the levels of poverty in socialist countries.

Socialism denies basic humanity of minority persons and their fundamental needs.

Socialism discrimination causes destitution.

Socialism uses illusions that bring delusions of a good life that turns very bitter and filled with daily hardships – working in jobs assigned to the people without freedom of choices.

Socialism is a kind of dark religion that everyone is forced to believe without objections or receive exile from society or other drastic punishments.

Socialism inflicts dread on those forced to obey orders from corrupt leaders or suffer confinements and indescribable punishments.

Socialism has many disguises like democratic socialism to entice youths, in particular, to imagine a freer or better life for themselves until they are trapped inside of anti-social socialism and unable to leave at will as were Jews in the Soviet Union for decades forbidden to leave their lives of desperation.

“Some came with sledgehammers, some just with their bare hands. On the night of November 9, 1989, jubilant crowds began tearing down the Berlin Wall, an infamous barrier dividing families, a city, a nation. Even as we celebrate that iconic moment, the moral meaning of the Berlin Wall is little understood.

“The Berlin Wall was built and murderously enforced in the name of a profoundly destructive political idea, which, alarmingly, many today are embracing….”

WHAT MORE IS THERE TO KNOW?

©2025 All rights reserved

RELATED ARTICLES:

The Berlin Wall and the evil of socialism

Zohran Mamdani visited Brooklyn mosque whose cleric called for ‘annihilation of Israel’

Brooklyn Sermon: Allah, Guide The Mujahideen’s Shooting | MEMRI

Statistics: ‘Sanctuary’ Policies Saw 25K Illegal Immigrants Released from Jails to Streets

A new study is revealing one of the greatest dangers that “sanctuary” cities and states pose to the public: allowing murderers and rapists to roam the streets. The Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) analyzed new statistics from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and found that between October 1 of 2022 and February 6 of 2025, over 25,000 illegal immigrants arrested for crimes in “sanctuary” jurisdictions were released back into the public, instead of being handed over to ICE. Of the illegal immigrants released, 72 were charged with or convicted of homicide.

Broken down by state, California led the way by releasing 13,025 illegal immigrants from jails (52% of the 25,283 released nationwide), while Illinois trailed behind at 2,946, followed relatively closely by Virginia at 1,601. Other states that released a high volume of illegal immigrants from jails include Massachusetts (1,324), Connecticut (1,153), New York (873), Minnesota (873), North Carolina (508), Pennsylvania (486), Maryland (384), Colorado (295), New Jersey (239), Kentucky (192), New Mexico (157), Wyoming (155), Indiana (139), and South Carolina (111).

Santa Clara Main Jail in California released a total of 2,981 during the studied period. Cook County Jail in Chicago released 1,804, and Fairfax County Adult Detention Center in Virginia released 1,151. Of the 30 jails that freed the most illegal immigrants, 18 are located in California. Jails in California also let 29 illegal immigrants go with homicide charges or convictions, and Illinois jails released 28. Other jails responsible for releasing illegal immigrants with homicide charges or convictions were located in Arkansas, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin.

The study’s author and director of policy at CIS, Jessica Vaughan, told The Washington Stand that “sanctuary” policies — which largely shield illegal immigrants from prosecution or investigation on the basis of their noncitizenship and refuse or prohibit cooperation with ICE and other agencies in enforcing federal immigration law — often “attract” illegal immigrants to “sanctuary” jurisdictions.

“When a state or local government provides benefits and services to illegal aliens, it becomes well known among the migrant networks,” Vaughan said. “New York, Boston, and Denver are the latest examples, where we saw thousands of newly-arrived illegal border crossers flock to these cities under the Biden years, because these cities were offering hotel rooms, meals and other services.” She added that “criminal aliens also pay attention to local sanctuary policies, not so much for free hotel rooms, but because they know that they are not going to be turned over to ICE if they are arrested for a local crime, and they discuss this openly with reporters, local detectives, and prosecutors.”

“Sanctuary” cities have proven to be an obstacle for President Donald Trump’s mass deportation program. Just days after Trump returned to the White House, officials in Chicago began working to undermine ICE raids and shield illegal immigrants in the city. When ICE raids hit Los Angeles, the City of Angels erupted in violent riots. So far, Trump and his deputies have filed lawsuits against both Chicago and Los Angeles, two of the three largest “sanctuary” cities in the country, and the state of New York, where officials have implemented “sanctuary” policies.

“Trump has several options to try to discourage or block sanctuary policies, and he is exercising these options,” Vaughan told TWS. “He can bring lawsuits to try to obtain injunctions against these state and local policies. Those lawsuits will take some time to play out, but several have already been initiated, including most recently in Los Angeles.” She continued, “In addition, Trump can withhold certain kinds of federal funding to states and localities that interfere with immigration enforcement, such as by prohibiting cooperation.”

Vaughan noted that the Big Beautiful Bill “included a provision saying that certain grantees for law enforcement funding must comply with a provision in federal law that prohibits policies that block communication and cooperation with federal immigration agencies. Trump should also work with Congress to clarify the legal issues surrounding state and local cooperation with ICE.” She added, “I would also like to see a provision in the law to deny tax-exempt status for bonds issued by sanctuary jurisdictions to finance local spending projects, and one to allow victims harmed by sanctuary policies to sue the state and local government for damages.”

Brandy Perez, a researcher with the Heritage Foundation’s Border Security and Immigration Center, told TWS, “Sanctuary policies prioritize illegal aliens which endangers communities and make Americans pick up the check. By deliberately obstructing federal immigration enforcement efforts, local officials politicize public safety and increase the national security risk that illegal immigration poses.” Perez noted that “sanctuary” jurisdictions violate federal law “by refusing to share information with ICE or honor detainers, resulting in the release of dangerous individuals back into American neighborhoods. President Trump can push back by revoking federal funds for sanctuary states and enforcing mandatory detention…” She emphasized, “Sanctuary jurisdictions should be held accountable for their dangerous policies that upend public safety and undermine federal law.” Perez added, “State legislatures must also bring their statutes to level with federal immigration code, and ban sanctuary policies, to prevent any of their political subdivisions or law enforcement agencies from shielding illegal aliens.”

AUTHOR

S.A. McCarthy

S.A. McCarthy serves as a news writer at The Washington Stand.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Trump ‘Was Right’ on Immigration, John Kerry Says

‘Have To Own This’: Jonathan Turley Says Democrats, Media Have ‘Bill That Is Coming Due’ Over Anti-ICE Violence

Dem Infighting Explodes As Hakeem Jeffries’ Team Bites Back At Mamdani Allies

EXCLUSIVE: California university confirms attempts to shield illegal students, staff from deportation

RELATED VIDEOS:

‘LOSE-LOSE SITUATION’: Victor Davis Hanson Explains How Far Left ‘Bitten By Their Own Creation’

Criminal Illegal Alien Lina Maria Orovio-Hernandez received MORE THAN $400,000 in stolen federal benefits

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2025 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

Democrat Party Endorses Global Jihad and Annihilation of the Jews

The DNC Chairman Ken Martin was asked about Zohran Mamdani’s refusal to condemn “globalize the intifada,” he responded by saying the DNC is a “big tent party.”

Democratic Party adopts “globalize the intifada” as acceptable language via its DNC Chair.

Top Democrats are being asked about how they feel about Zohran Mamdani and his past controversial attitudes towards the state of Israel. It’s now confirmed: Democrats are the antisemitic party, who apparently think that having those who wish death upon Jewish people is a winning political move (via Fox News):

‘Big tent party’: DNC chair shrugs off Mamdani’s refusal to condemn ‘globalize the intifada’ slogan

DNC chair Ken Martin said building a winning coalition means embracing differing perspectives like those from Mamdani

By: By Alec Schemmel, Fox News, July 11, 2025:

Ken Martin, the chair of the Democratic National Committee (DNC), dismissed concerns over NYC Democratic mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani’s unwillingness to explicitly condemn the slogan “globalize the intifada,” adding in an interview with PBS that the key to developing a winning coalition is through welcoming people with whom you disagree.

After Mamdani’s monumental upset in the Democratic primary election for New York City mayor over former Governor Andrew Cuomo, he garnered backlash for refusing to condemn a phrase used to describe violent Palestinian uprisings against Israel. The slogan, “globalize the intifada,” has become a rallying cry for anti-Israel protesters in the United States ever since Hamas’ Oct. 7, 2023 attacks against hundreds of innocent Israelis.

“There’s no candidate in this party that I agree 100% of the time with, to be honest with you. There are things that I don’t agree with Mamdani that he said, but at the end of the day, I always believe, as a Democratic Party chair in Minnesota for the last 14 years and now the chair of the DNC, that you win through addition,” Martin said during a Wednesday interview with PBS NewsHour.
placeholder

TOP DEMOCRATS, MEDIA DEMAND ZOHRAN MAMDANI CONDEMN ‘GLOBALIZE THE INTIFADA’ PHRASE

“You win by bringing people into your coalition. We have conservative-Democrats, we have centrist-Democrats, we have labor-progressives like me, and we have this new brand of Democrat which is the leftists,” Martin continued. “We win by bringing people into that coalition and at the end of the day, for me, that’s the type of party we’re going to lead. We are a big tent party.”

Martin conceded that sometimes this type of coalition building “leads to dissent and debate,” but, he noted, such “differences of opinion” should be celebrated and recognized as a way to move the party forward.

During a podcast last month, Mamdani referred to the controversial slogan as “a desperate desire for equality and equal rights in standing up for Palestinian human rights.” When given another chance to explicitly condemn the phrase on NBC’s “Meet The Press,” the NYC mayoral candidate once again refused to do so.

“We win by bringing people into that coalition and at the end of the day, for me, that’s the type of party we’re going to lead. We are a big tent party.”

Pro-Palestinian protesters

Anti-Israel activists hold banners that include, “globalize the intifada” during a protest commemorating ‘Nakba Day’ on May 15, 2025 in the Brooklyn borough of New York City. ‘Nakba Day,’ which means “catastrophe” in Arabic, is an annual day of commemoration for Palestinians to mark the expulsion from land that now makes up parts of greater Israel, which occurred during the 1948 Arab-Israeli War. (Photo by Alexi Rosenfeld/Getty Images)

“That’s not language that I use,” Mamdani told NBC’s Kristen Welker. “The language that I use and the language that I will continue to use to lead this city is that which speaks clearly to my intent, which is an intent grounded in a belief in universal human rights.”

When Welker doubled-down on whether Mamdami would “actually condemn” the slogan, which Welker pointed out a lot of people perceive as a call to violence against Jews, Mamdani responded that he has spoken with numerous Jewish New Yorkers about their fears of anti-Semitism and said he would be committing to increasing “anti-hate crime programming” in the city by 800%.
placeholder

“Ultimately, what I think I need to show is the ability to not only talk about something but to tackle it and to make clear that there’s no room for antisemitism in this city,” Mamdani responded. “And we have to root out that bigotry, and ultimately we do that through the actions, and that is the mayor I will be, one that protects Jewish New Yorkers and lives up to that commitment through the work that I do.”
NYC Democratic mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani, left; pro-Israel demonstration, right

Before turning to a different topic, Welker, for a third time, sought to get Mamdani on the record over whether he condemned the controversial slogan. “Why not just condemn it?” Welker asked.

“My concern is to start to walk down the line of language and making clear what language I believe is permissible or impermissible. Takes me into a place similar to that of the president who is looking to do those very kinds of things, putting people in jail for writing an Op-Ed, putting them in jail for protesting,” Mamdani responded. “Ultimately, it’s not language that I use, it’s language I understand there are concerns about, and what I will do is showcase my vision for this city through my words and my actions.”

Continue reading.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Everything you think about Gaza is based on a lie

Islamic State (ISIS) Tallies Attacks Worldwide In First Half Of 2025: 3,193 Dead And Wounded In 620 Operations, Somalia Tops Casualty List

Dem Infighting Explodes As Hakeem Jeffries’ Team Bites Back At Mamdani Allies

Iranian Group Places $40 Million Bounty on Trump’s Head, Urges ‘Every Cell of the Resistance in the West’

Terror Agitator Mahmoud Khalil Files $20 Million Dollar Lawsuit Against US Government

Zohran Mamdani and the Normalization of Jew Hatred and Jihad

UNIMAGINABLE Hamas Gang-Rape Horror Revealed in Shocking New Report: Terrorists stripped October 7 sex attack victims, tied them to trees and mutilated them during ‘systematic’ onslaught

Democrats Collude With Judges To Keep Allowing Noncitizens To Vote In U.S. Elections

CIVIL WARFARE: Rioters Open Fire, Attack ICE Agents in California, Assaults on ICE Agents Up 700%

Trump Admin Sanctions U.N. Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese for Spewing ‘Unabashed Antisemitism,’ Supporting Terrorism

POSTS ON X:

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Arab Clan Leader in Gaza Declares Open War on Hamas

Yasser Abu Shabab is the leader of one of the largest clans in Gaza, and is fighting against Hamas. More on him can be found here: “‘No stopping a civil war against Hamas,’ Gaza militia chief Abu Shabab tells KAN,” Jerusalem Post, July 7, 2025:

Yasser Abu Shabab, leader of the allegedly Israel-backed, anti-Hamas Popular Forces group, revealed to Israeli public broadcaster KAN on Sunday that his militia is actively working against Hamas in the Gaza Strip, particularly operating in the Rafah area.

“There is no stopping a civil war against Hamas,” Abu Shabab said in the interview.

He told KAN that those who comprise his militia do not belong to any political or organizational ideology. However, Abu Shabab told Army Radio in an interview last month that he denied working with Israel and confirmed his group’s relationship with the Palestinian Authority. In that interview, he said that he wouldn’t rule out cooperating with the IDF on issues such as humanitarian aid distribution in the future….

Abu Shabab may deny working with Israel, but he is believed to have accepted weapons from the IDF; for obvious reasons, he keeps quiet about that. And he knows that his forces, and the IDF, share a common goal: to fight against and destroy Hamas. He has also said that he could see his group cooperating with the IDF on the distribution of humanitarian aid and similar issues, no doubt including the rebuilding of hospitals and schools. He claims to be open to people of all ideologies — except for Hamas, which is the Gazan branch of the Muslim Brotherhood. He also said that he has a relationship to the Palestinian Authority, which is Hamas’ bitter enemy, but offered no details.

He’s blaming Hamas, not Israel, for the Gaza War, and the misery that the war that Hamas started on October 7, 2023 has brought to so many people in Gaza. The “aggression” he deplores is that of Hamas, not the IDF. It’s a remarkable statement from a Palestinian leader in Gaza.

Abu Shabab is known to be receiving military assistance from Israel. Financial assistance — to pay his men — may come from the Arab enemies of Hamas, including the Emirates and Saudi Arabia, whose leaders would not want a Gazan enclave ruled by an affiliate of the Muslim Brotherhood, an organization that is a direct threat to the Arab monarchies of the Gulf. Logistical support, however, could only come from the IDF, that has mapped out every part of Gaza and knows the positions, the weapons, the command-and-control centers, of all the forces belonging to Hamas.

Abu Shabab claimed that after Hamas leaves power, the Popular Forces will rule the enclave afterwards. “Hamas knows and understands this; the Popular Forces will be the heirs in Gaza after they are crushed and defeated,” KAN quoted him….

The Popular Forces is the name being given to the collective of local clans opposed to Hamas, of which the Abu Shabab’s clan is one part, albeit one of the most powerful.

Keenly aware of Hamas’ weakness, and of his own clan’s power — it has many hundreds of fighters, with more recruits, including non-family members, streaming in to join the group in its war with Hamas, and has been well provided with arms by the IDF — Abu Shabab is simply going to let the ultimatum pass. He knows Hamas is no longer capable of imposing its will on the powerful families like his own.

Hamas won’t dare to attack him when the ten-day ultimatum ends. It knows that if it is bloodied by Abu Shabab and his men, the humiliation will be so great as to efface completely whatever little authority it had left. Hamas doesn’t want to risk it. But in failing to enforce its own ultimatum, it will also be humiliated. In Gaza, what’s to come is still unsure, but one thing is certain: Hamas will be out of the picture, militarily and politically, and very likely, physically as well.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Democrat Party Endorses Global Jihad and Annihilation of the Jews

Mahmoud Khalil files $20,000,000 lawsuit against DHS, DHS says his claim is ‘absurd’

Islamic Republic of Iran: At least 20 cities ban dog-walking, Khamenei says keeping dogs ‘damages Islamic culture’

The BBC’s Relentless Anti-Israel Animus

Pakistan: Muslim murders his daughter for ‘honor’ over not deleting her TikTok account

India: Muslims Kill Hindu Youth During Muharram Procession in Bihar, Violence in Other States As Well

Muslims wave Islamic flags on steps of Helsinki Cathedral, surround Melbourne cathedral

Houthis Still Standing, But Israel Soldiers On

UK government tells public not to lay memorials for Southport attack anniversary

RELATED VIDEO: Does the Qur’an command Muslims to kill?

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

What really happened at the Trump-Netanyahu summit?

Sometimes the news is not what you hear, but what you don’t hear.

From what I can see, the Trump-Netanyahu White House meeting this week falls into the latter category.

There were no big statements and no joint press conference, something Trump loves to do whenever he has great things to announce — or great perfidy to expose (remember the Zelenskyy White House meeting?)

In his interview the next day with Fox Business host Maria Bartiromo, Prime Minister Netanyahu praised Trump repeatedly for the US efforts to take out Iran’s nuclear weapons capabilities.

Netanyahu called the 12-day war with Iran a “joint” effort, and praised the valor of the US B-2 pilots who flew the 37-hour long mission to bomb Iran’s underground enrichment site at Fordo into railway ballast.

All of this was music to Trump’s ears, of course. But there was more than just flattery.

Netanyahu talked cautiously of reaching a 60-day ceasefire with Hamas that would return half of the living and dead Israeli hostages, and of a follow-on deal that would totally eradicate Hamas.

But he was remarkably short on detail.

The media had been saying Trump was “summoning” Netanyahu to the White House — once again — to get him to stop the war in Gaza.

Trump was being hammered by the Saudis to get Israel to agree to a Palestinian state (Trump being “hammered’? Really?).

Once again, I think the pundits were wrong.

The last time the two met, the media was also saying Trump was going to pressure Netanyahu to ease up on Gaza. Instead, the two plotted their joint operation to take out the Iranian nuclear weapons capabilities.

That operation included significant strategic misdirection by the United States, starting with deception by President Trump himself, who reminded the Iranians that he was willing to talk, thought they wanted to talk, and said they could make a great deal that would benefit the Iranian people and the regime.

Instead, they got GBU-57s down the ventilation shafts of Fordo.

This president has shown he understands multi-dimensional warfare, as my military friends call it, from strategic misdirection and the tactical diversion of B2s the day of the bombing, to a knock-out blow bombing, using our biggest weapons against their weakest point.

Israel took out Iran’s air defenses, destroyed their ballistic missile launchers and manufacturing plants, and killed the heads of Iran’s nuclear and missile programs as well as leaders of the repressive apparatus. The U.S. then took out Fordo.

That is the new definition of “combined arms”: a US-Israel military coalition that will bring peace to the Middle East through an overwhelming demonstration of strength.

So what’s next? Hamas is on its last legs. A report from one of the remaining Hamas leaders, widely quoted in the Arab press, acknowledged that Hamas has been decimated, with 95% of its leaders killed and its ability to govern Gaza obliterated.

Rival Palestinian groups — not affiliated with the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank – are cooperating with the US-Israeli Gaza Humanitarian Foundation aid distribution effort, so Hamas mafia goons can’t steal the aid and resell it.

Rival Palestinian and Bedouin leaders are rising up and calling on the population to join the Abraham Accords and make a real peace with Israel. What a game-changer that would be!

I think big things are afoot, which explains the relative quiet surrounding the Trump-Netanyahu summit.

But what is the actual plan?

As wider heads than me have said, those who speak don’t know, and those who know don’t speak. So we shall have to wait and watch and listen.

I discuss this, as well as the latest from the war in Ukraine and the prospect for new sanctions on Russia, in this week’s Prophecy Today Weekend.

As always, you can listen live on Saturday at 1 PM on 104.9 FM or 550 AM in the Jacksonville, Florida area, or by using the jacksonville Way Radio app. You can listen to the podcast later here.

Yours in freedom.

©2025 . All rights reserved.


Ken Timmerman’s 14th book of non-fiction, THE IRAN HOUSE: Tales of Revolution, Persecution, War, and Intrigue, can be ordered by clicking here or by viewing my author’s page, here. 

Raising Olives in Provence, can be ordered by clicking here.

VIDEO: The Shadow War: Netanyahu and Trump vs. the Deep State

While the world watches the Trump-Netanyahu meetings in D.C., assuming they are focused mostly on Gaza, an underlying war for Israel’s future is unfolding behind closed doors, and it’s not just about Hamas or Iran. In a quiet but decisive alliance, Netanyahu and Trump are taking on the unelected deep states in both Jerusalem and Washington that have worked to sabotage their governments, paralyze military action, and undermine democratic control.

Pulse of Israel is a project of the 12Tribe Films Foundation. We rely on the generosity of our supporters to produce and promote our videos to cut through the noise and influence public opinion by amplifying the truth about Israel and the Jewish people.

Consider making a tax-deductible donation today.

RELATED ARTICLE: Deep State Steps Out of the Shadows, Using Their Regime Change Skills to Destroy Trump Presidency,“ CIA’s Simple Sabotage”

EDITORS NOTE: This Pulse of Israel video is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Gaza Ceasefire Inches Closer, but Israel Remains Committed to Defeating Hamas

Hamas’s genocidal war against Israel is proceeding so poorly that the masters of propaganda have now stooped to throwing grenades at aid workers. On Saturday, America suffered its first casualties in Gaza since Biden’s floating pier fiasco, when terrorists motivated by Hamas’s cash bounties threw grenades at two civilian contractors delivering aid to Gazans through the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF). Fortunately, the grenades failed to kill their victims, just as Hamas has failed to prevent GHF from delivering more than 60 million free meals to Gazans, thus undermining their authority.

Since Hamas’s militias are pulverized every time they face Israel Defense Forces (IDF) in open combat, the terrorist organization is reverting to familiar terrorist tactics, such as roadside bombs. On Monday night, Hamas killed five IDF soldiers and wounded 14 after remotely detonating three roadside bombs, then opening fire on forces who arrived to rescue the wounded. In late June, a Hamas militant killed seven IDF soldiers after throwing a bomb inside their armored vehicle. Since Israel ended its 12-day ceasefire with Iran, at least 17 Israeli soldiers have been killed in Gaza.

Such tactics and attrition may remind Americans of the circumstances that American soldiers faced as they tried to maintain order in Iraq after the downfall of Saddam Hussein. Some polls suggest that Israelis are also growing tired of a seemingly endless struggle, with around 70% of Israelis now supporting an end to the war in exchange for the release of all hostages.

At the same time, Israel’s campaign to clear and hold Gazan territory has gone relatively well. The IDF said on Friday that it now holds operational control over approximately two-thirds (65%) of the Gaza Strip. Whether the IDF presses through the remaining portion of Gaza, or Israel strikes a deal with Hamas, the time is ripe to hammer out a resolution to the war in Gaza.

On Tuesday morning, a senior Israeli official told reporters in Qatar that negotiators had already settled 80% to 90% of the terms for a new ceasefire. According to an Egyptian official, Hamas would release 10 living hostages and 20 dead hostages during the 60-day ceasefire. Hamas also agreed to hold no public humiliation spectacles before releasing them.

At first, Hamas objected to the ongoing operation of GHF in Gaza, since its operation discredits the terrorist organization, and the terror group cannot plunder its aid. But the two sides have reportedly struck a compromise, under which the U.N. and Palestinian Red Crescent will lead aid operations, but GHF would continue to operate.

Remaining areas of disagreement reportedly include the ongoing presence of IDF inside Gaza and the prospect for the ceasefire to turn into a permanent peace. “Israel wants Hamas gone. Hamas wants to retain power. So, right there, you get this conflict,” analyzed Family Research Council President Tony Perkins.

Of course, the more fundamental reason behind both Israel’s wish to expel Hamas and Hamas’s wish to cling to power is that Hamas is unwaveringly committed to the annihilation of Israel — as they demonstrated on October 7, 2023.

“The single biggest obstacle standing in the way of this [peace] is Hamas, and particularly Hamas’s possession of hostages, because the hostages are literally the only leverage Hamas has,” said Regent University professor A.J. Nolte on “Washington Watch” Tuesday. “The desire of the Israeli people is to bring them home … but they also recognize that, any deal you make, Hamas has a very high likelihood of breaking.”

Thus, the question persists of who will govern Gaza after Israel’s war with Hamas ends. “History will tell us that evil will fill a void there in the Middle East very rapidly,” Perkins predicted. “We’ve seen that happen before.”

The aforementioned Egyptian official said the current ceasefire proposal would “put Gaza under a group of Palestinians without political affiliations known as the Community Support Committee,” summarized The Times of Israel. Yet Israel is “not talking about giving up land this time,” Perkins pointed out. Although Netanyahu is willing that “Palestinians should have all the powers of governance,” he said, “Israel would have to retain control of security over Gaza,” which rules out the classic two-state solution.

During his trip to Washington, D.C. on Monday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also endorsed President Trump’s proposal to relocate the current population and turn the Gaza Strip into a luxury resort. “They want to give the Palestinians a better future,” he suggested. “I think we’re getting close to finding several countries [where they could go]. I think this will give them the freedom to choose. Palestinians should have it, and I hope we can secure it.”

Negotiations in Qatar have continued as Netanyahu’s stay in Washington enters its third day. After a Monday dinner meeting, a senior Israeli official said there was “full trust” and “total coordination” between American and Israeli leaders.

Israel has made some concessions, including a redrawn proposal to partially withdraw IDF troops from Gaza, which Arab diplomats attribute to U.S. pressure. Yet Israel has not budged on its core requirements, which include no permanent end to the war until Hamas is thrown out of Gaza.

Israel will only accept a future vision for Gaza in which “there is no more Hamas,” a senior official said Tuesday. “It has to lay down its weapons. Its people have given up. The leaders have been exiled. Another force has taken over the territory and prevents the use of weapons.”

When the remnants of Hamas’s battalions have exchanged any hope of victory for random attacks on aid workers distributing food to Gazans, the final expulsion of Hamas will be good for Gazans too.

AUTHOR

Joshua Arnold

Joshua Arnold is a senior writer at The Washington Stand.

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2025 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

‘We Will Not Be Intimidated’: Federal Prosecutor Says Those Who Assault ICE Agents ‘Will Go To Federal Prison’

Interim United States Attorney Bill Essayli of the Central District of California vowed Wednesday to prosecute anyone who assaulted United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents.

Democratic Mayor Karen Bass of Los Angeles showed up at a location where ICE was carrying out an operation Monday, demanding that the agents leave the vicinity, echoing previous demands from some Democrats that the agency cease its operations in the Los Angeles area as a way to “restore order” in the city after riots broke out following an ICE operation in June. Essayli told “Fox and Friends” guest co-host Griff Jenkins that Bass should have “changed the law” while she was in Congress.

“Let me be very clear what’s going on here,” Essayli told Jenkins. “You have the politicians in California are being openly hostile to the federal government. We are doing our job. We are enforcing federal immigration laws as written by Congress. If Karen Bass didn’t like the law, she should have changed it when she was in Congress.”

WATCH:

“But instead, what she’s doing is she’s signaling to the public that it’s okay to stand up stand up to federal agents to obstruct them, to impede them and some cases, to attack them,” Essayli continued. “This is why the military’s here. It is so critical we have the military protecting our agents. And to Ms. Bass, we will not be intimidated, we will not be deterred from accomplishing our mission.”

Since Friday, gunmen attacked a Border Patrol facility in McAllen, Texas, and an ICE office in Alvarado, Texas.

“When you look at the number of assaults just that my office here at the U.S. Attorney’s office has charged, it’s exploded,” Essayli said. “Almost every day, we are arresting people for assaulting our agents, damaging our vehicles, getting in our way. And then you saw over the weekend in Texas, you have ICE officers and federal agents get ambushed.”

“Officers were shot and you saw 10 people be arrested and indicted by the federal government there. They are escalating their tactics. What they are doing is not working,” Essayli continued. “And so my concern is things are going to escalate and people are going to get hurt. But I want to be very clear. If anybody gets in our way, if anybody touches our officers, you will be arrested, and you will be charged and you will go to federal prison. You can take that to the bank.”

AUTHOR

Harold Hutchison

Media Reporter

RELATED ARTICLE: ‘Just Unacceptable’: Border Patrol Chief Accuses Left Of Inciting Attacks

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All righs reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

Inciting Political Violence: The Hypocrisy of the Left

As people who live in a fallen world with prevailing hatred and violence, it’s great to see politicians speak out against these issues that run rampant in our country.

But many of the same hypocrites who tell us to strive for peace continue stirring division, strife, and anger through their words and actions. How can they vehemently cry for unity when their actions so obviously strive for discord?

Exposing the duplicitous statements of the Left is necessary to reveal their lack of consistency as a political party and ideological group.

‘Condemning Violence Is Important’

According to Senator Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), “Condemning violence is important, but it is not enough. We must also confront the toxic forces radicalizing individuals, and we must do more to protect one another, our democracy, and the values that bind us as Americans.”

What are the “toxic forces” he is referring to? Well, we could argue that Schumer himself acts as one of these “toxic forces” as he encourages unnecessary fear and hatred within his supporters by using inflamed and oftentimes false language.

When President Trump sent the U.S. Marines into the violent and devastated streets of California in the early days of June, Schumer posted on X, “Trump’s order deploying active-duty Marines to an American city is outrageous. It’s unnecessary. It reeks of authoritarianism. That’s what authoritarian dictators do.”

Comparing the President of the United States — the leader of the freest country in the world — to an “authoritarian dictator” such as Stalin or Hitler is one of the most obvious examples of a “toxic” force that can only be topped by some of the following statements of other Democratic leaders.

Schumer’s toxicity and violence-inducing language is clear in his X post about the recent altercation involving Senator Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) at Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem’s press conference. He wrote, “The way agents treated Senator Padilla is what you see in totalitarian regimes. It is outrageous that Secretary Noem let this happen, then lied about the incident after the fact.”

But the minority leader failed to mention that Padilla had the right to ask questions if he would’ve simply sat down and showed decorum like everyone else in the room, instead of rushing up to the podium and yelling at Noem as though being a senator makes him entitled to circumventing the press conference process.

‘The Culture of Violence … Must End’

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) posted on X, “The culture of violence that has been created by political extremists in this country must end” in response to the horrific shooting of two Minnesota state legislators.

If this is Jeffries’s belief, why does he seek to tear down the very agencies that protect the state he represents? “Every single ICE agent who’s engaged in this aggressive overreach and who are trying to hide their identities from the American people will be unsuccessful in doing that,” Jeffries claimed. “This is America. This is not the Soviet Union. We’re not behind the Iron Curtain. This is not the 1930s. And every single one of them, no matter what it takes, no matter how long it takes, will, of course, be identified.”

Other prominent democratic leaders followed Jeffries’s lead on this issue. Nashville Mayor Freddie O’Connell (D) doxed ICE agents, releasing information regarding interactions they had with Nashville emergency services, as well as some of their identities, making them subject to gang retaliation. Minnesota Governor Tim Walz (D), who formerly ran for vice president in the 2024 presidential election, said at his University of Minnesota Law School commencement speech, “[ICE Agents are] Trump’s modern-day Gestapo.”

But comparing a federal law enforcement agency to the political police force of the Nazi regime isn’t promoting a culture of violence? What do these Democrats think will happen when they consistently fill their listeners’ minds with this level of hateful propaganda?

‘Violence of Any Kind in Our Country Is Unacceptable’

Also responding to the tragic shooting of the two Minnesota state legislators, Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), stated, “Violence of any kind in our country is unacceptable. Political violence can unravel our increasingly fragile democracy.”

Yet Sanders consistently uses inflammatory language to convince his supporters and others on the Left that the greatest evil in our world is the President of the United States. Why? Because he’s a Republican. Sanders has said on X, “Trumpism isn’t just about oligarchy, authoritarianism & kleptocracy. It is the deeply held belief that the rich & powerful have the ‘divine right’ to rule.” Oligarchy? Authoritarianism? Kleptocracy? The government Sanders is referencing is the same government he was praising in 2024, but apparently, he changed his mind the moment Democrats weren’t in control.

Sanders also posted on X, “In 1776 brave Americans took on and defeated the most powerful despot in the world. In 2025 we will do the same,” to promote his appearance at the Kings rallies that took place on June 14. An interesting statement from someone who is so deeply worried about unraveling “our increasingly fragile democracy.”

‘Anti-Semitism Is a Threat to All We Hold Dear as a Society’

After the murders of two Israeli Embassy workers, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) wrote on X, “[W]e must be clear that hatred has no home here. Antisemitism is a threat to all we hold dear as a society. It must be confronted and rooted out everywhere.”

But in March of 2024, Ocasio-Cortez said in a speech on the House floor that Israel was committing “genocide” and had “crossed the threshold of intent.” And days after the one-year anniversary of the October 7 attack, Ocasio-Cortez posted on X “The horrors unfolding in northern Gaza are the result of a completely unrestrained Netanyahu gov… This is a genocide of Palestinians.”

Ocasio-Cortez also condoned the anti-Israel protests that endangered hundreds of Jewish students across America. In her Earth Day speech, she said, “It is especially important that we remember the power of young people shaping the country today of all days, as we once again witness the leadership of those peaceful student-led protests on campuses like Columbia, Yale, Berkeley and many others.”

‘[We Should] Recommit Ourselves to Civility and Respect in Our Politics’

The July 13 assassination attempt on President Donald Trump was a unifying moment for all parties. At least for a few hours. In response to the assassination attempt on President Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania, former President Barack Obama stated, “There is absolutely no place for political violence in our democracy. Although we don’t yet know exactly what happened, we should all be relieved that former President Trump wasn’t seriously hurt, and use this moment to recommit ourselves to civility and respect in our politics.”

Former President Joe Biden also notably stated, “This heinous attack motivated by politics should never happen in America. We must give hate and extremism no safe harbor, and we must all unite against political violence as a nation.”

And yet, the former president’s office replied affirmatively a few months later that Trump is a dictator. Asked if Biden believes Trump is a “fascist,” then-White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre answered, “I mean, yes … the former president has said he is going to be a dictator on Day 1. We cannot ignore that.”

“Civility and respect in our politics” are sentiments the Democratic Party clearly lacks. In the last few months, our country saw former FBI Director James Comey post — and then delete — a picture of shells depicting “8647,” with 86 commonly meaning to “get rid of” something, and 47 being a reference to the 47th president, Donald Trump.

We also saw Democratic Representative Al Green (Texas) stand up and shout during Donald Trump’s speech to Congress. Even after the respectful intervention of House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), who “issued a warning for order, banging the gavel,” and told Green to “Take your seat, sir!” the Texas congressman continued his disruption until he was removed from the House chamber.

And we witnessed the heated, disrespectful committee meeting where Democratic Representative Salud Carbajal (Calif.) said to Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, “You know what? I’m not going to waste my time anymore. You’re not worthy of my attention or my questions. You’re an embarrassment to this country. You’re unfit to lead. And there’s been bipartisan members of Congress that have called for your resignation. You should just get the hell out and let somebody competently lead this department.”

These are just a few examples of the aggression, hatred, and lack of propriety that run rampant amongst the Democratic Party. Where is the peace, decorum, and tolerance that they keep talking about? As they say, “Rules for thee, but not for me.”

AUTHOR

Caily Shriver

Caily Shriver serves as an intern at Family Research Council.

RELATED ARTICLE: Illegals Invade Hospital ER… ICE Deports ‘Entire Building’ in 37 Mins

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2025 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

Democrats Are Telling Their Representatives They Want BLOOD In the Streets

Axios has a blockbuster story about how Democrat Party activists are literally asking for blood in their fight against Trump. Democratic lawmakers are getting a harsh reality check, according to a new Axios report that claims many of their voters want violence. Not just any old Democratic Party violence, either – but the blood of the electorate.

Just like their pre-civil war Southern Democrat predecessors, they are braying for blood, itching for civil war to ensure slavery continued. Same party, same fight – now they want bloodshed in defense of oppression, suppression of individual rights, destruction of equality for all before the law and the ruin of our nation.

Don’t expect the dying, legacy media to report on this. They are complicit.

(Axios):  Many lawmakers said these voters tend to be white, well-educated and live in upscale suburban or urban neighborhoods. “What I have seen is a demand that we get ourselves arrested intentionally or allow ourselves to be victims of violence, and … a lot of times that’s coming from economically very secure white people,” said an eighth House Democrat. “Not only would that be a gift to Donald Trump, not only would it make the job of Republicans in Congress easier if we were all mired in legal troubles … [we are] a group that is disproportionately people of color, women, LGBTQ people — people who do not fare very well in prison.” The bottom line: “The expectations aren’t just unreal. They’re dangerous,” the eighth House Democrat said. (Axios)

David Strom: Remember when democracy itself was at stake if Trump won? The Democrats weren’t kidding–their view is that unless they win by democratic means, they will use other means to get their way. (Hot Air).

Democratic Lawmakers Disturbed as Their Own Voters Demand Violence: ‘There Needs to Be Blood’

By Johnathan Jones, Western Journal, July 7, 2025:

Democratic lawmakers are getting a harsh reality check, according to a new Axios report that claims many of their voters want violence.

Not just any old Democratic Party violence, either – but the blood of the electorate.

Axios quoted several Democrats who were stunned by the rhetoric they’re now hearing from their own base in a piece that was published early Monday morning.

One of nine House Democrats who spoke to Axios off the record said, ”Some of them have suggested … what we really need to do is be willing to get shot.”

The lawmaker added, “Our own base is telling us that what we’re doing is not good enough … [that] there needs to be blood to grab the attention of the press and the public.

These weren’t isolated statements.

Axios noted that multiple Democratic lawmakers and aides said they were alarmed by the number of rank-and-file party voters who had told them in recent months that violence was the answer to what they viewed as America’s political crisis.

The publication added that some of these voters said they were fed up with what they viewed as a system that is stacked against them.

Statements Democrats were willing to make without their name attached to them include, but are not limited to:

“[Civility] isn’t working…”

“[Prepare for violence] … to fight to protect our democracy.”

“It’s like … the Roman coliseum. People just want more and more of this spectacle.”

“What I have seen is a demand that we get ourselves arrested intentionally or allow ourselves to be victims of violence, and … a lot of times that’s coming from economically very secure white people.”

No one should be surprised that so-called progressive voters are experiencing bloodlust.

For nearly a decade, Democrats have pushed nonstop doomsday rhetoric about President Donald Trump and the conservative movement.

They’ve compared him to Hitler. They’ve called him a dictator. They’ve claimed without evidence that the country is experiencing a death rattle.

These people incited not one, but two assassination attempts against Trump last summer — that we know of.

Now, Democrats are realizing that their constantly crying wolf and stoking fear has led much of their base to take them seriously.

Axios reported that lawmakers who have faced the brunt of violent opponents are trying to calm tensions.

But the damage is done. This is what happens when partisan media and elected officials normalize panic and desensitize imbalanced people to violence.

It’s liberal voters, egged on by years of apocalyptic headlines, outright lies, and wild accusations.

Continue reading.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Democrat Terror: 11 Far-Left Terrorists Arrested in Planned ‘Coordinated and Targeted Terror Attack’ on Texas ICE Facility, Opening Fire on Agents

The Islamic Republic of Iran Has Been Plotting to Kill American Officials

Many Democrat Officials CHARGED for Voter Harvesting Scheme in Texas

NYC Jihad Communist Mayoral Frontrunner Zohran Mamdani’s Father Claimed Hitler Inspired For Holocaust by Abraham Lincoln

Chicago: Muslim Immigrant Convicted of Recruiting For Islamic Terror

RELATED VIDEO: Democrats (DeMS13 Party) are building “RESISTANCE LABS” to SABOTAGE Trump.

POSTS ON X:

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

The Islamic Republic of Iran Has Been Plotting to Kill American Officials

The Iranians have hired killers to threaten, scare, and attack Israeli and Jewish sites in Sweden and Denmark. Live grenades were found near the Israeli embassy in Stockholm, and grenades were actually thrown at the Israeli embassy in Copenhagen. The leading Israeli defense company Elbit had explosives go off at its offices both in Sweden (Gothenburg) and in Belgium (Brussels). Iran supplied to its criminal mercenaries a list of targets and what was to be done with them: kidnappings and murders of Israelis, attacks on Jewish community sites, grenade attacks on Israeli embassies and Israeli-owned businesses, and the killing of exiled Iran journalists. Quite a long list.

The Iranians, or their mercenaries, have been plotting to kill American officials. An Iranian plot to kill Mike Pompeo, Trump’s former Secretary of State, was foiled in time. Another former Trump official, former National Security Advisor Robert O’Brien, was tailed by two “Middle Eastern men” in Paris to his hotel, from which he later had to be “extracted by his security detail.” Were those who had been following him Iranians, or men hired by the Iranians? And were they intent on killing him, or only on threatening him?

Tehran’s agents managed to stab a dissident Iranian journalist in London. An enemy of the Tehran regime, the singer Shahin Najafi, almost died after an attack on her in Hannover, Germany.

Another Iranian plot was directed at killing John Bolton, Trump’s national security adviser from 2018 to 2019. Bolton has long been an outspoken hawk on the Islamic Republic. He is now under round-the-clock security. The government has offered a $20 million award for information leading to the arrest of an Iranian national, Shahram Poursafi, whom the American government believes tried to hire hitmen to kill Bolton. Poursafi is likely to now be safely back in Iran.

Hezbollah, and thus its puppet-master Iran, was responsible for the 1994 attack on the Argentinian Mutual Israelite Association (AMIA). Iran, through Hezbollah, was also responsible for the attack on the Israeli embassy in Buenos Aires in 1992. Alberto Nisman had investigated and uncovered incontrovertible evidence of Iran’s role in the AMIA attack. For that, he had to be killed.

All over Europe, and in North and South America, too, dissident Iranians and their non-Iranian supporters, and Jewish communal leaders having nothing to do with Iran, are known to be the targets of the Iranian regime, either directly using its own nationals, or employing members of Hezbollah, or even common criminals, whom it hires to carry out some of its political assassinations. The fatwa against Rushdie was ultimately carried out; he lost an eye, and almost died in the attack. In New York City, several attempts have been made to kill the anti-hijab activist Masih Alinejad, but have been foiled in time; she now requires a permanent security detail. In the Netherlands, an MP, Ulysses Ellian, received a threatening letter from Iran’s Embassy, counseling him to stop speaking out about Iran — or else. He made the letter public, and has not been cowed. But the government of the Netherlands has yet to take action against Iran’s Embassy by, for example, demanding that the author of the letter be expelled, or perhaps threatening to shut down Iran’s embassy in The Hague altogether, a move sure to get Iran’s attention.

Providing security details to those threatened with death by the Iranians should not be the only response. In any country where threats are made by Iranian diplomatic personnel, or carried out by Iranians or those in their pay, the response ought to be to cut off diplomatic relations with the Islamic Republic. After a few such cut-offs, the Iranians are likely to stop their overseas plotting. And if that cutoff in diplomatic relations does not have the desired effect, then the next stop is to place crippling economic sanctions — ending all Iranian imports, for example, to whatever country has experienced an attack by Iranian agents on its soil. Iran’s economy is already collapsing; such sweeping measures, carried out by half-dozen of Iran’s most important trading partners in Europe, will topple it.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Coming soon: Hugh Fitzgerald’s blockbuster new book, ‘Islamizing Europe: Is the Conquest Inevitable?’

UK: Muslim soldiers distributed graphic videos of murdered Israelis from Oct. 7 jihad massacre

Pakistan: Muslim teacher beats five-year-old Christian boy for drinking water from her glass

India: Hindu accidentally knocks over Muslim’s vegetable cart, Muslim mob murders him

Bangladesh: Muslim Leader Rapes Hindu Woman

RELATED VIDEOS:

Plea to Trump: Please Support Murals Dedicated to Persian Women.

Exploring the Quran: Surah Al-A’raf with Hatun Tash and Robert Spencer surah 7:73-152

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

DOJ ‘Thoroughly’ Investigating Hamas Apologist Group Favored By Democrats

The Department of Justice (DOJ) is investigating whether a Muslim advocacy organization it previously linked to Hamas should maintain eligibility to receive taxpayer funds, according to emails obtained by the Daily Caller News Foundation.

The DOJ’s Executive Office for Immigration Review said June 30 that it was currently probing a complaint accusing the California chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) of irregularities in its financial reporting and support for terrorism. The review centers around federal funding California has allocated for immigration-related services to CAIR, a group that high-profile Democrats have embraced for years as a force for civil rights.

“We appreciate your patience as we thoroughly review the matter,” the DOJ wrote to watchdog group Intelligent Advocacy Network (IAN), which filed the complaint on March 13. “Should we require additional information, we will reach out to you.”

Federal officials named CAIR as an unindicted co-conspirator in the 2007 trial of activists who were convicted of running a charity funding Hamas, and the United Arab Emirates labeled CAIR a terrorist organization in 2014, IAN noted. The DOJ’s court filings said CAIR was part of a “Palestine Committee” led by a Hamas official advancing the Islamist group’s interests in the U.S.

CAIR’s local media team did not respond to multiple requests for comment. California’s Department of Social Services, which allocated the federal government’s funds to CAIR, did not respond to a request for comment.

IAN’s complaint also highlights past statements by Zahra Billoo, who leads CAIR California’s San Francisco Bay Area office, in which she praised Hamas’s Oct. 7, 2023, massacre in Israel as “decolonization” and declared that a slain Hamas leader’s “martyrdom is not in vain” in July 2024. In 2018, former Democratic California Gov. Jerry Brown appointed Billoo to an advisory panel tasked with informing California’s state librarian on “civil liberties and civil rights issues,” state webpages show.

IAN also accused CAIR California of failing to report some government funds on its tax forms, inexplicably awarding subgrants to itself through its regional offices and other discrepancies, citing state and federal documents it obtained. In one example, CAIR awarded more than $3.6 million to “CAIR LA,” a branch of CAIR California that is not a registered tax-exempt nonprofit but a part of CAIR California, records show.

CAIR California called IAN a “hate group” promoting a “smear campaign” in a March press release responding to the complaint.

We operate in full transparency and cooperation with the State of California and their thorough reporting requirements,” CAIR California CEO Hussam Ayloush said at the time without addressing IAN’s specific claims. Every penny—not just every dollar—of government grants is accounted for, and transparently and effectively used to empower vulnerable populations.”

The Muslim group denies supporting terrorists or having ties to them and dedicates a section of its website to debunking such allegations. It emphasizes that the DOJ was never required to prove its claims about CAIR in court.

CAIR’s website also argues that its national executive director, Nihad Awad, was not supporting terrorism when he publicly said that he is “in support of the Hamas movement” in 1994, a statement that IAN’s complaint references. Awad and CAIR opposed Hamas after it began suicide bombings and was declared a terrorist group by the U.S., CAIR’s website says. However, Hamas released a charter that called for eradicating Jews years before Awad expressed support for the organization.

“We welcome the DOJ’s confirmation last week that its investigation is ongoing,” IAN told the DCNF. “CAIR-CA’s financial misconduct, regulatory violations, and Hamas-aligned rhetoric make it unfit to retain its DOJ immigration accreditation.”

“Its parent organization, CAIR, was named an unindicted co-conspirator in the largest terrorism financing case involving Hamas in U.S. history. That legacy continues today through statements and actions by CAIR-CA’s top leadership,” IAN said. “Public money must never be used to subsidize organizations that flout statutory and regulatory obligations or undermine national security.”

The DOJ’s Executive Office for Immigration Review and media team did not respond to the DCNF’s requests for comment.

AUTHOR

Hudson Crozier

DCNF Crime and Extremism Reporter

RELATED ARTICLES:

United Arab Emerates designates Hamas-linked CAIR a terrorist organization

Liz Warren, Who Attacked Pete Hegseth Over His ‘Extremist’ Christian Tattoo, Has Ties To Hamas Apologist Org

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

NYC Jihad Communist Mayoral Frontrunner Zohran Mamdani’s Father Claimed Hitler Inspired For Holocaust by Abraham Lincoln

The fact that this creature got as far as he did and is embraced by leaders of the Democrat party is a stunning indictment of the infiltration of our worst enemies at the highest echelons of American governance.

WATCH: Mahmood Mamdani claiming Hitler inspired for Holocaust by Abraham Lincoln

NYC mayoral frontrunner Zohran Mamdani’s professor father claimed Hitler inspired by Abraham Lincoln

Mamdani’s Ivy League professor father added America was the ‘genesis’ for modern ‘settler-colonialism’

By Alec Schemmel, Fox News, July 6, 2025:

New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani’s father, a longtime academic and Ivy League professor, said during a 2022 panel discussion about one of his many books that Adolf Hitler drew his inspiration for the Holocaust from Abraham Lincoln.

The younger Mamdani, a self-proclaimed socialist, has credited his parents with providing him a “privileged upbringing,” one that included frequent discussions on politics and global affairs, according to a New York Times profile on the mayoral candidate and his parents. Mamdani’s mother is an Oscar-nominated filmmaker.

During a 2022 panel discussion hosted by the Asia Society, Mamdani’s father, Mahmood, asserted that America was the “genesis of what we call settler-colonialism” around the world.

“With the Civil War, Abraham Lincoln generalized the solution of reservations, they herded American Indians into separate territories,” Mamdani, Columbia’s Herbert Lehman professor of government, said. “For the Nazis, this was the inspiration – Hitler realized two things: one, that genocide is doable. It is possible to do genocide, that’s what Hitler realized. Second thing Hitler realized, is that you don’t have to have a common citizenship.”
Zohran Mamdani and his parents at election victory party

The elder Mamdani also argued during the talk that the racist and antisemitic Nuremberg Laws of Nazi Germany “were patterned after American laws.”

Other comments included claims that there is no difference between “nationalism and colonialism” and that the Allied forces during World War II shared the same goals as the Nazis.

“The Nazi political project was shared by the Allies, and that political project was to turn Germany into a ‘pure’ nation. A ‘pure’ nation rid of its minorities,” Mamdani said at the Asia Society event. “When the Allies defeated the Nazis and went into Eastern Europe, they began to create ‘pure’ nations. To ethnically cleanse Eastern Europe of Germans – move them back into Germany. One crime doesn’t wipe out another.”

Following the political upset in New York City’s Democratic mayoral primary, critics began unearthing videos of the younger Mamdani espousing similarly radical views.

One of those moments came from remarks the NYC mayoral candidate made at a Young Democratic Socialists of America conference in 2021, during which he told attendees not to compromise on goals like “seizing the means of production.”

NYC Mayoral Candidate Zohran Mamdani meets Al Sharpton

A second included a video from The Gravel Institute, during which Mamdani discusses the need to turn housing from a private commodity to a public one. In the video, he called for luxury condos to be replaced with communal-style living that would include things like shared laundry facilities and food co-ops.

“If we want to end the housing crisis, the solution has to be moving toward the full de-commodification of housing,” Mamdani urged in the video for The Gravel Institute.

Meanwhile, other remarks by Mamdani’s father have raised concerns about how the Democratic mayoral candidate’s upbringing could impact his governing style.

In an interview about his book, “Good Muslim, Bad Muslim: America, the Cold War, and the Roots of Terror,” the older Mamdani asserts that the term “suicide bomber” is a misnomer because they are no different from “soldier[s] whose objective is to kill.”

Continue reading..

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Johathan Turley: Why NYC’s Zohran Mamdani looks more and more like a hardcore Marxist

Dem Mayoral Candidate in major American city linked to rabid anti-Israel activism: Report

City-Run Grocery Stores, Defunding Police, Safe Injection Sites: What to Know About NYC’s Next Potential Mayor

Chicago: Muslim Immigrant Convicted of Recruiting For Islamic Terror

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Netanyahu Meets With Trump and Cabinet Members in the White House, Seeks Gaza Deal ‘On Our Terms,’ Vows Hamas Will Be Destroyed

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu meets U.S. President Donald Trump in Washington. Their third meeting this year comes after recent Israeli and U.S. strikes on Iran and will be dogged by questions over how hard Trump will push for an end to Israel’s 21-month war against Hamas in Gaza.

The war in Gaza is at the top of the agenda.

Times of Israel: As Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu departed Israel on Sunday for Washington, where he will meet with US President Donald Trump, he highlighted his opposition to any hostage deal that would ultimately leave Hamas in power in Gaza. “Twenty living hostages remain and 30 who are fallen. I am determined, we are determined, to bring back all of them,” the premier told reporters, as he prepared to board the Wing of Zion state plane. But, he added, “we are determined to ensure that Gaza will no longer constitute a threat to Israel. That means, we will not allow a situation that encourages more kidnappings, more murders, more beheadings, more invasions.” “That means one thing: eliminating Hamas’s military and governing capabilities. Hamas will not be there,” he said. An Israeli negotiating team was traveling to Doha, meanwhile, for indirect talks with the terror group on a deal (Times of Israel).

PM Netanyahu emphasized, “I am committed to eliminating Hamas military and governmental capabilities — Hamas will no longer be in Gaza; we will remove it from there.”

Hamas, meanwhile, has accepted the framework for a ceasefire: The 60-day cease-fire proposal, crafted by US special envoy Steve Witkoff and officials from Egypt and Qatar, includes the exchange of 30 deceased and 10 living hostages for a higher number of Palestinian prisoners held in Israel, officials familiar with the plan told The Wall Street Journal. It also includes a timeline for the releases, with eight living hostages promised on the first day and two more on Day 50 — and the withdrawal of Israeli military forces from Gaza. If signed by the warring sides, it’s expected that President Trump would announce the deal, according to the report (New York Post).

Netanyahu seeks Gaza deal ‘on our terms,’ vows Hamas will be destroyed

At meeting Monday, Trump reportedly wants to finalize framework for ending the war; PM insists that when that happens, ‘Hamas will not be there’; also said to still reject PA role

By Lazar Berman, Nava Freiberg and ToI Staff 6 July 2025:

As Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu departed Israel on Sunday for Washington, where he will meet with US President Donald Trump, he highlighted his opposition to any hostage deal that would ultimately leave Hamas in power in Gaza.

“Twenty living hostages remain and 30 who are fallen. I am determined, we are determined, to bring back all of them,” the premier told reporters, as he prepared to board the Wing of Zion state plane.

But, he added, “we are determined to ensure that Gaza will no longer constitute a threat to Israel. That means, we will not allow a situation that encourages more kidnappings, more murders, more beheadings, more invasions.”

“That means one thing: eliminating Hamas’s military and governing capabilities. Hamas will not be there,” he said. An Israeli negotiating team was traveling to Doha, meanwhile, for indirect talks with the terror group on a deal.

Asked whether there will be a hostage deal within the week, Netanyahu turned back to the reporters — something he rarely does – and said: “We are working to reach this deal under the terms we have agreed to.”

“I sent a team to the negotiations with clear directives,” he said. “I think the conversation with President Trump can certainly help advance the outcome we are all hoping for.”

Gaza is expected to be the main subject of Monday’s discussion between Netanyahu and Trump, who has repeatedly called in recent days for an end to the war that began when Hamas attacked Israel on October 7, 2023.

Trump said on Tuesday that Israel had accepted the latest ceasefire proposal, which provides for the release in five separate stages of 10 living and 18 slain hostages, in exchange for a 60-day ceasefire, an influx of humanitarian aid to the Strip, and the release of many Palestinian security prisoners and detainees. (Eight living hostages would be freed on the first day and two released on the 50th day, according to an Arab diplomat from one of the mediating countries. Five slain hostages would be returned on the seventh day, five more on the 30th day and eight more on the 60th day. That would leave 22 hostages still held in Gaza, 10 of them believed to be alive. It is not clear whether Israel or Hamas would determine who would be released.)

Hamas on Friday gave what it called a “positive” response to the proposal. However, the terror group stressed it has reservations about the proposed truce, most notably its temporary nature, and has demanded a guarantee that agreeing to the deal will lead to a permanent end of the war.

Netanyahu’s office called the demands — which also concerned aid mechanisms and IDF troop withdrawals — “unacceptable.”

The so-called Witkoff proposal on which the nascent deal is based provides for negotiations on a permanent ceasefire to be completed during the 60-day truce period. However, it adds that if the permanent ceasefire is not finalized in that period, “the temporary ceasefire may be extended under conditions and for a duration to be agreed upon by the parties so long as the parties are negotiating in good faith.”

One of Hamas’s reservations reportedly relates to the phrase “so long as the parties are negotiating in good faith,” which it wants deleted since it fears Netanyahu would exploit that phrase to avoid ending the war.

A Channel 12 report on Friday claimed Trump could personally pledge to do his utmost to ensure the success of negotiations on a permanent end to the war. Trump, the unsourced report claimed, could publicly “commit that negotiations over the terms for ending the war will continue even after a temporary ceasefire, and that he will do everything in his power to help the parties reach an agreement on the terms of a permanent ceasefire.”

Channel 12, citing senior US officials, reported that Trump wishes to finalize a framework for ending the war during Monday’s meeting.

A central topic the leaders will discuss is the “day after” plan in Gaza, the network said. It said post-war governance of the Strip would also be the main focus of diplomatic talks during the 60-day truce, should Hamas and Israel agree to the overall deal.

According to the report, Netanyahu continues to insist that the Palestinian Authority can have no role in governing post-war Gaza, while Trump’s proposal remains to be seen.

Israel is willing to be more flexible on its stance that Hamas leaders be exiled from the Gaza Strip as part of the agreement, said Channel 12. That is because, according to an Israeli official, “There aren’t many senior Hamas officials left in Gaza. They wouldn’t fill a ship to be exiled; even a paddleboard would do.”

Continue reading

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES: 

“Operation Black Flag”: Israel Launches Unprecedented Multi-Port Attack on Yemen

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Amidst the Glitz, the State of Israel Shall Not Cede it’s Land, under Divine Contract with the Jews

Moments ago, a devastating explosion in Gaza’s Khan Yunis region critically injured at least 16 IDF soldiers. Emergency airlifts are already underway, urgently evacuating several soldiers who have sustained life-threatening injuries.

While Israel is being pressured again and again to unfinish its sacred mission to protect its people from ceaseless terrorism, real Israelis share their heartbreaks and broken bodies:

WATCH: Alon Kaminer’s life was forever changed on October 7th. While serving as an IDF soldier, the unthinkable happened—a premature explosion during combat left him with devastating injuries: he lost his leg, right arm, left hand, eye, and more. He was clinically dead—but he survived. This is more than just a survivor story. It’s one of unimaginable courage, resilience, and hope. Together with his friend Sagi, Alon has been training day after day to rebuild his life and show the world what it truly means to never give up. If you’re looking for an inspirational story that puts everything in perspective, this is it. A true hero of Israel, fighting not just for his country—but now, for every step of his future.

The Most Injured IDF Soldier Refuses to Give Up

Real Israelis are dying and barely surviving continuous Hamas attacks right now, as Israel is told to stand down again and again and again.

HELICOPTER — July 7, 2025 11:30 PM IDT A severe ambush unfolded near Beit Hanoun in the northern Gaza Strip, where at least 15 to 16 IDF soldiers were targeted by Hamas. The initial attack involved a powerful IED explosion inside an armored vehicle carrying troops. Moments later, additional explosives detonated in a coordinated series—three targeting the IDF convoy and a fourth triggered as rescue forces arrived. The fourth blast reportedly struck the rescuers directly. The attacks caused significant injuries, including to a senior IDF officer, with several soldiers listed in critical condition. Visuals from the area show heavy flare activity over northern Gaza as IDF helicopters airlift the wounded to Ichilov Hospital. Local residents in Sderot recorded these rescue operations and reported a massive explosion that caused widespread power outages.

In a second incident near Beit Hanoun, an anti-armor missile hit a vehicle loaded with ammunition, reportedly operated by IDF engineering forces. More soldiers were wounded in this attack. Footage shows continuous Israeli helicopter activity in the area, with multiple strikes launched and injured personnel evacuated under fire. One Israeli media outlet confirmed, “One of the casualties is said to be a high-ranking officer….” Separately, Syrian state media reported a large explosion at an ammunition depot near the town of Al-Fu’ah, northeast of Idlib. The cause of the blast remains unknown.

Please share and spread the word about ISRAEL REALTIME “Connecting the World to Israel in Realtime.” WhatsApp: http://tinyurl.com/IRWAC Telegram: http://tinyurl.com/3fz86npa Other links: http://IsraelRealTime.com

©2025 All rights reserved.