Harris Honeymoon Fizzles Out As Trump Leads In Sun Belt Battlegrounds

Former President Donald Trump has gained ground and is leading Vice President Kamala Harris in key Sun Belt states, according to a New York Times/Siena poll from Monday.

Trump gained in Arizona and is now leading Harris by five points with the two candidates polling at 50% and 45% among likely voters respectively, according to the poll. At the same time, Trump has also held onto his lead over Harris in Georgia by four points and in North Carolina by two points.

While the Republican candidate is leading, a significant portion of likely voters across all three states are independents, according to the poll. On average, 31% of likely voters in the Sun Belt consider themselves Democrats, 33% identify as Republicans and 31% say they are independents.

The top issues for Sun Belt likely voters are the economy and immigration, polling at 26% and 16% ,respectively, according to the poll. When it comes to handling these top issues, 50% of likely voters trust Trump while just 46% prefer Harris.

Under Harris’ purview, who has previously been dubbed the Border Czar, there have been over 10 million nationwide migrant encounters, according to data from U.S. Customs and Border Patrol. During the Biden-Harris administration, there have been over 8 million migrant encounters on the Southern Border alone.

Inflation and economic struggles have also been a recurring theme over the last four years, with the national debt skyrocketing to $35 trillion for the first time in American history in July.

Several Biden-Harris initiatives, like the American Rescue Plan and the Inflation Reduction Act, have hiked up the federal deficit. The American Rescue Plan, which passed in March 2021, approved $1.9 trillion in spending, and the Inflation Reduction Act, which passed in August 2022, authorized an additional $750 billion in spending.

While Trump is leading, both candidates are viewed unfavorably across the Sun Belt, according to the poll. On average, Trump is polling at 47% favorability and 50% unfavourability across likely voters, while Harris is polling at 46% favorability and 51% unfavourability.

In Arizona, Georgia and North Carolina, only 30%, 24% and 28% of likely voters think the country is on the right track and roughly two-thirds say the country is headed in the wrong direction, according to the poll. This trend remains the same across groups irrespective of age and gender.

Although Trump won North Carolina in 2020, President Joe Biden won both Arizona and Georgia in 2020.

The NYT/Siena poll surveyed 2,077 likely voters in Arizona, Georgia and North Carolina from Sept. 17 to Sept. 21 with a margin of error of +/- 2.5%.

AUTHOR

Rebeka Zeljko

Contributor.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Experts Say Major Swing State Is Once Again ‘Pivotal’ To Trump’s Chances Of Retaking White House

Trump Hammered Voters’ Key Concerns In RNC Speech, Harris Hardly Mentioned Them

‘Less Vibes, More Policy’: Here’s Why Harris Is Polling Worse Than Past Democratic Candidates

Majority Of Voters Support Mass Deportations, New Poll Reveals

Georgia Mandates Hand-Counts Statewide!

RELATED VIDEO: Tim Walz makes the case to elect Trump because, “we can’t afford 4 more years of this!”

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

How Sustainability Has Harmed Businesses and Our Economy: A Critical Examination

Sustainability is often seen as a critical goal for the long-term health of the planet, emphasizing reduced environmental impact and responsible resource management. While these are undoubtedly noble aims, the pursuit of sustainability has also presented significant challenges to businesses and, in some cases, created ripple effects that have impacted the broader economy.

Increased Operational Costs

One of the primary complaints from businesses regarding sustainability initiatives is the increase in operational costs. Many sustainability-driven regulations require companies to invest in new technologies, modify manufacturing processes, and adhere to stricter environmental standards. These shifts often come with hefty price tags while promo products play a crucial role in driving business growth by increasing brand visibility and customer engagement, while also supporting the economy through job creation, manufacturing demand, and stimulating consumer spending across various industries.

Green Technology Investment: Transitioning to renewable energy sources, installing energy-efficient machinery, or shifting to biodegradable packaging can be expensive. Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) often lack the financial reserves to make these adjustments without a significant strain on their bottom lines.

Higher Production Costs: Sourcing sustainable materials, which are often more expensive than conventional alternatives, can cut deeply into profit margins. For industries dependent on raw materials, like textiles and manufacturing, this can lead to price hikes, which may make their products less competitive.

Regulatory Burdens

Sustainability-focused regulations, particularly environmental regulations, have become increasingly stringent in recent years. While these rules are intended to protect ecosystems and reduce carbon footprints, they also impose substantial administrative burdens on businesses.

Compliance Costs: The need to meet complex environmental standards often forces companies to hire legal experts, compliance officers, and auditors. The cost of non-compliance, including hefty fines, can be steep, particularly for industries like energy, automotive, and construction.

Limitation of Growth: Some businesses, especially in developing sectors, are finding that the need to comply with stringent environmental rules restricts their ability to expand or innovate. This regulatory overreach has, in some cases, stifled entrepreneurial activities and dampened the growth of industries that are otherwise critical to economic advancement.

Loss of Competitiveness in the Global Market

Sustainability regulations vary widely across countries. This lack of global alignment can leave companies operating in countries with stricter rules at a disadvantage in the global market.

Offshoring: Many businesses have responded to sustainability mandates by offshoring production to countries with more lenient environmental regulations. While this reduces the immediate compliance burden, it also results in the loss of jobs in more regulated markets, contributing to economic stagnation in some regions.

Decreased Export Competitiveness: Some companies face higher production costs due to sustainability-related investments, which can make their products more expensive and less attractive to foreign buyers. In competitive industries, like manufacturing and agriculture, this has resulted in a loss of market share to international rivals who operate under looser environmental regulations.

Impact on Traditional Industries

Certain industries are bearing the brunt of the sustainability push, as their very business models are being challenged. Fossil fuel companies, traditional farming practices, and manufacturing plants have all faced significant disruption.

Fossil Fuels: The global shift toward renewable energy has hurt traditional energy industries, particularly coal, oil, and natural gas. Many of these companies, which were once mainstays of the economy, have faced declining revenues, layoffs, and even bankruptcy. Communities dependent on these industries have been economically devastated, as job losses mount, and alternative employment options are limited.

Agriculture: Farmers, particularly those in developing nations, are grappling with sustainability mandates around water usage, pesticide controls, and deforestation. While these initiatives are meant to protect the environment, they often leave small-scale farmers unable to compete, contributing to food insecurity and economic instability in rural regions.

Slowdown of Economic Growth

The pursuit of sustainability has also contributed to a slowdown in economic growth in some regions. The shift away from resource-intensive industries, while beneficial for the environment, can lead to short-term economic contraction.

Investment Shifts: Investors and governments are increasingly focusing on green technologies, often at the expense of traditional industries. While this promotes innovation, it can also result in the decline of key economic sectors that have historically driven growth.

Reduced Consumption: Many sustainability campaigns advocate for reduced consumption, urging people to buy less, waste less, and conserve resources. While beneficial for the planet, this shift can directly harm consumer-driven economies, where growth is dependent on consistent spending.

Innovation Stifled by Sustainability Mandates

While sustainability can foster innovation, it can also hinder it in some areas. Companies are increasingly being forced to dedicate substantial resources to meet sustainability goals, leaving less capital and focus for other forms of research and development.

Limited R&D in Non-Green Areas: Traditional innovation often takes a backseat as companies focus on meeting environmental standards. This shift in priorities can result in the delay of breakthroughs in areas like artificial intelligence, biotechnology, or medical advancements, slowing overall technological progress.

Conclusion

Sustainability is undoubtedly a crucial goal for the long-term preservation of the environment and human life on Earth. However, the economic and business challenges it presents cannot be ignored. Increased operational costs, stringent regulations, loss of competitiveness, and harm to traditional industries are among the real-world consequences businesses face. As policymakers and environmental advocates push forward with sustainability initiatives, it is important to strike a balance between environmental goals and economic realities to ensure that the transition is equitable and doesn’t harm vulnerable sectors or slow down economic growth altogether.

©2024. , All rights reserved.

How the Bureau of Labor Statistics is Distorting America’s Economic Reality — Part 2

Fed Chairman Powell just lowered interest rates 50 basis points or 1/2% in an effort to stimulate the economy. It is his feeling that inflation has cooled, But has it ? Prices are still to high for Mr. and Mrs. American. What will this do for inflation? Prices will probably go up again because the dollar has been devalued again. In addition Powell doesn’t think this will do much for the housing market. Neither do I. Every time the rates went down the price of houses went up. Especially when there is a lack of inventory. Powell also said the unemployment rate is going up because the market was flooded will illegals and there are not enough jobs. So what is Powell doing? Does he know?

If you want to fix anything you have to revers the stupid policies that cause inflation and unemployment -Energy prices and illegals on to of excessive government spending and printing money. Don’t look for that with this administration. After all we must be unburdened by what has been. Only VP Kamala did the burdening. Why on earth would we think she will unburden?

Good morning. I couldn’t sleep last night. Those claimed construction jobs didn’t make sense. The Job Openings and new job creation Revision don’t jive with it. So I went digging. I found it. It’s all a scam! What else is new. The 3 Scams:

  1. Print Money
  2. Add Debt programs for bankrolling Federal Projects, Solar Panels, Wind Turbines, EV Vehicles, all massively poisoning our environments with fiberglass (turbines), Lithium Batteries, and solar panels (being buried in Nuclear Landfills).
  3. Bring in workers who will work for half the wages.

3/4 of the money is going to Democrat States like California, NY, Wisconsin, etc. all wrapped up in the 3 Massive Scam Acts; INVOLVING THE PRINTING OF ANOTHER $2 TRILLION! Being perpetrated on the American People. They are called;

  1. Inflation Reduction Act (Even Joe Blow screwed up on the campaign trail and said this Act does not Reduce Inflation and should be called something else. That’s when they pulled him off of the stage 7 replaced with Scamala! See for yourself. (pic.twitter.com/2WL7N1exN2 )
  2. CHIPS Act
  3. Infrastructure Act

They are creating questionable jobs with all of this money and counting them in different industries to hide it, all in the name of: their words! Pushing DEI, Socialism, Social Justice and creating jobs for the deranged that they created under the LGBTXYZ movement, Diversity, DEI,  etc.

Equity matters. The BIL, CHIPS, and IRA seek to redress long-standing inequalities by laying a stronger foundation for sustainable, inclusive growth. When making funding decisions, stakeholders at all levels should consider the needs of communities that have historically been underrepresented in shaping public works.

These include people living in rural, low-income, tribal, climate-vulnerable, and other marginalized areas. To harness federal funds for these goals, state leaders could consider three actions: include a diverse range of stakeholders in decision making, provide targeted support to critical stakeholders pursuing grants, and take proactive steps to promote transparency in the investment process.

View Documents that explain the supposed construction jobs they claimed and others for August 2024 jobs report.

DOCUMENT 1

DOCUMENT 2

DOCUMENT 3

DOCUMENT 4

DOCUMENT 5

©2024. Karen Schoen. All rights reserved.

Please visit Karen’s Newsletter Substack


Join the Florida Citizens Alliance  goflca.org    Help save America mentor a child.

Show Link https://www.americaoutloud.news/the-prism-of-americas-education/

Show: Sat and Sun 7AM ET and 5PM ET on  https://www.americaoutloud.news/

Podcasts and Articles:    karenbschoen.com      karenschoen.substack.com

GUEST: Ricki De Santis, researcher, public speaker, economist

Information: rdesan@protonmail.com

Teamsters Union Won’t Endorse Harris after Members Back Trump

For the first time in decades, one of the nation’s largest and most influential labor unions is refusing to endorse a Democrat for president. Representing nearly one-and-a-half million American workers, the Teamsters Union announced late Wednesday that it would not be endorsing either Vice President Kamala Harris or former President Donald Trump in this year’s presidential race.

This marks the first time since 1996 that the Teamsters have not endorsed a presidential candidate. Previously, the union has overwhelmingly endorsed Democrats for president, including endorsing now-President Joe Biden in 2020. The Teamsters have not endorsed a Republican presidential candidate since George H.W. Bush in 1988.

“The Teamsters thank all candidates for meeting with members face-to-face during our unprecedented roundtables,” Teamsters’ International Union General President Sean O’Brien said in a statement. “Unfortunately, neither major candidate was able to make serious commitments to our union to ensure the interests of working people are always put before Big Business,” O’Brien continued. “We sought commitments from both Trump and Harris not to interfere in critical union campaigns or core Teamsters industries — and to honor our members’ right to strike — but were unable to secure those pledges.”

“As the strongest and most democratic labor union in America, it was vital for our members to drive this endorsement process. Democrats, Republicans, and Independents proudly call our union home, and we have a duty to represent and respect every one of them,” O’Brien added. “We strongly encourage all our members to vote in the upcoming election, and to remain engaged in the political process. But this year, no candidate for President has earned the endorsement of the Teamsters’ International Union.”

In comments to The Washington Stand, FRC Action Director Matt Carpenter said, “To see the Teamsters decline to endorse the Democratic nominee for president is not something I thought I would ever see in my lifetime. Since the 2016 election, we have seen the emergence of a truly stunning realignment in the coalitions that make up the two-party system in American politics.” He explained, “The GOP, once home to free trade absolutists and corporate America, has transformed into the home of working men and women, while the Democratic Party has morphed into a party of the upwardly-mobile, high-income, and college-educated.”

Carpenter added, “While the Teamsters opted not to endorse Donald Trump, and instead opted to decline an endorsement of either candidate, they did release polling of their members showing by almost two-to-one they prefer a second Trump term to a Harris administration.”

The Teamsters did release internal polling data, also on Wednesday, asking union members who the 121-year-old organization should endorse for president. According to electronic polling conducted from late July to September 15, nearly 60% said the union should back Trump, while only 34% went with Harris. The remaining 6.4% of polled Teamsters said “other candidates.” A phone poll conducted from September 9 to September 16 found little difference, except a noticeable decline in support for Harris, with 58% of Teamsters backing Trump and only 31% backing Harris. The remaining 11% were almost evenly split between “undecided” and “don’t know.” Polling conducted prior to Biden dropping out of the presidential race found nearly 45% of Teamsters supported Biden, 36.3% supported Trump, and the remaining 7% were split among third-party candidates.

Trump himself commented on the Teamsters’ refusal to back Harris. “The Teamsters for many, many decades always automatically support the Democrats. This year, they refused to do it,” the 45th president said in an interview Wednesday night. He continued, “They took a poll and we got 60% in the poll, in the Teamsters. They’re not gonna support the Democrat this year, they’re gonna — I guess remain neutral. But that was sort of a big event. Nobody ever expected a thing like that to happen.” Trump added that a lot of Teamsters workers used to work for him in the construction and real estate development business years prior and referred to O’Brien as a “top guy.”

In July, O’Brien became the first Teamster to speak at the Republican National Convention, at Trump’s invitation. Upon accepting Trump’s warm welcome, O’Brien said, “Anti-union groups demanded the president rescind his invitation. The Left called me a traitor. This is precisely why it is so important for me to be here today.” Referring to Trump being shot in the head and surviving an assassination attempt just days earlier, O’Brien added, “I think we all can agree, whether people like him or they don’t like him, in light of what happened to him on Saturday, he has proven to be one tough S.O.B.” The Teamsters leader also derided economic and labor policies that hurt “American workers,” calling for reform to labor law and bankruptcy law.

Just last month, polling data found that Trump commands a nearly-30-point lead over Harris among white, working-class, and non-college-educated voters nationally. The former president also leads among white, working-class voters across swing states. Earlier this week, Trump spoke at a campaign rally in Flint, Michigan and pledged to increase tariffs on cars made in places like Mexico, in order to bring jobs back to American workers in places like Michigan. “We are going to bring so many auto plants into our country,” Trump promised. “You’re going to be as big or bigger than you were 50 years ago. Because if they’re not willing to build a plant, we don’t want their product.”

AUTHOR

S.A. McCarthy

S.A. McCarthy serves as a news writer at The Washington Stand.

RELATED VIDEOS:

Teamsters are for Trump at 59.6% of members

CNN stunned because Teamsters’ WILL NOT endorse Kamala Harris

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2024 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

California’s Marxist Comrade Gavin Newsom Outlaws All Election Memes!

On Tuesday, September 17th, 2024, Governor Gavin Newsom signed legislation banning digitally altered political videos in California—even those that are made to parody elected officials.

Newsom pledged to ban these types of videos after Elon Musk posted a clearly satirical artificial intelligence-generated post mocking Kamala Harris’s policy preferences and record.

How is this crack down on free speech not violative of the First Amendment?

Rich Zeoli notes, in his podcast, that the law will almost certainly be challenged in court.

An Amazing Video Meme

This amazing video/meme has sparked mass censorship and a new totalitarian law by the communist left and people’s republic of California, a.k.a. Commiefornia.

Governor Newsom just signed AB-2655 in response to this meme going viral.

The law criminalizes “certain” political memes.

The law could force 𝕏 to ban this video.

The left HATES freedom of speech.

PLEASE DO NOT MAKE THIS VIDEO MEME GO VIRAL AGAIN! LOL!

HERE’S SOME OTHER POLITICAL MEMES THE WE DON’T WANT TO GO VIRAL—LOL:

MEME #1

MEME #2

MEME #3

VIDEO MEME #4

MEME #5

MEME #6

VIDEO MEME #7

BTW, Facebook has censored this column, so please share it on Facebook and see how long it stays up before they ban it!

The choices are clear: Freedom of Speech or Censorship!

Remember this on November 5th, 2024.

Choose wisely.

©2024. Dr. Richard M. Swier, LTC U.S. Army (Ret.) All rights reserved.

EXCLUSIVE: New Docs Shed Light On Air Force’s ‘Goal’ To Reduce ‘White Male Population’ Joining Officer Ranks

The Air Force finally handed over a trove of documents pertaining to its sweeping “goal” of reducing the number of white male applicants in a popular officer program after spending months stonewalling requests for their release.

Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman C.Q. Brown — at the time the highest-ranking member of the Air Force — issued a memorandum in 2022 that the branch was updating its racial and gender demographic goals for applicants seeking to become officers, in a bid to prioritize “diversity and inclusion.” Internal documents obtained by the Daily Caller News Foundation include a slideshow from 2022 where the Air Force outlines racial and gender quotas and details how it hopes to “achieve” a reduced number of white males in its Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (ROTC) officer’s applicant program.

The documents reflect the Biden-Harris Pentagon’s intense focus on implementing diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policies in the armed forces, even as the military continues to combat dwindling morale among its rank-and-file, recruiting and retention shortfalls and low pay.

“The American people are rightly concerned that, at a time when our country is facing dangerous and increasing threats throughout the world, the Air Force is focused on recruitment efforts based on arbitrary racial diversity goals — not merit or increasing the force’s lethality,” James Fitzpatrick, director of the Center To Advance Security In America (CASA), told the DCNF.

CASA requested records regarding the Air Force’s new officer applicant standards through a federal transparency request, called a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request in 2023. At the time, the Air Force said it couldn’t find any records, according to a letter obtained by the DCNF.

CASA then sued the Air Force for the records in April 2024 and received hundreds of documents and slides in response, which the DCNF subsequently obtained.

A spokesperson for the Air Force told the DCNF “The FOIA request was being processed at multiple levels within the Air Force.”

“One of the units responded to the FOIA request with a ‘no responsive records’ response after conducting their own local search, while the remainder of the units continued to process the responsive documents that were ultimately provided,” the spokesperson told the DCNF.

One of the slides in question, labeled “AFROTC White,” depicts a graph that shows the percentage of white male ROTC officer applicants declining from approximately 60% in fiscal year 2019 to a projected 50% in fiscal year 2023. The graph further details how the Air Force’s goal is to reduce that percentage down to approximately 43% by fiscal year 2029, denoted by a star with the label “achieve(d) goal.”

“White male population will decline as other demographics increase,” the slide reads.

The respective slides in question also explain that the Air Force is either on track or needs to do more to hit racial and gender quotas in the ROTC’s officer applicant pool.

For example, with the African American population, the slideshow suggests the Air Force “target [the] male population through ongoing programs and marketing” and notes it has already met its “female goal” for ROTC officer applicants. For the American Indian, Asian and Hispanic applicants, the slideshow says the Air Force is “on track to grow diversity.”

“These documents show us that the Air Force has taken steps toward implementing their new directive of specific racial quotas for officer recruitment and enrollment throughout the branch,” Fitzpatrick told the DCNF.

Included in the slide deck are funding requests for diversity recruiting initiatives, including $500,000 for “diversity advertising campaigns” and $250,000 for “influencer engagements.”

In a separate set of documents from as early as 2022, the Air Force outlines its efforts to modify ROTC scholarship programs, which “play an important role in accession and diversity goals.” The Air Force suggests modifying the scholarship models could remove certain “testing barriers” to entry for under-represented groups.

A screenshot of an internal Air Force slide deck titled “Officer Accession Applicant Pool Goals Diversity & Inclusion Outreach Plans” from January 2022.

The diversity plans extend to the Air Force’s Aim High Flight Academy (AHFA), an aviation scholarship program for high school, ROTC and Air Force Academy students, according to the documents. The Air Force notes that the AFHA applicant pool should be made up of a “minimum” of 60% underrepresented groups, further noting that it must be at least 35% minorities.

Like other branches of the military, the Air Force has struggled to keep up with recruiting and retention targets in recent years. The Navy is expected to miss its recruiting goals in 2024; the Marine Corps, Army and Air Force are on on track to meet their goals, although the latter two branches missed their targets in 2022 and 2023, according to Military Times.

Only approximately 57% of servicemembers or military families polled by the Military Family Advisory Network in 2023 said they’d recommend joining the service, compared to 74% in 2019. Among some of the reasons the respondents wouldn’t recommend service were the politically charged nature of the military, differences and divisions, and low pay, among others.

A year-long study from the Arizona State University Center for American Institutions found that the Pentagon has turned into a “vast DEI bureaucracy” in the last four decades, a challenge that has been exacerbated by the Biden-Harris administration.

“It’s no surprise that young people are turning away from military service in record numbers… DEI indoctrination has become a core component of military training that begins for officers even at the service academies,” Matt Lohmeier, former Space Force commander, said in a statement in June.

Editor’s note: This article has been updated with comment from the Air Force.

AUTHOR

Jake Smith

Contributor.

RELATED ARTICLES:

US Is ‘Dangerously Reliant’ On Chinese Cranes Deeply Embedded In America’s Major Ports, House Investigation Finds

‘Worth Billions’: Defense Contractors Set To Hit Gold Rush Amid Record Weapons Orders

EXCLUSIVE: Former Navy SEAL Says Biden, Harris Haven’t Learned ‘Any Lessons’ From Afghanistan Withdrawal

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

A Clear Violation of the Hatch Act by Harris-Walz Campaign Exposed

Straight-up Election Interference, and it’s illegal.

Democrats, the Fake News and social media will never point this — so we will.

“​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​The Hatch Act, a federal law passed in 1939, limits political activities of federal employees and federal agencies, as well as some state, D.C., and including local government employees who work in connection with federally funded programs. ​The law’s purposes are to ensure that federal programs are administered in a nonpartisan fashion”

What follows, in effect, is an illegal campaign donation from an executive federal agency; namely, to benefit the the Harris-Walz, campaign.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
August 15, 2024
Contact: HHS Press Office
202-690-6343
media@hhs.gov

Negotiating for Lower Drug Prices Works, Saves Billions

The Biden-Harris Administration delivers on promise to lower prescription drug costs for Americans

In a historic moment that will help lower prescription drug prices for millions of people across America, the Biden-Harris Administration announced that it has reached agreements for new, lower prices for all 10 drugs selected for negotiations. These negotiated drugs are some of the most expensive and most frequently dispensed drugs in the Medicare program and are used to treat conditions such as heart disease, diabetes, and cancer. The new prices will go into effect for people with Medicare Part D prescription drug coverage beginning January 1, 2026.

If the new prices had been in effect last year, Medicare would have saved an estimated $6 billion, or approximately 22 percent, across the 10 selected drugs. These negotiated prices range from 38 to 79 percent discounts off of list prices. About nine million people with Medicare use at least one of the 10 drugs selected for negotiation. People with Medicare prescription drug coverage are expected to see aggregated estimated savings of $1.5 billion in their personal out-of-pocket costs in 2026.

For more detailed information about the negotiated prices please see the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Negotiated Prices Fact Sheet – PDF.

Complaints are being filed to the Department of Health and Human Services Inspector General, as well as the Federal Election Commission.​​

It begs the question, How many other federal agencies are being engaged in illegal ways that violate existing federal statutes​?

If any would like to join in this pursuit of justice, please let us know by email at: merlin1246@aol.com.

©2024. Editorial Board – DrRichSwier.com. All rights reserved.

America’s Dark Secrets – Part I

Mentioned below is Part I of a two-part podcast addressing a national investigation into money laundering, child sex trafficking, payoffs to political officials, judges and courts. The information you are about to hear is valid and comprised of solid evidence gathered over two years of investigation. Two State Attorney Generals have been separately briefed, each for four hours, resulting in their agreement that sufficient Probable Cause exists to warrant a Grand Jury. Additional pieces are being put into place prior to a Grand Jury being called. President Trump, Gen. Mike Flynn, and former Director of ICE, Tom Homan, have all been briefed.

The coming election will have far more sobering repercussions no matter who is elected President. That said, it is absolutely critical and necessary for the survival of our nation to have Donald Trump return to the Oval. Make NO mistake, diabolical powers of pure evil have been at work behind the curtains in both political parties for some years now to abolish the gift our founders gave us, “if we would keep it!” Ladies and gentlemen, we better “keep it” or what little we are witnessing in several states with the Haitians, Venezuelan crime syndicate, and other illegals who have NO loyalty or care for America will become the new norm for We the People.

This is Part I of a two-part report. There are no restrictions releasing the two podcasts you will hear given they are in the public domain, and this decision to now release this information was deliberate. While the content of both podcasts is rich with solid findings, you would be correct thinking there is far greater detailed evidence not released at this time.

WATCH: “He was about to EXPOSE them all and they raided his home” | Redacted News

©2024. Lyle J. Rapacki, Ph.D. All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLES:

158 Democrats Voted Against Deporting ‘Non-Citizens’ Who Commit Violence Against Women

Teamster Says Union’s Leadership Is Totally Ignoring Overwhelming Support For Trump Among Rank-And-File

‘Not A Threat To Democracy’: Chris Cuomo Torpedoes Dems’ Claim That Trump Would Be ‘Dictator’

Trump Vows To Turn ‘Hallowed’ World Trade Center Site Into National Monument During New York Rally

DHS, Secret Service Sued For Refusing To Release Trump Assassination Attempt Documents

WaPo Columnist Asks Why Kamala Doesn’t Talk About Her Dad — But The Answer Is Clear

RELATED VIDEO: REAL AMERICA — Dan Ball W/ J.J. Carrell, New Document Exposes Human Trafficking

Eliminate the Machines, Return to Paper Ballots

“Pretending that voter fraud does not exist puts the integrity of our voting process at risk.” — Mercedes Schlapp

“When you have a million plus names on the rolls, people who aren’t voting or are inactive, dead, people who have moved away, that’s a massive pool of potential voter fraud opportunities for those who want to be able to steal elections.” — Tom Fitton

“The Democratic Party does not want anybody to have a photo ID because that would have a very negative impact on cheating! If you require a photo ID, that pretty much shuts out cheating. Well, it doesn’t shut it out. It just makes it harder, and that’s why they don’t want it.” — Rush Limbaugh

“Why allow paper ballots and voter ID when you can make a fortune harvesting the biometric data of hundreds of millions of people while rigging the vote count as you choose.” —  Dr. J. Michael Waller


In previous articles, I’ve mentioned J. Michael Waller’s book several times, Big Intel How the CIA and FBI Went from Cold War Heroes to Deep State Villains. Dr. Waller is the Senior Analyst for Strategy at the Center for Security Policy and President of Georgetown Research, a political risk and private intelligence company.  Waller worked for the CIA in Central America, did groundbreaking scholarship after the Soviet empire’s breakup, and taught history and methods at America’s premier intelligence schools.

The following information comes from a wide selection of Dr. Waller’s articles which can be found at the Center’s website.

For generations, the United States has been constantly assaulted by what former Soviet KGB colonel Anatoliy Golitsyn called “strategic disinformation.” He warned in 1984 that the United States and its interests were under a permanent strategic disinformation offensive from Moscow.  They paired this with political influence.

President Reagan recognized what was going on and established a permanent Foreign Denial and Deception Committee (FDDC) to coordinate within the intelligence community. The goal was to counter the dual challenges raised by Golitsyn and other defectors.  It operated for 30 years.

Without public knowledge, Obama ordered it shut down in the spring of 2016.  The Office of the Director of National Intelligence ran the FDDC. James Clapper oversaw its demise.  CIA Director John Brennan, FBI Director James Comey, and VP Biden all went along with it.  This was part of the coverup in weaponizing the intelligence community and ultimately the entire federal government.

As a result, the mainstream media denial of election fraud has been successful.

Venezuela

Byron York, chief political correspondent for the Washington Examiner, exposed an affidavit from a former confidant of the late Venezuelan dictator, Hugo Chavez.  He provided evidence that Smartmatic election tabulation software was created by the regime with the help of Cuban intelligence, and exported internationally to manipulate voting results.  Chavez wanted to give himself dictatorial powers through guaranteed election fraud.  He also wanted to guarantee the election of allies.

The confidant explained that the Smartmatic software works in the Dominion machines and is the core of all major vote counting software.  He said, “The conspiracy included Chavez and his people, and representatives and personnel from Smartmatic.”  The software could change the votes from against to in their favor.

Smartmatic was used in a 2009 referendum to change the Venezuelan constitution to end term limits, including for Hugo Chavez. The referendum passed.  It was Chavez’s electoral chief, Jorge Rodriguez, who promoted the idea of software that could change the outcomes of elections.  Smartmatic even fed the false voting tabulations directly onto the Internet and to the news media.

In the 2013 Venezuelan election, Chavez’ opponent was ahead by two million votes, so the decision was made to reset the system and take it offline for about two hours.  (Sound familiar?)  Smartmatic’s fraud went public in Venezuela in 2017.

Wonder where our intel was on this key operation to change the outcomes of elections?  Well guess who was in charge of protecting the USA from this kind of election villainy?  FBI Counterintelligence chief, Peter Strzok.

Here is the Smartmatic/Dominion affidavit from the Chavez confidant.

Smartmatic Owners Indicted

The firm said it is owned primarily by three entrepreneurs: Antonio Mugica, a dual-Spanish-Venezuelan national (78.8 percent); Alfredo Anzola (3.87 percent); and Roger Pinate (8.47 percent). The other main investor is Jorge Massa (5.97 percent), a French-Venezuelan businessman. Smartmatic employees and friends and family own the remainder of the firm (2.89 percent).

Smartmatic competes with Dominion Voting Systems, Hart InterCivic, and other companies to supply machines and software for running elections. In addition to selling voting systems, Smartmatic also makes identity management systems for governments.

Three current and former Smartmatic executives are charged with running a brazen alleged bribery scheme to use bribes connected to use of the company’s voting machine technology.

“The co-conspirators allegedly funded the bribes through a slush fund that was created by over-invoicing the cost per voting machine for the 2016 Philippine elections. To conceal and disguise the nature and purpose of the corrupt payments, the co-conspirators used coded language to refer to the slush fund and caused the creation of fraudulent contracts and sham loan agreements to justify transfers. The co-conspirators then allegedly laundered funds related to the bribery scheme through bank accounts located in Asia, Europe, and the United States, including in the Southern District of Florida.” Link

The indictment, handed down in Florida in August 2024, doesn’t identify the name of the company, which gained notoriety in 2000.  “These bribes were allegedly paid to obtain and retain business related to providing voting machines and election services for the 2016 Philippine elections and to secure payments on the contracts, including the release of value added tax payments,” according to a Justice Department release on the indictments.  Link

In relation to the recent DOJ indictment, Smartmatic stated the following:

Smartmatic has learned that two of our employees have been indicted for alleged violations of the FCPA in the Philippines almost 10 years ago.  Regardless of the veracity of the allegations and while our accused employees remain innocent until proven guilty, we have placed both employees on leaves of absence, effective immediately.

No voter fraud has been alleged and Smartmatic is not indicted.  Voters worldwide must be assured that the elections they participate in are conducted with the utmost integrity and transparency.  These are the values that Smartmatic lives by.

Smartmatic grotesquely understates the problem. Those indicted are not mere employees. They are the co-founder/President and COO, and the brother-in-law of the Chairman and CEO.

Smartmatic in America

Somehow, the United States saw fit to use software from that company in our own voting machines. In 2020, five states using Dominion equipment stopped vote counting and then the votes flipped. Smartmatic ended up buying Sequoia Company, although we don’t know how they got the cash for the purchase.  Then it used its own software in the Sequoia software election counting systems.

Smartmatic’s chairman, Lord Malloch-Brown, a socialist politician from the UK, who was Deputy Secretary General of the UN and is now President of the Soros Open Society Foundations, told us in 2009 that Dominion voting machines licensed the Smartmatic software.

Frank Gaffney interviewed Dr. Michael Waller on Securing America podcast and Waller has the goods on Smartmatic.  Here’s what he told Frank:

“During the Trump administration, the justice department started an investigation of Smartmatic.  A federal grand jury was convened to investigate Smartmatic for corruption.  They couldn’t do it in the United States, they didn’t have the evidence for it, but they had evidence from the Philippines that Smartmatic had bribed the head of the Philippine Commission to buy Smartmatic machines for Philippine voting.  Turns out the information came from the estranged wife of the head of the election commission who was complaining all of a sudden that her husband came across a whole lot of money.

“That got the federal investigation started and so last week (in early August) the federal grand jury indictment was unsealed for the Smartmatic president and COO, the  Smartmatic Vice President for Development and the brother-in-law of Smartmatic’s CEO, the largest shareholders were the four Venezuelan Americans indicted for criminal conspiracy and bribery under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act to bribe the Philippine Elections Commission to buy their machines.

“The DOJ announcement purposely didn’t even mention Smartmatic. You had to know the personalities involved to put two and two together.  The indictment only alleged that these executives of this unnamed company, were being accused of corruption and bribery.  But of course, the character of the CEO or COO or the people running the company, shows the character of the company itself.

“This was an end-of-day news release by the DOJ about an unsealed indictment.  It just mentioned the individuals and the Philippines.  It didn’t mention Smartmatic at all, when the whole thing, of course, was all about Smartmatic.  That was really curious, why would that not be in the announcement of the indictment?  The text of the indictment itself was not released at that time.  So, when I found that out and put two and two together and threw it up on X, and was first to market on putting that together, then all the news organizations had to follow suit and mention Smartmatic. CNN did and Miami-Herald because it was unsealed in Miami.

“What we know is the executives and one of the co-founders, of the company that designed the DNA of election software in different jurisdictions of our country, was just indicted by a grand jury for international corruption and bribery.  The federal grand jury found sufficient cause to indict them on a range of corruption crimes.

“The President and CEO entered ‘no plea’ when he appeared and turned himself in, claiming that he didn’t have legal counsel, when his colleagues’ legal counsel told them that they’ve known about this investigation since 2019.

“So, something is very strange and especially an election company who prides itself on transparency and integrity, they have to be beyond reproach, and I don’t think Smartmatic meets that standard anymore.

“Right now, the only Smartmatic machines I’m aware that are being used are in Los Angeles County, California.  However, a lot of the people investigating election fraud or potential election fraud, including some people who had been associated with Smartmatic the company, say that Smartmatic software has become woven into the DNA software of other big election voter machine companies.  So, it’s not Smartmatic software per say, but these people, who have studied it really closely, say that it’s the same DNA.”

When Dr. Waller was asked by Frank Gaffney if our machines were similarly at risk of being manipulated, especially if hooked up with the internet, he answered, “It is possible and even plausible that if you’ve got the federal grand jury charging the leaders of the company with corruption…the fact is, we don’t know.  But the fact is also that you have five-year investigations just come to fruition with federal felony charges involved.  So, there is something there that shows there is an integrity deficit with this important company.”

Frank Gaffney then asked Mike if we should be using this kind of software with this legacy.  Dr. Waller said, “We shouldn’t be using any electronic voting machines because even the computer experts themselves say that ‘nothing is not hackable in this,’ so if foreign powers or corrupt domestic elements can hack our voting systems, then we shouldn’t be having these voting systems.  The whole way our voting system structure has been from town and city and state upward, it’s not central downward, and if you have a central software that is being used or varieties of it being used to tabulate our votes, then that’s going completely opposite the way our voting system should function.  So, if you have paper ballots, you can’t hack paper ballots.  And the big advocates of these electronic voting systems are like the late Hugo Chavez in Venezuela, Nicolas Maduro in Venezuela, the Marxists running Brazil, and the Harris/Walz campaign.”

Conclusion

It is apparent that voting machine software has been used to compromise elections throughout the world.

One has to wonder if this software gave us a false result of the US 2020 election.  If so, what is to stop it from happening again?

I agree with Dr. Waller that paper ballots are the answer.

However, in the Texas Senate race of 1948, Lyndon Baines Johnson had his people change paper ballot votes from 7s to 9s in his favor and claimed victory over the beloved former Texas Governor, Coke Stevenson.  Texas Ranger, Frank Hamer, proved the fraud and took it all the way to the Supreme Court.  Democrat Justice Hugo Black never looked at the proof and gave the election to LBJ.

Swindlers will always find a way to cheat, but it’s much less likely with paper ballots.

©2024. Kelleigh Nelson. All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLE: Network of Georgia election officials strategizing to undermine 2024 result

Media Censorship Money Trail Leads Back to U.S. State Department, House Committee Finds

How far will the Biden administration go to block speech it doesn’t like? The outer limit may never be reached, but it does go international, according to an interim report by the House Committee on Small Business (HCSB) published earlier this week.

“The Global Engagement Center (GEC), an interagency body housed within the U.S. Department of State … circumvented its strict international mandate by funding, developing, then promoting tech start-ups and other small businesses in the disinformation detection space to private sector entities with domestic censorship capabilities,” stated the report. Additionally, “The National Endowment for Democracy (NED), a private non-profit funded almost entirely by Congressional appropriations, violated its international restrictions by collaborating with fact-checking entities in assessing domestic press businesses’ admission to a credibility organization.”

The GEC’s proclivity toward domestic censorship was already exposed by a House Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government report in November 2023, which exposed its collaboration with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and big-tech companies to censor disfavored political viewpoints during the 2020 election. This collaboration was separate from the DHS’s short-lived Orwellian innovation in the spring of 2022, the justly stillborn Disinformation Governance Board.

Where the HCSB broke new ground was in identifying ways that government funding was inappropriately subsidizing a burgeoning censorship industry — specifically by using foreign-only funds to subsidize domestic censorship projects. It focused on the GEC because it “is the only Federal entity known to this Committee: (1) whose purpose is countering foreign disinformation that threatens the United States, … [and] (3) that administers taxpayer dollars to small private entities that interfere with the ability of American businesses to compete online because of their lawful speech.”

The HCSB report identified multiple instances where GEC awards were subcontracted to other groups. This practice decreases the transparency of these awards, since the State Department has refused to inform the committee of all subaward recipients, and in some cases professes not to know who received a subaward. However, the committee did uncover enough information to raise further concerns about “GEC’s compliance with its international mandate.”

For instance, “one such award was to the Institute of War & Peace Reporting (IWPR), which administered a subaward

to the Poynter Institute for Media Studies, Inc. (Poynter),” detailed the committee. “This subaward was used to convince international news outlets to join Poynter’s International Fact-Checking Network’s (IFCN) Code of Principles. … To join the Code of Principles, organizations must apply and be accepted by the IFCN’s assessors.”

“It appears that[,] in implementing this award, GEC staff was added to a Google Group email in which IFCN assessors (including representatives from the NED and fact-checking organizations Snopes, Full Fact, and Poynter/IFCN) critiqued applicants, including domestic businesses such as The Daily Caller and its fact-checking organization,” continued the HCSB report. At the very least, this means that GEC staff were aware that, despite their strict international mandate, this award affected domestic, American media.

The committee also noted NED’s role in this domestic enterprise. “As set forth in its Articles of Incorporation and the National Endowment for Democracy Act, it is a violation of the NED’s mandate to operate domestically, and therefore to interfere with the operations of domestic press,” stated the report. It found evidence that NED staff weighed in, from their official email addresses, on the credibility of U.S.-based media organizations. On February 22, 2021, NED program officer Dean Jackson wrote:

“On the other hand, you really have to ask yourself if you want to be featured on a website with a history of [here he linked to a Snopes article claiming that ‘many’ Daily Caller writers had expressed white supremacist views, when in fact they exposed one who was immediately fired], next to headlines like [here he linked to a Daily Caller article titled, ‘Public Schools Are Becoming Cesspools Of Woke Liberal Activism. What Happened?’]. It’s something everyone has to answer for themselves. I personally wouldn’t lend them the credibility.”

Jackson worked for a federally-funded organization whose strictly international mandate prevented them from interfering with the operations of domestic press. Yet, using his work email, he publicly opined about the credibility of a domestic news organization based on how they covered domestic education topics.

Jackson no longer works for NED. In fact, he left NED in June 2021 for a position with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a left-wing group. During his two years there, he also worked as an analyst on the January 6 subcommittee. Jackson’s post-NED resume demonstrates not only his political leanings but also the left-wing ecosystem in which the National Endowment for Democracy exists.

The political bias on display with NED underscores why federally-funded non-governmental organizations should stay out of domestic media markets in the first place. In the last century, the U.S. government founded Voice of America (VOA) to counter propaganda coming from hostile foreign governments. But it restricted VOA’s reach on U.S. soil precisely to safeguard the freedom of the press. The committee report recognized that organizations like GEC have a role to play in countering propaganda from new hostile actors, ranging from pro-terrorist Imams to states like Iran, Russia, and China.

But there should still be guardrails to protect the freedom of domestic, American press from undue government interference. The HCSB report describes how the GEC and NED overrode those guardrails.

The HCSB identified another award “to a small domestic business” that was “not subject to international restrictions” and affected domestic news media. The GEC awarded contracts to Park Capital Investment Group, LLC (Park Advisors), which had a residential address on the GEC contract list and is now defunct. In 2020 and 2022, Park Advisors sub-awarded a total of $75,000 to a tech start-up, NewsGuard, which created new methodology for evaluating the trustworthiness or “health” of news organizations.

The HCSB did not have to search far to find bias in NewsGuard’s ratings. It found misleading headlines in mainstream media articles (regarding the Trump assassination attempt and a malicious misquotation to imply that Trump promised a “bloodbath” if he lost the election) and noted that these headlines did not affect NewsGuard’s scoring system.

In a few short years, NewsGuard has “partnered with three of the top five global advertising agencies and five of the top ten ad exchanges,” as well as Microsoft, YouTube, and other companies to discredit certain news organizations and “influence[] thousands of ad buys.” The report suggests, at least implicitly, that NewsGuard’s rapid rise was due in part to the patronage of the GEC.

The HCSB report is only an interim report because of aggressive stonewalling on the part of the State Department. To date, the committee has reviewed 40 hours of interviews and hearings, as well as 6,185 pages of documents, but largely from other sources. “The Committee sent an initial request for award records to the GEC on June 7, 2023,” the report summarized. “Subsequent requests for additional documentation were made over the course of one year, during which the Committee gave significant leeway in time and scope to State. Despite these accommodations, only two heavily redacted lists of awardees were produced, with none of the requested award application, risk assessment, or contract information.”

After 14 months of such delays, the small business committee issued a subpoena for the relevant documents. The State Department responded that it would take them 21 months — nearly a whole Congress — to fulfill it. This is an unacceptably long time, the report noted. Not only has the State Department already had months to collect the information, but the State Department should already have many of the documents compiled in response to requests from other committees. “The aforementioned failures are all indicative of a wider problem experienced by other committees — that the Biden-Harris Administration does not properly adhere to Congressional oversight,” they stated.

“The Federal government is a primary component of the CIC [censorship-industrial complex], and it is this nexus which concerns the Committee,” summarized the HCSB report. Due to the nature of the committee, their particular area of concern is the award of State Department grants to small businesses. “There are some awardees who tout ideological beliefs as fact, and work to diminish the reputation of American businesses if their speech negates those narratives,” it stated. “The Committee has received only a fraction of the documents it requested and subpoenaed from the GEC …. There is much more to learn[,] and transparency is in short supply.”

AUTHOR

Joshua Arnold

Joshua Arnold is a senior writer at The Washington Stand.

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2024 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

AWED MEDIA BALANCED NEW: We cover COVID to Climate, as well as Energy to Elections.

Welcome! We cover COVID to Climate, as well as Energy to Elections.

Here is the link for this issue, so please share it on social media.

Checkout the 2024, 2023, & 2022 archives, plus asterisked items below.


— This Newsletter’s Articles, by Topic —

If You Only Have Time to Read Some Select Articles:

*** Critically Thinking about the recent Presidential Debate

*** ABC Presidential Debate: Part I and Part II (Ayaan Hirsi Ali)

*** About the Debate: A Lost Opportunity

*** Tim Walz family members pose in t-shirts declaring their presidential preference: ‘Walz’s for Trump’

*** Alan Dershowitz leaves Democratic Party, cites DNC: ‘I was disgusted’

*** A Good Reason to Vote as Early as Possible

*** Suppressing the Vote

*** Grow Some Independence America

*** Report: America Invaded

*** The Green New Deal could make electricity 28 times more expensive

*** If Germany kept nuclear power, it could have saved $600b and cut emissions by 73%

*** Is Nuclear the Tortoise to the Wind and Solar Hare?

*** Has the Electricity Reality Check Arrived?

*** More Solar Silliness In The New York Times

*** Energy Essentials: Why Modern Civilization Critically Depends on Coal, Oil & Gas

*** Climatism Or Energy Humanism?

*** Natural Gas or Coal — Do We Have a Choice?

*** Talking points on Kamala Harris’s fracking reversal

*** The Electric Vehicle Transition That Isn’t

*** Scientists Expose Major Problems With Climate Change Data

*** Follow the Science: Biden Climate Policy is a Fraud

*** 2024 hurricane season: the worst climate prediction ever?

*** Rejoice — It’s Over: Climate Alarmism has been Debunked

*** How it ends: 96% of Big Corporations are quietly abandoning their climate commitments

*** Is Climate Change Fanaticism the Greatest Killer of All Time?

*** The Socratic Method: Teaching children through guided inquiry

*** The Good Ole Days

*** A Revolution Begins in Austin, Texas

*** In the Netherlands, they keep two sets of books for the COVID vaccines

*** Study: A potential association between COVID-19 vaccination and development of Alzheimer’s disease

*** U.S. Surgeon General warns that parenting is a health hazard (not fake news)

*** Duke Health injecting race into care, firing doctors who object

*** Trump Can Make America Healthy Again

Secondary Education Related:

*** Report: The Key to Fixing the US Education System

*** The Socratic Method: Teaching children through guided inquiry

*** The Good Ole Days

Public school failures behind demand for private school vouchers

Restore ACT’s Science Section

Political Gender Polarization Among Young People

K-8 School hid Girl’s Transition from Parents, and Called Authorities on Them

Why aren’t governments tackling the epidemic of sexual abuse in America’s public schools?

Pfizer Deploys Mobile ‘School of Science’ to Teach Kids the ABCs of Pandemics and Vaccines

Higher Education Related:

*** A Revolution Begins in Austin, Texas

Academia Gets an ”F”

VCU’s New Protest Policy Makes Sense

The Mass Formation Psychosis in America’s Universities

Artificial Intelligence:

AI and The Death of Work 1

Is Artificial Intelligence the Next Easy-Money Bust?

Greed Energy Economics:

*** Has the Electricity Reality Check Arrived?

*** The Green New Deal could make electricity 28 times more expensive

Two Days of Fall Weather in Late Summer Demonstrates Industrial Wind’s Incredible Costs

New Paper Shows the Problem with Power Subsidies

Wind Energy — Offshore:

Offshore wind energy development: A David vs Goliath story

Wind Energy — Other:

*** Taking the Wind Out of Climate Change (referencing 60± studies)

Wind turbines “destroy habitats”

Turbine fire burns 260+ acres in California

Solar Energy:

*** More Solar Silliness In The New York Times

Nuclear Energy:

*** If Germany kept nuclear power, it could have saved $600b and cut emissions by 73%

*** Is Nuclear the Tortoise to the Wind and Solar Hare?

Fossil Fuel Energy:

*** Climatism Or Energy Humanism?

*** Natural Gas or Coal — Do We Have a Choice?

*** Talking points on Kamala Harris’s fracking reversal

The Texas heat deaths scam

Electric Vehicles (EVs):

*** The Electric Vehicle Transition That Isn’t

Misc Energy:

*** Hydro-Québec and the New York and New England contracts — selling electricity it does not own at a cost it does not know

NY Gov’s futile ‘energy summit’ can’t resolve NY’s impossible green goals

Manmade Global Warming — Some Deceptions:

*** Scientists Expose Major Problems With Climate Change Data

*** Follow the Science: Biden Climate Policy is a Fraud

*** 2024 hurricane season: the worst climate prediction ever?

Editorial: Climate alarmists see the glass half empty

Leaders of climate science societies are suffering from mass delusion

Manmade Global Warming — Misc:

*** Rejoice — It’s Over: Climate Alarmism has been Debunked

*** How it ends: 96% of Big Corporations are quietly abandoning their climate commitments

*** Is Climate Change Fanaticism the Greatest Killer of All Time?

Why Democrats aren’t talking much about one of their biggest issues

Archive Reports: Methane and Climate & Nitrous Oxide and Climate

Giant Wyoming Carbon Capture Project Pulls Plug

Climate Watch: Is CO2 Reaching a Crisis Level?

Expert opinion filed Hague Court of Appeals in Shell v. Milieudefensie

US Election:

Election-Integrity.info (10 major election reports by our team of experts, plus much more!)

*** A Good Reason to Vote as Early as Possible

*** Suppressing the Vote

Election 2024: Beware of the USPS

The Easy, Cheap, Quick Solution to the RFK Jr. Ballot Issue

Clear Battle Lines Drawn at Congressional Hearing on Election Confidence

Why Are Democrats Protecting Noncitizen Voting Rights?

US Election — State Issues:

Town Clerk Raises Concerns Over Detroit’s Election Law Violations

Myth vs. Fact: Georgia State Election Board Rules

RNC Forces Walz’s Minnesota to Stop Non-Citizen Voting

RITE Statement on Victory in PA Supreme Court on Undated Mail Ballots

US Election — Presidential Debate:

*** Critically Thinking about the recent Presidential Debate

*** ABC Presidential Debate: Part I and Part II (Ayaan Hirsi Ali)

*** About the Debate: A Lost Opportunity

We Didn’t Get to Know Harris in Debate, and Likely Never Will

US National Election — Harris & Walz:

*** Tim Walz family members pose in t-shirts declaring their presidential preference: ‘Walz’s for Trump’

*** Alan Dershowitz leaves Democratic Party, cites DNC: ‘I was disgusted’

Kamala’s Long War on Free Speech

The Bogus Theory of Greed Inflation

House panel subpoenas Tim Walz over $250M COVID fraud

Harris-Walz: Joy and Freedom – or misery and tyranny?

Kamala Won’t Give Position on Green New Deal

Biden’s Legacy: the Decline of Arms Control and Disarmament

Misc US Politics:

*** Grow Some Independence America

*** Report: America Invaded

Which came first, the dirty politician or the apathetic patriot?

CDC advised against punishing crime more, triggering FOIA lawsuit and release of records

Censorship:

On Fire: The Global War Against Free Speech

Health:

*** U.S. Surgeon General warns that parenting is a health hazard (not fake news)

*** Duke Health injecting race into care, firing doctors who object

*** Trump Can Make America Healthy Again

Little Known Facts about Coffee

To Sleep, Perchance Not Very Well, by Taking Melatonin

Cryptosporidium in the UK

Israel/Ukraine:

Pray for the safety of the Israeli people

Latest Developments in Israel

Pray for the safety of the Ukrainian people

A well-rated source to make a Ukraine donation

Latest Developments in Ukraine

COVID-19 — Misc:

*** In the Netherlands, they keep two sets of books for the COVID vaccines

*** Study: A potential association between COVID-19 vaccination and development of Alzheimer’s disease

Japan Links Covid Shots to 201 Dangerous Diseases

Caught Red Handed: U.S. D.O.D issued ‘COVID-19 Research’ contract 3 Months before COVID was known to exist

COVID-19: Are You Getting Your Latest Booster?


Please use social media, etc. to pass on this Newsletter to other open-minded citizens…If you’d like to be added to (or unsubscribe from) the distribution of our popular, free, worldwide Media Balance Newsletter, simply send me an email saying that.


Note 1: We recommend reading the Newsletter on your computer, not your phone, as some documents (e.g., PDFs) are much easier to read on a large computer screen… We’ve tried to use common fonts, etc. to minimize display issues.

Note 2: For past Newsletter issues see the archives from 2021, 2022, 2023, & 2024. To accommodate numerous requests received about prior articles over all fourteen plus years of the Newsletter, we’ve put this together — where you can search ALL prior issues, by year. For a background about how the Newsletter is put together, etc., please read this.

Note 3: See this extensive list of reasonable books on climate change. As a parallel effort, we have also put together a list of some good books related to industrial wind energy. Both topics are also extensively covered on my website: WiseEnergy.org.

Note 4: I am not an attorney or a physician, so no material appearing in any of the Newsletters (or any of my websites) should be construed as giving legal or medical advice. My recommendation has always been: consult a competent, licensed attorney when you are involved with legal issues, and consult a competent physician regarding medical matters.

Copyright © 2024; Alliance for Wise Energy Decisions (see WiseEnergy.org).

U.N. Summit of the Future will kick off Sept. 20-23 to build framework for new one-world ‘system’

This conference in the heart of modern Babylon marks the unveiling of the beast system, and the nations of the world affirming the supremacy of the system. 

The United Nations will be meeting soon to secretly negotiate a series of pacts at its so-called Summit of the Future. The goal, in the words of the UN and its top officials, is to establish the framework for a new one-world “system” tailored to the digital age in a restructured world.

No matter how they try to dress it up with euphemistic buzzwords — spouting off promises of more equality and a world that’s more inclusive, more efficient, and more resilient — this new system will not be a friend of freedom.

The Exposé notes that there is no lawful authorization for delegates to vote on any of the pacts being negotiated — the so-called Pact for the Future, the Declaration for Future Generations, the Global Digital Compact or what UN Secretary General António Guterres is calling Our Common Agenda.

The Summit of the Future is a high-level United Nations summit scheduled for September 22 and 23 in New York City, with “action days” being held on September 20 and 21. The summit will culminate in the adoption of a “Pact for the Future.”

My gut tells me this Pact for the Future will be a pact with the devil.

Leaders from UN member states will attend the summit to reaffirm their “unwavering commitment” to the UN, its charter, its principles and its Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals. They will vow to submit to all UN agencies including the World Health Organization and the International Court of Justice. All of this is designed to move us towards what the UN is calling a “reinvigorated multilateral system better positioned to impact people’s lives positively.”

We must ask ourselves: When has the UN “system” ever impacted our lives in a positive way?

About the Pact for the Future, the UN says on its website: “This actionable document will be negotiated and endorsed by countries during the September 2024 Summit, fostering a more resilient global community for current and future generations.”

Participants will include representatives from various UN agencies, selected non-governmental organizations, selected businesses and industries, selected representatives from universities and research institutions, selected municipalities, regional governments and local authorities.

They’re all gathering to unite under the slogan of “representatives of future generations.”

Buried deep in the bowels of this document is this little gem, requiring member states to embed UN “agreements and resolutions” into their national laws:

“[Member states will] deepen United Nations’ engagement with national parliaments in United Nations intergovernmental bodies and processes, in accordance with national legislation, including through building on the efforts of the United Nations and Inter-Parliamentary Union to engage parliamentarians to maintain support for the implementation of relevant UN agreements and resolutions.”

Guterres, the unapologetic Portuguese socialist who runs the UN, says, “We can’t build a future for our grandchildren with a system built by our grandparents.”

So they’re talking about scrapping the current world order based on sovereign nation-states and switching over to a new one — one that will be fully integrated under a centralized power structure and fully digital for maximized control of the masses.

Everyone will be expected to have a biometric digital ID that marks them not just as citizens of their individual country but as global citizens. Dissident opinions or unapproved expressions of reality will be dismissed as “misinformation,” “disinformation” or “malinformation” and memory-holed. Perpetrators of such unapproved information will be fact-checked and punished by the system, which will be operated and enforced by the most efficient of means — artificial intelligence. Punishments will include being locked out of one’s bank account, being unable to make certain purchases, unable to get on a plane or subway or drive on public roads. This is the future according to the world’s self-appointed overlords at the UN.

There are two chapters in the draft Pact of the Future document: a chapter on science, technology, innovation and digital cooperation, and a chapter on youth and future generations. The draft chapter on youth and future generations builds on the 1997 UNESCO Declaration on Responsibilities towards Future Generations.

Patrick Wood, editor-in-chief at Technocracy.News, says the Pact for the Future will be where nations swear fealty to the UN.

Fealty is defined as “the fidelity of a vassal or feudal tenant to his lord.”

Wood adds that, “These national leaders aren’t free agents but rather behave like they are members of a cult, given over to self-harm. The UN mixes the magic potion that is willingly consumed, converting them into global citizen/slaves. If the U.S. were to stop funding the UN, it would fold like a deck of cards.”

Trust me, nothing good will come out of this globalist conference in New York.

The only way around it will be through official declarations by state legislatures, county commissions, city councils and, most importantly our sheriffssaying that any UN dictates will be considered null and void in their jurisdictions, regardless of whether such dictates are being enforced by the county, the state or the rogue entity in Washington that refers to itself as the federal government.

We need to elect more Constitutional Sheriffs. They will be our best defense against the unique form of globalist tyranny coming down from the United Nations and its subsidiary organizations (these subsidiaries include the U.S. federal government and any state or municipal government that is in compliance, officially or unofficially, with any UN goals, guidelines or dictates).

Do you have a Constitutional Sheriff in your county of residence? Do you know of a current candidate for sheriff who you know will stand up to the globalists that you’d like to support or give a shout out to? If so, please let us know in the comments below your county and the name of your sheriff or sheriff candidate.

©2024. All rights reserved.


Please visit Leo’s Newsletter Substack.

Trump Says He Will Not Debate Harris Again

Former President Donald Trump said Thursday that he would not debate Vice President Kamala Harris again after her campaign called for another face-off.

Immediately following Trump and Harris’ show down Tuesday, the vice president’s campaign began pushing for a second debate between the two in October. Trump wrote in a Truth Social post that he would not be debating Harris again, adding that she had previously denied his push for forums Sept. 4 on Fox News and Sept. 25 on NBC News.

“She was a no-show at the Fox Debate, and refused to do NBC & CBS. KAMALA SHOULD FOCUS ON WHAT SHE SHOULD HAVE DONE DURING THE LAST ALMOST FOUR YEAR PERIOD. THERE WILL BE NO THIRD DEBATE,” Trump wrote.

Harris and Trump faced off for the first time Tuesday on ABC News. Trump had previously debated President Joe Biden on June 27. After Biden stumbled through answers on stage, Democrats began pushing for the 81-year-old to drop out of the presidential race. About a month later, Biden did just that and endorsed his vice president.

Trump later proposed three debate dates to the Harris campaign, but the vice president accepted only one. Once the Sept. 10 debate was agreed upon, the Harris campaign issued a statement saying they would debate Trump in October if he showed up to the September debate.

National Press Secretary for the Trump campaign, Karoline Leavitt, previously told the Daily Caller that the statement was a lie, and that there was no October debate in the works.

“When a prizefighter loses a fight, the first words out of his mouth are, ‘I WANT A REMATCH.’ Polls clearly show that I won the Debate against Comrade Kamala Harris, the Democrats’ Radical Left Candidate, on Tuesday night, and she immediately called for a Second Debate. She and Crooked Joe have destroyed our Country, with millions of criminals and mentally deranged people pouring into the USA, totally unchecked and unvetted, and with Inflation bankrupting our Middle Class,” Trump wrote.

“Everyone knows this, and all of the other problems caused by Kamala and Joe – It was discussed in great detail during the First Debate with Joe, and the Second Debate with Comrade Harris,” he continued.

During the Tuesday debate, the vice president attempted to bait Trump into moments of anger by poking fun at his rallies and the results of the 2020 election. Conservative pundits and viewers were left frustrated with the moderators who repeatedly fact checked Trump but failed to correct Harris when she repeated previously debunked stories.

“Two nights ago Donald Trump and I had our first debate, and I believe we owe it to the voters to have another debate because this election and what is at stake could not be more important,” Harris said in response to Trump’s decision on another debate.

AUTHOR

Reagan Reese

White House correspondent. Follow Reagan on Twitter.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Did Tim Walz Call Kamala a ‘Prostitutor?’ VP Pick Under Fire After Comments About Harris Leave Viewers Stunned

ROOKE: ABC Moderator Straight Up Admits They Had To Tip The Scales Against Trump

Trump Proposes Eliminating Taxes On Overtime Pay For Workers

EXCLUSIVE: Harris Campaign Attempts To Mask Its Own Retreat With Outright Lie About Debates

Trump Frenzies As Kamala, Moderators Throw Chum In The Water

One Red State Senate Seat Could Flip The Balance Of Power In DC

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

The USDA Wants Control of Your Land, Air, Water. Take Action Before September 16th!

Propaganda is the game of the communist DNC. This is how the communists gain power. Lazy citizens who don’t pay attention to anything other than free stuff from the government vote for more free stuff. Equity just means we will be all be equal in poverty as the communist government will regulate, tax and steal everything we own.

Contrary to popular belief when the communists put a program in place and it loses, they don’t end the program. All they do is change the name and bring it back again. Remember the National Asset Company, NAC? This was the company run by the USDA, Department of Agriculture that was going to put a monetary value on all environmental services.  What is an environmental service? Basically they intend to put a monetary value on land, air, water, trees anything that had to do with the environment.

We were able to stop the NAC by the people participating and making comments on the USDA web site. We thought it was gone. Boy were we foolish. Because it’s back again under a new name called the Sustain Act. The Sustains Act was, signed into law as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023. Congress signed another bill without reading it. This one provides USDA with the authority to accept contributions of private funds that can be channeled through its existing conservation programs and provides additional guidelines for those contributions.

According to the American Stewards of Liberty, Americanstewards.us The USDA is preparing policy to implement the Sustains Act, which will monetize NATURALPROCESSES determining who will own “environmental services,” which include the air we breathe, photosynthesis, pollination, and the health benefits of open space.

We have until Sept 16 to register comments.

According to American Stewards: The earlier attempt to accomplish this was stopped when the Natural Asset Company scam was soundly defeated in January. This ACT is the first step towards implementing UN Agenda 21/2030, the United Nations’ sustainable development agenda. The Sustains Act  will provide the path to transfer America’s real assets from private citizens to federal and international interests.
This Act needs to be repealed which is why it is so important to get the right people in Congress and stop these insane CRs which are implemented without being read.

The Sustains Act sponsored by the USDA again is after rural communities. They want us to live in Packam Stackam 15 Minute car-less cities so that they can control our food, our water and our freedom. All of this is going to be done in conjunction with Agenda 21/2030 coming out of the United Nations. United Nations is having a conference from the 20th to the 24th called the Summit of the Future where they will describe how we will own nothing they will own everything and we will be happy. Communists do not believe in private property rights or sovereignty.

We have an opportunity to go on the USDA website and put a comment in the comment section just like we did with the NAC. If you want more information please go to the AmericanStewart.us website where the description of this act which by the way is already on the books. We have until September 16th to place our comments. We know that this worked because the NAC was killed so let’s kill this one also.


USDA Requests Public Input on Implementation of SUSTAINS Act | Natural Resources Conservation Service

USDA is asking for public input on how best to implement the SUSTAINS Act, which authorizes USDA to accept private contributions to channel through several existing USDA conservation programs. Submit comments to the Request for Information via the Federal Register by Sept. 16, 2024.

WASHINGTON, Aug. 15, 2024 – The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) is asking for public input on how best to implement the SUSTAINS Act, which authorizes USDA to accept private contributions to channel through several existing USDA conservation programs. The public should submit comments to the Request for Information via the Federal Register by September 16, 2024.

“Agriculture is at the forefront of the nation’s effort to conserve our natural resources, and we want to hear from people on the ground how to implement this legislation to maximize its benefits, promote equity and assist all producers,” said USDA’s Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Chief Terry Cosby.

The SUSTAINS Act, signed into law as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023, provides USDA with the authority to accept contributions of private funds that can be channeled through its existing conservation programs and provides additional guidelines for those contributions. Specifically, the SUSTAINS Act provides an opportunity for the private sector to partner with USDA to engage farmers, ranchers, and forest landowners in supporting conservation initiatives, including to expand implementation of conservation practices to sequester carbon, improve wildlife habitat, protect sources of drinking water and address other natural resource priorities.

NRCS is asking for public input and recommendations to determine how the agency can utilize private funds to target specific natural resource concerns associated with agricultural production. NRCS is interested in supporting program implementation and improving program delivery, including by effectively leveraging additional funds to increase outreach and expand access to financial and technical assistance for underserved producers. NRCS will use the input to determine the next steps to implement this legislation, which could include a proposed rule.

Public comments should be submitted through this Federal Register notice by September 16, 2024.

Anyone with questions can contact NRCS by sending an email to: NRCS.SUSTAINS.Input@usda.gov. Please specify the Docket ID: NRCS-2024-0014 in the subject line.

More Information

To learn more about NRCS programs, producers can contact their local USDA Service Center.  Producers can also apply for NRCS programs, manage conservation plans and contracts, and view and print conservation maps by logging into their farmers.gov account. Producers without an account can sign up today.

For more than 90 years, NRCS has helped farmers, ranchers and forestland owners make investments in their operations and local communities to improve the quality of our air, water, soil, and wildlife habitat.  NRCS uses the latest science and technology to help keep working lands working, boost agricultural economies, and increase the competitiveness of American agriculture. NRCS provides one-on-one, personalized advice and financial assistance and works with producers to help them reach their goals through voluntary, incentive-based conservation programs. Now, with additional funding from the Inflation Reduction Act, NRCS is working to get even more conservation practices on the ground while ensuring access to programs for all producers. For more information, visit www.nrcs.usda.gov.

USDA touches the lives of all Americans each day in so many positive ways. In the Biden-Harris administration, USDA is transforming America’s food system with a greater focus on more resilient local and regional food production, fairer markets for all producers, ensuring access to safe, healthy and nutritious food in all communities, building new markets and streams of income for farmers and producers using climate smart food and forestry practices, making historic investments in infrastructure and clean energy capabilities in rural America, and committing to equity across the Department by removing systemic barriers and building a workforce more representative of America. To learn more, visit usda.gov.

‘We Will Be Relentless’: One. Simple. Trick … And Corporations Scramble To Kill ‘Divisive’ Diversity Policies

Robby Starbuck has been collecting scalps.

First came Tractor Supply Co. Then John Deere. Most recently, Coors scrapped their participation in the Human Rights Campaign’s (HRC) Corporate Equity Index, a social credit score-style running tally of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) marks for publicly traded companies.

The corporations all dropped their participation in HRC’s index after Starbuck simply started highlighting them in public, amplifying complaints from internal whistleblowers to his massive X (formerly Twitter) following.

Harley Davidson, FordLowe’s and the parent company of Jack Daniels have all joined the ranks of companies that ended their participation in the index and committed to backtracking on woke corporate policies like deploying racial quotas, segregating employees into resource groups based on race and sexuality and celebrating pride events.

Each company announced the policy shift after Starbuck merely shined a spotlight on their practices.

“We’ve shown our teeth here. We’ve shown what we’re capable of. We’ve shown that we will be relentless when a company does not do the right thing, and that we will not stop, will not back down,” Starbuck, a conservative activist who focuses mostly on issues of family, told the Daily Caller.

The First Domino To Fall

Tractor Supply Co. was Starbuck’s first target after an internal whistleblower tipped him off to some of their HRC-compliant policies like providing LGBT and intersectionality training and sponsoring a “family friendly” drag show.

“I didn’t believe it until we vetted the information,” Starbuck told the Caller. “I go to Tractor Supply … I took my kids there every week,” Starbuck said.

But upon review, Starbuck found that the Brentwood, Tennessee-based farm supply company was engaged in things like selling the Queer Agenda card game on their website.

Starbuck released a seven-minute video detailing the company’s comprehensive compliance with the HRC’s index and their CEO Hal Lawton’s support for progressive causes in early June.

WATCH: ‘We Will Be Relentless’: Corporations Scramble To Kill ‘Divisive’ Diversity Policies

He included contact information for the company in the video. What happened next, he told the Caller, was the result of a grassroots campaign of thousands of the company’s customers calling and placing pressure on the company to drop their policies.

Three weeks after his video, Tractor Supply Co. released a statement detailing policy changes that included ending their submission of data to the Human Rights Campaign, eliminating DEI roles and DEI goals and a withdrawal of their carbon emission goals.

“This monumental change is thanks to all of you who supported my work exposing this, to the whistleblowers in Tractor Supply and my fellow farm owners who respectfully spoke up,” Starbuck wrote on X.

Others took notice. “Robbie Starbuck is a hero. He’s a one-man band,” Monica Crowley, a former Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs for the U.S. Treasury Department under President Trump, told the Caller.

“It’s perfectly within the American consumers’ right to understand and decide for themselves whether or not they want to support those companies with their hard earned disposable income,” Crowley said.

Starbuck replicated this model for other companies, continuing to use social media — X in particular — to highlight companies with a largely conservative consumer base for their woke policies.

“When I recognized that a company that depended on conservative consumers had fallen for this woke nonsense, I said they’re probably not the only one.”

Social Credit Scores For Business

The companies all announced they would stop sending data to the HRC, which had previously given many of them high scores on its Corporate Equality Index (CEI).

The CEI is a social credit score-like rating system that awards businesses up to 100 points on a scale that includes criteria like “nondiscrimination policies,” “equitable benefits for LGBTQ+ workers” and “supporting an inclusive culture,” according to their website.

The seemingly innocuous language stands in front of policies that, upon closer inspection, represent explicitly discriminatory policies like requiring companies to buy from suppliers with specific same sex preferences.

“82 percent of rated employers in this year’s CEI have supplier mandates with respect to non-discrimination in place, and 98 percent of these mandates (1105 of 1131 companies) explicitly include sexual orientation and gender identity alongside other named categories,” the HRC touts on its website.

The index also encourages businesses to “provide education, training, and accountability measures on diversity and inclusion in the workplace.” The index specifically mentions the formation of LGBT employee resource groups and “diversity councils.”

“When a company offers ’employee resource groups’ to support workers of certain skin colors or ethnicities, it’s also unwittingly supporting a form of segregation by separating employees based on their immutable characteristics,” Monica Harris, the Executive Director at the Foundation Against Intolerance & Racism (FAIR), told the Daily Caller. “When employers separate people who are supposed to work together, it’s not inclusive; it’s divisive,” she said.

Before breaking with the HRC, some of the businesses courted high scores on their index by setting targets for hiring specific percentages of employees of different racial heritage.

John Deere said they aspired to increase black hires by 85 percent, hispanic hires by 61 percent and Asian hires by 10 percent, according to company documents obtained by Starbuck.

John Deere also apparently tied employee bonuses and pay raises specifically to DEI performance, writing in their 2022 Sustainability report that “DEI is the only global behavioral performance metric upon which salaried employees are evaluated,” according to Starbuck.

They also encouraged employees to snitch on each other. In July, their mandatory code of conduct included a pledge to “report any diversity, equity, or inclusion-related concerns to a manager … ” a screenshot Starbuck took of the code of conduct shows.

John Deere dropped their participation in the HRC’s index after their stock price reached a one-year low and announced it would stop its participation in “social or culture awareness parades, festivals, or events,” following Starbuck’s campaign.

HRC has pushed back against the companies’ rejection of their index in a big way, noting that they would still be indexing companies that choose not to send them data. Their website landing page now has a large graphic highlighting Ford and other companies that rejected their index and says “This Isn’t Just Policy. It’s Personal. Millions of hardworking Americans and their families count on these companies.”

They’ve also returned fire on Starbuck, starting their own pressure campaign against him.

“They’re doing a text and email campaign against me right now,” Starbuck told the Caller. “It’s silly, but in a weird way they’re actually helping me, and I don’t think they realize it. They called me a MAGA weirdo. You’re only proving my point to these major companies that you are a partisan actor. You just said MAGA weirdo. So that means anybody who believes in MAGA that shops in one of these stores at these Fortune 500 companies is going to be thinking, ‘Why are they partnered with a group that calls people who think like me a MAGA weirdo?’”

Many of the companies mentioned the HRC by name in their announcement in policy shifts. A Ford spokesman said their CEO Jim Farley did so because it was the group their employees asked about the most often, according to The Wall Street Journal.

HRC’s President Kelley Robinson said in a statement the decision “will hurt the company’s long-term business success, from employee retention to consumer decisions about how they will spend their dollars.”

Starbuck, however, disagrees.

“If DEI and wokeness were making these companies money, and nobody on my end was making them feel pressure, these companies would not change policy,” he told the Caller.

Some experts note that these extremes are not the only way to go about building an inclusive workspace. Before the DEI craze, companies centered their diversity efforts along non-racial lines like differences in class, geography, religion and political perspective, Harris told the Daily Caller.

“My sense is that companies adopting aggressive, discriminatory DEI policies are out of sync with the current racial landscape in our country, but they don’t realize it,” Harris told the Caller.

“They’re being advised to use a sledgehammer to swat a fly. Does racism still exist in America? Unquestionably, yes. But unlike 60 years ago, race no longer defines the experience of black or white Americans. Increasingly, class, not race, is what’s causing system inequities. As a society, we’ve made tremendous progress in race relations that is being minimized and even ignored and, sadly, many DEI programs lean hard into this distortion of our racial reality,” Harris said.

American corporations spend a pretty penny on DEI training, over $8 billion, according to a review by Harvard’s Iris Bohnet. A McKinsey analysis predicts that number to nearly double by 2026.

While companies are incredibly secretive about the specific figures they spend on DEI initiatives (both Starbuck and the Daily Caller have conducted extensive reviews of HRC-indexed company financials and have been unable to find concrete figures), American educational institutions publicly spend millions on their efforts.

A January analysis by University of Michigan professor Dr. Mark J. Perry found the school was spending over $30 million in salary for employees “whose main duties are to provide DEI programming.”

A 2021 report by the Jefferson Council found the University of Virginia was spending almost $7 million yearly for their DEI efforts.

“I Felt Like I Was Sinning”

Rather than driven by financial motives, the DEI initiatives, incubated at the HRC, are pushed upon companies by their human resources and public relations departments, a nerve center Starbuck likens to “tumors.”

“Those two departments worked in tandem to convince executives you needed to do this or you were going to look racist,” Starbuck told the Caller.

An HR initiative at one of the companies Starbuck took down, Harley-Davidson, apparently encouraged employees to read the book “White Fragility” by author Robin DiAngelo, which among other things, claims “a white supremacist worldview” is “the bedrock of society.”

Other companies encouraged employees to sign LBGT ally pledges. Employees felt pressured to sign the pledges, telling Starbuck they felt they might be fired if they didn’t.

“I thought I would be fired if I didn’t do it. I’m a Christian. I felt like I was sinning by doing it,” Starbuck told the Caller, echoing an employee’s sentiments.

Harley-Davidson even sent white male employees to white male only diversity training, according to Starbuck.

The HR and PR departments are the “nerve center” of these movements, with the CEOs of the companies often wholly unaware of the radical takeovers, Starbuck said.

“They said, ‘Honestly, I watched the video you sent us, and I was shocked. I didn’t know this was going on,’” Starbuck said of some executives he’s spoken to. “‘It’s a real wake up call,’ is the term he used. There were things that were being done that he just didn’t know. He had kind of lost control of a certain department of people, and their ability to just do certain things without him ever knowing about it.”

Outside of the CEOs, many of the companies’ corporate leadership and executive class are simply out of touch with their consumer base, Crowley told the Caller.

These executives tend to all come from the same socioeconomic and educational class, Crowley said.

“There’s tremendous peer pressure to toe the social justice line, policy line, because their social group is all doing it, and that if they refuse to do it, that somehow they would be ostracized from their social group, their economic group, their fellow CEOs,” Crowley said.

Wilfred Reilly, a professor of political science at Arkansas State University, concurred with Crowley’s assessment.

“The root issue here is a total disconnect between an Ivy League and Big 10 educated executive class and hard workers at their own companies … regular Americans who buy motorcycles, heavy equipment and Bud Light,” Reilly told the Caller.

The HR and marketing departments, Starbuck told the Caller, are often spearheaded by young, radical leftists who attach to pseudo-Marxist ideology in college and infect the companies with it.

“The belief system coming out of a lot of colleges that folks have … They think it is their job to inject this stuff into the DNA of a company. Those folks, in many ways, use the fear of CEOs after George Floyd against them to create a lot of the space for wokeness in the workplace, and then it takes on a life zone. It becomes a disease that spreads to every part of the company’s body. And I would say what we’re doing is something akin to removing the tumor.”

While Starbuck has been able to declare victory over many of the companies, he’s not stopping. He has thousands of whistleblowers in his inbox ready to expose more of the over 500 companies who the HRC lists in their index.

“If they were able to shift the Overton window that fast, I realized we could do the same thing by waking up companies to where their customers are,” he told the Caller.

The majority of the companies he’s gone after so far have had largely conservative consumer bases, but Starbuck says it doesn’t have to be solely right-leaning companies who feel the heat.

“If conservatives even just make up 20% of your customer base, you really can’t afford to do things that are just openly sort of discriminatory toward them or violating their values in some way,” Starbuck said.

AUTHOR

Robert McGreevy

Reporter.

RELATED ARTICLE: Bush, Bowman, Gay, Kendi. All Disintegrated. Their Commonality? Woke Acolytes Are On The Run

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.