Ron DeSantis Files To Run For President

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis filed paperwork with the Federal Election Commission (FEC) Wednesday to run for president in 2024.

DeSantis has been widely expected to jump in the Republican primaries for months and has consistently polled in the double digits alongside former President Donald Trump. The FEC filing comes ahead of his highly-anticipated presidential announcement at 6 p.m. Wednesday on Twitter Spaces with CEO Elon Musk, the Daily Caller News Foundation confirmed.

The governor has been traveling to key early primary states, touting his book “The Courage To Be Free” and pitching his “Florida Blueprint” agenda. DeSantis has already secured key endorsements from state legislators in Iowa, New Hampshire and Florida, as well as top Republicans in Congress like Reps. Chip Roy of Texas, Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Bob Good of Virginia.

DeSantis’ entrance into the Republican primaries comes after he wrapped up Florida’s legislative session filled with GOP-backed bills. The governor scored conservative wins on parental rights in education, school choice, gun rights, immigration, the death penalty, abortion and plenty more.

The governor changed his political Twitter account handle Monday, preceding with his imminent presidential launch. The governor’s account had previously been used for both Florida gubernatorial campaigns, so he dropped the “FL” from his handle “@RonDeSantisFL.”

On a private phone call last week held by Never Back Down, the political action committee tasked with drafting DeSantis into the race, DeSantis indicated that he is the only Republican contender who can win the GOP primary and beat President Joe Biden in a general election.

“You have basically three people at this point that are credible in this whole thing,” DeSantis said. “Biden, Trump and me. And I think of those three, two have a chance to get elected president — Biden and me, based on all the data in the swing states, which is not great for the former president and probably insurmountable because people aren’t going to change their view of him.”

The Real Clear Politics (RCP) average for a 2024 national Republican primary, based on polls conducted between April 21 and May 18, indicates that DeSantis has 19.4% support.

The governor joins a growing GOP primary field with former President Donald Trump, former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley, former Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson, South Carolina Sen. Tim Scott, conservative businessman Vivek Ramaswamy and conservative radio personality Larry Elder, with former Vice President Mike Pence soon to follow.

DeSantis was elected to Congress in 2012 where he served until he narrowly won the governorship in 2018, beating former Democratic Mayor of Tallahassee Andrew Gillum 49.6% to 49.2%, according to Ballotpedia. The governor handily won reelection in 2022 by nearly 20 points, trouncing former Democratic Rep. Charlie Christ.

DeSantis’ political team did not immediately respond to the DCNF’s request for comment.

AUTHOR

MARY LOU MASTERS

Contributor.

RELATED ARTICLES:

‘Stay Tuned’: Ron DeSantis Quietly Changes Twitter Handle Ahead Of Expected 2024 Run

Ron DeSantis made a guarantee about Donald Trump that made everyone sit up and take notice

RELATED TWEET:

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

The Eyes are the Windows of the Soul

Observing the plague of virulent Socialism and Marxism infecting America, I am reminded of my own youth in England and of a particular incident when I was but seventeen years of age, which both changed my life and my political outlook.

As we know, young people have always been – and certainly are today – filled with idealistic notions. That is good and is part of growing up. I certainly was idealistic and, not surprisingly, had automatically wished to assert my own ideas in opposition to those of my father. I loved him greatly, but he was a staunch member of the British Conservative party and so I foolishly chose – to his dismay – to join the left-wing and radically Socialist opposition Labour Party.

Now my father’s relatives being mostly working-class folks were all automatically wedded to Britain’s Labour Party that claimed to be for the workers. In fact, Communist ideas were front and center among so many Brits in the 1950’s and 60’s. The old Socialist song, “We’ll keep the Red flag flying here” was often sung along with the parading of the slogan; “Workers of the World Unite.”

Back now to that incident when I was about seventeen. I was getting off a double decker bus in my hometown. An elderly man was boarding the bus and he saw a lapel badge I was wearing. He asked what was written on it and I proudly and naively said, “Oh, it shows I’m a member of the Young Socialists.”

It was what I saw in the eyes of that elderly stranger that so profoundly shook me. The look was one of weary, even ageless despair, and I could not stop thinking about it. I later learned how many older people shared that same anguished look when similarly confronted by youthful ignorance and naivety. I also later learned of the horrific history of worldwide Marxist, Communist and Socialist state control and the vast numbers of hapless people who had died horribly under their heartless regimes.

I soon left the Young Socialists, outraged at what I had read. It was then that I grew up. I was comforted by Winston Churchill’s allegedly famous quote: “If a man is not a socialist when he is 20, he has no heart; If he is not a conservative by the time he is 40, he has no brain.” Of course, Churchill famously went on to also say the following:

“Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.” Perhaps the greatest conservative successor to Winston Churchill in Britain was Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, the daughter of a grocer, known as the iron lady and of whom it was said, ironically, that she was the only man in the Cabinet. She had pointed out that, “The trouble with Socialism is that eventually you run out of other people’s money.”

Here in our American towns and cities the Socialist youth today now go by names such as Antifa or Black Lives Matter. Unwittingly they are now the violent and very fascist heirs to Hitler’s thugs. even though they falsely preach with utter idiocy that they are anti-fascists.

Traditional temples of free thought, our Universities and Colleges, have now become academic gulags where only so-called progressive (aka regressive) speech is permitted. Watching them howl at any conservative speaker, should one show up to speak, and you will see the extent of the leftwing rot.

Of course, Communism in America never died. It simply changed its name. We now hear leftists calling themselves progressives when they are the “regressive” political plague of the 21st century.

In the nation’s universities or, what Michael Savage once called, “the universities of lower learning,” those rioting youth of the sixties are now ensconced as aged leftwing and Socialist tenured professors, spewing corrosive Marxist twaddle to the current crop of idealistic youth. The generations come and go, but students are now political fodder on an ever-fateful Socialist conveyor belt which works tirelessly to bring empty headed youth to unknowingly enable a Marxist revolution in America.

The left is divisive. Socialism separates people by class and by race. This is its powerful weapon of choice, along with its manufactured support of multi-gender identities as we march towards what may well be a most fateful coming general election in America’s history.

Conservatism eschews and disdains class, race or multiple gender identities. It prefers values of character, individuality, personal freedom, a love of America and its wondrous Constitution and the enduring bedrock of Judeo-Christian civilization.

I think back now with gratitude to that older man who long ago boarded that bus and whose eyes told me all I needed to know.

© 2023 Victor Sharpe. All rights reserved.

VIDEO: Gender vs. Free Speech

Constitution Corner with Robert Owens published the video below titled Gender vs. Free Speech. Owens states,

A school district in Ohio recently enacted a policy that allows administrators to expel a student for the crime of “misgendering”.  Sound Crazy?  The group, Parents Defending Education, thought so too, so they are suing the school district to keep Freedom of Speech alive.­

WATCH:

Take Action:

1.) Like and Share this video with others.

2.) Apply for Membership with The John Birch Society and get involved.

3.) Learn more about home school options at the Freedom Project Academy.

©2023. Robert Owens’ Constitution Corner. All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLE: Why The Media Attacks Detransitioners

ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT FILED AGAINST: Biden, Garland, Mayorkas, Graves, Wary. Ask your Representative to Co-Sponsor!

Articles of impeachment, below, have been filed against Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr., Alejandro Nicholas Mayorkas, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Attorney General Merrick Garland, Christopher Asher Wray, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Matthew M. Graves, United States Attorney for the District of Columbia.

Please call, text or write to your member of Congress and demand he or she sign on to each of these House Resolutions:

H.Res420 — Against Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr.

H.Res411 — Against Alejandro Nicholas Mayorkas, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security.

H.Res410 — Against Attorney General Merrick Garland.

H.Res406 — Against Christopher Asher Wray, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

H.Res.405 — Against Matthew M. Graves, United States Attorney for the District of Columbia.

You know what to do. Just do it!

©2023. Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.

List of current U.S. House members

Office Name Party
U.S. House Alabama District 1 Jerry Carl Republican
U.S. House Alabama District 2 Barry Moore Republican
U.S. House Alabama District 3 Mike Rogers Republican
U.S. House Alabama District 4 Robert Aderholt Republican
U.S. House Alabama District 5 Dale Strong Republican
U.S. House Alabama District 6 Gary Palmer Republican
U.S. House Alabama District 7 Terri Sewell Democratic
U.S. House Alaska At-large District Mary Peltola Democratic
U.S. House American Samoa At-large District Aumua Amata Radewagen Republican
U.S. House Arizona District 1 David Schweikert Republican
U.S. House Arizona District 2 Eli Crane Republican
U.S. House Arizona District 3 Ruben Gallego Democratic
U.S. House Arizona District 4 Greg Stanton Democratic
U.S. House Arizona District 5 Andy Biggs Republican
U.S. House Arizona District 6 Juan Ciscomani Republican
U.S. House Arizona District 7 Raúl Grijalva Democratic
U.S. House Arizona District 8 Debbie Lesko Republican
U.S. House Arizona District 9 Paul Gosar Republican
U.S. House Arkansas District 1 Rick Crawford Republican
U.S. House Arkansas District 2 French Hill Republican
U.S. House Arkansas District 3 Steve Womack Republican
U.S. House Arkansas District 4 Bruce Westerman Republican
U.S. House California District 1 Doug LaMalfa Republican
U.S. House California District 2 Jared Huffman Democratic
U.S. House California District 3 Kevin Kiley Republican
U.S. House California District 4 Mike Thompson Democratic
U.S. House California District 5 Tom McClintock Republican
U.S. House California District 6 Ami Bera Democratic
U.S. House California District 7 Doris Matsui Democratic
U.S. House California District 8 John Garamendi Democratic
U.S. House California District 9 Josh Harder Democratic
U.S. House California District 10 Mark DeSaulnier Democratic
U.S. House California District 11 Nancy Pelosi Democratic
U.S. House California District 12 Barbara Lee Democratic
U.S. House California District 13 John Duarte Republican
U.S. House California District 14 Eric Swalwell Democratic
U.S. House California District 15 Kevin Mullin Democratic
U.S. House California District 16 Anna Eshoo Democratic
U.S. House California District 17 Ro Khanna Democratic
U.S. House California District 18 Zoe Lofgren Democratic
U.S. House California District 19 Jimmy Panetta Democratic
U.S. House California District 20 Kevin McCarthy Republican
U.S. House California District 21 Jim Costa Democratic
U.S. House California District 22 David G. Valadao Republican
U.S. House California District 23 Jay Obernolte Republican
U.S. House California District 24 Salud Carbajal Democratic
U.S. House California District 25 Raul Ruiz Democratic
U.S. House California District 26 Julia Brownley Democratic
U.S. House California District 27 Mike Garcia Republican
U.S. House California District 28 Judy Chu Democratic
U.S. House California District 29 Tony Cárdenas Democratic
U.S. House California District 30 Adam Schiff Democratic
U.S. House California District 31 Grace Napolitano Democratic
U.S. House California District 32 Brad Sherman Democratic
U.S. House California District 33 Pete Aguilar Democratic
U.S. House California District 34 Jimmy Gomez Democratic
U.S. House California District 35 Norma Torres Democratic
U.S. House California District 36 Ted Lieu Democratic
U.S. House California District 37 Sydney Kamlager Democratic
U.S. House California District 38 Linda Sánchez Democratic
U.S. House California District 39 Mark Takano Democratic
U.S. House California District 40 Young Kim Republican
U.S. House California District 41 Ken Calvert Republican
U.S. House California District 42 Robert Garcia Democratic
U.S. House California District 43 Maxine Waters Democratic
U.S. House California District 44 Nanette Barragán Democratic
U.S. House California District 45 Michelle Steel Republican
U.S. House California District 46 Lou Correa Democratic
U.S. House California District 47 Katie Porter Democratic
U.S. House California District 48 Darrell Issa Republican
U.S. House California District 49 Mike Levin Democratic
U.S. House California District 50 Scott Peters Democratic
U.S. House California District 51 Sara Jacobs Democratic
U.S. House California District 52 Juan Vargas Democratic
U.S. House Colorado District 1 Diana DeGette Democratic
U.S. House Colorado District 2 Joe Neguse Democratic
U.S. House Colorado District 3 Lauren Boebert Republican
U.S. House Colorado District 4 Ken Buck Republican
U.S. House Colorado District 5 Doug Lamborn Republican
U.S. House Colorado District 6 Jason Crow Democratic
U.S. House Colorado District 7 Brittany Pettersen Democratic
U.S. House Colorado District 8 Yadira Caraveo Democratic
U.S. House Connecticut District 1 John Larson Democratic
U.S. House Connecticut District 2 Joe Courtney Democratic
U.S. House Connecticut District 3 Rosa L. DeLauro Democratic
U.S. House Connecticut District 4 Jim Himes Democratic
U.S. House Connecticut District 5 Jahana Hayes Democratic
U.S. House Delaware At-large District Lisa Blunt Rochester Democratic
U.S. House Florida District 1 Matt Gaetz Republican
U.S. House Florida District 2 Neal Dunn Republican
U.S. House Florida District 3 Kat Cammack Republican
U.S. House Florida District 4 Aaron Bean Republican
U.S. House Florida District 5 John Rutherford Republican
U.S. House Florida District 6 Michael Waltz Republican
U.S. House Florida District 7 Cory Mills Republican
U.S. House Florida District 8 Bill Posey Republican
U.S. House Florida District 9 Darren Soto Democratic
U.S. House Florida District 10 Maxwell Alejandro Frost Democratic
U.S. House Florida District 11 Daniel Webster Republican
U.S. House Florida District 12 Gus M. Bilirakis Republican
U.S. House Florida District 13 Anna Paulina Luna Republican
U.S. House Florida District 14 Kathy Castor Democratic
U.S. House Florida District 15 Laurel Lee Republican
U.S. House Florida District 16 Vern Buchanan Republican
U.S. House Florida District 17 Greg Steube Republican
U.S. House Florida District 18 Scott Franklin Republican
U.S. House Florida District 19 Byron Donalds Republican
U.S. House Florida District 20 Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick Democratic
U.S. House Florida District 21 Brian Mast Republican
U.S. House Florida District 22 Lois Frankel Democratic
U.S. House Florida District 23 Jared Evan Moskowitz Democratic
U.S. House Florida District 24 Frederica S. Wilson Democratic
U.S. House Florida District 25 Debbie Wasserman Schultz Democratic
U.S. House Florida District 26 Mario Diaz-Balart Republican
U.S. House Florida District 27 Maria Elvira Salazar Republican
U.S. House Florida District 28 Carlos Gimenez Republican
U.S. House Georgia District 1 Earl Carter Republican
U.S. House Georgia District 2 Sanford Bishop Jr. Democratic
U.S. House Georgia District 3 Drew Ferguson Republican
U.S. House Georgia District 4 Hank Johnson Democratic
U.S. House Georgia District 5 Nikema Williams Democratic
U.S. House Georgia District 6 Rich McCormick Republican
U.S. House Georgia District 7 Lucy McBath Democratic
U.S. House Georgia District 8 Austin Scott Republican
U.S. House Georgia District 9 Andrew Clyde Republican
U.S. House Georgia District 10 Mike Collins Republican
U.S. House Georgia District 11 Barry Loudermilk Republican
U.S. House Georgia District 12 Rick Allen Republican
U.S. House Georgia District 13 David Scott Democratic
U.S. House Georgia District 14 Marjorie Taylor Greene Republican
U.S. House Guam At-large District James Moylan Republican
U.S. House Hawaii District 1 Ed Case Democratic
U.S. House Hawaii District 2 Jill Tokuda Democratic
U.S. House Idaho District 1 Russ Fulcher Republican
U.S. House Idaho District 2 Michael K. Simpson Republican
U.S. House Illinois District 1 Jonathan Jackson Democratic
U.S. House Illinois District 2 Robin Kelly Democratic
U.S. House Illinois District 3 Delia Ramirez Democratic
U.S. House Illinois District 4 Jesus Garcia Democratic
U.S. House Illinois District 5 Mike Quigley Democratic
U.S. House Illinois District 6 Sean Casten Democratic
U.S. House Illinois District 7 Danny K. Davis Democratic
U.S. House Illinois District 8 Raja Krishnamoorthi Democratic
U.S. House Illinois District 9 Jan Schakowsky Democratic
U.S. House Illinois District 10 Brad Schneider Democratic
U.S. House Illinois District 11 Bill Foster Democratic
U.S. House Illinois District 12 Mike Bost Republican
U.S. House Illinois District 13 Nikki Budzinski Democratic
U.S. House Illinois District 14 Lauren Underwood Democratic
U.S. House Illinois District 15 Mary Miller Republican
U.S. House Illinois District 16 Darin LaHood Republican
U.S. House Illinois District 17 Eric Sorensen Democratic
U.S. House Indiana District 1 Frank Mrvan Democratic
U.S. House Indiana District 2 Rudy Yakym Republican
U.S. House Indiana District 3 Jim Banks Republican
U.S. House Indiana District 4 Jim Baird Republican
U.S. House Indiana District 5 Victoria Spartz Republican
U.S. House Indiana District 6 Greg Pence Republican
U.S. House Indiana District 7 André Carson Democratic
U.S. House Indiana District 8 Larry Bucshon Republican
U.S. House Indiana District 9 Erin Houchin Republican
U.S. House Iowa District 1 Mariannette Miller-Meeks Republican
U.S. House Iowa District 2 Ashley Hinson Republican
U.S. House Iowa District 3 Zach Nunn Republican
U.S. House Iowa District 4 Randy Feenstra Republican
U.S. House Kansas District 1 Tracey Mann Republican
U.S. House Kansas District 2 Jacob LaTurner Republican
U.S. House Kansas District 3 Sharice Davids Democratic
U.S. House Kansas District 4 Ron Estes Republican
U.S. House Kentucky District 1 James Comer Jr. Republican
U.S. House Kentucky District 2 Brett Guthrie Republican
U.S. House Kentucky District 3 Morgan McGarvey Democratic
U.S. House Kentucky District 4 Thomas Massie Republican
U.S. House Kentucky District 5 Hal Rogers Republican
U.S. House Kentucky District 6 Andy Barr Republican
U.S. House Louisiana District 1 Steve Scalise Republican
U.S. House Louisiana District 2 Troy Carter Democratic
U.S. House Louisiana District 3 Clay Higgins Republican
U.S. House Louisiana District 4 Mike Johnson Republican
U.S. House Louisiana District 5 Julia Letlow Republican
U.S. House Louisiana District 6 Garret Graves Republican
U.S. House Maine District 1 Chellie Pingree Democratic
U.S. House Maine District 2 Jared Golden Democratic
U.S. House Maryland District 1 Andrew Harris Republican
U.S. House Maryland District 2 Dutch Ruppersberger Democratic
U.S. House Maryland District 3 John Sarbanes Democratic
U.S. House Maryland District 4 Glenn Ivey Democratic
U.S. House Maryland District 5 Steny Hoyer Democratic
U.S. House Maryland District 6 David Trone Democratic
U.S. House Maryland District 7 Kweisi Mfume Democratic
U.S. House Maryland District 8 Jamie Raskin Democratic
U.S. House Massachusetts District 1 Richard Neal Democratic
U.S. House Massachusetts District 2 Jim McGovern Democratic
U.S. House Massachusetts District 3 Lori Trahan Democratic
U.S. House Massachusetts District 4 Jake Auchincloss Democratic
U.S. House Massachusetts District 5 Katherine Clark Democratic
U.S. House Massachusetts District 6 Seth Moulton Democratic
U.S. House Massachusetts District 7 Ayanna Pressley Democratic
U.S. House Massachusetts District 8 Stephen Lynch Democratic
U.S. House Massachusetts District 9 Bill Keating Democratic
U.S. House Michigan District 1 Jack Bergman Republican
U.S. House Michigan District 2 John Moolenaar Republican
U.S. House Michigan District 3 Hillary Scholten Democratic
U.S. House Michigan District 4 Bill Huizenga Republican
U.S. House Michigan District 5 Tim Walberg Republican
U.S. House Michigan District 6 Debbie Dingell Democratic
U.S. House Michigan District 7 Elissa Slotkin Democratic
U.S. House Michigan District 8 Dan Kildee Democratic
U.S. House Michigan District 9 Lisa McClain Republican
U.S. House Michigan District 10 John James Republican
U.S. House Michigan District 11 Haley Stevens Democratic
U.S. House Michigan District 12 Rashida Tlaib Democratic
U.S. House Michigan District 13 Shri Thanedar Democratic
U.S. House Minnesota District 1 Brad Finstad Republican
U.S. House Minnesota District 2 Angie Craig Democratic
U.S. House Minnesota District 3 Dean Phillips Democratic
U.S. House Minnesota District 4 Betty McCollum Democratic
U.S. House Minnesota District 5 Ilhan Omar Democratic
U.S. House Minnesota District 6 Tom Emmer Republican
U.S. House Minnesota District 7 Michelle Fischbach Republican
U.S. House Minnesota District 8 Pete Stauber Republican
U.S. House Mississippi District 1 Trent Kelly Republican
U.S. House Mississippi District 2 Bennie Thompson Democratic
U.S. House Mississippi District 3 Michael Guest Republican
U.S. House Mississippi District 4 Mike Ezell Republican
U.S. House Missouri District 1 Cori Bush Democratic
U.S. House Missouri District 2 Ann Wagner Republican
U.S. House Missouri District 3 Blaine Luetkemeyer Republican
U.S. House Missouri District 4 Mark Alford Republican
U.S. House Missouri District 5 Emanuel Cleaver Democratic
U.S. House Missouri District 6 Sam Graves Republican
U.S. House Missouri District 7 Eric Burlison Republican
U.S. House Missouri District 8 Jason Smith Republican
U.S. House Montana District 1 Ryan Zinke Republican
U.S. House Montana District 2 Matt Rosendale Republican
U.S. House Nebraska District 1 Mike Flood Republican
U.S. House Nebraska District 2 Don Bacon Republican
U.S. House Nebraska District 3 Adrian Smith Republican
U.S. House Nevada District 1 Dina Titus Democratic
U.S. House Nevada District 2 Mark Amodei Republican
U.S. House Nevada District 3 Susie Lee Democratic
U.S. House Nevada District 4 Steven Horsford Democratic
U.S. House New Hampshire District 1 Chris Pappas Democratic
U.S. House New Hampshire District 2 Annie Kuster Democratic
U.S. House New Jersey District 1 Donald Norcross Democratic
U.S. House New Jersey District 2 Jeff Van Drew Republican
U.S. House New Jersey District 3 Andrew Kim Democratic
U.S. House New Jersey District 4 Chris Smith Republican
U.S. House New Jersey District 5 Josh Gottheimer Democratic
U.S. House New Jersey District 6 Frank Pallone Jr. Democratic
U.S. House New Jersey District 7 Thomas Kean Jr. Republican
U.S. House New Jersey District 8 Robert Menendez Jr. Democratic
U.S. House New Jersey District 9 Bill Pascrell Democratic
U.S. House New Jersey District 10 Donald Payne Jr. Democratic
U.S. House New Jersey District 11 Mikie Sherrill Democratic
U.S. House New Jersey District 12 Bonnie Watson Coleman Democratic
U.S. House New Mexico District 1 Melanie Ann Stansbury Democratic
U.S. House New Mexico District 2 Gabriel Vasquez Democratic
U.S. House New Mexico District 3 Teresa Leger Fernandez Democratic
U.S. House New York District 1 Nicholas J. LaLota Republican
U.S. House New York District 2 Andrew Garbarino Republican
U.S. House New York District 3 George Devolder-Santos Republican
U.S. House New York District 4 Anthony D’Esposito Republican
U.S. House New York District 5 Gregory W. Meeks Democratic
U.S. House New York District 6 Grace Meng Democratic
U.S. House New York District 7 Nydia Velazquez Democratic
U.S. House New York District 8 Hakeem Jeffries Democratic
U.S. House New York District 9 Yvette D. Clarke Democratic
U.S. House New York District 10 Daniel Goldman Democratic
U.S. House New York District 11 Nicole Malliotakis Republican
U.S. House New York District 12 Jerrold Nadler Democratic
U.S. House New York District 13 Adriano Espaillat Democratic
U.S. House New York District 14 Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Democratic
U.S. House New York District 15 Ritchie Torres Democratic
U.S. House New York District 16 Jamaal Bowman Democratic
U.S. House New York District 17 Michael Lawler Republican
U.S. House New York District 18 Pat Ryan Democratic
U.S. House New York District 19 Marcus Molinaro Republican
U.S. House New York District 20 Paul Tonko Democratic
U.S. House New York District 21 Elise Stefanik Republican
U.S. House New York District 22 Brandon Williams Republican
U.S. House New York District 23 Nicholas A. Langworthy Republican
U.S. House New York District 24 Claudia Tenney Republican
U.S. House New York District 25 Joseph Morelle Democratic
U.S. House New York District 26 Brian Higgins Democratic
U.S. House Non-Voting Delegate District of Columbia Eleanor Holmes Norton Democratic
U.S. House North Carolina District 1 Donald Davis Democratic
U.S. House North Carolina District 2 Deborah Ross Democratic
U.S. House North Carolina District 3 Gregory Murphy Republican
U.S. House North Carolina District 4 Valerie Foushee Democratic
U.S. House North Carolina District 5 Virginia Foxx Republican
U.S. House North Carolina District 6 Kathy Manning Democratic
U.S. House North Carolina District 7 David Rouzer Republican
U.S. House North Carolina District 8 Dan Bishop Republican
U.S. House North Carolina District 9 Richard Hudson Republican
U.S. House North Carolina District 10 Patrick T. McHenry Republican
U.S. House North Carolina District 11 Chuck Edwards Republican
U.S. House North Carolina District 12 Alma Adams Democratic
U.S. House North Carolina District 13 Wiley Nickel Democratic
U.S. House North Carolina District 14 Jeff Jackson Democratic
U.S. House North Dakota At-large District Kelly Armstrong Republican
U.S. House Northern Mariana Islands At-large District Gregorio Kilili Camacho Sablan Democratic
U.S. House Ohio District 1 Greg Landsman Democratic
U.S. House Ohio District 2 Brad Wenstrup Republican
U.S. House Ohio District 3 Joyce Beatty Democratic
U.S. House Ohio District 4 Jim Jordan Republican
U.S. House Ohio District 5 Bob Latta Republican
U.S. House Ohio District 6 Bill Johnson Republican
U.S. House Ohio District 7 Max Miller Republican
U.S. House Ohio District 8 Warren Davidson Republican
U.S. House Ohio District 9 Marcy Kaptur Democratic
U.S. House Ohio District 10 Michael Turner Republican
U.S. House Ohio District 11 Shontel Brown Democratic
U.S. House Ohio District 12 Troy Balderson Republican
U.S. House Ohio District 13 Emilia Sykes Democratic
U.S. House Ohio District 14 David Joyce Republican
U.S. House Ohio District 15 Mike Carey Republican
U.S. House Oklahoma District 1 Kevin Hern Republican
U.S. House Oklahoma District 2 Josh Brecheen Republican
U.S. House Oklahoma District 3 Frank Lucas Republican
U.S. House Oklahoma District 4 Tom Cole Republican
U.S. House Oklahoma District 5 Stephanie Bice Republican
U.S. House Oregon District 1 Suzanne Bonamici Democratic
U.S. House Oregon District 2 Cliff Bentz Republican
U.S. House Oregon District 3 Earl Blumenauer Democratic
U.S. House Oregon District 4 Val Hoyle Democratic
U.S. House Oregon District 5 Lori Chavez-DeRemer Republican
U.S. House Oregon District 6 Andrea Salinas Democratic
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 1 Brian Fitzpatrick Republican
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 2 Brendan Boyle Democratic
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 3 Dwight Evans Democratic
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 4 Madeleine Dean Democratic
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 5 Mary Gay Scanlon Democratic
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 6 Chrissy Houlahan Democratic
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 7 Susan Wild Democratic
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 8 Matt Cartwright Democratic
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 9 Dan Meuser Republican
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 10 Scott Perry Republican
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 11 Lloyd Smucker Republican
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 12 Summer Lee Democratic
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 13 John Joyce Republican
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 14 Guy Reschenthaler Republican
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 15 Glenn Thompson Republican
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 16 Mike Kelly Republican
U.S. House Pennsylvania District 17 Christopher Deluzio Democratic
U.S. House Rhode Island District 1 David N. Cicilline Democratic
U.S. House Rhode Island District 2 Seth Magaziner Democratic
U.S. House South Carolina District 1 Nancy Mace Republican
U.S. House South Carolina District 2 Joe Wilson Republican
U.S. House South Carolina District 3 Jeff Duncan Republican
U.S. House South Carolina District 4 William Timmons Republican
U.S. House South Carolina District 5 Ralph Norman Republican
U.S. House South Carolina District 6 James Clyburn Democratic
U.S. House South Carolina District 7 Russell Fry Republican
U.S. House South Dakota At-large District Dusty Johnson Republican
U.S. House Tennessee District 1 Diana Harshbarger Republican
U.S. House Tennessee District 2 Tim Burchett Republican
U.S. House Tennessee District 3 Charles J. Fleischmann Republican
U.S. House Tennessee District 4 Scott DesJarlais Republican
U.S. House Tennessee District 5 Andy Ogles Republican
U.S. House Tennessee District 6 John Rose Republican
U.S. House Tennessee District 7 Mark Green Republican
U.S. House Tennessee District 8 David Kustoff Republican
U.S. House Tennessee District 9 Steve Cohen Democratic
U.S. House Texas District 1 Nathaniel Moran Republican
U.S. House Texas District 2 Daniel Crenshaw Republican
U.S. House Texas District 3 Keith Self Republican
U.S. House Texas District 4 Pat Fallon Republican
U.S. House Texas District 5 Lance Gooden Republican
U.S. House Texas District 6 Jake Ellzey Republican
U.S. House Texas District 7 Lizzie Pannill Fletcher Democratic
U.S. House Texas District 8 Morgan Luttrell Republican
U.S. House Texas District 9 Al Green Democratic
U.S. House Texas District 10 Michael McCaul Republican
U.S. House Texas District 11 August Pfluger Republican
U.S. House Texas District 12 Kay Granger Republican
U.S. House Texas District 13 Ronny L. Jackson Republican
U.S. House Texas District 14 Randy Weber Republican
U.S. House Texas District 15 Monica De La Cruz Republican
U.S. House Texas District 16 Veronica Escobar Democratic
U.S. House Texas District 17 Pete Sessions Republican
U.S. House Texas District 18 Sheila Jackson Lee Democratic
U.S. House Texas District 19 Jodey Arrington Republican
U.S. House Texas District 20 Joaquin Castro Democratic
U.S. House Texas District 21 Chip Roy Republican
U.S. House Texas District 22 Troy Nehls Republican
U.S. House Texas District 23 Tony Gonzales Republican
U.S. House Texas District 24 Beth Van Duyne Republican
U.S. House Texas District 25 Roger Williams Republican
U.S. House Texas District 26 Michael C. Burgess Republican
U.S. House Texas District 27 Michael Cloud Republican
U.S. House Texas District 28 Henry Cuellar Democratic
U.S. House Texas District 29 Sylvia Garcia Democratic
U.S. House Texas District 30 Jasmine Crockett Democratic
U.S. House Texas District 31 John Carter Republican
U.S. House Texas District 32 Colin Allred Democratic
U.S. House Texas District 33 Marc Veasey Democratic
U.S. House Texas District 34 Vicente Gonzalez Jr. Democratic
U.S. House Texas District 35 Greg Casar Democratic
U.S. House Texas District 36 Brian Babin Republican
U.S. House Texas District 37 Lloyd Doggett Democratic
U.S. House Texas District 38 Wesley Hunt Republican
U.S. House Utah District 1 Blake Moore Republican
U.S. House Utah District 2 Chris Stewart Republican
U.S. House Utah District 3 John Curtis Republican
U.S. House Utah District 4 Burgess Owens Republican
U.S. House Vermont At-large District Becca Balint Democratic
U.S. House Virgin Islands At-large District Stacey Plaskett Democratic
U.S. House Virginia District 1 Robert J. Wittman Republican
U.S. House Virginia District 2 Jennifer Kiggans Republican
U.S. House Virginia District 3 Robert C. Scott Democratic
U.S. House Virginia District 4 Jennifer McClellan Democratic
U.S. House Virginia District 5 Bob Good Republican
U.S. House Virginia District 6 Benjamin Lee Cline Republican
U.S. House Virginia District 7 Abigail Spanberger Democratic
U.S. House Virginia District 8 Donald Sternoff Beyer Jr. Democratic
U.S. House Virginia District 9 H. Morgan Griffith Republican
U.S. House Virginia District 10 Jennifer Wexton Democratic
U.S. House Virginia District 11 Gerald Edward Connolly Democratic
U.S. House Washington District 1 Suzan DelBene Democratic
U.S. House Washington District 2 Rick Larsen Democratic
U.S. House Washington District 3 Marie Gluesenkamp Pérez Democratic
U.S. House Washington District 4 Dan Newhouse Republican
U.S. House Washington District 5 Cathy McMorris Rodgers Republican
U.S. House Washington District 6 Derek Kilmer Democratic
U.S. House Washington District 7 Pramila Jayapal Democratic
U.S. House Washington District 8 Kim Schrier Democratic
U.S. House Washington District 9 D. Adam Smith Democratic
U.S. House Washington District 10 Marilyn Strickland Democratic
U.S. House West Virginia District 1 Carol Miller Republican
U.S. House West Virginia District 2 Alexander Mooney Republican
U.S. House Wisconsin District 1 Bryan Steil Republican
U.S. House Wisconsin District 2 Mark Pocan Democratic
U.S. House Wisconsin District 3 Derrick Van Orden Republican
U.S. House Wisconsin District 4 Gwen Moore Democratic
U.S. House Wisconsin District 5 Scott Fitzgerald Republican
U.S. House Wisconsin District 6 Glenn Grothman Republican
U.S. House Wisconsin District 7 Tom Tiffany Republican
U.S. House Wisconsin District 8 Mike Gallagher Republican
U.S. House Wyoming At-large District Harriet Hageman Republican

Largely Unnoticed, WHO Moves Forward with Global Governance Plan

Former congresswoman Michele Bachmann sounded the alarm Monday about developments coming out of the World Health Assembly that suggest that the World Health Organization (WHO) is intent on establishing “a platform for global governance through health care” in the wake of the COVID pandemic.

On Sunday, the WHO kicked off its annual 10-day World Health Assembly in Geneva, Switzerland, described as the “decision-making body of WHO.” Concerns over the WHO’s actions have been steadily building since the beginning of the pandemic, when observers noted that the WHO’s deference to China arguably worsened the spread of COVID. In addition, observers are also pointing out that the Biden administration is working to enable the organization to “centralize authority not just for pandemics, [but] for any health emergency in the hands of the director-general.”

Now, says Bachmann, the current World Health Assembly is poised to increase the WHO’s mandate over the health care decisions of sovereign nations.

“There’s a dual track process that they’re following,” she explained during an on the ground report from Geneva on Monday’s edition of “Washington Watch with Tony Perkins.” “One is through a global pandemic treaty that they’re calling an ‘accord.’ The second is through a package of about 300 amendments to the international health rules. Both lead to the same result. Both lead to the creation of a platform for global governance through health care. And it is a web that locks us in … the likes of which we’ve never seen before.”

As Bachmann went on to observe, the potentially massive ramifications of the decisions being made at the World Health Assembly are happening with surprisingly little fanfare.

“There were no members of Congress here,” she pointed out. “I was actually shocked because this has been a big issue that a lot of their constituents have rightfully been very concerned about. … There was no American press here. So how would anyone even know what was going on unless they tuned in and they watched for themselves?”

Bachmann, who currently serves as dean of the Robertson School of Government at Regent University, further noted that the WHO’s view of COVID appears to be exactly the same now as it was at the beginning of the pandemic. “We’ve learned a lot of things in the last three years, haven’t we? And the World Health Organization bungled almost everything, whether it was masks or vaccines or lockdowns, but yet they acted like nothing happened. There was no review. They acted like everything was just normal.”

Bachmann then laid out the WHO’s plans going forward. “They’re planning to meet in New York City in September. They’ll go over the progress that they’re going to make in January. They’ll give a final completed package of the 300 amendments, together with a global pandemic treaty, to the World Health Organization and the U.N. And then they’ll meet again in Geneva next February. But one year from this week, they will take the vote. And so they intend to vote for a platform for global government and to give themselves the power that no one has ever seen before.”

The former congresswoman from Minnesota also described the U.S. government’s involvement in the WHO’s agenda.

“I heard from Secretary Xavier Becerra, the head of our Health and Human Services [who] said he wants more ‘bio surveillance,’ in other words, surveillance of our bodies. And then they want to share that data with everyone else in the world. This is highly invasive. They were very clear today. They want very bold language. They intend to have surveillance over every citizen on earth, and they intend to … control us through health care.”

Bachmann further detailed how the WHO’s agenda goes well beyond pandemics.

“They’ve got this concept they talked about today called ‘One Health’ — they’ve got graphics on it [that] show humans, animals, the earth — ‘One Health.’ So when decisions are made about health care, they have to take into account the earth and what the impact would be on climate change. … So what it boils down to is, ‘Humans = cockroaches = a clump of dirt.’ … That’s why you don’t want to give up decision-making authority to someone like the director general of the WHO. They have a very different agenda at hand.”

At the same time, she underscored, the WHO’s emphasis seems to be on “equity” rather than innovations in medicine.

“The number one word that they use besides ‘urgent’ was ‘equity.’ [They want] to have equal outcomes for everyone on earth with universal health care. … And for those countries that are producing health products, they need to produce more health products and give them away to the world. So one thing they didn’t do [was] focus on any new breakthroughs in medicine. … There was nothing about breakthroughs or cures. Everything was about giving themselves more power and more authority control.”

Bachmann called on Congress to start confronting concerns over the WHO’s attempted power grab sooner rather than later.

“We need our senators to wake up, hold hearings, pull these documents in, [and] start to review them. [I]f they’re thinking they’ll wait until January, that’s pretty late, because the next meeting will be in in Geneva in February. The final vote will take place in May. … They should have been there this week. … And I would call on [House Speaker] Kevin McCarthy as he is negotiating for raising the debt ceiling [to] put on the table that Joe Biden has to get the United States out of the World Health Organization and pull [their] funding … as the price of raising the debt ceiling.”

AUTHOR

Dan Hart

Dan Hart is senior editor at The Washington Stand.

RELATED ARTICLE: Democracy Victorious: U.S. Must Defend Global Civilization with Justice, Sympathy, and Humility

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2023 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

EXCLUSIVE: Biden Admin Tells Adults How to Discuss Sex with Teens Behind Parents’ Backs

As part of its month-long focus on adolescent health, the Biden administration is promoting a document that tells Planned Parenthood and other taxpayer-funded family planning offices how to talk to minors about sex without their parents overhearing, and how to secretly deliver birth control to adolescents without parental knowledge or consent.

Federally-funded guidelines instruct adults to pause before discussing sex with minors and to ask, “Are you alone in the room?” These instructions specify tactics to follow “if you’re really having a hard time getting a parent” to leave the room during the sex talk. They suggest children as young as 13 discuss sex with groups like Planned Parenthood in a parked car or communicate in writing, so their parents cannot hear the adults’ side of the conversation. And they encourage offices to have vans roam neighborhoods giving minors federally funded contraceptives; to mail birth control to adolescents in “plain, unmarked packaging;” and/or to have teenagers receive contraceptives at public meet-up places.

A federal grant recipient admitted the cloak-and-dagger sex discussion is necessary, because “parents might not agree with some of the things that we’re talking about.”

The emphasis on shutting out adults comes as the Biden administration and 24 states are fighting against a lawsuit to recognize parents’ right to know if the government is enabling underage sexual activity by giving teens birth control.

Biden Admin: ‘It Takes a Village’ to Teach Teens about Sex

The Biden administration revealed that it aimed to “expand sexual and reproductive health information and services” for teens during National Adolescent Health Month (NAHM), which runs during the month of May. The announcement made it clear government-funded strangers would take a leading role in forming teens’ views of sexuality.

“The adage ‘It takes a village’ has been proven time and again,” said Jessica Marcella, deputy assistant secretary for Population Affairs and director of the Office of Adolescent Health in the official press release. “[T]his year,” the Biden administration is “amplifying the important role of youth-serving professionals and other caring adults in their interactions with young people.”

The Biden administration’s official Resources for National Adolescent Health Month™ 2023 links to a document titled “Providing Family Planning Services to Adolescents During Uncertain Times,” produced by the Reproductive Health National Training Center (RHNTC), a group that trains Title X providers at taxpayers’ expense. Its instructions detail how Title X recipients, who distribute federally funded contraception to children in the name of “family planning,” can and should bypass parents during sex-related telehealth meetings.

‘Why Are You Talking to My Young Person in the Bathroom with the Door Locked?’

The plan to speak about sex one-on-one with impressionable youth begins during scheduling. “Confirm with youth clients that you have their phone number/contact information rather than their parents’ contact information,” the document tells federal grant recipients. “At the beginning of the visit, do a privacy screen. Ask ‘Are you alone in the room?’ or ‘Can other people hear what you are saying?’”

The document links to a webinar which fleshes out these ideas in greater detail. A slide on “Ensuring Adolescent Privacy” tells Title X grantees to ask:

1. Are they alone in the room? Always ask first! If a parent is present, ask to provide alone time during the appointment.

2. Can people hear them outside the room? Can they relocate? Use headphones? Use yes/no questions or chat feature?” (Emphases in original.)

The written document tells teens who want to “protect their privacy” from their parents “during a virtual visit” to:

  • “Take the call in the bathroom, outside, or in a parked car.”
  • “Use headphones.”
  • “Schedule the call at a time when there are fewer people at home.”

“[P]arents might not agree with some of the things that we’re talking about and some of the services that our patients are looking for,” Safiya Yearwood, a nurse at Baltimore’s Star Track Clinic, told the webinar. Title X grantees must “mak[e] sure that patients are, number one, safe to even have these conversations, and determine[e] where they can do it.”

The easiest method is to assure teens know how to call without their parent or guardian’s input. “[A]re we letting all of our adolescent patients know what their protections are?” asked webinar host Kaleigh Cornelison, MSW, who was then lead program specialist at the University of Michigan’s Adolescent Health Initiative, and who now works at ETR, which specialized in “health equity” advancement. “[A]re we informing everyone of what their rights are?”

“Are we ensuring that everyone knows what their rights are and what they have access to without a parent or caregiver’s consent?”

If parents are present, Title X grantees should make every effort to get them to leave the room. “Standardize time alone for all adolescent clients with the provider,” Cornelison instructed Title X offices. Have a “system in place so it’s standard practice; it’s not out of the ordinary. It comes to be expected every time.”

“We had to create scripts” for telehealth visits, explained Chinwe Efuribe, MD, MPH, who founded the Centered Youth Clinic and Consulting clinic and medical director of Every Body Texas, on the webinar. Employees told parents their absence “is our practice” and, “we usually have one-on-one time with our young people, and we would like to continue that.”

It is important to normalize the practice to evade parents’ suspicion, she said. “If the parent was there in the visit, also let them know that this is something that we’ve always been doing that we want to continue doing, so they don’t think that, you know, ‘Why are you talking to my young person in the bathroom with the door locked?’” said Efuribe.

If parents refuse to leave, Cornelison told Title X recipient offices, they should tell teens they “can maybe get a little creative about moving rooms, putting on headphones, maybe some questions are asked in a chat instead of verbally just to sort of deal with that privacy issue if you’re really having a hard time getting a parent or caregiver outside of the space.”

To maintain silence after the visit, Cornelison told providers to assure all emails are sent to the teens’ private email account, so no “parent is going to get a red flag.”

Two sexually active minors testified the Biden administration-promoted guidelines helped them hide their sexual activity from others, including parents.

“It had been an ongoing battle for me” to keep her parents uninformed of her sexual activity, said Kacie, an underage teenager. “I did not think I needed to hear or experience the repercussions from my family.” Her efforts included talking to her Title X office “on the phone behind the shed” and lying to her parents to get the use of the family car. “I’d be like, ‘Hey, I’m going here, and I’m doing this.’ It’s not like, ‘I’m going to my doctor to get help with Title X services,’” she said. Bianca, a teen who uses they/them pronouns, added that she particularly appreciated online events, where “you can tell someone, ‘Hey, I’m going to this event!’ and you don’t have to say, ‘I’m going to the clinic.’”

Contraceptive Vans and Unmarked Boxes of Condoms

After the consultation, adult Title X grantees must deliver contraceptives to minors without the parents’ knowledge. “With more virtual visits happening, clinics have come up with creative ways to deliver the prescriptions and supplies that they previously gave youth on-site at the clinic,” says the document, which encourages offices to begin:

  • “Mail delivery of supplies in plain, unmarked packaging”
  • “Curbside pickup of supplies at the clinic or other community locations frequented by youth”
  • “Use of a mobile van to bring supplies to people in their neighborhoods”

Yearwood told the webinar she mailed teens “That Box,” a box full of condoms, “little toys,” and other sex items. “There’s no sort of markings on there that would say, ‘There’s HIV [testing kit] and condoms in here,’” she said.

“When I go to the clinic, Safiya and them [sic] always give me like a ‘goodie bag.’ And it’s so cute. It’s like a bag but it has condoms and all these things that I need,” said Bianca — with her parents none the wiser.

Eroding Parents’ Rights Did Not Begin with Gender

“These guidelines encourage health care providers to keep the parents of teens in the dark about their potentially life-altering decisions surrounding sexual activity,” Dr. Jennifer Roback Morse, the founder and president of the Ruth Institute and author of “The Sexual State: How Elite Ideologies are Destroying Lives and How the Church was Right All Along,” told The Washington Stand.

“It has long been federal policy that minors past the age of puberty have a right to contraception without their parents’ knowledge or consent,” Morse told TWS. “This latest effort by the federal government to actively encourage health care providers to help teens deceive their parents is part of a longstanding pattern of the Sexual State to spread the ideology of the Sexual Revolution — whether people know it or not, whether people want it or not.”

Title X became law when President Richard Nixon signed the Family Planning Services and Public Research Act of 1970 (now Public Law 91-572). In 1978, Congress amended the law specifically to include adolescents. A series of courts ruled that the law forbids parental consent or notification laws. In 2021, the Biden administration codified these rulings in regulation to federal law 42 C.F.R. § 59.10(b), which states that “Title X projects may not require consent of parents or guardians for the provision of services to minors, nor can any Title X project staff notify a parent or guardian before or after a minor has requested and/or received Title X family planning services.”

Family advocates have tried to remove the government-imposed barrier between parents and unemancipated minors for more than a quarter of a century. In 1997, then-Rep. Ernest Istook attempted to require parental consent before federally funded facilities could give birth control to minors. But the House Appropriations Committee defeated the Istook amendment, substituting a watered-down alternative that asked Title X participants to encourage family involvement “to the extent practical.”

More recently, parents earned a victory in a federal courtroom — a breakthrough the Biden administration is trying to reverse.

Biden Takes Parents to Court

A concerned parent sued HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra, Deanda v. Becerra, last December, arguing that Title X confidentiality guidelines violate parents’ rights — and won.

The secretive “administration of the Title X program violates the constitutional right of parents to direct the upbringing of their children,” ruled U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk, a Trump appointee, who also recently found the FDA had wrongly approved the abortion pill (mifepristone). “[P]arental rights … do not completely disappear with respect to a minor child’s sexual activity.”

The Biden administration appealed the decision in February. The attorneys general of 24 states and the District of Columbia signed an amicus brief siding with Biden and against parents/guardians.

They are supported by Planned Parenthood and other federally funded contraceptive providers who oppose parental “involvement” — starkly framing the legal battle as a struggle between their business and parents’ rights.

“Forced parental notification and involvement undercuts the integrity of the Title X program and creates barriers to care and decision-making,” said Clare Coleman, president and CEO of the National Family Planning & Reproductive Health Association (NFPRHA). Establishing parental oversight of their minor children’s sex life would “eviscerate longstanding Title X program protections that ensure young people can access the care they need from providers they trust.”

The Deanda lawsuit is “shameful,” said Planned Parenthood CEO Alexis McGill Johnson. “Young people deserve access to the health care they need to make their own decisions about their bodies, lives, and futures.”

Planned Parenthood said it is “grateful” to the president and “fortunate that the U.S. Justice Department and the Biden administration [is] dedicated to fighting back,” said Johnson, adding that Planned Parenthood will “look forward to our ongoing work with them.”

Sexually Active Teens Have Worse Mental Health: Biden Administration

The Biden administration’s anti-parental rights legal efforts seem at odds with its own advice on how to improve poor teen mental health. The CDC website states multiple times, “Parent engagement also makes it more likely that children and adolescents will avoid unhealthy behaviors, such as sexual risk behaviors and tobacco, alcohol, and other drug use.” Sexually active teens are more likely to suffer from depression, addiction, and suicidal ideation than their abstinent heterosexual peers, according to a report the CDC released in February. Teens who have sex with members of the opposite sex are twice as likely to self-report attempting suicide, more than twice as likely to use marijuana, and 45% more likely to report overall poor mental health.

The rates are higher for teens who have sex with members of the same sex.

Independent studies have found parental involvement is particularly important for vulnerable populations the Biden administration uplifts as the center of its policies. Black female teens living in low-income urban areas and “at increased risk for sexually transmitted diseases” found high levels of “perceived parental supervision” resulted in lower rates of gonorrhea and chlamydia, concluded one such study. “[P]arental supervision can result in lower sexually transmitted disease rates in urban high-prevalence populations.”

“Given the mental health crisis among American teens, deliberately putting a communication barrier between children and their parents is a really bad idea,” Morse told TWS.

Any sexual activity increases the possibility of physical health impacts, as well. While abstinence prevents all pregnancies and disease, the oral contraceptives distributed by Title X fail to prevent pregnancy at least 7% of the time, and condoms have a “typical use failure rate [of] 13%,” according to the CDC. The NAHM’s resources page admits that “condom use with every sexual act can greatly reduce — though not eliminate — the risk of” sexually transmitted infections/diseases (STIs/STDs). People between the ages of 15 and 24 accounted for half of the 26 million new STDs/STIs in the U.S., according to the CDC.

Many of the hormonal contraceptives and long-acting reversible contraceptives Title X offers teens also constitute potential abortifacients. And many are now distributed by Planned Parenthood, which may now refer visitors for abortions.

‘It Takes a Family,’ Not a Village

Perhaps knowing how incendiary its materials are, the RHNTC guide carries a disclaimer that, although “[t]his publication was supported by the Office of Population Affairs (Grant FPTPA006030),” the “views expressed do not necessarily reflect the official policies of the Department of Health and Human Services.” It does, however, reflect a training document intended to teach Title X providers how to use the taxpayer dollars furnished by the HHS.

Pro-family advocates say these prescriptions align with the Biden administration’s attempt to have minors guided on sexual issues by unrelated adults at the government’s direction, instead of loving parents.

Marcella’s reference that “it takes a village to raise a child” is “simply an attempt to replace parents. It takes a family to raise a child — not a village. It takes a loving mother and father who work together to teach their child to strive for the good, true, and beautiful,” Mary Szoch, director of the Center for Human Dignity at Family Research Council, told The Washington Stand.

“Since day one, the Biden administration has worked to replace mothers and fathers with a village — and not just any village, but one that is only made up of people intent on leading teenagers down the path of self-destruction and death.”

Resources: You can read the document here. You can view the webinar here.

AUTHOR

Ben Johnson

Ben Johnson is senior reporter and editor at The Washington Stand.

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2023 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

Transgenderism on Trial

I routinely ask people in social gatherings ‘how do we win – how do we defeat the Left?’  One answer that’s come back is lawfare, tying up our opponents in court.  Transgenderism is one area where lawfare could actually work.  Legal action has the potential to bring down the entire Transgender-Industrial Complex.

To that end, I have created a new section on my website – Transgenderism on Trial – to foment more litigation against doctors, psychologists, school administrators, teachers, and other instrumentalities of the Transgender-Industrial Complex who are either out to make a buck or to make America a communist country.

I don’t throw around the word ‘communism’ lightly, only when I have the goods and here I most definitely do.  The first thing you will see in my new transgenderism section is a video showing four transgender activists openly and explicitly discussing how the purpose of transgenderism is to usher communism into the United States.  If you think communism is cute, we’ll see how cute you think it is when communism arrives here and you get the midnight knock on the door from the secret police to haul you off to the gulag for thought crimes.

Transgenderism on Trial starts with a news feed.   I am the only one collecting all the stories from all around the country about litigation against health care providers and school districts pushing life-altering drugs and irreversible mutilating surgery on defenseless kids.  The news out of Missouri is amazing.   A trans whistleblower documented enough corrupt practices at a gender clinic in St. Louis to bring a whole-of-government investigation down on the clinic that may result in civil enforcement actions and criminal charges.  The practices include pushing transitioning on kids without psychological assessments in individual cases, prescribing drugs without parental consent or after consent was revoked, lack of full disclosure of the adverse and long-term consequences of sex change drugs and surgery, false claims children would commit suicide if not allowed to transition, and other high pressure sales tactics.  The investigation will determine whether school officials conspired with clinicians to form a school-to-clinic pipeline of steady business for the clinic.

That’s just one case.  My news feeds chronicles other cases where doctors are being sued for botched surgeries, medical experimentation with unstudied or unapproved drugs, and pushing transgender drugs and surgery instead of providing counseling.  Cases are also sprouting up against school districts for transitioning kids without parental knowledge or consent, violating teachers’ religious beliefs, and firing teachers who refuse to lie to parents or otherwise get with the transgender program.

Transgenderism on Trial provides a list of law firms and legal foundations around the country bringing these types of cases or expressing a desire to enter the field.  These are the courtroom warriors who vindicating parental rights, pursuing medical malpractice claims, and taking action against so-called transgender sanctuary states that lure kids from other parts of the country.

Using my collection of parental resources, parents can arm themselves with the facts and learn how to deal with gender-questioning children and high-pressure sales tactics from clinicians and school administrators.  In addition to books and parental guides, the list of resources tells parents how to find support groups and objective counselors who will give parents unbiased information about the subject.

Finally, there’s a page on the most despicable high-pressure sales tactic of all – telling parents their children will commit suicide if not allowed to transition.  A second set of researchers reexamined the raw data from the original study making this claim and found that the data did not support the study’s conclusions.   When confronted with this information, the University of Washington which participated in the original study tried to cover it up.  Other early studies making similar claims were later found to be flawed for, among other things, failing to track outcomes long enough to draw reliable conclusions and hiding raw data from other researchers.  Finally, the page describes two other studies showing people who transition are MORE likely – not less likely – to commit suicide.  Lies, misrepresentations, hiding data, ignoring later studies – there’s enough on the page to completely debunk the high pressure sales tactics the snake-oil salesmen are using on parents.

Plaintiffs of the World, Unite!  Let’s bring down the communist transgender activists who are trying to destroy the country and the doctors, school administrators, and other financially self-interested useful idiots who are getting paid handsomely for doing their bidding.  There’s nothing like legal liability and a blizzard of court cases to focus the mind.  Let’s swarm them and put them out of business.

©2023. Christopher Wright. All rights reserved.

Visit The Daily Skirmish and dWatch Eagle Headline News – 7:30am ET Weekdays

Israeli Considering $1.3 Billion Lawsuit Against CNN Over Amanpour Terror Coverage

Amanpour has been to inciting to Jew hatred and genocide for years, this is long overdue.

Rabbi Leo Dee’s wife and two daughters were murdered by a Palestinian terrorist. CNN’s Christiane Amanpour described the terror attack as a shootout. Amanpour apologized to Rabbi Dee after he threatened a lawsuit against CNN. Rabbi Dee should not accept Amanpour’s apology, and proceed with a lawsuit against CNN. CNN continues to allow Amanpour to demonize Israel (hereherehere) with impunity. It’s about time CNN pay a price for employing this vicious anti-Semite.

Rabbi Dee Considering $1.3 Billion Lawsuit Against CNN Over Amanpour Terror Coverage

By Jewish Journal, May 22, 2023

Rabbi Leo Dee, whose wife and two daughters were murdered in a terror attack, is considering a $1.3 billion lawsuit against CNN over their international anchor Christiane Amanpour describing the terror attack as a “shootout.”

Dee made the announcement via video during a May 21 event at The Carlebach Shul in New York titled, “Antisemitism: Is There No Solution?” as part of the third annual Yoav Boteach Memorial Lecture series, in honor of Rabbi Shmuley Boteach’s late father. Dee was speaking alongside Boteach, Elisha Wiesel, chairman of the board of the Elie Wiesel Foundation for Humanity, and Rabbi Naftali Citron. Media watchdog HonestReporting had reported that Amanpour had said during an April 10 interview with Palestinian Authority Prime Minister Mohammad Shtayyeh, “We have a young 15-year-old Palestinian boy who’s been shot and killed by security — Israeli security forces. We also have the mother of two sisters, Israeli British sisters. They were — they were killed in a shootout, and now the mother has died of her injury — injuries.”

“A shootout is two sides firing at each other,” HonestReporting tweeted on May 11. “A mother & her two daughters were shot at close range by Palestinian terrorists. @amanpour, you owe a grieving family an apology.”

Read more.

AUTHOR

RELATED TWEETS:

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

NAACP Vice Chair Lives in Florida as Organization Issued Travel Advisory for Black Americans to Not Go to Florida

You can’t make this stuff up.

As I wrote when the news of the NAACP’s racist declaration broke, this is what happens to organizations after they’ve achieved their founding goal. Instead of disbanding and moving on, they become increasingly radical and dangerous. The NAACP, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, was founded in 1909. They achieved their civil rights goals in the last century and yet here they are issuing racist edicts against states standing for individual rights.

NAACP Issues Travel Warning for Florida…There’s Just One Problem

As Leah has reported, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) issued a formal travel advisory for the state of Florida for what the group claims are Gov. Ron DeSantis’s (R) “aggressive attempts to erase Black history” and take down Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion programs in state colleges.

The NAACP went on to say that the state under DeSantis “has become hostile to Black Americans and in direct conflict with the democratic ideals that our union was founded upon. He should know that democracy will prevail because its defenders are prepared to stand up and fight. We’re not backing down, and we encourage our allies to join us in the battle for the soul of our nation.”

DeSantis Press Secretary Jeremy Redfern noted how the National Board of Directors Vice Chair Karen Boykin-Towns had taken a Florida vacation in 2021, during the time when Democrats were accusing DeSantis of still not doing enough to clamp down on COVID-19.

On top of that, Redfern also pointed out that Leon Russell, the chairman of the board of directors, currently lives in Tampa. 

Read more.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLE: Toxic: NAACP Announces Travel Advisory for Florida Claiming the State Attacks Civil

RELATED TWEETS:

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Weaponized DOJ SHUT DOWN Clinton Foundation ‘Investigation’ as Trump Left Office, Biden’s FBI Destroyed All Evidence

This goes well beyond “two tiered” justice. This is treason.

DOJ Halted Clinton Foundation ‘Investigation’ as Trump Left Office, Biden’s FBI Destroyed All Evidence

By: Kyle Becker, May 22, 2023:

Newly revealed documents and interviews with former Justice Department officials indicate that the investigation into the Clinton Foundation, focused on its interactions with foreign donors during Hillary Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state, remained open for the majority of President Donald Trump’s administration.

The case was eventually closed just days before Trump left office, as detailed in closing documents obtained through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, the New York Times reported on Monday.

The investigation, which had been a subject of intense scrutiny and campaign promises by Trump to “lock her up,” continued despite FBI agents and prosecutors leading it to a dead end. The prolonged investigation became a rallying cry for Republicans who anticipated finding evidence of corruption that would harm Clinton’s political prospects.

The scrutiny of the Clinton Foundation began in 2015 after the publication of “Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich” by conservative author Peter Schweizer. The book examined donations made by foreign entities to the foundation. Republicans accused Clinton of engaging in a quid pro quo by supporting the sale of Uranium One, a Canadian company connected to mining interests in the United States, to a Russian nuclear agency in exchange for substantial donations to the foundation.

The FBI initiated a preliminary investigation based on the book’s claims in 2016, but it relied on unverified hearsay information. Additional investigations were launched by the FBI in New York and Little Rock, Arkansas, based on confidential source reporting. However, the Justice Department expressed doubts about the validity of the investigations, causing frustration among FBI agents. Some prosecutors even believed that Schweizer’s book had been discredited.

Keep reading.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLE: THE BIDEN REPORT: Physical and Video Proof of The Biden Family’s Corruption

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

THE BIDEN REPORT: Physical and Video Proof of The Biden Family’s Corruption

The Marco Polo USA website has provided links and a video, below, of proof of corruption in the Biden family. Please take the time to click on each link and learn the truth about Benedict Biden and his cohorts.

Please read Marco Polo USA’s Biden Report.

REPORT PHYSICAL COPIES PDF


THE BIDEN FAMILY BUSINESSES


SAR #1   SAR #2   SAR #3   SAR #4   SAR #5

CATHAY BANK 8969

CATHAY BANK 8992

SUBPOENA ON 05/15/2019

A WRECKED LIFE: HUNTER’S BILLS

WANTED: JAMES ANDREW GILLIARČEŠTINA


EMAILS


BIDEN LAPTOP EMAILS

EMAIL ADDRESSES ON THE BIDEN LAPTOP


COMMUNICATIONS


HB IPHONE BACKUP MESSAGESATTACHMENTS

HB IPHONE BACKUP WHATSAPP MESSAGES.ZIPATTACHMENTS
PDF

BIDEN LAPTOP MESSAGES.ZIPPDF

TONY BOBULINSKI MESSAGES.ZIPPDF


INFLUENCE PEDDLING


SOFT COUP PLANNING CALL ON 10/25/2018TRANSCRIPT

BIDEN + MCCAIN = AMERICAN MISERY


ASHLEY BIDEN DIARY


ASHLEY BIDEN DIARY: TRANSCRIBED

ASHLEY BIDEN DIARY: ORIGINAL
DELRAY BEACH FL POLICE REPORT
DELRAY BEACH FL POLICE BODY CAM


PERSONAL


A “DEVASTATING” OP-ED FROM MAUREEN DOWD

TRANSCRIPT

AN ORGY WITH DAPHNE GUINNESS, AND JOE THINKS I’M A GOD

TRANSCRIPT

HUNTER BIDEN SAFARI BROWSER HISTORY.CSV

ALIMONY FROM HELL ON 03/21/2017

“MOST GENIUS SHIT EVER.MP3” ON 05/11/2018

TRANSCRIPT

HUNTER AND HALLIE: THE COCAINE SAGA ON 06/23/2018TRANSCRIPT


TRANSCRIPT

©2023 Marco Polo USA. All rights reserved.

Judicial Watch’s Guide to Congressional Investigations

The new House of Representatives was sworn in early Saturday morning after Kevin McCarthy was elected Speaker on the fifteenth ballot. The House GOP leadership promises an ambitious agenda of investigations, including a special committee on the weaponization of federal agencies, but history is not reassuring. Will the House probes bring real progress—important new information, defunding of bad actors, sunlight on wrongdoing, indictment referrals, impeachment if warranted—or two years of fruitless bickering over documents and testimony?

At Judicial Watch, we run our own investigations and have been holding government officials, Democrat and Republican, accountable for nearly three decades, but we’ll be closely watching the House probes. Republican staff on the House Judiciary Committee earlier released a “road map” to the new investigative agenda, and over at the Senate, ranking Judiciary Committee member Charles Grassley has been digging deep into FBI corruption, releasing letters outlining serious allegations of wrongdoing. We’ve reviewed all the documents and talked to our sources. Here’s our guide to the new Congressional investigations.

Who Is Jack Smith?

No case is likely to dominate the 2023 headlines more than the investigation of former president Donald Trump by new special counsel Jack Smith. Attorney General Merrick Garland appointed Smith, a career federal prosecutor, to lead a probe into Trump’s conduct surrounding the events of January 6, 2021, as well as a separate probe of the storage of presidential documents at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate. Trump has denied wrongdoing in both cases. Notably, any decision to indict rests with the attorney general, not the special counsel.

The Trump affair screams for Congressional oversight—and apparently will get it. Even before the appointment of Smith, the House investigative road map signaled concerns about an “unprecedented raid on a former president’s home” to seize documents. The roadmap noted that Trump had cooperated with government officials seeking documents before the raid; that “the Biden Justice Department has provided limited justification for this unprecedented action;” and that Justice and the FBI “have failed to sufficiently comply” with Congressional requests for documents related to the raid. Congress will want to take a look as well at the belated disclosure of classified documents found at a Joe Biden office in the days before the 2022 midterm elections.

Smith’s unusual career—a path that took him from the office of the Manhattan District Attorney to federal postings in Brooklyn, Washington, Tennessee, and the Hague—is also worth a closer look. From 2010 to 2015, he headed the Justice Department’s Public Integrity Section and was at the center of several controversial issues. Among them: the IRS scandal.

In 2014, a Judicial Watch investigation revealed that top IRS officials had been in communication with Smith’s Public Integrity Section about a plan to launch criminal investigations into conservative tax-exempt groups. Government officials were looking to step up a probe into requests for tax-exemption from organizations with conservative sounding names like “Tea Party” and other “political sounding names,” according to a later report by the Treasury Department’s inspector general. Smith appears to have been a key player in this attempt to silence conservative voices.

 According to the documents obtained by Judicial Watch, Smith directed the head of the Justice Department’s Election Crimes Branch, Richard Pilger, to meet with the director of the IRS’s Tax-Exempt Organizations division, Lois Lerner. In one email obtained by Judicial Watch, Lerner discusses an idea that the Justice Department could build “false-statement cases” against tax-exempt conservative groups.

Judicial Watch later obtained additional documents detailing a planning meeting between Justice Department, FBI and IRS officials about possible criminal prosecutions. Thanks to Judicial Watch disclosures, House investigators discovered that the IRS improperly turned over confidential tax records of non-profit organizations to the FBI—sparking a public uproar and forcing the return of the records to the IRS. Read more about the case here and here.

Biden Family Corruption

The other headline-grabbing case in the House roadmap are allegations of corruption involving President Biden’s son, Hunter, and other family members—possibly even the president himself. The House report puts aside the sensational aspects of the Hunter Biden saga—the crack cocaine use, the heavy drinking and hookers, the controversy over a suddenly surfaced laptop computer, a gun, a seemingly endless parade of incriminating, embarrassing, or outright disgusting personal photographs from the laptop—and focuses on the sober case.

Judicial Watch’s Freedom of Information Act litigators are pressing for additional information about the Secret Service’s handling of the Hunter Biden gun caseBiden business dealings, and possible FBI obstruction of a Senate inquiry into Biden business dealings.

“Mounting evidence from the last two years,” the House roadmap notes, “shows that Hunter Biden, son of President Biden, has received preferential treatment from federal law enforcement, who seem to have turned a blind eye to potential national security threats presented by his business dealings with Chinese, Russian, and other foreign nationals.”

The roadmap notes the September 2020 release of an investigative report by Senator Chuck Grassley. That report noted “potential criminal activity relating to transactions among and between Hunter Biden, his family, and his associates with Ukrainian, Russian, Kazakh, and Chinese nationals.” One Hunter Biden business associate charges that Joe Biden was slated for a payoff in 2017. Congress will want to hear from the Biden business partner alleging a payoff of the president and take a close look at the evidence.

The Grassley letters outline an apparent campaign of stonewalling and coverup by the FBI and others in response to Congressional inquiries in the Hunter Biden case. The letters, cited at length in the House roadmap, also note the role of several senior FBI officials and Richard Pilger—the Justice Department Election Crimes Branch chief involved in the earlier IRS scandal—in opening investigations into “the Trump campaign and individuals linked to the 2020 elections.” FBI whistleblowers told Grassley that there was a “double standard” in opening investigations that appeared “to benefit the political aims and objectives of a select few Justice Department and FBI officials.”

Those are serious charges. Congressional investigators will have to steer around numerous roadblocks, including a criminal inquiry into Hunter Biden by U.S. Attorney David Weiss, the top federal prosecutor in Delaware. Fox News has reported that Attorney General Garland—Weiss’s boss—has taken a “hands-off approach” to the Hunter Biden case and is “leaving charging decisions up to Weiss,” a Trump appointee. But Congress may want a look at the Garland connection as well.

FBI Corruption: Faking a Rise in Domestic Violent Extremism?

The House roadmap reports that whistleblowers have come forward with claims that “the FBI is manipulating data about domestic violent extremism to support the Biden Administration’s political agenda.” According to the roadmap, the FBI “is pressuring agents to reclassify cases as domestic violent extremism (DVE)” and allegedly “manufacturing DVE cases where they may not otherwise exist and even manipulating its case categorization system to feign a national problem.”

That’s a grave charge. The issue traces back to the events of January 6, 2021, Congressional investigators say. According to the roadmap, whistleblowers have come forward “with information about how the FBI manipulated the manner in which it categorized January 6-related investigations to create a misleading narrative that domestic terrorism is organically surging around the country.”

According to FBI whistleblowers, FBI field offices around the country have been directed by the powerful FBI Washington Field Office to open cases against individuals who were at Capitol on January 6. But no work is actually done in the field, according to the whistleblowers. Rather, the entire January 6 investigation is run from the Washington office.

The upshot? Notes the roadmap: the “FBI’s case categorization creates the illusion that FBI field offices around the country are investigating a groundswell of domestic terrorism cases, giving the impression that [domestic violent extremism, or DVE] is present in jurisdictions across the nation. In reality, however, the cases all stem from the same related investigation concerning the actions at the Capitol on January 6. Such an artificial case categorization scheme allows FBI leadership to misleadingly point to ‘significant’ increases in DVE nationwide.”

FBI Corruption: Targeting School Boards & Parents

In October, as controversy about Covid masking and the influence of hard-left Critical Race Theory in education rippled through school board meetings across the country, Attorney General Garland issued a memorandum directing the Justice Department and FBI to target local school boards and parents. The FBI would address a purported “disturbing spike in harassment, intimidation, and threats of violence” against school boards.

Following a national outcry about Justice Department overreach, Garland publicly backpedaled, but did not rescind or disavow the memorandum. In fact, the FBI quickly doubled down. The House road map notes that soon after the Garland memorandum, the FBI established “a new ‘threat tag’ created to apply to school board investigations.” The new “EDUOFFICIALS” threat tag, officials directed, was to be applied to all “investigations and assessments of threats specifically against school board administrators, board members, teachers, and staff,” according to an email obtained by House investigative staff.

Critics charge that the Justice and the FBI has gone too far, chilling legitimate dissent over issues such as Covid masks and Critical Race Theory. Imagine speaking up at your local school board meeting and getting a visit from the FBI. The roadmap claims that “information from whistleblowers show that the FBI has opened investigations with the EDUOFFICIALS threat tag in almost every region of the country and relating to all types of educational settings.”

Big Brother, Big Tech

House leaders are also calling for close looks at the FBI’s relationship with Big Tech powerhouses like Facebook and Twitter. The House roadmap says evidence “shows that the FBI is helping censor conservative viewpoints” on Big Tech platforms. Whistleblower information provided to House investigators “suggests that the FBI and Facebook have a so-called ‘special relationship’ that may threaten constitutional protections and lead to partisan efforts.” Whistleblower allegations suggest that the special FBI relationship includes “Facebook voluntarily sending information that may relate to citizens’ private political speech.”

Elon Musk’s recent “Twitter Files” disclosures have increased pressure for congressional scrutiny of the relationship between government entities and Big Tech. The Twitter disclosures outlined apparent government interference with free speech, suppression of conservative voices, improper banning of then-President Trump from the platform, and censorship of New York Post reporting on the Hunter Biden scandal. Incoming House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan told the Wall Street Journal that the Twitter Files showed the “collusion between big government, big tech and big media” was “worse than we thought.” Jordan and incoming House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer are expected to launch hearings exploring the Twitter Files revelations.

The Border Crisis

It’s not in the road map, but the other House investigations worth noting are upcoming probes into the crisis on the southern border. House leaders have said they will support investigations by the House Judiciary and House Oversight committees into border issues, including a possible impeachment inquiry into Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas.

The southern border is under tremendous strain. More than two million illegal immigrants were arrested in border crossings in 2022 up to October, a record number—and that’s just the ones that got caught. More than 800 died making the dangerous crossing in the same time period. Mexican drug cartels pound the border in an unceasing drug war. The latest cartel gambit? A plague of fentanyl on both sides of the border.

House investigators want to hear from Mayorkas and other top Homeland Security officials on a wide range of issues, including the unprecedented surge of illegal aliens, the failure of border policing and border security technology, the impact of President Trump’s wall and other Trump-era policies, the influence of drug cartels and drug smuggling, and the entry into the U.S. of violent criminals and terrorists.

We’ll have more on the House investigations in the coming months. And the independent Judicial Watch investigations will continue. Stay tuned.

AUTHOR

Micah Morrison

Micah Morrison is chief investigative reporter for Judicial Watch. Follow him on Twitter @micah_morrison. Tips: mmorrison@judicialwatch.org

RELATED ARTICLES:

DOJ & FBI Target Biden Political Opponents

Decorated Veteran and FBI Analyst Whistleblower to Testify at House Judiciary ‘Hearing


Investigative Bulletin is published by Judicial Watch. Reprints and media inquiries: jfarrell@judicialwatch.org


EDITORS NOTE: This Judicial Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Politics – Resounding Success or Dismal Failure?

I am fully aware that the title of this article appears to offer a contradiction, but I am prepared to give an explanation that should, hopefully, clear up any confusion.

I often quote Ayn Rand, author of “Atlas Shrugged”, “Anthem” and “Fountainhead”, and one of my favorite quotes from her is: “Contradictions do not exist. Whenever you think you are facing a contradiction, check your premises. You will find that one of them is wrong”.

So, what IS a premise? From the Cambridge English Dictionary, premise is defined as  a noun, “an idea or theory on which a statement or action is based; and also a verb, “to base a theory, argument, etc. on an idea, thought, or belief.

For the believer, a premise is a ‘starting point’ for deciding which of the many ideas he might encounter in life are worthy of consideration, and adoption, which will eventually form your personal belief system. As events in life occur, many times one’s premises about these events must be changed as knowledge and wisdom are increased in the believer’s life. Changing one’s premises, as one gains wisdom and knowledge through God’s word, is a vital part of growing in Christ. Do NOT be afraid to examine your premises and change them as needed.

If one of your premises is that politics is a beneficial system that provides for the betterment of humanity, and you eventually see, or possibly see NOW that that is NOT the case, then your premise was wrong. Research further and see how that premise needs to be changed.

The title of the article proposes that politics was/is a success while also being a failure. You decide.

The Success of Politics

What we all know as ‘politics’ is more than just a ‘system of governance’ that seems prevalent in nearly every government on earth. While most people seem to regard politics as a ‘necessary evil’, it is UN-necessary and IS completely evil. It is the system devised by Satan to gain and maintain control over people and nations and has been around since the events recorded in the Book of Genesis with Satan gaining, through lies and deceptions, the control over ‘the world’ that was initially given to Adam and Eve.

Politics was formed as a ‘control system’ when the first humans created by God were approached by a minion of Satan/Lucifer and were asked some questions about their trust in, and belief of, God and His word. Though we have no idea how long that conversation lasted, the end result was a resounding success—for Lucifer. He had obviously been waiting in the dark shadows (where most politicians do their best work) and watching to see what God would do as He was surveying the condition of the earth (see Genesis 1:1).

What would a political success look like from Satan’s vantage point? One must understand what his goal was in approaching God’s new creatures and questioning the word and authority of God who gave His man CONTROL OVER His new earth creation.

Satan was likely still reeling from his defeat in his futile attempt to elevate himself above the throne of God. Being a prideful creature, desperate to regain some control over the earth, and knowing that God had given that control and authority to Adam and Eve, he knew he would need to trick them into relinquishing it to him. Obviously, deception would be one way to proceed, along with tempting them to desire to “be like gods” by acting in complete contradiction to God’s commands.

It was at this point that Satan earned the title given him by Jesus and recorded in John 8:44. There Jesus was speaking to the Pharisees, the religious leaders of the Jews who were also the preeminent politicians of Jesus day. He said, “Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

What was the first recorded lie in the Bible? When Satan, through the serpent, questioned Eve about God’s command regarding the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil, he said “Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden? And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden: But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.  God’s command to Adam did not mention touching the fruit, only forbade eating the fruit.

When Satan said to Eve,  “Ye shall not surely die. For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil” (Genesis 3:4-5). That was the second recorded lie in the Bible and it directly contradicted God’s word to His new creation, recorded in Genesis 2:17: “And the Lord God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat: But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.

Satan’s ploy worked on the innate nature of man to desire to  “be like gods”, having the same power, authority and control God has, and he was right on target with that deceptive tactic.

It is so telling that there had not been even ONE recorded lie until the first politician arrived on the scene and from there, everything went downhill quickly. Neither humanity nor the earth has been the same since, with lies and deception being the modus operandi of nearly every political system, and most of the politicians, in the world today.

I sometimes wonder if Satan was surprised by how easily he was able to deceive the woman and gain the control he was seeking. In any case, with his political success he was able to bring a curse upon the earth and all its inhabitants. I know, I know, God stated that because of Adam’s sin and rebellion, the earth was cursed, but the actions of Satan are what started the entire process of the curse that still today results in the death and destruction that has destroyed so many millions of human lives.

So from that standpoint, politics as a “system of control” using deception and lies, was a tremendous success. As a result of his success, Satan was able to begin a 6000 year reign of terror on the earth that has damaged and/or destroyed much of what God created.

The Failure of Politics

As great as the success of politics was, and is, for Satan, it has been the absolute biggest, and most destructive, failure for all of humanity. One only needs to consider what the human race lost when our primal parents gave in to the deception that changed everything God had created and given to his man.

God gave Adam and Eve ‘dominionover the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth. Along with the dominion, man was expected to care for and dress the perfect garden created for him; in other words, man lacked nothing needed for a happy and successful existence. He neither needed to break the ground to sow seed, nor break a sweat to produce his food. The earth had been blessed by God to produce everything they needed in abundance. Life before the curse caused by their disobedience was PERFECT.

We cannot even imagine a life on earth before the curse, or what life might be now if Satan had not been successful in deceiving the woman. As beautiful as some aspects of nature on the planet are, without the curse placed on it as a result of the success of “The Politician” (another name for Satan), we would all be living in a veritable paradise.

The system of politics, built on lies and deception and introduced by Satan, controls, or at least dominates, every government on earth. While that control seems wonderful for the politicians whose pockets bulge with their ill-gotten gain, with nearly all of them becoming wealthy beyond belief, the lives of ordinary people are not quite so glamorous. The endless and needless laws passed by politicians in governments have certainly not made life better for any of us; on the contrary, whenever a new law is passed by the US Congress, it usually means additional suffering for the average taxpayer. Every time the Congress passes a new bill and POTUS signs it into law, it will mean an increase in spending that must be funded by all US taxpayers.

The massive number of laws passed by the US Congress and signed into law by various presidents over the last 40 years have brought an unpayable level of debt upon this nation and all its citizens. Proverbs 22:7 states, “The rich ruleth over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender”. The debt now crushing the US citizen means that a formerly ‘free nation’ is now the slave to all the other nations that have funded the uncontrolled spending of US politicians. Just as Adam and Eve became slaves to Satan, the ‘new god of this world’, until that debt is paid, the United States will never again be truly free.

I am extremely frustrated that so many Americans still believe our political system exists to make life better for us. These deceived and deluded people are constantly putting their misplaced trust in this or that politician, none of whom is worthy of ANY trust, and I guarantee you, they WILL be disappointed when that politician does NOT accomplish what they promised to do for Americans. But, as they have done for many decades, they will just sigh and say, “Oh well, next election we’ll win the Congress, or the White House and that will finally change things.” But it won’t ‘change things’ because the ‘system’ does not want to be changed; the bloodsucking parasites who own the system will not allow it to be changed. To do so would dry up their endless flow of unearned money and would cramp their luxurious lifestyles. The lifeblood of the political system, the money that flows like the mighty Mississippi River, is what draws so many people into that system, and causes them to become something that never dreamed they would be.

I envisage, with at least some small hope, the day when people wake up and understand just how much damage politics has done and is still doing to their lives. I’m not pointing fingers at any political party more than another, as they are all guilty of the financial, cultural and social crises that now have made the US a joke and byword in the world. The political system OWNS the politicians who engage in it and that system is owned, in turn, by the globalist banking dynasties, corporate conglomerates and super wealthy elites of the world who in turn are owned by Satan.

Until the entire system is removed, nothing will change for the better. Politics can NEVER be a success for the individual citizen who only wants to be left alone to live, peacefully, quietly, in complete freedom.

Instead of living in freedom, peace and quietness, as we are told will happen if we pray according to God’s word, the people of the United States are subjected to the insane ideas of a small group of people who are completely dedicated to the destruction of our freedom, our peace and our quietness. We are subjected to the most palpable fear ever experienced in the history of our nation. That fear stems from the looming loss of our first freedom, the right of “free speech”. If Americans are silenced from expressing our personal views in any public forum, then we are no longer a free nation, and have become slaves to a small but powerful group that not only denies the existence of any of our rights, but also denies the existence of the God Who originally provided those rights.

For the people described in the last sentence, politics, and the entire political system, will always be a TOTAL FAILURE.

Conclusion

I truly wish I had a solution to the horrific mess politics has caused, not just in the US, but in the whole world. I continue to hear commentators insist that we, as Christians, MUST take part in the political system so that we can gain our share of the control that everyone seems to desire. What they fail to realize is that politics is a “worldly system”, initiated by Satan himself and perpetuated by every person who gets involved in it. There is NO GODLINESS whatsoever in politics, only evil, corruption, greed, and lust for the power that once belonged to Adam. However, mankind gave that power to a fallen angel who has used it very successfully to destroy billions of people in the last 6000 years.

The only human capable of handling the kind of power and control that once was Adam’s is the man, the second Adam, Christ Jesus, and until the lease on the earth that was given to the first Adam has expired, Jesus will NOT be stepping in to solve all the world’s problems. He came to earth originally as the Lamb of God to provide a way for all mankind to prosper as Adam would have, but mankind rejected Him and chose Satan’s system instead.

Since that time, mankind’s ability to govern himself has proven to be a complete failure, but when Jesus returns, He will arrive on planet earth, NOT as a lamb, but as the King of kings, and His first action will be to eliminate the ugly, corrupt political system that has dominated the lives of billions, leaving a wake of death and destruction; He will do this by eliminating ALL politicians who have rejected Him and by starting a new world kingdom that will cover the whole earth, and it will have only one Head: Jesus Christ.

“For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace. Of the increase of his government and peace there shall be no end, upon the throne of David, and upon his kingdom, to order it, and to establish it with judgment and with justice from henceforth even forever. The zeal of the Lord of hosts will perform this.” Isaiah 9:6-7 (emphasis mine).

I know there are many who will insist that we, as Christians, must partake in the political system to ensure that we are treated fairly by “the system’, and that our voices can be heard, but when has that ever been true? If a Christian tries to have a voice, using the foul system of politics, the demonic power of “the system” will not only drown out that voice, it will eliminate it if possible. Remember the account of John the Baptist who was “the voice of one crying in the wilderness, Prepare ye the way of the Lord, make his paths straight” (Mark 1:3). Remember also that John the Baptist was killed by the political system of his time for “trying to have a voice”. But that did not stop him for crying in the wilderness, and preparing the way of the Lord. He was not afraid to do as God commanded him even at the cost of His life.

“Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness? And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel? And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you and will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty.” 2 Corinthians 6:15-18 (emphasis mine)

If a Christian can enter politics with a pure, clean heart and a desire to truly change the status quo of the system, and still remain as Paul exhorted in his letters, then possibly some good can come from it. However, the problem is that the system does not like change, especially that encouraged or initiated by Christians. It was started by Lucifer, has been grown and maintained by Lucifer and his minions for centuries and to allow for a change that will eliminate the greed, corruption and unrighteousness from it WILL be hard-fought by Satan. But be prepared for a fight on Satan’s turf; that alone gives him an advantage that will be difficult to overcome, UNLESS, you are truly commanded by God to get into that fight.

I will close with this word: If you are determined to enter the foul world of politics and still try to maintain a pure, clean heart, please be prepared for the battle of your life. Satan is still “the god of this world and he does not like interlopers trying to change HIS world. Be ready to count the cost of your decision, using the words of Jesus as a guide:

And whosoever doth not bear his cross, and come after me, cannot be my disciple. For which of you, intending to build a tower, sitteth not down first, and counteth the cost, whether he have sufficient to finish it? Lest haply, after he hath laid the foundation, and is not able to finish it, all that behold it begin to mock him, Saying, This man began to build, and was not able to finish.  Or what king, going to make war against another king, sitteth not down first, and consulteth whether he be able with ten thousand to meet him that cometh against him with twenty thousand? Luke 14:27-31

Blessings and Maranatha

©2023. Bud Hancock. All rights reserved.

Democrat Asks Biden to Send Illegal Immigrants to Every Town in America

Republicans and one of the nation’s most prominent Democrats agree on one issue: America’s open border with Mexico has created a humanitarian crisis that has stretched multiple cities’ resources to the breaking point. Yet while Republicans focus on increased border security, at least one Democrat wants the Biden administration to adopt a comprehensive plan to settle illegal immigrants in every city, town, and village in the United States.

Historically unprecedented levels of illegal immigration since Joe Biden took office have created a humanitarian crisis for the most vulnerable people. Administration officials admitted last month that they had lost track of 85,000 children, roughly one of every three children who entered the U.S. illegally. “It horrifies me to think of the conditions that they possibly have been thrust into, sold into and have been distributed” into sex slavery, Rep. Matt Rosendale (R-Mont.), a member of the House Border Security Caucus, told “Washington Watch with Tony Perkins” on Monday.

“That is not humane. That is not compassionate.”

New York City Mayor Eric Adams (D) has said the uncontrolled border has drained the Big Apple’s finances to the core. Adams anticipates the sanctuary city will spend $1.4 billion on illegal immigrants this fiscal year. When asked, Adams expressed no gratitude for $30 million in federal funding provided by the Biden administration. “When you look at the price tag, $30 million comes nowhere near what the city is paying for a national problem,” Adams told “Face the Nation” on Sunday.

The city’s shelters and hotels became so overfilled that Adams began placing illegal immigrants in seven NYC public school gyms — while students were in the classrooms.

It is “unfair to the city of New York and [other] cities to carry the burden of a national problem,” Adams said — leaving critics to charge him with hypocrisy.

“For the past two years, Texas has been Ground Zero for the unprecedented surge of illegal immigration unleashed by the Biden administration that has strained resources in border communities to the breaking point,” said Dan Stein, president of the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR). “Even with the efforts of Gov. Greg Abbott to move migrants away from the border, Texas is getting slammed to the tune of $13.4 billion for costs associated with illegal immigration.” Florida, led by Governor Ron DeSantis (R), pays more than $8 billion annually on programs for illegal immigrants or their children, according to a recent FAIR report that calculated the cost imposed on states.

Americans nationwide bear an ever-mounting cost for the uncontrolled border. “It’s costing [U.S.] taxpayers $150 billion a year,” said Rosendale. “Now, the cities that are starting to have this same economic impact pushed upon them are starting to recognize, yes, there is a problem.”

Adams has called on Biden to make the problem the nation’s problem by evenly distributing illegal immigrants nationwide.

“We have 108,000 cities, villages, towns. If everyone takes a small portion of that, and if it’s coordinated at the border to ensure that those who are coming here to this country in a lawful manner is actually moved throughout the entire country, it is not a burden on one city,” said Adams.

The mayor has tried to implement the process by sending illegal immigrants who arrive in his city to other locations statewide, and even to Canada. New York Governor Kathy Hochul (D) has been “a real partner” in helping Adams “find space throughout the state,” he said. “We believe the entire state should participate in a decompression strategy.”

Others were less pleased. Canadian MP Christine Fréchette learned of Adams’ “surprising” decision to bus illegal immigrants to the Canadian border in February. A month later, President Joe Biden and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau hammered out an agreement for Canada to allow 15,000 asylum-seekers to enter from the United States.

Aside from the economist cost, “the people of my city, are watching this city being transformed … the same people I protected for 22 years as a police officer,” Adams said. Illegal immigration has transformed North America, with Canada admitting three migrants for every birth and the U.S. adding three migrants for every four native American births in 2022.

All parties agree the size and scope of illegal border crossings is without parallel in U.S. history. There have been 5,429,144 illegal border encounters since February 2021, the first full month of the Biden-Harris administration, according to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). That number does not include nearly one million (989,155) gotaways, who successfully eluded Border Patrol, according to an inspector general report on how “Intensifying Conditions at the Southwest Border Are Negatively Impacting CBP and ICE Employees’ Health and Morale.” The number of total encounters at the southern border has increased 245% and gotaways increased 303% since the fiscal year 2019, the IG report found.

Altogether, border encounters and gotaways under the Biden-Harris administration totaled 6,418,299 — more than the population of the state of Missouri. Adams may have a population deficit to make up; nearly half-a-million people (468,200) moved out of New York City between April 2020 and last July — 5.3% of the city’s total population, according to U.S. Census data released last Thursday.

Adams blamed the crisis on the GOP, alleging that “Republicans have blocked comprehensive immigration reform,” by which he meant partial or full amnesty granting U.S. citizenship. Yet previous spikes in illegal immigration in 1986 and 2000 coincided with fulfilled or anticipated amnesty plans.

New York City has long touted its status as a sanctuary city. Mayor Ed Koch (D), whom The New York Times revealed as a “closeted gay man,” established New York City as a sanctuary city through Executive Order 124 on August 7, 1989. Subsequent mayors Michael Bloomberg (a Republican-turned-independent) and Bill DeBlasio (D) liberalized the categories of illegal immigrants whom the city would not turn over to the federal government for deportation.

Adams personally greeted a busload of illegal immigrants sent by Texas Governor Greg Abbott (R) last August. Adams proposed sending illegal immigrants to community college at taxpayer expense — in Sullivan County, more than 100 miles north — and he supported a city council measure allowing illegal immigrants to vote in citywide elections. The voting law was struck down by the New York Supreme Court of Richmond County last June.

Citizens in other parts of New York state have indicated they want nothing to do with Adams’ plan to relocate his illegal population. Suffolk County hired a lawyer to prevent Adams from sending illegal immigrants to their area.

Adams also reversed himself on gyms after parents expressed concerns about their children roaming the halls with unvetted adults.

But parents and communities will not receive relief until the president gets serious about border security, said Rosendale.

“We know what to do,” he said. Washington must start “completing the border wall security system — the sensing devices, the cameras, the lighting, the road that would parallel the wall. That would be a huge, huge help.”

D.C. must also reform the oft-abused asylum process, he said. “We know that by implementing the stricter standards on asylum and making sure that people really do have a threat to their lives,” rather than merely coming as economic migrants. “That’s why they’re fleeing, and they’re only coming across one border in order to gain that asylum status.”

They must also reinstate President Donald Trump’s Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP) policies. “While they had to wait in Mexico,” 75% of alleged asylum-seekers “went back to their country of origin,” casting serious doubt on their stories that they feared for their lives.

These policies can again “slow down the flow of people that are fleeing, trying to get into our country dramatically.”

AUTHOR

Ben Johnson

Ben Johnson is senior reporter and editor at The Washington Stand.

RELATED VIDEO: ANYWHERE BUT HERE: Adams Says No More Migrants in NYC, Says Spread Them All Over Country

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2023 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

Dutch Holocaust Memorial of Names Dedicated by Dutch Auschwitz Committee

Very near my home this monument has been erected.

Seventy years after the Second World War, more than 102,000 victims of the Holocaust will finally have their own memorial.

In Amsterdam, a memorial has been erected with the names of all the Dutch Holocaust victims.

This will finally provide the Netherlands with a tangible memorial where the 102,000 Jewish victims and 220 Sinti and Roma victims can be commemorated individually and collectively.

Up to now, no memorial in the Netherlands has listed each individual Holocaust victim by name. For surviving relatives, a place to commemorate family members is invaluable.

In addition, a memorial listing more than 102,000 names serves as a reminder to current and future generations of the dangers of racism and discrimination.

King to unveil National Holocaust Names Memorial

On Sunday afternoon 19 September 2021, His Majesty the King, together with Jacques Grishaver, chairman of the Dutch Auschwitz Committee, will unveil the new Holocaust Names Memorial in Amsterdam.

More than 75 years after World War II, a memorial dedicated to the over 102,000 Dutch victims of the Holocaust without a grave will finally be unveiled in the Netherlands. Designed by the Polish-American architect Daniël Libeskind, the memorial is located on Weesperstraat in Amsterdam. During a private ceremony on 19 September in the nearby courtyard garden of the Protestant Deaconry, Prime Minister Mark Rutte and City Mayor Femke Halsema will be among those to address a limited gathering of invited guests.
King Willem-Alexander, together with Jacques Grishaver, will then unveil the memorial in the presence of a number of survivors and descendants.

Memorial
The National Holocaust Names Memorial is a tangible memorial where 102,000 Jews and 220 Sinti and Roma can be remembered both individually and collectively. This is the first memorial in the Netherlands that lists each individual Dutch victim of the Holocaust by name.

©2023. Matthys van Raalten. All rights reserved.