Supreme Court Hands Trump Admin Victory On Efforts To Deport ‘Worst’ Illegal Migrants

The Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to more quickly deport illegal migrants to countries not specified in their removal orders.

A majority temporarily blocked a lower court order that required the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to give migrants notice and allow them to raise concerns about potential threats of torture before deporting them to a “third country.”

Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Ketanji Brown Jackson and Elena Kagan dissented from the decision.

“Apparently, the Court finds the idea that thousands will suffer violence in farflung locales more palatable than the remote possibility that a District Court exceeded its remedial powers when it ordered the Government to provide notice and process to which the plaintiffs are constitutionally and statutorily entitled,” Sotomayor wrote. “That use of discretion is as incomprehensible as it is inexcusable.”

The Trump administration argued the order interfered with their ability to deport “some of the worst of the worst illegal aliens” in its emergency application.

“The United States is facing a crisis of illegal immigration, in no small part because many aliens most deserving of removal are often the hardest to remove,” Solicitor General John Saur wrote in May. “When illegal aliens commit crimes in this country, they are typically ordered removed. But when those crimes are especially heinous, their countries of origin are often unwilling to take them back. As a result, criminal aliens are often allowed to stay in the United States for years on end, victimizing law-abiding Americans in the meantime.”

District Court Judge Brian Murphy, a Biden appointee, wrote in his original order that plaintiffs “are simply asking to be told they are going to be deported to a new country before they are taken to such a country, and be given an opportunity to explain why such a deportation will likely result in their persecution, torture, and/or death.”

“This small modicum of process is mandated by the Constitution of the United States,” the judge wrote.

Attorneys for the migrants claimed in a brief that the administration “repeatedly sought to remove people as a punitive measure, to some of the most dangerous places on the planet, and with only hours’ notice.”

AUTHOR

Katelynn Richardson

Investigative Reporter.

RELATED ARTICLE: Judge Really, Really Wants To Release Dems’ Favorite Suspected Human Smuggler

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permisison. ©All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

Trevor Loudon: The Communist-Jihadi candidate for Mayor of NYC — If you live in NYC watch this TODAY!

… As the election for Democrat front runner is tomorrow.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Socialist Likely To Take Control Of Country’s Biggest City Thanks To Quirky Voting System, Poll Shows

BDS-supporting Zohran Mamdani personally urged Ben & Jerry’s co-founder to boycott West Bank: video

RELATED VIDEO: Zohran Mamdani screeched like a maniac to protest Tom Homan deporting criminal illegal aliens

EDITORS NOTE: This Vlad Tepes Blog column with video posted by  is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Political Antisemitism Exposed by Operation Rising Lion

There are two possible reasons for the persistence of shrill, reflexive denunciations of Israel by progressive politicians: naiveté or malice. 

Israel initiated Operation Rising Lion because there was absolutely no doubt regarding Iran’s intention to attack the Jewish State with nuclear weapons. And the timing was critical because the Islamic Republic was dangerously close to “breakout,” facilitated in part by Barack Obama’s feckless nuclear deal and the transfer of billions of dollars to Iran during both his and Biden’s administrations. This windfall also enabled Iran to fund Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis, and in effect finance the atrocities of October 7th.

Faced with the potential for annihilation, Israel needed to act without further delay and was applauded by many Congressional Republicans for doing so. Democrats were split, however, indicating the progressive wing’s descent into political antisemitism, which ultimately has nothing to do with Israeli policies, and everything to do with hatred of Israel as a Jewish nation.

As college campuses and cities explode with antisemitic violence, as Jews are physically assaulted, and as Jewish institutions are defaced, vandalized, and set ablaze, progressives find it acceptable to utilize the world’s oldest hatred as a political weapon. But how can they spew anti-Israel propaganda that is demonstrably false without being challenged, and how can the mainstream continue to cover for them?

One of the more outrageous statements was that of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), issued after Israel’s first strike, saying: “The world is more dangerous and unstable as a result of the extremist Netanyahu’s government ongoing defiance of international law…First, he uses the starvation of children in Gaza as a tool of war, a barbaric violation of the Geneva Conventions. Now, his illegal unilateral attack on Iran risks a full-blown regional war.”

But here is a reality check for the Senator from Vermont: the world is not more dangerous because Netanyahu struck Iran as it was about to achieve nuclear breakout. Did Sanders express the same concerns regarding global peace and stability when Hamas murdered, raped, and kidnapped Jewish civilians? Or when Iran instigated the war in Yemen? All Netanyahu did was take action to eradicate the nuclear threat of a terror regime that has sworn repeatedly to destroy Israel and perpetrate another Holocaust.

The operation was not “unilateral,” moreover, but only the latest action in a battlefront opened last year when the Islamic Republic attacked Israel with a barrage of nearly two-hundred ballistic missiles. Retaliation then was muted – reportedly because of pressure from the Biden administration to prevent Israel from attacking Iran’s nuclear facilities. Additionally, the first ballistic assault against Israel followed multiple wars that Iran precipitated through its proxies Hamas and Hezbollah over the last two decades and a terror campaign it has waged against Jewish targets around the world since 1979.

And despite the Senator’s high-pitched hyperbole, Israel’s actions do not violate international law.

The canard that Israel is starving Gazan children is particularly vile because it evokes false claims of Israeli genocide disseminated by progressives since the beginning of the war. Such calumnies are nothing short of blood libel and are as delusional as the nonsense spouted by politicians who chastise Israel for having the chutzpah to fight for her survival. Senator Jack Reed (D-RI), Senior Democrat on the US Senate Armed Services Committee, and Senator Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), who serves on the Foreign Relations Committee, come to mind for their tedious condemnations of Israel’s actions despite Iran’s well-documented history of terror, provocation, and genocidal threats.

There are two possible reasons for the persistence of shrill, reflexive denunciations of Israel by progressive politicians: naiveté or malice:

  1. They can perhaps be excused for not knowing if they are truly unaware of the relevant history and facts, but absolution by ignorance only goes so far in the internet age, when people have immediate informational resources at their fingertips. Consequently, even the ignorant have an intellectual obligation to reevaluate their core beliefs when confronted with easily accessible facts that undermine their predicate assumptions and prejudices.
  2. If they continue to disregard facts that present inconvenient truths concerning the genocidal threat against Israel, their ignorance becomes willful and crosses a line from which malevolent bias can be reasonably inferred.

Are there conservatives or Republicans who harbor anti-Israel sentiments? Probably, but they are not attacking Jews in the streets because of the President’s support for Israel. In fact, Republicans as a collective seem to recognize that Israel is doing what the western nations themselves should have done to prevent the Iranian nuclear threat in the first place, instead of coddling Iran, lifting sanctions, and ignoring the Mullahs’ continuous threats of genocide. It would be laudable to help eradicate the nuclear threat posed by a rogue nation with a record of terrorism and regional destabilization; but the West, unfortunately, has a history of weakness, incompetence, and duplicity where Israel and the Jews are concerned.

Israel cannot afford to entrust her survival to a community of nations that failed the Jews so spectacularly during the Holocaust – and which actively participated in their persecution and slaughter for centuries (e.g., during the pogroms, the Russian civil war in which Russians and Ukrainians murdered up to 250,000 Jews, the Khmelnytsky Rebellion, the Inquisition, and the Crusades). Jew-hatred is so thoroughly ingrained in European culture and Islamic society that the kneejerk response to news of any Mideast conflict is to blame Israel. Consequently, empathy or goodwill regarding any national or collective tragedy suffered by Israel or the Jews is typically conditional and fleeting at best.

Indeed, global sympathy after October 7th began fading almost immediately – particularly among progressives.It is especially disappointing to see how progressive antisemitism has engendered moral tone deafness regarding not only hatred of Israel, but the safety of Jews in the United States.

Illustrative of this ethical malaise was the mixed reaction in Congress to the recent attack against Jews in Boulder, Colorado, by an Egyptian immigrant wielding Molotov cocktails and a homemade flamethrower. The perpetrator attempted to immolate twelve Jews who were engaged in a peaceful solidarity walk calling for release of the remaining hostages held by Hamas. Shortly thereafter, Rep. Gabe Evans (R-Colo) introduced a resolution condemning the antisemitic attack and expressing unanimity with the Jewish community. Though Rep. Evans is of non-Jewish heritage, he immediately came to the defense of his Jewish constituents out of a sense of decency and humanity.

The resolution passed by a vote of 280-113, with 205 Republicans voting in favor joined by only 75 Democrats. Incredibly, 113 Democrats voted against the bill, claiming the language was too politically charged. This rationalization was disgraceful and would never have been tolerated if the resolution were written to condemn hate crimes against African Americans, Hispanics, gay people, or any other minority.

Even those who proclaim sympathy for Israel often seem compelled to conflate issues that have disparate historical etiologies, while always placing the burden for resolution on Israel. This was illustrated by the British Foreign Secretary in his address to Parliament about the Israel-Iran conflict, which he concluded by stating: “Our vision remains unchanged. An end to Iran’s nuclear programme and destabilising regional activity. Israel, secure in its borders and at peace with its neighbours. A sovereign Palestinian state, as part of the two-state solution.”

The Foreign Secretary’s juxtaposition of the Iranian nuclear crisis and two-state myth seems to echo the theory of linkage, which deems Israel the root cause of all instability in the Mideast. It also suggests that compassion for Israel is conditioned on how high she will jump when imperiously commanded by nations that do not face existential annihilation.

The menace of a nuclear Iran, however, stands alone and has nothing whatever to do with the Palestinian Arabs – except to the extent that Iran has been subsidizing their state of war against Israel for years, and that the atrocities coordinated by Iran and committed by Hamas on October 7th show the fundamental impossibility of a two-state “solution.”

If the Jewish people have learned anything from the harsh realities of exile, it is:

(a) to distrust the platitudes of those who lecture us on how self-abnegation is essential for our survival, and

(b) to believe antisemites when they say they intend to kill us.

This dialectic was simply yet eloquently articulated to the narrator in Elie Wiesel’s Holocaust memoir, “Night,” by the unnamed character who said: “I’ve got more faith in Hitler than in anyone else. He’s the only one who’s kept his promises, all his promises, to the Jewish people.”

If the Mullahs in Iran vow their intent to exterminate the Jews with nuclear weapons, we should take them at their word; and conversely, we should ignore the diatribes of western political elites who show their antisemitism by portraying Israel as the aggressor and Jews as bad actors.

©2025 All rights reserved.

Critically Thinking about Iran: The importance of this issue is hard to overstate…

Iran is yet another matter that screams out for Critical Thinking. Regretfully, like with many things, much of what you read and hear will be devoid of that, as it’s a lot easier to spew political talking points, disguised as journalism.

This short commentary will try to put some parts of this concerning matter into perspective. As readers know, accurate perspective is a necessary ingredient of Critical Thinking.

Brief History of Iran —

Most of us know very little about the long history of Iran. Here is a recent overview. This is a reasonable (but somewhat more detailed) history.

How we have confused Iran —

It’s understandable that Iran may not take any President at face value, as the last three have had radically different Iran policies…

Despite claims that Iran was a terrorist state, etc, President Obama gave them $1.7 Billion in cash, plus freed up $50+ Billion more for them.

In President Trump’s first term, he stated that he was exerting “maximum pressure” on Iran. One consequence of this was that their annual oil reserves went from $122 Billion in 2018 to $4 Billion in 2020 (see here).

President Biden’s Iran policy was vague and non-descript, which translated to that it was about appeasement. This led to Iran being enriched by tens of billions of dollars (e.g., herehere, and here).

What’s at Stake —

Three things are clear about the current Iranian regime: 1) it hates Israel and America, 2) it has funded deadly terrorist activity in many areas, and 3) it has been aggressively working towards developing nuclear bomb capability.

The ruse of the JCPOA —

JCPOA = Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action. See herehere, and here.

What Israel has done recently —

In the last week or so, Israel has made multiple very targeted (military only) strikes on Iran. For sample reporting see here and here. In response, Iran has made several non-military attacks on Israel (e.g., see here).

What the US has done recently —

Iran was given numerous warnings by President Trump in hopes of getting them to be serious about a diplomatic solution, but their responses indicated that there was no hope for that. No citizens know exactly what stage Iran was at regarding a nuclear bomb. The President and his team (who do have access to such confidential intelligence), decided that we needed to quickly undermine their nuclear bomb progress, which was done (see here and here).

What Iran may do —

This, of course, is unknown. This article opines: Seven Options for Iran After US Attacks. Another: Here’s how Iran could retaliate after US strikes on its nuclear program.

The short-range impact on US citizens —

There are multiple possibilities, from cyberattacks to oil price increases. There will also be incessant political dissent from never-Trumpers — like calls for his impeachment. [Note that complaining Dems forgot that the prior U.S. Secretary of State publicly stated that military intervention to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons could not be ruled out — e.g., here.]

The long-range impact on US citizens —

One potentially positive outcome is that other bad actors will appreciate that President Trump is willing to step up if necessary. Hopefully that will lead to less bad behavior on their part…

China and other players —

China is an ally of Iran, and what they will do is undetermined. One recent reported development is that they sent five 747’s to Iran. These may be to:

a) replenish Iran’s missile stockpile,

b) remove and safeguard some of what Iran has developed regarding a nuclear bomb, or

c) something else.

The Bottom Line —

The short answer is that no one knows what the total fallout will be here. This was not a zero-sum matter, as doing nothing also had the real potential for catastrophic results. In effect, the U.S. was between a rock and a hard place.

Praying is a good idea, and getting your own affairs in order also makes sense.

©2025   All rights reserved.


Here is other information from this scientist that you might find interesting:

I am now offering incentives for you to sign up new subscribers!

I also consider reader submissions on Critical Thinking on my topics of interest.

Check out the Archives of this Critical Thinking substack.

WiseEnergy.orgdiscusses the Science (or lack thereof) behind our energy options.

C19Science.infocovers the lack of genuine Science behind our COVID-19 policies.

Election-Integrity.infomultiple major reports on the election integrity issue.

Media Balance Newsletter: a free, twice-a-month newsletter that covers what the mainstream media does not do, on issues from COVID to climate, elections to education, renewables to religion, etc. Here are the Newsletter’s 2025 Archives. Please send me an email to get your free copy. When emailing me, please make sure to include your full name and the state where you live. (Of course, you can cancel the Media Balance Newsletter at any time – but why would you?

UN Secretary-General, Obama Officials, Chuck Schumer Condemn Operation ‘Midnight Hammer’

All the right people.

President Trump’s strikes quickly took out Iran’s nuclear program without risking any American lives or further involvement. Despite that the strikes were greeted with outrage not only by Iran, but by social media influencers, the former Obama officials who empowered Iran, and by Democrats, including Sen. Chuck Schumer who claimed that he would, rather late in the game, move for a War Powers vote.

Schumer had spent multiple elections running on promises to push back on Iran only to now campaign for Iran.

Tommy Vietor, Obama’s NSC spokesman, warned that, “Iran might retaliate today, tomorrow or in months. Or a year from now, Iran or its proxies might blow up a bus filled with American tourists in Cyprus.”

True. Would that ongoing state of affairs be better with or without nukes?

Obama chose to make Iran more of a threat, President Trump chose to shrink the threat.

“I am gravely alarmed by the use of force by the United States against Iran today. This is a dangerous escalation in a region already on the edge – and a direct threat to international peace and security,” UN Secretary-General António Guterres warned.

Iran has promised to complain to the UN. Unfortunately it may find out, as we already have, that the UN is entirely useless.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Israel, Hamas, and the BBC

Cal State prof: ‘Iran should build nukes’ to protect itself from ‘murderous sociopathic Zio‑American global empire’

The Muslim Invasion and the Implosion of Brussels

UK: ‘Asylum seeker’ Mohammed Akbari rapes 17-year-old girl

Syria: Islamic jihadis murder 15 people in jihad attack at Greek Orthodox Church in Damascus

Support for a Palestinian State is Support for Oct. 7

Pakistani parliamentarians flaunt their obsession with jihad against India; MP calls for elimination of unbelievers

UK: Officials covered up rape by ‘asylum seeker’ for fear of inflaming ‘community tension’

RELATED VIDEO: Spencer vs Smith and Gaetz Debate Review: David Wood, Apostate Prophet, Robert Spencer

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

‘NO Kings 2.0’ Protests Set for July 4th Because the First One Was a Bust

After the first “NO Kings” protests fell flat and failed to gain traction, organizers are doubling down with plans for a second demonstration.

The protests are scheduled for July 4th, as anti-ICE activists once again aim to disrupt America’s Independence Day celebrations and advance their agenda.

We think these paid for by CCP; other Communist groups funded by Soros; pro-illegal alien NGOs which are anti-American; anti-ICE; anti-Trump falderal’s will fail again.

Great how Marxists Democrats and their legacy sycophants keep picking these hills to die on.


No Kings 2.0 Protests Set for July 4 Because the First One Was a Bust

Sarah Arnold  | June 21, 2025 1:30 PM

After the first “No Kings” protests fell flat and failed to gain traction, organizers are doubling down with plans for a second demonstration. 

The protests are scheduled for July 4th, as anti-ICE activists once again aim to disrupt America’s Independence Day celebrations and advance their agenda. According to a Facebook post, the second No Kings protest promises to deliver “No Kings” and “reclaim” freedom for the nation. The first demonstrations occurred earlier this month during President Donald Trump’s 250th celebration of the U.S. Army. Still, the far-left organizers failed to seize control or remove the president from office, so now they’re making another attempt.

Despite protests planned across the country, many critics have dismissed them, expressing frustration with the far left’s repeated disruptive tactics.

Continue reading.

©2025 . All rights reserved.

RELATED VIDEO: The Left’s “Mostly Peaceful Protests” Charade

Minnesota assassin tells FBI in a letter that Tim Walz wanted Klobuchar taken out to clear Walz’s run for the U.S. Senate

KaBoom — Minnesota assassin tells FBI in a letter that Tim Walz wanted Klobuchar taken out to clear Walz to run for the U.S. Senate.

Now We Know Why the Minnesota Assassin Story Disappeared Overnight

Matt Margolis • 10:04 PM, June 20, 2025

Have you wondered why the story of the Minnesota assassin Vance Boelter has suddenly vanished from the news? Now we have a pretty good idea why.

Boelter, who murdered State Rep. Melissa Hortman and her husband while also shooting State Sen. John Hoffman and his wife, unleashed terror that sparked a massive manhunt before his capture late Sunday. Initial media coverage was rife with speculation, with left-leaning outlets eager to cast Boelter as a MAGA Republican, hastily blaming the GOP and even President Donald Trump for inciting his shooting spree.

Yet the letter found in Boelter’s abandoned vehicle tells a radically different story, one that not only exposes the media’s rush to judgment and political opportunism but sudden drop in coverage.

According to Minnesota’s largest newspaper, the Star-Tribune, Boelter believed he was acting under the supposed orders of Democrat Gov. Tim Walz. Boelter’s incoherent letter, about a page and a half long, bizarrely claimed that killing Sen. Amy Klobuchar was necessary to clear the way for Walz to run for the U.S. Senate.

The letter is the clearest evidence yet of Boelter’s mindset after the targeted violence against Minnesota politicians last week. It is incoherent, one and a half pages long, confusing and hard to read, according to two people familiar with the letter’s contents. It includes Boelter alleging he had been trained by the U.S. military off the books, and that Walz, who is not running for Senate, had asked him to kill Klobuchar and others.

Asked to comment about the letter, Hennepin County Attorney spokesperson Daniel Borgertpoepping said the office cannot comment on an open investigation but “due to the seriousness of the allegations it contains, we will state only that we have seen no evidence that the allegations regarding Governor Walz are based in fact.”

What’s more, as we previously reported, Walz appointed Boelter to a government workforce board, a fact that seemingly fueled his delusion of a personal relationship with the governor. But this imagined relationship was the extent of any link, as the letter’s ramblings make clear. There is no evidence that support for Trump or any conservative cause motivated Boelter’s actions. Instead, his violent spree was rooted in a deranged fixation on Walz, a far cry from the media’s initial narrative that sought to weaponize the tragedy against the pro-Trump right.

In short, Boelter is just a wacko. His letter is a testament to his fractured mind, not a manifesto of political grievance. The media’s rush to blame conservatives and the governor’s passive complicity in allowing false narratives to spread are failures that demand scrutiny. The truth matters, and in this case, it exposes a grotesque distortion of reality by those eager to score political points amid a horrific crime.

This deliberate misinformation campaign explains why the story vanished from the headlines so quickly. Once the facts emerged, the narrative that fit the media’s partisan agenda collapsed. The silence that followed speaks volumes about the lengths to which some will go to manipulate public perception and exploit tragedy for political gain.

Matt Margolis is a conservative commentator and columnist. His work has been cited on Fox News and national conservative talk radio, including The Rush Limbaugh Show, The Mark Levin Show, and The Dan Bongino Show. Matt is the author of several books and has appeared on Newsmax, OANN, Real America’s Voice News, Salem News Channel, and even CNN.

©2025 . All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Bombshell Report: Alleged Minnesota Assassin Wrote to FBI About Walz’s Orders

Accused assassin Vance Boelter blames Gov. Tim Walz for murderous rampage: Report

Ilhan Omar Forced to Delete Post on Juneteenth

Red Alert: FBI Monitoring Possible Domestic Sleeper Cells

What’s the Point?

Greetings, everyone, I am typing this missive from the Holiday Inn Express in Del Rio, Texas. Yep, the same Del Rio, Texas, that was practically in the news daily during the Biden administration, evidencing the droves of tens of thousands of illegal immigrants who were flowing into our Nation.

I am here in several Texas border counties recognizing outstanding constitutional law enforcement officers from Kinney, Sutton, and Kerr Counties as part of the American Constitutional Rights Union Defender Initiative.

As I drove through Kinney and Val Verde counties, there was an absolutely noticeable difference.

You did not see a law enforcement vehicle every 800 meters. There are no more high-speed chases down US Hwy 90. And the children in Kinney County have not had a lockdown in over six months due to illegal immigrant bailouts and pursuits.

I stood there at the International bridge in Del Rio, and there was no chaos, no mass throngs of people polluting and trashing the area, awaiting their turn to illegally enter America.

Just so you know, Texas shares some 1,249 miles of border with Mexico…and it appears we have regained operational control of our southern border.

So, when I flip on the news and watch all these insidious riots being waged by the progressive socialist leftists, my question is simple. What’s the point?

Saturday was the 250th birthday of the US Army. However, for the left it was a day to remind people why their party symbol is a jackass.

This so-called “No Kings” protest leaves me scratching my head.

I find it quite laughable that leftists do not consider mandating people what type of car they can drive, food they can eat, dishwasher and stove they can have, shower head they can use, and the amount of toilet water they can flush as tyrannical. Nope, controlling your life is just fine. Telling you that you cannot own a firearm and defend yourself while illegal immigrants are obtaining firearms and committing acts of violence against Americans is perfectly acceptable.

I just want to know, what delusional, deranged Democrat strategist came up with the chucklehead idea that they should riot in the streets to protect criminal illegal immigrants. Ya know, the murderers, rapists, child sex offenders, those who assault, set women on fire on subways, kill female college students and mothers.

What person said, “This is a grand idea, and we can win back the American people?”

And to have useful idiots and mindless lemmings, like Maxine Waters, tell us this is all peaceful? Only leftists would believe that an illegal immigrant tossing a Molotov cocktail at law enforcement or dropping cinder blocks from overpasses is peaceful.

Again, what’s the point?

The point is simple to comprehend. The progressive socialist leftists care more about their open borders agenda to “fundamentally transform” America than YOU and your safety and security.

They care little about the Constitution, the rule of law, and, actually, it appears they embrace foreign criminality and terrorist organizations.

I mean, why else would a United States Senator, Chris Van Hollen, make an utter fool of himself and go to El Salvador and plead for the release of an El Salvadoran citizen who entered our Country illegally, and is now facing charges of human and sex trafficking and conspiracy to murder. One can only deduce that Van Hollen, who shared a margarita with Abrego Garcia, thinks of him as just a fine, cheeky fellow.

Yes, the leftists want more young American U.S. Air Force Academy Cadets, like 18-year-old Ava Moore, to die at the hands of a criminal, illegal immigrant female from Venezuela. Ava Moore was kayaking on Lake Grapevine in North Texas when she was struck by this cretin on a jet ski. Heck, maybe that is the point, leftists are rioting because they want more illegal immigrants to have a jet ski.

The bottom line is simple: leftists, Marxists, and their compatriots, Islamic jihadists, cannot win you over with reason.

They cannot advance their ideological agenda through a logical debate.

What they believe in does not stand scrutiny by anyone with a functional brain. Therefore, they must foment fear, promote coercion, forcibly intimidate, and ultimately enact violence to advance their ideals.

By the left’s own definition of an insurrection, this is really one. And President Trump has every right to put down this insurrection by the means he commands. Attacking federal law enforcement agents is a crime. Purposefully destroying federal property is a felony. And all these leftists decrying states’ rights would not do so when a State stands against dismembering unborn babies in the womb.

President Trump is acting “in pursuance thereof” in regards to our Constitution, protecting our national sovereignty, and “insuring domestic tranquility”.

For four years, leftists watched the Biden administration autopen undermine our border security, and remember, “the border is secure”. They said nothing while millions poured into our Country illegally, including single military age males, non-state non-uniform belligerents, and Chinese operatives.

Now we are taking action to rid this Country of criminal illegal immigrants, and the leftists, along with the jihadists, are rioting.

What’s the point? The progressive socialist left, the Democrat party, hates America.

They hate anyone who stands in the way of their totalitarian control.

They hate you for being a Patriot and believing in this Nation.

They happily prefer to allow criminal illegal immigrants to murder you, rape our women, commit heinous acts of depravity against our children, and will gladly burn this Nation down…just to have domination and complete power.

What’s my point? I took an oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic. And I will honor my oath and take insurrectionists to the woodshed.

Steadfast and Loyal, not just words, but a calling by which I live.

First published on ACRU Action

©2025 . All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Hegseth wants to clean up the military, but enemies remain in its ranks

Propaganda Influences American Military Leaders in Foreign Academic Programs

Until President Trump Fires Woke Leadership, West Point Will Never Get Back to Forging Warriors

Subverting the Efforts of CinC and SecDef to Restore the Military, At Least One Senior Official Appears to Have Made a Promise He Had No Intention to Keep

Prism of America’s Education

Educate and inform the whole mass of the people… They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty.” — Thomas Jefferson

“Whatever is taught today in school will be in the Government tomorrow.” — Abraham Lincoln


Our founders said repeatedly, the most important topics for Americans to learn in schools are: Reading, Writing, Math, morality, thinking, Finance and Civics. What is NOT being taught in school today: Reading, Writing, Math, morality, thinking, Finance and Civics.

Today, whenever anyone asks the WHY question as a follow up, the answer is always the same: because that is not being taught in SCHOOLS.

When liberty is not learned, it is forgotten.

How can you fight for something you know nothing about?

Why are these subjects no longer taught in school? Because the global elite wants to rule. If you understood the constitution, you would know that the people were meant to have the power, not the elites. They must answer to you.

BY KEEPING YOU IGNORANT, THEY RULE

Nothing is more pitiful than the “No Kings” rallies. The military was created to keep America King-free. Because these people are ignorant, who do they hate? The military. Who do they support? The countries with Kings.

The true purpose of school is to create worker bees that are only capable of following directions, not capable of making decisions. By telling the people the purpose of school is to provide work is nothing but a cover-up for training worker bees to work in some mindless, soulless government-sanctioned corporation. The purpose of school is to provide knowledge, so individuals can make their own informed decisions. School to work, No Child Left Behind, Common Core Standards are all “training” which eliminates choice.

Ask yourself, why have the globalists designed the decline of America? Why are they supporting the illegals and not Americans? Illegals come in from countries where the things we view as necessities, they view as luxuries. Whoever provides those luxury items to them gets their allegiance forever, or, so they assume.

Then we have the sheeple who must vote as mommy or daddy did without accepting the fact that the parties have changed.

Ask yourself, with all of the money we spend on education, why is there so little to no change? No improvement? At all? In fact, overall ratings for U.S. education have declined. Could it be because we are addressing the wrong problem? The problem is the curriculum.

From elementary school to college, students are not taught HOW to think. They are taught WHAT to think.

They are not taught about America’s riches and opportunities. They are taught to do more for less or to do without. They are not taught about morality, family, God and country. Instead, they are told what to think and to think that only the government and schools have the answers.

  • School replaces family
  • Government replaces God
  • America is replaced by the UN

Is that the life and future you want for your child? No? Then get involved.

NOW is the TIME.

If you believe certain left wing commentators, you would think that protestors/rioters were trying to promote “due process” & “justice”. That is just a lie spread by the media and government schools. SkyNews Australia revealed that the globalists supported violence:

THEY WANT TO OVERTHROW THE GOVERNMENT.

The Globalists tell their followers that America stole land from Mexico and it must be returned. They say Israel must return its land without knowing to whom or the names of the river and sea they reference. It is amazing to me how little the protestors know about the cause they claim to protest. It is sad to witness their ignorance, but even worse, when you realize it is the globalists/communists that created this whole mess.

DARK MONEY

On today’s show you will learn how Dark Money has taken over our elections. You will also learn that most of the dark money comes from We the People through our tax dollars giving grants to NGOs. You will learn the corruption in Florida politics. If you want to go deeper, I suggest you sign up on Data Republican where you will discover how money flows through government grants, charities and NGOs. Then call your legislators and tell them to stop the money train to destruction.

GET MAD!

©2025 . All rights reserved.


RELATED:

USAID Officer and Contractors Admit to Massive $544 Million Bribery Plot.

How does this work. Lets use Bill Kristol as an example: Bill Kristol, gets money from the deep state. He is listed as the President of Defending Democracy (EIN 831567380) which is an indirect beneficiary of USAID through Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors.

From Data Republican:

FYI Bill Kristol is the President of DEFENDING DEMOCRACY TOGETHER INSTITUTE. He gets money from taxpayer grants.

FUNDING IS FUNGIBLE!!! That means USAID DOLLARS DO NOT LITERALLY FLOW INTO THESE NGOS!!!

INSTEAD, THE MONEY MOVES THROUGH MULTIPLE LAYERS!

VARIOUS ENTITIES HANDLE IT, SHUFFLE IT AROUND, AND REDISTRIBUTE IT!

So instead of obsessing over individual grants and NGOs, OPEN YOUR EYES to the BROADER PATTERN of FUNDING DISTRIBUTION and INFLUENCE!

And YES—layers of UNACCOUNTABILITY exist!

WHO’S TRULY DEPENDENT ON USAID?!

The ones who DON’T want it to be shut down!

THIS IS COMMON SENSE!!! THIS IS NOT TAUGHT IN SCHOOL!

Keep calling legislators. It works. GOP-led House ends DC sanctuary city policy

Enjoy this weekend and join me on americaoutloud.news

Let Truth be our weapon, for it is the only thing that counts.

Get Involved. Join rinoremovalproject.org and or Reclaimcampaign.com

Support President Trump, and make sure our students get a traditional American education. Phonics in K-3, Cursive in 3-5, Singapore Math, civics.

Join the Florida Citizens Alliance, goflca.org Help save America, mentor a child.

Show: Sat and Sun 7AM ET and 5PM ET

Show Link https://www.americaoutloud.news/the-prism-of-americas-education/

Podcasts and Articles: karenbschoen.com karenschoen.substack.com

Guest: Kat Stansell

Website: https://newswithviews.com/author/kat katsmeow.substack.com

Guest: Bob White, activist. Head of Republican Liberty Caucus

Website: https://rlcfl.org/

**News**

Dave Walsh talks about the rising ENERGY costs in Florida

U.S. Sugar & Everglades Equipment Group Announce Strategic Partnership

Why do we need illegals?

U.S. Sugar, Clewiston, FL —U.S. Sugar’s commitment to sustainably producing sugar for American consumers

REPORT: Police Accuse Repeat-Offender Protester For Setting 11 Of Their Cars On Fire

The New York City Police Department (NYPD) identified New Jersey native Jakhi Lodgson-McCray as the suspect behind the torching of 11 police vehicles in Brooklyn earlier in June. The suspect has a criminal history and was arrested prior at multiple pro-Palestine protests, according to authorities.

NYPD said Wednesday that the 21-year-old suspect climbed over the gate at 1:00 a.m. June 12 at a parking lot one block from the Bushwick neighborhood’s police station and placed fire starters on the hoods, windshields and tires of police cars. Ensuing fires caused upwards of 800,000 dollars of damage, according to the New York Post. NYPD Chief of Detectives Joseph Kenny said “we do believe that he acted alone, and obviously he targeted this location because it is a police facility.” The suspect was allegedly captured by surveillance cameras fleeing the scene on foot and is still reportedly at large. Kenny added that the suspect changed his disguise “several times during his escape.”

The NYPD’s social media accounts posted photos Wednesday of Lodgson-McCray, adding that “there is zero tolerance for anyone who attacks the NYPD.”

Police are also investigating whether he is responsible for a similar attempt to set a police van ablaze Wednesday in another part of Brooklyn.

Though police have not confirmed a connection, Democratic New York City Mayor Eric Adams suggested that the crime was motivated by recent anti-Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) riots. Lodgson-McCray’s extensive record of arrests — dating back to 2023 — includes an incident at an anti-ICE protest in May and for burning a flag at a city embassy as part of an anti-Israel demonstration, according to authorities.

The suspect was wanted previously for causing over 1,000 dollars of damage last fall to a Columbia University statue during pro-Palestine protests, police said. He reportedly has two open criminal cases, the first for disorderly conduct and resisting arrest for allegedly obstructing traffic May 28 and another for assault and resisting arrest in May 2024. He has pleaded not guilty in both cases and was released without bail.

AUTHOR

Caleb Ruger

Caleb Ruger is a student at William and Mary studying History. He serves as Publisher at The Wren Journal, the Collegiate Network paper at William and Mary. He also serves as the Secretary of the Virginia College Republicans and Vice President of the William and Mary College Republicans. A recent Catholic convert, he is the Vice President of William and Mary’s Thomistic Institute chapter.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Father And Son Allegedly Robbed Bank, Engaged In Six-Hour Standoff With Police

State Department Begins Scrutinizing Social Media Accounts Of Student Visa Applicants

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

EXCLUSIVE: We Found Out How Easy It Is To Order An Abortion Pill. The Results Are Shocking.

In as little as five minutes, the Daily Caller News Foundation was able to easily order abortion pills opponents argue are unsafe without a doctor adequately verifying key eligibility requirements.

Groups that launched online services after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved mail-order abortions will provide the pill under circumstances that are questionable even by the agency’s relaxed standards, a DCNF investigation found.

“Mail-order abortion subjects women to an abysmal standard of care,” Dr. Christina Francis, CEO of the American Association of Pro-Life OBGYNs (AAPLOG), told the DCNF. “Not only is there minimal health screening that occurs, but women typically have no interaction with any medical professional, let alone a physician.”

The FDA removed in 2021 a requirement that providers distribute mifepristone in person and enabled prescribers to send the pill directly to women in the mail. Now, without speaking to a physician or confirming a pregnancy, a woman can order prescription abortion pills to her home “just in case” she needs them in the future.

Minutes after filling out a brief online form, she’ll have her request approved. Days after payment, the pills will arrive on her doorstep. The package might include a handwritten note saying, “You are brave,” but no doctor will physically be there to warn her that mifepristone is not “safer than tylenol” as its advocates claim or that the danger of complications is likely higher than the drug’s label indicates.

The DCNF obtained five sets of medication for $660 — with sets ranging from $90 to $150 each — simply by filling out online medical forms created by providers.

WATCH:

Three of the five organizations that sent pills to the DCNF — Aid Access, OPTIO Women’s Health and Abuzz Health — use GenBioPro, one of two FDA-approved manufacturers of mifepristone. The fourth, Cambridge Reproductive Health Consultants (CRHC), supplies pills produced by Danco Laboratories, the other approved manufacturer.

The final group, Women on Web, sent pills in a plain manila envelope that did not indicate the drug’s producer. The mailing address on its website is in Toronto, Canada, though the return address on the package was listed as “Supplement City” in Kansas City, Kansas.

The owner of the Kansas property is Jose Franco Guevara, per public records, who owns multiple other buildings in the neighborhood. He faced a federal lawsuit in 2019 for not paying employees overtime compensation at one business he runs in the area, Sabor Latino Restaurant. Guevara agreed to a Consent Order paying the employees money owed to them.

Several other groups listed P.O. boxes as their return address. Aid Access’ package shipped from a California address linked to an individual who works for Honeybee Health, which was the first online pharmacy to begin shipping abortion pills by mail.

Aid Access, OPTIO Women’s Health, Abuzz Health, CRHC, Women on Web and Honeybee Health did not respond to requests for comment. GenBioPro and Danco Laboratories also did not respond to requests for comment.

‘Legal Gray Area’

Mifepristone obtained by DCNF (Credit: Katelynn Richardson/Daily Caller News Foundation)

Though the FDA prescriber agreement form requires being able to “assess the duration” of a pregnancy and “diagnose ectopic pregnancies,” the online pill distributors made no effort to do so.

Advanced provision is a “legal gray area” that exposes the root problem of the FDA’s relaxed regulations, Gabriella McIntyre, legal counsel for Alliance Defending Freedom’s Center for Life, told the DCNF.

“It’s not an FDA-approved use of abortion drugs,” McIntyre told the DCNF. “It’s difficult to see how you get recourse, at least from the FDA’s perspective, unless you reinstitute in-person dispensing, which would resolve the issue of practitioners being able to send these drugs in the mail without verifying things like gestational age or whether the woman is pregnant.”

McIntyre said she is not aware of any litigation related to doctors providing pills for future use.

Abuzz Health Abortion Pill How-To (Credit: Screenshot/Abuzz Health)

Groups that supplied pills to the DCNF give instructions for taking the pill long after the 10 week period the FDA approved it for use.

“At 14 weeks, you might see a fetus about the size of a lemon,” Aid Access states. “Seeing a fetus after 14 weeks can be upsetting for some people. It is good to be prepared and have a plan for how to dispose of the fetal tissue.”

OPTIO Women’s Health similarly warns that a fetus at 12 weeks can be “about the size of a lime.” Abuzz indicates the pills can be used through 12+ weeks on its instructions, directing women to a FAQ page for more information, though the bottom of the page includes a caveat that “nothing on this website is to be construed as medical advice.”

“As an OB-GYN practicing in Texas, I have seen firsthand how these recommendations hurt women, because I have cared for many of them in the ER,” Dr. Ingrid Skop, vice president and director of medical affairs at the Charlotte Lozier Institute (CLI), told the DCNF. “Abortion drugs fail more frequently in higher gestational ages, so off-label use until 13 weeks may often require surgery to remove retained pregnancy tissue and/or the dead baby to prevent serious infection or hemorrhage.”

While the online medical forms these groups ask women to complete vary in length, each one took less than 5 minutes to fill out.

The groups asked only a few basic questions about preexisting health conditions and allergies to misoprostol or mifepristone, along with any history of a caesarean section or ectopic pregnancy. Several providers also asked about gender identity, sexual orientation and preferred  pronouns. Only one of the five websites, Abuzz Health, asked for photo identification.

When the DCNF asked about cost assistance, Aid Access indicated they could not reduce the cost for pills in advance but would help in the future if pills were needed for a current pregnancy. Other groups share similar policies on their website, promising financial assistance to those in immediate need.

However, one group, Abuzz, did provide a discount from the full $150, allowing a minimum payment of $90 for pills in advance.

The quickest deliveries came in just three days. The longest order arrived after 7 days.

An FDA spokesperson did not say whether the specific groups that supplied pills to the DCNF violated their prescriber agreement but noted the Mifepristone Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) Program is “in place to ensure the safe use of this drug and sets forth specific requirements providers must meet before prescribing this drug, including the ability to date pregnancies accurately and the ability to diagnose ectopic pregnancies.”

Shield Law Practice

After Roe v. Wade was overturned in 2022, three doctors founded the Abortion Coalition for Telemedicine to promote laws that shield medical professionals in pro-abortion states from penalties for supplying abortion pills in states where it is banned. The organization provides instructions for doctors who want to become a “shield provider” supplying medication abortion in other states, including information on malpractice insurance and establishing an LLC.

One of the group’s co-founders, New York doctor Maggie Carpenter, is facing felony charges in Louisiana for supplying abortion pills to a mother who allegedly ordered them for her minor daughter. Democratic New York Gov. Kathy Hochul has said she would not comply with an extradition request to turn Carpenter over to Louisiana authorities.

A Texas court also ordered Carpenter to pay a $100,000 penalty in February for providing pills to residents of the state. Carpenter has worked with Aid Access since 2020, according to her archived bio.

The cases against Carpenter are the first efforts to hold doctors accountable for providing abortion pills across state lines. Several of the organizations that supplied mifepristone to the DCNF operate within states with shield laws.

CRHC operates The Massachusetts Medication Abortion Access Project (The MAP), which was developed after Massachusetts became the first state to pass a shield law in 2022 protecting doctors who serve patients in other states, where abortion may be illegal.

The CRHC is run by professors primarily from Canada, though one consultant on the team, Dr. Kathryn LaRoche, is an assistant professor of Public Health at Purdue University. CRHC’s website explains that it uses “doctors in Massachusetts to prescribe FDA-approved abortion medication to patients who apply through our website.”

Dr. Angel Foster, one of The MAP’s co-founders, wrote in a March letter to Connecticut state Sen. Gary Winfield that the organization is now supplying medication abortion “to about 2,500 patients a month,” with 95% of patients residing in states with abortion bans.

“[W]e need more states with comprehensive Shield Laws and we need more telemedicine Shield Law providers willing to offer care in all 50 states,” she wrote. “The more providers we have the more we will be able to normalize Shield Law provision and support each other.”

A Safe Choice Network, which partners with OPTIO Women’s Health, indicates on its website that all doctors in the network are licensed to practice in California, which passed a shield law in 2023.

Aid Access’ organization operated abortion “Roe-bots” — robots that dispense the abortion pill — outside the Supreme Court when it heard the case challenging mifepristone in 2024, operating them “remotely from within shield law states.”

Twenty-two states, along with Washington, D.C., now have some form of abortion-related shield laws in place, according to UCLA Law.

‘This Is Not Healthcare’

Nearly 83.5% of abortion-related ER visits that result from taking mifepristone were incorrectly coded as miscarriages between 2016 and 2021, according to a study of Medicaid data by CLI. These miscoded visits were more likely to be severe than those correctly coded.

“These miscoded abortion complications remain invisible to research scientists resulting in a large underestimation of actual medical abortion complications,” the study found.

Skop noted abortion providers who tell women not to disclose they took the abortion pill both reflect “a disregard for women’s well-being” and exacerbate “the already poor-quality abortion data collection in the U.S., further obscuring the frequency of complications from women and the public.”

One in ten women who take the abortion pill will experience a “serious adverse event,” according to an April study of insurance data by the Ethics and Public Policy Center (EPPC), which is higher than the “less than 0.5 percent” of patients listed on the drug label.

“Across the country, we’ve seen the horrific results of these practices,” Francis told the DCNF. “A teenage girl required emergency care for complications of the abortion drugs after being forced to take them by her mother who obtained them online. Women have died alone at home after attempting to undergo this process without medical supervision. This is not healthcare. It’s negligence.”

Yet statistics published by the groups, as well as anecdotes, confirm women are ordering the pills for future use in record numbers. Some women began stocking up after Trump won the 2024 election.

“I bought 2 rounds of the pills from Women on the web as soon as trump won,” one woman wrote on Reddit. “I have them because we don’t want kids, and I’m afraid we may loose [sic] access in a red state. So it’s well worth having, 2 Year shelf life. Would recommend to anyone who wants to protect their right to abortion access.”

Aid Access received over 5,000 requests for pills in the 12 hours after Trump’s victory was announced, according to The Guardian.

“We’ve never seen this before,” co-founder Rebecca Gomperts told the outlet.

AUTHOR

Katelynn Richardson

Investigative Reporter.

EDTORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

Boycotts, Sell-Offs, and Burned Nikes: What Actually Works Against Woke Corporations

Patriotic and Bible-believing Americans are tired of being ignored — but are we aiming our firepower in the right direction?

If you’ve ever felt like your righteous anger fizzled into nothing more than a crumpled receipt and an angry tweet… you’re not alone.

First, corporations offend us with some outrageous policy — a rainbow-covered children’s line at Target, a drag queen beer can from Bud Light or a Disney movie that looks more like a lecture than entertainment.

So what do we do?

We rise up. We boycott. We cancel. We organize. We even burn our sneakers.

But then… nothing.

The CEO doesn’t step down. The board doesn’t apologize. The company releases a carefully worded statement about “values” and “dialogue,” and we’re left wondering:

Are we just yelling at brick walls while their stock portfolios continue to grow?

Let’s be honest — the average patriotic American is now three layers deep into frustration:

  1. Frustrated over the woke garbage coming out of corporate America.
  2. Frustrated over how to respond in a way that actually matters.
  3. Frustrated that even our responses seem to have no impact.

But here’s the thing:

Sometimes, boycotts do work.

Sometimes they don’t.

And sometimes… the real pressure point isn’t the consumer — it’s the shareholder.

Let’s talk about that.

Why Boycotts Feel Good — But Often Fizzle

Boycotts are emotional. They’re immediate. And they send a signal.

But they rarely hit the company where it really hurts unless two things happen:

  1. The boycott goes viral, affecting the company’s brand among its core customers.
  2. The backlash spooks investors and tanks the stock price.

If you’ve got both? You’ve got a firestorm.

If not? You’ve got a hashtag.

Take Nike, for instance. When they made Colin Kaepernick the face of their campaign in 2018, millions of Americans were furious. Videos of people burning their Nike socks flooded social media. And Nike? They leaned back and said, “Thanks for the free publicity.”

Sales soared. Stock rebounded. Why? Because their target audience — younger, urban, progressive buyers — loved it. The investors weren’t scared, and Nike walked away laughing.

But when shareholders panic, corporations listen

Take a look at Disney.

They jumped headfirst into every culture war they could find — picking a fight with the state of Florida over transgender ideology in the schools, cramming progressive, gay-grooming messaging into children’s content, and alienating the very families that built the Disney brand.

The result? Not just a boycott.

Disney’s stock tanked by over 50%.

Shareholders panicked.

The CEO, Bob Chapek, was fired.

And guess who they brought back to clean up the mess? Bob Iger, who immediately (at least in words) announced Mickey Mouse would be backing off the culture war stance and refocusing on “core storytelling.”

Why? Because investors lost faith in the leadership. And when investors lose faith, heads roll.

But What About Bud Light?

Ah, yes — the beer that broke the internet.

When Bud Light partnered with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney, they probably thought it was a harmless, “inclusive” marketing stunt.

Instead, they lost billions in market value, became a cultural punchline, and saw their sales collapse so badly that bars stopped stocking them altogether. Even their delivery drivers were begging stores not to drop them.

The backlash hit both the consumer base and the shareholders.

That’s the holy grail of pressure. And Bud Light is still trying to recover.

So, what works and what doesn’t?

  • Boycotts Alone? Sometimes. But only if they’re big, loud, and sustained.
  • Shareholder Sell-Offs? Often. Because sell-offs directly affect stock price & leadership.
  • Social Media Campaigns? Rarely, because they’re too easy to ignore.
  • Targeted Investment Pressure? High, especially when activist investors can force board action.

So What Should We Do?

Here’s where the frustration turns into strategy.

If you’re a Bible-believing, America-loving patriot who’s tired of woke corporations stomping on your values, you need to think like a tactician, not just a protester. You have the power to make a difference.

Yes, boycott.

Yes, speak up.

But also — consider pressuring those with money.

Write to major institutional shareholders.

Start campaigns that target investors, not just customers.

Expose how companies are losing their audience and damaging long-term profitability.

And don’t just shout — document, report, and repeat.

Jesus flipped the tables of the money changers.

Perhaps it’s time we took a few more steps — not just by boycotting beer or canceling a Disney subscription, but by holding corporations accountable with financial transparency and focused scrutiny.

And we’ve already seen it work, by just one man.

Enter Robby Starbuck.

Robby Starbuck is a former Hollywood music video director turned conservative activist, political commentator, and defender of traditional values. After walking away from the entertainment industry, he began using his media savvy to expose the radical agendas creeping into corporations, classrooms, and culture.

When Target, Bud Light, North Face, Kohl’s, and others began aggressively pushing gender ideology on children and celebrating radical LGBTQ messaging, Robby Starbuck didn’t just rant about it on Twitter (though, yes, he did that, too).

  • He connected the dots for consumers and shareholders alike:
  • He posted data showing stock drops in real-time
  • He called out corporate leaders by name
  • He rallied consumers with clear messaging: “This is not just about politics — this is about your children.”

And critically, he encouraged investors and retirement fund holders to speak out and reconsider where their money was going.

It worked.

His public pressure campaigns helped create the perfect storm: massive consumer backlash, stock sell-offs, media coverage, and a chilling effect on other corporations considering similar actions.

Some brands quietly pulled merchandise.

Others scrubbed campaigns.

Many stopped commenting altogether.

Robby didn’t act alone — but he showed what happens when activists stop just reacting emotionally and start organizing strategically. His success should inspire us all to do the same.

The Takeaway

You don’t need to be a billionaire or own 100,000 shares of stock to make a difference. You just need to know where the pressure points are — and aim accordingly.

So yes — keep boycotting.

But don’t stop there.

Follow the money. Find the leverage. Flip the tables.

Because when the investors get nervous, the corporations finally listen.

If you found this helpful, share it with others who care about reclaiming our culture from woke corporations.

©2025 . All rights reserved.

Most Americans Demand Term Limits To Delete the Corrupt Rot in Congress

America inherently is a corrupt country. It cannot be fixed.

British philosopher Lord Acton said, “Power corrupts…and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” He knew human nature all too well.

He might have added, “Longterm power corrupts long-term power holders.”

Our Founding Fathers’ worst mistake was to allow endless political careers for politicians who desire personal wealth and prestige over service to the people. South Carolina’s Strom Thurmond served 49 years as a U.S. Senator before dying in office at age 100. U.S. Senator Diane Feinstein (D-CA), wheel-chaired, nearly blind and suffering from dementia died at age 90, while still in office. Joe Biden, suffering from Alzheimer’s Disease, aged 82, wanted to run for another four years as president of the United States, while in fact, his staff illegally “ran” our country because Biden was not in charge of his mental faculties.

Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, having served for 35 years, wants to serve another two years as she babbles past 84 years of age. At the same time, she fed her husband stock trades as “insider trading” to defense contracts while she voted to keep the Afghanistan-Iraq wars continuing for 20 years. Her corruption sinks as deep as the Mariana Trench at 36,000 feet in depth.

General George S. Patton said, “Politicians are the lowest form of life on Earth. Democrats are the lowest form of politicians.”


Most Americans Demand Term Limits To Delete the Corrupt Rot in Congress

British philosopher Lord Acton said, “Power corrupts…and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” He knew human nature all too well.

He might have added, “Longterm power corrupts long-term power holders.”

The worst mistake our Founding Fathers made: to allow endless political careers for politicians who desire personal wealth and prestige over service to the people. South Carolina’s Strom Thurmond served 49 years as a U.S. Senator before dying in office at age 100. U.S. Senator Diane Feinstein (D-CA), wheel-chaired, nearly blind and suffering from dementia died at age 90, while still in office. Joe Biden, suffering from Alzheimer’s Disease, aged 82, wanted to run for another four years as president of the United States, while in fact, his staff illegally “ran” our country because Biden was not in charge of his mental faculties.

Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, having served for 35 years, wants to serve another two years as she babbles past 84 years of age. At the same time, she fed her husband stock trades as “insider trading” to defense contracts while she voted to keep the Afghanistan-Iraq wars continuing for 20 years. Her corruption sinks as deep as the Mariana Trench at 36,000 feet in depth.

General George S. Patton said, “Politicians are the lowest form of life on Earth. Democrats are the lowest form of politicians.”

When you examine the extraordinary corruption in America’s U.S. Congress—-it’s most disturbing that the majority of 535 Congressional Critters solve very little while letting enormous issues boil out of control. We all pay for those consequences. We paid billions for the Vietnam War. We lost 58,479 young men. That war brought Drug Addictions to America into the millions of kids. It destroyed any sense of “right and wrong” as our politicians and the Military Industrial Complex kept pumping that war up with lies, big lies and more lies for 10 years. All of it for nothing but big bucks in Congressional Pockets and the M.I.C. corporate heads.

Same thing for the 20 year Afghanistan-Iraq War: we lost $6 trillion in that engineered war. We should have fled that war after killing bin Laden in 2011. Instead, once again, the M.I.C. and Congress kept us in it for another 10 years. Over 7,500 kids paid with their lives and over 131,000 soldier suicides since 2001.

All the while, we’re eyeball-deep in a $36 trillion national debt. Our Congress allowed Biden to inject 12 million illegal aliens our midst, at INCREDIBLE COSTS of billions to our citizens. We’ve got over 800,000 homeless Americans sleeping on our streets or slum camps around the country. We’ve got our own governors, senators and mayors protecting, feeding and housing refugees who have invaded our country. Those elected officials violate our laws. What happened to oath of office, serving American citizens, and abiding by our laws?

Then, when you look at what D.O.G.E. has turned up as to the trillions of dollars stolen from American taxpayers over the past 50 years—you gotta’ starting wondering, “What the hell is going on with our corrupt Congressional Critters?”

For certain, my two U.S. Senators, Hickenlooper and Bennet, are both corrupt. They lie, they cheat, they do nothing to serve any of us in my home state of Colorado. My Governor Polis is also corrupt, a liar, and he violates his oath of office to force us into paying for over 50,000 illegal aliens that he invited into Colorado.

When you look at over 25 million of them hanging out in America, it’s all because of Congress and all those long-term corrupt politicians that could give a damn about, we, the American citizens—who are paying for this nightmare in our dead children killed by illegals, drugs everywhere killing over 270,000 kids in the past five years, crime in all 50 states, rapes, shoplifting, failing schools, and resources being sucked up faster than we can begin to understand. Not to mention all the foreign invaders marching around with their countries’ flags instead of ours. You would think that we’ve been conquered by Mexico because that’s the dominant flag being flown from California to New York.

“Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. Ah, but I repeat myself.” ― Mark Twain

What can we do and what must we do to change the corruption of SO MANY rats in The Swamp of Washington DC? The fact remains: if we had at least 51 percent of them honoring their oath of office, we wouldn’t be in our current mess.

“When buying and selling are controlled by legislation, the first things to be bought and sold are legislators.” – P. J. O’Rourke

The solution is: TERM LIMITS for all senators and House members. We give them a max of two four-year terms. If they are doing a great job, we give them a second four year term. If not, we dump them after their first four year term. That’s it!

We need fresh American minds in Congress in these critical days in the first quarter of the 21st century. There’s no way an old man like Kentucky’s U.S. Senator Mitch McConnell, at 83, should be in charge of our lives with his “forever” career in Washington DC. Same with Charles Schumer of New York. Both of them have held Senate Majority leader chairs, but they solved nothing while in office. And we sure should not tolerate House Member, Somalian illegal immigrant, Ilhan Omar (D-MN) who said this week, “America is the worst country in the world.” We should not tolerate House Member Rashida Talaib (D-MI) from Detroit, siding with Hamas and wrapping herself in a Palestinian flag when Detroit’s Muslim population voted her into office. Both should be deported and/or tossed out of Congress.

So, the solution is: TERM LIMITS! How do we get there because it’s been brought up numerous times, but the bill gets tabled and thrown into the “oblivion” circular file?

We will receive term limits by voting into office elected officials who campaigned for such passage. We can also write our senators and House members in such large numbers that we make it a national calling. It’s got to come from the ground level American citizens in order to become a popular mandate. If you want term limits, you’ve got to speak up, write up, and stand up.

AUTHOR

Frosty Wooldridge possesses a unique view of the world, cultures and families in that he has bicycled around the globe 100,000 miles, on six continents and six times across the United States in the past 30 years. His published books include: “HANDBOOK FOR TOURING BICYCLISTS”; “STRIKE THREE! TAKE YOUR BASE”; “IMMIGRATION’S UNARMED INVASION: DEADLY CONSEQUENCES”; “MOTORCYCLE ADVENTURE TO ALASKA: INTO THE WIND—A TEEN NOVEL”; “BICYCLING AROUND THE WORLD: TIRE TRACKS FOR YOUR IMAGINATION”; “AN EXTREME ENCOUNTER: ANTARCTICA.” His next book: “TILTING THE STATUE OF LIBERTY INTO A SWAMP.” He lives in Denver, Colorado. His latest book. ‘IMMIGRATION’S UNARMED INVASION—DEADLY CONSEQUENCES.’ E:Mail: frostyw@juno.com Website: www.FrostyWooldridge.com

©2025 All rights reserved.

Emmanuel the Egregious

Macron is using the ongoing conflict in Gaza and the Iran-Israel standoff not out of genuine concern, but as tools to pander to the Muslim world

With the war raging between Iran and Israel, few news items beyond reports from the battlefront itself make it into international headlines. The recent G7 Summit in Canada was one event that did manage to breach that barrier, mostly relating to provocative statements and/or actions by Donald Trump. Such, for example, was his decision to leave the Conference after barely a day, and his vehement verbal assault on French President Emmanuel Macron.

Deserved disdain

Trump ridiculed Macron’s assessment of the reasons for his abrupt departure. According to Macron, this was to negotiate a ceasefire between Israel, hinting that this would entail US pressure on Israel. Trump scornfully dismissed Macron’s statement: “Publicity‑seeking President Emmanuel Macron of France mistakenly said that I left the G7 Summit…to work on a ‘cease fire’ between Israel and Iran…Wrong!” and jeered: “Whether purposely or not, Emmanuel always gets it wrong…”

The disdain evident in Trump’s reaction has been well-earned by Macron due to dubious shenanigans over recent years, raising grave doubts regarding his intentions, competence, and motivation. Indeed, one historian, cited in the New York Times, dismissed him as “… neither consequential nor coherent.”

In previous articles, I pointed to his shady dealings with Hezbollah affiliates and his veering away from mainstream Western foreign policy in an apparent attempt to find favor with a growing Muslim segment in the French electorate. Indeed, Macron has also been a leading figure in promoting an arms embargo against an embattled Israel, locked in a mortal, multi-front battle against the forces of Islamic terror. In an uncalled-for admonition, Macron had the brazen gall to accuse Israel of “sowing barbarism” in its struggle to repel the naked barbarism of its enemies.

Gallic gall

France has also been leading the push for a Palestinian state, and until recently, was supposed to co-chair a UN conference this month aimed at advancing the goal of Palestinian statehood. Not only would this profoundly undermine Israeli security, but, in the wake of the October 7th massacre, it would have constituted a resounding reward for terror and barbarism. Indeed, the Trump administration strongly disapproved of the move, discouraging other governments from attending the conference and reportedly warning that any “anti-Israel actions” taken after the conference could be followed by diplomatic consequences from Washington.

Fortunately, the conference has been delayed due to Israel’s preemptive strikes in Iran.

But the catalogue of Paris’s ill-founded malevolence goes on to include the latest act of Gallic gall—the puerile decision to obstruct the view of some Israeli weapon systems at the country’s pavilion at the Paris Air Show at Le Bourget by means of black boards. This comes in the wake of two earlier (illegal) attempts last year to preclude Israeli participation in high-profile French arms exhibitions (Eurosatry, and Euronaval). This latest move was aimed particularly at offensive systems which have been used with great effect around the world.

Money, not morals

Informed sources suggested that the latest anti-Israeli obstructionist measures were not motivated by high-minded concern spurred by the alleged misuse of Israeli weapons but by purely commercial ones, designed to prevent Israel from displaying superior merchandise competing with French-produced systems. Indeed, the French military industry recently took a hit after French-manufactured Rafale jets were reportedly outperformed by Chinese J-10Cs in a recent Indian-Pakistani aerial engagement in Kashmir, which negatively impacted share prices of major French armaments corporations.

Paradoxically—and perhaps predictably—Israel radio reported that the latest French measure succeeded only in piquing the interest of potential purchasers.

Of course, when it comes to humanitarian concerns, France has little room to claim the moral high ground given its brutal record in its former colonies from Indo-China, through Oceania to Central and North-West Africa, where even today the post-independence governments are chafing at the bit to rid themselves of lingering French dominance and military presence.

Pathetic pandering

This leaves the troubling question as to what prompted this poorly timed display of animus by France. According to some sources, at least part of the answer may lie in a recent report, initiated by the French government, that warned that the rapidly growing Muslim influence is becoming a national threat. These sources suggest that by Paris’s newly accentuated pro-Palestinian pivot, Macron is hoping not only to curry favor with, but also placate—this increasingly influential Islamic constituency.

It is indeed disheartening to witness French kowtowing to the same dark forces that barely a decade ago perpetrated acts of barbaric slaughter on the streets of Paris (Charlie Hebdo, Bataclan), preferring instead to sanction the very country, that more than any other, has acted to confront and contain the scourge menacing both nations.

©2025 All rights reserved.

Communism: Independent Thinkers Need Not Apply

ACAT Speaker Lilia Slavova on the Luxury of Thinking for Yourself After Growing Up in a System Where Telling a Joke Could Land You in Prison

by Michael V. Clinton
June 2025

Lilia Slavova is an actress, director, playwright, and producer with extensive international experience. She is the founder and owner of Stars Studio, where she has been teaching acting for over 30 years. She was born in Sofia but grew up among the beautiful hills of Plovdiv in Bulgaria.

At ACAT, we are delighted to interview her as a long-time and valued member of our Speakers Bureau.  We had the privilege of conversing with her at length regarding her experience in communist Bulgaria and with the U.S. public education system. It is a pleasure to share her responses and the wisdom she imparted during our discussion.

ACAT: You mentioned that you originally believed in the communist system. What led you to eventually be disillusioned with communism?

Lilia: [I felt disillusioned] when I took the entrance exams for the Bulgarian National Institute for Theater Arts. I passed all the exams, and I had first place on the list of applicants. I had finished high school with a gold medal and the highest score.

When I went to register for the National Theater Institute, I had been removed from the list because my father had been unjustly imprisoned by the communist regime. I had been placed on the waiting list. The truth is, I had been certain that I would be admitted, but all of my professors told me, “Lilia, next year you’re going to be in. This year they needed to accept the children of so-and-so (meaning the communist nomenklatura and others with important personal connections).”  I felt this as the first significant slap on the face by the system, proving that what we were hearing and fearing was true.

We had to work for eight months before we could apply to other universities. I thought of becoming a journalist, perhaps a sports journalist, as I was deeply involved in sports. However, my father advised me not to go into journalism, as I could not speak against the Prime Minister and the party leadership. He said I could be imprisoned for speaking the truth. He showed me the photos of the Politburo of the Central Committee of the Communist Party Members, and I thought they were all so repulsive. So, when my father asked me if I could write a puff piece about any of them as a journalist, I started crossing out their photos one by one and could not picture myself writing about them. Moreover, I truly wanted to be an actress. The arts were a way to escape the politicization of society.

My sister, who had been a musician since early childhood, belonged to a prestigious children’s symphony orchestra, which travelled all over the world. Every time she came back from abroad, she would lock herself in her room and refuse to go out for some time. As a teenager, she had already been to Italy twenty times. She was allowed to travel to the West, since the communist government wanted to boast about these children’s talent. All of a sudden, after she shared her experiences abroad, I realized that there was a whole world out there from which I was being kept.

She was the first one to have emigrated, and I was allowed to visit her a few times as a “first-blood relative” (meaning the closest blood relative). Then I could see the other world beyond the Iron Curtain. I had been an honest believer in the system. As an actress, I would recite these very emotional poems about the U.S.S.R. and the revolution. However, I knew people who were telling jokes against the system, such as one of my father’s best friends, who went to prison for telling a joke. I also noticed that privileged party people were riding in different cars, wearing different clothes, and going to the West for vacations. I thought, “What’s wrong with the rest of us? Why can’t we live like that?”

ACAT: You mentioned that the communist education system was “teaching by phrasing.”  Could you elaborate on what that means?

Lilia: You’ve probably heard that Bulgaria has excellent education. We had incredible teachers.  They would teach us values and discipline. But of course, I am speaking of central Sofia.  Education in smaller towns and villages was worse. For example, high-school students had to return and remain at home before the curfew, at 7:30 p.m.! Boys needed to have very short hair, and girls needed to have their hair braided. They all had to wear uniforms in those small towns.  While we in the city did not need to wear uniforms, they could not go outside wearing civilian clothes. Could you imagine not being able to go out in civilian clothes?

ACAT: What would happen if somebody did?

Lilia: Oh, they would get punished: you know, suspended, given low behavioral grades, etc.  There  was such a thing as a grade for behavior. If you had a grade lower than expected, you could not enter the university.

There was a slogan in Eastern Europe, not only in Bulgaria: “Study hard so you won’t have to work hard.”
Pupils in the countryside even had to wear berets or some school badge. If someone didn’t have the beret or the school badge, even if it hadn’t been his fault, he would face a strict punishment.  To avoid that, a friend would sneak into the basement of the school and hand his beret to anyone
who needed it. It was quite humiliating but funny at the same time. The teachers would wait at the door and check if one’s collar was clean. If one did not have a clean collar, one would be sent home and subsequently punished. They would also check if the boys were properly shaven, and the girls could not have long or painted nails.

They established their system and governed it through fear.

Teaching by phrasing means that communist education recycled the same politically charged phrases that the students were supposed to repeat without expressing their truthful opinion. For example, they had to praise children like Pavlik Morozov, a boy who informed on his family members and got them killed.

For comparison, I had taught in Virginia at the Fairfax, Alexandria, and Arlington County public school systems. The public school system was horrible. I talked to principals and the Secretary of Education. They used various phrases that were repeated as certain ideological clichés. Some party leaders nowadays use such rhetoric. These are political phrases. They make the students study Maya Angelou’s poetry, and they are supposed to write, for example, “Maya Angelou is the most wonderful, open-minded, and talented author.” This is a U.S. example of using key phrases to cement a political point. Had someone written, for instance, “I don’t like her poetry very much,” they would not accept that. You had to write somebody else’s opinion, but there are exceptions both here and during my childhood.  [Editor’s Note – many have observed that political correctness is the beginning of communist indoctrination.]

Thankfully, in the ninth grade, in Bulgaria, I had a teacher who encouraged independent thinking as much as possible. She said, “No, I want you to write exactly what you think.” However, we were still careful and did not do that entirely. She did not allow us to repeat clichés that were expected of us, but encouraged us to use our own words. She was truly remarkable and had the title of “National Teacher,” which was a rare honor. She could get away with not following the permanent clichés. For example, she had us sing a beautiful, apolitical song about Bulgaria, and we had to express our thoughts and feelings about it. There were incredibly educated people in Bulgaria because they were educated before communism. They went to the Sorbonne in France. They went to Switzerland to study, and my mother studied in the French lycée in Sofia. She was a lawyer, and my father was an electrical engineer. They were both superbly educated before communism.

Most other people were afraid to use their own words. We were afraid, all of us, and had to live in fear. My intuition often protected me.

ACAT: In Communist Bulgaria, as has been here in the public school system, there was a lack of parents’ involvement in the education of their children. Were there any ways that the parents could make an imprint on their children, despite the continuous indoctrination? How would this happen?

Lilia: We had a little bit more control because those PTA (Parent Teacher Association) meetings were very much mandatory for the parents. Our teachers also had to, from the first to the fourth grade, go to each student’s home to see how the students live and understand their level of poverty, malnutrition, and other factors. I remember that we lived right in the center of Sofia, in the attic, in extremely poor conditions. My teachers were in shock. They were not expecting that because my father was an engineer. The roof was leaking, and often it would rain on my bed, and we would use dishes to collect the water.

The teachers were trying to understand the family backgrounds of the students, and that helped to a certain degree. Some parents came from family backgrounds similar to mine and rebelled against the system.

When I taught in the United States public school system, some parents were not involved and were not aware of what their children were learning. Sometimes they didn’t speak English. In private schools, however, parents are naturally involved and want to make sure their money goes to good use. Today, we have many private schools also in Bulgaria, and they work rather well.

When I was talking about how good education was during my childhood, I created perhaps a bit of a misconception. It wasn’t that education per se was that good, but we did have some excellent teachers who were educated before the communists took power, and the discipline that was imposed on us, largely out of fear, created a positive result. What discipline teaches you is that you ought to behave even if you do not want to. You had no choice but to listen. There were no phones; you could not talk back to the teacher; even if you didn’t want to study, you were still there and passively learning.

In America, children simply walk out of the classroom if they do not want to be there. We however, had a genuine fear that we could be kicked out if we misbehaved.

There were special schools where children would go if they did not behave, and unfortunately, now I recognize those behavior problems could just have been medical issues, for example, hyperactivity. Such children would be placed in these schools, which were “correctional facilities” for those who did not follow the rules. They would beat them up there. They would physically punish them. It was horrible. There were movies made about these “correctional facilities.” Fearing to end up there, many children stayed in school and somehow learned more than they wanted.

When I taught in Virginia, a lot of my students in my acting class came from Thomas Jefferson, which was one of the top high schools in the nation. The involvement of the parents there was incredible. They had a very good theater department. The boys I taught became engineers. I had three girls who became producers. It was an incredible school, and an important factor was the involvement of the parents.

The same was true for my high school. Do you remember the teacher that I told you about earlier? Thanks to her, half of the class entered colleges with performing arts as musicians, writers, actors, and dramatists. There’s a Bulgarian proverb: “One bird does not make a spring.”  But in this case, it did.

ACAT: If you could give any words of advice to young people in the West, what would you say?

Lilia: The world is a very confusing place right now. Because of all the mass media, fake news, and misinformation, I think the best thing for young people to do is to inform themselves properly. Make sure the information you receive is correct. Do not immediately believe what you hear.

Another piece of advice I can give young people has to do with the fact that we had real friends. We had a childhood. We socialized. It’s incredibly important because right now, people are glued to their devices and their computers. It alienates you from the real world. It affects the brains of young people. Socialize. Get into interest groups. Don’t get your information from fake news. If you wish to be involved in politics, consider a variety of sources.

Another thing lacking here is discipline and respect.

I’m going to brag a little bit about my teaching. Almost 20 years ago, at Drew Model Elementary  School, the students were failing their SOLs (Standard of Learning exams) for more than two  years in a row, and the school was about to close down. The principal was very close to the theater in Shirlington, and she asked for our help. She told us that they were not passing the Social Studies test. They were turning to us because they thought we would have some idea about how to help them. After all, we are actors and are skilled in memorization.

So, she asked if I could develop some sort of program based on my theatre experience in learning and sustaining information.  I was not especially skilled in American history. Nevertheless, I said that I would do it. I created the program, and after a year, the school’s test scores increased by 700 percent. Our Congressman, James P. Moran, went to Congress and asked, “How were these Russians able to teach so well?” I was a bit annoyed to be called Russian, but appreciated the compliment. And so, the Department of Education gave us a grant of $500,000 directly for this  program. When we matched this with two financial programs afterwards, we received $1.5 million to spend for five years.

When they asked us what the solution to this crisis was, I told them that it was discipline— simply discipline and nothing else. I helped them focus and retain information through games and reading exercises. Initially, these children couldn’t focus for five minutes. I couldn’t believe they couldn’t do the simplest theater exercises for five minutes! The main culprit for this was all these distractions, external and technological. I helped them focus and learn. By 2015, we had spent twenty years using different grant money simply because of the successful theater exercises that improved the school discipline and scores. One of the reasons we had success back in my day was because there was discipline, even though it was out of fear.

Thankfully, for private and Catholic schools, discipline is a very high priority. Back in Bulgaria, they would smack our hands and pull our ears. Some boys had one ear bigger than the other due to frequent punishments.

Another one of the disadvantages of today’s life is that people are so lonely. It’s especially sad and strange that young people are lonely. The elderly are lonely for different reasons, but the loneliness of young people is abnormal. People have called me a social butterfly because I’m always happy and smiling. I’ll tell you another thing that surprised me when I came here: nobody talks to anybody! I thought, “What am I going to do here?” I talked to one of my friends, and we decided to start a social committee. We planned projects and decided on many things to do every month. People love each other; people help each other. It’s created a blossoming effect.

I’m wishing you good luck with this! I hope I was helpful.

ACAT: You were very helpful! Thank you!

©2025 . All rights reserved.