AWED MEDIA BALANCED NEW: We cover COVID to Climate, as well as Energy to Elections.

Welcome! We cover COVID to Climate, as well as Energy to Elections.

Here is the link for this issue, so please share it on social media.

Checkout the 2024, 2023, & 2022 archives, plus asterisked items below.


— This Newsletter’s Articles, by Topic —

If You Only Have Time to Read Some Select Articles:

*** Critically Thinking about the recent Presidential Debate

*** ABC Presidential Debate: Part I and Part II (Ayaan Hirsi Ali)

*** About the Debate: A Lost Opportunity

*** Tim Walz family members pose in t-shirts declaring their presidential preference: ‘Walz’s for Trump’

*** Alan Dershowitz leaves Democratic Party, cites DNC: ‘I was disgusted’

*** A Good Reason to Vote as Early as Possible

*** Suppressing the Vote

*** Grow Some Independence America

*** Report: America Invaded

*** The Green New Deal could make electricity 28 times more expensive

*** If Germany kept nuclear power, it could have saved $600b and cut emissions by 73%

*** Is Nuclear the Tortoise to the Wind and Solar Hare?

*** Has the Electricity Reality Check Arrived?

*** More Solar Silliness In The New York Times

*** Energy Essentials: Why Modern Civilization Critically Depends on Coal, Oil & Gas

*** Climatism Or Energy Humanism?

*** Natural Gas or Coal — Do We Have a Choice?

*** Talking points on Kamala Harris’s fracking reversal

*** The Electric Vehicle Transition That Isn’t

*** Scientists Expose Major Problems With Climate Change Data

*** Follow the Science: Biden Climate Policy is a Fraud

*** 2024 hurricane season: the worst climate prediction ever?

*** Rejoice — It’s Over: Climate Alarmism has been Debunked

*** How it ends: 96% of Big Corporations are quietly abandoning their climate commitments

*** Is Climate Change Fanaticism the Greatest Killer of All Time?

*** The Socratic Method: Teaching children through guided inquiry

*** The Good Ole Days

*** A Revolution Begins in Austin, Texas

*** In the Netherlands, they keep two sets of books for the COVID vaccines

*** Study: A potential association between COVID-19 vaccination and development of Alzheimer’s disease

*** U.S. Surgeon General warns that parenting is a health hazard (not fake news)

*** Duke Health injecting race into care, firing doctors who object

*** Trump Can Make America Healthy Again

Secondary Education Related:

*** Report: The Key to Fixing the US Education System

*** The Socratic Method: Teaching children through guided inquiry

*** The Good Ole Days

Public school failures behind demand for private school vouchers

Restore ACT’s Science Section

Political Gender Polarization Among Young People

K-8 School hid Girl’s Transition from Parents, and Called Authorities on Them

Why aren’t governments tackling the epidemic of sexual abuse in America’s public schools?

Pfizer Deploys Mobile ‘School of Science’ to Teach Kids the ABCs of Pandemics and Vaccines

Higher Education Related:

*** A Revolution Begins in Austin, Texas

Academia Gets an ”F”

VCU’s New Protest Policy Makes Sense

The Mass Formation Psychosis in America’s Universities

Artificial Intelligence:

AI and The Death of Work 1

Is Artificial Intelligence the Next Easy-Money Bust?

Greed Energy Economics:

*** Has the Electricity Reality Check Arrived?

*** The Green New Deal could make electricity 28 times more expensive

Two Days of Fall Weather in Late Summer Demonstrates Industrial Wind’s Incredible Costs

New Paper Shows the Problem with Power Subsidies

Wind Energy — Offshore:

Offshore wind energy development: A David vs Goliath story

Wind Energy — Other:

*** Taking the Wind Out of Climate Change (referencing 60± studies)

Wind turbines “destroy habitats”

Turbine fire burns 260+ acres in California

Solar Energy:

*** More Solar Silliness In The New York Times

Nuclear Energy:

*** If Germany kept nuclear power, it could have saved $600b and cut emissions by 73%

*** Is Nuclear the Tortoise to the Wind and Solar Hare?

Fossil Fuel Energy:

*** Climatism Or Energy Humanism?

*** Natural Gas or Coal — Do We Have a Choice?

*** Talking points on Kamala Harris’s fracking reversal

The Texas heat deaths scam

Electric Vehicles (EVs):

*** The Electric Vehicle Transition That Isn’t

Misc Energy:

*** Hydro-Québec and the New York and New England contracts — selling electricity it does not own at a cost it does not know

NY Gov’s futile ‘energy summit’ can’t resolve NY’s impossible green goals

Manmade Global Warming — Some Deceptions:

*** Scientists Expose Major Problems With Climate Change Data

*** Follow the Science: Biden Climate Policy is a Fraud

*** 2024 hurricane season: the worst climate prediction ever?

Editorial: Climate alarmists see the glass half empty

Leaders of climate science societies are suffering from mass delusion

Manmade Global Warming — Misc:

*** Rejoice — It’s Over: Climate Alarmism has been Debunked

*** How it ends: 96% of Big Corporations are quietly abandoning their climate commitments

*** Is Climate Change Fanaticism the Greatest Killer of All Time?

Why Democrats aren’t talking much about one of their biggest issues

Archive Reports: Methane and Climate & Nitrous Oxide and Climate

Giant Wyoming Carbon Capture Project Pulls Plug

Climate Watch: Is CO2 Reaching a Crisis Level?

Expert opinion filed Hague Court of Appeals in Shell v. Milieudefensie

US Election:

Election-Integrity.info (10 major election reports by our team of experts, plus much more!)

*** A Good Reason to Vote as Early as Possible

*** Suppressing the Vote

Election 2024: Beware of the USPS

The Easy, Cheap, Quick Solution to the RFK Jr. Ballot Issue

Clear Battle Lines Drawn at Congressional Hearing on Election Confidence

Why Are Democrats Protecting Noncitizen Voting Rights?

US Election — State Issues:

Town Clerk Raises Concerns Over Detroit’s Election Law Violations

Myth vs. Fact: Georgia State Election Board Rules

RNC Forces Walz’s Minnesota to Stop Non-Citizen Voting

RITE Statement on Victory in PA Supreme Court on Undated Mail Ballots

US Election — Presidential Debate:

*** Critically Thinking about the recent Presidential Debate

*** ABC Presidential Debate: Part I and Part II (Ayaan Hirsi Ali)

*** About the Debate: A Lost Opportunity

We Didn’t Get to Know Harris in Debate, and Likely Never Will

US National Election — Harris & Walz:

*** Tim Walz family members pose in t-shirts declaring their presidential preference: ‘Walz’s for Trump’

*** Alan Dershowitz leaves Democratic Party, cites DNC: ‘I was disgusted’

Kamala’s Long War on Free Speech

The Bogus Theory of Greed Inflation

House panel subpoenas Tim Walz over $250M COVID fraud

Harris-Walz: Joy and Freedom – or misery and tyranny?

Kamala Won’t Give Position on Green New Deal

Biden’s Legacy: the Decline of Arms Control and Disarmament

Misc US Politics:

*** Grow Some Independence America

*** Report: America Invaded

Which came first, the dirty politician or the apathetic patriot?

CDC advised against punishing crime more, triggering FOIA lawsuit and release of records

Censorship:

On Fire: The Global War Against Free Speech

Health:

*** U.S. Surgeon General warns that parenting is a health hazard (not fake news)

*** Duke Health injecting race into care, firing doctors who object

*** Trump Can Make America Healthy Again

Little Known Facts about Coffee

To Sleep, Perchance Not Very Well, by Taking Melatonin

Cryptosporidium in the UK

Israel/Ukraine:

Pray for the safety of the Israeli people

Latest Developments in Israel

Pray for the safety of the Ukrainian people

A well-rated source to make a Ukraine donation

Latest Developments in Ukraine

COVID-19 — Misc:

*** In the Netherlands, they keep two sets of books for the COVID vaccines

*** Study: A potential association between COVID-19 vaccination and development of Alzheimer’s disease

Japan Links Covid Shots to 201 Dangerous Diseases

Caught Red Handed: U.S. D.O.D issued ‘COVID-19 Research’ contract 3 Months before COVID was known to exist

COVID-19: Are You Getting Your Latest Booster?


Please use social media, etc. to pass on this Newsletter to other open-minded citizens…If you’d like to be added to (or unsubscribe from) the distribution of our popular, free, worldwide Media Balance Newsletter, simply send me an email saying that.


Note 1: We recommend reading the Newsletter on your computer, not your phone, as some documents (e.g., PDFs) are much easier to read on a large computer screen… We’ve tried to use common fonts, etc. to minimize display issues.

Note 2: For past Newsletter issues see the archives from 2021, 2022, 2023, & 2024. To accommodate numerous requests received about prior articles over all fourteen plus years of the Newsletter, we’ve put this together — where you can search ALL prior issues, by year. For a background about how the Newsletter is put together, etc., please read this.

Note 3: See this extensive list of reasonable books on climate change. As a parallel effort, we have also put together a list of some good books related to industrial wind energy. Both topics are also extensively covered on my website: WiseEnergy.org.

Note 4: I am not an attorney or a physician, so no material appearing in any of the Newsletters (or any of my websites) should be construed as giving legal or medical advice. My recommendation has always been: consult a competent, licensed attorney when you are involved with legal issues, and consult a competent physician regarding medical matters.

Copyright © 2024; Alliance for Wise Energy Decisions (see WiseEnergy.org).

A Very Short List, and a Very Long Question

I was wondering, not exactly idly, where American foreign aid now is sent, and found online a list of the ten countries that receive the most aid from Washington. Here is that list.

In 2023, the United States spent nearly $61 billion on foreign aid. Fully half of that budget has gone to just ten countries:

  1. Ukraine ($16.4 billion)
  2. Israel ($3.3 billion)
  3. Ethiopia ($1.95 billion)
  4. Jordan ($1.65 billion)
  5. Egypt ($1.43 billion)
  6. Afghanistan ($1.19 billion)
  7. Somalia ($1.13 billion)
  8. Yemen ($1.05 billion)
  9. Congo ($987 million)
  10. Syria ($896 million)

Now I have no objection to aid for Ukraine, as it fights to push Putin’s troops out of the country. This unusually large sum — $16.4 billion, and much more so far in 2024 — far outstrips the amounts for the other recipients of aid. This aid only started to be given in 2020, after Russia invaded Ukraine, and it will not continue at anything like that level once that Ukraine-Russia war is over.

As for #2 on the list, I certainly do not object to the sums given to Israel, which for the fourth time in its young life is having to fight for its very existence (the previous wars were in 1948, 1967, and 1973) as it faces a seven-front war, with Hamas in Gaza, with Hezbollah in Lebanon, with the Houthis in Lebanon, with Assad’s army in Syria, with assorted terrorist groups — Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine — in Judea and Samaria, with the Shi’a militia, Kata’ib Hezbollah, in Iraq, and looming behind them all, pulling the strings of these various proxies, the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Nor do I begrudge Ethiopia its aid, for that Christian country has endured several years of severe drought and internal conflict, including the war involving the Ethiopian central government and the northernmost region of Tigray. Ethiopia has once again become engaged in violent internal conflict, this time involving militia groups from the regions of Amhara and Oromia. And Ethiopia has long had a close relationship with the United States for many decades, beginning under the reign of Haile Selassie. The amount we provide is to help the government restore peace; as with the aid given to Ukraine, it isn’t intended to be a long-term commitment.

But. beyond that, I wonder. Of the seven remaining countries on the list of the top ten recipients, all but one are Muslim countries. Why are we transferring wealth to Muslim countries when the Arab states of the Gulf have trillions of dollars in their sovereign funds? Why do we not insist that the rich Arabs should be helping their brethren, instead of assuming that we should support Muslim states that, precisely because they are Muslim, cannot possibly be our friends (as the Qur’an directs them not to be; see suras 3:28 and 5:51)? Saudi Arabia has more than $1 trillion in its sovereign wealth fund. The UAE has even more: $1.7 trillion. In the first half of 2024 the sovereign wealth funds of five Gulf Arab states — Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the UAE, Qatar, and Bahrain — invested $39 billion. Surely they can spare $8 billion to provide to other Arab states, which is roughly the total the United States now gives to the seven Muslim states on the list above.

For reasons that deserve to be pondered, Anwar Sadat got the American aid ball rolling for Egypt with his “prince-of-peace” impersonation. And that money has continued ever since, despite the litany of human rights abuses in that country. Egypt need not be continuously bribed to keep the peace with Israel. What keeps the peace between Israel and Egypt is the IDF. If Egypt needs money, the Gulf states, whose monarchs share El-Sisi’s fear and hatred of the Muslim Brotherhood, should be happy to help.

Jordan, similarly, need not be given large sums by the Americans. The Hashemite king need only hold out his hand in Eleemosynary Position #1, and the Emirates and Saudis will be glad to help out a fellow monarch, especially one who doesn’t want to be overthrown by the two-thirds of his population that is Palestinian. That would be a dangerous example for the monarchs in the Gulf. King Abdullah, like the Saudi Crown Prince and the Emirati rulers, is prepared to repress the Muslim Brotherhood. He, too, needs no American bribe to keep the peace with Israel. The IDF maintains that peace.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Kansas City, Kansas: Imam says that Jews have ‘now become cursed by Allah’

Hamas has made half a billion dollars from ‘humanitarian’ aid, pays jihadis

University of Michigan’s Black Student Union Cuts Ties To Anti-Zionist Group

Palestinian Authority Calls On UN to Remove 500,000 Israelis From Judea and Samaria Within Six Months

9/11 MIA at Debate

RELATED VIDEOS:

Spencer: Biden Regime Sent $10 Billion to Iran After Oct. 7.

The 2024 U.S. Presidential Election and its Potential impact on Israel

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Fraud Grips $112.8 Billion U.S. Food Stamp Program, $61.5 Million in Stolen Benefits Replaced

Fraud in the government’s food stamp program is so pervasive that the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), the agency that administers it, launched a special system to facilitate the replacement of the welfare benefit when recipients claim it stolen. In the two years since the Biden administration created the program, the government has doled out a hefty $61.5 million to replace pilfered food stamps—rebranded Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) by the Obama administration to eliminate stigma—in 127,290 cases. Keep in mind, this is in addition to the staggering $112.8 billion that Uncle Sam spends to provide 42.1 million with free groceries, according to the latest government figures.

The USDA’s SNAP Replacement of Stolen Benefits Dashboard reveals that 79% of claims were approved by the agency and that 339,269 fraudulent transactions were identified through approved stolen benefits claims. Recipients in every state in the nation have submitted claims and New York has by far the most food stamp fraud cases—50,678. Maryland is second with 33,509, followed by Illinois (16,369), Texas (11,633), Washington State (4,208), New Jersey (3,630), Arizona (3,541), North Carolina (3,434), Indiana (3,309) and New Mexico (3,027). Three states have reported over 2,000 cases and more than half a dozen have over 1,000. The federal government allows states to replace benefits stolen as far back as October 2022, according to the USDA dashboard.

“The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) is aware of increased reports of Electronic Benefit Transfer (EBT) theft due to card skimming, cloning, and similar fraudulent methods,” the agency announced in January 2023, revealing that at the end of 2022 President Biden signed a measure that includes a provision for the replacement of stolen food stamp benefits with federal funds. The USDA cites the section of the law that requires it to issue guidance to state agencies and “promulgate regulations to protect and replace SNAP benefits stolen via card skimming, card cloning, and other similar fraudulent methods.” Other similar fraudulent methods may include, but are not limited to, scamming through deceitful phone calls or text messaging that mimics official state agency messaging and phishing. “A theft that resulted from any of these methods would be eligible for replacement,” according to the USDA.

Rather than so easily replacing the stolen benefit, perhaps the government should create a system to crack down on the rampant fraud. Besides saving American taxpayers tens of millions of dollars, it seems like a more efficient way to operate. After all, the nation’s bloated food stamp program has long been plagued by problems that have fleeced the system out of large sums. A few years ago, the USDA disclosed that it sees over a billion dollars annually in food stamp fraud. Many of the retailers authorized by the government to accept food stamps also engage in illegal practices, the agency has found. A few years ago, nearly 200 people were arrested in Florida for operating a sophisticated ring in which 22,000 fraudulent food stamp transactions totaling $3.7 million were recorded by a task force of local and federal authorities. In 2016 the feds busted the largest food stamp fraud operation in history, a $13 million scheme run by flea market retailers in the largely black and Hispanic areas of south Florida’s Miami-Dade County known as Opa-Locka and Hialeah.

The government has failed to mitigate the illicit activities that have long plagued the program and now it is doling out tens of millions of dollars to replace stolen benefits rather than implement a system to prevent it. Just a few weeks ago, a Kentucky news station reported that thieves have stolen more than $5 million worth of food stamps in the past year from families in Kentucky and Indiana. “Scammers are draining accounts linked to EBT cards,” used by the government to distribute benefits, the story says. In South Carolina a woman recently got busted for fraudulently receiving more than $28,000 in food stamp benefits. Another woman was also recently arrested in the state for fraud after taking over $12,000 in food stamps that she did not qualify for. In Delaware and Tennessee, the government recently replaced hundreds of thousands of dollars in stolen food stamps, according to local news reports. The list goes on and on.

EDITORS NOTE: This Judicial Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

‘A New Way Forward’? Harris Campaign [Finally] Announces 2024 Policies

One day ahead of her debate with former President Donald Trump, Vice President Kamala Harris has unveiled a policy agenda that could compel Christian businesses to participate in abortion and LGBT events that violate biblical morality, sign a national abortion expansion bill, pack the Supreme Court, give amnesty to the entire illegal immigrant population of the United States, strip law-abiding U.S. citizens of their Second Amendment rights without due process, double-down on inflationary economic policies, continue criminal lawfare against Trump, and promote universal daycare.

Until Monday morning, the “issues” section of Kamala Harris’s campaign website did not exist 49 days after the Democratic Party coronated Harris without a primary. Harris has dubbed her policy plan “A New Way Forward” — the same name President George W. Bush gave to his 2007 surge in Iraq, intended to end terrorism against U.S. soldiers and transform Muslim Iraq into a pluralistic Western democracy.

Equity for the LGBTQ movement, bankruptcy for Christian businesses: The cornerstone of Harris’s LGBTQ policy, which she brands as promoting “civil rights,” would prevent Christian business people from living out their faith in the private sector and economically impoverish believers. After noting she began unlawfully officiating same-sex marriage in 2004 as California attorney general and “refused to defend” a marriage protection amendment democratically passed by California voters, Harris promises “to pass the Equality Act to enshrine anti-discrimination protections for LGBTQI+ Americans in health care, housing, education, and more into law.” The so-called Equality Act would add sexual preference and, in some versions, gender identity, to landmark civil rights legislation designed to protect racial minorities and women from discrimination. By raising homosexuality and transgenderism to the same legal status as race and religion, the Equality Act could force Christian doctors to perform gender-reassignment surgeries and require Christian business owners to take part in services that violate their religious beliefs — or go out of business. State and local statutes modeled after this bill have resulted in such lawfare prosecutions as the never-ending legal disputes of Masterpiece Cakeshop owner Jack Phillips.

Throughout the issues section, Harris contrasts her policy positions, not with the radically truncated 2024 Republican Party platform which Trump campaign operatives foisted on rank-and-file delegates at the Republican National Committee on July 8, but with “Trump’s Project 2025 Agenda.” The Trump campaign publicly opposed the project, which the Heritage Foundation subsequently shut down. Trump replaced GOP’s historic commitment to a Human Life Amendment, and Republican vice presidential candidate Senator J.D. Vance (R-Ohio) confirmed that Trump will veto any national pro-life protections that cross his desk during the next four years.

The “Project 2025 agenda will eliminate federal rules that protect LGBTQI+ Americans from discrimination,” says the website, referring to laws like the SAFE Act that prevent the predatory transgender industry from targeting minors for puberty blocks, cross-sex hormone injections, and life-altering surgeries.

A national abortion expansion act: The website continues the Harris campaign’s rebranding of abortion as “reproductive freedom,” vowing that, as president, “she will never allow a national abortion ban to become law. And when Congress passes a bill to restore reproductive freedom nationwide, she will sign it.” The Biden-Harris administration has endorsed the so-called “Women’s Health Protection” Act (WHPA), which would strike down more than 1,300 state pro-life protections including laws protecting children from late-term abortions (including some after the point of viability), repealing parental consent and notification laws, and repealing conscience protections for pro-life healers.

“If elected, Trump will ban abortion nationwide, restrict access to birth control, force states to report on women’s miscarriages and abortions, and jeopardize access to IVF,” it claims, although no law nor proposal would curtail IVF, and Trump controversially promised to force insurance plans, or U.S. taxpayers, to fund the procedure, which has resulted in unknown millions of abortions and abandoned embryos.

“He even called for punishment for women who have an abortion,” says the website — based on an off-the-cuff remark Trump reversed the day after he made it in a March 2016 interview with Chris Matthews, who resigned from MSNBC four years ago. Trump explained during the 2016 campaign, “I didn’t mean punishment for women like prison” but rather that women who have abortions “punish themselves.” Numerous surveys show women suffer psychologically, and often physically, after enduring an abortion.

The section apparently praises her own administration’s foray into compelling taxpayers to fund abortion. “Vice President Harris and Governor Walz believe we have a sacred obligation to care for our nation’s service members, veterans, [and] their families,” says the website. Last July, the Biden-Harris administration Pentagon spokesman, John Kirby, called paying for abortions a “foundational, sacred obligation of military leaders.”

Amnesty for millions of illegal immigrants: Harris promises to “secure our borders and fix our broken immigration system,” which her website ranks below promoting gun control. She “will bring back the bipartisan border security bill,” which she called “the strongest reform in decades.” Harris promises to reward tens of millions of illegal immigrants who broke U.S. immigration law with U.S. citizenship, calling her amnesty plan “an earned pathway to citizenship.” The Biden-Harris administration has presided over record-breaking levels of illegal immigration every year in office, not counting new legal pathways they have been established for immigrants from nations such as Haiti. Previous historic levels of illegal immigration came when candidates promised, or delivered, amnesty. This “is her attempt to make permanent what we have seen, which is lawlessness,” Rep. Laurel Lee (R-Fla.) told Fox Business on Tuesday morning.

The Democratic candidate blames the broken border on Donald Trump. “Trump fail to tackle violence in our communities or fix our broken immigration system — he will make us less safe,” the Harris website states. “He’ll advance his cruel immigration agenda which includes separating children from their parents,” a policy carried out by the Obama-Biden administration and continued by the Biden-Harris administration.

The fentanyl crisis: “This past year, the number of overdose deaths in the United States declined for the first time in five years,” the website boasts. But the Biden-Harris administration presided over record-breaking numbers of overdoses, largely driven by fentanyl crossing the Southern border from Mexico. The administration’s drug policy aimed to decriminalize marijuana and promoted so-called “harm reduction” policies, which distributed crack pipes to addicts as part of taxpayer-funded “smoking kits.”

Supreme Court packing: Harris supports a plan that would overhaul the U.S. Supreme Court by “requiring [j]ustices to comply with ethics rules that other federal judges are bound by and imposing term limits.” The recent term limits plan embraced by prominent Democrats would sideline the most conservative justices and transform the court from a lifetime appointment to one continually threatened by, and responding to, political pressure.

More gun control: Harris promises to “ban assault weapons and high-capacity magazines.” The Biden-Harris administration has applied the term “assault rifle” to America’s most popular rifle, the AR-15; California law also bans magazines that hold more than 10 rounds of ammunition. The vice president’s pledge to “require universal background checks” would require the government to pry into all sales, and potentially gifts, of guns between private individuals. She also vows to pass “red flag laws,” which unconstitutionally remove guns from the home of law-abiding citizens without due process, if their neighbors, criminals, or vengeful ex-boyfriends report them as mentally troubled. The laws would render those reported defenseless in their own homes.

The website notes, “As head of the first-ever White House Office of Gun Violence Prevention, she spearheaded policies to expand background checks and close the gun show loophole. Under her and President Biden’s leadership, violent crime is at a 50-year low, with the largest single-year drop in murders ever.” In fact, the U.S. homicide rate rose again in 2021 to 8.2 out of 100,00 according to the CDC. The homicide rate in 2022, the most recent year for which data are available, stood at 7.7, significantly higher than the 5.9 rate in 2018.

The website complains that Donald Trump “wants to arm teachers in our classrooms” in response to an ongoing string of school shootings.

Prosecuting Donald Trump? The Harris campaign website promises the Democratic presidential candidate will “fight to ensure that no former president has immunity for crimes committed while in the White House.” That comes in response to a Supreme Court ruling which granted presidents extremely limited immunity for actions carried out in his official capacity as president of the United States — not for private actions. Legal experts warn the threat of prosecution would criminalize political differences and turn the United States into a banana republic.

Nonetheless, the website claims President Trump will “bring the Department of Justice and the FBI under his direct control so he can give himself unchecked legal power and go after his opponents.” Similarly, at the first night of the Democratic National Convention, Michigan State Senator Mallory McMorrow (D) warned, “Under Project 2025, Donald Trump would be able to weaponize the Department of Justice to go after his political opponents.”

“Donald Trump is a convicted criminal who only cares about himself,” the website says.

Recycling lies about Donald Trump: The issues section also misleads about the two candidates’ biographies and policy positions. “Vice President Harris grew up in a middle[-]class home as the daughter of a working mom,” says the website. But Kamala Harris grew up in the famously left-wing city of Berkeley where her father, Donald J. Harris, was “a renowned Marxist professor” and her mother, Shyamala Gopalan, was a cancer researcher. The vice president also grew up in Montreal.

Donald Trump has “said he would let Russia ‘do whatever the hell they want’ to our NATO allies. And he calls soldiers who gave their lives in defense of American democracy ‘suckers’ and ‘losers,’” it says. Trump’s former national security adviser, John Bolton — a neoconservative who has persistently criticized Trump’s non-interventionist foreign policy — called reports that President Trump disparaged fallen U.S. soldiers “simply false.” The comments from Trump, a master of overstatement, about NATO came in response to a question from a foreign leader about whether the U.S. would defend a nation that steadfastly refused to meet its obligations under the treaty to spend a requisite amount of funds on its own national defense. For decades, Trump has criticized one-sided deals in which foreign nations freeload off U.S. taxpayers.

Demonizing Trump: “Someone as dangerous as Donald Trump should never again be allowed to serve as commander-in-chief,” says the website. “Top American military generals and national security officials — including those who worked for Trump — have warned that he is ‘dangerous’ and ‘unfit’ to lead, and now he is surrounded by ultra-loyalists who enable his worst impulses.” These remarks come despite a near-fatal assassination attempt against the former president in Butler, Pennsylvania, on July 13, which missed by a fraction of an inch, something the president has credited to divine intervention.

Civil rights: Kamala Harris commits herself to securing “$2 billion in funding for Offices of Civil Rights across the federal government,” which will supersize federal lawsuits against private employers who refuse to implement Woke policies on the basis of race, sexual preference, and gender identity.

Inflationary economics and price controls: Kamala Harris says that “guilding up the middle class will be a defining goal of her presidency.” Yet on her watch, inflation reached a 40-year high of 9.1% in 2022, lifting costs and squeezing families across the nation. Overall groceries have risen nearly 20% over four years. The median price of a new house has more than doubled since Joe Biden and Kamala Harris took office. Americans must spend an extra $13,000 a year under the Biden-Harris administration to have the same standard of living they enjoyed under the Trump administration, according to one expert analysis. The spike in prices, which critics dub Bidenflation, has reduced Americans’ savings levels by 3.2%. The website notes “[h]er tie-breaking vote on the Inflation Reduction Act,” which economists say carried a real price tag of $1.2 trillion and sparked inflation, in addition to piling more money onto the $35 trillion national debt. As the site also points out, “Vice President Harris cast the deciding vote on the” $1.9 trillion “American Rescue Plan.”

Harris has promised to implement national price controls on food and rent. She will implement the “first-ever federal ban on corporate price gouging on food and groceries,” says the website, although grocers have an extremely thin profit margin. She also promises national rent control. “Vice President Harris knows rent is too high and will sign legislation to outlaw new forms of price fixing by corporate landlords.” She claims she’ll build three million more rental units and “Vice President Harris will provide first-time homebuyers with up to $25,000 to help with their down payments, with more generous support for first-generation homeowners.” Economists agree the policy will simply raise the price of houses by $25,000 while price controls, which failed in the 1970s, will restrict supply.

“Trump would raise rents and add $1,200 a year to the typical American mortgage,” she claims without proof.

Harris’s campaign promises she “will take on Big Pharma,” although the Biden-Harris administration passed vaccination mandates that the White House claimed applied to two-thirds of all U.S. workers, including attempting to force the approximately 25 million people employed at a workplace with at least 100 employees to take the COVID-19 shot or be fired. They also dismissed 8,400 members of the U.S. armed forces who refused to take the shot. Researchers have subsequently linked the injection to an increased risk of myocarditis and excess deaths.

“Vice President Harris will protect Social Security and Medicare against relentless attacks from Donald Trump,” who has steadfastly opposed any reform of the entitlement programs. Social Security is scheduled to become insolvent in 2033. Medicare faces the same fate in 2036.

Environmental globalism: Meeting the “global challenge” of climate change “will require global cooperation,” and she is committed to continuing “the United States’ international climate leadership,” says the Harris campaign website. The U.S. will lead global compacts on fossil fuels. “[S]he will unite Americans to tackle the climate crisis as she builds on this historic work, advances environmental justice.” Harris, who promised she would “absolutely” end fracking in the 2020 Democratic primaries, claims this will result in “lowering household energy costs” and “record energy production.”

Kamala warns Trump will increase gasoline prices: “Trump asked Big Oil executives to give his campaign money so he could roll back regulations and cut taxes for Big Oil to boost their profits, and Trump’s plans would push gas prices up,” she asserts. The cost of a gallon of gasoline has increased from $2.33 when President Donald Trump left office in January 2021 to a record high of $5.02 in June 2022 under Biden-Harris, despite releasing nearly half of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. The cost now sits at $3.62 a gallon.

“Trump’s economic plans would also trigger a recession by mid-2025,” she said, although some economists agree America is already in a recession. The U.S. experienced the textbook definition of a recession — two consecutive quarters of economic contraction — under the Biden-Harris administration in the first two quarters of 2022. But the administration has denied the recession took place, since the panel tasked with declaring a recession, the Business Cycle Dating Committee at the National Bureau of Economic Research, did not formally make such a pronouncement.

PRO Act/public sector unions: “She’ll sign landmark pro-union legislation, including the PRO Act to support workers who choose to organize and bargain and the Public Service Freedom to Negotiate Act to make the freedom for public service workers to form unions the law of the land.” The PRO Act would force millions of workers to pay union dues against their will, cripple freelance work, erase free speech and privacy rights, skew elections in favor of unionization, and radically increase the federal government’s intervention into everyday workplace disputes. President Franklin D. Roosevelt, who signed the 1935 Wagner Act codifying Americans’ right to union representation, believed public-sector unions should not exist and called militant labor tactics “unthinkable and intolerable.”

“She’ll fight to raise the minimum wage, end sub-minimum wages for tipped workers,” radically altering the landscape of tipped work.

Harris’s agenda will be paid for by “making millionaires and billionaires pay their fair share in taxes.” The top 1% of U.S. income earners pay 46% of all federal income taxes, while the bottom 50% pays 2% of taxes.

Manufacturing jobs: “Under the Biden-Harris Administration, more than 1.6 million manufacturing and construction jobs have been created,” Harris claims. But most of these are jobs destroyed during COVID-19 lockdowns coming back online. The Biden-Harris administration has in fact added 147,000 manufacturing jobs above the level in January 2020.

Universal preschool: “Vice President Harris will fight to ensure parents can afford high-quality child care and preschool for their children. … [E]nsuring hardworking families can afford high-quality child care, all while ensuring that care workers are paid a living wage and treated with the dignity and respect they deserve,” the website states. However, surveys consistently show most mothers would like to remain home with their own children, at least part of the time, during their child’s formative years.

Transferring student loan debt and medical costs to taxpayers: Harris will “continue working to end the unreasonable burden of student loan debt,” she promises. “As Vice President, she also announced that medical debt will be removed from credit reports, and helped cancel $7 billion of medical debt for 3 million Americans. As President, she’ll work with states to cancel medical debt for even more Americans.”

Promising not to raise taxes on most Americans, but … : Harris is also “committed to ensuring no one earning less than $400,000 a year will pay more in taxes.” But the Biden-Harris administration has already raised fees on the middle class and working poor by:

  • expanding the number of items that must be registered under the National Firearms Act, with a $200 fee for each item;
  • reinstating the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate and $695-per-person penalty, which President Trump eliminated;
  • imposing a carbon and/or methane tax. One proposal would charge companies $1,800 per ton of methane they handle (not emit), with the cost rising 2% above inflation each year;
  • increasing corporate taxes, which pass on approximately one-third of increased costs to consumers by raising prices (and another third by reducing payroll costs/hours); and
  • hiking cigarette taxes, which fall disproportionately on the working class.

She also praises tax-and-spend policies, claiming that “when the government encourages investment, it leads to broad-based economic growth and creates jobs, which makes our economy stronger.” But Paul Mueller of the American Institute for Economic Research (AIER) described Harris’s economic interventionism as “extensive government involvement, huge amounts of spending,” and “a giveaway campaign.”

She also plans more Woke equity, pledging to “increase access to capital for small businesses and bring venture capital to parts of middle America that have for too long been overlooked … tripling the Small Business Administration’s lending to [b]lack-owned businesses, and more than doubling small-dollar lending to Latino and women-owned businesses.”

Harris also supports increasing taxpayer-funded subsidies for the Obamacare health care exchanges.

Foreign policy: Harris says she “will always stand up for American interests in the face of China’s threats.”

“Vice President Harris will always stand up for Israel’s right to defend itself,” the website avers. “She and President Biden are working to end the war in Gaza, such that Israel is secure, the hostages are released, the suffering in Gaza ends, and the Palestinian people can realize their right to dignity, security, freedom, and self-determination.”

The vice president’s website also notes her strong support for Ukraine. Under the Biden-Harris administration, U.S. taxpayers have spent more than $175 billion aiding Ukraine, despite its stalled war with Russia, the Zelensky government’s well-documented corruption, and persecution of the canonical Ukrainian Orthodox Church.

The website boasts that Kamala Harris has been “advising on tough decisions in the Oval Office and the Situation Room.” Harris bragged about being “the last person in the room” before Joe Biden decided on the details of the calamitous withdrawal from Afghanistan, which cost the lives of 13 U.S. service members and left an unknown number of Americans stranded behind the Taliban’s lines.

AUTHOR

Ben Johnson

Ben Johnson is senior reporter and editor at The Washington Stand.

RELATED VIDEO: President Trump ROASTS the ABC moderators for not debunking Kamala’s lies!

RELATED PODCAST: The Deep State with Eric Teetsel

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2024 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

‘Kamala Harris Is Running a Giveaway Campaign’: Economist

As presidential hopefuls Donald Trump and Kamala Harris approach their first debate on Tuesday, their campaigns have unveiled economic policies that seem in some ways diametrically opposed — and only one could stimulate “robust economic growth,” a leading economist has warned.

Harris has proposed imposing price controls on food, undoing the Trump tax cuts of 2017 by raising the top tax rate to 39.6%, hiking corporate taxes and capital gains taxes to 28%, giving first-time homebuyers $25,000, and doubling down on Obamacare by raising taxpayer-funded subsidies for those who buy their plans from the exchange.

She also proposed one tax cut to benefit small businesses. “I want to see 25 million new small business applications by the end of my first term,” said Harris last week. “So, part of my plan is we will expand the tax deduction for startups to $50,000.”

In a speech at the Economic Club of New York last Thursday, former President Trump proposed unleashing the power of the free market by maintaining the 2017 tax cuts and further slashing the corporate tax from 21% to 15%, cutting red tape, protecting U.S. manufacturing by raising tariffs on imported goods, clawing back all unspent funds from the Biden-Harris administration’s Inflation Reduction Act, and making more jobs available to U.S. citizens by deporting illegal immigrants who lower wages and compete for jobs.

Both candidates agree on ending federal taxation on tips, a policy first proposed this presidential race by Trump and parroted by Harris.

“Kamala Harris is running a giveaway campaign,” Paul Mueller, a senior research fellow at the American Institute for Economic Research (AIER) told “Washington Watch” guest host Joseph Backholm last Thursday. “Of course, the Biden administration has been trying to cancel various forms of student debt for years now. And her approach, I think, to stimulating the economy is more of what we’ve seen over the past four years, which is extensive government involvement, huge amounts of spending. It’s not really an organic growth within the economy.”

Artificial stimulus raises prices, a major problem over the course of the Biden-Harris administration. “When you subsidize people’s ability to buy things — whether that’s higher education or health care — and we give people money in the form of loans or grants or scholarships to do that, what it does is boosts demand. And so what we see over time in both of those areas is rising costs. The cost of higher education has grown much faster than everything else in the economy. The rate of increase for health care has increased very rapidly,” Mueller stated. “And so this $25,000 credit for first-time home buyers, while it sounds nice, it’s actually going to continue to put upward pressure on the price of housing overall.”

The entire amount of the subsidy is “actually going to be eaten up by rising prices,” Mueller noted.

Even a putatively pro-business tax policy like a small business tax credit could backfire. “There are a lot of small business owners who maybe will close down their existing business and start a new one just to get the tax credit,” Mueller warned.

On the other hand, “President Trump’s agenda” has the potential to spur “robust economic growth” in an organic way, said Mueller. “He has talked about wanting to roll back regulations.”

Mueller noted he opposed Trump’s tariff policy, “and, then, he hasn’t really addressed runaway government spending. And the more money that is spent by the federal government, the less money there is for people in the private sector to spend on their businesses, their houses, their projects.”

Backholm suggested the greatest vacuum in economic dialogue involves America’s $35 trillion national debt. “So far, we are not seeing a lot of politicians raise their hand and say, ‘I’m the guy that’s going to give you less so we can save the future.’ I think that might be what we need. We’re not getting that from anybody at this point.”

AUTHOR

Ben Johnson

Ben Johnson is senior reporter and editor at The Washington Stand.

RELATED VIDEO: MUST WATCH: Tulsi Gabbard on Dick Cheney endorsing Kamala

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2024 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

Kamala Harris’s Housing Plan Would Be Worse Than Doing Nothing

On August 16, presidential candidate Kamala Harris unveiled a series of housing proposals that recycle the same failed strategies that have plagued federal housing policy for decades. Among the key components are subsidies for the construction of 3 million new housing units over four years, as well as a total of $100 billion over four years in down payment assistance to first-time homebuyers (FTBs).

Experience tells us her plan would be worse than doing nothing.

These proposals rest on the faulty premise that housing affordability can be improved through subsidies for construction and home purchases. But history offers a cautionary tale: From the 1930s to 2008, Congress passed and presidents signed into law at least 43 housing, urban renewal, and community development programs. Despite their lofty promises, these initiatives consistently failed in making housing more affordable.

Candidate Harris’s plan will be no different.

First, the plan to provide up to $25,000 in down payment assistance to 4 million first-time buyers over four years is likely to inadvertently raise home prices, thereby diminishing the intended benefits of this support. Currently, first-time buyers typically make a median down payment of around $10,500, or 3 percent of the home price. We estimate that even without the Harris proposal, 3 million of its recipients would have been able to purchase a home without any additional assistance and would experience a significant boost their purchasing power, in an already supply limited market. Additionally, the subsidy will also create and draw forward new demand from approximately 1 million additional buyers, further inflating prices. The cost-effectiveness of this plan is also questionable: With only one in four buyers truly needing the assistance, the cost per added homebuyer rises to a steep $100,000.

Second, Harris’s proposal to subsidize the construction of 3 million new housing units over four years is unlikely to significantly increase the overall housing supply. Much of this plan depends on expanding the Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC), a program that, like many other subsidy programs, faces several challenges, which we dub the Five Cs: cost, complexity, corruption, a cartel of specialized LIHTC developers and non-profits, and the crowding out of private developers; studies show that nearly all LIHTC developments displace other housing that could have been built by the market without subsidies.

On the cost side, we estimate that the average new LIHTC unit costs around $450,000. Additionally, nearly half of the LIHTC units funded are allocated for the renovation and preservation of existing affordable units, rather than adding new ones.

Harris’ proposed tax incentive for building starter homes is the other main driver to add supply. It would suffer from many of the same Five Cs as LIHTC, and like the down payment assistance program, many of these new homes would have been built without the subsidy.

History shows that this approach can lead to significant market distortions. For example, the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968 provided easy credit terms and substantial subsidies, resulting in a surge of housing permits by 1971-1972, only for this boom to dissipate by 1975. This program left lasting scars on cities like Detroit, Chicago, and Cleveland—areas that remain hollowed out to this day. Similarly, the 1992 congressional mandate for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to meet affordable housing goals led to an easing of credit before the Great Financial Crisis. This policy caused housing permits to double from 1.1 million in 1992 to 2.2 million in 2005, but the market collapsed by 73 percent in 2009, leaving behind millions of foreclosures and a persistent housing supply deficit that still affects us today.

Third, Harris’s $40 billion fund for local governments to explore “innovative” housing solutions will likely funnel money into projects burdened by self-defeating government-mandated affordability requirements, which HUD loves but markets abhor. By further empowering federal bureaucrats, it will do more harm than good.

The fundamental problem with past programs and Harris’s proposed efforts is not insufficient subsidies but structural issues—namely, restrictive zoning and land use rules—that are holding back housing construction. These regulations make buildable land both scarce and expensive.

What is needed is a paradigm shift. As Charles Marohn, the founder of Strong Towns, succinctly put it, “We have to move beyond the narrow, almost futile task of making affordable [subsidized] housing and start working on the broader and more meaningful effort of making housing affordable.”

To achieve this, we need to significantly increase housing supply. The federal government has several levers at its disposal to encourage this result. First, a 10-year plan to auction surplus federal lands for new market-rate home construction could add 200,000 homes per year. This initiative could generate $10 billion in annual receipts. Second, eliminating the mortgage interest deduction for second homes could free up 700,000 existing homes over the next decade for first-time buyers. Third, reducing regulatory costs that hold back builders by increasing construction expenses is crucial—and indeed, this is an issue that Harris’s plan rightfully addresses.

These measures, in combination with state and local efforts to deregulate land use and zoning, can more effectively address the housing affordability crisis, all at no taxpayer cost and without unintended consequences.

AUTHORS

Edward J. Pinto and Tobias Peter

©2024. All rights reserved.

Trump & Musk Will Restore Fiscal Responsibility To Our Republic

President Trump and Elon Musk will do, what the do nothing Republican’s have never done – audit and dismantle all the wasteful federal government spending and departments.

WATCH: TRUMP: “At the suggestion of Elon Musk.. I will create a Government Efficiency Commission’

The Republican and Democrat Uni-Party pigs have been sucking on the taxpayers mammaries for years and years. The federal government is so fat it would qualify as a DEI hire.

Soon we will return to fiscal responsibility and sanity and fund only what is required to maintain a strong national defense.

Trump will secure our borders, and also return our constitutional republic to energy independence.

Trump will tell the Speaker of the House no more bullxxxx continuing resolutions (CR) it’s time for a fiscally conservative budget that puts American citizens first.

The weak Republican Party is also being flushed and cleansed of its fraud party members. The Communist Democrat party is imploding under its tyranny.

Trump 2024.

©2024. Geoff Ross. All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLE: 9 States Where the Cost of Living Has Increased Most During Biden’s Presidency

The Democrats’ War on Reality: Spending Bills Reveal a Twisted Vision for the Future

It’s almost September, and that can only mean one thing: Congress is returning to Washington, and Americans should hold on to their wallets. Several things could combine to make this fall a budget-buster: The fiscal year end means that $6 trillion worth of federal budgeting must be renewed by September 30th; the last three weeks of September are the last time Congress will be in session before the November 5th election; and, liberals in Washington only know one way to win — by buying reelection with your taxpayer dollars.

Dear taxpayer, September ain’t gonna be pretty, so buckle up.

Already in July, well ahead of next month’s funding fights, several reporters who cover Capitol Hill suddenly began simultaneously reporting that House Republicans are “fighting culture wars” by stuffing supposedly unrelated provisions into congressional spending bills. They are repeating Democratic talking points that characterize the spending bills in the Senate (controlled by Democrats) as neutral and bipartisan. The obvious implication of this reporting is that the “fair” approach would be to reject House conservatives’ “inflaming” language and instead adopt the Senate’s “neutral” language. Look for that framing to be used in force in September, when the House and Senate return to Washington to try to pass a budget.

This framing gets at least two things wrong.

First, the House and Senate are miles apart, not just on moral issues but on basic spending levels. Last year, the House and Senate fiscal year 2024 (FY24) spending bills were more than $150 billion dollars apart. (Neither set of spending bills balanced the budget, much less made a dent in the national debt, but the Republican-controlled House was proposing spending levels that were either pared down or more modestly increased than the Democrat-controlled Senate.)

This year will be no different, and the difference between what House Republicans and Senate Democrats (with some Republicans) want to spend will likely be even greater. With inflation ballooning under the Biden-Harris administration because of government spending, Democrats in Washington and their friends in the media would like nothing better than to deflect attention onto so-called “culture war issues.” Don’t miss the sleight of hand.

Second, when it comes to standing for life, marriage, and religious liberty, it’s important to realize that conservatives on Capitol Hill are actually playing defense against the Biden-Harris administration’s aggressive offense. Last year, for example, Planned Parenthood received one-third of its budget — $699.4 million — from taxpayers. The Biden-Harris administration is actively and aggressively using the levers of government to advocate for false sexual identities (LGBT) in everything from federally-funded school lunch programs to foreign assistance to poor countries. The government is being weaponized against people of faith and people with no faith at all who continue to believe that marriage is between one man and one woman.

In other words, if there is a “culture war,” it is one that the Biden-Harris administration is waging, with the help of Congressional Democrats who dominate the Senate. Meanwhile, House Republicans — the only bulwark to this onslaught — comprise a bare majority that is split into several factions. Conservative House Republicans are pushing back against the Democrats’ radical agenda, but other House Republicans try to stay as far away from the issues as they can, and some Republicans even join Democrats in destructive efforts to underminemarriage and target the unborn. Senate conservatives often do not have the votes to block harmful Democratic policies.

While some Republicans seem embarrassed by conservative principles, Democrats have seemingly no shame in using taxpayer funding to advance a radical leftist agenda. In the Senate, for example, here are some examples of radical, “culture war” earmarks that Senate Democrats have offered in this year’s spending bills:

Supporting abortion providers

  • $5,106,000 in earmarks for a hospital that provides the abortion drug, mifepristone, up to 10 weeks and surgical abortions up to 23 weeks, when some infants would be able to survive outside of the womb (Sen. Tom Carper, D-Del., ChristianaCare Health Services, Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Labor-HHS appropriations bill, in two separate earmarks).
  • $500,000 earmark for a hospital that provides abortions through 13 weeks and six days (Tammy Duckworth, D-Ill., Stroger Hospital, Labor-HHS bill).

Pushing false sexual identities on youth

  • $1,050,000 earmark for an LGBT advocacy organization that pushes this ideology on youth and advocates for them to undergo harmful gender transition procedures (Laphonza Butler, D-Calif., The Trevor Project, Labor-HHS bill).
  • $750,000 earmark to push gender ideology on youth ages 11-18 years old (Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., Long Island Gay and Lesbian Youth, Inc., Labor-HHS bill).
  • $500,000 earmark for a “mental health support initiative” to counsel youth through the lens of LGBT ideology (Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.M., and Schumer, Lesbian and Gay Community Services, Inc., Labor-HHS bill).
  • $356,000 earmark for an all-expenses-paid “training intensive” for self-identified transgender and non-binary theater artists in New York City (Schumer, D-NY, Unremarkable Productions, Labor-HHS bill).
  • $238,000 earmark for an organization said to serve not only girls, but “gender-expansive youth,” signaling that the organization pushes gender ideology on youth (Sen. John Hickenlooper, D-Colo., Asian Girls Ignite, Labor-HHS bill).

Directing funding for women’s services to serve men, and vice versa

  • $2,846,000 in earmarks for a young men’s organization to provide “accessibility” to YMCA programs regardless of certain characteristics, including gender identity, suggesting that the money will be used (in part) to facilitate the provision of services meant for men to women who identify as men (Tim Kaine and Mark Warner, D-Va., Young Men’s Christian Association of Central Virginia, Transportation, Housing, and Urban Development, and Related Agencies T-HUD appropriations bill).
  • $1,500,000 earmark to provide “gender-inclusive shelter” to victims of abuse, raising the concern that biological men will be housed with women, increasing the latter’s risk of harm in the name of inclusivity (Tina Smith, D-Minn., Alexandra House, Inc., T-HUD bill).

House Democrats are no slouches, either, offering at least one “culture war” earmark and many, many amendments to stop conservatives from pumping the brakes on the radical Biden-Harris agenda.

Here are some examples of ways they have prioritized false LGBT identities:

Pushing false sexual identities on youth

  • $125,000 earmark for a heretical church seeking to establish a taxpayer-funded program that would likely push LGBT ideology on at-risk youth struggling with their gender or sexual identities under the guise of “juvenile justice prevention and education” (Mark Pocan, D-Wis., First Congregational United Church of Christ, Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies CJS appropriations bill).

Discriminating against Americans who believe in one-man, one-woman marriage

Advocating for false sexual identities

Putting women at risk, paying for false sexual identities

  • Amendment to strike a section preventing the Bureau of Prisons from assigning placements based on gender identity, which would allow the placement of men in women’s prisons (Tlaib, D-Mich., amendment to the CJS bill).
  • Amendment to strike a section that would prohibit placement in federal prisons based on gender identity, and a section prohibiting public funding of gender transition procedures (Lee, D-Pa., amendment to the CJS bill).
  • Amendment to strike sections barring funding for gender transition procedures, defunding Biden’s anti-religious liberty in adoption final rule, and barring funding for schools that allow males to participate in women’s and girls’ sports (Craig, D-Minn., amendment to the Labor-HHS bill).

Here are a few examples of ways House Democrats are prioritizing the promotion of abortion and other policies leading to the destruction of human life:

Advocating for dangerous, do-it-yourself, at-home abortions

  • Amendment expressing the sense of Congress that the abortion drug, mifepristone, was appropriately approved and is appropriately regulated under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, and that this law supersedes any state effort to regulate this drug to mitigate harms to women (Pat Ryan, D-N.Y., amendment to the Ag bill).

Paying for/subsidizing abortions and the destruction of human life

  • Amendment to strike the Hyde Amendment, which has been in place for 47 years and prohibits HHS funds from being used for abortions (Barbara Lee, D-Calif., amendment to the Labor-HHS bill).
  • Amendment to restore Title X Family Planning Funding to FY23 levels. Title X pays for drugs and devices that can destroy human embryos, and programs that bypass parental consent laws for minors; it also heavily subsidizes abortion businesses like Planned Parenthood (Kathy Manning, D-N.C., amendment to the Labor-HHS bill).
  • Amendment to strike a section barring funding for certain organizations that provide abortions, including Planned Parenthood (Rosa DeLauro, D-Conn., amendment to the Labor-HHS bill).
  • Amendment to strike a section that would allow an individual to sue in court for a suspected violation of the Weldon amendment, which prohibits funding for programs/agencies that discriminate against healthcare entities that decline to provide/pay for abortions (Sara Jacobs, D-Calif., amendment to the Labor-HHS bill).
  • Amendment to strike a section prohibiting the NIH from using fetal tissue obtained from an elective abortion in medical research (Diana DeGette, D-Colo., amendment to the Labor-HHS bill).
  • Amendment to strike a section barring funding for elective abortions for federal prisoners (Lois Frankel, D-Fla., amendmentto the CJS bill).
  • Amendment to narrow the scope of the Dornan amendment, which prohibits D.C. funds from paying for abortions, allowing the use of local funds for this purpose (Eleanor Holmes Norton, D-D.C., amendment to the FSGG bill).
  • Amendment to prevent the Office of Personnel Management from contracting with Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) carriers unless their plans cover IVF, a procedure that results in the routine destruction and perpetual freezing of living human embryos (Gerry Connolly, D-Va., amendment to the FSGG bill).
  • Amendment to strike a provision prohibiting abortion coverage under the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (Ritchie Torres, D-Calif., amendment to the FSGG bill).
  • Amendment to strike a section prohibiting funds to establish, support, administer, oversee, or issue a grant, contract, or cooperative agreement to provide information on, promote access to, or facilitate an abortion (Lizzie Fletcher, D-Va., amendment to the Labor-HHS bill).

Paying for abortion advocacy

Allowing the District of Columbia to side-step pro-life federal protections

  • Amendment to strike a section requiring D.C. to submit a report to Congress on its enforcement of the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003, keeping Americans in the dark about unlawful abortions being performed on (sometimes viable) babies (such as the DC Five) in D.C. (Norton, D-D.C., amendment to the FSGG bill).
  • Amendment to strike a section barring D.C. from enforcing its law allowing physician-assisted suicide and from passing any other similar legislation in the future (Norton, D-D.C., amendment to the FSGG bill).

Discriminating against Americans who are pro-life

  • Amendment to strike a section prohibiting funds to implement the EEOC’s rule requiring reasonable accommodations for employees to get abortions, even if such actions would be against the employer’s conscience (Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., amendment to the CJS bill).
  • Amendments to prevent Republicans from protecting the conscience rights of employers from being forced to provide coverage of or accommodations for abortions and contraception for their employees (Norton, D-D.C., amendment to the FSGG bill).
  • Amendment to strike a section that would bar funding for post-graduate physician training programs if they don’t provide an opt-out option for abortion training or if they discriminate against physicians who do opt-out (Kathy Castor, D-Fla., amendment to the Labor-HHS bill).
  • Amendment to strike a section barring funding for two pro-abortion Biden executive orders — the first contained directives to convene volunteer lawyers to sue against pro-life legislation, use the FTC to go after pregnancy resource centers, and convene an interagency task force to promote abortion while the second set up policies to pay for out-of-state travel for abortion through Medicaid and used sex discrimination laws to go after health care providers that will not provide abortions because of moral objections (Manning, D-N.C., amendment to the Labor-HHS bill).
  • Amendment to strike a section prohibiting funding for HHS to administer, enforce, or finalize its proposed rule that would stop taxpayer dollars from going to pregnancy resource centers, which provide practical support for women facing unplanned pregnancies (Josh Gottheimer, D-N.J., amendment to the Labor-HHS bill).

Jim Wallis, a liberal theologian, left-wing activist, and author of the ambitiously titled “Politics According to the Bible,” famously helped coin the phrase, “A budget is a moral document” to argue that it is immoral to cut federal spending. For close to two decades, Democrats have used itto cloak policy prescriptions for everything from wide-open borders to abortion-on-demand in biblical-sounding verbiage and to berate conservatives who opposed the expansion of the federal government far beyond its authority or means.

Maybe it’s time for conservative Republicans to take liberals at their word and take the fight to them. (Hint: They started to last year, and many of those spending provisions either made it into the final package or at least blunted radical Democrats’ counter-proposals.)

Whether or not spending bills are moral documents, they are a battleground. Those are your tax dollars being spent, and you have a right to demand that they reflect your values.

AUTHORS

Chantel Hoyt and Quena Gonzalez

RELATED PODCAST: Pros and Cons of the Child Tax Credit

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2024 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

Carbon Copy of Maduro, Castro, Lula… Meet Comrade VP Kamala

There is nothing new under the sun. Everything is just copied, reworked, duplicated, and redesigned to meet the needs of the moment. Napoleon Hill, author of “Think and Grow Rich”, tells his readers that if they want to be successful, they should find a leader and copy their policies. I wonder if the DNC took Hill’s advice?  It seems as though Kamala took a few lessons from Joe, and learned to plagiarize. Kamala doesn’t have enough creativity to come up with ideas on her own. Maybe, they both have the same puppet master?

How many times have they called Trump “Hitler, a Nazi, a Fascist”? While we are looking for their new plans, programs, and policies, they are busy copying Trump.   What will they do to fix the America that they broke? Stealing the plans of Trump, maybe they should just forward her website to Trump’s policy site. It seems to me that is all they have.

During the DNC convention, we were constantly reminded of the Joy we were feeling, as our country falls apart. How much JOY there was, “Strength through Joy” is their theme.

The government will bring you joy. Really! What better JOY than to watch as the prices of everything we need escalates daily? The Joy of choosing Food, Gas, Medicine, or Rent.  The Joy of paying thousands a month to live in a shoebox.  The Joy of watching our country be invaded by 3rd world illegals, and listening to them complain that the 4-star hotel should be a 5-star hotel that Americans are paying for them to stay in. The Joy of watching America’s children give up their seat in school to a child that is taught to hate America. In the meantime, we listen to Snopes-biased garbage tell us what is True and what is False, and basically, we are wrong. It is False to believe that the DNC copied this phrase from the Nazi play book.

Please look it up. “Strength Through Joy

Well guess where that phrase Strength Through Joy come from?

We see what can beunburdened by what has been.”

I was determined to find out where this phrase came from. This phrase is a modified version or interpretation of the verbiage from Communist leader Mao Tse-tung (Zedong), a motto of his regime to justify killing or starving millions in an attempt to bring about a socialist utopia in China.

Have you noticed that every Kamala solution for the mess she creates, ends in the destruction of the very program she proposes to fix?  This is because it is the goal of the Communists to destroy the West.. They hate free thought. You can’t show the group you are trying to conquer that, if they learn the skill of individual free thought, they won’t need the government. Their want us to believe that we are too stupid to exist without the government. So in the name of fixing things, they instead, destroy.

Kamala’s tax proposal to tax unearned income will cause the loss of private property.  In order for us to pay for the invaders, she intends to tax the equity of our property, regardless of whether or not we sold it.  Example; You bought a house for $200,000. The next year it is valued at $300,000. You made $100,000 if you sell it. Whoa, not in Kamala’s eyes!

You owe taxes on $100,000 whether or not you sold the house! 25% please,  or $25,000, where are you getting $25,000.m? What happens if the house drops in value the next year? Will the government give you back that money? HA. Not in this lifetime!! Many people use the equity in their homes to start a business. How can you do that if you start out owning the government money?

The Education Unions have destroyed the schools. Hatred of family and country is taught daily. This is evident by the amount of uneducated gangs we see in our cities.

Regarding the wonderful border bill everyone is bitching about, supported by the RINOS, Globalists, and Commie Dems in Congress:  Did you ever read it? It guarantees 5K illegals a day, that we, the taxpayer in debt for $35Trillion, have to pay for.

It gives no money to complete the Wall and turned CBP into application takers, with no power to turn anyone away, since there could be no vetting. It guarantees more drugs and cartel members flood America. But not to worry, it’s DTJ’s fault for not passing it. Last I looked,  DJT is not President.

Why are there massive amounts of murders, rapes, robberies, car jacs and cartel members in America? (Rapes have increased 60% in the U.S.). Oh, I forgot, the MSM says we are crazy, again. Many people don’t believe the crime exists, because MSM doesn’t report it. They want us to believe that crime is down.

Sorry, the invaders are here doing their job to harm, scare, rob, rape, and kill the Americans. Joe and Kamala invited them and does not prosecute them, turning a blind eye to the crimes they commit. In America, immigrants have a permanent Get-Out-Of-Jail-Free card, no matter what they do.

Aurora is not the only city in America with violence!

WATCH:

This never reported demise of America is due to the Globalist policies of outsourcing and illegal immigration. Both parties are at fault. The Defund the Police policy of the Harris administration exacerbated lawlessness.  Will she fix the problem she created? No she can’t because all of her policies rely on the people being dependent on the government programs. The programs once in place will deplete the resources of the middle class while feeding the upper class. That is called communism.

As more people investigate and realize what these fake policies will cost them, their life/freedom, liberty and prosperity, they are beginning to turn to MAGA. Trump is just a place holder putting in place policies that will enable MAGA to grow and prosper on their own.

This week we have 2 wonderful people who escaped communism. They will tell you their life experience. Hopefully we will be smart enough not to experience the same.

Make sure you vote. Is America worth saving? Do everything you can to energize you and your family and friends to vote.  Your life and freedoms depend upon it. Over the weekend listen to the show.

©2024. Karen Schoen. All rights reserved.


Join the Florida Citizens Alliance  goflca.org    Help save America mentor a child.

Show Link https://www.americaoutloud.news/the-prism-of-americas-education/

Show: Sat and Sun 7AM ET and 5PM ET on  https://www.americaoutloud.news/

Podcasts and Articles:    karenbschoen.com      karenschoen.substack.com

Guest:  Jennifer Zeng, was born in Sichuan province, China in 1966. She was arrested four times and held as a prisoner of conscience in a labor camp for a year.  In the camp, she was physically and mentally abused, and subjected to attempted brainwashing and electroshock treatment.  She fled China in 2001 for Australia, wrote a book about her experiences, and eventually settled in the United States.  There is also a documentary about her life.  You can find Jennifer’s current reporting on China and her other work on the Web at JenniferZengBlog.com and on her YouTube channel (Inconvenient Truths by Jennifer Zeng 2.0).

Websites:  Inconvenient TruthsJennifer’s World

Guest:   Ciprian Ivanof, was born in communist Romania to ethnic Russian parents in a poor village. He got sick, was put in the notoriously bad orphanage system, and then was adopted after the fall of communism. He lived in poor neighborhoods in DC, moved back to post-communist Romania from 2001-2006, studied History at the University of Minnesota Twin-Cities, and then studied law at American University in DC.

Email:  ciprian.ivanof@gmail.com

Guest:  Chris Wright, is an independent liberty activist in the leadership of Potomac Tea Party, a national Tea Party based in Northern Virginia. He founded and is president of the first and only nonprofit formed to empower grassroots activists with small financial grants.  He founded the Anticommunism Action Team (ACAT) in 2013 to counter communist influence at home and abroad.  ACAT’s Speakers Bureau has presented to the Heritage Foundation and Leadership Institute, and been on Breitbart and LevinTV.  Mr. Wright has also formed a number of national teams fighting the Woke Mob

COMMUNISM: Oregon Voters to Consider Approving Nation’s First Universal Basic Income

“From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.” — Karl Marx, German-born philosopher, political theorist, economist, historian, sociologist, journalist, and revolutionary socialist.


Who pays for this? The hardworking Oregon taxpayer.

Is it any wonder that THIRTEEN Oregon counties voted to secede and join Idaho.

Oregon Voters to Consider Approving Nation’s First Universal Basic Income

The proposal is meeting stiff bipartisan resistance from elected officials and pushback from the business community.

By Scottie Barnes, The Epoch Times, August 23, 2024;

Oregonians will vote in November on a controversial ballot measure that would give every resident, regardless of age or income, $1,600 each year—as long as they live at least 200 days in the state.

A family of four would receive $6,400 annually, with no strings attached. The money would be nontaxable and would not affect other benefits.

If voters approve Measure 118, the universal basic income (UBI) program would be funded by a tax on the gross receipts of corporations that generate more than $25 million in annual sales.

Oregon would be the first state to roll out such a comprehensive UBI.

As of June, no U.S. states had a UBI program, though several states and cities have run pilot programs.

Oregon Rebate, the group backing the measure, says on its website that Measure 118 (previously known as IP 17) would increase minimum corporate taxes to 3 percent.

The organization claims that the “largest corporations” currently pay less than 1 percent in Oregon tax, while individual taxpayers pay from 5 percent to 10 percent.

Local small businesses would not be affected by the tax increase, it says, as the tax would apply only to corporations making more than $25 million a year.

The Tax Foundation, a Washington-based think tank, disputes the claim that corporations pay less than 1 percent in Oregon taxes. It notes that the state already has “one of the highest business tax burdens in the country.”
In a report on the measure, the foundation concludes that Oregon corporations pay a 7.6 percent corporate income tax and a 0.57 percent gross receipts tax.

If they’re in the Portland area, they are subject to a 2.6 percent business license tax, a 2 percent business income tax, a 1 percent supportive housing services tax, and a 1 percent Clean Energy Surcharge, all of which are additional taxes on net income.
Story continues below advertisement

Oregon corporations pay taxes on profits and gross receipts (sales attributable to Oregon), making it one of only two states (the other is Delaware) that impose both types of taxes.

Money provided by the measure would decrease overall poverty in the state by 36 percent, childhood poverty by 53 percent, and senior citizen poverty by 26 percent, according to Oregon Rebate.

“More money in the pocket of Oregonians will boost our economy and mean more jobs, opportunities, and taxable revenue,” the group states.
According to an Oregon legislative fiscal analysis published on July 23, households making less than $40,000 won’t have any Oregon tax liability should the measure pass.

“The [payment] might sound good,” the Tax Foundation wrote, “but if it raises the cost of goods, drives jobs and economic activity out of state, and puts Oregon-based businesses at a massive disadvantage with their out-of-state competitors, it’s likely to be an awful deal for Oregonians.”

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLE: Socialism Never Works

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Socialism Never Works

Will the 2024 election be a referendum on socialism? Socialism, in the name of “neighborliness,” acts as if money grows on trees. It does not.

Socialism is forced redistribution of wealth by the government. In confiscatory taxes, the government takes from the productive to give to the poor. It may sound good to the naïve, but in reality, it hurts the poor more than anyone because its policies cause inflation. The only ones who really benefit from socialism are the administrators.

The dirty little secret about socialism is that it fails every time. Long before we became a country, the Pilgrims were forced to practice a form of socialism.

We explain the details of the Pilgrims’ experiment in socialism in our Providence Forum documentary, “The Pilgrims.”

One of the stipulations of the London Adventurers, a group of investors who had lent money to the Pilgrims for the voyage of the Mayflower, was that everyone in the colony was to divide all the proceeds of the colony equally…no matter how much work he or she did. The problem with this imposition is that those who worked hard were paid just the same as those who chose not to work at all. This incentivizing of laziness undercut productivity immensely.

One guest the program was Dennis Prager, the founder of PragerU. He told our viewers: “The Pilgrims did experiment with socialism or communalism, and they realized it didn’t work. They embodied this. It didn’t take long to realize that doesn’t work. It is against human nature. The moment you tell people that the community will take care of you, they work less. It undermines character.”

Leo Martin, the founder of the Jenney Museum/Learning Center in Plymouth, added, “in 1623, Governor Bradford changed the deal. We’re going to stop a communal existence; we’re going to go to land ownership. Every family will own their own land, grow their own food, and feed themselves, and we’ll trade with each other what we have left over.  Free trade, that worked, they never had a starving day after that, they tripled their production….Shows you what an incentive will do; works every time.”

About this episode, law professor John Eidsmoe writes: “The Pilgrims did not abandon their ideal of a Christian colony; they embraced it. They abandoned an imposed system contrary to the laws of God and the nature of man, embracing instead a system consistent with biblical principles and human nature.”

The 20th century saw one failed experiment in socialism after another, including the Soviet Union.

Ronald Reagan used to collect jokes that Russians would tell each other in the Soviet Union, to ameliorate the misery of living under Communism. Such as the one about the man trying to buy a car, somewhat of a rarity for the common people in those days.

The man fulfilled his obligations, including paying all the money for the car up front. The bureaucrat told him that he had successfully completed his paperwork–and he would get his car in ten years. The man asked, “In the morning or the afternoon?” The bureaucrat was taken aback and replied, “Comrade, it’s ten years from now. What do you care whether it’s the morning or the afternoon?” The man said, “Well, I’ve got the plumber coming in the morning.”

Here in modern America, the federal government is bankrupting our children and grandchildren.

For example, the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities notes the federal government spent $6.1 trillion in 2023, and we received $4.4 trillion in revenue. The rest was borrowed. And it’s been like this for a few years now. This is an unsustainable path.

Sometimes it’s hard to grasp how big a trillion is, compared to a million or a billion.

If I owed you $100 and said I’d pay you in a million seconds, you’d be repaid in 12 days.

If I owed you $100 and said I’d pay you in a billion seconds, you’d be repaid in 32 years.

If I owed you $100 and said I’d pay you in a trillion seconds, you’d be repaid in 32,000 years.

And we have deficit spending year after year of more than a trillion dollars.

Thomas Jefferson warned us so long ago: “I place…public debt as the greatest of dangers to be feared. To preserve our independence, we must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt. If we run into such debts, we must be taxed in our meat and drink, in our necessities and in our comforts, in our labor and in our amusements.”

Finally, our third president added, “If we can prevent the government from wasting the labor of the people, under the pretense of caring for them, they will be happy.”

We the people get decide on which path we choose in the 2024 election.

©2024. Jerry Newcombe, D. Min. All rights reserved.

Revised 2024 Democratic Platform More Extreme than the Draft

The final version of the Democratic Party’s 2024 Platform has added references calling transgender procedures “medically necessary,” claiming that Christian schools may further “discrimination,” shifting blame on the U.S. border to the previous administration, and promising American children a more “multilingual” education. The platform maintains its promises to keep “fighting” parents’ efforts to keep pornographic books out of children’s hands, expanding abortion nationwide, and promoting transgender procedures for children and prisoners.

Delegates to the 2024 Democratic National Committee in Chicago adopted the revised platform last week inside Chicago’s United Center. The final version contains minor modifications from the draft platform, which was released on July 13 and obtained by Politico. At that time, Joe Biden remained the presumptive Democratic Party presidential candidate.

Curiously, the 2024 Democratic Party Platform did not update that previous version’s references to the nominee’s name: It contains 20 references to 2024 being an election for Joe Biden’s “second term.” For example, the 2024 platform states, “In his second term, President Biden will continue to support access to FDA-approved medication abortion” and “stand with Ukraine.” It contains less than 10 references to Kamala Harris in an individual capacity, rather than conjoined with Joe Biden or as part of the “Biden-Harris administration.”

Yet the alterations made between the two drafts indicate a Democratic Party moving ever further to the Left. The revised platform added a brand new promise — not to average citizens but to the transgender industry: “Democrats will vigorously oppose state and federal bans on gender-affirming health care and respect the role of parents, families, and doctors — not politicians — in making health care decisions.”

Yet Minnesota Governor and vice presidential candidate Tim Walz (D) signed a bill disrespecting the role of parents in their children’s health care by allowing children whose parents will not allow them to undergo transgender procedures to flee to Minnesota, a “sanctuary” where the state will reassign custody until the child has undergone a transition against his/her parents’ wishes. Walz also signed a bill outlawing so-called “conversion therapy,’ even if parents and children want it.” The 2024 Democratic Party Platform doubles down on transgender procedures, adding that Biden “protected transgender Americans’ access to health care and coverage, including medically necessary gender-affirming care” (emphasis added).

The platform also strengthened promises to come after individuals accused of holding the wrong positions on hot-button issues. The revised platform changed its promise of “protecting LGBTQI+ children from bullying and assault” to stopping anti-LGBTQI+ “bullying and discrimination” (emphasis added). The platform still mentions the party’s intent to prosecute “hate crimes,” noting, “The Justice Department is taking an all-of-department approach to protecting LGBTQI+ rights.”

That promise may be directed at Christian schools, which may lose federal funding for holding to biblical morality under the vague language of the 2024 Democratic Party Platform. A new section added to the platform states: “We oppose the use of private-school vouchers, tuition tax credits, opportunity scholarships, and other schemes that divert taxpayer-funded resources away from public education. Public tax dollars should never be used to discriminate” (emphasis added). Teachers’ unions and LGBTQ pressure groups have accused Christian schools of “discrimination,” because they do not allow teachers who flout biblical morality to set that example for their students, or because they do not allow GSA Networks clubs like the one Tim Walz founded in his high school, which promotes transgender transitions without parental notification. Traditional Christianity teaches that one’s biological sex is unalterable, a gift from God, and should be treasured, as well as opposing all sexual activity outside biblical marriage.

The revised platform also deals with language, promising a greater cacophony inside public schools: “[W]e’re working to provide every student with a pathway to multilingual education, while ensuring equitable access to a high-quality education for English learners, who’ve historically been underserved.”

The revised platform pledges to tax U.S. citizens and their communities to facilitate giving U.S. citizenship to non-citizen immigrants. A new sentence states the Harris administration “will also help to fund community-based organizations that host clinics to assist with immigration cases.”

Seemingly, the revised platform added references to the LGBTQIA+ movement wherever possible. The revised platform adds that, not only did President Joe Biden pardon gay veterans, but he “pardoned approximately 2,000 gay,lesbian, and bisexual veterans who were convicted years ago just for being themselves” (emphasis added). Again, “President Biden … expanded funding for campus sexual assault prevention and is keeping students safe on campus by restoring and strengthening protections under Title IX, including explicit protections for LGBTQI+ students” (emphasis added). At other times, it worsens the reputation of those who disagree. It notes that Biden and Harris “reversed Trump’s un-American ban on transgender service members and ended the disgraceful and discriminatory ban on blood donation by gay and bisexual men” (emphasis added). It also replaced the term “gay” with the ever-more expansive “LGBTQI+.”

The platform still contains its promise to expand taxpayer-funded abortion-on-demand nationwide: “With a Democratic Congress, we will pass national legislation to make Roe [v. Wade] the law of the land again. … We will repeal the Hyde Amendment. And in his second term, President Biden will continue to support access to FDA-approved medication abortion, appoint leaders at the FDA who respect science and appoint judges who uphold fundamental freedoms.”

A second abortion-related plank invokes the so-called Equal Rights Amendment, a relic of the 1970s feminist movement led by Gloria Steinem. “Democrats will fight to make the Equal Rights Amendment the law of the land,” although the never-ratified ERA has been interpreted to codify both a constitutional right to abortion and women’s eligibility for the military draft.

At times, the revision nods toward reality. It edits a sentence saying “the cost of living can still feel too high” to say the cost of living “is too high.”

The revision specifies that national rent control is coming in a Harris-Walz administration. A new sentence states that their housing policy “offers corporate landlords a basic choice for the next two years: either cap rent increases at 5 percent, or lose a valuable federal tax break.” The new platform added another line on housing policy: “and we will go after negligent landlords who don’t maintain basic habitability standards. We will also crack down on those who violate the Fair Housing Act, and on landlords who discriminate against low-income and minority renters and people with housing vouchers.” The Obama-Biden administration ignored written law and interpreted the Fair Housing Act as though it applied to people who identify as transgender. If you are renting out a room in your home but do not want your children sharing a bathroom with a trans-identifying male, you could become the target of a federal lawsuit.

A new section also alleges that former President Donald Trump “and his allies benefit directly from the housing shortage.”

The language does soften some of its anti-Trump rhetoric in light of the July 13 assassination attempt. Rather than saying, “Trump is a greater danger to democracy than ever,” the revised platform states, “Trump refuses to defend core tenets of our democracy: the Constitution, the rule of law, our system of checks and balances.” In two other instances, the platform changes some variant of the word “threat” to softer language (e.g., “The stakes in this election for the soul of our nation are profound.”). It also deletes a sentence stating Trump “has never respected service because he does not understand sacrifice.”

Yet it seeks to blame Trump and others for an historic influx of illegal immigrants over the last four years, and away from the Biden-Harris administration, discussing “a broke immigration system decades in the making” (emphasis added).

The revised platform contains the pledges made in the previous draft, as well, to continue “fighting” alleged “book bans.”

Since delegates did not revise the nominee’s name — or pronouns — the platform gives an insight into what a Joe Biden reelection campaign might have looked like. Until her rebranding as the candidate of “joy,” Kamala Harris was seen as the weaker link on the ticket, with major publications calling on her to drop out so Biden could choose a stronger running mate in articles with titles such as “The Case for Biden to Drop Kamala Harris,” in New York Magazine last September, or “For the country’s sake, Vice President Harris should step aside” in The Washington Post this March.

The Republican National Convention in Milwaukee adopted a slimmed-down document containing only a handful of campaign promises that resonated with Donald Trump’s campaign. Notably, the 2024 Republican Party Platform jettisoned its traditional language vowing to protect life from the moment of conception until natural death. Over the weekend, vice presidential nominee J.D. Vance indicated that President Donald Trump opposed any federal legislation to protect life, leaving the matter entirely to the states.

That is, however, significantly less pro-abortion than the 2024 Democratic Party Platform.

AUTHOR

Ben Johnson

Ben Johnson is senior reporter and editor at The Washington Stand.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Facebook Founder Confesses Censorship of Conservatives Was Ordered by Biden-Harris Admin.

Biden-Harris DEI Policies at NASA Favor ‘Inclusivity’ over Quality of Research, Experts Say

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand c0lumn is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2024 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

Going Full Orwell: Harris-Walz Equate Fighting ‘Climate Change’ With ‘Freedom’

Shh. A moment of ‘climate silence’ being observed on live TV – Morano on Fox & Friends on Harris-Walz ‘climate silence’ & pushing climate solutions as ‘freedom’

Harris Goes Full Orwell! 

NYT: Harris’s New Strategy: Equate Fighting Climate Change With ‘Freedom’ – Framing As ‘Patriotism’ – ‘A novel way of framing climate change’

New York Times – Aug. 23, 2024: Vice President Kamala Harris mentioned climate change just once in her speech before the Democratic National Convention on Thursday, wrapping it into her larger campaign theme of freedom. … Ms. Harris declared that along with reproductive choice “many other fundamental freedoms are at stake” in the November election. Those include “the freedom to breathe clean air, and drink clean water and live free from the pollution that fuels the climate crisis,” she said. …

Via Study.com’s Analysis of George Orwell’s 1984 & the meaning of ‘Freedom is Slavery:  “The slogan coined by Big Brother goes on to explain that freedom is slavery…Big Brother justifies this confusion by saying that someone who is free under the typical conception, able to operate according to their own will, is ultimately unsuccessful. Rather, true freedom is serving the state, which allows one to operate with more freedom than they ever would have had if they went out into the world on their own.”

Marc Morano: This is this is the biggest con I’ve seen in modern politics. Kamala Harris in 2019 was the co-sponsor of The Green New Deal — the AOC original Green New Deal, and as you mentioned, Harris cast a breaking vote in 2022 for the Inflation Reduction Act. Climate is supposed to be an existential threat. Climate is supposed to be in crisis —  an emergency. The Biden-Harris Administration was talking openly — as The Washington Post and Associated Press reported — declaring a National Climate emergency — and all of a sudden, summer of 2024, everything went silent. And why is that? Because according to the Washington Post, the New York Times, they have found in focus groups, they have found in polling, they have found this across the board — that there’s just no concern over climate change in America. It’s dropped even in these polls by the mainstream media, out of the top 20 issues, it’s not even in the top half, and so what’s happened is they’ve just moved on, and they’re framing it now, according to the New York Times, as an issue of ‘freedom’ —  climate ‘solutions’ will bring ‘freedom.’ This is after they talked about banning gas-powered cars, restricting meat eating, banning gas stoves and thermostat controls, and CNN promoting ‘carbon passports’ for travel. But now they’ve just gone silent on this existential threat of the 21st century. We’re being conned.

Partial Transcript: 

Rachel Campos-Duffy: Even the Washington Post has taken notice, saying the split-screen approach suggests that Democrats see talking about the environment as a lose-lose proposition. Here to discuss is Climate Depot publisher Marc Morano. Marc, it is really interesting she cast the deciding vote on the Big Green New Deal, or some call it a scam, and she should be bragging about it, and no one’s talking about this issue. Why, what’s happened?

Marc Morano: This is this is the biggest con I’ve seen in modern politics. Kamala Harris in 2019 was the co-sponsor of The Green New Deal — the AOC original Green New Deal, and as you mentioned, Harris cast a breaking vote in 2022 for the Inflation Reduction Act. Climate is supposed to be an existential threat. Climate is supposed to be in crisis —  an emergency. The Biden-Harris Administration was talking openly — as The Washington Post and Associated Press reported — declaring a National Climate emergency — and all of a sudden, summer of 2024, everything went silent. And why is that? Because according to the Washington Post, the New York Times, they have found in focus groups, they have found in polling, they have found this across the board — that there’s just no concern over climate change in America. It’s dropped even in these polls by the mainstream media, out of the top 20 issues, it’s not even in the top half, and so what’s happened is they’ve just moved on, and they’re framing it now, according to the New York Times, as an issue of ‘freedom’ —  climate ‘solutions’ will bring ‘freedom.’ This is after they talked about banning gas-powered cars, restricting meat eating, banning gas stoves and thermostat controls, and CNN promoting ‘carbon passports’ for travel. But now they’ve just gone silent on this existential threat of the 21st century. We’re being conned.

Morano: This is a huge opening for Trump. They need to ridicule what Harris has said and done. Remember, she was the one who said climate change was the root cause of immigration on the southern border, and she actually went down to investigate. They can’t let her get away with this.

Gov. Tim Walls, by the way, is the exact same way. He was actually —  going back a decade — trying the same tactic of avoiding climate change by telling Minnesotans to support then Pres. Obama’s climate bills because ‘we would all be rich from it’ — they’re all emphasizing this fake government-supported green jobs so-called, and they’re getting labor unions involved and the ideas we’re going to subsidize through trillions of dollars. Remember, the Inflation Reduction Act was only a couple hundred billion dollars, but now the latest estimates are without Congressional authorization of spending of over $1 trillion and rising. So this money is being pumped in. That’s how they’re trying to sell climate change now,  as some kind of cash scam for people to get rich off of.  No longer do we face the tipping point 12 years or the existential threat. They know the public’s not buying that scientific claptrap.

Morano: 2030 was AOC’s climate tipping point deadline, and the clock is ticking, but usually, when it expires, they cross it out and put a new date.

Rachel Campos-Duffy: Tick-tock, tick-tock. Thank you, Marc. So great to have you on.

Morano: Thank you, Rachel. Appreciate it.

RELATED ARTICLES:

NYT: ‘Harris Goes Light on Climate Policy. Green Leaders Are OK With That’ – ‘If she takes a strong position on climate…it will make her look too progressive’

Harris-Walz push ‘climate silence’! WaPo: ‘Why Democrats are so quiet about climate change right now’ –

Dem ‘Party leaders appear to have calculated that climate silence is the safest strategy’ as ‘most voters rank other issues as more important’

‘Third Rail’: Here’s Why Team Kamala Isn’t Peddling The Typical Dem Climate Panic This Election – Morano: ‘No one is buying their ‘climate emergency’ claptrap anymore’

Shhhh. Despite climate silence, Harris Planning ‘Bold Action’ on Climate Change, Adviser Says

Kamala Harris Barely Mentioned Climate at the DNC

Harris, Walz frame climate change in context of ‘freedom’ as only ‘glancing references to climate’ made by Harris & Walz – ‘Climate was muted’

Watch: Interior Sec. Deb Haaland says Kamala Harris will ‘fight climate change’ in speech to DNC

Climate is missing from climate groups’ $55 million ad splurge! – Part of new ‘strategy from Democrats & allies’ –

Ads ‘don’t mention climate change or global warming’

Harris & Walz Are ‘Climate Champions’ Says Former Obama EPA chief Gina McCarthy

Harris’ VP Pick Walz Has Pushed Green Energy Mandates More Aggressive Than Gavin Newsom’s – ‘Walz signed over 40 climate-related initiatives into law’

©2024. Marc Morano from Climate Depot. All rights reserved.

List of 59 Corporations that Fled San Francisco — Now We Wait on the San Andreas Fault to Shift!

Over 50 major corporate company headquarters have left the Communist controlled city of San Francisco since Comrade Newsom and the local Communist government implemented a Marxist ideology popular in Cuba and Venezuela, thus draining this once prosperous beautiful city of significant tax revenues.

So who will fund the city government of San Francisco once all the free market capitalist entrepreneurs that fund these bottom feeding none producing government Marxist leaches have left?

Will Governor Newsom fly back to Communist China for another vacation using global warming as an excuse for a trip and ask for another possible loan from his Commie pals to bail out San Francisco ? It’s a possibility right ?

Under it’s current socialist government led by people many of whom were not even born in the USA, San Francisco is now a filthy third world, nasty bio hazard of a city buried in massive debt.

Future Dirty Harry movies will need to be made in another location with hills that are not filled with human feces, homeless Meth-heads and deteriorating infrastructure useless now for filming exciting car chases.

In my opinion God is playing a significant role here creating conditions for all these good people that create jobs and opportunities for Americans to get them out of this decrepid third world city before He unleashes the biggest earthquake in the history of mankind.

This massive earthquake is going to happen mark my words, it’s just a matter of time and luckily all these corporate headquarters listed below and their precious employees and staff will have relocated out of San Francisco and thus will not suffer the economic and personal losses soon to be incurred by such a horrific disaster.

These capitalist job creating entrepreneurs listed below have said goodbye to San Francisco.

  1. X formerly named Twitter moving to Texas
  2. Expensify – moving to Oregon
  3. Hero Digital moving to Illinois
  4. Fireside moving to Florida
  5. Skillz moving to Nevada
  6. Kelly – More Paints moving to Texas
  7. Tesla moved to Texas
  8. Redaptive – moved to Colorado
  9. InBenta moved to Texas
  10. Garcia Hand Picked – multiple states not CA
  11. McAfee moved to Texas
  12. Blue Vine moved to New Jersey
  13. All Spring Global Investments moved to NC
  14. Trimble moved to Colorado
  15. Virta Health Corp moved to Colorado
  16. American Airlines – multiple locations not CA
  17. Belong – moved to Florida
  18. Chevron – moved to Texas
  19. Aviatrix – moved to Texas
  20. Sandeso business software – moved to Arizona
  21. Hyperion – moved to Ohio
  22. FICO moved to Montana
  23. First Foundation Bank – moved to Texas
  24. Flexible Funding – moved to Texas
  25. Global Foundries – moved to New York
  26. HomeLight – moved to Arizona
  27. NinjaOne – moved to Texas
  28. AECOM – moved to Texas
  29. Smart Wires Incorporated – moved to NC
  30. I fly.vc – moved to Texas
  31. Wiley X – moved to Texas
  32. Landing – moved to Alabama
  33. Snowflake Security Exchange – moved to Montana
  34. Education Media Foundation – moved to TN
  35. Harmonate – moved to Texas
  36. Viavi Solutions – moved to Arizona
  37. Align Technology – moved to Arizona
  38. Digital Realty – moved to Texas
  39. OPSWAT – moved to Florida
  40. Charles Schwab – moved to Florida
  41. Oracle – moved to Texas
  42. Tanium Cyber Security – moved to Washington
  43. Hewlett-Packard enterprise – moved to Texas
  44. 8VC – moved to Texas
  45. CBRE Investment Group – moved to Texas
  46. Arctic Wolf – moved to Minnesota
  47. Pabst Brewing – moved to Texas
  48. O.W. Lee outside furniture – moved to Texas
  49. Incora – moved to Texas
  50. Palantir – moved to Colorado
  51. Dhasan Zone Solutions – moved to Texas
  52. Varo Bank – moved to Utah
  53. File Trail – moved to Texas
  54. Sign Easy – moved to Texas
  55. Finical – moved to Texas
  56. XO Jets – moved to Florida
  57. ASGN Incorporated – moved to Virginia
  58. Question Pro – moved to Texas
  59. Norton Life Lock – moved to Florida

This list does not include all of the restaurants that have closed and hotels, mom and pop stores, supermarkets, clothing stores etc.

As the illegal immigrants move into San Francisco looking to take jobs from Americans they will be disappointed to see no jobs exist for them.

It’s just a matter of time when the San Andreas fault slides north on its pacific plate and the employees of all these awesome companies that relocated out of San Francisco will be safe. The buildings that once housed these companies will rock and shudder and tremble and collapse into a pile of dust and debris, the final curtain falling on what was once one of America’s greatest cities.

Then the Communist dictator Governor Newsom and his Marxist local and state governments will be begging President Trump in 2025 for federal aid and FEMA disaster assistance, funded once again by us the free market hard working capitalists and entrepreneurs that Democrat Communists despise.

God is in control. His hand of protection soon to be lifted from this cesspool city of Communists. My advice to San Francisco Democrats is buy more earthquake insurance. My advice to everyone else move far away from San Francisco.

©2024. Geoff Ross. All rights reserved.

The ‘Commie’ Harris Campaign explained in just 3 Articles

According to various reports, “Commie” Kamala Harris supports imposing a 25% tax on so-called “unrealized capital gains” along with hiking the corporate tax rate to 35%.

Unrealized capital gains tax means if you buy a stock for $100 and it goes up to $500 then back down to $50 you owe taxes on the $400 profit you never made.

Check out these articles related to “Commie” Harris’s campaign:

1. Kennedy family dumps their diapers after RFK Jr. endorses Trump

Democrats exploded in shock and anger after Robert F. Kennedy Jr. endorsed Donald J. Trump and the independent candidate’s own family threw him under the bus.

The warm and fuzzy feelings from Vice President Kamala Harris’ coronation ceremony at the Democratic National Convention were swept away by Kennedy’s Friday afternoon announcement in which he eviscerated the current incarnation of the party as something his father and uncle wouldn’t recognize.

2. Experts baffled by unrealized capital gains tax plan: ‘This is voodoo economics… it’s absolutely ridiculous’

Former CKE Restaurants CEO Andy Puzder is no fan of Democrat presidential candidate Kamala Harris’ radical tax proposals.

According to various reports, Harris supports imposing a 25 percent tax on so-called “unrealized capital gains” and hiking the corporate tax rate.

Speaking with Fox News about this agenda, Puzder cried foul.

“It would be devastating to the economy,” he said. “You’re going to give up revenue, you’re going to lose companies, we’re going to lose business.”

3. One in three jobs Biden admin announced over course of a year didn’t actually exist, revisions show

Over a third of the over 3 million jobs the Biden administration announced were added in initial reports between April 2023 and March 2024 did not actually exist, according to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).

Including monthly revisions, the Biden administration overstated the number of jobs in the U.S. economy by 1.18 million in the year through March, accounting for approximately 36% of the 3.24 million jobs initially claimed, according to data from the BLS calculated by the Daily Caller News Foundation. The massive revision, along with a disappointing July jobs report that showed the U.S. economy adding 61,000 fewer nonfarm payroll jobs than economists anticipated, has heightened fears of a recession.

“One of the few areas that President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris have been able to crow about since they took office has been employment,” an analysis of the revision performed by conservative advocacy group Committee to Unleash Prosperity stated. “But now we learn that much of this was a statistical illusion.”

©2024. Royal A. Brown III. All rights reserved.

RELATED VIDEOS:

This is the best 60 second video about the Dems hypocrisy on the internet right now!

Watch RFK. Jr’s Epic Speech in Arizona as he joins the MAGA Movement