Zohran Mamdani: A Polished ‘Progressive Muslim’ Driving Pro-Jihad Narratives and Hatred of Hindus

It is now confirmed that last week’s massive blast in India’s national capital was carried out by Islamic jihad suicide bomber Umar un Nabi, underscoring yet again that academic qualifications alone do not shield individuals from turning to jihad. For most Indians, it is hardly surprising that an educated and professionally established Muslim man turned out to be a terrorist. In fact, the average non-Muslim Indian is well aware of how a significant section of this community openly defends such suicide bombers. These so-called “moderate Muslims,” who do not shy away from acting as apologists for Islamic terrorists, are often found in the elite sections of society, both in India and abroad.

Many Western readers may not realize this, but New York’s newly elected Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s father was an educated Muslim academic known for openly sympathizing with jihadist narratives. Mahmood Mamdani, a Ugandan scholar, author, and political theorist of Indian origin, is widely respected in Islamo-leftist ideological circles as an outspoken intellectual specializing in decolonization studies. But there is much more to him. In his zeal to criticize Western interventions, colonialism, and global power structures, Mahmood Mamdani has repeatedly humanized terrorists and suicide bombers in his writings.

In his book When Victims Become Killers, Mamdani falsely alleges that Hindus committed genocide against Muslims in India. Historical records, however, clearly establish the opposite: Muslim invaders-turned-rulers began the genocide of Hindus over a thousand years ago. This brutality continued for centuries, and culminated in the run-up to India’s partition, through bloody anti-Hindu pogroms such as the Noakhali riots and the Calcutta killings. It did not end there; it continued for decades after partition in tragedies such as the mass massacre and exodus of Kashmiri Pandits. In his 2004 book Good Muslim, Bad Muslim, Mahmood Mamdani even argues that suicide bombers or fidayeen should be regarded as “soldiers.”

As the saying goes, the apple does not fall far from the tree. Zohran Mamdani appears to have inherited his admiration for Islamic jihadists from his father. Blatant Hinduphobia, anti-India disinformation, and antisemitism marked his entire mayoral campaign, while he carefully packaged himself as a “progressive Muslim.” In reality, Mamdani Jr. espouses a pro-jihad worldview, building his political career on Hindu hate, distortion of facts, and the propagation of lies to advance Islamic interests in the Western world, while cultivating sympathy for jihad-sympathizing Muslim populations through fabricated narratives of victimhood.

A vocal supporter of Palestinian “freedom fighters,” Mamdani once described the establishment of the Ram Mandir as “a celebration of the destruction of a mosque.” He is a well-educated man and fully aware of historical facts: the Ram Mandir was reclaimed after an Islamic invader demolished the original temple 600 years ago and built a mosque over its ruins. However, when history does not fit his narrative, Mamdani and his ideological allies conveniently overlook it.

The mayor-elect has also claimed, only months ago, that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi is a war criminal who “left no Muslims alive” in Gujarat after the 2002 riots. He conveniently omits the fact that the violence was triggered after hundreds of Muslims set a train on fire, burning alive 59 Hindu devotees of Lord Ram, including women and children. Mamdani hides these facts because they do not fit into his carefully crafted narrative of Muslim victimhood, which he sells easily to his gullible Western voter base.

Over the past ten years, the Gujarat Anti-Terrorism Squad has arrested several Islamic terrorists linked to ISIS and Al-Qaeda. There have also been numerous cases of rape, sexual exploitation, kidnapping, and forced conversion of Hindu women, including minors, in the state. So much for Mamdani’s claim that “no Muslims were left in Gujarat after 2002.”

Zohran Mamdani’s hatred for Hindus runs so deep that he once openly provoked his opponents to hurl abuse at the Hindus while leading an anti-Ram Mandir protest in New York in 2020. A now-viral video shows the New York mayor-elect leading a mob of protestors in Times Square, calling Hindus “harami” (bastards) and heaping abuses upon Lord Rama, who Hindus worship, and thus winning roaring approval from the large Muslim vote bloc he targets in his political calculations.

During a recent “emotional speech” in October, Mamdani accused his opponents of “racist, baseless attacks.” Yet the only thing baseless so far is his own anti-Hindu rhetoric and fabricated claims of Muslim persecution. Mamdani has made his Muslim identity the centerpiece of his political persona, which has helped him consolidate the Muslim vote bloc, much like London Mayor Sadiq Khan, who enjoys similar support from a unified community that votes collectively, regardless of individual preferences.

As long as Zohran Mamdani remains the mayor of New York, Hindus will have to live under the looming fear of targeted violence and attacks by jihad groups that the administration emboldened and shielded. And given the trajectory of his rhetoric, it would surprise no Hindu if, one day, he glorifies the Islamic suicide bomber involved in the recent Delhi blast and commemorates him as a “soldier” or “freedom fighter.” The Pakistan-backed terror outfit Jaish-e-Mohammad literally translates to “The Army of Prophet Muhammad,” after all.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Michigan-based Muslims planned series of jihad massacres, including one at Chicago Pride Parade

CAIR-Michigan claims anti-Sharia march aims to ‘distract’ over Trump-supported Gaza ‘genocide’

RELATED VIDEO: The Palestine Laundromat

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republised with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Did You Say, Obliterate?

The press has had a field day since an anti-Trumper inside the US intelligence community leaked a preliminary Defense Intelligence Agency assessment of the B2 bomber strike on Iran’s deeply buried uranium enrichment site at Fordo.

The New York Times, CNN, MSNBC, and others all selectively cited the preliminary report, labelled “low confidence” (a caveat they of course omitted to tell their readers), which said the strikes may only have inflicted moderate damage on Fordo.

To counter that, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth brought out the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Dan Caine, who gave an in-depth description of the attacks and the 16-years of preparation, intelligence, and weapons design that went into them.

Among the astonishing things we learned from General Caine was that the GBU-57 deep penetrating bomb used to attack the Iranian enrichment site had been specifically designed for this task.

The GBU-57 was not just some off-the-shelf bomb that the Pentagon decided to use in hopes it would work: it was designed to take out Fordo, and tested hundreds  of times in realistic environments to evaluate how well it would accomplish that task.

General Caine also revealed that the United States has been tracking Fordo since it first learned the Iranians were building a deeply-buried nuclear plant in 2009, and assigned two officers from the Pentagon’s Defense Thread Reduction Agency (DTRA) to monitor the site.

“In 2009, a [DTRA] officer was brought into a vault at an undisclosed location and briefed on something going on in Iran,” Caine said. “He was shown some photos and some highly classified intelligence of what looked like a major construction project in the mountains of Iran. He was tasked to study this facility, work with the intelligence community to understand it, and he was soon joined by an additional teammate.”

The two studied satellite photographs of the site during construction, equipping, and operations over the next fifteen years.

They studied the excavation equipment, the tailings, and the size of the ventilation shafts. Eventually they came to the conclusion that the United States had no conventional weapon that could penetrate the 250 feet of granite protecting the underground production halls and destroy them.

“They began a journey to work with industry and other tacticians to develop the GBU-57,” Caine revealed. “They tested it over and over again, tried different options, tried more after that — they accomplished hundreds of test shots and dropped many full-scale weapons against extremely realistic targets, for a single purpose: kill this target at the time and place of our nation’s choosing.”

Think about that for a second. For over fifteen years the United States has been tracking this one particular site in Iran, because it was crystal clear to most analysts that it was dedicated to making a nuclear weapon.

And yet, the intelligence community as a whole continued to assess, as Tulsi Gabbard told Congress in March, that Iran did not have a nuclear weapons program.

Either that was a massive subterfuge, or our intelligence community is peopled by political creatures who actually want to see Iran develop a nuclear weapon. Neither option is very pretty.

General Caine made clear that the military doesn’t do its own bomb-damage assessments, so he refrained from qualifying the success of Operation Midnight Hammer, leaving that for the intelligence community.

But he could say with confidence what he knew: the weapons were “built, tested and delivered properly; they were released on-speed and on-parameter; they were all guided to their intended targets; and the weapons all functioned as designed,” he said.

“We know that the trailing jets saw the first weapons function, and the pilot stated, ‘this was the brightest explosion that I’ve ever seen. It literally looked like daylight,'” Caine said.

Fordo’s weakness was its ventilation system. General Caine explained that the Iranians covered the main ventilation shafts with fresh “caps” of cement to thwart an attack just two days before the B2s struck.

But the US was ready for them.

“The cap was forcibly removed by the first weapon,” he said, “and the main shaft was uncovered. Weapons two, three, four, five, were tasked to enter the main shaft, move down into the complex at greater than one thousand feet per second, and explode in the mission space,” Pentagon jargon for the main uranium centrifuge enrichment hall 240 feet below ground.

“Weapon number six was designed as a flex weapon, to allow us to cover if one of the preceding jets, or one of the preceding weapons, did not work,” he said.

Six weapons were launched on each of the ventilation shafts, twelve in all, for a total of 360,000 pounds of steel and explosive.

“Unlike a surface bomb, you won’t see a surface crater,” General Caine explained, because they are designed to penetrate deeply before exploding.

“All six weapons, at each vent at Fordo, went exactly where they were intended to go,” Caine said.

If anyone wants to see just how much damage the US inflicted on Iran’s premier uranium enrichment facility, they were going to need a pretty big shovel, Secretary Hegseth added.

Meanwhile, the Israelis revealed their own list of targets destroyed.

In the twelve day campaign they crippled another enrichment plant at Natanz, the uranium conversion plant in Isfahan, and took out more than half of Iran’s long-range missile launchers.

They destroyed missile and drone production plants, pulverized multiple facilities where Iran was producing uranium enrichment centrifuges, as well as the secret bomb plant at Parchin, just south of Tehran, that the Iranians repeatedly refused to allow international inspectors to view.

In addition, they eliminated the top dozen nuclear weapons designers and engineers in Iran, and another dozen top military leaders in charge of the nuclear and missile programs. While they were at it, they leveled a dozen IRGC and bassij bases, and blew open the door of the regime’s main political prison, Evin.

In any ordinary sense of the word, the U.S. and Israel have obliterated Iran’s nuclear weapons program. Any attempt by the Iranian regime to reconstitute it in the coming years would constitute a transparent effort to acquire nuclear weapons.

The legend of Iran’s “civilian” nuclear program was buried once and for all during the 12-Day war.

I discuss this, as well as President Trump’s triumphant summit with NATO leaders in the Netherlands, on this week’s Prophecy Today Weekend.

As always, you can listen live at 1 PM on Saturday on 104.9 FM or 550 AM in the Jacksonville, Florida, area, or listen to the podcast later.

Yours in freedom.

©2025 . All rights reserved.


Ken Timmerman’s 14th book of non-fiction, THE IRAN HOUSE: Tales of Revolution, Persecution, War, and Intrigue, can be ordered by clicking here or by viewing my author’s page, here. 

Raising Olives in Provence, can be ordered by clicking here.

JD Vance Follows Through On GOP Convention Promise To Celebrate His Mom’s 10-Year Sobriety Anniversary At White House

Vice President J.D. Vance held a ceremony at the White House on Friday to celebrate his mother’s ten years of sobriety, the White House announced on Monday.

Vance’s mother, Beverley Aikins, celebrated her milestone in the Roosevelt Room alongside about two dozen family members. The vice president first proposed holding this celebration during his speech at the 2024 Republican National Convention, where he accepted the vice presidential nomination.

“I’m proud to say that tonight my mom is here, 10 years clean and sober. I love you, Mom. And, you know, Mom, I was thinking. It’ll be 10 years officially in January of 2025, and if President Trump’s okay with it, let’s have the celebration in the White House,” Vance said during the speech in July.

During the ceremony, Aikins received a ten-year medallion to commemorate her sobriety. Vance said he is “grateful” that the celebration could be held in honor of his mother in a Monday statement on X. “This year marks my mom’s 10th year of sobriety, and I’m grateful that we were able to celebrate in the White House with our family. Mom, I am so proud of you,” the vice president said.

Aikins currently works as a nurse at a recovery center near Cincinnati, Ohio, where she “devotes her life to her family and to helping Americans who are struggling with addiction,” according to a Monday press release from Vance’s office. The vice president’s mother advised those battling addiction “to reach out, to try to get help, and that recovery is hard, but it’s so worth it.”

His mother’s struggles with addiction were chronicled in Vance’s 2016 memoir, “Hillbilly Elegy.” Her addiction began when she took painkillers to ease headaches, which later led to her usage of the opioid Percocet and heroin. Vance was placed into the car of his maternal grandparents, James and Bonnie Vance, after his mother’s arrest when he was a child. Actress Amy Adams portrayed Aikins in the film adaptation of the memoir on Netflix.

Photographs from the ceremony show Vance and his mother smiling at the White House briefing room podium, hugging in the Roosevelt Room and standing outside of the White House with members of their extended family. His wife, second lady Usha Vance, and their three children were present.

AUTHOR

Nicole Silverio

Media reporter.

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

SYRIA GENOCIDE: Horrific Wholesale Slaughter Christians, Alawites, Druze By Muslim Terror Regime Continues As World Stays Silent

The Biden regime backed this new Syrian government by al-Qaeda Terrorist al-Jolani (Jawlani). He told the American people that Jawlani’s new government was going to serve all Syrians.

He even sent them ‘ humanitarian aid.’

Now Christians and non-Muslims are being rounded up en masse by the Biden-backed  Islamic regime in Syria.

RAMADAN KILLATHON: Muslim Terrorists in Syria Are Slaughtering Christians, Druze, Dragging Their Bodies Through the Streets

Biden’s State Department removed the $10 million reward for Abu Mohammad al Jolani, the Specially Designated Global Terrorist who leads Haytat Tahrir al Sham (HTS), which State describes as an Al Qaeda branch. The bounty on Jolani was removed as US Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Barbara Leaf met with him and other Hayat Tahrir al Sham leaders in Damascus on December 20.

I have no love for Assad but he protected Christians, Alawites. The Assad family, members of the minority Alawite sect, ruled Syria for over half a century until Assad was ousted late last year by jihad terrorists.

No Jews. No news. The only way this gets press coverage is if Israel takes this on to protect non-Muslim minorities. Then, the leftwing media axis can blame the Jews for the bloodshed.

AUTHOR

 

RELATED ARTICLES:

Beloved Moderate Rebels Accused Of Slaughtering Hundreds Of Civilians In Syria After Toppling Assad

MADNESS: Biden Regime Removes $10 Million Reward for Syrian Terror Leader Jolani

Backed By Biden, Syria’s New Supreme Leader: “We’re Coming For You, Jews.”

Biden-Harris Regime Supports Syrian Government Led by Former al-Qaeda Terrorist al-Golani

‘THERE WAS NOBODY’: Trump Shocked After Asking Freed Israeli Hostages If Anyone in Gaza Ever Showed Them an Act of Kindness, “NOT A SINGLE PERSON”

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Take Courage — Wait for the Lord

Fr. Thomas G. Weinandy, OFM Cap.: Courage, for Christians, is founded upon Jesus. Through His passion, Jesus has conquered sin and vanquished death – that which most frightens humankind.


In the Office of Readings recently, a second-century anonymous author exhorted his readers to “take courage.”  This counsel brought to mind an event from my distant past that still resonates as we begin this Advent season.

I was about to begin my doctrinal studies at King’s College, and it was dark when I arrived at our Capuchin friary in the borough of Peckham in southeast London.  When I was shown my room, I immediately looked out the window to see my view over the next three years.  Across the way, was a pub.  Blazing above its door, in big red neon letters, was the phrase: “Take Courage.”

One of the friars informed me that that pub sold a beer called “Courage,” and so the brewery’s motto, “Take Courage.” I took it as a providential sign as I was about to study for my D. Phil.  I also, over the years, imbibed a pint or two of Courage, though I found that it did not make me more courageous.

The phrase, “take courage,” contains within it the future, but not simply a neutral future, that of “the yet” still to be lived.  Rather, it looks to a future that will be fraught with challenges, risks, and even dangers.  In the face of these future menacing encounters, one must “take courage.”  The Courage brewing company is not alone in urging one to “Take Courage.” God Himself, throughout the whole of the Old Testament, exhorts the Jewish people to “take courage.”

Although Moses did not enter the Promised Land, a land that was occupied by other peoples, God declared to Moses: “Be strong and of good courage, do not fear or be in dread of them: for it is the Lord your God who goes with you.” (Deuteronomy 31:6)  Even though the future would be filled with many dangers, Moses was to take courage, for the Lord would be present at all times.

God also promised Joshua that, as he was with Moses, so now he would be with Him: “Be strong and of good courage; be not frightened, neither be dismayed; for the Lord your God is with you wherever you go.” (Joshua 1:9)

When Solomon inherited the kingly throne of David, God said that he would give him “discretion and understanding,” and therefore he is to “be strong and of good courage.” (1 Chronicles 22:12-13)

In these historical cases, these important individuals were not to be fearful of the future, but were to take courage in all circumstances because God would be with them at all times.

Moreover, the Psalmist prayed in hope that he would see the goodness of the Lord in the land of the living.  Therefore, he affirmed to himself: “Wait for the Lord; be strong, and let your heart take courage; yea, wait for the Lord.” (Psalm 27:13-14)

The Psalmist may have needed to await the future, but he did so courageously, for he awaited in the assurance of the Lord’s saving action.  Similarly, the saints were to “love the Lord,” for he preserves the faithful.  Therefore: “Be strong, and let your heart take courage, all you who wait for the Lord!” (Psalm 31:23-24)

Paul, in his epistles, continually exhorts his readers to be faithful to the Gospel.  This loyalty demands courage in the midst of trials and persecution.  Therefore, he urged the Corinthians: “Be watchful, stand firm in your faith, be courageous, be strong.” (1 Corinthians 16:13)

Among other things, courage demands watchfulness, lest one lose heart and forsake the faith.  Courage is the stalwart advocate of the Christian life.

Courage, for Christians, is founded upon Jesus.  Through His passion, Jesus has conquered sin and vanquished death – that which most frightens humankind.  Through faith in Jesus, Christians have been saved from sin and thus from the curse of death.  In His resurrection, Christians obtain eternal life.

Jesus can, therefore, truly proclaim to His apostles: “In the world you have tribulations; but be of good cheer, I have overcome the world.” (John 16:33)  Whatever tribulations that may come in the course of one’s Christian life, one can take courage in that Jesus has overcome them, and, therefore, one can be of good cheer.

Today, Christians, more and more, live in a world that is antithetical to what they believe.  This is especially so in Western secularized countries where Christianity is seen as hostile to the reigning Zeitgeist.  France has recently experienced a rash of church vandalism.  Similar instances have occurred in the United States and Canada.  But Christians, and particularly Catholics, are to take courage.

The future may not bode well for us.  We may be mocked, scorned, and ostracized for upholding and promoting Christian moral norms concerning abortion, sexuality, gender identity, and euthanasia. But with courage, we live in the good hope that ultimately Jesus and His gospel of life will prevail.  We are to wait upon the Lord.

Similarly, even within the Church, the faithful, both clergy and laity, must take courage.  Many theologians, bishops, Cardinals, synods, and even members of the Vatican at the highest level are advancing an agenda that is contrary to perennial theological and apostolic magisterial teaching, such as endorsing the moral legitimacy of adultery, fornication, homosexual acts, transgenderism, and women priests.

Once again, faithful Catholics, clergy and laity alike, must take courage.  We know, in faith, that such heterodox teachings will not prevail.  They have no future.  The future belongs to those who courageously hold fast to the faith.

To take courage is to hope in the future and that future is eschatological.  When Jesus returns in glory at the end of time, what courage sustained, what courage advanced, what courage died for will win the day.  In so doing, those who took courage, will drink courage’s reward – everlasting life.

The pub outside my window was declaring something more than the proprietor imagined.  Take Courage!

AUTHOR

Fr. Thomas G. Weinandy, OFM, Cap.

Thomas G. Weinandy, OFM, a prolific writer and one of the most prominent living theologians, is a former member of the Vatican’s International Theological Commission. His newest book is the third volume of Jesus Becoming Jesus: A Theological Interpretation of the Gospel of John: The Book of Glory and the Passion and Resurrection Narratives.

Critically Thinking about Experience

Should you automatically vote for the candidate with the most experience?

Although the Presidential election race has rightly taken front stage, there are several down-ballot races that are EXTREMELY significant. As a good example of these, I’m going to discuss a North Carolina contest. Don’t be fooled into thinking that this is just a NC matter!

There is almost universal agreement that the US K-12 education system is seriously distressed — so fixing it is a bipartisan issue. The problem is that almost no one is doing anything meaningful to address this extraordinarily important problem — until now. (BTW, School Choice is a great thing, but it will not fix this situation.)

Arguably one of the top twenty most important elections in the US is the contest for the NC Superintendent of the Department of Public Instruction (DPI: K-12 schools). The outcome there could have profoundly beneficial national — and even international — repercussions.

The GOP candidate, Michele Morrow, is a political novice (note that I did not say education novice). She is a mom with five children (and most of them were home-schooled), a long-time nurse, and a staunch Conservative Christian.

As an aside, here is a short video of Michele speaking at her local school board a few years ago — long before she decided to run for DPI Superintendent. Since this is an unscripted talk, it is a good representation of who she really is…

The Democrat candidate for NC DPI Superintendent is Maurice (Mo) Green, who is politically experienced. He is a lawyer, former superintendent of a large NC school district, and CEO of a Left-leaning organization.

There have now been a few debates between these candidates, and the mantra from Mr. Green is that he should be elected because he is the “experienced” option. (Watch a representative debate [below], and hear that for yourself. Also note who seems more competent.)

The question here is: should “experience” be the primary reason that a citizen votes for a candidate?

Let’s critically think about what “experience” is. Basically, it means that a person has done something before.

Let’s say you’ve never played golf, and you decide that (for health, social, etc. reasons) you’d like to become a competent golfer. You share this new aspiration with a neighbor, who has played golf 50± times. Since he clearly has much more experience than you do, should you accept his offer to give you lessons?

Hopefully, this analogy should make clear: experience — by itself — is NOT any assurance of competence. Your neighbor may never have broken 100, so is that the person you want giving you instructions about golf habits you should adopt?

Back to the NC Contest —

Interestingly, this NC contest reveals the types of concerns that any Critically Thinking voter should have about their own state’s education department…

Since Mr. Green is trumpeting his experience and leadership in NC K-12 education, the question to Critically Thinking voters is: is that a positive factor?

Let’s look closer at NC DPI, which is a system that has been run for years by credentialed experts with extensive experience, including Mo Green. What the question for NC voters is: are you happy with the results? This means considering that:

  1. NC DPI is having great trouble in not only recruiting but retaining teachers. (NC’s most recent annual attrition rate was over 10,000, the highest on record!)
  2. There were some 11,000 reports of violence last year in NC K-12 schools, again the highest on record. (Note: there were likely many more not reported.)
  3. Academic test results have been inferior. (Things are so bad that DPI is portraying results that show that less than sixty percent of NC students just have the minimum proficiency in their grades, as a positive thing! Look at the official DPI trends over the last twenty years to see the bigger, disturbing picture.)
  4. record number of parents are removing their children from NC public schools, and are now home-schooling them. (Some 100,000 children have now been taken out of the NC public school system and home-schooled.)
  5. DPI has allowed Progressive ideology like DEI, CRT, SEL, etc. to become thoroughly indoctrinated into NC children (e.g., here).
  6. There is no part of the DPI’s curricula that specifically teaches NC children how to be Critical Thinkers. Compare that to the fact that regarding SEL, DPI has webpages, has hired people to promote SEL, has professional training for teachers on SEL, etc. There is nothing remotely comparable to that for Critical Thinking!

These extremely troubling results are what has happened when we have put the education of our children in the hands of so-called experts with experience, like Mr. Green. Again: experience is only a positive thing when results are a success. That’s obviously not the case in NC, so we need to look for outside-the-box solutions.

This is exactly why Michele is running for NC Superintendent of DPI. Voting for her means business as usual at DPI is no longer acceptable.

  • She believes that DPI should have more emphasis on academics and be paying much closer attention to what is in the curricula. In doing so, DPI needs to scrub DEI, CRT, etc. from the curricula, as it is counterproductive and disruptive. These types of progressive messages increase violence and undermine teacher retention.
  • She believes that DPI should primarily be teaching our children HOW to think, not WHAT to think — as is happening now.
  • She believes that after emphasizing student academics and critical thinking, DPI will be much more successful at recruiting and retaining good teachers.
  • She believes that if DPI actually taught students what is promised in the Portrait of a Graduate (how to critically think, communicate, have empathy, etc.) DPI will not only reduce safety issues but will also increase teacher retention.
  • She believes that getting more money from the NC State Legislators would be a complete waste if it is just dumped into the current system. When Legislators see Michele’s DPI changes, it is highly likely that they will loosen the purse strings.

In short, Michele believes that DPI can provide a superior education productcompetitive with the best private schools, and better than the home-school option.

So the choice to NC voters is very simple and extraordinarily important.

Attorney Green is a proud and unrepentant part of the NC education establishment. Voting for him means that citizens are happy with how things are going at DPI, and that they want Mo of the same.

Voting for Michele means that citizens believe that NC K-12 public schools can provide an excellent education — but need an outside infusion of creativity to return NC schools to their past levels of performance.

The Bottom Line —

No matter where you live, please support this courageous, competent, conservative woman!

PS: Just so you don’t think this is all in my head, here is a fine piece about Michele, from a credible NC source, with no connection to me.


Here are other materials by this scientist that you might find interesting:

I now am offering incentives for you to sign up new subscribers!

Check out the Archives of this Critical Thinking substack.

WiseEnergy.orgdiscusses the Science (or lack thereof) behind our energy options.

C19Science.infocovers the lack of genuine Science behind our COVID-19 policies.

Election-Integrity.infomultiple major reports on the election integrity issue.

Media Balance Newsletter: a free, twice-a-month newsletter that covers what the mainstream media does not do, on issues from COVID to climate, elections to education, renewables to religion, etc. Here are the Newsletter’s 2024 Archives. Please send me an email to get your free copy. When emailing me, please make sure to include your full name and the state where you live. (Of course, you can cancel the Media Balance Newsletter at any time – but why would you?

Harris’s Confused Answer about Whether Israel Is Our Ally

In a recent interview with “60 Minutes,” Vice President Kamala Harris responded to a question about the U.S.-Israel alliance with what amounted to “more of a political answer than an answer of reality,” said Family Research Council President Tony Perkins.

Interviewer Bill Whitaker asked, “Do we have a real close ally in Prime Minister Netanyahu?” To this, Harris responded, “I think, with all due respect, the better question is do we have an important alliance between the American people and the Israeli people. And the answer to that question is yes.”

It shouldn’t be difficult for an American official running for president — not to mention one heartbeat away from the presidency — to affirm this country’s close relationship with both Israel and its leader, a relationship that every administration has respected since President Harry Truman recognized Israel’s independence in 1948. But, for Harris, encountering this question in a friendly media venue made her so uncomfortable that she had to rephrase the question into one she preferred to answer.

The roundabout nature of her reply led some commentators to interpret an implied negative to the first question. “That’s another way of saying no,” summarized National Review’s Jim Geraghty. “Heck of a way to mark the first anniversary of the October 7 massacre.”

“I never thought I would see someone running for president say something like this. This should automatically disqualify her from even running,” declared Rep. Mark Alford (R-Mo.) on “Washington Watch” Monday. “[It was a] tepid, disgusting answer that creates doubt and uncertainty between our relationship and Israel.”

“It does nothing but cast doubt on our relationship with the leadership of Israel,” Perkins agreed. “And if there is not a good relationship between the leadership of Israel and the United States, then there’s no good end.”

The fatal flaw in Harris’s reply is the natural connection between the people of Israel and their prime minister. In contrast to most countries in the Middle East, Israel maintains a parliamentary system where national leaders are popularly elected (with various coalition negotiations because no party holds a true majority in Israel’s multi-party parliament).

In effect, the people of Israel choose their prime minister at the ballot box. The Israeli prime minister then carries out constitutionally defined duties on behalf of the people, such as running the government and overseeing national defense. Harris’s insistence that the people of Israel are a close ally, but not their popularly elected head of government, is nonsense.

Harris appears to be running Biden’s playbook against Netanyahu. Throughout the year, Biden has conducted a whisper campaign against the Israeli prime minister, not-so-subtly suggesting that the White House would welcome a change of leadership in Israel to a government willing to countenance Biden’s failed strategy of Iranian appeasement and the fantastical ultimate aim of a two-state solution.

Distinguishing a nation’s regime from its people can be appropriate when a government is not popularly elected and its people are discontented with its governance. The Islamist regime in Tehran, which brutally suppresses its own people, comes quickly to mind as an example. But neither condition applies in Netanyahu’s case.

Not only has Netanyahu triumphed in election after election, but his policies are more popular now than perhaps at any other point in his long career. It turns out that the people of Israel likedhis decision to strike Hezbollah hard and fast, even while the Biden-Harris administration was impotently blustering about a ceasefire. In fact, Israelis are so fed up with the Biden-Harris administration’s apparent determination to rob them of victory that 83% agreed with Netanyahu’s decision to inform Washington only after terrorist leaders were killed. If an Israeli election were held today, polling suggests that Netanyahu enjoys twice the support of each of his top two rivals, and these rivals would most likely prosecute the war in a similar way to Netanyahu.

The basic problem is not that Netanyahu is the prime minister of Israel, but that the Biden-Harris administration does not approve of the policies that are good for (and popular among) the Israeli people. “They would rather have the votes in Michigan and Minnesota from the people in the Islamic community,” suggested Alford. “They’re [so] afraid of losing congressional seats and possibly electoral votes, that they are willing to turn their back on Israel.”

There is a longstanding alliance between the U.S. and Israel — both their people and their respective governments. But a small and vocal minority hate Israel and deny its right to exist. The power of these voters is accentuated by the closeness of the election and their concentration in important swing states, but that doesn’t mean that they represent the opinions of most Americans, nor that they should be able to dictate the policy of the U.S. government.

AUTHOR

Joshua Arnold

Joshua Arnold is a senior writer at The Washington Stand.

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2024 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

Biden: No Money for Flood Victims, $336,000,000 for ‘Palestinians’

Over $1 billion in aid for the terrorists since Oct 7.

Plenty of people have seen the short clip of Biden replying that there’s no more money left for Hurricane Helene victims.

BIDEN: “We’ve given everything that we have.”

“Are there any more resources the federal government could be giving them?”

BIDEN: “No.”

But there’s always more money for Hamas and the PLO who are occupying parts of the West Bank and Gaza.

After just wasting over $200 million on a failed Gaza aid pier, the Biden-Harris admin is dispatching over $300 million more in “humanitarian aid” to prop up Islamic terrorists.

The real devil however is in the details.

Today’s funding brings the total U.S. humanitarian assistance announced for the Palestinian people to more than $1 billion since October 2023.

Kill over 1,000 people, get over $1 billion. What Islamic terror group wouldn’t take that deal?

There’s always money for Islamic migrants and terrorists, but there’s never enough money for Americans.

AUTHOR

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Biden White House Communications Division Staffer Deletes Thousands of Radical Left, Anti-Israel Tweets

Tyler Cherry claimed they “do not reflect my current views. Period.”


A man recently promoted to the White House communications division is erasing thousands of his anti-Israel and anti-police tweets that outed him as a woke progressive, Fox News Digital reported Monday.

Tyler Cherry deleted nearly 2,500 tweets overnight Sunday according to Social Blade, an app that tracks user statistics on social media, after some of his posts reemerged recently and were strongly criticized.

These included such messages as “Cheersing in bars to ending the occupation of Palestine – no shame and f— your glares #ISupportGaza #FreePalestine.”

The post came in the middle of the seven-week long Operation Protective Edge in 2014, when Israel invaded Gaza to stop a constant rain of Hamas rocket fire into the country’s south, after the group’s terrorists committed a particularly brutal murder of three teenaged Jewish youths.

This particular tweet first resurfaced about a week after Hamas’ massacre of 1,200 people and abduction of 252 from Gaza envelope communities and a dance rave on October 7, 2023, setting off the current war.

At the time, Cherry was the Department of the Interior’s senior spokesperson. Neither he, the Interior Department nor the Biden administration responded to a Fox News request for comment on the old post.

A White House spokesperson did tell The Advocate, which advertises itself as “the world’s leading source of LGBT news and information,” that “Tyler is an invaluable member of our team who continues to deliver for the Department of Interior and the American people.”

Other kinds of posts that have angered conservatives blasted America in 2015 as  “a capitalistic police state motivated by explicit and implicit racial biases” and noted that “the modern day police system is a direct evolution of slave patrols and lynch mobs.”

In 2018, he called for the closing of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, which is in charge of preventing illegal immigration, a hot-button issue in the current election campaign.

After three years in the Department of the Interior, Cherry is now in charge of explaining President Joe Biden’s climate policies as an associate communications director.

On Sunday, he defended the deletions by saying he was a changed man.

“Past social media posts from when I was younger do not reflect my current views. Period. I support this Administration’s agenda – and will continue my communications work focused on our climate and environmental policies,” he posted to X.

While again not reacting to the content of the now-deleted tweets, House senior deputy press secretary Andrew Bates told Fox Digital Thursday that “We’re very proud to have Tyler on the team.”

EDITORS NOTE: This World Israel News column is republished with permission. All rights reserved.

VIDEO: Minute by minute in ‘Operation Arnon’

The movement secretly and in daylight to the buildings where the four abductees were kept. The fall of the IDF soldier Arnon Zamora in fighting to rescue three of them. The influx of hundreds of armed terrorists to the area. And the unusual permission given to the assault helicopters to land deep in the Gaza Strip. This is how the operation was conducted in which Noa Argamani, Almog Meir Jan, Shlomi Ziv and Andrey Kozlov were rescued

Thursday, 18:30: After careful planning, exercises and models, and advanced intelligence surveillance that lasted for many weeks, the political echelon approves the operation initially called “Summer Seeds”. The approval was done in a classified discussion, under heavy compartmentalization and waiting for the right moment.

Saturday, 10:00: Two central commando teams leap from several directions, when they are upset, towards the Nusirat refugee camp near the coast. The forces move in broad daylight secretly to the two buildings where the abductees were held, with thousands of Palestinians and hundreds of terrorists from the local Hamas battalion among them – who are not noticed. According to the Palestinians, the forces entered using a humanitarian aid truck – and Al Jazeera even published documentation of it with IDF vehicles, apparently from the moments after the operation. The IDF denied this, and also denied that they later used the American pier.

10:45 Special ground observations and technological surveillance means from Air Force aircraft detect that the area is clean and there is no suspicious movement in the two buildings, 3-4 stories. Noa Argamani was held in one of them and in the other the three other abductees, with Gazan families and armed guards.

10:50: The information and live documentation of the hundreds of meters long alleys that separate the two targets are transferred to the screens of the two security forces that commanded the operation from them: of the Shin Bet in the center of the country in the presence of the head of the service Ronan Bar and Chief of Staff Herzi Halevi, and of the Southern Command in Be’er Sheva, from where the commanding general directed the envelopment and rescue forces.

11:00: The two teams on the ground receive the “act” order that was personally approved in real time by the head of the Shin Bet and the Chief of Staff. They attack the buildings simultaneously and in full coordination, at the same second, to prevent the terrorists in the second target from discovering this – which would endanger the abductees.

11:10: While the elimination of the terrorists who guarded Argamani and the rescue goes relatively smoothly, the operation in the second building is much more complicated. Zamora’s commander’s team reports that he was injured in the exchange of fire. The fighters who eliminated the terrorists at that target take care of their commander and try to save him on the way out of the building, under increasing fire.

11:15: The announcement that everyone was waiting for is reported. “The diamonds are in our hands” – meaning, the stolen ones are with us.

11:20: Under the cover of the delay, dozens of terrorists gather around the building where the three hostages were held, and hundreds more armed men approach from all sides with RPGs, PK machine guns and Kalashnikov rifles. They run through the crowded alleys and the nearby market, crowded with thousands of Gazans.

11:22: The troops try to escape in the rescue vehicle, but it is hit by heavy fire and begins to falter. Major General of the Southern Command Yaron Finkelman then activates the rescue plan that was prepared in advance.

11:25: Air Force fighter jets and helicopters launch dozens of weapons at the terrorists in order to isolate the arena. Hundreds of fighters from the 7th Brigades, the Paratroopers, Givati, and Kafir who were stationed as reinforcements are jumped on foot as well as in tanks and anti-aircraft guns into the refugee camp, and navy ships are covering from the west.

11:30: The reinforcement forces and the air force manage to isolate the main battle scene, thus providing a safe escape route for the main force with the three hostages. The Southern Command abnormally authorizes Air Force attack helicopters to land for rescue deep in the Gaza Strip, covered by the fire of fighter jets. The fire from the air hits the terrorists, tens of meters from the soldiers.

11:50 The last fighters from the special forces get on the helicopters that take off to the hospitals in Israel. Attempts to revive Commander Arnon Zamora continue even in the air, but at the hospital they are forced to declare his death. The reinforcements from the IDF brigades continue to engage the terrorists in the shell of the operation – and eliminate dozens more of them, until the end of the operation.

13:33: The IDF, the Shin Bet and the police officially announce the rescue of the four abductees, and spontaneous celebrations begin – both in Israel and among Israelis abroad.

EDITORS NOTE: This Newsrael column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

MUST-SEE VIDEO! Arnon Zmora – The Hero of a Legendary Hostage Rescue Operation

The recent rescue operation will be spoken about for years to come. Military analysts will dissect the mission and wonder how Israeli intelligence got such accurate information and how Yamam fighters exhibited such amazing precision.

After spending 230 days in captivity, four Israeli hostages were simultaneously rescued from two adjacent apartment buildings on different floors by the Israeli counterterror squads with cooperation from the Air Force and Navy.

Tragically, Arnon Zmora a battle-hardened veteran was mortally wounded during the high-stakes operation and later died in the hospital leaving behind a wife with two young children as he gave his life for the safety of others.

EDITORS NOTE: This UNITED WITH ISRAEL column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

‘No Tech For Apartheid’: Google Workers Protest Company’s Services To Israel

A group of Google employees protested Tuesday in California and New York against the information technology corporation’s provision of cloud computing services to Israel, according to reports.

The protesters in Google’s Sunnyvale, California location entered the office of Google Cloud CEO Thomas Kurian Tuesday morning and said they would leave only if Google would withdraw from Project Nimbus, a $1.2 billion joint contract with Amazon to provide cloud services and data centers to the Israeli government, the Washington Post reported.

A similar protest took place in a common space within Google’s New York office, Zelda Montes, one of the protesters, told the outlet. A banner reading “Google Worker Sit-In”, “Against Project Nimbus”, and “No Tech for Genocide” hung above the common space, the outlet revealed.

A protester wore a T-shirt sporting the slogans “Googler against Genocide” and “No Tech for Apartheid” according to Gizmodo.

The provision of public cloud services to the Israeli government is the first of five “central layers” of the “multi-year, large-scale flagship project” that started in 2019, according to Israel’s Government Procurement Administration. Google and Amazon shrugged off Microsoft, Oracle and IBM, the other tenderers who also bid for the contract, in Apr. 2021, Reuters reported.

Protests from within Google and Amazon have erupted in various forms since then. More than 90 Google employees and more than 300 Amazon employees collectively signed an anonymous Oct. 2021 letter accusing the companies of “aggressively” pursuing military and law enforcement contracts that “are part of a disturbing pattern of militarization, lack of transparency and avoidance of oversight.” They called on both companies to “pull out of Project Nimbus and cut all ties with the Israeli military.”

Two months after Hamas’ Oct. 7, 2023 terror attack on Israel, workers staged a “die-in” at Google’s downtown San Francisco offices to protest against Israel’s reported use of what appeared to be a separate artificial intelligence program—termed “the Gospel”—in its military response to Hamas, according to the San Francisco (SF) Chronicle.

Google fired an employee who heckled the corporation’s top executive in Israel during a conference in New York in March, leading Montes to contemplate the possibility of being fired, too, according to the Washington Post report. “I have been waiting for months for people to be in the same position as me and be ready to put their job on the line,” Montes told the outlet in part.

Montes also reportedly alleged that Google lied to its employees about Project Nimbus.

Google spokesperson reportedly told the SF Chronicle that Project Nimbus was a public service program, not a military one.

AUTHOR

JOHN OYEWALE

Contributor.

RELATED ARTICLES:

“Kill All Jews” at Google Leads to Anti-Jewish Google Employees ARRESTED While Occupying CEO’s Office With Terrorist Demands

Hamas Applauds Ex-Google Employee Who Resigned Over Company’s Israel Ties

Police Enter Google Offices, Arrest Nine Employees After Some Refuse To Leave Google CEO’s Office For Hours

Video Appears To Show Pro-Palestinian Activist Shoving Israeli Arab At Columbia University

Biden Admin Funded Study Involving Researcher From Iranian University Linked To Nuclear Program

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

GOP Leader Urges Party: ‘Stop Using the A-word and Start Talking about Life’

The closer we get to November, the more high-profile Republicans are admitting it: Silence isn’t selling on abortion. From RNC Chair Ronna McDaniel to the head of the House’s GOP fundraising arm, the cry to get off the sidelines on life is echoing off the walls of campaign headquarters. Lt. Governor Mark Robinson (R-N.C.) is the latest to join the chorus of conservatives, telling candidates to “stop being cowards and stand up for what you believe.” But know this first: the problem is as much about how the GOP is messaging as whether they do.

“I’m tired of talking about abortion,” the candidate for governor told reporters. The “a-word,” as he calls it, is what sent the party in a tailspin to begin with. “I’ve changed what I’m saying,” he told Family Research Council President Tony Perkins. “Democrats, the leftists, they want everyone to say the word ‘abortion.’ They want our children to say it in schools. They want us to say it in our churches. They want politicians to say it on the floor of the House and on the floor of the Senate. They want me to say it. As the lieutenant governor, I’m bound and determined to stand up for what I believe in. And what I believe in [is] life — and it’s time for us to start using that word. This is an issue of life, about protecting life, and then about doing what we can to elect officials to make sure that once those lives come into the world, that they have life and have it more abundantly.”

His intentional shift raised the antenna of local media, who’ve started reporting that Robinson is trying to duck the issue now. Baloney, he replies. “They think that I’ve changed my position,” he said. “I have not changed my position.” Instead, he’s doing what he believes every pro-lifer should do: he’s changed the terms. “The subject is not abortion,” the lieutenant governor insisted, “the subject is life.” And that’s where conservatives need to debate.

Perkins nodded emphatically. The FRC president has also called for a shift in language, drawing America’s attention back to the unborn baby, not the procedure. Of course, that’s become more difficult, the “Washington Watch” host pointed out, since Republicans let Democrats define the terms when “so many were just silent.” Now, he shook his head, they’ve “started stuttering.” “We need to go out and tell people what we’re for. We are for protecting the unborn and preserving a culture of life in this country.”

Bringing the conversation back to life also extends an arm to women, Robinson wanted people to know. “… [W]hen I speak, I want to be that person who’s there, who’s understanding. I want to be the person who’s … not up on a platform telling the young woman why she can’t have an abortion. I want to be that person who’s coming down, putting my arm around that young woman who may find [herself] in crisis, and telling them why she doesn’t have to have an abortion… [and that] our folks as elected officials [are] going to fight hard to make sure that you can bring that child into the world — and not only bring that child into the world, but have a great life for that child, yourself, and your family.”

It’s exactly the kind of message he and his wife needed to hear when they were struggling with an unexpected pregnancy before they were married. “My wife and I chose the route of abortion years ago,” he admitted, “and I cannot tell you the immense pain, the solid pain that we went through for so many years over this issue. It was just this unspoken thing that hurt both of us very deeply. And we have always regretted it, almost to the point where we just couldn’t even speak to one another about it because it was so painful.” But the difficulty of reliving that choice hasn’t stopped Robinson from sharing what they’ve been through. “We want to tell those stories to young people.” In fact, “It’s because of this experience and our spiritual journey that we are so adamantly pro-life,” he’s said.

Since that conscious decision to open up about it, the Robinsons have been amazed to see “how God used that to reach so many people who felt the exact same way, to encourage them to keep going and to know the mistakes that they made are shared by so many of us.”

And the beauty of that, Perkins added, is that when you do share it, “Yes, there’s pain, there’s guilt — it still bothers you — but there’s forgiveness. And that’s the good news of Jesus Christ in the gospel message, is that we don’t have to carry that burden. We don’t want others to do it, but we don’t have to carry that burden any longer.”

That’s exactly right, the lieutenant governor agreed. “That’s one of the best things about giving your life to Jesus Christ, you know when Jesus forgives. It’s a forgiveness that you can feel down deep in your soul. … But I would definitely warn anyone, any young person out there, do not take this issue lightly. Do not take this issue lightly. It haunts, it hurts, and it causes deep emotional distress.”

But the abortion crisis didn’t start overnight, he pointed out, and Republicans can’t end it overnight. “Educating our young people is going to be crucial,” Robinson urged. “You want to empower a young person? Empower that young person to know the greatest thing that they can do for their future is hold control of their body and make sure that they’re not falling into those traps that popular culture is pushing so many of them into. That’s real empowerment. That’s real progress.”

That’s not a message North Carolina is hearing form its current governor, Perkins half-joked. Roy Cooper (D) has embraced the radical agenda of the Left on everything from abortion to transgenderism. And yet, his challenger says, “People love [my] message. They love it.” So what advice would he give conservatives who are running from the issue?

“The number one thing I would tell them to do is to stop listening to the bad reports of CNN, CBS, and ABC and all those news agencies that are using this issue to try to browbeat Christian, Bible-believing conservatives. That’s number one. The second thing that I would say is, quite frankly, stop being a coward and stand up for what you say you believe in. It’s time for the people of this nation to realize who we are.” Look, he said, “America’s survival is at stake” in this election. “We need to make our stands strong — and it starts with us standing up for what’s right.” Without apology.

AUTHOR

Suzanne Bowdey

Suzanne Bowdey serves as editorial director and senior writer at The Washington Stand.

RELATED ARTICLE: WHO Chief: Nations Must ‘Counteract Conservative Opposition’ to Abortion, Promote Transgenderism

RELATED VIDEO: Sarah Gabel Seifert Reveals How Women Have Been Lied to About Abortion and Birth Control

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2024 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

IRS Criminal Investigators Subjected to Woke Training Featuring Black Trans Prof., Dalai Lama

Federal agents charged with investigating money laundering, public corruption, counterterrorism, and narcotics trafficking at the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) were pulled from their critical duties to endure woke training that directs them to operate in a culturally inclusive environment and speak up for multiple social identities. The drills focused on equity, diversity, inclusion and justice and instructed agents from the specialized IRS Criminal Investigation (IRSCI) unit to question how much they know about different cultural norms and mores and challenged them with the following inquiries: “Are you prepared adequately to accommodate different cultural expectations and practices?” and “Can you deliver cultural inclusion behaviorally?” The course’s introduction, titled “Cultural Inclusion is About Justice,” was provided by a black transgender professor who asserts in an academic article that the high impact of “whiteness” oppresses trans college students.

Judicial Watch obtained and reviewed material from the controversial special training presented to IRSCI agents as part of mandatory continuing professional education for all staff. A source connected to the Washington D.C. field office provided slides from the specific presentation in that division, which has dozens of agents that investigate crimes throughout the capitol area, including Maryland, Virginia, and West Virginia. Federal agents—as well as the special agent in charge of the D.C. office—working on high-profile probes involving bribery, embezzlement, illegal kickbacks and dismantling the country’s major drug and money laundering organizations were reluctant to be yanked from their important work to participate in the woke training. “They want us to consider people’s race,” said a veteran investigator whose identity cannot be disclosed. “Criminals don’t discriminate. White collar criminals are mostly what IRSCI goes after.” And they are a diverse bunch, according to government sources interviewed by Judicial Watch.

Nevertheless, in this heated environment of political correctness many government agencies are implementing official woke initiatives under a Biden executive order to advance racial equity and support for underserved communities through the federal government. That includes subjecting government workers to similar equity, diversity, inclusion, and justice training as well as establishing special programs to help the targeted audience. The Department of Justice (DOJ) has formulated a strategy to “advance equity for marginalized and underserved communities” that, among other things, directs federal prosecutors to ignore maximum sentencing under the law to “avoid unwarranted disparities.” The Department of Labor has dedicated $260 million to promote “equitable access” to government unemployment benefits by addressing disparities in the administration and delivery of money by race ethnicity and language proficiency. The Treasury Department named its first ever racial equity chief, a veteran La Raza official who spent a decade at the nation’s most influential open borders group. The list goes on and on.

The IRSCI training is part of that expansive woke agenda. Criminal investigators at the nation’s tax agency were taught about cross-cultural competence in a section that questioned their cultural behaviors, values, biases, preconceived notions, and personal limitations. “Do you understand the worldview of your culturally different customers/colleagues without negative judgements?” one slide asks. “Can you develop relevant and sensitive intervention strategies and skills with your culturally different customers/colleagues?” Keep in mind these are federal law enforcement agents investigating the perpetrators of serious crimes, not public relations, or human resources representatives. It is difficult to understand how they benefit from this type of training, which also featured a “cultural perceptions” discussion that covered how Mexicans and Taiwanese describe people in the U.S. Answers include rushed, reserved, hard-headed, unemotional, independent, and self-indulgent.

A slide focusing on projection bias includes a quote from the Dalai Lama, the infamous Buddhist monk and Tibetan spiritual leader who recently ignited global outrage after kissing a child on the lips at an event in northern India then asking the boy to suck his tongue. Adjacent to the Dalai Lama’s banner is a deep quote from a diversity, equity and inclusion strategist who claims to be an expert on cultural, racial, religious, gender, generational and sexual orientation. Her message to IRS criminal investigators is “I am not culturally different from you. I am culturally different like you.” Cultural exclusions are discussed in a slide featuring a photo of a black woman who claims wearing her hair naturally was the only thing that defined her in the office and another black woman who refrains from conversations in the office about famous black people to avoid a negative affiliation. A Latina woman says that she tries “not to be regularly seen with other Latinx employees on staff” to avoid a negative association.

See slides below:

Slide 1

Slide 2

Slide 3

Slide 4

Slide 5

Slide 6

Slide 7

Slide 8

Slide 9

Slide 10

Slide 11

Slide 12

RELATED ARTICLE: Records Show Joe Biden Used Email Alias in Correspondence which Included Hunter Biden and James Biden; Signed Off on Brief Cessation of Secret Service Protection for Hunter and Natalie Biden

VOX Deputy Rocío de Meer speaks the plain truth about Islamization of Spain—Except for one thing!

What a shame that even by her own admission, it is too late to do anything about it.

On the other hand, that is a lie.

There is always something you can do.

It’s just that the longer you wait to solve a problem, the more draconian, expensive and unpleasant the solution becomes. So one wonders if her use of the word, “unstoppable” two times in this video isn’t really a kind of predictive programming. She didn’t say the solution would be difficult. She said there isn’t one. That should ring alarm bells in the rest of the VOX.

After all, in political warfare, you beat the enemy in no small part by disinforming them.

And it should be clear to all by now, that Covid, the Vaxx, and a large number of other narrative attacks including multiculturalism have been political warfare attacks by what appear to be our own governments against what are our own people.

Read the full story in the RAIR Foundation article Minarets In, Bell Towers Out: VOX Deputy Rocío de Meer Sounds Alarm on Spain’s Islamization in the Shadow of a New Mega Mosque

EDITORS NOTE: This Vlad Tepes Blog column with video posted by Eeyore is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.