CULTURAL TERRORISM: The War On Parents Is Heating Up

The War on Parents is heating up.  A public middle school in Connecticut suspended a school nurse for revealing online the school was secretly gender-transitioning kids without their parents’ knowledge.  The nurse said the school was giving puberty blockers to kids and starting the process of confusing kids about their gender in kindergarten.  Teachers, social workers, and school administrators are all part of the program.  In suspending the nurse, the school said some remarkable things:  It is the school’s job, not the parents’ job, to be the caretakers of children. Further, schools and not the parents must provide for the health, well-being, and social and emotional development of children.  That’s just stunning.  The job of the parents, I guess, is to just shut up and pay the taxes that make all this insanity possible.  Not to mention, as ‘birthing persons’, to turn out new lab rats for professional left-wing activists’ social engineering experiments.

Connecticut isn’t the only place where this insurrection is taking place.  New reports have come in about public schools in New Jersey forcing students to learn about transgender hormone therapy without their parents’ knowledge or consent, and secret gender-transitioning occurring in schools in California, Wisconsin, and Florida.  Federal support for this began in the Obama administration.  The Biden administration just yesterday picked up where Obama left off, affirming puberty blockers and irreversible sex-change surgery for children.

In Texas, the state Attorney General informed the Austin school district it was breaking state law by holding Pride Week events that provided sex education to students without parental consent.  The schools encouraged students to keep the content of the instruction secret from their parents.  “What we say in this room stays in this room,” pre-K through second graders were told. The schools fired back against the Attorney General, telling him they want their “LGBTQIA+ students to know that we are proud of them and that we will protect them against political attacks.”

So public schools in Texas and Connecticut are NOT SORRY for driving wedges between children and their parents, or for signing kids up for political agendas, specifically, the sexual revolution and the fundamental transformation of this horrible rotten place we call America. Public schools in Eau Claire, Wisconsin aren’t sorry, either.  According to them, parents are not entitled to know about their child’s sexuality at all, UNLESS the parents are fully on board with the schools’ left-wing agenda to completely destroy society in order to save it.  If the parents will support the political agenda, then and only then can they be brought into the loop and be told about their children.

Here are the consequences of keeping parents in the dark and claiming it’s not their job to worry about the mental health of their children:  A California teen committed suicide after being coached by her high school on how to get hormone treatment and sex-change surgery when she should have been referred for treatment for her depression.  The mother blames the school, which kept everything secret, for her daughter’s death.

Anybody who opposes any of this insanity is branded a domestic terrorist by our federal government.  Schools in Fairfax County, Virginia asked for proposals to collect intelligence on parents.  The contract calls for monitoring social media posts, identifying parents by their real names, and mapping out all their associations.  The funny thing about Fairfax is, all the school board members are professional left-wing activists.  There is not even one parent on that school board.

Are you starting to get the picture?  I’ve documented several times the communist roots of all this. I’ll tell you who the real terrorists are – professional left-wing activist teachers, school administrators, and school board members who will stop at nothing – even espionage – to pursue their left-wing agendas and tear everything down until there’s nothing left.  It’s no accident communist theorists like Herbert Marcuse and Wilhelm Reich were the ones who ushered in the sexual revolution.  And it’s no accident another communist theorist Georgi Lukacs called it “cultural terrorism”.

None of this has anything to do with education or children’s well-being.  it all has to do with a communist program to destroy America.   If that doesn’t bother you, and you just keep sitting on your couch eating bonbons, I guarantee you, pretty soon, you won’t have an America left to eat bonbons in.

Visit The Daily Skirmish and Watch Eagle Headline News – 7:30am ET Weekdays

©Christopher Wright. All rights reserved.

The ‘Laptop from Hell’ Burns Our Devilish Elites

UPDATE: The Left Admits Hunter Biden’s Laptop From Hell is Real.


The pretend-media buried the Hunter Biden laptop story before the 2020 election. Poll results now show almost half of Americans believe Trump would have been re-elected if the media hadn’t suppressed the story.  Among media sources guilty of hiding the story were CNN’s Brian Stelter, other CNN analysts, Twitter, Facebook, and MSNBC.

They parroted the line concocted by complicit Left-wing swamp creatures from the nation’s intelligence agencies who claimed the story was just “Russian disinformation” when they had no basis for saying so.  Fifty-one former intelligence officials signed a public letter to that effect in the month before the election.  Joe Biden relied on this letter in repeating the phony ‘Russian disinformation’ narrative in a presidential debate before the election.  The Biden administration has continued to push this line ever since.  NBC and the Washington Post were among many media outlets repeating the lie.  [more here]

But just recently, the New York Times admitted email evidence from Hunter’s laptop is real, not Russian disinformation.  The Washington Post has authenticated thousands of emails from the laptop giving the gory details about Hunter Biden’s influence peddling schemes in Ukraine and China.  The Washington Post story described how Hunter Biden and his uncle were paid almost $5 million by an energy company linked to the Chinese government.  The Post commented these facts “illustrate the ways in which his family profited from relationships built over Joe Biden’s decades in public service.”  CBS now also admits the scandal is real.

So where are the apologies for deliberately misleading the American public?  No apologies were forthcoming from the media which now has egg all over its face. And no apologies have been issued by the swamp creatures from the intelligence agencies.  Most are not talking, understandably, and some are doubling down. A former CIA agent isn’t sorry in the least. He bragged about it on Twitter:  “I take personal pride in personally swinging the election away from Trump.  You’re welcome.” The Assistant FBI director of cybersecurity claimshe doesn’t know where the laptop is.

You may not know where it is, Mr. G-Man, but the laptop is real and the scandal is real.  Hunter Biden’s problems are just beginning. Prosecutors are looking into his activities and some people believe he is close to indictment.  More on the extent of the Biden family corruption on another day, but we now see how the Left stacks its numerous capabilities on top of one another to keep scandals from breaking out and to put the American people to sleep with soothing phony narratives like ‘oh, that’s just Russian disinformation’.  Congressman Jim Jordan said, “the mainstream press, along with Big Tech and Democrats, all colluded to keep this important information from the American people just days before our most important election, the presidential election.”  That about sums it up.  Had enough from our arrogant elites, yet?  Or are you going to let them trick you into voting for this level of corruption again?   And if you like all these tricks because it means your side wins, there’s a special place in hell for you.

Visit The Daily Skirmish  and  Watch Eagle Headline News – 7:30am ET Weekdays

©Christopher Wright. All rights reserved.

PODCAST: Team Biden’s Endgame – “No USA At All”?

“No borders. No walls. No USA at all.” That’s the rallying cry – and the agenda – of the radical leftists who have worked with fellow travelers in the Biden administration to open America’s southern border.

Now, they are celebrating the announcement that Team Biden is going to remove at the end of May the last significant impediment to illegal entry to this country. A Covid-19 pandemic-related provision known as Title 42 will be dispensed with, clearing the way for millions of single men, many of them military age, to join the invasion now well underway.

Government officials from President Biden on down are violating their oaths of office. Far from protecting our Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, they are actively collaborating in those enemies’ efforts to ensure there is no USA at all. Will the rest of us tolerate such betrayals?

This is Frank Gaffney.

The Secure Freedom Minute – the most interesting, informative and life-saving 60 seconds of your day 

EDITORS NOTE: This Center for Security Policy podcast is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

‘The Gods of the Copybook Headings’ by Rudyard Kipling.

The Gods of the Copybook Headings” is a poem by Rudyard Kipling, characterized by biographer Sir David Gilmour as one of several “ferocious post-war eruptions” of Kipling’s souring sentiment concerning the state of Anglo-European society. 


Last weekend my wife and I were invited to our old friends Joe and Debbie Clarks lovely home in Plant City. They were members of the original Save America Foundation of which I was president. They drove a good distance to attend our monthly meetings in Clearwater, Florida. After an incredible dinner (Pig! Never saw one I didn’t wanna eat!) he bought the following out for me to read. Needless to say I was fascinated and was impressed with the work this patriot had done. I asked him if I could publish it and he gracefully agreed I could. I hope all of you who take the time to read the poem and the analysis that is enclosed within the blog and enjoy it as much as I did. Great job Joe!

“It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere” – Voltaire

Interesting and relevant to the world today, this analysis of Kipling’s poem, the work of myself and several other individuals who also see it as a prediction of inevitable hills and valleys in the future of mankind. Written a hundred years ago but could have been written today about the United States.

The Gods of the Copybook Headings by Rudyard Kipling

As I pass through my incarnations in every age and race,

I Make my proper prostrations to the Gods of the Market-Place.

Peering through reverent fingers I watch them flourish and fall,

And the Gods of the Copybook Headings, I notice, outlast them all.

We were living in trees when they met us. They showed us each in turn

That Water would certainly wet us, as Fire would certainly burn:

But we found them lacking in Uplift, Vision and Breadth of Mind,

So we left them to teach the Gorillas while we followed the March of Mankind.

We moved as the Spirit listed. They never altered their pace,

Being neither cloud nor wind-borne like the Gods of the Market-Place.

But they always caught up with our progress, and presently word would come

That a tribe had been wiped off its icefield, or the lights had gone out in Rome.

With the Hopes that our World is built on they were utterly out of touch

They denied that the Moon was Stilton; they denied she was even Dutch

They denied that Wishes were Horses; they denied that a Pig had Wings.

So we worshipped the Gods of the Market Who promised these beautiful things.

When the Cambrian measures were forming, They promised perpetual peace.

They swore, if we gave them our weapons, that the wars of the tribes would cease.

But when we disarmed They sold us and delivered us bound to our foe,

And the Gods of the Copybook Heading said: “Stick to the Devil you know.”

On the first Feminian Sandstones we were promised the Fuller Life

(Which started by loving our neighbour and ended by loving his wife)

Till our women had no more children and the men lost reason and faith,

And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said: “The Wages of Sin is Death.”

In the Carboniferous Epoch we were promised abundance for all,

By robbing selected Peter to pay for collective Paul;

But, though we had plenty of money, there was nothing our money could buy,

And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said: “If you don’t work you die.”

Then the Gods of the Market tumbled, and their smooth-tongued wizards withdrew,

And the hearts of the meanest were humbled and began to believe it was true

That All is not Gold that Glitters, and Two and Two make Four —

And the Gods of the Copybook Headings limped up to explain it once more.

As it will be in the future, it was at the birth of Man —

There are only four things certain since Social Progress began —

That the Dog returns to his Vomit and the Sow returns to her Mire,

And the burnt Fool’s bandaged finger goes wabbling back to the Fire —

And that after this is accomplished, and the brave new world begins

When all men are paid for existing and no man must pay for his sins

As surely as Water will wet us, as surely as Fire will burn

The Gods of the Copybook Headings with terror and slaughter return!

Kipling, astute in his observation of human nature, in this poem he captures the past and future of the human race should man continue to arrogantly ignore the lessons learned by past generations and cast aside by the newest generation who are intent on destroying what past generations have built because future generations have always and will always see themselves as more intelligent and more educated than the forbearers who built the civilization they view with contempt.

The “Gods of the Copybook Headings” refer to the tradition of writing words of wisdom and morality on the top of pages of 19th century student notebooks.  These headings were used to practice penmanship, spelling, punctuation, vocabulary, comprehension and instill time tested wisdom and values in the student.

As I pass through my incarnations in every age and race,

I Make my proper prostrations to the Gods of the Market-Place.

Peering through reverent fingers I watch them flourish and fall,

And the Gods of the Copybook Headings, I notice, outlast them all.

An important thing to note as we begin is that the “Gods of the Market Place”,  are the latest progressive thoughts viewed by present day elites/intellectuals as more advanced, more intelligent than the old-fashioned  time proven principals that guided past generations to productive, fulfilling lives.

We were living in trees when they met us. They showed us each in turn

That Water would certainly wet us, as Fire would certainly burn:

But we found them lacking in Uplift, Vision and Breadth of Mind,

So we left them to teach the Gorillas while we followed the March of Mankind.

This clearly describes the tendency among newer generations to quickly abandon the source of knowledge, and fall into the trap that leads us to the conclusion that we are more intelligent than those who proceeded us and the standards that they used to achieve an elevated culture have become obsolete and no longer useful.  Instead of pursuing deeper studies of the world and history, we abandon proven dogma for the more  “visionary”.  The applications of this to modern society are uncountable.  The number of educators who insist on abandoning classical education that focuses on “How to Think” for the newest and popular educational fad, “What to Think”,

The “March of Mankind” humanity as a constant necessity to “progress” to some new stage, throwing out values and knowledge gathered by passed generations and recycling the destructive concepts of Marxism and Fabian socialism concepts that have proven over and over again to be destructive but for some reason never loose their allure.

We moved as the Spirit listed. They never altered their pace,

Being neither cloud nor wind-borne like the Gods of the Market-Place.

This is evidence that this poem is about the cycle of civilizations, and how it’s all very predictable.  As a society reaches increasing heights, it becomes more and more likely to lose touch with the fundamental values upon which it was built.  The story of 20th century United States is very telling.  The conclusion becomes that the basic knowledge of how societies work, while during long periods being forgotten, always returns, but not until a civilization has died, and a new one emerges.  We are currently living immediately prior to the period when the empire falls, and Western civilization ends.

With the Hopes that our World is built on they were utterly out of touch

They denied that the Moon was Stilton; they denied she was even Dutch

They denied that Wishes were Horses; they denied that a Pig had Wings.

So we worshipped the Gods of the Market Who promised these beautiful things.

Again, a reference to how culture goes from a dedication to the values that are the foundation of society, and how these traditions and values become “utterly out of touch”.  Instead people begin pursuing narcissistic dreams and fancies, completely ignoring the fundamentals that has enabled them to do so.  And along always comes politicians, the intellectuals, the merchants of ignorant dream-fulfillment and the lies that the masses want to hear.

When the Cambrian measures were forming, They promised perpetual peace.

They swore, if we gave them our weapons, that the wars of the tribes would cease.

But when we disarmed They sold us and delivered us bound to our foe,

And the Gods of the Copybook Heading said: “Stick to the Devil you know.”

The Cambrian Measures, the first period of the Paleozoic Era, another reference to the beginning of the principals that would bring success to human interaction.

This is an astonishing verse, which quite obviously refers to the fact that every time a brutal dictatorship like Nazi Germany, the Italian fascists or something similar has emerged, the first thing they do is take away the peoples means of protecting themselves (even though these two specific examples lie into the future when this poem was written),  Without guns, there will be no violence is what we are told.  They forget to tell us that the violence we should most fear is that which comes from the governing class.  Without the means to protect itself, a population will always be at risk of being sold into slavery by its masters.  The price we pay for avoiding being enslaved by the system, is having to face the possibility of every man being armed.  Freedom is not free, it requires that you are willing to take risks.  A promise of safety is a promise of future slavery.

On the first Feminian Sandstones we were promised the Fuller Life

(Which started by loving our neighbour and ended by loving his wife)

Till our women had no more children and the men lost reason and faith,

And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said: “The Wages of Sin is Death.”

Geological Time

The idea of social communism, where everyone shares everything, inevitably ends with you have to share even you wife.  This was in fact how Plato saw the ideal society, a communist state where all property was communal, including wives.  Another interpretation is how the idea that all should be shared and everyone equal, ends with nothing but more of the jealousy and moral decay that it was intended to stop.  Man is by birth a property of owner, claiming exclusive ownership of his own body.  Any negation of the principle of ownership negates the existence of a free society.  And being free to create and homestead all that which is previously unowned, man will in the end find himself not among equals, rather among other men which own in accordance to their capabilities, and their willingness to work.

The second last sentence is of great interest-“Till our women had no more children and the most lost reason and faith”.  This is in fact the stage that the West had found itself in.  Thanks to the destruction of traditional values, women are having fewer and fewer children.  Our dying western culture is becoming barren, and our homes are being taken over by other cultures.  Meanwhile the “men lost reason and faith”, which hardly needs any explanation if we simply look at how much honest work is being done, and how many dedicate their life to crime, destruction or decadent behavior and all becomes acceptable behavior by society.  Through the loss of our cultural heritage, we have lost that which makes us civilized, and the spiral downwards will continue.

Society, as we know it, is dying.

In the Carboniferous Epoch we were promised abundance for all,

By robbing selected Peter to pay for collective Paul;

But, though we had plenty of money, there was nothing our money could buy,

And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said: “If you don’t work you die.”

The reference to socialism hardly needs any further explanation.  What is interesting is the interpretation of “though we had plenty of money, there was nothing our money could buy”, which is a very astute observation of what happens when less and less or real value is produced.  Whether of not Kipling foresaw a future where money would become worthless paper is maybe a bit unclear, but the fact remains that many experiments with flat paper money had been made long before his time, and they all ended in monetary destruction.  A clear sign of decadence is when money is decoupled from value, and the control of it is given to the political class.

The final sentence brings a message that is the essence of what I am trying to say.  All those dependent on the effort and money of others, to be given to them by the State, are going to find themselves destitute and starving, unless they again learn to work.  When things come crashing down, there is no wealth to redistribute.  There will be no “social security” or “welfare”.  When everyone finds themselves impoverished, only a fool will expect to be handed free sustenance.  Those of us able and willing to work  will survive, others may not.

Then the Gods of the Market tumbled, and their smooth-tongued wizards withdrew,

And the hearts of the meanest were humbled and began to believe it was true

That All is not Gold that Glitters, and Two and Two make Four —

And the Gods of the Copybook Headings limped up to explain it once more.

Inevitably, reality sets in.  The “Gods of the Market” will tumble, and their smooth talk and chicanery will be for naught.  They will head for the door, tail between their legs, desperately preparing to dodge any bullets, as the common man reaches for his gun.  And finally, as all that most held dear and everlasting has come crashing down, old wisdom returns, slowly and steadily.

As it will be in the future, it was at the birth of Man —

There are only four things certain since Social Progress began —

That the Dog returns to his Vomit and the Sow returns to her Mire,

And the burnt Fool’s bandaged finger goes wabbling back to the Fire —

History inevitably repeats itself, and “Social Progress” is always a progression first towards ever-increasing wealth and prosperity, and as the people become complacent and decadent, a likewise inevitable collapse and reset of the system.

From the Proverb Peter 2:22, The Dog returns to his vomit and the Sow returns to it mire, after being cleansed by a higher standard of behavior we will eventually return to the vile behavior that we originally abandoned in search of a better life.

The burnt Fool’s bandaged finger goes wobbling back to the Fire.  Man is destined to repeat his mistakes, and our efforts to root out of society ignorance and foolishness will never be completely successful.  Civilization will continue to come, and go, and when the book on mankind is finally closed, our experience will be nothing but a small blot of ink, among the innumerable pages that have been written.

And that after this is accomplished, and the brave new world begins

When all men are paid for existing and no man must pay for his sins

As surely as Water will wet us, as surely as Fire will burn

The Gods of the Copybook Headings with terror and slaughter return!

The “Brave New World”, inevitably turns into the “Decadent Old World” once more.  Another reference to socialism is rather clear-cut.  What “no man must pay for his sins” means needs no explanation, taking it literally will move straight into the early 21st century.  And 

The Gods of the Copybook Headings…….with Terror and slaughter return.

©Fred Brownbill. All  rights reserved.

CHILD ABUSE: New Emails Show CDC Was Corrupted by Political Coordination with Teacher’s Unions and Activist Groups

“The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ignored the science that showed children are at statistically insignificant risk from Covid.”

Unimaginable child abuse on a monumental level – the repercussions to be suffered for decades to come.

New Emails Show CDC Was Corrupted by Political Coordination with Teacher’s Unions and Activist Groups

By: Becker News, March 30, 2022:

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ignored the science that showed children are at statistically insignificant risk from Covid and issued policies based on close consultation with political activists in teacher’s unions, Republican lawmakers assert in a revealing new report.

The CDC’s guidance was used as the basis for closing schools and forcing children to wear masks throughout the Covid pandemic. An exclusive Fox News report on Wednesday provides yet another glimpse of the CDC’s politically motivated coordination with teacher’s unions.

“Republican lawmakers who sit on the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis are releasing a report Wednesday revealing a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) official’s testimony claiming that the agency coordinated with teachers’ unions at an extraordinary level in crafting its school reopening guidance, despite the agency’s earlier claims that such coordination was routine and nonpolitical,” Fox News reported in its exclusive…

[Emphasis added]

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Quick note: Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here. We will not waver. We will not tire. We will not falter, and we will not fail. Freedom will prevail.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here — it’s free and it’s critical NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America’s survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow me on Gettr. I am there, click here. It’s open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

The Self-Oppression of Identity Politics

Which story will define and inform your lives?


In today’s world of exponentially less systemic discrimination, claiming its continued existence effectively compromises more crucial mental and spiritual freedoms.

“The mind moves in the direction of our currently dominant thoughts.”

Earl Nightingale, American radio-show speaker, author, human-potential pioneer

Who amongst us hasn’t attained some goal in life—from getting your first bicycle as a kid, to landing our dream job, and everything in between—by single-mindedly focusing on its realization? We all have. In fact, that exercise, embodied by the above quote, is at the heart of virtually every self-help prescription—mantras, affirmations, visualization, positive thinking—for improving one’s life in any number of arenas.

With the above Nightingale quote in mind, let’s look at identity politics, defined as:

“A tendency for people of a particular religion, race, social background, etc., to form exclusive political alliances, moving away from traditional broad-based party politics.”

The appeal of identity politics is undeniable and understandable. For members of groups that, historically, have been oppressed or marginalized to any extent, it’s sensible (not to mention downright heady) to join forces with like-minded souls, and fight to end that oppression. Over the past half-century, minorities, women, and gays have made enormous progress precisely because they systematically organized and fought against proactive discrimination.

As such, no one could seriously argue that the above groups aren’t far freer and have far more possibilities and opportunities than they did prior to the 1960s. Because of their efforts, there are bodies of law in place expressly prohibiting discrimination based on race, gender, religion, national origin, and sexual orientation. As well there should be.

So, what happens when an identity-politics mindset encounters a society that has made enormous strides in eliminating institutionalized forms of discrimination—i.e., Jim Crow laws, red-lining practices in real estate; racial/sex discrimination in businesses, restaurants, public transportation, clubs, organizations, etc.? Does it become a movement subject to the law of diminishing returns?

Consider the underlying sentiment expressed by most practitioners of identity politics: “I am not free to fully succeed in life, and if I indeed don’t succeed, it’s because I am surrounded by people and institutions committed to keeping me down.” In the not-too-distant past, for the above groups, that sentiment was a statement of fact.

But, in our vastly different times today, does such a mindset simply become a reliable path to victimhood?

It’s one thing to fight against true oppression, where there are activecodified, societally accepted measures that prevent you from realizing your dreams, but in a much freer society, where the laws are now on your side to a far greater extent, what does one end up fighting against?

Yes, there is, but that racism exists far more in the realm of personal beliefs and prejudices held by individuals, as opposed to institutionalized policies to keep people down. Shelby Steele, acclaimed black author, columnist and filmmaker, in a recent Wall Street Journal opinion piece, obliquely underscored this point (emphasis mine):

“Of course this does not mean there is no racism left in American life. Racism is endemic to the human condition, just as stupidity is. We will always have to be on guard against it. But now it is recognized as a scourge, as the crowning immorality of our age and our history.”

Racism is endemic to the human condition. A bold statement on its surface, yet, given the history of human behavior across millennia, and the hard-wired tendency of groups—regardless of culture, race and nationality—to consider themselves superior to those different from themselves (i.e., the essential quality of “racism”), were truer words ever spoken?

So, given all the above, and particularly the personal (vs. systemic/institutional) nature of most racism today, if your goal is to “eliminate racism,” you’d need to enter the realm of mandating proper speech and thought. And one look at the insanely PC-driven attempts to curtail free speech at many of our universities (just one venue for this awful trend) is all it takes to see how dangerous and unconstitutional that exercise is.

Let’s try a thought experiment. Imagine two gay black women—people who are part of multiple “identity” groups.

One says, “Yes, I’m a gay black woman, but nothing and no one can stand in the way of my living my ideal life, and realizing my dreams.” In this day and age, with far more freedom to thrive than at any other time in history, is it even remotely far-fetched to imagine that this woman, if she worked hard enough, would, in fact, realize her dreams?

On the flipside, let’s take another gay black woman, who, immersed in the world of identity politics, aligns herself with other similar folks. To them, the world is a hostile place, replete with systemic oppression and institutionalized racism standing between them and what they want.

If those are the two respective worlds these two women inhabit, which of them is more likely to succeed? Who has more “agency”?

I can hear it now: “But you’re a straight, white male. What do you know about oppression?” Not much. But, what does my reality and opinion (ignorant and naïve?) have to do with your journey? Nothing. Given the extraordinary progress these groups have made, the far more relevant question for them is, “Which story will define and inform your lives?”

Will it be the one that essentially says, “The deck is stacked, and if I fail, it’s not my fault”? Or the one that says, “Sure, there’s still ignorant, bigoted, racist, sexist, homophobic people out there, but they no longer have the power to stop me from realizing my dreams. And if they try, I’ve got the law on my side”?

We’re all aware of plenty of people who are members of “aggrieved” groups, who’ve succeeded in life—some enormously—despite countless obstacles and hardships. By the same token, we all know of plenty from those same groups who haven’t.

Doesn’t the existence of that real-world dichotomy argue far less for discrimination, and far more for the incandescently self-evident fact that human beings are endowed with widely varying levels of intelligence, initiative, ambition, drive, vision, motivation, etc.?

We should all be prepared to push back against cases of real racism when we encounter them. But in a world that, legally, is far freer for all its citizens than at any point in history, more often than not, invoking identity politics amounts to little more than arguing for a life of limitation. And who would consciously choose that?

AUTHOR

Peter Bowerman

Peter Bowerman is an Atlanta-based freelance writer, and author of the acclaimed Well-Fed Writer series on commercial freelance writing.

EDITORS NOTE: This FEE column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

How Socialism Discourages Work and Creates Poverty

Socialism diminishes people’s incentive to work to improve their circumstances by depriving them of the fruits of their effort.


Advocacy for “socialism,” which the Socialist Party USA defines as a “social and economic order in which workers and consumers control production,” has made a comeback in American politics in recent years. Public figures such as Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders sing its praises. But the truth is that socialism deeply undermines people’s ability (and motivation) to improve their own living conditions. The misery socialism has caused for millions of people refutes its promises—horrifically.

Socialism, advocates claim, will bring prosperity and better living conditions for everyone, a claim also made for communism, in which the government controls the means of production and the distribution of the results. British philosopher Bertrand Russell wrote that socialism is “calculated to increase the happiness, not only of proletarians, but of all except a tiny minority of the human race.” As have its advocates throughout history, the now-defunct Socialist Labor Party of America depicted socialism as utopian, writing: “Under socialism our farmlands would yield an abundance without great toil; the factories, mines and mills would be the safest, the most modern, the most efficient possible and productive beyond our wildest dreams—and without laborious work.” The website doesn’t specify how such magic would occur.

The website further insists that socialism would improve virtually every aspect of life, stating: “Our natural resources would be intelligently conserved. Our schools would have the finest facilities and they would be devoted to developing complete human beings, not wages [sic] slaves who are trained to hire themselves out for someone else’s profit. Our hospitals and social services would create and maintain the finest health and recreational facilities.”

But socialist policies, when enacted, have catastrophic effects on the lives of the people living under them. To enforce such policies, governments must take control of people’s property—whether by fully nationalizing businesses, mandating what and how much a company must produce, or seizing and distributing their products—thereby violating people’s right to the product of their own effort. The victims include entrepreneurs who have built or purchased businesses, landlords who maintain and manage properties, and everyone who earns a wage, from construction workers to artists.

By violating these rights, socialism diminishes people’s incentive to work to improve their circumstances by controlling or taking away the results of their effort. However hard you work, whatever you achieve, whatever value you create—it won’t be reflected in your earnings.

The novelist Ayn Rand dramatized the effects of such a doctrine in her magnum opus, Atlas Shrugged. In the novel, a small town factory enacted Marx’s slogan “From each according to his ability, to each according to his need” as policy, so that each person’s pay depended on what managers considered as their level of need compared to their colleagues’. They did this based on such factors as the number of children the employees supported, family members’ illnesses, and so on. People began to spend more time sharing their woes with the management than working, and many of the best employees left the company entirely. Within four years, the factory closed. One character explained the hopelessness the policy created: “What was it we were supposed to want to work for? For the love of our brothers? What brothers? For the bums, the loafers, the moochers we saw all around us? And whether they were cheating or plain incompetent, whether they were unwilling or unable—what difference did that make to us? If we were tied for life to the level of their unfitness, faked or real, how long could we care to go on?”

He explained that the company had once been a thriving one that people were proud to work for, but now hard times were the status quo: “We were beasts of burden struggling blindly in some sort of place that was half-hospital, half-stockyards—a place geared to nothing but disability, disaster, disease—beasts put there for the relief of whatever whoever chose to say was whichever’s need.”

This story, although fictional, points to an important fact about human nature: If people can’t change their situation, they won’t try to. Knowing the outcome in advance, they will feel no motivation to make Herculean efforts for miniscule or nonexistent rewards. As economist Ludwig Von Mises put it:

To make a man act, uneasiness and the image of a more satisfactory state alone are not sufficient. A third condition is required: the expectation that purposeful behavior has the power to remove or at least to alleviate the felt uneasiness. In the absence of this condition no action is feasible. Man must yield to the inevitable. He must submit to destiny. [emphasis added]

Socialist policies severely restrict individuals’ ability to improve their conditions, so productivity suffers and living conditions plummet. Historical examples of socialism, as well as modern-day Venezuela and North Korea, show the misery that results.

In Soviet Russia, the government attempted to distribute the results of sixty years of steady GDP growth equally by seizing personal fortunes and dictating wages. But buying power for the average person dropped sharply, and whether a person could actually spend his or her wages was largely dependent on knowing the right people. Economist Mark Harrison explains: “The distribution of consumer goods and services was characterized by shortage and privilege. Every Soviet adult could count on an income, but income did not decide access to goods and services – that depended on political and social status.”

People who lived under the Soviet regime and now live in modern Russia appreciate that they have more opportunities to improve their lives than they used to. Back in 2007, interviewers asked Russians about their memories and opinions of life under the Soviet regime; many of them recalled that the USSR had “fewer possibilities.” One respondent explained, “Now there are so many chances. You can earn enough money even to buy an apartment. Certainly it is very, very difficult, but possible.” Another participant elaborated, “Now I can earn money and there are many ways of doing so. . . . In the Soviet Union, engineers and other technical employees of middle and high rank did not have [a] right to a second job. People who had the time and energy and wanted to provide more for their families could not do it.”

In other words, people were willing to work extremely hard to improve their conditions—but weren’t allowed to.

In Venezuela, socialism has driven a once-prosperous country into the ground. University professors juggle multiple jobs to keep food on the table. Others try to escape a desperate situation; more than six million have fled in recent years, and in 2017 the suicide rate was nearly double the global average. Venezuelans are willing to work to improve their circumstances—but the socialist regime’s oppression and economic destruction consistently frustrate their efforts.

North Korea was conceived as a communist nation following the Second World War, but formally switched to a form of “self-reliant” socialism following the Korean War. The leadership of the Worker’s Party of Korea has brought widespread misery in the form of horrific rights violations, including torture, severe censorship, forced labor, and arbitrary detention. Their policies have also led to nearly half the country suffering from inconsistent access to food and water—in stark contrast to their far more capitalist neighbor, South Korea, which has flourished in recent decades.

Advocates of socialism protest that historical examples of socialism were not “true socialism” or “the right kind of socialism.” But it is socialism—people giving government control of producing things—that undermines people’s ability and willingness to produce and provide for themselves in all these examples.

With free markets, by contrast, people are free to own private property and run businesses without the government dictating production or distribution. People are rewarded for their hard work and ability. By innovating, excelling at work, and creating more and better products or services, they can make more money, which they can use to pay for better living quarters, education, electronics, travel, or other life-improving goods or services produced by others. Hence, in mostly free and capitalistic countries, such as the US, the United Kingdom, Ireland, and Hong Kong, people have enjoyed massive economic growth, which has corresponded with a major increase in average living standards.

When human beings struggle, create, and innovate, but their efforts do not improve their own circumstances, they burn out or give up. Marx, Russell, Sanders, and other proponents of socialism and communism claim that their preferred systems are “for the people”—but the truth is that they work against the nature and needs of human beings.

AUTHOR

Angelica Walker-Werth

Angelica Walker-Werth is an Ayn Rand Fellow with FEE’s Hazlitt Project and a recent graduate of Clemson University. She is an assistant editor and writer at The Objective Standard and a fellow and research associate at Objective Standard Institute. Her hobbies include gardening and travel.

RELATED ARTICLE: Bernie Sanders Just Proposed a 95% Business Tax. Here’s Why That’s So Absurd

RELATED VIDEO: DeSantis Says That Americans Are Fleeing “Dumpster Fire States”

EDITORS NOTE: This FEE column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Abortion and Biden’s SCOTUS Nominee

WATCH: An anti-abortion activist testifies against Jackson’s Supreme Court nomination. Eleanor McCullen, an anti-abortion activist, delivered testimony in opposition of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson’s nomination, on the final day of the Senate Judiciary Committee’s Supreme Court confirmation hearings.

With a bang of a gavel in 1973, 63 million fellow Americans were condemned to die. And the number keeps growing.

Now if the Senate confirms Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, another pro-abortion justice will be added to the Supreme Court.

Last week, Judge Jackson, nominated by Biden to the Supreme Court, faced four days of hearings in the Senate. South Carolina Republican Senator Lindsey Graham raised an intriguing point to her: “Every group that wants to pack the court, that believes the court is a bunch of right-wing nuts who are going to destroy America, that considers the Constitution ‘trash’—all wanted you picked. That is all I can say. That so many of these left-wing radical groups who would destroy the law as we know it…supported you is problematic for me.”

Jon Schweppe of the American Principles Project noted, “On abortion and religious liberty, it’s clear where she stands. Jackson co-authored an amicus brief for the Massachusetts NARAL chapter characterizing pro-life sidewalk counselors as ‘indisputably harmful’ and supporting the notion that they should not be allowed anywhere near an abortion clinic.”

He adds, “Why would leftist groups like American Atheists, the Human Rights Campaign, NARAL, Planned Parenthood, the National Education Association and the Southern Poverty Law Center push the White House to nominate Jackson and the Senate to confirm?….Ketanji Brown Jackson is a woke Trojan horse, as the preponderance of evidence suggests.”

When asked to define what a woman is, Judge Jackson declined, claiming she’s “not a biologist.” When asked when human life begins, she said to Louisiana Senator John Kennedy: “Senator, um… I don’t know.”

Gary Bauer responded to her answer: “Of course, this well-educated, Harvard graduate knows life begins at conception. The problem is that she’s all in on abortion on demand.”

The Supreme Court decisions Roe v. Wade (1973) and Casey v. Planned Parenthood (1992) established by judicial fiat a right to abortion. Thus abortion, said Judge Jackson, is “settled law of the Supreme Court concerning the right to terminate a pregnancy. They established a framework the court has reaffirmed.”

One Constitutional authority had some criticisms of Roe v. Wade as a legal opinion. She said that Roe “tried to do too much, too fast—it essentially made every abortion restriction in the country at the time illegal in one fell swoop—leaving it open to fierce attacks. ‘Doctrinal limbs too swiftly shaped…may prove unstable.’”

Who was this radical anti-abortion activist that would dare criticize the left’s most beloved decision? It was Ruth Bader Ginsburg–before she became a justice on the high court who did everything in her power to preserve Roe v. Wade.

Writing for Lifenews.com, Micaiah Bilger observes that Judge Jackson has called peaceful pro-life sidewalk counselors at abortion clinics “hostile, noisy and in your face” people.

Bilger added, “Jackson has the support of NARAL Pro-Choice America, which advocates for abortions without limits up to birth…She also ruled against the Trump administration’s efforts to defund the billion-dollar abortion chain Planned Parenthood, and she clerked for pro-abortion Justice Stephen Breyer when he issued an opinion against the partial-birth abortion ban.”

I believe abortion is the single most important political issue of our time. It’s not complicated. Abortion takes a human life every time.

When judges rule in favor of abortion, they are playing God. I find it amazing that the left constantly decries bullying, yet they favor abortion rights. What could be more bullying than dismembering a defenseless, unborn child limb by limb because it is perceived as somehow inconvenient?

Some critics on the left, like Bill Maher, say that the only reason conservatives oppose Judge Jackson is because she’s black. But people need to remember that the founder of the nation’s leading abortion provider, Planned Parenthood, was Margaret Sanger, who spoke at a Ku Klux Klan meeting. She wrote a letter to one of her board members (Dr. Clarence J. Gamble, 12/10/1939): “We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population.” No wonder the majority of abortion facilities are in urban areas—to this day.

In our nation’s birth certificate, the Declaration of Independence, our founders said that our rights come from the Creator—and first among these rights is the “right to life.” Indeed, if you’re dead, how can you enjoy any other right?

The Constitution, which is predicated on the Declaration, notes in the preamble that one of its purposes is: “secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.” Our posterity? That is, the yet to be born.

To paraphrase Dr. D. James Kennedy, Judge Jackson should get down on her knees and thank God that her mother wasn’t “pro-choice.”

If you get abortion wrong, you tend to get everything else wrong too.

Hunter Biden’s laptop and how Twitter tipped the scales of the 2020 election

The ‘New York Times’ has finally admitted that the laptop’s emails were genuine.


It is well known that Twitter makes a sport of censorship. There’s even a Wikipedia page dedicated to the topic.

Typical of previous years, the 2022 log of Twitter suspensions is mostly a list of conservative commentators and Republican politicians — though refreshingly, a deranged Middle East dictator, one Ali Khamenei of Iran also made the cut this year.

Sharing “Covid-19 misinformation” (or at least what is presently considered such) is one of the more likely sins to get you banned in 2022, as is — gasp — calling male swimmers “men”.

What Twitter deems a transgression changes slightly from year to year but the themes and the political partisanship is consistent.

In 2020, what really put a bee in Twitter’s bonnet was sharing factual stories that threatened Joe Biden’s entry into the White House. Yes, Twitter interfered in the 2020 election. Egregiously.

The New York Times’s recent, glaring admission that Hunter Biden’s laptop is authentic, though 18 months late, has brought this fact to the fore once again.

We are yet to fully come to terms with Twitter’s misdeeds in those closing weeks of the 2020 contest, and the precedent they have set for public discourse in the West.

But first some background, if you are unfamiliar with what happened.

With all of America on seat’s edge and the world tuned in to the Trump-Biden contest, the New York Post broke a bombshell report on October 14, 2020.

Through intriguing circumstances, a laptop belonging to Joe’s son Hunter had made its way to the Post. On that hard drive were emails indicating that when the senior Biden was Vice President, he massaged US foreign policy in Ukraine to the benefit of his son’s business ventures there.

follow-up story intimated that Joe Biden himself was making a ten percent cut from Hunter’s overseas dealings, despite Joe previously denying any knowledge of what his son was up to abroad.

The evidence strongly suggested that the millions in profit flowing to the Biden family estate from Ukraine, China and Russia were only made possible by the exclusive White House access it granted Hunter’s contacts in those countries.

Additionally, the laptop harboured a trove of debauched images and videos revealing Hunter’s prostitute- and drug-fuelled lifestyle — factors that made the Biden family more vulnerable to blackmail and other clandestine political influence.

So much for the story — what of the censorship?

Infamously, Twitter immediately locked two accounts: the New York Post’s, and that of Trump’s press secretary, Kayleigh McEnany, who had tweeted out the report. Anyone else who tried to share the story were either suspended or unable to tweet the link, myself included. As Brendan O’Neill of Spiked has described that “truly extraordinary moment“:

Here we had the spokesperson for the democratically elected president of the United States and the oldest continuously published daily newspaper in America being cast out of social media for the crime of sharing a story that was true.

Not only was the story true — revelations of endemic Biden family corruption would doubtless have swung many undecided voters back to Trump in those dying days of the 2020 race, had they had access to it. This is a hypothesis made even more likely by poll after poll unearthing post-election Biden voter regret.

Twitter was the most flagrant partisan operative in the Hunter laptop saga, but far from the only one.

Facebook limited sharing of the New York Post’s piece until its “fact checkers” had a chance to assess the report. They never did. And they never apologised. In the years previous, however, Facebook did give free rein to flat-out lies about a Trump “pee-pee” tape and his being a Russian asset.

The conspiracy of the corporate press was one of silence. Had the same revelations emerged about Donald Trump Jr, there is no question the media would have reigned fire and brimstone on the Trump family.

But even a generous bribe wouldn’t have tempted most media outlets to report accurately on Hunter’s toxic laptop with a presidential election just around the corner. “The media world has largely ignored the Post’s Hunter Biden story,” one CNN reporter bragged at the time. “We don’t waste our time on stories that are not really stories,” taxpayer-funded NPR likewise scoffed.

Then came 50 former intelligence officials to denounce Hunter’s laptop as a Russian plant, part of a disinformation campaign to get Trump re-elected. They didn’t have any evidence for this, they admitted, just the feels. Now the media had its angle, one they amplified endlessly until Biden’s victory was secured.

With Hunter’s laptop now authenticated, the New York Post recently chased down every one of those 50 intelligence figures for a retraction. Most didn’t respond. A few couldn’t be reached. Several dug their heals in. Not one walked back their perfidious story. “Intelligence”?

Now, with the Russia-Ukraine war in full swing, even more Biden family misdeeds are coming to light. The Daily Mail reported just this week that, per emails on his laptop, Hunter helped secure millions in funding for a US contractor specialising in deadly pathogen research in Ukraine biolabs. The same company has also partnered with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, now acknowledged as the most likely source of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

What else don’t we know about the Bidens? What else are we about to find out?

Most importantly, what is the future of political discourse in the West? Our democracies are rendered hollow if elites in Silicon Valley and on America’s coasts decide before an election what information can and cannot be seen by the public.

There has never been a more pressing need for regulation that will rein in Big Tech’s political partisanship and election interference. And never have everyday people needed more discernment as they assess the news stories put before them.

AUTHOR

Kurt Mahlburg

Kurt Mahlburg is a writer and author, and an emerging Australian voice on culture and the Christian faith. He has a passion for both the philosophical and the personal, drawing on his background as a graduate… More by Kurt Mahlburg

EDITORS NOTE: This MercatorNet column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Is TikTok dangerous for teens?

Parents need to monitor how their kids use the world’s #1 most downloaded app and the #1 most visited website.


How much do you know about TikTok? Maybe you’ve heard of it but haven’t used it. Or if you have used TikTok, you may think of it as an app for sharing videos of teens doing funny dances or cute pets doing tricks, which it is. But it is more than that.

For starters, TikTok is now the world’s most downloaded app and the world’s #1 most visited website, ahead of Google (#2) and Facebook (#3). Every day, more than one billion different videos are viewed on TikTok. Experts agree that the key to its success is its unique algorithm. When you join TikTok, you are asked some questions about your interests and what sort of things you’d like to see. TikTok then offers you some of the most popular videos that match your interests and starts monitoring what you do. It takes note of which videos you watch and—crucially—how much time you spend watching them, and which videos you watch more than once. The algorithm then hones your preferences. Within hours, or even minutes, your videos become more specific, more customized to your interests.

The results are uncanny. “TikTok can read my mind” is a common refrain among young people, as the app soon starts serving up videos that are precisely what the viewer was hoping to see: whether it’s a funny cat video, or a video of synchronized swimming, or one about applying glitter make-up, or a video of a pretty girl dancing in a way that appeals to a particular teen boy and wearing precisely the outfit that boy finds most arousing, doing exactly the moves that the boy finds most irresistible. And the same is true of sexual variations. “TikTok knew I was bisexual (or gay, or trans) before I did” is a common trope online.

Is TikTok Harmful?

TikTok is customized. It can be addictive. But is it truly harmful to teens?

That depends on how a teen uses it.

Adolescence can be confusing. Young people are struggling to figure out who they are. Increasingly, they are looking online for clues and for guidance. Doctors at Texas Children’s Hospital used to see one, maybe two teenagers a year presenting with new-onset Tourette syndrome. Between spring 2020 and autumn 2021, that number skyrocketed to about 60. Psychiatrists worldwide—from the South Atlantic island of St Helena, to New Caledonia in the South Pacific, to almost anywhere on the planet where kids have access to the Internet—began reporting a surge of teenage girls self-diagnosing with Tourette syndrome. Many of these girls are shouting out “beans!” at unpredictable intervals. Psychiatrists in England call these girls “Evies” because their behavior resembles that of Evie Meg Field, whose TikTok videos have earned her more than 14 million followers and more than 500 million likes. In a characteristic video, Evie shouts out “beans” uncontrollably. In an earlier era, the sudden appearance of myriad teenage girls shouting out “beans” might have been called mass hysteria. Today, the preferred term is “social media induced illness.”

Other issues can lead quickly down a rabbit hole. Go to TikTok and type “how can I lose weight?” and it will offer many options. The TikTok hashtag #diet has had over 11 billion views. There, you will find videos encouraging viewers that simply doing some planks and leg lifts will result in becoming slim in just 16 days (that particular video has had over 32 million views). Scrolling through the videos, it’s easy to be drawn into a spiral of more videos that speak directly to an individual situation. Alyssa Moukheiber, a dietitian at a residential treatment center for eating disorders in northern Illinois, says, “The TikTok algorithm is just too freaking strong.” The algorithm sucks girls into a world that promises physical perfection for just trying a little harder.

Girls who post videos on TikTok soon discover that their online popularity is linked to their sexuality. Newport Academy is an Atlanta-based treatment center for eating disorders. Crystal Burwell, the program’s director of outpatient services, recently noted that 60% of the girls treated since last summer have posted “sexually inappropriate” videos on TikTok. A similar observation comes from Paul Sunseri, director of the New Horizons Child and Family Institute in El Dorado Hills, California, who is concerned about the growing number of girls who are posting sexualized videos on TikTok. “For a young girl who’s developing her identity, to be swept up into a sexual world like that is hugely destructive,” he says. “When teen girls are rewarded for their sexuality, they come to believe that their value is in how they look.” Sunseri estimates that about one-quarter of the girls at his clinic have posted sexualized content on TikTok.

Boys are not immune. A growing number of teen boys are getting sucked into TikTok’s algorithm, which often means they are seeing TikTok videos of young men who are bigger, more muscular, than they are. That can lead to “bigorexia,” boys becoming obsessed with acquiring the muscle-bound look exemplified by The Rock and the entire cinematic Marvel universe of he-men.

Advice for parents

So, what’s a parent to do about TikTok?

The first step is for parents to have a frank conversation with their daughters—and their sons—about the dangers of TikTok. I have heard teen girls say, “I saw it on TikTok” with the same air of authority as a middle-aged woman a few years back might have said, “I heard it on Dr. Oz.” In both cases, the speaker is citing an authority they believe to be unchallengeable. Parents, make sure your kids understand that a TikTok video is not authoritative, even it has 10 million likes.

At what age should a child be allowed to be on TikTok? Jean Twenge, our nation’s leading researcher on how social media impacts child and adolescent development, recommends that no child under 13 should be on any social media, including TikTok. And I would add that many 13-year-olds aren’t ready. TikTok offers a curated version of their app for under-13s. Don’t use it. That watered-down version is designed to fuel interest in the grown-up version. Twelve-year-olds don’t like to be on the kiddie version of anything. And tweens quickly figure out that if they lie about their age, they can easily access the full version.

As with any social media, the parent must limit, govern, and guide their teen’s use. At this time, we don’t have evidence that 10 or 15 minutes a day on TikTok, or social media in general, is harmful. One study of more than 220,000 teens found that the risk of bad outcomes began to increase after more than 30 minutes of social media a day, on average (see, for example, Figure 3). However, that study was published in 2019, based on data gathered before TikTok became the most-viewed social media for teens. An hour a day on TikTok is definitely too much. Kids have better things to do with their time than spending an hour a day on TikTok. So I advise parents to install parental monitoring apps to limit how much time kids are spending on TikTok.

That’s where many parents push back. One parent told me: “I think it’s important to show my daughter that I trust her. Installing a monitoring app implies that I don’t trust her. Besides, I already use the TikTok Family Pairing option, so that I can see what my daughter is doing in the app.” I remind parents that I see many teens who have created two TikTok accounts. One is the “clean” account which they show to their parents and which their parents follow on the Family Pairing option. The other is the real account, where the daughter is watching, or posting, the videos she doesn’t want her parents to see.

Then the parent says: “My daughter would never create a secret account just to deceive me.” I explain that if all the girl’s friends are doing it and advising her to do it, what is that girl supposed to say to her friends? It’s not reasonable to expect a modern American girl to say, “I know all you guys are doing it, but I won’t do it because I don’t want to deceive my parents.” The parent needs to allow the daughter to tell her friends, “I can’t do that, because my parents have installed this evil monitoring app that sees everything I do!”

Anne Sena is Director of Technology at St David’s School in Raleigh, North Carolina. She recently told me that she uses the Bark parental monitoring app to monitor and limit her teen’s online activities across social media, email, web browsers, and YouTube. She likes that Bark installs a VPN so that the controls are in place when her teen is outside of the home network, for example at a friend’s house or using a network provided by a cell phone. In Sena’s own home, she uses the Circle Home Plus device as well as the Apple’s screen time controls and Microsoft Family Safety to enforce time limits and provide an added layer of search protection on the family’s home computers. There are other similar monitoring and filtering programs out there, including the Canopy app, for parents to choose from.

“That sounds like a lot of work,” one mother told me the other day when I suggested that she follow Sena’s example. And it may be, especially for those of us who are not as knowledgeable about VPNs and screen time controls. But if taking these steps decreases the risk of more teens becoming anxious and/or depressed, I think the extra effort is worth it.

I recently spoke with a young woman who is a senior in college. She admits that she used to spend up to four hours a day on TikTok. But one of her professors inspired her to take control of her time, and she now spends 5 minutes a day, or less, on the app. She says she has reconfigured TikTok to show her only those videos that are closely related to her professional interests. She gives her professor the credit for inspiring her to cut back. I am inclined to give her the credit for finding the courage to govern herself—even when many of her peers can’t, or won’t.

This article has been republished from the Institute for Family Studies blog.

AUTHOR

Leonard Sax

Dr. Leonard Sax MD PhD attended public schools in Shaker Heights Ohio from kindergarten through grade 12. He enrolled in the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in Cambridge Massachusetts in the… More by Leonard Sax

RELATED ARTICLE: Keep your kids safe online: All you need to know about internet safety at school and home

EDITORS NOTE: This MercatorNet column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

FDA Tells Doctors in 8 States to Stop Using COVID-19 Treatment

If the FDA and the CDC oppose it then it must work. This is the new science.

FDA Tells Doctors in 8 States to Stop Using COVID-19 Treatment

By;: Zachary Stieber, The Epoch Times, March 27, 2022:

U.S. drug regulators have directed health care workers in eight states to stop using a COVID-19 treatment because it may not be effective against an Omicron coronavirus subvariant that’s rising in prevalence.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said stotrovimab, a monoclonal antibody used to treat COVID-19, can no longer be used in Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, and Vermont.

Providers in Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands also have been told to stop using stotrovimab.

Regulators believe that the treatment, which was given emergency use authorization in May 2021, “is unlikely to be effective against the BA.2 subvariant,” the FDA said in a statement.

BA.2 is a subvariant of Omicron, a variant of the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus, the pathogen that causes COVID-19.

According to genomic surveillance conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, BA.2 was responsible for 12.6 percent of COVID-19 cases in the United States in the week ending on March 5. But the agency projected an increase to 35 percent in the week ending on March 19, and the subvariant was pegged as circulating widely in the northeast.

Based on the estimates, BA.2 is responsible for the majority of the cases in the states where the administration of sotrovimab is now limited.

The FDA had indicated in February that it would limit the treatment.

Several studies have indicated that sotrovimab doesn’t perform well against BA.2, including one published in Nature Medicine.

But GlaxoSmithKline and Vir Biotechnology, the makers of the drug, have said that testing suggested that the treatment retained neutralizing activity against BA.2.

The companies said on March 25 that they were aware of the FDA’s move and are preparing to send a data package to the agency and other regulatory authorities that show a higher dose of sotrovimab works against BA.2……read the rest.

RELATED ARTICLES:

VIDEO: COVID Jab Deadlier Than COVID for Anyone Under 80

Fourth Country Stops All Covid Vaccinations

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Quick note: Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here. We will not waver. We will not tire. We will not falter, and we will not fail. Freedom will prevail.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here — it’s free and it’s critical NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America’s survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow me on Gettr. I am there, click here. It’s open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Watchdog sues Voice of America for ‘amplifying anti-American and pro-Islamist reporting’

Hating America is de rigueur on the Left these days. Everyone’s doing it. Why shouldn’t the VOA join in? But this rot in the very institutions that should be protecting and defending the nation will one day eat its way all the way through.

Exclusive: Watchdog Sues Voice of America News for Alleged Anti-American, Pro-Islamist Reporting

by Joshua Klein, Breitbart, March 27, 2022:

In light of Voice of America News’ (VOA) failure to respond to dozens of FOIA requests over alleged pro-Islamic bias in its Persian reporting, the American Accountability Foundation (AAF) filed a lawsuit last week accusing VOA of withholding communications that demonstrate the broadcasting service’s role in disseminating “messages opposed to American interest.”

The American Accountability Foundation (AAF), a political watchdog group that investigates and reports on bureaucratic overreach that impacts constitutional liberties, shared its complaint against the U.S. government-funded international radio broadcaster and news outlet with Breitbart News on Sunday.

In it, Voice of America (VOA), an independent arm of the U.S. government, is accused of failing to respond to nearly 60 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests throughout an investigation into allegations that VOA was “amplifying anti-American and pro-Islamist reporting” targeting both Iranians in the region as well as Iranian-Americans.

“Voice of America and the United States Agency for Global Media (USAGM) have a history of pushing partisan propaganda and manipulating the visa system to benefit shady foreign nationals,” said AAF founder Tom Jones in a statement to Breitbart News.

“Now, while using American taxpayer dollars, they are openly violating FOIA rules to shield their bad behavior from the public,” he added….

AAF alleges in its lawsuit that locals in the Middle East have raised concerns that “VOA has been infiltrated by anti-American, pro-Islamic state interests, and that the message of VOA had been compromised in a manner that was biased toward the Islamic state factions in Iran.”…

In a statement to Breitbart News, Iranian advocacy group Iranian Americans for Liberty (IAL) threw its support behind the lawsuit….

RELATED ARTICLES:

Israel: Muslim opens fire at passersby, murders five people

Muslim who plotted jihad massacres in California gets 15 years prison for selling meth while on supervised release

Germany: Muslim migrant beheads man, was afraid Christian faith would be inserted into him like a hard drive

Ukraine’s Zelensky pleads with jihad-financing Qatar to boost gas output to help ‘stabilize’ Europe 

Grand mosque rector slams French leaders for ‘scapegoating’ Muslims like Jews in the 1930s

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Groups Linked to Zuckerberg, Soros Lobby to Keep Accused NY Criminals Out of Jail

Jailbreak organizations with financial ties to leftwing billionaires George Soros and Mark Zuckerberg are lobbying New York lawmakers to preserve the state’s “bail reform” policies that help keep accused criminals out of jail, according to Breitbart News.

Disgraced former Gov. Andrew Cuomo signed into state law measures that allow suspects accused of second-degree manslaughter, criminally negligent homicide, child sex crimes, and making threats of terrorism to walk free from jail without ever having to post bail.

Coinciding with the state law is New York City’s Supervised Release Program, which allows thousands of criminal suspects to be released following their arrests without having to post bail or be monitored by social workers.

As a result, crime in New York City has skyrocketed. Statistics show that although murders are down compared to the same time last year, rapes have increased 24 percent, robberies 46 percent, grand larceny nearly 60 percent, grand larceny auto 85 percent, and transit crimes more than 70 percent.

“The most important city on the globe has become the laughingstock of the globe. And the dysfunctionality of our city has cascaded throughout the entire country,” New York City Mayor Eric Adams (D) told a crowd of hundreds of New York Police officers this week.

A number of jailbreak organizations — including the Soros-funded Center for American Progress, the Center for Popular DemocracyUnited We Dream, and MoveOn, as well as the Zuckerberg-funded FWD.us — are lobbying New York lawmakers to oppose any changes to the bail reform law.

Polling released this week shows that about 56 percent of New Yorkers believe the bail reform law has been bad for the state while just 3 in 10 said it is good policy. Nearly 64 percent said the law has increased crime across the state.


George Soros

364 Known Connections

On July 13, 2020, OSF, in support of the Black Lives Matter movement and its allies, pledged to donate $220 million into initiatives designed to help “build power in Black communities, promote bold new anti-racist policies in U.S. cities, and help first-time activists stay engaged.” The pledge earmarked $150 million in five-year grants for black-led “racial justice” organizations, and $70 million for a range of initiatives such as helping city governments reform policing and criminal justice by implementing a new approach to public safety that includes “moving beyond the culture of criminalization and incarceration.” “This is the time for urgent and bold action to address racial injustice in America,” said OSF deputy chair Alex Soros, George Soros’s son. “These investments will empower proven leaders in the Black community to reimagine policing, end mass incarceration, and eliminate the barriers to opportunity that have been the source of inequity for too long.” Tom Perriello, executive director of Open Society-U.S., said: “The success of this movement, the largest in U.S. history, will be measured over years, not weeks, and we cannot say that Black lives matter and not make a multi-year commitment to a strategy set by and centering Black leaders and organizations who changed America’s sense of what is possible.”

To learn more about George Soros, click here.

EDITORS NOTE: This Discover the Networks column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

TAKE ACTION: Christians should boycott Disney’s new move ‘Lightyear’

Disney puts gay kiss back into children’s movie to appease LGBTQ demands.


TAKE ACTION

Earlier this year and to the delight of parents everywhere, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis and the state legislature passed the “Parental Rights in Education Bill,” which prohibits public schools from indoctrinating children grades K-3 with pro-gay, pro-transgender propaganda.

Disney CEO Bob Chapek initially said his company would not take sides in the controversy. Then came the loud, expected rhetoric from the rabid LGBTQ left, with their nasty accusations that Disney was anti-gay and hateful for not vocally opposing the law.

Again, the Florida law is simply designed to protect the youngest grade-school children from being taught lies, such as their birth gender might possibly be a freak of nature and that they can change it.

As a result, Disney quickly abandoned its neutral position for one of total surrender. Chapek apologized to his employees in a letter, telling them, “You needed me to be a stronger ally in the fight for equal rights and I let you down. I am sorry.”

As a result, and to the delight of homosexual activists everywhere, Disney has announced it will restore a previously cut lesbian kissing scene in its June Pixar release of the kid’s movie “Lightyear.”

Disney doesn’t think you will care, nor does it think Christian parents and grandparents will take a stand for their children and grandchildren. I think you will.

TAKE ACTION

I encourage you to join with me and other parents in telling Disney you’re not buying what they are selling.

Sign our pledge, committing to boycott Disney Pixar’s movie “Lightyear” when it is released in theatres and streaming avenues.

How America Morphed From a Force for Good into an Instrument of Evil

“In this country we have one great privilege which they don’t have in other countries. When a thing gets to be absolutely unbearable the people can rise up and throw it off. That’s the finest asset we’ve got — the ballot box.” – Mark Twain, 1905 interview in Boston, Massachusetts.


On Tuesday, November 3rd, 2020 we the people held a presidential election. Since that date many believe that we removed a good man and replaced him with an evil one. Since the inauguration of Joseph Robinette Biden Jr. on January 20th, 2021 we have literally seen America fundamentally transformed from a great good in the world to a source of great evil promoted both domestically and overseas.

But this transformation from good to evil did not happen overnight. In fact it was all planned well in advance.

W. Cleon Skousen in his 1958 book “The Naked Communist” listed the 45 goals that the Communists were seeking to achieve in America. Since 1958, and even before, we began to see the evil, known as Communism, infiltrate our schools, colleges, universities, corporations, legacy and social media and in the U.S. House of Representatives with Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (Democrat Socialist – NY) and U.S. Senate with Socialist Bernie Sanders and even in our court system with Judge, and Supreme Court nominee, Ketanji Brown Jackson.

To understand here are the key goals outlined in Skousen’s book:

#41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.

#17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers’ associations. Put the party line in textbooks.

#29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a world-wide basis.

#30. Discredit the American founding fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the “common man.”

#31. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of “the big picture.” Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.

#12 Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party

BTW, The latest edition of Skousen “The Naked Communist” book says that the Communists have achieved 44 of the 45 goals. One more, and someone can turn the key and activate The Apparatus” also known as “the Great Reset”.

Our once proud and good nation has now been totally taken over and faces ruin from the evil within.

Let’s look at how we got too this point where pure evil trumps good.

First we overlooked evil

This all began on September 12th, 1905 in New York City when we the people overlooked a organizational meeting held by the Intercollegiate Socialist Society (ISS). This was a meeting to begin the infiltration of our schools at every level to begin growing young socialists who would grow up to become today’s leaders of the Communist movement in America.

The first slate of officers elected at the Sept. 1905 organizational meeting included the following:

President: Jack London; First Vice President: Upton Sinclair; Second Vice President: Graham Phelps Stokes; Secretary: M.R. Holbrook; Treasurer: Rev. Owen Lovejoy; Executive Committee: Rev. George Willis Cooke, Morris Hillquit, Robert Hunter, Harry Laidler, Katherine M. Meserole, George H. Strobell.

Of this group of socialist worthies, only Harry Laidler was actually a current college student.

MarxistHistory.org reported:

The Intercollegiate Socialist Society (ISS) was a national non-party group dedicated to the organization of current and former collegians for the socialist cause and the spreading of socialist ideas on campus.

There were at least two isolated cases of socialist organization on campus prior to the establishment of the ISS in September 1905. From about 1901 there was a college socialist club organized at the University of Wisconsin in Madison. In its first year the club had 11 student members and one professor and was limited to confirmed socialists. The membership restriction was loosened in 1904, however, and the club grew, coming to hold weekly discussions on the exploitation of child labor, workplace safety, and other matters of general concern.

The second collegiate socialist club was organized at the University of California at Berkeley. Called the “Social Progress Club,” the group sprung into existence following a lecture by Jack London early in 1905. [fn. Max Horn, The Intercollegiate Socialist Society, 1905-1921: Origins of the Modern Student Movement. (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1979), pp. 18-19.] [Emphasis added]

Adolf Hitler said,

“The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people. As long as the government is perceived as working for the benefit of the children, the people will happily endure almost any curtailment of liberty and almost any deprivation.

And so began the indoctrination of our children to reject capitalism and embrace Marxism.

Goal #17 accomplished. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers’ associations. Put the party line in textbooks.

Then we permitted evil

As stated in goal #41.

Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.

Replace rights of parent with the state agenda of equity, inclusion and diversity. What occurred simultaneously was the gradual, but inevitable destruction, of the traditional family unit of a mother, father and their biological children.

In an article titled “Antonio Gramsci: the Godfather of Cultural Marxism” Bradley Thomas wrote:

There’s little debate that modern-day American universities, public education, mainstream media, Hollywood, and political advocacy groups are dominated by leftists. This is no accident, but part of a deliberate strategy to pave the way for communist revolution developed more than eight decades ago by an Italian political theorist named Antonio Gramsci. [Emphasis added]

Slowly but shurly our universities, colleges, public, private and even parochial schools began turning children against their parents. The state, represented by the teacher’s unions and their Democrat allies, began the needed process of taking the power of parenthood away.

In March 2022 National School Boards Association, which represents local school boards, worked with the White House and the Department of Justice in drafting a memo that labeled parents who spoke at school board meetings “domestic terrorists” when they objected to a schools curriculum (e.g. teaching Critical Race Theory and supporting political agendas of groups like Black Lives Matter and the LGBTQ+ community), textbooks used in classrooms and certain sexualized books in public school libraries.

Then we legalized evil

In a June 26th, 2021 Politico article titled “6 Years After Same-Sex Marriage, Now What?” Sasha Issenberg wrote,

On June 26, 2015, six years ago today, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down all state laws that discriminated against gay and lesbian unions and made same-sex marriage the law of the land. Unlike other landmark civil-rights decisions, like the court’s 1954 order to desegregate schools, implementation of Obergefell v. Hodges was straightforward and easy. The most any local clerk, county recorder or state health department had to do was to change a few words on an application for a marriage license.

The impact of those small clerical adjustments is now strikingly clear. According to the census, more than half of the country’s nearly one million same-sex partner households are now married. One of them includes a man who was a leading contender for the White House and today serves in the president’s cabinet. Gallup recently found that 70 percent of the American public, including for the first time a majority of Republicans, now support equal marriage rights.

On March 17th, 2016 Dr. E. Michael Jones, a world renowned and best-selling Catholic author, lecturer, and editor of Culture Wars magazine, called gay marriage a “form of political control.”

Today if you support marriage as between one man and one woman you are labeled homophobic. If you say there are scientifically only two genders male (XX) and female (XY) you are ostracized. Even the current nominee for the U.S. Supreme court won’t define the word “woman.”

Evil may soon have a seat on the Supreme Court.

Today we celebrate evil

Today we see evil celebrated by Hollywood, corporations like Disney, Apple, Amazon and Google, the media both legacy and social and in our public schools. America’s children are being taught that our constitution is evil, our founding fathers were white supremacists and their parents are not to be listened too. Instead of learning mathematics, American history, how to read and write today’s children are taught to hate.

Democrat Pete Buttigieg’s husband Chasten led elementary school children in a pledge of allegiance to the rainbow flag. The Biden administration is filled with LGBTQ persons and supporters.

The Eau Claire, Wisconsin school district says parents ‘not entitled’ to know child’s sexuality. In the Eau Claire district’s guidance was a slide stating,

“Some transgender, non-binary, and/or gender-nonconforming students are not ‘open’ at home for reasons that may include safety concerns or lack of acceptance. School personnel should speak with the student first before discussing a student’s gender nonconformity or transgender status with the student’s parent/guardian…Remember, parents are not entitled to know their kids’ identities. That knowledge must be earned.”

Parents are persona no grata.

Parents have now become unwelcome or unacceptable to school boards because of something they have said, done or believe.

Accomplished:

#29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a world-wide basis.

#30. Discredit the American founding fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the “common man.”

#31. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of “the big picture.” Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.

Finally, we persecute those who still call it evil

Perhaps the best example of how the powers to be deal with those who disagree with them is Florida’s Governor Ron DeSantis. In March 2022 the Florida legislature passed and Governor DeSantis signed into law the Parents Rights Bill. DeSantis signed HB1467 requiring schools to publicly disclose all curriculum to parents. DeSantis at the signing ceremony stated:

“Parents have a fundamental role to be involved in the education of their kids. That’s how it’s going to be in the state of Florida.”

When the bill passed the Florida legislature the media immediately labeled HB1467 the “Don’t Say Gay” bill. Watch when a reporter asks Governor DeSantis about the “Don’t Say Gay” bill:

In response DeSantis said,

“In Florida, our parents have every right to be involved in their child’s education. We are not going to let politicians deny parents the right to know what is being taught in our schools. I’m proud to sign this legislation that ensures curriculum transparency.”

America has been fundamentally transformed from a force for good into an instrument of evil by our government controlled education system.

Accomplished: #12 Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party.

As Ayn Rand wrote, “The uncontested absurdities of today are the accepted slogans of tomorrow.

Today its parents tomorrow its will be your children and grandchildren.

On Tuesday, November 8, 2022 we the people have an opportunity to redeem ourselves. Let us all pray that we do.

©Dr. Rich Swier. All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLES:

DeSantis Signs Parental Notification Bill, Shrugs Off ‘Don’t Say Gay’ Uproar

DON’T SAY CATHOLIC