Tag Archive for: 2020 Election Fraud

CIA Director Ratcliffe Releases Damning Durham Annex Exposing the Obama-Clinton Russia Collusion Hoax

/in , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , /by

The smoking gun has been found inside “burn bags” hidden in the evil Hoover FBI building.

Let’s expect this leads to perp walks for likes of H. Clinton, Comey, Clapper, Brennan, McCabe, Hayden, Rice and many other crooks who participated in the Russiagate, “Hurricane Crossfire” Hoax to undermine both candidate and POTUS Trump 45. This obvious illegal conspiracy is provable and not an attempt to change history as alleged by the perps and can be prosecuted under RICO. A liar is a liar and these crooks manufactured false evidence to try to take down Trump.

Of course, Obama is the ringleader but he has Presidential Immunity – however, as a private citizen, if he lies to a grand jury he can then be prosecuted. Their is no “stute of limitations” to prevent prosecution here.

Ratcliffe releases damning Durham annex. Here’s what it reveals about Obama-Clinton Russia collusion hoax.

The FBI sat on credible intelligence that the Clinton campaign cooked up the Russia hoax.

“Ratcliffe releases damning Durham annex. Here’s what it reveals about Obama-Clinton Russia collusion hoax.”

As promised, CIA Director John Ratcliffe has declassified the appendix from the 2023 Durham report and provided the documents to Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa). The contents are damning.

The Department of Justice authorized federal prosecutor John Durham in 2019 to explore the origins of Crossfire Hurricane, the FBI’s investigation into whether President Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign conspired with Russia to win the presidential election — which the intelligence community knew full well did not occur.

The result was a 306-page unclassified report that exposed the bureau’s investigation as an Obama administration hatchet job launched on the basis of “raw, unanalyzed, and uncorroborated intelligence,” willfully blind to contradictory information, and conducted without basic due diligence.

In addition to exposing misconduct — how an FBI attorney apparently altered an email in support of a FISA renewal request targeting a Trump campaign adviser — and highlighting how the bureau took a far different approach when tackling failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s alleged pay-to-play scheme, Durham detailed the FBI’s outsized reliance on a foreign-sourced political opposition research report paid for in part by the Clinton campaign, the contents of which the bureau knew to be unreliable.

There was more to Durham’s report than what was originally made publicly available: namely a 29-page classified appendix that provided insights into the genesis of the Russia collusion hoax.

That appendix, released on Thursday by Grassley, provides additional insights into the FBI’s willful failure under former Director James Comey to investigate intelligence indicating that the Clinton campaign manufactured the Russia collusion hoax out of whole cloth.

The so-called Durham annex also provides strong indications that when confronted with evidence of the Clinton campaign plan, the FBI ultimately decided not only to play along but to weaponize the false narrative against Trump.

According to the Durham annex, the Obama administration received intelligence from a source via two separate memos — one in January 2016 and the other in March 2016 — describing confidential conversations between then-Democratic National Committee Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz and two individuals at George Soros’ Open Society Foundations, Leonard Benardo and Jeffrey Goldstein.

‘The FBI will put more oil into the fire.’

Both memos referred to former President Barack Obama’s intention and alleged efforts to torpedo the FBI’s probe into Clinton’s use of a private email server and mishandling of highly classified information while secretary of state.

Continue reading.

©2025 . All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLE: Ex-CIA counterintelligence chief Susan Miller’s Russia hoax denials reek of desperation

RELATED VIDEO: Barack Obama Admits Russian Collusion Hoax

Mail-In Ballot Fraud Study Finds Trump ‘Almost Certainly’ Won In 2020

/in , , , , , , , , , , , /by

Never forget what the Democrat party of treason did.

Mail-In Ballot Fraud Study Finds Trump ‘Almost Certainly’ Won In 2020

By Tom Ozimek, via The Epoch Times,

A new study examining the likely impact that fraudulent mail-in ballots had in the 2020 election concludes that the outcome would “almost certainly” have been different without the massive expansion of voting by mail.

The Heartland Institute study tried to gauge the probable impact that fraudulent mail-in ballots cast for both then-candidate Joe Biden and his opponent, President Donald Trump, would have had on the overall 2020 election results.

The study was based on data obtained from a Heartland/Rasmussen survey in December that revealed that roughly one in five mail-in voters admitted to potentially fraudulent actions in the presidential election.

After the researchers carried out additional analyses of the data, they concluded that mail-in ballot fraud “significantly” impacted the 2020 presidential election.

They also found that, absent the huge expansion of mail-in ballots during the pandemic, which was often done without legislative approval, President Trump would most likely have won.

“Had the 2020 election been conducted like every national election has been over the past two centuries, wherein the vast majority of voters cast ballots in-person rather than by mail, Donald Trump would have almost certainly been re-elected,” the report’s authors wrote.

Over 43 percent of 2020 votes were cast by mail, the highest percentage in U.S. history.

‘Biggest Story of the Year’

The new study examined raw data from the December survey carried out jointly between Heartland Institute and Rasmussen Reports, which tried to assess the level of fraudulent voting that took place in 2020.

The December survey, which President Trump called “the biggest story of the year,” suggested that roughly 20 percent of mail-in voters engaged in at least one potentially fraudulent action in the 2020 election, such as voting in a state where they’re no longer permanent residents.

In the new study, Heartland analysts say that, after reviewing the raw survey data, subjecting it to additional statistical treatment and more thorough analysis, they now believe they can conclude that 28.2 percent of respondents who voted by mail committed at least one type of behavior that is “under most circumstances, illegal” and so potentially amounts to voter fraud.

“This means that more than one-in-four ballots cast by mail in 2020 were likely cast fraudulently, and thus should not have been counted,” the researchers wrote.

A Heartland Institute research editor and research fellow who was involved in the study explained to The Epoch Times in a telephone interview that there are narrow exceptions where a surveyed behavior may be legal, like filling out a mail-in ballot on behalf of another voter if that person is blind, illiterate, or disabled, and requests assistance.

However, the research fellow, Jack McPherrin, said such cases were within the margin of error and not statistically significant.

What Are the Implications?

In addition to reassessing the likely overall degree of fraudulent mail-in ballots in the 2020 election, Heartland analysts calculated the potential impact that fraudulent mail-in ballots might have produced in the six key swing states that President Trump officially lost.

This, then, was used to determine the impact of potentially fraudulent mail-in ballots on the overall 2020 election result.

First, the researchers analyzed the electoral results for the six swing states—Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin—under the 28.2 percent fraudulent mail-in ballot scenario that they estimated based on the raw survey data.

Then they calculated the electoral results in the six states under the different scenarios, each with a lower assumed percentage of fraudulent ballots, ranging from 28.2 percent all the way down to 1 percent.

For each of the 29 scenarios that they assesses, the researchers calculated the estimated number of fraudulent ballots, which were then subtracted from overall 2020 vote totals to generate a new estimate for vote totals.

Overall, of the 29 different scenarios presented in the study, the researchers concluded that President Trump would have won the 2020 election in all but three.

Specifically, they calculated that the only scenarios that would affirm the official 2020 election result, namely that candidate Biden won, were mail-in ballot fraud levels between 1 and 3 percent of ballots cast.

Mail-in ballot fraud rates higher than 3 percent would, according to the study, mean more fraudulent Biden votes that should be subtracted from the total, putting President Trump ahead.

For example, the adjustment to the vote tallies under fraud percentage rates between 13 and 6 percent would mean President Trump would have won Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, though he would have still lost in Michigan and Nevada.

Under such a scenario, President Trump would have won 289 Electoral College votes compared to candidate Biden’s 249.

In scenarios of 5–4 percent fraud, each candidate would have received 269 Electoral College votes, but President Trump would likely still have won because Republicans controlled more state delegations and, under a tie scenario, Congress would have voted based on the number of delegates.

However, the researchers expressed confidence in their overall assessment that the level of mail-in ballot fraud was over 25 percent, indicative of an actual Trump win.

“We have no reason to believe that our survey overstated voter fraud by more than 25 percentage points, and thus, we must conclude that the best available evidence suggests that mail-in ballot fraud significantly impacted the 2020 presidential election, in favor of Joe Biden,” the paper’s authors wrote.

Continue reading.

AUTHOR

Pamela Geller

RELATED ARTICLES: 

President Trump To Sue Major Media Outlets For Election Interference

TRUMP EFFECT: Trump Announces Japan’s SoftBank Will Invest $100 BILLION in the USA and Create 100,000 Jobs

POSTS ON X:

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

FOIA Lawsuit Emails Show CIA Rushed Approval of Infamous Hunter Laptop Letter by 51 Former Intel Officials Before Election

/in , , , , , , , , /by

Washington, D.C. — Judicial Watch announced today that it received eight pages of records from the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) showing Mike Morell, former acting CIA director under President Obama, requesting CIA permission to publish a letter by former intelligence community leaders stating that they believed the laptop emails exposing Hunter Biden’s connections to Ukraine were Russian disinformation. Morrell’s request for prepublication review was approved in just six hours by the CIA.

Judicial Watch forced the release of material through a June 23, 2023, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed after the CIA failed to respond to a May 11, 2023, request (Judicial Watch v. Central Intelligence Agency (No. 1:23-cv-01844)). Judicial Watch is asking for:

Records and communications of the Prepublication Classification Review Board, Central Intelligence Agency, including emails, email chains, email attachments, text messages, cables, voice recordings, correspondence, statements, letters, memoranda, reports, presentations, notes, or other form of record, regarding an October 19, 2020, email request to review and “clear” a letter involving the Hunter Biden laptop story potentially having Russian involvement or being a Russian disinformation plot. 

“This is a rush job, as it needs to get out as soon as possible,” Morell wrote in an email on Monday, October 19, 2020, at 6:36 a.m., to the CIA’s Publications Classification Review Board (PCRB) with a copy to Marc Polymeropoulos, a former CIA senior intelligence officer. 

This was five days after the New York Post published an article on the Hunter Biden emails, three days before a Donald Trump/Joe Biden debate, and 15 days before the presidential election.

 The “Public Statement on the Hunter Biden Emails” is included in the records. It states in part:

We want to emphasize that we do not know if the emails, provided to the New York Post by President Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani, are genuine or not and that we do not have evidence of Russian involvement — just that our experience makes us deeply suspicious that the Russian government played a significant role in this case.

At 8:01 a.m. the same day, an unnamed CIA official sent Morell’s request to an official whose name is also redacted:

Below is a high profile/high alert action item for 19 October:

Former DDCIA Michael Morell submitted for review the attached manuscript (“Public Statement on the Hunter Biden Emails”). Mr. Morell has advised us that this article was co-authored with former DO officer Marc Polymeropoulos and that “many former senior and working-level officials from across the IC will sign and then be made public. PCRB has determined that this manuscript contains no classified information.” [Emphasis in original]

 At 11:44 a.m., five hours and eight minutes after Morrell sent his request, a person whose name is redacted sends an email stating:

You may notify former DDCIA [Deputy Director] Morell.

 At 12:44 p.m. an official whose name is redacted emails Morell:

 Dear Michael,

The Prepublication Classification Review Board completed its review of your article titled “Public Statement on the Hunter Biden Emails.” The Board determined that it contains no classified information and can be published. Agency approval for publication of this material does not represent Agency endorsement or verification of this work.

If you add new material, please resubmit it before sharing, highlighting the new language to expedite our review. The PCRB appreciates your cooperation with prepublication review. You may reach out to us via [redacted] with questions or concerns.

Kind regards, PCRB Staff 

“These documents are astounding. That the CIA would turn around a campaign document like this for Joe Biden’s team in six hours is insane news,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said. “This seems to be demonstrable campaign interference by the CIA, and that should be alarming to all Americans.” 

Judicial Watch has multiple federal lawsuits focused on Biden family corruption:

In July, Judicial Watch sued the DOJ for records from the Office of the Attorney General and Office of the Deputy Attorney General regarding the Internal Revenue Service investigation of Hunter Biden.

In June 2023, Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit against the Department of Justice for a copy of the FBI FD-1023 form that describes “an alleged criminal scheme involving then-Vice President Biden and a foreign national relating to the exchange of money for policy decisions.” Judicial Watch also asked for communications about the FD-1023.

In May 2023, Judicial Watch filed a FOIA lawsuit against the National Archives for Biden family records and communications regarding travel and finance transactions, as well as communications between the Bidens and several known business associates.

On October 14, 2022, Judicial Watch sued DOJ for all records in the possession of FBI Supervisory Intelligence Analyst Brian Auten regarding an August 6, 2020, briefing provided to members of the U.S. Senate. Ron Johnson (R-WI) and Chuck Grassley (R-IA) raised concerns that the briefing was intended to undermine the senators’ investigation of Hunter Biden.

Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit against the U.S. State Department on April 20, 2022, for messages sent through the SMART (State Messaging and Archive Retrieval Toolkit) system that mention Hunter Biden.

In December 2020, State Department records obtained through a Judicial Watch FOIA lawsuit showed that former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie “Masha” Yovanovitch had specifically warned in 2017 about corruption allegations against Burisma Holdings.

In October 2020, Judicial Watch forced the release of State Department records that included a briefing checklist of a February 22, 2019, meeting in Kyiv between then-U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch and Sally Painter, co-founder and chief operating officer of Blue Star Strategies, a Democratic lobbying firm which was hired by Burisma Holdings to combat corruption allegations. At the time of the meeting, Hunter Biden was serving on the board of directors for Burisma Holdings.

EDITORS NOTE: This Judicial Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

ISRAELI INVESTIGATION: 2020 Election Fraud by the Democratic Party and U.S. Supreme Court

/in , , , , , /by

As America approaches the 2024 Presidential election it is important to understand this Israeli investigations post-election update of the unconstitutional activities of the Democrat Party and U.S. Supreme Court during the 2020 elections.

Below is an Israeli investigations summary, based on the video below, by Israeli journalist Amir Tsarfati on the U.S. 2020 elections fraud on the un-Constitutional activities of the Democrat Party and U.S. Supreme Court in the 2020 Elections- Special Report with a summary.

Please share it with all people as public knowledge based on firm evidence and not on any ideology.

Amir Tsarfati: Post—2020 Elections  Special Report

by Amir Tsarfati and Pastor Mike, Nov 2020

Amir Tsarfati investigated the following and used also an investigation of an Israeli journalist who investigated it.

Following are Israeli investigations about lots of un-constitutional activities of the Democratic Party and U.S. Supreme Court in the 2020 US elections, described in this video  with a summary of key findings:

Democrats created a system to appeal to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court and made it easier to change criteria where every single enveloped would be counted, which allowed them to count ballots sent after election day, by people who left the state, without ID and a signature on them, ballots of dead people and ballots without a name-

Dems prepared before a huge bank of DEAD people and kept them in a separate room.

When the real results started coming in from Florida and Texas and they realized Trump had a big lead on Biden of hundreds of thousands of real votes, they realized they were in real trouble and moved in all the fraudulent ballot votes and even started to create fake ballots on the spot, in the counting room.

They released bulks of ballots that were 100% Biden, they started using the engineered fake ballots from the other room and from trucks that started to download TENs of MILLIONS fake ballot envelops-

This happened at 4 AM in the morning and the Republican observers were asked to leave the room

We have a testimony of a woman on it, from that counting room, who said:

“At 4:00 AM vans started coming in. Ferrari came in and boxes were unloaded and immediately were rushed into the counting room. This is when the Republican observers were literally kicked out of the room”.

The governor and Secretary of Pennsylvania said to all their operatives “Whatever it takes, Trump cannot win this state” and the head of the postal service (all three were Democrats) instructed all his people that any envelop would be counted, even if it was sent after elections day (all the above were unconstitutional acts).

In October 2020 the US chief justice made an unconstitutional decision by allowing the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania to bypass the legislators and do those illegal actions.

Beforehand, they appealed to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania to ease the regulations and allow to count even ballots without a stamp, with no ID or signature- with nothing.

In this case, the Chief Justice of the USA made an unconstitutional decision by allowing the Pennsylvania Supreme Court (with Democrats majority) to do those without going to the legislature in Pennsylvania.

In this case, the USA Supreme Court, in a very odd manner, did not give opinions and explanations. This unconstitutional US Supreme Court created unconstitutional election orders and executive orders.

Dems allow counting ballots three days after election day.

Thousands of people in Michigan, Wisconsin, Arizona, Nevada, and Pennsylvania that do not exist or do not live there, voted.

They released bulks of ballots that were 100% Biden,

By using these banks of illegal ballots on Nov 4, it made the voting of 2020 elections not important: 100 MILLION Americans already SUPPOSEDLY VOTED with the illegal ballots.

We caught them on cameras for the following:

At 4 AM in the morning, Boxes were entered from coming-in trucks and it was moved to the counting room immediately (caught on cameras). They threw away ballots for TRUMP after they already separated them ahead of time (they were not allowed to do that).

It was a huge blue wave and not a red wave.

AUTHOR

Amir Tsarfati

Amir Tsarfati served in the Israel Defense Forces achieving the rank of major. In 2001, Tsarfati founded a non-profit organization called “Behold Israel“, which is focused on reporting current events and developments and has since expanded to an international ministry with extensive in-person teachings and conferences, and online resources.

©2024. Udi Geva. All rights reserved.

RELATED VIDEO: FBI rigs 2020 election by denying Hunter’s laptop was real, but somehow it gets admitted to court as evidence