Tag Archive for: Amil Imani

Political Correctness is the Incubator of Islamism

Time and again, we are told by the politically correct “experts” not to worry about Islam posing a threat to our way of life. We are repeatedly lectured that only a tiny minority of Muslims are troublemakers who are giving the peaceful masses of Muslims a bad name. We are also informed that the terrorists, who happened to be Muslims, are the disaffected and the young. And do not worry, since as the fire of youth turns to ashes of old age, the rebellious will mellow, as they always have.

With heavy assurances like this from so many know-it-all authoritative figures, we can sleep soundly without sleeping pills. After all, people reason that these pundits are “experts” whose job is to know and tell it like it is. Those who voice contrary views must be a bunch of racists and alarmist hatemongers. Who is right?

Wouldn’t it be more prudent to let the facts settle the matter rather than unquestioningly accepting either position? Of course, it would, except for one huge problem. In the face of threats, people tend to go to the mind’s medicine cabinet and take a few denial and rationalization pills, in the same way that it is the aspirin bottle they turn to when a headache strikes. Why not? We are the Easy Species. We love effortless, quick, and simple solutions. And that’s not invariably bad. It has given us all kinds of labor-saving and time-saving devices.

Yet, the Islamic problem is very real and deadly. Neither the pronouncements of the experts nor the tranquilizing pills of the mind can make it go away. It is here and shows every sign of imposing itself on us.

Let us look at some of the facts:

  • Not every Muslim wears an explosive vest ready to detonate amid a crowd of innocent civilians, yet there are more volunteers for the mission than there are explosive vests. The Islamic Republic, for instance, hasn’t even officially joined this form of jihad. Yet, by its admission, it has over 10,000 volunteers trained and ready to be deployed, and thousands more are queuing to join in. This time around, the jihadists heading for Allah’s heaven might come fitted with nice little suitcases of dirty bombs instead of the bulky explosive vests. Recall that it took only 19 of these killers to launch the aerial mass murder of 9/11 that killed 3,000 people, shattered our open, trusting way of life, and cost us billions of dollars.
  • The jihadists are not confined to a minority of disaffected Muslim youth. How young were Bin Laden, his deputy doctor of death Al Zawahiri, Mullah Omar of the Taliban, Khamenei, and the late Rafsanjani of Iran, to name a few? How disaffected are they? Muhammad Ata, leader of the 19 airborne thugs and the decapitator of Wall Street Journal reporter Pearl, was somewhat younger yet well-healed and Western-educated.
  • Coin some terms such as the “Melting Pot” or “Multiculturalism,” and you have the problem solved? Roll out the red carpet for the immigrant Muslims, treat them as you would your citizens, give them stipends, medical care, and free education, and they will integrate seamlessly into society. No such thing at all. The idea of the Melting Pot may work with people who come from different lands to make the new country their home. The Islamists, on the other hand, come with the belief that they already own the place and want to make it part of the Ummah. Some forty percent of second and third-generation Muslim Britons reject British democracy, express their allegiance to Islam, and want to live under Sharia. So much for the Melting Pot comfort pill.
  • The new Islamist arrivals take advantage of the provisions of the most benign system known to humanity, democracy, to implode it from within. Muslims, by sheer numbers, will soon be in a position to vote out democracy in many countries. They are already doing that in bits and pieces. They are imposing many of their values in several societies, even while they are in the minority. Politicians, hungry for votes and devoted to the practice of political correctness, bend backward to accede to Islamists’ demands.
  • As for Multiculturalism, it is even more of a delusion than the Melting Pot myth. It is a second-generation Comfort Pill. Since the Melting Pot proved to be worse than a placebo, the politically correct gave us the new pill. A glance at Europe shows how Multiculturalism has served as the incubator of Islamism in no time at all. Europe’s Multiculturalism is rapidly birthing an Uniculturalism if the Islamists’ medieval way of life can be dignified as a culture.
  • Respect for diversity, separation of religion and state, and freedom of belief and expression are pillars of democracy, yet anathema to Islam. In no Islamic land do you find an ecumenical organization. It is only in non-Islamic countries that the shameless, duplicitous Muslim, be he an imam, a mullah, or a regular run-of-the-mill faithful of Allah, meekly participates in ecumenical feel-good gatherings.
  • To Muslims, no other religion is deemed worthy of recognition, much less accommodation. There is not a single church, synagogue, or Buddhist temple in all of Saudi Arabia. They are barred. The Islamic Republic of Iran’s raft of genocidal pogroms includes the heinous practice of bulldozing even the cemeteries of its Baha’i religious minority. The Islamic tyranny of the mullahs imprisons Christian Iranians for celebrating Christmas. Egypt denies its own citizens identity cards for refusing to lie and fake their religious beliefs or disbelief. The ID cards are required for education, securing work, receiving medical care, and just about every right of citizenship. Without it, a citizen is subjected to a slow death.
  • In Islam, only Muslim men and, to a lesser extent, Muslim women are entitled to certain rights. All non-Muslims, including the so-called people of the book, namely Christians and Jews, are at best second-class subjects, subjects who must pay the back-breaking Jizya, poll tax, for their “sin” of not converting to Islam. So, as Islam makes its inroads in new lands, as its membership swells through explosive birth and conversion, secular democracies will be inevitably replaced by Islamism with its stone-age Sharia laws. The best offer that Islam will make is to spare the non-Muslim’s life if he puts on the heavy yoke of Jizya for the rest of his living days.
  • Not to worry about the horrific things happening on the other side? If Muslims act heinously toward non-Muslims, it is just the way things are in those countries, and it is hardly any of our business. This is the same attitude that set the Islamization of Europe on a seemingly irreversible track. One European country after another is rapidly buckling under the weight of Islamism.
  • * Most importantly, not to worry about the Islamization of our country? After all, Muslims are about 6-7 million minority in a population of nearly 300 million, you reason? That even a smaller number of these Muslims are hothead radicals, while the majority are just like everyone else? However, small minorities can overwhelm the majority by the use of coercion and deadly force. Islamists are notorious for their dedication to the use of force to achieve their aims. The Taliban were a tiny minority in Afghanistan; the Islamists were a small faction in the 1979 Islamic Revolution of Iran. Both overwhelmed the masses and imposed their reign of terror. The terrorist Hamas is also a “minority” in number, yet it rules the Palestinian Territory. Hizballah of Lebanon is a minority, yet it has taken the country to the verge of destruction.
  • Islamists are Islam’s locomotive that takes the wrecking-ball Islamic train on its demolition course. Islam and democracy are incompatible. As democracies practice their magnificent accommodating belief, they knowingly or unknowingly lay the track for the advancing wrecking train of Islam. We, in the United States of America, must resist Islamism while it is still gathering momentum unless we wish to end up in the same fix as the Europeans. ,
  • We, in the United States, further need to embark on a comprehensive legal, educational, and social campaign to eradicate the deadly plague of Islam. By effective action, we even save those peaceful Muslims from their affliction. I am not hatemongering. I would love to see all Muslims become ex-Muslims and full-fledged members of a diverse, tolerant, democratic society. It is a statement of fact about what Islam is. Islam is a highly contagious, pandemic-violent disease that demands urgent and severe containment.

Europe is already severely infected with Islamism. It is the coal miners’ canary. It tells us that the next stop is America. We must act and act now. We must not sacrifice our cherished way of life and the lives of our children at the altar of political correctness: the incubator of Islamofascism.

©2025 . All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLES:

FBI Helped Cover Up Saudi Role in 9/11

Devout Muslims Unknowingly Adhere to a Brutal Death Cult

Muslim Sexual Assaults In Liverpool

RELATED VIDEO: Muslim Brotherhood in the West: Playbook, Propaganda and Policy Fixes

Islam: America’s Historical Failure

Honestly, I don’t know what will work! Apathy, political correctness, and massive Islamic lobbying have successfully prevented the public from truly grasping the all-pervasive, invasive Islamic assault.

As usual, the sworn enemies of the United States- leftist politicians, hungry for votes- despise America and harbor hatred for our Constitution. They delightfully embraced and welcomed this ‘Trojan Horse’ army inside our gates. It was a perfect marriage; both sides needed one another to survive.

These desert dwellers and the Quran-trained people, aided by our leftist politicians, exploit the provisions of the most benevolent system known to humanity- our democratic republic- to undermine it from within.

Islamists, by sheer numbers, will eventually be in a position to vote out democracy in many countries. They will elect Muslims to all positions of local influence, who will create and enforce policies according to the Quran. Once they control a town, they will establish informal Sharia, and there’s nothing the government can (or will want to) do about it.

Oddly enough, our elected officials have entirely overlooked the Islamization of European cities. Many European leaders have acted out of intense fear, granting Muslims the right to create their own shadow governments within countries like Sweden, England, the Netherlands, France, and Belgium, where they control their populations through Sharia Law without any accountability.

America, the greatest superpower on the planet, is gradually losing its power to these newcomers, and out of fear of being labeled racist, they, too, look the other way and remain silent.

The United States was in an excellent place to learn from its fellow European allies and stop this mess of Islamic immigration before it was too late. Even the attacks of 9/11 were not convincing enough for many of our fellow American citizens to wake up!!

Rather than seek a drastic solution to halt the progress of Islam, some of our fellow citizens and elected officials have welcomed more Muslims for resettlement and provided additional resources at the taxpayers’ expense to establish more mosques.

By now, we know that the apparatus that moves Islamic ideology is the life manual of Islam: the Quran, the Hadith, and the Sunna. Unfortunately, Muslims themselves are the ones who Islam most victimizes. They have inherited this viral psychological disease of hate and violence that they live by and transfer it to their children, as well as to sympathetic people in their cause.

It is generally assumed that peaceful religions address matters of importance to daily life and those that transcend it. Religion is believed to exercise a civilizing influence by structuring social life, promoting spirituality, and advancing a range of human virtues. Zoroaster, for instance, based his faith on the triad of good thoughts, good speech, and good deeds; Moses framed the fundamentals of his faith in the Ten Commandments; and Jesus placed love at the core of his beliefs.

Many people adhere to religion to find comfort and guidance in life. These perceived benevolent aspects of religion give it a special status. However, concerns about religious overreach have prompted societies to implement safeguards against that possibility.

The bottom line is that Islam remains a paradox for many, including America’s law enforcement agencies. Many so-called experts have struggled to decipher and understand this ideology, except for a few individuals I know.

It is a virtue to take action to oppose the hateful, a vice to ignore it. It is a virtue to hate tyranny, misogyny, discrimination of all sorts, oppression, and all manner of violations of the legitimate rights of individuals and peoples. Islam is a form of religious fascism, a destroyer of liberty and much of what free people cherish. Therefore, it must be confronted and destroyed ideologically.

Fellow Americans, it is time for us to confront the advancement of Islam in America. The destiny and survival of the free world are at stake. Avoiding this responsibility would be an unpardonable act by every enlightened individual and organization that values humanity.

Life, liberty, and dignity.

©2025 . All rights reserved.

RELATED ARTICLES:

A Criminal Investigator-Intelligence Analysts’ Handbook of Islam

Grand Mufti of Pakistan declares official World Wide Jihad against Israel and all once Islamic lands

RELATED VIDEO: ‘Women Under Sharia’ with National Security Expert Clare Lopez

The TikTok Tussle of Concerns and Legislation

The TikTok Tussle of Concerns and Legislation

BY SUZANNE HARP

Currently, the TikTok ban debate is swirling through the USA and raising concerns about national security and parental frets. Like vigilant conductors, the concerned moms lead the chorus against TikTok’s potential negative influence on their children.

The composition includes worries about inappropriate content, age appropriateness, psychological impact, behavior influence, and safety, as well as the content maestros at TikTok potentially exposing their little ones to unsuitable tunes. Indeed, on the parental front, it is the age-old melody of parental anxiety that echoes, questioning the appropriateness of content and its potential influence on the impressionable minds of children.

A trio of lawmakers is tuning their instruments to legislate a ban on TikTok. The proposed bill to ban TikTok, known as the RESTRICT Act, aims to prevent transactions with social media giants from countries deemed foreign adversaries. The bill seeks to empower the Secretary of Commerce to decide which technologies Americans can or cannot access, and it could potentially exempt lawmakers from providing details about their decision process.

A new movement begins as lawmakers draft legislation forcing app owners to disclose ownership information. Transparency becomes the critical refrain, potentially harmonizing trust among users and attracting a larger audience to the app.

In the ongoing symphony of the TikTok debate, the security movement takes the lead, orchestrating concerns about data safeguarding from the Chinese government. The FBI has also raised the curtain on national security concerns surrounding TikTok’s U.S. operations. The potential for the Chinese government to sway American users or gain control over their devices is immense. FBI warnings give rise to apprehensions about data collection, algorithm manipulation, and the ominous prospect of device compromise on a massive scale.

The ability to compel data sharing upon request and concerns about gathering intellectual property and personal data add a dissonant note to the melody. TikTok, owned by China’s ByteDance, acknowledges a potential breach in fortifying U.S. user data by allowing non-U.S. employees access – a revelation that resonates like a haunting refrain.

However, there are several legal and constitutional challenges to this bill. The First Amendment protects American freedom of speech, and the Berman Amendment restricts the President’s power to regulate or forbid the free flow of information in and out of the country. These laws make banning TikTok for all American citizens an unconstitutional decision. Another critical point is who owns the data garnished from these apps or any other platform? I strongly believe Congress should pass laws or a Data Bill of Rights into the constitution as inherent no different than our identity or image.

Moreover, the RESTRICT Act could be used to challenge these constitutional protections. It would require any ban to be justified by a significant governmental interest and would have to be narrowly tailored to address that interest. This means that ByteDance, the Chinese-based company that owns TikTok, could easily challenge a possible ban in court on constitutional grounds.

China’s National Intelligence Law, a law with an absolute stance on supporting national intelligence efforts, injects an element of suspense. Skepticism surrounds the law’s potential for punishment, raising questions about the compliance dance that foreign and domestic firms may be forced to perform.

The symphony turns unexpectedly as critics argue that the data issue is merely a prelude. The genuine concern lies in TikTok’s potential to manipulate opinions, a potential front-runner in controlling political discourse. The platform’s influence on shaping public sentiment becomes a haunting refrain in the minds of skeptics.

The accusation that TikTok allows access to American data, including sensitive biometrics, heightens the concerns about national security. The risks posed to individual privacy and the broader national security landscape amplify the circumstances surrounding this digital symphony.

Amidst the security overture, proposed legislation emerges as a regulatory intermezzo, introducing potential impacts on app owners and their operations. This legislative sonata could reshape the tech industry’s landscape in significant ways.

The curtain rises on the Increased Transparency Act. App owners may need to pull back the curtains on their ownership structures and operational bases, creating a more transparent tech industry. This shift could harmonize trust among users, potentially attracting a larger audience to the app.

The demand for increased regulatory compliance will only increase, and due to this, App owners may find themselves at the center of this regulatory maelstrom, necessitating robust data security measures and policy updates and potentially altering their business models. Like echoes through the concert hall, the impacts could be felt across financial, operational, and strategic dimensions.

The concerns and legislation continue as the TikTok turmoil reaches its zenith, leaving audiences anticipating the final movement. Will the security overture find a resolution, or will the discord persist, impacting the digital stage? Only time will tell as this intricate symphony unfolds its final notes.

ABOUT SUZANNE HARP

Suzanne Harp (Republican Party) candidate for election to the U.S. House to represent Texas’ 3rd Congressional District. She declared her candidacy for the Republican primary scheduled on March 5, 2024.

©2023. . All rights reserved.