Tag Archive for: Canada

Canadian Mass Shooter Confirmed Transgender — Social Media Footprint Shows Path To Radicalization

The Royal Canadian Mounted Police confirmed Wednesday that the suspect in one of the deadliest school shootings in Canadian history was trans.

The RCMP provided an update on the tragic shooting that shook the nation and left nine dead and 27 injured in Tumbler Ridge, B.C., on Tuesday, confirming the identity of the suspected shooter as 18-year-old local area resident Jesse Van Rootselaar, according to CBC News.

Initial reports described the shooter as a female with brown hair, wearing a dress.

Authorities confirmed Van Rootselaar was born a biological male and began transitioning to female approximately six years ago. The timeline suggests Van Rootselaar started his gender transition when he was just 12 years old.

The social media footprint allegedly tied to Van Rootselaar shows a dangerous, downward path to radicalization.

Police confirmed that Van Rootselaar’s mother, Jennifer Strang, and 11-year-old stepbrother were killed in the attack. Purported screenshots from Jennifer Strang’s Facebook page show her linking to her “[son’s] … YouTube channel,” jesseboy347. The account name appears to have later been changed to “JessJess347.”

The YouTube account features the transgender flag and uses “she/her” pronouns.

The profile image is an anime figure overtop a transgender pride background, alongside an SKS rifle.

Juno News claimed the channel featured just one public post, uploaded six months before the shooting. The post read, “I’ve been pretty um, aimless.”

A Reddit account with a similar username, jesseboy347, depicted identity issues and biological confusion.

In a now-deleted post from 2023, jesseboy347 described an obsession with anime and frustration with body image.

“How do I stop comparing myself to fictional characters?” the individual wrote.

“I’m trans MtF, I’m pre-HRT 15yo and I’ve been viewing a lot of anime related content recently, was never into it before. The characters are always so cute!”

The post continued, “I’m super skinny, so that sometimes makes me feel kinda good! But I’m Pre-HRT and my expectations are minimal for chest growth, and I’m 6ft tall! Why can’t I be petit an smol?”

It’s unclear why the messages, visible Wednesday morning, were stripped from the internet.

Jennifer identified Jesse on her alleged Facebook page with her last name, Strang, rather than Van Rootselaar. Juno News said they spoke to Russell G. Strang, who claimed to be the uncle of “Jesse Strang” and said his nephew was responsible for the mass shooting.

The RCMP also indicated in their press conference that Van Rootselaar had a history of mental health issues and that there had been prior calls to the home.

AUTHOR

Leena Nasir

Entertainment Reporter

RELATED ARTICLES:

Worst Mass Shooting In Decades Reportedly Leaves 9 Dead, Dozens Injured In Canada

Stonewall’s Rainbow Falls: Trump Pulls Pride Flag from ‘Birthplace’ of Modern LGBT Movement

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

She Changed Her Mind. Canada Killed Her Anyway

I call it state-sanctioned murder? What about you? 

An elderly Canadian woman withdrew her request to die, asked instead for hospice care, and was euthanized that same evening.

She was offered no reprieve. No second chance. And no appeal. Death was her only option.

The decision unfolded in hours, not weeks. And it happened inside a system that insists it has safeguards.

According to a report released by Ontario’s Medical Assistance in Dying Death Review Committee, the woman, referred to as “Mrs B,” was in her 80s and recovering from complications following coronary artery bypass surgery.

Her condition declined sharply after returning home, where she received palliative support and was cared for by her husband.

As her health worsened, the burden on her husband increased. Even with visiting nurses, he struggled.

The report later described him as experiencing caregiver burnout, which anyone could empathize with.

At some point, Mrs B reportedly expressed interest in Medical Assistance in Dying, or MAiD, to her family. On the same day, her husband contacted a referral service on her behalf.

But when an assessor met with Mrs B, she changed her mind.

She told the assessor she wanted to withdraw her request for assisted death, citing personal and religious beliefs. Instead, she asked for inpatient hospice care.

That should have ended the process.

It did not.

The morning after withdrawing her request, Mrs B was taken to hospital. Doctors found her medically stable, but documented that her husband was exhausted and overwhelmed.

Her palliative care physician applied for inpatient hospice care, citing caregiver burnout. Despite her request, hospice was denied as she didn’t qualify under strict criteria—leaving death as the apparent ‘solution.’

Later that same day, her husband requested an urgent second MAiD assessment.

A different assessor arrived and deemed Mrs B eligible. That assessor asked to meet Mrs B again the next day.

But that request was declined.

A third assessor was brought in. This assessor also agreed with the second.

Mrs B, however, wasn’t awarded inpatient hospice care. Instead, she was euthanized that evening.

This is not a tragedy caused by confusion. It is not a “complex ethical dilemma.” And it is not compassionate care gone awry.

Mrs B said she wanted to live. She withdrew consent. She asked for hospice. And the state killed her anyway.

If a person explicitly revokes permission to die and is then deliberately put to death, that is not assisted dying. That is not medical care. That is not autonomy. That is state-sanctioned murder.

Words matter

There was no crime. No trial. No sentence. No judge. No jury. No appeal. There was only exhaustion, denial of care, bureaucratic urgency, and a system that decided death was the fastest solution.

Hospice was denied. Time was denied. Her stated wishes were denied. But death was expedited.

This is what happens when a society treats human life as a problem to be solved instead of a gift to be protected. When caregiver burnout becomes justification for killing the person who is hardest to care for. When speed matters more than consent. When safeguards exist on paper but vanish in practice.

Canada’s assisted dying system did not fail Mrs B. It worked exactly as it is designed to.

And that is the most terrifying part.

Because once a government accepts killing someone who wants to live as an acceptable outcome, no safeguard matters anymore. The elderly become vulnerable. The disabled become expendable. The sick become negotiable. And anyone who becomes inconvenient can suddenly be declared “urgent.”

Mrs B did not choose death.

Death was chosen for her.

And if that is not murder, then the word no longer has meaning.

This is why we must pray, advocate, and protect the sanctity of life—before more stories like Mrs. B’s become normalized. Share this if you believe every life deserves to be defended.

AUTHOR

Martin Mawyer

Martin Mawyer is the President of Christian Action Network, host of the “Shout Out Patriots” podcast, and author of When Evil Stops Hiding. For more action alerts, cultural commentary, and real-world campaigns defending faith, family, and freedom, subscribe to Patriot Majority Report.

©2026 . All rights reserved.


Please visit the Patriot Majority Report substack.

‘DON’T DRIVE JEWS’: Jewish Miss Slovakia Miriam Mattova Kicked Out of Uber For Being Jewish

The religion of peace strikes again.

This incident is not unusual. Ubering when Jewish: Never self identify, never use Jewish words when on the phone or mention the Jewish state. Self preservation.

‘Don’t drive Jews’: Jewish ex-Miss Slovakia Miriam Mattova kicked out of Toronto Uber — Interview

“At that moment, I chose to step out of the car, not out of fear but out of clarity. When someone reveals open discrimination, there is no reason to remain in that space,” Mattova explained.

By: Mathilda Heller, Jerusalem Post, December 8, 2025:

Canadian-Slovakian Jewish model Miriam Mattova was kicked out of an Uber in Toronto when the driver realized she was a Jew. Mattov’s lawyer, Howard Levitt, told The Jerusalem Post on Sunday.

The incident occurred on November 30, when Mattova got into an Uber on Dundas Street (booked by her friend) to travel to her home. Once in the car, Mattova facetimed another friend and casually recounted details of her recent trip to Israel.

In the middle of the intersection, the driver, a Muslim woman, suddenly hit the brakes and told Mattova to get out of the car. She asked her what was happening, and the driver responded that she did not feel comfortable with Mattova in the car.

“I asked why, because I still didn’t understand the situation, and then the driver responded by saying they do not drive Jewish people,” Mattova told the Post.

“At that moment, I chose to step out of the car, not out of fear but out of clarity. When someone reveals open discrimination, there is no reason to remain in that space.”

However, they only received a response after the story was published in The National Post.

“Uber responded with a phone call, saying that they are going to give me a refund. I wanted to be clear that this situation is about more than the cost of a ride and that the incident I experienced was a blatant act of antisemitism.”
Mattova inquired as to whether the driver would be removed from the company, to which Uber responded that it could not give her an answer. In a subsequent email correspondence, Uber said it would speak to the driver, but no more information was provided.

“When [Uber] called [Mattova], they wanted to ask whether she had an injury from it, like an insurance company does,” added Levitt. “That is all they were interested in, not about the racism of the driver.”

Levitt sent Uber a letter demanding that it stipulate in every driver’s contract that there can be no discrimination, basing the stipulations on human rights grounds, which of course include religion and race.

Levitt confirmed that if Uber does not respond, he will file a human rights application before the Human Rights Tribunal in Ontario.

Mattova told the Post that since she posted about the incident on Instagram, scores of people have been reaching out to her to say they have experienced similar antisemitic incidents. They had also reported the incidents to Uber but had received no answer.

Continue reading.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

VICTORY: After RAIR Foundation’s Relentless Campaign, Florida Designates Muslim Brotherhood and CAIR as Foreign Terrorist Organizations

Hamas Hid Tons of Baby Formula to Starve Babies So That They Could Blame the Jews

Florida Designates CAIR and Muslim Brotherhood Foreign Terrorist Organizations

“WE ARE BEING EXTERMINATED”: The Real Genocide, Religious Minorities Slaughtered in Syria

‘INSANE’: Zohran Mamdani Appoints Convicted Armed Robber Who Served 7 Years As Criminal Justice Advisor

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Trailer for new documentary on the case of the persecution and prosecution of Helen Grus

This site has given what a lot of readers may think is disproportionate attention to what an outsider might think of as a minor internal police investigation of one of its officers.

In fact it is the clear and detailed example of the communist revolution playing out in real-time.

I found out about this new documentary watching Det. (Ret.) Donald Best on the Jason Levine show on X.com. Det. best reminded me that because of the case of Det. Grus, there is a new law/rule in Canada. Police are no longer allowed to launch a criminal investigation without permission from higher ups. Higher ups certainly means those officers who live in the balance between political interests, and actual criminal investigations which the police had been created to do.

Again, from the outside, it may sound like a good thing that police can’t launch a criminal investigation without permission. But seeing as how it was overtly stated during the trial/hearing of Helen Grus that her investigation into a cluster of baby deaths had political implications and therefore should not have been done, we can know for a fact that this new law/rule about policing in Canada is nothing other than Orwellian.

Better stated, it is nothing short of authoritarian communism as was so brilliantly illustrated in Orwell’s book, 1984, and Animal Farm.

Below is the Levigne Show from today. It also has a lot of excellent material on the state of Canada and Alberta and Quebec separatism. Both of which should now be supported providing they are moves to a Republic like state and not merely part of the dissolution of Canada to create a global Marxist polity.

Canadians and even Americans if you blow this last chance Donald J Trump has given you. Germany’s present is your future. For Canadians, it’s as soon as a few months.

German police raid a libertarian’s home for the crime of calling civil servants “parasites,” advise him to “Think carefully about what you post in future”

EDITORS NOTE: This Vlad Tepes Blog column posted by Eeyore is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

‘Direct And Blatant Attack On Our Country’: Trump Announces End To Trade Talks With Canada

President Donald Trump announced Friday he is ending trade talks with Canada over the northern neighbor’s decision to impose a digital service tax on American technology companies.

Trump called Canada’s decision “a direct and blatant attack on our Country” in a Truth Social post.

“They are obviously copying the European Union, which has done the same thing, and is currently under discussion with us, also. Based on this egregious Tax, we are hereby terminating ALL discussions on Trade with Canada, effective immediately,” Trump also wrote.

Canada is reportedly going ahead with the tax despite its inclusion in the Group of Seven (G7) agreement in which President Trump agreed to remove Section 899, also known as the revenge tax proposal, from his “Big Beautiful” tax billaccording to Bloomberg.

The tax will require digital services companies like Meta to pay 3 percent of the digital services revenue they make on Canadian users above 20 million Canadian dollars ($14.6 million) in a calendar year, according to Bloomberg.

Canada’s tax will apply retroactively to 2022 and the country’s Finance Department says the first payments will be due from digital companies Monday, Bloomberg reported.

Canadian Finance Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne hinted that the tax may be a potential piece of leverage in trade negotiations.

“Obviously all of that is something that we’re considering as part of broader discussions that you may have,” he told Bloomberg.

Trump concluded his Truth Social post with indications that the U.S. will retaliate.

We will let Canada know the Tariff that they will be paying to do business with the United States of America within the next seven day period,” he wrote.

Industry leaders applauded Trump’s move.

“This tax unfairly singles out American firms while local competitors skate by. Whether it’s Brussels or Ottawa, President Trump is right to call them out and force this to change,” John Czwartacki, co-founder and principal at Public Policy Solutions said in a statement provided to the Daily Caller

“Canada is once again seeking to discriminate against U.S. technology companies, this time with a European-style digital services tax,” Michael Lucci, the founder and CEO of State Armor, also said in a statement.  

“This is not how allies and partners should treat one another. Canada is not holding up their end of our partnership, and President Trump is right to stand up for American interests,” Lucci concluded.

AUTHOR

Robert McGreevy

Reporter.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Trump FDA Reveals Canada Will Play Major Role In Bringing Drug Prices Down

Senate GOP Slashes Spending In ‘Big, Beautiful’ Bill As Fiscal Hawks Push For More Cuts

Thom Tillis Announces Retirement Hours After Trump Threatened To Field Primary Challenger

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Trump Tells Carney ‘NEVER SAY NEVER’ and ‘WE DO NOT WANT YOUR CARS!’

During an on-camera Oval Office meeting, Trump doubled down on his suggestion that Canada would benefit from becoming the 51st state even as Carney was adamant it would not happen. “I say ‘never say never.’ I’ve had many, many things that were not doable, and they ended up being doable,”

Trump said. “Canada loves us, and we love Canada. That’s I think the number one thing that’s important. But we’ll see. Over time, we’ll see what happens.”

TOPIC: Trump Tells Carney “NEVER SAY NEVER” and “WE DO NOT WANT YOUR CARS!”

©2025 . All rights reserved.

Alberta Premiere Danielle Smith lays out a potential roadmap which includes a practical method for Alberta separation from Canada

Under Carney and his Trudeau era cabinet, this is probably the only hope for any part of Canada, or existing and legacy Canadians to have any chance at all for an individualist, more or less libertarian existence. Many are greeting her speech with skepticism, as they should. We cannot trust politicians anymore to represent our interests. This much is clear. But if we take her speech at face value, she is entering negotiations with Carney for an Alberta future which he will never agree to. And if he does, it is to lay a trap.

So she clearly states, and recently passed a bill making a referendum on separation, a practical possibility for the near future.

We shall see what we shall see.

RELATED ARTICLES:

ALBERTA Province in Canada Petitions to Become 51st State of America

Alberta premier to chair sovereignty panel, put proposals to 2026 referendum

From Canada, There’s Bad News and There’s Good News

‘It’s Open Season On Jews in Canada’

EDITORS NOTE: This Vlad Tepes Blog column with video posted by is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Canada’s Islamist Takeover: ‘It’s Open Season On Jews And Jewish Institutes’ — An Active Front In The Clash Of Civilizations

MEMRI Daily Brief No. 765

Media reports and videos on social media, immediately after the October 7, 2023 attack and to this day, document a significant segment of Canada’s Muslim community’s targeting, bullying, and trying to intimidate the Jewish community in the country, with disturbing protests often thousands strong. As one recent X post stated, “it’s open season on Jews in Canada.”

While the U.S. has had its share of extremist pro-Palestinian supporters, marching with signs, flags, and banners of Hamas, Hizbullah, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), and other terror groups, and targeting of the U.S. Jewish community, the size and scope of this phenomenon in Canada is even more pervasive and severe – and at times terrifying.

Since October 7, 2023, antisemitic incidents in Canada have increased by 670%, and members of the Jewish community have said they feel abandoned by the government. At the same time, Canada’s Muslim community constitutes 4.9% of the population, and in some cities, including Toronto, it is rapidly approaching 10% – and in the Greater Toronto Area it is 12%-14%; the Canadian Jewish community is less than 1% of the total population.

The growing problem of support within Canada for jihadi groups, which is well documented on social media, has been growing in size and scope for a decade, and the virulent antisemitism and hatred for Israel on full view at these protests is only part of the protestors’ ideology. In addition to the frequent calls for the destruction of Israel, the U.S., and Canada itself, there are calls for jihad and martyrdom. As this phenomenon continues to play out daily, there is a need for some pointed questions about who these protestors actually are. They should be named and exposed, and any who have so far broken laws with impunity should face consequences.

Violent Attacks On The Jewish Community: Schools, Synagogues, Senior Citizens

Self-identified Canadian Muslim supporters of designated terrorist organizations, including Canada’s own Samidoun, a PFLP affiliate, have taken to the streets in full force targeting the Jewish community. They do this not only through aggressive and often frenzied protests, but also through recurring vandalism.

In the past year, this vandalism has included swastikas and graffiti at synagogues – in some cases as many as seven times – along with broken windowsarson attacks against community centersJewish schoolsschool propertymore than one instance of firebombingharassment of and physical attacks on Jewish elementary school students as well as university students and college campusesmultiple instances of gunfire; harassment of worshipers and theft of religious artifacts; shouting for violence against Jews outside Jewish hospitals and chanting support for “the resistance” – i.e. Hamas and Hizbullah – outside Jewish old age homes; picketing Jewish restaurants with terrorist flags; and delivering death threats to Jewish business owners. Just earlier this month, Mohamed Ilyess Akodad was charged with arson and related criminal offenses following his arrest for the December 2024 firebombing of a synagogue in a Montreal suburb.

Mobs have even thronged Jewish residential neighborhoods, going door-to-door to intimidate residents.

Recent Muslim Immigrants Call For Jews Whose Families Have Been In Canada Since The 1760s To “Go Back To Europe” Express Support For Hamas And Hizbullah

Participants in these violent Canadian protests comprise network of jihadi and Islamist sympathizers across the country best described as vile for what they stand for and how they express it. In Montreal, shortly after October 7, 2023, Canadian imam Adil Charkaoui called on Allah to “kill the enemies of the people of Gaza,” shouting “Destroy the Zionist aggressors… Allah, count their number and slay them one by one, and spare not one of them,” as the crowd repeated “Ameen.” Charkaoui had been arrested in 2003, and was alleged to have trained at an Afghanistan camp, but was never formally charged.

A typical protest in Canada features calls for ‘”jihad,” chants of “Jews go back to Europe,” and even “death to Canada,” as participants wave signs and banners with swastikas and the Hamas red triangle, used by Hamas in its videos to mark its targets. These keffiyeh-covered activists and Islamists harass Jews, including children and the elderly.

On a number of occasions, some have dressed up as Hamas fighters, including at universities, and re-enacted the “martyrdom” of Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar, including in Jewish neighborhoods. At their public rallies, they chant their support for the October 7 attacks and give Nazi salutesAt one Toronto rally, protestors praised Sinwar and another slain Hamas leader, Ismail Haniyeh, as well as “resistance fighters.”

Pro-Palestinian rallies in Canada have also featured “kids’ intifada corners” where children, including toddlers, can dress up as Hamas fighters and speakers tout the importance of teaching children to support “the resistance.” Little children are often a feature of rallies and protests.

Mosques Hold Commemorations For Hizbullah Fighters And Iranian Jihadi Figures

The widespread support for Hamas in Canada over the past few years is accompanied by increasing signs of support for Hizbullah and other U.S.- and Canada-designated terrorist organizations, and for Iran. A January 7, 2025 memorial service at the Ahlulbayt Youth Collective in Windsor, Ontario for “martyrs murdered by Israel in Lebanon” highlighted slain Hamas deputy leader Saleh Al-Arouri and Hizbullah officials, as teen boys saluted posters of these “martyrs” while the song “Salute, Commander” played. This is a song that exhorts young people to serve as soldiers for Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and to emulate jihad fighters. Also, a Toronto vigil on January 3, 2025 marking the fifth anniversary of the killing of Iranian IRGC Qods Force commander Qassem Soleimani featured protestors burning U.S., Israeli, and U.S. Marine Corps flags and chanting “Down, Down Trump” and “Death to America!”

Another commemoration in Windsor, for Hizbullah leader Hassan Nasrallah, took place September 29 at the Ahlul Bayt Mosque, a leading Shi’ite Islamic center in the city. This mosque regularly holds memorial services for slain Hizbullah fighters; a previous mass memorial, on June 22, honored over a dozen Hizbullah fighters. The mosque also frequently glorifies Hizbullah on its Instagram account and promotes a Telegram channel providing minute-by-minute updates on operations against Israel by Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, Hizbullah, and other terror organizations.

These celebrations of terrorism do not appear to faze local authorities: Windsor Mayor Drew Dilkens was photographed at an event at the mosque in support of the family of a slain Hizbullah leader. In the photo, Dilkens stands next to Firas Al-Najim, a very active young supporter of the Iranian regime, who wore a scarf depicting Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.

The Ahlulbayt Youth Collective memorial is only one reflection of the clash of civilizations that is growing by the day, not just in Canada and the U.S. but in Europe and Australia as well. As the speaker at the memorial said, in English: “We gathered today for loved ones who paid a price in this battle and in this war, the war of good versus evil… We hear from the evil side that this is not our fight to fight. They are wrong – this is the best time and the best fight.”

In fact, the Islamist and pro-jihadi Canadians see their actions of targeting Jews and others as engaging in a battle of “good versus evil” – with them on the side of good. Their actions reflect deeply held ideological beliefs which are not properly understood by law enforcement, government officials, and others responsible for addressing this threat.

Canadian Law Enforcement Comes Under Criticism For Inaction In Every Case Of Support For October 7 Attack, Amid Accusations Of Political Surrender

Canadian law enforcement has been criticized for inaction in the face of this hatred. Shockingly, video footage of some incidents shows police present but not intervening – and even arresting victims of antisemitic attacks or Jews who fight back. Not a single instance of deportation of extremist activist non-citizens has been reported since October 7, nor has a single mosque exposed as extremist lost its government-granted status. We have also been been unable to find a single significant prison sentence handed down for assaults or property destruction against Jews.

In March, Canada’s largest municipal police force, the Toronto Police Service (TPS), came under criticism for an official TPS podcast episode in which two Muslim liaison officers discussed the positive outcomes of the October 7 Hamas attack, saying that it had produced greater interest in Islam, including more people studying it and converting. The TPS later apologized and deleted the episode.

As disturbing as this law enforcement and judicial passivity is, what is even worse is the inaction or even acquiescence on the part of some of Canada’s political leaders. The government appears to be too timid to deal with this threat. When a “Vigil For Resistance Leaders,” titled “Lest We Forget Our Heroes” and commemorating “the great hero” Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar, was planned by Canadian Defenders 4 Human Rights for November 26, 2024 at a public space in Mississauga, Ontario, the city’s mayor responded to calls for its cancellation by defending the event. Saying “Your terrorist and somebody else’s terrorist may be two different things,” she went on to compare Sinwar to Nelson Mandela. Ultimately, the event did not take place.

Terror Plots, Government Documents Warn Of Coming Lone Wolf Attacks Against Jewish Community

The Islamist protests and violent antisemitic attacks are just one aspect of Canada’s Islamist crisis; there is an omnipresent threat of major terror attacks in Canada as well. Terror plots are regularly disrupted by authorities, and the toxic brew of a growing jihadi threat in the country is reflected by the series of arrests over the past year of would-be terrorists and supporters of ISIS, Al-Qaeda, and other jihadi groups.

Actual terror plots against Jews have been foiled multiple times. In December 2023, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) arrested and charged “a young person” for “facilitation of a terrorist activity by communicating instructional material related to an explosive substance” and “knowingly instructing, directly or indirectly, a person to carry out a terrorist activity against Jewish persons.”

In July 2024, a naturalized Canadian citizen originally from Egypt – who is also accused of war crimes committed outside the country in 2015 – and his son who has refugee status were caught before carrying out their plan for a mass attack against Jews in Toronto. According to a Canadian MP, “we were within a hair’s breadth – minutes, hours or potentially days away – of a mass casualty event on the Toronto Jewish community.” The man who killed 14 people in New Orleans on New Year’s Day is also known to have travelled to Canada in July 2023; authorities are investigating.

Security guard Bezhani Sarvar was charged with firing multiple rounds from an assault rifle and throwing firebombs in Edmonton City Hall in January 2024, as a class of first graders was visiting. In a video manifesto recorded prior to the attack, he addressed “leaders and officials and anybody that has hands in” the “genocide that is going on in Gaza,” saying “Inshallah, we will rise against you.”

Also in January 2024, in Quebec, restaurant employee Ahmed May was arrested and charged with three counts of attempted murder, assault and obstructing police officers at his workplace. Immediately after his attack, he posted photos of himself in the restaurant pointing upward with his index finger in a jihadi gesture, with the words “Free Palestine.” Previously, he had praised Hamas on social media.

In July, the RCMP arrested a father and son, Ahmed and Mostafa Eldidi, on terrorism-related charges, including “participation in the activities of a terrorist group.” They were, according to the RCMP, “in the advanced stages of planning a serious, violent attack in Toronto.” That same month, a British Columbia woman was arrested and charged with terrorism offenses; according to the RCMP, she had left Canada and traveled to Syria in 2015 to join ISIS. And, in August, a “person from the Greater Toronto Area who was allegedly participating in the activities of a listed terrorist group” was arrested and charged with “participating in the activities of a terrorist group and “counselling another person to commit a terrorism offence.”

In March 2025, a Toronto man was convicted of criminal offenses for his threats a year earlier to “plant a bomb in every synagogue in Toronto and blow them up to kill as many Jews as possible.”

These arrests reflect the serious threat of an attack on the scale of 9/11 – not only in Canada but also in the U.S. and Europe – with the very real possibility that the Jewish community will be targeted. In one close call, a man arrested in Canada in September had sought to carry out the “largest” U.S. attack “since 9/11,” involving the “murder [of] as many Jewish people as possible” in New York, “all in support of ISIS.” The attack was planned for around October 7, 2024. Canadian lawyer and author Warren Kinsella wrote in the Toronto Sun about reports from the Integrated Terrorism Assessment Centre (ITAC) – the Canadian federal body assessing terror threats in the country – that were declassified in 2024; one stated: “Amid (rising) antisemitic hate, an undetected lone actor could commit an act of serious violence in Canada at any time.”

The very active PFLP-affiliated Samidoun organization, finally outlawed and designated as a terror group in Canada in October after it had been banned years ago by other countries, operated with impunity across the country, harnessing student movements to work for its Marxist and terrorist agenda and raising funds for the PFLP. As of this writing, it continues its activities wherever it is allowed.

Extremist Mosques And Imams Openly Incite Their Communities, With Calls For Violence – Including Calls For Jihad And Martyrdom, And Praise For Hamas And Hizbullah

Over the past year, MEMRI has monitored scores of extremist mosques and imams in Canada, documenting many of them flaunting their support for jihad, and openly and proudly posting videos of their lectures and sermons on social media for the world to see. Canadian authorities continue to avert their eyes from figures such as British Columbia’s Sheikh Younus Kathrada, known for labeling Canadian society “evil and filthy” and regularly calling for the annihilation of the Jews. He was even invited to speak in November 2024 at the University of Victoria by the Muslim Student Association, but once this became public and an outcry ensued, the invitation was rescinded. One of his recent sermons praised Sinwar and denounced young Muslims who do not follow in his footsteps; he has also called Jews apes, pigs, and vermin. Other sermons of his are explicit calls for jihad and martyrdom – in other words, incitement to young Muslims to carry out suicide attacks to gain the rewards of martyrdom, including “72 black-eyed virgins.” Despite being the object of mainstream media attention, Kathrada continues undisturbed by any government or legal action.

Kathrada is only one of the many extremist sheikhs in Canada who have openly mourned Hamas leaders responsible for the October 7 attack and other terror leaders eliminated by Israel. The main mosque in Hamilton, Ontario held a memorial service for Sinwar on October 18, 2024; the proceedings were broadcast by Qatar’s Al-Jazeera TV. Also, at the Islamic Centre of Southwest Ontario in London, on October 25, Canadian imam Munir El-Kassem eulogized Sinwar at length, saying: “What a beautiful lesson Abu Ibrahim [Sinwar] gave us. What a beautiful lesson.”

In the Vancouver area, in Coquitlam, imam Adnan, in his August 2, 2024 sermon, called jihad the “pinnacle of Islam” for which Allah has awakened desire. The “Jews – may Allah curse them,” he added, had killed “the martyr” Hamas “mujahid leader” Ismail Haniyeh – just as they had attempted to poison Islam’s Prophet Muhammad, according to a hadith. He concluded: “May Allah curse them and the Christians that are supporting them… [and] the Christian and atheist countries that are supporting them, the U.S., and everyone that is supporting them – may Allah curse you.”

Ayman Taher, chaplain at the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto – Canada’s most research-intensive hospital and largest children’s health center – praised Hamas and its founder Ahmed Yassin in his December 18, 2023 speech at Toronto Palestine House. Focusing on children, he exhorted his audience to have their children watch an interview with Yassin predicting Israel’s end in 2027, because, he said, Yassin “never doubted that Allah is going to give victory to His religion, [and] we [also] should not, because he has inspired millions.” He was later suspended from his position pending investigation.

Imams in Canada are inciting not just against Jews but also against Christians. In his April 25, 2025 Friday sermon at the Toronto and Region Islamic Centre, following the passing of Pope Francis, Canadian Islamic scholar Abdullah Hakim Quick spoke about the arrogance shown by Christians in Arabia against the Prophet Muhammad, likening it to the attitude of Christians in the Vatican today, saying, “You see them with their clothing, their arrogance, and their splendor.” The Christians of Arabia were allowed to remain Christians, he said, but had to pay the jizya poll tax. Turning to Canada, he said that three things distinguish Muslims in the country from the Christian majority: Christians eat “swine flesh,” use “pagan symbols” like the cross, and have no modesty or shame. Adding that Jesus is alive, he said that He will return to rule over the Muslims, and will he will slay the pigs and break the cross.

Despite The Threat Of Radicalization, Foreign Extremist Sheikhs Regularly Visit Canada

Another problem is that mosques and other venues in Canada regularly host extremist imams and sheikhs from outside the country, from the U.S. and elsewhere, who are allowed to freely enter the country to speak to large audiences. In August, for example, a touring Saudi cleric, Assim Al-Hakeem, who had said that “3,000 Jews did not go to work ” on 9/11, was set to speak at a theater in Montreal, after an engagement earlier that month at a Winnipeg church. The Montreal event was eventually cancelled.

Muhammad Hijab, who has been condemned for inciting violence against the LGBT community, Jews, Hindus, and other groups, was scheduled to speak at a “Reviving Roots Conference” in Burlington, Ontario. The event was eventually cancelled following pressure from the community and politicians. The “2025 Khilafah [Caliphate] Conference” planned by the Islamist group Hizb ut-Tahrir Canada was initially slated to be held in Hamilton, Ontario before being moved to Mississauga, but eventually moved to online only, with no apparent consequences for anyone involved in it. This is despite the fact that Hizb ut-Tahrir is banned in many countries worldwide.

A Clash Of Civilizations Is Playing Out In Canada

The pro-Palestinian protests, often expressing outright support of designated terrorist and extremist groups, and the increasing extremism taking over the mosque pulpits – all from a bold new post-9/11 generation – are evidence of, in their words, a “clash of civilizations” between Islamists and Western society. Across the West – Canada, the U.S., Europe, and Australia – lines are being drawn, as children, teens, and susceptible young Westerners are indoctrinated in the virtues of jihad and martyrdom, and extremist sheikhs incite their followers to attack unbelievers. They demand that the Jews return to Europe, amid calls for “death to Canada” and to other Western countries where they reside.

Some Canadian government officials have proposed solutions to begin to address this challenge, including establishing and implementing a national plan to combat antisemitism and to protect Canadian democracy from pro-Hamas, pro-Iran, and jihadist movements. But to this day, no actual steps have been taken.

Canada is respected around the world for its welcoming of immigrants, its tolerance, and its vibrant multiculturalism. It has proudly accepted tens of thousands of refugees over the past decade from the Syrian civil war, and is reportedly now taking in 5,000 Palestinian refugees. Sadly, it appears to also be welcoming, as well as tolerating, those who seek to attack other Canadian communities, such as the Jews, and who also seek the destruction of Canada as we know it – with no ability to summon the will to change course.

AUTHORS

Steven Stalinsky, Ph.D. Executive Director of MEMRI

Elliot Zweig Deputy Director of MEMRI

EDITORS NOTE: This MEMRI report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Canada’s Crossroads: Globalism, Islamism, and the Future for Jews

Canada’s April 28th election comes at a pivotal moment. Mark Carney, the new Liberal leader and longtime globalist insider, is pushing forward a vision for Canada shaped by centralization, mass immigration, and policies that erode national identity. 

Sonia Bailley – RAIR FOUNDATION —  Paired with the rise of Islamic influence, this alliance threatens freedom, fuels antisemitism, and marginalizes Canadian Jews.

This isn’t a sudden shift. Carney has been steering Canada’s trajectory for years—from his time as Governor of the Bank of Canada and the Bank of England, to his role as Trudeau’s unelected COVID-era advisor, and as a key figure in the UN, WEF, and Bilderberg Group. He represents the same globalist elite that empowered Trudeau and now seeks to consolidate control with Carney’s official entry into politics.

Islam has become a strategic partner in this agenda, exploiting globalist policies that erase borders and dissolve shared values. Islam, rooted in allegiance to the Ummah rather than any one nation, resists integration and drives parallel societies. The result is cultural fragmentation and a rise in antisemitism, already seen across Europe—and now mirrored in Canada.

Carney and the Liberals have tolerated and even rewarded this trend. Pro-Hamas protests that glorify violence are protected by police, while peaceful trucker protests were crushed and demonized. Canada’s $100 million aid pledge to the Palestinians will flow through Hamas-linked channels and fund a terror regime that incentivizes the murder of Jews via the PA’s Pay-for-Slay program.

Meanwhile, Canadian Jews are increasingly under attack. Since October 7, there’s been a dramatic surge in antisemitic violence—synagogues vandalized, Jewish businesses targeted, and students harassed on campuses. The government’s silence emboldens these acts, while speech-restricting laws (C-11, C-18, C-63) make it dangerous to speak out.

This is not just neglect—it’s strategy. Globalist elites like Carney rely on instability to justify tighter control. Islam, refusing to integrate, helps create that chaos. Together, they undermine national sovereignty while shielding themselves from criticism.

Mass immigration is a key pillar of this transformation. The Century Initiative—co-founded by Carney ally Mark Wiseman—calls for growing Canada’s population to 100 million, not to strengthen the nation, but to dilute cohesion and increase dependency.

Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre offers a stark alternative. He condemns pro-Hamas extremism, defends free speech, and stands firmly with Israel and Canadian Jews. His platform pushes back against globalist overreach and restores national priorities.

This election isn’t just political—it’s existential. Canadian Jews face a growing threat. Canadians must decide: surrender sovereignty to globalist-Islamic power, or reclaim control, confront antisemitism, and defend Western values.

The choice is clear—and time is short.

RELATED ARTILES:

JORDAN OUTLAWS the Muslim Brotherhood

YONI BEN MENACHEM: How can Israel increase pressure on Hamas?

U.S. weapons abandoned in Afghanistan supplied to Houthis​

Brig. Gen. Wiener: Anti-war protests blocked hostage deal

‘Son of Hamas’ explains why Arab countries refuse Palestinian refugees

RELATED VIDEOS:

Why is the U.S. vigorously fighting the Houthis but the EU doesn’t?

MUST SEE: The Moment a Terrorist is Shot and Killed

EDITORS NOTE: This Newsrael News Desk column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


Download the Newsrael App: Google PlayAppStore

‘Worst-Case Scenario’: Canada Trades Trudeau For Another … Trudeau

Mark Carney, the newly elected Canadian Liberal Party leader positioned to succeed Justin Trudeau as Prime Minister, may impose familiar far-left policies to the nation already burdened by inflation and regulation, some critics warn.

Carney, ex-central banker of the Bank of Canada and the Bank of England as well as the former UN Special Envoy on Climate Action and Finance, won his party’s support in a landslide victory Sunday. The new Liberal Party leader was recently appointed to head a Liberal task force on economic growth, with support from Trudeau, who resigned in January following years of economic trouble and a public dispute with President Donald Trump.

“This is about a worst-case scenario for Canadians,” Marc Morano, the head of Climate Depot and author of “The Great Reset: Global Elites and the Permanent Lockdown” told the Daily Caller News Foundation. Morano cited concerns over how a Carney-led government would oppose the latest political and economic trends seen in Argentina, the United States and most recently, Germany, to instead “hammer consumers” and “double down on the green agenda.”

“It’s as if he’s looked at the world the last five years and completely ignored reality,” Morano continued.

Morano described Carney as “Justin Trudeau 2.0” and a “power player” that supports “corporate government collusion,” even comparing him to “BlackRock CEO Larry Fink, in terms of his power, expertise, connections and ability.”

Canada’s Conservative Party leader Pierre Poilievre now faces a reinvigorated Liberal Party, though he’s led in the polls since October, according to CBC News.

“Liberals are trying to trick Canadians into electing them for a fourth term by replacing Trudeau with his economic advisor, Mark Carney,” Poilievre said on X in response to Carney’s victory.

Carney is a staunch supporter of green energy policies and has vowed to “reward Canadians for making greener choices, such as purchasing an energy efficient appliance, electric vehicle, or improved home insulation,” though he also promises to cut the country’s carbon tax, which has been described as “very unpopular,” according to a campaign press release.

The Liberal Party leader has a long record of supporting green energy policies, even if they conflict with the flow of the free market. “Achieving net zero emissions will require a whole economy transition – every company, every bank, every insurer and investor will have to adjust their business models,” Carney said at the COP26 UN climate talks in 2020. “This could turn an existential risk into the greatest commercial opportunity of our time,” he claimed.

“Canada’s current climate policy has become too divisive,” a press release from Mark Carney’s campaign also reads. “We need a climate policy that is unifying, credible, and predictable—to reduce emissions, drive investment, and build an economy for the future.”

During his victory speech in Ottawa, Carney also said that “Donald Trump is trying to weaken [Canada’s] economy. But there’s someone else who, if he succeeds, will weaken our economy. It’s Pierre Poilievre. … A lifelong politician who worships at the altar of the free market despite never having made a payroll himself.”

“Pierre Poilievre’s plan will leave us divided and ready to be conquered,” Carney continued. “Because a person who worships at the altar of Donald Trump will kneel before him, not stand up to him.”

Carney has spoken out against Trump’s tariffs on Canadian imports, writing on X that they are “unjustified” on Thursday. The Trump administration argues that these tariffs are in response to the “flow of fentanyl” into the U.S. from Canada, further adding, “the situations at our Northern and Southern borders continue to require appropriate action from the Governments of Canada and Mexico.”

“The world is absolutely going in the opposite direction from everything Carney stands for,” Morano said. He noted that Carney is “poised now to wreak this hellscape on Canadians,” potentially forwarding policies that will cause prices and restrictions to soar.

“It’s easier to transition your gender than it is our energy supply,” Morano said. He asserted that clean energy power supply comes at a “higher cost, and it’s not green.” The author pointed to the fact that it takes 45 tons of non-renewable plastic to make one wind turbine.

Morano also questioned green energy’s profitability, suggesting that if clean energy alternatives were profitable, green energy policies wouldn’t need to be mandated or subsidized. “Why do they have to ban the competition? … Why did you have to mandate them? Why did you have to subsidize them? Why are they the weakest points of energy output?”

Justin Trudeau announced his resignation in January after nine years in office and a sharp decline in approval ratings. Since 2015, Canada’s national debt has nearly doubled, Bloomberg reported, prompting citizens’ increased discontent with the state of the economy. Canadians cited the cost of living as their biggest concern that they wanted members of Parliament in the next session to focus on, according to an Ipsos poll taken in September.

Mark Carney’s campaign did not respond to the DCNF’s request for comment.

AUTHOR

Audrey Streb

Contributor.

RELATED ARTICLE: Liberal Party Chooses Mark Carney As New Canadian PM As Trudeau Era Closes

RELATED VIDEO: MASSIVE voter fraud is taking place in Canada!

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

CANADA: 100 Synagogues and Jewish institutions get bomb threats – but you wouldn’t know it from CTV UPDATES

100 Synagogues and Jewish institutions get bomb threats

THIS is a crime. Not a hate crime, a crime and a large scale one. Any judge worthy of dry cleaning his robes would factor in motive to the sentence should the state bother to track this down and lay appropriate charges.

Montreal synagogues on Canada-wide list of threatened Jewish institutions

Montreal police (SPVM) says at least a dozen synagogues in Montreal are on a list of more than 100 places of worship across Canada that received a threatening email Wednesday morning.

The force received a 911 call at 7:10 a.m. about the email, which was received at 5 a.m., and officers are currently onsite at Adath Israel Poale Zedek Anshei Ozeroff on Harrow Crescent in Hampstead.

So far, the force says it has not found any reasonable threat.

“The premise was checked inside and outside. No threats were found, nothing was found,” said Montreal police spokesperson Sabrina Gauthier. “We will complete an analysis of the email.”

Rabbi Michael Whitman tells CTV News that morning services were halted at 6:30 a.m. following the threats. About 15 people were evacuated from the building.

Whitman says synagogue members will receive updates on the situation. For now, he says the institution remains open.

Gauthier confirms officers are also checking for potential threats at other Jewish establishments across the city.

The force says it is consulting with its hate crime squad, and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) is now in charge of the investigation.

As usual reading CTV, the reader is forced to decode it to try and figure out WTF it actually means. How do police search for “a threat” exactly. CTV in fact does not include materials that they clearly are likely to have had at the time of publication. Materials like this:

Whole image of communication.

Meanwhile, we can hope that the police have more specific information than just “threats” to look for.

UPDATE: 

RCMP tweets in which they manage to say as little as CTV:

I believe the hospitals were entirely Jewish ones. But can’t confirm that from the RCMP tweets. I wonder why that is. They also seem to make moral equivalence between all faith based leaders, as if for instance, hypothetically mosques had all been targeted, or if Islam had any actual hospitals, they were targeted.

EDITORS NOTE: This Vlad Tepes Blog column posted by  Eeyore is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

DAVID BLACKMON: The One Simple Reason Electric Vehicles Are Doomed To Fail

In a story that seems to be becoming increasingly common as time goes on, The Western Journal reported this week about a Canadian EV owner experiencing some massive sticker shock over the cost of replacing the damaged battery in his electric vehicle.

Now, those of us who have always driven internal combustion engine (ICE) cars have at one time or another been faced with big repair bills for some of those vehicles. I can remember spending $4,000 on a new radiator for a 10-year-old Infiniti QX 50 with 220,000 miles on it that I just couldn’t bear to part with several years back. I did finally retire that wonderful vehicle when faced with the prospect of a $6,000 tag for a rebuilt transmission.

So, all cars will eventually cost you or your insurance company big money to repair — no one is saying that’s unique to EVs. But where EVs are concerned, it’s the magnitude of the price for replacing a damaged or worn-out battery that is often quite eye-popping.

I wrote a story in September about a fellow in the U.S. deciding to junk his paid-off EV when he got an estimate of $30k to replace his battery. We now see frequent reports that auto insurance companies are charging higher rates for EVs than for comparable ICE cars due in large part to this extravagant battery replacement cost.

If you think that $30,000 is extravagant, well, get ready, because it apparently isn’t even close to the worst-case scenario. Per the Western Journal, a Canadian man, Kyle Hsu, paid roughly $55,000 Canadian ($41,583 US) in 2022 to buy a brand new Hyundai IONIQ 5. But, less than a year later, Mr. Hsu was involved in what seemed to be a minor accident resulting in superficial damage to his beautiful EV.

Unfortunately for Hsu, it turned out that the battery protector cover on his car’s undercarriage was warped, a problem that could in certain instances cause the battery to explode. This meant that he would have to replace his car’s battery pack in addition to fixing its structural damage. Hsu says he was shocked when the estimate to replace the battery came in at $61,000 Canadian, or about $46,000 in US dollars. That’s almost $6,000 more than he paid for the car when he purchased it brand new.

Even worse, because the damage was caused by an accident, the bill was not covered by the car’s warranty, leaving Hsu with the alternative of filing a claim with his insurance carrier. But the resulting insurance implications were enormous, with Mr. Hsu facing a rate increase of up to 50% if he filed the claim. His only other choice would be to foot the repair bill himself and now have over $87,000 US dollars invested in a $41,000 car.

This is insane. This is not sustainable. The EV industry simply cannot have stories like this one popping up with increasing frequency and hope to sustain growing demand for its products.

When you combine horror stories like this one with:

  • range anxiety that pops up any time the weather isn’t perfect;
  • the lack of charging infrastructure;
  • the unreliability of the infrastructure that does exist;
  • the non-recyclability of the battery materials;
  • the increasing restrictions on charging due to the massive load EVs place on the grid;
  • and all the other significant issues EV makers have yet to address,

You see an industry that is almost doomed to failure before it really gets up and running.

I frequently remind readers that EVs have been around since the 1880s. They are not a new idea in any sense of that word. If they were really the answer to displacing ICE cars at societal scale, it seems likely they would have already done so. What we see popping up with increasing frequency now in the form of stories like this one are simply manifestations of the reasons why that has not already happened.

EVs today are what they have always been: A niche product, a luxury item suitable to fill discreet purposes for the upper 5% or so elites in any society. The technology simply is not there yet to make them anything more than that.

AUTHOR

DAVID BLACKMON

David Blackmon is an energy writer and consultant based in Texas. He spent 40 years in the oil and gas business, where he specialized in public policy and communications.

The views and opinions expressed in this commentary are those of the author and do not reflect the official position of the Daily Caller News Foundation.

RELATED ARTICLES:

DAVID BLACKMON: Climate Fascists Are On The March

Climate Radicals Block Major Highway In Netherlands

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

Elon Musk: Justin Trudeau is trying to ‘crush free speech in Canada’

The biggest accomplishment of Justin Trudeau is that he managed to make Canada a focus of intense international media attention, but not for respectable reasons. Canada’s freedoms are being severely compromised, and it is drowning economically as well. The latest out of Canada: Elon Musk tweeted that Trudeau is trying to crush free speech in Canada.

The proverbial ship has sailed. It has been a long, tough process for patriotic Canadians as they watch Trudeau strip away their freedoms. Musk was responding to a new law in Canada, Bill C-18, that requires social media and streaming services with revenues over $10 million to register with the government, starting in November 2023. Subscription television services which are available online, as well as Facebook, X, Netflix, and Disney, are also included, as are radio stations that livestream online, and podcast services. Individual podcasters need not worry, unless, of course, they make over $10 million in revenue.

The wing of the Canadian government overseeing Bill C-18 is the Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC). Details of the requirements can be found here.

Trudeau is beyond “trying to crush free speech” in Canada, as Musk observed. He has already largely succeeded, and has trampled not only the freedom of speech. Other examples of Trudeau’s infringement of the freedom of Canadians include:

Bill C-18 did not suddenly appear in a kind of jump scare. The impetus for it was building over time, and its basis was actually formed under Canada’s anti-Islamophobia Motion, M-103, which “progressives” did everything they could to present as a benign motion which didn’t carry any legal ramifications. Everyone already knew that it wasn’t legislation, but few were willing to address its impact in laying the groundwork for a future bill, which we now see in  Bill C-18.

In February, Trudeau’s own appointed Senator David Richards described the prime minister’s sweeping censorship Bill C-11, a precursor to Bill C-18, as “Stalinesque.” Richards called it “an Orwellian attempt to force individuals to comply with government messaging.” Richards’ description may have seemed exaggerated to those who were unaware of Trudeau’s activities, but it was spot-on.

Bill C-18 followed. It was also known as the Online Streaming Act. It was an updated version of Bill C-11, which it incorporated, with an addition: it requires digital giants such as Google and Meta to pay compensation to Canadian news sites to share any of the news content that appeared on their platforms. University of Ottawa Professor Michael Geist characterized it accurately: “Bill C-18 is a shakedown with requirements to pay for nothing more than listing Canadian media organizations with hyperlinks in a search index, social media post, or possibly even a tweet.

The response from Google, Facebook and Instagram to Bill C-18, when they were asked to compensate Canadian news outlets, elicited a meltdown from Trudeau. Did he really expect social media giants to comply with his shakedown? Meta said it would shut out news in the country, meaning that all Facebook and Instagram users in Canada would be blocked from accessing news on these platforms. Google stated:

We have now informed the Government that when the law takes effect, we unfortunately will have to remove links to Canadian news from our Search, News and Discover products in Canada, and that C-18 will also make it untenable for us to continue offering our Google News Showcase product in Canada.

When Canada’s wildfires broke out and news was fundamental to access, everyone knew exactly whom to blame: Trudeau. But he wouldn’t accept responsibility. Instead, he blamed Meta and Google for supposedly “putting corporate profits ahead of people’s safety.

Vicky Eatrides, Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer of the CRTC, stated:

We are developing a modern broadcasting framework that can adapt to changing circumstances. To do that, we need broad engagement and robust public records. We appreciate the significant participation during this first phase and look forward to hearing a diversity of perspectives at our contributions proceeding in November.

The government further explains:

A new bargaining regime to govern the making available of news content
The operators of dominant digital news intermediaries to which the Act applies would be subject to a new duty to bargain with eligible news businesses, which may bargain individually or as a group. This duty to bargain would arise when an eligible news business initiates bargaining with a digital news intermediary organization subject to the Act. The bargaining process could involve up to three sequential steps: bargaining sessions; mediation sessions; and final offer arbitration.

Final offer arbitration
When digital news intermediaries and news businesses do not reach agreements about making news content available through bargaining or mediation sessions, outstanding monetary disputes may proceed to a final offer arbitration process if at least one of the parties wishes to initiate arbitration. Under this process, an independent panel of arbitrators would select a final offer made by one of the parties.

This gibberish not only establishes powers of the CRTC online to set up an annoyingly inconvenient system in which potential users must now compete in a bargaining process, but it leaves a lot of questions about the players who will be comprising these “mediation sessions” and this “arbitration” on the government side. And beware whenever a government uses terms such as “independent panel,” because they are never “independent”; they end up being staffed with government cronies who are paid by taxpayers to advance the interests of the regime. And as for the sections of Bill C-18 guaranteeing the “freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression,” not even the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms has  stopped Trudeau from his encroachments upon Canadian freedoms.

The world is increasingly coming to know what Canadians have been enduring ever since Trudeau came to power in 2015. In a telling gesture, Trudeau shut down the Office of Religious Freedom almost immediately after taking office. Three years later, his government made a change to the Canada Summer Jobs program that required organizations to tick a box affirming that they supported abortion in order to qualify for government funding. The former head of the Office of Religious Freedom, Andrew Bennett, pointed out Trudeau’s “totalitarian tendency,” and he has been proven right.

It was inevitable that Bill C-18 would now require registration with the Canadian government. The CRTC, which has been regulating Canada’s airwaves since 1976, is the reason why Canadian productions are so limited in content. Some would even say they’re boring. There is little room for full creativity. Now the CRTC has expanded online in its attempt to tighten its grip and stymie free expression, after the fashion of China and Iran.

M-103 was passed in 2018. It was cleverly presented as only a motion — not a law — but it was part of the groundwork for something more nefarious: a broad assault upon the freedom of expression. After extensive committee hearings, the Minister of Heritage, who was Melanie Joly at the time, published a document entitled “TAKING ACTION AGAINST SYSTEMIC RACISM AND RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION INCLUDING ISLAMOPHOBIA.” It stated:

The Government acknowledges that in order to fully understand the issues and challenges confronting Canada’s increasingly diverse population, comprehensive and high quality data is required to better monitor and target policies to eliminate discrimination and inequalities.

Those policies favored the red-green axis and were grounded in wokeism. They eventually resulted in the appointment of an “Islamophobia Czar“; Trudeau’s absurd designation of the patriotic Freedom Convoy as “racist” (and his subsequent crackdown on them); and the passing of Bill C-11, which promised “greater support for Black, Indigenous and racialized people’s content and viewpoints,” as determined by the woke Trudeau government. A group aligned with Trudeau, the Racial Equity Media Collective, called for a “mandatory collection of race-based data by broadcasters…” Then came a government-funded school booklet that warned the country’s children against the Conservative Party, the freedom of speech and even Donald Trump. The booklet was entitled Confronting and Preventing Hate in Canadian Schools; it was created by the far-left “anti-hate” network led by Bernie Farber, a member of the Trudeau government’s “’expert’ advisory group on online ‘safety.’” Some highlights of this 53-page propaganda booklet:

  • Freedom of expression is presented as a cover for “hate.”
  • Trump’s border wall to stop illegals is likewise presented as “hate.”
  • Mainstream Conservative parties are singled out, and are presented as being “infiltrated” by bigots, “groypers,” and “white nationalists.” The pamphlet actually states: “While the majority of Groypers are white, there are a growing number of youth of colour involved in the movement, as they engage in antisemitism, anti- feminism/misogyny, anti-2SLGBTQIA+, Islamophobia, and anti-Black racism.”
  • It condemns a “specific Canadian flavour” of the “worldview”  that is “seen on many college campuses, often under the banner of “Canada First.”
  • In a chapter on “hate promoting symbols,” the booklet names the Red Ensign flag as offensive, even though it was used as Canada’s national symbol until 1965.
  • It condemns concerns about terrorism and crime as “anti-immigrant.”
  • It references  Trump as a “problematic politician” and condemns his border wall as “racist.”
  • It warns about students who may inquire “why there aren’t any straight pride parades, or a white history month during class discussion.
  • Without context, anti-police sentiment is taught; the pamphlet claims that “Black residents are 20 times more likely to be shot by Toronto police than white counterparts.”
  • The booklet ironically utilizes intersectional tropes and stereotypes “people of colour,” stating that “shared beliefs in misogyny, anti-2SLGBTQIA+, Islamophobia, and anti-Blackness will often attract and unite people of colour to hate groups.”
  • It heavily promotes the Marxist, anti-nuclear family Black Lives Matter movement.

The Canadian government’s mission was clear by that point, and that mission is now broadening via Bill C-18. Trudeau has severely impaired and is now working to marginalize the freedom of speech. Trudeau, with whom Canadians are stuck until the 2025 elections, is well on his way to crushing that freedom. The leader of Canada’s official opposition Conservative Party tweeted:

As Trudeau tries to extend his egoism and oft-noted totalitarian tendencies beyond the borders of Canada itself, he may be in for a tougher ride than he anticipated. The ongoing controversy with India isn’t about to disappear, especially in light of the fact that India has just ordered Canada to remove 41 diplomats from its Delhi embassy. The Hindustan Times just published a story entitled Elon Musk’s Big Attack On Trudeau Amid India Tensions; ‘Canada Govt Crushing. Now Trudeau must contend with Facebook as well as Musk’s X. Add in the brouhaha over Canadian MP’s giving standing ovation to a prominent Nazi during a Zelensky visit to Ottawa, and the accompanying calls for accountability.

AUTHOR

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Bud Light Sponsors Raunchy Pride Show After Desperately Trying To Salvage Its Image

Bud Light sponsored a pride drag show in Toronto, Canada which featured dancers performing with their breasts exposed in leather suits and strange face masks, according to Bud Light Canada.

Video taken by journalist Beth Baisch shows drag performers dancing provocatively in exposed clothing with face masks. A large Bud Light banner can be seen near the stage.

“Bud Light Canada has been a proud partner of Pride Toronto for the last 10 years,” Bud Light Canada’s website reads. “This year, we’re commemorating this milestone with Pride Toronto by featuring them on our can design, as well as continuing as the official beer sponsor of the festival.”

“As a brand, Bud Light Canada is excited to once again celebrate and support the LGBTQIA2S+ community through Pride Toronto’s annual pride celebration and parade.”

Anheuser-Busch — Bud Light’s parent company — sent a can of beer to transgender TikTok star Dylan Mulvaney celebrating his “365 Days of Girlhood.” Mulvaney, a biological male, also posted several videos promoting the beer brand. Mulvaney creates TikTok videos documenting his “Days of Girlhood,” which critics accuse of promoting a demeaning depiction of womanhood.

Bud Light’s in-store sales plummeted during the week of April 17-22, according to a report by Bump Williams Consulting. Sales dropped by 21%, and 11% in the two weeks preceding. Pours in bars and restaurants across the country have also decreased, with servers pouring 6% less Bud Light from April 2 to April 15, per the report.

Bud Light’s year-over-year sales numbers have continued to drop in June, three months after the company’s partnership with Mulvaney sparked boycotts.

Anheuser-Busch is reportedly giving distributors free beer to apologize for their plummeting sales. In an apparent bid to win back customers, the company is reportedly producing camouflage bottles with images of the “Folds of Honor” program, which helps families of fallen service members.

AUTHOR

SARAH WEAVER

Social issues reporter.

RELATED ARTICLES:

New Jersey AG Sues School Districts Over Policies Prohibiting Teachers From Secretly Transitioning Students

BETSY MCCAUGHEY: America’s Silent Majority Is Turning Up The Heat On LGBTQ Activism — The Results Speak For Themselves

New York City LGBT Activists Chant ‘We’re Coming For Your Kids’

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Caller column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Woke Universities Sacrificing Science on the Altar of Ideology and Profit

Three case studies from Canada and Australia about suppression of heterodox opinions in universities.


Two thousand five hundred years ago the Greek playwright Aeschylus is reputed to have said “the first victim of war is truth.” Recent events in the academic world have demonstrated that truth is also a casualty when ideology and commercial interests are at stake.

The most recent case occurred last month at Laval University in Canada, when professor and RNA expert Patrick Provost was suspended without pay for anti-mRNA vaccine comments. Patrick Provost has run an RNA lab for 20 years and has published nearly 100 peer-reviewed studies. In 2003, Provost’s work on the role of microRNA in gene expression was named one of the 10 discoveries of the year by the Quebec Science Magazine.

Based on the government’s own hospitalization and mortality statistics for children, which are both very low, Provost said he believed the risks of Covid-19 vaccination in children could outweigh the benefits because of the potential side-effects from mRNA vaccines, which have only gone through two of the usual four stages of testing required before vaccines are approved for general use.

“I was just doing what I was hired to do,” he said in an interview. “I had some concerns about something, I searched the literature and I prepared a talk and I delivered it to the public. Being censored for doing what I’ve been trained to do — and hired to do — well, it’s hard to believe.”

“As soon as you raise some concerns about vaccines, or side-effects, or complications related to vaccines, then it’s worse than the N-word,” he continued. “You’re condemned by the media, by the government and you’re chased and put down …. We should be able to discuss any ideas — any opinions — and because I expressed opinions that went against the government narrative, I was suspended.”

Regarding the University’s reaction, one might well wonder about the fact that the top 20 pharmaceutical companies spent C$139 billion on Research & Development in 2022, a portion of which went to university researchers. Faculties of medicine are particularly favoured beneficiaries of such funding. And Patrick Provost is a professor at the Faculty of Medicine.

In an entirely different field, geophysicist Peter Ridd was sacked in 2018 by James Cook University, in Australia, for criticizing the work of a colleague studying the Great Barrier Reef. In an email to a journalist, he said the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority “is grossly misusing some scientific ‘data’ to make the case that the Great Barrier Reef is greatly damaged.” Ridd maintained that scientific organisations were “quite happy to spin a story for their own purposes, in this case to demonstrate that there is massive damage to the Great Barrier Reef.”

In a report published last year based, like Provost’s talk, on publicly available data, from the Australian Institute of Marine Science, aka the AIMS, Ridd notes that “the average coral cover as of 2022 is (…) the highest level on record. Figure 2 makes it clear that AIMS has effectively hidden the very good news about the reef between 2016 and 2022 by not publishing the Great Barrier Reef average data since 2017.”

Since 2014, the Australian government has committed A$4 billion to saving the Reef. The Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, based at James Cook University, has been a major recipient of this funding. It should be no surprise that Ridd’s colleagues did not take kindly to someone undermining the claims on which their research, and the government funding that subsidizes it, is based.

Back in Canada, Frances Widdowson, a professor of economics, policy, and justice at Mount Royal University in Alberta was fired last year after colleagues and activists called for her termination because she dared to challenge groupthink on indigenous issues. Widdowson had made the self-evident claim that residential schools provided access to education that otherwise might not have been available, which was not an endorsement of the residential school system, but a mere statement of fact. A large percentage of Indian parents willingly opted for residential schools as they were the only way for their children to get an education. Despite the factuality of the claim, she was vilified and called a “denialist.”

Widdowson observes that no one dare question indigenous leaders in Canada these days, which makes it difficult to check their claims about buried remains of children. Widdowson has remarked that while lurid talk of buried indigenous children has circulated for more than 25 years and is “now firmly ensconced within the Canadian consciousness,” there is still no hard evidence to support it. Not a single body has been found at the Kamloops Indian Residential School where 215 bodies were allegedly detected by ground-penetrating radar.

Widdowson’s words in her last hearing at the disciplinary committee just before being fired are worth quoting as a moral to these stories:

“My final thought is that I don’t think it’s understood, not just at Mount Royal but in universities generally, that there is a fundamental conflict between academic universities, academic values and these ideological types of intrusions which are put forward under a number of different names, whether it be diversity, inclusion or equity policies. (…). I’m being pushed out because I can’t accept things that I believe to be untrue. I can’t say that I think something is true when I don’t think it’s true and I think it would be a violation of my academic position to do that. And unfortunately there are people who are either opportunistic or just afraid who won’t stand behind the academic foundation of the university.”

The university is now a house without foundations. We all know what eventually happens to such houses.

AUTHOR

Patrick Duffley

Patrick Duffley is Professor of English Linguistics at Université Laval, in Canada. More by Patrick Duffley.

RELATED ARTICLE: Mr. President, Fire Your Woke Minions And Appoint Some Competent People

EDITORS NOTE: This MercatorNet column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.