Council on America Islamic Relations Archives

A tidal wave is crashing toward America’s shores, and it’s not just a political shift — it’s a calculated invasion. Muslim candidates are rising in U.S. elections, and their victories are not mere milestones of diversity. They signal a relentless march toward imposing Sharia law, eroding the Constitution, and dismantling the very freedoms that define this nation. This is not speculation; it’s a battle cry rooted in undeniable patterns from past elections and the stark reality of what’s at stake. The list of consequences is long, the stakes are existential, and the enemy is already within the gates.

In 2022, 153 Muslim candidates ran for office across the U.S., with 89 securing seats in local, state, and federal roles. This wasn’t a random surge — it was a coordinated push, backed by groups like the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and Jetpac, who openly celebrate their growing influence. Fast forward to 2025, and the trend accelerates. Muslim leaders boast of 43 state delegates now, with projections of 50 congressional seats by 2031. This isn’t representation; it’s a takeover. These candidates aren’t here to assimilate — they’re here to dominate, wielding political power to reshape America into a Sharia-compliant state.

The threat of Sharia law is not a distant nightmare; it’s a clear and present danger. Sharia is not a benign personal code, as apologists claim. It’s a totalitarian legal system that demands absolute submission, crushing free speech, gender equality, and individual liberty. It mandates harsh punishments — stoning, amputations, death for apostasy – and enforces rigid control over every aspect of life, from dress to diet. In Dearborn, Michigan, where Muslim populations dominate, local councils already mirror Sharia’s influence, with sex segregation and religious edicts creeping into public spaces. These are not isolated incidents; they’re test runs for a broader agenda. Muslim leaders openly admit their strategy: infiltrate local government, climb the political ladder, and rewrite laws to align with Islamic doctrine.

Past elections prove this is no conspiracy theory – it’s history repeating itself. Look at Mehmet Oz’s 2022 Senate run in Pennsylvania. A self-described “secular Muslim,” Oz still faced backlash for his Trump ties and anti-Sharia rhetoric, yet his campaign dodged Muslim community engagement, refusing to address their concerns directly. Why? Because candidates like Oz are often sleeper agents — presenting as moderate to win votes, only to pivot toward Islamist agendas once in power. The Muslim Brotherhood’s playbook, perfected in Egypt and Tunisia, thrives on this deception: gain trust, secure office, then push Sharia incrementally. In Michigan, Mayor Amer Ghalib of Hamtramck, a Yemeni Muslim, sparked outrage by endorsing Trump while ignoring dissent from his own council, signaling a willingness to prioritize personal power over community unity. These are not anomalies – they’re warnings.

The consequences of this infiltration are catastrophic. First, Sharia’s implementation erodes constitutional protections. Free speech? Gone, replaced by blasphemy laws that silence dissent. Women’s rights? Obliterated under mandates for modesty and submission. Religious freedom? Crushed as non-Muslims face second-class status or worse. In the UK, where Muslim political influence has grown, 58% of Conservative Party members view Islam itself as a threat, with 52% believing European cities already have Sharia-controlled “no-go” zones. America is on the same path. Cities like Minneapolis and Dearborn are becoming enclaves where Sharia’s shadow looms, with police hesitant to enforce laws in Muslim-dominated areas.

Second, national security is gutted. Muslim candidates, even those posing as moderates, often align with anti-American ideologies. The 2024 election saw Muslim voters abandon Democrats not for policy disagreements but because of rage over Gaza, funneling votes to third-party candidates like Jill Stein or even Trump, who promised to end foreign wars. This isn’t about peace – it’s about leveraging chaos to weaken U.S. resolve. CAIR, with its documented ties to Hamas, mobilizes Muslim voters to sway swing states like Michigan, where 200,000 registered Muslim voters tipped the scales for Trump in 2024. These voters aren’t loyal to America — they’re loyal to a global ummah, ready to exploit democracy to destroy it.

Third, the cultural fabric of America unravels. Muslim candidates push policies that prioritize their community over the nation. In Georgia, Ruwa Romman, the first Muslim woman elected to the state House, vowed to fight “anti-Sharia” laws, framing them as bigotry while ignoring their role in protecting constitutional governance. This isn’t inclusion — it’s a deliberate attack on the legal system that safeguards American values. Meanwhile, posts on X scream the truth: Muslims don’t believe in separating mosque and state. Their religious duty is to impose Sharia, whether through ballots or jihad.

Lessons from past elections burn like wildfire. In 2010, candidates exploited fears of Sharia to stoke division, yet voters ignored the deeper threat. By 2022, the number of Muslim elected officials had skyrocketed, with each victory paving the way for more radical policies. The 2024 UK election showed Labor losing seats due to Muslim voters’ fury over Gaza, proving their voting power can punish parties that don’t bend to their demands. America’s future is clear: every Muslim candidate elected is a step toward Sharia’s iron grip.

The solution is not negotiation or appeasement – it’s resistance. Americans must reject Muslim candidates at the ballot box, not out of prejudice but out of survival. Every vote for them is a vote for Sharia, a vote for the end of freedom. The Constitution is not a suggestion; it’s a fortress, and we must defend it with unrelenting fury. Expose their agendas, demand transparency, and hold them to the fire of American values.

The storm is here, and it’s time to fight like hell to stop it.

RELATED ARTICLES:

‘Brutal, Unthinkable’: Islamists Slaughter Nearly 50 DRC Christians During Sunday Vigil

Iranian Calls For Nuclear Strike Or Preemptive Missiles Strike Against Israel

Fox News Host Implores GOP To Use ‘Wacko’ Zohran Mamdani As Bludgeon Against Dems In 2026

Poll: Democrat Favorability Continues to Plummet

“They [CAIR] have been a leading organization that has advocated for civil rights and civil liberties.” — Maya Harris

Maya Harris, Kamala’s sister, a radical ACLU activist, ran her 2020 presidential campaign. Maya’s husband, Tony West, who formerly served as the lawyer for John Walker Lindh, the American Taliban, is playing a major role in her current presidential campaign. Meena Harris, Maya’s daughter, who is very close to Kamala, has tweeted in support of the pro-Hamas encampments and spread false claims of atrocities against Israel.

All of this provides a certain amount of background about Kamala’s views from some of the most important people in her life who have also served as close advisers to her presidential campaigns and during her time in office.

Here is Maya defending CAIR, an organization linked to Hamas, whose leader, Nihad Awad, would later celebrate the attacks of Oct 7.

Last fall, Senator Barbara Boxer of California issued a routine Certificate of Appreciation to the organization representative in Sacramento, but she quickly revoked it when critics assailed her on the Web under headlines like “Senators for Terror.”

“There are things there I don’t want to be associated with,” Ms. Boxer said later of the revocation, explaining that her California office had not vetted the group sufficiently.

CAIR and its supporters say its accusers are a small band of people who hate Muslims and deal in half-truths. Ms. Boxer’s decision to revoke the Sacramento commendation provoked an outcry from organizations that vouch for the group’s advocacy, including the American Civil Liberties Union and the California Council of Churches.

“They have been a leading organization that has advocated for civil rights and civil liberties in the face of fear and intolerance, in the face of religious and ethnic profiling,” said Maya Harris, the executive director of the A.C.L.U. of Northern California.

This was back in 2007. So let’s just be clear about what Maya Harris was defending.

Co-founder Nihad Awad asserted at a 1994 meeting at Barry University, “I am a supporter of the Hamas movement.” Awad wrote in the Muslim World Monitor that the 1994 trial which had resulted in the conviction of four Islamic fundamentalist terrorists who had perpetrated the previous year’s World Trade Center bombing was “a travesty of justice.”

In October 1998, CAIR demanded the removal of a Los Angeles billboard describing Osama bin Laden as “the sworn enemy.” According to CAIR, this depiction was “offensive to Muslims.”

In 1998, CAIR denied bin Laden’s responsibility for the two al Qaeda bombings of American embassies in Africa. According to Ibrahim Hooper, the bombings resulted from “misunderstandings of both sides.”

The home of Muthanna al-Hanooti, one of CAIR’s directors, was raided in 2006 by FBI agents in connection with an active terrorism investigation. FBI agents also searched the offices of Focus on Advocacy and Advancement of International Relations, al-Hanooti’s Michigan- and Washington DC-based consulting firm that investigators suspect to be a front supporting the Sunni-led insurgency in Iraq. Al-Hanooti according to a 2001 FBI report, “collected over $6 million for support of Hamas”.

Onetime CAIR fundraiser Rabih Haddad was arrested on terrorism-related charges and was deported from the United States due to his subsequent work as Executive Director of the Global Relief Foundation, which in October 2002 was designated by the U.S. Treasury Department for financing al Qaeda and other terrorist organizations.

Abdurahman Alamoudi, one of CAIR’s former directors, is a supporter of both Hamas and Hezbollah, and is currently serving a 23-year prison sentence for terrorism-related convictions.

And that’s a small sample from the Discover the Networks profile of CAIR.

Has Maya Harris changed her mind? Did Tony West? And does Kamala Harris disagree with them?

AUTHOR

Daniel Greenfield

RELATED ARTICLES:

Kamala’s Counsel Defended Hamas Supporters Harassing Jewish Students

Harris enraged as Israel takes out 19 jihadis in Hamas command room hidden inside mosque at school complex

Jewish Neighborhood in NYC: Jewish Man Stabbed by Terrorist Screaming Jew-Hating Slurs and ‘Free Palestine’

Walzing with Hamas

Tag Archive for: Council on America Islamic Relations

Daniel Greenfield