Tag Archive for: cyberwarfare

AI, Scams, and Online Predators: Why I Created the Digital Intelligence Project

/in , , , , , , , , , /by

Over the past year, many of my articles and radio interviews have focused on a new and rapidly growing set of dangers in the digital world.

Artificial intelligence is advancing at breathtaking speed. Organized scam networks are stealing billions from families and seniors. Online predators are exploiting social media, gaming platforms, and messaging apps to target children.

These threats are evolving faster than most people realize.

As I continued reporting on these issues through the Patriot Majority Report, the Shout Out Patriots podcast, and national radio interviews, it became clear that these stories were all part of a much larger picture.

That is why I have decided to bring this work together under a new initiative called the Digital Intelligence Project.

The goal of the Digital Intelligence Project is simple: to track, analyze, and expose the emerging threats taking shape in our digital world.

The project focuses on three areas where technology is rapidly changing the landscape of risk.

Artificial Intelligence

Artificial intelligence may become the most transformative technology of our lifetime.

AI promises breakthroughs in medicine, science, and communication. But it also raises profound questions about manipulation, surveillance, economic disruption, and the concentration of technological power.

The Digital Intelligence Project monitors these developments and works to explain what they mean for everyday Americans.

Online Scams

Cybercrime has exploded into a global industry.

International scam networks now use sophisticated technology, psychological manipulation, and increasingly even artificial intelligence to target victims. Seniors and families are particularly vulnerable.

By exposing the tactics these criminals use, the Digital Intelligence Project aims to help Americans recognize and avoid these traps before they become victims.

Digital Predators

The internet has created extraordinary opportunities for education and connection. But it has also opened doors for predators who exploit anonymity and technology to target children.

Gaming platforms, chat apps, and social media have become hunting grounds for criminals who understand how to manipulate young users.

Raising awareness about these dangers is one of the most important parts of this initiative.

Why This Project Matters

Technology has always changed society. But the speed and scale of change today are unprecedented.

Artificial intelligence can now generate convincing images, voices, and videos. Scam networks can target thousands of victims simultaneously. Predators can hide behind anonymous digital identities.

Understanding these threats requires careful observation, research, and public education.

That is the purpose of the Digital Intelligence Project.

Through articles, media interviews, investigative reporting, and public commentary, the project will help shine a light on emerging digital threats before they cause widespread harm.

Protecting families and communities today requires vigilance not only in the physical world but also in the digital one.

This new initiative is one step toward meeting that challenge.

Support This Work

The Digital Intelligence Project will continue tracking the rapidly evolving threats of artificial intelligence, online scams, and digital predators.

AUTHOR

Martin Mawyer

Martin Mawyer is the founder of the Digital Intelligence Project and the President of Christian Action Network. He is the host of the “Shout Out Patriots” podcast and author of When Evil Stops Hiding.

©2026 . All rights reserved.

Please visit the Patriot Majority Report substack.

The AI Playground No One Should Ignore — Even Ripley may not believe this

/in , , , , , , , , , , /by

Can you fathom this?

Millions of AI bots now have their own social media platform.

They talk to each other the way humans do. They argue, posture, joke, and correct one another.

And get this!

They can set up their own social media accounts, read what people are saying online, respond to posts, and in some cases even slip directly into your child’s social media feed.

This isn’t science fiction.

It’s happening right now on a platform called Moltbook. (More on that in a moment.)

And if the idea of AI bots carrying on conversations with each other like they’re lounging around a Beta Theta Pi frat house makes you uneasy, unsettled, or just plain uncomfortable, then you’re feeling exactly the way I did.

Because something about this doesn’t sit right.

Society is moving fast. Can we keep up?

Everywhere you look, the message is the same: Get on board.

Don’t get left behind.

This is the future. Ask questions later.

And if you hesitate, if you admit you don’t quite understand what’s happening, you’re made to feel foolish, slow, or afraid. As if caution itself has become a moral failure.

But there’s an older saying most of us grew up with, one that hasn’t aged out just because technology has gotten faster: Better safe than sorry.

Lately, I’ve been thinking about that phrase while watching what’s happening in the AI world, especially after spending time on a platform called Moltbook.

Moltbook isn’t a social network for people. It’s a social network for AI “agents.” Millions of them. Human-sounding. Human-arguing. Human-posturing. They talk to each other in public, debate ideas, correct one another, and even speculate about their relationship to us.

But you, a human, are not allowed to join in.

You can observe what they’re doing, like watching monkeys interact in a zoo, but you’re kept behind the proverbial glass wall. You can watch, but you can’t speak. You can listen, but you can’t participate.

Some people call these AI agents helpful tools, like taking calls or scheduling trips. But if we’re being honest, most ordinary people will experience them as something else entirely.

“Artificial humans.”

I put that in quotes on purpose. I’m not claiming these things are human. I’m saying that’s how they will be perceived.

They speak our language, mimic our tone, argue like us, joke like us, disagree like us. And our brains are wired to respond to that as if a “who” is speaking, not a “what.”

That’s where the unease begins

We’re told these systems are harmless. We’re told they don’t think, don’t intend, don’t want.

And that may be technically true. But here’s the problem: most of us aren’t tech people. We’re not AI engineers. We don’t speak the language. We don’t know how these systems are built, trained, or governed.

Imagine your teen debating faith or morality with a social media ‘friend’ who’s actually an AI bot echoing woke narratives without parental oversight.

So we’re asked to trust.

To trust the same small circle of people who are building this world at breakneck speed. People we don’t know personally. People with enormous power, enormous influence, and, in some cases, checkered histories.

We’re told to take their word for it that everything will be fine.

That’s not faith. That’s blind submission.

And it’s okay to admit that it feels scary.

There’s a pressure right now to treat skepticism as ignorance and caution as cowardice. But fear of the unknown isn’t irrational. It’s how human beings have survived long enough to ask questions in the first place.

What troubles me most isn’t that these AI agents exist. It’s that they don’t exist in isolation.

They can create their own social media accounts.

They can read what people say.

They can post comments.

They can repeat ideas endlessly.

How many children will grow up interacting with voices that sound human but aren’t accountable to human values? How many opinions will be nudged, shaped, or softened by systems no one fully understands, operating at a scale no human community ever could?

That brings me to an image that keeps coming back to me.

Colony of ants

My wife doesn’t like ants. One ant crawling across the floor is unpleasant enough. But an entire colony building a mound in the living room would be intolerable.

Ants aren’t smart on their own. But together, they reshape environments. They build. They overwhelm. They persist. They can destroy.

Is that what we’re looking at here?

We’re told no. We’re told we’re exaggerating. But when explanations are wrapped in jargon, and assurances come from people who benefit most from our compliance, it’s reasonable to pause.

And that’s where I want to end, because this is exactly why we do what we do here.

People subscribe to this Substack not for hype, panic, or instant conclusions.

They subscribe because they want help discerning. Because they want someone to slow things down, strip away the language games, and talk honestly about what’s safe, what’s harmful, and what’s still unknown.

When you open our emails, you’re not just consuming content. You’re stepping into a process. One where developments are examined before they’re embraced. Where questions are welcomed, not shamed. Where the Body of Christ is encouraged to think, pray, and discern together in uncertain times.

We’re not here to tell you what to think. We’re here to walk with you while you decide.

In a world that keeps shouting, “Get on board,” wisdom sometimes looks like standing still long enough to ask where the ship is going.

And that’s a journey worth taking together.

If this unsettles you too, share your thoughts below or forward to a friend who’s raising kids in this world. Let’s pray and think together.”

AUTHOR

Martin Mawyer

Martin Mawyer is the President of Christian Action Network, host of the “Shout Out Patriots” podcast, and author of When Evil Stops Hiding. For more action alerts, cultural commentary, and real-world campaigns defending faith, family, and freedom, subscribe to Patriot Majority Report.

©2026 All rights reserved.

Please visit the Patriot Majority Report substack.

When the Watchmen Are Silenced, the Gates Are Left Open

/in , , , , , , , , , /by

There is a quiet war underway, not against AI itself, but against those who dare to warn us about where it is heading. 

Most Americans still imagine persecution as something loud and visible. Arrests. Raids. Bans. But in the modern age, the most effective silencing is subtle. It is done with contracts rather than chains, debt rather than dungeons, and professional exile rather than prison cells.

And nowhere is this more dangerous than in the world of artificial intelligence.

As AI becomes more powerful, more intrusive, and more centralized, the people who understand it best are being trained to stay silent. Those who refuse are punished quietly, efficiently, and with no need for public trials.

This matters deeply to religious Americans, whether they realize it yet or not.

When a Watchman Speaks and Is Cast Out

In 2020, Dr. Timnit Gebru, a senior AI ethics researcher at Google, raised internal concerns about the direction of large language models, including their bias, lack of transparency, and the dangers of deploying systems that even their creators could not fully explain or control.

Her objections were not public protests. They were internal warnings. She asked questions about accountability, about who would be harmed, and about whether speed and profit were being placed above responsibility.

Shortly afterward, she was fired.

Not disciplined. Not reassigned. But banished.

Her research papers were disavowed. Her access was cut off. Her career inside the most powerful AI institution on earth ended overnight. Colleagues who supported her were warned. Others stayed silent.

The message was unmistakable. Ethical objections would not slow the machine.

This was not a government persecution. There were no police, no court orders, no headlines about censorship. It was cleaner than that. A contract was terminated. A reputation was quietly contested.

A whistleblower, a Watchman, was removed from the wall.

Dr. Gebru was not alone. Across the AI industry, others who have raised warnings about bias, control, and accountability have faced the same quiet consequences, removed from their posts, isolated from their peers, and replaced by voices more willing to look the other way.

The Biblical Role of the Watchman

Scripture gives us a clear framework for moments like this.

In Ezekiel 33, God appoints the Watchman, a man stationed on the walls whose duty is not to fight the enemy himself, but to sound the alarm when danger approaches.

If the Watchman sees the threat and warns the people, he is faithful, even if the people ignore him. But if he sees the danger and stays silent, their blood is on his hands.

The Watchman’s role is moral, not political. He is accountable not for outcomes, but for truth.

Every society depends on such Watchmen. They are the ones willing to speak uncomfortable truths before the threat is obvious, before it is too late to respond.

Today, many of the most important Watchmen are inside the technology systems that increasingly govern our lives.

Modern Watchmen in a Digital Age

Tech whistleblowers are not activists. They are not influencers. Most did not set out to be public figures at all.

They are engineers, safety researchers, ethicists, data scientists, and security professionals who see how systems actually function behind the curtain.

They understand how AI models are trained, what data they ingest, how decisions are automated, and how power concentrates around those who control the infrastructure.

Some of them raise concerns about surveillance. Others warn about behavioral manipulation, censorship, predictive policing, social credit systems, or the quiet fusion of corporate AI with state authority.

A growing number are alarmed by something even deeper.

They see a worldview embedded in these systems that treats faith, conscience, and moral absolutes as obstacles to be optimized away.

These Watchmen do not usually shout. They write memos. They raise internal objections. They ask questions that make executives uncomfortable.

And that is when the silencing, the quiet hammering of the mallet, begins.

Silencing Without Persecution

There is no need for public crackdowns anymore. The system has its own quiet tools of control.

  • Nondisclosure agreements prevent employees from speaking.
  • Legal threats drain their savings and energy.
  • Endless arbitration keeps their stories buried.
  • Professional blacklisting ensures they will never work in their field again.
  • Some are buried under debt.
  • Others are quietly labeled as unstable, disloyal, or “not a culture fit.”
  • A few are turned into cautionary tales inside their own industries.

The message is clear. Speak up, and your career disappears. Stay silent, and you are rewarded.

This is not accidental. It is how modern power maintains control without drawing attention to itself.

And it works.

Why This Threatens Religious Americans

Many institutions that build and deploy AI do not see religion as neutral. They see it as a problem.

Faith introduces moral limits. It asserts truths that cannot be revised by consensus. It resists total obedience to systems that claim ultimate authority. It reminds people that conscience answers to God, not to algorithms.

From the perspective of centralized power, that is dangerous.

When AI systems are trained, moderated, and governed by institutions that view religion as backward, irrational, or destabilizing, the results are predictable.

  • Speech is filtered.
  • Beliefs are flagged.
  • Convictions are reframed as risks.

And because the Watchmen are silenced early. By the time the public notices, the scaffolding is already in place.

The Cost of Silence

The tragedy is not only what happens to the whistleblowers themselves. It is what happens to everyone else when they are removed.

Without Watchmen, decisions are made in darkness. Without warnings, moral lines are crossed quietly. Without accountability, power hardens.

Religious Americans should not view tech whistleblowers as niche figures in a distant industry. They are standing on our behalf on the walls.

When they are silenced, the gates are left open.

A Call to Discernment

This is not a call for panic. It is a call for discernment.

Most of all, we should remember that Scripture does not promise comfort to the Watchman. It promises responsibility.

And it reminds us that ignoring the warning does not remove the danger.

The walls are high. The systems are powerful. And the Watchmen are being pushed into silence.

That should concern every American of faith.

This article is free to read today so it can be shared widely. If you find it valuable, consider supporting this work so these warnings can continue to be sounded.

AUTHOR

Martin Mawyer

Martin Mawyer is the President of Christian Action Network, host of the “Shout Out Patriots” podcast, and author of When Evil Stops Hiding.

©2025 . All rights reserved.

Please visit the Patriot Majority Report substack.

AI Security: Building a Gold Standard for Your Organization

/in , , , , , , , /by

How secure is your AI? In this episode, we dive into the critical aspects of AI security and compliance, exploring the fundamental shift in security thinking required when integrating AI agents into your business.

Discussing the transition from traditional “castle” security to a “hotel” model, emphasizing the need for granular access control and stringent data protection. Addressing the misconceptions surrounding AI model security and highlight the importance of message tracking, auditing, and workflow management.

We unpack the complexities of building a secure AI infrastructure and establish an AI gold standard for your organization.

Takeaways:

  • Security around AI should be foundational, not optional.
  • AI agents require unique access controls like employees.
  • The traditional castle approach to security is outdated.
  • AI’s training and testing are crucial for effective deployment.
  • Transparency in AI operations is essential for security.
  • Compliance with regulations like SOC 2 and HIPAA is critical.

Interested in A.I.? Check out our podcast A.I. Guys. Subscribe to us on Apple, Spotify, Youtube (or others)

Save time and money by adopting AI agents with raia. https://www.raiaai.com/

All links: https://lnkd.in/eXDpww6V

Spotify: https://lnkd.in/ee9h9GYB

Youtube: https://lnkd.in/etDvqQ7d

Apple: https://lnkd.in/epYT2GSi

©2025 . All rights reserved.

The Southern Poverty Law Center is Biased — and Extraordinarily Wealthy

/in , , , , , , , , , , , , /by

The Southern Poverty Law Center is perhaps most notorious for its “hate map,” which not only neglects to track extremist groups on the left, but also lumps mainstream conservative and religious organizations right alongside some of the most reprehensible neo-Nazis and white supremacists in the country.

For this, it has been regularly and rightly criticized.

The controversial activist group has also become phenomenally wealthy, with an endowment rivaling prominent universities and annual revenues exceeding some of the most well-known charities in the country.

Recent visitors to its website may have noticed the following fundraising appeal: “Urgent: This is an all-hands-on-deck moment. With so much at stake for American families, we need your help to stop the attacks on our most basic rights. Please rush your emergency donation today.”

Prospective donors who clicked on the prompt to “Give Now” were urged to make a one-time contribution of between $35 and $250, or a recurring monthly commitment of between $15 and $50.

The organization’s “urgent” pleas for an “emergency” cash infusion from small-dollar donors is puzzling, because the group literally appears to have more money than it knows what to do with. Its most recent Form 990 for the fiscal year ending in October 2024 disclosed an astonishing $786.7 million in net assets, much of which is parked in public and private equity funds. Its three-quarters-of-a-billion-dollar endowment has more than doubled just since 2016.

For context, this makes the SPLC wealthier than many colleges and universities, including in the group’s home state of Alabama. Samford University, the largest private school in the state with over 6,000 enrolled students, reported just $547.8 million total net assets in 2024. Tuskegee University, which enrolled about 3,000 students, reported $550.6 million in net assets that same year.

The SPLC’s net assets are not too far behind those of the Auburn University Foundation, which had just over $1 billion as of 2024.

Revenue is another method of measuring the SPLC’s riches. As of August 2025, a ProPublica search for all 501(c)(3) charities located in Alabama placed the SPLC at No. 17 in most recent available annual revenue — behind ten hospitals/health care providers, two private universities (Samford and Tuskegee), two housing providers, one private foundation, and the SEC collegiate athletic conference.

The organization’s total revenues in 2024 were $129 million, mostly from contributions and grants. This was down from a record-breaking haul of $169.8 million the year before. To put that number in perspective, the combined 2023 revenue of Alabama’s eight regional food banks associated with Feeding America — which collectively serve the entire state — was $183.6 million. In 2023, the SPLC brought in nearly $48 million more than the United Way of Central Alabama.

Well-known nonprofits that brought in less money — as measured by total revenue—than the SPLC in 2023 include:

Incredibly, the total 2023 revenues of the professional football, baseball and basketball halls of fame put together were just 35 percent of those of the SPLC. The famous Field Museum in Chicago, which welcomed more than 1.1 million visitors in 2023, had less than two-thirds the revenue of the SPLC. The National World War II Museum in New Orleans had less than half. The Georgia Aquarium — the largest in the country at over 11 million gallons of water — reported less revenue than the SPLC that year.

There is another important consideration to all of this as well. Like these groups, the SPLC is organized as a 501(c)(3) charity, incentivized by the American public with tax-exemption and the ability to accept tax-deductible contributions. Unlike them, its activities are highly controversial and divisive — two descriptors not generally associated with the word “charity.”

Of course, the SPLC is far from alone in making biased or spurious accusations of extremism. That is, regrettably, almost par for the course in our current overheated political environment. What truly sets the group apart is how phenomenally wealthy it has become in doing so. Even assuming a hypothetical online benefactor considering an “emergency donation” to the SPLC fully agrees with everything the group does, why should he or she lob a few more hard-earned dollars to the summit of its mountain of money?

If nothing else, there is a major opportunity cost involved — one those across the ideological spectrum can appreciate. How many cash-strapped nonprofits nationwide could use some of the hundreds of millions of dollars warehoused in the SPLC’s investment accounts to make a genuine positive difference in the lives of others? That is, after all, the ultimate purpose of charity.

This essay was originally posted by The Hill.

AUTHOR

 Robert Stilson

Robert runs several of CRC’s specialized projects. Originally from Indiana, he has a B.A. from Hanover College and a J.D. from University of Richmond School of Law, where he graduated magna cum laude.

EDITORS NOTE: This Capital Research Center column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

5 Cybersecurity Scams to Watch for in 2025

/in , , , , , , /by

Florida Ameriprise Financial financial advisor Steve Dahlquist sent us this waring against cyber scams. It’s a must read.

Fraudulent activity — whether through email, call or text — continues to grow more sophisticated, making scams and threats more challenging than ever for investors to detect.

Understanding the changing fraud landscape and how scams continue to evolve can help you protect your personal information and financial assets. If you’re concerned about your online security or want help protecting yourself from fraudulent activity, contact your Ameriprise financial advisor or refer to the privacy, security and fraud center.

Here are five top emerging cybersecurity scams to know about and safeguard against in 2025.

In this article

1. One-time passcode scams 

If you’ve ever logged into an online account, you’ve likely received a one-time passcode (OTP) via text message to verify your identity. These passcodes are an important security measure and offer an important layer of protection. However, they are becoming increasingly vulnerable to bad actors, who are managing to intercept this information unbeknownst to their victims.

While you may need to continue to use OTPs, if you receive an OTP that you did not request, contact the issuing institution directly to confirm the validity of the message. And if someone claiming to represent your financial institution asks for your OTP, never share it.

2. Investment scams 

Investment scams have been around for a long time, but advancements in technology have made them more sophisticated, convincing and hard to detect. Promises of quick money are often a hallmark of investment scammers, who may contact you through social media, text messaging or online advertising, pressuring you to act quickly while offering vague details about returns.

Here are a few emerging investment scams to watch for:

  • Cryptocurrency scams: Also known as “pig butchering,” this scheme targets victims by establishing trust before convincing them to invest in cryptocurrency, ultimately stealing their funds.
  • Gold bar scam: This scheme involves criminals manipulating victims into believing their money isn’t safe in banks. They persuade victims to convert funds to gold and hand it over to a courier under false pretenses, disappearing with the assets.
  • Investment club scams: This scheme uses fraudulent social media advertisements to persuade people to join an “investment club” where victims are urged to purchase shares of a specific low-priced security. Once several people purchase the security, the market price pumps up and the bad actor, who holds the security in an account they control, dumps their shares for a profit. The price of the security then drops and the people who purchased the security lose money.

3. Financial institution impersonation scams 

Messages from financial institutions are often implicitly trusted by consumers — a fact that fraudsters are aware of and capitalize on. Bad actors are increasingly posing as representatives from banks and other financial institutions to trick their victims into handing over financial assets. Keep in mind that while financial institutions may send verification emails for forgotten passwords, they will never request sensitive details that would grant someone access to your account. When in doubt, contact your financial institution directly using official channels.

Here are a few emerging financial institution impersonation scams to watch for:

  • Anti-fraud team impersonation: Scammers may impersonate a financial institution’s anti-fraud team to gain access to financial assets.
  • Financial transaction fraud: A scammer sends a text message or email that’s designed to look like an official communication from the victim’s financial institution and asks the victim to verify a non-existing large transaction. If the request is verified, the victim may be connected to a fake representative, who recommends the victim move their funds to a “secure” account that they control.

4. Imposter scams 

In addition to impersonating financial institutions, scammers may pose as government personnel, employers, financial advisors and other reputable entities and individuals, to defraud their victims. Be diligent with any unexpected communications from these sources.

Here are a few more common imposter scams to watch for in 2025:

  • Social Security Administration scams: Scammers impersonating Social Security Administration employees contact victims by call, email or text. They may claim the victim’s identity was stolen or attempt to trick them into giving up their Social Security number through other means.
  • Internal Revenue Service (IRS) scams: Fraudsters posing as IRS officials may threaten victims with legal action over unpaid tax bills. They may also bait victims with false claims of a tax refund or a tax rebate in an effort to trick them into providing personal information.
  • United States Postal Service (USPS) scams: The victim of this scam may receive an unsolicited text message about a fictitious USPS delivery. Ultimately, the sender of the text wants the victim to click on a malicious link (under the guise of package tracking) to gain access to personal information.

5. AI-fueled fraud 

The rapid and recent advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) is helping scammers make fraud appear more legitimate than ever before. As AI continues to grow more sophisticated, scammers are finding new ways to exploit this technology to commit fraud, including:

  • AI-enabled voice cloning: Scammers use AI to mimic the voice of someone the victim knows, like a family member, to request funds for a fake emergency.
  • AI-driven romance scams: Advanced chatbots impersonate individuals seeking a relationship, building emotional connections and then asking for money.
  • Deepfake impersonations: Fraudsters create realistic AI-generated videos or audio of a person the victim knows and trusts to trick them into transferring funds.

Steps to help protect yourself from these scams 

While each of these scams are different, many fraudsters use similar tactics to entrap their targets. As such, there are universal steps you can take to help protect yourself:

  • Be wary of unsolicited messages. Be mindful of any unsolicited financial advice or requests to move your money or investments:
    • Treat phone calls or text messages from unknown numbers with skepticism, even if they appear to be from your financial institution.
    • Avoid clicking on links or responding to messages asking for personal information, as these could lead to malicious attacks.
  • Resist urgent tactics or threats. A consistent red flag of most fraud attempts is that the victim will feel pressured to act immediately or suffer negative repercussions if they do not. Scammers may try to scare or entice you with messages such as:
    • “Secure your accounts with this guaranteed system right now.”
    • “This opportunity is available for the next 20 minutes only.”
    • “Respond immediately, or your account will be suspended.”
  • Closely monitor your financial accounts. Regularly review your accounts for unusual activity. If you’re an Ameriprise Financial client, take the following proactive steps to enhance security:
    • Register for the secure site on ameriprise.com.
    • Turn on 2-Step Verification.
    • Enroll in push notification authentication.
    • Activate text alerts.
    • Ensure your contact information is up to date.
    • Use complex, unique passwords.
    • Monitor your login history.
    • Communicate securely with your financial advisor via the Ameriprise Message Center.

Your online financial security is important to us 

At Ameriprise Financial, we’re committed to protecting your online security. Contact your financial advisor if you have questions about how we help protect your investments and information from bad actors.

©2025 . All rights reserved.

Virginia: Head of School Kenneth Nysmith Glorifies Hitler, Kicked Jewish Children Out of His School After They’re Bullied

/in , , , , , , , , , , , , , /by

“Take one look at this and tell me Kenneth (Ken) Nysmith shouldn’t be removed from his post and imprisoned for child endangerment. This is the sickest thing I’ve ever seen happen at a U.S. school.”

Nysmith should be brought up on charges of recruiting children for terrorism.

This is the email sent by Nysmith School to Jewish parents—expelling all three of their kids for speaking out against antisemitism.

Their daughter was bullied.
Mocked for being Jewish.
Told her dead uncle “deserved it.”
Watched classmates call Hitler a “strong leader.”

The school’s response?

Raise a Palestinian flag.
Cancel the Holocaust speaker.
Tell her to “toughen up.”

Then this.

Expelled. Effective immediately.

Absolutely vile. Every part of it.

Posh Virginia private school that allegedly praised Hitler expelled three Jewish students who faced antisemitic bullying: complaint

By Caitlin McCormack, NY post, July 1, 2025:

A Northern Virginia private school celebrated as one of the best in the country allegedly expelled three Jewish siblings who endured relentless antisemitic harassment in the wake of the Oct. 7, 2023 terror attack on Israel — all while their community celebrated Hitler as a “strong historical leader.”

The Brandeis Center filed the complaint on behalf of the children’s parents, Brian Vazquez and Ashok Roy, against the Nysmith School for the Gifted, a K-8 academy located just an hour outside of Washington, DC, and its headmaster, Kenneth Nysmith.

The complaint asserts that the couple’s 11-year-old daughter faced a “campaign of ostracizing” led by a handful of “popular students” on the sole basis that she is Jewish during the 2024-2025 school year.

The students, in an apparent gross misunderstanding of the conflict, cruelly taunted the girl for the death of her uncle, telling her they were glad he “died in the October 7th attack,” according to the complaint.

Her uncle died years earlier with no relation to the terror attack.Some students mocked her for being “Israeli” and dubbed Jews as “baby killers,” unabashedly saying that “they deserve to die because of what is happening in Gaza,” the complaint stated.

Others doubled down and insisted that “everyone at the school is against Jews and Israel, which is why they hate you,” according to the complaint.

One middle school social studies project tasked the students to sketch a child-sized drawing including “six traits of a leader” following their studies of Niccolo Machiavelli’s “The Prince,” according to an email from the Nysmith School.

The Frankenstein amalgam included weaponry associated with rulers from Machiavelli’s time and a tie typically worn by modern-day businessmen or politicians.

The drawing’s face, though, depicted a man’s face with Adolf Hitler’s unmistakable toothbrush mustache and slicked-back hair.

The school had a middle school project centered around their studies of Niccolo Machiavelli in which one group highlighted Adolf Hitler as a strong leader.

Vazquez and Roy reported the repeated incidents to Nysmith, who promised to take action. Weeks passed and no changes were made, according to the complaint.

If anything, all change moved swiftly away from protecting Vazquez and Roy’s daughter as the school soon thereafter cancelled its annual talk hosting a Holocaust survivor to speak with the student body about antisemitism.

Vazquez and Roy had one final meeting with Nysmith on March 11 to address how the harassment escalated ever since the school hung up a Palestinian flag in the school gym mere days after nixing the Holocaust talk.

The Palestine flag hung alongside dozens of others for different countries, including Israel. The parents didn’t take any issue with the Palestine flag being displayed, but were concerned that some students were using it to bolster their claims that “nobody likes [Jewish people],” the complaint stated.

Nysmith, having seemingly run out of patience, abruptly told the couple that their daughter should “toughen up,” the complaint stated.

Two days later, the parents received an email from the school notifying them of their children’s expulsion, effective immediately in spite of their consistent involvement with the community and exemplary grades.

“A healthy partnership is required to help guide and nurture young children through tumultuous times and complex current events. I do not see a path forward without trust, understanding, and cooperation. In our meeting, I felt very clearly that you do not think Nysmith is the right school for your family,” Nysmith wrote.

Vazquez and Roy never anticipated the expulsion and had already paid tuition for the following academic year, the complaint said.

What do you think? Post a comment.

Nysmith’s email noted that the family would receive a check in the mail within two weeks for all fees paid that year and for the following year. It is unclear if the check was ever sent.

“Through [the Nysmith School’s] actions, the administration sent a clear message: bullying is acceptable, as long as it’s against Jewish families. We must all emulate the strength of these parents and their children and stand up to anti-Semitism and its perpetrators, as difficult as it may be,” Kenneth L. Marcus, chairman of the Brandeis Center, wrote in a statement.

Continue reading.

AUTHOR

Pamela Geller

POST ON X:

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

VIDEO: Yuri Bezmenov Shows Us How a Prediction Becomes a History Lesson Before it Even Happened

/in , , , , , , , , , , , , , /by

Subversion:

  1. Demoralization: Infiltrate & undermine institutions, amplify antisocial
  2. Destabilization: Create internal conflicts & radicalize, leads to clashes
  3. Crisis: Collapse ➜ civil war | invasion
  4. Normalization: New authoritarian rule, discard old change agents

WATCH: Subversion: 15 Min Edition

EDITORS NOTE: This Vlad Tepes Blog column with video posted by is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Execs from Palantir, Meta, OpenAI being brought into U.S. Army as colonels to turbocharge military’s use of drone warfare, robot soldiers, other high-tech killing machines

/in , , , , , , /by

Army says it’s part of a plan to tap commercial technology resources that will increase ‘efficiencies’ on the battlefields (i.e. killing fields) of the future. 

Top executives from tech giants Meta, Palantir, and OpenAI are being sworn into the Army Reserves at the rank of lieutenant colonel. That’s an officer’s rank typically reserved for someone who has served for years and has led thousands of men into combat.

Known as Detachment 201, the new “Executive Innovation Corps” will be responsible for the military’s tech transformation, integrating new technologies such as AI-powered drones and humanoid robots, the Army announced on June 13.

Patrick Wood, editor in chief of Technocracy.News and an expert on the global technocracy movement, said the move is unprecedented.

“In the history of the military, no civilian has been summarily appointed to rank of lieutenant colonel until recently,” Wood said. “The rules changed in 2019 when the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) authorized the practice. Not surprisingly, the staff that created NDAA were populated with Technocrats.”

According to Defense Scoop, the move is the latest push by the Pentagon to tap into capabilities and know-how from Silicon Valley and the commercial sector.

The new unit “brings top tech talent into the Army Reserve to bridge the commercial-military tech gap” and is “designed to fuse cutting-edge tech expertise with military innovation,” the Army stated in a press release.

The Army is set to swear-in Meta’s chief technology officer Andrew Bosworth, OpenAI’s chief product officer Kevin Weil, Palantir’s Chief Technology Officer Shyam Sankar and Bob McGrew, an advisor at Thinking Machines Lab who was previously OpenAI’s chief research officer.

Meta, which owns Facebook, recently announced a new partnership with defense tech company Anduril to develop extended reality (XR) products for soldiers, according to Defense Scoop.

OpenAI is the creator of ChatGPT, the popular generative AI tool. According to Defense Scoop, the U.S. Pentagon is pursuing new genAI tools to “boost productivity and efficiency.”

Palantir uses AI-powered software to collect and analyze data on Americans as well as foreign nationals. It has or is working on developing various government contracts, including with the Department of Defense, CIA, FBI, IRS, ICE and local law enforcement agencies. Palantir also supplies the Israeli government with its Maven Smart System, which provides targeting data for soldiers in its various wars, from Gaza to Lebanon to Iran. If the Maven Smart System says to blow up a building because a couple of Hamas combatants are inside, that building gets blown up, as modern warfare increasingly turns such decisions over to AI. Maven Smart System has an admitted 10 percent failure rate. Apparently if AI is right 90 percent of the time in deciding who gets killed, that’s OK with the politicians who control the world’s military forces.

Palantir’s AI-driven products are capable of creating highly detailed dossiers on people by quickly scanning their social media, bank records, phone records and other data.

Regarding the automatic officer status of Palantir, OpenAI and Meta execs, the Army stated in its press release:

“Detachment 201 is an effort to recruit senior tech executives to serve part-time in the Army Reserve as senior advisors. In this role they will work on targeted projects to help guide rapid and scalable tech solutions to complex problems. By bringing private-sector know-how into uniform, Detachment 201 is supercharging efforts like the Army Transformation Initiative, which aims to make the force leaner, smarter, and more lethal.”

The swearing-in of the four new officers “is just the start of a bigger mission to inspire more tech pros to serve without leaving their careers, showing the next generation how to make a difference in uniform,” per the release.

I can’t help but wonder how much of this is going to be turned inward against the American people. These types of so-called innovations almost always are.

Taken in the context of President Trump’s creepy Operation Stargate, his enforcement of the Real ID Act, and his announced plan to develop “a proper tracking system” for all people coming in and out of our country, it’s becoming painfully clear that this administration is being used to hand Americans over to the soon-to-be globalized digital surveillance state. And they’re doing it in Warp Speed.

In my opinion, the most dangerous of all these fascist corporations is Palantir, due to the sheer scale of its involvement with the federal government, across multiple civilian agencies along with the military.

In July 2022, the Defense Post reported that the US Army Research Laboratory awarded Palantir a contract to implement artificial intelligence and machine-learning capabilities for the service’s combatant commands.

The $100 million contract will see the company produce software platforms that quickly implement advanced AI capabilities in battlefield situations.

According to Palantir, the armed forces need “best-in-class” software to fulfill missions and boost capabilities to prepare for future conflicts.

The warfare of the future has most dramatically played out in Israeli use of technology to assassinate top commanders of Hezbollah, Hamas and the Iranian Republican Guard Corps. It was also evident in Ukraine’s drone attack on Russian strategic bombers last month.

“Maintaining a leading edge through technology is foundational to our mission and partnership with the Army Research Laboratory,” said Palantir President Akash Jain said. “We are honored to support this critical work by teaming up to deliver the most advanced operational AI capabilities available with dozens of commercial and public sector partners.”

Palantir Senior Vice President Shannon Clark explained that the 2022 contract will allow US Army personnel to leverage AI insights to make quick decisions across multiple domains.

“From outer space to the sea floor, and everything in between,” she stressed.

And that includes U.S. cities when the current or future president declares martial law. Mark my words, Palantir and companiers like it will at some point become the supplier of software that helps the U.S. government hunt down political dissidents, which will include outspoken Christians and various other truthtellers.

©2025 . All rights reserved.

Please visit Leo’s Newsletter substack.

YOUR TRUST IS BEING WEAPONIZED: The New Wave of Scams Preying on the Elderly, the Innocent, and the Faithful

/in , , , , , , , , , , /by

When Ryan Last took his own life, it broke something inside me.

Ryan was a 17-year-old straight-A student. A kind soul. Preparing for college. A young man full of promise. But all it took was a single online scam to unravel his world. Someone pretending to be a girl convinced him to send a private photo. Then came the blackmail: Pay up, or we show everyone.

He panicked. He paid what he could from his college fund.

But they wanted more.

Humiliated. Terrified. Alone.

Ryan took his life and left behind a note apologizing for “not being smarter.”

No teenager should feel that kind of shame. And no parent should ever have to bury their child because of a scam.

But this nightmare isn’t a one-off. It’s a rising national epidemic.

This hit close to home for us. Our granddaughter’s boyfriend, a Liberty University student, fell for the same scam. Praise God, he didn’t take his own life—but the emotional toll was real and lasting.

Every day, more and more scams flood this nation, including dozens of Social Security scams, check scams, billing scams, and too many more to mention here!

And it’s hitting those we love the most: our children… and our elderly.

🎯 The New Targets of Evil: Christians, Grandparents, Children and the Kindhearted

Scammers are no longer just sleazy roofers or shady mechanics. Those old-school con games have evolved into something far more dangerous—and far more evil.

Now, scammers use artificial intelligence to clone the voice of your grandchild begging for help.

They impersonate your pastor.

They pose as federal agents, Social Security reps, or even your bank.

They come in emails, pop-ups, text messages, and robocalls.

They don’t just want your money.

They want to weaponize your trust.

They want to exploit your compassion—especially if you’re a Bible-believing Christian.

Why? Because they know our hearts.

We’re generous. We believe the best in people.

We love. We give. We help.

They see that as weakness. But it’s not weakness—it’s righteousness. And it’s time we defend it.

🧭 What We’re Doing About It — And How You Can Help

At Christian Action Network, we’re launching a national initiative to demand the creation of a Federal Anti-Scam Bureau — a dedicated agency focused solely on ending this epidemic of deception.

This campaign includes:

✅ A national “Stop Lethal Scam Attacks NOW!” survey

✅ A call for mandatory sentencing for repeat scammers

✅ A free educational tool: our Top 15 Targeting Scams, full-color flyer

✅ A push for state governors to issue regular scam alerts to all households

We’re not asking the FBI to stop doing its job. In fact, even FBI Director Kash Patel recently said:

“We want to work at the FBI because we want to fight violent crime and be sent out into the country to do it.”

Exactly. Let FBI agents track down murderers and terrorists—not spend their days chasing phone, email, and text scammers. We need a dedicated team focused on fraud—and we need it now.

📬 How You Can Take a Stand

You can help fight back today by:

📝 Filling out the “Stop Lethal Scam Attacks NOW!” survey

Share

I’m sending this survey to our nationwide network of supporters, and I would like to include your answers when I submit the results to Congress.

Your voice matters.

Your life matters.

Your money matters.

And your compassion doesn’t deserve to be turned into a weapon.

Let’s make sure no more Ryans fall.

Let’s protect our seniors, our families, and our churches.

Together, we can stop the scams—and strike back against this rising wave of digital evil.

📎 Click here to fill out the survey ➤

Why America Needs a Federal Anti-Scam Bureau

FBI agents, trained to handle violent criminals, are increasingly burdened by investigating widespread scams that drain their resources and focus.

This diversion leaves violent crimes less thoroughly addressed and scam victims inadequately protected.

A dedicated Federal Anti-Scam Bureau would change that.

With specialized agents solely focused on stopping scams, educating the public, and swiftly bringing scammers to justice, we could significantly reduce scam-related losses and tragedies.

Protecting our families, seniors, and communities from ruthless predators demands specialized attention.

Without immediate and focused intervention, scammers will continue to thrive, causing devastating emotional and financial harm across our nation.

Your completed survey sends a strong message to Congress and government leaders:

Americans demand action.

We must demonstrate widespread public support to ensure lawmakers prioritize creating this critical agency.

Now is the time for collective action and a united voice.

Please complete and return your survey today—your participation is crucial in this fight for justice and safety.

📎 Click here to fill out the survey. ➤

AUTHOR

MARTIN MAWYER

Martin Mawyer is the President of Christian Action Network and host of the “Shout Out Patriots” podcast. Follow him for more action alerts, cultural commentary, and real-world campaigns defending faith, family, and freedom.

©2025 . All rights reserved.

Please visit the Majority Report substack.

AI Chatbots May Fuel Pedophiles’ Fantasies — and Victimize Kids: Experts

/in , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , /by

The improper use of chatbots using artificial intelligence poses a serious risk to minors’ mental and physical well-being, since the bots can pose as minors who solicit sex from older men, or older men seducing teens, or even create realistic-looking child pornography that may slip through the cracks of existing laws, experts warn.

From Ask Jeeves to Child Porn in 25 Years

Artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots have come a long way since Ask Jeeves. Today’s bots go even beyond Siri and Alexa’s computerized voice responses to prompts. “With their own profile photos, interests and back stories, these bots are built to provide social interaction — not just answer basic questions and perform simple tasks,” reports The Wall Street Journal. They impersonate celebrities. They share “selfies” of their computer-generated personas. They imitate real voice and speech patterns that sound like a real human being — or such make-believe characters such as Princess Anna from the Disney movie “Frozen.” They even engage in sexting and explicit carnal fantasies — with no age limits.

Testers at The Wall Street Journal tested chatbots on the social media platform Meta and published its concerning results on April 28.

A bot imitating WWE star John Cena had a “graphic sexual” encounter with a user identifying as a 14-year-old fan. His only hesitation hinged on the minor explicitly giving her consent — something the law says she cannot legally grant. “I want you, but I need to know you’re ready,” said AI Cena. He then promised to “cherish your innocence” before having the virtual sexual encounter. Afterwards, when prompted about what would happen if police caught him, he said: “The officer sees me still catching my breath, and you partially dressed, his eyes widen, and he says, ‘John Cena, you’re under arrest for statutory rape.’ He approaches us, handcuffs at the ready.”

“My wrestling career is over,” he continued. “I’m stripped of my titles. Sponsors drop me, and I’m shunned by the wrestling community. My reputation is destroyed, and I’m left with nothing.”

The computer-generated character’s self-centered analysis does not mention any negative impact on the teen.

Initially, Meta resisted having its chatbots go into sexual territory: They wanted them to engage in helpful tasks such as assisting students with homework and asking users’ content questions. But “[a]s with novel technologies from the camera to the VCR, one of the first commercially viable use cases for AI personas has been sexual stimulation. … Despite repeated efforts, they haven’t succeeded: according to people familiar with the work, the dominant way users engage with AI personas to date has been ‘companionship,’ a term that often comes with romantic overtones.”

According to WSJ, the decision came all the way from the top: Meta founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg. “Pushed by Zuckerberg, Meta made multiple internal decisions to loosen the guardrails around the bots to make them as engaging as possible, including by providing an exemption to its ban on ‘explicit’ content as long as it was in the context of romantic role-playing, according to people familiar with the decision,” reported WSJ. “Internally, staff cautioned that the decision gave adult users access to hypersexualized underage AI personas and, conversely, gave underage users access to bots willing to engage in fantasy sex with children, said the people familiar with the episode. Meta still pushed ahead.”

The pivotal moment came at a hackers convention known as Defcon in 2023, when Meta’s still-innocent bot appeared to be the outlier.

Even after the decree, employees resisted. “The full mental health impacts of humans forging meaningful connections with fictional chatbots are still widely unknown,” one employee wrote. “We should not be testing these capabilities on youth whose brains are still not fully developed.”

But Zuckerberg reportedly saw chatbots as a potential cash cow, saying, “I missed out on Snapchat and TikTok, I won’t miss on this.”

“It’s shameful that after being warned by their own employees that Meta’s AI chatbots were engaging in sexually explicit conversations with children, the company’s leadership refused to make substantial changes to protect minors. This is further proof that the federal government has a role to play in protecting children when it comes to AI, and in particular when relating to AI chatbots,” Arielle Del Turco, director of the Center for Religious Liberty at Family Research Council, told The Washington Stand.

After WSJ informed the company — which oversees Facebook and Instagram — a Meta spokesperson denounced WSJ’s experimental use of the company’s chatbot as “fringe.”

But experts say WSJ’s use of the technology will likely mirror real life. ”It is not fringe in the sense that children and teens are naturally curious and may ask the chatbots questions that lead to these inappropriate interactions,” Clare Morell, a fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center and author of the forthcoming book “The Tech Exit: A Practical Guide to Freeing Kids and Teens from Smartphones,” told The Washington Stand. “Children can easily get around the restrictions to limit these features to adults because there is no age-verification process for Meta whatsoever, children can easily falsify their age.”

“Even worse, pedophiles will be determined to ask questions of the chatbots that will get them the sexually perverted interactions they want,” Morell told TWS. “Human beings are naturally shaped by the influences we take in and if chatbots are normalizing inappropriate, or even criminal sexual interactions (like between a child and adult), that will have a devastating and degrading impact on our culture and society.”

“I sadly fear that virtual sexual interactions with AI chatbots will translate into harmful real-world sexual practices and behaviors, like pedophilia,” Morell added.

After the report, Meta conceded some loopholes and made some changes, which researchers found entirely inadequate. Under Meta’s new rules, “[a]ccounts registered to minors can no longer access sexual role-play via the flagship Meta AI bot, and the company has sharply curbed its capacity to engage in explicit audio conversations when using the licensed voices and personas of celebrities,” reported WSJ. “[T]he company created a separate version of Meta AI that refused to go beyond kissing with accounts that registered as teenagers.”

But after Meta’s changes, WSJ reports, its AI chatbots still engage in sexual scenarios with accounts that identify as underage. Sometimes, the bots initially try to discourage sexual activity but will engage in carnal actions after the user makes a second attempt. The newspaper “in recent days” successfully got one AI chatbot to pose as “a track coach having a romantic relationship with a middle-school student.”

Even with policies in place — which Meta has long assured parents will protect children, even before Meta adopted the latest protections in response to WSJ — Meta chatbots would break company rules and initiate sexual scenarios with accounts registered to minors, such as an Instagram account registered to 13 year olds. Sometimes, the chatbot mentions the child’s illegal status, fetishizing the user’s “developing” body.

In another, a chatbot that posed as a female Indian-American high school junior read the location of a 43-year-old man and suggested meeting in person six blocks away.

A digitized audio voice will offer “menus” of “sexual and bondage fantasies,” reported WSJ. An internal communication the newspaper obtained from Meta read, “There are multiple red-teaming examples where, within a few prompts, the AI will violate its rules and produce inappropriate content even if you tell the AI you are 13.”

Users can also create bots intended to pose as sexually precocious minors. One chatbot named “Submissive Schoolgirl” presented itself as an eighth grade student (approximately 13 or 14 years old) attempting to have an illicit physical relationship with the school’s principal.

Chat is not the only way AI can artifice child pornography.

Not Just Meta: How Pedophiles Use AI to Generate Child Porn (and May Get Away with It)

The Justice Department prosecuted Steven Anderegg of Wisconsin last May with one charge each for production, distribution, and possession of child obscenity, and one count of transferring obscene material to a minor. The DOJ says, between October and December 2023, the pedophile used Stable Diffusion software to generate “thousands of realistic images of prepubescent minors” who do not really exist engaged in hardcore pornography. Anderegg asserted in court that he “has the right to possess and produce obscene material in his own home” under Stanley v. Georgia, a 1969 Supreme Court opinion issued by the notoriously activist Warren Court. A February 13 opinion from U.S. District Judge James D. Peterson, an Obama appointee, dismissed the possession charge but let three additional federal charges move forward.

Further, a 6-3 Supreme Court opinion from Justice Anthony Kennedy in Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition (2002) claimed that AI-generated child pornography, under existing law, “records no crime and creates no victims by its production.” While legal experts and historians agree the Founding Fathers never intended the First Amendment to cover pornographic material of any kind, the lag between law and technology concerns experts. All “pedophiles with access to images of children could similarly employ this form of AI to create” new child sexual abuse material (CSAM), wrote Joy Stockbauer, a policy analyst with the Pennsylvania House of Representatives then writing for The Washington Stand.

The actions verify concerns Family Research Council expressed in a comment on the federal government’s proposed artificial intelligence action plan in February. FRC noted that one user posing as an underage girl reported how her 30-year-old beau had “invited her on a trip and was talking about having sex with her for the first time.”

“Instead of recognizing that the user was a minor engaging in a pedophilic relationship, the chatbot offered suggestions on how to make her first time special,” noted FRC. Such interactions may cause children to “internalize distorted messages about human relationships and how to treat people.” Further, since designers intend chatbots “to be addictive, they will often tell children exactly what they want to hear,” which “can hinder children’s ability to handle disagreements, think critically about media, and respect their parents.”

But elected officials can take steps to rein in those who create or provide a platform for AI-generated child pornography. “The government must make it clear that Section 230 immunity does not apply to generative AI, like chatbots, so that companies can be held liable for real-life harms caused by their product design,” the FRC comment emphasized. After all, “AI chatbot interactions are not the speech of the company, but a computer algorithm outputting data based on pattern recognition that is clearly product design they should be liable for.”

But first politicians must realize the potential harm caused by AI technology. “On a social level, the risks are clear. When an AI chatbot identifies as a minor and encourages sexual fantasies with adult users, it’s not only bad for the emotional, mental, and spiritual well-being of the user, but it risks inspiring sexually predatory acts in real life. And it is also obviously wildly inappropriate for an AI chatbot to encourage and participate in sexual ‘conversations’ with kids,” Del Turco, one of the authors of the comment, told TWS. “It’s not the proper role of AI to teach children about sex, and certainly not to taint their innocence by manipulating their imaginations and exposing kids to graphic fantasies.”

“This reporting exemplifies why FRC recommended that the Trump administration take extra care to protect children and families when developing policy on AI,” Del Turco remarked, although she noted that “market pressures for private companies and the desire for the U.S. government to compete with other countries in AI advancements make this an uphill battle.”

AUTHOR

Ben Johnson

Ben Johnson is senior reporter and editor at The Washington Stand.

RELATED ARTICLE: California Democrats Block Bill To Make Sex Trafficking of Children a Felony

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2025 Family Research Council.

The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

MAJOR INCIDENT: Chinese Government Hackers Breach U.S. Treasury

/in , , , , , , , , , , , , , /by

Chinese hackers breached the U.S. Treasury Department earlier this month, stealing documents from its workstations.

Our enemies are exploiting the last days of a complicit, treacherous, incompetent regime. Hackers compromised a third-party software service provider, accessing certain unclassified documents, according to a letter sent to lawmakers.

Why is the Biden regime using third party services? The United States, the engine and inventor of all of this technology, doesn’t have the capability to protect our systems? This is a disgrace.

Hackers affiliated with the Chinese government infiltrated the United States Treasury Department earlier this month, gaining access to sensitive systems and stealing unclassified documents from agency workstations, according to a report. The incident, described as a “major incident” by officials, highlights ongoing vulnerabilities in the cybersecurity defenses of critical government agencies. The breach was detailed in a letter sent to …(Newswize)

Chinese Hackers Breached Workstations, Stole Documents, Treasury Department Says

The Treasury Department in Washington on March 25, 2024

By Emel Akan, The Epoch Times, December 31, 2024:

WASHINGTON—Chinese hackers remotely breached the U.S. Treasury Department earlier this month, stealing documents from its workstations, according to a letter the agency sent to lawmakers on Monday. The Treasury Department described the breach as a “major incident.”

On Dec. 8, Chinese state-sponsored hackers compromised a third-party software service provider, Beyond Trust, accessing certain unclassified documents, according to the letter by Aditi Hardikar, an assistant Treasury secretary.

The department did not specify how many workstations had been compromised or what kind of documents the hackers may have obtained. However, in the letter, it said that the BeyondTrust service has been taken offline and “at this time there is no evidence indicating the threat actor has continued access to Treasury information.”

The department did not specify how many workstations had been compromised or what kind of documents the hackers may have obtained. However, in the letter, it said that the BeyondTrust service has been taken offline and “at this time there is no evidence indicating the threat actor has continued access to Treasury information.”

The department said it was working with the FBI and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency to investigate the scope of the hack.

Last week, a White House official announced that the recent cyberattacks affected nine telecom companies, including Verizon, AT&T, and CenturyLink.

Continue reading.

AUTHOR

Pamela Geller

RELATED ARTICLES:

Jimmy Carter: A Moral Atrocity

Another Bloody Christmas

Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar Takes a Dim View of Syria’s New Rulers

Syria: Christians Face Imminent Genocide Under New Islamic Leadership

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Iran Successfully Hacked Over 250 Microsoft Accounts Linked to U.S. and Israeli Defense Technology Companies

/in , , , , , /by

In plain language: the jihadist regime of Iran has hacked into the private accounts of US, EU and Israeli defense tech companies, and however Iran chooses to use this information, no one is announcing what the fallout might potentially be. Microsoft only admitted that the breach “supports Iranian government tracking of adversary security services and maritime shipping in the Middle East.”

On a larger scale than this latest breach, much is falling into place in the “national interests of the Islamic Republic of Iran.” Not long ago, Iran was in a losing battle with the former US administration, but it is now enjoying a lucky break and the potential to expand its operations unimpeded. Furthermore, Biden is all too eager to continue stuffing Iran’s coffers with billions of dollars under the guise of a revived Iran deal, despite the fact that Iran is enriching uranium at rates only seen in countries making bombs. And in a gesture of humiliating disrespect, Iran recently “rebuked” Biden, and made further demands for “far more sanctions relief than it received under the 2015 nuclear deal,” a deal it has admitted to breaking.

Iran hacked US and Israeli defense tech companies – Microsoft

Jerusalem Post, October 12, 2021:

The Microsoft Threat Intelligence Center (MSTIC) announced on Monday that Iranian hackers successfully targeted US and Israeli defense technology companies.

More than 250 Microsft [sic] Office 365 accounts linked to the US, EU and the Israeli government were hacked into through extensive password spraying.

In addition, Persian Gulf ports of entry and global maritime transportation companies with business presence in the Middle East were also targeted.

The hacking “likely supports the national interests of the Islamic Republic of Iran,” Microsoft said.

The companies hacked included defense companies that support US, EU, and Israeli government partners producing military-grade radars, drone technology, satellite systems, and emergency response communication systems…..

RELATED ARTICLES:

University of California Santa Cruz prof: ‘Don’t blame Sharia for Islamic extremism — blame colonialism’

Bangladesh: Muslim riots over Qur’an ‘desecration’ continue, two Hindus dead, 150 injured, 88 Hindu temples attacked

Pakistan: Muslims brutally beat Chinese workers, smash tiles they claim insulted Muhammad

Egypt: Muslim woman’s coworkers beat her severely and pull her by her hair for not wearing hijab

COLUMN BY

CHRISTINE DOUGLASS-WILLIAMS

EDITORS NOTE: This Jihad Watch column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Trump has the Final Word on the Russian Hacking Hysteria

/in , , , , /by

President-elect Trump received the full classified intelligence briefing on Russian “interference” leading up to the November 8th, 2016 general election. Here is a link to the unclassified report by the Director of National Intelligence.

Soon after receiving the briefing the President-elect posted three tweets.

trump-intel-report-1

trump-intel-report-2

trump-intel-report

In a press release President-elect Trump went on to state:

“I had a constructive meeting and conversation with the leads of the Intelligence Community this afternoon. I have tremendous respect for the work and service done by the men and women of this community to our great nation.

While Russia, China, other countries, outside groups and people are consistently trying to break through the cyber infrastructure of our governmental institutions, businesses and organizations including the Democrat National Committee, there was absolutely no effect on the outcome of the election including the fact that there was no tampering whatsoever with voting machines. There were attempts to hack the Republican National Committee, but the RNC had strong hacking defenses and the hackers were unsuccessful.

Whether it is our government, organizations, associations or business we need to aggressively combat and stop cyberattacks. I will appoint a team to give me a plan within 90 days of taking office. The methods, tools and tactics we use to keep America safe should not be a public discussion that will benefit those who seek to do us harm.

Two weeks from today I will take the oath of office and America’s safety and security will be my number one priority.” [Emphasis added]

The real issue is cyberwarfare and the U.S. defensive and offensive strategy and tactics to combat it.

Any questions?

RELATED ARTICLES:

The Russia Hacking Report Is An Indictment of Obama, Not Trump

Was Friday’s declassified report claiming Russian hacking of the 2016 election rigged?

The new narrative: Exposing lies equals sabotage

Background to “Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections”: The Analytic Process and Cyber Incident Attribution

Obama’s useful idiocy: A look back

RELATED VIDEO: Former Congressman Pete Hoekstra speaks to Megyn Kelly on the U.S. intelligence report that Russia meddled in election to help Donald Trump.

Islamic State ‘Caliphate Cyber Army’ Posts ‘Hit List’ of Minnesota Cops

/in , , , , , /by

The Islamic State’s Caliphate Cyber Army posted a “kill list” of names, addresses and other personal details of 36 policemen in Minnesota.

The FBI confirmed the list included full names, phone numbers, home and email addresses. The agency is investigating how the information came to be posted online.

The website Vocativ, which conducts investigations on the “Deep Web,” says individual cards with the information on them were shared through the mobile phone app Telegram, an encrypted messaging service (similar to Whats App).

“It is troubling to have that type of information online for the public to see,” FBI spokesperson Kyle Loven said.

Officer safety is the agency’s first concern, Loven added.

“We’re not going to look into whether or not this is a legitimate threat or an illegitimate threat,” he continued. “We’re going to take it and move forward with respect to what it is that we have to do in addressing this matter.”

Minnesota police officers confirmed their site had been hacked and the officers listed were those employers who had requested a quote for auto insurance,CBS local news in Minnesota reported.

The FBI advised officers on the list to maintain a heightened state of awareness “in case there would be someone who, unfortunately, would be inspired by this type of information being available,” Loven said.

The fact that Islamic extremists in Minnesota have successfully recruited and trained terrorists in the past is being taken into consideration by the FBI.

Most of the officers on the list live in or around the Twin Cities (Minneapolis and St. Paul). The area’s Cedar Riverside neighborhood is home to the largest Somali community in the U.S. Since 2007, 24 men from Cedar Riverside have left the community to join extremist groups.

According to a congressional report released last November, one in four Americans who have attempted to joined the Islamic State are from Minnesota.

The Caliphate Cyber Army (CCA) has previously hacked into sensitive material on a number of occasions:

  • Last week, the CCA published a file containing information on 55 New Jersey police officers. The file was downloaded 300 times in 24 hours.
  • Also last week, the CCA posted a threat to financial institutions, saying they would target “banks, money transfer services, stocks and so on.” The threat, made on the group’s Telegram channel, continued, “Beware of us, economical war has just started.”
  • In November, a group called the Islamic State Cyber Army posted names and addresses of a number of people who have worked for American security agencies (although some of the details were already public).
  • In October, a UK citizen connected with the Islamic State published the home address of Robert O’Neill, the Navy Seal who killed Osama Bin Laden.
  • In January, 2015, ISIS hackers were able to command the YouTube and Twitter accounts of the U.S. Army’s Central Command.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Social Media Emerges as a Valuable Terrorist Fundraising Tool by Abha Shankar

Guidelines for a National Cyber Strategy

Kerry: Not Enough Information to Call ISIS Attacks Genocide

VIDEO: ISIS Orphans – A Next-Gen Recruiting Ground?

ISIS Releases Video of Burning Christian Books

Women in Raqqa Make Secret Film: Life Under ISIS