Tag Archive for: election fraud

TEXAS BLOWS THE LID OFF SHARIA FINANCE: Texas Exposes Foreign Islamic Financial Pipeline Operating in America’s Heartland

The Austin Roll Call: How Texas Is Exposing Foreign Financial Networks on American Soil

Most people look for foreign influence at the federal border, but on July 30, a paper trail inside the Texas State Capitol proved the real beachhead might be in the state’s banking system.

While legacy news cameras chased federal soundbites in Washington, the Texas House Committee on Homeland Security, Public Safety, and Veterans Affairs quietly convened in Austin for something far more dangerous to the status quo: a methodical audit of foreign money in American backyards. This wasn’t political theater designed for a ten-second clip. It was a cold, calculated exercise in state power, laying down an evidentiary blueprint built to reclaim American land, lock down financial pipelines, and force federal agencies to answer for what they’ve ignored.

That strategy hinges on a unique Texas weapon: the interim charge. Because the state’s part-time legislature meets just once every two years, the real legislative warfare happens in these off-season hearing rooms long before the public ever sees a headline. This is where statutes are quietly pre-written, bulletproof evidence is locked into the public record, and next year’s sweeping state mandates are weaponized long before January’s opening gavel ever hits the bench.

The backdrop to this hearing was already historic. In November 2025, Governor Greg Abbott issued a landmark executive proclamation designating the Muslim Brotherhood and the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) as foreign terrorist and transnational criminal organizations within Texas. The order took direct aim at foreign influence operations by barring both groups from acquiring land anywhere across the state.

Although CAIR and the Muslim Legal Fund quickly mounted a federal court challenge, alleging first amendment violations, Texas leadership signaled that the state would not back down from defending its borders and banking systems.

Taking the witness chair was Sam Westrop, head of Islamic Watch at the Middle East Forum and a senior fellow at the Texas Public Policy Foundation. Rather than offering political rhetoric, Westrop submitted a detailed, written filing directly into the official public record – a permanent document titled Sharia Finance in Texas.

The filing methodically detailed over a dozen financial entities operating within the state, highlighting major institutions like Guidance Residential, which reports over $2 billion in home financing, and Sharia Portfolio, with over $3 billion in globally managed assets. The record also named key operational firms and financial groups including Ijara CDC, University Islamic Financial, Amana Mutual Funds, and A Continuous Charity.Westrop’s testimony mapped out links between these domestic entities and foreign networks tied to radical Islamist currents – including Deobandi, Salafi, and Qutbist ideology – as well as state actors in Malaysia and Iraq.

More critically, the testimony traced the financial ecosystem back to the Islamic Development Bank, a multilateral financial institution whose major shareholders include the governments of Iran, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar. According to the filed record, this global institution has quietly funneled millions into state-level non-profits, mosques, and local educational institutions – including a $3.5 million expansion of the Austin Peace Academy, located in the heart of the Texas capital.

Following Westrop, senior fellow Ammon Blair outlined actionable enforcement mechanisms for state lawmakers. Recognizing that federal authorities hold exclusive power over international terrorist designations, state officials are turning to robust transparency laws – a domain where state authority remains unchallenged.

To counter foreign influence, the proposed Texas legislative strategy focuses on a three-tier framework centered on state-level oversight and financial transparency. First, the state would mandate full financial disclosure for local entities, requiring them to reveal their governance boards, corporate structures, and foreign backers. Second, lawmakers would establish systematic state-level vetting, subjecting any organization seeking tax privileges, state contracts, or land acquisitions to rigorous audits. Finally, the framework applies network-level enforcement, allowing regulators to track and restrict entire foreign-tied funding pipelines rather than evaluating entities in isolation.

The proposed framework urges state lawmakers to:

  1. Build a State-Level Transparency Registry: Mandate comprehensive disclosures revealing who finances local institutions, who sits on governance boards, and where capital originates.
  2. Implement Network Auditing: Require thorough vetting for any organization seeking state contracts, tax privileges, or land acquisitions, treating foreign-backed funding networks as unified systems rather than isolated entities.
  3. Impose Strict Penalties: Enforce clear statutory consequences for organizations with verified ties to hostile foreign interests or designated foreign threats.

While representatives for the named financial entities maintain that their operations are fully compliant with standard commercial banking rules, and CAIR continues to dismiss state actions as political maneuvering, the official state record tells a clear story.

Attorney General Ken Paxton’s escalating lawsuit to strip CAIR of its ability to operate on Texas soil isn’t just local legal drama—it’s the frontline of a quiet revolution. States are finally realizing they don’t have to wait for Washington’s permission to defend their borders, their land, and their financial systems from unvetted foreign capital.

When the Texas Legislature gavels back in this January, lawmakers won’t be starting from scratch or relying on soundbites. Sitting on the shelf is a cold, fully documented financial paper trail—a line-by-line blueprint that hands states the exact model to police foreign influence on American soil.

For a complete breakdown of the testimony and official filings from the hearing, watch the full report on YouTube: The Austin Roll Call: Texas Hearing on Foreign Financial Influence

©2026 . All rights reserved.

Election Integrity — a California Case

This puts ALL of us on notice… 

I was recently sent this video of former LA mayoral candidate Spencer Pratt.

For late arrivals, I have been extensively involved with election integrity for several years (e.g., see this). For Substack readers, I put together a one-page list of numerous examples of highly suspect behavior that transpired in the 2020 presidential election.

In other words, I can personally assure you that most of what Spencer is saying is accurate.

This is better than the K-12 catastrophe in that a good number of people are actually doing something about it. A prime example is that attorney Cleta Mitchell has been conducting one-hour Friday morning Zoom meetings since 2021 — every week! There are 100± attendees from all over the US, and Cleta selects different people every week to discuss issues in their State.

The idea is to exchange information on what works so that election integrity citizens elsewhere are not reinventing the wheel.

Along the way, Cleta founded the Election Integrity Network (EIN). If you are serious about election integrity and you’d like to attend these online meetings (when able to) sign up at EIN.

Now let’s hear what Spencer Pratt has to say…


FYI, President Trump is not pushing for the federal SAVE Act because he is stubborn, but rather because he has first-hand privileged information, knowing that there is meaningful corruption in our election process. That EVERY Senator is not 100% supportive of that legislation is beyond a disgrace.

All you need to know is that if the SAVE Act is universally opposed by the mainstream media and Left-wing organizations, then it is important to pass.

©2026 All rights reserved.

RELATED VIDEO: Hamtramck Muslim city council member Abu Musa caught stuffing ballot box


Here is other information from this scientist that you might find interesting:

I urge all readers to subscribe to AlterAI — IMO the absolute best AI option for subjective questions.

I will consider posting reader submissions on Critical Thinking about my topics of interest.

My commentaries are my opinion about the material discussed therein, based on the information I have. If any readers have different information, please share it. If it is credible, I will be glad to reconsider my position.

Check out the Archives of this Critical Thinking substack.

C19Science.info is my one-page website that covers the lack of genuine Science behind our COVID-19 policies.

Election-Integrity.info is my one-page website that lists multiple major reports on the election integrity issue.

WiseEnergy.org is my multi-page website that discusses the Science (or lack thereof) behind our energy options.

Media Balance Newsletter: a free, twice-a-month newsletter that covers what the mainstream media does not do, on issues from climate to COVID, elections to education, renewables to religion, etc. Here are the Newsletter’s 2026 Archives. Please send me an email to get your free copy. When emailing me, please make sure to include your full name and the state where you live. (Of course, you can cancel the Media Balance Newsletter at any time!)

Democrats Vote to Pack the Supreme Court

205 Democrats just voted against keeping the Supreme Court at nine justices. When Democrats don’t get their way, they don’t accept the outcome. They move to dismantle the Constitution, abolish the Electoral College, corrupt the voting system, and rewrite the law to rig the rules in their favor.

In case you didn’t think that they are going to try to pack the court if they take back power, they just gave us our answer.

When the Democrats can’t win the legitimate way, they rip up the Constitution and rewrite it.

The US House has failed to secure the votes needed to pass a Constitutional Amendment capping the number of Supreme Court justices at 9

Democrats just made crystal clear they intend to PACK THE COURT when they take power.

That’ll be the END of our republic.

Final vote tally: 212-206 (Two-third majority needed).

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Biden Judge Rules Trump Admin CANNOT Deport Foreigners Who Express Support for Terrorist Groups

How BerlinRosen Is Normalizing Mamdani’s Communist Congressional Takeover

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Radical Socialists Rock the Democratic Party: ‘I Do Not Think They Can Push Back’

The Year of the Democratic Socialists took another twist Tuesday when the House went on the offensive to paint Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries’s (D-N.Y.) party as a dangerous force of anti-Americanism. While the New Yorker has desperately tried to put some distance between Democrats and the DSA (somewhat unsuccessfully, others would add), the party’s drift toward mind-boggling radicalism is putting the entire country on edge.

The four-page resolution at the center of the House’s return to Washington this week “condemns and denounces socialism in all its forms, including the Democratic Socialists of America and opposes the implementation of socialist policies in the United States.” The brainchild of Rep. Jeff Crank (R-Colo.) spells out the wild ideas of the DSA, including abolishing prisons, ICE, the U.S. Senate, the Supreme Court, the Electoral College, and the presidency as we know it. Yet, despite those blaring red sirens, Jeffries’s rank-and-file are trying to dismiss the GOP’s concerns as “silly season.”

“Let’s scare people with yet another boogeyman and not do anything about it. Not really solve problems,” Rep. Mary Gay Scanlon (D-Pa.) argued. But others, like Rep. Nick Langworthy (R-N.Y.), were quick to push back, reminding her that this is no hypothetical. “I’ve seen firsthand the alarming rise of socialism,” he said. “… Families in western New York have watched one-party rule in Albany pile on more taxes, more mandates, more government control, while hardworking taxpayers are left to foot the bill,” Langworthy warned. “And now downstate, we’ve watched the socialist left move more from the activist fringe into positions of real, serious political power. And anyone [who] thinks that these ideas are going to stay confined in New York City is sadly mistaken.”

While Jeffries’s lieutenants speak out of both sides of their mouths about the creeping communist agenda — “Democratic Socialists aren’t part of the Democratic Party,” but “we’re a broad caucus” — conservatives are making it clear that the party has already been ideologically captured.

“[S]cores of these candidates coming up through the system at the state level and congressional level,” House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) emphasized on Saturday’s “This Week on Capitol Hill” with Family Research Council President Tony Perkins. “Almost 40 of them now have prevailed and gone through these primary processes, because … the energy, the excitement, the grassroots, the money is on the side of the insurgent Left, sadly, in the Democratic Party. They’re taking the party over. And this is not a game,” he said somberly. “It’s not a flash in the pan. This isn’t a New York City thing. It’s happened in Oklahoma. It happened in Florida. It’s happening in red states, and it’s something that we must take into account.”

And this extreme makeover of Democrats is happening at warp speed, Johnson underscored. “… [A] few years ago, Republicans and Democrats in Congress [were] arguing over marginal tax rates and shades of regulation. We are now quite literally locked into a contest to determine whether we’re going to keep our republic — to keep the country as it is, or to break this thing down to the foundation and go [down] an entirely different road and set of principles towards communism. That’s the balance.”

The speaker, who’s been crisscrossing the country with this urgent message, pointed to a new website that Republicans put together called ContrastForAmerica.com that lays out the grim history of communism and socialism. “It always — every single time — has led to human suffering, misery, famine, even to death and the murder of tens of millions of innocent people in the 20th century alone. We can’t do it. It’s anti-American, and everybody needs to wake up right now. That is what is on the ballot almost 65 days from today.”

Johnson pointed to some of the shocking platforms embraced by candidates vying for some of the highest offices in Congress. There’s Abdul El-Sayed, running for Michigan’s Senate seat, who won’t disavow streamer Hasan Piker for blaming America for 9/11 or for calling Jews “bloodthirsty pig dogs.” The radical Muslim, whose own anti-Semitism has earned him the scorn of even far-Left Democrats like Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.), is frantically trying to make inroads to the state’s Jewish population despite more baggage than a Boeing 737.

Yet if he wins, El-Sayed will be one of the most powerful voices in Washington. These are people, the speaker cautioned, “who are so determined to rip the Constitution in half.” And when some of these candidates get elected, “and they will in some of these blue districts,” he concedes, “you’re going to have a number of effectively communists elected to Congress under the Constitution.” So what happens? “Will they disavow what they say if they raise their hand and they take an oath to uphold the Constitution? Someone would have to prove that they’re lying. It’s a very subjective determination. I mean, it’s a fascinating, untested, unprecedented question. Those are the times in which we live.”

At the end of the day, “They’re delusional,” the speaker shook his head. “They do not understand history. They do not understand how dangerous this is. And the idea that anyone who is currently sitting in Congress or the Senate, like [Senator] Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) or [Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y.] or any of them … would align themselves with this madness is crazy. … And I’m sad to tell you,” the Louisianan lamented, “I say this with great sadness, I think it’s too late for the Democrat[ic] Party. I do not think they can push back.”

Conservatives will continue to, despite allegations from the Left that anti-socialism resolutions like the one the House is pursuing this week are unnecessary. Yes, FRC’s Quena González acknowledges, some of this is political strategy. But that’s not to say the threat isn’t real.

“Republicans voting for a resolution condemning socialism less than two months before the midterms is a classic election-year maneuver to find the lowest of low-hanging fruit. It’s a clever ploy,” he notes, “because Democrats in Congress are watching members of the Democratic Socialists of America win primaries and can’t afford to condemn them without risking their chance of retaking the House majority.”

Obviously, González acknowledges, “It would be easy for Christians to throw up their hands, discouraged by the electioneering and paralysis in D.C. But thinking biblically means that we do not have the luxury of giving in to cynicism and despair. We are called to be salt and light, to act for the good of our neighbors, and to pray for our rulers. And in America,” he urged, “praying for our rulers included praying for wisdom for our fellow citizens. Americans choose our leaders, but less than half of eligible voters vote in midterm elections. Bible-believing Christians have an out-sized impact when they vote wisely.”

Speaker Johnson is also banking on reason and common sense to prevail. “You can trust the American people when they are given the facts. And [if] they’re informed, they will do the right thing. We’re still a center-right country,” he insists. “We’re still one nation under God — no matter [what] these crazy, radical, leftist, anti-God, anti-Semitic, pro-terrorism [people] say. This is still America. And I believe God’s not done with America yet. And people are going to rise up, do the right thing, elect the right people who love their country, and want to preserve it and continue to make it better. That is the challenge. That is the choice. That’s the election before us.”

AUTHOR

Suzanne Bowdey

Suzanne Bowdey serves as editorial director and senior writer at The Washington Stand.

RELATED ARTICLES:

The Value and Virtues of Capitalism

JD Vance Says Abdul El-Sayed Represents an Evil Plaguing America

RELATED VIDEO: Proud Nazi Hasan Piker Is Now the Face of the Democratic Party

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2026 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

Obama Judge Orders Postal Service To Defy Trump’s Mail-In Ballot Executive Order

An Obama-appointed judge once again temporarily barred the U.S. Postal Service from carrying out President Donald Trump’s restrictions on mail-in ballots in a Thursday ruling.

U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani lifted a preliminary injunction Wednesday after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that some of Trump’s limits could remain in place. The judge issued a new ruling reversing the previous decision, arguing that USPS overstepped its legal mandate, which once again blocked Trump’s rule.

Trump signed an executive order on March 31 titled, “Ensuring Citizenship Verification and Integrity in Federal Elections,” which established certain rules for the USPS regarding mail-in and absentee ballots. Section 3 of the executive order required all outgoing election mail to be marked as “Official Election Mail,” including a unique Intelligent Mail barcode and be pre-approved by the USPS for design and barcode placement.

“Where a state or local election official does not obtain envelope and return envelope design approval, or does not upload voter information, or does not include unique intelligent mail bar codes on ballot envelopes, the U.S.P.S. will not mail ballots to voters,” the ruling stated. Talwani argued that Congress did not delegate authority to the USPS to regulate election mail. She argued the rules would prevent citizens from voting by mail unless the USPS approved the ballots in a timely manner.

The judge further argued that imposing these rules on the states is unconstitutional. She placed a fourteen-day stay on the “implementation or enforcement” of the rules, which prevents USPS from taking these steps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. “The court finds Plaintiffs likely to succeed on the merits of their claims that (1) the USPS lacked authority to issue the Final Rule; (2) the Final Rule is unconstitutional in imposing these requirements on the States; and (3) the Final Rule is unconstitutional in prohibiting non-compliant State and local officials from using the United States Postal Service to mail ballots,” the judge said.

A court in California issued a similar injunction, which reached the Supreme Court in the case, Trump v. California. The high court stayed the injunction, allowing the administration to move forward with the executive order.

©2026 . All rights reserved.

Election Integrity Remains a Fault Line Between RINOs and the Grassroots

Sen. Murkowski says she opposes the SAVE America Act which would require voter ID.  Murkowski said: a person living on a small Alaska island would not be able to vote if the SAVE America Act was passed because they would have to travel all the way to Anchorage to get an ID.  An Unalaska (island) resident confirmed voting takes place at City Hall and said residents “Don’t have to go to Anchorage [to register to vote or obtain ID].”

GOP strategist Matt Locke says, the real problem is that President Trump’s agenda hasn’t advanced because of RINO Republicans.  “The John Thune’s of the party, they like the old ways, they like being in charge, they like telling the President what to do” Locke said, “Now you have these Republicans who are used to the old ways, who want to run everything who can’t, so they’re going to step in and try to do as much damage as they can do, to outlast Trump and get the power back.”

WYOMING

Republican Mark Gordon kvetches about federal election monitors instead of welcoming their assistance in improving election integrity

Wyoming voters reject Freedom Caucus incumbents across the board, perhaps because of focus on spending cuts.  “Establishment Republicans annihilated Freedom Caucus.  ”WY’s results crushed the conservative narrative that establishment Republicans are out-of-touch “RINOs.”

Fellow RINO hunters, we’re not doing our job well enough.

Picture

 

 

 

 

 

 

August 23, 2026

If You Don’t Like My Principles, I Have Others

What Is a RINO?

Our working definition of a RINO is a Republican who meets one or more of these criteria:

  • Votes with Democrats against a Republican majority
  • Endorses Democrats
  • Takes money from Democrat-aligned sources
  • Doesn’t care about immigration, election integrity, limited government under the Constitution, free markets, or fiscal responsibility
  • Votes for more Democrat social spending
  • Wants open primaries
  • Is a former Democrat who ran as a Republican as the only way to get elected in a red state
  • Doesn’t stand for anything except reelection and personal enrichment

Please send us your definition of RINO – tips@liberato.us

FLORIDA

Belinda Keiser is suddenly claiming she’s MAGA? She ran as a Democrat. She donated to Hillary Clinton. She donated to Debbie Wasserman Schultz. Now she wants a seat in Congress from Florida. FL – 22, do not get played. A leopard does not change its spots

TEXAS

James Talarico poached Sen. John Corny’s deputy legislative director, Jacob Smith.
What was a man who could so easily abandon the conservative movement for a dishonest, radical leftist like Talarico ever doing on any GOP congressional staff?

As Groucho Marx said: “Those are my principles, and if you don’t like them… well, I have others.”

Picture

August 16, 2026

Swampmeister John Thune Blocks Trump Recess Appointments

National Scene

BETRAYAL IN THE SWAMP: Turncoat John Thune Sends Senate Home for 37 Days — But Schedules 11 Pro Forma Sessions to BLOCK Trump from Making Recess Appointments

ARIZONA

Good riddance — Gov. Katie Hobbs confirms former Mesa Mayor John Giles will be her running mate.  “I was a lifelong Republican before becoming an Independent because extremists shouldn’t stand in the way of getting things done,” Giles said.

TENNESSEE

Is this why our feckless establishment Republican Supermajority in TN has KILLED every bill in the last 3-4 years to close the primaries in TN? They want to leave it for Marsha [Blackburn] so she can claim it as some kind of “conservative victory”?

TEXAS

Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) added his voice to local politicians and Democrat State Representative James Talarico (D-Austin), nominee in the 2026 U.S. Senate election in Texas, in opposing border security enhancements in the Big Bend National Park.

©2026 . All rights reserved.

TERROR CRACKDOWN: Trump Admin Set to Target George Soros ‘Nonprofit’, Southern Poverty Law Center and CAIR in Major Tax Crackdown

Enemies of the state. The prayers of the victims of these radical terror groups have been answered.

Trump admin set to target George Soros nonprofit, Southern Poverty Law Center and CAIR in major tax crackdown: sources

By James Franey, NY post, Aug. 27, 2026:

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and the IRS could revoke the tax-free status of left-wing nonprofits such as George Soros’ Open Society Foundations, the Southern Poverty Law Center, and the Council on American-Islamic Relations, three sources familiar with the matter have told The Post.

It is part of a Trump-backed crackdown on “bogus” charities, and Treasury officials are drawing up a sweeping audit of outfits deemed to be using and abusing Uncle Sam’s tax code, the three people briefed on the Treasury Department’s internal policy deliberations said.

Bessent’s inner circle is drafting a blueprint that could ultimately strip non-compliant organizations of their 501(c)(3) status, according to two of the people familiar with the plans. The reviews could result in massive back payments and civil penalties, the same sources said.

The initiative leans in part on a 2025 executive order signed by President Donald Trump targeting nonprofits operating with a “substantial illegal purpose,” paving the way for the IRS to issue fines or even strip the tax-exempt status of charities allegedly tied to political violence, protests or radical ideologies.

Officials have also scrutinized a number of anti-corporate and labor-aligned advocacy groups that could end up on the blacklist, including the Private Equity Stakeholder Project, the anti-Amazon Athena Coalition, left-leaning watchdog MediaJustice, and the Strategic Organizing Center alongside its parent union, the SEIU, according to the three insiders briefed on the matter.

One of the sources warned that Treasury Department officials were “like a dog with a bone” and reckoned that many of the groups and their donors could be “on borrowed time.”

“There’s a lot of internal pressure to get it done, but some people are still moving too slowly at the IRS,” the source said. “That is expected to change very soon.”

The aggressive crackdown is already facing fierce legal blowback. Left-leaning legal powerhouse Protect Democracy sued Treasury and the IRS earlier this year, accusing the administration of illegally weaponizing the tax code against its political opponents.

While there is intense internal pressure from some administration officials to get “a good chunk of the crackdown” over the line before the midterms, others have argued for delaying formal enforcement until later in the term to avoid triggering massive, protracted legal battles, the three sources said.

There is a fear that adding high-profile domestic political targets like the SPLC and Soros’ network will trigger a wave of lawsuits, potentially stalling any momentum against foreign terror-linked groups like CAIR, these people told The Post.

The Treasury Department declined multiple requests to comment, but Bessent confirmed last October on the “Charlie Kirk Show” that work on compiling the hit list had begun.

To help with the review of nonprofits, Bessent enlisted Tony Saffier, a former special operations veteran and AI executive recently tapped to spearhead the interagency task force.

Penalties under consideration range from corrective fines to the ultimate regulatory sanction: full revocation of tax-exempt status, which would force the nonprofits to pay the standard 21% federal corporate tax rate.

A Post analysis of the latest IRS filings for all three organizations shows they would have owed about $165 million in federal income tax for 2024 if taxed at that 21% rate.

Almost all of it comes from a single source: the Soros network accounts for $163.6 million of the total. The SPLC would owe roughly $354,000, and 17 CAIR chapters would owe about $860,000 between them. That combined total amounts to a mere rounding error for the US government’s coffers.

Alex Soros sits on celebrity row during the fourth quarter of the Detroit Pistons vs. New York Knicks game at Madison Square Garden.

The targets face unique controversies that the administration is leveraging to justify the crackdown.

Now chaired by George Soros’ 40-year-old son, Alexander, the Open Society Foundations funnels billions to NGOs pushing diversity initiatives, bankrolling climate-change lawsuits, and supporting undocumented migrants.

A spokesperson for the Soros nonprofit told The Post: “Threatening any nonprofit’s tax status for political reasons would be nothing more than an illegal attempt to target and stifle work that the administration disagrees with.”

Bessent is eyeing Soros’ charity despite famously spearheading global currency bets for the Hungarian-born billionaire—including a wildly lucrative wager against the British pound.

When Bessent stepped down as chief investment officer for Soros Fund Management in 2015, Soros staked his new firm with a cool $2 billion.

OSF’s beneficiaries include Black Lives Matter, the US Campaign for Palestinian Rights, and United We Dream Action, a group that actively works to frustrate the deportation of illegal migrants.

The Southern Poverty Law Center is reeling from the recent federal indictment of its former intelligence director. While OSF and SPLC are being scrutinized under the president’s domestic executive order, the administration is treating CAIR strictly as a national security target.

Prosecutors allege the self-described anti-racism outfit secretly funneled donor funds to extremist informants, including an operative who allegedly helped organize the violent 2017 Charlottesville rally.

Meanwhile, the Council on American-Islamic Relations has long faced scrutiny over alleged foreign entanglements.

Federal prosecutors named the group as an unindicted co-conspirator in the 2007 Holy Land Foundation terror-financing trial. CAIR adamantly denies any ties to illicit foreign funding or terror organizations.

Continue reading

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

Trump Allies Allege Foreign Interference As Host At Israeli-Funded Media Outlet Repeatedly Targets Vance

THE ISLAMIC TAKEOVER IS HERE: Turning US Cities Into ‘Beachheads’ for Islam

ABSOLUTE SUBMISSION: Canada’s CBC Orders Reporters, Don’t Call 9/11 a Terrorist Attack

Murderer-Mourning Mamdani Grieves for Meat-Cleaver Killer

The Beast Descends On Texas

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Leftists Try to Change Their Language, but Not Their Policies

Some progressive politicians have awoken to the fact that their far-left language is hurting them with voters, reports Axios. Terms like “birthing people” (women), “unhoused people” (homeless), “criminal justice-impacted individuals” (inmates), and “substance abuse disorder” (addiction) are just plain weird and make officials who use them seem out of touch. At a Michigan Democratic fundraising dinner in April, Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear (D) urged candidates present to “talk like a normal human.” That should be a low bar to clear.

Yet some left-wing activists and the politicians who need their endorsements go on endlessly about “allyship,” “people experiencing food insecurity,” “Latinx,” and “equity.”

Beshear is not the only Democrat to make this point. Senator Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) recently argued, “‘social equity’ — why do we say that? Why don’t we say, ‘We want you to have an even chance’?” Former Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel advised his party to “ignore the culture police.” Even California Governor Gavin Newsom (D) keeps urging Democrats to become more “culturally normal,” advice he could well afford to follow.

In fact, some Democrats have been pointing out the problem ever since their electoral loss. “Some words are just too Ivy League-tested terms,” Gallego complained in a May 2025 Washington Post article. The same piece quoted Beshear in harmony, “Democrats have begun to speak like professors and started using advocacy-speak. … It makes Democrats or candidates using this speech sounding like they’re not normal.”

In August 2025, the Democratic group Third Way published a memo to “All Who Wish to Stop Donald Trump and MAGA” to stop using several dozen ridiculous terms. “For a party that spends billions of dollars trying to find the perfect language to connect to voters, Democrats and their allies use an awful lot of words and phrases no ordinary person would ever dream of saying,” they said. “To please the few, we have alienated the many — especially on culture issues, where our language sounds superior, haughty and arrogant.”

Thus far, few Democrats have heeded the appeals of their fellow partisans to be normal. Days after the Third Way memo, the Democratic National Committee unanimously approved a resolution in support of DEI.

The bizarre vocabulary has even made its way out of rhetoric and into policy. Last year, the public library in Baton Rouge, La. fired a bi-vocational pastor who refused to use the preferred pronouns of a trans-identifying coworker. In June 2026, the New York legislature enacted a bill that did nothing but replace 22 instances of “father” and “mother” in family law with “gestating parent” or “non-gestating parent.”

And the hits keep coming. This year, Rep. Wesley Bell (D-Mo.) introduced a bill to replace the term “ex-felon” in law with “qualified criminal justice-impacted individual.” In January, Senator Cory Booker (D-N.J.) announced a joint resolution that recognized health systems who helped “birthing individuals” and “birthing people.” In May, Governor Newsom announced new apartment space in Los Angeles for “formerly unhoused people.”

As far-left candidates associated with the Democratic Socialists of America continue to steamroll their way through Democratic primaries, the party is likely to drift even further to the left.

A handful of self-aware leftists are right to observe the problem with their language. Successful politicians practice making their ideas sound normal and acceptable, not weird and extreme. By letting “‘advocacy speak’ seep into our Democratic language,” said Beshear, politicians on the Left “make it feel like we’re talking down to people, like we’re talking at them, instead of to them.”

But the weird language is a symptom of weird ideas. And politicians like Beshear are proposing a cosmetic change to their agenda, not a systemic one. “The idea [behind woke language] was, we reduce stigma,” he said. “But we don’t reduce stigma by changing words. We reduce stigma by changing parts.” To put it differently, Beshear will shed the woke words if it means getting to implement the woke ideas behind them.

If anything, the leftist push to revise its language is an exercise in insincerity. The Left wants to change what it says without changing what it means. It recognizes that its words are offensive and off-putting to Americans. Good. It must also recognize that its ideas are just as unacceptable. So, why does it continue to push them? And will Americans be hoodwinked?

Editor’s note: A previous version of this story incorrectly stated that Senator Katie Britt (R-Ala.) used the terms “birthing individuals” and “birthing people” in a joint resolution. Only Senator Cory Booker (D-N.J.) used those terms in a press release announcing their joint resolution.

AUTHOR

Joshua Arnold

Joshua Arnold is a senior writer at The Washington Stand.

RELATED ARTICLE: Study: Confiscatory Taxation of the Rich Won’t Cover Federal Deficit for a Year

EDITORS NOTE: This Washington Stand column is republished with permission. All rights reserved. ©2026 Family Research Council.


The Washington Stand is Family Research Council’s outlet for news and commentary from a biblical worldview. The Washington Stand is based in Washington, D.C. and is published by FRC, whose mission is to advance faith, family, and freedom in public policy and the culture from a biblical worldview. We invite you to stand with us by partnering with FRC.

Homeland Security Warns of Chinese parts in Election Machines, Will Require Paper Ballot Audits

The 2020 election was a coup. We watched it happening in real time. Voting machines are hackable and unreliable and vulnerable to foreign interference. We must go back to paper ballots.

Homeland Security warns of Chinese parts in election machines, will require paper ballot audits

The Department of Homeland Security is mandating random paper ballot audits for upcoming elections, citing significant security risks posed by Chinese-manufactured components in widely-used voting machines.

 By Steven Richards,Just The News, August 27, 2026:

The Homeland Security Department will require random audits of paper ballots in the midterm elections, citing long-simmering concern that the nation’s largest voting technology companies use Chinese parts in their voting machines, according to a letter from Secretary Markwayne Mullin released Thursday.

Mullin sent the letter to the White House Transparency Task Force earlier this week outlining the dangers posed by Chinese components in American voting machines and the way that these components could be exploited by hackers or other malicious actors.

The letter highlighted longstanding concerns first raised in a bipartisan manner before the 2020 election, but which officials appear to have taken little action on in the intervening years.

“Voting machines with components manufactured by foreign adversaries introduce significant security risks,” Mullin wrote. “These vulnerabilities mean that malicious actors could potentially compromise election infrastructure at any stage of the supply chain, even before the machines are assembled or deployed.”

The secretary explained, “If a component is tampered with during manufacturing, it could serve as a point-of-entry for hackers, allowing for the possibility of synchronized attacks across multiple machines and jurisdictions.”

Two Biden administration Intelligence Community memos in 2024 identified China as “the most active and persistent cyber threat” and assessed that China, along with Iran and Russia, has “the technical capability to access some U.S. election-related networks and systems.”

You can read Mullin’s letter below:

Earlier this year, the Trump administration took drastic action to ban the import of all internet routers manufactured in foreign countries because of the unacceptable security risks posed by Chinese hacking capabilities.

Internet routers connect computers, cellphones, and other electronic devices to the internet, the backbone of the modern economy.

According to the agency, Chinese hackers have exploited vulnerabilities in Chinese-manufactured systems to extensively burrow into U.S. critical infrastructure networks, affecting industries like communications, energy, transportation and water supply, Just the News previously reported.

Mullin noted major U.S. voting machine companies have acknowledged that some of their components cannot be sourced from any American manufacturers, requiring them to rely on foreign suppliers. Three of those vendors which make up the vast majority of election systems in the U.S., “more than 80%,” are ES&S, Hart InterCivic, and Dominion.

Each of these vendors has previously said that their machines have parts made in China.

Ahead of the 2020 election, the big three came under public and political scrutiny as worries mounted that foreign powers could interfere in U.S. elections.

Voting machines were widely seen as a vector for such interference, including through potential hacking or tampering. According to documents previously declassified by President Donald Trump and made public by the White House Transparency Task Force last month, the U.S. Intelligence Community also harbored concerns after vulnerabilities were exposed by a Venezuelan regime plot to manipulate its own election machines.

The Trump administration has declassified several tranches of documents outlining concerns about election vulnerabilities, seeking to bolster its efforts secure American elections ahead of the midterms. These include:

  • Evidence that China has obtained 220 million American voter registration files, some of which include non-public data, through buying, stealing or hacking. The administration’s intelligence chiefs later said that this represents “election interference.”
  • Assessments from spy agencies beginning in 2020 that at least five foreign powers — China, Russia, Iran, North Korea and Venezuela — possess the ability to hack voting machines.
  • Evidence gathered by the Homeland Security Department that hundreds-of-thousands of likely illegal foreign voters were on the voter rolls states–and estimated the total across the whole country to be higher.
  • Documents that show the FBI investigated a breach of voter registration data in Arizona’s largest county in the days before the 2020 election. In that incident, a self-described hacker foiled security and obtained 633,000 voter registration files, but the Biden Justice Department and local prosecutors declined to bring charges.

The scrutiny on American election machines used to be bipartisan.

Four Democratic lawmakers wrote a letter to the private equity firms that own the election machine vendors in December 2019 asking them to ultimately disclose ownership and finances, citing concerns that these firms have skimped on election security measures. L

Earlier, in 2017, Democratic senators also sent letters to the three major voting machine manufacturers inquiring about their cybersecurity practices.

NBC News interviewed ES&S’s chief executive, Tom Burt, in December 2019 about concerns that the company sources election machine parts from China.

Burt told the outlet that the company’s facilities overseas in China and the Philippines were “very secure” and that ultimate assembly takes place in the United States. In a separate letter to the outlet, ES&S said all components “are trusted, tested and free of malware.”

In 2020, the executives of all three companies testified before the House Administration Committee–the panel tasked with overseeing federal elections–and acknowledged that some of their voting machine components were made in China. The then-president and CEO of Dominion told lawmakers that his company sources parts from China because “in some cases, there are simply no alternative suppliers.”

The Homeland Security Department first outlined its plan to tie its Homeland Security Grant Program funding to state performance in implementing several election security measures in July.

The agency said that it would require all states to “submit a plan for transitioning away from unsecure electronic voting systems” using bar codes and QR codes to count votes, “conduct a manual audit of at least 5% of all ballots cast,” reconcile the number of voters with the number of ballots cast, and use the department’s SAVE system to verify the citizenship of voters.

Documents previously declassified by the president and released by the White House Transparency Task Force show that the U.S. Intelligence Community developed concerns about the security of American voting machines beginning in 2004 when it first detected plans by the Venezuelan government to electronically manipulate their country’s own voting machines, including the use of substituting false votes, to secure victory for the ruling socialists.

The plans raised alarm as early as 2006 among U.S. officials as a potential avenue for the Venezuelans to attempt to “undermine confidence in, or manipulate the electoral process in, the United States,” according to a June 2026 CIA summary of prior intelligence reporting on Caracas’ capabilities.

By 2020, the CIA had obtained reporting on Venezuelan plans to swing the country’s election that year by manipulating electronic voting machines in a way that would make false votes appear legitimate and leave no trace of the changes.

The intelligence raised questions about whether some U.S. voting machines could be vulnerable to similar types of manipulation.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

President Trump: “I Would Absolutely Prohibit Sharia Law!”

Trump Bombshell: More Than 100 UN Terror Employees Referred for Taking Part in Hamas’ October 7 Atrocities

Marines Say CIA-trained Afghan Units ‘Executed’ Civilians to Clear Kabul Airport

Trump Administration Honors Heroes of Biden’s Afghanistan Disaster – Abbey Gate

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Victor Davis Hanson: Trump’s Midterm Strategy Is Taking Shape

Victor Davis Hanson: Trump’s Midterm Strategy Is Taking Shape

Editor’s note: This is a lightly edited transcript of today’s video from Daily Signal senior contributor Victor Davis Hanson.Subscribe to our YouTube channel to see more of his videos.


Hello, this is Victor Davis Hanson for the Daily Signal.

Let’s have a periodic check on the status of the midterms that we’re now less than 80 days away from. The Democrats are riding high. They feel that historical trends, i.e., 39 out of the last 41 midterms, the in party in the White House loses seats, and there’s not very many seats Republicans can afford to lose, and they may lose the House and Senate.

They’re already, I guess you’d call it, measuring their drapes, but in the sense that they’re already explaining how they’re going to go after the Trump family, the Trump family associates, cryptocurrency concerns, any hangers-on, people going to the Middle East and investing. They’re gonna open it wide open.

These are the people, of course, who never investigated the Biden family or Hunter Biden. That’s no excuse if there’s culpability, but nonetheless, you can count on a two-year investigation of Donald Trump and a never-ending impeachment inquiry, and the end of the MAGA agenda should he lose the House and the Senate.

Donald Trump is strangely confident. He now has finally hit on a strategy that he feels will work. Earlier, I called it the “Anaconda Strategy,” the idea that he is squeezing a debilitated Iran. In other words, the kinetic 40 days of bombing have left the nuclear military-industrial complex in shambles.

And this time, he’s not just blockading, he’s not just having an embargo on goods. He is not just freezing the bank accounts of Iranian grandees. He’s not just debanking the entire country. He’s going to third parties and saying, “You and China and Russia and Europe have been trading with this country even while we were bearing the burden of defanging a potential nuclear renegade nation, and we’re going to isolate you. We’re not gonna do business with you if you do business with Iran.”

And the Iranians now are crying foul. They’re saying we’re colonialists. But what I’m getting at, after all that military damage from Feb. 28 for the next 40 days, and after all the blockades, they’re not able to withstand a renewed squeezing.

And so, time is actually on our side. The second part of this strategy is Donald Trump has now put the war on the back burner. He is saying that we don’t need to have ground troops. We might not even go in and bomb them again unless they egregiously attack an ally of ours or one of our carriers or ships.

We have managed it now. The strait is mostly open, and whatever the status of the nuclear stockpile or enriched uranium of the theocracy, it’s pretty clear they can’t get at it.

Hamas, the Houthis, and Hezbollah don’t seem to be getting money. They don’t seem to have enough rockets to threaten the Gulf States or Israel, at least to get through their missile defenses.

And so, we’re just going to concentrate, Trump thinks, on the economy.

So, what he is doing now is he and JD Vance are barnstorming the country, and they’re starting to make headway. They’re not worried about the polls that show a generic 7% Democratic advantage and betting odds and polls that say they’re gonna lose the House because they looked at the recent primaries.

El-Sayed, the candidate, Abdul El-Sayed, the Democratic candidate for the Democratic senatorial seat in Michigan, was polling ahead 10 points, and he scarcely won by a point and a half.

Francesca Hong, the Wisconsin Democratic candidate for governor, was polling ahead 10 or 15 or 20 points. She lost and lost handily.

Mr. [Alexander] Vindman, who was running for Senate in Florida, was polling ahead. He lost to a crazy, wacky Ms. [Angie] Nixon, a democratic socialist.

So, what I’m getting at is the polls are worthless. And what we need to look at is what the status is right now.

The war is starting to wane. If it should end or if the Iranians crack in the next 60 to 70 days, that would be a spectacular achievement that Donald Trump—you know, we’ve tragically lost 17 Americans—but at a tolerable cost in blood and treasure, he ended a 50-year problem that seven presidents said was existential.

You could not allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon, and the pressure that he’s put on them and the damage he’s inflicted would probably, in the next year or two, prompt a renewal of internal opposition against a theocracy that is bleeding.

The second thing to remember very carefully is, as I said earlier, the redistricting, the red state redistricting and the Supreme Court prohibition on racial gerrymandering might give him an additional four or five seats.

But the most important developments are money and the agenda of the new Democratic Party.

Very quickly, Donald Trump has got a war chest of about $400 million, and he’s now going to use it. He says he’s going to use it all in his political action committees to help save the Republicans in the midterms.

Elon Musk said that he is going to match dollar for dollar the Democratic oligarchic class that if they start to donate in great amounts to Democratic candidates.

So, the money issue probably favors also, like, the redistricting and maybe the course of the Iran war that could wane and be not an issue.

But the most important thing to conclude is the Democratic Party. No one thought that the Democratic socialists would ever try to absorb and even seem to succeed in absorbing the Democratic Party. I mean, Nancy Pelosi, Hakeem Jeffries, Chuck Schumer, they’ve all said they have no problem with the Democratic socialists, that they …

It’s a big tent party, and they’re going to help them win their seats. But the problem is, once you have the money and the effort and the attention, and you show what the democratic socialists are, like, defunding the Pentagon, defunding the police, opening the border, mass amnesties, warring on fossil fuels, isolationist foreign policy, the transgender issue reopened with biological men now by statute free to compete in women’s sports. I could go on and on.

They even want to destroy the Senate and the Electoral College, not to mention packing the Supreme Court, ending the filibuster, and bringing in new seats in the Senate by admitting new blue states such as Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico.

And so, what I’m getting at is, the more we learn about the democratic socialists, and the more that the Democratic Party feels they’ve already taken over the apparatus of the party and they’re going to join them, or at least they’re not going to oppose them, they’re gonna be culpable or responsible for what these people say.

And they’re saying all sorts of stuff, not just antisemitic venom, not just anti-Israel venom, but questioning the very legitimacy of the United States government, the way that our Founders created a legislative, judicial, and executive branch, the Declaration of Independence. Our entire traditions, they’re saying, are flawed at their origins.

They got worse during our maturity, and now they’re god-awful right now. That’s not a winning message.

So, the midterms are very much up in the air.

Contrary to historical precedent, there’s still a chance that the Republicans can save both the Senate and the House.

We publish a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of the Daily Signal.

AUTHOR

Victor Davis Hanson

Victor Davis Hanson is a Daily Signal senior contributor, hosting a podcast, producing video commentaries, and writing a weekly column. He is the author of “The Counterrevolution The Fall and Rise of Donald Trump and the MAGA Movement.” Follow on X VDHanson.

RELATED ARTICLES:

Supreme Court Backs Trump Election Integrity Order in Mail Ballot Fight

You Don’t Have to Help. You Do Have to Police.

LGBTQ CRACK-UP: Human Rights Campaign Slams Log Cabin Republicans for Rejecting Transgender Activism

South Carolina’s Primary Battle Heats Up in the Final Stretch

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Signal column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

Supreme Court Backs Trump Election Integrity Order in Mail Ballot Fight

The Supreme Court on Monday sided with President Donald Trump in a mail-in ballot case stemming from his election integrity executive order.

The case is not over, but the high court allowed the federal government to continue implementing the election integrity policies while the case is on appeal.

The justices decided in a 6-3 shadow docket ruling to stay a district court ruling that blocked Trump’s executive order on election integrity and held that the states challenging the order lacked standing.

Democrat officials in 23 states and the District of Columbia, led by California Attorney General Rob Bonta, sued to block Trump’s March executive order, which, among other things, created a list of eligible voters. The executive order required the U.S. Postal Service to deliver mail ballots only to people on those lists.

The court determined the order imposed no direct burden or obligation on the states that would have given them Article III standing in the litigation.

The 6-3 ruling comes with the midterm elections fast approaching and early voting and mail voting set to begin in several states next month.

The U.S. Postal Service on Friday announced how it would implement the order.

The majority opinion says: “The Court’s disposition of this application does not mean that any measure taken by the Government to implement the Order will necessarily be lawful. On that score, time will tell.”

Lead plaintiff California has some of the most permissive ballot-harvesting rules in the nation. A 2016 law allows a voter to designate “any person” to return the voter’s ballot.

This story has been updated.

AUTHOR

Fred Lucas

Fred Lucas is senior investigative reporter for the Daily Signal. He is the author of “The Myth of Voter Suppression: The Left’s Assault on Clean Elections.” Follow on X FredLucasWH.

RELATED ARTICLE: U.S. Supreme Court Hands a Win to Trump over Mail-In Ballot Restrictions

EDITORS NOTE: This Daily Signal column is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

VOTER ID SCANDAL: Traitorous RINO Murkowski Demands Prosecution of Journalist Who Was Offered a Ballot in Her Brother’s Name—No ID Required

Murkowski wants the journalist who exposed Alaska’s no-ID voting hole PROSECUTED.

Murjowki is one of those solid ‘no’ votes on the SAVE America Act.

What a cow.

Pass the SAVE AMERICA act. Without it, the country does not stand a chance against our domestic enemies.

James O’Keefe walked into an Anchorage polling place and asked for a ballot under Sen. Lisa Murkowski’s own brother’s name.

Poll worker was ready to hand it over.

No ID. No questions.

Her office’s response?

“Voter impersonation is a crime and should be prosecuted.”

Not a word about the gaping security hole in her own state.

And she still opposes the SAVE Act — the exact bill that would require proof of citizenship and stop this cold.

Not mad about the fraud.

Ranked-Choice Voting Is A Disaster

“The only people who benefit from Ranked Choice Voting are career politicians and the special interests that are in bed with them…..”

Nevada voters have approved a ballot measure that makes sweeping changes to the election system in their state, according to a race call by the Associated Press.

One person. One vote. That’s how American elections work. 

Ranked-Choice Voting (RCV) threatens to undo this very principle—discounting votes, diminishing voter confidence, and threatening prompt election results.

The end result? A drop in voter confidence that lingers long after Election Day. Experiences with RCV in Maine and New York City should serve as cautionary tales, encouraging voters and policymakers to reject RCV in their communities.

Learn more about why RCV suppresses voter choice below, by reading our one-pager, and by delving into even further detail in our latest research paper.

The measure, which was passing by 52.8% as of Sunday morning, establishes open primary elections in which the top five candidates advance and then a ranked-choice voting system for general elections.

Ranked-Choice Voting (RCV) threatens to undo this very principle—discounting votes, diminishing voter confidence, and threatening prompt election results.

Take for example, ranked choice voting in Alaska, 60% of voters cast ballots for Republicans. A Democrat won.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

CALIFORNIA ENSHRINES FRAUD: Democrats Criminalize the Exposure, Protect the Crime and Pass ‘Stop Nick Shirley Act’

Deep State’s Election Interference Spin Is Now A Case Study In Spy Schools

POSTS ON X:

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.

YOU VILL BE HAPPY

The other day, Gavin Newsom, when asked what he thought about all of the Democrat Socialists of America (DSA) becoming part of the Democrat party. He said he thought it was “healthy”. He also said that he was about additions and not subtractions, and after all, the Democrats have a big tent.

If you go to the website of the Democrat Socialists of America.

You will find what they stand for, and what they intend to do.

  • They intend to destroy the Constitution. Your rights, what’s left of them after they strip them out, are determined by the government.
  • They do not believe in American greatness. No more gifted classes in school.
  • They want open borders and will bring about 60 million people into America. Think about a pizza pie, the more people that you have to share in that pizza, the smaller your slices are. What slice will you have when an additional 60 million people come in and demand welfare, housing, free healthcare, education and food.
  • They can’t produce anything of their own, so that’s okay, they’ll just take yours. You will own nothing, and you will be happy. No more private business; no more private property. Everything will be owned by the government, just to be fair. You get the privilege of renting your phone, car, and home. Even clothing. You get to rent 2 sets, that’s all.
  • They want to abolish prisons. So just let those rapists and murder back out on the street. then they can complain that the crime is sky-high! It will be the gun’s fault, so they will just take yours.
  • Of course, they want to add more justices to the Supreme Court, so nothing will get done.
  • They want to eliminate the Electoral College, so the middle States will have no representation. You won’t either.

The real problem is that today’s students and their parents have never been taught anything other than “Socialism is wonderful and the only system that is fair.” Yes, it is fair…in shared despair, poverty, and misery.

It seems to me like the Democrats are seriously playing for keeps. As more and more of the DSA get elected, the Democrats are playing to win.

The Republicans are afraid of losing power, and passing the Baton. They are afraid that they will not be able to maintain the power that they think they so rightfully deserve. They set out a course to eliminate the Grassroots, and any other fresh blood into the Grand Old Party.

Years ago, when I moved to Florida, I realized that the atrocities that were happening in New York were also happening in Florida as well as all over the country, and that there is a slow creep, a takeover by the Communists, as they set out to destroy the schools and the minds of our youth. They are following the NAZI program of Hitler’s Youth.

They have joined together with the Jihades and both have focused on the American youth. If your school is providing Muslims with sinks to wash feet, pray time and prayer rooms, demand the same for the Christians, Jews, Hindus, Buddists and any other religious group. If they say NO, sue them.

The first wave of indoctrinated students are now the parents who have the students of today. Since the parents were taught socialism, they don’t see anything wrong, and all they are doing is emulating the mistakes of the past. We scream that the kids can’t read, and we forget that the parents can’t read either. We scream at the kids can’t do math, and we forget that the parents can’t do math. We have bred a society of dummies, who are now dependent on their handheld devices. Overseas, schools are going back to the basics and using real books again.

When I first started studying the UN Agenda 21 / 2030 and all of the support documents that went with it, I discovered the real goal was to depopulate the planet, so they could keep the wealth for themselves. The DSA can’t earn wealth, they don’t know how to, so they must steal it. They must make everybody else that they deem is not worthy, become their slaves. This is a party of hate and jealousy.

What a simple beautiful plan that was started thousands of years ago. Do you think the Romans and the Coliseum were any different? Surprise, they’re not. We have traded the Coliseum, the Lions, and the Gladiators for football, hockey and soccer. No difference. They must get the populace focused on something else so they can write laws to restrict and steal from those who have aka the infidels.

The only difference that I see from ancient teachings and could not figure out, is how are they going to get millions and millions of people to stop thinking on their own? Hegelian Dialectic, Cognitive Dissonance, lies, indoctrination, group think, and propaganda. Make them dependent upon the government.

How do you create a society that is so dependent, and void of free thought, that they become obedient drones, too afraid to step out of line. How do you make people compliant and obedient. I couldn’t figure it out, until a few years ago when I happen to see a TV show called Persons of Interest. The first minute of that show told everything.

What was it you ask? The camera. The camera ties it all together, the camera helps them anticipate and manipulate your behavior, and keeps you in line. For the next couple of weeks we’re going to be talking about the camera, because the AI data centers don’t work without the camera feeding them the information.

Applying Knowledge is Power.

©2026 . All rights reserved.


Join me this week, as Kat Stansell and I discuss the camera in Segment 1, and in Segment 2, Ed Vidal and I discuss the election, and how the Noose is getting Tighter and Tighter and Tighter.

Is America worth saving? Will you vote? Will you participate and voice your opinion. The only way to make a change is to change.

Guest: Kat Stansell, author, journalist

Website: https://substack.com/@pat4evr

Guest: Ed Vidal, Executive Producer and General Counsel

WSQF 94.5 FM Radio

Website: Miamiindependent.com

ActBlue Pleads the Fifth

ActBlue co-founder Matt DeBergalis clammed up and pleaded the Fifth during a congressional grilling over allegations that the Democrats’ fundraising behemoth opened the door to fraudulent and  illegal foreign donations.

ActBlue Co-Founder Invokes the Fifth Amendment As House Fraud Probe ...

ActBlue co-founder Matt DeBergalis

Illegal foreign donations were rampant in the Obama campaign — a story I broke back in 2008 — but nothing was ever done so of course it proliferated and became an illegal million dollar fundraisng scam for Democrats.

ActBlue has been the cash cow for Democrats.

In the 2024 cycle alone, the super PAC processed nearly $4 billion for Dems. The sources of those funds have long been sus.

His closed-door testimony lasted barely 25 minutes before he walked out without answers. ActBlue only began requiring basic credit-card security codes after investigators exposed the glaring loophole. Pleading the Fifth is not proof of guilt—but when the man who helped build the Democrats’ money machine refuses to answer questions about who funded it, the stench only grows.

Fox News: ActBlue co-founder Matt DeBergalis pleaded the Fifth Amendment during his closed-door deposition before three key House committees, sources familiar with the matter told Fox News Digital. The Committee on House Administration, House Oversight Committee, and House Judiciary Committee are conducting a joint investigation into ActBlue, a massive fundraising platform for Democrats, over allegations that lax fraud prevention standards may have allowed foreign donations to seep into U.S. campaigns. DeBergalis’ deposition, which was scheduled for Thursday morning, lasted less than half an hour. Fox News saw DeBergalis entering and exiting the committee room within roughly 25 minutes.

ActBlue co-founder pleads Fifth Amendment in closed-door House GOP grilling

The closed-door session before three key committees lasted less than half an hour

By Elizabeth Elkind, Kelly Phares, Fox News, August 20, 2026:

Rep Jim Jordan: If I worked for ActBlue, I’d plead the Fifth too

FIRST ON FOX: ActBlue co-founder Matt DeBergalis pleaded the Fifth Amendment during his closed-door deposition before three key House committees, sources familiar with the matter told Fox News Digital.

The Committee on House Administration, House Oversight Committee, and House Judiciary Committee are conducting a joint investigation into ActBlue, a massive fundraising platform for Democrats, over allegations that lax fraud prevention standards may have allowed foreign donations to seep into U.S. campaigns.

DeBergalis’ deposition, which was scheduled for Thursday morning, lasted less than half an hour. Fox News saw DeBergalis entering and exiting the committee room within roughly 25 minutes.

Fox News Digital reached out to ActBlue for comment. Fox News Digital also reached out to the majority and minority of each of the three committees.

ActBlue is prolific across Democratic campaigns, being used by the likes of Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Michigan Senate hopeful Abdul El-Sayed, among others.

Pleading the Fifth Amendment is not evidence of wrongdoing. ActBlue has repeatedly denied running afoul of the law during the course of Republicans’ probe.

The Committee on House Administration, which has jurisdiction over U.S. election laws, first opened a probe into ActBlue in 2023. Chairman Bryan Steil, R-Wis., accused the group of potentially accepting foreign or fraudulent donations for not requiring a credit card CVV number for contributions.

ActBlue has since updated its donation requirements with a CVV mandate.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

CENSUS BOMBSHELL: 24,000 Noncitizens Illegally Voted in 2020—and Millions of Records Remain Unchecked

The Commerce Department’s Census Bureau has released an analysis indicating that more than 24,000 noncitizens didn’t merely register to vote—they allegedly cast illegal ballots in the 2020 election.

And that may be only the beginning. More than 32 million additional voter records are expected to be analyzed in the coming weeks, potentially uncovering tens of thousands more illegal votes. Where those ballots were cast—in which swing states, congressional districts and razor-thin local races is critical. Even a fraction of that number could change the outcome of a close election.

Howard Lutnick: The Department of Commerce’s Census Bureau just released its analysis showing more than 24,000 noncitizens illegally voted in the 2020 election. Not just registered but literally illegally voted. And that is just the beginning. More than 32 million more voters’ records will be analyzed in the coming weeks, and these records will likely show tens of thousands of additional illegal voters.

The American people deserve transparency. We are making sure the facts are out for everyone to see.

‘24,000 Non-Citizens Voted Illegally’: Trump Flags Poll Fraud To Push For ‘Save America Act’

Mexican nationals accounted for the largest share of identified non-citizen voters at 3,800, followed by Canada, the Philippines and Jamaica.

By: Vaishnavi Mishra, NDTV News, Aug 19, 2026:

President Donald Trump has renewed his push for Congress to pass the SAVE America Act after the US Census Bureau’s preliminary analysis identified more than 24,000 non-citizens among 2020 election voter records.

In a post on Truth Social on Tuesday, Trump said, “The Census Bureau has begun checking the Voter Records from 2020 against their Citizenship Records. On the first 128,000,000 Voters, the Census Bureau proves that over 24,000 Noncitizens voted illegally!”

He added that the bureau would next analyse a further 32 million voter records, predicting the “number will explode,” and declared, “I WON THE ELECTION! We must pass THE SAVE AMERICA ACT.”

According to Census Bureau graphics shared alongside the post, of nearly 160 million ballots cast in the 2020 general election, more than 128 million voter records were linked to US citizens, while over 24,000 were linked to non-citizens, with 32 million records still to be analysed.

The bureau said non-citizen status was determined through cross-referencing against immigration records, including green-card, visa, foreign-student and DACA records, in the absence of any citizenship documentation.

Mexican nationals accounted for the largest share of identified non-citizen voters at 3,800, followed by Canada, the Philippines and Jamaica.

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, whose department oversees the Census Bureau, said on X that the remaining 32 million records “will likely show tens of thousands of additional illegal voters.”

The findings feed into Trump’s long-running campaign for the SAVE America Act, which would mandate documentary proof of citizenship to register and photo identification to vote.

The bill has cleared the House but remains stalled in the Senate, where Democrats have argued it would disenfranchise eligible voters, and Republicans lack the 60 votes needed to overcome a filibuster.

The Census Bureau itself described the review as a “beginning analysis” and noted the preliminary findings do not establish that the identified votes affected the outcome of the presidential election.

AUTHOR

RELATED ARTICLES:

DOJ Set for ‘Historic’ Deployment of Poll Watchers for Midterms

ICE Nabs Twice-Deported, Previously Convicted Drug Trafficker with 126 Kilos of Meth in Georgia

POSTS ON X:

EDITORS NOTE: This Geller Report is republished with permission. ©All rights reserved.